My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
REP FC 338 10/19/2004 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Reports
>
2002-2004
>
Finance Committee (FC)
>
REP FC 338 10/19/2004 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2008 11:07:44 AM
Creation date
5/15/2008 10:26:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reports
Reports - Type
REP
Reports - Council Term
2002-2004
Report
338
Committee
FC
Meeting date
2004-10-19
Document Relationships
BIL 049 Draft 03 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2002-2004
COM 0118.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
COM 0118.006 2002-2004
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REPORT OF THE <br />COMMITTEE ON FINANCE <br />DA'I'S: October 19, ?004 Re: Comm. No. 118/Bill No. 49 <br />PLAC-~;: Council Chambers <br />MIME: 125 p.m. <br />Council Chair and Members <br />Hawaii County Council <br />Hilo, Hawaii 96720 <br />Your Committee on Finance. to which was referred Bill No. 49, reports as follows: <br />Bill No. 49. transmitted by Mayor Harry Kim, via Communication No. 1 18, dated <br />January 22. ?004, amends Chapter 19, Articles 1, 7 and 8, Hawaii County Code 1983 (1995 <br />Edition), relating to Real Property Tax Definitions; non-dedicated agricultural use assessment <br />and agricultural use dedication. <br />The purpose of this measure is to define commercial agricultural activities; require commercial <br />agricultural activity to qualify for 10-year dedication benefits; maintain an agricultural use <br />valuation method for dedicated properties; allow a shorter dedication period for leasehold <br />properties in certain circumstances; allows cancellation of dedication without penalty in the case <br />of certain disasters or disabilities of the primary farmer; reduce severity of rollback penalties for <br />breach of dedication; provide benefits for Ag use, Non-dedicated properties using two times the <br />dedicated agricultural use valuation; reduce rollback period for Ag Use, Non-dedicated program; <br />and eliminate 20-year dedications. <br />Originally heard on February 19, 2003, this measure was deferred. <br />At a subsequent Finance Committee workshop held on February 18, 2003, Director of F InanCe <br />William Takaba presented a two part presentation: one to go over proposed the real property tax <br />agriculture program and the second part to show the comparisons between the existing ag tax <br />program and the administration"s proposal in order to have side-by-side comparisons of the <br />use(s) of property, zoning requirements, length of participation, minimum lots, breach <br />(exceptions, appeal. and rollback taxes), rollback penalty, homesite value, assessed values and <br />the desired outcomes (establish sound definition, simplify ag program and improve rules, prevent <br />obvious abuse and simplify enforcement). <br />Bill No. 49, Draft 2 was referred to Your Committee, dated February 18. 2003, from Director of <br />Finance William Takaba. amended the following additional sections: <br />Article 8, Section 19- (b). Commercial Agricultural Use Dedication: <br />"..July t_ 2003 may continue to he [lased] assessed at fifty percent of its [°.-se.~^°-!-~!_•_~, <br />J agricultural <br />use ~,i^a:,.^~:,.^ w_ ai:^,. ^ ^,..:«:._._ ..:.i..~o a:_~.«,._ t~. c~...o..,~.~. i onnz~ value and Shall be <br />suhiect to the conditions and provisions of the effective commercial agricultural use dedication." <br />Article 8, Section 19-(c)(4). Commercial Agricultural Use Dedication <br />°...market value of a comparably[~+nedi homesite." <br />Heard on August 8. 2004, this measure was deferred again to allow Your Committee to provide <br />workshops on this measure in various districts. <br />FC REPORT NO. 338 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.