HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0147.000 2008-2010William P. Kenoi
Mayor
r~ca+m
car..~..~a~~___.
rY nor. .,CMN1tT' (~.efUnetl
r ~'•
•' :• Williaro T. Taka6a
Mawging Direcror
Welly Lau
County of Hawaii ~DnhMaaogiagDiretlw
891 Ululani SVeet • Hilo, Hawaii 96720-3982 • (808) 961-8211 • Fax (808) 9615553
KONA 75.5706 Kualoni Hi~way, Suim 103 Keilua-Kona, Hawaii 96740
(808) 329.5226 Far (808) 326.5663
February 3, 2009
Honorable J Yoshiinoto, Chairman
and Members of the County Council
County ofHawai`i
333 KilaueaAyenue
Hilo, HI 96720
Dear Chairman Yoshimoto and Members:
State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application (SLU 08A00021)
Request: Agricultural to Urban
Change of Zone Application (REZ 08-000085)
Request: A-20a to ML-la
Applicant: Hawaiian Rainforest Water Co., LLC
Tax Map Key: 1-6-3:18 and 23
Change of Zone Application (REZ 08.000087)
Applicant: Michael Tokunaga and Peggy Konanui-Tokunaga
Request: RS-10 to CN-10
Tax Map Key: 2-2-34:88 -
/Change of Zone Application (REZ 08-000088)
Applicant: S. Russell and Aldko Oda
RequesC RS-10 tc CN-10
Tax Map Key: 2-2-34:36
Change of Zone Ordinance No. 06 137 lRR9 709, DockeF Ref. No. 91-000003)
Change of Zone Ordinance No. 06 ] 3 B (REZ 524, Docket Ref. No. 85-00003
Applicant: Samson LLC
Request: Amendment to Condition C of Ordmance Nas. 06 137 and 06 138
Tax Mao Kev: 7-5-10:nortion 13
As requued by Chapter 4, Sec. 6-4.3(C), Hawaii County Charter, transmitted herewith for the County
Council's consideration and action are the Planning Commission's letters and enclosures regarding the
above-referenced requests.
S'ncerely,
am P. K of
Mayor
Enclosures / (~7
cc: Planning Department Comm. NO.~
CounTy of Hawai i is an E9uaI Opportunity Provide and Employer. (ref, j0:
Ref. Date, F~~2 2004
~B~It 327
County of Hawaii
PLANNING COMMISSION
Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street, Suite3 • Hilo, Hawai `i 96720
Phone (808) 961-8298 Fax (808) 961-8742
February 3, 2009 0
co
i)
O ~` ^"
m -,,
_
~ ,_ ;"T ,
The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman -<='' ca
and Members of the County Council : +"'~
County of Hawaii ;._, ~ ~r
333 Kilauea Avenue, 2°d Floor T
~"
i_. ";.r '"
rV '=~
~v
Hilo, HI 96720 ~" ~
crt
Dear Chairman Yoshimoto and Council Members:
Change of Zone Application (REZ 08-000088)
Applicant S. Russell and Akiko Oda
Request RS-10 to CN-10
Tax Ma~Key: 2-2-34:36
The Planning Commission at its duly held public hearing on January I5, 2009, reviewed and.
acted on the above-referenced request for a Change of Zone from a Single Family Residential -
10,000 square toot (RS-10) to a Neighborhood Commercial - 10,000 square foot (CN-10) district
for approximately 22,500 square feet of land. The property is located along the east side of
Manono Street, approximately 300 feet north of the Manono Street - Hualani Street intersection,
Waiakea House Lots, Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii.
The Commission concurs with the following Planning Director's reasons for recommending
favorable consideration of the change of zone:
The applicants are requesting a Change of Zone from RS-10 to CN-10 to convert
an existing single-family dwelling into an office building to be leased to supplement the
applicants' retirement income. The existing 1,134-square toot structure currently used as
asingle-family residence will be renovated. The property is of sufficient size to
accommodate a minimum of 19 parking stalls. Existing landscaping will be retained or
improved upon. The applicants believe that an office use is appropriate given the
increased number of commercial uses in this area and commercial uses on the adjacent
properties. However, as there are residential uses in the general area, the applicants
intend to retain and renovate the existing residential structure rather than construct a new
building on the site.
Hawaii Cnuraty is an Equaf Opporhmi[~~ Provider and Employer
The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman
and Members of the County Council
Page 2
In order to consider an area for any type of zoning designation, the applicable
goals, policies and standards of the General Plan must be adequately addressed. 1t is only
through such a comprehensive policy analysis approach that evaluations and decisions
can be made [o better time and stage developments to achieve growth determined by the
General Plan and related planning documents. The implications of these evaluations and
decisions must also be considered as they may have an impact on similar areas in the
County.
The Change of Zone request from RS-10 to CN-10 will conform to the goals,
policies and standards of the General Plan Economic and Land Use Elements. The
General Plan is intended to be used as a policy guide for the coordinated growth and
development of all sectors of the County. The overall goals, policies and standards are
set forth to physically plan the lands in the County in the best interest of the island's
residents. Land Use is one of the principal focal points of public concern and policy. The
Land Use Element provides the primary basis for direct control and guidance of publicly
and privately owned resources.
The request conforms to the goals, policies and standards of the General Plan in
that the proposed development will be developed in an area adequately served by
necessary services such as water, utilities and transportation systems. The proposed
project conforms to the Commercial Development goal which states "provide commercial
developments that complement the overall pattern of transportation and land usage within
the island's regions, communities, and neighborhoods."
The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map component of the General
Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated
growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical
relationship among the various land uses. The LUPAG Map establishes the basic urban
and non-urban form for areas within the County. The project area is designated Medium
Density Urban on the LUPAG Map. The requested zoning would be consistent with the
urban designation on the LUPAG Map for this area of Hilo.
The State Land Use designation for the subject property is Urban. The property is
designated Urban by the Land Study Bureau's Productivity Rating. The Hilo Community
Development Plan (CDP), adopted in 1975, suggests residential uses in this area.
However, this area is transitioning to higher density commercial uses. The proposed
change of zone would complement the existing commercial land uses already in existence
and provide for an orderly development of the area.
The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman
and Members of the County Council
Page 3
The property is located on Manono Street, adjacent to a real estate office to the
north and Durrant Media Five to the south. The property is landscaped, and there is a
single-family dwelling on the site. The land uses in the area are a mix of residential and
commercial uses. The Big Island Land real estate office is located adjacent to the
property to the north and zoned CG-7.5. Adjacent to the property to the south is Durrant
Media Five, zoned CN-7.5 in 1998. The Ke Kilohana Oka Malamalama Church is
located diagonally across Manono Street to the southwest. Within 500 - 600 feet of the
property are single family dwellings and various commercial uses including Freddy's
Restaurant, the HGEA office, and the Hilo Hooganji Mission church on the corner of
Manono and Pi`ilani Streets.
All utilities and services are available to the site. All essential utilities are
available to the project site. The project will connect to the existing County sewer
system. Solid waste will be disposed of by commercial handlers. The property has no
severe geological or topographical problems which cannot be rectified or which would
render the land unusable. The project site is located within Zone "X", area determined to
be outside the 500-year floodplain. All development generated storm run-off shall be
disposed of on-site and not allowed onto adjacent properties or roadways.
Access to the site is from Manono Street, a County roadway with aright-of-way
of 50 feet fronting the subject parcel. According to the City of Hilo Zone Map, Manono
Street is proposed to be widened to a 60-foot right-of-way; thus affecting five feet of
properties along Manono Street. The Department of Public Works (DPW) recommends
that access be limited to a single location on Manono Street. The DPW also recommends
improvements to the entire frontage of Manono Street consisting of, but not limited to,
pavement widening with concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk, drainage improvements, and
any required utility relocation.
By letter dated October 29, 2008, the applicants requested a "no effect" letter from
the DLNR-HPD. No professional surveys were conducted of the site due to the history of
extensive disturbance. No professional flora or fauna surveys were conducted of the site.
The applicant does not believe that rare or endangered floral or faunal resources are on
the site as the project site has been improved and is located within an urban environment
close to existing commercia] uses.
The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman
and Members of the County Council
Page 4
The request is not contrary to Chapter 205A, Hawaii Revised Statutes, relating to
Coastal Zone Management. The property is not located in the Special Management Area.
There is no record of a designated public access to the shoreline or mountain areas that
traverses the site. According to the applicants, no valued cultural, historical or natural
resources exist on the property and there is no evidence~of any traditional and customary
Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the site. Thus, it is not anticipated that the
proposed request will have any adverse impact on cultural or historical resources in the
area. Therefore, no action is necessary to protect these rights.
Based on the above, approval of the change of zone request from aSingle-Family
Residential (RS-10) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN-10) zoned district would result
in an appropriate land use pattern that will further benefit the general public.
For your favorable consideration, an amendment to Section 25-8-33 (City of Hilo Zone Map), of
the County Zoning Code is transmitted.
We are enclosing copies of the staff Background and Planning Director's Recommendation for
your information.
Sincerely,
ll /I ,,
Rodney Watanabe, Chairman
Planning Commission
Loda02PC
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Sidney Fuke
S. Russell and Akiko Oda
Department of Public Works
Department of Water Supply
DOT-Highways, Honolulu
Lincoln Ashida, Esq., Corporation Counsel
C
`' Y
BOdaREZ.doc-12/17/08
COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BACKGROUND REPORT
S. RUSSELL AND AKIKO ODA
CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 08-881
S. RUSSELL AND AKII{O ODA have submitted an application for a Change of Zone
from Single-Family Residential 10,000 square feet (RS-10) to Neighborhood Commercial 10,000
square feet (CN-10) for approximately 22,500 square feet of land. The property is located on the
east side of Manono Street, approximately 300 feet north of the Manono Street-Hualani Street
intersection, Waiakea House Lots, Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii, TMK: 2-2-34: 36.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
1. Request/Project Description: Change of Zone from RS-10 to CN-10 to convert an
existing single-family dwelling into an office building to be leased to supplement the
applicants' retirement income. The existing 1,134-square foot structure currently used as
asingle-family residence will be renovated. The property is of sufficient size to
accommodate minimum of 19 parking stalls. Existing landscaping will be retained or
improved upon. (Planning Department Exhibit 1-Change of Zone application)
2. Objectives: The applicants believe that an office use is appropriate given the increased
number of commercial uses in this azea and commercial uses on the adjacent properties.
However, as there are residential uses in the general area, the applicants intend to retain
and renovate the existing residential structure rather than construct a new building on the
site.
