Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0578.000 2008-2010 NtV or N~ i William P. Kenoi • ~l't'~f William T. Takaba Mnya• ' • Mnnnging Director r Wally Lau ~tt of ~Nr'M Depuq~ Mnnnging Director County of Hawaii 891 Ululani Street • Hilo, Hawaii 96720-3982 • (808) 961-8211 • Fax (808) 961-6553 KONA 75-5706 Kuakmi Highway, Surte 103 • Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 (808) 329-5226 • Fax (808) 326-5663 rv co l7 Q October 6, 2009 ~ i°" -a ti' a° , Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman ~ and Members of the County Council ~ cn cta County of Hawaii 333 Kilauea Avenue Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Chairman Yoshimoto and Members: State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application (SLU 09-000022) Request: Agriculture to Urban Change of Zone Application (REZ 09-000096) Request: A-Sato RS-10 Applicant: Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC Tax Map Key 7-5-17.42 - As required by Chapter 4, Sec. 6-4.3(C), Hawaii County Charter, transmitted herewith for the County Council's consideration and action are the Planning Commission's letter and enclosures regarding the above-referenced applications. Sincerely, 'lliam P. enoi Mayor Enclosures cc: Planning Department ~~itlg t~2 and l(03~ Comm. No. Ref. To: _ Ref. Uasc~ OCT 21 2QQ,GL v ~ ~~v °s.y__ ~~Jigi O~~M~' County of Ii~w~i`i PLANNING COMMISSION Aupum Center • 101 Pauah~ Street, Surte 3 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Phone (808)961-8288 • Fax (808)961-8742 October 6, 2009 w The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman p and Members of the County Council ~ ~I County of Hawaii , 'v t"`y u.., 333 Kilauea Avenue, 2"d Floor '+'a~ Hilo, HI 96720 ~ t ..5~~ Dear Chairman Yoshimoto and Council Members: ~ State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application (SLU 09-000022) Request: Agriculture to Urban Change of Zone Application (REZ 09-000096) Request: A-Sa to RS-10 Applicant: Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC Tax Map Key: 7-5-17:42 The Leeward Planning Commission, after a duly held public hearing on September 18, 2009, I voted to recommend for your approval the proposed legislative bills for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban and a Change of Zone from Agricultural - 5 acre (A-Sa) to Single Family Residential - 10,000 square feet (RS-10) for 14.437 acres of land. The property is located approximately 1,400 feet mauka of the Hawaii Belt Road/Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and 1,100 feet makai of Hienaloli Road, adjacent to and north of the Pualani Estates Subdivision, Kahului 2"d, North Kona, Hawaii. The Commission concurs with the following Planning Director's reasons for recommending favorable consideration of the requests: State Land Use Boundary Amendment The approval of the reclassification from the State Land Use Agricultural to the Urban District will not be violative of Section 205-2, Chapter 205, Hawaii Revised Statutes, nor will it be inconsistent with the Land Use Commission Rules and the County General Plan. According to the Land Use Commission Rules, one of Hawai County is an Equal Opportunity Provider mid Employer s The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 2 the standards for considering an area for urban reclassification states that "In determining urban growth for the next ten years, or in amending the boundary, land contiguous with existing urban areas shall be given more consideration than non-contiguous land, and particularly when indicated for future urban use on state or county general plans." The project area conforms to this standard as it is situated adjacent to existing Urban- designated lands to the south. The applicant's request to designate 14.437 acres into the Urban District reflects the infilling of Agricultural-lands within this section of North Kona already surrounded by Urban-designated lands to the south. The applicant requests a concurrent Change of Zone from Agricultural (A-Sa) to Single-Family Residential 10,000 square feet (RS-10) to develop a 53-lot single family residential subdivision on the site. The Urban District request would be consistent with the goals and polices of the Land Use element of the General Plan. The LUPAG Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals, policies, standards and courses of action. It is also a graphic depiction of the physical relationship between the various land uses. The LUPAG Map establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the County. The Urban District request conforms to the General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map, which designates this area as Urban Expansion Area. Thus, the area under consideration is consistent with the urban form established for this section of North Kona as depicted on the LUPAG Map. The project site is located in an urban-like setting adequately served by transportation, utilities, commercial establishments and other amenities. The reclassification and proposed rezoning will allow the property to be used for the development of a 53-lot single-family residential ! subdivision. The urban classification also conforms to the standard that the development is within reasonable proximity to centers of trading and employment and basic services such as schools, police and fire protection, transportation systems and water. The project site is located near the Kailua-Kona urban area, and thus conforms to the Land Use Commission Rules that encourages urban development in close proximity to existing developments, services and facilities. Access to the project area will be from two locations: Hualalai Road to the north, and Paulehia Street located in the Pualani Estates Subdivision to the south. The primary access will be from Paulehia Street which will connect to the signalized intersection at the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street in the Pualani Estates Subdivision. The project will include anorth-south - connector road between the project's primary access at Paulehia Street to Hualalai Road. Hualalai Road is a County collector street with an 18 to 20-foot wide pavement with a variable right-of-way. The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 3 The Department of Public Works (DPW) states, in summary: ® Hualalai Road is substandard based on width, alignment and roadside hazard clearances. o The proposed connection to Hualalai Road should be master planned further mauka to serve both the subject property and adjoining Parcel 43 mauka of the site. • Realign the right-of-way property line along the entire subject property frontage of Hualalai Road to provide an alignment meeting with the approval of the DPW. The applicant states that future roadway connectivity to the adjacent west/makai Parce141 and east/mauka Parce143 will be provided via roadway stub outs planned within the proposed project. Water can be made available to the site. Police and fire protective services are within close proximity to the project site. All essential utilities will be made available to the property. The project is also consistent with the Hawaii State Plan, a guide for the long- range development of the State. The Plan identifies goals, objectives, policies and priorities for the State and provides a basis for the determination of policies and allocation of limited resources. Section 226-19 (Objectives and policies for socio-cultural advancement -housing), subsection (b)(1) of the Hawaii State Plan Chapter 226, HRS, (1996) states "it shall be the policy of this State to effectively accommodate the housing needs of Hawai`i's people". Section (b)(3) which states, "Increase home ownership and ~ - rental opportunities and choices in terms of quality, location, cost, densities, style and size of housing." Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the policies outlined in the ! Hawaii State Plan. Urban Districts shall include lands characterized by "city-like" concentrations of people, structures, streets, urban level of services and other related land uses. The project site is located near urban-type uses, including the Pualani Estates Subdivision and Sugar Cane Lane Subdivision. Kailua-Kona, the urban center for West Hawaii with hotels, multi-family residential, single-family residential, public facilities and commercial uses, is located proximate to the site. The property has no severe geological or topographical problems which cannot be properly rectified or which would render the land unusable. The U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency designates the property as Zone "X", areas The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 4 ' outside of the 500-year flood plain. Any improvements to the property must comply with Chapter 27 of the County Code relating to Flood Hazard Control. Thus, the reclassification meets the standard which states that the lands included within the urban district shall be those with satisfactory topography and drainage and reasonably free from the danger of floods, tsunami and unstable soil conditions and other adverse environmental effects." While the project site is situated within the State Land Use Agricultural and County's Agricultural (A-5a) zoned district, it is not currently being used for active agricultural purposes. The property is unclassified under the State of Hawai`i's Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH) Map and is not in agricultural use. The project site is vacant and heavily vegetated. The Land Use Study Bureau's Overall Master Productivity Rating for the soils in the area is "D" or "Poor". An Archaeological Inventory Survey was prepared by Rechtman Consulting, LLC and submitted to the DLNR-HPD on November 30, 2005. The survey was approved by the DLNR-HPD on October 4, 2006. In a letter dated June 15, 2009, the DLNR-HPD stated that no historic properties will be affected because "SHPD previously reviewed this project and mitigation has been completed." The reclassification of 14.437 acres from the Agricultural to the Urban designation will not be detrimental to the reduction of this area from the agricultural land inventory in the County of Hawaii. Based on the above, the approval of the State Land Use Boundary Amendment from the Agricultural to the Urban District complements the State Land Use District Regulations and is supportive of the Hawaii State Plan. Change of Zone The applicant requests a Change of Zone from Agricultural (A-Sa) to Single- Family Residential (RS-10) to develop a 53-lot single-family residential subdivision on the property. The applicant intends to submit a Planned Unit Development (PUD) application to allow for a small selection of smaller lot sizes of approximately 7,500 square feet. The applicant also requests a concurrent processing of a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban. In order to consider an area for any type of zoning designation, the applicable goals, policies and standards of the General Plan must be adequately addressed. It is only through such a comprehensive policy analysis approach that evaluations and decisions can be made to better time and stage developments to achieve growth determined by the General Plan and related planning documents. The implications of these evaluations and The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 5 decisions must be also considered as they may have an impact on similar areas in the County. The Change of Zone request from a Agricultural (A-5a) to Single-Family Residentia110,000 square feet (RS-10) conforms to, among.others, the goals, policies and standards of the General Plan Economic and Land Use Elements. The property is zoned A-Sa and the State Land Use designation is Agricultural. The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map component of the General Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical relationship among the various land uses. The LUPAG Map establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the County. The subject area is designated Urban Expansion Area. This designation allows for a mix of high density, medium density, low density, industrial, industrial- commercial and/or open designations in areas where new settlements may be desirable, but where the specific settlement pattern and mix of uses have not yet been determined. Thus, the proposed development would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and result in an intensity of land utilization no higher than as permitted or as otherwise specified for the district in which this proposed development occurs. The Kona Community Development Plan (KCDP) adopted by Ordinance No. 08 131 effective September 25, 2008 identifies the property as located within the Urban Area. The project is consistent with the Land Use and Transportation policies in the KCDP, as the project is considered an "infill" rezoning. In addition, the project will provide anorth-south connector road through the development. I Surrounding properties are zoned A-la, A-Sa and RS-7.5. The project site is located adjacent to the Pualani Estates Subdivision (RS-7.5) to the south. Sugar Cane Lane Subdivision (RS-15) is located mauka of the Pualani Estates Subdivision. Nearby properties are vacant or in residential uses. Therefore, a favorable recommendation of this change of zone request will be consistent with the existing land uses within this portion of North Kona. The project site's proximity to schools would foster educational opportunities for students as well as residents in the nearby community. The Federal Emergency Management Agency designates the property as Zone "X", an area determined to be outside of the 500-year flood plain. The property is unidentified by the Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH) System and is not currently being used for any agricultural activities. Soils within the property and surrounding area are classified as "D" or "Poor" for agricultural productivity ; by the Land Study Bureau. The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 6 Access to the project area will be from two locations: Hualalai Road to the north, and Paulehia Street located in the Pualani Estates Subdivision to the south. The primary access will be from Paulehia Street which will connect to the signalized intersection at the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street in the Pualani Estates Subdivision. The project will include anorth-south connector road between the .project's primary access at Paulehia Street to Hualalai Road. The applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) conducted by Witcher Engineering, LLP dated April, 2009. In addition to the analysis of other intersections in the nearby vicinity, the TIAR examined the overall traffic impact of the proposed project, including the primary access road at Puapuaanui Street in the Pualani Estates Subdivision from the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and the secondary access road at Hualalai Road makai/east of its intersection with Hienaloli Road. The TIAR concluded that "the levels of service at the intersection of a) Puapuaanui Street and the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and 2) Hualalai Road and Hienaloli Road to be "A" or "B" during the AM and PM peak hours and thus `acceptable levels of service' in compliance with Concurrency Requirements for traffic impact analysis reports of the Hawaii County Code." Hualalai Road is a County collector street with an 18 to 20-foot wide pavement ~ with a variable right-of-way. The Department of Public Works (DPW) states, in summary: • Hualalai Road is substandard based on width, alignment and roadside hazard clearances. • The proposed connection to Hualalai Road should be master planned further mauka to serve both the subject property and adjoining Parce143 mauka of the site. • Realign the right-of-way property line along the entire subject property frontage of Hualalai Road to provide an alignment meeting with the approval of the DPW. The applicant states that future roadway connectivity to the adjacent west/makai Parce141 and eastlmauka Parce143 will be provided via roadway stub outs planned within the proposed project. All utilities and services are available to the site. County water is available to ' the project site. The Department of Water Supply states that the applicant is a member of the Waiaha System, LLC, which executed a Water Development Agreement with the Water Board to secure water commitments for the development. The DWS has The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 7 confirmed that the applicant has obtained a water commitment for 79 units. The applicant will be required to complete the necessary transmission and storage facilities. The DWS is currently reviewing construction plans for the installation of a 16-inch waterline to be placed within a private waterline easement within the subject parcel. Water will be made available from the new 16-inch waterline after all.water system improvements have been completed in accordance with the agreement. The project will connect to the County sewerline after the approval of a Sewer Extension application by the Department of Environmental Management. All essential utilities are available to the property. The subject request is not contrary to Chapter 205A, Hawaii Revised Statutes, relating to Coastal Zone Management Area. The property is located mauka of the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and not within the Special Management Area. As such, the project site will not be impacted by coastal hazard and beach erosion. There are no identified recreational resources, public access to the shoreline or mountain areas, designated scenic and open space preserves, coastal ecosystems, marine resources or other natural and environmental resources in the immediate project area. Thus, the proposed request and use of the property will not adversely impact those resources. An Archaeological Inventory Survey was prepared by Rechtman Consulting, LLC ' and submitted to the DLNR-HPD on November 30, 2005. The survey was approved by the DLNR-HPD on October 4, 2006. In a letter dated June 15, 2009, the DLNR-HPD stated that no historic properties will be affected because "SHPD previously reviewed this project and mitigation has been completed." In view of the Hawaii State Supreme Court's "PASH" and "Ka Pa'akai O Ka'Aina"decisions, the issue relative to native Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights must be addressed. These rights must be addressed in terms of the cultural, historical, and natural resources and the associated traditional and customary practices of the site. Investigation of valued resources: An Archaeological Inventory Survey was prepared by Rechtman Consulting, LLC and submitted to the DLNR-HPD on November 30, 2005. The survey was approved by the DLNR-HPD on October 4, 2006. In a letter dated June 15, 2009, the DLNR-HPD stated that no historic properties will be affected because "SHPD previously reviewed this project and mitigation has been completed." The valuable cultural, historical, and natural resources found in the area: The archaeological/cultural surveys conducted on the project site revealed no endangered The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 8 ' species or historical sites. However, a condition will be included to require the applicant to cease work and notify the DLNR-HPD should any remains be discovered on the site, until given clearance to proceed by the DLNR-HPD. Possible adverse effects or impairment of valued resources: Native vegetation may be destroyed by ground alteration. There is no evidence that the flora in the area are particularly desired or used for cultural practices. The DLNR-HPD has indicated that no historic properties will be affected by this project. Feasible actions to protect native Hawaiian rights: The applicant has stated that there is no evidence of any traditional or customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the project site, nor existence of any known valued cultural, historical or native resources in the area. Thus, it is believed that the project would have no adverse impact relative to the cultural and historical resources in the area. To the extent to which traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights are exercised, the proposed action will not affect traditional Hawaiian rights. Based on the above findings, the approval of the Change of Zone request from an Agricultural (A-5a) to a Single Family Residential (RS-10) zoned district would result in an appropriate land use pattern that will further benefit the public. For your favorable consideration, amendments to the State Land Use Boundary Maps and Section 25-8-3 (North Kona Zone Map) of Chapter 25, Zoning Code, of the Hawaii County Code are transmitted. i The Honorable J Yoshimoto, Chairman and Members of the County Council Page 9 We are enclosing copies of the staff Background and Planning Director's Recommendation and a transcript of the hearing for your information. Sincerely, ~~2~~~ Rodney Watanabe, Chairman Leeward Planning Commission Lhukopa02PC Enclosures cc: Steven S. C. Lim, Esq. Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC Department of Public Works Department of Water Supply Department of Land & Natural Resources-HPD DOT-Highways, Honolulu State Land Use Commission Lincoln Ashida, Esq., Corporation Counsel i -r', - - - - ~ - - - ' ' LEEWARD PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY OF HAWAII HEARING TRANSCRIPT SEPTEMBER 18, 2009 A regularly advertised hearing on the applications of HU-KO-PA, LLC (SLU 09-22/REZ 09- i, 96) was called to order at 9:50 a.m. in the King Kamehameha's Kona Beach Hotel, Ballroom I, 75-5660 Palani Road, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii with Chairman Rodney Watanabe presiding. PRESENT: Rodney Watanabe Lani Bowman Geraldine Giffin ' Frederic Housel Wayne Iokepa Brandon Gonzalez, Deputy Corporation Counsel BJ Leithead Todd, Planning Director ' Norman Hayashi, Planning Program Manager Maija Cottle, Staff Planner Kiran Emler, Engineering Division, Department of Public Works ABSENT & EXCUSED: Brandi Beaudet And seven people from the public in attendance APPLICANT: HU-KO-PA, LLC (SLU 09-22/REZ 09-96) a. State Land Use District Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban for 14.437 ; acres of land. b. Change of Zone from Agricultural 5-acre (A-Sa) to Single-Family Residential 10,000 square feet (RS-10) for 14.437 acres of land. The property is located approximately 1,400 feet mauka of the Hawaii Belt Road/Queen i Ka`ahumanu Highway and 1,100 feet makai of Hienaloli Road, adjacent to and north of the Pualani Estates Subdivision, Kahului 2°d; Noah Kona, Hawaii, TMK: 7-5-17: 42. , WATANABE: Agenda Item No. 2 is a State Land Use, yeah, a request for State Land Use ~ change and rezoning. This would be Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC: SLU 09-22 and REZ 09-96. So Maija, it's all yours. COTTLE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. We WATANABE: Oh, technical difficulties? ! COTTLE: We lost our projector, so if you could just hold on a second. j WATANABE: Okay. 1 ~ i I~.i COTTLE: Okay. The next item is a request by Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban and a Change of Zone from Agricultural 5 acres to Single-Family Residential 10,000 square feet. The subject property is shown on this slide outlined in black. It's mauka of Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and just north of the Pualani Estates Subdivision and just south of Hualalai Road. And most of the property surrounding to i the north, east and west are zoned Agricultural with the exception of Pualani Estates and another subdivision to the south-east, which are zoned Residential. This is an aerial photograph of the property. The land is currently undeveloped. And you can see there is development of the Pualani Estates Subdivision going into the south; but most of the surrounding properties are vacant. ' The State Land Use Boundary Designation for the property is Agricultural that's shown in light green. And the areas on the slide in pink are Urban. The areas in yellow are Rural. And the General Plan LUPAG Designation for the property is Urban Expansion that's shown on the slide i in the crosshatch. The areas in orange are Medium-Density Urban. The areas in the light green are Important Agricultural Lands. And then this area down here in the dark green is Rural. ' The Kona CDP identifies the project site in their Urban Area, the Kona Urban Area. And the property is on the periphery of the Kahului-Puapuaa Village Neighborhood Transit Oriented Development Center, which is shown here by this big blue circle. The applicant is proposing to create a 53-lot subdivision mainly of 10,000-square foot size lots; however, they will be submitting a Planned Unit Development application to allow for some i smaller lot sizes of approximately 7,000 square feet, as well as variances from the Subdivision Code regarding the roadways. I i And I just wanted to put this slide in to show how the property will be accessed. There will be two accesses: one from Hualalai Road, as well as an access through the Pualani Estates ~ Subdivision off of this road stub-out here called, I think it's Paulehia Street, yeah, right through here. And then the next slide shows the preliminary lot layout. Again, this is the stub-out from the Pualani Estates Subdivision to the south. The applicant is also proposing astub-out for j future development of the property to the west, as well as development of the property to the north and to the east, and then the access ,qff of Hualalai Road. ~ k J The Planning Department is recommending a favorable recommendation for both the State Land ~ Use Boundary Amendment and the Change of Zone applications. 1 i WATANABE: Thank you, Maija. Fellow Commissioners, do we have any questions of ~ staff? Seeing none, then, Mr. Lim, are you representing i LIM: Good morning, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. Steve Lim representing Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC. With me today are Lee Barrett who is a manager of the limited ~ liabilit com an i Y P Y i WATANABE: Mr. Lim, maybe I can swear you guys in, I'm sorry. Yeah, right hand, please. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth now before the Planning Commission? I 2 - - - - - I - - - - I '1 i I r APPLICANTS: I do. WATANABE: Thank you. And then of course, you know, I know your name, but name and address for the record. LIM: Steven Lim, P. O. Box 121, Hilo 96721. Good morning again. I'm representing Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC. With me to my left is Lee Barrett who is a manager of the company, and his brother Al Barrett who is a member. We are here on the State Land Use and County Change of Zone application for this parcel of about 14.5 acres. i ' We received the Planning Director's background and recommendation documents and we have no comments. We'd appreciate your support on this application. What we'd like to do is to, I'll turn the mike over to Lee to give you a little bit of background of who they are WATANABE: Okay LIM: And then I can go back into the details of the application and the compliance with the Kona CDP. WATANABE: Okay, before we do that, though, you did mention that you are in agreement with the conditions; however, we do have a revised Condition D, which indicates that restrictive covenants in the deeds will reflect that the property cannot be further subdivided. And I assume you've already gotten a copy of that? 1 LIM: Yes, we have. So we reviewed that new condition, and have no i comments. We understand that's a standard condition. WATANABE: Right. I LIM: I don't know if we have been in agreement with all of the conditions. We will continue, on the traffic and roadways and on the drainage improvements that we would be li required, we are going to continue our discussions with Mr. Emler at Public Works as we go + through the process. , 4 WATANABE: Okay, thank you. BARRETT: Good morning. I'm Lee Barrett, Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC. Address is 16541 ' Gothard Street, Huntington Beach, California 91709 - I don't know if you need all the info. We are developing this land as a part of our involvement in Hawaii here. My parents have had a house here about 15 years and we've been coming to the island for about 20. And we've just been starting the business about five years ago. Originally, we got in with Phil Tinguely and we ~ bought this land with him. And since then we've bought him out, and just developing on our j own now. I don't know, just looking at the PUD, we like the look of the PUD a little bit better than the standard streets. And we just like the feel of how this looks and we'd like to move forward with that. ~ I i I 3 - WATANABE: Okay. Fellow Commissioners, do we have any questions of Mr. Barrett? Mr. Housel. HOUSEL: I had a question just to make sure I understand what you are proposing. You are proposing 53 lots, right? BARRETT: Yes. ' HOUSEL: Okay. Average of this lot size will be 10,000 square feet, is that correct? r ~ BARRETT: Yes. HOUSEL: Okay. However, you want to reduce some of those to 7,000 square feet. Is that what the plan is? ~ BARRETT: Yes. Some of the lots will be smaller in size and some of them will go up a little bit over the 10,000. HOUSEL: Okay, but the total lots will stay at 53? BARRETT: Yes, it will. HOUSEL: Okay, okay, that's what I wanted to clarify. The other question I had was I the Condition R; it says the applicant will comply with the requirements of Chapter 11, Article 1, Hawaii County Code relating to Affordable Housing Policy. How do you plan to do that? BARRETT: As of right now we plan on complying with the rule and we don't know if that's still incorporating 53 lots - I believe there will be 11 lots that will be for affordable housing - so we are not sure if we are going to incorporate some of that into our subdivision or if we are going to buy the available credits. HOUSEL: I see, okay. So that's why it's not defined in the applica-. BARRETT: It's not defined, Yeah. We are still unsure of how we want to incorporate it into the property. HOUSEL: I see, okay. The roadways that you show here in your plan, do those include bicycle trails? i BARRETT: There are sidewalks on all sides of the street except the makai of the road moving through there. And there will be no access to those lots; that's a pretty steep portion of it ~ right there, so we are going to access it from the top lots. But the rest do have sidewalks. HOUSEL: They will. BARRETT: Yes. 4 - - - - ~ - - - - i ~ HOUSEL: Okay. Now, there will be no gates, is that correct? BARRETT: No. HOUSEL: Okay, so you know, there will be free access through the property. ? BARRETT: You will have a smooth flow running from Pualani and up to Hualalai Road. ~ HOUSEL: Okay, thank you very much. BARRETT: Thank you. WATANABE: Any further questions? Is your brother, Al, going to testify also? No? So ` then we are back to you Oh, Ms. Giffin. GIFFIN: Mr. Lim, do you plan or have you already held community meetings? LIM: We have held no community meetings. They've talked to people in the area, but nothing formal. This is, we think, and that's part of the Kona CDP discussion is that this is an infill project within the Kona Urban Area; so it's supposed to be given a priority in development. We feel that the big thing that it gives community also is north-south connectivity r i GIFFIN: Right. LIM: From the Pualani Estates Subdivision back out to Hualalai Road. And also they are providing the connectivity that the Kona CDP requires. GIFFIN: Thank you. WATANABE: Okay. Ms. Bowman. f w BOWMAN: I have a question. ,.~1nd I'm sorry I didn't notice this. Do you own any of the other lots right there? I'm not sure what the ownership is. BARRETT: No, my brothers and I do own Lot D, 42. " BOWMAN: Lot D 42, which would be " i BARRETT: Which is the Hu-Ko-Pa property. BOWMAN: Okay. i BARRETT: And my father owns the lot right above it -Lot E. BOWMAN: Lot Sorry, I'm looking at the Tax Map, so i s ~ _ - - ~ - - - i BARRETT: Just mauka of it. BOWMAN: Mauka from the Belt Road, right? BARRETT: From the Hu-Ko-Pa lot. It's up, yes. BOWMAN: Okay. BARRETT: Then that it's all right there. BOWMAN: Okay. And the other two lots are held by someone else. BARRETT: Yes, somebody else. i BOWMAN: Thank you. I BARRETT: You're welcome. Thank you. WATANABE: Okay, Mr. Housel. HOUSEL: Mr. Chair, I had one question regarding Condition L -and I'm not sure who the right person to ask is - it says, "If required, a drainage study shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer...." If required by whom? LEITHEAD TODD: That's typically by Department of Public Works. HOUSEL: Okay, Department of Public Works. Is there a reason why they wouldn't I ask for a drainage study? 1 LEITHEAD TODD: If there have been prior drainage studies, if they are very familiar with this area, they might feel that it isn't necessary. They will take a look at the topography, they'll look at the information provided by the applicant, and then they'll make a determination on what's required. , , ti HOUSEL: I see. f LIM: And we understand that Public Works does have drainage issues; so we'll be, we've already submitted a preliminary drainage study and we'll be further working with Public Works on the drainage issues. t HOUSEL: Okay, thank you. ' i r WATANABE: Okay. Looks like we are done with the questions. So I guess we are back ~ to you and your presentation, Mr. Lim. 6 - - LIM: The design as you can see is anon-standard subdivision design; we'll be processing a Planned Unit Development to modify the lot sizes and the roadway standards. The north-south road will be designed to be dedicable, and even though that's not going to be full County standards, that'll be a decision that's made by the Planning Director as to what is dedicable standard and what is not. So we have been working with Mr. Emler of Public Works on both the roadway and the drainage issues, and we are going to continue to work with him as we go through the process. So we'd ask for your support. This is an infill project of the Kona CDP. And we want to see if we can get this thing entitled and hopefully get set out for hopefully the return of our real estate market. WATANABE: Okay, thank you. Any further questions? Okay, then I do have one person who signed up to testify. So you all maybe seated and I'll call up Mr. Robinson. I do need to swear you in, Mr. Robinson, so raise your right hand, please. Yes. