HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0010.029 2006-2008Harry Kim
Mayor
(g a>lutt?r of Pafuaii
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4224
(808) 961-8288 • FAX (808) 961-8742
Christopher J. Yuen
Director
Brad Kurokawa, ASLA
LEED®AP
Deputy Director
May 21, 2008 ,
Honorable Pete Hoffmann, Council Chair
and Members of the County Council
Hawaii County Council
25 Aupuni Street, Ste. 209 -
Hilo, HI 96720
Dear Chair Hoffmann and Members of the County Council:
C_
r\„
SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT — WAIMEA TRAFFIC CIRCULATION STUDY (WTCS)
Attached is a Final Report for the Waimea Traffic Circulation Study for your files.
Name of Grant Program: Waimea Traffic Circulation Study (WTCS)
Federal or State Grantor: HDOT-SPR
County Grantee Department or Agency: Planning Department
Grant No. (IF KNOWN):
Amount of Grant: $120,000.00
Amount of County Match: $66,000.00
County Revenue Account Numbers: 010-141-5141-56-115 & 110-399-5394-44-115
Grant Period (Commencement & Completion): May 1, 2006 to November 30, 2007
Goals:
1. Identify short-term actions and improvements to address existing traffic congestion issues
within Waimea town and the surrounding area.
2. Evaluate recommended short-term improvements in light of other public and private local
roadway improvements and the proposed regional roadway improvements as they relate
to the known future development plans within the Waimea area.
3. The contract was amended to include the development of a consistent travel demand
forecast model applicable to the various State and County roadway projects being
planned for the Waimea-Kawaihae area.
Comm. No. /10-291
(Note: Attached Report is on file in the Clerk's Office.) Ref. To:
Ref. Date MAR 3 2fln�
Form FR 9103
Hawaii County is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Hawai `i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Honorable Pete Hoffmann, Council Chair
and Members of the County Council
Hawaii County Council
Page 2
May 21, 2008
Objectives:
1. Improve traffic safety;
2. Provide for commuting efficiency and peak -hour travel demands;
3. Provide transportation improvements for off-peak travel needs; and
4. Identify multi -modal connectivity network options based on origins and destinations.
Outcomes or Results:
The Waimea Traffic Circulation Study proposes projects that provide alternatives to the
existing limited roadway facilities, multi -modal choices, additional connectivity, equity,
capacity, and safety. Short-range actions fall into the following categories:
1. Phase 1 Roadway Improvements:
a) The construction of the two-lane Parker Ranch Connector between Mamalahoa
Highway, south of Lindsey Road, and Mamalahoa Highway at or near Kamamalu
Street;
b) Selected widening of Mamalahoa Highway;
c) Waimea School access improvements;
d) Prohibition of East and West -bound left turns at the Lindsey Road/Mamalahoa
Highway intersection; and
e) Traffic signal optimization
2. Phase 2 Roadway Improvements that primarily call for the construction of the
Mamalahoa Highway to Kawaihae Road Connector. This roadway would be generally
aligned with the south terminus of the Parker Ranch Connector and intersect the
Kawaihae Road in the vicinity of the transfer station.
3. Transit Improvements that include the implementation of an intra -Waimea shuttle
Bus service.
4. Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements proposing the utilization of existing and proposed
roadways augmented by the Waimea Trails and Greenways project paths.
Sincerely,
CHRISTOPHER J. YUEN
Planning Director
LMB:cs
PAwpwin60\Larry\Waimea Circulation Plan\WTCS Final Report to County Couneil.doc
Attachment
Form FR 9/03
Hawaii County is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
December 2007
Prepared For:
County of Hawaii
Department of Planning
Aupuni Center,101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Prepared By:
PB Americas, Inc.
1001 Bishop Street
American Savings Bank Tower - Suite 2400
Honolulu, HI 96813
(808) 531-7094
PB Reference: 16444A
While VIC7, `1NcJioc-;a (;C=i',PirE(1iPEiy( UC` fll .: t` ilJil cP(: (PI( (iaifric (r(iiIg ;1P(}i P, ii :- s() io
iI-]i�intairl llPe sprx-iai ilii= f (mils ()i VV�'JVI1, I-C:;ure, fiIr1(valive, vt/o'}/S 0'i
c=dUrG'(::Ifll� the tia-Mc; C:onge ;ti(�n FiE) ne(7:dC(!.
One of the key reasons for the congestion experienced in Waimea Town is that, currently,
all traffic must pass through the Lindsey goad/Mamalahoa Highway intersection. Thr-. area
around the intersection is developed and roadway improvements are difficult without
causing much disruption to existing uses. There is also a secondary bottleneck at the
Kamamalu/Mamalahoa intersection.
Previously, major regional bypasses have been proposed to alleviate traffic congestion
within Waimea. However, this study determined that much of the current congestion is
caused by trips either traveling within Waimea or trips originating or terminating within
Waimea. The regional bypasses are not suited to address this type of travel. While in the
long run, the regional Kawaihae and Waimea Bypasses are needed to handle the growth in
regional traffic, the internal connector roads serve the other, more local, components of
travel better.
Two internal roads have been identified in the past: Parker Ranch Connector Road and the
Kawaihae Road - Mamalahoa Highway Connector. The former is part of the Parker Ranch
development while the latter is currently going through the Environmental Assessment (EA)
process as a County of Hawaii Department of Public Works project. The Waimea Traffic
Circulation Study searched for alternatives to these two roadways, but found that other
routes were not feasible.
A series of actions connected with the internal connector roads are recommended in this
report as well as recommendations enhancing intra -Waimea transit and improving
pedestrian and bicycle paths within Waimea.
Most importantly, it has been determined that the land use policy within Waimea Town must
support the most feasible transportation improvements. These improvements tend to create
better circulation in the west and south. To preserve the internal character of Waimea, it is
important that future land use take advantage of the internal connector roadways and the
future regional bypasses. Therefore, future growth of Waimea needs to be directed to the
C ui'if'Y Waimea Traffic Circul^tion Stijd� t
fel' f.ari-w- � :, EiDecembei 2001
r 'wi o-1 C; ("u I I id. o i
o I ov"!i I VV(-
coi-ridol thiough
Ille combination of the physical irnprovevnerris and the land use policy changes such as
St-nai-t Growth and Infill Development is hoped to help Waimea preserve its uniCIL).e and
historical character as it grows and transitions into a larger community.
Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PE An-w-ricas, htc, December 2007
\NTR0kUC|0N
U� /�URREN�ll�/�NGP(Rl7�lION !8�"UE"�..... ---------------------'U
A.
E>U8T(NGTRAFFIC, ISSUES ....... ......... ............. ....... ............. --------'0
B.
THE CAU8E0-THE EX|5T>NGTRA!' FIG ISSUES ......... .................. ........ --'8
C.
INTERNAL CONNECTOR ROADS ............................................................ ...........
13
1.
Connector Road North of Waimea Town ........ :..................... ..................................
13
2.
Southern Connector Roadways --------------------------1O
D.
OTHER CURRENT TRANSPORTATION ISSUES ................................................
10
1.
Traffic Congestion inthe Vicinity ofthe Waimea Elementary and Middle Schools.
1S
2.
Need for More Transit Service ................................................................................
1S
3.
Need for More Bicycle Facilities .............................................................................
10
4.
Need for More Pedestrian Facilities ........................................................................
2D
E.
ADDRESSING THE CURRENT TRANSPORTATION ISSUES .............................
20
Ui
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ...........................................................................
21
A.
EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK ........................................................................
21
1.
KovvoihaeRoad .............. .... ....... ......... ...............................................................
21
2.
Moma|ohoaHighway ..............................................................................................
21
3.
Waimea Town Roadways -----------------------------22
4.
Key Intersections ....................................................................................................
22
B.
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................................................................
25
1.
24-hourVolumes ....................................................................................................
25
2.
Peak Period Turning Movement Counts .................................................................
25
C.
EXISTING TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ......................................................................
28
1.
Peak Hour Travel Time ................................. .........................................................
29
�0umey C),fNammU iii VVoimeaTraffic Cimu|a xnStudy
I,11-4 � 6 k l i v0i............ .
,ANIGL
� �t
I /1,C' I E� �!�. ...............
A. PHASE-- 1................................................................................................................3U
1. Mamalahoa Highway Widening from Hospital to L=ast of Kamarna<lu......................39
'
2. Parker Ranch Connector.. ............... ......................................... ............................
44,
3. Waimea School Improvements.......... .....................................................................
4-4
'
4. Prohibit East and West-bound Left-Turns at Lindsey/Mamalahoa Intersection ......
45
5. Traffic Signal Optimization......................................................................................47
B. PHASE 2 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS...............................................................50
C. TRANSIT PROJECTS............................................................................................53
D. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS................................53
'
E. ESTIMATED COST OF PROPOSED PROJECTS.................................................53
V. EVALUATION OF FUTURE CONDITIONS................................................................57
VI. SUMMARY.................................................................................................................65
'
APPENDIX A TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS...................................................................A
APPENDIX B SIMTRAFFIC REPORT FOR EXISTING CONDITION.....................................B
'
APPENDIX C SIMTRAFFIC REPORT FOR 2011 CONDITION............................................
C
APPENDIX D FUTURE VOLUME PROJECTION..................................................................
D
—
- --
Gruu fy ofHav�adeiv Waivnea. Traiiic Circulation Siudy
O Avias'Fca gid, km,-. December
2007
|)6URE1\41A|MLAkLQDU---------'—..... ------------....... ----'�
ROUNE2KFG/L}N/H-R()ADVVAYk/iAP—.......... ........... ........ -----------3
F|(�URE3P[)PULA�UONE;R(}VVTH|N3(/UTl|KOHALA-----------------�
FIGURE 4L|NDGEYROAD B(}TTLENECK--......... --........... ................................ ........
n
F|GURE5PROPOSED NEW ROADWAY PROJECTS .................. ........................ .............
/
FIGURE OEXISTING AK8PEAK PERIOD TRAFFIC QUEUES ... ....................... .... .........
1O
FIGURE 7EXISTING PK8PEAK PERIOD TRAFFIC QUEUES .................................... .......
+'
11
FIGURE 8BYPASSES SERVE REGIONAL TRAFFIC ......................... ........................... 12
FIGURE 9THREE TYPES [)FTRAFFIC PATTERNS INVVA|K8EA.....................................
14
FIGURE 10POTENTIAL CONNECTOR ROAD ROUTES THE NORTH [)FVVA|MEA........
15
FIGURE 11 HOKU'ULA R{JAD-------------------------------
17
FIGURE 12SOUTHERN ALTERNATIVE CONNECTOR ROUTES .....................................
18
FIGURE 13VV/\K8EAINTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATION .......................................
24
FIGURE 14 HISTORIC 24-HOUP|VOLUMES ...... ...............................................................
26
FIGURE 1534-HOUFlVOLUMES PEAK WITHIN VVA|K8EATOWN ....................................
27
FIGURE 16 EXISTING PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS ..........................................
28
FIGURE 17EXISTING AK8PEAK HOUR TRAVEL TIME MAMALAHOA HWY....................
3O
FIGURE 18EXISTING /\KVPEAK HOUR TRAVEL TIME ALONG K/YWY\H/\ERD.............
31
FIGURE 19EXISTING PK8PEAK HOUR TRAVEL TIME ALONG MAMALAHOA HVVY......
32
FIGURE 2OEXISTING Pk8PEAK HOUR TRAVEL TIME ALONG K/AWA|HAERD.............
33
FIGURE 21POTENTIAL SHORT-RANGE DEVELOPMENT IN VVA|MEA................ ........
35
FIGURE 222011 AKAPEAK HOUR VOLUMES ................................... ................................
37
FIGURE 232D11 PMPEAK HOUR VOLUK8ES—.................................................................
3U
FIGURE 24 PHAGE 1 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ..........................................................
4D
("oung"y of [faveraff v \NaimeaTraffiuQnm|ationStodl�l
PIP./%onortoo4/mc Deuombex2O07
i'l L'A _ ........
2'i 1XII F01`� FLfl'ANA'lTD
FiG,URF-1 2-,) POTFNI] IAL MIFIAAN Al LINDSFY INTERSEECTION LOOKING EAs_l_..........1«
FIGURF 29 POTENTIAL MEDIAN AT Lll,,.IDS[7.Y INTERSECTION! LOOKING WEST......... 49
FIGURE 30 PHASE 2 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ............... .......................................... 51
FIGURE 31 KAWAIHAE ROAD BYPASS TRAVEL DISTANCE ........ ........ ......... ........... 52
FIGURE 32 INTRA-WAIMEA TRANSIT SHUTTLE .............................................................. 54
FIGURE 33 PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE NETWORK ............................................................... 55
FIGURE 34 AM PEAK HOUR TRAVEL TIME ALONG MAMALAHOA HWY ........................ 59
FIGURE 35 AM PEAK HOUR TRAVEL TIME ALONG KAWAIHAE RD ...............................60
FIGURE 36 AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION DELAY IN SECONDS/VEHICLE ...............61
FIGURE 37 PM PEAK HOUR TRAVEL TIME ALONG MAMALAHOA HWY ........................62
FIGURE 38 PM PEAK HOUR TRAVEL TIME ALONG KAWAIHAE RD ...............................63
FIGURE 39 PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION DELAY IN SECONDSNEHICLE ..............64
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 SIGNAL COORDINATION PLANS ...................................................................... 23
TABLE 2 DEVELOPMENTS PROJECTED WITHIN THE YEAR 2011 ...............................34
TABLE 3 PLANNING LEVEL CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE BY PHASE .............................56
TABLE 4 SCENARIOS EVALUATED FOR THE SHORT-TERM PROJECTS ...................57
Countle, of Fb`pw6ff vi Waimc-al Traffic Circulation Study
PR Amevic;as, hic- December 2007
Wairne,a. is loca,ic•d iii the di€itl id o[ '1100h Ill the= Gourliv. of I ictUlraii, `iCtlii E ! is E<ri
aerial photoc rraph that V`/�Ji -lc.a region. Figt_frc, 2 illy/sircd(s the: le-gion I
ror;dway network.
In Waimea, Facino-Future-A CoillmUllitv� Design Primer, by I�!ino Walker, it is described as
follows:
Waimea is arl unincorporated up -country town in the saddle of the Kohala Mountains
and Mauna Kea. Development is centered at a crossroads that forms its commercial
core. The east side of town, also known as the "wet -side", stretches five miles to
Lakeland in a mix of large and small agricultural parcels and residential subdivisions.
To the west, the "dry -side," development extends eight miles down Kawaihae Road
to include Kanehoa, Anekona, and the future development of Ouli. The commercial
businesses are a mix of daily needs, building and farm supplies, auto repair, and
includes two major grocery stores. Tourism supports a number of boutique/specialty
shops (clothing, arts and crafts, etc.), and a diverse set of restaurants. Waimea is
also a professional center with a large new hospital and the operational
headquarters for some of Mauna Kea's telescopes. Agriculture — ranching, truck
farming, and nurseries — are a major, but shrinking, part of the local economy.
Waimea hosts a public elementary and middle school, and eleven private and
independent charter schools.
According to 2000 US Census, Waimea has an estimated population of 7,028. The South
Kohala area has experienced one of the fastest population growths on the Island of Hawaii,
as shown in Figure 3. This growth has put stress on the transportation infrastructure,
resulting in traffic congestion during the morning, mid-afternoon, and afternoon peak periods
in Waimea town. These traffic issues are not new to Waimea. As far back as 1986, the
update of the comprehensive plan by the County of Hawaii identified traffic congestion and
the Lindsey Road bottleneck as issues. In 2005, the County of Hawaii adopted an
updated General Plan. In it, it identified several policies specifically for Waimea and South
Kohala including:
Encourage the preservation of the rural, ranching character within the town of
Waimea, and growth of astronomy R&D;
Preserving the beauty of the pu'us and pastures above town (area identified by area
following the tree lines from HPA to Church Row;
Encourage the State Department of Education to explore the feasibility of
establishing a high school in the South Kohala district;
E Continue to seek additional groundwater sources for the Waimea System;
CooAy of Herfifak 1/Va,inlea Traffic CirculE tion study
PP k c_. Decernber 200
Gountv of Hawaii kNla.inica. Circulation Study
PR 2007
Z
CD M
F, =
0" 0
G
Syr CA
CEJ
State County N.+S.Kona Puna S.Kohala
0 Percent increase over 1980 population (1980-1990)
(Source: Adopted from Waimea CDP Committee web site)
■ Percent increase over 1980 population (1990-2000)
Resident Population Growth Between 1980 and 2000
V! r e
Ei[ El [�di �,`tefa �(- i�6t.-; �k.) \ Y
�'—tE'��c,_ii
li"f c9frklE'-E r! I _f.:•Ilt[if L'Il l ;-[ iEliYfGE( ti E. f.s.rri. i"il ic;t� C.i'i�% ctCt:C, ! "c C' lol
Lic.vc{op additional rcctc��,iic�tE-:I iti(Audiiio Ott �i i�;c'>�irrl��ic 30
acre regional park on land ic) be donated t>>r F'r.rker Ranch;
Encourage development of Waimea Trails & Greeriways and Waimea future Park
(Ulu Laau);
Encourage the estate to construct a scenic highway from the Waipio Malley lookou
it
extending mauka to connect to Mud Lane at the entrance of Waitrlea;
Protect important agricultural lands from urban encroachment;
• The establishment of Waimea as a regional commercial center for northern Hawaii
shall be encouraged;
• Encourage the development of a regional industrial park at Kawaihae and centralize '
limited industrial activities in Waimea.
The plan also calls for supporting the Waimea Bypass and Kawaihae Road Bypass, as well
as connections back to local roads. But it is clear that the General Plan recognizes that the
transportation issues need to acknowledge the importance of quality of life and sense of
place in Waimea.
Today, the traffic congestion issues still remain. Figure 4 illustrates the congestion at the
Lindsey Road bottleneck. There are currently four new roadway projects that are proposed
for the future in the Waimea area:
1. Waimea Bypass;
2. Kawaihae Road Bypass;
3. Kawaihae Road - Mamalahoa Highway Connector;
4. Parker Ranch Connector Road.
Figure 5 illustrates these proposed new roadway projects. The Waimea Bypass and the
Kawaihae Road Bypass are new roadways proposed by the State of Hawaii Department of
Transportation (HDOT). The Kawaihae Road - Mamalahoa Highway Connector is a project
proposed by the County of Hawaii and managed by its Department of Public Works (DPW).
The
N3 ArrBe6`tr'- s, h,c.
y WaiMea Traffic Cil-cuiatiarI Stud)'
Peceinbei god
5
041�jl
Afth.
Waimea Circulation Study
Decemher 2007
"t ♦ c6
�o_o I .rtex
0 My s 1
ym
Iip
�yIL
L ' i
i `artier Na €c h Go€ 1r1ec ioI Roa o, i{: pati 'A II Ic, Vklairnea Tok<<rn Genie pIojcc.i I1Y(I c Cie, «e:lc>:)ad
by Palker Flanch. are bein(t cor€rl_`leted to identify opiiatui-n aliunsne=nis and fo ubtair€
onvironmental clearance tar the, iv -,,w roadway p€ojects. These projects would provide more
appropriate routes for regional aGce: s and regional through traffic; and would allow the,
Waimea town roadways to better- Nerve local traffic, potentially providing more opportunities
for alternatives modes such as transit, biking, and walking.
These roadway projects are several years in the future. Therefore, the County of Hawaii
Planning Department in consultation with the Department of Public Works, retained PB
Americas, Inc. (PB) to conduct this Waimea Traffic Circulation Study to identify how traffic
circulation within Waimea town could be improved and- .how the local roadway network
interfaces with the proposed regional roadway improvements. The Waimea Traffic
Circulation Study also prioritizes the proposed roadway improvements planned and
identifies ways to integrate future roadway projects into the existing roadway network for the
Waimea area. It also examines how local traffic improvements can incorporate community
desires for alternative modes and "sense of place." It looks at a multi -modal approach to
transportation mobility within Waimea Town, incorporating transit and bicycle/pedestrian
modes into its recommendations.
County of Hawaff 8 Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PR Atnertc&sr Cac_ december 2007
/,« i i 'ii11Ci F1 iU f� _'I!&
/ks noleC' in the Introduction of this report, Ireilfic issues are not new to Waimec" town. f fallic
congestion, especially at. they Lindsey Road/Mamalahoa Highway intersection has been
documented as for back as 'i986. A key reason for this is the fact that all traffic passing
through the Wairnea area must travel through this intersection. There is currently no
alternative to this route.
The result is traffic congestion during the morning, mid-afternoon, and afternoon peak
periods of the day. The traffic congestion manifests itself as traffic queues and travel delay.
Figures 6 and 7 illustrate existing vehicle queuing during the AM and PM peak periods,
respectively. As shown, the PM peak period queuing is more pervasive than the AM peak
period queuing, especially for eastbound traffic entering the Lindsey Road/ Mamalahoa
Highway intersection. Traffic queues on Kawaihae Road were observed extending % of a
mile beyond the Opelo Road intersection, while on Mamalahoa Highway, the traffic queue
extends % of a mile back from the Lindsey Road intersection. However, observations by PB
staff also identified traffic queuing at the Pukalani Road and Kamamalu Road intersections
on Mamalahoa Highway. During the AM peak period, westbound traffic at the Kamamalu
Road intersection was observed to queue almost 2 miles back to the DHHL Hawaiian
Farmer's Market.
This indicates that besides the Lindsey Road bottleneck, the Kamamalu Road intersection is
also creating a bottleneck to traffic.
B. The Cause of the Existing Traffic Issues
Much of efforts to address the existing traffic issues have focused on developing bypass
roadways to conduct regional through traffic around Waimea. The Kawaihae and Waimea
bypass road projects are examples of this action. The primary target for these bypass
roads is regional traffic as shown in Figure 8.
Got mtY of Aea € afi i3 Waitw-.a Traffic Circulation Study
PH Ac.facrkrz, CrrE . DeceinL)er 200
F.
m m m m m m = m m m =
Kaw,qii"- -
to K, ,
, ailua- 017a ancl Hawi
Legend
= Stop and Go Queue
J -
Existing AM Peak Period Traffic Queues
Z
-P, "
Kh 0
awa
zz�
3e Rd
azUa-Ko,,7aandHaw,,
fill,,
3/4 mile long past
Opelo Road
Intersection
e"O'; MT,
--13/4 mile lona I
,j
Legend
Stop and Go Queue
Parker
School "Q�
Parker A
Ranch476712
/017
Shopping
,\Center I
School
OOOP"---*P1
North Hawaii
Community
� Hospital j
W A I M E A
Existing PM Peak Period Traffic Queues
I
F�U')f Hawaii Wain -tea Circulation Study
r
Pr� Dee,.mnber 2007
Road Rvpas"s project, EC appeam, Eh:'E the ihrc?lJph Emflh
15 anct 32 perccn'L of the total duperluing cm the location being siudiecl, l ht' bala.:rlce
of the total traffic is comprised of trips traveling either between Waimea. and locations
outside Waimea (internal-external) or trips traveling within Waimea (intra-Wairriea.). Figure 9
illustrates the tyre of trips discussed. The implication of this finding is that while- the
proposed Kawaihae and Waimea Bypass Roads would help lessen the existing congestion
within Waimea, much of the congestion is caused by traffic originating or destined for
Waimea. This increases the importance of providing alt&native routes closer to the core of
Waimea such as the Kawaihae Road - Mamalahoa Highway Connector and the Parker
Ranch Connector Road.
C. Internal Connector Roads
Proposed internal connector roads such as the Kawaihae Road - Mamalahoa Highway
Connector and the Parker Ranch Connector Road would serve the internal-external and
intra Waimea travel in a way that would help reduce the congestion currently experienced in
Waimea. They do this by providing alternative routes for these patterns of travel.
1. Connector Road North of Waimea Town
As part of this traffic circulation study, a search was conducted for other alternative routes in
addition to those already being studied. One of the logical places to search for an
alternative was north of Waimea. As shown in Figure 10, a northern bypass to Waimea
would have several deficiencies:
• it would intrude into the pu'u and pasture areas explicitly identified for preservation in
the General Plan;
it would not provide good access to the commercial center of Waimea.
The pu'u and pasture areas are a visual amenity to the Waimea area and creating a
connector road through this area would likely detrimentally impact this asset. Additionally,
�ra��rc s of tAF .e �,> _Waimea, Traffic C:irculatinn Study
Pff-f Arnc� lca! , h7c, December 2007
-
i�«��E<<El��..
Vail€c;;
tai!
l€GEE1&C.° J*
e sljrvP�( GGnC !_1CAUJI hV ` kl1 fll'LJI
=�f1lE'ti1 r "I(i %°���.(�C[�%fC
_ C e�t�<i}��) of
'th(F
Road Rvpas"s project, EC appeam, Eh:'E the ihrc?lJph Emflh
15 anct 32 perccn'L of the total duperluing cm the location being siudiecl, l ht' bala.:rlce
of the total traffic is comprised of trips traveling either between Waimea. and locations
outside Waimea (internal-external) or trips traveling within Waimea (intra-Wairriea.). Figure 9
illustrates the tyre of trips discussed. The implication of this finding is that while- the
proposed Kawaihae and Waimea Bypass Roads would help lessen the existing congestion
within Waimea, much of the congestion is caused by traffic originating or destined for
Waimea. This increases the importance of providing alt&native routes closer to the core of
Waimea such as the Kawaihae Road - Mamalahoa Highway Connector and the Parker
Ranch Connector Road.
C. Internal Connector Roads
Proposed internal connector roads such as the Kawaihae Road - Mamalahoa Highway
Connector and the Parker Ranch Connector Road would serve the internal-external and
intra Waimea travel in a way that would help reduce the congestion currently experienced in
Waimea. They do this by providing alternative routes for these patterns of travel.
1. Connector Road North of Waimea Town
As part of this traffic circulation study, a search was conducted for other alternative routes in
addition to those already being studied. One of the logical places to search for an
alternative was north of Waimea. As shown in Figure 10, a northern bypass to Waimea
would have several deficiencies:
• it would intrude into the pu'u and pasture areas explicitly identified for preservation in
the General Plan;
it would not provide good access to the commercial center of Waimea.
The pu'u and pasture areas are a visual amenity to the Waimea area and creating a
connector road through this area would likely detrimentally impact this asset. Additionally,
�ra��rc s of tAF .e �,> _Waimea, Traffic C:irculatinn Study
Pff-f Arnc� lca! , h7c, December 2007
I
Through Waimea Traffic
T
o From Waimea Traffic
j
Intra -Waimea Traffic
Locally Generated Traffic
Three Types of Traffic Patterns in Waimea
illcC i-)'f Piw"iiiy'tiJ Connect ilsE_ (:;bldttiFEir"ifiEG« to i"errs CC7r16i(;G:tCJr fC}() t!t/C)l.!ICi E)C== 116"i[€E'Ci P''tc:l {I"i Ca
ri more CJ'f d 1ad°i7as.:' €liars czl! Ir*70rnal GrrCrilca-l.lCJh-I CCJaGi. _
Potential connector road routes to the north also do not provide connectivity to the
commercial center of Waimea. Much of the intra -Waimea travel is oriented to this
commercial center. If the connector road does not provide convenient access to this
commercial center, it would likely riot be used by the community.
Using the existing roadways located in the northern areas of Waimea was also examined.
These roadways could provide an alternative to traveling through the Lindsey Road/
' Mamalahoa Highway intersection for residents living along Kawaihae Road. However, the
existing roadways such as Kapiolani Road, Hoku'ula Road, Opelo Road, Konokohau Road,
and Lae Lae Road are relatively narrow residential streets with existing, adjacent residential
development. Figure 11 is a photo of Hoku'ula Road. Because of this, it was judged
inappropriate to utilize these roadways to provide alternative routes for traffic currently using
the Lindsey Road intersection.
2. Southern Connector Roadways
The difficulty finding northern alternatives routes within Waimea town left the southern
alternatives as the remaining routes. As previously identified, there are two alternative
routes currently under study: the Kawaihae-Mamalahoa Highway Connector and the Parker
Ranch Connector. Rather than being two separate alternatives, the two proposed connector
roadways would work together to form an internal alternative route to the existing Kawaihae-
Lindsey-Mamalahoa and the Mamalahoa east to Mamalahoa west via Lindsey routes. The
combination of these two alternatives does allow connection to the existing communities and
provide access to the commercial center of Waimea town. Figure 12 illustrates these
southern alternative routes.
D. Other Current Transportation Issues
The Waimea community has identified other transportation issues in addition to the
congestion occurring along the Kawaihae Road and Mamalahoa Highway corridors.
Countlf of HawalE 16 Waimea Traffic Girculation Study
PO Amerkas, Eric, Docember 2007
k`
C-oric,C�iiCtE1 [7x tits' vi€;iiiii" of fl:(' VVc,: m' ; lI\�`IV�IfC=tC?i� yol, )ol'- l["h-i"t a. '1w
Lt`rii rand Epi id tzt tit !:C.{gw? l (i -;v
need fol I -nose; balIsit S( -"'i VK;e;;
need for noon= bicycle facilities;
e need for more pedestrian facilities.
I . Traffic Congestion in the Vicinity of the Waimea Elementary and Middle Schools '
During the course of this traffic circulation study, there was a meeting held at the Waimea
Schools by the State of Hawaii Department of Education (DOE) to discuss potential ,
measures to improve traffic flow and safety in the vicinity of Waimea Elementary and Middle
Schools.
The outcome of the meeting was a set of recommendations formulated by Mr. Cheng-Hsin
Chang of DOE. These included the removal of parking along Mamalahoa Highway adjacent
to the Elementary School and the modification of traffic circulation for pick-up and drop-off of
students.
2. Need for More Transit Service
The County of Hawaii provides an islandwide transit service called Hele-On Transit.
Currently, the Hilo -South Kohala Resorts routes passes through Waimea via Mamalahoa
Highway and Kawaihae Road. This route is active in the Waimea area between 4:50 AM
and 6:20 AM and between 2:55 PM and 4:45 PM. There is no intra -Waimea service.
3. Need for More Bicycle Facilities
Bike Plan Hawaii, the statewide bicycle facilities master plan by the State of Hawaii
Department of Transportation (HDOT) identifies mostly shared bike routes on Kawaihae
Road and Mamalahoa Highway in the Waimea area. This type of bicycle facility is identified
by signing the roadway as a Bicycle Route, increasing the awareness of drivers of vehicles
to share the road with bicyclist. Bike Plan Hawaii also identifies the Waimea Trails and
Greenways project as a bicycle path.
VVaimpa Traffic Girculzfioil Study
V At c=14 ' .r, 11, Uecernber 200/
.. i,i,,. C _ !"•tl' :�[��.> � t CEC.«i't€�_iB ie { If:,`�
tiE�,�.Cu�ll�� F!�'. f�i.i�f4f�Ee€� �6f 1fY,%trl�'.Ic•;61., E .t€�.:(>1f 4:i 11;. �'E7E"F':kttt;6C'€'c% C�C9EtIf::E 4:�i �ic tkE�E. �`..
Ctl1C I�J<:VE.' S {€(.: C:CifIIElI��fC-i(:I (C,.f1tF;f, I,t'CiC t�P 't l�f_,ilii€ �, t?e'cone rrfoi-e
li" %f1 ill€ ;Cil/t�lE (F-=nth=r, fl"€C}`;'t Ct"I It�f :t}kc:lE'IIC.k I'i(f71i\hrc;.y al 6, I,ak"'E'Jh'`.0 iso :C) 6.0 fl 1'E IIrV
sidcvvull s. Additionally, I"I o'A o the f es-idc f Iii 11 '_A e( is do not I -lave Sidewalks.
F. Ad€ dossing the Gey€ rent T ranspo€ labor, €s,gmjos
These trans=portation issues are addressed by dividing the traffic circulation plan into the
following categories:
• short-range traffic mitigation actions;
• other transportation issues;
• mid to long-range traffic mitigation actions.
In addressing these categories of actions, it is a goal of this traffic circulation study effort to
incorporate the desires of the Waimea community as documented in the County of Hawaii
General Plan (General Plan) to the extent possible. The transportation -related desires in
the General Pian are:
• encourage the preservation of the rural, ranching character within the town of
Waimea, and;
• preserve the beauty of the pu'us and pastures above town (area identified by area
following the treelines from HPA to Church Row.
These desires for Waimea town expressed by the community challenge transportation
planners and engineers to search for innovative ways to address the traffic congestion
issues identified.
��be�Fv�fF �f fr'�Iep��R�
20 Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
December 2007
1
[n orcur to'lheC IdclllE ied t;l'c.ri ;j""ii''i-f.O 1-��1'� Uca'�c' !-r��c='O 'm h'�: roilcd(.(s, "ro �h'' i
quantitative an' i,";c; foal", t.E- i Inc. appliod. I ;�;Ja collocJc>c)' in('A de,0' i:r�.fiiic; �cilurEEc
roadway data., arc tri fi(; I,at(-ern c«t&[,;� 11c;tic�i-1 ctCic;tsft"In4S the 0101iciiIiu>
collection and analysis. The detailed data surnmariZed in this section can be, found, in
Appendix A.
A. Existing Roadveay net;�grort
The roadway network and key intersections in Waimea Were shown earlier in Figure 2. The
study area for the Waimea Traffic Circulation Study consists of Kawaihae Road between
Kohala Mountain Road and Mamalahoa Highway, and (Mamalahoa Highway between
Waimea Airport Access and Mud Lane.
1. Kawaihae Road
Kawaihae Road is a rural arterial roadway which provides east -west mobility from coastal
North Kohala to Waimea. Its western terminus is at Queen Kaahumanu Highway and it runs
west to coastal North Kohala where it becomes Akoni Pule Highway. Approaching to
Waimea town, Kawaihae Road becomes Lindsey Road. Kawaihae Road is a 2 -lane
undivided roadway with a speed limit of 35 mph for the majority of the segment. From west
to east, Kawaihae Road increases in elevation from about 300 ft to 2700 ft. The only
signalized intersection along Kawaihae Road is in Waimea town where it intersects with
Mamalahoa Highway. All other intersections are unsignalized with STOP -sign control on the
intersecting roadway approaches.