3. Timetable: Renovation to commence upon securing all development permits, with
projected occupancy by mid to late 2009.
4. Landowners: Akiko K. and Shigeyasu R. Oda Trust.
OTHER INFORMATION
5. Proposed CN zoning:
Height limit - 40 feet.
Setback -front, 15 feet; side yards 8 feet.
-1-
ATTACH: Crnm. 147
Bill 32
• Landscaping -required on all front yards; side yard requires a screening hedge not
less than forty-two inches in height, within five feet of the property line, except for
necessary drives and walkways.
• Plan approval required.
(P.D. Exhibit 2 -Chapter 25, Zoning Code, Division 10, Neighborhood Commercial
Districts)
STATE AND COUNTY PLANS
6. State Land Use Designation: Urban.
7. General Plan LUPAG Map: Medium Density Urban.
8. County Zoning: RS-10.
9. Hilo Community Development Plan: The Hilo Community Development Plan adopted
by Resolution No. 1 on May 21, 1975 designates this area as RM-4.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA
10. Subject Property: The approximately 22,500 square foot landscaped property is
improved with asingle-family dwelling.
11. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: The land uses in the area aze a mix of residential
and commercial uses. The Big Island Land real estate office is located adjacent to the
property to the north and zoned CG-7.5. Adjacent to the property to the south is Durrant
Media Five, zoned CN-7.5 in 1998. The Ke Kilohana Oka Malamalama Church is located
diagonally across Manono Street to the southwest. Within 500 - 600 feet of the property
are single family dwellings and various commercial uses including Freddy's Restaurant, the
HGEA office, and the Hilo Hooganji Mission church on the corner of Manono and Piilani
Streets.
12. U.S.D.A. Soil Type: Keaukaha extremely stony muck, 6 to 20 percent slopes (rKFD).
The Keaukaha Series consists of well drained, thin organic soils over pahoehoe lava
bedrock.
13. Land Study Bureau's Productivity Rating: Urban.
14. Noise Impacts: Existing ambient noise includes airport/aviationuse and traffic. To
mitigate short-term noise impacts during the construction phase, the applicants state that
-2-
site work will be limited to daylight hours and on weekdays.
15. Air Quality: The proposed project will not directly impact air quality in the area.
Fugitive dust during construction can be mitigated by compliance with the regulations of
the Department of Health.
16. FIIZIVI: Zone "X", an area outside of the 500-year flood plain.
17. Coastal Hazard: The property is not an oceanfront parcel, and will not affect, or be
affected by shoreline processes.
18. Recreational Resources: The proposed development will not reduce the size of the
coastline or other areas used for public recreational uses.
19. Scenic Resources: The project will not affect the line-of--sight towards the ocean or the
mountains.
20. Flora/Fauna: As the project site has been improved and is located within an urban
environment close to commercial, industrial and residential uses, no professional surveys
were conducted of the site. The applicant believes that there are no rare or endangered
floral or faunal resources within or proximate to the project site.
21. ArchaeologicaVHistorical Resources: No professional surveys were conducted of the
site, due to the history of extensive disturbance. By letter dated October 29, 2008, the
applicants have requested a "no effect" letter from the Department of Land and Natural
Resources Historic Preservation Division.
22. Cultural or Native Gathering Rights: There is no evidence of any traditional and
customary Native Hawauan rights being practiced on the site, nor existence of any known
valued cultural, historical or native resources in the area.
23. Public Access: There is no record of a designated public access to the shoreline or
mountain areas that traverses the properties.
PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES
24. Access: Access is from Manono Street, a County roadway with aright-of--way of 50 feet
fronting the subject parcel. According to the City of Hilo Zone Map, Manono Street is
proposed to be widened to a 60-foot right-of--way; thus affecting five feet of properties
-3-
along Manono Street. The Department of Public Works recommends that access be
limited to a single location on Manono Street.
25. Water: County water is available to the property.
26. Wastewater: The project area is serviced by a County sewer system.
27. Solid Waste: Solid waste will be handled by commercial haulers.
28. Essential Utilities and Services: Electricity and telephone services are available to the
project site. County fire stations, police and emergency medical services are available to
the property.
AGENCIES' AND ORGANIZATIONS' COMMENTS
29. Department of Public Works: P.D. Exhibit 3 -December 10, 2008 memo
30. Fire Department: P.D. Exhibit 4 -November 24, 2008 memo
31. Department of Environmental Management: P.D. Exhibit 5 -November 24, 2008
memo
32. Department of Health: P.D. Exhibit 6 -November 24, 2008 memo
AGENCIES - NO COMMENTS OR OBJECTIONS
33. Police Department, DLNR Land Division
AGENCIES - NO RESPONSE
34. Department of Water Supply, Civil Defense Agency, DLNR Historic Preservation
Division, Department of Transportation
PUBLIC COMMENTS
35. None as of this writing.
-4-
,4
?SOB orr 29 Rol ? r, 20
?~NNlrli:; ~t=3~RrMENT
~VUNT`r 0. I ~l~WAll
APPLICATION
FOR
COUNTY REZONING
(RS-10 to CN-10)
S. RUSSELL AND AKIKO ODA
Waiakea Houselots, South Hilo, Hawai i
TMK: (3) 2-2-34: 036
Prepared For:
S. Russell and Akiko Oda
Prepared By:
Sidney M. Fuke, Planning Consultant
October 2008
Planning Dept.
Exhibit /
CHANGE` OF ZONE APPLICATION
COUNTY OF AAWAII
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(Type or legibly print the requested information)
APPLICANT:
APPLICANT'S
TE: ~~ Z do
ADDRESS: 190 Mamaki Street
Hilo Hawaii 96720
LIST APPLICANT'S INTEREST IF NOT OWNER:
LIST PRINCIPAL(S) INCLUDING NAMES OF MAIN OFFICERS:,
PHONE:(Bus.) (808) 935-9358 (Fax) (Res) (808L59-9770
LANDOWNER SIGNA'
DATE: /O~~.I~/o p
(May be by.letter)
LANDOWNER(S) ADDRESS: 190 Mamaki Street Hilo, HI 96720
REQUEST: RS-10 TO CN-10
(Existing zoning) (Proposed Zoning)
TAX MAP KEY: (3) 2-2-34: 036
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 533 Manono Street Hilo_ HI 96720
SIZE OF PROPERTY OR AFFECTED AREA(S) TO BE REZONED: 22,500 square feet
AGENT: Sidnev M. Fuke, Planning Consultant
ADDRESS: 100 Pauabi Street. Suite 212, Hilo. Hawaii 96720
TELEPHONE:(Bus.) (808) 969-1522 (Res.) (Fax) (8081969-7996
Please indicate to whom orianal correspondence and conies should be sent.
ORIGINAL: Sidney M. Fuke COPIES: S. Russell Oda
ti
ATTACHMENT
Commercial, RM, Resort, & Industrial
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
COONTY OF HAWAII
APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE
1. if your request is approved, do you intend to subdivide.
the subject land in accordance with the approved change
of zone? No
If des, please answer the rest of question I and then to
question 3.
a• How many acres of the requested area do you intend to
subdivide?
b. Into what lot sizes?
c. if your request is approved, approximately how long
after the date of approval do you expect to submit
your subdivision plans to the Planning Department
for preliminary approval?
If you intend to subdivide, please submit a preliminary
schematic subdivision plan together with your change of
zone application form.
2. If you nave no firm plans of subdividing the subject area,
do you intend to:
a. Sell or lease the land to someone who has firm
plans? No
b. Sell or lease the land to someone who has tentative
plans? No .
c. Sell or lease the land to someone who has no plans? No
d- Keep it? Yes
e. other (please state)
S
f. If you intend to do either a, b, or c, please elaborate
on the kind of plans the other party has. Please, also,
include in your answer approximately how soon after
approval of your rezoning do you 'expect to transfer the
subject land to another party.
N/A
3. What specific building plans do you have for the subject land?
Include in your answer the following: type of building
(apartment, office, launderette, etc.); financing arrangement;
timetable for construction; and any other information which you
feel might help us in evaluating your request.
Renovate the existing dwelling for office use.
4. Have you performed any study which would demonstrate a need for
your proposed building and/or development? No
if so, please elaborate on your findings in the space provided
below.
-2-
5• Have you performed any study which discusses the
environmental impacts your request would nave on the
surrounding area and/or the County? Yes
If so, please elaborate on your findings in the space
provided below.
Please refer to accompanying planning and environmental report
6. Are there any buildings on the subject area? Yes
If so, what kind?
Single family dwelling
What do you intend to do with those buildings if your
request is approved?
Renovate the dwelling for office use
~• Is the subject land currently being used for any
agricultural activity? No
if so, please list the kinds of products grown on and
how many square feet or acres of land per product?
-3-
1
B• To your knowledge, has there been any flooding and/or
drainage problem on the subject area?
If so, please describe the problem.
9. Do you think that the roads leading to the subject area
needs improvement?
If so, what kind?
No
No
Is the road adequate for the proposed traffic volume
or load?
10. What sort of governmental assistance and/or improvements
do you feel will be needed in the subject area when
developed?
a. Schools
b, Roads
c. Sewer
d. Drainage
e. Police Protection
f. Fire Protection
g, Recreational Facilities
h. Recreational Facilities
i.
yes
Yes
wo
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
-4-
For those checked "yes," please elaborate what type or kinds of.
improvements and/or assistance are needed.
11. Have you performed any historic sites study and/or survey of the
subject area? If so, what were the results? Please, also,
submit a copy of the study together with this change of zone
supplement.
No. The site has been improved and used for a residence for over 50
Signature: ~/
Address : 190 Mamaki Street Hilo, HI 96720
Telephone: 959-9770
Date : October 24, 2008
-5-
6338A/SOA
P. D. 5/84
COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT
APPLICATION FOR COUNTY REZONING REQUEST (RS-10 to CN-10)
S. RUSSELL AND AKIKO ODA
WAIAKEA HOUSELOTS, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII
TAX MAP KEY: (3) 2-2-034: 036
INTRODUCTION
-The applicants, S. Russell and Aki Oda, own the subject property
consisting of 22,500 square feet. They would like to convert the existing
single-family dwelling into an office building. As such, they are requesting
-the rezoning of the subject site from Single-family Residential (RS-10) to
Neighborhood Commercial (CN-10).
11. PROJECT LOCATION
The subject site is situated in the Waiakea Houselots in the City of Hilo. It
consists of 22,500 square feet and identified by TMK: 2-2-034: 036.
