Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Pete Hoffmann, Chairman <br /> and Members of the County Council <br /> Page 3 <br /> <br /> submitted subdivision plans for the rear 30-acre parcel (not a part of Docket No. <br /> SP73-159), to subdivide this portion of the project into 1-acre parcels. The applicant <br /> originally offered to limit the number of residential-agricultural lots within the <br /> development to a maximum of 22. In addition, the applicant offered to restrict the <br /> construction of second dwelling units on the proposed subdivided lots. The change of <br /> zone request affected an area larger than necessary to accommodate the proposed 22-lot <br /> subdivision and to allow for adjustments to the layout of the proposed subdivision and <br /> 9-hole pitch and putt golf course. The original plan was that once the proposed <br /> residential-agricultural subdivision had secured Final Subdivision Approval, the land area <br /> encumbered by the golf course would be rezoned to an Open (O) zoned district to <br /> preserve the density and land use characteristics of the affected area as represented by the <br /> applicant. <br /> <br /> <br /> On December 14, 2004, the Planning Commission approved a request to nullify <br /> Use Permit No. 126, as the applicant no longer had plans to purse the pitch and putt golf <br /> course. Now that the original plan of developing a golf course has been deleted from <br /> their development plan, the applicant is requesting to delete that portion of Condition B <br /> which limits the maximum amount of lots to 22. The applicant has indicated that if the <br /> request to delete the 22-lot limit is approved, they would like to add 2 or 3 more lots. <br /> <br /> The Planning Director recommends that the lot limit be increased to 25 rather than <br /> to delete the limit. Change of Zone Ordinance No. 95-55 reclassified 41.75 acres to A-la, <br /> which could allow up to 41 1-acre lots if the limit is deleted. <br /> <br /> The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen <br /> or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns, and that are not the result <br /> or their fault or negligence. The reason for the time extension request is a result of the <br /> amount of time the project was delayed in obtaining the approval of the construction plan. <br /> The initial construction plan was submitted on November 16, 2004, but did not receive <br /> final approval until January 26, 2006. The applicant needs more time to secure a <br /> construction bond, which would qualify the project to receive Final Subdivision <br /> Approval. <br /> <br /> The reason for the request to delete the portion of Condition B limiting the <br /> amount of lots to 22 is that the applicant no longer plans to develop the pitch and putt <br /> golf course. The applicant has consistently been working towards compliance with the <br /> conditions of the change of zone and non-performance is the result of conditions that <br /> could not have been foreseen and were beyond the control of the applicant. <br /> <br /> Approval of this request would not be contrary to the General Plan nor the <br />