State of Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) traffic volume counts document that
in 2004 Kawaihae Road carried 13,426 vehicles just east of Kohala Mountain Road and
20,505 vehicles just north of Mamalahoa Highway during 24-hour period
2. Mamalahoa Highway
Mamalahoa Highway in South Kohala runs generally parallel to Queen Kaahumanu
Highway. Queen Kaahumanu Highway traverses coastal Waikoloa with Mamalahoa
Highway offset about 10 miles inland from Queen Kaahumanu Highway. Both highways
intersect with Kawaihae Road. Mamalahoa Highway intersects Kawaihae Road in Waimea
(70cfng"y Of I -A, all 21 Waimea Traffic rirculation Study
Cf f rtccrtn �.c; fric" Doccrnber 2007
r r �
�i. I rtc,hLJ I lis�I A!V" � t ri' f''�.0"_ I�tc.A�trc fl iE•C; l�Cic-moi kl :cel Iti: �r��all f� c ! 1c,i'E �.�f ,
l��if..€! Ir llCbs I lighkik'ay is « lal"!v3 m16'iVi6!C•dt roa6wr`.V with thc lkllil (A bt, IIFI" h t.uE lido;
of 1ft/aimea 'Lown. A speed linnit of 35 mph is posted as lean-! �lahoa highway gasses throrlO�l-b
\1Vairnea town. IVlarnalaho- 1-iipliway from Lindsey intersection to Noi h H,'�waii Comrriuniiy
Hospital is 4-lane divided with the landscaped median.
HDOT traffic counts show that in 2.004 the 24-hour volurnes on Mamalahoa Highway peak in
Wairnea town area. Mamalahoa Highway carries 7,140 vehicles just north of Saddle Road,
20,929 vehicles east of Lindsey Road, and 10,297 vehicles east of Mud Lane.
3. Waimea Town Roadways
Opelo Road connects north Waimea residential areas with Kawaihae Road at Opelo Plaza.
Its intersection with Kawaihae Road is unsignalized with STOP -control on the Opelo Road
approach. Opelo Road is 2 -lane residential street with the speed limit of 25 mph.
Lindsey Road serves Parker School, Waimea Park, and the north Waimea residential areas.
Its intersection with Kawaihae Road is unsignalized with STOP -control to the southbound
Lindsey Road approach. Lindsey Road north of this intersection is a 2 -lane residential street
with the speed limit of 25 mph. East of this intersection, Kawaihae Road becomes Lindsey
Road and intersects Mamalahoa Highway at a channelized, signalized intersection.
Pukalani Road is located east of the Lindsey Road intersection on Mamalahoa Highway. Its
1 intersection with Mamalahoa Highway is signalized. Pukalani Road is accessed by Parker
Ranch Shopping Center and provides access to Mamalahoa Highway. It also serves Holo
Holo Ku subdivision. At Mamalahoa Highway, Waimea Shopping Center driveway located
opposite Pukalani Road. Pukalani Road is a 2 -lane collector road with the speed limit of 25
mph.
Further east, Kamamalu Road intersects Mamalahoa Highway at a signalized intersection.
Kamamalu Road provides access to the Waimea Civic Center, The Seniors of Keopualani
Hale, and Kuhio Village. Kamamalu Road is a 2 -lane collector road with the speed limit of 25
1 mph.
4. Key Intersections
' The key intersections analyzed are
Goulpty o`t-�r4'vvall 22 - Waimea Traffic Circulation Sitidy
PG A ... evica�, 1rae• December 2007
I _i fC.,;'t; U
'r. I��riti_=.IE�,ftfi I ?€C�at4/-.fit _i�d �����:itlit Plicrdlc-., S(._ic,ol
11. Il i inalcihoa I €ip t\rw�ty c,rld V\4—iilie,. Libiary ai"i(:l G\ nt A(;uess, c tC7i-i-c;oEdiolled
/j.. Miarnalalioa Highway and Liiidsey itoad, signalized
5. Mamalahoa. Highway and PUkalani Street, signalized
6. Mamalahoa Highway and Kamamalu Street, signalized
Figure 13 shows the lane configurationw of these intersections.
The three signalized intersections are configured for actuated control under one master
. ,>> .
signal controller. The master signal controller is programmed with different time of day
coordination plans. Table 1 shows the AM peak period plan and the PM peak period plan.
The AM peak period plan runs from 6:45 AM to 8:00 and the PM peak period plan from 2:00
PM to 6:00 PM. The intersections run freely during the rest period. It should be noted the
Kamamalu Road intersection is coordinated in the AM peak period plan but not in the PM
peak period plan. The PM peak period plan runs the Kamamalu Road intersection
independently with a maximum 227 second cycle to maximize the eastbound throughput,
thereby reducing the amount of traffic queue for this movement.
Table 1 Signal Coordination Plans
AM Plan 6:45 - 8:00 AM
Intersections
Coordinated?
Cycle Length (sec)
Offset (sec)
Lindsey Road
Yes
95
83
Pukalani Road
Yes
95
0
Kamamalu Road
Yes
190
14
PM Plan 2:00 - 6:00 PM
Intersections
Coordinated?
Cycle Length (sec)
Offset (sec)
Lindsey Road
Yes
150
10
Pukalani Road
Yes
150
0
Kamamalu Road
No
227
N/A
C4 hfawatii �n ain,iea. T rafpic Cir(Mila-tlon Dkidy
Pt�; lac. Decen-fiber 2007
County of Hawaii
Flu Arne-ricas, Inc,
WiW
I
FAD !P,
Waimea Circulation Study
December 2007
xih= i,C! I -I" il1r: A/r,il'i "t(_
i Il G, t}c='i:r;EIE:(r Cis;.€.c �'E,'rilfttc.<i`!:_(-:Ci In 'iilE` vE.'-f�i.E`k"€ Ga!! l?( lC)�E.I"!�7 iii ��i_il-1i1()(" A.
1. 2/1 -hour Volurn es
'examining 24 --hour volumes ai selected locations is a useful tool for determining travel
patterns and overall travel demand. 24-hour volumes in `Fears 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002, and
2004- were obtained frorn the State of llav<<aii Department of Transportation (f- DOT) Traffic
Counts. Figure 14 shows the volumes constantly increased during the 8 -year period at all
locations. The total volumes increased 27% from 1996 to 2004, equivalent to 3% annual
growth rate. Within the Wairnea area, these volumes peak at the junction of Mamalahoa
Highway and Lindsey Load, the point through which all traffic must pass. This is shown in
Figure 15.
2. Peak Period Turning Movement Counts
Peak period turning movement counts were conducted on March 7 (Tuesday), 8
(Wednesday), and 9 (Thursday) 2006. A summary of existing AM and PM peak hour turn
movements is shown in Figure 16. It was determined that the AM peak hour occurs between
7:00 to 8:00 AM and the PM peak hour occurs between 4:15 to 5:15 PM.
PE fiun dc't; -, [tir-,
2r Waimea Tiaffic Circulation Study
Decernl�e€ 2007
" tV
� V
V �
I� W
� V
� A
A �
A
0 0
� N
1W
0
1
T
Mamalahoa Highway 3663 3022 2672 2328 (2364) �--5446 5898 3619 - (3538) -*--10588 10507 12772 - (12066)
3477 2947 2585 2283 (2280)—► 5195 4398 3391 - (3446)--o-- 1 10341 9299 10201 - (8534) --0,-
Legend
XX 2004 Volumes g
XX 2002 Volumes Saddle Road
XX 2000 Volumes
XX 1998 Volumes
(XX) 1996 Volumes
Kawaihae
Road
Kohala Mtn. Road
Kamamaiu
Road
Lindsey Road
M�.I Ler1;�
C
F
x-5815 5303 4918 59'16
5764 5223 4968 4222
I
ry
North
DRHistorical 24 -Hour Volumes
f
'0
26
i / V!
Cour. (le of flawall
PS Arnericlas, Inc.
eo4olewevi
C99t —01 -
Wairnea'Cil'CUlati011 ShIdY
r)ecember -'00-11
co
'0
26
i / V!
Cour. (le of flawall
PS Arnericlas, Inc.
eo4olewevi
C99t —01 -
Wairnea'Cil'CUlati011 ShIdY
r)ecember -'00-11
�°
iri ry�Ra 1
Xl41
a
Z
�`y6�R1`366011ss622
4
(522to Kailua-Koa 484(68)and Hawi " 140(52)
y�61���2,o
24 4
24(4
8{652) Kawaihae
�
Rady�
m0
44
yQ
A
X60\ ,��
�pl
W A f ItR E A'
.- 372 (368) 540 (360)
tl
�o0a
Ar- 224 (28) 0-212(24)
608 (608) 552 (648) -�
�0
52(12)--*, w > 24 (28) 'y N -•
CD
Waimea M.S. Gym
Legend
XX (XX) -AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes
•
Counts Conducted; 317(06 - 319106
p"p North
cam^. c
..,
cc �
a- 0
Hour Turning Movements
T'
Existing Peak
92
_
1
Ilii` {;�t(Cill CiC�Crlill��lf 1ITe f ��if�E !f�wkl f� Ei7 ��f�','Efii� t tic iIK R'itC.I
wa used' forail ly�.[�. SII€�EI.cIl-ir-E` €z i_ir�l�lFt:Ifrll IlilulE l[t�I �C«�l E�I.E��i��il�f {fCiil(UI c.E c-. El���l CCa
cvaluat�; CongesLiC-d Travel iii-ne �;ii-nulaied by Sint"1 I aflic i0i
Mamalahoa I-lighvfray between Waimea Airpol i �-:trid Mud Lane and for Kawaihae
Road/Mamalahoa Highway between Kohala Mountain [toad and feud Lane. The simulation
was calibrated by travellime rung: conducted by PIS uiafll.
11. Peak Hour Travel Time
a) AM Peak Hour
Figure 17 summarizes the travel time results between Mud Lane and Waimea Airport and
Figure 18 summarizes the travel time results between Mud Lane and Kohala Mountain
Road. For both routes the westbound traffic in the AM peak hour time period is more
congested than the eastbound traffic. Travel time from Mud Lane to Waimea Airport took 40
minutes but only 25 minutes traveling in the opposite direction. Travel time from Mud Lane
to Kohala Mountain Road took 40 minutes but only 30 minutes in the opposite direction.
b) PM Peak Hour
Figure 19 summarizes the travel time results between Waimea Airport and Mud Lane and
Figure 20 summarizes the travel time results between Kohala Mountain Road and Mud
Lane. Travel time simulated by SimTraffic showed that the pattern of congestion is reversed
during the PM peak hour. For both routes the eastbound traffic is more congested than the
westbound. Travel time from Waimea Airport to Mud Lane took 55 minutes but only 20
minutes in the opposite direction. Travel from Kohala Mountain Road to Mud Lane took 70
minutes but only 25 minutes in the opposite direction.
2. Peak Hour Traffic Queues at Intersections
These delays are seen as traffic queues. Figures 6 and 7 shown previously illustrate the
extent of the existing peak hour traffic queues in Waimea. These queues are the source of
much of the traffic complaints within the Waimea community and will be a measure of
effectiveness of actions taken to improve transportation in the Waimea area.
County or/ P'Ri`M,rl 2P Wainie�, TI-Rf is Circl.Ilati0fi `hidy
II? Amcrk*ss IITC Deua:rliber 2007
1
1
1
1
1
IF -a i1a�1
1
County of Hawaii
PR Americas, Inr-
-C
U)
o
Waimea Cil-CUla.lion Study
D f: ce nn 1) e r 2 OCA 7
04
cc
0��
o
1
County of Hawaii
PR Americas, Inr-
-C
U)
o
Waimea Cil-CUla.lion Study
D f: ce nn 1) e r 2 OCA 7
04
0
D
P'.
7
North
NTS
AM Peak Hour Travel Time Between Kohala Mountain Road and Mud Lane
I L-,--
60UMt (;t Hawaii
PB Arriericas, fix,
I
E U)
z0
2: A)
Waimea Circulation Study
Decerriber 200-7
--
w
a?
j
Travel Time Route Terminus.
25minutes....VFW
H� 00Kawaihae Rd. Mama�ahoa•�* "�
s
so
-ft ��� 0 0000
�inutes
70
a
0
cofoedLof
-_
Air ort
n p North
f,
FITS
-1.-. ---
PM Peak Hour Travel Time Between Kohala Mountain Road and Mud Lane �
-j'<
jy
I
� iiu■� r r iii iiiii� i� i� �■■ iiia � � iii r r i. r r
[[[• .[-lC>[ `i 'i Ef[ IcF [ � `-[ lrf;E `i E [C; VG.LI_ [rFr.[_Eri
As discussed !r"1 the Ir€i!`GCiUC;tRC)rl of it"1!S f'C'1 06i, !i[f-llirl)!!!lC actions to addrC %%s} iullR'Ig and
shori-tenrrl future traffic congestion in Wairnea is a key goal of this study. The short-term
future is defined as a five-year horizon, so the short-term future traffic volumes were
forecasted for this time period.
The five-year horizon is the year 2011. The following is a summary of how the short-term
volumes were projected. The detailed approach can be found in the Appendix.
•. 1. • .
In consulting with County of Hawaii Planners, Wairnea Community Development Plan
Committee, and other resources, five major developments were assumed to be developed
within the year 2011 time frame. Table 2 summarizes the developments projected to occur
within the short-range time frame. Figure 21 illustrates the location of these projects.
Table 2 Developments Projected Within the Year 2011
By 2011, these five major developments are expected to add about 1,400 homes in west
and south Waimea. These added new homes will increase the population by approximately
3,850 assuming average family size of 2.75 (Hawaii Data Book 2000 Average Population
per Household). This would bring the population of the Waimea Census -designated Place
(CDP) to 11,408.
CoulOyaff V'wR --[P
OP, fnpc.
34 Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
December 2'1007
Development
Landowner/Developer
Location
Residential
Units in 5
Years
1
Lalamilo
State of Hawaii Dept. of
Next to Transfer Station
440
Subdivision
Hawaiian Home Lands
Road
DHHL
2
Jacaranda Inn
Jacaranda Inn Entitlements
Existing Jacaranda Inn
140
3
Waimea
Kaloko Development
East of Lindsey Road
40
Parkside
4
Waimea Town
Parker Ranch
South of Mamalahoa
499
Center
5
Ouli Golf
Hale Wailani Partners
Ouli Makai Subdivision
225
Community
By 2011, these five major developments are expected to add about 1,400 homes in west
and south Waimea. These added new homes will increase the population by approximately
3,850 assuming average family size of 2.75 (Hawaii Data Book 2000 Average Population
per Household). This would bring the population of the Waimea Census -designated Place
(CDP) to 11,408.
CoulOyaff V'wR --[P
OP, fnpc.
34 Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
December 2'1007
Dot
Name
Landowner
iUnits".
1
Laiamilo Subdivision
DHHL
" 44o
2
3
Jacaranda Inn
Waimea Parkside
Jacaranda Inn Entitlements
i(aloko Develo menti
140
40
4
5
Waimea Town Center
Ouli Golf Community
Parker Ranch
Hale Wailani Partners
€ 300
225 r
i
W A I M E A
kohala M,ountan Rd Ma�aiah0a tawy F
e' a €
i
I .y PWralanl R
Kawaihae Rd. %.d,''�a�ab 4
r"
♦
s
P
♦ . - r I
r
r
r
r . r
r ♦
awa�hae Bypass. • '
� o
N m
E
North NTS
ra �
Cr
C�
C 0. t pp
zr
Potential Short -Range Development in Waimea
Vic,
110% vviihk-'i 1/
expo'c:ied i.cJ (ffOVY F"I E?lh E:A_ffflra'l rate 01 12"yo 11 -on) �1.006 to '�Oii. This rate
is to fl -le: F." 1.,optil''dion prokvth rate; adopied by Gounty I 11awifafl Geneml
Plan in 2005, The total traffic iii '2.011 is obtained by Gombining the trips cjenerated by five
developments identified and the growth. -factored background traffic. I -lie detailed volume
projection for Year 2011 and Year 2030 can be found in Appendix D.
■ The resulting peak hour traffic volurnes within the Waimea area are shown in Figures 22 and
23 for the AM and PM peak hour time periods, respectively. These volumes are the basis
for the evaluation of the Short -Range actions recommended in this report.
COUW1, Off-lawah 36 V1/air nea Traffic Circulation Study
P -B Amevicas, inc, Decerriber 2007
1
County of HawFail Vk1a.'N.-nea Circulation StUdy
b 0 0
Waimea
2011 9M Peak Hour Volumes
North
796
-4k--
350
938
Ka car 476
523
839
2011 9M Peak Hour Volumes
North
2011 9M Peak Hour Volumes
��', I.I"�t;`i,'I,'` r�i�ia� �-'[if,,�,.�i�.lJ:(_ _.._,t ,:`•
T he" Mai €IIC I' :fIic ErC;IEIaiioi! I lkn ldE-r6lEll(, ,.h. k fell(,, i ("IiorI to add I, t e C;LlI,R i1'
cl'afflC, I ;4t1,E'S ill kIValmea I UUt,EI c,nd C:UlOC10c=1;7 t!"ilii C(} lC)IiU I"a{"1CC 1"-;411Es 1(hat nCsGC? "iC) -)C:
considered whL.,n iwiplernontinci the rc gioiial iransi-mrtation irnprovemerflLs currerriiy being
planned.
The short: -range actions fall into the following categories:
• Phase 1 Roadway Improvements
Phase 2 Roadway Improvements
• Transit Improvements
® Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements
A. Phase 1
The Phase 1 roadway improvements are:
• Selected Widening of Mamalahoa Highway
• Parker Ranch Connector
• Waimea School Access Improvements
• Prohibit East and West -bound Left -Turns at Lindsey/Mamalahoa Intersection
• Traffic Signal Optimization
Figure 24 illustrates the Phase 1 improvements which can be implemented on a relatively
short time frame.
1. Mamalahoa Highway Widening from Hospital to East of Kamamalu
This action would widen Mamalahoa Highway to four lanes from the North Hawaii
Community Hospital driveway to a point approximately one-half mile east of Kamamalu
Street.
Understanding that the widening is not desired by all community members because it
conflicts with the goal of maintaining the unique character of Waimea Town, there is a
segment of Mamalahoa Highway that is a bottleneck and needs to be increased in capacity
to allow other measures to be successful.
i
� ear-r�r�,< ofF t F�r"Fare -l_rT,i(ic Cir�:rJfRtie,n Stud�A
PE', firF;�r c _ ;, (rrr. Pccembe %M
iltt : h-),L'k- c-rcl" occ=rlif t 'ilt C-:ci: lritc I`�-:Ptt".Ilir,�lE irt.ra r�it( r. L- A1,01I E S �A�;;�=r�iC-E r` bV long
LIF Ific C�It�.tEC_ e� Ei!,`i"iI G EIE I)� .I� il`� flrc p f'00"'. AAVfilll�)Ul SC�r€€E_ IriCrG. �. rid C:;.I7� GItV� c.E thiu=
loccyi-iun, oillor actions such a_-1 the Parkin f11,�;nch ("onnc:601 would 1101 be" Cable to be
properly implen-tented. Ficsure ?5 illustr<<r, : the existing congie.stion that iesultF. frofil this:
bottkl:rl cic at Mreet.
Additionally, improvements proposed at the Lindsey Road/Marnalahoa Highway intersection
will convey more traffic to the Kamamalu Street intersection, further exacerbating the
existing traffic queuing issues without some type of capacity enhancement.
Right-of-way (ROW) is a Ivey issue with this improvement. Marnalahoa Highway at
Kamamalu Street has a constrained ROW due to existing land use in the vicinity of the
intersection.
It is expected that relocation of utilities on the south side of Mamalahoa Highway needs to
occur. This could be implemented in sub -phases.
Figure 26 illustrates limited widening concept for Mamalahoa Highway in the vicinity of
Kamamalu Street.
Z., Waimea Trafiic Gircu12ti011 Study
Uccenibcr 10
r,
lailligh road 10
"Citamniod'it
r,lane hedge may remain Install new 4'sidawalk
W.M. K Richard Smart
PUL110a Observatcrly oa
Piddock Trust
Lot
Lexclusive )))be Lside..remains
(um rel�
'as'4" " " to land
W.Ug"'ghtwon
shared hire
North Hawaii Community Hospital
North
MrMq11"Mq
1-M MLA
instalf new median --J
relamte existing sidewalk
and utility poles
park wall remains
histall new park walkway
Waimea Public Park
%
�-'
mhvsienacted
intersection
Church of
Church
Latter -Day Saints
A'skl�-k
proposedParker Ranch
Connector Road
install new
d-alk
eastern terminus relocate evsting sty
and at"is
pals
Conk's Corner
Waimea Civic Center
is intersection
le'ains jaf;
turn from
Uj
M-alsh.
10 HO)Dn'ua Centsr
Proposed Marnalahoa Highway Widening in the Vicinity of Kamamalu Street
t1p,
""X r
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
The l .3if I" {E .{! (;i'rfCE1 C;.Cgf wilt (lrtr'tft)( iYillc;il
Eu truly I,c: cisCcilve, f� need'- pct Lc-. c:crnIplcJc H�Urn I olph�tic;.Y wc�;i Of
l._indi c;yf I'I" Rad Licj lvia. lcalr i o1 :I 1 ifyihvfaiiy it 1 tyle vicif iKy of Kan -I i-rialu sh-e >i.
As indicatod it) the discussion of the selected lkfiainalahoa Highway widening, the mariner in
which the Parker Ranch Connector Road connects to Mamalahoa Highway in the vicinity of
Kamamalu `:street is important. Current plans show the Parker Ranch Connector
intersecting Kamamalu Street in the vicinity of the Eldercare Facility. If this terminus
configuration is implemented, widening of the Karnarnalu approach to Mamalahoa. Highway
and widening of Mamalahoa Highway in the vicinity •oVthe Kamamalu Street intersection
would be required. These widenings will impact existing development on Kamamalu Street
and on Mamalahoa Highway.
An alternative connection could be made to Mamalahoa Highway near or at the existing
Civic Center driveway on Mamalahoa Highway. This location would allow widening of
Mamalahoa Highway without significant conflict with existing development to allow for
proper channelization of the intersection.
There are issues on how the Parker Ranch Connector Road reaches its intersection in the
vicinity of Kamamalu Street. The North Hawaii Community Hospital is concerned that the
alignment of the Parker Ranch Connector Road could impact its development plans. The
project that designs the Parker Ranch Connector Road needs to consider these concerns in
establishing the alignment. Whatever alignment results, however, it is recommended that
the Parker Ranch Connector Road intersect Mamalahoa Highway in the vicinity of the Civic
Center Driveway as opposed to a direct connection to Kamamalu Street.
3. Waimea School Improvements
Traffic improvements at the Waimea Elementary/Waimea Middle School complex are
proposed by the State of Hawaii Department of Education (DOE). These improvements
involve increasing the efficiency of traffic circulation in the vicinity of the Waimea School
complex.
A connector roadway between Lindsey Road and the Waimea Schools internal road,
referred to as Road A would allow for smoother and safer drop off of students at the
Goffin(v OF Hpnvaif 44 Waimea Traffic Ch-culatioii Study
PE /'%f�t&II c a, if, t, c. December 2-00-f
i-_�._`C.7: ��I1�lY ''IF �_! 'r l��. `•F tit, _ii ,--- _'. i�_i (r_�6 c..l�%�t�_ E€1'J. 1t I'
eE ,�et 11€Cxl`7cr"--(!,(! r(7DIlE0VI.' I.'�..ilittfi; rs e�F;;.? ��t�`llf%. ,.k�Ilr�. {-t �ti ft-"c�V c eJl,:�c.C,itl "€.o fl 1(f, ..-C;11CFf-)J,
t/dlii-,li will wo,ocf. hi(I-iott fJonli i a.il €!"npl' wc: t1a iie acJe�iy.
It. is recon€mended to support the DOE proposal 'lo irriplement these improvements.
4. Prol iibit East and West -bound' Left -1 UFFIS at Lindsey/I a.malahoa Intersection
This intersection is the pii€r€ary bottlenecl iri Waimea. Due to existing development, there is -
little room for road widening on its approaches. There is need for additional signal time for
the east -west Mamalahoa Highway traffic movements .and the Lindsey Road-Mamalahoa
Highway traffic movements. The existing traffic signal is already fully utilized with virtually
no more capacity to allocate the required additional signal time.
To free up signal time for key traffic movements at this intersection, it is recommended that
the east and west -bound left turns be eliminated. The westbound left -turn is a low
magnitude traffic movement and there are alternate routes via Pukalani Street and via the
Parker Ranch Center Driveway to the Post Office and other destinations. The eastbound
left -turn is more significant in terms of traffic volume. Alternative means to accomplish this
movement must be provided. The Parker Ranch Connector would serve as an alternate
way to handle the east and west -bound left -turns. Figure 27 illustrates how these
movements may be accommodated using a portion of the Parker Ranch Connector Road.
The portion of the Parker Ranch connection that needs to be constructed first to allow the
left turns at the Lindsey/Mamalahoa intersection to be eliminated is the segment between
Lindsey Road and Kaomoloa Road. This will provide the necessary connectivity to allow
eastbound trips to access Lindsey/Kawaihae Road to the north. The "Road A" improvement
proposed as part of the Waimea School improvements would also be desirable to facilitate
Waimea School traffic circulation. This connection would intersect Lindsey Road in the
vicinity of the existing Parker Shopping Center roadway that passes between the shopping
center and the YMCA building.
C-Cmfloof14atf"aaE Traffic (.irCLdatir,€1 Study
f C' F ,reek L, Eric, Dace€r1hcr 200
PU)
70
0
MA
'W
Cq
I L--�
County of Hawaii
PP Americas, Inc,
Wainiea Circulaaticm Study
ltl
L ecernber 2007
11
11
11
In addition to allowing more green signal time to be allocated to the high -demand
movements, the elimination of east and west—bound left turns at the Lindsey/Manlalahoa '
intersection allow for beautification of the Town Center area of Waimea. Figures 28 and 29
illustrate how landscaped medians could be extended into the area currently used for the '
left -turn lanes.
5. Traffic Signal Optimization '
The elimination of left -turns at the Lindsey/Mamalahoa intersection and construction of '
segments of the Parker Ranch Connector Road, would provide the necessary system
flexibility to optimize the existing traffic
n
u
11
11
11
n
n
n
Couny of Hawaii 47 Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
P8 Arnewicas, Inc. Jecernber 2007
I L�
County of Hawaii
PEI Americas, Inc.
Z7� CAL)
C"q,
IC
U)
CO
LU
0)
0
0
0
0
Q)
(D
CO
CO
_0
W
CO
O
Il;"
Waimea Circulation Study
December 2007
County of Hawaii Waimea Circulation Study
1-58 Americas, Inc. Decernbe, 2007
D. Phase 2 Roadway Errol rovements
The Kawaihae Road -- Mamalahoa Highway Connector is the primary Phase 2 roadway
improvement. Figure 30 illustrates the proposed Kawaihae-Mamalahoa Connector project
alignment.
This improvement would provide much needed alternative circulation for traffic traveling
between the Kawaihae Road corridor and the Waimea Town center area and between the
Kawaihae Road corridor and destination east of Waimea.
The Kawaihae Road - Mamalahoa Highway Connector provides for the intra Waimea traffic
and the internal-external Waimea traffic patterns. The regional traffic that passes through
Waimea could also use it until the regional Kawaihae and Waimea Bypasses are
constructed in the longer term future.
The alignment of the Kawaihae Road - Mamalahoa Highway Connector is an issue with the
Lalamilo Farm Lots development and the Sandalwood residential development. The farmers
within the Lalamilo Farm Lots development are concerned about contamination of their
crops due to the traffic that would use the proposed Connector Road. Sufficient buffer
and/or separation needs to be provided to protect the farm lots from both contamination and
crop pilferage. The County of Hawaii Department of Public Works currently has a consultant
working on the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and conceptual design for the project.
It is hoped that an acceptable method to buffer the farm lots and affected residential lots can
be worked out through the EIS/Conceptual Design process.
One alternative to the Kawaihae Road - Mamalahoa Highway Connector was reviewed and
rejected. This alternative involves the construction and use of part of the regional Kawaihae
Road Bypass Road in the vicinity of Waimea. However, evaluation of this route reveals that
it would be considerably out of the direct travel route for the users that the Kawaihae Road -
Mamalahoa Highway Connector would serve. As shown in Figure 31, the Kawaihae Road
Bypass route would be almost 6 miles longer than the more direct routes using Kawaihae
Road or the Kawaihae Road - Mamalahoa Highway Connector. It is judged that this indirect
travel route would make the Kawaihae Road Bypass route undesirable for intra Waimea and
internal-external Waimea travel to and from the east.
County of Haterah 50 Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PB Americas, hic. December 2007
E
2
C-3
E
0
ry
N
cn
n
Cotinty of Ilawaii 'Alaimea. CirCUlation Study
PR Americas, If ic� December 2007
c
0
coun€!" of Hawaii
r -B A'nlorkas, Im.
(L)
C)
U)
C/)
cz
CL
>1
m
(1)
co
m
m
Y
Circulation Study
December 2007
.1
0
0
0
<
At
E
U)
j
C6
D-
>1
E
ON
t
� i
MO as tox•100
00 10 0
(L)
C)
U)
C/)
cz
CL
>1
m
(1)
co
m
m
Y
Circulation Study
December 2007
G. Transit Projects
As noted in the discussion of existing transportation issues, it was noted that there is no
intra -Waimea transit service. Although the Hilo -South Kohala Resorts routes passes
through Waimea via Mamalahoa Highway and Kawaihae Road, these routes do not serve
the intra -Waimea function. It is recommended that intra -Waimea shuttle bus service be
instituted to provide an alternative mode of transportation. Figure 32 illustrates a potential
route alignment that could provide this service.
D. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Projects
It was stated frequently by the community that a solid system that provide bicyclists and
pedestrians with mobility within Waimea would be desirable. Figure 33 illustrates a potential
bicycle and pedestrian network that would provide this mobility. The plan utilizes existing
and proposed roadways as the backbone of a bicycle -pedestrian network and augments this
backbone through the use of the Waimea Trails and Greenways project paths. It is
recommended that bicycle and pedestrian facilities be part of all future roadway construction
projects.
E. Estimated Cost of Proposed Projects
Two phases of projects were proposed to provide better circulation and to mitigate traffic
congestions: Table 3 summarizes the project's description and the planning level capital
cost in Year 2007 dollars.
It should be noted that the proposed projects would best be implemented as a unified
package instead of separate stand-alone projects. For example, east and westbound left
turns at Lindsey intersection can not be detoured without the Parker Ranch Connector and
Waimea School Access Improvements.
County of Hawaii 53 Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PES Americas, fnc. December 2007
-, witib
M -WA
xTIE
MIA
p n �
C t
p1z 10
F
1
1
1
'-1
Table, 3 Planning Level Gapital Cost Estimate by Phase
Count or Hawaii
PE. Ainefic6s, lac.
56 Wainnea Traffic Circulation Study
Decernber 2007
Mamalahoa Highway Widening
Maintain 5 -lane from North Hawaii Community Hospital to Civic Center
$ 7,800,000
Access; taper down to 4 -lane at Kamamalu Street; maintain 4 -lane
2000 ft east of Kamamalu Street
Parker Ranch Connector
2 -lane roadway from Mamalahoa Highway in the vicinity of Vacuum
$ 15,000,000
Cooling Plant on the west to Kamamalu Road and/or Mamaholahoa
Highway in the vicinity of the Waimea Civic Center on the east
Waimea School Access Improvementsz
2 -lane roadway connecting Waimea Middle School Access with
$ 1,000,000
Lindsey Road, south of the existing school bus parking
Lindsey/Mamalahoa Signal Improvement
Prohibit East and West -bound Left -turns at Lindsey/Mamalahoa
$ 600,000
Intersection; Extend median to cover Ea-st anQ West -bound Left -
turning bay; Detour East and West -bound Left-iurning Traffic
Phase I Traffic Signal Optimization
Signal improvement at Parker Ranch Connector east and west
$ 1,600,000
terminus; Signal Optimization after all other Phase i projects are
implemented
Phase I Sub total
$ 26,000,000
Phase II
Kawaihae-Mamalahoa Connector Road
2 -lane roadway connecting Kawaihae Road in the vicinity of Waimea
$ 9,000,000
Baseyard and Mamalahoa Highway in the vicinity of the Vacuum
Cooling Plant
Phase If Traffic Signal Optimization
Signal improvement at Kawaihae-Mamalahoa Connector Road west
$ 1,000,000
and east terminus;Signai Signal Optimization after Kawaihae-
Mamalahoa Connector Road is implemented
Phase it Sub total
Is
10,000,000
Grand Total' $ 36,000,000
Notes: 1 It is expected that Parker Ranch Connector will mainly funded by Parker Ranch.
2 Waimea School Access Improvements to be funded by Department of Education.
3 Intra -Waimea Transit Shuttle and Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements costs are not included.
Count or Hawaii
PE. Ainefic6s, lac.
56 Wainnea Traffic Circulation Study
Decernber 2007
Six scenarios were evaluated using Synchro/Sin-rTraf(ic. methods as shown in Table 4. The
detailed SimTraffic Reports are included in Appendices B and C. The Phase I network is the
existing roadway network with Phase I projects, while the Phase II network is the existing
roadway network with Phase I and II projects. t
Table 4 Scenarios Evaluated for the Short -Terra Projects
Scenarios
Existing
Phase 1 Network
Phase 11 network
Roadway
Network
Existing 2006
X
X
X
Volumes
Future 2011
X
X
X
Volumes
The total delay calculated by simulation is the congested travel time minus the time it would
take the vehicle with no other vehicles or traffic control devices. It should be noted that it is
not the signal delay used in Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 or the stopped delay
used in HCM's earlier version. The total delay calculated by simulation takes queue
interactions and lane change into account. The queue intersections could be the queue
interference due to a filled left turning bay or the queue spill back from the downstream
intersection. In other words, the total delay calculated by simulation is more comprehensive
and generally more accurate than the one defined in HCM 2000.
Therefore, it is inappropriate to convert the total delay in simulation to the Level of Service
(LOS). LOS has been a more traditional way of viewing traffic operations. Because the
existing peak period traffic conditions are congested in nature, simulation was judged to be
the appropriate tool to evaluate traffic operations. The examined Measure of Effectiveness
(MOE) is intersection delay in seconds/vehicle and travel time in minutes along Mamalahoa
Highway and Kawaihae Road.
County ofHawaii 57 Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PES Amprioas, fac, Decernber 2007
Figures 3A.- through NmmpamUe six scenaiius' travel times and intersection delay -for L'ho
AM and PM peak hourtin-ie p9hnda.Thmfinding
aare ouoonoahzedas follows:
1. Without Phase i and Phase U projects, the future conditions will deteriorate in terms
of delay and travel time.
