My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RES 131 Draft 02 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Resolutions
>
1996-1998
>
RES 131 Draft 02 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2010 1:10:27 PM
Creation date
1/30/2009 9:50:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
RES
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
1996-1998
Bill/Resolution
131
Draft
02
Introducer
James Y. Arakaki, Chair
Referred To
COUNCIL
Action 1
Presented: FC - August 5, 1997
Action 2
Council: Adopts Res. 131-97, Draft 2 - 8/20/97
Status
Adopted
Date To Mayor or Adoption Date
8/20/1997
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
8/20/1997
Ayes
7-Arakaki; Chung; Leithead-Todd; Ray; Reynolds; Smith; Yagong
Noes
1-Tyler
Absent
1-Santangelo
Excused
0
Document Relationships
COM 0407.003 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the Legislative Auditor's Office. An overview of the Internal Control Procedures is <br />presented bel~w. <br /> <br />OVERVIEW OF INTERNAL CONTROL PROCEDURES <br /> <br />Upon Council approval of the initiating document, the Legislative Auditor assigns one or <br />more staff members to the project. Throughout the course of an expanded research report <br />or special study, the staff will maintain an objective, independent, and professional <br />attitude. Staff will exercise due professional care. They do not, in their contacts outside <br />the office, express agreement or disagreement with the opinions of officials or positions <br />taken by the agency, nor do they advise agency staff or comment on the quality of agency <br />work. They do not urge Council approval or rejection of pending research proposals. <br /> <br />During the expanded research report or special study, staff will not release information <br />they have developed or collected. No information about the study is given to any person <br />or agency until it has been completed and the report distributed, except with the approval <br />of the Legislative Auditor. <br /> <br />All correspondence drafted by staff, including informal written requests for information, <br />is reviewed and approved by the Legislative Auditor before being finalized. All <br />correspondence shall be signed by the Legislative Auditor or the appropriate Council <br />Member. <br /> <br />An expanded research program or special study process may be comprised of four main <br />phases as shown below. The process is different than the larger, more comprehensive <br />types of audits. <br /> <br />Phase 1: Prqiect Formulation and Plannin.g <br /> <br />Pre-authorization: An expanded research or special study request is initiated by <br />Council Member(s) and approved by resolution. The scope should be included in the <br />resolution or drafted for subsequent approval. <br /> <br />Post-authorization: If consultants are to be contracted, staff drafts research or <br />special study specifications, bid documents, contract and its execution. If Legislative <br />Auditor's Office is to conduct the research program, staff drafts work plan and its <br />execution. <br /> <br />Phase 2: Fieldwork and Report Develovment <br /> <br />Staff conducts field work as laid out in work plan. <br /> <br />A report 0utline is prepared and a preliminary draft is prepared. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.