My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RES 108A Draft 01 2008-2010
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Resolutions
>
2008-2010
>
RES 108A Draft 01 2008-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2009 11:04:51 AM
Creation date
7/29/2009 1:46:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
RES
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2008-2010
Bill/Resolution
108
Draft
01
Introducer
Donald Ikeda, Council Member
Referred To
COUNCIL
Action 1
Council: Adopts Res. 108-09A & PC-35 - 08/05/09
Status
Adopted
Date To Mayor or Adoption Date
8/5/2009
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
8/5/2009
Ayes
8-Enriques;Ford;Hoffmann;Ikeda;Naeole;Onishi;Yagong;Yoshimoto
Noes
1-Greenwell
Absent
0
Excused
0
Comments
Please see August 5, 2009 Council Agenda
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 08/05/2009 2008-2010
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2008-2010\Council
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
degree of effort, and, in some cases, the inability to achieve a sufficient <br />consensus, has been the limiting factors. <br />The need for a Community Development Plan for a particular area should <br />be assessed considering a number of factors, including how much is public <br />infrastructure challenged by recent or anticipated growth and whether there are <br />significant efforts to change the zoning and land use in the area. <br />After the steering committee has recommended approval of the <br />Community Development Plan, it shall be forwarded to [*'~~ Dates <br />~s~n] either the Windward or Leeward Plannin¢ Commission, or both <br />meeting as a joint commission as provided for in the Hawaii County Charter, for <br />[its] review and recommendation to the County Council. The County Council may <br />modify or amend the Community Development Plan before enacting it by <br />ordinance, but it shall give the steering committee and the designated Planning <br />Commission, or ioint commission, as the case'may be, an opportunity to review <br />and comment upon substantive amendments and modifications before final <br />adoption of the plan. <br />In the process of creating the Community Development Plan, it may be <br />determined that the General Plan should be amended. The Planning Director or <br />County Council may initiate amendments to the General Plan, and the steering <br />committee may recommend amendments, that would be enacted at the same time <br />as the Community Development Plan, or as a follow-up to the Community <br />Development Plan: If there is a direct conflict between the Community <br />Development Plan and the General Plan, the General Plan shall be controlling. <br />The Community Development Plans shall focus on action. The courses of <br />action specified in each element of the General Plan need greater detail and need <br />to be coordinated by district. The Community Development Plans shall identify <br />appropriate governmental actions that include: <br />• Regulatory actions. Regulations rely on government's police power to <br />control what people can and cannot do in the interest of the public's health, safety, <br />or welfare. The County administers and enforces various regulations to control <br />land use. These regulations include the zoning code, subdivision code, flood <br />control code, grading code, sign code, and building code. The County also <br />administers requirements imposed by the Federal and State governments, such as <br />the Coastal Zone Management Act and the State Land Use Law. The Community <br />Development Plans shall recommend amendments as appropriate to the codes, <br />maps, or administration and enforcement. <br />• Incentive measures. Where regulatory controls are the government's <br />"sticks", incentives are the "carrots" to encourage certain actions. Too often, <br />regulation is the solution. Regulation can be restrictive, reactive, and divisive. <br />Incentive measures, on the other hand, can invite creative "win-win" solutions. <br />Exhibit A <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.