2. The major benefit of Phase | projects will occur during AM peak hnur, Phase |
projects alone can not mitigate PM traffic congestion to an acceptable level.
3. Phase U projects in addition to Phase | projects can mitigate AM and PM traffic
congestions to an acceptable level.
4. Phase | and Phase U projects should be implemented as a whole package.
Implementation of single project will onh relocate the bottlenecks.
County mfHawaii 58 Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PE, Americas, fnG. December 2007
eerA
40 Existing
Z
Existing 25 Phase I
Volumes
20 Phase 11
a 1415 Existing
Future
3.� � Phase I
Travel
Time Route Terminus
Volumes
25 Phase If
51
5
ZIP
OW 00 low
K ihm Ro,
ANO
Aw oo
wo
25 Existing
I
Existing 25 Phase I
volumes
20 Phase 11
Airporl
35 Existing
Future
30 Phase I
Volumes 3Q'
Phase If
North
0
w
T,
NTS
9? c F
DAM
Peak Hour Travel Time in Minutes Along Mamalahoa
pr
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
3
Travel Time. Route Terminus
-4( -----------------
�(y Xa vv�th tie, Rd,
30 Existing
Existing 25 Phase I
Volumes 25 Phase 11
5 Existing
Future 5 Phase I"
Volumes Phase 11
Airporl
North
NTS
Mosi� ANSEL Pig re
I AM Peak Hour Travel Time in Minutes along Kawaihae
40 Existing
Existing_
Phase I
Volumes
Phase It
;m-'��25
50 Existing
Future
33 Phase I
Volumes
25 Phase It
-4( -----------------
�(y Xa vv�th tie, Rd,
30 Existing
Existing 25 Phase I
Volumes 25 Phase 11
5 Existing
Future 5 Phase I"
Volumes Phase 11
Airporl
North
NTS
Mosi� ANSEL Pig re
I AM Peak Hour Travel Time in Minutes along Kawaihae
75 Existing 270 Existing
Existing 30 Phase I Existing 4 Phase I
1 0
Volumes Volumes ' f,
45 Phase It -735 Phase 11
140 Existing ,.�330 Existin
FutureFuture
0 Phase 1 90 Phase I
E
Volumes Volumes
,6 Phase It 45 Phase 11
i ic Cenfcr
r
-o North Hawaii
to tri wi
Community Hospital
Parker Rancb
Shopping Center
150 Existing
Existing
Volumes =40 Phase I
�W35 Phase 11
280 Existing
Future 130 Phase I
Volumes
50 Phase If
AM Peak Hour Intersection Delay in SecondsNehicle
M M M M M M M M M M M IIIIIIII M M M M M M 111111110
c7 y
CL
I
Travel Time Route Terminus
i
North
NTS
20 Existing
Existing20 Phase I
Volumes F 20 Phase 11
Future 45 Existing
5 Phase I
Volumes w.
w.
0 Phase 11
Z-7
00 00
40 00
ro,
55 Existing
Existing
25 Phase 1
°tPne5
0
gve Volumes
25
do
?"af\ 25 Phase 11
covo
Future 5 65 Existing
A rp t 35 Phase I
i ort
r, Volumes
rp
10— 22 30 Phase 11
7
PM Peak Hour Travel Time in Minutes Along Mamalahoa
g u Fe,
3 77
North
NTS
ram
a Kawaihae Rd. Mama`aboa
N
0000
•
•♦
25 Existing
Existing
25 Phase I
Volumes
Existing
25 Phase 11
Travel Time Route Terminus
45 Existing
Future
25 Phase 11
VolumesF30
35 Phase 1
Phase 11
North
NTS
ram
a Kawaihae Rd. Mama`aboa
N
0000
•
•♦
Fig e
PM Peak Hour Travel Time in Minutes Along Kawaihae
`
70 Existing
Existing
35 Phase
pa<Ke�
Volumes
25 Phase 11
95 Existing
Future
Airport
Volumes
70 Phase 1
1.,
. 45 Phase 11
Fig e
PM Peak Hour Travel Time in Minutes Along Kawaihae
rr rs r rr rr rr r r it rr r rr it r. .• ••• �•
140 Existing
Existing
Volumes
30 Phase I
35 Phase 11
180 Existing
Future
180 Existing Volumes
70 Phase I
d
Existing 55 Phase 1
�, -.. 50 Phase If
D
Cr p
�C/)
VolumesEt!L
Future 270 Existing
VolumesLMS 80 Phase 1
50 Phase 11
Kawaiha_�_ \
Kailua.KO aand H,
""""'�
Existing'111111111110 185 Phase 1
Volumes ��'145 Phase 11
Future -_
Volumes
100 Phase 11
�a�ar°a
�a
North Hawaii
Community Hospital
a
Parker Ranch
Shopping Center
550 Phase 1
3
d
Civic Center �a
000 Existing
North
NTS
f
Gigli c
Ps,- PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay in Seconds/Vehicle
39
V1. ISUMMIARY
With the rapid growth in population and businesses during the past ten years, Waimea is
undergoing a transition. One of the ways this transition manifests itself is recurring traffic
congestion during the morning and evening pear periods.
While the Waimea community desires to mitigate the traffic congestion, it also wishes to
maintain the special character of the Town of Waimea. Therefore, innovative ways of
addressing the traffic congestion are needed.
One of the key reasons for the congestion experienced in Waimea Town is that, currently,
all traffic must pass through the Lindsey Road/Mamalalio'a Highway intersection. The area
around the intersection is developed and roadway improvements are difficult without
causing much disruption to existing uses. There is also a secondary bottleneck at the
Kamamalu/Mamalahoa intersection.
Previously, major regional bypasses have been proposed to alleviate traffic congestion
within Waimea. However, this study determined that much of the current congestion is
caused by trips either traveling within Waimea or trips originating or terminating within
Waimea. The regional bypasses are not suited to address this type of travel. While in the
long run, the regional Kawaihae and Waimea Bypasses are needed to handle the growth in
regional traffic, the internal connector roads serve the other, more local, components of
travel better.
Two internal roads have been identified in the past: Parker Ranch Connector Road and the
Kawaihae Road - Mamalahoa Highway Connector. The former is part of the Parker Ranch
development while the latter is currently going through the Environmental Assessment (EA)
process as a County of Hawaii Department of Public Works project. The Waimea Traffic
Circulation Study searched for alternatives to these two roadways, but found that other
routes were not feasible.
A series of actions connected with the internal connector roads are recommended in this
report as well as recommendations enhancing intra -Waimea transit and improving
pedestrian and bicycle paths within Waimea.
County of Hawai; 65 Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
Pik fln7ai-ecas, hPic. December 2007
u
1
11
1
0
u
11
[7
�7
1�
t
'I
1
k8uat innpudenUy` K hzs been dal*nnioed thcdUhe land use policy vvQ'in VVainnoa Town nnust
support the most feasible tnanopurbaioninoprovemonta. These improvements tend tocreate
better circulation in 1he west and south. To preserve the inbannm| character nfWaimea, it is
important that future land use take advantage of the internal connector roadways and the
future regional bypasses. Thenafore, future growth of Waimea needs to be directed to the
west and south of the existing Town. Development along the Manna|ohoa Highway corridor
east of Town vvnu|d have the most detrimental impact on the existing yWerna|mhua Highway
corridor through Waimea.
The combination of the physical improvements and the land use policy changes such as
Smart Growth and Infill Development is hoped to help Waimea preserve its unique and
historical character as it grows and transitions into a larger community.
County of Hawaii 66 Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PB Americas, Inc. December 2007
APPENDIX A TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
County of flawail Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
P8 Arapricas, bm-.
December 2007
WEEKDAY AFA CPUUT SHEET
North
D F F
Intersection: Kama rnal u/Mamalahoa
Ii 1 ! L
Date: Tuesday, 3/7/2006 ---- G
— H Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
By: C —P I
B
Weather: Sunny
LI K J
South
Street: Kamamalu St
TIME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
6:00 AM - 6:15 AM
6
24
0
0
0
0
0
237
1
2
0
11
6:15 AM - 6:30 AM
4
43
0
0
0
0
0
252
2
0
0
18
6:30 AM 6:45 AM
10
49
0
0
0
0
0
244
3
4
0
22
6:45 AM - 7:00 AM
8
64
0
1
0
0
0
187
3
9
0
27
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM
11
74
0
1
0
0
1
210
3
8
0
35
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM
16
93
0
1
0
0
0
232
3
9
0
39
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM
15
120
0
1
0
0
1
211
4
9
0
66
7:45 AM 8:00 AM
18
129
1
1
0
1
1
216
0
17
0
64
Peak 15 -min (vph)
72
516
4
4
0
4
4
864
0
68
0
256
e North
Peak 15 -min ivph) 4 0 4
RIGHT THRU LEFT
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 1124
4 LEFT
516 THRU
8
Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
Total
Mvmt
281
319
332
299
343
393
427
448
1792
RIGHT 4 868
THRU 864
LEFT 0
592 72 RIGHT
588
LEFT THRU RIGHT
256 0 68
72 South 324
Street: Kamamalu St
PARSONS
BR/NCKERHOFF
WEEKUk:Y MiDAPAY COUNT SHEET
Intersection:
Date: i
By:
Weathem
Kamamalu/Mamalahoa
4
C
B
A —y
I,
Street:
North
D F F
✓ ~' -
•
✓
I
L K J
_ South_
Kamamalu St
i
Street: lMamalahoa Hwy
Tuesday, 3/7/2006
G
— H
I
Sunny
TIME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
!
J
K
!
Total
Mvml
2:00 PM ', 215 PM
21
163
1
0
0
0
0
143
6
8
0
24
366
2:15 PM 1- 2:30 PM
23
191
0
0
0
0
1
165
7
5
0
24
416
2:30 PM - 2:45 PM
35
193
0
0
0
0
1
178
8
12
0
14
441
2:45 PM 3:00 PM
I '
23
204
0
1
0
0
0
179
6
8
0
21
442
3:00 PM - 3:15 PM
23
227
3
0
0
0
0
150
29
7
0
21
460
3:15 PM 3:30 PM
21
236
2
3
1
0
1
153
8
10
0
30
465
3:30 PM
- 3:45 PM
25
224
1
0
0
0
0
150
10
14
0
26
450
3:45 PM
(- ? 4:00 PM
30
243
0
0
0
0
0
131
5
12
0
19
440
Peak 15 -min (vph) 1 84 1 944 1 8 1 12
1 3:15 PMI- 3:30 PM
PARSONS
BR/NCKERHOFF
744
1036
THRU
4
0
4
I 612
j 32
I 40
I 0
I 120
I 1860
16
North
12
-- --
-
Street:
Mamalahoa Hwy
-12
4
0
RIGHT
----
THRU
1 LEFT
-
'
- —
RIGHT
4 648
THRU
1 612
LEFT
1 32
LEFT THRURIGHT
- -- _ ....... -- -
120 0 40
120 South 160
-_ - -
eet: Kamamalu St
984 1
WEEKDAY PM COUNT SHEET
PARSONS
BR/NCKERHOFF
tF'EEKFM7\' f"!, G�:�i<-r' a I•.E.E'C
North
0 E F
Intersection: Waimea School Library/GYni Access
Date: _Wednesday, 3/8/06 ti G
�— H Street: Marnalahoa Hwy
By: C
I
B —�
Weather: Sunny A
L K J
South
Street: Waimea School
TIME
L1
D
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
6:00 AM - 6:15 AM
0
26
0
0
0
0
0
102
0
0
0
0
6:15 AM - 6:30 AM
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
126
0
0
0
0
6:30 AM 6:45 AM
0
47
0
0
0
0
0
108
4
0
0
0
6:45 AM - 7:00 AM
0
54
0
0
0
0
0
101
8
5
0
1
7:00 AM 7:15 AM
2
90
0
0
0
0
0
104
32
16
0
5
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM
3
109
0
0
0
0
0
115
37
23
0
2
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM
6
138
0
0
0
0
0
135
53
41
0
5
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM
6
97
0
0
0
0
0
95
40
26
0
6
Peak 15 -min (vph)
24
552
0
0
0
0
0
540
212
164
0
20
0 North
Peak 15 -min (vph) 0 0 0
RIGHT THRU LEFT
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 560
o LEFT
552 THRU
Total
Mvmt
128
166
159
169
249
289
378
270
1512
0
Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
RIGHT 0 752
THRU 540
LEFT 212
576 24 RIGHT 716
LEFT THRU RIGHT
20 0 164
236 South 184
Street: Waimea School
PARSONS
BR/NCKERHOFF
V, EEKDA\ P W, COUNT SI i EET
nlnrlh
D L
Intersection: Waimea School L ibrarG m Access L / -Y — —
Date: Wednesday, 3(8/06 �— G
�— H Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
By: _ C —r
R --�
Weather: Sunny A
LI K JI
South
Street: Waimea School
TIME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
2:00 PM - 2:15 PM
5
71
0
0
0
0
0
68
12
7
0
2
2:15 PM - 2:30 PM
3
88
0
0
0
0
0
86
23
21
0
3
2:30 PM - 2:45 PM
2
120
0
0
0
0
0
92
24rl
0
1
2:45 PM - 3:00 PM
4
166
0
0
0
0
0
86
15
0
1
3'.00 PM - 3:15 PM
6
102
0
0
0
0
0
85
17
24
0
2
3:15 PM - 3:30 PM
2
108
0
0
0
0
0
108
17
22
0
0
3:30 PM - 3:45 PM
1
49
0
0
0
0
0
42
14
8
0
3
3:45 PM - 4:00 PM
6
191
0
0
0
0
0
143
26
36
0
6
Peak 15 -min (vph)
24
764
0
0
0
0
0
572
104
144
0
24
o North
Peak 15 -min [vphi 0 0 0
RIGHT THRU LEFT
3:45 PM - 4:00 PM 596
o LEFT
764 THRU
Total
Mvmt
165
224
295
285
236
257
117
408
iBRAI
0
Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
RIGHT 0 676
THRU 572
LEFT 104
788 24 RIGHT
908
LEFT THRU RIGHT
24 0 144
128 South 168
Street: Waimea School
PARSONS
BRtNCKERHOFF
WEEKUI_Y i"4,^ SWEFY
NIM h
D L L
Intersection: Waimea School Ubraryl Access I
I L
1
Date; Wednesday, 3/8/06 '(-- G
H Street: Mamalahoa Bury
By: C
— – R .
Weather: Sunny A �, }
L K J
South
Street: Waimea School
TIME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
4:00 PM 4:15 PM
4
162
0
0
0
0
0
97
9
7
0
1
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM
5
86
0
0
0
0
0
52
6
10
0
4
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM
3
108
0
0
0
0
0
66
17
18
0
0
4:45 PM 5:00 PM
5
134
0
0
0
0
0
89
8
23
0
3
5:00 PM 515 PM
7
162
0
0
0
0
0
90
6
8
0
1
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM
0
142
0
0
0
0
0
44
4
3
0
3
5:30 PM 5:45 PM
1
119
0
0
0
0
0
62
9
3
0
0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM
1
81
0
0
0
0
0
40
3
4
0
1
Peak 15 -min (vph)
28
648
0
0
0
0
0
360
24
32
0
4
0 North
Peak 15 -min (vph) 0 0 0
RIGHT THRU LEFT
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 364
0 LEFT
648 THRU
Total
Mvm1
280
163
212
262
274
196
194
130
1096
0
Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
RIGHT 0 384
THRU 360
LEFT 24
676 28 RIGHT 680
LEFT THRU RIGHT
4 0 32
52 South 36
Street: Waimea School
PARSONS
SRINCKERHOFF
WEErD[,,Y PM COUNT SF.U)
nn,rth
f) E F
Intersection: I indsey/Mamalahoa L
Date: Tuesday, 3/7/2006 ✓ G
t — H Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
By: C � I
f—
R —�
Weather: Sunny q —�
L K fF
South
Street: Lindsey Rd
TIME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
6:00 AM - 615 AM
3
21
5
10
1
12
134
76
5
2
21
13
6:15 AM - 6:30 AM
3
22
11
11
9
36
172
105
5
2
18
7
6:30 AM 6:45 AM
8
28
17
13
13
38
132
100
1
2
22
8
6:45 AM 7:00 AM
3
32
20
22
18
69
123
88
4
2
17
12
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM
14
50
46
30
22
64
147
94
8
7
17
25
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM
8
55
51
48
19
92
132
79
12
3
29
28
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM
23
70
70
70
29
92
174
92
2
7
22
32
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM
25
91
55
73
36
135
145
84
7
3
31
46
Peak 15-min(vph)
100
364
220
292
144
540
580
336
28
12
124
184
976 North
Peak Mmin (vph) 292 144 540
RIGHT THRU LEFT
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 812
PARSONS
BR/NCKERHOFF
220 LEFT
364 THRU
Total
Mvmt
303
401
382
410
524
556
683
731
2924
924
Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
RIGHT 580 F 944
THRU 336
LEFT 28
684 100 RIGHT g1g
LEFT THRU RIGHT
184 124 12
272 South 320
Street: Lindsey Rd
WEEKDAY PM COF_rNTSHEET
Nnrth
D E F
Intersection: Lindsey/Mamalahoa
L
-
Date: Tuesday, 3/7/2006
-- H Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
gy: C d I
B —�
Weather: Sunny
L K J
South
Street: Lindsey Rd
TIME
A
8
C
D
E
F
G
H
i
J
K
L
2:00 PM - 2:15 PM
19
61
23
37
56
119
92
67
8
11
29
21
2:15 PM 2:30 PM
28
84
39
38
33
103
109
64
18
7
51
17
2:30 PM - 2:45 PM
27
65
36
36
47
127
119
53
14
10
35
19
2:45 PM - 3:00 PM
33
104
39
25
49
129
123
67
15
5
53
21
3:00 PM 3:15 PM
28
85
35
44
48
140
110
64
13
9
47
32
3'15 PM - 3:30 PM
24
85
40
38
59
144
86
68
24
12
53
39
3:30 PM 3:45 PM
19
101
30
33
29
161
108
56
11
9
41
27
3:45 PM - 4:00 PM
17
98
40
32
46
149
93
57
15
13
25
26
Peak 15-min(vph)
96
340
160
152
236
576
344
272
96
48
212
156
964 North
Peak 15•min [vph) 152 236 576
RIGHT THRU LEFT
3:15 PM - 3:30 PM 580
PARSONS
6RINCKERHOFF
160 LEFT
340 THRU
Total
Mvmt
543
591
588
663
655
672
625
611
2688
716
Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
RIGHT 344 712
THRU 272
LEFT 96
596 96 RIGHT 964
LEFT THRU RIGHT
156 212 48
428 South 416
Street: Lindsey Rd
WEEKDAY PM COUNT SHEET
Nnrih
D F F
Intersection. Lindsey/Mamalahoa
I I
Date: Tuesday, 3/7/2006 G
-- H Street: Marnalahoa Hwy
By: C ,l I
B
Weather: Sunny A ti }
C[
L K J
South
Street: Lindsey Rd
TIME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
4:00 PM 4:15 PM
24
110
37
21
53
111
90
55
16
14
49
32
4:15 PM 4:30 PM
28
99
27
33
34
116
76
49
15
12
32
23
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM
44
87
22
29
50
131
82
53
7
8
29
13
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM
38
100
23
30
33
114
84
53
8
13
40
27
5:00 PM 5:15 PM
32
71
37
25
38
128
87
45
10
8
40
35
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM
33
112
42
23
54
122
89
46
13
14
38
12
5:30 PM 5:45 PM
23
78
29
18
28
133
76
39
8
12
45
21
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM
13
62
32
23
20
100
78
48
5
8
30
8
485
677
2027
15%
21%
64%
100%
Peak 15-min(vph)
132
448
168
92
216
488
356
184
52
56
152
48
796 North
Peak 15 -min (vph) 92 216 488
RIGHT THRU LEFT
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 324
PARSONS
BRINCKERHOFF
168 LEFT
448 THRU
Total
Mvmt
612
544
555
563
556
598
510
427
91110A
676
Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
RIGHT 356 592
THRU 184
LEFT 52
748 132 RIGHT 992
LEFT THRU RIGHT
48 152 56
400 South 256
Street: Lindsey Rd
WEEKDAY AM COUNT SHEET
Nnrth
LI L
Intersection: Waimea Middle School Access
I L
I
—I
Date: Wednesday, 3/8/06 1 G
f— H Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
By: C ✓�
R —�
Weather: Sunny A
IK
LI JI
South
Street: Middle School
TIME
A
B
G
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
6:00 AM - 6:15 AM
1
30
0
0
0
0
0
88
8
3
0
2
6:15 AM - 6:30 AM
0
28
0
0
0
0
0
63
2
1
0
2
6:30 AM - 6:45 AM
0
44
0
0
0
0
0
103
5
2
0
3
6:45 AM - 7:00 AM
0
51
0
0
0
0
0
75
5
4
0
2
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM
1
65
0
0
0
0
0
102
14
6
0
2
T 15 AM 7:30 AM
2
35
0
0
0
0
0
70
17
12
0
0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM
5
90
0
0
0
0
0
80
18
20
0
2
7:45 AM 8:00 AM
13
152
0
0
0
0
0
93
56
41
0
9
Peak 15 -min (vph)
52
608
0
0
0
0
0
372
224
164
0
36
o North
Peak 15 -min (vph) 0 0 0
RIGHT THRU LEFT
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 408
PARSONS
6RINCKERHOFF
0 LEFT
608 THRU
Total
Mvmt
132
96
157
137
190
136
215
364
1456
0
Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
RIGHT 0 596
THRU 372
LEFT 224
660 52 RIGHT
772
LEFT THRU RIGHT
36 0 164
276 South 200
Street: Middle School
WEEKDAY AM COURY S!"EET
Nnrit,
r
EI
Intersection: Waimea Middle School Access
I I
— jl ~L—
Date: Wednesday, 9006 G
I i Street: Mat alahoa Hwy
By: i G l ✓
B --�
Weather: Sunny A
L KI J
South
Street: Middle School
TIME
A
13
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
2:00 PM 2:15 PM
6
93
0
0
0
0
0
80
5
13
0
6
2:15 PM - 2:30 PM
0
104
0
0
0
0
0
81
7
17
0
1
2:30 PM - 2:45 PM
0
116
0
0
0
0
0
80
5
5
0
2
2:45 PM 3:00 PM
2
83
0
0
0
0
0
89
11
23
0
2
3:00 PM - 3:15 PM
2
89
0
0
0
0
0
61
2
9
0
0
3:15 PM 3:30 PM
1
117
0
0
0
0
0
90
15
13
0
2
3:30 PM - 3:45 PM
4
106
0
0
0
0
0
90
8
22
0
3
3:45 PM 4:00 PM
2
141
0
0
0
0
0
91
17
25
0
2
Peak 15-min(vph)
8
564
0
0
0
0
0
364
68
100
0
8
o North
Peak 15 -min (vph) 0 0 0
RIGHT THRU LEFT
3:45 PM - 4:00 PM 372
0 LEFT
564 THRU
572 8 RIGHT
76
Street:
PARSONS
BRINCKERHOFF
Total
Mvmt
203
210
208
210
163
238
233
278
1112
0
Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
RIGHT 0 432
THRU 364
LEFT 68
664
LEFT THRU RIGHT
8 0 100
South 108
WEEI' T11P, ' ATF E.:cFt.rt T-FidEl'
Noah
E F
Intersection: Waimea Middle School Access
I � L
Efate: Wednesday, 3(8106 1` G
`
11 Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
BY C A-
B B
Weather: Sunny A
L K J
South
Street: Middle School
TIME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
4:00 PM 4:15 PM
3
83
0
0
0
0
0
70
9
11
0
6
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM
1
125
0
0
0
0
0
99
11
11
0
4
4:30 PM 4:45 PM
6
63
0
0
0
0
0
67
4
12
0
2
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM
4
116
0
0
0
0
0
96
6
13
0
3
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM
2
128
0
0
0
0
0
71
10
11
0
2
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM
3
152
0
0
0
0
0
92
7
13
0
2
5:30 PM 5:45 PM
0
63
0
0
0
0
0
54
0
6
0
0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM
1
109
0
0
0
0
0
63
0
1
0
0
Peak 15-min(vph)
12
608
0
0
0
0
0
368
28
52
0
8
=0=11 North
Peak 15 -min (vphi 0 0 0
RIGHT THRU LEFT
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 376
PARSONS
BR(NCKERHOFF
0 LEFT
608 THRU
Total
Mvmt
182
251
154
238
224
269
123
174
1076
0
Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
RIGHT 0 396
THRU 368
LEFT 28
620 12 RIGHT 660
LEFT THRU RIGHT
8 0 52
40 South 60
Street: Middle School
INEEKDAY PIT, GOURY SKEET
North
108 North
Peak 15 -min (vph) 84 12 12
RIGHT THRU LEFF
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 604
PARSONS
BRINCKERNOFF
24 LEFT
628 THRU
Total
Mvmt
111
257
255
307
286
374
397
398
1592
sa
Street: Kawaihae Rd
RIGHT 40 664
THRU 484
LEFT 140
696 44 RIGHT 728
LEFT THRU RIGHT
36 0 88
196 South 124
Street: Opelo Rd
Intersection: OpelolKawaihae
Date: Wednesday, 3/8/2006 ' 1` G
H Street: Kawaihae Rd
BY: C ,l I
B --+
Weather: Sunny A —�
C[ L KI J
South
Street: Opelo Rd
TIME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
6:00 AM - 615 AM
3
17
0
1
0
0
4
68
5
2
1
10
6:15 AM 6:30 AM
4
29
1
2
1
2
2
180
12
6
0
18
6:30 AM - 6:45 AM
3
52
0
1
0
2
2
150
17
3
0
25
6:45 AM - 7:00 AM
8
84
3
1
1
1
7
153
19
16
2
12
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM
3
79
5
3
4
1
8
131
24
7
2
19
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM
13
142
6
4
1
1
14
131
28
23
1
10
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM
8
146
6
6
4
1
4
154
25
25
1
17
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM
11
157
6
21
3
3
10
121
35
22
0
9
Peak 15 -min (vph)
44
628
24
84
12
12
40
484
140
88
0
36
108 North
Peak 15 -min (vph) 84 12 12
RIGHT THRU LEFF
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 604
PARSONS
BRINCKERNOFF
24 LEFT
628 THRU
Total
Mvmt
111
257
255
307
286
374
397
398
1592
sa
Street: Kawaihae Rd
RIGHT 40 664
THRU 484
LEFT 140
696 44 RIGHT 728
LEFT THRU RIGHT
36 0 88
196 South 124
Street: Opelo Rd
v"EErl"Ph_Y t`irt CE)Ctia f.WE rl
\Rimm
12o North
Peak 15 -min (vph) 48 4 68
RIGHT THRU LEFT
3:00 PM - 3:15 PM 588
16 LEFT
756 THRU
Total
Mvmt
336
317
381
369
434
394
409
346
1736
72
Street: Kawaihae Rd
RIGHT 56 664
THRU 480
LEFT 128
800 28 RIGHT g16
LEFT THRU RIGHT
60 0 92
160 South 152
Street: Opelo Rd
PARSONS
BR/NCKERHOFF
Intersection: Opelo/Kawaihae
Date: Wednesday.. 3/8/2006--- G
w — H Street: Kawaihae Rd
By: C
R
Weather: Sunny
L K J
South
Street: Opelo Rd
TIME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
.1
K
L
2:00 PM - 2:15 PM
1
131
8
5
4
23
9
138
9
4
1
3
2:15 PM - 2:30 PM
5
138
4
4
0
7
12
118
10
14
0
5
2:30 PM 2:45 PM
15
159
8
5
0
20
24
120
16
10
1
3
2:45 PM - 3:00 PM
8
145
11
6
1
23
10
128
16
15
2
4
3:00 PM 3:15 PM
7
189
4
12
1
17
14
120
32
23
0
15
3:15 PM 3:30 PM
7
147
9
8
1
16
6
139
25
27
1
8
3:30 PM 3:45 PM
11
201
9
7
0
13
9
125
15
6
0
13
3:45 PM - 4:00 PM
16
177
6
5
1
15
12
70
11
27
1
5
Peak 15-min(vph)
28
756
16
48
4
68
56
480
128
92
0
60
12o North
Peak 15 -min (vph) 48 4 68
RIGHT THRU LEFT
3:00 PM - 3:15 PM 588
16 LEFT
756 THRU
Total
Mvmt
336
317
381
369
434
394
409
346
1736
72
Street: Kawaihae Rd
RIGHT 56 664
THRU 480
LEFT 128
800 28 RIGHT g16
LEFT THRU RIGHT
60 0 92
160 South 152
Street: Opelo Rd
PARSONS
BR/NCKERHOFF
WEEKDAY MI. CQUlZT SKIRT
Norih
D L F
Intersection: 0pe1o/Kawaihae
Date: Wednesday, 3/8/2006 y G
H Street: Kawaihae Rd
BY: _ _ C ✓
R
Weather: Sunny A y
L K J
South
Street: Opelo Rd
TIME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
4:00 PM 4:15 PM
11
121
9
1
0
17
13
134
14
17
2
10
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM
4
152
11
5
0
1
4
120
15
19
3
9
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM
7
191
11
6
0
6
27
112
17
6
2
3
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM
1
171
6
7
1
2
21
105
10
14
0
8
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM
6
163
10
3
1
7
13
157
13
8
0
8
5:15 PM 5:30 PM
1
129
9
9
3
8
11
145
9
8
1
5
5:30 PM 5:45 PM
4
140
9
8
0
14
15
106
9
4
0
8
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Peak 15 -min (vph)
24
652
40
12
4
28
52
628
52
32
0
32
44 North
Peak 15 -min (vph) 12 4 28
RIGHT THRU LEFT
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM E7771
PARSONS
BRINCKERHOFF
40 LEFT
652 THRU
Total
Mvmt
349
343
388
346
389
338
317
0
1556
92
Street: Kawaihae Rd
RIGHT 52 732
THRU 628
LEFT 52
IF716 24 RIGHT 712
LEFT THRU RIGHT
32 0 32
80 South 64
Street: Opelo Rd
WEEKDAY AM COUNT SHEET
North
D E F
Intersection: Pukalani/Mamalahoa _
Date: Tuesday, 3/7/2006 G
-- t I Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
By: C I
R
Weather: Sunny A
LKJI
South
Street: Pukalani Rd
TIME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
i
J
K
L
6:00 AM - 6:15 AM
0
26
17
6
2
2
22
215
20
2
1
2
6:15 AM - 6:30 AM
3
38
8
16
2
5
21
236
16
5
3
1
6:30 AM 6:45 AM
0
62
8
121
7
11
226
19
3
2
2
6:45 AM - 7:00 AM
4
79
16
11
2
7
15
204
25
11
2
2
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM
1
98
28
18
2
11
11
219
18
4
4
3
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM
0
119
30
16
6
15
15
217
24
7
3
6
7.30 AM - 7:45 AM
2
125
26
11
6
17
8
233
47
16
6
6
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM
0
168
29
10
5
12
8
216
72
13
5
9
Peak 15-min(vph)
0
672
116
40
20
48
32
864
288
52
20
36
Total
Mvrnt
315
354
353
378
417
458
503
547
2188
108 North 168
Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
Peak 15 -min (vph) 40 20 48
RIGHT THRU LEFT
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 940 RIGHT 32 1184
THRU 864
116 LEFT LEFT 288
672 THRU
788 0 RIGHT
772
LEFT THRU RIGHT
36 20 52
308 South 108
Street: Pukalani Rd
PARSONS
BR/NCKERHOFF
WEEKDAY AM COUNT SHEET
North
El FI
Intersection: Pukalani/Mamalahoa � I
�L—
Date: Tuesday, 3/7/2006 G
�— H Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
BY: C f I
R
Weather: Sunny A 1,
L K J
South
Street: Pukalani Rd
TIME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
2:00 PM - 2:15 PM
4
148
30
26
6
29
21
133
35
38
10
12
2:15 PM - 2:30 PM
1
172
38
25
5
23
16
139
23
58
9
18
2:30 PM - 2:45 PM
6
169
41
25
6
33
17
154
28
46
9
15
2:45 PM 3:00 PM
3
191
37
23
7
29
18
155
26
43
11
10
3:00 PM 3:15 PM
3
202
38
23
13
31
10
158
31
44
8
24
3:15 PM 3:30 PM
5
201
39
23
9
32
11
128
21
47
10
18
3:30 PM - 3:45 PM
5
200
41
23
9
23
13
122
31
39
12
18
3:45 PM 4:00 PM
4
211
21
19
5
41
10
130
22
50
11
18
Peak 15-min(vph)
16
844
84
76
20
164
40
520
88
200
44
72
2Bo North
Peak 15 -min (yph) 76 20 164
RIGHT THRU LEFT
3:45 PM - 4:00 PM 668
PARSONS
BRINCKERHOFF
84 LEFT
844 THRU
Total
Mvmt
492
527
549
553
585
544
536
542
2168
168
Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
RIGHT 40 648
THRU 520
LEFT 88
944 16 RIGHT 1208
LEFT THRU RIGHT
72 44 200
124 South 316
Street: Pukalani Rd
WEEKDAY AM COU14T � FEET
North
D C F
Intersection: Pukalani)Mamalahoa I 1 I L—
Date: Tuesday, 3%7/2006 l ,` �— G
H Street: Marnalahoa Hwy
By: C
B --+
Weather: Sunny _ A —ti � }
L K fF-
South
Street: Pukalani Rd
TIME
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
1
J
K
L
4:00 PM 4:15 PM
12
191
14
15
5
28
10
115
21
41
9
17
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM
3
224
21
13
8
25
9
116
33
43
5
14
4:30 PM 4:45 PM
3
204
13
10
4
32
12
109
20
48
10
12
4:45 PM 5:00 PM
5
195
19
14
11
25
7
132
20
46
5
10
5:00 PM 5:15 PM
0
172
17
13
7
33
13
122
18
61
10
13
5:15 PM 5:30 PM
5
231
28
7
7
31
14
109
17
51
14
11
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM
0
164
21
10
8
47
7
83
20
38
5
10
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Peak 15-min(vph)
20
924
112
28
28
124
56
436
68
204
56
44
180 North
Peak 15 -min fvph) 28 28 124
RIGHT THRU LEFT
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 508
112 LEFT
924 THRU
1056 20 RIGHT
116
Street:
PARSONS
BRINCKERHOFF
Total
Mvml
478
514
477
489
479
525
413
0
2100
224
Street: Mamalahoa Hwy
RIGHT 56 560
THRU 436
LEFT 68
1252
LEFT THRU RIGHT
44 56 204
South 304
APPENDIX B SIMTRAFFIC REPORT FOR EXISTING CONDITION
Gounty of fiawaii _ Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PR Americas Inn. December 2007
County of Hawaii Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PB, Arneficas, Inc. December 2007
Siris"i rafiic Simu!:ition'ummr„y
Baseline
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number
1
Avg
Start Time
6:30
6:30
End Time
7:30
7:30
Total Time (min)
60
60
Time Recorded (min)
30
30
# of Intervals
2
2
# of Recorded lntvls
1
1
Vehs Entered
2468
2468
Vehs Exited
2156
2156
Starting Vehs
941
941
Ending Vehs
1253
1253
Denied Entry Before
50
50
Denied Entry After
536
536
Travel Distance (mi)
7629
7629
Travel Time (hr)
682.7
682.7
Total Delay (hr)
423.3
423.3
Total Stops
15229
15229
Fuel Used (gal)
317.4
317.4
Interval #0 Information Seedi
Start Time 6:30
End Time 7:00
Total Time (min) 30
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
Interval #1 Information Recordi
Start Time 7:00
End Time 7:30
Total Time (min) 30
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number
1
Avg
Vehs Entered
2468
2468
Vehs Exited
2156
2156
Starting Vehs
941
941
Ending Vehs
1253
1253
Denied Entry Before
50
50
Denied Entry After
536
536
Travel Distance (mi)
7629
7629
Travel Time (hr)
682.7
682.7
Total Delay (hr)
423.3
423.3
Total Stops
15229
15229
Fuel Used (gal)
317.4
317.4
Sim7raffic Report
Page 1
SirnTia1 is Peifornionce Fleport
Baseline
2: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
WBL
WBT
WBR
SBR
NEL
NER
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
Delay / Veh (s)
9.0
2.5
1.3
1.2
49.5
0.4
5.8
Stop Delay (hr)
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
St Del/Veh (s)
6.2
0.3
0.0
0.1
47.9
0.0
3.9
Total Stops
89
1
0
0
2
0
92
Stop/Veh
0.16
0.09
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.o0
0.10
Travel Dist (mi)
16.4
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.1
14.2
31.0
Travel Time (hr)
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
2.5
Avg Speed (mph)
8
15
15
22
3
27
12
Vehicles Entered
567
12
2
1
2
344
928
Vehicles Exited
567
11
2
1
2
344
927
Hourly Exit Rate
1134
22
4
2
4
688
1854
Input Volume
1778
21
8
3
2
900
2716
% of Volume
64
105
50
67
200
76
68
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SimTraffic Report
Page 2
Sim-l-raffic Perioi i i iancc E sport
Baseline
3: #2 & #1 92 Performance by movement
Movement
SEL
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
NWR
NEL
NET
NER
SWL
SWT
SWR
Total Delay (hr)