More specifically, it is located on the east side of Manono Street, midblock
between Piilani Street. and Hualani Street. Adjacent to the site, there is an
architect's office - Durrant Media Five - to the south, while a real estate
office is located to its north. Both properties are zoned commercial.
There are othercommercial uses, a church, and a few residences within
500 feet of the subject property. The si#e has since been graded and
leveled. (Figures 1 and 2)
A. Project Concept and Components
As noted earlier, the applicants would like to convert an existing
single-family dwelling into an office that would be either leased or
rented to supplement their retirement income. Given the increasing
amount of commercial uses in this area and the fact that adjoining
properties are both zoned commercial, the applicants believe that
office use would be appropriate- However, inasmuch as there are
still some residential uses in the general area, the applicants intend
to retain and renovate the existing residential structure rather than
construct a new building at this time.
As proposed herein, the existing 1;134 square foot building -which
is currently been rented as asingle-family residence -would be
renovated to comply with building code and American with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The structure is setback 40
5
~~~~~
PAaps
~oa H 19 Kama - M ~ h r ~`"~~ ~.~~ o - I I f ~ f
'M' z' Pv.~ to -•r_ ~ s~ o e 7
a+i '~~,~Fa~>~~ti`~~ s~ ~~s1~'~~'`'~ r f. ~ ~ ._-~ ~ ~c~i a ~ zt i
.~d'. ~. ICuavrd S[ } t s
~~ ~"' ~ ?r ~ , 2 + ~"CC.a`~''t+ c~ ° ~ Er+.` a Jl '" ~,
~` h~T` FY ~u-~+~`dr~rt S~`nat+i~v ~ m ~ 5 F ~~..
Y y
„;ri~~9.., ~ ~~ s' ~ ~ f tY+ ' <~ ~ Cpiranora st ^F'.
t Walloa Rluer a `_ ~~~ C ( ~ +o ~~ + ~ < ~ ~
"t"~Sla 2 ~af~C ~ 'v I - I a v .~ ~r ~ A -c t 't.,:
^` tl
1~ n.~ § $ '4 I F~ t` ~ ~G 1 ~~ L
w+a'tk~ Filen 54- `~ Pidanl Si ~. Pipani Sl d1 iTn '~ ;.°'~'~'1 ~~~~1~i
u pond ,~~ ` F ~. ~ ,°~~,a ~~t ~~ u~'dzwt~~ mt
T ~ '~ k ~4
C t .4 f N ~b F
a ~''~ry ~ ~ ~' m .~ ~~ r Aire ~ Y j^ g ~z~
'1 ~ ~ fi t 'w 'wi `~. t~l N'
i ~, --.~,alan,?.~.,,,_ _~Huahanl 6l ._,_~ Hualanl ~t ~,~~ t~~+ ~~~itynx4F
L. ~`
"'^ 7 - ~~ o ~m 1' ~`t ~''vY^ -
r e
o e T~~ .~, ~an~ r
RA fy ~ ~ c'; ~t a3" F~„w y~~?tl tg t
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_.. b ~ d' 3~t ~ Y~ta~
-"~KekuanaoaSt ~;;~ Keku_anaoaSt ^;;, -KekuanaaaSt~,~ ~o~ KQ .~ ~ ~'h.
q ~,t~~mt- 1= ~ -~, ~.
1 Ifallte Si t 4N~'t, 5~ ~I 'm~ ~ ~ 11 -.
}l _ I ~~oA@~ ~~ ~ h~ a_~ ~ ,
L..-1 L-.~ . ~ .__I f ~ ~ ~ ' I-.- _.._~~
1-,~~,~„~t __ Lellani st t.eilani st -
_ ~ '
d
f ~m r
r',
1 I°~ N`. N ty~ ~~ I tF. l,t
Address 533 Manono St GetGoogleMapsonyourphone
HIIO, H196720 Textthe xvrd "GMAPS"to 466453
Figure 1
m.
'~ 0.
_J
~~,
~ E
R
>y .~
's~. ~~
Ck. [tLC
5~' ~] J
tP( f2V , y
{~_ [€:. ~
iiE, '33 ~Ir{I
S3i ~F~
a, a ~I-
age i
n5 ='I
f e~Ng=.
} 34 tl $€9
Z~
:`
4
a5
~5
~~
~e ;F~
FWD
o 24y
Mi
9f 1v]d
fF1d]d I I \
~~ gsEg SubiectSite
,,,. ~a~
.~ a~E
Y y
N A`l ~ 9
~ °~ <e
Figure 2
1, ,
r
n~
l~~
u°u
s:
L
b I 0 +~xx~
a `~i
W ``5;
s f W iZ~iY
r'
h I m5
i II
i f
S ;
5 L. ~; «
"s k n
<3F~ ~$~~
"~ 3i~
:~: ~..
I ,I N~.
e
c
E ~; y x
a+
«~ sii
i
C~_
ml~p:da(r rri ~~ ~^°S
feet from Manono Street and 10 feet from the northern side
property line. It is set back more than 100 feet from the rear
property line and 60 feet from the south property line.
Although less than 5 parking stalls are required for this conversion,
the site has sufficient area to accommodate at least 19 stalls.
Access would continue to be from Manono Street. Furthermore,
since the site is already landscaped, the applicants intend to retain
most of them and/or improve upon them. (Figure 3)
B. Project Timetable and Cost
The applicants intend to secure the balance of the required
construction permits and begin making the improvements
immediately upon securing all development permits. Hopefully,
construction can begin early next year, with occupancy by the mid
to latter part of 2009.
The applicants estimate the cost of the project to be about
$100,000, which includes the cost of the parking area.
IV. INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
A. State Land Use
The subject property is designated Urban. As such, a boundary
amendment to cover the requested CN-10 zone is not needed.
B. County General Plan
The County General Plan Land Use Pattern Alloca#ion Guide
(LUPAG) map designates the site Medium Density. As such, a
General Plan amendment to the LUPAG map would not be
required.
Relative to the Medium Density designation, the General Plan
allows consideration for "Village and neighborhood commercial and
residential and related functions (3-story commercial; residential -
up to 35 units peracre." The requested zoning and planned uses
would be consistent with the uses envisioned within the Medium
area.
C. Hilo Community Development Plan
The Community Development Plan (CDP) attempts to further define
0
0
N
N
N
M A N O N O S T R E E
533 MANONO STREET
tax map key: 2-2-034036
.5165 Acreage (22,500 square feet)
Property Class: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Zoning: RS-10 (minimum building site area of
.70,000 square feet
O~ OWNER:
EXISTING SITE PLAN ~ ^ ~ ~ 190 MAMAKI STREET DA
SCALE 1'=20' HILO, HAWAII 96720
SCALE IN FEET
Fia re3
September 2008
the General Plan and serves as a guide for decision-makers. It
was adopted by the Planning Commission in 1975, over 25 years
ago. Although reviewed by the County Council,-the CDP was never
adopted.
The CDP's Land Use Concept map identifies a RM-4 designation
for this area. Although the proposed uses are not residential, it
should be noted that requested CN-10 zoning would allow single
and multi-family residential uses.
Notwithstanding the technical inconsistency, however, it should be
noted that the General Plan has been amended three (3) times,
and much has occurred in the way of development in Hilo and its
outlying areas. Accordingly, some of the planning assumptions
reflected in the CDP are obsolete. An updated CDP would be
timely.
Absent the availability of a relevant intermediary planning
document, one must rely only on the General Plan LUPAG map
and policies. In the end, the General Plan is more critical, as the
County Charter requires all zone changes to be consistent with it.
C. County Zoning
The County zoning of the requested area is Single-family
Residential (RS-90). Over the past ten years, there have been a
number of commercial rezonings in this general area, resulting in
the commercial zoning of properties on both sides of the subject
site. Other rezoning include a 87,500 square foot parcel (Ord. 01-
03} approved on March 31, 2001 that fronts both Manono and
Hinano Streets. This site is less than 500 feet to the south. A
property on the west side of Manono Street and less than 600 feet
south of the subject site was also rezoned to CN-20 in 2006. It is
thus clear that this section of Houselots is undergoing a land use
transformation from single-family residential to light commercial
uses. (See Figure 5)
In the event the requested Neighborhood Commercial (CN-10)
request were approved, all related land use and development
codes such as Plan Approval, parking, landscaping, fire, ADA, and
the like would be complied with by the applicants.
D. Other Permitting Considerations
The site is not Located wRhin the County Special Management Area
(SMA). As such, no SMA-Use Permit would be required.
However, as noted earlier, other construction-related permits would
still be required. These would be of the "ministerial° variety, such
as Plan Approval, grading permit, building permit, driveway permit,
Department of Health clearances, and the like.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
A. General Description
The 22,500 square foot site is rectangular in shape. The site's
frontage along Manono Street is 100 feet, with a depth of 225 feet.
The subject property is now used as asingle-family residence. If
the rezoning is approved, the applicants intend to provide sufficient
notice to the tenant and assist with its relocation efforts.
B. Climate, Soil and Topography
According to the State Commission on Water Resource
Management, the nearest rain gauge in this area is the Hilo Airport.
The rainfall data of this gauge notes that over the past 37 years, the
annual median rainfall for this area was 131.1 inches. The wetter
months tend to occur between October through April. The average.
daily temperature ranges from a minimum of 61 degrees to a
maximum of 79 degrees Fahrenheit. Wind patterns are generally
tradewinds (easterly) during the day and westerly or mountain
winds during the evenings.
The property's elevation is approximately twenty (20) feet above
mean sea level. It is fairly flat for the most part. There are no
perceptible topographic or geologic constraints on the subject site.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (now
known as the Natural Resource Conservation Service) Land Study
Bureau Overall Master Productivity Rating designates this site
Keaukaha Series (rKFD), which is extremely rocky muck, well
drained, thin organic soils overlying pahoehoe lava bedrock.
Runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard slight.
Because the site is part of a built up urban area, the University of
Hawai i Land Study Bureau Overall Master Productivity Ratinq map
does not classify this site and immediate surrounding areas.
Likewise, the site is not classified under the Agriculture Lands of
Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH) classification system.
Thus, the State's classification system does not recognize this site
as being agriculturally important.
C. Natural Hazards
Drainage
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood
Insurance Ra#e Map (FIRM) identifies the area of the
requested zoning to be within Zone X (areas outside of 500-
yearflood). There are no existing drainageways on the site:
Nonetheless, as there will be an added level of impervious
surface resulting from the proposed parking area, there may
be an issue relating to potential increased run-off. In that
event, drywell(s) or similar type of accommodations will be
implemented, subject to the review and approval of the
Department of Public Works and State Department of Health
via the Underground Injection Control (UIC) permit process.
