My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1332.033 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 1332.033 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2008 11:49:18 AM
Creation date
9/24/2008 8:08:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
1332
Point
033
Author
Dixie Kaetsu, Acting Mayor
Communications - Referred To
N/A
Comments
Council: Transmits Bill 326, Draft 2 for recosideration to override Mayor's Veto - 10/08/08
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2008/10/08 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The ILLS Report <br />REVIEW OF LIFE CYCLE DATA RELATING TO DISPOSABLE, <br />COMPOSTABLE, BIODEGRADABLE, AND REUSABLE GROCERY BAGS <br />I. BACKGROUND <br />In March 2007, the Board of Supervisors of the City of San Francisco passed an <br />ordinance effectively banning the use of plastic grocery bags at supermarkets and <br />large pharmacies. The Board's objective was to stop environmental degradation and <br />reduce litter, and its solution was to legislate the replacement of traditional plastic <br />bags with reusable bags or bags made from paper or compostable plastic. <br />In an effort to gauge the impact of the Board's decision, both in terms of <br />environmental impact and litter reduction, the Editors of The ULS Report have <br />examined a number of credible third-party research reports, and used the findings to <br />develop their own conclusions and recommendations. <br />Please note that this review was originally published in June, 2007 and has been <br />revised as follows: <br />This review includes research performed by Boustead Consulting l3 Associates <br />that was released after the previous version was published in June 2007. <br />2. Information from the EPA's web sites cited in the previous summary has been <br />removed from this version, as it is no longer publicly available. <br />3. All results mentioned below have been made equivalent to reflect the different <br />carrying capacity of paper vs. plastic bags. For reference, it is generally <br />accepted that 1.5 plastic bags equal the capacity of 1 paper bag. <br />II. METHODOLOGY <br />An examination was made of four studies that compared the environmental impacts of <br />various grocery bags, or provided data widely used to do so: <br />Carrefour Group, an international retail chain that was founded in France and <br />is second only to Wal-Mart in terms of global retail revenues, commissioned a <br />Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Study by Price-Waterhouse-Coopers/EcoBalance <br />(Evaluation des impacts environnementauxdes sacs de caisse, February 2004, <br />#3009408E8) that compared the environmental impact of four types of bags: <br />plastic made from high density polyethylene (HDPE), paper, biodegradable <br />plastic (50% corn starch and 50% polycaprolactone compostable plastic), and <br />reusable plastic (flexible PE). The study evaluated environmental impacts from <br />material production, through bag manufacturing and transport, to end of life <br />management. <br />The study was completed according to ISO standards 14040-14043, and peer <br />reviewed by the French environmental institute, ADEME, the Agency for <br />28 March 2008 <br />4853 Goodison Place Drive • Rochester • MI • 48306 <br />248-726-9729 • wN+w.use-less-stuN.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.