10.8
2.1
2.3
1.4
1.2
0.1
5.7
3.6
0.5
0.1
8.7
8.6
Delay / Veh (s)
214.5
90.6
106.3
57.6
64.3
33.4
232.4
79.4
39.3
57.5
152.6
91.5
Stop Delay (hr)
10.2
1.9
2.1
1.2
1.1
0.1
5.5
3.3
0.4
0.1
8.2
8.2
St Del/Veh (s)
202.0
82.0
97.1
52.1
57.9
30.7
223.5
72.2
35.9
52.3
143.5
87.2
Total Stops
312
87
124
77
67
11
162
167
39
10
222
381
Stop/Veh
1.72
1.02
1.57
0.90
0.99
1.38
1.84
1.02
0.93
1.11
1.08
1.12
Travel Dist (mi)
19.2
6.9
8.3
6.8
5.7
0.7
6.5
11.7
3.2
0.7
15.3
26.0
Travel Time (hr)
11.5
2.4
2.7
1.6
1.4
0.1
5.9
4.0
0.6
0.2
9.3
9.7
Avg Speed (mph)
2
3
3
4
4
7
1
3
5
4
2
7
Vehicles Entered
175
85
78
85
67
9
88
159
42
8
209
341
Vehicles Exited
187
85
79
86
69
8
88
168
42
9
203
337
Hourly Exit Rate
374
170
158
172
138
16
176
336
84
18
406
674
Input Volume
540
272
292
184
124
12
220
414
100
34
612
957
% of Volume
69
62
54
93
111
133
80
81
84
53
66
70
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
6
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
0
10
17
3: #2 & #1 #2 Performance by movement
Movement
All
Total Delay (hr)
45.2
Delay / Veh (s)
120.1
Stop Delay (hr)
42.4
St Del/Veh (s)
112.6
Total Stops
1659
Stop/Veh
1.23
Travel Dist (mi)
111.2
Travel Time (hr)
49.5
Avg Speed (mph)
3
Vehicles Entered
1346
Vehicles Exited
1361
Hourly Exit Rate
2722
Input Volume
3761
% of Volume
72
Denied Entry Before
8
Denied Entry After
33
SimTraffic Report
Page 3
n
(' SimTraffic Performzmce Report
Baseline
5: Int Performance by movement
Movement
SEL
SET
SER
NEL
NET
SHUT
SWR
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
4.7
0.8
3.7
4.6
4.6
0.1
3.2
1.8
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
2.7
0.2
2.5
3.6
2.9
0.0
2.7
0.9
Total Stops
5
0
1
5
22
0
9
42
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.05
0.00
1.12
0.30
Travel Dist (mi)
0.8
8.1
0.2
0.2
0.7
0.6
1.1
11.7
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.5
Avg Speed (mph)
21
24
20
12
13
22
19
21
Vehicles Entered
5
92
1
5
22
8
8
141
Vehicles Exited
5
93
1
5
21
8
8
141
Hourly Exit Rate
10
186
2
10
42
16
16
282
Input Volume
10
263
5
10
32
20
15
355
% of Volume
100
71
40
100
131
80
107
79
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SimTraffic Report
Page 4
SimTraitic Fleriforniance Report
Baseline
6: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL,
SBT
SBR
NEL
NET
NER
SWL
SWT
SWR
Total Delay (hr)
0.6
0.5
0.8
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.6
3.2
0.0
4.8
9.2
0.2
Delay / Veh (s)
99.9
86.6
78.5
46.2
76.7
48.1
54.9
39.6
5.7
150.3
74.1
55.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.6
0.4
0.8
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.5
2.8
0.0
4.4
7.9
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
98.0
83.7
77.3
42.4
74.3
47.8
50.3
34.4
5.7
138.2
63.4
48.2
Total Stops
25
18
41
26
9
38
42
185
3
234
519
13
Stop/Veh
1.09
0.95
1.11
1.08
0.90
1.06
1.11
0.63
1.00
2.05
1.16
1.18
Travel Dist (mi)
1.0
0.8
1.7
1.0
0.4
1.5
1.9
14.4
0.1
11.3
42.7
1.1
Travel Time (hr)
0.7
0.5
0.9
0.4
0.2
0.6
0.7
3.7
0.0
5.2
10.6
0.2
Avg Speed (mph)
1
2
2
3
2
3
3
4
12
2
4
5
Vehicles Entered
25
20
40
24
10
36
40
292
3
116
444
12
Vehicles Exited
22
18
35
24
10
36
37
297
3
112
450
11
Hourly Exit Rate
44
36
70
48
20
72
74
594
6
224
900
22
Input Volume
54
32
78
72
30
60
116
792
10
346
1389
48
% of Volume
81
112
90
67
67
120
64
75
60
65
65
46
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
All
Total Delay (hr)
20.9
Delay / Veh (s)
71.0
Stop Delay (hr)
18.6
St Del/Veh (s)
63.2
Total Stops
1153
Stop/Veh
1.09
Travel Dist (mi)
77.9
Travel Time (hr)
23.7
Avg Speed (mph)
3
Vehicles Entered
1062
Vehicles Exited
1055
Hourly Exit Rate
2110
Input Volume
3027
% of Volume
70
Denied Entry Before
0
Denied Entry After
0
SimTraffic Report
Page 5
I SimTrafric Performance Report
Baseline
9: #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBR
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.5
75.0
1.4
0.0
0.2
0.0
77.1
Delay / Veh (s)
1667.8
785.3
993.1
1.5
1.9
1.1
326.6
Stop Delay (hr)
0.4
70.6
1.4
0.0
0.1
0.0
72.5
St Del/Veh (s)
1602.5
738.7
988.8
0.1
0.6
0.5
307.0
Total Stops
4
1172
8
1
14
3
1202
Stop/Veh
4.00
3.41
1.60
0.14
0.04
0.02
1.41
Travel Dist (mi)
0.4
142.7
2.0
1.8
37.1
8.1
192.2
Travel Time (hr)
0.5
79.9
1.5
0.1
1.7
0.4
84.0
Avg Speed (mph)
3
4
1
28
22
19
5
Vehicles Entered
1
352
8
8
355
139
863
Vehicles Exited
1
336
2
7
354
138
838
Hourly Exit Rate
2
672
4
14
708
276
1676
Input Volume
6
1092
12
12
924
377
2423
% of Volume
33
62
33
117
77
73
69
Denied Entry Before
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
Denied Entry After
2
197
0
0
0
0
199
12: #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
5.0
0.4
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.6
1.7
0.1
0.1
0.2
9.1
Delay / Veh (s)
61.5
59.4
66.4
24.4
6.2
6.7
183.8
240.2
55.9
31.6
17.9
40.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.2
4.2
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.6
1.7
0.1
0.1
0.2
7.8
St Del/Veh (s)
52.7
50.4
59.2
18.5
1.8
1.6
180.9
239.9
54.1
27.8
17.1
34.9
Total Stops
20
173
10
9
25
5
16
29
6
7
50
350
Stop/Veh
1.18
0.57
0.45
0.64
0.09
0.09
1.33
1.12
1.20
1.00
1.04
0.44
Travel Dist (mi)
1.8
33.2
2.3
6.6
106.5
25.2
2.7
5.0
1.8
2.1
14.5
201.7
Travel Time (hr)
0.4
6.1
0.5
0.3
4.1
1.0
0.7
1.9
0.1
0.1
0.8
16.0
Avg Speed (mph)
9
7
8
20
26
25
4
3
13
16
19
14
Vehicles Entered
18
305
22
15
290
56
15
29
6
7
49
812
Vehicles Exited
16
301
22
14
293
57
10
23
5
7
47
795
Hourly Exit Rate
32
602
44
28
586
114
20
46
10
14
94
1590
Input Volume
24
628
44
40
756
140
32
88
12
12
84
1860
% of Volume
133
96
100
70
78
81
62
52
83
117
112
85
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
SimTraffic Report
Page 6
SimTraffic Pe:rformanc<! Report
Baseline
15: #1 & Performance by movement
Movement
NWL
NWR
NET
NER
SWI
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.2
10.2
12.2
0.9
0.3
0.2
25.0
Delay / Veh (s)
2092.3 3057.8
143.2
135.3
19.4
3.7
142.2
Stop Delay (hr)
1.2
10.2
9.5
0.7
0.3
0.1
22.0
St Del/Veh (s)
2092.6 3061.2
112.0
108.1
16.2
1.7
125.0
Total Stops
4
13
611
48
46
18
740
Stop/Veh
2.00
1.08
1.99
2.00
0.73
0.08
1.17
Travel Dist (mi)
0.0
0.3
173.8
13.5
5.4
18.6
211.6
Travel Time (hr)
1.2
10.2
18.0
1.4
0.5
0.9
32.2
Avg Speed (mph)
0
0
10
10
10
22
9
Vehicles Entered
2
13
321
27
64
224
651
Vehicles Exited
2
12
294
21
63
225
617
Hourly Exit Rate
4
24
588
42
126
450
1234
Input Volume
18
82
631
52
224
607
1614
% of Volume
22
29
93
81
56
74
76
Denied Entry Before
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
Denied Entry After
3
36
0
0
0
0
39
17: #1 & Performance by movement
Movement
NWL
NWR
NET
NER
SWL
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
2.2
17.3
5.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
25.6
Delay / Veh (s)
991.5 1200.8
68.1
70.6
13.4
3.1
130.0
Stop Delay (hr)
2.2
17.4
4.6
0.2
0.2
0.0
24.6
St Del/Veh (s)
993.9 1204.2
59.1
62.7
10.1
0.6
125.2
Total Stops
7
53
246
10
33
10
359
Stop/Veh
0.88
1.02
0.87
1.11
0.49
0.03
0.51
Travel Dist (mi)
0.1
0.7
22.7
0.9
5.3
22.2
51.9
Travel Time (hr)
2.2
17.4
6.1
0.2
0.5
1.1
27.5
Avg Speed (mph)
1
1
4
4
11
20
5
Vehicles Entered
7
53
286
10
66
288
710
Vehicles Exited
8
52
278
9
69
290
706
Hourly Exit Rate
16
104
556
18
138
580
1412
Input Volume
20
164
666
24
212
837
1923
% of Volume
80
63
83
75
65
69
73
Denied Entry Before
4
17
0
0
0
0
21
Denied Entry After
6
49
0
0
0
0
55
SimTraffic Report
Page 7
Sim T raffic Pe.rforrmince Reperl
Baseline
21: Airport & #1 Performance by movement
� I
SimTraffic Report
i' Page 8
J
Movement
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL-
SBT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
1.2
Delay / Veh (s)
11.7
11.2
2.3
2.9
1.3
7.4
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
12.3
0.7
2.1
0.0
0.1
0.5
'
Total Stops
Stop/Veh
2
1.00
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
0.00
2
0.00
Travel Dist (mi)
0.2
318.9
1.3
0.4
20.0
340.8
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
11.8
0.0
0.0
0.8
12.6
Avg Speed (mph)
14
27
31
23
27
27
'
Vehicles Entered
2
340
2
4
213
561
Vehicles Exited
2
341
1
4
210
558
Hourly Exit Rate
4
682
2
8
420
1116
Input Volume
3
660
4
6
612
1287
% of Volume
133
103
50
133
69
87
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
'
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
23: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.5
0.2
0.1
51.6
0.1
4.5
0.6
58.6
Delay / Veh (s)
17.0
16.9
431.0
369.2
184.4
71.4
214.7
Stop Delay (hr)
1.0
0.1
0.1
39.8
0.1
4.3
0.5
46.0
St Del/Veh (s)
11.0
12.7
353.6
284.9
178.4
67.8
168.7
Total Stops
120
17
5
2240
0
104
36
2522
Stop/Veh
0.37
0.47
5.00
4.45
1.20
1.24
2.57
Travel Dist (mi)
26.5
2.9
0.7
334.9
0.0
5.9
1.9
372.8
Travel Time (hr)
2.4
0.3
0.1
62.8
0.1
4.7
0.7
71.2
Avg Speed (mph)
11
10
5
7
1
3
6
Vehicles Entered
321
36
2
511
0
91
29
990
Vehicles Exited
328
36
1
496
0
84
29
974
Hourly Exit Rate
656
72
2
992
0
168
58
1948
Input Volume
864
72
7
1512
6
205
68
2734
% of Volume
76
100
29
66
0
82
85
71
Denied Entry Before
2
0
0
5
0
0
0
7
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
43
1
1
0
45
� I
SimTraffic Report
i' Page 8
J
Siiri'r fiic 11cric
Ba-eline
27: #1 #2 & Mena Road Performance by movement
EBL
EBT
WBT
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT NBL
NBR
All
0.1
Total Delay (hr)
0.4
0.0
2.0
15.0 2.0
5.1
24.4
76.1
Delay / Veh (s)
4.2
4.9
100.4
88.4 3510.2 3063.8
113.0
84.6
Stop Delay (hr)
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
1.2
9.0 1.9
5.1
17.2
'
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
63.0
52.8 3504.2 3057.4
59.7
221.7
Total Stops
0
0
128
934 4
14
1080
1
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
1.83
1.53 2.00
2.33
1.04
2.00
Travel Dist (mi)
98.9
6.7
35.2
304.2 1.6
5.0
451.6
606.3
Travel Time (hr)
3.7
0.3
3.2
25.3 2.0
5.3
39.7
1.9
Avg Speed (mph)
27
26
12
13 1
1
12
14
Vehicles Entered
331
15
72
643 4
13
1078
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
338
15
68
580 0
0
1001
Hourly Exit Rate
676
30
136
1160 0
0
2002
824
Input Volume
896
34
173
1431 13
19
2566
2
% of Volume
75
88
79
81 0
0
78
4
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
1 0
0
1
33
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
3
7 0
0
10
108
28: #1 #2 & Puu Nani
Performance by
movement
108
Movement
EBL
EBT
WBT
WBR
SBL
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
26.3
0.0
0.0
0.1
26.5
Delay / Veh (s)
76.1
3.5
129.8
139.0
14.1
221.5
113.0
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
18.5
0.0
0.0
0.1
18.6
St Del/Veh (s)
74.0
0.0
91.5
82.5
12.1
221.7
79.4
Total Stops
1
0
767
2
1
1
772
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.00
1.05
2.00
1.00
1.00
0.91
Travel Dist (mi)
0.5
53.5
606.3
0.5
0.5
0.6
661.9
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
1.9
46.7
0.1
0.0
0.1
48.8
'
Avg Speed (mph)
14
28
18
11
26
8
18
Vehicles Entered
1
112
749
1
1
2
866
Vehicles Exited
1
111
709
1
1
1
824
Hourly Exit Rate
2
222
1418
2
2
2
1648
Input Volume
4
350
1575
6
4
3
1942
% of Volume
Denied Entry Before
50
0
63
0
90
3
33
0
50
0
67
0
85
3
Denied Entry After
0
0
108
0
0
0
108
SimTraffic Report
Page 9 '
11
11
SimTraffic i'erfcnf:ci)oi i
Vaseline
29: Int Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR All
j SimTraffic Report
' Page 10
1
Total Delay (fir)
0.3
0.2
0.2
5.0
0.0
0.0
5.7
NER
Delay / Veh (s)
958.9
748.4
141.9
135.8
0.3
0.2
114.3
0.0
Stop Delay (hr)
0.3
0.2
0.1
4.7
0.0
0.0
5.3
1.2
St Del/Veh (s)
956.8
745.8
130.5
126.5
0.0
0.0
107.1
0.0
Total Stops
2
3
5
139
0
0
149
'
Stop/Veh
2.00
3.00
1.25
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.84
Travel Dist (mi)
0.2
0.2
2.9
85.6
1.9
0.4
91.2
3
Travel Time (hr)
0.3
0.2
0.3
7.9
0.1
0.0
8.7
1.00
Avg Speed (mph)
1
1
11
11
19
16
10
0.8
Vehicles Entered
2
3
5
149
31
6
196
0.0
Vehicles Exited
1
0
4
118
31
6
160
28
Hourly Exit Rate
2
0
8
236
62
12
320
' Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
Input Volume
10
7
7
256
65
14
360
91
91
% of Volume
20
0
114
92
95
86
89
20
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
80
30: Int Performance by movement
130
111
150
92
j SimTraffic Report
' Page 10
1
' Movement
WBL
WBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
NEL
NET
NER
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Delay / Veh (s)
0.2
0.5
1.2
1.2
0.4
6.1
2.0
4.1
1.7
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.0
2.8
0.4
2.5
0.7
Total Stops
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
3
16
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.18
Travel Dist (mi)
2.0
6.9
0.9
0.5
0.8
1.7
0.7
0.4
13.9
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.5
Avg Speed (mph)
28
29
27
23
25
20
23
20
26
' Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
10
10
34
34
7
7
8
8
6
6
13
13
10
10
3
3
91
91
Hourly Exit Rate
20
68
14
16
12
26
20
6
182
Input Volume
15
80
20
20
20
20
18
4
197
% of Volume
133
85
70
80
60
130
111
150
92
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
j SimTraffic Report
' Page 10
1
L
11-1 i 'tat iC keport
�3�,Se�ina
33: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement NWL NWR NEL
NET
NER
SWT
All
'
Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
4.7
5.1
1.9
Delay / Veh (s) 254.7 9.9
8.9
2.4
1.0
29.5
19.6
0.7
Stop Delay (hr) 0.1 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.9
4.1
0.0
St Del/Veh (s) 253.2 9.9
5.1
0.1
0.3
24.5
15.6
90.8
Total Stops 2 4
Stop/Veh 1.00 1.00
2
1.00
0
0.00
0
0.00
310
0.54
318
0.34
,
Travel Dist (mi) 0.1 0.3
0.2
35.0
0.2
31.1
66.9
Travel Time (hr) 0.1 0.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
5.7
7.4
0.18
Avg Speed (mph) 1 12
17
24
21
5
9
0.1
Vehicles Entered 2 4
2
352
2
572
934
2.8
Vehicles Exited 2 4
2
352
2
570
932
27
Hourly Exit Rate 4 8
4
704
4
1140
1864
2
Input Volume 7 4
4
932
4
1782
2736
4
% of Volume 57 200
100
76
100
64
68
Hourly Exit Rate
Denied Entry Before 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
'
36: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
% of Volume
200
200
77
64
Movement
SER
NEL
NET
SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.1
1.9
0.0
2.1
,
Delay / Veh (s)
90.5
18.9
0.7
12.3
1.6
8.3
Stop Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
1.4
0.0
1.5
St Del/Veh (s)
90.8
16.1
0.1
8.7
0.0
5.8
,
Total Stops
4
2
2
156
0
164
Stop/Veh
1.00
1.00
0.01
0.27
0.00
0.18
Travel Dist (mi)
0.1
0.1
19.4
25.9
0.1
45.7
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.7
2.8
0.0
3.7
,
Avg Speed (mph)
1
8
27
9
17
12
Vehicles Entered
4
2
346
569
2
923
Vehicles Exited
4
2
347
568
2
923
Hourly Exit Rate
8
4
694
1136
4
1846
Input Volume
4
2
902
1781
3
2692
% of Volume
200
200
77
64
133
69
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
J
SimTraffic Report
Page 1 t
' Movement
SirnTraffic Performance Repori
NET
SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
Baseline
4.6
0.0
10.8
Delay / Veh (s)
101.4
63.7
30.3
39: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
43.0
Stop Delay (hr)
0.1
5.2
4.0
I'
Movement
EBT
WBL
' WBT
NBL
NBT
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
0.0
10.2
2.7
0.1
0.3
13.5
Delay / Veh (s)
1.9
5.5
63.1 4822.1
326.2
24.8
51.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
9.1
2.7
0.1
0.3
12.2
St Del/Veh (s)
0.8
0.0
56.0 4817.6
323.8
4
47.0
Total Stops
21
0
199
5
2
1
228
Stop/Veh
0.06
0.00
0.34
2.50
2.00
1098
0.24
Travel Dist (mi)
14.0
0.2
49.6
0.1
0.0
0.0
63.9
Travel Time (hr)
0.7
0.0
12.0
2.7
0.1
0.3
15.7
Avg Speed (mph)
21
17
11
0
0
0
8
'
Vehicles Entered
345
2
585
5
2
1
940
Vehicles Exited
345
2
583
0
1
0
931
Hourly Exit Rate
690
4
1166
0
2
0
1862
Input Volume
902
8
1800
7
10
4
2733
% of Volume
76
50
65
0
20
0
68
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
' Denied Entry After
0
0
34
0
0
0
34
43: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
' Movement
SER
NET
SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
6.0
4.6
0.0
10.8
Delay / Veh (s)
101.4
63.7
30.3
18.2
43.0
Stop Delay (hr)
0.1
5.2
4.0
0.0
9.2
St Del/Veh (s)
1
101.4
54.7
25.9
14.5
36.9
Total Stops
4
349
233
4
590
Stop/Veh
1.33
1.03
0.42
0.57
0.66
Travel Dist (mi)
0.2
24.8
26.1
0.4
51.4
'
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
6.8
5.6
0.1
12.5
Avg Speed (mph)
2
4
6
7
4
Vehicles Entered
4
341
550
8
903
'
Vehicles Exited
2
339
549
7
897
Hourly Exit Rate
4
678
1098
14
1794
Input Volume
7
926
1551
17
2501
% of Volume
57
73
71
82
72
Denied Entry Before
0
0
2
0
2
Denied Entry After
0
0
4
0
4
SirnTraffic Report
Page 12
Sim -I raffic Performance Report
Baseline
45: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
NWR
NET
NER
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
6.1
0.1
6.2
12.3
Delay / Veh (s)
11.2
63.7
80.4
40.3
49.2
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
5.3
0.1
5.2
10.6
St Del/Veh (s)
11.3
56.0
73.7
33.9
42.4
Total Stops
5
326
4
361
696
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.95
1.33
0.65
0.77
Travel Dist (mi)
0.3
26.8
0.2
39.2
66.5
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
7.1
0.1
7.5
14.7
Avg Speed (mph)
9
4
3
5
5
Vehicles Entered
5
347
3
551
906
Vehicles Exited
5
339
3
552
899
Hourly Exit Rate
10
678
6
1104
1798
Input Volume
10
927
7
1558
2502
% of Volume
100
73
86
71
72
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
50: #1 #2 & Kalake Road Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBT
NBL
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
0.0
1.0
0.1
0.0
1.3
Delay / Veh (s)
6.9
14.1
8.8
15.7
5.7
8.7
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.2
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
0.6
13.5
5.8
1.1
Total Stops
0
0
0
21
4
25
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.95
1.00
0.05
Travel Dist (mi)
62.0
1.6
236.0
6.8
1.3
307.6
Travel Time (hr)
2.3
0.1
9.0
0.3
0.1
11.7
Avg Speed (mph)
27
26
27
21
24
27
Vehicles Entered
113
3
412
22
4
554
Vehicles Exited
111
2
412
22
4
551
Hourly Exit Rate
222
4
824
44
8
1102
Input Volume
350
4
813
29
5
1207
% of Volume
63
100
101
152
160
91
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
SimTraffic Report
Page 13
SitnTraffic Performance Report
Baseline
53: #1 #2 & Mud Lane Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
WBT
- All
Total Delay (hr)
0.7
0.9
1.6
Delay / Veh (s)
22.5
12.0
15.1
Stop Delay (hr)
0.1
0.3
0.5
St Del/Veh (s)
4.8
4.3
4.5
Total Stops
100
269
369
Stop/Veh
0.90
1.01
0.98
Travel Dist (mi)
109.5
126.7
236.2
Travel Time (hr)
4.3
5.2
9.5
Avg Speed (mph)
25
25
25
Vehicles Entered
106
266
372
Vehicles Exited
115
267
382
Hourly Exit Rate
230
534
764
Input Volume
320
538
858
% of Volume
72
99
89
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
56: Int Performance by movement
Movement
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
NEL
NER
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
Delay / Veh (s)
2.6
3.4
1.3
1.6
10.6
2.3
3.2
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
0.1
2.7
0.1
0.2
9.5
2.5
2.1
Total Stops
0
6
0
0
29
5
40
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.19
Travel Dist (mi)
0.6
5.7
2.0
2.9
1.3
0.2
12.8
i Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.8
Avg Speed (mph)
22
23
16
14
9
14
17
Vehicles Entered
5
50
61
64
30
5
215
Vehicles Exited
5
49
61
64
29
5
213
Hourly Exit Rate
10
98
122
128
58
10
426
Input Volume
15
100
186
200
50
10
561
% of Volume
67
98
66
64
116
100
76
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SimTraffic Report
' Page 14
I
Si:mTraffic Perfiornna,ice Report
Baseline
59: Lalamilo Farm Road & #1 Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBR"
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.2
0.0
1.2
Delay / Veh (s)
24.2
3.5
8.2
9.5
3.4
3.2
7.5
Stop Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
17.3
3.7
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.4
Total Stops
13
3
0
0
0
1
17
Stop/Veh
1.08
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.03
Travel Dist (mi)
21.9
5.4
1.4
191.4
52.5
5.7
278.2
Travel Time (hr)
0.8
0.2
0.1
7.3
2.0
0.2
10.6
Avg Speed (mph)
26
30
25
26
27
25
26
Vehicles Entered
12
3
3
341
200
21
580
Vehicles Exited
12
3
2
340
193
22
572
Hourly Exit Rate
24
6
4
680
386
44
1144
Input Volume
23
7
8
660
568
45
1311
% of Volume
104
86
50
103
68
98
87
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
62: #2 & Kohala Mtn Road Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
WBT
°WBR
SEL
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.6
0.9
Delay / Veh (s)
0.5
4.8
3.4
23.7
6.3
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.5
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
21.9
3.8
Total Stops
0
0
0
92
92
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.02
0.18
Travel Dist (mi)
8.2
30.5
10.3
4.2
53.2
Travel Time (hr)
0.3
1.2
0.4
0.8
2.8
Avg Speed (mph)
27
25
23
5
19
Vehicles Entered
196
170
58
92
516
Vehicles Exited
195
174
59
89
517
Hourly Exit Rate
390
348
118
178
1034
Input Volume
389
398
155
181
1123
% of Volume
100
87
76
98
92
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
SimTraffic Report
Page 15
r
I]
Sim] r&ffic P(,;iorm3..ncc Report
Baseline
64: #2 & Performance by movement
SimTraffic Report
' Page 16
Movement
EBL
EBT
WBT
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.2
Delay / Veh (s)
4.2
1.5
1.3
4.0
1.6
'
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
2.0
0.4
0.0
4.1
0.4
Total Stops
Stop/Veh
7
0.33
3
0.02
0
0.00
8
0.89
18
0.04
Travel Dist (mi)
4.0
37.2
7.8
0.2
49.2
Travel Time (hr)
0.2
1.3
0.3
0.0
1.9
Avg Speed (mph)
24
28
24
8
27
Vehicles Entered
21
197
174
8
400
Vehicles Exited
21
196
175
9
401
Hourly Exit Rate
42
392
350
18
802
Input Volume
35
389
398
16
838
% of Volume
120
101
88
112
96
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
65: Kohala Mtn Road & Performance by movement
'
Movement
NBL
SET
SER
NWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
5.8
1.0
1.0
0.2
1.3
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
'
St Del/Veh (s)
5.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.7
Total Stops
20
0
0
0
20
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
Travel Dist (mi)
0.6
18.6
1.5
2.9
23.6
'
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
0.7
0.1
0.2
1.0
Avg Speed (mph)
8
29
26
16
25
1
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
21
20
92
92
7
8
59
58
179
178
Hourly Exit Rate
40
184
16
116
356
Input Volume
35
181
16
155
387
% of Volume
114
102
100
75
92
'
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
SimTraffic Report
' Page 16
'i ri i r< -,fl ic P( rh): i:,L:n Pepuri
Baseline
66: #2 & South Kohala Distr Road Performance by movement
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All
Total Delay (hr)
Delay / Veh (s)
Stop Delay (hr)
St Del/Veh (s)
Total Stops
Stop/Veh
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (mph)
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
Input Volume
% of Volume
Denied Entry Before
Denied Entry After
0.1
0.0
0.1
1.0
0.1
1.2
1.4
15.0
15.0
12.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
3.9
0.4
10.7
0
0
8
11
16
0.00
0.00
0.53
0.05
1.00
46.9
1.4
15.0
220.9
3.3
1.7
0.1
0.6
8.3
0.2
27
25
26
27
19
276
8
15
232
16
274
8
15
231
16
548
16
30
462
32
550
20
31
570
25
100
80
97
81
128
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Network Performance
Total Delay (hr)
423.3
Delay / Veh (s)
659.1
Stop Delay (hr)
346.3
St Del/Veh (s)
539.2
Total Stops
15229
Stop/Veh
6.59
Travel Dist (mi)
7629.3
Travel Time (hr)
682.7
Avg Speed (mph)
14
Vehicles Entered
2468
Vehicles Exited
2156
Hourly Exit Rate
4312
Input Volume
67647
% of Volume
6
Denied Entry Before
50
Denied Entry After
536
0.0 1.2
7.1 7.7
0.0 0.1
6.8 0.9
23 58
1.00 0.10
4.8 292.4
0.2 11.1
22 26
23 570
23 567
46 1134
37 1233
124 92
0 0
0 0
SimTraffic
Report
Page 17
n
11
11
11
n
n
11
I-
Arteri;�l l._evc,l of Scwl:.,e
Baseline
Arterial Level of Service: EE #1
Total 583.8 1579.8 8.6 20
ShTraffic Report
Page 18
Delay
Travel
Dist
Arterial
Cross Street
Node
(s/veh)
time (s)
(mi)
Speed
Airport
21
11.2
124.2
0.9
27
19
1.5
13.6
0.1
26
Lalamilo Farm Road
59
9.5
77.4
0.6
26
1
4.3
36.8
0.3
26
15
143.2
211.4
0.6
10
17
66.8
76.5
0.1
4
3
80.2
88.9
0.1
3
45
66.6
75.4
0.1
4
43
63.8
72.6
0.1
4
6
39.6
45.5
0.1
4
33
2.7
14.8
0.1
24
36
0.7
7.5
0.1
26
#1 #2
2
0.4
5.4
0.0
29
41
0.3
4.0
0.0
27
42
0.4
4.5
0.0
27
39
1.9
6.8
0.0
22
23
17.0
26.9
0.1
12
24
10.3
93.3
0.7
26
26
6.4
55.1
0.4
27
Mana Road
27
4.2
39.7
0.4
40
Puu Nani
28
3.5
61.3
0.5
29
48
10.6
131.5
1.0
28
Kalake Road
50
6.9
72.9
0.6
28
49
9.1
93.3
0.7
27
Mud Lane
53
22.5
140.4
1.0
27
Total 583.8 1579.8 8.6 20
ShTraffic Report
Page 18
Aite.rial t e%,cl of Se vice
Baseline
Arterial Level of Service: WB #1
SimTraffic Report
Page 19
Delay
Travel
Dist
Arterial
Cross Street
Node
(s/veh)
time (s)
(mi)
Speed
Mud Lane
53
12.0
69.7
0.5
25
49
12.3
138.9
1.0
27
Kalake Road
50
8.8
78.3
0.7
33
48
8.7
76.9
0.6
27
Puu Nani
28
129.8
230.8
1.0
22
Mana Road
27
88.5
149.1
0.5
12
26
115.9
169.6
0.4
9
24
144.5
193.6
0.4
8
23
369.2
449.6
0.7
7
39
68.8
79.0
0.1
12
42
11.0
15.9
0.0
9
41
9.8
13.8
0.0
9
2
9.0
12.5
0.0
9
36
12.4
17.9
0.0
9
33
29.4
36.0
0.1
6
6
73.9
85.4
0.1
4
43
31.7
37.4
0.1
6
45
40.3
48.9
0.1
5
#2
3
152.6
161.7
0.1
3
17
4.3
13.8
0.1
21
15
3.5
13.6
0.1
23
1
4.7
73.8
0.6
28
Lalamilo Farm Road
59
3.4
36.0
0.3
27
19
5.5
74.2
0.6
28
Airport
21
1.3
12.8
0.1
28
Total
1351.1
2289.4
8.1
14
SimTraffic Report
Page 19
Arterial Level of Service
Baseline
Arterial Level of Service: EB #2
CrossStreet
Node
Delay;
(slveh)'
Travel
time (s)
Dist
(mi)
Arterial
Speed
64
1.5
24.6
0.2
29
Kohala Mtn Road
62
0.5
5.6
0.0
29
South Kohala Distr R
66
1.1
21.7
0.2
30
11
11.2
133.8
1.0
27
10
23.7
143.9
1.0
25
12
59.4
72.7
0.1
8
#2
9
824.3
874.8
0.4
5
#1
3
214.1
228.4
0.1
2
45
59.8
72.2
0.1
4
43
63.8
72.6
0.1
4
6
39.6
45.5
0.1
4
33
2.7
14.8
0.1
24
36
0.7
7.5
0.1
26
#1 #2
2
0.4
5.4
0.0
29
41
0.3
4.0
0.0
27
42
0.4
4.5
0.0
27
39
1.9
6.8
0.0
22
23
17.0
26.9
0.1
12
24
10.3
93.3
0.7
26
26
6.4
55.1
0.4
27
Mana Road
27
4.2
39.7
0.4
40
Puu Nani
28
3.5
61.3
0.5
29
48
10.6
131.5
1.0
28
Kalake Road
50
6.9
72.9
0.6
28
49
9.1
93.3
0.7
27
Mud Lane
53
22.5
140.4
1.0
27
Total
1396.0
2453.2
9.1
17
SimTraffic Report
Page 20
Arterial Level of -Iervicc
L3,,seIine
Arterial Level of Service: VVB #2
Total 1305.9 2379.1 9.3 16
SimTraffic Report
Page 21
Delay
Travel
Dist >
Arterial
Cross ,Street
Node
(s/veh)
time (s)
(mi)
Speed
Mud Lane
53
12.0
69.7
0.5
25
49
12.3
138.9
1.0
27
Kalake Road
50
8.8
78.3
0.7
33
48
8.7
76.9
0.6
27
Puu Nani
28
129.8
230.8
1.0
22
Mana Road
27
88.5
149.1
0.5
12
26
115.9
169.6
0.4
9
24
144.5
193.6
0.4
8
23
369.2
449.6
0.7
7
39
68.8
79.0
0.1
12
42
11.0
15.9
0.0
9
41
9.8
13.8
0.0
9
2
9.0
12.5
0.0
9
36
12.4
17.9
0.0
9
33
29.4
36.0
0.1
6
6
73.9
85.4
0.1
4
43
31.7
37.4
0.1
6
45
40.3
48.9
0.1
5
#2
3
91.5
103.5
0.1
7
#2
9
1.1
16.7
0.1
23
12
5.9
49.8
0.4
32
10
1.2
16.1
0.1
28
11
9.1
127.7
1.0
28
South Kohala Distr R
66
15.0
129.1
1.0
28
Kohala Mtn Road
62
5.0
26.0
0.2
25
64
1.3
6.6
0.0
25
Total 1305.9 2379.1 9.3 16
SimTraffic Report
Page 21
SimT raffic Simulation Summary Baseline
Baseline 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
Surnmary of All Intervals
Run Number
2 '
Avg
Start Time
4:30
4:30
End Time
5:30
5:30
Total Time (min)
60
60
Time Recorded (min)
30
30
# of Intervals
2
2
# of Recorded,
1
1
Vehs Entered
2536
2536
Vehs Exited
2127
2127
Starting Vehs
969
969
Ending Vehs
1378
1378
Denied Entry Before
363
363
Denied Entry After
1157
1157
Travel Distance (mi)
7449
7449
Travel Time (hr)
970.1
970.1
Total Delay (hr)
716.4
716.4
Total Stops
11993
11993
Fuel Used (gal)
375.5
375.5
Interval #0 Information Seedin(
Start Time 4:30
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min) 30
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
interval #1 Information Recordi
Start Time 5:00
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min) 30
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number
2
Avg
Vehs Entered
2536
2536
Vehs Exited
2127
2127
Starting Vehs
969
969
Ending Vehs
1378
1378
Denied Entry Before
363
363
Denied Entry After
1157
1157
Travel Distance (mi)
7449
7449
Travel Time (hr)
970.1
970.1
Total Delay (hr)
716.4
716.4
Total Stops
11993
11993
Fuel Used (gal)
375.5
375.5
Baseline SimTraffic Report
HL Page 1
SimTraffic Per�ormance. report
Baseline--,_--_
2: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Baseline
4:30 pm 3/7/2006
Movement WBL WBT
SBL
SBR
NER
All
,
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.9
Delay / Veh (s) 0.3 0.2
128.2
1.0
4.3
3.2
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.4
St De►/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0
126.6
0.1
2.0
1.5
Total Stops 0 0
1
0
31
32
Stop/Veh 0.00 0.00
1.00
0.00
0.05
0.03
Travel Dist (mi) 8.3 0.3
0.1
0.1
27.2
36.0
Travel Time (hr) 0.3 0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
2.1
Avg Speed (mph) 27 28
2
24
19
20
Vehicles Entered 287 15
1
1
666
970
Vehicles Exited 288 14
1
1
669
973
Hourly Exit Rate 576 28
2
2
1338
1946
Input Volume 975 44
4
3
2034
3070
'
% of Volume 59 64
50
67
66
63
Denied Entry Before 0 0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 1 1 '
t
17
�1
I
Baseline SirnTraffic Report
HL Page 2 ,
Sil;-61_ta fic Perfoi-maiiG(- Rerport
Flaseline
3: #2 & #1 #2 Performance by movement
All
Total Delay (hr)
91.0
Delay / Veh (s)
303.5
Stop Delay (hr)
Baseline
4:30 pm 3%7/2006
Movement
SEL
SET
SER
NWL
_
NWT
NWR
NEL
NET
NER
SWIL
SWT
SWR
Total Delay (hr)
12.0
2.2
0.9
11.4
32.7
16.0
5.4
5.9
1.6
1.2
1.1
0.7
Delay / Veh (s)
159.2
109.8
89.0 2157.6 2219.7 1990.8
257.8
126.9
124.5
110.2
50.4
12.4
'
Stop Delay (hr)
11.0
2.0
0.8
11.3
32.5
16.0
5.2
5.5
1.5
1.1
1.0
0.5
St Del/Veh (s)
146.8
96.4
77.4 2147.5 2209.7 1984.7
249.7
119.6
120.9
106.2
45.1
9.6
Total Stops
426
82
47
40
99
58
120
134
38
47
69
181
'
Stop/Veh
1.57
1.12
1.31
2.11
1.87
2.00