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth now before the Planning Commission? ROBINSON: I do. i ' WATANABE: Thank you. And could you speak into the mike, and for the record state your name and address. ROBINSON: Okay. My name is Rick Robinson and my address is P. O. Box 430, Kealakekua 96750. And Should I go ahead? I WATANABE: Yes. ROBINSON: Okay. Mr. Chairman, I've been asked by Margaret Joye who is president of Uluwehi LLC. Margaret Joye is the owner of a neighboring property that's referred to as ~ Sugar Cane Lane. I believe that you saw earlier the map that was on there - if we had that map I back, it may help forme to identify Mrs. Joye's property. If I could point out i WATANABE: Sure. I think she has a pointer for you. ~ ROBINSON: Mrs. Joye's property is Sugar Cane Lane, which is right here, and the I subject property is right here. Mrs. Joye.~s in Australia. She has lived here. She had her ~ children here. She and her husband, Ian Joye, still own property here. When their children j became of age to go to school, they relocated back to Australia so that their children could go to the same school that Mr. Joye went to in Sydney. ~ They have developed Sugar Cane Lane. They bought the property a while back. I believe it's 21 j lots. They have not put it on the market to sell; they've just developed it and let it sit. They in their development extended the street into their property with the understanding that there would be through streets connecting straight through Hualalai and actually continuing on so that they will line up with the other roads in Kailua View Estates. Mrs. Joye has sent me the email and ' she is really concerned over this project, and had asked me to appear on her behalf today. The concern primarily deals with the access, the access into Hualalai Road, that the road I believe it's Paulehia - I'm not sure of that pronunciation -that goes into the project does not continue straight but instead kind of meanders through the property to connect with Hualalai Road, which 7 ~ ~ - i I believe all the other streets are shown as lining up and being straight streets so they would be safe to travel. Her concern is also about traffic, additional traffic that would be generated to Hualalai Road. When they did their project, even though there was an access point at the top, they took access off of the other street that comes in directly from Puapuanui that is the access mauka-makai through the neighboring subdivision WATANABE: Pualani? ROBINSON: Pualani, Pualani Estates. And that was the source of her concern. So she had asked me to appear today on her behalf and testify as to her concerns before this Commission today. i And I do have to say one thing: It's on a personal note for many years testifying before the ! Planning Commission on different items, it's really a first for me to testify before the Leeward Planning Commission and I want to tell you that's a great step forward. Thank you. I WATANABE: Okay. Fellow Commissioners, do we have any questions of Mr. Robinson? Okay then, Mr. Robinson, thank you for your testimony. ROBINSON: Okay, thank you, Mr. Chairman. WATANABE: Let's see, shall we open this up for discussion or are we, or could I have a motion? HOUSEL: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to make a motion. ' WATANABE: Let's start with the LUC first, I believe. I HOUSEL: Okay. Do you want me to do them separately or together ~ GIFFIN: Yeah, you know, excuse me, Mr. Chairman, I'm sorry. May I ask another ~ question before we entertain a motion? i WATANABE: Sure. Your questipp ~ GIFFIN: I'm sorry. I was WATANABE: Would be directed towards j GIFFIN: Actually it was to the last speaker. ~ i WATANABE: Oh, Mr. Robinson? ~ GIFFIN: Yeah, it just now occurred to me. I'm sorry, Rick, could you please come back up? Thank you. If I understood your concerns or the concerns of the woman that you represent, it's access, right? i 1 i i 8 ' _ _ . ~ - - - - ROBINSON: Correct. GIFFIN: Okay, and specifically, would you go over again what her concern is? ~ ROBINSON: Okay. Maybe I meandered a little bit, but primarily if you look at the road that goes into her project BOWMAN: If you could use the ! GIFFIN: Could you use the pointer? ~ ROBINSON: Which is right here GIFFIN: Yes, okay, okay. ROBINSON: Yeah, and then if you look at the road that goes into this project, which is here GIFFIN: Correct. ROBINSON: And then if you look at the overlay that shows the project in its entirety - that one -this is where the road comes in. But instead of going straight on through as planned and eventually connecting up so it would align with all the other roads that are through the I mauka portion above Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway, you'll see that this, you know, goes in and I then it kind of meanders through the subdivision; so it takes away from the integrity of the other roadways. That's one concern. i The other concern is m traffic on Hualalai Road, if this is the access. I think we all know that Hualalai Road is a substandard road, and if we're throwing more traffic onto it When Mrs. Joye did her project, her access was off of the Puapuanui Road that goes through Pualani Estates. ~ GIFFIN: Was that part of her conditions, or did she have any conditions that she had to comply with? ~ ROBINSON: I don't know. I don't know the answer to that question; I just know that, ~ i you know, she constructed the road so that it's continuation of a road that will, you know, has 1 curbs and gutters and sidewalks and will have the ability to be a continuation, if the property next door to her property is developed; but in this case the road stubs out into their project and then meanders through their project before accessing Hualalai rather than continuing as a straight shot as it should. i WATANABE: Okay. Does that pretty much answer your question, Ms. Giffin? ~ GIFFIN: Yes, thank you. WATANABE: Okay. Then you maybe seated, Mr. Robinson. a 9 ~ _ - - - - - ROBINSON: Okay. HOUSEL: Mr. Chair? WATANABE: Yes. HOUSEL: If I could ask, if we have a representative from the Department of Public Works here, that we could ask for a little more information. GIFFIN: Yeah. WATANABE: Okay. Yeah, that's I didn't notice you, I'm sorry. You are hiding behind the projector, Mr. Emler. EMLER: Good morning, Members of the Planning Commission. COMMISSIONERS: Good morning, Ki. WATANABE: Go ahead. You don't need to, you are quasi EMLER: Would you like to ask me a question? HOUSEL: Hi Ki. The question is, obviously Hualalai Road is substandard as far as current standards and i EMLER: We've stated that on the record. i HOUSEL: And I believe I read in here as far as your recommendations or the Department of Public Works that that road has to be improved as a condition of this rezoning, is ~ that correct? EMLER: What we asked for was not real specific as far as what exactly they had to do as far as road improvements were concerned. What we asked them in general to do was to give us a proper right-of--way line that we ,can work with to make improvements, if they are necessary in the future - a uniform, properly, geometrically established right-of--way line. As you can see, it varies; it kind of pops in and out there alongside. It's the roadway along the mauka side of the exhibit there; it does not have a uniform width we would be looking for. We try to establish uniform width as these properties develop, and that's what we were asking for in ~ our recommendations. I ~ t HOUSEL: Now, the existing streets in Pualani Estates, how wide_are those roadways? EMLER: In Pualani Estates Can I just go on with what I was saying, too? HOUSEL: Sure. ' 10 , i EMLER: Yeah, we also ask that they provide a setback along that side to establish a possible future collector road width of 60 feet -that's not entirely in their property, dust their share of it, right -and to stay back from that with any grading efforts that they do to, and possibly do some grading along there, to establish a proper foundation for a roadway there that could be improved in the future. That is what we were looking for. HOUSEL: I see. EMLER: And also obtain the additional width for a possible turn lane there in the future, if that's necessary. WATANABE: Could I interject a second? So just for clarification, then you are looking for the rights so that potentially you could realign to some degree Hualalai Road and also provide a 60-foot wide north-south connector? EMLER: North-south, I wouldn't use those directions but, because Hualalai Road is basically a mauka-makai connector road. WATANABE: Yeah, right, right, okay. EMLER: That's, what you're just asking about, yes, that's what we are looking for. i WATANABE: Okay. And would regard EMLER; The General Plan what is establishes it as a collector road and it gives ~ Collector roads in the Subdivision Code are generally, and in our specifications, are 60 feet - that's why. WATANABE: Okay. And you also heard the concern about the north-south road through this proposed subdivision meandering, and I'm wondering if you have any feedback on that. EMLER: Well, certainly I think the former testifier pointed out an inconsistency in the layout of this subdivision as opposed to the layout in the adjacent subdivisions. We made that clear to the developer that that is something that might concern us because, you know, connectivity is an issue, that we are looking for connectivity. We wouldn't want to necessarily j be discouraging people from driving through this way; that's possibly what could occur in something that's very tight, and somebody might choose to go the other way instead, if they didn't want to take a circuitous route. But technically what we are looking for is a safe road, too, and you need to establish proper sight distances at intersections along the route based on what the j ii WATANABE: Grade is, too. i EMLER: Appropriate design speed for the road would be. It should be designed, you know, generally similar to what the adjacent roadways would be designed for us. WATANABE: Okay i 11 7 EMLER: As far as your, oh, I'm sorry WATANABE: I don't want to get too technical in this here, so Mr. Housel. HOUSEL: I guess that was my question. Are the roadways proposed in this subdivision consistent with the roadways in Pualani Estates? i EMLER: I would say no. The answer to that is no because, well, the roads in Pualani Estates have'fairly straight alignment, larger curves, it's 50 feet wide, fully developed right-of--way with curb, gutter and sidewalk; this one obviously is showing landscaping in the i right-of--way, which unless it was approved specifically by that ordinance, would have to be ~ approved by the Planning Director through the PUD process - it's a variance process. So that would be something that would be under the jurisdiction of the Planning Director to make that discretionary decision whether that would be acceptable, if the condition is that the roadways be dedicable. WATANABE: Okay, Ihave afollow-up question to that, though, because originally you said connector roads generally are 60 feet and it seemed like you indicated Pualani is 50 feet. EMLER: Collector roads are 60 feet. Collector roads, it's a class of roadway I defined in the Subdivision Code and other national standard design guidelines. Collector road is ~ something that not only serves as a connecting road between properties but also serves adjacent ~ properties -that's basically the definition of a collector road. In this case the adjacent roadways ~ are 50-foot wide right-of--way; it does not meet the minimum standard of a collector roadway in ! the Subdivision Code, although it does connect through. One also might use the term "minor road" but I'm not sure I'm answering your question fully. ~ WATANABE: And so the proposed roads in here are, what, 50 or 60 feet roadways? EMLER: After, well, I think that is something that the developer's representative should answer. I've only scaled them, and so I think I know based on the scale; but I think specifically they should answer the question. ~ i WATANABE: Okay. Mr. Lim, you did indicate that you're still in negotiations with ~ Public Works; so maybe you can enlighten us. LIM: Right, that's correct. You know, as you realize this is at the State Land Use and the County Zoning stage where you don't design roadways i WATANABE: Right, right, I understand. ~ i LIM: But the proposal is to use the Planned Unit Development tool to address, I ~ I mean, how do I word this, the roads that are not the north-south connector road. And the reason why you're seeing This is a revised concept plan; we've met with Mr. Emler numerous times 1 and one of the things he did raise or he wanted us to move the connection to Hualalai Road from where we had it originally here to the area that's further mauka, which provides the best sight 12 ~ distance, and so we had our engineer do the calculation and he says based upon the speed and the ' design of Hualalai Road that the location that you see at the upper mauka piece, mauka portion ~ of the property will provide adequate sight distance for the Hualalai intersection. We plan to work with the Planning Department and Public Works on the actual design of this north-south road because the ordinance that you have now before you requires it to be dedicable to the County; so they'll have to approve the standards by which we build it. The other roadways in the project are probably going to be private roads, if that's what we are going to develop, they're probably going to be narrower. The ordinance that you have before you for the, what we call a ~ north-south connector road, is mandating that the road be designed to minor street standards, which is a 50-foot wide right-of--way. That's in Condition No. I that's before you. The other issues about the improvements to Hualalai Road that Mr. Housel brought up, that's going to be for the portion of the property that abuts Hualalai Road, which is a section here; the developer is going to have to -and this is according to Condition E that's proposed by the ' Director -we're going to have to do the improvements to the Hualalai Road, give up a half of the difference in the right-of--way, if Mr. Emler decides that he wants, and additionally give another five feet for aroad-widening easement for later-on improvement by the County. So I think that the Hualalai Road improvement issues are going to be covered under E. WATANABE: Okay. Does that HOUSEL: Mr. Chair? i' WATANABE: Yes, Mr. Housel. HOUSEL: Mr. Lim, question. On the current slide it shows astub-out going probably east, I guess. Now, do your clients also own the property mauka of this property? ' I LIM: No, Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC does not own the mauka parcel; it is owned by a ~ related company by family. This is Mr. Ted Barrett and his investors. So they have two separate investment groups -the son and, you know, their family, and then the father and his business partners. ~ i i HOUSEL: The question I haul is from the previous slide regarding the Sugar Cane property there is a road planned to go north-south through that. Would that road lining alignment - I can't read the name of the road but -would that go, that would go through, if it went all the way to Hualalai Road, that would go through your client's relative's property, is that j right? I LIM: Right, that's correct. We've been working with Mr. Emler on the road connections for the last year and a half probably. So the proposal would be, this property is owned by Mr. Tincher and we are assuming that the extension of this north-south road will come ~ through Mr. Tincher's property, then head into what we call Laii (phonetic), then meeting the connection into Hualalai Road. HOUSEL: Okay, so it'll eventually join the stub-out you are proposing there? 13 - - - .,i \ LIM: That's correct. We've already pre-, rough-designed that road in for the mauka parcel. HOUSEL: Okay. For the entrance that you are proposing to this new subdivision, how wide will that roadway be? i LIM: The entrance right-of--way will be 50 feet wide. The pavement is going to be pursuant to Public Works standards. i HOUSEL: Will that be signaled or, how would that be i LIM: At Hualalai, no, it will be stop-sign controlled. HOUSEL: I see. Okay. i LIM: I think what we are expecting that most people will do is they are going to come out -and that's why we call it the main entry -the Paulehia entry here, they'll come down and hit the traffic signal to get out to Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway. l HOUSEL: Is there, looking at the mauka lot, is there another owner that owns the land on that curve shown on Hualalai Road? i LIM: Yes, we believe that's owned by either Dan Bolton or one of his LLC ~ companies; it's part of a water tank site that's going to be used during the development of water system for these projects. HOUSEL: I see, okay, okay. Thank you very much. ~ I WATANABE: Any Ms. Bowman. ~ BOWMAN: I just have a question because I don't live in Kona. And I think you answered it, Steve. Most people then would access it through the existing subdivision rather than Hualalai, right, because it's kind of winding. I mean, those of you who live in Kona, would that be WATANABE: Yeah, that's a I LIM: That's correct, yeah. WATANABE: Reasonable assumption. ; BOWMAN: Okay, thank you. i LIM: We are, initially we planned not to connect up to Hualalai because as you ~ can see we are picking up some significant roadway improvement conditions on that side; but because of the Kona CDP and the connectivity issues and then the discussions with Mr. Emler, 14 I i I you know, we came to realize that that was something that was very important to the County, so we put that in. BOWMAN: Thank you. WATANABE: All good? Very good. Thank you, Mr. GIFFIN: Mr. Chairman? ' WATANABE: Yes. GIFFIN: Since his name was mentioned earlier in some discussion, the letter that we have from Richard and Leslie Tincher, has that been forwarded onto the applicant? LIM: That's correct. We received Mr. Tincher's letter and we analyzed it. We understand his issues and we believe that what he'll find is when Mr. Ted Barrett's company comes in to apply for the entitlements, that they'll be doing the RS-20 that he was proposing. We feel that the Kona CDP, you know, intends that denser development will occur more makai, _ and it's more, the proposed project, the Hu-Ko-Pa project at RS-10 is more consistent with the Pualani Estates' RS-7.5, which is just all that, all the last to the south, and that perhaps the more mauka lots should be more RS-20. GIFFIN: Okay. ~ i WATANABE: All good? Okay, thank you for your explanation, Mr. Lim. I believe we were about to address a motion on the State Land Use Boundary Amendment. Mr. Housel. HOUSEL: Yes, Mr. Chairman, I'd like to make a motion for the first request that we give afavorable -this is a recommendation, is that correct? i WATANABE: That's correct. It will go to the Council. t HOUSEL: Okay, a favorable recommendation to the Council for the State Land Use ~ i District Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban for the 14.437 acres of land for the Ho-Ku-Pa (sic), LLC, SLU 09-22. WATANABE: Thank you. Any second on that? ~ IOKEPA: Second. i WATANABE: Mr. Iokepa, thank you. Just for the record, it's Hu-Ko-Pa, right, I think? I'm struggling with it also. Any discussion on the matter? Maija? ~ i COTTLE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Commissioner Housel? HOUSEL: Aye. i 15 - - - - - COTTLE: Commissioner Iokepa? i ' IUKEPA: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Bowman? ' BOWMAN: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Giffin? GIFFIN: Aye. ' COTTLE: And Mr. Chairman? ' WATANABE: Aye. COTTLE: Motion passes, five-zero. WATANABE: Thank you. Would you care to continue, Mr. Housel, on the Change of Zone? HOUSEL: Sure, I'll be happy to. I'd like to make a motion that we give a favorable recommendation to the County Council for the applicant's Change of Zone request from Ag-5 to I Single-Family Residential 10,000 square feet, RS-10, for the 14.437 acres of land for the rezone ~ request 09-96. WATANABE: Okay, that will be inclusive of the Director's recommendation, recommendations and conditions, also including the recent revision to Condition D, yeah? HOUSEL: Right, including the last conditional addition. I WATANABE: Oh, I'm sorry, rt was not a revised D; just for the record it's in addition, Condition D and re-numbering of, re-lettering, excuse me, of the other Conditions. Mr. Iokepa? ~ I i IOKEPA: I was just going to second his motion. WATANABE: Thank you. Any further discussion on this? Ms. Bowman. ~ i BOWMAN: I do have just maybe clarification because I - and I don't know this may not be the right time to bring it up - but I know that the Office of Hawaiian Affairs had a rather lengthy letter with the water commitment, with the water development, and I try to understand l the, yeah, I try to understand the planning consultant's reply. So maybe someone could enlighten us a little bit about this. i i WATANABE: Well, let me, I remember reading that. Give me a second. 16 ~ i ' BOWMAN: Okay, so on Page 2 of 3 of Mr. Namuo's, no, Yukie Ohashi's reply, "the Applicant will be paying 68.8 percent of the total cost to build the transmission system to DWS standards, and in exchange, will receive 1,500 units, or 33 percent of the Waiaha well resource over a 20 year time period," and what I think I read was that the Water Board agrees with this because Kona needs the water. WATANABE: Well, I could be wrong but my interpretation was that they're overbuilding for their subdivision so that, and the Board (sic) of Water Supply was going to pay for the overbuilding, so that other parts of Kona could also use that infrastructure -that was my interpretation. BOWMAN: Okay, cause it WATANABE: And if BOWMAN: The applicant, it does say that the applicant WATANABE: Bobby Jean, you want to LEITHEAD TODD: Perhaps Mr. Lim. LIM: I believe what Ms. Bowman is referring to is Apri13, 2008 letter by OHA i to Yukie Ohashi and Yukie Ohashi's July 2 response. This is not part of our project; this is the ~ water project and this is the environmental assessment that was processed for the Waiaha Water System project. But I guess what I'm hearing is that you just want to kind of understand what that means is that BOWMAN: Thank you. LIM: The private water system will be developed by Waiaha System LLC using one of the Department of Water Supply's existing wells; they didn't have the money to develop the well out and the biggest thing they didn't have was they didn't have the land easements around the pipelines and everything else. So what happened was the, it was Dan Bolton and ' many of the property owners in the area gpt together to form Waiaha System LLC, which is the developer of the water system, they'll build that out. They were able to get all the easements from various landowners, and in exchange for their share of the payment of the cost they will receive water commitments. At the point in time when they finish the water system, DWS will be forcing, you know, they'll make them design to their standards, they'll inspect and then they will dedicate the system to DWS; it will be part of the County's water system BOWMAN: So 30, about 33 percent, I guess, then will be the County and the other will j be private. LIM: That's correct. That's a negotiated deal that was done between DWS, the Water Board and the developer of the water system. 17 ~ i I - - i i i BOWMAN: And of this then your applicant will be getting seventy - I can't remember what was the i LIM: It's about 74 - I forgot the exact number -but seventy-some, yes, that's correct. BOWMAN: Okay. And basically the concerns of the Honokohau National Park was because of the Waiaha Water System, not this development, correct? i LIM: That's correct. Their concerns, especially from National Park Service in the past two years or so have been over new well sources, and this is an existing well source that the Department of Water Supply has just sitting up there, just is unable to, you know, develop the transmission lines necessary to bring the water down. BOWMAN: Yeah, cause I understand their concern. But thank you very much. WATANABE: Are we okay with this? Ms. Bowman? BOWMAN: Yes, thank you. WATANABE: Yeah, okay. Do we need any further discussion? I believe we have aI favorable recommendation. i HOUSEL: Mr. Chair? i WATANABE: Yes. ~ HOUSEL: I guess I'd like to make a comment. i WATANABE: Yes. ~ HOUSEL: You know, it seems like, you know, we've asked a lot of questions about roadways and connectivity and things that, you know, the CDP requires that are undefined so far r in this project as far as how the roads are, going to be done, how Hualalai Road is going to be ~ improved -that's all still being negotiated. It seems like, you know, bringing this to the Commission for approval without those details already determined is premature. i WATANABE: I think often times when you are looking at the entitlements, the site plans j that we are looking at are not really set in stone; they are conceptual by nature. And depending ' on, again, like how Mr. Emler described, we do want it to be a safe road and so they are moving the locations of the road depending on the topography, sight distance and potential grade. That's why you don't really, my interpretation is that's why you don't really get something that's very concrete. In addition, in particular with Hualalai Road, it being such a narrow and meandering t road, it maybe, and having more than one property owner to work with, it maybe rather difficult to have a fixed plan before you even have the entitlements. j 18 - - - - - i• HOUSEL: Well, as a commissioner I feel very uncomfortable being asked to approve something that's undefined. WATANABE: Uh huh. Any further discussion on that? Madam Director. LEITHEAD TODD: Mr. Housel's concerns are typically addressed at subdivision and not at rezoning. At subdivision the applicant comes in with their preliminary map on how they are going to create lots and where the roads are going to go, and then that map is sent out for comment by all of the departments and we incorporate those comments including comments ' from Department of Public Works in terms of the road alignment, sight distance and necessary infrastructure as delineated, one, in the rezoning ordinance, and as required by the Subdivision Code. Generally speaking, when somebody is coming in for entitlements, the reason you don't see something set in stone is you don't go and hire the engineers and everybody else to do all of ' that work, if you don't know whether you are going to have an entitlement to develop the property, because that's frankly from our property owner's standpoint that's pretty much throwing money away because you don't know if you have a right to develop it. So typically what happens in this process is that you have a conceptual plan that gives you kind of an idea of what may or may not look like; but when it ultimately comes to the Department for subdivision approval, it may look different as already what they had initially envisioned is starting to change. Maija, can you go back to the map of, where it shows Hualalai? Yeah. If you look at that and ! sight distance, if you are familiar with Hualalai, the DPW's request to basically move the I entrance to the mauka portion of the land makes sense because wherever you are going to have an entrance in or out and left and right turn lanes, you need to be looking at sight distance. And given the piece of property, moving it to the far mauka corner makes the most sense in terms of the sight distance. The difficulty that we sometimes have when we are looking at things is where j you site something may not be the ideal spot on Hualalai Road. But we are not dealing with the other properties; we don't have those other properties in front of us -what we do have is this. So given this particular application, the Public Works is trying to get it sited as best as they can to try and take care of those issues of sight distance; but by moving it as far mauka as you can on one hand it makes it difficult to line that up in any kind of a straight line to the existing stub-out ~ in Pualani, and given topography in this area, the applicant's problem is going to be putting in a road that has the appropriate slope and grade, works in all the drainage features, and to meet ' County dedicable standards. And so sometimes especially in Kona it's really hard to do straight lines. You end up having to do something that's a little bit more meandering in order to get the I requisite slope that you need so that you aren't basically redoing Ka`iminani Drive. And so there are some unique issues and typically it's addressed at subdivision. I understand your concern ' that it's kind of, well, is this what it's really going to look like. What you know is that there will be a maximum of 53 lots, and that the size may vary because they are trying to do a PUD, and you have assurances from the conditions of the rezone that they have to build to a certain standard, and you have assurances from the rezone that they have to build their intersection with j Hualalai meeting with the requirements of the Department of Public Works as to sight distance i and requiring additional right-of--way so that we can preserve the ability to possibly improve j Hualalai in the future. But if you've driven on Hualalai, you know that it presents some very difficult problems in terms of improving rtpartially -sight distance, the way it curves, some of ~ the areas mauka of this the property drops off significantly from the road. And so I don't know how much in the future Hualalai because I think it'll be a very expensive project especially the i 19 ~ - - - - - - - - - - ~ ' I mauka areas. So what we have is the project in front of us and we are trying to do the best we ' can with rt. And luckily for us it is in an area where Hualalai is relatively straight; so we can try to accommodate some of the sight distance issues. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. WATANABE: Thank you. Does that pretty much HOUSEL: Thank you for the explanation. That helps. I understand it better. WATANABE: Okay. So c ~ BOWMAN: I have a ~ WATANABE: Ms. Bowman. BOWMAN: I just Maija, can you go to the Kona Community Development Plan map? Okay, so the project site -and pardon my ignorance but - is considered an infill development located adjacent to the Transit Oriented, TOD, right there, right? But it's adjacent to it; so it's not included in the TOD, right, which l LEITHEAD TODD: I think I want to comment that the circles on the Kona CDP are not necessarily meant to be set in stone; they are guidelines. And you recognize that, particularly in Kona because of topography and where existing roads are laid out, that you have to have certain flexibility. Obviously you don't take that circle two miles out, but areas that are close to it, you know, you want to try and accommodate. And the purpose of the TOD is really to try and make sure that we've got connectivity, and that we plan for public transportation opportunities, so that ~ we can have corridors that will accommodate buses, and try to, I want to say, concentrate ~ development in those TOD areas. And then outside of the TOD areas then you would probably be looking at bigger lots; but within the TOD areas what you are trying to do is concentrate ? development so you can avoid urban sprawl is my understanding of why we are tying to set up these TOD areas. ~ i BOWMAN: Thank you. I guess I just have one comment and that is we are, you know, to me setting the precedents right here with this rezoning, if it goes through, because it's kind of i isolated, and I guess, you know, the mau~~a lots and the two makai lots are well within the Urban Expansion area also. So, and I notice that the`stub-out leads to the mauka lot, which I assume upon development would probably go into Hualalai Road, if they do develop it. I'm not sure about the topography of this area -maybe too steep. But this is just something to consider. I mean I defimtely believe that this is setting the precedents for urban expansion in this area. So ' that's just my comment. Thank you. i WATANABE: Any further discussion? Maija? I believe we have, yeah, we are ready, I think. i COTTLE: Okay, thank you, Mr. Chairman. Commissioner Housel? t HOUSEL: Aye. ~ i 20 ~ i i ! COTTLE: Commissioner Iokepa? IOKEPA: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Bowman? ~ BOWMAN: Aye. COTTLE: Commissioner Giffin? GIFFIN: Aye. COTTLE: And Mr. Chairman? ~ WATANABE: Aye. COTTLE: The motion passes, five-zero. WATANABE: Okay, thank you. So good luck at the Council level, Mr. Lim, and also with your discussions with Public Works. j LIM: Thank you very much. For Commissioner Bowman's benefit, it is j consistent with the Kona CDP because it's within the Kona Urban Area. So it's not really setting a precedent; it's just meeting the established standard. ~ i BOWMAN: Thank you. The discussion ended at 10:48 a.m. I Respectfully submitted, Noriko Sauer, Secretary Leeward Planning Commission i i i i i i I i I 21 ~ I 1 / - ~..2~t~ 1~. ! rte-` I BHuKoPaSLUREZ doc-7/16/09 COUNTx OF' HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HU-KO-PA, LLC STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (SLU 09-22) CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 09-96) i HU-KO-PA, LLC has submitted applications for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban and a Change of Zone from Agricultural 5-acres (A-Sa) to Single-Family Residential 10,000 square feet (RS-10) for approximately 14.437 acres of land. The property is located approximately 1,400 feet mauka of the Hawaii Belt Road/Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and 1,100 feet makai of Hienaloli Road, adjacent to and north of the Pualani Estates Subdivision, Kahului 2°d, North Kona, Hawaii, TMK: 7-5-17: 42. PROPOSED ACTION 1. Request: State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban and a Change of Zone from A-Sato RS-10 for approximately 14.437 acres of land to subdivide the roe mto 531ots a roximatel 10 000 uare feet in size. The a licant intends P p rtY ~ PP Y sq Pp to submit a Planned Unit Development (PUD) application to allow for a small selection of smaller lot sizes of approximately 7,500 square feet. (Exhibit 1-State Land Use Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone applications) 2. Project Schedule: Construction of the infrastructure is proposed to be completed within twelve (12) months of Final Subdivision Approval. Based on current maxket conditions, the lots are expected to be developed and sold over an ~.pproximately 2-3 year period. 