With the proposed on-site drainage improvements, and since
none of the proposed improvements will occur within the
Floodway (AE) designated area, all potential drainage and/or
flooding issues could be reasonably addressed and
mitigated.
2. Tsunami Hazard
The site is located within the Civil Defense's Tsunami
Evacuation Zone, as is much of Waiakea Houselots and the
government complex at Kaiko'o. Accordingly, during
tsunami threats, appropriate evacuation measures must be
taken.
Given the fact that the proposed use will be for office and not
residential, there should be sufficient response time to
minimize danger to lives.
3. Volcanic and Earthquake Hazards
The United States Geological Survey (USGS) classifies the
subject site as Lava Flow Hazard Zone 3, oh a scale of
ascending risk, 9 to 1. This designation applies to all of Hilo
There is very little that can be done to protect structures and
improvements on the site from lava flows. Relative to
protection of life, however, this would be achieved through
the evacuation routes and warning systems provided by the
County Civil Defense agency. Such notices will be
prominently placed within the office building.
The entire island of Hawaii falls within Earthquake Zone 4,
according to the County Building Code. As such, the
renovated structure will have to meet with the more
restrictive seismic hazard structural requirements of the
Building Code.
D. Fauna Resources
The applicants do not believe that rare or endangered faunal
resources are likely to be found within or proximate to the subject
si#e. This is due to the existing residential use and the already
developed state of the subject area and its surrounding area.
Due to the developed state of this area, the faunal resources
should be somewhat typical of other developed areas. One may
thus find bird species such as the Spotted Dove, Japanese White-
eye, House Finch, Common Myna, and the like. Domestic animals
such as cats and dogs, and other animals like rats and mongoose
are also common.
None of these are endangered animals. As such, it is unlikely that
the development of this property would cause any adverse faunal
impacts.
E. Flora Resources
As with the description of the site's faunal resources, no
professional botanical survey was done of the subject area.
The existing landscaping consists of a few older trees, such as a
monkey pod and macadamia nut tree, as well as a lawn. The
applicants are also in the process of planting podocarpus trees
around the perimeter boundary of the property.
These are all non-native and non-endangered plants. As such,
there should be no adverse floral impacts.
F. Historic/Cultural/Archaeological Resources
Likewise, no commissioned archaeological survey of the site was
made. The historical residential use and accompanying
landscaping of the entire site make it less likely to find any
archaeological features on the site. Nonetheless, during the course
of improving the site, should any unanticipated archaeological
features or sites be uncovered, work will cease and the applicants
will immediately notify the Planning Department.
G. Valued Cultural Resources
In view of the recent Hawaii State Supreme Court's "PASH" and
"Ka Pa'akai O Ka'Aina decisions, the issue relative to native
Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights must be addressed.
Specifically, there must be a discussion of the cultural, historical,
and natural resources and associated tradition and customary
practices of this site.
In this situation, the subject site is not adjacent and/or proximate to
the shoreline. As such, gathering of marine life and coastal access
is not an issue.
It is not known whether the subject or immediate surrounding area
was used in the recent past for the gathering of plants by native
Hawaiians. However, as the site has been used as a residence
with no claims being made to date, it would appear highly unlikely
that the site would serve such purpose today.
In the unlikely event that legitimate gathering claims are made by
native Hawaiians, the applicants intend to respect and honor such
claims and provide the needed access within the site.
Based on the above, it does not appear that the project would have
any potential adverse impact relative to the cultural and historical
resources of the area.
H. Water and Coastal Resources
The Hilo area is underlain by basal groundwater. The Wailoa River
is approximately''/a mile from the subject site. The coastline is
about a mile away.
The proposed development is already connected to the County's
sewer system along Manono Street. This should further reduce
potential adverse groundwater or nearshore water impacts resulting
from this project.
Further as noted earlier, prior to the installation or use of any
drywells on the site to address on-site drainage concerns, the
appropriate UIC permit from the State will be taken. At that time,
impacts to water and coastal resources will be carefully examined.
I. Noise, Air Quality, and Dust
The existing background ambient noise level in this area is wind,
foliage, birds, and the like. However, the significant manmade
noise is influenced by the traffic associated primarily along Manono
Street. With the traffic, the noise level is relatively high, averaging
more than 55 Ldn.
The existing landscaping already help mitigate this noise impact. It
should be noted, however, as the proposed use would be for an
office, the noise impact should not be significant, unlike a
residential use.
There will also be short-term noise impacts during the construction
phase. To mitigate this impact, the development of this project -
particularly the site work -will be limited to daylight hours and on
weekdays. Contractors will also be required to comply with
established State Department of Health guidelines and standards
relating to noise and emission controls.
The proposed development should not generate any direct air
uali impacts. As the project itself is not expected to have uses
that generate adverse air pollutants, the only discernible air quality
impact would be associated with vehicular traffic to and from the
site. While the added traffic will have an impact to the ambient air
quality, the impact should not be significant. This is due in part to
the higher EPA standards for vehicular air emissions and the
prevailing tradewinds.
All of the required parking area within the project site will be paved
with an all-weather, dust free surface. Landscaping will also be
required as part of the Plan Approval requirement. As such, with
the exception of minimal construction dust in the beginning, long
term dust generated by the project should be insignificant.
J. Scenic and Visual Considerations
In the Natural Beauty element of the General Plan, there are sites
or areas listed as scenic resources.. The subject site is not listed as
a scenic site. However, there were a few examples cited in the Hilo
area, which were the backdrop of Mauna Kea and Hilo Bay.
The proposed development would not have any visual impacts on
Mauna Kea or Hilo Bay. The view of Mauna Kea in this area is
visible from Manono Street. However, because the subject site is
located on the east side of Manono Street; any development of this
site should not impede or obstruct the views of Mauna Kea from
Manono Street.
The view of Hilo Bay is somewhat visible from this area. Given the
location of the site, however, vehicles traveling along Manono
Street should not have this view impeded.
Thus, with the existing height of the structure and the location of the
site in relation to the views of the significant landmarks, the visual
impact should not be significant, if at all.
VI. SOCIAL AND RELATED CONSIDERATIONS
A. Surrounding Land Uses
The surrounding land uses in this area are a mixture of low to
moderately dense residential and commercial uses. While there
are a number of single-family residences, with the "ohana-nization"
of lots, there are also a number of duplexes. There are also
churches, commercial-retail and commercial-ofFce uses, as well as
a potato chip manufacturing plant, all within 600 feet of the subject
site along Manono Street.
The requested rezoning would be generally consistent with the
evolving mixture of commercial and residential land use pattern in
this area. The properties on both sides of the subject site are
zoned for commercial uses.
B. Economic Imaacts
The requested zoning would have some measure of economic
impact, as it would provide short-term employment opportunities for
those in the construction and related industries.
When completed, the project would provide an opportunity for a
small office use to operate in the structure. It is estimated that the
size of the office should generate employ between 3-5 persons.
A commercial rezoning would also increase the tax revenues to the
County. However, there could be some real property tax
consequences for the adjoining residentially zoned properties. As
the assessed valuation of the subject property rises due to the
higher commercial use, there could be some fallout to neighboring
properties. However, a landowner who wishes to retain the
residential use would have the option of dedicating its land for
residential use.
C. Agriculturallmpacts
The subject site has not been used for agricultural purposes for
over 50 years. It was and continues to be used residentially.
Given the urban setting, the agricultural impacts resulting from this
rezoning should not be significant.
Vii. INFRASTRUCTURE CONSIDERATIONS
A. Road and Traffic
The subject site fronts Manono Street. Manono Street is a 2-lane
County road which serves as one of several north/south roads in
this part of Hilo. It has aright-of-way of 50 feet with a 22-foot wide
pavement and graveled shoulders.
Manono Street is designated as a "collector" road on the Zoning
Map. Such a designation requires a sixty (60) foot right-of-way.
The applicants are prepared to set aside five (5) feet of their
property to accommodate this designation.
This portion of Manono Street is straight. As such, there is
adequate sight distance for ingress and egress movements. The
applicants, pursuant to the requirements of the Department of
Public Works will make the necessary driveway improvements.
The applicants do not anticipate vehicular movements to and from
the site to be substantial. Generally, they will be associated with
employee movements between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Client traffic should average no more
than 5 movements every 60 minutes during the course of the day.
As such, the traffic impacts along Manono Street should not be
significant.
B. Water
Water service to the project site is from the Piihonua well source.
There is an existing 5/8-inch meter serving the site from Manono
Street. In the event this needs to be upgraded to a 1-inch meter, it
will be done by the applicants. As an office, however, the
ro
applicants do not anticipate water use to exceed two (2} units or
1,200 gallons per day.
Should this application be favorably considered, the applicants - if
needed -could secure the required water commitments from the
Department of Water Supply for this project.
C. Wastewater
The subject area is serviced by the County sewer system. There is
aline fronting Manono Street and the site is already connected to
this line.
D. Solid Waste
Solid waste will be handled by commercial haulers who will dispose
of the refuse at the county landfill in Hilo, which is at or nearing
capacity. This landfill must be closed when full. Unless an
approved site is located in Hilo, the waste will have to be hauled
and ultimately disposed off at Pu'uanahulu in West Hawaii.
There should be minimal land clearing necessary, as the existing
structure will be used. For the construction phase of this project,
efforts will be taken by the contractor to minimize disposal and all
disposal will be done at approved disposal sites. This and other
waste reduction methods will be taken during the construction and
operating phases of this project.
E. Other Government Services
As this area is already part of an urban area, it already has access
to a number of services. All of the required police, fire, and related
services are available. Police protective services are provided from
the main station along Kapiolani Street, less than 2 miles from the
site. Likewise, the nearest fire station would be at Central and
Waiakea, both within 2 miles from the subject site. There are also
the Kaumana and Kawailani stations, located less than 4 miles
away. Emergency medical and paramedical services are also
provided from these stations.
The Hilo Medical Center is located approximately 3 miles from the
site and is managed by a quasi-State entity, the East Hawaii
Region of the Hawaii Health System Corporation. This facility is
- one of 5 licensed hospitals on the island.
it
As this project is a commercial one, it should have little or no direct
impacts to schools, parks, and other related facilities. As the
project may indirectly generate a school demand, it should be noted
that the site is proximate to the K-12 Hilo Complex and Waiakea
Complex, both of which are less than 3 miles from the site. There
are also a number of public parks within a 2-mile radius.
