Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> • P <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Richard D. Wurdeman, Esq. <br /> David 2. Arakawa, Ssq. <br /> J. P. Schmidt, Esq. <br /> August 4, 1998 <br /> Page 11 <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> <br /> in conclusion, as the governor submitted all cost items for <br /> bargaining units 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 13 to the state <br /> Legislature, and as the Legislature failed to approve the cost <br /> items prior to adjournment Gina dj&, the cost items are rejected <br /> and returned to the parties for bargaining. The non-cost items <br /> of the respective collective barga%nq agreements remain in <br /> effect. No jurisdiction has the authority to unilaterally pay <br /> wage increases or other cost items which require specific <br /> appropriations from the respective legislative bodies. <br /> Very truly your*, <br /> = eam s V HalvortA on <br /> Deputy Attorney General <br /> PROVED) : <br /> <br /> <br /> Margery S. Bronster <br /> Attorney General <br /> JEH:lhi <br /> 89-10(B).opn <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 08/04/98 17:23 TX/RX N0.8856 P.012 <br />