3. Cost: Approximately $5 million. 4. Landowner: Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 5. Planned Unit Development (PUD): The purpose of the PUD (Chapter 25, Zoning Code Section 26, Article 6, Division 1) is to encourage comprehensive site planning that adapts the design of the development to the land, by allowing diversification in the relationships of various uses, buildings, structures, open spaces and yards, building heights, and lot sizes in planned building groups, while still insuring that the development complies with + \ i i I I ~ ~ the Zoning Code. The minimum land area required for a PUD is two acres. The Planning Director reviews and approves/denies the PUD application. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 6, State Land Use Designation: Agricultural. 7. GP LUPAG Map: Urban Expansion Area. 8. County Zoning: A-Sa. 9. Community Development Plan: The Kona Community Development Plan (KCDP) adopted by Ordinance No. 08 131 effective September 25, 2008 identifies the property as located within the Urban Area. The project is consistent with the Land Use and Transportation policies in the KCDP, as the project is considered an "infill" rezoning, and the project will provide anorth-south connector road through the development. 10. Coastal Zone Management, HRS, Chapter 205A: The entire State of Hawaii lies within the Coastal Zone Management Area. 11. Special Management Area (SMA): The Special Management Area is a part of the Coastal Zone Management Program and regulated by the County. The property is not situated within the Special Management Area. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA 12. Project Site: The property is an approximately 14.437-acre vacant parcel, adjacent to, and north of the Pualani Estates Subdivision. The project site is heavily vegetated. 13. Surrounding Zoning/Land Uses: Surrounding properties are zoned A la, A-Sa and RS- 7.5. The project site is located adjacent to the Pualani Estates Subdivision (RS-7.5) to the south. Sugar Cane Lane Subdivision (RS-15) is located mauka. ofthe Pualani Estates Subdivision. Nearby properties are vacant or in residential uses. 14. ALISH: Unclassified. 15. Land Study Bureau's Detailed Land Classification System: "D" or "Poor". 16. U.S. Soil Survey: rPYD, or Punaluu extremely rocky peat, 6 to 20 percent slopes. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. 17. FEMA: Zone "X", areas determined to be outside the 500-year flood plain. 18. Flora/Fauna: The property is almost entirely covered with a dense growth of introduced grasses. Vegetation within the project area consists of a combination of kiawe, koa haole, and other grasses, vines, weeds and shrubs. Species observed in the project area -2- include the Zebra Dove, Spotted Dove, Common Myna, House Sparrow and House Finch. According to the applicant, there are no known rare or endangered flora or fauna on the site. 19. ArchaeologicaUCultural Resources: An Archaeological Inventory Survey was prepared by Rechtman Consulting, LLC and submitted to the DLNR-HPD on November 30, 2005. The survey was approved by the DLNR-HPD on October 4, 200b. In a letter dated June 15, 2009, the DLNR-HPD stated that no historic properties will be affected because "SHPD previously reviewed this project and mitigation has been completed." 20. Air Quality: The proposed project is not expected to impact air quality in the area. 21. Noise Impacts: There could be short-term noise impacts due to construction activities. However, the applicant states that impacts can be mitigated through scheduling work during the day and ensuring that construction equipment complies with County regulations. 22. Scenic/Visual Resources: As the property is located approximately 6,000 feet mauka of the shoreline, views to the shoreline should not be impacted. From the shoreline, the project will be visible, though not distinguishable from the surrounding area. 23. Public Access: None that traverses the property. 24. Traffic: The applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) conducted by Witcher Engineering, LLP dated April, 2009 (Planning Department Exhibit 2 -April, 2009 TEAR by Witcher Engineering, LLP). In addition to the analysis of other intersections in the nearby vicinity, the TIAR examined the overall traffic impact of the proposed project, including the primary access road at Puapuaanui Street in the Pualani Estates Subdivision from the Queen Ka` ahumanu Highway and the secondary access road at Hualalai Road makai/east of its intersection with Hienaloli Road. The TIAR concluded that "the levels of service at the intersection of a) Puapuaanui Street and the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and 2) Hualalai Road and Hienaloli Road to be "A" or "B" during the AM and PM peak hours and thus `acceptable levels of service' in compliance with Concurrency Requirements for traffic impact analysis reports of the Hawaii County Code." PUBLIC UTII.ITIES AND SERVICES 25. Access: Access to the project area will be from two locations: Hualalai Road to the -3- north, and Paulehia Street located in the Pualani Estates Subdivision to the south. The primary access will be from Paulehia Street which will connect to the signalized intersection at the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street in the Pualani Estates Subdivision. The project will include anorth-south connector road between the project's primary access at Paulehia Street to Hualalai Road. Hualalai Road is a County collector street with an 18 to 20-foot wide pavement with a variable right-of--way. The Department of Public Works (DPW) states, in summary: • Hualalai Road is substandard based on width, alignment and roadside hazard clearances. • The proposed connection to Hualalai Road should be master planned further mauka to serve both the subject property and adjoining Parcel 43 mauka of the site. • Realign the right-of--way property line along the entire subject property frontage of Hualalai Road to provide an alignment meeting with the approval of the DPW. The applicant states that future roadway connectivity to the adjacent west/makai Parce141 and east/mauka Parcel 43 will be provided via roadway stub outs planned within the proposed project. 26. Water: The Department of Water Supply (DWS) states that the applicant is a member of the Waiaha System, LLC, which executed a Water Development Agreement with the Water Board to secure water commitments for the development. The DWS has confirmed that the applicant has obtained a water commitment for 79 units. The applicant will be required to complete the necessary transmission and storage facilities. The DWS is currently reviewing construction plans for the installation of a 16-inch waterline to be placed within a private waterline easement within the subject parcel. Water will be made available from the new l6-inch waterline after all water system improvements have been completed in accordance with the agreement. 27. Wastewater: According to the project's Sewer Report (Witcher, 2008, Attachment 10 in the application), there are no existing sewer facilities to the site. However, an 8-inch sewer connection is available at the north end of Paulehia Street in the adjacent Pualani Estates Subdivision. The Department of Environmental Management states that a sewer -4- study will be required prior to connection to the sewerline. A sewer extension application will be required for a Council resolution approving the sewer extension from Paulehia Street within the adjacent Pualani Estates subdivision into the proposed development. 28. Solid Waste: Solid waste will be disposed of at the Puuanahulu landfill. 29. Essential Utilities and Services: All essential utilities are available to the project site. Kona Community Hospital is located in Kealakekua. Police and fire services are located in Kealakehe and Kailua-Kona. AGENCIES' COMMENTS 30. Department of Public Works: Planning Department Exhibit 3 -June 17, 2009 memo 31. Department of Water Supply: P.D. Exhibit 4 -June 24, 2009 memo 32. Fire Department: P.D. Exhibit 5 -June 4, 2009 memo 33. Department of Environmental Management: P. D. Exhibit 6 -May 26, 2009 memo 34. DLNR Historic Preservation Division: P.D. Exhibit 7 -June 15, 2009 letter 35. DLNR Land Division: P.D. Exhibit 8 -June ib, 20091etter and attachments 36. Office of Housing and Community Development: P.D. Exhibit 9 -June 10, 2009 memo 37. Department of Health: P.D. Exhibit 10 -May 21, 2009 and June 29, 2009 memos 38. Department of Transportation: P.D. Exhibit it -June 13, 20091etter 39. Department of Education: P.D. Exhibit 12 -June 15, 2009 letter AGENCIES AND ORGA,~NIZATXQNS - PTO ~tESPONSES 40. Department of Parks and Recreation, Land Use Commission, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Kona Traffic and Safety Committee AGENCIES - NO COIVIIVIENTS 41. Police Department APPLICANT'S RESPONSES TO AGENCIES' COMMENTS 42. P.D. Exhibit I3 -June 26, 20091etter PUBLIC COMMENTS 43. None as of this writing. -5- i ~4~t~t&cT''°'~ r~~,~fi APPLICATIONS FOR STATE LAND USE DIST~(~t~' ~OIN~~~Y AMENDMENT, and CHANGE OF ZONE AND COUNTYENVIRONMENTAL REPORT at Kahului 2nd, District of North Kona, Hawaii TMK: (3) 7-5-017:042 Applicant: HU-KO-PA, LLC - Prepared by: J Steven S.C. Lim Carlsmith Ball LLP 121 Waianuenue Avenue Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Telephone: (808) 935-6644 May 2009 Planning Dept. - Exhibit r r STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (15 ACRES OR LESS) COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Type or legibly print the requested information) PETITIONER: Hu-Ko-Pa LLC ee attac a ee wner s ut ortzatton PETITIONER'S SIGNATURE:Letter DATE: ADDRESS: c/o Brendan Lee, LLC, 16541 Gothard Street, Suite 109, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 PETITIONER'S INTEREST IF NOT OWNER: TELEPHONE:(Bus.)(714)375-5866 (Res.) (Fax)(714)375-5888 LANDOWNER(S): Hu-Ko-Pa LLC ee attac a ee wner s ut ortzarion LANDOWNER SIGNATURE(S): Letter DATE: (May be by letter) ADDRESS:c/o Brendan Lee, LLC, 16541 Gothard Street, Suite 109, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 TAX MAP KEY: (3)7-5-017:042 STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: N/A (south of Hualalai Road) ZONING: Agricultural SIZE OF PROPERTY: 14.437 acres CURRENT STATE LAND USE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION: Agricultural REQUESTED STATE LAND USE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION: Urban AGENT: Steven S. C. Lim, Esq. ADDRESS: Carlsmith Ball LLP, 121 Waianuenue Avenue, Hilo, HI 96720 TELEPHONE:(Bus.)(808)935-6644 (Res.) (Fax) (808)935-7975 _ Please indicate to whom original correspondence and copies should be sent. ORIGINAL: Steven S. C. Lim, Esq. COPIES: Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC (See Instructions on Reverse Side) CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Type or legibly print the requested information) APPLICANT: Hu-Ko-Pa LLC APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE See attached Fee Owner's Authorization Letter DATE: ADDRESS: c/o Brendan Lee LLC 16541 Gothard Street, Suite_ 109 Huntington Beach CA 92647 LIST APPLICANT'S INTEREST IF NOT OWNER: LIST PRINCIPAL(S) INCLUDING NAMES OF MAIN OFFICERS: PHONE:(Bus.) (Res.) (Fax) LANDOWNER(S): Hu-Ko-Pa LLC LANDOWNER SIGNATURE(S): See attached Fee Owner's Authorization Letter DATE: (Maybe by letter) _ LANDOWNER(S) ADDRESS: c/o Brendan Lee LLC 16541 Gothard Street Suite 109, Huntin on Beach CA 92647 REQUEST: Agricultural 5 acres (A-Sa) TO Single Family Residential (RS-10) _ _ (Existing zoning) (Proposed Zoning) TAX MAP KEY: x,17-5-017042 STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: N/A (south of Hualalai Road) SIZE OF PROPERTY OR AFFECTED AREA(S) TO BE REZONED: 14.437 acres AGENT:._ Steven S C Lim Esq ADDRESS: c/o Carlsmith Ball LLP 121 Waianuenue Avenue Hilo, Hawaii 96720_ TELEPHONE:(Bus.)~8081935-6644 (Res.) (Fax)~808) 935-7975 Please indicate to whom original correspondence and copies should be sent. ORIGINAL: Steven S. C. Lim, Esq. COPIES: Hu-ko-,pa, LLC 4822-5140-2755.1.058109-00001 9628-1842-0995.1 Attachment Agricultural Rezoning PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF HAWAII APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE RESPONSE 1. If your request is approved, do you intend to subdivide the subject land in accordance with the approved change of zone? Yes If ryes] please answer the rest of question 1 and then to question 3. a. How many acres of the requested area do you intend to subdivide? 14.437 acres b. Into what lot sizes? 10,000 sq. ft. c. If your request is approved, approximately how long after the date of approval do you expect to submit your subdivision plans to the Planning Department for preliminary approval? 6 months d. Do you intend to build houses on the new created lots? Yes If yes, please answer the following questions: _ On how many of those lots? All At what approximate price range? House N/A Lot N/A Total N/A Approximately how long, after approval of the subdivision, would the first house be available for occupancy? N/A If you intend to subdivide, please submit a preliminary schematic subdivision plan together with your change of zone application form. 2. If you have no firm plans of subdividing the subject area, do you intend to: a. Sell or lease the land to someone who has firm plans? N/A b. Sell or lease the land to someone who has tentative plans? N/A 4828-2019-9427.1 c. Sell or lease the land to someone who has no lan ? _ p s N/A d. Keep it? N/A e. Other (please state) N/A f. If you intend to do either a, b, c, please elaborate on the kind of plans the other party has. Please, also, include in your answer approximately how soon after approval of your rezoning do you expect to transfer the _ subject land to another party. N/A 3. Do you think that your request and your further plans for the land will alleviate the local housing situation? Yes How? The proposed Project will provide much needed residential lot inventory to West Hawaii. 4. Are there any buildings on the subject area? No If so, what kind? What do you intend to do with those buildings if your request is approved? N/A 5. Is the subject land currently being used for any agricultural activity? No If so, please list the kinds of products grown and on how many squaze feet or acres of Iand per product.' 6. Was your request to allow for the creation of smaller agricultural lots? No - If so, did your plan include the following considerations? a. Commodity to be produced? What kinds of commodity? b. Suitability of the proposed lot-size for that commodity? c. Sufficient farm size to allow reasonable chance of success in commercial agriculture? d. Agricultural leases or other forms of assurance that potential buyers or -2- 4828-2019-9427.! leases would put the subject area into some form of agricultural use? Please state the proposed type of arrangement. Please submit your agricultural plans for the subject area and present evidence of consideration of the above requirements together with your request for a change of zone. If you do not intend to subdivide the subject land for some sort of agricultural purpose, please state your other reasons. 7. To your knowledge, has there been any flooding and/or drainage problem on the subject area? No _ If so, please describe the problem. ~ 8. Do you think that the roads leading to the subject area needs improvements? No If so, what kind? Primary access to the Project will be from the south at Paulehia Street which will connect to the signalized intersection at Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street with a overall Level of Service of "A" and "B". The subdivision design will include the north-south connector road between Paulehia Street and Hualalai Road meeting with the Kona Community Development Plan concept of interconnectivity of roads between projects. 9. What sort of governmental assistance and/or improvements do you feel will be needed in the subject area when developed? YES NO a. Schools X b. Roads I X c. Sewer X d. Drainage X e. Police Protection X f. Fire Protection X g. Recreational Facilities X h. Public Utilities X -3- 4828-2019-9427.1 i. Other N/A For those checked " es", lease elaborate what t e or kinds of im rovements and/or • Y P YP P assistance are needed. Although the Applicant has chosen "yes" for Police and Fire Protection, the Applicant - does not anticipate any new improvements will be required by the police or fire departments to service this relatively small project. The police and fire facilities will be addressed by the fair share contributions required from the project. _ _ See attached Fee Owners' Letter of Signature: Authorization Address: Telephone: Date: -4- 4828-2019-9427.1 • FEE OWNER'S LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION • • - - r ~ -rv r uww P,L FEE OWNER'S LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Tax Map Key: (3) 7-5-017:042 Kahului 2nd, District of North Kona, Island of Hawaii The undersigned is the fee owner ofthe real property above-identified, and hereby authorizes Carlsmith Ball LLP, to apply for, execute aad process any and all Couaty, State and Federal goven~mental permit applications, and to participate in proceedings related to said real p~pe~Y• A photosta#ic or facsimile copy of this executed authorization shall also be considered as effective and valid as the original. Dated: a rG ~ 3 0~OO _ HU-KO-PA, ,LI.C, a Domestic Limited Liability Company ~t - By G ~ - Its ./~l4rTT Ji?e,~, der - Address: c/o Brendan Lee, LLC 16541 Gothard Street; Suite 1Q9 Huntington Beach, CA 9264? Mar 31 09 02:17p BRENDAN LEE LLC 7143755888 p,3 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ~i2A~/C E ) On /yJAR~ti 3/f ,200 9 ,before me, r s ~7- ,Va ~b/, Date Name Aad TiOt:Of0111ea (e.g. °]eeo Dot Notoq Public's personally appeared C: • Nero of Slgeer(sj who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shelthey executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. o~q I certify that under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the ooennittNon s li3l6b~0i laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph ~ is true and correct. wos~~t WITNESS my hand and ofFicial seal. Signature Signanue of Notary Pubha OPTIONAL a Though the data below is not required bylaw, i1 inay prove valuable to persons relying on the docament and could prevent fraudulent reattachment ojthis form. _ Description of Attached Document Title or Typo of Document: Fee Owners Letter of Authorization Document Date: Dumber of Pages: 2 Signer(s) Olfier Than Named Above: Capatity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: - - ? Individual ? Individual ? Corporate Officer -Title(s): ? Corporate Ott'icer -Title(s): I$} Partner - O Limited ? General ? Partner - ? Limited ? General ? Attorney in Fact ? Attorney Tn Fact ? Trustee O Trustee _ ? Guardian or Conservator ? Guardian or Conservator ? ? Other: Signer is representing: Signer is representing: I~REstDtOw) ,Ct-s .LCC • METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION • LOT D Land situated approximately 1400 feet northeasterly of _ - the northeasterly side of Hawaii Belt Road and At Kahului 2~, North Kona, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii Being portion of Royal Pateirt 1669 Land Coaunission Av~ard 8516-B Apana 3 to Kamaikui Beginning at the Southwesterly corner of this parcel of land, being also the Southeasterly corner of Lot C and a point on the Northwesterly side of Royal Patent 6716 Land Commission Award 4887, Apana 2 to Thomas Sams the coordinates of said poim of beginning referred to Government Serve Trian Station "KAHE,LO" Y gelation being 1,620.97 feet North 5,817.15 feet East and running by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: Thence, for the next five (5) courses along Lot C, and the remainder of Royal Patern 1669, - Land Commission Award 8516 B, Apana 3 to Kamaikui: 1. 155° 19' SO" 720.66 feet to a point: - 2. 243° 44' 29" 221.15 feet to a poi - - 3. 268° 09' 17" 195.04 feet to a poiirt; - ~ 4. 257° 2T 50" 239.26 feet to i a point; 5. 170°-04' 30" 59.16 feet to a point; Thence, for the next seven (7) courses along the Southerly side of Hualalai Road 6. 246° 45' 30" 2.79 feet to a point; 7. 260° 04' 30" 46.36 feet to a point; . 8. 255° S8' 30" 36.15 feet to a poiaat; 9. 256° 57' 30" 44.68 feet to a poirn; 10. 252° 02' 00" 31.42 feet to a paint; 11. 252° 59' 30" 70.91 feet to a point; 12. 250° 07' 30" 33.72 feet to a point; ~ j ~l 7 Thence, following along Lot E, and the remainder of Royal Patent 1669, Land Commission Award 8516-B, Apana 3 to K:amaikui: 13. 338° 16' 12" 715.98 feet to a point; Thence for the next sixteen (16) courses along the middle of a stonewall; along Royal Patent 6716, Land Commission Award 4887, Apana 2 to Thomas Sams and partially along Lot 131 and Lot C Pualani Estates Subdivision 14. 85° 56' 30" 65.91 feet to a point; _ 1 S. 72° I3' 00" 138.54 feet to a point; _ 16. 72° 29' 10" 30.29 feet to a poiu~ • 17. 69° 34' 14" 121.45 feet to a poi 18. 71° 11' 30" 111.11 feet to a poi 19. 74° 31' 25" 38.40 feet to a point; • 20. 68° 46' 06" 54.35 felt ~ a point; - 21. 70° 11' 27" 56.27 feet to apoint; - 22. 82° 34' 25" 44.90 feet to a point; _ 23. 78° 04' 49" 47.37 feet to a poiu~ - 24. 70° 42' 35" 15.48 feet to a poit~ 25. 64° 13' 33" 12.84 feet to a point; • 26. 59° 16' 06" 21.06 feet to a poi _ 27. SS° 06' 36" 33.16 feet to a point; 28. 76°• 04 IS" 40.32 feet to a poi 29. 63° 16' 48" 55.43 feet to a point of beginning and containing as area of 14.437 Acres, more or less, as per survey of Erik Lange, - Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, • of the State of Hawaii, Certificate No. 10735, da~od November 18, 2004 _2_ ~-z ALSO SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to a portion of easement "A1" for access 8t utility purposes, containing an area of 0.651 Acres. Easement "Al" is described in its entirety in attached description ALSO SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to a portion of easement "WZ" waterline transmission line easement containing an area, of 0.651 Acres. Easemen "W2" is described in its entirety in attached description TOGETHER WTTI~ easement "Al" for access 8c utility purposes being more particularly described in attached description ~ Erik Lange ucorsoo au~ , ~ w~ y ~a. ,ors Licensed Professional d Sure or ~~'qil State of Hawaii Certificate No. LS-10735 745039D Queen Kaahumanu Hwy. - Kailu~Kona, Hawaii 96740 November 29, 2004 -3- 43 u » Easement Al access & utility easement over and across _ _ Lots A, B, C, D and E In favor of Lots A, B, C, and D Land situated on the Southeasterly side of Hualalai Road and on the Southeasterly side of Lot A At Kahului 1~, North Kona, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii Being portion of Lots ~,C,D,E; Grant 983 to Kipola; and Royal Patera 1669 Land Commission Award 8516-B Apana 3 to K~mailFUi Beginning at the Northeast corner of this easement of the true azimuth and distance to the Southwest corner of f I~,,ot lso>~g g2 t~ 2 41 ~ gf Lot 1, _ coordinates of said poitrt of beginning refereed to Government Surve T . ~ the being 2,616.90 feet North 6581.92 feet Fast and Y emulation S~On "I~AI~LO" - _ running by azimuths measured clockwise True South: T Thence, for the next ten (10) courses foIIowing partially along the remainders of Lot E, Lot D, Lot C, and _ Lot B: 1. 337° 21' S7" 15.19 feet to a poi 2. 66° 26' 25" 472.75 feet tb a point; 3. 77° 27' SO" 248.20 feet to a poi 4. 88° 09' 17" 192.58 feet to a point; 5. 63° 44' 29" 227.50 feet to a point; 6. 74° 13' 42" 92.83 feet to a point;• 7. 93° 39' 35" 242.69 feet to a point; 8. 75° 28' 24" 220.77 feet to a point; . 9. 79° 41' 3T' 333.22 feet to a point; 10. 163° 40' 38" 50.28 feet to a point; ~ -1- 44 Thence, for the next eight (8) courses following along Lot A: 1 1. 259° 41' 3T' 336.65 feet to a point; 12. 255° 28' 24" 226.93 feet to a point; 13. 273° 39' 35" 242.13 feet to a point; 14. 254° 13' 42" 79.68 feet to a point; - 15. 243° 44' 29" 233.73 feet to a point; 16. 268° 09' 1T' 198.72 feet to a point; 17. 257° 27' S0" 91.78 feet to a poi . Thence along the remainder of Lot A: 18. 167° 27' S0" 62.43 feet to a poi Thence, for the next twelve (12) courses, along the Southeasterly side of Hualali road _ 19. 291 ° 28' 30" 40.06 feet to a point; 20. 283° 53' 00" 42.21 feet to a point; 21. 2755' 00" 15.18 feet to a point; 22. 245° 19' 00" 32.35 feet to a point; 23. 246° 45' 30" 33.61 feet to a point; 24. 260° 04' 30" 46.36 feet to a point; ~ 25. 255° 58' 30" 36.15 feet to a point; 26. 256° 57' 30" 44.68 feet to a poit~ 27. 252° 02' 00" 31.42 feet to a point; 1 -2- - 4-5 28. 252° 59' 30" 70.91 feet to a point; 29. 250° 07' 30" 58.60 feet to a point; _ _ 30. 258° 39' 30" 35.12 feet to a poi _ Thence along Lot 1; 31. 252° 53' 25" 141.12 feet to a point of beginning and containing an area of 2.363 Acres, more or less, as per survey of Erik Lange, Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, - of the State of Hawaii, Certificate N'o. 10735 Dated l~iovember 18, 2004 . Brik Lange u~ tea. ~ * ti' ~a~ Licensed Professio Surveyor - ~'4q v~ State ofHawaii Certificate No. LS-10735 - ?4-5039D Queen Kaahumanu Awy. Kaiiua-Kona, Nawaii 96740 ' November 29, 2004 _1 46 Easement "W2" Waterline easement over and across Lots A, B,C, D and E In favor of Lot 1 Land situated on the Southeasterly side of Hualalai Road and on the Southeasterly side of Lot A At Kahului 1~` , - North Kona, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii - Being portion of Lots A,B,C,D and E; 'Cram 983 to Kipola; and Royal Patent 1669 Land Commission Award 8516 B Apana 3 to Kamaikui Beginning at the Northeast comer of this easement of land, being also a' point on the southerly side of Lot 1, the true azunuth and distance to the Southwest corner of Lot 1 being 252° 53' 25" 141.12 feets the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station "KAHELO" - being 2,616.90 feet North 6581.92 feet East and running by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: Thence, for the next ten (10) courses following partially along the remainders of Lot E, Lot D, Lot C, and Lot B: 1. 337° 21' ST' 15.19 feet to a point - 2. 66° 26' 25" 472.75 feet to a point; 3. 77° 27' S0" 248.20 feet to a point; 4. 88° 09' 17" 192.58 feet to a point; _ 5. 63° 44' 29" 227.50 feet to a point; 6. 74° 13' 42" 92.83 feet to a point; 7. 93° 39' 35" 242.69 feet to a point; _ 8. 75° 28' 24" 220.77 feet to a point; 9. 79° 41' 3T' 333.22 feet to a poirrt; - 10. 163° 40' 38" 50.28 feet to a point; -1- Thence, for the next eight (8) courses following along Lot A: 11. 259° 41' 3T' 336.65 feet to a point; ' 12. 255° 28' 24" 226.93 feet to a point; 13. 273° 39' 35" 242.13 feet to a point; 14. 254° 13' 42" 79.68 feet to a point; _ 15. 243° 44' 29" 233.73 feet to a point; lb. 268° 09' 17" 198.72 feet to a point; 17. 257° 27' S0" 91.78 feet to a poi Thence along the i+ennainder of Lot A: 18. 167° 2T 50" 62.43 feet to a poi - • . Thence, far the next twelve (12) courses, along the Southeasterly side of Hualali road 19. 291° 28' 30" 40.06 feet to a point • _ 20. 283° 53' 00" 42.21 feet to a point; . 21. 275°25' 00" 15.18 feet to a point; 22. 245° 19' 00" 32.35 feet to a poi 23. 246° 45' 30" 33.61 feet to a point; 24. 2b0° 04' 30" 46.36 feet to a point 25. 255° 58' 30" 36.15 feet to a point; 26. 256° 57' 30" 44.68 feet to a point; 27. 252° 02' 00" 31.42 feet to a poi 28. 252° 59' 30" 70.91 feet to a point; -2- 48 29. 250° 07' 30" 58.60 feet to a point; 30. 258° 39' 30" 35.12 feet to a point; Thence along Lot 1; 31. 252° 53' 25" 141.12 feet to a point of beginning and containing as area of _ 2.363 Acres, more or less, as per survey of Erik Lange, Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, of the State of Hawaii, Certificate No. 10735, dated November 18, 2004 ~p~K Erik I.aage . u~ N. ~ roR * ~ y ~ ,ova icwred Pmfessio Surveyor 9'~t~ State of Hawaii Certificate No LS-10735 74-5039D Queen Kaahumanu Hwy. 1taiIua Kona, Hawaii 96740 November 29, 2004 4 l - 3 - - 49 i + ..~'----^-A 3RD MAP SHOWING THE CONSOLIDATION j p UA _ - ~ 1ST ' OF TAX LOTS 7-5-17: 30(0),3O(b),30(c), 31 ~ AND 33 ~--~-1 A g A ~ _ - I BEING PORTION OF R.P. 1669 L.C. AW. 8516-B Ap.3 TO KAMAIKUI; PORTION OF GRANT 983 TO KIPOLA; W i A A --~`~?`~'D ' POR110N OF GRANT 1868 TO KAUPENA AND RESUBDIVISION INTO LOTS A, B, C, D ,E AND LOT 1 ~,..r--A 'J;~ N T I 1 --,~*m AT KAHULUI 1ST & 2ND, NORTH KONA w _ - ISLAND, COUNTY ANO STATE OF HAWAII ~ ` ! K ' A ~ .rr K I rs ~ ~ - A ~A ~ ''+,tq4~+; I ~ I 8 iJ A / ~ / / I $ ~ g~~~~ qo q+;~ $ 1x4 `;~8b / ~ ~ ~ y~'+~°~ i LOCATION MAP 4 ~ x.84 ro'rcwmcsl>ra'uwdar \ / / 7-s-t730(o) $~q~~~'~i'bp~~b s odd ~l ~~''~.~~g°4A~ x~w ~`i~Rao $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i I 4'~9 d~ 1x~4~{7g8~g4 y '~.~~x~, ~4g'~~ ~ I1I ~~'~{~°w 7-5-,133 ~ ~ / ~ ~ 16Pd0 ~,4~ g~4{7g'~ 1-Y11 q,~ ~.~;4 ~'~~YQ~ ~~~+y4 I V LOT I ~ ~/45 >e2r~' 999g4d ~4~ ti~~9 . \V ,i L 36 870 ~s~Z1NJf X (SHADED aurae' 4g1 Q i w~ Y°,f ~ r ' V ~-ZOHf X 1 i ~ ~ 'e~ ~ ,2~~ -0' ' ~r'b8 1 Vv1~ I _ r rsnrs~' I x : Q I ` '~~l k51 d~ y" ~ ~ 'ate eeee"- LOT 1 i 4'$4+~ $ t ~ xis'"~ ~ !~4 ~~3 rsrrrrraa2ay ~ ~ 1 I u~~ A m~.vr..aue d 9, y nl,ee eecowo vwn .f, y~,~++ g ~Y R3~ P~dln 4B' nrow+ u w• o tB ~ 'd" "a r ~ ~ ~syy3,ldas LOT E $,p~~~ I n~,aee a~aamb .,,~1,e' Z N D ~y ' ,4 eae ~s , $lea:'°' ¢'ren' I , ~ ,w,o,wne~-°° ~ ~ 'u'e".J1.~ud p^bi U / l ~ Lor D q~. q $ ~ / ~ jj U L ,4.437 ACItE$a q d ~ ~w ti a IY I Lor c ~ ~ x~b ak~k4~~ ~ net a EwslxD ems m ~ mxmlmnm v~ d 3 £ ~ 1 ` ~ a 707 ACRES ~ w 1~ m+w ~ ~ ~ $ d~~~ a rAx car r-ten so fa) ~zr AQES ~ m ~ ~ I i P, d°a` li ~ ~ ~d ~bq c q'~ q scleAtR wG 7 R Lon flEfarawdn er ~ ZDNf X ~ ` . I~ I a D' 1.12 ACAES % E105101G GRANT IAE \ (e1 zxrl ACIRS 'A LOT 8 ~ ~ P ~ ~ ~ r,~ ~ r~H~iuiaRA'SrxmaAmuwu.eaaun I ~ ca*+,.w,w,NaNw aweAaFS ~ ,a6e2 yadp0 dab @~~d'~ ~ ~ k k rAxtorT-s-,r•a1 ur~w~s ~ ~7~I I ~"s' ~~,dga4+~"+,~ ~C dd q 1 S~ .i1 'c,;nd„w uelor7-s-,r.33 r>SeAass r b~ Bd,s~ + dr ~ ,ue! ~~d ~~Rk~ q~¢ sa"' 1 DEC0210D1 ~ ~ arc: x I ' 10'AAMOea aaame usmvr , ~ yy4,}7a Y ~ ~~~3~ q S so+M4` A A ra ~b4~AV10 R ALaW6 9 ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ IIQNSFD NOTES o~ s ~~~~~:p~~~ dk ~ p fir, w~aeu Tae lot 7-5-17 30 aondefs of three aeperate Mfe m Der deteminatbn of ~ ~d ~ ~ A ; Canty of Hawa1 Plaorwg Deportment to Letter dated Ame 24, ZDOa a+ t, F'~d d • ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 Me 107" Amrwtha and Coardeatae ore nBared to Government Survey Tlfanpulatbn Siatwn 'KAHELO'~ J~ rtdgd~d q$g~A' ~~~~s ~ p ~ L 4 y~i o~ + + ~ 6, 6j1~ Fldd warty was perlamed Gom Octabu 2001 to Novwnher 2004 w ~e~~~i~7a""~~,~~~ k r1C, ~ ~ F , >ros wa1 wa aangd0 er ~q"$ d i1^~ ~ d I Yc ae uuu 1n asuvmal SNDkct Parcel b located porlidly N Zane AE (epedal Rood hazed areoe Nvyidoted 5Y ,00-yeor flood. base ~ ^ Ibod deatiorm determhled), parliady fn Zone % (eAadedKoraae o1 500-year Aaod) and partWOy h Lane X ~ a ~~an ) - (oreae detannaud to be auteWe Ne 500-year flood pN1N) a Ps Flood Ineurana Rate Yap (F Ut YJ + ` + u /L CpmnuBily-Pond t~m6er 155,66 0113 0. rem Yay ,8, tg94. ~ pp~ e~y _ ! ~ I NO 4EHIClRAR ACCESS PERWT,ED i ere n e tJYIIED ACCESS pER11177ED ~ EASEMENT ' brow BOUNDARY FOLLOWS ALONG ROdC WALL GRAPHIC SCALE Erde Lange LS w, Iea ro ,m %ANtIDIG p®ApTYBU 7h5039D Ouaen Koahumanu Nwy COIINn ~ NAWAB NdduG-Nona, HOwml 96740 la~l sumlrl4~ot~c Phone (NOB) 329-8240 PREPARED FOR t sore . o» rt !1 GONES FAYLY LBOIED PARIAYRSHIP, OWNER I a3 4 ~ Fax (808) 326-1247 YAIU GHANA 0 PAR7fIERSIIIP, OWNFR ' WAUWA SYS7FY, LLC 1 LIST OF SUROlJiVDIG P OPETY ~ O 12S (500 F T) • - ~ HU-KO-PA LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS 500 FEET FROM TMK :(3) 7-5-017:042 _ TMK Owner Mailin Address 7-5-017:042 Hu-Ko-Pa LLC 16541 Gothazd St., Ste 109 c/o Brendan Lee LLC Huntin on Beach, CA 92647 _ _ 7-5-017:040 JKS Partners LP 828 Fort St Ma114th Floor Honolulu, HI 96813 - 7-5-017:041 Brian R. Cook Development Inc. 78-7021 Kewalo St. c% Brian R. Cook Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 7-5-017:043 Hualalai Partners of Kona LLC PO Box 33640 Lau lin, NV 89028 - 7-5-017:044 Kona Coffee and Tea Company Inc. PO Box 898 Kailua-Kona, HI 96745 7-5-017:003 Joseph A. Gomes Tr PO Box 379 Paauilo, HI 96776 7-5-017:027 County of Hawaii 101 Aupuni St., Ste 325 Director of Finance Hilo, HI 96720 7-5-017:030 Waiaha System LLC PO Box 898 Attn: Daniel Bolton Kailua-Kona, HI 96745 Kona Coffee and Tea Company Inc. PO Box 898 Kailua-Kona, HI 96745 7-5-017:022 Tincher Trust 567 Cresta Vista Lane c/o Richazd Tincher Menlo Park, CA 94028 _ 7-5-043:038; 052 Uluwehi Properties LLC 75-170 Hualalai Rd, Ste D214 Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 7-5-043:090, 91, Schuler Homes Inc. 828 Fort St Ma114th Floor 93-103; Honolulu, HI 96813 7-5-043:128 7-5-043:092 Roger K. Thomas 1742 Cole Loop SE Port Orchard, WA 98366 Bazbaza C. Thomas 75-636 North Mea Lanakila Pl. _ Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 7-5-043:130-142; DR Horton- Schuler Homes LLC 828 Fort St Ma114th Floor 164 Honolulu, HI 96813 7-5-041:063-070; DR Horton- Schuler Homes LLC 828 Fort St Ma114th Floor 073-085; 088-099; Honolulu, HI 96813 i 107-111; 113-115 ` 4814-0946-5859 1 I EXHIBIT A REi4L PROPERTY T CLEARANCE LETTER • • William P. Kenoi M`• r°`•"•. e¢;'•• . ~'iy Nancy E. Crawford Mayor - Ftnance Director Deanna S. Sako •.,Z Deputy Dtrector - ya•Nr.