1.60
0.80
0.84
1.24
0.86
0.94
Travel Dist (mi)
28.1
7.4
3.9
1.8
4.5
2.5
5.4
12.6
3.4
2.8
5.9
14.2
Travel Time (hr)
13.0
2.5
1.1
11.5
32.8
16.1
5.6
6.3
1.7
1.3
1.3
1.3
Avg Speed (mph)
2
3
4
1
1
1
1
3
4
2
4
11
Vehicles Entered
269
74
37
18
54
30
72
168
45
39
77
193
Vehicles Exited
272
72
36
20
52
28
77
167
45
37
83
193
Hourly Exit Rate
544
144
72
40
104
56
154
334
90
74
166
386
Input Volume
976
332
184
72
228
84
252
672
198
78
276
534
% of Volume
56
43
39
56
46
67
61
50
45
95
60
72
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
11
35
18
1
2
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
28
79
37
3
8
2
0
0
0
3: #2 & #1 #2 Performance
by movement
Movement
All
Total Delay (hr)
91.0
Delay / Veh (s)
303.5
Stop Delay (hr)
88.5
St Del/Veh (s)
295.4
Total Stops
1341
Stop/Veh
1.24
Travel Dist (mi)
92.6
Travel Time (hr)
94.5
Avg Speed (mph)
2
Vehicles Entered
1076
Vehicles Exited
1082
Hourly Exit Rate
2164
Input Volume
3886
% of Volume
56
Denied Entry Before
67
Denied Entry After
157
Baseline SimTraffic Report
HL Page 3
Baseline SirnTraffioReport
HL Page
BassUine
�ase! i O8
4�Qpm3��08G
5: #2/� P��8[O1�nC�b
movement
��
Movement
-
SET NEL
NET
SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay /Voh (o)
1.2 2.7
4.4
0.1
2.8
1.6
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
StDe|/Veh(o)
02 2.2
2.7
0.0
2.3
0.8
Total Stops
0 8
21
O
7
34
Stop/Vah
0.00 0.86
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.18
Tmwo| Dist (mi)
127 0.2
0.7
0.0
0.9
15.5
Travel Time (hr)
0.5 0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
07
Avg Speed (mph)
23 13
13
22
10
22
Vehicles Entered
146 6
21
13
7
193
Vehicles Exited
144 7
21
13
7
192
m�
Hourly Exit Rate
288 14
42
28
14
384
Input Volume
549 10
32
20
15
041
%ofVolume
52 140
131
130
93
80
m�
Denied Entry Before
U 0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0 O
O
U
O
0
Baseline SirnTraffioReport
HL Page
Sirn���ific l='e�(�r��zanct. Report Baseline
Baseline 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
6: 41 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
NEL
NET
NER
SWIL
SWT
SWR
Total Delay (hr)
0.5
1.0
2.6
17.8
4.3
3.5
2.0
4.6
0.1
0.4
0.8
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
95.6
166.7
113.2 1602.7
1299.3
1555.9
Denied Entry After
141.6
28.6
21.5
64.5
12.8
11.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.4
1.0
2.6
17.7
4.3
3.5
1.9
3.5
0.1
0.3
0.6
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
94.7
163.2
112.2 1597.5
1294.5
1553.6
135.0
21.5
17.9
60.0
9.3
9.1
Total Stops
12
20
74
68
18
15
72
337
10
18
89
16
Stop/Veh
0.71
0.95
0.90
1.70
1.50
1.88
1.41
0.58
0.59
0.90
0.38
0.48
Travel Dist (mi)
0.5
0.7
2.7
1.6
0.4
0.3
2.6
28.3
0.8
2.1
21.9
3.2
Travel Time (hr)
0.5
1.0
2.7
17.9
4.3
3.5
2.1
5.6
0.1
0.4
1.6
0.2
Avg Speed (mph)
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
5
6
5
14
13
Vehicles Entered
16
23
83
41
11
9
55
578
17
21
235
33
Vehicles Exited
17
20
82
39
13
8
48
583
17
20
234
33
Hourly Exit Rate
34
40
164
78
26
16
96
1166
34
40
468
66
Input Volume
44
56
204
124
28
28
168
1852
30
84
736
102
% of Volume
77
71
80
63
93
57
57
63
113
48
64
65
Denied Entry Before
0
0
1
22
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
3
6
43
9
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
6: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
All
Total Delay (hr)
37.6
Delay / Veh (s)
121.2
Stop Delay (hr)
36.0
St Del/Veh (s)
115.8
Total Stops
749
Stop/Veh
0.67
Travel Dist (mi)
65.2
Travel Time (hr)
40.0
Avg Speed (mph)
4
Vehicles Entered
1122
Vehicles Exited
1114
Hourly Exit Rate
2228
Input Volume
3456
% of Volume
64
Denied Entry Before
30
Denied Entry After
68
Baseline SimTraffic Report
HL Page 5
SimTralric Peronnana klcpc)ri Dasc;Iinc
Baseline pm 31712000,
9: #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBR
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.7
131.6
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
132.5
Delay / Veh (s)
645.6 1266.8
5.7
1.3
1.6
1.1
676.4
Stop Delay (hr)
0.7
125.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
126.5
St Del/Veh (s)
593.0 12.11.1
4.6
0.1
0.5
0.5
646.1
Total Stops
11
1162
1
0
1
5
1180
Stop/Veh
2.75
3.11
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.05
1.67
Travel Dist (mi)
1.8
163.8
0.3
1.3
24.2
5.7
197.0
Travel Time (hr)
0.8
137.2
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.3
139.4
Avg Speed (mph)
5
5
23
29
22
19
5
Vehicles Entered
4
369
1
5
230
92
701
Vehicles Exited
4
378
2
5
229
91
709
Hourly Exit Rate
8
756
4
10
458
182
1418
Input Volume
9
1480
12
12
724
290
2527
% of Volume
89
51
33
83
63
63
56
Denied Entry Before
0
93
0
0
0
0
93
Denied Entry After
2
314
0
0
0
0
316
12: #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.1
60.7
2.8
0.1
0.8
0.1
3.5
9.1
5.7
1.2
2.4
87.5
Delay / Veh (s)
340.9
629.2
914.2
24.2
13.6
18.7 1586.2
1726.1 1565.1
2234.9 1744.1
479.6
Stop Delay (hr)
1.1
59.1
2.8
0.1
0.4
0.1
3.5
9.1
5.6
1.2
2.4
85.4
St Del/Veh (s)
326.6
613.0
901.5
18.5
6.9
12.5 1584.9
1730.1 1561.9
2228.4 1743.6
468.1
Total Stops
17
359
10
11
56
9
13
22
21
5
8
531
Stop/Veh
1.42
1.03
0.91
0.58
0.28
0.50
1.62
1.16
1.62
2.50
1.60
0.81
Travel Dist (mi)
1.4
40.8
1.3
8.3
89.2
8.0
1.0
2.4
4.7
1.2
2.0
160.2
Travel Time (hr)
1.2
62.0
2.8
0.4
3.8
0.4
3.6
9.2
5.8
1.3
2.5
93.0
Avg Speed (mph)
5
5
5
20
23
21
0
0
1
1
1
5
Vehicles Entered
11
342
12
18
198
18
14
24
21
5
8
671
Vehicles Exited
12
351
11
19
207
18
3
15
5
0
2
643
Hourly Exit Rate
24
702
22
38
414
36
6
30
10
0
4
1286
Input Volume
40
913
29
52
632
52
32
88
28
4
12
1882
% of Volume
60
77
76
73
66
69
19
34
36
0
33
68
Denied Entry Before
0
33
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35
Denied Entry After
9
151
7
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
176
Baseline SirnTraffic Report
HL Page 6 ,
n
Sim raffic Performance Report Baseline
Baseline 4 30 pm 3/7/2006
15: #1 & Performance by movement
Movement
NWL
NWR
NET
NER
SWL
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.7
7.6
45.8
0.6
0.1
0.6
55.5
Delay / Veh (s)
5474.6
602.0
579.9
35.4
11.7
427.8
Stop Delay (hr)
0.7
7.6
39.9
0.6
0.1
0.5
49.4
St Del/Veh (s)
5478.0
524.7
510.0
31.6
9.7
381.0
Total Stops
0
8
1507
22
8
34
1579
Stop/Veh
1.60
5.50
5.50
0.67
0.20
3.38
Travel Dist (mi)
0.0
0.2
151.6
2.2
0.9
13.4
168.3
Travel Time (hr)
0.7
7.6
50.9
0.7
0.2
1.0
61.1
Avg Speed (mph)
1
0
3
3
6
14
3
Vehicles Entered
0
6
278
5
12
172
473
Vehicles Exited
0
4
270
3
12
172
461
Hourly Exit Rate
0
8
540
6
24
344
922
Input Volume
8
52
956
12
42
552
1622
% of Volume
0
15
56
50
57
62
57
Denied Entry Before
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
Denied Entry After
4
16
0
0
0
0
20
17: #1 & Performance by movement
Movement
NWL
NWR
NET
NER
SWL
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
3.6
33.9
0.9
0.1
0.1
38.9
Delay / Veh (s)
803.2
481.2
291.3
24.1
2.1
309.8
Stop Delay (hr)
0.3
3.6
33.3
0.9
0.1
0.0
38.1
St Del/Veh (s)
806.4
471.3
284.6
21.3
0.3
303.6
Total Stops
1
14
197
7
7
0
226
Stop/Veh
0.88
0.78
0.64
0.58
0.00
0.50
Travel Dist (mi)
0.0
0.4
21.9
0.9
0.8
11.1
35.1
Travel Time (hr)
0.3
3.6
34.7
0.9
0.1
0.5
40.2
Avg Speed (mph)
1
0
3
4
7
22
4
Vehicles Entered
1
16
256
10
12
159
454
Vehicles Exited
0
16
253
11
12
158
450
Hourly Exit Rate
0
32
506
22
24
316
900
Input Volume
4
32
1047
42
36
547
1708
% of Volume
0
100
48
52
67
58
53
Denied Entry Before
0
0
37
1
0
0
38
Denied Entry After
1
4
81
3
0
0
89
Baseline SimTraffrc Report
HL Page 7
Mizi fefPerornance Report
.Baseline
21: Airport & #1 Performance by movement
EBT
EBR
Baseline
4:30 pm 3/7/2006
Movement WBR NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
_
All
,
Total Delay (hr) 0.1 20.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.7
63.5
Delay / Veh (s) 166.7 148.3
9.8
18.7
1.0
117.7
Stop Delay (hr) 0.1 16.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.3
'
St Del/Veh (s) 167.1 116.9
1.0
16.1
0.1
92.8
7.4
Total Stops 3 807
0
1
0
811
130.8
Stop/Veh 1.00 1.62
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.28
99.8
Travel Dist (mi) 0.3 461.5
1.9
0.1
12.2
476.0
'
Travel Time (hr) 0.2 36.0
0.1
0.0
0.4
36.7
5
Avg Speed (mph) 2 13
28
11
28
13
0.23
Vehicles Entered 3 564
2
1
131
701
1.04
Vehicles Exited 3 432
2
1
128
566
13.4
Hourly Exit Rate 6 864
4
2
256
1132
220.5
Input Volume 3 990
4
4
408
1411
68.2
% of Volume 200 87
100
50
63
80
'
Denied Entry Before 0 5
0
0
0
5
3
Denied Entry After 0 2
0
0
0
2
Vehicles Entered
649
31
25
267
4
'
23: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
26
1159
Vehicles Exited
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
59.6
3.3
7.7
63.5
0.7
0.9
0.1
0.7
136.4
Delay / Veh (s)
333.4
391.8 1267.5 1024.5 1218.2
102.8
3.5
92.4
444.9
Stop Delay (hr)
58.2
3.2
7.4
59.7
0.6
0.8
0.1
0.7
130.8
St Del/Veh (s)
325.3
386.3 1217.8
963.8 1145.5
99.8
2.1
90.7
426.4
'
Total Stops
130
7
80
758
10
25
5
27
1042
Stop/Veh
0.20
0.23
3.64
3.40
5.00
0.83
0.04
1.04
0.94
Travel Dist (mi)
53.9
2.5
13.4
140.6
1.3
2.0
5.1
1.7
220.5
Travel Time (hr)
61.5
3.4
8.2
68.2
0.7
0.9
0.3
0.7
143.9
Avg Speed (mph)
13
13
2
3
3
2
17
2
4
Vehicles Entered
649
31
25
267
4
30
127
26
1159
Vehicles Exited
640
30
19
179
1
30
125
26
1050
Hourly Exit Rate
1280
60
38
358
2
60
250
52
2100
Input Volume
2088
129
48
780
6
52
230
48
3381
% of Volume
61
47
79
46
33
115
109
108
62
Denied Entry Before
69
5
0
2
0
0
0
0
76
Denied Entry After
161
9
4
132
2
0
0
0
308
1
Baseline SirnTraffic Report
HL Page 8
SimTraffic Performance Repori Baseline
Baseline 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
27: #1 #2 & Mana Road Performance bV movement
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
NBL
NBR
All.
Total Delay (hr)
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
1.6
Delay / Veh (s)
5.5
7.4
10.7
7.0
12.2
9.9
6.1
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
10.5
9.1
0.3
Total Stops
0
0
3
0
11
14
28
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.03
Travel Dist (mi)
224.1
5.1
5.8
118.0
4.8
6.1
364.0
Travel Time (hr)
8.6
0.2
0.2
4.5
0.2
0.3
13.9
Avg Speed (mph)
26
25
25
27
24
23
26
Vehicles Entered
655
11
13
242
11
14
946
Vehicles Exited
651
12
11
234
11
14
933
Hourly Exit Rate
1302
24
22
468
22
28
1866
Input Volume
2094
42
24
473
27
31
2691
% of Volume
62
57
92
99
81
90
69
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28: #1 #2 & Puu Nani Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBT
WBT
WBR
SBL
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.5
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.6
Delay / Veh (s)
14.9
5.2
14.1
10.9
6.4
1.9
8.7
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
7.6
0.1
0.3
0.0
5.5
2.1
0.3
Total Stops
5
0
0
0
3
4
12
Stop/Veh
0.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75
1.00
0.02
Travel Dist (mi)
3.5
169.5
235.2
4.2
1.5
2.0
415.8
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
6.3
8.9
0.2
0.1
0.1
15.6
Avg Speed (mph)
24
27
26
27
24
29
27
Vehicles Entered
7
375
244
4
3
4
637
Vehicles Exited
7
382
248
4
4
4
649
Hourly Exit Rate
14
764
496
8
8
8
1298
Input Volume
8
1217
489
8
4
3
1729
% of Volume
175
63
101
100
200
267
75
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Baseline SirnTraffic Report
HL Page 9
Sint l raffic Performance Report Baseline
Baseline s - - 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
29: Int Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
` NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.3
Delay / Veh (s)
18.8
10.7
4.8
0.3
0.4
4.1
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
18.1
5.8
1.9
0.1
0.1
1.7
Total Stops
2
1
8
0
0
11
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.33
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.05
Travel Dist (mi)
0.1
1.8
108.4
2.0
0.4
112.6
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.1
3.9
0.1
0.0
4.1
Avg Speed (mph)
8
27
28
18
17
28
Vehicles Entered
2
3
179
43
6
233
Vehicles Exited
2
3
181
42
5
233
Hourly Exit Rate
4
6
362
84
10
466
Input Volume
10
7
320
163
14
522
% of Volume
40
86
113
52
71
89
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
30: Int Performance by movement
Movement
WBL
WBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
NEL
NET
NER
Alt'
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Delay / Veh (s)
0.1
0.5
0.4
0.6
0.8
6.2
2.1
4.0
1.2
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.0
2.6
0.2
2.6
0.4
Total Stops
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
2
11
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.10
Travel Dist (mi)
1.2
9.0
1.1
1.2
1.8
1.2
0.7
0.3
16.5
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.6
Avg Speed (mph)
29
29
26
23
24
20
24
19
27
Vehicles Entered
6
45
9
18
14
9
10
2
113
Vehicles Exited
6
44
9
18
14
9
10
2
112
Hourly Exit Rate
12
88
18
36
28
18
20
4
224
Input Volume
15
80
20
20
20
20
18
4
197
% of Volume
80
110
90
180
140
90
111
100
114
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Baseline SimTraffic Report
HL Page 10
t
i�
1
L
u
1
1
L
!I Sim-Lraffic Penurmance Rehori
Baseline
33: #1 4-2 & Performance by movement
Baseline
4:30 pm 3/7/2006
Fl�
Baseline SirnTraffic Report
' HL Page 11
Movement
NWL
NWR
NEL
NET
NER
SWIL
SWT
All
0.0
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
0.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.7
2.3
Delay / Veh (s)
139.4
33.4
4.9
12.2
5.6
18.9
0.3
9.7
'
Stop Delay (hr)
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
32
St Del/Veh (s)
138.2
33.4
0.0
3.1
0.0
18.9
0.0
3.2
0.1
Total Stops
7
1
0
317
0
0
0
325
2.3
Stop/Veh
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.33
3
Travel Dist (mi)
0.5
0.1
0.1
68.5
0.2
0.0
15.3
84.7
958
Travel Time (hr)
0.3
0.0
0.0
4.8
0.0
0.0
0.5
5.6
4
Avg Speed (mph)
2
6
20
14
17
0
28
15
64
Vehicles Entered
7
1
1
699
2
0
282
992
0
Vehicles Exited
7
1
1
700
2
1
285
997
Hourly Exit Rate
14
2
2
1400
4
2
570
1994
Input Volume
7
4
4
2168
4
5
922
3114
% of Volume
200
50
50
65
100
40
62
64
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
36: #1 #2 & Performance
by movement
Fl�
Baseline SirnTraffic Report
' HL Page 11
Movement
SER
NEL
NET
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.6
Delay / Veh (s)
2.3
6.0
3.1
0.6
2.3
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
2.4
2.7
0.5
0.0
0.4
Total Stops
3
1
28
0
32
Stop/Veh
1.00
1.00
0.04
0.00
0.03
Travel Dist (mi)
0.1
0.1
37.1
13.1
50.3
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.0
1.8
0.5
2.3
Avg Speed (mph)
12
15
20
27
22
Vehicles Entered
3
1
663
289
956
Vehicles Exited
3
1
663
291
958
Hourly Exit Rate
6
2
1326
582
1916
Input Volume
4
3
2031
975
3016
% of Volume
150
67
65
60
64
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
Fl�
Baseline SirnTraffic Report
' HL Page 11
S 111 -I ri,i R( -1),-)i i
'�se,inc
39: #11 .2 & Performance by movernent
Movement EBT WBT NBL
NBT
NBR
L'ase:iinc '
41:30 pin 3/7/2006
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.2
0.2
_
0.2
0.0
0.1
1.8
Delay / Veh (s)
6.4
2.3
297.7
1.8
514.8
6.5
Stop Delay (hr)
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.9
St Del/Veh (s)
2.4
1.4
296.3
0.0
514.7
3.5
Total Stops
72
0
3
0
1
76
Stop/Veh
0.11
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.08
Travel Dist (mi)
27.6
21.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
48.9
Travel Time (hr)
2.1
0.9
0.3
0.0
0.1
3.4
Avg Speed (mph)
13
26
0
19
0
15
Vehicles Entered
678
291
3
4
1
977
Vehicles Exited
674
296
3
4
1
978
Hourly Exit Rate
1348
592
6
8
2
1956
Input Volume
2036
1020
7
10
4
3087
% of Volume
66
58
86
80
50
'
63
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
43: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
SER
NET
SWT SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
8.8
0.1
0.0
8.9
Delay / Veh (s)
2.1
49.0
1.5
1.5
33.7
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
6.5
0.0
0.0
6.5
St Del/Veh (s)
2.5
36.0
0.4
0.3
24.6
'
Total Stops
1
504
2
0
507
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.78
0.01
0.00
0.53
Travel Dist (mi)
0.0
47.9
13.2
0.4
61.5
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
10.4
0.6
0.0
11.0
Avg Speed (mph)
14
5
23
17
6
Vehicles Entered
1
643
298
9
951
Vehicles Exited
1
649
296
9
955
Hourly Exit Rate
2
1298
592
18
1910
'
Input Volume
7
2053
866
15
2941
% of Volume
29
63
68
120
65
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
Baseline SirnTraffic Report
HL Page 12 ,
G
r
C
� I
u
5irn-ha.fiic Per`Mn-r3iic:e IR(,p;)iL E>aseline
Baseline 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
45: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement NWR NET NER SWT All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
17.8
0.1
0.1
18.2
Delay / Veh (s)
98.1
100.8
54.7
0.8
68.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.2
16.3
0.1
0.0
16.6
St Del/Veh (s)
98.2
92.5
49.8
0.0
63.1
Total Stops
8
517
3
1
529
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.82
0.38
0.00
0.56
Travel Dist (mi)
0.4
41.8
0.5
21.4
64.2
Travel Time (hr)
0.2
19.4
0.1
0.8
20.6
Avg Speed (mph)
2
5
10
27
7
Vehicles Entered
8
633
8
297
946
Vehicles Exited
8
635
8
299
950
Hourly Exit Rate
16
1270
16
598
1900
Input Volume
10
2043
11
873
2937
% of Volume
160
62
145
68
65
Denied Entry Before
0
14
1
0
15
Denied Entry After
0
20
0
0
20
50: #1 #2 & Kalake Road Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
NBL
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
1.3
Delay / Veh (s)
9.4
4.2
9.5
8.3
11.8
6.2
8.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
2.5
0.2
10.2
6.1
0.4
Total Stops
0
0
4
0
9
8
21
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.67
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.04
Travel Dist (mi)
170.2
1.7
3.9
134.6
2.9
2.6
315.8
Travel Time (hr)
6.6
0.1
0.1
5.0
0.1
0.1
12.0
Avg Speed (mph)
26
25
26
27
22
23
26
Vehicles Entered
310
3
6
206
9
8
542
Vehicles Exited
304
3
6
205
9
8
535
Hourly Exit Rate
608
6
12
410
18
16
1070
Input Volume
1016
14
4
413
9
6
1462
% of Volume
60
43
300
99
200
267
73
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Baseline SimTraffic Report
HL Page 13
�rir raiii ' F'c; is n-,ari opt of i
F3 a.F,eIiiie
53: ##1 #2 & Mud Lane Performance b)
Movement
EBT
WBT
All
Total Delay (hr)
2.4
0.5
3.0
Delay / Veh (s)
29.3
10.2
21.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.6
0.2
0.8
St Del/Veh (s)
7.6
3.7
6.1
Total Stops
262
188
450
Stop/Veh
0.88
0.99
0.92
Travel Dist (mi)
301.9
90.3
392.3
Travel Time (hr)
12.7
3.6
16.2
Avg Speed (mph)
24
25
24
Vehicles Entered
301
191
492
Vehicles Exited
298
188
486
Hourly Exit Rate
596
376
972
Input Volume
952
368
1320
% of Volume
63
102
74
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
56: Int Performance by movement
Seline
x:30 pni 3/7/2005
movemerii
Movement
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
NEL
NER
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.4
Delay / Veh (s)
4.2
13.0
1.7
0.7
25.6
12.9
7.3
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.3
St Del/Veh (s)
2.4
11.2
0.3
0.3
24.6
13.1
6.3
Total Stops
1
16
1
0
21
12
51
Stop/Veh
0.12
0.32
0.03
0.00
1.05
1.09
0.26
Travel Dist (mi)
0.9
6.1
0.8
2.2
0.9
0.5
11.5
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.9
Avg Speed (mph)
20
16
16
14
5
7
13
Vehicles Entered
7
52
30
79
21
12
201
Vehicles Exited
8
49
30
78
19
11
195
Hourly Exit Rate
16
98
60
156
38
22
390
Input Volume
15
100
50
200
50
10
425
% of Volume
107
98
120
78
76
220
92
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Baseline
HL
SirnTraffic Report
Page 14
r
1
L
H
r
1
1
1
SimTraffic Performance Repoi i Baseline
Baseline u� 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
59: Lalamilo Farm Road & #1 Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL"
"NBT
SBT
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.5
0.0
0.3
32.6
0.1
0.0
33.4
Delay / Veh (s)
292.3
3.8
182.4
311.2
2.1
2.9
215.3
Stop Delay (hr)
0.5
0.0
0.2
27.6
0.0
0.0
28.3
St Del/Veh (s)
290.0
3.7
141.1
263.2
0.0
0.0
181.9
Total Stops
8
5
10
1165
0
1
1189
Stop/Veh
1.33
1.00
2.00
3.09
0.00
0.08
2.13
Travel Dist (mi)
12.7
7.8
2.8
207.4
35.1
3.5
269.4
Travel Time (hr)
0.9
0.3
0.3
39.5
1.3
0.1
42.5
Avg Speed (mph)
14
29
8
5
28
26
6
Vehicles Entered
7
4
5
422
153
13
604
Vehicles Exited
6
5
5
332
153
13
514
Hourly Exit Rate
12
10
10
664
306
26
1028
Input Volume
23
7
8
985
515
45
1583
% of Volume
52
143
125
67
59
58
65
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
62: #2 & Kohala Mtn Road Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
WBT
WBR
SEL
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.3
0.4
Delay / Veh (s)
0.5
2.2
1.0
15.1
2.7
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
0.1
13.5
1.7
Total Stops
0
0
0
62
62
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.13
Travel Dist (mi)
12.1
17.4
5.4
2.9
37.8
Travel Time (hr)
0.4
0.7
0.2
0.4
1.7
Avg Speed (mph)
27
27
25
8
22
Vehicles Entered
289
104
30
63
486
Vehicles Exited
290
105
31
62
488
Hourly Exit Rate
580
210
62
124
976
Input Volume
532
339
96
123
1090
% of Volume
109
62
65
101
90
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
Baseline SirnTraffic Report
HL Page 15
Siml-raffic Performance Report
Baseline
64: #2 & Performance by movement
NBL
Baseline
4:30 pin 3/7/2006
SER
Movement
EBL EBT
, WBT
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0 0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
1.8 1.4
0.7
3.1
1.3 ,
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
0.1 0.4
0.0
3.2
0.5
Total Stops
0 0
0
20
20
Stop/Veh
0.00 0.00
0.00
1.00
0.05
Travel Dist (mi)
0.4 55.1
4.2
0.5
60.2
Travel Time (hr)
0.0 2.0
0.2
0.1
2.2
Avg Speed (mph)
25 28
26
8
28
Vehicles Entered
2 292
92
20
406
Vehicles Exited
2 289
93
20
404
Hourly Exit Rate
4 578
186
40
808
Input Volume
9 532
304
27
872
% of Volume
44 109
61
148
93
Denied Entry Before
0 0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0 0
0
0
0
65: Kohala Mtn Road & Performance by movement
Denied Entry Before
Movement
NBL
SET
SER
NWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Delay / Veh (s)
3.3
0.4
1.0
0.1
0.5
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
2.6
0.2
0.4
0.0
0.2
Total Stops
2
0
0
0
2
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
Travel Dist (mi)
0.1
12.8
4.1
1.5
18.5
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.7
Avg Speed (mph)
10
29
26
16
27
Vehicles Entered
2
63
19
31
115
Vehicles Exited
2
63
20
31
116
Hourly Exit Rate
4
126
40
62
232
Input Volume
9
123
27
96
255
% of Volume
44
102
148
65
91
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
Baseline SimTraffic Report
HL Page 16
Baseline SimTraffic Report
HL Page 17
' SimTraffic Performance report
Total Delay (hr)
716.4
Delay / Veh (s)
1106.5
Baseline
649.7
Baseline
1003.4
Total Stops
11993
Stop/Veh
5.15
4130 pm 3/7/2.006
66: #2 & South Kohala Distr Road Performance by movernent
Travel Time (hr)
970.1
'
Movement EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
NBL
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr) 0.1
0.0
0.1
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.8
Delay / Veh (s) 1.5
0.7
14.9
10.3
6.9
6.5
4.9
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s) 0.1
0.0
3.4
0.4
5.3
6.1
0.6
Total Stops 0
0
9
9
9
18
45
Stop/Veh 0.00
1
0.00
0.69
0.05
1.00
1.00
0.08
Travel Dist (mi) 59.7
1.3
13.7
153.9
1.9
3.9
234.2
Travel Time (hr) 2.2
0.0
0.5
5.7
0.1
0.2
8.8
Avg Speed (mph) 27
25
26
27
22
22
27
Vehicles Entered 345
7
14
184
9
19
578
Vehicles Exited 343
7
13
188
9
18
578
Hourly Exit Rate 686
14
26
376
18
36
1156
Input Volume 635
20
31
641
25
37
1389
% of Volume 108
70
84
59
72
97
83
Denied Entry Before 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I' Denied Entry After 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Network Performance
Baseline SimTraffic Report
HL Page 17
Total Delay (hr)
716.4
Delay / Veh (s)
1106.5
Stop Delay (hr)
649.7
St Del/Veh (s)
1003.4
Total Stops
11993
Stop/Veh
5.15
Travel Dist (mi)
7449.1
Travel Time (hr)
970.1
Avg Speed (mph)
12
Vehicles Entered
2536
Vehicles Exited
2127
Hourly Exit Rate
4254
Input Volume
74853
% of Volume
6
Denied Entry Before
363
Denied Entry After
1157
Baseline SimTraffic Report
HL Page 17
Pu Lerital Leval of Se: vi; e Baseline
Baseline 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
Arterial Level of Service: EB #1
Total 2618.6 3626.0 8.6 11
Baseline SirnTraffic Report
HL Page 18
Delay
Travel
Dist
Arterial
Cross Street'
Node
(s/veh)
time (s)
(mi)
Speed
Airport
21
148.3
260.2
0.9
13
19
32.0
44.1
0.1
8
Lalamilo Farm Road
59
311.2
377.7
0.6
5
1
225.6
257.9
0.3
4
15
602.0
668.6
0.6
3
17
490.0
500.4
0.1
3
#2
3
124.7
133.7
0.1
3
45
141.0
147.8
0.1
8
43
49.0
58.0
0.1
5
6
28.6
34.5
0.1
5
33
14.0
26.0
0.1
14
36
3.1
9.9
0.1
20
#1 #2
2
4.3
9.3
0.0
20
41
3.0
6.7
0.0
16
42
4.2
8.3
0.0
14
39
6.4
11.3
0.0
13
23
334.0
344.1
0.1
13
24
12.2
95.3
0.7
26
26
7.7
57.0
0.4
26
Mana Road
27
5.5
47.2
0.4
34
Puu Nani
28
5.2
59.5
0.5
30
48
15.5
140.7
1.0
26
Kalake Road
50
9.4
76.9
0.6
27
49
12.3
98.6
0.7
26
Mud Lane
53
29.3
152.4
1.0
25
Total 2618.6 3626.0 8.6 11
Baseline SirnTraffic Report
HL Page 18
Arterial Leve;; cif E3a: eine
Baseline 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
Arterial Level of Service: WB #1
Baseline SirnTraffic Report
HL Page 19
Delay
Travel
Dist
Arterial
Cross Street
Node '
(s/veh)
time (s)
(mi)
Speed
Mud Lane
53
10.2
68.0
0.5
26
49
10.6
137.6
1.0
27
Kalake Road
50
8.3
87.8
0.7
29
48
6.8
74.3
0.6
27
Puu Nani
28
14.1
130.3
1.0
29
Mana Road
27
7.1
67.4
0.5
27
26
6.3
60.2
0.4
27
24
44.2
93.3
0.4
16
23
1024.5
1100.7
0.7
4
39
2.4
10.9
0.1
32
42
0.3
5.3
0.0
28
41
0.3
4.4
0.0
27
2
0.3
3.8
0.0
28
36
0.6
6.0
0.0
27
33
0.3
6.8
0.1
29
6
12.9
24.3
0.1
15
43
1.6
7.0
0.1
27
45
0.8
9.6
0.1
28
#2
3
50.4
59.5
0.1
5
17
2.9
11.2
0.1
26
15
11.7
21.1
0.1
16
1
4.5
74.3
0.6
27
Lalamilo Farm Road
59
2.1
29.9
0.3
32
19
4.4
73.8
0.6
28
Airport
21
1.0
12.5
0.1
29
Total
1228.8
2180.1
8.1
17
Baseline SirnTraffic Report
HL Page 19
L_r.,v(-'i of �Icrvice i EiIf1P
Baseline 1100 pni "x1712006
Arterial Level of Service: EF)' 12
Total 2698.4 3771.7 9.1 17
Baseline SimTraffic Report
HL Page 20
Delay
Travel
Dist
Arterial
Cross Street
_ Node
(s/veh)
time (s)__
(mi)
Speed
64
1.4
24.5
0.2
29
Kohala Mtn Road
62
0.5
5.5
0.0
29
South Kohala Distr R
66
1.5
22.4
0.2
29
11
11.6
132.2
1.0
27
10
30.7
150.5
1.0
24
12
629.2
643.5
0.1
5
#2
9
1311.7
1364.7
0.4
5
#1
3
109.8
122.2
0.1
3
45
58.3
70.6
0.1
4
43
49.0
58.0
0.1
5
6
28.6
34.5
0.1
5
33
14.0
26.0
0.1
14
36
3.1
9.9
0.1
20
#1 #2
2
4.3
9.3
0.0
20
41
3.0
6.7
0.0
16
42
4.2
8.3
0.0
14
39
6.4
11.3
0.0
13
23
334.0
344.1
0.1
13
24
12.2
95.3
0.7
26
26
7.7
57.0
0.4
26
Mana Road
27
5.5
47.2
0.4
34
Puu Nani
28
5.2
59.5
0.5
30
48
15.5
140.7
1.0
26
Kalake Road
50
9.4
76.9
0.6
27
49
12.3
98.6
0.7
26
Mud Lane
53
29.3
152.4
1.0
25
Total 2698.4 3771.7 9.1 17
Baseline SimTraffic Report
HL Page 20
Arterial Level of Servic- Baseline
Baseline 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
Arterial Level of Service: WB 92
Total 1207.1 2297.6 9.3 18
Baseline SimTraffic Report
HL Page 21
Delay
Travel
Dist
Arterial
Cross Street
Node
(s/veh)
time (s)
(mi)
Speed
Mud Lane
53
10.2
68.0
0.5
26
49
10.6
137.6
1.0
27
Kalake Road
50
8.3
87.8
0.7
29
48
6.8
74.3
0.6
27
Puu Nani
28
14.1
130.3
1.0
29
Mana Road
27
7.1
67.4
0.5
27
26
6.3
60.2
0.4
27
24
44.2
93.3
0.4
16
23
1024.5
1100.7
0.7
4
39
2.4
10.9
0.1
32
42
0.3
5.3
0.0
28
41
0.3
4.4
0.0
27
2
0.3
3.8
0.0
28
36
0.6
6.0
0.0
27
33
0.3
6.8
0.1
29
6
12.9
24.3
0.1
15
43
1.6
7.0
0.1
27
45
0.8
9.6
0.1
28
#2
3
12.4
24.2
0.1
12
#2
9
3.0
16.7
0.1
23
12
13.6
67.5
0.4
24
10
1.6
16.8
0.1
27
11
11.5
135.1
1.0
26
South Kohala Distr R
66
10.3
111.2
1.0
32
Kohala Mtn Road
62
2.3
22.3
0.2
29
64
0.7
6.1
0.0
26
Total 1207.1 2297.6 9.3 18
Baseline SimTraffic Report
HL Page 21
1
APPENDIX C SIMTRAFFIC REPORT FOR 2011 CONDITION
County of Hawaii Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PB Americas, Inc. December 2007
L SirriTraffic Simulation Summary PRC; and Lalamilo Farm Connecior
Short-term 7:45 am 7/28/2006
J
F�
Summary of All Intervals
Run Number
term\AM
Avg
Start Time
7:15
7:15
End Time
8:15
8:15
Total Time (min)
60
60
Time Recorded (min)
30
30
# of Intervals
2
2
# of Recorded Intvls
1
1
Vehs Entered
3614
3614
Vehs Exited
3491
3491
Starting Vehs
1156
1156
Ending Vehs
1279
1279
Denied Entry Before
25
25
Denied Entry After
11
11
Travel Distance (mi)
12727
12727
Travel Time (hr)
628.6
628.6
Total Delay (hr)
186.8
186.8
Total Stops
7772
7772
Fuel Used (gal)
811.0
811.0
HL Page 1
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Recording
Start Time 7:15
Start Time
End Time 7:45
Total Time (min) 30
End Time
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
HL Page 1
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Interval #1 Information
Recording
Start Time
7:45
End Time
8:15
Total Time (min)
30
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number term\AM
Avg
Vehs Entered
3614
3614
Vehs Exited
3491
3491
Starting Vehs
1156
1156
Ending Vehs
1279
1279
Denied Entry Before
25
25
Denied Entry After
11
11
Travel Distance (mi)
12727
12727
Travel Time (hr)
628.6
628.6
Total Delay (hr)
186.8
186.8
Total Stops
7772
7772
Fuel Used (gal)
811.0
811.0
HL Page 1
Parsons Brinckerhoff
im1-raffi ; Performance Report PRC Gn6 Lala,ililo Farm Connector
Short-term 7:45 am 7/28/2006
2: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
WBT
WBR
SBL
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
Delay / Veh (s)
0.7
0.7
0.2
32.0
5.9
0.8
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Def/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.4
5.8
0.1
Total Stops
0
0
0
3
2
5
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
Travel Dist (mi)
18.9
20.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
39.8
Travel Time (hr)
0.7
