My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
REP PC 081 04/08/2008 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Reports
>
2006-2008
>
Planning Committee (PC)
>
REP PC 081 04/08/2008 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2008 2:00:36 PM
Creation date
7/2/2008 2:00:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reports
Reports - Type
REP
Reports - Council Term
2006-2008
Report
081
Committee
PC
Meeting date
2008-04-08
Document Relationships
BIL 274 Draft 01 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
COM 1113.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> Communication 1113 <br /> Bill 274 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br /> Chair Pilago clarified that on December 2007 there is a letter from the applicant to the <br /> Director requesting a two-year extension and that in January 2008 the Planning Director <br /> advised applicant that applicant's request would only extend the time to April 26, 2007. <br /> Therefore, the Director recommended that applicant be allowed a five-year time <br /> extension from April 26, 2005, when the original time lapsed. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Ford's concern was whether the applicant had been consistent in <br /> supplying the Department with annual reports and status updates. Director Yuen stated <br /> that this ordinance does not require annual reports and that currently, annual reports are <br /> only required of large projects such as Hualalai Resort and that to require annual reports <br /> of a typical project such as this would just add another layer of paperwork. In response to <br /> Ms. Ford's other concern that this application has been in existence since 1973, Director <br /> Yuen said there may have been confusion from the write-up of this proposal because they <br /> listed a lot of things located within Nani Mau Gardens as well as things connected with it <br /> that do date back to 1973. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Jacobson expressed concern about Mr. Lim's complaint of the Council's <br /> lack of consistency and that of the need to hold applicants accountable to what they <br /> agreed to in their rezonings. Mr. Jacobson said he would be voting against this proposal <br /> because of what appears to be a frequency of requests for extension resulting from <br /> applicants who are not taking the rules seriously. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Yagong stated that his focus was on the application which is consistent <br /> with the County General Plan in terms of placement of the project. He explained the <br /> proposal does not involve property located in areas associated with traffic mitigation <br /> issues or in an area where views, vistas and quality of life issues are at risk. Instead, <br /> Mr. Yagong noted, this proposal is about building a small subdivision in an area in Hilo <br /> that would provide housing opportunities for residents and those who work in Hilo or out <br /> in Puna. Mr. Yagong said he sees an applicant who is actually trying to address a <br /> housing market of people who may earn too much to qualify for affordable housing yet <br /> not enough to qualify to purchase a home and that in these tough economic times, <br /> someone willing to invest and provide housing opportunities to support continued <br /> economic growth on the side of the island that really needs it and this Council should <br /> applaud and support the proposal. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> PC Report No. 81 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.