~ County of Hawaii DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE -REAL PROPERTY TAX Aupuni Center • 101 Pauahi Street • Suite 4 • Hilo. Hawaii 96720-4679 • Fax (808) 961-8415 Appraisers (808) 961-8354 • Clerical (808) 961-8201 • Collections (808) 961-8282 75-5706 Kualdni Highway • Suite 112 • Kailas-Kona, Hawaii 96740 • Fax (808) 327-3538 Appraisers (808) 327-3542 • Clerical (808) 327-3540 REAL PROPERTY TAX CLEARANCE (Rev. 07/99] _ April 7, 2009 . ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ 1, TN1K: (3) 7-5-017-042-(jQ00 ~ , ~ ` ' _ , - ~ , This is to certify that HlkKO-PA LLB (owrr~~ q~f r~~ors~~.„ha;~ paid ~iF deal properly taxes due to the- County of Hav~tei~ ltd to ~rtt~ i~iclt:~di0g'~0~~ 30# 20,Q9,. , ,.a~. , , , " ~ _ • x ' ~ , ~ , ~~~1 , REAL PR~7PRRTY 7~C C~YVfSIOM I Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity ProrRder and Employer I County Environmental Report State Land Use District Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone from Agricultural 5-acre (A-Sa) to Single Family Residential 10,000 sf. (RS-10) Applicant: HU-KO-PA, LLC Agent: Steven S.C. Lim, Carlsmith Ball LLP Kahului 2nd, District of North Kona, Hawaii TMK: (3) 7-5-017:042 (14.437 t acres) i i t i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................1 ' 1.1 SUMMARY OF REQUEST ..................................................................................1 1.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES 6 1.3 EXISTING LAND USE 8 1.4 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 8 1.5 DEVELOPMENT TIMETABLE 8 1.6 ESTIMATED INFRASTRUCTURE & SITE DEVELOPMENT COSTS 8 2. ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ANTICIPATED IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 9 2.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 9 ` 2.1.1 Geology, Physiography, and Climate 9 2.1.2 Soils and Agricultural Potential 9 2.1.3 Flora and Fauna ........................................................................................10 ..................................................................................................................10 ~ 2.1.4 KA PA' AKAI O KA' AINA ISSUES 10 2.1.5 Historic and Archaeological Sites 11 - - 2.1.5 Natural Hazards 12 2.1.6 Air and Noise Quality 13 2.1.7 Scenic and Visual Resources ...................................................................14 2.2 PUBLIC SERVICES AND ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS 14 2.2.1 Schools .....................................................................................................14 ' 2.2.2 Parks and Recreation 15 2.2.3 Medical Services 15 ' 2.2.4 Police and Fire Protection Services .........................................................16 2.2.5 Water System ...........................................................................................16 ' 2.2.6 Drainage ...................................................................................................17 2.2.7 Sewerage System 17 2.2.8 Solid Waste Disposal ...............................................................................18 2.2.9 Electrical, Telephone, and Cable Services 18 • 2.2.10 Vehicular Circulation/Traffic ...................................................................18 I -1- i TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page 3. CONFORMANCE WITH STATE AND COUNTY PLANS .........................................19 3.1 STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR SUBMITTAL OF CONCURRENT APPLICATIONS AND APPLICATIONS FOR 15 ACRES OR LESS .............19 3.2 CHAPTER 205, HAWAII REVISED STATUTES (HRS) -LAND USE - COMMISSION ....................................................................................................19 3.3 HAWAII STATE PLAN 23 3.4 CHAPTER 343, HRS, ENVIRONMENTAL 1MPACT STATEMENT REGULATIONS 24 3.5 HAWAII COUNTY GENERAL PLAN 24 3.6 KONA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 29 3.7 COUNTY ZONING 32 3.8 SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA 32 3.9 STATE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AREA (SCZMA) 33 4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS 33 4.1 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USE OF THE y ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY 33 _ 4.2 MITIGATIVE MEASURES PROPOSED TO AVOID, MINIMIZE, RECTIFY, OR REDUCE IMPACTS 35 4.3 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT 36 4.4 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF RESOURCES 36 5. AGENCIES CONTACTED 37 LIST OF EXHIBITS Following Page A MASTER PLAN ..................................................................................................................1 B TAX MAP KEY ...................................................................................................................1 - C COUNTY LUPAG MAP .....................................................................................................1 D KONA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OFFICIAL LAND USE MAP .........................1 E REGIONAL LOCATION MAP ..................................................................................6 F STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY MAP ..........................................................................20 I- G COUNT OF HAWAII ZONING MAP ..............................................................................32 I -ii- I ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ (continued) LIST OF ATTACHMENTS 1. FEE OWNER LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION 2. WARRANTY DEED ' 3. ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY SURVEY, RECHTMAN, NOV 2005 4. OCTOBER 4, 2006 STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION APPROVAL LETTER 5. OCTOBER 22, 2008 LETTER FROM BOB RECHTMAN TO STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION 6. FEBRUARY 2009 ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY PLAN OF SIHP SITES 24558 AND 24562 7. TABLE 3.3 -PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ENROLLMENT AND GRADES, HAWAII DISTRICT: 2005 - 2006 (COUNTY OF HAWAII DATA BOOK) i' 7A. TABLE 1.13 -RESIDENT POPULATION OF COUNTY DIVISIONS AND CENSUS r DESIGNATED PLACES (CDPs), HAWAII COUNTY, BY AGE: 2000 (COUNTY OF ~ ~ HAWAII DATA BOOK) 8. WATERLINE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 9. PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT, (WITCHER, MARCH 2009) 10. SEWER REPORT, (WITCHER, 2008) 4831-3939-7635 1 i -111- 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.1 SUMMARY OF REQUEST HU-KO-PA, LLC, hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant" is seeking a State Land Use District Boundary Amendment (SLUDBA) from "Agricultural" to "Urban" and a Change of Zone from the Agricultural 5-acre (A-Sa) to the Single Family Residential - 10,000 squaze feet (RS-10) zone district to allow the development of a single family residential subdivision of approximately fifty-three (53) lots, hereinafter referred to as the "Project" (See Exhibit A - Master Plan). The subject property is approximately 14.437 acres, located in a portion of Waiaha 1st to Puapuaanui 1st, District of North Kona, Island and County of Hawaii and identified as Tax Map Key No. (3)7-5-017:042, hereinafter referred to as the "Property". (See Exhibit B -Tax Map Key). Assuming approval of these land use applications, the Property would be subdivided into a 53-lot subdivision of approximately 10,000 squaze feet per lot. - The Applicant is the fee owner of the Property. A Letter of Authorization from the Applicant is attached to the Application to allow Cazlsmith Ball LLP to represent the Applicant on these land use permit applications. A copy of the deed recorded in the Bureau of Conveyances on December 15, 2004 as Document No. 2004-252857 showing ownership has also been included as part of both applications (See Attachments 1 -Fee Owner Letter of Authorization and 2 -Warranty Deed). The Property is not located within the County Special Management Area (SMA) which J extends from the shoreline to Queen Kaahumanu Highway ("QKH") and Kuakini Highway in this azea. - The General Plan adopted by the County Council in February 2005 and recently amended - in December 2006 under Ordinance 06-153, sets forth along-range comprehensive development plan of the Island of Hawaii. The General Plan outlines planning objectives for each of the island's districts. For North Kona, the General Plan encourages the development of appropriately located and serviced privately-held and State-owned lands for house lots and to improve and develop roadways, water and sewerage systems, and other basic facilities to encourage development of lands suitable for residential use. Furthermore, the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) designation for the Project, as shown in Exhibit C -County LUPAG Map, indicates that the Froject is designated as part of the Urban Expansion azea. Therefore, the proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan. In addition, the Project site is situated in the Kona Urban Area, an azea designated for urban use within the Kona Community Development Plan's ("KCDP") Official Land Use Map (Exhibit D -KCDP Official Land Use I Map). Therefore, the proposed Project is generally consistent with the County's long-range land i use plans for the azea. The Property is located approximately 1,400 feet mauka of Hawaii Belt Road/Queen Kaahumanu Highway and 1,100 feet makai of Hienaloli Road, with Hualalai Road to the north and Pualani Estates Subdivision to the south. There will be dual access entry points into the Project from the north at Hualalai Road and with the primary access from the south at Paulehia 1 I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ;,r,~_ , - ~ ~ 1 s - ~ , ~ ~ Hualalal Road ~ . 1 I _ ~ ~ - ~ ' ~ - ~ _ - _ i i f 1 1 11 ~ ~ r-- ~ - I ~ _ _ t ~ ~ ~'i _ i i li 73_ ~ ig ~ ,j - ~ j . _ _ - - - - ~ ~ I Easement WaterTrensmissbn We ~ ~ ~ t ~ I _ ~ ~ I I 1s ~21 r i~l I i ~ I r Nix i ~ { 7' ,t~-. _ ~ `8 1 y ~ ~ ~ I - ~ +i ~~l ~ ~i .p ~ is ~n . 1; I - - 't . ~ • ~'}t" ~ > " 1 ~ ~Y~, ~ ~ ~ y., ~ _ ~ n ~ . r ~ ~ i y , ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ , ~ , . 1' - sa _ _ 1- _ ' ~ q~ ~'C ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ a f ~ as E ~ --I~ .2a i makal - , ~ _ ---------.hP 'f ,I - ~ ~ 9 i 1 ~ - « - mauka ~ g ~;i I q~_ . d 9 f F ~ ~ ~ 37 95 i - 1 .y% i ~ a0 ~I> ~ ,T~ ~ 4y ~ I~ li. 1 ~.s _ ~ ~ 1 ~ i i ~ I . f ~~~~______1 - r- .f i Y , ~ s f ~ ~ - - t , ~ r- ~ i ~ i' ~ ~.rt. . ~ °d~- ~ f . - ~'~'rt~~ '''CV ~'l~, ~ ~ PROJECTINFORMATION ~ ~ ~ - ~ - i ~ ~ ~ ~ \ / V ' - TAX MAP KEY TMK (317-517 042 Y. r ~ , ~ i ' _ 1 V AREA OF LOT SITE 14437 ACRES i 3 ~ i ~ ~ \ / ~ NUMBER OF LOTS 53 LOTS r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DRAWING NOTE ~ ' ~ ~ I 33 _ - Thisdravnng is br presentation purposes only ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 3t ~ ~ and not to be used as a base drawing for any ~ ~ u i l _ ' ^ en ineenng work unless approved by the I ~ .Q Master Plan r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + . ~ ~ ~ a«Rne~ _ 1 ~ S I~- _ _ N I ~~Y" Yv m I ~ Yr' t I PLANNERS I I I l I a i ARCHITECTS Q~ Q1f' 3O' 02099 xIFMM OWEHBBY SCele t"=40'-0" 83109 oFOx 99mo xxlwrc rcoxxxeweuwraar¢eoe 9229n9 A Single ~ami~y Kesidentia~ Community ` Kadun-Kana,NorthKmm isLrnd6Countyo/Rowan A ~ 1F1 Sheet No r, s z r. 0 - ~V\ ~J_¢ t- V ~ p 5 1 ~ \ f ~ o h y/ N7,` ~ h ivy O*Q C W F V Y~ •'1~ 1b'7v I ~ ~ ~ ~R ~ r u N IL r( ~ni 1~ ~ ~ 0 ~ "ly N ~ ~ ~ [3 r ~ q 4 a ~1 F *li ~ ro ~ h ,I sh`/ F,2 e r ° : m a n ~ ~c ~ t Z y~ I{ `'J ~*I n I ~ ~ F ~ 1 I ~ ~ lwg ~iCt~ 3 * ; ~ s.. ~ E ~ Q % t' 3 iyU Q * a~t~ ~ 7 J R10 ~ ~ y. `Z 1 e d _ f ~ y ,~f b ~ „ ~ ~ h , a ~ R nb , ~f~0y' w r~ w i l d i ~ Pj 1~ ? PN RSR PPP Q K ~ ~ a z 6 P ~ a s^~~ 1 1 R -11 n „ ~ ; ~ ~ I ~f ~ _ t' IZ ~ ? / a N i i ~ L I ~ ~ ao4 ® ~ ® e 1 . pY Zx l $ ! i / / y .a ~ A'~ ~ ~ i I ~ u xrx~u dr PyA? J C tia I r$ S` 1 I ~ e , 1 ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ '4 - - a . \ _ ~ ~ ,.f t~ 3 m a RI ` w I b ' r~~ ~ d e ~ f+ r ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ o y ~ A r o _ a ~ EXHIBIT B ' ~ 6-,, ~ v K a ? ~ ~ I HU-KO-PA, LLC ~ e State Land Use District Boundary Amendment ..r° ~ 1 & Change of Zone Application _ _ ~ Tax Key Map h ~ ~ ~ _ xs.F. ~ s a ez aP r ~ n a o'O a ~--,..e,a: .~s. ° O iE f O ~:o• =~ei';i~ iii g+~= s~ti=~~::~ (03.10.09) - - i - _ - Yrnportant ~ a 'AgriculturalI.ar~d (ial) - 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ -i - Project Site ~l ~ I _ .F 1 _ EXHIBIT C HU-KO-PA, LLC State Land Use District Boundary Amendment & Change of Zone Application General Plan LUPAG Map (03.10.09) ~ - - - - - - ~ ~ - ' - - 5 ~ ~ - - ~ ~ . - - - ~ _ - - ~ - - . ~ _ a _ 26 , "T~ ~,l~~ f~~~~ - - , " ` Pu =V~aiaha-,Village" _ _ f - - _ _ _ - ~ ~ F e'ighborh©od`` nsit~ Ori`ent~d Development , - ~ _ ; _ - ~ ` i ~ - „ _ - - ~ ~ ~ _ : i _ - , ' _ , ` ~ , (KONA URBAN AREA) _ _ - - , _ _ _ _ _ _ ; " ~ ~ - ..,,`r~~~~s ~ - ~ ~ - i 30A ~ ' ~ r~ PI'O~QCt . " ~ ~ ~ ' _ Site ~ _ - - , . i ~ (K4~A - ~ ~ - _ "RURAL - , ~ s _ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ; ~ _ _ - - - - _ - " ~ ~ x" ' ~ " ~ ~ ~ " ~ . ~ahului=Piia ,Lad Villa ~ - ~ ~ , ~ 'Neighborhood Transit ~7riented=Dev, op~nerit- 'i° ' ~ `x ~ x _ _ _ _ ~ - , ; EXHIBIT D ~ r _ , _ , _ ~ ~ . r ~ _ HU-KO-PA, LLC - k - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - State Land Use District Boundary Amendment - ~ ' , - , ~ ~ _ ~ . ~ ~ w - , - ' ; ~ ~ & Change of Zone Application 'r _ " - • ~ - - ~ - ~ ~ ' ~ . ~ ' Kona CDP: Official Land Use Map I ' , ~ a _ ~ ~ ~ ` (03.10 09) . - i - Street located in the Pualani Estates Subdivision. Future roadway connectivity to the adjacent west/makai Pazce141 and east/mauka Pazce143 will be provided via roadway stub outs planned within the proposed subdivision. The location and regional context of the Project azea are shown in Exhibits B -Tax Map Key and E -Regional Location Map of Property. The following Table 1 summazizes the land use status of the Project land. Table 1 LAND USE STATUS Tax Map Key: (3) 7-5-017:042 (14.437± acres) State Land Use: Agricultural County General Plan (LUPAG): Urban Expansion County Kona Community Development Plan (KCDP): Kona Urban Area - Hawaii County Zoning: Agricultural (A-Sa) County Special Management Area: Not Within the SMA 1.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES The Applicant intends to develop the Property into approximately 53 single-family residential lots and provide future road connectivity with the adjacent westJmakai Pazce141/Lot C and east/mauka Parcel 43/Lot E, Hualalai Road to the north and the Pualani Estates Subdivision to the south. The Pualani Estates subdivision is within the County's Single Family Residential 7,500 squaze feet (RS-7.5) zone district, with roadways constructed according to the County Department of Public Works standazds. - The master plan (Exhibit A) for the Project proposes subdivision lots comprised of approximately 10,000 squaze feet per residential lot. The Applicant intends to develop the J proposed 53-lot subdivision based upon strong mazket demand for these types of residential lots in this particular area of North Kona. Over the years, with the exception of the recent mazket _ downturn, residential sales within the Kailua-Kona urban center and Resort area have been relatively steady, due in lazge pazt to the well-planned residential community environment, the range and quality of residential products being offered, and the wealth of neazby commercial and _J recreational amenities. The Project is intended to help meet the growing demand for residential lots in the Kailua-Kona urban center and Resort area and allow for the expansion of existing and pending adjacent subdivisions in an orderly and cost-effective manner. The Project offers the advantage of being adjacent to existing infrastructure and supportive public facilities as it is located adjacent to the Pualani Estates Subdivision, Sugaz _ Cane Lane and Hualalai Heights subdivisions. The Project has also been planned with sensitivity to the environmental and cultural considerations of the site. Development of the Project will be consistent with the existing single family residential subdivisions in the area. 6 _ _ _ i - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ I i ~ ~ ~ Tr , ~ i r ~ Ta E Iii ~ _ - - , ~ Q r~ ~m B F ~ ,4~' g ,R. a ~~a ~r~ e t ¦ , ies ¦ 4~ 1 ~ ~ ~ _ ~ - ® 'ti,,_,~'~ ~f _ ~ , ~ Pr ject Site®~a ~ ~ ® ~ ~ ~ r ~ 1~; - t q ~ wr sire ta. ~ r± ` y'r - . , _ B ~ q' Sj S~ U~ ~ ~ ~ p` i~ 'Y ~ ~ ~~v °le ~ ~ r ~ X 'E t ~ - r t~ ;R` ~ ~ ~ a s r ' w ~ a`~ ~ ds; ~ r, / _ ~ .r 'tv A ,v a tv ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 5. y: ~ ,a{ 'b, s?' ' t z, !6 t ~ ' rs ~ e 5 c ~ / r N T ~ ~ B ~ a" ~ " l ~ t wF ~ € F ~ t ~ w w it ~ E ° ~ ae~ q C i xk, s' ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ v~?s ~ ~ 3 S H ~C ' ~ r .t x,g v ~ t A , X~r n a " v„ k ~ -1 B r :n ~t si xa a ca k ~ ~ b, ire '7 _ ~ - x ,'n ~s ~ w¢ z y# ^ ~ t C. ~ ,z ~-M e a • ~ 3a ~ ' ~ ~s ~ iYy ~ ~ 6~ ~ a {3 r, ~ iM ~ nw o- f~ ~ ~ r ~ e a ~ y s ~?3~~ ~ ~ ~,g ar ~ "3 fs t A~ ~ ~ ~~r ~ 3,' d, a`a~n~~p ~ ~ ~ -~~40' 1 ~ Y F _ w ~ v 4 s ~ ~ ~ EXHIBIT E ~ ~k; z - ~ . - , ~ `wz , , ; ~ _ ~ HU-KO-PA, LLC ~ ' k~ ~ Y~ State Land Use District Boundary Amendment y,~a _ ' ' ` ~ `r``~ ~ ~ & Change of Zone Application i Regional Location Map (03.10 09) 1.3 EXISTING LAND USE The Project site is currently vacant and heavily vegetated. To the north are privately owned Agricultural lands, to the south is the Pualani Estates, Sugar Cane Land and Hualalai Heights Subdivisions, to the West and East are vacant lands that may be developed as Single - Family Residential development. Kailua-Kona is the urban center for West Hawaii and includes several hotels, multi- " family and single family residential projects, several commercial shopping centers and Federal, State and County public facilities. The Project is consistent with the existing and proposed uses within the Kailua-Kona urban center and Resort area, and will complement the adjacent land - uses. 1.4 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM _ The Project, as shown in Exhibit A (Master Plan), will contain approximately fifty-three (53) residential lots adjacent to the Pualani Estates subdivision and makai of the Sugar Cane Lane Subdivision comprised of single-family residential lots. The proposed subdivision will - include lots that are approximately 10,000 square feet in size. Assuming approval of the State Land Use Boundary District Amendment and Change of Zone application from the County Council, the Applicant intends to submit a Planned Unit Development ("PUD") application to - allow for a small selection of smaller lot sizes of approximately 7,000 square feet, to be accessed by non-dedicable roadways. Primary access to the Project will be from the south at Paulehia Street which will connect to the signalized intersection at QKH and Puapuaanui Street in the - Pualani Estates Subdivision. Consistent with the KCDP regarding interconnectivity, the Project will include anorth-south connector road between the Project's primary access at Paulehia Street to Hualalai Road. The Project site will be developed in a manner that is responsive to the site characteristics and surrounding uses. 1.5 DEVELOPMENT TIMETABLE Assuming approval of: 1) the State Land Use District Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone, and 2) the Planned Unit Development Application from the County Planning Department, the Applicant will submit Subdivision plans approximately three (3) months from the date of the PUD approval. Construction of subdivision infrastructure would be completed within twelve (12) months of final subdivision approval. Based on current market conditions, the Project lots are expected to be developed and sold over an approximately 2-3 year period. 1.6 ESTIMATED INFRASTRUCTURE & SITE DEVELOPMENT COSTS The estimated costs for infrastructure elements, which include site preparation, individual wastewater systems, water, drainage, power and communication utility improvements for the proposed subdivision will be approximately $5 Million. 8 f t i I I 2. ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ANTICIPATED IMPACTS OF ' THE PROPOSED ACTION 2.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 2.1.1 Geology, Physiography, and Climate Located on the southwest slope of Hualalai Volcano, overlooking Kailua-Kona, the Project area is situated on remnants of lava flows from Hualalai that are covered by a very thin ' layer of rocky, organic soil. The Property elevations range from approximately 450 feet above mean sea level at the makai boundary, to approximately 570 feet above mean sea level at the mauka boundary, with slopes averaging from eight to ten percent. Due to the wind-shadow ' effect caused by Mauna Loa and Hualalai, winds in the area are often light and variable, dominated by local land-sea breezes. However, Kona storms in the winter season can bring very strong winds from the south or southwest for brief periods. Average daily temperatures range from a minimum of 61 degrees F to a maximum of 79 degrees F. Annual rainfall averages approximately 30 - 40 inches, with most falling in the summer months. 2.1.2 Soils and Agricultural Potential 1 Soils in Hawaii are commonly rated in terms of three classifications systems: (1) Detailed Land Classifications, (2) Soil Survey, and (3) Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of ~ Hawaii, which systems are discussed below. ? Detailed Land Classification. Based on the five-level productivity rating system from the Land Study Bureau's 1967 Detailed Land Classifications, Island of Hawaii (Baker et a1.1965), where "A" represents the highest rating and "E" the lowest, the soils within the entire ' Project site consist of "D" (Poor) soils, which are considered marginally suitable or unsuitable for agricultural purposes. None of the Project lands are categorized as "A", or "B" soils, which ' are considered important for agricultural purposes under Hawaii Revised Statutes Chapter 205 (State Land Use Law). Soil Survey. Soils on the site are identified by the Soil Survey of the Island of Hawaii (USDA-SCS 1973) as Punaluu extremely rocky peat, as described below. rPYD Punaluu extremely rocky peat, with 6 to 20 percent slopes. This soil is ' low on the leeward side of Mauna Loa. In a representative profile, the surface layer is black peat about 4 inches thick. It is underlain by - pahoehoe lava bedrock. This soil is medium acid. The peat is rapidly - permeable. The pahoehoe lava is very slowly permeable, although water moves rapidly through the cracks. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard - is slight. Roots are matted over the pahoehoe lava. Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii. The Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH) classification system identifies three types of agricultural lands, based on characteristics such as soil quality, growing season and moisture 9 ! t _ j I supply. The three classifications used are prime, unique, and other important lands. None of the land within the Project site is designated as "prime" or "unique" or "other important" agricultural lands, by the ALISH classification system. Agricultural Potential. Due to the generally poor quality of soils within the Project site, the agricultural potential of the Project area expected is minimal and insignificant. Although development of the Project will result in a curtailment of the present limited use of the Project _ lands for occasional grazing purposes, this use is not significant, given the marginal quality of these lands and the availability of other, more suitable grazing lands in the region. Additionally, - the viability of any potential agricultural use of the Project land should be viewed in the context of the surrounding urban uses and the long-range land use plans for the azea, as set forth by the State and County development plans. 2.1.3 Flora and Fauna - Flora. The property is almost entirely covered with a dense growth of introduced - grasses. Vegetation within the project area consists of a combination of kiawe (Prosopis pallida), koa haole (Leucaena glauca) and a variety of grasses, vines, weeds, and shrubs (Rechtman 2005). There aze no known raze or endangered plant life of animal species on the _ Property or in the neaz vicinity. In that those plants found on site aze generally alien and introduced species, with an absence of plant species classified as rare, endangered, or threatened, the overall impact on area flora is expected to be negligible. Fauna. Species observed in the Project area and vicinity include the Zebra Dove - - (Geopelia striata), Spotted Dove (Streptopelia chinensis), Rock Doves (Columba livis), Nutmeg _ Manikin (Lonchura punctulata), Common Myna, House Sparrow, and House Finch (Carpodacus mexicanus), as well as other non-native species. Mammals common to the area aze Mongoose - - and feral cats and dogs. These species are highly mobile and will have little trouble in relocating to other areas. None of the species are rare or endangered. The Project will have no adverse impact on fauna in the area, and would create a more _ open and urbanized habitat than presently exists. This change in the habitat may result in a decrease or increase in the numbers of different species, depending on the habitat preference of the species. The number of feral cats and dogs could decrease due to the urban nature of the residential development. 2.1.4 KA PA' AKAI O KA' AINA ISSUES Based on the findings of the historical record of the Property, the Applicant presents the - - following statements in response with the requirements of the Hawaii State Supreme Court's criteria in the Ka Pa' Akai O Ka' Aina case. a. The identity and scope of "valued cultural, historical or natural resources" in the petition area, including the extent to which traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights are exercised in the petition area: 10 - - - - - t - i I ~ ~ Discussion: An Archaeological Inventory Survey of TMK 3-7-5-017: 042 was conducted by Rechtman Consulting, LLC in November 2005 (Attachment 3- Archaeological Inventory Survey, Rechtman, Nov 2005). On October 4, 2006, under the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 Review, the Department of Land and Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Division approved ("DLNR- SHPD") the Archaeological Inventory Survey report (Attachment 4 - SHPD 10/4/06 approval letter). Due to the past use of the Property for cattle grazing, much of the land has been cleared and there was no evidence of valued cultural, historical, or natural resources on the Property to date. Due to the residential development of much of the surrounding area, the Applicant is not aware of the existence of any traditional or _ customary Native Hawaiian rights on the Property. i b. The extent to which those resources -including traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights -will be affected or impaired by the proposed action; and ~ Discussion: As no valued cultural, historical or natural resources and no traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights were found or being practiced in the Project, these rights will not be affected or impaired by the proposed uses. c. The feasible action, if any, to be taken by the Planning Commission to J reasonably protect native Hawaiian rights if they are found to exist. I' Discussion: There is no feasible action to be taken by the Planning Commission and u' ~ County Council other than to require that if in the future, any valued cultural, historical, natural resources and/or traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights are discovered in the Project, that the Applicant will report the discovery to the State of Hawaii, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Historic Preservation Division for review • and assessment. No evidence was found to specify any specific natural or cultural _ resources or cultural beliefs and practices identified relative to the Property. Therefore, ~ no traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights will be affected or impaired by the ~ - proposed rezoning. 2.1.5 Historic and Archaeological Sites An Archaeological Inventory Survey was prepared by Rechtman Consulting, LLC dated November 2005 and submitted to the DLNR-SHPD on November 30, 2005. On October 4, 2006, under the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 Review, the DLNR- SHPD approved (Attachment 4) the Archaeological Inventory Survey report. The report argues that the data collected from the six sites (Sites SIHP Sites 24553, 24555, 24563, 24564, 24565, i and 24566) were adequate for mitigating any potential impacts resulting from the proposed development of the Project area and no further work is necessary. Furthermore, Site 24567 did not meet the criteria for significance and no further work is recommended. A copy of the ~ Archaeological Inventory Survey is included as Attachment 3. The Project area comprise a small area of the Kona Field System which is extensive within North and South Kona, from Ka'u Ahupua'a to the north to Honaunau to the south and west from the coastline and east to the forested slopes of Hualalai (Gordy 1995 in Bulgrin and Rechtman 2005). A large part of this 11 ~ - field system is designated in the State Inventory of Historic Places (SIHP) Site 50-10-37-6601 and has been eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Although the entire Project area is located within the Kona Field System, the Kona Field System is not listed on the Hawaii State Register of Historic Places. The Project contains six previously unrecorded azchaeological sites (SIHP Sites 24562, 24563, 24564, 24565, 24566, and 24567) and two previously recorded core-filled walls (SII3P Sites 24553 and 24555) were documented. Six recorded Historical Period azchaeological sites (SIHP Sites 24553, 24555, 24563, 24564, 24565, and 24566) are all considered significant under Criterion D for the data that they have yielded relative to the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century land use of the Project area and for sugarcane agriculture and ranching within the larger North Kona region. These are historic walls which functioned as boundaries or in ranching (Sites 24553 and 24556), a ranching enclosure (Site 24557) and a terraced outcrop _ interpreted as a temporary habitation site in use prior to Western contact (Site 24558). Test excavations within terracing at Site 24558 yielded small amounts of marine shell, pig bone, volcanic glass flakes, and an adze fragment, suggesting temporary habitation use. As noted in a October 22, 2008 letter to DLNR-SHPD from Rechtman Consulting, LLC (Attachment 5 - 10/22/08 Letter from Rechtman to DLNR), all data recovery fieldwork at the SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 on TMKs: (3)7-5-17:42 and 43 has been completed. On March 10, 2009, Rechtman Consulting, LLC submitted the Archaeological Data Recovery Plan for Sites - ~ 24558 and 24462 (Attachment 6 -February 2009 Archaeological Data Recovery Plan of SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562) and is currently waiting for DLNR-SHPD approval. 2.1.5 Natural Hazards Potential natural hazazds to the Property include volcanic eruptions and earthquakes. Volcanic hazazds in the area have been studied in detail (Mullineaux and Peterson 1974). The proposed Project site is located on the southwestern slope of the Hualalai Volcano. The last volcanic eruption of Hualalai occurred in 1800 to 1801. Lava emerged from the northwest and south-southeast volcanic rift zone at about the 1,600-foot elevation (in the vicinity of Puhi-a-Pele - cinder cone, just makai of Mamalahoa Highway) creating the flow that entered the ocean north - of Keahole Point, about 16 miles north of the Project area. The U.S. Geological Survey divides the Island into zones that are ranked from 1 through 9 based on the probability of lava coverage. The USGS Lava Flow Hazazd Maps show the Project azea, as is all of the Kona area, to be within Lava Flow Hazazd Zone 4, which indicates that less than 15 percent of the land in this zone has been covered with lava in the past 750 yeazs - and that there has been 5 percent lava coverage in the past 200 yeazs. Although lava flows on Hualalai have typically covered large azeas, historic flows have been concentrated on its western flank. The historic flow closest to the Project site is the 1800-1801 flow, mentioned above. The most recent flow at Keauhou Bay, approximately 5.8 miles distant from the proposed Project area, is between 300 and 10,000 yeazs old (Sterns and MacDonald 1946). 