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.6
Avg Speed (mph)
26
24
16
7
15
24
Vehicles Entered
460
821
11
3
2
1297
Vehicles Exited
461
823
10
3
2
1299
Hourly Exit Rate
922
1646
20
6
4
2598
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
3: #2 & #1 #2 Performance by movement
Movement
SEL
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
NWR
NET
NER
" SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
5.0
1.7
1.4
0.5
1.2
0.1
1.2
0.2
1.5
3.9
16.8
Delay / Veh (s)
65.4
55.1
52.6
45.0
34.2
48.0
21.6
15.6
18.9
30.7
36.6
Stop Delay (hr)
4.4
1.5
1.2
0.4
1.1
0.1
1.0
0.2
1.2
3.2
14.4
St Del/Veh (s)
58.1
47.7
45.3
40.3
30.3
45.5
18.6
14.3
14.5
25.3
31.3
Total Stops
295
98
124
35
78
9
108
27
103
381
1258
Stop/Veh
1.07
0.88
1.29
0.88
0.60
0.82
0.55
0.61
0.35
0.84
0.76
Travel Dist (mi)
28.8
10.1
10.1
6.2
17.5
1.6
14.4
3.3
21.0
33.8
147.0
Travel Time (hr)
6.1
2.1
1.8
0.7
1.9
0.2
1.7
0.3
2.3
5.4
22.5
Avg Speed (mph)
5
5
6
8
9
7
8
9
10
8
7
Vehicles Entered
278
112
99
38
131
10
197
44
294
456
1659
Vehicles Exited
272
112
94
42
127
11
198
44
295
454
1649
Hourly Exit Rate
544
224
188
84
254
22
396
88
590
908
3298
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HL Page 2
Parsons Brinckerhoff
U
it
11
11
11
I
LI
LJ
11
Sim -Traffic Performance Report PRC and Lalamilo Farm Corinector
Short-term 7:45 am 7/28/2006
5: #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
SEL
SET
SER
-NWL
NWT
NWR
NEL
NET
SWL
SWR
`: All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.4
Delay / Veh (s)
3.3
1.3
2.3
2.7
1.1
0.5
7.2
2.4
7.9
6.2
3.1
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
St Del/Veh (s)
1.3
0.1
0.0
0.4
0.1
0.0
4.8
1.0
5.7
5.6
1.7
Total Stops
1
0
0
0
0
0
22
25
71
41
160
Stop/Veh
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.25
1.01
1.05
0.33
Travel Dist (mi)
0.7
12.5
0.5
0.7
21.1
1.2
3.4
10.1
5.1
3.2
58.4
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.2
2.7
Avg Speed (mph)
21
25
24
22
25
24
20
25
14
14
22
Vehicles Entered
4
116
3
4
126
7
22
102
70
40
494
Vehicles Exited
5
113
3
4
127
7
22
101
70
39
491
Hourly Exit Rate
10
226
6
8
254
14
44
202
140
78
982
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement -
- NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR-
NEL
NET
SWC
SWT
-SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.7
3.0
2.4
5.2
0.2
14.7
Delay / Veh (s)
57.5
76.3
51.4
59.4
39.6
20.9
67.5
30.4
65.1
27.9
30.3
36.5
Stop Delay (hr)
0.4
0.5
0.8
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.7
2.6
2.1
3.8
0.2
12.4
St Del/Veh (s)
54.6
73.3
51.1
56.1
35.4
20.1
63.6
26.1
58.4
20.2
24.8
30.8
Total Stops
29
24
55
47
16
37
45
270
149
405
16
1093
Stop/Veh
1.12
0.89
0.95
0.85
0.84
0.95
1.15
0.75
1.14
0.60
0.67
0.75
Travel Dist (mi)
1.1
1.1
2.4
2.3
0.8
1.6
2.0
17.5
13.2
66.3
2.3
110.6
Travel Time (hr)
0.5
0.6
1.0
1.0
0.2
0.3
0.8
3.6
2.9
7.5
0.3
18.8
Avg Speed (mph)
2
2
3
2
3
5
2
5
5
9
8
6
Vehicles Entered
26
28
58
54
19
38
42
362
135
673
23
1458
Vehicles Exited
26
27
58
56
19
39
36
356
127
671
25
1440
Hourly Exit Rate
52
54
116
112
38
78
72
712
254
1342
50
2880
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
' HL Page 3
Parsons Brinckerhoff
1
SirnTraffi- Performwice Fir -:pori IARC aiid Lalamilu Fane Connector
Short-tern'i -/:45 am 7/28/2.006
8: Parker Ranch Connector & Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
NEL
NET
SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.3
Delay / Veh (s)
15.6
0.7
10.7
5.6
2.0
1.6
1.3
2.2
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
13.0
0.0
10.9
3.4
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.9
Total Stops
13
0
3
1
1
0
0
18
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.50
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.04
Travel Dist (mi)
2.4
2.2
0.6
0.4
37.3
13.6
0.7
57.3
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
1.4
0.7
0.0
2.4
Avg Speed (mph)
16
28
18
21
27
21
19
24
Vehicles Entered
13
23
3
2
190
178
9
418
Vehicles Exited
13
22
3
2
189
178
9
416
Hourly Exit Rate
26
44
6
4
378
356
18
832
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9: #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBR
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
2.2
0.5
0.0
1.3
0.0
4.1
Delay / Veh (s)
53.8
16.4
183.9
15.7
8.2
0.8
13.4
Stop Delay (hr)
0.1
0.4
0.4
0.0
0.1
0.0
1.1
St Del/Veh (s)
39.7
3.3
179.7
14.0
0.8
0.4
3.7
Total Stops
8
70
10
6
37
1
132
Stop/Veh
1.14
0.14
1.11
0.67
0.06
0.04
0.12
Travel Dist (mi)
3.3
202.5
2.8
2.1
56.1
2.0
268.7
Travel Time (hr)
0.2
9.2
0.6
0.1
3.6
0.1
13.7
Avg Speed (mph)
15
22
5
19
16
21
20
Vehicles Entered
8
488
11
10
575
24
1116
Vehicles Exited
7
482
7
8
574
24
1102
Hourly Exit Rate
14
964
14
16
1148
48
2204
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HL Page 4
Parsons Brinckerhoff I
Sing f raffic Perforn iai i -e Report PRC and ( .alamilo Farm Connector
Short-term 7:45 am 7/28/2006
12: 92 & Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 1.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.3 3.4
Delay / Veh (s) 12.9 6.7 4.5 19.7 9.7 8.9 35.5 26.9 40.0 48.0 21.1 10.9
Stop Delay (hr) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.3
St Del/Veh (s) 8.0 0.6 0.3 7.1 1.2 1.2 32.8 25.6 37.7 43.3 19.1 4.1
Total Stops
3
19
1
7
38
6
13
39
6
6
45
183
Stop/Veh
0.75
0.05
0.06
0.44
0.08
0.10
0.81
0.72
1.00
0.86
0.82
0.16
Travel Dist (mi)
0.5
46.5
2.0
7.2
179.6
28.1
2.9
9.7
1.8
2.1
16.7
296.9
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
2.3
0.1
0.3
7.4
1.2
0.3
0.8
0.1
0.2
0.9
13.7
t
1
HL Page 5
Parsons Brinckerhoff
1
Avg Speed (mph)
14
20
19
22
24
24
11
12
14
13
18
22
Vehicles Entered
4
381
16
17
501
64
16
53
6
7
54
1119
Vehicles Exited
4
381
16
15
502
63
16
54
6
7
56
1120
Hourly Exit Rate
8
762
32
30
1004
126
32
108
12
14
112
2240
1
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'
15: #1 & Performance by movement
Movement
NWL
NWR
NET
NER
SWI
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.8
Delay / Veh (s)
19.9
9.1
3.2
2.6
6.3
1.9
4.3
Stop Delay (hr)
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.4
St Del/Veh (s)
17.5
8.5
0.4
0.1
3.3
0.1
2.0
Total Stops
40
34
0
0
34
1
109
Stop/Veh
1.05
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.42
0.00
0.17
Travel Dist (mi)
3.8
3.2
26.9
8.2
6.7
23.6
72.4
Travel Time (hr)
0.4
0.2
1.1
0.4
0.4
1.0
3.4
Avg Speed (mph)
11
17
25
23
16
24
22
Vehicles Entered
39
33
158
46
79
284
639
Vehicles Exited
38
34
156
44
80
283
635
Hourly Exit Rate
76
68
312
88
160
566
1270
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t
1
HL Page 5
Parsons Brinckerhoff
1
Shoft tern
17: 41 & Performance by movement
Movement NWL NWR NET NER SWL SWT
i "C c .16l �_c?�� illiiCi Fano GollflE'cloi
4 and 7128/2006
Ail
Total Delay (hr)
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.2
'L2
Delay / Veh (s)
33.9
19.7
1.4
1.1
6.2
2.7
6.1
Stop Delay (hr)
0.5
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.9
St Del/Veh (s)
35.1
21.2
0.1
0.2
2.4
0.2
4.4
Total Stops
40
52
0
0
34
0
126
Stop/Veh
0.82
0.96
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.17
Travel Dist (mi)
0.7
0.8
14.8
2.2
6.8
24.9
50.1
Travel Time (hr)
0.5
0.4
0.6
0.1
0.4
1.2
3.2
Avg Speed (mph)
2
3
24
21
16
21
17
Vehicles Entered
50
55
181
28
89
324
727
Vehicles Exited
48
54
182
28
88
323
723
Hourly Exit Rate
96
108
364
56
176
646
1446
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21: Airport & #1 Performance by movement
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
2.3
0.0
0.0
0.3
2.6
Delay / Veh (s)
36.5
11.5
20.7
9.0
5.5
3.0
11.7
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
34.4
11.5
0.6
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.4
Total Stops
2
1
0
0
0
0
3
Stop/Veh
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Travel Dist (mi)
0.2
0.1
367.1
0.9
0.1
40.3
408.7
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.0
14.8
0.0
0.0
1.7
16.7
Avg Speed (mph)
7
13
25
25
20
23
25
Vehicles Entered
2
1
395
1
1
407
807
Vehicles Exited
2
1
392
1
1
406
803
Hourly Exit Rate
4
2
784
2
2
812
1606
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HL
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Page 6 11
11
�I
I]
u
J
Ii
Sirrfiic 'eo�inrRe�or1m dUamilo Farm Gonne ctor
Short-term 7:45 am 712812.006
23: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.7
0.1
1.1
5.5
0.0
1.0
0.1
9.4
Delay / Veh (s)
9.4
6.7
85.7
24.5
15.2
47.4
18.5
21.0
Stop Delay (hr)
0.9
0.0
0.9
1.9
0.0
0.9
0.1
4.8
St Del/Veh (s)
5.1
3.8
69.6
8.6
4.9
44.2
16.6
10.6
Total Stops
139
11
51
261
0
65
16
543
Stop/Veh
0.22
0.35
1.11
0.32
0.00
0.86
1.23
0.34
Travel Dist (mi)
52.5
2.6
16.2
300.1
1.3
5.0
0.9
378.5
Travel Time (hr)
3.6
0.2
1.7
15.7
0.1
1.2
0.1
22.5
Avg Speed (mph)
14
15
10
20
22
4
8
18
Vehicles Entered
624
32
45
812
3
75
14
1605
Vehicles Exited
640
31
46
818
4
77
13
1629
Hourly Exit Rate
1280
62
92
1636
8
154
26
3258
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
27: #1 #2 & Mana Road Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
NBL
-NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
2.0
0.1
1.0
4.7
0.4
0.5
8.6
Delay / Veh (s)
11.9
14.2
35.6
21.6 1339.5
192.7
20.4
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.4
0.5
1.2
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
13.3
0.0 1336.3
191.4
2.8
Total Stops
0
0
75
0
2
9
86
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.78
0.00
2.00
1.00
0.06
Travel Dist (mi)
244.9
6.0
49.4
389.5
0.9
4.8
695.4
Travel Time (hr)
10.4
0.3
2.7
17.8
0.4
0.7
32.2
Avg Speed (mph)
23
23
18
22
2
7
22
Vehicles Entered
616
14
96
789
2
11
1528
Vehicles Exited
612
13
96
786
1
8
1516
Hourly Exit Rate
1224
26
192
1572
2
16
3032
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HL
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Page 7
Jlfi"l t 1'GrlUi
Short -terns
28: 91 * & Puu Bans Performance by movernent
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBR
Total Delay (hr)
Delay / Veh (s)
Stop Delay (hr)
St Del/Veh (s)
Total Stops
Stop/Veh
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (mph)
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
Denied Entry Before
Denied Entry After
1.0
2.1
21.1
3589.8
14.7
85.1
1.0
0.1
8.7
3584.3
0.4
35.2
2
1
0
2.00
0.00
0.00
1.0
241.4
695.4
1.0
10.4
44.8
1
23
19
2
510
900
0
501
884
0
1002
1768
0
0
24
0
1
8
11
0.1
0.9
25.2
138.7 3410.8
64.6
0.0
0.9
10.7
35.5 3411.4
27.6
0
1
4
0.00
1.00
0.00
2.5
0.5
940.8
0.1
1.0
57.3
19
1
19
3
1
1416
2
1
1388
4
2
2776
0
0
24
0
0
9
29: Civic Center Loop & Kamamalu Performance by movement
and ' _n,.I:,.rrll&r F Iri o Goi infector
7:45 an) 7/28/2006
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
7.8
2.6
4.8
1.1
1.0
0.4
1.2
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
6.6
2.6
3.1
0.2
0.7
0.4
0.7
Total Stops
7
2
3
2
0
0
14
Stop/Veh
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.05
Travel Dist (mi)
0.7
0.1
0.4
9.2
7.3
0.3
18.0
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.4
0.0
0.8
Avg Speed (mph)
15
15
19
27
22
17
24
Vehicles Entered
8
2
4
87
170
9
280
Vehicles Exited
7
2
4
87
172
8
280
Hourly Exit Rate
14
4
8
174
344
16
560
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HL Page 8
Parsons Brinckerhoff I
t
t
0
t
i
ri
[I
1
U-
SiniTraffic Performance Report FIRC and Lalarnilo Farm Connector
Short-term 7:45 am 7/28/2006
30: Int Performance by movement
Movement
WBL
WBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
NEL
NET
NER
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
0.5
0.4
2.0
1.9
0.8
8.3
1.5
4.5
1.8
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.1
0.2
3.9
0.7
Total Stops
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
4
18
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.12
Travel Dist (mi)
0.9
5.9
4.4
0.2
1.8
1.9
1.4
0.5
17.0
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.7
Avg Speed (mph)
24
27
25
25
23
18
25
19
24
Vehicles Entered
7
58
35
3
14
14
19
4
154
Vehicles Exited
7
58
35
3
14
14
19
4
154
Hourly Exit Rate
14
116
70
6
28
28
38
8
308
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31: #2 & Parker Ranch Connector Performance by movement
Movement
SEL
SET_
; SER
NEL
NET
SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.0
1.3
Delay / Veh (s)
24.9
16.4
13.7
7.3
5.5
2.7
1.6
8.0
Stop Delay (hr)
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
St Del/Veh (s)
22.6
13.3
12.6
1.7
0.5
0.0
0.0
4.5
Total Stops
49
25
72
20
11
0
0
177
Stop/Veh
0.96
0.83
1.01
0.26
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.30
Travel Dist (mi)
6.8
4.5
10.4
24.0
49.7
23.0
11.4
129.8
Travel Time (hr)
0.6
0.3
0.7
1.0
2.0
0.9
0.5
6.0
Avg Speed (mph)
11
15
15
24
25
26
25
22
Vehicles Entered
50
31
71
79
192
116
57
596
Vehicles Exited
51
30
71
77
192
116
57
594
Hourly Exit Rate
102
60
142
154
384
232
114
1188
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HL Page 9
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Sirnl rafiic Perfon riance Report PRC and La!amilo Farm Connector
Short-ie rm 7:45 am 7/2.8/2006
33: #1 #2 & Performance bV movement
Movement
WBL
WBT
SEL
SER
NWL
NWR
NET
NER
NER2
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.2
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
1.7
Delay / Veh (s)
5.5
2.5
193.3
8.8
29.8
4.8
1.4
2.2
2.9
4.7
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
St Del/Veh (s)
0.1
0.0
192.2
8.9
28.9
4.8
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.5
Total Stops
21
0
2
4
5
2
0
0
0
34
Stop/Veh
0.03
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
Travel Dist (mi)
47.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.6
45.7
0.2
94.4
Travel Time (hr)
2.9
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.0
5.0
Avg Speed (mph)
16
17
1
9
6
15
22
24
22
19
Vehicles Entered
823
1
2
4
5
2
11
456
2
1306
Vehicles Exited
822
1
2
4
5
2
11
457
2
1306
Hourly Exit Rate
1644
2
4
8
10
4
22
914
4
2612
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
36: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
WBT
WBR
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.5
Delay / Veh (s)
0.9
1.6
1.3
18.2
1.3
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
0.3
18.2
0.0
Total Stops
0
1
1
2
4
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.33
1.00
0.00
Travel Dist (mi)
27.4
34.5
0.1
0.1
62.0
Travel Time (hr)
1.1
1.5
0.0
0.0
2.6
Avg Speed (mph)
26
23
17
5
24
Vehicles Entered
461
822
3
2
1288
Vehicles Exited
460
822
3
2
1287
Hourly Exit Rate
920
1644
6
4
2574
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
HL Page 10
Parsons Brinckerhoff
j
Siml raffic Perforrnance Report PkC and l alamiio Farm Connector
Short-term 7:45 am 7/28/2006
39: #1 #2 & Parker Ranch Connector Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT'
NBL'
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
2.4
0.0
1.9
1.0
0.1
0.8
6.2
Delay / Veh (s)
19.1
36.2
73.5
4.5
51.2
14.5
14.1
Stop Delay (hr)
2.0
0.0
1.7
0.4
0.1
0.7
4.9
St Del/Veh (s)
15.9
34.1
68.3
1.6
48.1
12.5
11.2
Total Stops
238
4
89
100
5
178
614
Stop/Veh
0.52
1.00
0.98
0.12
1.25
0.85
0.39
Travel Dist (mi)
18.0
0.2
7.4
68.3
0.3
13.8
107.9
Travel Time (hr)
3.0
0.0
2.2
3.4
0.1
1.5
10.2
Avg Speed (mph)
6
3
3
20
4
10
11
Vehicles Entered
456
4
89
825
3
210
1587
Vehicles Exited
455
4
92
826
4
210
1591
Hourly Exit Rate
910
8
184
1652
8
420
3182
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
40: Civic Center Loop & Parker Ranch Connector Performance by movement
Movement
WBL
WBT_
WBR-
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.3
Delay / Veh (s)
10.6
0.3
2.9
2.5
12.0
3.5
4.6
3.3
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
8.6
0.1
2.4
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
Total Stops
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
Travel Dist (mi)
0.5
0.4
0.1
51.0
0.3
0.2
6.7
59.2
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
2.5
Avg Speed (mph)
14
20
18
25
21
16
17
24
Vehicles Entered
4
7
1
182
1
3
94
292
Vehicles Exited
4
7
1
186
1
3
95
297
Hourly Exit Rate
8
14
2
372
2
6
190
594
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HL Page 11
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Sim T ra{Iic; }erforrnz.nce RI -port PRC arid. I-alamilo [=arm Connector
Short-term 7:45 am 7/28/2006
43: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
SER
NET
SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.4
0.8
0.0
1.2
Delay / Veh (s)
23.4
3.3
3.9
2.5
3.7
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.4
St Del/Veh (s)
24.2
1.5
0.9
0.3
1.2
Total Stops
3
39
55
0
97
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.09
0.08
0.00
0.08
Travel Dist (mi)
0.1
30.2
38.1
0.5
69.0
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
1.4
2.1
0.0
3.6
Avg Speed (mph)
5
21
18
16
19
Vehicles Entered
3
412
724
11
1150
Vehicles Exited
3
411
726
11
1151
Hourly Exit Rate
6
822
1452
22
2302
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
45: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
NWR
NET
NER
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.0
1.3
1.5
Delay / Veh (s)
3.5
1.2
1.5
6.6
4.5
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.6
St Del/Veh (s)
3.5
0.1
0.1
2.6
1.7
Total Stops
6
2
0
153
161
Stop/Veh
0.86
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.13
Travel Dist (mi)
0.3
34.3
0.5
52.7
87.8
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
1.5
0.0
3.1
4.7
Avg Speed (mph)
14
23
19
17
19
Vehicles Entered
6
461
6
729
1202
Vehicles Exited
7
458
6
729
1200
Hourly Exit Rate
14
916
12
1458
2400
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
HL Page 12
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Ll
D,
1
Siml'raific Porfor n -lance Deport PRC and L.alamilo Pai n i Connector
Snort -term 7:45 am 7/23/2006
50:41 #2 & Kalake Road Performance by movement
Movement-
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
NBL
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.9
0.0
0.0
2.5
0.1
0.0
4.5
Delay / Veh (s)
13.9
15.0
28.8
19.7
27.0
17.6
16.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.3
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
11.8
1.2
25.3
15.3
1.1
Total Stops
0
0
4
0
15
6
25
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.07
1.00
0.03
Travel Dist (mi)
226.5
1.5
2.4
274.9
4.5
1.9
511.7
Travel Time (hr)
9.6
0.1
0.1
11.9
0.3
0.1
22.0
Avg Speed (mph)
24
23
22
23
17
20
23
Vehicles Entered
486
2
5
456
14
6
969
Vehicles Exited
482
3
4
448
14
6
957
Hourly Exit Rate
964
6
8
896
28
12
1914
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
53: #1 #2 & Mud Lane Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
WBT
SBL
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
3.5
1.9
0.0
0.0
5.4
Delay / Veh (s)
41.5
19.9
6.5
1.1
30.0
Stop Delay (hr)
0.7
0.8
0.0
0.0
1.5
St Del/Veh (s)
8.3
8.3
4.8
1.8
8.2
Total Stops
265
337
1
2
605
Stop/Veh
0.87
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.94
Travel Dist (mi)
302.8
160.0
0.3
0.7
463.8
Travel Time (hr)
13.8
7.3
0.0
0.0
21.1
Avg Speed (mph)
22
22
24
32
22
Vehicles Entered
310
337
1
2
650
Vehicles Exited
297
337
1
2
637
Hourly Exit Rate
594
674
2
4
1274
Denied Entry Before
0
1
0
0
1
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
HL Page 13
Parsons Brinckerhoff
,ill n l f.;lf! i `Cil"UrCila(Y;C' I �C:I�C� % i i1�: c.;1 ! �_ ,.iF'.'siili0 Fw-1 n iilccto!-
�ho-tA(!rn; 1:45 �ryi 7/28/2006
56: Int Performance by movement
Movement
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
NEL
NER
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.6
Delay / Veh (s)
6.3
18.0
4.1
2.6
10.3
2.7
7.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.4
St Del/Veh (s)
4.3
15.9
0.5
0.4
9.2
2.7
5.6
Total Stops
5
21
0
0
27
6
59
Stop/Veh
0.45
0.30
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.22
Travel Dist (mi)
1.2
8.5
2.0
4.8
1.2
0.3
17.9
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
0.7
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.0
1.4
Avg Speed (mph)
18
13
15
13
9
14
13
Vehicles Entered
11
71
45
107
27
6
267
Vehicles Exited
11
71
46
110
27
6
271
Hourly Exit Rate
22
142
92
220
54
12
542
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
59: Lalamilo Farm Road & #1 Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.5
0.0
2.5
Delay / Veh (s)
21.9
3.3
13.3
16.9
4.2
3.3
10.2
Stop Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
18.0
3.1
2.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
Total Stops
15
2
1
0
0
0
18
Stop/Veh
1.07
0.67
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
Travel Dist (mi)
26.8
6.1
1.1
223.2
76.6
4.3
338.2
Travel Time (hr)
1.0
0.2
0.0
9.5
3.2
0.2
14.2
Avg Speed (mph)
27
29
23
23
24
22
24
Vehicles Entered
14
4
2
399
438
25
882
Vehicles Exited
14
2
2
396
432
23
869
Hourly Exit Rate
28
4
4
792
864
46
1738
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HL Page 14
Parsons Brinckerhoff
1
J
[l
Sin7'l raffic; Perfonnancc= Rcpori PRC: wiC Lalarniio Farm Connector
Short-term 7:45 am 7/28/2006
62: #2 & Kohala Mtn Road Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
WBT
WBR
SEL
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.4
0.1
3.1
3.7
Delay / Veh (s)
0.9
6.3
5.3
120.5
17.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.1
3.1
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
120.7
15.1
Total Stops
0
0
0
96
96
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.03
0.13
Travel Dist (mi)
14.9
39.7
12.7
4.3
71.6
Travel Time (hr)
0.6
1.8
0.6
3.3
6.3
Avg Speed (mph)
25
23
21
1
11
Vehicles Entered
353
227
72
96
748
Vehicles Exited
353
224
72
90
739
Hourly Exit Rate
706
448
144
180
1478
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
64: #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBT
WBT
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.4
Delay/ Veh (s)
5.9
2.8
1.5
3.1
2.3
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
2.1
0.6
0.0
3.2
0.4
Total Stops
3
4
0
6
13
StopNeh
0.38
0.01
0.00
1.00
0.02
Travel Dist (mi)
1.5
66.2
9.8
0.2
77.7
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
2.6
0.4
0.0
3.1
Avg Speed (mph)
24
27
23
8
26
Vehicles Entered
8
347
222
6
583
Vehicles Exited
8
353
221
6
588
Hourly Exit Rate
16
706
442
12
1176
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
HL Page 15
Parsons Brinckerhoff
vlfllTfca!!i!.l C(lC;iflcilT'�F:I�E'i)Cil
Short -ter rr�
65: Kohala Witn Road & Performance by movement
Movement
NBL
SET
SER
NWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.9
Delay / Veh (s)
4.6
31.0
28.5
0.2
17.5
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.8
St Del/Veh (s)
3.5
27.7
26.6
0.0
15.5
Total Stops
8
54
3
0
65
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.56
0.50
0.00
0.36
Travel Dist (mi)
0.2
19.8
1.4
3.5
25.0
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
1.5
0.1
0.2
1.8
Avg Speed (mph)
9
13
14
17
14
Vehicles Entered
8
97
7
72
184
Vehicles Exited
8
96
6
72
182
Hourly Exit Rate
16
192
12
144
364
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
66: #2 & South Kohala Distr Road Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
NBL
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.5
0.0
0.2
1.5
0.0
0.1
2.2
Delay / Veh (s)
3.8
0.6
26.9
15.3
11.6
10.7
9.3
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
St Del/Veh (s)
0.3
0.2
5.6
0.6
9.8
10.4
0.9
Total Stops
0
0
14
31
12
18
75
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.67
0.09
1.00
1.00
0.09
Travel Dist (mi)
79.5
1.5
14.0
203.7
2.5
3.7
304.9
Travel Time (hr)
3.2
0.1
0.6
8.6
0.1
0.2
12.8
Avg Speed (mph)
25
23
23
24
19
19
24
Vehicles Entered
450
7
23
351
12
18
861
Vehicles Exited
445
9
20
363
12
18
867
Hourly Exit Rate
890
18
40
726
24
36
1734
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7:45 a,n //28/200G
HL Page 16
Parsons Brinckerhoff I
F,
Li
1
SimTraffic Performance Report PRC and Lalamilo Fat n -i Connector
Short-term 7:45 am 7/28/2006
69: Parker Ranch Connector & Performance by movement
Movement
SEL,
SER
NEL '
NET
SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.5
Delay / Veh (s)
10.8
5.5
3.3
1.5
3.5
2.9
3.5
Stop Delay (hr)
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
St Del/Veh (s)
8.3
2.8
0.7
0.0
0.2
0.2
1.2
Total Stops
66
5
2
1
0
0
74
Stop/Veh
1.00
1.25
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
Travel Dist (mi)
12.8
1.0
1.0
15.7
47.8
9.6
88.0
Travel Time (hr)
0.7
0.0
0.1
0.6
1.8
0.4
3.6
Avg Speed (mph)
18
21
19
25
26
25
24
Vehicles Entered
68
5
14
228
156
33
504
Vehicles Exited
65
4
14
227
159
32
501
Hourly Exit Rate
130
8
28
454
318
64
1002
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
70: Kamamalu & Performance by movement
Movement
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
NEL
NET
NER
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
Delay / Veh (s)
5.5
3.8
0.3
0.3
5.5
0.2
3.1
2.3
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
0.9
0.4
0.0
0.0
3.3
0.1
2.6
0.5
Total Stops
11
0
0
0
9
0
21
41
Stop/Veh
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.12
Travel Dist (mi)
29.8
36.6
12.1
0.7
2.4
0.8
5.5
87.9
Travel Time (hr)
1.1
1.3
0.4
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
3.3
Avg Speed (mph)
26
28
29
26
24
29
24
27
Vehicles Entered
63
77
168
6
10
6
21
351
Vehicles Exited
62
75
166
6
9
6
21
345
Hourly Exit Rate
124
150
332
12
18
12
42
690
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HL Page 17
Parsons Brinckerhoff
SimTraflk Performance Report PRC r;nri LFII lrn to Farm Connector
Short-term 7:45 am 7/28/2006
71: #1 & Performance by movement
Movement :
NWL
NWR
NET
NER
SWL
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.2
1.0
Delay / Veh (s)
15.9
6.6
4.6
5.2
5.4
2.7
5.1
Stop Delay (hr)
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
St Del/Veh (s)
14.1
5.4
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.1
1.7
Total Stops
63
36
0
0
9
0
108
Stop/Veh
0.98
1.06
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.16
Travel Dist (mi)
4.9
2.7
72.0
7.0
8.5
52.5
147.6
Travel Time (hr)
0.5
0.2
2.8
0.3
0.4
2.0
6.2
Avg Speed (mph)
10
15
26
26
23
26
24
Vehicles Entered
63
33
254
19
44
272
685
Vehicles Exited
64
35
246
18
43
272
678
Hourly Exit Rate
128
70
492
36
86
544
1356
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
72: Int Performance by movement
Movement
SEL
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
NWR
NEL
NER
SWL _
SWR --
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
1.8
0.4
0.3
2.0
0.1
0.4
4.6
3.5
4.5
2.7
2.2
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.2
3.0
3.3
2.4
1.5
Total Stops
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
26
33
19
103
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.49
Travel Dist (mi)
1.5
2.8
1.0
1.2
3.7
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.2
0.7
15.7
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.8
Avg Speed (mph)
21
22
21
24
24
24
14
14
12
13
19
Vehicles Entered
14
38
9
6
34
6
25
26
33
20
211
Vehicles Exited
14
38
9
6
33
6
25
26
33
19
209
Hourly Exit Rate
28
76
18
12
66
12
50
52
66
38
418
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HL Page 18
Parsons Brinckerhoff
SimTraffic Perfori-nance Report PRC and Lalamilo Farm Connector
Short-term 7:45 am 7/28/2006
C
w
1
HL Page 19
Parsons Brinckerhoff
77: Lalamilo Farm Connector & #1 Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Total Delay (hr)
0.9
0.7
0.3
2.7
2.0
0.1
0.5
1.3
0.5
0.1
2.1
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
74.2
50.5
27.3
87.3
77.1
87.6
68.5
20.6
10.8
64.2
24.4
11.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.8
0.6
0.3
2.3
1.7
0.1
0.5
0.8
0.2
0.1
1.7
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
67.4
42.9
23.6
75.9
65.5
67.4
60.6
12.4
4.2
59.1
18.9
9.8
Total Stops
46
50
39
142
114
8
30
104
84
9
172
7
Stop/Veh
1.02
0.94
0.91
1.28
1.21
2.00
1.11
0.45
0.49
1.50
0.54
0.29
Travel Dist (mi)
7.0
8.8
6.7
39.1
35.7
1.6
4.8
39.0
30.3
0.5
26.5
2.0
Travel Time (hr)
1.2
1.0
0.6
4.1
3.2
0.2
0.7
2.7
1.7
0.1
3.1
0.2
Avg Speed (mph)
6
8
11
10
11
11
7
15
18
4
9
18
Vehicles Entered
44
55
42
112
96
4
28
228
173
6
314
24
Vehicles Exited
45
52
43
111
93
4
27
232
173
6
318
24
Hourly Exit Rate
90
104
86
222
186
8
54
464
346
12
636
48
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
77: Lalamilo Farm Connector & #1 Performance by movement
Movement
All
Total Delay (hr)
11.5
Delay / Veh (s)
36.7
Stop Delay (hr)
9.2
St Del/Veh (s)
29.2
Total Stops
Stop/Veh
805
0.71
Travel Dist (mi)
202.0
Travel Time (hr)
18.7
Avg Speed (mph)
11
Vehicles Entered
1126
Vehicles Exited
1128
Hourly Exit Rate
2256
Denied Entry Before
0
Denied Entry After
0
C
w
1
HL Page 19
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Siml-raiic; Pei ormai ice Report PF"�C and I_alamilo farm Connector ,
Short-term 7:45 am 7/28112006
79: #2 & Lalamilo Farm Connector Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
NBL
NBT
NBR
All
■
Total Delay (hr)
2.8
0.7
0.5
1.2
1.8
0.0
0.1
7.1
Delay / Veh (s)
27.8
23.6
68.4
13.6
69.6
2.0
23.7
27.1
0.0
Stop Delay (hr)
0.8
0.1
0.4
0.2
1.7
0.0
0.1
3.3
'
St Del/Veh (s)
7.7
4.0
54.9
2.8
64.0
0.0
19.9
12.6
Total Stops
141
40
27
57
92
0
22
379
Stop/Veh
0.39
0.36
1.12
0.19
0.98
0.00
1.00
0.40
Travel Time (hr)
Travel Dist (mi)
223.2
69.5
8.8
106.9
9.3
1.4
2.2
421.3
20
Travel Time (hr)
10.4
3.2
0.8
4.8
2.2
0.1
0.2
21.6
Avg Speed (mph)
21
22
12
22
4
23
9
19
63
Vehicles Entered
354
109
25
304
93
27
22
934
764
Vehicles Exited
359
112
23
308
94
27
22
945
0
Hourly Exit Rate
718
224
46
616
188
54
44
1890
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 ,
80: Parker Ranch Connector & Performance by movement
Movement
SBL
SBR
NEL
NET
- SWT
SWR
- All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.7
Delay / Veh (s)
10.7
11.3
2.4
1.8
13.7
13.1
6.8
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.4
St Del/Veh (s)
7.6
7.8
0.3
0.1
9.4.
