Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Richard D. wurdeman, Esq. <br /> David Z. Arakavia, Esq. <br /> J. P. Schmidt, Esq. <br /> August 4, 1998 <br /> Page 4 <br /> the agreement is executed. Matters requiring the <br /> approval of the State Legislature shall be submitted by <br /> the employer within 14 days of the Legislature <br /> convenes, if it is not in session at the time the <br /> agreement is executed. Request for funds to implement <br /> the agreement shall be included in the Governor's <br /> operating budget. The legislativa body may approve or <br /> reject such submission, as a whole, by a majority vote <br /> of those present and voting on the matter; but, if <br /> rejected, the matter shall be returned to the parties <br /> for further bargaining. Failure by the employer to <br /> submit such requests to the legislative body within the <br /> appropriate period ehall be considered to be a refusal <br /> to bargain, in violation of Section 5(a)(5) of this <br /> Act. Such requests shall be considered approved if the <br /> legislative body fails to act within thirty days of the <br /> and of the period for submission to the legislative <br /> body. The parties may agree that those provisions of <br /> the agreement mot re"LcLag acties by the legislative <br /> body shall be affective and operative in accordance <br /> with the term of the agreement. If the legislative <br /> body rejects the provisions submitted to it the <br /> employer, either party may reopen all or part of the <br /> remainder of the agreement. lEmphasis added.] <br /> The Senate amended S.S. 1696-70 by removing the provision <br /> which provided that a request for funds was to be considered <br /> "approved if the legislative body failed to act within thirty <br /> days of the end of the period for submission to the legislative <br /> body. <br /> The apparent intended affect of the removal of the automatic <br /> approval provision was that the failure of the Legislature to <br /> approve the cost items properly submitted to the Legislature <br /> cannot be construed as approval of the cost item. <br /> In 1972, the Attorney General was asked to render his <br /> opinion on three questions concerning legislative approval of <br /> cost items in a collective bargaining agreement. One of the <br /> questions was "(b)y what means could the Legislature approve or <br /> reject the cost items?" The Attorney General responded that a <br /> rejection may be indicated by the failure to appropriate the <br /> necessary funds. This response was published as Attorney General <br /> Opinion No. 72-10. There has been no change in the statute since <br /> 1972 which would affect this opinion. <br /> <br /> 08/04/98 17:23 TX/RX N0.8856 P.005 <br />