Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> a <br /> <br /> KPMG LLP <br /> PO Box 4150 <br /> Honolulu, HI 96812-4150 <br /> <br /> a <br /> <br /> <br /> Report on Compliance with Requirements Applicable to <br /> Each Major Program and on Internal Control over <br /> Compliance in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133 <br /> <br /> <br /> D The Members of the <br /> County Council of Hawaii <br /> County of Hawaii <br /> Hilo, Hawaii: <br /> <br /> Compliance <br /> We have audited the compliance of the County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii (the County), with the types of <br /> compliance requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 <br /> D Compliance Supplement that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended <br /> June 30, 2008. The County's major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditors' results <br /> section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Compliance with the requirements <br /> o of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to each of its major federal programs is the <br /> responsibility of the County's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the County's <br /> compliance based on our audit. <br /> a We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the <br /> United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing <br /> Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of <br /> n States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 <br /> u require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance <br /> with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement <br /> that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes <br /> U examining, on a test basis, evidence about the County's compliance with those requirements and <br /> performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our <br /> <br /> Q audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the <br /> County's compliance with those requirements. <br /> In our opinion, the County complied, in all material respects, with the requirements referred to above that <br /> are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2008. <br /> Internal Control over Compliance <br /> n The management of the County is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control <br /> SJ over compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to federal <br /> programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the County's internal control over <br /> O compliance with the requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program <br /> in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance, but <br /> not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. <br /> <br /> <br /> 1 5 <br /> KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S. <br /> member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. <br />