Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Preserving the North Kohala Coast <br /> <br /> Planning Committee <br /> Hawaii County Coun408 RPR 22 Rol 8 55 Fax rases 7671 pug= <br /> af -1 <br /> Planning Department T F _ <br /> 101 Patrahi St., Suite 3 - co _ <br /> Hilo, H196720-3043 COIJ ! ; vmn~ a wire r <br /> April 21, 2008 r- r• <br /> Re: Support for Repeal of Ordinance No. 97 192 and Urge Rezoning T1N] 9) 5-9-1:8 to RA 20 acres <br /> Aloha, <br /> <br /> The six Nordt Kohala nonprofit organizations and groups signing this letter represent nearly 400 families <br /> in North Kohala. We have testified at the Platming Commission rueeturp in August and December of <br /> 2001 and January of 2008 in support of the Planning Director's recommendation to repeal ordinance No. <br /> 97 102 and to revoke the Special Management Area (SMA) Use Permit No. 379 for TMK (3) 5-9-1:8. <br /> MOST SIGNIFICANTLY, the applicant does not meet the conditions for a time extension. <br /> The circumstances and contexts under which the application was initially approved have changed and <br /> must be considered: <br /> I ) There is very compelling documentation that development and construction actin ities upslope of <br /> this area have already significantly degraded water quality. A State marine biologist has publicly <br /> stated that the reef immediately offshore of this property has been severely impacted and is "a <br /> mess". Low-lying coral has been killed and is now covered by a layer of filamentous algae and <br /> everything that lived in the send, molhtsks, worms and urchins, is dead. Please see the attached <br /> photos. The scale of damage in this area, immediately offshore of Kohala LLC, is significantly <br /> greater than the damage that precipitated the EPA investigations and fares against Hokuha. <br /> Additional development of any kind will only contribute to this problem, especially development <br /> on this parcel that borders the ocean. There are no best management practices (BMPs) on the <br /> planet that can guarantee no further degradation. <br /> 2) There is an even greater body of evidence and support that the proposed Kohala LLC project is not <br /> at al l aligned with what the community has consistently expressed with regard to preserving the <br /> coastline. The input received in the last two years during the community readiness program for <br /> the North Kohala Community Development Planning (CDP) process and the draft <br /> recommendations emerging fi oar the focus groups for the CDP, including a call for rezoning the <br /> State coastal lands to Conservation, clearly identify preserving this coast free of any development. <br /> We support re-zoning TMK (3) 5 - 9- 1-8 AND we urge the Council to please introduce a floor <br /> amendment to re-zone this area to Ag-20 acres or A4-15 acres. There are many significant reasons to <br /> support a. change of zone of at least AS-20aeres and many of these reasons were documented in previous <br /> testimony. In summary Ag-20 acres is the most appropriate zoning for this parcel because: <br /> a) The vast asgjority of land in North Kohala is zoned Ag-20 acres. <br /> <br /> b)The land immediately north of this parcel will most likely be rezoned to Conservation in the next <br /> year (see item in, below). <br /> <br /> <br /> Comm. No.`I R to <br /> Ref. To: a? as& <br /> Ref. Date APR 22 2nng <br />