12 In addition to lava flow hazard zones, tephra hazard zones (ash fall) have also been established for Hawaii. (Mullineaux and Peterson, 1974). The Project is in the Tephra Hazard Zone 4, which indicates that tephra falls from lava fountains, should these occur, may be frequent, but thin. The impacts of lava flows on the Project site can only be mitigated with the intention of protecting life. Protection of property from lava inundation has proven to be relatively ineffective on a regional scale. Therefore, mitigation of lava flow hazards would be limited to the provision of adequate evacuation routes and civil defense warning systems designed to provide users of the Project site with as much advance notice of a threatening lava flow as possible. In order to minimize potential damage to structures as a result of earthquakes, all buildings and structures within the Project will be designed and constructed in compliance with applicable Building Codes and Standards. 2.1.6 Air and Noise Quality Air Quality. Generally, air quality is affected by regional and local climates, together with the amount and type of human activity in a given location. No large, stationery sources of air pollutants and no major industries that would contribute to air pollution are located within the Project area vicinity. Air quality in the Project vicinity is most affected by emissions from natural and vehicular sources. The dominant factor for the past several years has been the volcanic haze (vog) from Kilauea Volcano, which drifts into the Kona area from more than fifty miles away. Another natural source of air pollution that may affect the air-quality at the site is windblown dust. Although there is little air quality monitoring data currently available for the area, it appears that both State and Federal ambient air quality standards are currently being met, despite the persistent vog. i The 53-lot Project would increase traffic in the area very slightly and is not expected to ~ generate significant levels of air pollutants. Those that are generated would be dispersed rapidly by the prevailing winds. There could be short-term air quality impacts due to construction activities, especially during clearing and grubbing operations. However, these impacts can be ~ mitigated through utilization of best management practices such as covering transported ~ materials, water spraying, and planting of ground cover as soon as practical. Noise Ouality. Because there is residential development adjacent to and in the vicinity of the Project area, existing background ambient noise levels within the Project site are similar to levels in other residential areas of the Kailua-Kona urban center and surrounding area. Noise ' levels in the Project area are primarily influenced by the traffic on Hawaii Belt Road. ~ - There could be short-term noise impacts due to construction activities, especially during ~ clearing and grubbing operations. However, these impacts can be mitigated through scheduling work during the daytime and by ensuring that construction equipment complies with County 13 ~ i I T regulations. When fully developed, the Project is not expected to add significantly to current ~ noise levels. 2.1.7 Scenic and Visual Resources ~ The Project will not impact views to the shoreline from the Hawaii Belt Road, the nearest State right-of--way makai of the Project site. The Project is located approximately 1,400 feet ~ mauka of the Hawaii Belt Road and approximately 6,000 feet mauka from the shoreline. It is situated in an area where topography and vegetation would lazgely blend the proposed development into the mauka to makai view. From the shoreline, the Project will be visible as T part of a lazger regional view of the Kailua-Kona mauka lands, but not distinguishable. The Project will have no significant adverse effect on the existing scenic and visual resources of the Kailua-Kona azea. ~ 2.2 PUBLIC SERVICES AND ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS 2.2.1 Schools 1 The Project is a relatively small residential development compazed to the Pualani Estates Subdivision, and is not expected to cause a significant increase in the student enrollment in the r- region. In fact, the latest enrollment data available for the schools listed below under Table 3.3 of the County of Hawaii Data Book (Attachment 7) indicate a 1.2% decline in public school T • enrollment from 2005 to 2006. According to the County of Hawaii Data Book, Table 1.13 (Attachment 7A), the number of school age children ages 5 through 17 within the Project's vicinity in the Kahaluu-Keauhou azea comprises approximately 10% of the resident population and thus the Project is expected to have a minimal impact on the demand for education services in the region. Schools that may be affected by the Project would include Konawaena and Kealakehe High Schools, Kealakehe Intermediate and Konawaena Middle Schools, Konawaena L and Kealakehe Elementary Schools, Holualoa Elementary, Ke Kula o Ehunuikaimalino (K - 12) School, and Kahakai Elementary School. In November 2008, the Hawaii State Boazd of ~ Education ("BOE") held its initial public hearing regarding the Proposed West Hawaii School a~ Impact District which is the first such district under Act 245, Session Laws of Hawaii 2007 which authorizes the State Department of Education to collect impact fees from all new residential development in designated areas. The law requires the designation of impact districts across the state and sets a formula for calculating the amount of land and fees applied to each new single-family and multi-family unit built. Land and fees will be used for new schools and facilities to accommodate students residing in the new residential units within the proposed district. The fees can only be collected in designated impact fee districts approved by the BOE. The proposed West Hawaii Impact Fee District covers areas served by the Waimea Elementary, Waikoloa Elementary, Konawaena Elementary and the entire Kealakehe Complex. The Project is located within the Kealakehe Complex and may be subject to the school impact fees upon approval of the proposed West Hawaii Impact Fee District. • 14 i 2.2.2 Parks and Recreation The new Prince Jonah Kuhio Kalanianaole Pazk, a 5-acre County park, is located makai nearest to the project within the adjacent Pualani Estates Subdivision which can currently hold major recreational sporting events such as baseball, football and soccer. County pazk facilities in the area include Pahoehoe Beach Park, White Sands, Magic Sands (Laaloa) and Kahalu'u Beach Parks, all of which are located within a few miles of the Project site. Kailua Park, located at the ' Old Kona Airport, consists of approximately 14 acres and includes a gymnasium, public swimming pool, soccer and baseball playing fields, lighted play fields, tennis courts, meeting facilities, restrooms, park offices, and a walking and bike track. The State parks in the region include the Old Kona Airport Recreational Area, a 104 acre coastal park, Kekaha Kai State Pazk, a 1,642 acre coastal park, Keolonahihi State Historical Park, a 12 acre coastal park, and the Kaloko-Honokohau National Historical Park, a 1,178 acre coastal park approximately 2 miles north of Kailua Village. Based on the most recent estimates, the resident population for the North Kona district is ' _ approximately 28,543 (County of Hawaii April 1, 2000 Data Book, Department of Research and Development), with approximately 2,839 acres in State and County parks in the North Kona District (County of Hawaii Research and Development website: _ http://co.hawaii.hi.us/databook currentJTable°/o207/7.30.~df This equates to approximately 143 acres of park per thousand population and exceeds the five acres of park per thousand population standard established by the County for park needs. According to the latest available data listed under Table 1.13 of the County of Hawaii Data Book (Attachment 7A) ,senior citizens and retirees aged 55 years and older comprise 40% of the residential population for the Kahaluu-Keauhou area. Therefore,the Project residents are expected to include a large portion of retirees and upgrading home buyers. On the other hand, ~ - the number of children living in the Project's vicinity aged 5 to 17 years old comprise 10% of ' _ the residential population for the Kahaluu-Keauhou area. Given the relatively small size of the Project, the socio-economic make-up of the targeted buyers and adequacy of recreational resources within the Kailua-Kona urban center and Resort and surrounding area, additional measures to address the need for additional park and recreational facilities in the area do not appear to be warranted. ' 2.2.3 Medical Services The nearest available public health facility is the Hawaii Health Systems Corporation's (HHSC) Kona Community Hospital at Kealakekua, which is one of five licensed hospitals operating on the Big Island and also the primary health care facility serving West Hawaii. The _ community facility was established in 1975, and recently expanded in April of 2001. The Kona Community Hospital is a 94-bed full service medical center comprised of 33 medical surgical acute beds, 34 long-term care beds, 7 Obstetrics beds, 11 bed Psychiatric unit, and 9 bed intensive care unit, approximately 61 active medical staff members, approximately 94 RNs and LPNs, and a total of approximately 475 employees. Specialty services offered by Kona Hospital ~ include acute inpatient medicaUsurgical, skilled nursing, intensive care, outpatient surgery, a 24- i 15 j I f hour emergency room, laboratory, internal medicine, cardiology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, pediatrics, OB/GYN, urology, ENT, Opthamology, Plastic Surgery, ICU, chemotherapy, psychiatric and long-term care (HHSC 2006). Because of the limited size of the Project, it is not anticipated to add significantly to the demand for emergency or daily medical Gaze services in the Kona azea. 2.2.4 Police and Fire Protection Services The main police station for North and South Kona is located in Kealakehe. Substations for the Hawaii County Police Department and the Hawaii County Fire Department aze located in Captain Cook, Kailua-Kona, and Keauhou. A 24-hour fire station is located in Kailua-Kona with fire, Emergency Medical Services ("EMS"), and Rescue capabilities. A full-time fire/EMS operation is located at Keauhou and a full-time fire/EMS operation is located in the Captain Cook public office center. Twenty four-hour, on-call volunteer services are located in Kalaoa Mauka, Milolii Village and Kona Pazadise Subdivision. (Hawaii General Plan, 2006) The Kailua-Kona facility provides air, land, and sea rescue as well as fire and emergency medical response services. The Captain Cook facility provides only fire and emergency medical response services. Volunteer stations at Hualalai and Kona Village supplement the County facilities. Kona's existing police and fire protection services should adequately accommodate the slight increase in anticipated demand generated by the Project. 2.2.5 Water System Waiaha System, LLC and Waiaha System II, LLC received approval of the County of Hawaii Board of Water Supply (Water Board) and entered into Agreements with the Water _ Boazd to develop the North Waiaha Water System and South Waiaha Water System together known as "Waiaha Water Systems". The Applicant is a member of Waiaha System, LLC, - comprised of vazious adjacent developers and landowners, and has secured a total of 79 water commitment units to develop the Project via the South Waiaha Water System Agreement executed on November 6, 2007. A Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No-Significant Impact (Ohashi, July 2008) (Attachment 8 -Waterline Final Environmental Assessment) approved by the County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply on July 8, 2008 allows development of the Waiaha well resource distribution system, including two transmission mains and three reservoirs, along two routes between Mamalahoa Highway and Hienaloli Road and Mamalahoa Highway and the Hawaii Belt Road (also known as the Queen Kaahumanu Extension). The existing Waiaha production potable water well has a capacity of two million gallons per day, however, at the present time, only 25 percent of the available water is utilized due to a lack of transmission lines. The nearest County water system is located within the Hualalai 3Zoad right-of--way. The Project will connect to the South Makai water alignment via a 16-inch transmission main and 1 million gallon (1 MG) water tank and will connect to the proposed South Makai route that begins at the - Hienaloli RoadlPu Holoha intersection and traverses south on Hienaloli Road to the Hualalai Road intersection. The alignment will then traverse to the west along the Hualalai Road right-of- 16 i way and finally through private undeveloped land, terminating at the Queen Kaahumanu Extension. Upon completion of both the North and South Water Systems, the water system and the land for the reservoirs will be turned over to the Water Board and dedicated as a public facility. Construction plans for the Waiaha Water System are currently being reviewed by the Department of Water Supply. 2.2.6 Drainage The Project area is located well outside any flood drainageways within the County Department of Public Works ("DPW"), FIRM map. Additionally, no natural drainage features are found on site. Because the land and soil are well drained, floods due to rainwater and surface runoff across the property are unlikely to occur if County regulations pertaining to drainage and flood control are adhered to. At the request of the DPW, a Preliminary Drainage Report (Witcher, March 2009) (Attachment 9), was done for offsite flows to Lot D which quantified the amount of runoff from the tributary area mauka of Lot D, to include the storm water runoff from Lot E at TMK:(3)7-5-017:43. The typical drainage pattern due to the topography of the area would direct storm water runoff to primarily traverse onto Hualalai Road and into the adjacent mauka Lot E. - No storm water conveyance systems, such as culverts, inlets, catch-basins, and storm sewer lines, are present in or near the Project or would be affected in any way by the proposed Project. There is no significant storm water runoff or any major flood drainage ways found to be in or near the Project Area and the Project is located well outside of any flood zone areas. During the design phase of the Project, offsite flows will be taken into consideration and the ~ developer shall continue to coordinate with the Department of Public Works to determine the - appropriate storm water drainage facilities. It will be necessary in the design of a subdivision for this parcel to take the offsite flow into consideration. The Department of Public Works, at this time, feels that the 100-year storm should be considered when designing offsite work. However, within the subdivision, a l0year, 1-hour storm is used. ~ As stated previously, the predominant soil type is highly permeable and allows much of the rainfall to percolate into the ground; thus surface runoff is negligible. The Project will increase surface runoff due from road pavements, sidewalks, driveways, and roofs which will be controlled by storm drains and drywells as part of a County approved storm drainage system. All Project generated runoff will be disposed of on site, so as not to impact makai properties. i 2.2.7 Sewerage System According to the Project's Sewer Report by Witcher Engineering, LLC (Witcher, 2008) - (Attachment 10) there are no existing sewer facilities to the site. However, an 8-inch sewer - connection is available at the north end of Paulehia Street in the adjacent Pualani Estates Subdivision. The proposed sewer flow route will start from the southern boundary of the Project, traverse south through Paulehia Street, makai along Puapuaanui Street, then south on ~ Kaanee Place, continue makai across Queen Kaahumanu Highway where the pipe size is 12- inches onto Kuakini Highway towards Kailua Town where the pipe changes from a 12-inch to an 18-inch sewer line at Walua Road. The portion from Queen Kaahumanu Highway to the 17 I connection with the 12-inch line near the University of the Nations has been installed by Pualani Estates Subdivision. The 12" line has a total line capacity of 2.34 mgd. Of this, 1.49 mgd is either currently being utilized or reserved for (The Heights at Hualalai Subdivision, Pualani Estates Subdivision and 65-acres makai of Queen Ka' ahumanu Highway and mauka of Kuakini Highway). This leaves a total 0.85 mgd available capacity. The project would require only 0.21 mgd of this capacity leaving 0.64 mgd available for others. With 0.85 mgd available capacity in the sewer system and the Project only requiring 0.21 mgd, there is adequate capacity in the existing County sewer system to service the project. - 2.2.8 Solid Waste Disposal Homes within the Project will generate solid waste, which will be collected by commercial haulers and disposed of at the County landfill at Pu'uanahulu, North Kona. Solid waste would be collected and disposed in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and County rules and regulations. Because the Project will not cause a significant change in the amount and manner of collection and disposal, and because there is ample capacity at the County - landfill to accommodate the projected waste generated from the Project, no adverse impacts aze expected relative to solid waste disposal. - - 2.2.9 Electrical, Telephone, and Cable Services Electrical Power. Electrical power service would be provided by Hawaii Electric Light Company (HELLO), a privately owned utility company, via its network of overhead lines in the project azea. Given the limited size of the Project development and the utility's existing and projected reserve capacity, the projected power demands for the Project are not anticipated to have a significant impact on the utility's ability to meet the growing demand of the area. The power lines for the proposed subdivision will connect with either the existing lines from Hualalai Road or from the adjacent Pualani Estates subdivision, and will meet HELCO's design and - installation standards. Coordination with the utility's engineers well in advance of development will ensure that the provisions of electrical power aze integrated with planned utility system - improvements in the azea. Telephone and Cable Service. Hawaiian Te1Com provides telephone and other - telecommunication services to Kailua-Kona, and the rest of the island. As with electrical demand, given the limited size of the Project development and the utility's existing and projected capacity, the projected demands for telecommunications services for the Project are not - anticipated to have a significant impact on the utility's ability to meet demand in the azea. Telephone lines for the Project will be installed underground from a connection from Hualalai Road. 2.2.10 Vehicular Circulation/Traffic - The major roadways serving Kailua-Kona include Hawaii Belt Road, Palani Road, Kuakini Highway, Henry Street, Makalapua Drive, Kaiwi Street, and Ali'i Drive. All aze 18 1 I ~ ~ directly connected with roadways serving Kailua-Kona. The Hawaii Belt Road and Queen ' Kaahumanu Highway are both State rights-of-way. Primary access to the Project will be from the south at Paulehia Street which will connect from the signalized intersection at QKH and ' Puapuaanui Street in the Pualani Estates Subdivision. Consistent with the KCDP regarding interconnectivity, the Project will include anorth-south connector road between the Project's primary access at Paulehia Street to Hualalai Road. Paulehia Street is a 50-foot right-of-way that will be dedicated to the County of Hawaii by the end of 2009. Future roadway connectivity to the adjacent makai Parcel 41 and mauka Parce143 will be provided via roadway stubouts, which are being designed in consultation with the Department of Public Works. Short-term impacts of noise, dust and construction traffic may occur during the construction of the subdivision roads and infrastructure. No closure or rerouting of existing public traffic lanes are anticipated. 3. CONFORMANCE WITH STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 3.1 STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR SUBMITTAL OF CONCURRENT ' APPLICATIONS AND APPLICATIONS FOR 15 ACRES OR LES5. i - Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Article 2, Division 1, Section 25-2-9 (b) (Applications including lesser actions, concurrent applications) state that "Two or more applications involving the same building site or the same project requiring commission action may be considered concurrently, provided that the commission decision on each application shall be issued - separately by the commission." Hawaii County Planning Commission Rule No. 13 (State Land Use Boundary - Amendment), Section 13-1 (Purpose and Authority) states "This rule governs State Land Use district boundary amendment procedures pursuant to authority conferred by Section 205-3.1 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes and Chapter 28 of the Hawaii County Code, which allow the County - to amend State Land Use District boundaries for lands fifteen acres or less located in the State ~ Land Use Urban, Rural, and Agricultural Districts." Section 13-8 (Consolidated Proceeding with Other Land Use Changes) states "A petition for a district boundary amendment may be submitted simultaneously with other land use changes and applicable permits for consolidated review and processing, including any hearings." i 3.2 CHAPTER 205, HAWAII REVISED STATUTES (HRS) -LAND USE COMMISSION Currently, the Project site is designated within the Agricultural District by the State of ~ Hawaii Land Use Commission (Exhibit F -State Land District Boundary Map). To ,I - implement the Project, a district boundary amendment conforming to the State of Hawaii Land - Use Commission Hawaii Administrative Rules, (Title 15, Subtitle 3, Chapter 15, Subchapter 8, Section 15-15-77(d) and Hawaii County Planning Commission Rule No. 13) would need to be approved by the Hawaii County Council. The applicant is submitting a State Land Use Boundary Application for the 14.437 acre Property, concurrently with an application for Change of Zone. The proposed boundary amendment must conform to the Commission's standards for determining Urban District boundaries as contained within Section 15-15-18. The standards are addressed as follows: 19 i f - F _.J _ _ _ k ' Y _ 1 i ~~a~ i , 1 , : - y _ ~ , r , ~ ~ a. - .i-' ' - ~ i- ! ~J ~ - ~ j; - ~ _ r _ ~A~ricult~t~~1; ~ . F - ~ - r'f .,l 'F ~ i k 17F rr y ~ ? 'S .,'t ..r-Y 4.~ a'L ~ - i. ~l ~ .lam ~ ~ t }~.,""~pp ~.~~r>} ~ ~ ~.cl--~'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p~ ~ ` ~ ,'r - ~ t ~,i i . ~ ' j 7. .`I'mo tr ~ ~_1,~ i ~ .,f { i -v~..1,~,~ i ~ .'vri.-. j -•~r ~ -w.'`s _ ps`.'-rr' ~r',:f y~.~--~r`-~'< •L'~-~~ '.i~ ",1 fir i',.~ ~,~i' y ~ r "i ~ ~ }f Y_'~~ ~ _ r`„ 1 i 3,.r ~ f_. is _ 1 ~ J - _ r _ 1 + • 4 i - E j1(~~ -}('rte ~ ~ ~ `r r 4 a ~ -e - I~ ~~~~r+-'r ~ _ ~ ~ r ~ _F-r`-t f ~ ii--~~ _ . e~'" t°v ~ F t, , ~ ~ I. ~ 3E''~""i Y - 1 ' ~ ` ,r ~J C t ~ i ~ EXHIBIT F ~ ' r~~~~~- '"~f~-~' HU-KO-PA, LLC ~ ~ r ~ t {i~~~y State Land Use District Boundary Amendment ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ _ ~ f ' ~ & Chan e of Zone A li 'on . Wi''``t - - cats ~r g PP t j~" ~ n~ i W~ - ~ ~ ~ ' fi~ ` State Land Use District Boundary Map ~ ` ~ ~ r (03 10.091 ' ~ s # -r c... ~ 4.~ ~.._._v . ~i~-fit yJ ~ K.c._ ~ ~'f w ~ ~ s.__ ''%..a~1.~?"r~'~_~.~ .~i~~~~f . _ _~.w. ,s.~ I 1 i Standard One (1): It (the Urban District) shall include lands characterized by "city-like" concentrations of people, structures, streets, urban levels of services, and other related uses Response: The Project will be a complementazy extension of the Pualani Estates Subdivision and Sugar Cane Lane and Hualalai Heights Subdivisions to the south of the Property. The Project will complement these single family residential developments, which are consistent with the existing General Plan Land Use Allocation Guide Map (LUPAG) and KCDP for this area. These adjacent uses aze "city-like" in concentration and the Project would expand this general chazacteristic. Standard Two (2): It (the Urban District) shall take into consideration the following specific factors: 1. Proximity to centers of trading and employment, except where the development would generate new centers of trading and employment. Response: The Project would be integral to the trading and employment center of Kailua-Kona, which includes commercial shopping centers, residential developments, public service facilities, and several hotels. 2. Availability of basic services such as schools, parks, wastewater systems, ' solid waste disposal, drainage, water, transportation systems, public utilities, and police and fire protection. ' I Response: The Project would complement the existing Pualani Estates Subdivision and Sugaz Cane Lane and Hualalai Heights Subdivisions and thus bean _ integral component of the surrounding Kailua-Kona Urban area since it is in close proximity to the necessary supporting infrastructure and public ` - services. 3. Sufficient reserve areas for foreseeable urban growth. _ Response: The Project is located in an appropriate location for urban growth, as indicated on the County's General Plan and the KCDP, which designates ' the Project azea and surrounding lands as being appropriate areas for urban expansion and residential use, respectively. The Project site is contiguous ' to existing urban areas and is located in proximity to major transportation corridors. Furthermore, the Project is consistent with the General Plan and KCDP, which includes reserve azeas for urban growth based on a ten-year projection. t i s Zo Standard Three (3): It shall' include lands with satisfactory topography, drainage, and reasonably free from danger of any flood, tsunami, unstable soil condition, and other adverse environmental effects Response: Having an overall slope of less than ten percent, the topography of the Project area is well suited for urban development. The Project area is in Zone X, outside the 500-yeaz flood zone according to the Department of Public Works, Engineering Division FIRM maps. There is no other evidence of significant natural drainage features within the site. Additionally, the U.S. Geological Survey indicates that the Project site, similar to the entire Kailua-Kona azea, is located within the volcanic and seismic hazazd Zone 4, indicating a relatively low exposure to volcanic - and seismic hazazds. Standard Four (4): Lands contiguous with existing urban areas shall be given more - consideration than non-contiguous land, and particularly when indicated for future urban use on State or County General Plan. - Response: The Property is contiguous to existing urban azeas that are indicated for urban expansion development on the County General Plan and, therefore, - merit favorable consideration over noncontiguous lands. Standard Five (5): It shall include lands in appropriate locations for new urban concentrations and shall give consideration to areas of urban growth, as shown on the State - and County General Plans. - Response: The Project is consistent with the Hawaii State Plan which encourages actions that will promote the orderly development of residential azeas sensitive to community needs and desires of families and individuals; increase home ownership and rental opportunities and choices in terms of - - quality, location, cost, densities, style, and size of housing; promote design and location of housing developments taking into account the physical setting, accessibility to public facilities and services, and other concerns of - existing communities and surrounding areas; and foster a variety of lifestyles traditional to Hawaii through the design and maintenance of neighborhoods that reflect the cultures and values of the community. Additionally, the County General Plan designates the azea for urban _ expansion. The site is also adjacent to the Pualani Estates Subdivision and Sugaz Cane Lane and Hualalai Heights single family residential subdivisions. Standard Six (6): It may include lands which do not conform to the standards in paragraphs - (1) to (S): - (a) When surrounded by or adjacent to existing urban development; and 22 I I? I (b) Only when those lands represent a minor portion of this district; Response: Complies with Paragraphs (1) to (5). Standard Seven (7): It shall not include lands, the urbanization of which will contribute toward scattered spot urban development, necessitating unreasonable investment in public infrastructure or support services. Response: As stated in the response to Standard 4, the Property is contiguous with the ' existing urban area. Infrastructure lines including water, wastewater and utility facilities (electrical, telephone, and cable) are already present in the approved Pualani Estates and Sugar Cane Lane and Hualalai Heights ' subdivisions and will extend to include the Project. Standard Eight (8): It may include lands with a general slope of twenty per cent or more if the commission finds that those lands are desirable and suitable for urban purposes and that the design and construction controls, as adopted by any federal, state, or county agency, are adequate to protect the public health, welfare and safety, and the public's interests in the i aesthetic quality of the landscape. r Response: There are no lands that have a general slope of 20°Io or more, such that they require special design and construction controls as adopted by any federal, state, or county agency, are adequate to protect the public health, welfare and safety, and the public's interests in the aesthetic quality of the landscape. - 3.3 HAWAII STATE PLAN The Hawaii State Plan, as set forth in Chapter 226, Hawaii Revised Statutes, consists of a - series of long-range and comprehensive plans, goals and policies which serve as a guide for the growth and future long-range development of the State. Amendments to the State Land Use District Boundary must be consistent with these plans and policies. The goals of the Hawaii - State Plan and their relationship to the Project are as follows: o Goal: A strong, viable economy characterized by stability, diversity, and growth that + - enable the fulfillment of the needs and expectations of Hawaii's present and future generations. ' o Goal: A desired physical environment characterized by beauty, cleanliness, quiet, stable and natural systems, and uniqueness that enhances the mental and physical well being of the people. o Goal: Physical, social and economic well being for individuals and families that nourishes a sense of community responsibility and caring of participation in family life. ~ 23 i - I f I - Response: The Project would contribute to the attainment of the goals in the Hawaii State Plan goals in that increased availability of residential products to Hawaii residents would contribute to the stability, diversity and growth of the local and regional economies. More specifically, the Project would provide housing opportunities in a planned setting wherein the design, operation, maintenance and provisions for environmental protection can be effectively, efficiently and economically controlled. Further, the Project's proximity to existing and planned developments within the Project area would encourage a sense of community responsibility and participation in family life. 3.4 CHAPTER 343, HRS, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT REGULATIONS - An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as defined by Chapter 343, HRS and by the State Environmental Commission Rules and Regulations, is not required for the proposed use as none of the applicable actions delineated in Chapter 343, Section 5, HRS, apply to the Project. This County Environmental Report, however, has been prepared to address the environmental and technical considerations of the Project in compliance with Section 25-2-42 of the Hawaii County (Zoning) Code. 3.5 HAWAII COUNTY GENERAL PLAN - " The Hawaii County General Plan is the County's comprehensive land use policy for - - guiding long-range development on the Island of Hawaii. It specifies goals, policies, and standards of development for the most desirable land uses on the island. The General Plan's associated Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map designates the general allocation - of the various desired land uses, such as urban, residential, recreational, agricultural, resort commercial and industrial. Kailua-Kona is identified by the General Plan as a major resort and urban center and, as such, allows for basic resident and visitor-oriented development and support facilities. The Property is presently designated for Urban Expansion Development on the Land Use Pattern - ~ Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map (Exhibit C) of the County General Plan. As such, the Project is consistent with the County General Plan. In addition, the Project site is situated in an area designated for Urban use on the Official Concurrency Map of the KCDP and is, therefore, generally consistent with the County's long-range land use plans for the area. As a residential _ _ use, the Project is consistent with this designation and with the overall land use policies of the County General Plan for Single Family Residential development. The following is a discussion of the Project's consistency with the specific goals, policies, and courses of action of the General Plan that are relevant to the Project. 