My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1051.015 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 1051.015 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2016 2:08:27 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 8:19:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
1051
Point
015
Author
Karen Eoff, Ka Paakai O Kaaina
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: PC Public Hearing - 11/13/98
Communications - File Code
ZNG/KN
Document Relationships
COM 1051.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> P.K.O. 'C B08.32s-s3T2 ®I, i:rxa v.a.~a rn. u,~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Article XI, Section relating to the PUBLIC TRUST, and Article XII, Section 7 relating to <br /> ACCESS and GATHERING. Under federal law sources, among others, include the <br /> <br /> National Historic Preservation Act. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> These are what the coalition refers to as the Bundle of Rights, Privileges and <br /> Practices. As an example, within the SMA land use process, certain mechanisms are <br /> <br /> in place to protect these rights and some are not. The SMA provisions for the <br /> <br /> protection of these Bundle of Rights lie within Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 205A, <br /> <br /> Sections 2(b), 2(c), 4(a) and 28(2). The "Kohanaikl" (PASH/PILAGO) Supreme Court <br /> decision is the Supreme Court's reminder to governmental agencies (particularly the <br /> <br /> Hawaii County Planning Commission) of its obligation to protect these Bundle of <br /> <br /> Rights. <br /> <br /> <br /> In order for governmental agencies to properly determine whether <br /> <br /> hislorical/cultural properties have been properly Identified and which of the potential <br /> <br /> historical/cultural properties identified within the area of potential effect can be <br /> <br /> iegitamately regarded to be traditional cultural properties, it should, at a minimum, be <br /> guided by specific criteria which would result in well Informed and fair decisions. What <br /> <br /> is glaringly noticeable is the absence of many rules or guidelines which are critical to <br /> <br /> proper decision-making. <br /> <br /> <br /> Under Section 1-1 USAGE, and Section 7-1 WAYS, there are no mechanisms. <br /> <br /> Under Chapter eE HISTORIC PRESERVATION we find mechanisms such as the <br /> <br /> Burial Program, State Register Program and Unofficial "Draft' rules. Under Article XI, <br /> <br /> Section 1 PUBLIC TRUST, there is no mechanism. Under Article XII, Section 7 <br /> ACCESS and GATHERING there is alo no mechanism. Under the National Historic <br /> <br /> Preservation Act HISTORIC PRESERVATION, there are agency rules (Code of Federal <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.