REP PC 026 04/07/2009 2008-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Communication 218 Bill 56 plan, paved and striped parking stalls and driveway and other improvements associated with the proposed uses. Plans shall include landscaping along property boundaries for the purpose of mitigating any potential adverse noise and visual impacts to surrounding properties. Plans shall also indicate a 5-foot future road widening setback along the properties' Manono Street frontage." Condition D reads as follows: "The applicants shall construct the following roadway improvements along the subject property's Manono Street frontage, meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works: 1. A half-section of roadway improvements on the east side of Manono Street consisting of a 21-foot wide A. C. pavement with concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk and drainage improvements within the future road widening setback area established as one-half the distance between the existing right-of-way and 60 feet. 2. A half-section of roadway improvements on the west side of Hinano Street consisting of a 16-Foot wide A.C. pavement with concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk and drainage improvements in the area established as one-half the distance between the existing right-of-way and 50[-]feet. 3. If required, installation of street lights, signs, and traffic markings meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works, Traffic Division. All roadway improvements to Manono Street and Hinano Street shall be completed within five (5) years from the effective date of the change of zone ordinance or in conjunction with the County's road widening improvements, which ever occurs first." To date, the applicant has expended considerable funds for plans and extensive onsite preparation work. The properties have been graded and large trees, trash and miscellaneous debris have been removed. Additionally, the applicant is preparing a consolidation application to consolidate TMK Nos. 2-2-34: 84, 85 & 93. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns, and that are not the result or their fault or negligence. As a result of the poor economy, the applicant has been exploring the possibility of leasing the land to one main tenant who will carry out the initial vision to develop a multi-use commercial building. During contract negotiations, a sticking point has been the April 13, 2010, deadline. All interested parties are unwilling to take on the project unless they are assured that another time extension is granted. This will allow for the interested parties to receive necessary time to submit plan approvals, obtain applicable building permits and start work without having an unrealistic deadline to meet. Approval of this request would not be contrary to the General Plan or the original reasons for the granting of the Change of Zone. There have not been any significant changes to the General Plan for this area since this request was originally approved that would affect this project. Additionally, the request is not contrary to the original reasons for granting PC Report 26