Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Hawaii Preliminary Technical Assessment <br />ICTAP-HUHA-PREASSESS-001-RO <br />to offer a multiband portable radio capable of supporting a combination of the VHF, UHF, and <br />700/800 MHz bands. Several of these radios have been used on various systems around the country <br />while others are relatively new to the marketplace. Vendors offering P25 subscriber radios include <br />Motorola, M/A-COM, Kenwood, EFJohnson, Tait, Thales, Icom, Vertex/Standard and BK/Relm, <br />providing several options and competitive pricing far any new radio procurement, although not all <br />support trunking. <br />It should be noted that there are multiple optional features radio manufacturers can offer in their P25 <br />radios. A lack of commonality of these features can have a negative impact on interoperability. For <br />example, P25 currently supports DES-OFB and AES encryption. If implemented in the infrastructure, <br />all P25 subscriber radios must have the same optional encryption algorithm enabled in order to <br />support secure communications. For more information regarding standardized P25 features refer to <br />the P25 Features Matrix located on the PTIG website (www.oroiect25.oro). It's important to note that <br />there are several additional P25 features of interest that have not yet been defined within the P25 <br />standards but are planned for future development. These features are not included in the P25 <br />Features Matrix. Over-the-air-programming (OTAP) is one such example. Until an undefined feature <br />is standardized, manufacturers may provide proprietary implementations of the feature to allow the <br />service to be provided to the end user. These proprietary implementations will not allow for <br />interoperability of these respective features across multiple vendors. <br />When the County of Hawaii representatives look to buy new P25 subscriber radios, there are a few <br />recent upgrades to the P25 standards to be aware of prior to purchase. The first is the adoption of a <br />new enhanced full-rate vocoder for Phase 1 to replace the existing full-rate vocoder. The <br />improvements are intended to address degraded voice quality issues identified in the field caused <br />from self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) and other common fire ground noise. This issue was <br />briefly mentioned in section 2.1.1. Some P25 manufacturers currently use the new vocoder while <br />others plan to implement it in the future. The second upgrade relates to the changes necessary for <br />.:subscriber radios to fully support ISSI roaming. The P25 standard was recently modified and current <br />subscribers may not fully support the changes. ICTAP recommends consulting with selected <br />manufacturers on how their respective subscriber units support both of these recent upgrades. <br />2.6 Voice Communications Recommendations <br />Frequency Band Selection <br />The Macro Conceptual Design Analysis 8 Recommendation Report recommends the County adopt a <br />P25 trunked system operating in the 700 MHz band. There are concerns and complications involved <br />with choosing to stay in the VHF band or migrating to either 700 or 800 MHz. <br />We disagree with the Macro assumptions that digital VHF would not be favorable to wide area and <br />portable coverage and venders do not support VHF multicast P25 trunking. There are at least five <br />vendors that provide trunked P25 VHF multicast systems and at least three of those also support <br />VHF simulcast. We do agree that there would be additional frequency pairing concerns and system <br />migration concerns using the VHF spectrum. <br />The Macro Conceptual Design Analysis & Recommendation Report dismissed the thought of using <br />VHF and recommended a migration to 700 MHz with very little consideration of 800 MHz. All of the <br />adjacent counties are presently operating proprietary-protocol 800 MHz systems. If the County had <br />800 MHz capable subscriber units then County assets could deploy to other counties throughout <br />Hawaii and operate on 800 MHz interoperability channels in the NPSPAC band. Likewise the other <br />counties would be able to support the County of Hawaii if the County or State fielded an <br />interoperability system using 800 MHz NPSPAC channels on the Island. The 800 MHz interoperability <br />system could be deployed regardless of the frequency band that the County of Hawaii chooses for its <br />new system. <br />There is a potential for the State to install a 700 MHz P25 system on the island. At the present time all <br />subscriber units for 700 MHz are being developed as dual band (7001800) capable. If the County <br />October 2008 11 <br />