24 i - - i ' ~ Economic Goal o Provide residents with opportunities to improve their quality of life. ' Discussion: The Project will provide short-term construction-related job opportunities. Property, income, excise and other taxes will be generated, resulting in an increase in State and County revenues which in turn can be used to provide needed public services and facilities. Additionally, the Project will provide new housing opportunities for residents in a well planned and secure neighborhood environment. Environmental Quality Goal _ o Maintain and, if feasible, improve the existing environmental quality of the island. I Discussion: The Project will not result in any significant adverse effect on the environment. Those potential short-term adverse effects on the surrounding area associated with construction activities, such as, potential noise, air quality, or drainage impacts, would be reduced or eliminated _ through the implementation of appropriate mitigative measures as detailed ~ in this report. ~ Flood Control and Drainage Goals i o Conserve scenic and natural resources. o Prevent damage to man-made improvements. I o Reduce surface runoff and sediment runoff. Policy o All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of in a manner acceptable to the Department of Public Works. _ Discussion: The Project is aloes-profile development that will not affect scenic view planes in the area. The Project area is within Zone X of the Department of Public Works, Engineering Division FIRM maps outside the 500-year ~ _ flood zone. Surface water runoff and sedimentation will be minimized by methods approved by the Department of Public Works. A County approved erosion and sedimentation control plan will be implemented in _ conjunction with all grading activity. 25 i - ~ Historic Sites Goal o Protect and enhance the sites, buildings and objects of significant historical and cultural importance to Hawaii. Discussion: No significant historical or cultural sites, buildings, and objects were found in the Project. Natural Beauty Goals _ o Protect, preserve and enhance the quality of areas endowed with natural beauty, including the quality of coastal scenic resources. _ o Protect scenic vistas and view planes from becoming obstructed. o Maximize opportunities for present and future generations to appreciate and enjoy natural and scenic beauty. Discussion: Scenic view planes toward the shoreline will not be obstructed by the _ _ subdivision. The Project is located approximately 2,000 feet mauka (east) of the Hawaii Belt Road and will not impede the views of motorists - traveling along the State right-of--way. Notably, existing topography and _ vegetation shield the subdivision from the highway. The Project, approximately 6,000 feet mauka (East) from the shoreline will be visible, - but indistinguishable, as part of the larger regional view of the Kailua- Kona mauka lands. - Natural Resources and Shoreline Goals o Protect and conserve the natural resources of the County of Hawaii from undue exploitation, encroachment and damage. o Provide opportunities for the public to fulfill recreational, economic, and educational needs without despoiling or endangering natural resources. _ _ o Protect and promote the prudent use of Hawaii's unique, fragile and significant environmental and natural resources. _ o Ensure that alterations to existing land forms and vegetation, except crops and construction of structures cause minimum adverse effect to water resources, and scenic and recreational amenities and minimum danger of floods, landslides, erosion, siltation, or failure in the event of an earthquake. 26 i - - i I~ Policies o The shoreline of the island of Hawaii shall be maintained for recreational, education, and/or scientific uses in a manner that is protective of resources and is of the maximum benefit to the general public. o The shoreline shall be protected from the encroachment of man-made improvements and structures. Discussion: The Project is located approximately 6,000 feet from the shoreline and is not anticipated to have any direct adverse impact on the shoreline resources. The overall Kailua-Kona coastline, however, does provide beneficial recreational opportunities, such as beach parks and public ~ shoreline accesses for the general public. ' Housins Goals o Attain safe, sanitary and livable housing for the residents of the County of Hawaii. o Maintain a housing supply which allows a variety of choice. o Develop better places to live in Hawaii County by creating viable communities with - ~ decent housing and suitable living environments for our people. Discussion: As stated previously, the Project is intended to replenish the existing - inventory of residential lots in Kailua-Kona. This will allow the market to have a continued as well as diverse supply of quality residential units. The ' Project will be constructed in accordance with the standards and requirements of the Department of Public Works. Public Utilities Goal o To have public utility facilities which are designed to fit into their surroundings or , concealed from public view. Policies ' i o A systematic program by the County, State and private interests shall identify sources , of additional water supply to ensure the development of sufficient quantities of water , _ for future needs of high growth areas. - o All water systems shall be designed and built to Department of Water Supply standards. o Power distribution shall be placed underground when and where feasible. The County shall encourage developers of new urban areas to place utilities underground. ~ 27 _ 1 I o Private wastewater treatment systems shall be installed by land developers for major , resort and other developments along shorelines and sensitive higher inland areas, except where connection to nearby treatment facilities is feasible and compatible with the County's long-range plans, and in conformance with state and county requirements. Discussion: All utilities for the Project will be installed underground and constructed in accordance with State and County design standards and requirements. Wastewater treatment shall be in accordance with the requirements of the State Department of Health. Recreation - Goals o Provide a wide variety of recreational opportunities for the residents and visitors of the - County. o Maintain the natural beauty of recreation areas. o Provide a diversity of environments for active and passive pursuits. Policy - o Public access to the shoreline shall be provided in accordance with an adopted i program of the County of Hawaii. Discussion: The Project does not contain any recreational facilities as a result of the _ small size of the development. However, the Kailua-Kona area and coastline offers recreational opportunities such as boating, swimming and beach activities, that are available to guests, visitors and Hawaii Island residents. The County's new 5-acre Prince Jonah Kuhio Kalanianaole Park located within the Pualani Estates Subdivision is the nearest recreational facility. All of the recreational facilities within Kailua-Kona have been developed to maintain the natural beauty of the area. Conditions of permit approvals for all new projects within the Kailua-Kona area - include, to some extent, requirements for beach or shoreline accesses for public use. Land Use _ Goals o To maximize choices of single family residential lots and/or housing for residents of the County. 28 _ _ _ I o To provide single family residential areas conveniently located to public and private services, shopping, other community activities and convenient access to employment centers. Discussion: The Project is one of several residential projects that will help to replenish the existing inventory of house lots in the Kailua-Kona area, thus providing a continued choice of residential units in the area. The approved Pualani Estates Subdivision is zoned RS-7.5, with lots between 6,000 and 7,500 square foot lots. The Sugar Cane Lane Subdivision is zoned (RS-15) and will consist of 15,000 square feet up to 20,000 square feet lots. The Project is requesting RS-10 zoning and will consist of 10,000 square feet up to 14,000 square feet lots. These developments will ' form a quality residential community located within an area served by public and private services, shopping centers, and community facilities. ! 3.6 KONA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN The County of Hawai `i General Plan, Section 15.1 (February 2005, as amended) calls for the preparation of Community Development Plans "to translate the broad General Plan ~ statements to specific actions as they apply to specific geographical areas." Community Development Plans are to be long-term plans with a planning horizon to year 2020, consistent - with the General Plan. The Kona Community Development Plan ("KCDP") was recently adopted by the County Council on September 25, 2008 under Ordinance 08-131. The KCDP translates the broad goals and policies of the County of Hawai `i General Plan into specific actions and priorities for ' specific geographic areas in the districts of North Kona, reaching nearly to Waikoloa Village, and South Kona, including the community of Miloli`i. The KCDP will deal with all the elements included in the General Plan such as the economy, energy, environmental quality, flooding and other natural hazards, historic sites, natural beauty, natural resources and shoreline, housing, f public facilities, recreation, transportation, and land use. ? The purposes of the KCDP are to: • Articulate Kona's residents' vision for the planning area. • Guide regional development in accordance with that vision, accommodating future growth while preserving valued assets. • Provide a feasible infrastructure financing plan to improve existing deficiencies and proactively support the needs of future growth. • Direct growth in appropriate areas. • Create a plan of action where government and the people work m partnership to improve ~ the quality of life in Kona to live, work, and visit. • Provide a framework to monitor the progress and effectiveness of the plan and to make - changes and update, if necessary. 29 ~ 1 I I The goals, objectives, policies, and actions of the KCDP aze presented as eight elements, including: 1. Transportation 2. Land Use 3. Environmental Resources 4. Cultural Resources 5. Housing 6. Public Facilities, Infrastructure and Services 7. Energy 8. Economic Development - These elements generally correspond with the thirteen elements of the County of Hawai `i General Plan (GP) except that five elements of the GP have been combined in two of the Kona CDP elements. Specifically, the Kona CDP element for Public Facilities, Infrastructure and Services combines the GP elements for Public Facilities, Public Utilities and Recreation; and the Kona CDP element for Environmental Resources combines the GP elements for Environmental Quality, Flooding, and Other Natural Hazards, Natural Beauty and Natural Resources and Shoreline. The GP element for Historic Sites is referred to in the Kona CDP as Cultural Resources and the GP element for Economic is referred to as Economic Development. Kailua-Kona is identified by the KCDP as being within the Kona Urban Area and, as _ , such, allows for basic resident and visitor-oriented development and support facilities. Within this Kona Urban Area, growth is directed towards compact villages located along proposed transportation routes or to infill areas within, or adjacent to, existing development. The general locations of these villages are within the Growth Opportunity Areas, otherwise known as the Transit Oriented Developments (TODs). The Property is considered an infill development located adjacent to the Kahului-Puapuaa Village Neighborhood Transit Oriented Development and is designated for Urban use on the Official Land Use Map (Exhibit D) (KCDP Official Land Use Map) of the KCDP. The Property _ is presently designated for Urban Expansion on the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map of the County General Plan and is, therefore, generally consistent with the County's long-range land use plans for the area. As such, the Project is consistent with the _ _ County General Plan. As a residential use, the Project is consistent with this designation and with the overall land use policies of the County General Plan for Single Family Residential development. Most relevant to the Hu-Ko-Pa Project aze the following Guiding Principles and Policies of the Kona CDP. KONA CDP GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES 1. Protect Kona's natural resources and culture. 30 r t _ i i la. Natural resources. The watershed, including coastline, flood plains, important agricultural land, open space, and areas mauka of Mamalahoa Highway shall be protected. Guided by a principle of respect for the land, environment and natural resources shall be preserved and protected to ensure clear air and water, thriving native species, conservation of shorelines and open space, improvements in watershed management and flood control, ' and reductions in solid waste. ' Discussion: • The Project will be set back approximately 6,000 feet from the shoreline. • Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC would mitigate risks to noise, air, and water quality by preparing and implementing a dust control plan to ensure clean air. • Surface water runoff and sedimentation will be minimized by methods approved by the Department of Public Works. • A County approved erosion and sedimentation control plan will be implemented in conjunction with all grading activity. lb. Culture. Multi-ethnic culture is preserved, protected, and restored in a manner that perpetuates all aspects of the aloha spirit. i _ ; Discussion: ~ • As no valued cultural, historical or natural resources and no traditional and customary _ native Hawaiian rights were found or being practiced in the Project, these rights will not be affected or impaired by the proposed uses. _ 2. Provide connectivity and transportation choices. ' - Future growth should connect communities with movement alternatives such as sidewalks, trails, and bike lanes. We need an efficient public transportation system for moving people. It should have comfortable and frequent service to key destinations, along prominent - commuter routes, and at transfer points that offer connections to alternative modes of transportation. Discussion: • Future roadway connectivity to the adjacent westlmakai Parcel 41 and east/mauka Parcel ' 43 will be provided via roadway stubouts planned within the proposed subdivision. • Primary access to the Project will be from the south at Paulehia Street which will connect to the signalized intersection at QKH and Puapuaanui Street in the Pualani Estates Subdivision. Consistent with the KCDP regarding interconnectivity, the Project will include anorth-south connector road between the Project's primary access at Paulehia Street to Hualalai Road. - • Situated south of Hualalai Road and approximately 1,300 feet mauka of Queen ~ • Kaahumanu Highway, the Project has direct or easy access to pedestrian sidewalks, 31 ~r 1 i 1 I pedestrian/bike pathways to neazby shopping malls, grocery stores, restaurants, shoreline, and mixed-use azeas promoting pedestrian activity thus reducing the number of caz trips for azea residents. • The proposed Project will be ungated, thus, allowing the new roadways within the proposed subdivision to service the local transportation network. 5. Direct future growth patterns toward compact villages, preserving Kona's rural, diverse, and historical character. Discussion: • The Project offers the advantage of being adjacent to existing infrastructure and supportive public facilities as it is located adjacent to the Pualani Estates Subdivision, Sugaz Cane Lane and Hualalai Heights subdivisions. _ The Project master plan was prepazed only after study and consideration of the environmental and cultural resources of the site. - • Development of the Project will be consistent with the existing single family residential subdivisions in order to complement the development in the area. 8. Promote effective governance An effective and accountable regional government structure that improves the quality of life for Kona residents should manage the impacts of growth and meet the needs of the Kona community by encouraging cooperation among public, private, and civic partners, ensuring equitable distribution of resources, and instituting policies and regulations in a predictable and consistent manner. Discussion: • The Project is committed to working with the Kona community, a regional government structure, as well as the County. • The Project is committed to consulting with a number of individuals and groups with knowledge of the cultural resources in the azea. In summazy, the proposed Hu-Ko-Pa 53-lot subdivision is consistent with the vision, guiding principles, and policies of the KCDP. This is consistent with the State Land Use Urban District _ and County RS-10 zoning classification being sought. 3.7 COUNTY ZONING The Hawaii County Zoning Map for the North Kona District designates the Project site as I Agricultural 5-acre (A-Sa) (Exhibit G -County Zoning Map). A Change of Zone from l_ Agricultural 5-acre (A-Sa) to Single Family Residential - 10,000 squaze feet (RS-10) will be 32 f I' - _ r~ ! I ? t ,>J it 5 b ~ ,c7 d i o Y 1 ~ F y~ .r ~ ~~,f h~ 1 s `4i ~ 3 i ~kt a r- ~ c. yy< r lir,; {S a~i~ S x ~ T 1 ~ n,3, '=r \ ~il { - 4. ~ 4 ~ x- ~ : k ~ _ _ ~ t ~ 1~~~ 2 xr w ~ r ~ Teo _ `i ~ ~ ti l fr y;': rt , ~f i N ~ s t ~ e " r ~ L I F~ i 3 { i ~;rr r ' E - t - ~ ° a~ ~ u a .,.2 e 3 Sr t~ ~ d v qp, a a w ~ r xi x~.S ' i - 'i,~" ,_Y ~ ~ 3 '3 ~ Y ~'~`-r,1' If ~ StY r€f^' s."~. .F e~ v a~ ?2 -t~` _:k 4 ~ i ,f t a,r } r i ~ ~ . s a ::y ~ - ~ :_a v~ s>7 4 '~.u~e, i i ° ~ ~ 1~ K r as IyI °k .,~L, n fi~ +v.. an~3r .x'.e ~ ~._1 ~-a ~ s~ -n~z. t. _ _ \ - k 1 G 3 ~ ~ i - ~ ' ~ _ _ ~ ' i ~ , I i A ~ ~ ~ 1 - I r- ' ~ r "1 l ~ f I~ _ ! _ r. I r--~ i h _ - ~ 'r~- I ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ I - _ ;r ~ i. 1 ~ ~ ~ a ~ q ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ EXHIBIT G ' ~ - - 1 1 , v-:'- ~ ~ 1 . , ~ - - _ ' _ ~ _ HU-KO-PA, LLC \ ~ _ r ; ~ , L , ~1F,. State Land Use District Boundary Amendment ~t' ; ` ~ ~ ~r & Change of Zone Application i ~ r-~ ~ I f ~ ~ , , ~ ~ i a Hawaii County Zoning Map . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , (03.10.09) f ~ - - r,. C required to allow the development of residential lots to be incorporated with the approved Sugar Cane Lane (RS-15), Hualalai Heights (RS-20) and the Pualani Estates - RS 7.5 Subdivisions. 3.8 SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA The Pro ert is not within the Count 's S ecial Mana ement Area SMA . P Y Y P g ( ) 3.9 STATE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AREA (SCZMA) State CZMA -Pursuant to HRS, Chapter 205-2, like the rest of the Big Island, the property is situated within the State's Coastal Zone Management Area (CZMA). The Project is located approximately 6,000 feet mauka (east) of the shoreline and will not impede the views of the shoreline by motorists traveling along the State right-of--ways. Notably, existing topography C and vegetation shield the subdivision from the highway. The Project may be visible from the shoreline, but indistinguishable as part of the larger regional view of the Kailua-Kona maukalands. The Project is located approximately 6,000 feet from the ocean and is not anticipated to have any direct adverse impact on the shoreline resources. The Project site is currently vacant and heavily vegetated. It is occasionally used for grazing. The Project is near the Sugar Cane Lane and Hualalai Heights single family residential subdivisions and north of the Pualani Estates single family residential subdivision. Kailua-Kona is the urban center for West Hawaii and several hotels, multi-family and single family residential projects, several C commercial shopping centers and Federal, State and County public facilities. The Project subdivision is consistent with the existing and proposed uses within the Kailua-Kona urban center and Resort area, and has been planned in a manner so as to complement the adjacent land uses. In addition, the General Plan and the KCDP, identify no recreational resources, historic L resources, scenic and open space preserves, coastal systems, coastal hazards and marine resources or other natural and environmental resources related to the Property. There are no recreational resources, historic resources, scenic and open space preserves, coastal systems, L coastal hazards and marine resources or other natural and environmental resources on the Project or within the surrounding areas that would adversely affect the objectives and polices of the ( CZMA. The Project is also not part of any ongoing County or State CZM programs for this L particular area. Therefore, the proposed Project is consistent with the objectives and policies of HRS Chapter 205-2. C 4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS L 4.1 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USE OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY C Development of the Project site will alter the open space character of the property, but based on the findings within this report, with the implementation of appropriate mitigative C measures, the Project will not result in any substantial short-term or long-term adverse impacts to the environment. While development of the property will remove the land from potential pasture use, the agricultural productivity of the site is relatively low and there is an abundance of other lands available in the region that are better suited for such use. Developing the property for the 33 L f intended residential use will provide the benefit of enlarging the inventory of residential lands to this growing area. The Project will be supported by the necessary public facilities and services, and development would proceed in a manner that is in compliance with the long-range State, ~ County and community plans for the region. Development of the Project will also result in socio-economic benefits to the community. The construction work associated with the Project will provide short-term direct employment in the construction industry. Public revenues from personal and real property taxes are expected to more than offset the cost of the minimal expansion in the need for public services necessitated as a result of the Project. 4.2 MITIGATIVE MEASURES PROPOSED TO AVOID, MINIMIZE, RECTIFY, OR REDUCE IMPACTS. Two types of mitigation measures will be employed to ensure that potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from development of the Project are minimized. They can be characterized as generic and specific. Generic mitigation measures are standard actions aimed at reducing or eliminating impacts and which have already been institutionalized through County, State or Federal ~ - regulations, codes, laws and ordinances. Mitigation measures of this type usually apply to - control of temporary or short-term construction impacts such as soil loss, noise, and air quality impacts. Generic mitigation measures are standard, accepted means that are appropriate for minimizing temporary or limited environmental impacts. s' Specific mitigation measures are generally recommended for actions that may have residual or long-term impacts, or those for which some form of monitoring or compensation for - the environmental impact are required. In terms of the Project, the specific and generic ~ mitigation measures that are recommended include: ' o limiting construction activities to daytime hours o adherence to all Federal, State, and County laws, ordinances, rules and regulations relating to environmental protection, health, safety, and construction - o early construction of drainage features, where needed, such as berms o timely stabilization of any denuded areas through sodding or planting _ o application of fertilizers or biocides to landscaped areas only during periods of low rainfall to minimize chemical runoff ' o covering of open vehicles carrying soils, gravel, or other particulate matter ` o controlling dust by watering exposed areas and through the use of proper stockpiling procedures 34 i i I o protection and preservation of archaeological and historical resources in accordance with appropriate State and County laws, ordinances, rules and regulations 4.3 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT An exploration and evaluation of the environmental impacts of all reasonable alternative actions, particularly those that might enhance environmental quality, avoid or reduce adverse environmental impacts, costs, and risks, was performed in order to assess options that might enhance environmental quality and cause fewer detrimental effects. A discussion of these alternatives follows. No Action Alternative. The "no action" alternative will result in no physical change to the Property and leave it in its current unused use. The land will remain unaltered and unimproved. This alternative will not allow the objectives of the subdivision to be achieved and would deny the public the socio-economic benefits associated with the Project. There is a - growing demand for single family residential lots for sale in the Kailua-Kona area and under the "no action" alternative, the additional lots that would be provided through the Project will not be available. No source of income will be brought to the owner and consequently no increase in government revenues from higher property taxes will be realized. Alternative Use. The current zoning for the property is Agriculture (A-Sa). The Project site, based on its isolation, limited size and soil characteristics is not well suited for agricultural - use. As described earlier, soil studies indicate that commercial agriculture on the Project site would not be economically feasible. - Any alternate use of the Project site other than the proposed single family residential subdivision, would not be compatible with the General Plan and the KCDP. The Project site is _ located near the Sugar Cane Lane and Hualalai Heights single family residential subdivisions and north of the Pualani Estates single family residential subdivision. In addition, vacant land adjoining the parcel is also designated for residential uses by the Hawaii County General Plan and the KCDP. Finally, retaining the Project area for agricultural use would deny the public the socio-economic benefits associated with the Project. Alternative Locations. There are other vacant or non-committed sites in Kailua-Kona that have the same favorable site characteristics for residential development as the Project. However, the Project is near the Sugaz Cane Lane and Hualalai Heights single family residential subdivisions and north of the Pualani Estates single family residential subdivision and as such, would complement the proposed residential development pattern in the azea. Infrastructure to serve the property is already in place to the Project area boundary. 36 i i i i~ 4.4 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF ' RESOURCES The Project would result in the irreversible and irretrievable commitment of certain natural and fiscal resources. Major resource commitments include the land on which the Project homes and roadways would be constructed, as well as the private funds, construction materials and manpower that will be expanded in development of the land. They also include the energy, water resources, and other utility resources that will be committed to development of the Project. Existing vegetation will be removed from the Project area and partially replaced with typical landscape plants. The impacts of using these resources should be weighed against the expected socioeconomic benefits to be derived from the Project and the consequences of taking no action or adopting another, less beneficial use of the property. 5. AGENCIES CONTACTED - County o Planning Department o Department of Parks and Recreation o Department of Public Works o Department of Water Supply ~ i . State - - o Department of Land and Natural Resources, Land Management Division o DLNR, State Historic Preservation Division ~ - o Department of Health Private ' o Hawaii Electric Light Co., Inc. (Kona Engineering Department) i 1 i 37 I i - ~ i I _ _ _ _ _ _ „V___ _ _ _ _ velar 's1 U9 02:17p BRENDAN LEE LLC 7143755888 ~ p,2 i FEE OWNER'S LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Tax Map Key: (3) 7-5-017:042 Kahului 2nd, District of North Kona, Island of Hawaii ` The undersigned is the fee owner of the real property above-identified, and hereby ' authorizes Carlsmith Ball LLP, to apply for, execute and process any and all Couaty, State and ' Federal governmental permit applications, and to participate in proceedings related to said real property. A photostatic or facsimile copy of this executed authorization shall also be considered as effective and valid as the original. Dated: ~ ar~~ 3~, o7d0q HU-KO-PA, LLC, a Domestic Limited Liability Company By G ~ Its /~4YiaRr,iLi /V}e~r?~2(" ~ Address: c/o Brendan Lee, LLC 16541 Gothazd Street Suite 109 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 I i I i - i i I I - i i' Mar 31 09 02:17p BRENDAN LEE LLC 7143755888 p,3 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ~kANC ~ ) _ On /yIARC't/ 3t' ,2009 ,before me, T s uT ,ileTA~c ~6/, Deu ~ Nama Aad TigoOE011'iaor (e.g. °]aeo Doe, Nonry Publia'~ personally appeared ~ C= • L Name oESigaer(a) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) islaze subscribed to the within instrument and aclrnowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/herltheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/herltheir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. i~ ~ I certify that under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the Conrnlglot+ ~b/60+t7 laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. ~c°"~"''~~~~t WITNESS my hand and official seal. L 7`! . . Signature ~ i~ Sigaarnre of Notary Public OPTIONAL r Though the data below is not required bylaw, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document IL and could prevent fraudulent reattachntenl ojthis form. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Fee Owner's Letter of Authorization I Document Dace: 1`umber of Pages: 2 r Signer(s) Oti~er Than Named Above: 11 Capaeity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: ? Individual ? Individual ? Corporate Officer -Title(s): ? Corporate Officer -Title(s): f ~ Partner - ? Limited O General ? Partner - O Limited ? General L ? Attorney In Fact ? Attorney Tn Fact ? Trustee O Trustee ? Guardian ar Conservator ? Guardian or Conservator I ? Offer; Q Other. L Signer is representing: Signer is representing: R~v~pwJ l - - - 1 I ~ OR R-713 ~ + y STATE OF HAWAII BUREAU OF CONVEYANCES ~ RECORDED ' DEC 1 s, 2004 08:01 AM Doc No{s} 2004.262857 ~I f ~I~~~~~~ /s/CARL 7, WATANABE IU I' !!li I+~I~~jl~l~~' REGISTRAR OF CONVEY ANCES 20 g/8 Z6 CONVEYANCE TAX: $1200,00 LAND COURT REt~ULAR SYSTEM )tabus By Ma~7 Pick-up ro: - HLT KO-PA LLC 7'ITLB NO.: 14 6 tI ~3 ~I7LS - P. O. Boa 9013 ESCROW NO.: A4-301-066?. (S~ Kailna-Kona,11I 96743-9013 JANET LUM WON TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: I~0 ~ - ?TTLE OF DOCUMENT; I " - WARRANTY DEED PARTIES TO DOCUMENT; ' i - GRANTOR: GOME3 FAMQ.Y LIIVITPF,D PARTNERSHIP, a Hawaii limited partnership, whose mailing address is P. O Box 336, Kailas-Koss, ffi 96?45-0356 and BRIAN R COOK DEVELOPMENT, INC., a gawaii corporatioq whose mailing address is 75-5608 Hienalo6 Road, #2S, Kailas--Kona, >iII 96740 i GRANTEE: 13LJ-KO-PA LLC, a Hawsif limited BabiHty company, whose mailing address is P. O. Boi 9013, Kailas-Kona, SI 96745-9013 TAX MAP KEYS (3) 7.5-017-030, 031 and 033 (por.) ' LOT D 4850-8996-9408/K19347CJ1~-?-04 i i i I i ' ~I WARRANTY DE>:' D. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That GOMF,S FAMILY LIlVIITED PARTNERSHIP, a Hawaii limited partners>,ip, whose mailing address is P. O. Boa 356, Kailna-Kona, HI 96745-0356 and f BRIAN R COOK DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Hawaii corporation, whose mailing address is L- 75-5608 Hienaloii Road, #25, Kaiiua-Kona, H,Y 96740, hereinafter called the "C3raator", for and in consideration of the sum of TBN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00} and other good and I_ valuable consideration to the Grantor paid by HU-KO-PA LLC, a Hawaii limited liability r company, whose maiIiag address is P. O. Bo: 9013, Kailrea--Kona, HI 9b74S-9013, hereinafter ~ L called the "Grantee", the receipt wheroof is hereby acloaawledged, do hereby giant, bargain, sell and com?ey unto the Grantee a portion of all of those certain parcels of real property designated on the tax maps of the Third Taxation Division, State of Hawaii, as Tax Maps Key 7-S-Ol'1--030, 031 and 033 (por.