Laserfiche WebLink
Pete Hoffmann, Chairman <br />and Members of the County Council <br />Page 2 <br />The applicant also requests an amendment to Condition E, which currently allows only <br />one access to the proposed subdivision. Condition E currently reads: <br />"Only one access shall be allowed to the proposed subdivision from Ala Kahua <br />Drive. Such access shall meet with the approval of the Department of Public Works." <br />According to the applicant, the original concept was to develop the property in <br />conjunction with the adjoining property owner on TMK: 5-9-7: 004. However, the plans <br />were subsequently abandoned. The project timeline since the original ordinance was <br />approved in 1996 is as follows: <br />• April 26, 1996 -Tentative Subdivision Approval granted for an 8-lot subdivision. <br />• January 8, 1997 -Final Subdivision maps submitted to the Planning Department. <br />• Apri122, 1999 -Planning Department grants a 2-year time extension until <br />April 25, 2001 to satisfy conditions of the Tentative Subdivision Approval. <br />• March 7, 2001 -Applicant requests additional time extension from the Planning <br />Department to comply with the conditions of Tentative Subdivision Approval. <br />The applicant received no response from the Planning Department. <br />The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen <br />or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns, and are not the result of <br />their fault or negligence. In 2005, there was a change in management, and the relocation <br />of the access improvements from the makai to the mauka side was examined. At that <br />time, the new management was not aware ofnon-compliance with Condition C of <br />Ordinance No. 95 119. The proposed relocation was possible in that one of the partners <br />had an interest in the adjacent road lot identified as TMK: 5-9-007: 002. In addition, <br />discussions commenced with the mauka property owners regarding connection to the <br />proposed underground electrical utility system. The applicant retained a surveyor to <br />review the requirements to construct the subdivision improvements within TMK: 5-9- <br />007: 002. <br />The applicant then discovered that while the conditions within the Subdivision <br />Code were satisfied with the granting of the time extension [o comply with the conditions <br />of Tentative Approval, Condition C was not satisfied, as Final Subdivision Approval had <br />to be secured by April 25, 1999. The applicant now proposes to revise its subdivision <br />layout to provide road, water and electrical improvements within the adjacent road lot <br />(TMK: 5-9-7: 002). The landowner of Parcel 2 has agreed to utilize the 3.467-acre lot for <br />access purposes. <br />