My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0910.003 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0910.003 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2016 3:21:27 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 8:12:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0910
Point
003
Author
Milton D. Pavao, Water Supply Manager
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 8/5/98
Communications - File Code
ZNG/KN
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 08/05/1998 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Council
COM 0910.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Honorable Helene H. Hale, Councilwoman <br /> Page 2 <br /> November 20, 1989 <br /> <br /> 10,000 square feet of property by way of ohana permits, this is <br /> n2t 'subterfuge,' because it is legally permissible through <br /> Hawaii County Code chapter 25, article 25. The ohana permit was <br /> intended to allow two separate single family residential units <br /> on a 10,000 square foot lot in an RS-10 district. No illegal <br /> tactic is being attempted. If the subdivision had been sold as <br /> individual 10,000 square foot lots, with a single family <br /> residence on each one, it would be legally possible for each of <br /> those lots to eventually have two single family residences on <br /> it, because it would be possible for each of those lots to <br /> obtain an ohana permit. The conveyance of each unit separately <br /> as part of a condominium property regime is not necessarily a <br /> subdivision of the underlying property. We believe that as the <br /> Hawaii County Code and the Hawaii Revised Statutes now stand, <br /> developments such as Kamani Trees are not prohibited. If the <br /> Council concludes that it is not in the public's best interest <br /> to allow more of these developments, then the Council has the <br /> power to amend the County Code to provide more stringent <br /> regulations in the area of ohana permits to attempt to assure <br /> that there will not be similar developments in the future. <br /> As was pointed out in this office's opinion of October 3, 1989, <br /> if the ohana law were amended to bar the granting of ohana <br /> permits to any piece of land smaller than 15,000 square feet, it <br /> would insure that single family residential density would never <br /> be greater than one single family residence per 7,500 square <br /> feet of land, which is the maximum single family residential <br /> density allowed by the zoning code. It would also be possible <br /> to amend the subdivision code to allow the Planning Director to <br /> impose restrictions on ohana permits as a condition of <br /> subdivision approval. Still another possible change would be to <br /> amend the ohana law to bar multiple applications for ohana <br /> permits after subdivision approval, as is being done with Kamani <br /> Trees. All of these are viable alternatives. <br /> Conveyances of property under the condominium property regime is <br /> however a matter of state legislation. <br /> Please contact this office if there are any questions. <br /> Very truly yours, <br /> RICHARD I. MIYAMOTO <br /> Corporation Counsel <br /> <br /> By <br /> FREDERICK GIANNINI <br /> Deputy Corporation Counsel <br /> xc Mayor's Read File <br /> FG:de <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.