My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
REP PC 100 10/07/2008 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Reports
>
2006-2008
>
Planning Committee (PC)
>
REP PC 100 10/07/2008 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2009 3:22:55 PM
Creation date
11/28/2008 9:05:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reports
Reports - Type
REP
Reports - Council Term
2006-2008
Report
100
Committee
PC
Meeting date
2008-10-07
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2008/11/07 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
BIL 324 Draft 02 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
COM 1329.029 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Communication 1329 <br />Bill 324 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Commission was not required. Mr. Hoffmann explained it was necessary to create an impact fee <br />ordinance especially in light of the constitutionality regarding the fair share system currently <br />being used, and that due to the complex nature of the proposed bill, further outreach from <br />developer groups and the community was very critical. <br />Finance Director Bill Takaba stated that the overall bill had some merit, however he felt that <br />managing renewals, reimbursements and the use aspect of the fund should not fall under the <br />jurisdiction of the Finance Department or Finance Director. Mr. Takaba expressed concern that <br />having the Finance Department manage the funds and make decisions on behalf of the fund was <br />heading in the wrong direction. <br />Councilmember Jacobson stated he was glad a public hearing was being called because he <br />believed the biggest impact will not fall upon developers but on those people seeking to build <br />their homes on vacant lots that have already been rezoned. Mr. Jacobson stated although he is <br />not opposed to the impact fee assessment, he would certainly like to hear from those people out <br />there who will be impacted both positively and negatively. <br />Councilmember Yagong stated that a public hearing was the right way to go but suggested that <br />since this is an intense legislative change that will generate a lot of questions, he felt the public <br />hearing should be more like a workshop where a presentation is made and dialog exchanged <br />rather than simply listening to public testimony. <br />Council Chair Hoffmann said his intent was that the public heazing would include a 15-minute or <br />longer presentation to lay the groundwork for the legislation. A motion for two public hearings, <br />one to be held in Hilo and one to be held in Kona was duly approved, and this matter was held <br />over for public hearings. <br />At the October 7, 2008 Committee on Planning meeting, public testimony was presented by the <br />following persons: Tim Rees, Robert G. Williams, Raynard Torres, Paul Baillie, Donald <br />Schenkeir, Mazia Schenkeir, Evelyn Thompson, Ruth Smith, Mary Begier and Randy Ruper. <br />Council Chair Hoffmann presented a brief recap of the importance of approving the Impact Fee <br />bill and explained that the contents of Communication No. 1329.15 contained amendments that <br />were the result of the public hearing process and expressed his desire to request a postponement <br />to allow members time to review these proposed amendments. A motion to amend Bi11324 with <br />Communication No. 1329.15 was duly approved. Councilmember Yagong stated he was ready <br />to vote on the bill now and would not support a postponement. A motion to postpone failed and <br />discussion followed. <br />Council Chair Hoffmann stated that the current fair shaze system is illegal and cannot continue <br />because some other type of system that provides funding to address infrastructure must be put in <br />place. Mr. Hoffmann disagreed with Mayor Kim that the impact fee is a regressive tax affecting <br />middle income people, but rather, the impact fee represents an investment in infrastructure that <br />can actually improve "quality of life," increase the value of property and provide a better system <br />for the people of this island. <br />PC Report No. 100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.