My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1568.000 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 1568.000 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2008 11:09:43 AM
Creation date
10/30/2008 9:43:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
1568
Point
000
Author
Harry Kim, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Filed - 11/21/08
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2008/11/21 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• COUNTY COUNCIL INITIATED <br />AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) <br />Agenda Item # 11 <br />Correction to second sentence in the Recommendation; deleted portion is bracketed and <br />struck-through, as follows: <br />RECOMIV~ENDATION <br />The Planning Director recommends that the Planning Commission send a <br />negative recommendation to the Council on the proposed amendment to the Zoning <br />Code. Because the County does not currently meet the proposed standards, especially for <br />police and parks, the bill would create a moratorium on rezoning in the County for all <br />districts [e~ee}~-Seaile]. For Puna, North Kona, South Kona, and South Kohala, the <br />ban on new zoning would last until the County more than doubled the developed park <br />space in the district. At the same time, this rezoning ban would do nothing to increase <br />the number of parks or police officers. It would penalize property owners by forbidding <br />• them from getting zoning changes when they cannot themselves remedy the situation <br />with respect to parks, police, or fire stations. It would, in fact, ban rezoning on the <br />Bounds that insufficient developed park space existed in the district, even though the <br />zoning request might include public park lands that would reduce the problem. <br />Rezoning decisions should be made on their merits, guided by the General Plan <br />and Community Development Plans. ff a site is a not a good one for the development <br />proposed by the retuning, it should be denied. The denial can be based on many different <br />reasons, like traffic congestion, flooding, historic sites, inconsistency with the LUPAG <br />map, the desire to avoid sprawl or protect open space, and any of the other factors that go <br />into good land use planning. The lack of public facilities to serve a development may be <br />a legitimate reason for denying a rezoning. For example, if a large residential rezoning <br />was proposed on Saddle Road, say fifteen miles above Hilo, the distance from police and <br />fire stations would be a legitimate reason to deny retuting, even though the South Hilo <br />district as a whole might have enough police officers and firefighters. But this can be <br />addressed when the rezoning is considered, rather than apply an inflexible district-wide <br />rule. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.