Thus, no extension of government services would be required, and
existing facilities should be sufficient to accommodate the demand
expected from this project
F. Other Utilities
All other utilities such as telephone and electrical services are
available to the site.
VIII. IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS
A. Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of Environment
and Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity
The short-term use of the site would probably be the same as the
current use, which is limited residential use. This will continue until
the full improvements are completed, which will hopefully be mid or
late 2009.
This project should not result in any significantly adverse short or
long-term impacts that cannot be properly mitigated. There will be
direct and indirect economic benefits resulting from the construction
and implementation of this project. There will be construction jobs
created in the short-term and at least 3-5 full-time equivalent
positions created. Relatedly, the project will generate increased tax
revenues that can supplement the State and County's fiscal
resources.
Because of its location, this project will provide a service that can
be made reasonably accessible to the immediate neighborhoods
and surrounding commercial and industrial areas. The required
infrastructure - if needed -will be implemented by the applicants to
mitigate potential impacts of this project.
B. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources
The area of the requested rezoning has already been extensively
disturbed. As such, the commitment of natural or other resource
rz
(such as botanical, avifaunal, and archaeological), would not be
significant, if at all.
C. Mitigative Measures
The applicants intend to provide any required off and on-site
infrastructure in conjunction with the development of this project.
These will include on-site drainage system, Landscaping, road,
water, and wastewater improvements. All of these will be done in
conjunction with the permitting and permit implementation phases
of this project. If needed and/or required, off-site traffic-related
improvements at Manono Street fronting the property can be done
by the applicants.
If any inadvertent archaeological discoveries are made during any
construction phase of this project, the Planning Department will be
notified and appropriate mitigation will be taken before work is
resumed.
Additional landscaping, if required, could also be incorporated
within the project site, as well as along its boundaries. The
landscaping would be consistent with the Planning Department's
landscaping rules.
D. Alternatives to the Proposed Project
1. No Project
Under the status quo alternative, the site would remain in its
present residential use. Under this scenario, the site would
not be utilized to its highest and best use, as envisioned by
the General Plan and the commercial and residential growth
of the general area.
2. Development Based on Existing RS-10 Zoning
Under this alternative, the site could be subdivided into two
lots. Based on the Ohana dwelling provision of the Zoning
Code, each lot could conceivably support 2 dwellings for a
total of 4 dwellings. While that may be possible, residential
uses, however, may not be too desirable, due to noise
associated with the traffic along Manono Street.
3. Residential Rezoning
Another option could be to utilize this site for a denser
13
residential project. While that would still be consistent with
the General LUPAG's map Medium Density designation, it
may not be too feasible, given its location next to a major
connector road and the cost of the required off-site
infrastructure.
4. Evaluation of Alternatives
Leaving the property in its current state would not maximize
the use of the land. The land could continue to be used
residentially. However, there may be some safety factor with
more children in this area, given the collector road function
of Manono Street. This would also mean having to redirect
commercial uses to other areas of Hilo, areas that are
increasingly becoming less available.
There would also be diminished tax revenues and fewer
services to the public.
While alternative residential densities are possible, those
uses may not be really desirable, given its frontage along a
heavily traveled road and the cost to provide the required off-
site infrastructure.
Neither of the above alternatives could best deliver some
needed off-site infrastructure improvements as would the
requested commercial project. The proposed project would
make improvements fronting Manono Street . Then, too, the
rezoning would provide an opportunity for a SMALL business
to service the community.
In that regard, the project in totality would be consistent with
the land use objectives sought to be accomplished by the
County General Plan LUPAG map.
In view of the aforementioned, it would appear that none of
the alternatives would be more prudent and beneficial than
the requested CN-10 zoning alternative.
IX. REGULATORY ANALYSIS -County and State Land Use Policies
A. General Plan LUPAG Map
The General Plan provides for the long-range comprehensive
development of the island of Hawaii. It provides direction for
balanced growth in the County.
is
The LUPAG map designates the site Medium Density, a
designation that allows the requested CN10 zoning. Accordingly,
this request would be consistent with the LUPAG map. It should be
noted that none of the interim amendments proposed by the
Planning Director involves the subject site.
B. General Plan Policies
The requested zoning would be consistent with the goals, policies,
and standards of the Economic and Land Use Elements of the
General Plan. Specifically, the more pertinent ones follow:
Economic Element
Goals
• Provide residents with opportunities to improve their
quality of life.
• Economic development and improvement shall be in
balance with the physical and social environments of the
island of Hawaii.
• The County of Hawaii shall strive for diversity and
stability in its economic system.
• The County shall provide an economic environment
which allows new, expanded, or improved economic
opportunities that are compatible with the County's
natural and social environment.
Policies
• The County shall provide an economic environment
which allows new, expanded, or improved economic
opportunities that are compatible with the County's
natural and social environment.
The County shall strive for an economic climate which
provides its residents an opportunity for choice of
occupation.
• The County shall strive for diversification of its economy
by strengthening existing industries and attracting new
endeavors.
IS
The County shall encourage the development of a visitor
industry which is consistent with the social, physical, and
economic goals of the residents of the County.
Land Use Element (Commercial)
Goals
• Provide for commercial developments that maximize
convenience to its users.
Provide commercial developments that complement the
overall pattern of transportation and land usage within the
island's regions, communities, and neighborhoods.
Policies
Commercial facilities shall be developed in areas
adequately served by necessary services, such as water,
utilities, sewers, and transportation systems. Should
such services not be available, the development of more
intensive uses should be in concertwith a localized
program of public and private capital improvements to
meet the expected increased needs.
• Distribution of commercial areas shall be such as to best
meet the demands of neighborhood, community and
regional needs.
• The development of commercial facilities should be
designed to fit into the locale with minimum intrusion
while providing the desired services. Appropriate
infrastructure and design controls shall be incorporated
into the review of such developments
Standards
• Commercial developments shall be located in areas
adequately served by transportation, utilities, and
amenities. Commercial developments shall provide for
adequate internal circulation amongst commercial
facilities in the area.
Off-street parking and loading facilities shall be provided.
16
• Commercial development shall maintain or improve the
quality of the present environment through the
consideration of visual, access, landscaping, and other
design elements in their development.
• Preference shall be given to commercial lands with a
reasonably level topography.
Discussion
If approved, the project would provide needed services to
this sector of Hilo. Its location can provide support facilities
for other commercial users in this area, as well as the
neighboring residential community.
Relatedly, all required infrastructures are present or, if not,
will be provided by the applicants without taxing
government's servicing ability.
The site has limited on-site developmental constraints. The
site is not designated a floodway and instead designated "X"
areas outside of the 500 year storm. Because of its existing
developed residential use, archaeological, floral, or faunal
concerns should not be significant, if at all.
Relatedly, although there may be a potential for some
endemic birds to visit this area, the development of this site
would not remove a critical habitat. Then, too, there are
alternative areas that would be more suitable for any
habitats.
Furthermore, if there are inadvertent archaeological features
found on the site, work will stop and the State DLNR and
County Planning Department will be consulted before further
activities occur within the affected area.
Finally, the existing and any new structure will be renovated
and/or built to comply with the Zoning Code standards, such
as parking, setback, height, landscaping, and so forth.
C. Zonin
If the request were approved, the site would be used for office
purposes. The structure and improvements would be developed
consistent with the Zoning Code. No variances from the Code are
anticipated.
1~
D. Hawaii State Plan
Chapter 226, Hawaii Revised Statutes, outlines the long-range
goals and policies of the Hawaii State Plan. Said Plan is intended
to serve as a guide for the growth and future long-range
development of the State.
Pursuant to said requirement, a discussion of the pertinent policies
and goals and the project's relationship follows:
Goals
• A strong, viable economy characterized by stability, diversity,
and growth that enables the fulfillment of the needs and
expectations of Hawaii's present and future generations
• A desired physical environment characterized by beauty,
cleanliness, quiet, stable and natural systems, and uniqueness
that enhances the mental and physical well-being of the people
• Physical, social and economic well-being for individuals and
families that nourishes a sense of community responsibility and
caring of participation in family life.
Discussion
The proposed project would achieve these goals. It would provide
both direct and indirect employment opportunities for current and
future residents of the island; contribute to the island's overall tax
base and hence, increase both State and County revenues; and
complement and support other economic uses and in turn,
contribute to the stability, diversity, and growth of local and regional
economies.
This employment opportunity would come without adversely
affecting the environment. There is no known wildlife or plant life
listed as either endangered or threatened on the subject site.
Then, too, because of its historical residential use, the likelihood of
finding archaeological features on the site is quite remote.
Impacts to the surrounding areas would also not be significantly
adverse. All required infrastructures will be in place by the
applicants prior to occupancy of any portion of the project. These
include traffic improvements, and the wastewater and water
systems.
18
Furthermore, the provision andlor retention of natural landscaped
buffers around the perimeter of and selected portions within the
project site would also help mitigate any adverse visual and noise
impacts to neighboring residential properties.
G. Hawaii Coastal Zone Management Program
The objectives of the Hawaii Coastal Zone Management (CZM)
Program are outlined in Chapter 205a, Hawaii Revised Statutes.
The principal goal is to assure the protection and maintenance of
the State's coastal resources. Although the entire State falls within
the CZM area, the permitting process is geared for those areas
proximate to the coast and identified by the County as the Special
Management Area. Nonetheless, a general review of a project's
consistency to the CZM policies -regardless of its location -must
still be made.
In that regard, please note the following:
The proposed project will not have any substantial adverse
environmental or ecological effect. (Please refer to discussions
in Chapters V, VI, and VII). Any effect that may result will be
minimized to the extent practicable and will be clearly
outweighed by public interest.
• The proposed development would be consistent with the
objectives of the CZM program. Specifically:
• there would be no impact to the area's recreational
resources. This is not a shoreline property;
• because of its historical agricultural use, the project site
should not have any remaining historical resources. Any
inadvertent find during the course of construction can be
appropriately mitigated;
• the project will not affect any scenic and open space
resources;
• the coastal ecosystem will not be impacted;
• there will be more employment opportunities, and hence
furthering the economic uses of the site;
19
the site is more than a mile from the shoreline, and thus
there would be no coastal hazard or beach erosion or
marine resource impacts; and
public participation will be achieved through the hearings
on this request.
• The proposed development is consistent with the County
General Plan and other appropriate regulatory tools, such as the
Zoning Code.
20
ZONING § 25-5-100
Division 10. CN, Neighborhood Commercial Districts.
SeMion 25-5-100. Purpose and applicability.
