My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RES 131 Draft 02 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Resolutions
>
1996-1998
>
RES 131 Draft 02 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2010 1:10:27 PM
Creation date
1/30/2009 9:50:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
RES
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
1996-1998
Bill/Resolution
131
Draft
02
Introducer
James Y. Arakaki, Chair
Referred To
COUNCIL
Action 1
Presented: FC - August 5, 1997
Action 2
Council: Adopts Res. 131-97, Draft 2 - 8/20/97
Status
Adopted
Date To Mayor or Adoption Date
8/20/1997
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
8/20/1997
Ayes
7-Arakaki; Chung; Leithead-Todd; Ray; Reynolds; Smith; Yagong
Noes
1-Tyler
Absent
1-Santangelo
Excused
0
Document Relationships
COM 0407.003 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />(1) Any information required by the Council, including a list of the <br />agency' s/department' s goals, objectives and work data submitted with the <br />agency's/department's budget; the submittal of a program questionnaire, which provides <br />a narrative of the agency's/department's program and changing goals and objectives. <br /> <br />(2) Meetings by the Councilor an appropriately designated Committee to review the <br />agency/department submittals. <br /> <br />(3) The formulation of recommendations pertaining to any agency/department. <br /> <br />(4) Expanded research of a program may be requested by resolution as a result of the <br />findings of the Council. <br /> <br />V. Performance Review - Broad Scope <br /> <br />A. A broad scope performance review means an investigation addressing essential <br />County operations and major issues of governance and policy. Such investigations or <br />audits are typified by a focus on large organizations, large amounts of public funds, or <br />complex systems. As such, they are time consuming and expensive to conduct. It is <br />expected that no more than one or two broad-scope reviews would be conducted in any <br />year. Further, consultants with technical or specialized expertise must usually be <br />contracted. <br /> <br />B. A broad scope performance review shall be authorized by adoption of a Council <br />resolution, with a preliminary scope of work, assigning the engagement of a consultant, <br />management of the contract, and overall supervision of the review to the Office of the <br />Legislative Auditor. <br /> <br />C. Unless time limitations so preclude, consultants shall be selected by request for <br />proposals prepared in response to a scope of work as set forth in the Council resolution <br />and as may be further detailed. <br /> <br />D. Funding for consultant services shall be based on appropriations provided for <br />Council performance review activities. <br /> <br />VI. Performance Review - Limited Scope <br /> <br />, A. A limited scope performance review means an investigation of County operations <br />or issues which can be accomplished by existing Legislative Auditor's Office staff, <br />supplemented when needed with the limited engagement of outside consultants <br />possessing expertise not available in the Office. The limited scope review is principally <br />distinguished from the broad scope review in requiring less time and money, which is <br />made possible by its narrower subject focus. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.