11.6
4.0
Total Stops
4
99
0
0
63
8
174
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.97
0.00
0.00
1.02
1.14
0.45
Travel Dist (mi)
1.1
26.2
14.1
3.0
15.9
1.8
62.1
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
1.3
0.7
0.1
0.8
0.1
3.1
Avg Speed (mph)
21
20
22
24
20
19
20
Vehicles Entered
4
105
171
38
61
7
386 ,
Vehicles Exited
4
99
171
38
63
7
382
Hourly Exit Rate
8
198
342
76
126
14
764
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HL Page 20
Parsons Brinckerhoff I
fJ
1
C
LI
t
1
1
Siml-raffic Perforr lance Report PRC and La amilo i -arm Connector
Short-term 7:45 am 7/28/2006
81: #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBT
WBT
WBR
SBL
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
1.1
1.2
0.0
0.2
0.0
2.6
Delay / Veh (s)
15.0
10.6
12.1
14.2
24.1
5.2
11.7
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.2
St Del/Veh (s)
1.7
0.3
0.0
0.0
22.0
4.9
1.1
Total Stops
1
0
0
0
31
18
50
Stop/Veh
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.06
Travel Dist (mi)
1.1
136.5
208.5
3.7
5.9
3.4
359.1
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
5.8
8.4
0.2
0.4
0.1
14.9
Avg Speed (mph)
23
24
25
24
15
23
24
Vehicles Entered
3
371
365
6
31
17
793
Vehicles Exited
3
373
367
6
31
18
798
Hourly Exit Rate
6
746
734
12
62
36
1596
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Network Performance
Total Delay (hr)
186.8
Delay / Veh (s)
189.4
Stop Delay (hr)
75.4
St Del/Veh (s)
76.4
Total Stops
7772
Stop/Veh
2.19
Travel Dist (mi)
12726.8
Travel Time (hr)
628.6
Avg Speed (mph)
21
Vehicles Entered
3614
Vehicles Exited
3491
Hourly Exit Rate
6982
Denied Entry Before
25
Denied Entry After
11
HL Page 21
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Ski I rc:�ii% ,_.!nit!1�., atloti Al!1"tr112r)/ -:- . ;-C,
Short t i E 1 4:30 pm 3%7!2006
Surnmary of All Intervals
Run Number
term\PM
Avg
Start Time
4:30
4:30
End Time
5:30
5:30
Total Time (min)
60
60
Time Recorded (min)
30
30
# of Intervals
2
2
# of Recorded Intvis
1
1
Vehs Entered
3562
3562
Vehs Exited
3362
3362
Starting Vehs
1350
1350
Ending Vehs
1550
1550
Denied Entry Before
4
4
Denied Entry After
39
39
Travel Distance (mi)
13848
13848
Travel Time (hr)
746.0
746.0
Total Delay (hr)
274.4
274.4
Total Stops
12659
12659
Fuel Used (gal)
902.1
902.1
Interval #0 Information Seedinc
Start Time 4:30
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min) 30
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
No data recorded this interval.
Interval #1 Information Recordi
Start Time 5:00
End Time 5:30
Total Time (min) 30
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.
Run Number
term\PM
Avg
Vehs Entered
3562
3562
Vehs Exited
3362
3362
Starting Vehs
1350
1350
Ending Vehs
1550
1550
Denied Entry Before
4
4
Denied Entry After
39
39
Travel Distance (mi)
13848
13848
Travel Time (hr)
746.0
746.0
Total Delay (hr)
274.4
274.4
Total Stops
12659
12659
Fuel Used (gal)
902.1
902.1
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 1
Parsons Brinckerhoff I
fl
1
11
1
1
t
jI
t
C
1
Si[III raific lle;-forrn..nce Report
Snort term
2: ##1 #f2 & Performance by movement.
SEL
SET
(ICRC + (_FC
4:30 pm 3/7/2006
Movement
WBL
WBR
SBL
SBR
NER
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.6
Delay / Veh (s)
3.4
0.6
32.3
1.2
0.7
2.1
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
30.9
1.7
0.0
0.0
Total Stops
0
0
1
1
1
3
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
Travel Dist (mi)
15.9
0.2
0.1
0.1
26.2
42.6
Travel Time (hr)
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
2.1
Avg Speed (mph)
15
16
7
23
26
20
Vehicles Entered
550
8
1
1
565
1125
Vehicles Exited
550
8
1
1
565
1125
Hourly Exit Rate
1100
16
2
2
1130
2250
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
3: #2 & #1 #2 Performance by movement
Movement
SEL
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
NWR
NET
NER
SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
4.0
3.3
1.9
0.5
2.0
0.6
2.2
0.3
1.1
0.8
16.6
Delay / Veh (s)
59.4
72.7
56.2
50.0
51.1
45.1
30.6
25.3
19.1
11.1
39.7
Stop Delay (hr)
3.4
2.9
1.6
0.5
1.7
0.5
1.8
0.3
0.8
0.4
13.8
St Del/Veh (s)
51.5
62.8
47.3
43.3
42.4
39.6
25.9
22.3
13.3
6.1
33.0
Total Stops
269
189
181
42
137
55
171
35
140
195
1414
Stop/Veh
1.12
1.15
1.52
1.08
0.96
1.22
0.67
0.78
0.67
0.78
0.94
Travel Dist (mi)
24.9
16.3
12.6
6.5
21.2
7.1
19.3
3.4
14.9
18.7
144.9
Travel Time (hr)
4.9
3.9
2.4
0.8
2.8
0.9
2.8
0.5
1.6
1.6
22.2
Avg Speed (mph)
5
4
5
8
8
8
7
7
9
12
7
Vehicles Entered
238
162
120
39
146
46
255
44
208
253
1511
Vehicles Exited
243
166
119
39
139
45
254
45
209
246
1505
Hourly Exit Rate
486
332
238
78
278
90
508
90
418
492
3010
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 2
Parsons Brinckerhoff
"ir�l �G��;c ��.>� ���� i
_„cc I;ei�or�
I I R G -;
LI C,
Short is rrn
4:33 pm 'V-t120')6
5: Int Performance
by movement
Movement _
SEL
SET
SEER
NWL
NWT
NWR
NEL
NET
NER
SWL
SWT
SWR
Total Delay (hr)
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1 _
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.4
Delay / Veh (s)
7.9
3.6
1.6
2.2
2.3
1.2
8.2
11.0
7.4
15.1
16.7
12.0
Stop Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.3
St Del/Veh (s)
3.4
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
6.2
8.0
6.8
12.5
13.4
10.7
Total Stops
39
13
0
0
0
1
8
15
8
65
3
107
Stop/Veh
0.53
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.00
0.79
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Travel Dist (mi)
12.2
14.7
0.5
0.2
17.4
10.2
1.3
2.7
1.3
5.5
0.3
8.9
Travel Time (hr)
0.6
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.0
0.8
Avg Speed (mph)
19
23
24
24
25
23
20
18
20
11
11
12
Vehicles Entered
74
115
3
1
106
61
8
19
8
66
3
106
Vehicles Exited
73
114
3
1
102
58
8
19
8
64
3
107
Hourly Exit Rate
146
228
6
2
204
116
16
38
16
128
6
214
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5: Int Performance
by movement
Movement
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.1
Delay / Veh (s)
7.0
Stop Delay (hr)
0.7
,
St Del/Veh (s)
4.6
Total Stops
259
Stop/Veh
0.46
Travel Dist (mi)
75.0
Travel Time (hr)
4.0
Avg Speed (mph)
19
Vehicles Entered
570
Vehicles Exited
560
Hourly Exit Rate
1120
Denied Entry Before
0
Denied Entry After
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 3
Parsons Brinckerhoff
i�
fl
t
t
t
F1,
t
[ I I
1
SimTraffic Performance F epurt
Short term
6: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
All
Total Delay (hr)
17.1
Delay / Veh (s)
44.6
Stop Delay (hr)
F'i:C T LLC
4:30 pm 3/7/2006
Movement
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
NEL
NET
NER
SWL
SWT
SWR
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
0.7
2.0
0.7
0.4
0.1
1.8
2.5
0.1
1.0
6.5
0.8
Delay / Veh (s)
79.0
86.6
66.1
54.6
43.9
30.1
67.5
20.1
20.2
63.3
54.2
45.6
Stop Delay (hr)
0.3
0.7
2.0
0.7
0.4
0.1
1.7
2.0
0.1
0.9
5.4
0.7
St Del/Veh (s)
77.5
83.8
65.2
51.5
41.2
29.0
63.1
16.0
17.8
55.6
45.0
39.3
Total Stops
13
28
105
43
27
10
103
252
14
72
380
61
Stop/Veh
0.93
1.00
0.95
0.88
0.82
0.77
1.07
0.55
0.64
1.26
0.87
0.98
Travel Dist (mi)
0.4
0.8
3.6
1.9
1.3
0.5
4.7
21.4
1.1
5.5
42.5
6.0
Travel Time (hr)
0.3
0.7
2.3
0.8
0.5
0.1
2.0
3.3
0.2
1.2
8.0
1.0
Avg Speed (mph)
2
1
3
3
3
4
2
7
6
5
5
6
Vehicles Entered
15
27
112
50
34
13
97
454
22
56
437
61
Vehicles Exited
14
28
110
48
33
13
96
458
22
57
434
63
Hourly Exit Rate
28
56
220
96
66
26
192
916
44
114
868
126
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
2
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
All
Total Delay (hr)
17.1
Delay / Veh (s)
44.6
Stop Delay (hr)
15.0
St Del/Veh (s)
39.1
Total Stops
1108
Stop/Veh
0.80
Travel Dist (mi)
89.8
Travel Time (hr)
20.4
Avg Speed (mph)
5
Vehicles Entered
1378
Vehicles Exited
1376
Hourly Exit Rate
2752
Denied Entry Before
0
Denied Entry After
8
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 4
Parsons Brinckerhoff
SimTraffic Performance Report PRG + LFG
Short term 4:30 pm 3%7/2006
8: #1 & Performance by movement
Movement
NWL
NWR
NET
NER-
SWL
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.3
0.1
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.2
1.4
Delay / Veh (s)
26.6
8.4
6.4
6.8
9.7
2.5
6.4
Stop Delay (hr)
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.4
St Del/Veh (s)
24.8
6.8
0.0
0.0
5.8
0.0
1.9
Total Stops
38
33
0
2
33
0
106
Stop/Veh
1.00
1.14
0.00
0.03
0.63
0.00
0.14
Travel Dist (mi)
3.5
2.9
108.4
23.6
9.4
45.6
193.5
Travel Time (hr)
0.4
0.2
4.3
1.0
0.5
1.7
8.2
Avg Speed (mph)
8
15
25
24
19
26
24
Vehicles Entered
38
29
323
62
52
260
764
Vehicles Exited
38
29
328
64
52
260
771
Hourly Exit Rate
76
58
656
128
104
520
1542
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9: #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
3.4
0.2
0.0
0.8
0.0
4.6
Delay / Veh (s)
24.3
6.1
24.3
47.4
6.8
7.4
1.1
16.1
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
St Del/Veh (s)
11.4
0.0
9.0
44.0
5.2
0.4
0.2
5.3
Total Stops
6
0
219
14
8
12
0
259
Stop/Veh
0.86
0.00
0.43
1.08
0.62
0.03
0.00
0.25
Travel Dist (mi)
3.1
16.7
224.3
3.6
2.8
40.1
1.7
292.4
Travel Time (hr)
0.2
0.7
11.2
0.3
0.1
2.4
0.1
14.9
Avg Speed (mph)
19
24
20
12
24
17
23
20
Vehicles Entered
7
74
507
14
12
396
18
1028
Vehicles Exited
7
74
508
12
13
396
18
1028
Hourly Exit Rate
14
148
1016
24
26
792
36
2056
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 5
Parsons Brinckerhoff
t
t
C�
i'
SimTraffic Performance Report PRC + LFC
Short term 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
12: #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBT ;
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Total Delay (hr)
0.7
6.2
0.2
0.3
1.9
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.5
0.3
0.0
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
96.8
42.9
37.5
63.7
18.8
18.3
54.8
45.6
32.9
65.0
29.4
26.8
Stop Delay (hr)
0.6
4.3
0.1
0.3
0.6
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.5
0.2
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
84.2
29.4
27.0
49.0
5.9
7.8
52.4
39.3
30.6
62.7
25.9
26.0
Total Stops
42
403
13
21
119
10
16
3
51
12
1
10
Stop/Veh
1.62
0.77
0.81
1.11
0.32
0.45
0.89
0.75
0.94
0.86
0.50
1.00
Travel Dist (mi)
3.4
64.9
1.9
8.7
164.3
10.2
3.3
0.7
9.7
4.1
0.6
3.0
Travel Time (hr)
0.8
8.4
0.2
0.6
7.5
0.5
0.4
0.1
0.9
0.4
0.0
0.2
Avg Speed (mph)
4
8
8
14
22
22
8
10
11
10
17
16
Vehicles Entered
27
523
15
19
370
23
19
4
53
13
2
10
Vehicles Exited
25
522
16
19
369
22
17
4
54
15
2
10
Hourly Exit Rate
50
1044
32
38
738
44
34
8
108
30
4
20
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12: #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
All
Total Delay (hr)
10.6
Delay / Veh (s)
35.5
Stop Delay (hr)
7.0
St Del/Veh (s)
23.4
Total Stops
701
Stop/Veh
0.65
Travel Dist (mi)
274.6
Travel Time (hr)
20.1
Avg Speed (mph)
14
Vehicles Entered
1078
Vehicles Exited
1075
Hourly Exit Rate
2150
Denied Entry Before
0
Denied Entry After
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
' HL Page 6
Parsons Brinckerhoff
�imTraffic F'E: iorr.
once Rcpori
NWR
NET
NER
SWL
PRC {- LFC:
All
Short ferm
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
4:30 pm 3%1/2006
Delay / Veh (s)
15: #1 & Performance
by movement
2.0
0.7
6.0
1.9
Movement
NWL
NWR
NET
NER
SWL
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.5
Delay / Veh (s)
13.3
10.4
3.7
4.0
6.5
1.1
3.1
6
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.00
St Def/Veh (s)
11.6
10.5
0.1
0.0
3.9
0.2
0.9
24.3
Total Stops
13
29
0
0
8
0
50
Stop/Veh
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.53
0.00
0.08
Travel Dist (mi)
1.4
2.8
47.6
4.0
1.1
24.0
80.9
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
0.2
1.9
0.2
0.1
0.9
3.4
Avg Speed (mph)
14
17
25
23
17
26
24
546
Vehicles Entered
13
30
262
22
15
299
641
,
Vehicles Exited
13
29
262
22
15
299
640
0
Hourly Exit Rate
26
58
524
44
30
598
1280
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17: #1 & Performance by movement
Movement
NWL
NWR
NET
NER
SWL
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
Delay / Veh (s)
11.9
3.2
2.0
0.7
6.0
1.9
2.2
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
'
St Del/Veh (s)
11.5
3.3
0.1
0.0
2.1
0.2
0.4
Total Stops
12
16
0
0
6
0
34
Stop/Veh
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.40
0.00
0.05
Travel Dist (mi)
0.3
0.4
23.5
1.5
1.2
24.3
51.1
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
0.0
1.0
0.1
0.1
1.1
2.4
Avg Speed (mph)
5
10
24
22
16
21
22
Vehicles Entered
12
16
274
17
15
334
668
Vehicles Exited
12
16
273
17
15
337
670
Hourly Exit Rate
24
32
546
34
30
674
1340
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 7
Parsons Brinckerhoff
LI
fl
fl
u
ILI
1
SimTraffic 1"erfe-m-mrnce Reporfi PiRC + LFC
Short terra 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
2.1: #1 & Performance by movement
Movement
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
6.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
6.4
Delay / Veh (s)
10.3
32.5
45.1
11.2
2.4
24.2
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
St Del/Veh (s)
10.7
2.8
2.1
7.6
0.0
2.0
Total Stops
2
0
0
1
0
3
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
Travel Dist (mi)
0.2
629.6
2.8
0.1
26.0
658.7
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
27.7
0.1
0.0
1.1
28.9
Avg Speed (mph)
15
23
23
14
24
23
Vehicles Entered
2
685
3
1
262
953
Vehicles Exited
2
676
3
1
260
942
Hourly Exit Rate
4
1352
6
2
520
1884
Denied Entry Before
0
2
0
0
0
2
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
23: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
2.5
0.1
0.6
2.7
0.0
0.2
0.2
6.3
Delay / Veh (s)
11.3
9.5
74.4
17.2
12.6
40.5
20.5
15.4
Stop Delay (hr)
1.3
0.0
0.5
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
3.3
St Del/Veh (s)
6.1
5.7
62.1
6.5
4.6
38.3
20.1
8.1
Total Stops
224
6
29
136
1
14
32
442
Stop/Veh
0.28
0.21
0.94
0.24
0.50
0.82
0.91
0.30
Travel Dist (mi)
72.8
2.7
10.3
186.6
0.8
1.1
2.2
276.4
Travel Time (hr)
5.2
0.2
1.0
9.1
0.0
0.2
0.3
16.0
Avg Speed (mph)
14
13
11
22
21
5
7
18
Vehicles Entered
791
29
32
566
2
17
34
1471
Vehicles Exited
791
29
30
574
2
17
35
1478
Hourly Exit Rate
1582
58
60
1148
4
34
70
2956
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 8
Parsons Brinckerhoff
viI e
i pt
Short Cerin
27: #1 #2 8�. Mana Road Performance by movement
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL
NBR
11
4:30 pm 317/2006'
All
Total Delay (hr)
3.0
0.1
0.1
2.0
0.4
0.3
_
6.0
Delay / Veh (s)
13.5
12.0
38.5
17.3
124.5
85.1
16.8
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.4
0.3
0.8
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
20.8
0.0
120.7
82.9
2.2
Total Stops
1
0
10
0
12
15
38
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.83
0.00
0.92
1.15
0.03
Travel Dist (mi)
337.8
10.5
5.9
209.1
5.3
6.1
574.7
Travel Time (hr)
14.6
0.5
0.3
9.2
0.6
0.5
25.8
Avg Speed (mph)
23
23
17
23
8
12
22
Vehicles Entered
811
25
11
418
12
13
1290
Vehicles Exited
809
23
12
421
14
13
1292
Hourly Exit Rate
1618
46
24
842
28
26
2584
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28: #1 #2 & Puu Nani Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBT
WBT
WBR
SBL
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
2.9
4.1
0.1
0.0
7.0
Delay / Veh (s)
12.2
13.7
34.0
30.2
36.7
21.2
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
5.1
0.3
0.3
0.0
34.9
0.3
Total Stops
2
0
0
0
1
3
StopNeh
0.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
Travel Dist (mi)
1.5
336.9
428.4
5.7
0.5
773.0
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
14.4
19.0
0.3
0.0
33.7
Avg Speed (mph)
21
23
23
23
17
23
Vehicles Entered
3
752
444
6
1
1206
Vehicles Exited
3
749
427
6
1
1186
Hourly Exit Rate
6
1498
854
12
2
2372
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 9
Parsons Brinckerhoff
1
1�
L�
1
SimTraffic
Short term
29: Int Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Delay / Veh (s)
3.4
2.1
1.5
0.5
0.8
0.1
0.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
2.2
2.7
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.3
Total Stops
5
8
0
0
0
0
13
Stop/Veh
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
Travel Dist (mi)
0.6
0.6
0.4
5.0
3.3
0.4
10.3
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.5
Avg Speed (mph)
19
18
21
27
20
16
23
Vehicles Entered
5
8
4
48
53
7
125
Vehicles Exited
5
8
4
47
53
7
124
Hourly Exit Rate
10
16
8
94
106
14
248
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30: Int Performance by movement
PRC; + 1_1-C
4:30 pm 3/7/2006
Movement
WBL
WBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
NEL
NET
NER
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
0.9
0.4
1.0
0.0
1.2
5.7
0.6
1.9
0.8
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
0.6
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
3.5
0.2
1.9
0.2
Total Stops
2
1
0
0
0
7
0
1
11
Stop/Veh
0.20
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.04
Travel Dist (mi)
1.3
6.9
3.7
0.1
5.6
0.9
9.7
0.1
28.3
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.4
0.0
1.2
Avg Speed (mph)
24
28
27
32
24
19
22
21
24
Vehicles Entered
10
70
31
1
48
7
138
1
306
Vehicles Exited
10
68
31
1
47
7
138
1
303
Hourly Exit Rate
20
136
62
2
94
14
276
2
606
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 10
Parsons Brinckerhoff
33: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
NWL
NWR
NEL
NET
NER
-` i_;` (.%
Shiort term
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.3
4:30 pro, :';7/2006
31 : Parker Ranch
Connector
&:
Performance
by movement
10.2
32.4
2.0
Movement
_ NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
NEL
NER
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
2.1
1.0
0.4
0.4
5.9
3.5
1.8
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
3.4
2.7
1.0
Total Stops
0
0
0
0
7
52
59
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.34
Travel Dist (mi)
6.3
18.5
5.4
0.2
1.7
12.3
44.5
Travel Time (hr)
0.2
0.7
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.5
1.7
Avg Speed (mph)
28
28
27
23
25
25
27
Vehicles Entered
13
39
62
2
7
51
174
Vehicles Exited
13
39
62
2
7
52
175
Hourly Exit Rate
26
78
124
4
14
104
350
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
NWL
NWR
NEL
NET
NER
SWL
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.8
Delay / Veh (s)
89.5
10.2
32.4
2.0
2.3
11.9
1.9
2.5
Stop Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
St Del/Veh (s)
87.9
10.1
26.8
0.1
0.0
9.7
0.4
0.7
Total Stops
5
1
2
0
0
2
20
30
Stop/Veh
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.67
0.04
0.03
Travel Dist (mi)
0.3
0.1
0.2
56.1
0.4
0.2
29.9
87.2
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
0.0
1.3
3.9
Avg Speed (mph)
2
12
8
24
20
10
23
22
Vehicles Entered
5
1
2
571
4
3
550
1136
Vehicles Exited
5
1
2
566
4
3
549
1130
Hourly Exit Rate
10
2
4
1132
8
6
1098
2260
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 11
Parsons Brinckerhoff
FA
C]
L�
t
n
t
l
SimTraffic F=erformance R- eport PPG Lf=r
Short term 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
36: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
SER
NEL
NET
SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.3
Delay / Veh (s)
1.8
14.8
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
1.9
12.8
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
Total Stops
1
2
6
0
0
9
Stop/Veh
1.00
1.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
Travel Dist (mi)
0.0
0.1
31.7
25.7
0.0
57.6
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.0
1.2
1.0
0.0
2.3
Avg Speed (mph)
13
9
26
25
19
25
Vehicles Entered
1
2
565
550
1
1119
Vehicles Exited
1
2
564
552
1
1120
Hourly Exit Rate
2
4
1128
1104
2
2240
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
39: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
WBL
WBT
NBL
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
1.7
0.7
0.9
0.1
1.2
4.5
Delay / Veh (s)
10.7
63.3
5.6
39.4
20.0
11.7
Stop Delay (hr)
1.4
0.6
0.4
0.1
1.0
3.5
St Del/Veh (s)
8.9
59.4
2.6
35.3
17.2
9.2
Total Stops
150
34
86
10
188
468
Stop/Veh
0.27
0.92
0.16
1.25
0.86
0.34
Travel Dist (mi)
16.3
3.5
52.5
0.5
13.7
86.6
Travel Time (hr)
2.2
0.8
2.7
0.1
1.9
7.7
Avg Speed (mph)
7
5
20
5
7
11
Vehicles Entered
566
38
553
8
219
1384
Vehicles Exited
563
37
554
8
218
1380
Hourly Exit Rate
1126
74
1108
16
436
2760
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 12
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Sim -1 raffic Puriorrnance Report PRC LF C
Short term 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
40: Int Performance by movement
Movement
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
Delay / Veh (s)
12.2
0.1
7.4
3.6
2.0
5.9
0.8
3.4
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
10.3
0.0
6.9
0.1
0.0
4.0
0.2
0.4
Total Stops
5
0
5
1
0
0
0
11
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
Travel Dist (mi)
0.6
0.3
0.5
59.0
0.8
0.1
2.4
63.7
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
0.0
0.1
2.7
Avg Speed (mph)
14
22
14
24
23
16
21
24
Vehicles Entered
5
4
5
222
3
2
40
281
Vehicles Exited
5
4
5
220
3
2
40
279
Hourly Exit Rate
10
8
10
440
6
4
80
558
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
43: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
SER
NET
SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.8
0.3
0.0
1.2
Delay / Veh (s)
10.1
4.7
2.8
2.6
3.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.3
St Del/Veh (s)
10.1
1.7
0.2
0.3
1.1
Total Stops
6
83
14
1
104
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.14
0.03
0.09
0.10
Travel Dist (mi)
0.2
43.8
23.2
0.6
67.9
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
2.3
1.2
0.0
3.5
Avg Speed (mph)
8
19
20
16
19
Vehicles Entered
6
600
444
11
1061
Vehicles Exited
6
600
444
11
1061
Hourly Exit Rate
12
1200
888
22
2122
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 13
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Siml-raffic Pertormance Report PRC + L(=C;
Short term 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
45: #1 #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
NWR
NET
NER
SWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.2
0.5
Delay / Veh (s)
5.8
1.6
0.4
1.8
1.7
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
5.9
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.2
Total Stops
3
1
0
10
14
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
Travel Dist (mi)
0.2
43.8
0.1
32.5
76.6
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
2.0
0.0
1.3
3.3
Avg Speed (mph)
13
23
19
24
23
Vehicles Entered
3
598
1
450
1052
Vehicles Exited
3
600
1
452
1056
Hourly Exit Rate
6
1200
2
904
2112
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
50: #1 #2 & Kalake Road Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
' NBL
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
3.4
0.0
0.0
2.5
0.2
0.1
6.2
Delay / Veh (s)
19.1
15.9
62.6
23.0
82.8
52.9
21.2
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.3
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
29.3
0.2
80.3
52.8
1.0
Total Stops
0
0
3
0
7
6
16
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
1.50
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.02
Travel Dist (mi)
353.0
3.4
2.0
267.5
2.2
1.9
630.0
Travel Time (hr)
15.6
0.2
0.1
11.7
0.2
0.2
27.9
Avg Speed (mph)
23
22
19
23
9
12
23
Vehicles Entered
645
5
2
385
7
6
1050
Vehicles Exited
653
7
2
392
7
6
1067
Hourly Exit Rate
1306
14
4
784
14
12
2134
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 14
Parsons Brinckerhoff
SimTraffic F'erforrnance Report PfC + LFC
hort term
4:30 pin 3/7/2006
53: #1 #2 & Mud Lane Performance by movement
Movement J
EBT
WBT
SBL
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
48.5
2.3
0.0
0.0
50.9
Delay / Veh (s)
315.9
22.3
6.3
4.2
196.5
Stop Delay (hr)
48.5
1.1
0.0
0.0
49.6
St Del/Veh (s)
315.9
10.1
4.7
4.9
191.5
Total Stops
927
380
1
1
1309
Stop/Veh
1.68
1.01
1.00
1.00
1.40
Travel Dist (mi)
552.1
177.2
0.3
0.3
729.9
Travel Time (hr)
67.4
8.4
0.0
0.0
75.8
Avg Speed (mph)
8
21
27
30
10
Vehicles Entered
602
379
1
1
983
Vehicles Exited
504
376
1
1
882
Hourly Exit Rate
1008
752
2
2
1764
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
56: Int Performance by movement
Movement
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
NEL
NER
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
Delay / Veh (s)
3.3
4.0
2.1
1.3
5.5
3.2
2.6
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
0.3
2.9
0.6
0.5
4.5
2.9
1.5
Total Stops
1
6
0
0
21
7
35
Stop/Veh
0.25
0.08
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.17
0.12
Travel Dist (mi)
0.5
8.4
2.1
3.9
0.9
0.3
16.1
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.9
Avg Speed (mph)
22
23
16
15
12
14
18
Vehicles Entered
4
75
65
113
21
7
285
Vehicles Exited
4
76
65
112
21
6
284
Hourly Exit Rate
8
152
130
224
42
12
568
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 15
Parsons Brinckerhoff
SimTratfic Pe, lo;manw Report
Short term
59: Lalamilo Farm Road & #1 Performance by movement
PRC + LFC
4:30 pm 3/7/2.006
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
2.4
0.4
0.1
17.7
0.3
0.0
21.0
Delay / Veh (s)
730.4
726.6
92.0
96.7
4.2
4.2
77.3
Stop Delay (hr)
2.4
0.4
0.1
10.1
0.0
0.0
12.9
St Del/Veh (s)
724.8
710.3
53.5
54.9
0.1
0.1
47.6
Total Stops
16
4
10
999
0
0
1029
Stop/Veh
1.33
2.00
2.50
1.51
0.00
0.00
1.05
Travel Dist (mi)
27.9
7.7
1.9
370.9
48.6
6.0
463.0
Travel Time (hr)
3.4
0.7
0.2
30.4
2.0
0.3
37.0
Avg Speed (mph)
8
11
11
14
24
21
14
Vehicles Entered
16
4
4
678
271
33
1006
Vehicles Exited
9
1
4
642
264
33
953
Hourly Exit Rate
18
2
8
1284
528
66
1906
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
17
0
0
17
62: #2 & Kohala Mtn Road Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
WBT
WBR
SEL
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.6
0.2
0.9
1.8
Delay / Veh (s)
0.8
7.1
6.3
57.6
6.7
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.9
St Del/Veh (s)
0.0
0.0
0.1
56.6
3.2
Total Stops
0
0
0
51
51
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.94
0.05
Travel Dist (mi)
18.3
54.7
15.6
2.5
91.2
Travel Time (hr)
0.7
2.5
0.8
1.0
4.9
Avg Speed (mph)
25
22
21
3
18
Vehicles Entered
482
322
88
51
943
Vehicles Exited
483
323
87
57
950
Hourly Exit Rate
966
646
174
114
1900
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 16
Parsons Brinckerhoff
1
• i',
i �C(�Oi l I f
'-,L- -, L�-
('hort teem 30 prn 3/7/2006
64: #2 & Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBT
l/tBT
SBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.6
0.1
0.0
0.8
Delay / Veh (s)
6.9
4.4
1.8
5.4
3.4
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
St Del/Veh (s)
3.3
1.1
0.1
5.3
0.8
Total Stops
3
3
0
14
20
Stop/Veh
0.75
0.01
0.00
1.00
0.02
Travel Dist (mi)
0.8
91.2
13.3
0.4
105.7
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
3.7
0.6
0.1
4.4
Avg Speed (mph)
21
26
23
7
25
Vehicles Entered
4
481
302
14
801
Vehicles Exited
4
482
300
14
800
Hourly Exit Rate
8
964
600
28
1600
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
65: Kohala Mtn Road & Performance by movement
Movement
NBL
SET
SER
NWT
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Delay / Veh (s)
5.2
0.9
0.5
0.2
0.6
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
4.2
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.2
Total Stops