The CN (neighborhood commercial) district applies to strategically located centers suitable for
commercial activities which shall be of such size and shape as will accommodate a compact shopping center
which supplies goods and services to a residential or working population on a frequent need or convenience
basis. This district is distinguished from a central commercial district which provides general business and
broad services to a city or region.
(1996, Ord. No. 96-160, sec. 2; ratified April 6, 1999.)
Section 25-5-101. Designation of CN districts.
Each CN (neighborhood commercial) district shall be designated by the symbol "CN" followed by a
number which indicates the minimum land azea, in thousands of squaze feet, required for each building site.
(1996, Ord: No. 96-160, sec. 2; mtified Apri16, 1999.)
Section 25-5-102. Permitted uses.
(a) The following uses shall be pemritted in the CN district:
(1) Adult day Gaze homes.
(2) Automobile service stations.
(3) Bed and breakfast establishments, as permitted under section 25-4-7.
(4) Boazding facilities, rooming, or lodging houses, provided that the maximum density shall be one
thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit.
(5) Business services.
(6) Cemeteries and mausoleums, as permitted under chapter 6, article 1 of this Code.
('n Churches, temples and synagogues.
(8) Community buildings, as permitted under section 25-4-11.
(9) Convenience stores.
(10) Crop production.
(11) Day care centers.
(12) Dwellings, double-family or duplex, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two
hundred fifty squaze feet of land azea per rentable unit or dwelling unit.
(13) Dwellings, multiple-family, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred
fifty squaze feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit.
(14) Dwellings, single-family.
(15) Family child care homes.
(16) Farmers markets. When the vending activity in a fanners market involves more than just the sale of
local fresh and/or mw produce, plant life, fish and local homegrown and homemade products for
more than two days a week, the director, at the time of plan approval, shall restrict the hours of use,
maintenance and operations and may require improvements as determined appropriate to ensure its
compatibility with the existing character of the surrounding area.
(1'n Financial institutions.
(18) Group living facilities.
(19) Home occupations, as permitted under section 25-4-13.
(20) Medical clinics.
(21) Meeting facilities.
(22) Model homes, as permitted under section 25-4-8.
(23) Mortuaries.
(24) Museums.
(25) Neighborhood parks, playgrounds, tennis courts, swimming pools, and similar neighborhood
recreational areas and uses.
(26) Offices.
25-69
Planning Dept.
Exhibit -Z
§ 25-5-102 IIAWAI`I CouN'rr CODE
(27) Personal services.
(28) Photography studios.
(29) Public uses and structures, as permitted under section 25-4-11.
(30) Repair establishments, minor.
(31) Restaurants.
(32) Retail establishments.
(33) Schools.
(34) Telecommunication antennas, as permitted under section 25-4-12.
(35) Theaters.
(36) Utility substations as permitted under Section 25-4-11.
(b) In addition to those uses permitted under subsection (a) above, the following uses may be permitted in the
CN district, provided that a use pemrit is issued for each use:
(1) Crematoriums.
(c) Buildings and uses normally considered directly accessory to the uses permitted in this section shall also
be permitted in the CN district.
(1996, Ord. No. 96-160, sec. 2; ratified Apri16, 1999.)
Section 2SS103. Height limit.
The height limit in the CN district shall be forty feet.
(1996, Ord. No. 96-160, sec. 2; ratified Apri16, 1999.)
Section 2SS104. Minimum building site area.
The minimum building site area in the CN district shall be seven thousand five hundred square feet.
(1996, Ord. No. 96-160, sec: 2; ratified Apri16, 1999.)
Section 2SS105. Minimum building site average width.
Each building site in the CN district shall have a minimum average width of sixty feet.
(1996, Ord. No. 96-160, sec. 2; mtified Apri16, 1999.)
SeMion 2SS106. Minimum yards.
The minimum yards in the CN district shall be as follows:
(1) Front and rear yazds, fifteen feet; and
(2) Side yazds, none, except where the adjoining building site is in an RS, RD, RM, RCX or V district.
Where the side yard adjoins the side yazd of a building site in an RS, RD, RM, RCX or V district,
there shall be a side yard which confomrs to the side yard requirements for dwelling use of the
adjoining district.
(1996, Ord. No. 96-160, sec. 2; ratified Apri16, 1999.)
Section 2SS107. Landscaping of yards.
(a) All front yazds in the CN district shall be landscaped, except for necessary access drives and walkways,
and except for the construction of one single-family dwelling and accessory buildings per lot.
(b) Where any required side or rear yazd in the CN district adjoins a building site in an RS, RD, RM or RCX
district, the side or rear yard shall be landscaped with a screening hedge not less than forty-two inches in
height, within five feet of the property line, except for necessary drives and walkways, and except for the
construction of one single-faruily dwelling and accessory buildings per lot.
(1996, Ord No. 96-16Q sec. 2; ratified Apri16, 1999; Am. 2005, Ord. No. OS-155, sec. 10.)
Section 2SS108. Other regulations.
(a) In conjunction with plan approval, the director may require the construction of a continuous eave
overhanging the front property line in the CN district. The director may also requre that the eave be of
similar height and design in any one block of the CN district.
SUPP.1 (1-2006) 25-70
ZoxuaG § 2s-5-108
(b) Plan approval shall be required for all new structures and additions to existing structures in the CN
district, except for construction of one single-family dwelling and any accessory buildings per lot.
(c) Exceptions to the regulations for the CN district regazdmg heights, building site areas, building site
average widths and yazds, may be approved by the director within a planned unit development.
(1996, Ord. No. 96-160, sec. 2; ratified Apri16, 1999; Am. 2005, Ord. No. OS-155, sec. 11.)
Division il. CG, General Commercial DIStriMS.
Section 25-5110. Purpose and applicability.
(a) The CG (general commercial) district applies to an azea suitable for commercial uses and services on a
broad basis to serve as the cenh~al shopping or principal downtown azea for a city or a region.
(b) No CG district shall be established until there is a demonstrated need for such action and no two CG
districts shall be established in such relationship to each other that they cannot act as one center and yet
are too close together to serve two distinct regions.
(1996, Ord. No. 96-160, sec. 2; ratified Apri16, 1999.)
Section 255111. Designation of CG districts.
Each CG (general commercial) district shall be designated by the symbol "CG" followed by a number
which indicates the minimum land azea, in thousands of square feet, required for each building site.
(1996, Ord. No. 96-160, sec. 2; ratified Apri16, 1999.)
Section 255112. Perwitted uses.
(a) The following uses shall be permitted uses in the CG district:
(1) Adult day care homes.
(2) Amusement and recreation facilities, indoor.
(3) Art galleries, museums.
(4) Art studios.
(5) Automobile service stations.
(6) Automobile sates and rentals.
('n Bars, nightclubs and cabarets.
(8) Bed and breald'ast establishments, as permitted under section 25-4-7.
(9) Boazding facilities, rooming, or lodging houses, provided that the maximum density shall be one
thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit.
(10) Broadcasting stations.
(11) Business services.
(12) Caz washing, provided that if it is mechanized, sound attenuated structures or sound attenuated
walls shall be erected and maintained on the property lines.
(13) Catering establishments.
(14) Cemeteries and mausoleums, as pemtitted under chapter 6, article 1 of this Code.
(IS) Churches, temples and synagogues.
(16) Cleaning plants using only nonflammable hydrocarbons in a sealed unit as the cleansing agent.
(1'n Commercial pazlring lots and gazages.
(18) Community buildings, as permitted under section 25~-11.
(19) Convenience stores.
(20) Crop production.
(21) Day care centers.
25-71 SUPP.1 (t-2006)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
COUNTY OF HAWAII
HILO, HAWAII
DATE: December 10, 2008
TO: Daryn S. Arai, Acting Planning Director
FROM: Department of Public Works
SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 08-000088)
Applicants: S. Russell and Akiko Oda
Request: RS-10 to CN-10
Tax Map Key: 2-2-34: 036
We have reviewed the subject application forwarded by your memo dated November 12,
2008 and offer the following comments for your consideration.
All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on site and not directed toward any
adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared and the recommended drainage
system shall be constructed meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works.
The subject parcel is in an area designated as Zone X on the Flood Insurance Rate Map
(FIRM) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Zone X is an area
determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain.
The Zoning Map (Ordinance No. 187) classifies Manono Street as a secondary arterial
with an existing right-of-way width of 50 feet fronting the subject parcel. Access to Manono
Street shall be limited to a single location and shall conform to Chapter 22, County Streets,
of the Hawaii County Code.
Based on the proposed zoning, we recommend the applicant provide improvements to the
entire frontage along Manono Street consisting of, but not limited to, pavement widening
with concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk, and any required drainage improvements and
utility relocation, meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works. The
improvements shall be located within the future road widening setback as established by
the Planning Department.
Install streetlights and traffic control devices as may be required by the Traffic Division,
Department of Public Works. The applicant shall be responsible for the design, purchase,
and installation of such devices.
Planning Dept.
()i~stions may ba referred to Kally tomes at Pxt A327 EXIIIIJIt
~-
y!
~..
1
;li I fiF pW..~ LVPILO~,pq~ .
t '~ l r i ~9'~
Harry Kim ~•~ ;_ :~~° Darryl J. Oliveira
Mayor + v ~
Fire CLief
~ -_~ fit, r `?, -,, rt,7 ++i •; pr+~ Glen P.I. Honda
r ._il e.:U Deputy Fire C4ieJ
~ounl:p of ~acYn~f `i
HAWAII FIRE DEPARTMENT
25 Aupuni Street Suite 103 Hilo, Hawaii 96720
(808)981-8394 Fax (808)981-2037
November 24, 2008
TO: CHRISTOPHER J. YUEN, PLANNII~IG DIRECTOR "
FROM: CxLEN HONDA, DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF
SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 08-000088)
APPLICANT: S. RUSSELL AND AKIKO ODA
REQUEST: RS-10 TO CN-10
TAX MAP KEY: 2-2-34:36
In regards to the above-mentioned Change of Zone application, the following shall be in
accordance:
Fire apparatus access roads shall be in accordance with UFC Section 10.207:
"Fire Apparatus Access Roads
"Sec. 10.207. (a) General. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided and maintained
in accordance with the provisions of this section.
"(b) Where Required.- Fire apparatus access roads shall be required for every building
hereafter constructed when any portion of an exterior wal] of the first story is located more
than 150 feet from fire department vehicle access as rreasured by an unobstructed route
azound the exterior of the building.
