Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> Communication 1191 <br /> Bill 292 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> <br /> established and was acquired by the County. The state wanted an additional right-of-way <br /> for drainage and chose to secure that right-of-way by fee transfer as opposed to an <br /> easement. Had the state's right-of-way been obtained through an easement on applicant's <br /> property it would have been relatively simple to accomplish. However, the state having <br /> elected the fee process, required the subdivision maps to be redone and therefore time <br /> was further expended throughout that process. Mr. Yuen stated that apparently the State <br /> is now considering or likely to agree to obtain the right-of-way through an easement. <br /> <br /> Your Committee on Planning is in accord with the purpose and intent of Bill 292, as <br /> amended to Draft 2, and recommends it pass first reading. <br /> <br /> <br /> and <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> AYES NOES A&E EX Respectfully submitted, <br /> FORD X <br /> HIGH X COMMITTEE ON PLANNING <br /> HOFFMANN X <br /> IKEDA X <br /> JACOBSON X <br /> NAEOLE X K. ANGEL PILA , CHAIR <br /> PILAGO X <br /> YAGONG X PC REPORT NO. 86 <br /> YOSHIMOTO X ADOPTED: JUN 0 3 2008 <br />