~ and being ail of LOT D, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached / hereto and made a part hereof subject to the encumbrances noted therein. TOGETHER WITH ALL and singular the buildings, improvements, rights, tenements, heroditaments, easements, privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging or appertaining or held a~ enjoyed in connection therewith. f TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee, as its sole and separate L property, its successors and as~igius, in fee simple forever. AND THE SAID GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that the t Grantor is lawfully seised in fee simple of said granted premises and that rho said premises are free and clear of all encumbrances except as aforesaid, and except for assessments for real property taxes. And the said Grantor Rnthe< covenants and that the Grantor has good right to sell and convey the said premises in the manner aforesaid; that the Grantor will [ WARRANT AND DEFEND the same utrto the Grantee against the lawful claims and demands of all persons, except as aforesaid. The parties hereto that this rostrum a6~ ent may be executed in cow, each of which shall be deemed an original, and said counterparts shall together constitute one and the same agreement, binding all of the parties hea+eto, notwithstanding all of the parties are not signatory to the original or the same counterparts. For all purposes, including without 2 I ~ - - i I l i limitation, recordation, filing and delivery of this instrument, duplicate unexecuted and unaclmowledged pages of the counterparts may be discarded and the remaining pages assembled as one document iT IS MUTUALLY AGREED that the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee", as and when used hereinabove or hereinbelow shall mean and include the masculine or feminine, the singular or plural number, individuals, associations, trustees, corporations or partnerships, and their sad each of their respective successors is interest, heirs, executors, personal representatives, administrators and Permitted assigns, according to the context thereof, and that if these presents - shall be signed by two or more grantors, orb two or more i Y grantees, ail covenants of such garties shall be aad for all purposes deemed to be their joint aadseveral covenants. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed these presents on this - day of vw P'~.~_ 2004. ~ GOIKES FANIILY LIlVIITED I PARTNERSHIP, a Hawaii limited partnership L~ By: STANLEY . GO S, Co-Trnstee of - the Joseph owes Trust dated May 16, _ ~ 1991 ~ Its: General Partner - BY= GOMES, Trustee of the J h Gomes Trust dated Ma 16 1991 Its: General Partner i 3 _ I - 3 L BRIAN R COOK DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Hawaii corporation L ~.f.i~i, BY~ ~ 2 cook its: p 5; o~ l_ APPROVED A9 TO FORM CARLSN~1 BAW. LLP I BY 14obertD.T}~laxlm r ~ 12-7-04 I C L I 4 l 7 I STATE OF HAWAII ~ COUNTY OF HAWAII j ss. On this day of 2004, before me personally ~ appeared STANLEY A. GOME3, Co-Trastee of the Joseph Games Trust dated May 16, 1991, to me personally known (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) who, being by me duly sworn, did say that the trust is the managing general partner of the Games Family Limited Partnership, a Hawaii Limited Partaershi that the fore i P, going instrument was signed in the name of and an behalf of said partnership, and said trustee acknowled ed that he e g xecnted the same as his free act and deed and as the free act and deed of said partnership, _ _ Name Notary Public State of Hawaii EVElYN SHIMATA ~Xbit;•h••r ~Ahnlary 8, 2048 ~ My commission expires; I , R vJ ~ r f I _ t ~ I I i i I i ---r ~,...~.,.r.- - ~ I STATE OF HAWAII ) - COUNTY OF HAWAII ) On this 16 ~ da of 20p4 L Y before me personally appeared FRA1~1K GOMES, Co-Trustee of the Joseph Gomes Trust dated I~tay 16,1991, to me personally Imown (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence} who, bein b me g Y duly sworn, did say that the txust is the managing general partner of the Gomes Family Limited Partnership, a Hawaii Limited Partnership, that the foregoing instrument was signed in the name of and on behalf of said partnership, and said trustee aclmowledged that he executed the same as his &ee act and deed and as the free act and deed of said partnership. I_ I_ Naate: Notary Public State of Hawaii EVELYN SHIMATA EXDI?'^tirn r1„~o• ~ohrL~8ry6, 200$ _ My comimissioa expires: I C t 1 L t l_ e . _ . STATE OF HAWAII ) ~ ) ss. ` COUNTY OF HAWAII ) 1 On ~e E ~ \ , ~ o ~ before me personally appeared ~ ~ ~ 0 JIB to me personally k~wn/proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, who, being by me duly sworn or affirmed, did say that he/she is the i Q`~P ~ ~ of BRIAN R COOK DEVELOPMENT, INC., a I~Iawaii i _ corporation, and that such person executed the foregoing instrument as the &ee act and deed of such person, and if applicable is the capacity shown, having been duly authorized to execute ~ such instrument in such capacity. ' I - Name: Notary Public, State of Hawai~VELYN SHIMATA ' - Expfretfon Da+~• Fc+bruaryB, 2008 ~ My commission expires: ~ i E - I - I 7 , LOT D Land siinated approximately 1400 feet northeasterly of f the norl~ side of Hawaii Belt Road and At Kahului 2~, - North Kona, Island of Hawaii; Hawaii Being portion of Royal Pateirt 1669 Land Commission Award 8S 16-B Apana 3 to Kamaikui Beginning at the Southwesterly corner of this parcel of laud, being also the Southeasterly comer of Lot C _ .and.a point on the Northwesterly side of. Royal Patent.671d Laud.Commission Award 4587, Apana~ tio- . _ Thomas Saxes the coordinatees of said point of beginning refen-eci to Government Survey Triangulation Station "KAI3EL0" being 1,620.97 feet North 5,817.15 feet Fast and canning by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: Thence, for the next five (S) courses alo Lot C and ng the rematnderof Royal Patent 1669, Land Commission Award 8515 B, Apana 3 to Kaxnailrui: 1. 1SS° 19' SO" ?20.66 feel to a point: 2. 243° 44' 29" 221.1 S feet to a point; r 3. 268° 09' i7" I95.04 feet to s paint; f 4. 257° 27' SO" 239.26 feet to a point; 5. 170°.04' 30" S9. l 6 fact to a point; C Thence, for the next seven (7) courses along the Southerly side of HuaIalai Road : 6. 246° 45' 30" 2.79 feet to a point; 7. 260° 04' 30" 46.36 feet to a point; 8. 255° S8' 30" 36.15 feet to a lm~ 9. 256° 57' 30" 44.68 feet to a poi 10. 252° 02' 00" 31.42 feet to a point 1 1. 252° 59' 30" 70.91 feet to a point; 12. 250° 07' 30" 33.72 feet to a point; EXHIBIT "A" L Page 1 of 9 ~r l I - ~ Thence, following along Lot E, and the remainder of Royal Patent 1669, Land Commission Award 8516 B, Agana 3 to Kamaikui: 13. 338° 16' 12" 715.98 feet to a poi Thence for the next sixteen (15) courses along the middle of a stonewall; along Royal Patent 6716, Land Commission Award 4887, Agana 2 to Thomas Sams and partially along Lot 131 and Lot C Pnatani Estates ~ Subdivision 14. 85° S6' 30" 65.91 feet to a point; 15. 72° 13' 00" 138.54 feet to a point; J 16. 72° 29' 10" 30.29 fact to a pow 17. 69° 34' 14" 121.45 feet to a ~ Point; 18. 7I° 11' 30" 121.11 feet to a point; I9. 74° 3I' 25" 38.40 feet to a point; i 20. 68° 46' 06" 54.35 feet to a point; I _ 21. 70° 11' 2T' 56.27 feet to a poittt; - 22. 82° 34' 25" 44.90 feet to a point; i - 23. 78° 04' 49" 47.37 feet to a point; 1 24. 70° 42' 3S" 15.48 feet to a point; _ I 25. 64° l 3' 33" 12.84 feet to a point; I 26. 59° 16' 06" 21.06 feet to a point; ~ 27. 55° 06' 36~ 33.16 feet to a poir~ - 28. 76° ~J4 1S" 40.32 fcct to a point; 29. 53° 15' 48" SS.43 feet to a ~ point of beginning and containing ~ area of 14.437 Acres, ~ morc or Iess, as per survey of Erik Lange, Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, ~ of the State of Hawaii, Certificate No. 10735, ~ dated November 18, 2004 ~ _ EXHIBIT "A'• Page 2 of 9 w~~~~ _ a i ALSO SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to a portion of easement "Al"fat access d` ati3ity purposes, containing an area of 0.651 Acres. Easement "A1" is described in its entirety in attached description ALSO SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to a portion of easement "W2" waterline transmission Tine l_ easem~ cowaining an area of 0.651 Acres. F,asement "W"l°' is de~cnbed in its entirety in attached description - TOGET'I~R WTFi~ easeme~ "Al" for access & utdity Purposes bein more - described in attached description. . _ _ . . g parttcuIarly - . y' ~a. ,ores Lice~uaed Professional Surveyor ~i~ State of Hawaii Certificate No. LS-10735 ' 745039D Quoen Kaehumanu Hwy. Kaitua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 November 29.2004 f E~IBIT "A" Page 3 of 9 - ---~,-~,.,.~-,,.4....._.......rw, /D I i I . f Easement "Al" access 8c utility easement over and across Lots A, B, C, D and B In favor of Lots A, B, C, and D Land situated on the Southeasterly ssde of Hualalai Road and on the Southeasterly side of Lot A At Kahului I" , ~ . . _ _ _ North Kona, Island of Hawaii, Hawau - Being portion of - - - Lots A,B,C,D~; Grant 983 to Kipola; and j Royal Patent 1669 Land Commission Award 8516-B Apana 3 to Kamailcui _ Beginning at the Northeast comer of this easement of lan bei also a ~ ~ n$ poirrt on ffio southerly side of Lot 1, i the true azimuth and distance to the Southwest wmer of Lot 1 being 252° 53' 2S" 141.12 feet, the _ ~ ter of said pouxt of beginning referred to (iovernmen# Survey Triangulation Station "ICAFIELO" g ,616.90 feet North 6581.92 feet East and _ mm~ing by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: r Thence, for the next ten (IO) courses followin ~ Lot B: g partially along the remainders of Lot E, Lot D, I.ot C, and 1. 337° 21' S7" 15.19 feet to a point; _ C 2. 66° 26' ?.5" 4'72.75 feet to a point; i 3. 77° 2?' S0" 248.20 feet to a point; ~ I 4. 88° 09' 1T' 192.58 feet to a point; _ 5. 63° 44' 29" 227.50 feet to a point; _ . - d. 74° 13' 42" 92.83 feet to s point; ' 7. 93° 39' 35" 242.69 feet to a point; 8. 75° 28' 24" 220.77 feet to a point; 9. 79° 4l' 37" 333.22 feet to a point; 10. 153° 40' 38" 50.28 feet to a point; EXffiBIT "A" Page 4 of 9 ~ r,_______.. ~ _ - - - - 11 i . Thence, for the next eight (8) courses following along Lot A: _ 11. 259° 41' 3T' 336.b5 feet to a point; 12. 255° 28' 24" 226.93 feet to a poi r _ . 13. 273° 39' 35". 242.13 .feet to a point; . , _ Y... 14, 254° 13' 42" 79.68 feet to a poi - Y ' - J - • . ~ 1 S. 243° 44' 29" 233.73 feet to a poi 16. 268° 09' 1 T' 198.72 feet to a point 17. 257° 27' SO" 91.75 feet to a point; Thence along the remains of Lot A: 18. lb7° 27' SO" 62.43 feet to a poi Thence, far the next twelve (12}courses, along the Southeasterly side ofHualali road 19. 291° 28' 30" 40.06 feet to a point; 20. 283° 53' 00" 42.21 feet to a point; 21. 275°25' 00" 1 S. I8 feet to a poi 2Z. 245° 19' 00" 32.35 fit to a point; ~ 23. 246° 45' 30" 33.61 feet to a point; ~ ~ ~ ~ 24, 260° 04' 30" 46.36 feet to a point; 25. 255° 58' 30" 36.15 feet to a point; 26. 256° 57' 30" 44.68 feet to a point; l_ 27. 252° 02' 00" 31.42 feet to a point; EXHIBIT'+A'r - Page 5 of 9 ~rr L__.~ 1~ 9 i ' i 28. 252° 59' 30" 70.91 feet to a point; _ 29. 250° 0T 30" 58.60 feet to a point; 30. 258° 39' 34" 35.12 feet to a point; Thence along Lot 1; 31. 252° 53' 25" 141.12 fcet to a point of beginning and containing an area of - ~ 2.363 Acres, more oar less, as per survey of Erik Lange, _ Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, - of the State of Hawaii, Certificate No. 10735 Dated November 18, 2004 j i' t,tn~, Etilc I.aoge ~ u~ ~ emu. sv ~ * w y' "d 70?~ Licensed Professio Surveyor ~ 'w~i State of Hawaii Certificate No. LS-10735 7~-5039D Quest Kaahumat~u Hwy. Kailas-Kona, Raw$ii 96740 - - November 29, 2004 I h i EXHIBTI' - Page 6 of 9 I I t3 r 1 J L E' aSe[nCllt "W2" Waterline ea~sanent over and across Lots A, B,C, D and E _ In favor ofLot I Land situated on I the Southeasterly side of Hualalai Road and an the Southeasterly side of Lot A 1 At Kahului 1~, l - . - . North.Kon~,,~~d a~Hawaii, Hawaii Being portion of: Lots A,B,C,D and E; '(lraat 983 to Kipola; and Royal Patent 1669 Land Commission Award 8516-B Apana 3 to Kamaikui l_ Beguming at the Northeast corner of this easement of land, being also a point on the southerly side of Lot 1, the true a~rnuth and distance to the Southwest of Lot 1 being 252° 53' 25" 141.12 fect, the coordinates of said point of beginning refereed to Government Suety Triangulation S'tatiion `~CAHEI,p being 2,616.90 feat North 6581.92 feet Bast and " mm~ing by azimuths measured clockwise from Txue South; LThence, for the next ten (10) courses following partially along the remainders of Lot E, Lot D, Lot C, and 1. 33?° 2l' S7" 15.19 feet to a point; Z. 66° 26' 25" 472,75 feet to a point; 3. 77° 27' S0" 248.20 feet to a point; M 4. 88° 09' 17" 192.58 feet to a poi S. 63° 44' 2g" 227.50 feet to 8 point; 6. 74° 13' 42" 92.83 feet to a point; 7. 93° 39' 35" 242.69 feet to a point; ° 8. 75 28 24 Zz0.77 feet to a point; 9. 79° 4l' 37" 333.22 feet to a point; [ 10. 163° 40' 38" 50.28 feet to a point; EX1il$IT "A~+ Psge 7 of 9 Thence, for the next eight (8) courses following along Lot A: 11. 259° 41' 37" 336.65 feet to a point; _ 12. 255° 28' 24" 226.93 feet to a point; 13. 273° 39' 35" 242.13 feet to a point; 14, 254° 13' 42" __79,68 feet to a poi 15. 243° 44' 29" 233.73 feet to a point; 16. 268° 09' 1 T' 198.72 feet to a point; 17. 257° 27' S0" 91.78 feet to a point; -l I Thence along the remainder of Lot A: 18. 167° 27' S0° 62.43 feet to a point; ~ i ~ _ Thence, for the next twelve (12) courses, along the Southeasterly side of Hualali road ~ i 19. 291° 28' 30" 40.06 feet to a point; ~ 20. 283° 53' 00" 42.21 feet to a point; 21. 275°25' 00" 15.18 feet to a point; 22. 245° 19' 00" 32.35 feet to a point; _ 23. 246° 45' 30" 33.61 feet to a point; _ 24. 260° 44' 30" 46.36 feet to a point; 25. 255° 58' 30" 36.1 S feet to a point; 26. 256° 57' 30" 44.68 feet to a point; 27. 252° 02' 00" 31.42 feet to a point; 7,8. 252° 59' 30" ?0.91 feet to a point; E~g~ "A" ~ Page 8 of 9 _ ~ _ nm-,. _ ~S ' f L TOGE'T'HER WITH AND 3UT3JECT, HOWEVER TO: L 1. An unlocated ten foot wide easement, together with the right of reasonable access thereto, in favor or for the benefit of Lots A, D and E for the placement, maintenance and connection to wastewater lines over and across Lots B and C, which easement, if not utilized by any one or more of the adjoining Lots, shall ~ pctingnished of its own accord _ as to any such Lot not utilizing the easement ten (10) years from the date of the conveyance document conveying this easement to the benefited lots. 2. Agreement by and between .TKS PARTNERS, L.P., BRIAN R. COOK - DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Hawaii corporation, HU-KO-PA I.LC, a Hawaii limited 1 liability company, WAIA~IA SYSTEM, LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company, THE KONA COFFEE & TLA COMp,4Ny, LLC, and HUALALAI pAg~~ OF KONA, LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company, including but not limited to: a That the owners of Lots ,A, B, C, D and E, shall coordinate and coo optimal development of access, water system, sewer s 1P ~ the improvements and all utilities to service all of Lots A, B, C, D and E and L- b• ~ to wastewater lines traversing Lots B and C, the owners of each of the Lots utilizing wastewater lines over and across Lots B and C shall contribute an amount equal to their prorate share of the costs of the development of the wastewater lines across Lots B and C, sack cornn'bution shall be determined by the each Iot owners final lot count developed with their Lot as the numerator divided by the total number of subdivided Lots developed, or to be developed, on all five Lots (A-L~j, as the denominator. L ALSO SUBJEG°I', HOWEyER TO: ~ 1. The terms and previsions, including the failure to comply with any covenants, conditions and reservations, contained in the following: t INSTRUMENT: DL'CLARATION OF AQrREIIV1FdVT' FOR KAHULUI 96-ACRE CONSOLIDATION AND 1tESUBDMSION SUB: NO. ~ 20040120 DATED: November 20, 2004 C RECORDED: Document No. ~ ~ tf " ~b l l_ I EXFIIBIT "A" Page 9 of 9 -.-~..,~..r_,~~,.~,.z,~, 16 ATTACHMENT 3 _ 4.~ y} .~.ry, f :f .ev f ^•~e yam, ~ ...e.: n'..~ . r= ~ ~~Y'~f y~l~.• i.tYA~~ _"i:..'_,T,,....n. E~ECHTMAPI~CONSUL•TIPdGr LEoC HC 1 Box 41~~ ICca}au,,l~~vai~i 96749.9710 phone: (806)" G6>7636`fax: (806) 443.0065 e-mail: bo~Ctechtlri~neonsultin~.com ARCIIABOIACICAI„ TU12AL, 11NbI'~19'fORICAL SIVDIES November 30, 2005 RC-0285 MaryAnne Maigret Assistant Hawaii Island Archaeologist _ DLNR-SHPD 74383 Kealakehe Parkway Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Dear MaryAnne: Please find enclosed An Archaeological Inventory Survey of ?7bIK 3-7-5-017.042 for your review and approval. I have also sent a copy to Kapolei along with the submittal sheet. Should you have any questions, or would like further information please don't hesitate to contact tne. Regazds _ Bob Rechttnan, Ph.D. ~ Principal Archaeologist Cc: Dave Brown (Branch Chiefl i i d~ Date: November 30, 2005 Submittal Sheet for Historic Preservation Review Filing Fees State Historic Preservation Division 601 Kamokila Blvd., #555, Kapolei, Hawaii 96707 Agency/Firm (Requesting Review): Rechtman Consulting LLC Contact: Bob Rechtman Phone: " $86=~'b'~.........».._ .............._.Fax:......ddb-0~b$..................»....... E-Mail:.......bobi~r'ecfitman'consiiTtirig:con Address: HC 1 Box 4149 Keaau Hawa1196749 Title of Report/Plan: AnArchaeologlcallnventorySurveyofTMK:3-7-5-017.042 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...1~~=6~95...._ Island; Haw_all District: North Kona Ahupua'a: ,,,Kahului 2nd.». _ TMK[(1)1-t-001:001]:~~ .,~3),7`5-01~`:~6d2~......_......»..» ..................._......».»w.»...._....._....._........................._................._..... Submitted Plan/Report Fee & Type: (A11 reports or plans submitted to the SHPD for roview shall be accompanied by the appropriate feo in accordance with HAR § 13-275-4 and §284-4). Indicate here (X) ifreport is a re-submittal (no fee charged) 550 Archaeological Assessment - SISO Archaeological inventory Survey Plan X - 5450 Archaeological, Architectural or Ethnographic Survey Report ? ~ - S1S0 Preservation Plan _ 52S Monitoring Plan 5150 Archaeological Data Recovery Plan 5250 Burial Treatment Plan 5100 Archaeological Monitoring Report, if resources reported „ • , 5450 Archaeological Data Recovery Report 5450 Ethnographic Documentation Report 825 Burial Disinterment Report 550 Osteological Analysis Report _ Make check payable to "Hawai'i Historic Preservation Special Fund." A service charge of 5l5 will be assessed on all dishonored checks pursuant to HRS §40-35.5" A copy of this form will be m ailed or faxed back to you and Fee Total: S 450,,..•,,..•, will serve as your receipt. For Of'tice Use Onl Date Receivod: Recei t No.: . Payment Method• Cash 5 Check: Check No.: - Log. Na: Rcceipt Issued by• Treasury Deposit Receipt No: - j i RC-0285 An Ar chaeological Inventory Survey of ~ TMK: 3-7-5-017:042 ~f~': ~ i r Kahului 2nd Ahupua`a ~ North Kon a Dis tri ct ' Island of Hawaii PREPARED BY: Lon E. Bulgrin, M.A. and Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D. PREPARED FOR: I ' Phil Tinguely Hualalai Partners of Kona, LLC PO Box 9013 Kailua-Kona HI 96745 November 2005 RECFiTMAN CONSULTiNG~ LLC L E iC; 1 lic~x 4(49 Kea`au, Haivat'i aa749.971~ phone: (8t`8) 9tia•7636 fs?x: (8C8) 443-~hti5 c•maJ: hob(n~rechcmanctaisulting.cutn Ah'1'~IAFOId1f.R7A1., CUI;~IIRAt, AND J'{IS9Y)Fll'AI. s'11;1]IF:S i - - - j - - - - - - - ~ I i i~ _ ~ An Archaeological Inventory Survey of TMK:3-7-5-017:042 _ ~ Kahului 2nd Ahupua`a North Kona District r Island of Hawaii j i ~ I - f RLCNTMAN CONSULTING 1 i i~ RC-0285 I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the request of Mr. Phil Tinguely of Hualalai Partners of Kona, LLC, Rechtman Consulting, LLC conducted an archaeological inventory survey of a roughly 15-acre parcel along Hual8lai Road in Kahului i 2nd Ahupua`a, Noah Kona District, Island of Hawaii (TMK:3-7-5-017:042). As a result of the current L archaeological inventory survey six previously unrecorded sites (SIHP Sites 24562, 24563, 24564, 24565, L 24566, and 24567) were discovered and two previously recorded core-filled walls (SI~iP Sites 24553 and ( 24555) were documented. In addition, three test units were excavated at SIHP Site 24562. - ' SIHP Site 24562, a Precontact habitation site, is considered significant under Criterion D for the data that it has already provided as well as for the information that it has the potential to provide relative to Precontact settlement practices at the kuJa/kalu `ulu interface of the Kona field system. It is argued that further data recovery is needed to augment the excavation data obtained during the testing. Data recovery excavations could shed further light on site function and age. Settlement patterns of the kula/kalu'ulu transitipnal zone are poorly understood and this site has potential to increase archaeological understanding 1 of the past uses of these traditional agricultural zones. Six recorded Historical Period archaeological sites (SIHP Sites 24553, 24555, 24563, 24564, 24565, and 24566) are all considered significant under Criterion D for the data that they have yielded relative to the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century land use of the project area and for sugarcane agriculture and ranching within the larger North Kona region. It is argued that the data collected from these six sites is adequate for mitigating any potential impacts resulting from the proposed development of the study parcel. Therefore, no further work is the recommended treatnent for SIHP Sites 24553, 24555, 245563, 24564, 24565, and 24566. I SIHP Site 24567, aHistoric/Modern rock cluster that is interpreted to have supported a wooden fence post, is not considered a significant site. Therefore, no further work is the recommended treatment for SIHP Site 24567. l i I I t ii ` . _ i ~ I ~ RC-0284 i ~ i ~ ~ Contents ' ~ INTRODUCTION 1 ~ BACKGROUND ~ Project Area Description i Cultural Contexts 1 5 ~ Prior Archaeological Studies and Project Expectations FIELDWORK AND ANALYSIS i ~ Field and Laboratory Procedures 8 8 Site Descriptions, Test Excavations, and Functional Interpretations I 10 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION AND TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 23 REFERENCES CITED 26 i Figures I .Project area location ~ 2 2. Portion of TMK:3-7-5-017 showing current study parcel 042 ~ • ( ) 3 3. View of the project area from the eastern boundary looking west ~ 4 4. Vegetation within the survey parcel prior to the reintroduction of cattle 4 5. Project area plan view 6. SIHP Site 24562, Feature A plan view 9 i I 12 7. SIHP Site 24562, Feature A, TU-3 west wall profile ; 13 8. SIHP Site 24562, Feature A, TU-3 west wall profile. 13 9. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A TU-4 west wall ~ profile 14 10. SIHP Site 24562 TU-4 base of excavation view to west ~ 11. SIHP Site 24562, Feature B view to north......... 14 , 12. SIHP Site 24562 Feature B plan view 15 13. SIHP Site 24562, Feature B, TU-2 west wall profile 16 ~ 17 ' . SIHP Site 234562, Feature B, TU-2 west wall ' 17 15. SIHP Site 24563 view to easbnortheast. ~ 18 16. SIHP Site 24564 plan view...... ' 19 17. SIHP Site 24564 view to north 19 ~ 7 iii , I RC-0285 ~ 18. SIHP Site 24565 plan view 20 19. SIHP Site 24565 southeastern mound view to the east 21 20. SIHP Site 24565 southwestern mound view to the southeast 21 21. SIHP Site 24566 view to the south 22 22. SIHP Site 24567 23 l I Tables 1. Traditional Hawaiian agricultural zones 5 2. Archaeological sites recorded during the current inventory survey. 10 ~ 3. Artifacts recovered from SIHP Site 24562, Feature A TU-3. ' 11 4. Site significance and treatment recommendations 24 i I I l 1 iv [ ~ - - - ~ ~ RC-0285 I - INTRODUCTION j At the request of Mr. Phtl Tmguely of Hualalai Partners of Kona, LLC, Rechtman Consultin ,LLC conducted an archaeological inventory survey of a roughly i5-acre project area along Hua181ai Road in Kahului 2nd Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii (Figure 1). The current study area consists of one parcel (TMK:3-7-5-017:042) (Figure 2), This survey was undertaken in accordance with Hawaii Administrative Rules 13§13-284, and was performed in compliance with the Rules Governing Minimal Standards for Archaeological Inventory Surveys and Reports as contained in Hawaii Administrative Rules l 13§13-276. Compliance with the above standards is sufficient for meeting the initial historic preservation review process requirements of both the Department of Land and Natural Resource~State Historic Preservation Division (DLNR-SHPD) and the County of Hawaii Planning Department. f This report contains background information outlining the project azea's physical and cultural contexts, a presentation of previous archaeological work in the area and current survey expectations based on that previous work, an explanation of the project methods, detailed descriptions of the archaeological resources encountered, interpretation and evaluation of those resources, and lastly, treatment recommendations for all of the documented sites. BACKGROUND To generate expectations regarding the nature of the historic properties that might exist on the stud ~ and to provide an appropriate background to assess any resources that are encountered, the specific asazwell as general physical and cultural contexts are presented along with prior archaeological studies relevant to the project area. Project Area Description The current study area is bounded to the north by a stone wall previously identified as SIHP Site 24555 ~ _ I (Bulgrin and Rechtman 2005); to the east by an undeveloped parcel (TMK:3-7-5-017:043 that was previously subject to an archaeological inventory survey [Bulgrin and Rechtman 2005)) to the south by a stone wall previously identified as SIHP Site 24553 (Bulgrin and Rechtman 2005); and to the west by an undeveloped parcel (TMK:3-7-5-017.041) (see Figure 2). Terrain in the project area is gently undulating l and elevation ranges from 500 to 550 feet above sea level. The project area is chazacterized by Punalu`u extremely rocky peat (Sato et al. 1973), swell-drained, thin organic soil over bedrock. The underlying I bedrock is pahoehoe dating to more than 10,000 years 9.P. (Wolfe and Morris 1996). ! Despite the seemingly consistent semi-and condition of this area, seasonality is evident. Throughout ' ~ the Hawaiian Islands, the wanner and drier summer months, traditionally referenced as kau, extend from May to September, and the wetter, cooler months (ho'orlo) extend from October to April (Handy and Handy 1972). The temperatures in the Kona area are generally consistent with this seasonal pattern, ranging - between 62-80 degrees in winter and 68-86 degrees in summer (Sch~lt 1984). However, the ryp~cal rainfall ~ pattern differs considerably from that seen elsewhere; in all elevations along the Kona coast, rainfall during ' i - kau is typically greater than that dunngho `orlo (Schilt 1984). A ' 1 I RC-0285 19 190 Portions of USGS 7.5 minute series quadrangles Kailua and Kealakekua HI 1995 . K ua. w • Ko ~ • ~I~ • L • P i o ~w , ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ l_ A ~ 'Oo i • OQ • ?ti ~ \L I Lan/ek ~n s. °4 Oneo Ba ~ V k~ r f r Ke/a9 t= ~ • i~ ~ ~ L C7 Paakai m ~ ~ •r r• ~ 1 ~ 1 ocks~ ` a~'~ ~ ~ •Ta ksr O v T ~ O~c? Hdicre ` ` '9 PArk~, • • ~ ~ U L } • ~ eil • i • , L • i • • ~ I~YO~CCt area ~ _ t 3 ~ ~ . ~ ~ v ~ ~ M PROJECfARRA ~ ~ ' ~ • ' ~ t 1 L • + 1 • ~ apt .ei*r~} P Island ofHawai`i ~ \ ~ •t L 0 .25 1 ~ ? ~ ? ` L , ~ f Figure 1. Pm~ect area location. ' l 2 i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J RC-0285 I I 1, Y ,+r t ~ I rrN. ~ ~ I ° 4 Is ~ w I I Ni 1V ~.j ~Y ~ e ~ --4 ~ ° s q } ~ ~ w ~ h I i~ !~q ~ I ~ ~ O ° h tj;\ ti~ ~ I ~ I w r e ~;I L I ~ ~ dl .r V 1 I I ~ A w1 I 2 © '71_ ~n 2ti 1 I ~ ~ y~ 0 ~ ti , W ~ ~ x ~ . ~t p lii/Y~ \ It •SI iyl ; I J t1 . ail ~~Y 1 0 ~ ; ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •e S~ I A R ~ ISM ~ 2 I ~ E o • 1~ i I A ~~pj J = , RI i ~ ~_t I Y y ~ I F~ ~ I ~ f _ ~ ` 1 w° - ~ II ~ 9 m~ ~ Nips R /Q C_.,' v ~ M~uArr IO i I t ~ ~ ~I~ u`~ ~pr~ I t / r ~ N 1 ~lt r.t ; ~ ,r ~ o f ~ ~ ~ :i ) ~ $ t~~? AI ~ ~ Cfj ( I I I I V ~ 1 /t1 II ~ NI N/N/ ~1 't I ' ' 1 ) O 1 ~ ,M p i.~ `V t ~ 11 ~ b ~ I ` , i ~ ~ •4 + ~ c 1 I/ ~ i I ~ I ( . , 0 ~ 1 ~ © ~ 'I d~ / 2 fl . ~ , o ~ I n' a o ~ ~ RwRw~ , Q 6M~ Nld' ~ 1: gore 2. Tax Map Key 3-7-5-017 showing current study parcel (042) ' 3 i i i RC-0285 ~ Vegetation within the project azea consists of a combination of kiawe (Prosopis pallida), koa haole (Leucaena glauca) and a variety of grasses, vines, weeds, and shrubs (Figure 3). At the onset of archaeological survey vegetation within the pazcel was extremely dense (Figure 4), In order to increase survey visibility cattle were temporarily reintroduced into the property, and the intensive survey was completed after the cattle had several weeks to eat. Prior impacts within the project area can be described as substantial. Mechanical earth moving associated with extensive grubbing is evident throughout the lot. - - ~s;t e} ~,l . t t.;ti~ y~3 F I 4'~< S~c4. s r. a ~ ' ~ ~ f r . Figure 3. View of the project area from eastern boundary looking west, , i I r1 r r e: c J ~7. ..y'b, s ~ Figure 4. Vegetation within the survey parcel prior to the reintroduction of cattle. 4 i i' I RC-0285 r I Cultural Contexts The project area is in what has been termed the Kona Field System (Gordy 1995, Newman 1970, Schilt 1984). The Kona Field Sysytem extends north at least to Kaij Ahupua`a and south to Honaunau, west from the coastline and east to the forested slopes of Hualslai (Gordy 1995). A large portion of this azea is ~ designated in the Hawaii SIHP (State Inventory of Historic Places) as Site 50-10-37-6601 and has been determined eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The basic characteristics and ' elevationally delimited zones within this agriculturaUresidential system as presented in Newman (1970) have been confirmed and elaborated on by archaeological (Gordy 1995) and ethnohistorical investigations j (Kelly 1983). The current study parcel stands right at the recognized interface between the traditional kula and kalu'ulu zones (at 500 feet elevation). { Gordy (1995) presents a summary of archaeological settlement patterns for Kona that is based on previous archaeological work as well as on observations made by explorers and missionaries during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Gordy bases his reconstruction on the Hawaiian terms for the major vegetation zones used to define and segregate space within an ahupua'a. It was these native terms - ` (Table 1) that were used during the Mahele in the description of land claims. Gordy also describes a narrow shoreline zone that was primarily a residential area. Immediately behind the shoreline is thekula. Table 1. Traditional Hawaiian a~riculturat zones Zone Annual Rare all Descrlptlon Elevation Prim ~ Crops Kula c 30 50 m Plain, open country Coast-500 ft Wauke, gourd and sweet ~ (0.8-1.2 m) inland from the coast _ _ i (0-150 m) potato ' Kalu or c. 40-55 in. Luxuriant, cultivable 500-1,000 ft. Breadfruit, wauke, sweet ! Kalu'ulu (1.00-1.35 m) zone (150-300 m) potato, mountain apple, some ~ taro ~ :fpa'a c. 55-80 in. Dryland cultivation 1,000-2,500 ft Taro, sweet potato, sugar ~ (1.35-2.00 m) zone (300-750 m) cane, ki, and banana 'Ama'u c. 80 in. Upland/fern zone 2,000-3,000 ft Banana and `ama `u (fern) - (2.0 m) (600-900 m) i l The kula zone is the area from sea level to 150 meters elevation. Annual rainf ! all m the kula zone is 75 to 125 centimeters. This lower elevation zone is traditionally associated with habitation and the cultivation ( of sweet potatoes, paper mulberry, and gourds. Agricultural features, such as clearing mounds, planting I mounds, planting depressions, modified outcrops, pavements, enclosures, and planting terraces, are I common throughout much of this zone (Hammatt and Clark 1980, Hammatt and Folk 1980, Haun et al. I ~ 1998, Schilt 1984). Dwellings were scattered throughout the agricultural portion of the kula, but they are ~ commonly concentrated along the shoreline (Gordy 1981, Hammatt 1980). The shoreline zone, extending inland approximately 200 meters, was used primarily for permanent habitation and other non-agricultural activities, such as canoe storage, ceremonial and buria! practices, recreation, and fishingrelated activity. ' - Royal and high chiefly centers were also situated within the shoreline of the kula. These complexes included dwellings for chiefs and their entourage, places of refuge, and other structures. Several large and I densely populated royal centers were located along the shoreline between Kailua and Honaunau (Gordy 1995, Tomonar~-Tuggle 1993) A variety of non-residential features are present m the kula neaz royal centers, including small agricultural plots, and fomtal and informal burial features (Gordy 1995, Han et al. ! 