Laserfiche WebLink
Communication 60 <br />[3ill 17 <br />Page 3 <br />to undertake Puainako Street Improvements, Kilauea Avcnuc to Kanoclchua Avcnuc. Phases 1 <br />and Il. This project will likely require land acquisition tiom the subject parcels. A revised <br />Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TZAR) submitted in response to comments trom the Department <br />of Public Works and the Department of'fransportation concluded that with the mitigation <br />measures proposed by the Department of Public Works (right-turn in, right-turn out at Puainako <br />Street), the traffic should be satisfactory. Awapuhi Street, a private roadway which has a 16-ibot <br />pavement within a 40-tixri right-of-way, ends at the southern portion of the site. phis Atiapuhi <br />Street secondary access is not envisioned to serve the access needs or requirement of the project. <br />but will be provided largely for the convenience of the residents along Awapuhi Street. <br />According to the Department of Puhlic Works, Parcel 70 (site of the Hilo Kingdom 13x11 of <br />Jehovah's Witness) would become landlocked should this request be approved. Howcecr, <br />according to the applicant, access to Parcel 70 would be provided through this project b}' the <br />extension of Awapuhi Strcct, if allowed by the private owners. <br />l~here is no municipal sewer system in the area, so the applicant proposes several alternatives: <br />I . Construct an on-site private treatment plant such as a septic system meeting with <br />the approval of the Department of Health and Ucparunciu of Public Works <br />2. Extend the County's line at Makaala Street to the subject site <br />3. Hook up to the Prince Kuhio Shopping Plaza's private system <br />All other essential utilities and services are or will be made available to the site. <br />At the July 5, 2001 Committee meeting. the State Department o1`fransportation reiterated that <br />they would adhere to their original comments that they oppose any commercial driveways on <br />Kanoelehua Avenue and Puainako Strcct. "Chc reason was the same as it was earlier. <br />Committee Member "hyler stated that the proposal to convert the suhject parcel to I ligh Density' <br />was included in the list of proposed General Plan changes back in 1989, however, the request <br />was never initiated as noted in the Planning Departments'fable of Disposition. Therelbre the <br />subject parcel is still within the Low Density designation. <br />l~he measure was deferred on .luly ~, Z001 until the Planning Department could provide <br />documentation regarding the actual General Plan designation. <br />At today"s meeting. BiII No. 17. Draft 3, which included the Ibllowing amendments was <br />circulated and approved h.~ Your Committee: <br />l . Condition D. Deletes the existing language and replaces it with: "All structures <br />and their associated required parking shall be limited to those areas designated <br />°X'~ on the Flood [nsurance Rate Map. Only surplus parking, landscaping, and <br />utility and road improvements shall be allowed within those areas designated <br />"Af:'~ on the Flood Insurance Rate Map.' <br />