My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1051.023 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 1051.023 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2008 9:17:30 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 8:19:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
1051
Point
023
Author
Hannah Kihalani Springer
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: PC - 11/17/98
Communications - File Code
ZNG/KN
Document Relationships
AGE PC 11/17/1998 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Planning Committee (PC)
COM 1051.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> What new rules or protocols have been duly authorized and adopted to afford <br /> confidence in this process to properly evaluate impacts upon traditional and cultural <br /> practices as expressed at Ka'upulehu? <br /> <br /> As was noted by then LUC Chair Alan Hoe, the Kohanaiki / PASH decision raised <br /> more questions than it answered with regard to the land use application and permitting <br /> process as it relates to traditional and customary practices. The case presently being <br /> appealed before the Hawai'i Supreme Court, may nudge us towards some of those <br /> much needed answers. <br /> <br /> A well reasoned and prepared Integrated Resources Management Plan has been <br /> provided by the applicant, However this addresses the management of resources <br /> which they have self-identified and validated, not the systematic analysis and <br /> evaluation of impacts to all of the cultural resources and practices identified ihere in. <br /> <br /> For example: <br /> <br /> The 1800 'a'a flow surrounded Hinakapo'ula. Hinakapo'ula is a named wahi <br /> pana (Appendix A, page 31). <br /> This flow emerges from the cloud and dry forests, the domain of Kumokuhali'i <br /> (Ku who spreads the hali'i of greenery over the island, moku). <br /> <br /> Kuka'ohi'alaka (Ku who resides in a particular 'ohi'a further associated with <br /> Laka) is known from Pu'u Honua'ula near to the summit of of Hualalai, Hainoa <br /> (Appendix A, page 32). <br /> <br /> The southern lobe of the 1800, Ka'upulehu flow is 'a'a lava. The lava crept <br /> along, kulipe'e, moving like "an old woman" (Appendix A, page 28) creating the <br /> jumbled flow front that we cross when coming to Kalaemano from the Kona <br /> Village side. <br /> <br /> It is said by Kamakau, that Pele came from the inlands, hungry for the awa from <br /> the ponds at Kiholo and Ka'upulehu (Appendix A, page 18). <br /> <br /> Archaeological features on this flow are few. <br /> <br /> Archaeological features are the signature of our ancestors' presence on the <br /> land. In our family's practice, 'The absence of our ancestors' signature upon <br /> the landscape speaks as clearly as the presence of their signature upon the <br /> land." (Appendix A page 96) This flow is wao akua, a region of the gods, as <br /> compared with wao kanaka a region of men. <br /> Natural resources are cultural resources. The natural landscape is the cultural <br /> landscape. This lava flow is a cultural resource. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.