"EXCEPTIONS: 1 Wlleri buildings are completely protected with an approved
automatic fire sprinkler system, the provisions of this section maybe modif ed.
"2. When access roadways cannot be installed due to topography, waterways,
nonnegotiable grades or other similar conditions, the chief may require additional
fire protection as specified in Section 10.301 (b).
Planning Dept.
Exhibit
Hntuni'i CounhJ is nn Equal OpportunihJ Provider and Employer.
w
Christopher J. Yuen
November 24, 2008
Page 2
"3. When there are not more than two Group R, Division 3 or Group M
Occupancies, the requirements of this section may be modified, provided, in the
opinion of the chief, fire-fighting or rescue operations would-not be impaired.
"More than one fire apparatus road may be required when it is determined by the chief that
access by a single road may be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic
conditions or other factors that could limit access.
"For high-piled combustible storage, see Section 81.109.
"(c) Width. The- unobstructed width of a fire appazatus access road shall meet the
requirements of the appropriate county jurisdiction.
"(d) Vertical Clearance. Fire appazatus access roads shall have an unobstructed. vertical
clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches.
"EXCEPTION: Upon approval vertical clearance may be reduced, provided such
reduction does not impair access by fire apparatus and approved signs are installed
and maintained indicating the established vertical clearance.
"(e) Permissible Modifications. Vertical cleazances or widths required by this section
may be increased when, in the opinion of the chief, vertical cleazances or widths are not
adequate to provide fire apparatus access.
"(f) Surface. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the
imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all-
weather driving capabilities." (20 tons)
"(g) Turning Radius. The turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be as
approved by the chief." (45 feet)
"(h) Turnarounds. All dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length
shall be provided with approved provisions for the fuming azound of fire apparatus.
"(i) Bridges. When a bridge is required to be used as access under this section, it shall be
constructed and maintained in accordance with the applicable sections of the Building Code
and using designed live loading sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire appazatus.
"(j) Grade. The gradient for a fire apparatus access road shall not exceed the maximum
approved by the chief." (15%)
Christopher J. Yuen
November 24, 2008
Page 3
"(k) Obstruction. The required width of any fire apparatus access road shall not be
obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and
clearances established under this section shall be maintained at all times.
"(1) Signs. When required by the fire chief, approved signs or other approved notices shall
be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and
prohibit the obstruction thereof or both."
Water supply shall be in accordance with UFC Section 10.301(c):
"(c) Water Supply. An approved water supply capable of supplying required fire flow for
fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which buildings or portions of
buildings are hereafter constructed, in accordance with the respective county water
requirements. There shall be provided, when required by the chief, on-site fire hydrants and
mains capable of supplying the required fire flow.
"Water supply may consist of reservoirs, pressure tanks, elevated tanks, water mains or
other fixed systems capable of providing the required fire flow.
"The location, number and type of fire hydrants connected to a water supply capable of
delivering the required fire flow shall be protected as set forth by the respective county
water requirements. All hydrants shall be accessible to the fire department apparatus by
roadways meeting the requirements of Section 10.207.
~~--~
GLEN HONDA
Deputy Fire Chief
JCP:Ipc
IRE •'
r r i?'C?
Harry Kim ~-
Mayor
"`a' ' `pit ')
l i.
Bobby Jean Leithead Todd
Director
Nelson Ho
Deputy Otrector
Cnnixn~~r u~~t~fu~i`i
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
25 Aupuni Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720'. .
(808)961-8083~Fax(808)961-8086 -
~` http://co.hawaii.hi.us/directory/dir envmne htm '
MEMORAND UM
Date November 24, 2008
To CHRISTOPHER YUEN, Planning Director
From: BOBBY JEAN LEITHEAD TODD, Director ~ V
Subject: Change of Zone Application (REZ 08-000088)
Applicant: S. Russell and Akiko Oda
Request: RS-10 to CN-10
TMK: 2-2-34:36
We have reviewed the subject application and offer the following-recommendations:
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS:
WASTEWATER COMMENTS: ,
( ) o comments
( Require connection of existing and/or proposed structures to the public sewer in accordance with Section 21-5
of the Hawaii CounTy Code.
( )Require Council Resolution to approve sewer extension in accordance with Section 21-26.1 of the Hawaii
County Code. Complete D.E.M. Sewer Extension Application.
( )Require extension of the sewer system to service the proposed subdivision in accordance with Section 23-85
of the Hawaii County Code.
( )Other:
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMENTS:
SOLID WASTE COMMENTS:
( ) No comments
(~ Commercial operations, State and Federal agencies, religious entities and non-profit
organizations may not use transfer stations for disposal.
( Aggregates and any other construction demolition waste should be responsibly reused to
its fullest extent.
(?Ample and equal room should be provided for rubbish and recycling.
(~ Greenwaste may be transported to the green waste sites located at the Kailua and Hilo transfer stations, or
ther suitable diversion programs.
(construction and demolition waste is prohibited at all County Transfer Stations.
( )Submit Solid Waste Management Plan in accordance with attached guidelines.
( )Existing Solid Waste Management Plan is to be followed. Provide update to the department on current status.
( )Other. .,_ ._.. . ._
~c: swD, wwD Panning Dept. ` `
H291~`~'
Exhibit ~' " "" ~
r
,0~1~3~
County of Hawaii is an Equal OpporNnity Provider and Employer. ~ ~ ~ ~ " ' '" _
._ m
g O-c F
4•~ras9"•.,~
~f F
:3 ii
oQ^. _._ r f,;
`~L 4~
Q®.®.NU.Wa~.a
CHIYOME L. FUKINO, M.D.
Director of Health
LINDA LINGLE
GOVE
~j R, a, rs¢. i. , s ask ~`Y&e :5?r~
x
I r E
~ r
..~ , ~ r'• ll ~
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
November 24, 2008
STATE OF HAWAII
DEPARTMENT OF.HEALTH
P.O. BOX 916
HILO, HAWAII 96721-0916
vY
Y .f
Christopher J. Yuen
Planning Director, County of Hawaii
Newton Inouye V~1'
Acting District Environmental Health Program Chief
SUBJECT: Change of Zone Application (REZ 08-000088)
Applicant: S. Russell and Akiko Oda
Request: RS-10 to CN-10
TMK: 2-2-34:36
Construction activities must comply with the provisions of Hawaii Administrative Rules,
Chapter 11-46, "Community Noise Control."
1. The contractor must obtain a noise permit if the noise levels from the construction
activities are expected to exceed the allowable levels of the rules.
2. Construction equipment and on-site vehicles requiring an exhaust of gas or air
must be equipped with mufflers.
3. The contractor must comply with the requirements pertaining to construction
activities as specified in the rules and the conditions issued with the permit.
Should there be any questions on this matter, please contact the Department of Health at 933-
0917.
Planning Dept.
Exhibit ~
..~ ..
0479"~"~
.~
.,
~ Christopher J. Yuen
Page 2 of 2
November 24, 2008
The Department of Health does not have any objections to the proposed change inland uses.
However, existing or planned land use activities adjacent to the proposed residential area should
be compatible with a residential neighborhood.
We recommend that you review all of the Standazd Comments on our website:
httu'//hawaii.gov/health/environmental/env-planning/landuse/landuse.html. Any comments
specifically applicable to this project should be adhered to.
WORD:REZ 08-000088.a[
;'
ROdaREZ.doc-12/ 17/08
COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDATION
S. RUSSELL AND AKIKO ODA
CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ OS-88)
Upon careful review of the request against the guidelines for granting a change of zone,
the Planning Director is recommending that a favorable recommendation of the Change of
Zone request be forwarded to the County Council. Since this recommendation is made
without the benefit of public testimony, the Duector reserves the right to modify and/or alter this
recommendation based upon additional information presented at the public hearing. This
favorable recommendation is based on the following findings:
The applicants are requesting a Change of Zone from RS-10 to CN-10 to convert
an existing single-family dwelling into an office building to be leased to supplement the
applicants' retirement income. The existing 1,134-squaze foot structure currently used as
asingle-family residence will be renovated. The property is of sufficient size to
accommodate a minimum of 19 pazking stalls. Existing landscaping will be retained or
improved upon. The applicants believe that an office use is appropriate given the
increased number of commercial uses in this area and commercial uses on the adjacent
properties. However, as there are residential uses in the general area, the applicants
intend to retain and renovate the existing residential structure rather than construct a new
building on the site.
In order to consider an azea for any type of zoning designation, the applicable
goals, policies and standards of the General Plan must be adequately addressed. It is only
through such a comprehensive policy analysis approach that evaluations and decisions
can be made to better time and stage developments to achieve growth determined by the
General Plan and related planning documents. The implications of these evaluations and
decisions must also be considered as they may have an impact on similar areas in the
County.
The Change of Zone request from RS-10 to CN-10 will conform to the goals,
policies and standards of the GeneratPlan Economic and Land Use Elements. The
General Plan is intended to be used as a policy guide for the coordinated growth and
development of all sectors of the County. The overall goals, policies and standards are
set forth to physically plan the lands in the County in the best interest of the island's
residents. Land Use is one of the principal focal points of public concern and policy.
The Land Use Element provides the primary basis for direct control and guidance of
publicly and privately owned resources.
The request wnforms to the goals, policies and standards of the General Plan in
that the proposed development will be developed in an area adequately served by
necessary services such as water, utilities and transportation systems. The proposed
project conforms to the Commercial Development goal which states "provide commercial
developments that complement the overall pattern of transportation and land usage within
the island's regions, communities, and neighborhoods."
The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map component of the General
Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated
growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical
relationship among the various land uses. The LUPAG Map establishes the basic urban
and non-urban form for areas within the County. The project area is designated Medium
Density Urban on the LUPAG Map. The requested zoning would be consistent with the
urban designation on the LUPAG Map for this area of Hilo.
The State Land Use designation for the subject property is Urban. The property is
designated Urban by the Land Study Bureau's Productivity Rating. The Hilo Community
Development Plan (CDP), adopted in 1975, suggests residential uses in this area.
However, this area is transitioning to higher density commercial uses. The proposed
change of zone would complement the existing commercial land uses already in existence
and provide for an orderly development of the azea.
The property is located on Manono Street, adjacent to a real estate office to the
north and Durrant Media Five to the south. The property is landscaped, and there is a
single-family dwelling on the site. The land uses in the azea are a mix of residential and
commercial uses. The Big Island Land real estate office is located adjacent to the
property to the north and zoned CG-7.5. Adjacent to the property to the south is Durrant
Media Five, zoned CN-7.5 in 1998. The Ke Kilohana Oka Malamalama Church is
-z-
located diagonally across Manono Street to the southwest. Within 500 - 600 feet of the
property are single family dwellings and various commercial uses including Freddy's
Restaurant, the HGEA office, and the Hilo Hooganji Mission church on the corner of
Manono and Piilani Streets.