4
0
0
0
4
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
Travel Dist (mi)
0.1
10.4
2.9
4.3
17.7
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.7
Avg Speed (mph)
9
29
26
17
24
Vehicles Entered
4
51
15
87
157
Vehicles Exited
4
51
14
86
155
Hourly Exit Rate
8
102
28
172
310
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 17
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Simi rattic PFC + LFC
Short tone 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
66: #2 & South Kohala Distr Road Performance by movement
Movement
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
NBL
NBR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.6
0.0
0.1
2.4
0.5
0.3
3.9
Delay / Veh (s)
4.1
4.1
24.9
20.2
83.1
43.0
13.7
Stop Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.5
0.2
1.0
St Del/Veh (s)
1.0
1.7
10.6
1.0
81.7
42.7
3.7
Total Stops
0
0
13
45
21
21
100
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.93
0.10
1.00
1.00
0.10
Travel Dist (mi)
82.3
1.7
9.4
273.1
4.4
4.4
375.3
Travel Time (hr)
3.5
0.1
0.4
11.7
0.6
0.4
16.7
Avg Speed (mph)
25
24
21
23
7
10
23
Vehicles Entered
509
10
15
435
21
21
1011
Vehicles Exited
513
10
14
433
21
21
1012
Hourly Exit Rate
1026
20
28
866
42
42
2024
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
70: Parker Ranch Connector & Performance by movement
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
NEL
NET
SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
Delay / Veh (s)
7.9
0.1
2.3
3.1
2.6
0.6
0.3
2.2
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
St Del/Veh (s)
6.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
Total Stops
9
0
2
0
0
0
0
11
Stop/Veh
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
Travel Dist (mi)
1.7
2.0
0.4
0.8
54.9
5.1
0.8
65.7
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
2.1
0.2
0.0
2.6
Avg Speed (mph)
21
28
25
25
26
23
20
25
Vehicles Entered
9
20
3
4
276
53
8
373
Vehicles Exited
9
20
2
4
275
53
8
371
Hourly Exit Rate
18
40
4
8
550
106
16
742
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 18
Parsons Brinckerhoff
11
C,[ t
shC, tC l i 11-130�hm
71: #2 & I_alarnilo Farrn Connector Performance
Movement EBI EBR WBL
by movement
WBT NBL NBT NBR
3/7/2006
All '
Total Delay (hr)
11.9
2.9
0.7
1.8
1.6
0.0
0.8
19.7
Delay / Veh (s)
83.7
69.0
101.1
16.8
76.8
2.4
31.1
56.7
Stop Delay (hr)
5.9
1.3
0.6
0.4
1.5
0.0
0.6
10.3
St Del/Veh (s)
41.5
32.1
87.0
4.0
68.9
0.0
24.5
29.8
Total Stops
875
193
34
110
77
0
79
1368
Stop/Veh
1.72
1.30
1.36
0.28
1.00
0.00
0.88
1.10
Travel Dist (mi)
304.9
86.0
8.6
128.0
10.6
0.4
11.7
550.3 ,
Travel Time (hr)
22.4
5.9
1.0
6.2
2.0
0.0
1.2
38.8
Avg Speed (mph)
14
16
8
21
5
22
10
15
Vehicles Entered
511
150
25
388
74
6
86
1240 '
Vehicles Exited
509
148
25
394
80
6
93
1255
Hourly Exit Rate
1018
296
50
788
160
12
186
2510
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
12
1
0
0
0
0
0
13
72: Parker Ranch
Connector &
Performance
by movement
Movement
SEL
SET
SER
NEL
NET
SWT
SWR
'
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.7
0.0
0.5
0.4
0.6
0.0
0.0
2.2
Delay / Veh (s)
33.0
1.0
22.6
10.5
9.0
1.7
0.9
13.4
Stop Delay (hr)
0.6
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
'
1.1
St Del/Veh (s)
30.7
0.7
20.7
0.7
0.3
0.0
0.0
6.9
Total Stops
72
0
80
29
10
0
0
191
Stop/Veh
1.01
0.00
1.00
0.19
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.33 '
Travel Dist (mi)
11.5
0.5
12.9
46.6
65.2
7.6
2.9
147.2
Travel Time (hr)
1.1
0.0
1.0
2.1
2.8
0.3
0.1
7.4
Avg Speed (mph)
11
23
13
22
23
27
26
20
Vehicles Entered
70
5
81
154
222
38
15
585
Vehicles Exited
71
5
80
150
225
38
15
584
Hourly Exit Rate
142
10
160
300
450
76
30
1168
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC
HL
Parsons Brinckerhoff
SimTraffic Report
Page 19
u
n
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 20
Parsons Brinckerhoff
1
F'e fornrance Resori
Short
PRG 7 I_[=
'
term
Short term
- -_
�
6
4:30 psi 3/7/20013
t �
74: Parker Ranch Connector
& Performance
by movement
Movement
SEL
SET
SER
NEL
NET
SWT SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.4
Delay / Veh (s)
15.1
0.5
4.3
3.0
1.9
1.2
2.7
2.1
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
12.0
0.2
3.5
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.6
Total Stops
13
0
44
1
0
0
0
58
Stop/Veh
1.08
0.00
1.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
Travel Dist (mi)
2.4
4.9
8.5
0.5
26.7
23.9
7.2
74.1
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.0
1.1
0.9
0.3
3.1
Avg Speed (mph)
17
25
22
19
24
26
25
24
'
Vehicles Entered
12
48
44
7
390
93
24
618
Vehicles Exited
12
48
44
7
386
94
23
614
Hourly Exit Rate
24
96
88
14
772
188
46
1228
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75: Parker Ranch Connector &
Performance by movement
Movement
SBL
SBR
NEL
NET
SWT
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.4
Delay / Veh (s)
13.9
4.8
3.9
2.7
0.6
1.7
3.7
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Del/Veh (s)
12.1
3.0
0.5
0.1
0.0
1.9
0.8
Total Stops
3
42
12
0
0
1
58
'
Stop/Veh
1.00
1.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.16
Travel Dist (mi)
0.8
11.2
22.7
7.0
3.4
0.2
45.3
Travel Time (hr)
0.0
0.5
1.1
0.3
0.1
0.0
2.1
Avg Speed (mph)
21
23
21
24
26
28
22
'
Vehicles Entered
3
42
219
79
15
1
359
Vehicles Exited
3
42
221
80
14
1
361
Hourly Exit Rate
6
84
442
160
28
2
722
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
n
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 20
Parsons Brinckerhoff
1
Sim! rafiic Performance Repoit f'RC Lf -C
Short term 4:30 pm 3/7/2006
76: Int Performance by movement
Movement
SEL
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
NWR
NEL
NER
SWL
SWR
All
Total Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Delay / Veh (s)
2.5
0.6
0.4
1.9
0.8
0.5
4.3
2.9
4.4
2.4
1.9
Stop Delay (hr)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
St Def/Veh (s)
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.8
2.7
3.3
2.3
1.1
Total Stops
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
19
26
17
87
Stop/Veh
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.38
Travel Dist (mi)
1.2
9.4
0.7
0.6
2.6
0.8
1.2
0.9
0.9
0.6
19.0
Travel Time (hr)
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.0
Avg Speed (mph)
20
22
21
22
24
23
14
15
12
13
20
Vehicles Entered
10
100
6
3
23
4
25
19
26
17
233
Vehicles Exited
10
99
6
3
23
4
25
19
26
17
232
Hourly Exit Rate
20
198
12
6
46
8
50
38
52
34
464
Denied Entry Before
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Denied Entry After
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PRC + LFC SimTraffic Report
HL Page 21
Parsons Brinckerhoff
APPENDIX D FUTURE VOLUME PROJECTION
County of Hawail Wairnea Traffic Circulation Study
P8 Americas, Inc. December 2007
The base for forecasting is the AM and Pk/I volume counts in Year 200G. There are two
steps in forecasting 2030 conditions. The first step is from 2006 to 2011 when Parker Ranch
Connector and Mamalahoa Hwy — Kawaihae Rd connector are expected open. The second
step is from 2011 to 2030 when the State Kawaihae Road Bypass and Waimea Bypass are
expected to open. This study tried to refer to the State's Travel Demand Forecasting Model
but with the understanding of its limitations:
1. The state's model was last updated in 1998. The social and economic data used
were obsolete to some extent.
2. In the model's base year 1992, Waimea was characterized as one congregate Traffic
Analysis Zone (TAZ). The internal Waimea traffic pattern was not available.
3. In the model's future year 2020, none of Parker Ranch Connector, Mamalahoa Hwy
— Kawaihae Rd connector, the State Kawaihae Road Bypass, and Waimea Bypass
was in the Waimea's roadway network. Therefore the trip assignment in the model is
of no use for analyzing Waimea traffic.
Newer data sources such as 2000 Hawaii Data Book and 2005 Hawaii County General Plan
were also referred in this study.
2011 Volume
According to US Census, in 2000 Waimea Census -designated Place (CDP) had a
population of 7,028. By 2011, 5 major developments including Parker Ranch Waimea Town
Center, DHHL Lalamilo Subdivision, Ouli Golf Community, Waimea Parkside, and
Jacaranda inn are expected to add about 1,400 homes in west and south Waimea. These
added new homes will bring about 3850 population assuming average family size of 2.75
(Hawaii Data Book 2000 Average Population per Household).
The trips generated by the newly -added homes are expected to have stronger association
with South Kohala Coast and Kailua-Kona areas because the lower unemployment rate in
west Hawaii, as showed in Table D1.
County of Hawaii Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PS Airier is S, h1C, December '11007
`iva:l,le D'i Population and Employniont Data
Division and census designated
place
Total
Civilian labor force
Total
% Unemployed
Hawaii County
114,647
70,592
4.9
Hilo
33,368
- -19,414
6.0
Papaikou-Wailea
3,950
1,986
4.1
North Hilo
11434
792
2.3
Paauhau-Paauilo
1,584
997
4.7
Honokaa-Kukuihaele
3,036
1,785
3.9
North Kohala
4,712
2,534
2.6
South Kohala
9,708
6,862
2.3
North Kona
22,390
15,484
2.7
South Kona
6,663
565
3.8
Kau
41517
350
8.6
Pahoa-Kalapana
6,469
639
9.4
Keaau-Mt. View
16,816
1,509
6.1
Source: 2000 Hawaii Data Book
County of Hawaii Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PB Amet-icas, Inc. December 2007
Li gienera11, 50% CHI 'L! le 'Lcdal iie lJ he with ic UPio �zou 'i
l'ohala Coast, 30% o the total trip., tC \fkfaii"! ea, arid. 20% To lrlarnakua-HC rth Hil:) anf), "'ot h
Hilo.
The general traffic is expected to grow at an annual rate of 2% from 2006 fo 2011. 2% is the
scenario B population growth rate adopted by County Hawaii General Plan in 2005.
The total traffic in 2011 is obtained by superimposing the trips generated by 5 major
developments and the general traffic.
By 2011, Parker Ranch Connector and Mamalahoa Hwy — Kawaihae Rd connector are
expected open. Trip Assignment was conducted so that the travel times on Kawaihae Rd
and Mamalahoa Hwy and their alternative connectors are about same.
2030 Volume
Population and employment factors, as shown in Table D2, were examined to forecast the
volumes on Waimea roadway network in 2030. The State's Travel Demand Forecasting
Model was examined. First the population and employment in 2000 and 2020 were
compared. Big Island was largely divided as west (North Kohala, South Kohala, North Kona,
and South Kona) and east (Hamakua, South Hilo, North Hilo, Puna, and Kau). Year 2000
population and employment data are from Hawaii Data Book. Year 2020 data are from the
State's Travel Demand Forecasting Model. One index used is the job and population ratio.
In 2000, the ratio is 0.52 for west and 0.45 for east, which concurs with the fact of a tighter
job market and lower employment rate in west Hawaii. The ratio in 2020 indicates that the
employment discrepancy between west and east still exists in 2020 at the level of 2000.
Therefore, the through -Waimea traffic is expected to grow at the rate of the population which
is 2%.
(This is a rough estimate of through -Waimea Traffic because Waimea is included as part of
South Kohala. Because Waimea is relative small compared to the whole island, the
conclusion still stands.)
County of t'awO Waimea Traffic Ciro elation Study
Pfd Arrtertcp4= fnc. December 2007
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Iae' lu i -r1, F-Va6U.YclEort tr[ I'0 [,:flU,B�?`0(_;t[ and",' at
It is important to know the volume of through -Waimea traffic because the State bypasses
are designed and expected to carry largely through -Waimea traffic. Two license plate
surveys in 1999 and 2003 outlined the through -Waimea traffic on Kawaihae Road and
Mamalahoa Highway. This section is to estimate the through -Waimea traffic.
County= of Hawaii
17B Americas, Inc.
Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
December 2007
2000
r 2020
I
Pop
Emp
Pop -Job
Emp/Pop
Pop
Job
Pop -Job
Job/Pop
N.Kohala
6038
2534
11273
1555
S. Kohala
13131
6862
24426
14367
N.Kona
28543
15484
42275
30396
S.Kona
8589
4467
14092
5088
M
Hamakua
56301
'
6108
29347
4768
26954
92066
7328
51406
I
979
40660
I
S. Hilo
47386
19414
49791
32191
N. Hilo
1720
792
1879
2284
Puna
31335
13857
58246
13033
Ka'u
5827
2414
8408
2721
92376
41245
51131
125652
51208
74444
It is important to know the volume of through -Waimea traffic because the State bypasses
are designed and expected to carry largely through -Waimea traffic. Two license plate
surveys in 1999 and 2003 outlined the through -Waimea traffic on Kawaihae Road and
Mamalahoa Highway. This section is to estimate the through -Waimea traffic.
County= of Hawaii
17B Americas, Inc.
Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
December 2007
Ir`°vfrrrr ion
In this estirnation, Waimea is defined a the great area. between Clueen Kaahurnanu Hwy
and Mud Lane. Its south boundary is Saddle Road.
There are three types of traffic on the roadways of Wairnea as illustrated in the below figure:
1. Through -Waimea traffic defines those vehicles go through with no origins or
destinations within Waimea.
2. Traffic to or from Waimea defines those vehicles with either origins or destinations
within Waimea.
3. Traffic to and from Waimea (Intra -Waimea traffic) defines those vehicles that have
both origins and destinations within Waimea.
To or From Waimea and Intra -Waimea traffic can be combined and called locally generated
traffic.
< Through Waimea Traffic ,
1E To/From Waimea Traffic
Locally Generated Traffic '
Intra -Waimea Traffic
Analysis
A license plate survey was conducted by Wilbur Smith Associates in October, 2003 for the
State DOT Kawaihae Road Bypass Transportation Study. The study showed during 2:30 PM
to 6:30 PM, there were 344 vehicles going from Kawaihae Road just east of Queen
County of Pe?iviii — -----` Waimea l raffic Circulation Study '
PB Americas, [tic. Ciecember 2007
u
11
11
II
1
1
n
Kaahurrranu Huey ft-)IVlud k -eine and beyond. In conjun(Aion with the Siate DC -1l ratite �.urvE.y
Data., the estimation of through --traffic, can NO made at twr, locations:
1. Eastbound Kawaihae Road just east of Queen Kaahumanu Hwy. The State DOT's
surveys registered 1467 vehicles during the same period at this location. Therefore,
23% of vehicles (= 344 / 1467) are through -Waimea traffic.
2. Southbound left turn at Lindsey Road intersection. The through traffic from Kawaihae
Road must use southbound left turn lanes at Lindsey Road intersection. The same
344 vehicles were part of southbound left turn vehicles at Lindsey Road intersection.
The State DOT's surveys registered 3548 southbound vehicles including left turn,
through, and right turns. The turning movement counts at this intersection indicated
that about 65% of the southbound traffic is left turns. So the left turning vehicles was
2306 (=3548 x 65%). Therefore, 15% of vehicles (= 344 / 2306) are through -Waimea
traffic.
Table D3 summarized the finding on Kawaihae Road.
Table D3 Waimea Travel Patterns
Southbound left turn at Lindsey Road intersection
Vehicle Counts per
4 -hour
Through -Waimea Traffic (%)
To/From Waimea Traffic and Intra -
Waimea Traffic Combined (%)
2306
15%
85%
Another license plate survey was conducted by The Traffic Management Consultant in
December 1999 for the State DOT Hawaii Belt Road Realignment (State Waimea Bypass)
Project. The survey covered both AM peak hours (6:30 — 9:00 AM) and PM peak hours (2:30
- 5:30 PM) on Mamalahoa Highway east of Mud Lane and north pf Kamuela Race Track.
Table X summarized the study's finding based on the volumes observed on Mamalahoa
Highway east of Mud Lane. According to State DOT's traffic surveys, the through -Waimea
volumes were also estimated in Table D4.
County of Hawaii
PB Americas, Inc.
Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
Deceriber 2007
6 hk
l 1: 4 L -"Y i r_ `l. 4E tt �.k �,4
Percentages of Through -Waimea. Traffic on hramalahoa Highway easf_oi Mud Laine
I ime Period
Eastbound
Westbound
AM Peak
26%
23%
PM Peak
154 vehicles
252 vehicles
PM Peak
25%
21%
399 vehicles
180 vehicles
The State DOT's surveys also registered the volumes on Mamalahoa Highway west of
Lindsey Road. Using the estimated Waimea -though volumes divided the total volumes at
this location would produce the percentage of through -Waimea traffic. Table D5 indicated
that the percentages of through -Waimea traffic are either below or about 30%. The rest 70%
traffic would belong to To/From Waimea Traffic and Intra -Waimea Traffic Combined
Table D5 Waimea Through Traffic West of Lindsey Road
Percentages of Through -Waimea Traffic on Mamalahoa Highway west of Lindsey Road
Time Period
Eastbound
Westbound
AM Peak
19%
20%
PM Peak
32%
13%
Year 2030 through traffic on Kawaihae Road and Mamalahoa Highway was estimated for
two directions eastbound and westbound, and two periods AM and PM peak hour. Table D6
and Table D7 shows the AM and PM through traffic growth.
County of Hawaii Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PB Americas, lac.. Decenber 2007
u
u
n
1
1
11
e k c. ik irr=� s'ter° uFct `t Ei: fi u re-vif'Lit
ound
Southbound left turn peak hour
Through trarFic
Growth
Peak hour
r
volurne at Lindsey intersection
%
factor
through traffic in
in 2006
2030
Kawaihae
540
15°%
1.61
130
Eastbound peak hour volume
Through traffic
Growth
Peak hour
at Lindsey intersection in 2006
%
factor
through traffic in
2030
Mamalahoa
684
19°!°
1.61
209
AM
Westbound right turn peak hour
Through traffic
Growth
Peak hour
Westbound
volume at Lindsey intersection
%
factor
through traffic in
in 2006
2030
Kawaihae
580°o'
si ��� ,�
1.61
140
Westbound peak hour volume
Through traffic
Growth
Peak hour
at west of Lindsey intersection
%
factor
through traffic in
in 2006
2030
Mamalahoa
812
20%
1.61
261
d
3 ` OP;
Assumed; No License Plate Survey Available.
County of Hawaii
PB Americas, Inc.
Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
December 2007
Y7 o -ox -,FL
PM Eastbound
Southbound left turn peak hour
_through traffic
Growth
Peak hour -
volume at Lindsey intersection
%
factor
through traffic in
in 2006
2030
Kawaihae
976
15%
1.61
235
Eastbound peak hour volume
Through traffic
Growth
Peak hour
at Lindsey intersection in 2006
%
factor
through traffic in
2030
Mamalahoa
1122
32%
1.61
577
PM
Westbound right turn peak hour
Through traffic
Growth
Peak hour
Westbound
volume at Lindsey intersection
%
factor
through traffic in
in 2006
2030
Kawaihae
534
15%
1.61
129
Westbound peak hour volume
Through traffic
Growth
Peak hour
at west of Lindsey intersection
%
factor
through traffic in
in 2006
2030
Mamalahoa
532
13%
1.61
111
Assumed; No License Plate Survey Available.
Waimea future population growth and land use should define its future traffic pattern.
According to the State's Travel Demand Forecasting Model, in Base Year (1992) Waimea is
one aggregate TAZ, and in Year 2020 Waimea is comprised of 7 TAZs. Table D8
summarizes the population and employment growth.
Gotinty car llawaif Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PB Americas, filf�, December 2007
L
11
11
11
u
Table, D8 Waimea Future Population and Employment Growth
The State's Travel Demand Forecasting Model showed that the major population growth will
occur at east of Waimea. This conflicts with the fact that the major developments are located
in west or south of Waimea as seen in the short-term projection. The State's Travel Demand
Forecasting Model was updated in 1998. Newer data source such as 2000 Hawaii Data
Book and 2005 Hawaii County General Plan was used to forecast Waimea traffic.
According to 2005 Hawaii County General Plan, South Kohala population will grow from
13131 in 2000 to 24426 in 2020. This population increase equals to an annual growth rate of
' 3.15%. Because in 2011 the major developments in west and south Waimea are added, the
actual population growth from 2011 to 2030 should consider the added population of 3850
by the 5 major developments. Then the population growth rate for South Kohala from 2011
' to 2030 is about 2%. Therefore the Waimea traffic is assumed to grow at the same rate of
2% from 2011 to 2030.
County of Hawaii — Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PR Americas, Inc, December 2007
1992
2020
Waimea
Pop
Emp
Pop -Job
Emp/Pop
Pop
Job
Pop -Job
Job/Pop
Kawaihae
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
751
715
36
95%
Upper Waimea
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3446
225
3221
7%
Upper Lalamilo
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
605
284
321
47%
Puukapu
Homesteads
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6870
1743
5127
25%
Waki
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
154
144
10
94%
Waimea Village
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1788
2824
-1037
158%
Opelu
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1240
564
676
45%
Total
7640
4038
3602
53%
14853
6499
8354
44%
The State's Travel Demand Forecasting Model showed that the major population growth will
occur at east of Waimea. This conflicts with the fact that the major developments are located
in west or south of Waimea as seen in the short-term projection. The State's Travel Demand
Forecasting Model was updated in 1998. Newer data source such as 2000 Hawaii Data
Book and 2005 Hawaii County General Plan was used to forecast Waimea traffic.
According to 2005 Hawaii County General Plan, South Kohala population will grow from
13131 in 2000 to 24426 in 2020. This population increase equals to an annual growth rate of
' 3.15%. Because in 2011 the major developments in west and south Waimea are added, the
actual population growth from 2011 to 2030 should consider the added population of 3850
by the 5 major developments. Then the population growth rate for South Kohala from 2011
' to 2030 is about 2%. Therefore the Waimea traffic is assumed to grow at the same rate of
2% from 2011 to 2030.
County of Hawaii — Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PR Americas, Inc, December 2007
Trip assignment is conducted aasunning the State Kuvoaiham'Rnad Qvpaon and V8ai|oem
Bypass open by 2030. Other State's roadway projects such as Saddle Road Extension and
Saddle Road Improvement may have impact on how the through -Waimea traffic will choose
alternative routes. But this study ensunnea the through -Waimea traffic will continue to prefer
Kavvaihae F<nad, K8anna|ahoa Highvvay, and their bypasses over Saddle Road in 2030 as it
does presently.
Trip Assignment assumes all through -Waimea Traffic will use the State Bypasses,This is
conservative onUnmote because the 2030volume on the State Bypasses could easily serve
more than through -Waimea traffic:
1. Traffic between the areas around West terminus of Kawaihae Road Bypass and
Waimea Town areas, and traffic between Waimea Town areas and the areas around
eastern terminus of Waimea Bypass may also find the State Bypasses attractive.
2. More traffic could use the State Bypasses depending on how and where the State
Bypasses link to Kawaihae Road and Mamalahoa Highway. For example, a linkage
using the existing Mana Road between Waimea Bypass and Mamalahoa Highway
could serve the traffic between Waimea Town areas and Waimea east of Mana road.
Figure Al and A2 shows the projected 2030 volumes.
County sfHawaii Waimea Traffic Circu}ahonStudy
1138 �6�
971
Kaha/a Mountain
pd.
985
Q
North
ro c:
879
DRi
1095 Mamalahoa Hwy -
540 Kawaihae Rd
Connector
t
a
408
State Kawaihae Rd. Bypass r�
130
1169
,� I
of
m
I
E
m
2
1120
Waimea
Noll
Nay.
�a
dN9
14,
Airport
Sall
656
2030 AM with State Bypasses
i®
436
Q
North
ro c:
DRi
C
t
a
Q
1120
Waimea
Noll
Nay.
�a
dN9
14,
Airport
Sall
656
2030 AM with State Bypasses
i®
436
wD Z
fJ
F
0hal
a Mountain Ra.
Kawaihae Rd.
State Kawaihae Rd.
North
1109
p00
510
1095
1030
510
931 Mamalahoa Hwy -
129 Kawaihae Rd
4_ Connector
\y
6,81
761
435
1222
Waimea
g6�
�g
Mafia\ahoa NW`1
�d0
d�d�G
AGS �a 2A
8�
Airport
320
693
92030
PM with State Bypasses
PMAZI
I
11
11
n
II
I I
u
�1
u
J
7
L
Screenline cheep is ofkan used in transportation planning to valid the pi c.ct� d vc,lume.
Screenline is an imaginary line dividing a study area into iwo parts and used for a detailed
comparison of measured and simulated traffic or travel during a model calibration process.
Two screenline checks west and east Waimea Town, as showed in Table D9, were
conducted for eastbound PM peak volume. In 2006, the screenline west Waimea "i -own
registered 200 more vehicles than the one east Waimea Town. In 2030 that number
increased to 1016 vehicles. This concurred with the knowledge the future growth
concentrating on west and south Waimea.
Table D9 Screenlines East and West of Waimea
County of Hawaii
PB Americas, hic.
Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
December 2007
2006
2030
Screenline West of Waimea Town
Eastbound
Peak PM
Volume
Total
Eastbound
Peak PM
Volume
Total
Kawaihae at west of Lindsey
900
1095
Mamalahoa Hwy-Kawaihae Rd
Connector west of Mamalahoa
0
685
State Kawaihae Rd Bypass west of
Mamalahoa
0
435
Mamalahoa at south of Airport
660
1560
1222
3437
Screenline East of Waimea Town
Mamalahoa at east of Kamamalu
1360
1609
State Waimea Bypass
0
1360
812
2421
Diff
-200
-1016
County of Hawaii
PB Americas, hic.
Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
December 2007
SU (JE' IHVIL C;l"IF c�.<:, 8S, c iho cc1 tri 1)10, vvc-"ce c kso coo i(.;uGtcfJ to co' cIP-.1'= ,Ift `"
and the State's Travel Dernand Foi e l asting Wioclel data.
Fable D10 Comparison ®f'l ravel Demand lViQdel and adjusted Volumes
Screenline West of
Waimea Town
2020 Model
Estimated
2030 Model
Model 2030
PM
PB 2030
PM
Diff
Mamalahoa at Saddle
North
9395
11452
1145
1983
838
Kawaihae east Kohala Mtn
20720
25258
2526
2525
-1
30115
Screenline East of
Waimea Town
Mamalahoa at Mud west
13684
16681
1668
2384
716
Saddle
1579
1925
192
N/A
Mamalahoa at South Point
3648
4447
445
N/A
18911
23052
2305
County of Hawaii Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
PB A merk�as; Inc. DE cembel 2007
2020 Model volunK_ at twoscr cr�leftie erc; factored up to n -patch 2030 vole lle. h -y usincj 2%
annual increase. It was estimated the^t the PIA Leak hour volume will be about 10% of the
24-hour volume. The model's peak hour volume in 2030 was compared with PB's volume.
The PB's volumes were obtained before the traffic was assigned to the State Bypasses. The
volumes on Kawaihae Road east of Kohala Mountain Road are practically same. The PB's
volumes on Mamalahoa Highway are about 800 vehicles more than the model's. This is
because
l�
1. The model included Saddle Road Improvement project and it assumes that the
improved Saddle Road will attract more share of east -west traffic than it does today.
2. PB's estimate adopted 2005 Hawaii County General Plan in which South Kohala
outgrow the island as a whole. PB's estimate also acknowledged the major potential
developments in Waimea. Both data sources were not available when the State's
Travel Demand Forecasting Model was updated in 1998.
l
1
' County of Hawaii
PB Americas, lnc�.
Waimea Traffic Circulation Study
December 2007