REP PC 113 05/15/1998 1996-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON PLANNING DATE: May 15, 1998 Re: C-827/Bill No. 236 PLACE: Councilroom TIME: 8:37 a.m. Chair and Members Hawaii County Council Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Your Committee on Planning, to which was referred Bill No. 236, transmitted by Mayor Stephen K. Yamashiro per Communication No. 827, dated April 24, 1998, regazding the amendment request to Ordinance No. 91-22 by Haseko (Hawaii), Inc. at Kalaoa 5th, North Kona, Hawaii, TMK: 7-3-] 0:27, reports as follows: Bill No. 236 amends Ordinance No. 91-22, which reclassified lands from an Unplanned to Single Family Residential, Multiple-Family Residential and Neighborhood Commercial zoned district. Previously the applicant had requested a time extension to Condition D, which required the submittal of subdivision plans before September 9, 1992, to update certain technical matters before final action was taken by the Council. A yeaz's extension was granted, then the applicant requested a time extension for both the submittal of subdivision plans and multiple family plans. The requested extensions were granted; however, with the passing of time, policy amendments were made regarding ohana covenants, incremental developments, infrastructural requirements, etc., that the conditions in Ordinance 91-22 were outdated. Bill No. 236 amends the performance requirements of Ordinance No. 91-22 to ensure that the applicant is not in violation with the time conditions, and that certain conditions allow the property to be developed in a manner that ensures that the infrastructure impacts and concerns aze addressed in a manner that is fair to both the County and the owner. The proposed amendments will bring the conditions relating to incremental zoning requirements, performance, archaeological, pazk, housing, infrastructural requirements and the performance requirements in line with current practices for similaz rezonings. Your Committee concurs with the Planning Commission and the Planning Director that the approval of this request would not be contrary to the General Plan nor would it be contrary to the original reasons for granting the change of zone. Your Committee amended Bill No. 236 with Draft 2, which replaced the language in Condition K with the standazd language used to prohibit the construction of a second dwelling unit on each lot. PC Report 113