All utilities and services are available to the site. All essential utilities are
available to the project site. The project will connect to the existing County sewer
system. Solid waste will be disposed of by commercial handlers. The property has no
severe geological or topographical problems which cannot be rectified or which would
render the land unusable. The project site is located within Zone "X", area determined to
be outside the 500-year floodplain. All development generated storm run-off shall be
disposed of on-site and not allowed onto adjacent properties or roadways.
Access to the site is from Manono Street, a County roadway with aright-of--way
of 50 feet fronting the subject parcel. According to the City of Hilo Zone Map, Manono
Street is proposed to be widened to a 60-foot right-of--way; thus affecting five feet of
properties along Manono Street. The Department of Public Works (DPW) recommends
that access be limited to a single location on Manono Street. The DPW also recommends
improvements to the entire frontage of Manono Street wnsisting of, but not limited to,
pavement widening with concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk, drainage improvements, and
any required utility relocation.
By letter dated October 29, 2008, the applicants requested a "no effect" letter from
the DLNR-HPD. No professional surveys were conducted of the site due to the history of
extensive disturbance. No professional flora or fauna surveys were conducted of the site.
The applicant does not believe that rare or endangered floral or faunal resources aze on
the site as the project site has been improved and is located within an urban environment
close to existing commercial uses.
The request is not contrary to Chapter 205A, Hawaii Revised Statues,
relating to Coastal Zone Management. The property is not located in the Special
Management Area. There is no record of a designated public access to the shoreline or
mountain areas that traverses the site. According to the applicants, no valued cultural,
historical or natural resources exist on the property and there is no evidence of any
-3-
traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the site. Thus, it is
not anticipated that the proposed request will have any adverse impact on cultural or
historical resources in the area. Therefore, no action is necessary to protect these rights.
Based on the above, approval of the change of zone request from aSingle-
Family Residential (RS-10) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN-10) zoned district
would result in an appropriate land use pattern that will further benefit the general public.
The accompanying draft bill to amend Section 25-8-33 (City of Hilo Zone Map),
Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) of the Hawaii County Code, is provided for your favorable
consideration. Please note the proposed conditions of approval attached to the draft bill.
-4-
COUNTY OF HAWAII
STATE OF HAWAII
BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
f f~1tr<1ts~Gj ,-Jcf~TJ
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25-8-33 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP),
ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983
(2005 EDITION), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - 10,000 SQUARE FEET (RS-10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL - 10,000 SQUARE FEET (CN-10) AT WAIAKEA HOUSELOTS, WAIAKEA,
SOUTH HILO, HAWAII, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY 2-2-034:036.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII:
SECTION 1. Section 25-8-33, Article 8, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) of the Hawaii
County Code 1983 (2005 Edition), is amended to change the district classification of property
described hereinafter as follows:
The district classification of the following area situated at Waiakea Houselots,
Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii, shall be Neighborhood Commercial - 10,000 square feet
(CN-10):
Beginning at the southwest corner of this parcel of land, the coordinates of said
point of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station "HALM" being
623.00 feet South and 9,141.00 feet East and running by azimuths measured clockwise
from True South:
1. 180° 00' 100.00 feet along the east side of Manono
Street;
2. 270° 00' 225.00 feet along Lot 7, (Grant 8781 to Mrs.
Mary Lau On);
3. 360° 00' 100.00 feet along Lot 10 (Grant 8777 to
Akira Kazusa);
4. 90° 00' 225.00 feet along Lot I 1 (Grant 8784 to
Shozo Murakami) to the point of
-1-
beginning and containing an area of
22,500 square feet.
All as shown on the map attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and by reference
made part hereof.
SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 25-2-44, Hawaii County Code 1983 (2005
Edition), the County Council finds the following conditions are:
(1) Necessary to prevent circumstances which maybe adverse to the public
health, safety and welfare; or
(2) Reasonably conceived to fulfill needs directly emanating from the land use
proposed with respect to:
(A) Protection of the public from the potentially deleterious effects of
the proposed use, or
(B) Fulfillment of the need for public service demands created by the
proposed use.
SEE ATTACHED CONDITIONS
SECTION 3. In the event that any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, such
invalidity shall not affect the other parts of this ordinance.
SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval.
INTRODUCED BY:
COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAII
Hawai `i
Date of Introduction:
Date of 1st Reading:
Date of 2nd Reading:
Effective Date:
-2-
CGJ.5 RS-1G ~_
Z ~
w
O
CG-7.5 RS-10 RS-10
HINANO ST
RS-10
(--
(n
z
J
Q
H ~
(~ _
zg
O
Q. RS-10
MANONO ST
RS-IO
CG-7.5 CG-7.5 RS-10 RS-10
n
0
J
CG-7.5 CG-7.5 RS-30 RS-10 RS-l0
0 150 300 600 900
Feet
. AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE
AMENDING SECTION 25-8-33 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP) ARTICLE 8,
CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 (2005 EDITION),
BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL- 10,000 SQUARE FEET (RS-10)TO NEIGHBORHOOD.COMMERCIAL-
10,000 SQUARE FEET (CN-10) AT WAIAKEA HOUSELOTS, WAIAKEA,
SOUTH HILO, HAWAII
MAP PREPARED BY:
COUNTY OF FIAWAI'I, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TMK: 2-2-34:36 DATE: November 7, 2006
(S. Russell and Akiko Oda
CG-7.5 CG-7.5 RS-SO RS-10
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTAL -10,000
SQUARE FEET (RS-10)
TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL -
10,000 SQUARE FEET (CN-W 3
22,500 SQUARE FEET
~ `~ RS-7.5
i
V' ,..
?
~ CN-7.5
t
~
q
88881
,i. si 623.005
,j•'l•y;;:; 9,141.00E
§ ,I., 'HAlAI'
CG-Z5 CG 75 r': s 8~
Via. RS-7.5
CAfIIC)1l M Map ILJti)
COdaREZ.docd2/i9/08
S. RUSSELL AND AKIKO ODA
CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 08-88)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
A. The applicants, successors or assigns shall be responsible for complying with all
of the stated conditions of approval.
B. If required by the Department of Water Supply, prior to the issuance of a water
commitment, the applicant shall submit the anticipated maximum daily water
usage calculations as recommended by a registered engineer, and a water
commitment deposit in accordance with the "Water Commitment Guidelines
Policy" to the Department of Water Supply within 180 days from the effective
date of this ordinance.
C. Conversion of the existing dwelling to office uses shall be completed within five
(5) years from the effective date of this ordinance. Prior to conversion and/or
construction, the applicant, successors or assigns shall secure Final Plan Approval
for the proposed development from the Planning Director in accordance with
Section 25-2-70, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Hawaii County Code.
D. A five-foot future road widening strip along Manono Street shall be delineated on
the plans submitted for Plan Approval review. The five-foot wide future road
widening section with roadway improvements shall be subdivided and dedicated
to the County within five (5) yeazs from the effective date of this ordinance.
E. The applicant(s) shall provide improvements to the entire frontage of Manono
Street consisting of, but not limited to, pavement widening with concrete curb,
gutter and sidewalk, drainage improvements, and any required utility relocation,
meeting the requirements of the Department of Public Works. All roadway
improvements to Manono Street shall be completed prior to a Certificate of
Occupancy.
F. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on site and shall not be
directed towazd any adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepazed by a
licensed civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to
issuance of a construction permit. Any recommended drainage improvements, if
required, shall be constructed meeting with the approval of the Department of
Public Works prior to receipt of a Certificate of Occupancy.
G. A Solid Waste Management Plan shall be submitted to the Department of
Environmental Management for review and approval prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
H. If the applicants, successors, or assigns develops residential units on the subject
property, the applicants shall make their fair share contribution to mitigate the
potential regional impacts of the property with respect to parks and recreation,
fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads. The fair share contribution
shall become due and payable prior to receipt ofFinal Plan Approval. The fair
share contribution for each lot shall be based on the actual number of residential
units developed. The fair share contribution in a form of cash, land, facilities or
any combination thereof shall be determined by the County Council. The fair
share contribution may be adjusted annually beginning three yeazs after the
effective date of this ordinance, based on the percentage change in the Honolulu
Consumer Price Index (HCPn. The fair share contribution shall have a combined
value of $7,383.36 per multiple family residential unit ($11,506.13 per single
family residential unit). The total amount shall be determined with the actual
number of units according to the calculation and payment provisions set forth in
this condition.
The fair share contribution per multiple family residential unit (single family
residential unit) shall be allocated as follows:
I. $3,642.00 per multiple family residential unit ($5,548.46 per single family
residential unit) to the County to support park and recreational
improvements and facilities;
2. $115.11 per multiple family residential unit ($267.66 per single family
residential unit) to the County to support police facilities;
3. $354.08 per multiple family residential unit ($528.66 per single family
residential unit) to the County to support fire facilities;
-2-
4. $157.81 per multiple family residential unit ($231.45 per single family
residential unit) to the County to support solid waste facilities; and
5. $3,114.36 per multiple family residential unit ($4,929.90 per single family
residential unit) to the County to support road and traffic improvements.
In lieu of paying the fair share contribution, the applicants may contribute land
and/or construct improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation, fire,
police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads within the region impacted by the
proposed development, subject to the review and recommendation of the Planning
Director, upon consultation with the appropriate agencies and approval of the
County Council
I. Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria
for imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included
herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees
Ordinance.
J. To ensure that the Goals and Policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan
are implemented, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 11,
Article 1, Hawaii County Code relating to Affordable Housing Policy. This
requirement shall be approved by the Administrator of the Office of Housing and
Community Development prior to final plan approval.
K. The applicants shall comply with all applicable County, State and Federal laws,
rules, regulations and requirements.
L. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the
ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following
circumstances:
1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been
foreseen or aze beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns,
and that are not the result of their fault or negligence.
2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan
or Zoning Code.
-3-
3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original
reasons for the granting of the change of zone.
4. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period
originally granted for performance (i.e., a condition to be performed
within one year may be extended for up to one additional year).
If the applicant should require an additional extension of time, the
Planning Director shall submit the applicant's request to the County
Council for appropriate action.
Should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely
fashion, the Director may initiate rezoning of the area to its original or more
appropriate designation.
-4-