My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RES 204 Draft 01 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Resolutions
>
1996-1998
>
RES 204 Draft 01 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2010 4:28:42 PM
Creation date
2/23/2009 10:37:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
RES
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
1996-1998
Bill/Resolution
204
Draft
01
Introducer
Aaron S. Y. Chung, Councilmember Chair, Finance Committee
Referred To
FC
Action 1
FC: Amends Res. 204-98 to Dr. 2 - 1/6/98 (FC-0073)
Document Relationships
COM 0637.000 1996-1998
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />COUNTY OF HAWAII <br /> <br />STATE OF HAWAII <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br /> <br />204 98 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CORPORATION COUNSEL, AND HIS <br />AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH <br />THE INDIVIDUALLY NAMED DEFENDANT, WHO IS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE <br />COUNTY OF HAWAII, TO REPRESENT HIM IN THE CIVIL ACTION ENTITLED <br />DEAN E. BEAUMONT Vs. RICHARD CARTER, JR., ET AL., CIVIL NO. 97-187K <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the County of Hawaii and Police Officer Richard Carter, Jr., are <br /> <br />being sued by Dean E. Beaumont in Civil No. 97-187K; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Hawaii County Police Commission has found that the concerned <br /> <br />officer, i.e., Officer Carter, was acting in the performance of his duty when the alleged <br /> <br />acts complained of in that lawsuit occurred; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Council of the County of Hawaii concurs with the fmding by the <br /> <br />Hawaii County Police Commission; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of the <br /> <br />State of Hawaii has rendered the opinion that representation by one attorney of multiple <br /> <br />parties in such actions is improper unless those parties waive the potential conflicts <br /> <br />involved or unless the governmental entity agrees to indemnify the individual party for all <br /> <br />damages, including punitive damages; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.