1986, Schilt 1984, Tainter 1973, Tomanari-Tuggle 1993) Kahului is generally considered to have been a place ofhigh-status residences and ceremonial complexes ~I 5 I f i RC-028S l i Nineteenth century habitation features built on stone platforms were present in the kola Hammatt and Meeker 1979, Schilt 1984). Stone platforms with clearly defined internal divisions are prese t (O'Haze and i Wolforth 1997) and probably reflect a change in residential plans from a complex of multiple, separate, j single-function structures (men's sleeping, women's sleeping, cooking) to a single structure with multiple rooms and functions (entire family's quarters and cooking) (Ladefoged 1991). Burial features with historic- era artifacts and azchitectwe (i.e., mortaz and corrugated tin) aze present in the lower elevations. These are _ I frequently isolated structures, but burial also occurred within residential platforms during the Historic Period (O'Hare and Wolforth 1997). Inland of the kula is the kalu'ula. This zone was used primarily for breadfruit, with an under story growth of sweet potatoes and paper mulbeny. Cordy (1995:7) notes "archaeologists have not been able to identify this zone." He goes on to state that, "the area at the edge of the Kealakekua's cliff`', which was ' observed to be in this zone at European contact, has archaeological site patterns similar to the 'apa'a zone ~ [the next highest zone in elevation] (cf. Soehren and Newman 1968: Kaschko and Rosendahl 1987). Thus the kal'ulu and `vpa'a zones may well have neaz identical site patterns." (Cordy 1995:7). ~ During the eazly nineteenth century, following the breaking of the traditional eating kapu by Liholiho, Ka`ahumanu, and the Queen mother Keopuolani, which was a symbolic gesture that led to the demise of the entire Hawaiian religious system, the older places of worship (heiau) no longer held their significance. Many such places were dismantled, and the stones used for other building projects such as the Kuakini Wall and Mokusikaua Church. The religious, socioeconomic, and demographic changes that took place in the period between 1790 and the 1840s, promoted the establishment of a Euro-American style of Land ownership, and the Great Mahele was the vehicle for determining ownership of the native land. During this period (1848-1899), the Mahele defined the land interests of the King (Kamehameha III), the high-ranking chiefs, and the low- ~ ranking chiefs, the konohikl. The chiefs and konohiki were required to present their claims to the Land ~ Commission to receive awards for lands provided to them by Kamehameha III. They were also required to provide commutations to the government in order to receive royal patents on their awards. The lands were f identified by name only, with the understanding that the ancient boundaries would prevail until the land t- could be surveyed. This process expedited the work of the Land Commission and speeded the transfers (Chinen 1961:13). ` During this process all lands were placed in one of three cafe ones: Crown I 8 Lands (for the occupant of the throne), Government Lands, and Konohiki Lands. All three types of land were subject to the rights of the native tenants. Commoners could make claims for land, and if substantiated, they would receive awazds referred to as kuleana, from the Land Commission. During this period, other land grants were also made to individuals directly from the Kingdom. In 1862, the Commission of Boundaries (Boundary Commission) was established in the Kingdom of Hawaii to legally set the boundaries of all the ahupua'a that had been f ~ awarded as a part of the Mahele. Subsequently, in 1874, the Commissioners of Boundaries was authorized 1- to certify the boundaries for lands brought before them. The primary informants for the boundary descriptions were old native residents of the lands, many of which had also been claimants for kuleana during the Mahele. The information was collected primarily between 1873 and 1885. The testimonies were generally given in Hawaiian and simultaneously transcribed in English. The Missionary William Ellis visited the vicinity of the current project area in 1823 and described the following: Leaving Kairua [Kailuaj, we passed through the villages thickly scattered along the shore to the southward. The country around looked unusually green and cheerful, owing to the frequent ram, which for some months past have fallen on this side of the island. Even the barren lava, over which we traveled, seemed to veil its sterility beneath frequent tufts of tall waving grass, or spreading shrubs and flowers. 6 - - ~I I j RC-0285 The side of the hills, laid out for a considerable extent in gardens and fields, and generally ~ cultivated with potatoes, and other vegetables, were beautiful. I The number of heiaus, and depositories of the dead, which we passed, convinced us that ~ this part of the island must formerly have been populous. The latter were built with ' i fragments of lava, laid up evenly on the outside, generally about eight feet long, from four ' to six broad, and about four feet high. Some appeazed very ancient, other had evidently been standing but a few years, (1963[1823]:72-73). i In 1848 during the Mdhele the majority of Kahului 2 was awarded to Grace Kama`iku`i, (LCAw. 8516-B:3). Eight kuleana claims were made within the Kahalui 2. Most claims were small and located along the shoreline and in mauka (above 700 feet) regions (Haun and Henry 2004:8). Three claims were for coastal house lots (LCAw 7336:1 to Kuapu'u; LCAw 7073:8 to Kapa`e; and LCAw 10373 to Niniha) and the rest were for makka cultivation plots. There were no kuleana claimed within the current project area. Population declined and settlements became smaller in the Kona area during the Territorial Period (1900-1959). Coastal occupation was concentrated in the small villages of Kailua and Keauhou, with permanent residences with gardens and animal pens scattered along the shoreline. Upland areas of Kahului _ ( were associated with the Kona Sugaz Company from 1891 until 1904 and later from 1908 to 1926 with the l Kona Development Company (Dorrance and Morgan 2000:112). The Kona Development Company employed both the predecessor sugar company's mill and plantation lands. However, the Kona ~ ( Development Company used private contactors and independent homesteaders to provide the cane. j ~ Harvests were transported by the West Hawaii Railway Company, a narrow gauge railroad, which was _ , owned by the same consortium. An historic trestle associated with this railway is located mauka of the project area. The railroad was subsequently sold to Japanese investors. Walls may have been constructed to mark cane field boundazies in the early yeazs of the twentieth century. In 1927, Manuel Gomes acquired the Kahului ahupua'a along with Wai`aha ahupua'a, from the failed Kona Development Company (O'Hare and Wolforth 1997). The !and became part of the Gomes Ranch and was actively used for cattle grazing and stockading until the 1960s. Most of the stone walls seen in the study area today are a legacy of the Gomes Ranch. ( Prior Archaeological Studies and Project Expectations ( Archaeological investigations previously conducted in Kahului Ahupua`a have primarily concentrated on the zone makai of the current project azea (see Haun and Henry,2004 for a thorough overview). Hammat and Tomonazi-Tuggle (1978), Hammat and Meeker (1979) and O'Hare and Wolforth (1997) surveyed and tested a 32 acre parcel stretching from Ali`i Drive to the Kuakini wall. Sites in the vicinity of the Kuakini ~ wall include: a herau, a habitation structure that may be associated with some form of specialized I production, a burial, and walls (O'Hare and Wolforth 1997:4-2,4-3). Rechtman and Henry (1999) , conducted an inventory survey for a badge along Ali`i Drive within Kahului 1st and 2nd ahupua'a. Walls and a habitation site were documented in this study. Three surveys were carried out for the proposed A!i'i Highway project (Ching et al. 1973; Dunn and Rosendahl 1991; Haun et al. 1998). SIHP Site 6331, a ( habitation site, comprised of eleven features, was recorded. Rechtman and Dougherty surveyed a twelve acre parcel along Ali'i Drive in Kahului 2nd. Five archaeological sites were recorded including three i Precontact permanent habitation saes, one Precontact temporary habitation site, and a historic wall. Haun _ ~ and Henry (2004) conducted an archaeological survey in a 35 1 acre parcel makai of Kuakini Highway in Kahului 2nd Ahupua`a Seventeen sites made up of 103 features were discovered. The Precontact sites _ ' discovered were g g ' typical of the coastal portion of the kula zone includin a ricultural features, temporary and permanent habitation sites, and burials. Historical sites discovered were all ranch related walls Other ' archaeological investigations within Kahului lst and 2nd ahu ua'a ~ p (Dye 1978, Kennedy et al. 1992, Rosendahl 1989, Soehren 1976, 1979) have documented Precontact and Historical sites that are typical of the kula section of the Kona Field System. The findings of the pnor investigations allow for a comprehensive portrayal of past land use and settlement patterns for the area. The coastal kula areas of _ ~ 7 ~ l , I f RC•0285 greater Kailua-Kona contain numerous late prehistoric and early historic residential sites were associated with the more privileged members of Hawaiian society. Also known to exist in this region are heiau and burial features. Such sites aze known from both historic records and archaeological investigation. Burial sites both within habitation features and in dedicated burial features are not uncommon in the area (O'Hare and Wolforth 1997). Also common in this area are small agricultural features, most often associated with the residential sites, but not always. Historic Period sites, frequently I related to cattle ranching, also left their mark on the landscape; stone walls and cattle enclosures are found consistently along the area mauka of present day Ali`i Drive (former ala loa). t Haun and Henry (2001) conducted an archaeological survey of an 87 acre parcel mauka of the current t ~ project area located in Kahului 1st and 2nd ahupua'a. Twenty seven sites made up of 349 features were discovered. Precontact features identified included two agricultural enclosures, two agricultural terraces, a . modified outcrop, an agricultural wall, a small agricuhural complex with eleven features, a complex of 33 li featwes interpreted as elements of the Kona field system, a temporary habitation modified outcrop, and two permanent habitation platforms. Historical sites recorded included a complex of 101 features interpreted to correspond to Land Commission Awards, a complex of 181 clearing featwes interpreted as associated with I sugazcane cultivation, a historic road with a retaining wall, a historic railroad trestle, and twelve ranch related walls or enclosures. Bulgrin and Rechtman (2005) carried out an azchaeological inventory survey of a fifteen acre aroel immediately adjacent to and mauka of the current protect area. Six archaeological sites were recordedPFow of the sites were core filled stone boundary walls dating from the 1890s until the 1960s. One site, SIHP Site 24556, was an encloswe related to twentieth century ranching activities; and the sixth site (SIHP Site 24557) was a Precontact temporary habitation modified outcrop. Cultural material recovered from test I. excavation at this latter site included marine shell, coral, mammal bone, volcanic glass flakes, and basalt tools. Based on the previously conducted archaeological studies in the vicinity of the current project area, and the background information presented above, a set of field expectations can be generated. Household agricultural sites, permanent and temporary habitation sites, historic ranching walls, and burial features [ have been documented mauai of the current study area. All of these fit the pattern for the coastal portions of the Kona Field System. Precontact agricultural features with a scattering of temporary and permanent habitation sites have been discovered mauka of the project area. Historic features associated with land clearing, transportation, and agricultwe, as well as ranch related walls and enclosures have been discovered f as well. Dwing the current fieldwork it is possible that temporary habitation features and associated agricultural features will be encountered that date from the Precontact and early Historic Periods. The project area was part of a failed sugarcane plantation and later became the Gomes Ranch. These Historic L. Period activities likely resulted in the disturbance of some of the earlier features and these activities should be visible on the landscape in the form of large clearing mounds, corafilled walls, and enclosures. I~ L FIELDWORK AND ANALYSIS Between January 24-28, and August 1-4 2005, Matthew R. Clazk, B.A., David Nelson, B.A., Mark J. 1 Winburn, B.A, Christopher Hand, B.A., Oliver M. Bautista, B.A. and Michael E. Rivera, B.A. under the direction of Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D. carried out the fieldwork for the current project. Field and Laboratory Procedures l ' Fieldwork included an on-foot survey of the entire project area and test excavations at a selected feature. Survey transects were oriented north/south and the surveyors maintained a 10-meter spacing interval using L Garmin 76s handheld GPS technology. Features identified during the survey were flagged and plotted on a field map. These features were later cleared, recorded in detail, photographed and placed on a large-scale map of the project area (Figure 5). ~ - 8 ~ - - - - - - f E ' RC-0285 t I~ I 0 20 ~0 R Scale m meters i (heights m centimeters) c~~ ` Feature B ~ Feature A _ SIHP Site 24562 I N j ~ ~ .n N N ~ - SIHP Site 24565 = I SIHP Site 24563 ( SIHP Site 24566 SIHP Site 24564 ~1 i_ _ ' SIHP Site 24567 r _ ~ Figure 5 Project area plan view. I - ~ g I 1 RC-0285 Two 1 x t meter test units (TU-3 and TU-0) were excavated at SIHP Site 24562 Feature A unit (TU-2) was excavated at SIHP Site 24562 Feature B. These excavation units were dug following natural strata. Where natural layers could not be determined, excavation followed 10-centimeter azbitrary _ levels. All excavated material was passed through %,-inch screening in an attempt to recover cultural material. Excavation units were dug until bedrock was encountered. L Excavation record forms were maintained for each test unit and photographs were taken. Upon f ~ completion of the units, prior to backfilling, stratigraphic information was recorded and profiles drawn. Artifacts recovered from the screening process were cleaned, weighed, counted, and described. Faunal I remains were tabulated and identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible. Where applicable, the Number of Identified Specimens (NISP) and the Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI) were determined. Site Descriptions, Test Excavations, and Functional Interpretations I I During the current archaeological inventory survey six previously unrecorded sites (SIHP Sites 24562, 24563, 24564, 24565, 24566, and 24567) were discovered and two previously recorded core-filled walls l (SIHP Sites 24553 and 24555) were documented. In addition, three test units were excavated at SIHP Site 24562. Descriptions for each site and the test units excavated aze presented below. A listing of the sites including formal type, functional type, and temporal affiliation is presented in Table 2. The location of each I site is shown on Figure 5. ` Table 2. Archaeolo ical sites reco R rded dunn~ the current inventory survey SHIP Na Formal Type Functional Type ,4~_ I 24553 Wall Boundary mazker Historic 24555 Wall Boun marker 24562 ~ Historic Modified outcrop Temporary habitation Precontact 24563 Mound Cleazing piles Historic 24564 Mound Clearing piles Historic 24563 Mound Clearing piles Historic 24566 Mound Clearing piles Historic l 24567 Rock cluster Fence st su ort Historic/modem SIHP Site 24553 4 Site 24553 is a core filled wall running roughly east/west that was initially recorded by Bulgrin and 4 Rechtman (2005) in an inventory survey of the immediately adjacent mauka property. The wall is 1.2 meters tall and 60 centimeters wide. Site 24553 spans the entire southern boundary of the survey parcel and extends beyond to the west (see Figure 5). Site 24553 is collapsed in places and has been restacked in other J places during modern times. Site 24553 was most likely constructed by the Kona Sugar Company (1891- 1904) and later used by the Kona Development Company (1906-1926) and the Gomes Ranch (1927.1960s) ( to mark the parcel boundary and for livestock control purposes. ~ SIHP Site 24555 Site 24555 is a core filled wall (See Figure 5.) originally recorded by Bulgrin and Rechtman (2005) that ~ trends roughly east/west (80°/260°), stands 1.2 meters in height, and averages 70 centimeters in width. Modem wve mounted on metal "T-posts" and two inch galvanized pipe runs along the top of the wall in some places. Site preservation varies along the wall from good to collapsed. Portions of the wall have been I reconstructed in modem times. Site 24555 marks the northern boundary of the study parcel and runs along the ahupua'a boundary ~ between Kahului 1st and Kahului 2nd. The wall terminates at HualBlai Road and presumably extended further to the east prior to the construction of the Kailua-HSlualoa Road (now Hual!<lai Drive) in the late 1880s (Clark and Rechtman 2004:13). Site 24555 was probably constructed by the Kona Sugaz Company (1891-1904) as a parcel boundary mazker and later used by the Kona Development Company (1908-1926) ~r and the Gomes Ranch (1927-1960s) to mark the parcel boundary and for livestock control purposes. t lU C RC•0285 l~ SIHP Site 24562 ' SIHP Site 24562 consists of two modified outcrop featwes located in the southeastern portion of the project area (see Figure S). Based on formal surface attributes and the results of test excavation these features i ' appeaz to be related and collectively have functioned as a temporary habitation site during Precortact times. ~ Feature A is a roughly rectangular modified outcrop with stacked rock walls along portions of all sides. The heights of stacked rock walls range from 40 centimeters to 1.2 meters. The stacked walls in conjunction with the pahoehoe fill that they retain, serve to extend the surface area of the outcrop. Cracks in the pahoehoe bedrock are also filled creating a relatively level surface. Overall the feature measures 12 meters north/south and 8 meters east/west (Figures 6). In the center of the feature, one meter west of the eastern edge, there is a distinct pavement. This pavement is roughly rectangular and measures approximately 1.S meters by 1.5 meters. This level surface ~ is composed of medium sized pahoehoe cobbles and is raised 30 centimeters above the rest of the outcrop. I , TU-3 was excavated in the southwestern portion of the outcrop on a fairly level filled terrace azea. The surface of the unit was a favly uniform level pavement of sub-angular pahoehoe cobbles. Two siratigraphic layers were recorded in the unit (Figures 7 and 8). The fast was an architectural layer, approximately 40 ' centimeters thick, composed of pahoehoe cobbles. No cultural material was discovered in the first layer but one small piece of coral, 4 centimeters in diameter, was observed but not collected. The second layer, j ~ approximately 22 centimeters thick, was 7.SYR 3/4 dark brown silt mixed with small boulders and cobbles resting on decaying bedrock. A volcanic glass core, volcanic glass flakes, marine shell fragments, a ' mammal bone (Sus) fragment, and charcoal were recovered from the second layer. I ' Table 3. Artifacts recovered from S1lAP Site 24562, Feature A, TU-3, La er II. Acc# Material TvPe/Specles Count MNI Weight 1 2 Volcanic glass Core 1 13.5 3 Volcanic glass Flakes 7 6.4 - 4 Shell CYPraea 2 1 0.8 5 Shell Isogrrornen 1 1 0.6 ' 6 Shell Unknown g 7 Mammal bone 2 l 0.5 . Sus 1 1 O.Sg 8 Organic Kukui 4 0.3 ' 9 Organic Charcoal 7 0 4 i TU-4 was excavated in the northwestern portion of the feature. The surface of the unit was made up of ' pahoehoe cobbles of mixed sizes. Two stratigraphic layers were recorded in the unit (Figures 9 and 10). The first layer was an architectural layer made up of mixed size pahoehoe cobbles. The second layer was 7.SYR 3/4 dark brown clay loam averaging 5 centimeters in thickness and extending into depressions in the - pahoehoe bedrock. No cultural material was recovered from the unit. i 11 I i RC-0285 I ~ L (100) 0 1 2 ~ (110) (t;o ~ l_ Scale in meters ' (heights in centimeters) - (60) I l) Rg r DOS v O ~ Il (SO) Q~ O Oo a O / I ~ Oo ~ o ~ ~ ~ poo) po r ~ QQo dD ~ D d ° p ° f ~ oo moo 0 oo~ o ~ 0 00 00 00 I o 00 ~ a o ~ o (t2o) poo) L Figure 6. S1HP Site 24562, Feature A plan view. 12 ~ - ~ I ~ RC-0285 ! ~ to 20 ~ Scale in centimeters I I I Layer l ~ i ~ ~ Layer U r 111 111 ~ 111 Layer [ -Architectural layer cons~stmg of stacked sub-angular pahoehoe cobbles. Layer II -Dark brown (7 SYR 3/4) silt. Figure 7. SII-IP Site 24562, Feature A, TU-3 west wall profile. ' ti;,}'A~'y ;'y-,y'am' ~ =flit ~x °'a~~~~ f ~ ~ ~ b w `i'ii t'k1i~'~i ~ ~ ' a t~ ~ ,,~'y..a ~ ~ ;Y1 ~ fs ~~3V R ~ ~ r ~ ~r~C` /x;14 ~'jP'~'p'~s,~,, ~ 'A ~ ~ ~ ~ • J'I ,t~"1. d] a "a i'~'~,Atwf ''"a- JC ~ ti :4•= ~ - ~ " r: 'Y w 4f e. ,w.'~r . _ ~ ~ ~ i . V7'" t4 y r~r" ~ ; ~ ~S 1, r F>Igure 8. SIHP Site 24562, Feature A, TU3 west wall profile. i 13 i RC-0285 I 0 10 20 Ir Scale to centimeters I i Layer [ Ii I II~ Layer II I fit ITS I Layer I -Architectural layer consisting of mixed size puhoehoe cobbles. Layer [i - Dazk brown (7.SYR 3/4) clay loam. Figure 9. SIHP Site 24562, Feature A, TU-4 west wall profile. P ! ~ f _ ~ 1~ ~ f. ~s ~ ~ ,e+ ' yx~' ~ n'~' ~ t r~ ~ L ~ ~ . Figure 10. SIHP Site 24562, Feature A, TU-4 base of excavation view to east. 14 I - - - - - - - - - - - RC-0285 Feature B is an "L" shaped modified outcrop located 10.5 meters east of Feature A (see Figure 5). The main portion of the feature is a roughly paved area oriented northwesdsoutheast and measuring 5 meters in ~ length by 2.7 meters wide (Figure 11). A second roughly paved area oriented north south extends from the ~ northeast corner, is 10 centimeters lower, and measures 2.7 meters by 1.4 meters. The alignment of the upper paved area is clearly visible, suggesting that the lower area was added on to the upper. ~ The site is constructed of stacked medium and large sized pahoehoe cobbles with cobble pavement in the interior. Two distinctly smoother pavement areas are visible. The western end of the "L" shape has a level surface composed of small pahoehoe cobbles, measuring 2.7 meters east/west x 1.6 meters north/south. A second paved surface, also composed of small pahoehoe cobbles, is located at the I northeastern end of the site. This second paved surface measures 1.2 meters by 1.2 meters. The rest of the outcrop is paved with larger pahoehoe cobbles (Figure 12). TU-2, a (meter by 1 meter excavation unit, was excavated in the northwestern portion of the site (see Figure 12). The surface of the unit was fairly level sub-angular pahoehoe cobbles. Test excavation revealed two layers (Figures 13 and 14). The Post layer was composed of piled rocks. One small piece of coral, approximately 2 centimeters in diameter, was observed in the northwest comer of the unit within Layer 1 but not collected. The second layer was pahoehoe cobbles intermixed with 7.SYR 3/4 dark brown silt J resting on decaying bedrock. One volcanic glass flake was recovered from Level I of Layer 2 in TU-2. ' Charcoal flecks were observed within the unit but were too small to be collected. f ' t ~ , ~ ~ f 't4 i~ i~r. ~ ~ ~ ` ~ I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~t~}~ , / ~ Fp i ' r~ ! s~~~~tt~. ~ Figure 11. SIHP Site 24562, Feature B view to north. i IS i RC-0285 0 .5 1 Scale in meters ' ene (heights m centimeters) I ~ I I I I~ 11 I (45) (40) 111 I 111 (70) (23) II- o _ (60) (70) II it lit Figure 12. SIHP Site 24562, Feature B plan view 16 - !i ~ 1 RC-0285 i j~ o, 10 20 Scaleale ~n centimeters i i Layer I I ~ ~ Layer I( J I~~ i I~_1 I ~ I If~ Layer I -Architectural layer consisting of stacked pnhohoe cobbles. ` Layer Il - P~thoehoe cobbles intermixed with dark brown (7 SYR 3/4) silt. + I ; Figure 13. SIHP Site 24562, Feature B, TU-2 west wall profile. j ~ ~ ~ r ~wti a ,.,fit I a~ S KM Y DES ~ i t '~i ~f ,t?y j, M~ 1 ~ t 1 ~ "r, ? ' s° ~ `ST~~1~'s ~-i~ A~ Y:' ~ RAY ~ y F `T~ ~a F 1 ~ e ~ ~.j~ j ~ ~ ~ "r ,~s .r~ y ~ ~ .tom'. ~ , 4 , i. I ~ I Fi ure 1 4 SIHP , g Stte 24562 Fe azure B TU-2 west w all rofile. P I ~ 17 i i RC-0284 i SIHP Site 24563 SIHP Site 24563 is a rough mound located medially within the study parcel near the western boundary (see ! Figure 5). Pahoehoe cobbles of all sizes are piled into a mound running 3.1 meters north/south and 2.5 meters east/west (Figure 15). The high point of the mound is approximately 80 centimeters above ground surface. A barbed wire spool dispenser was found in association with the mound but probably postdates construction of the site. SIHP Site 24563 is interpreted as a land clearing feature most likely associated ' with activities of the Kona Sugar Company. },~i 4 f 1 i r ? ~ ~ f I ~ I { Y ~ / 3 ~ ..iii .~.GefM.. _ « ~I~~1~#~1~1P.r.;~ Figure 15. SIHP Site 24563 view to east/northeast. SIHP Site 24564 SIHP Site 24564 is an "L" shaped mound stacked against a bedrock outcrop in the western portion of the study parcel (see Figure S). The stacked sections of the mound extend 4.5 meters at 320° and 5.3 meters at 65° along a pahoehoe outcrop (Figure 16), and range in height from 1.3 meters at the northwest comer to 75 centimeters at the southeast comer and are built with pahoehoe boulders at the base and cobbles toward the top (Figure 17). This site appears to have resulted from land cleazing associated with sugarcane cultivation by the Kona Sugaz Company between 1891 and 1904. 18 i - - - ~ RC-0285 i T~ iL u~ tNt ~ (130) ' f Bedrock outcrop Q ~ f ' D ~ o Q y O o ~ ~ ti o so 100 40 ~ ~ ~ Scale m centimeters ~ (~s) Q ~ 11 ~ Q o ~ ~ i ~ I Figure 16. SIHP Site 24564 plan view. ~ c ~ al r~~ w~{ ~ r~ ` 6~{lh.~ Mir ~ ; ;~'~`V ~i F~'.r r ~ T - a l ~ r ~ ~ w 7 fat ~ ~ qtr 'rw is +~j+~~~i~1 s'~ iFV~,.g,'~ r F'~Y t ~wr' fir` ~ `I 7 i t ~ ~ ~ , ' Y ,tit ~ ~ "t~?~f~ ,,,._:ti ~ y t"q s 'tit ' e~'r 1~° ~ ~ ; ~ r ~~,iA~,N-~:,~iy,~~y `J(/', a~~~#~;Y `,~f~'g •t ,"it'd ~ Figure 17. SIHP Site 24564 view to the north ' 19 i i RC-0285 SIHP Site 24565 SIHP Site 24565 consists of two rock mounds stacked and piled against the south side of a pdhoehoe j outcrop in the western portion of the project azea (see Figure 5). Overall the site measures 5.9 meters east/west and 4.8 meters north/south (Figure 18). The southeastern mound (Figure 19) measures 2.3 meters northwesdsoutheast and 1.7 meters southwest/northeast. The edges of the mound are roughly stacked in ~ two courses of small boulders that rise to 55 centimeters. The southwestern mound (Figure 20) measures three meters northwest/southeast and 1.6 meters southwest/northeast, and is constructed of two courses of sub-angular pahoehoe boulders stacked along the edge and rising to 80 centimeters. The interior fill is small boulders and cobbles that have been pled, forming a rough but level surface. Site 24565 appears to represent agricultural clearing activity for sugazcane fields by the Kona Sugar Company in the very eazly twentieth century. I l 1 I I I I 20 j t RC-0283 i f i ~T k + i' ~ r ' ~ ,t~~if:'r3 , ~ fir, ~ ~ ~ ~y~,~~.~~° '.'fir` ~ { ~ ~i~ ~ ti?~ +~rNT A' Figure 19. SIHP Site 24565 southeastern mound view to the east. t _ Y.~~ s ^^WW _ s y .i n s" y~ ; s ~ ~ i i + ~9 ' ~ QS• 't N ~ ~ ~ . l.r r~. A 9 yl~i.yft'1 .w ,fir J Figure Site 24565 southwestern mound view to theoutheast.~~ ~ ~ , ~ , r 21 f RC•0285 SIHP Site 24566 S1HP Site 24566 is a mound of piled boulders against a pahoehoe outcrop in the northwestern portion of the study azea (see Figure 5). The mound is roughly t meter in height and extends 2.6 meters north/south (Figure 21). The mound is piled against fractured bedrock and is most likely associated with the land clearing activities of the Kona Sugar Company. f I t 7 4n.t . ~+Y ~ I r t~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~'!'j Iii .~A~- ( ~ f. . ~ i # ~ ~ r u~ f~ ~ ~ " ~ : .w, ~ ~;5 f ~ I r ~ I .1 ~ ~~M C Figure 21. SIHP Site 24566 view to the south. ' SIHP Site 24567 i SIHP Site 24567 is a Historic/Modern cluster of five rocks surrounding a crack in the exposed pahoehoe surface at the roughly middle point along the western project area boundary (see Figure 5). Two strands of heavy gauge (fence) wire lying directly on the ground surface and oriented along the property boundary run through the rock cluster. The rock cluster is approximately SO centimeters tall and 1.5 meters wide (Figure 22). Presumably the cluster supported a wooden fence post to which the wire was attached. The post was likely wedged into the crack in the bedrock. Site 24567 is associated with the former ranching use of the property beginning sometime after 1927. 22 ' I RC-0283 ~ ~ ~ r I ~ Y,y„ ~ i r~ " ~ i~ .tom it; 3 ~ I a/,F f.ti~'' n ~ I ~ ' ~ r ? y~ a. ` ~ b ~i. ~ h e: Figure 22. SIHP Site 24567. ~ ' SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION AND TREATMEN " RECOMMENDATIONS T All of the sites recorded during the current study are assessed for their significance based on criteria ' established and promoted by the DLNR-SHPD and contained in the Hawaii Administrative Rules 13§ 13- ~ f 284-6, dated 1998. These significance evaluations should be considered as preliminary until DLNR-SHPD ~ provides concurrence. For resources to be considered significant they must possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and meet one or more of the following criteria: A. Be associated with events that have made an important contribution to the broad patterns of our history; 8. Be associated with the lives of persons important in our past; i C. Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; represent the work of a master; or possess high artistic value; D. Have yielded, or is likely to yield, information important fQ research on prehistory i or history, , E. Have an important trad~t~onal cultural value to the native Hawaiian people or to another ethnic group of the state due to associations with traditional cultural " practices once carried out, or still can•ied out, at the roe ~ wrth traditional beliefs, events or oral accounts-these associations being important to the group's history and cultural identity. ~ 23 i i RC-0285 `i i The significance and recommended treatment for the nine sites are discussed below and presented in I Table S. Table 4. Site significance and treatment recommendations. f SIHP No. Type SiAnrrcance Recommended TYeatment ~ 24553 Hrstonc boundary wall D No further work 24555 Historic boundary wall D No firrther work 24562 Precontact temporary habitation outcrop D Data recovery 24563 Historic clearing mound D No further work 24564 Historic clearing mound D No further work 24565 Historic clearing mound D No further work 24566 Historic clearing mound D No further work 24567 Historic/Modem rock fence st su rt Not si ificant No further work ` SIHP Site 24553 This wall is considered significant under Criterion D, and has provided information relative to late nineteenth and early twentieth century use of the property. The information recorded from this site has sufficiently mitigated any potential impact that may be caused by the development of the parcel. No further f work is recommended. I SIHP Site 24555 I This wall is considered significant under Criterion D, and has provided information relative to late nineteenth and early twentieth century use of the property. The information recorded from this site has sufficiently mitigated any potential impact that may be caused by the development of the parcel. No further work is recommended. SIHP Site 24562 This modified outcrop habitation site is considered significant under Criterion D for information it has already provided as well as information it has the potential to provide relative to Precontact settlement practices in the kula/kalu'ulu transitional area of the Kona Field System. Therefore further data recovery is ( recommended for this site. SIHP Site 24563 This mound is considered significant under Criterion D, and has provided information relative to late nineteenth and early twentieth century use of the property. The information recorded from this site has sufficiently mitigated any potential impact that maybe caused by the development of the parcel. No further ~ work is recommended. SIHP Site 24564 This mound is considered significant under Criterion D, and has provided information relative to late nineteenth and early twentieth century use of the property. The information recorded from this site has sufficiently mitigated any potential impact that may be caused by the development of the parcel. No further work is recommended. 24 f i Rc-ozas i SIHP Site 24565 f This mound is considered significant under Criterion D, and has provided information relative to late I{ nineteenth and eazly twentieth century use of the property. The infonmation recorded from this site has sufficiently mitigated any potential impact that may be caused by the development of the pazcel. No further work is recommended. SIHP Site 24566 ' ~ This mound is considered significant under Criterion D, and has provided information relative to late ~ nineteenth and eazly twentieth century use of the property. The information recorded from this site has sufficiently mitigated any potential impact that may be caused by the development of the parcel. No further work is recommended. SIHP Site 24567 This rock cluster is not considered a significant site, and as such no further work is recommended. ~ ! I ~ I I i i - ~ _ i + I 2$ ~ 1 i i Rc-o2as L REFERENCES CITED Chinen, J. 1961 Original Land Titles in Hawaii. Honolulu: privately published. r Ching, F., E. Neller, S. Palama, and P. Griffin 1973 The Archaeology of North Kona, from the Ahupua`a of Kahului to the Ahupua`a of Kahalu`u. Surface Survey: Realignment of Ali`i Drive. Hawaiian Archaeological Journal73-2. Archaeological Reseazch Center Hawaii, Inc. Cordy, R 1981 A Study of Prehistoric Social Change: The Development of Complex Societies in the Hawaiian Islands. New York: Academic Press. 1995 Central Kona Archaeological Settlement Patterns. State Historic Preservation ( Division, DLNR, State of Hawaii. Prepared for the Planning Department, County of I Hawaii. I Dorrance, W. and F. Morgan 2000 Sugar Islands: The 16S Year Story of Sugar in Hawaii. Mutual Publishing: Honolulu Dunn, A., and P. Rosendahl 1991 Preliminary Report: Phase 1(a) -Site Identification, Phased Intensive Archaeological Survey, Alii Highway Phased Mitigation Program, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. PHRI Report 900-052191. Prepared for R.M. Towill Corporation. f Dye, T. 1978 An Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of Four Alternative Sites for the Kailua- Keauhou Elementary School. Ms. 031078. Department of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Ellis, W. [1823]1963 Journal of William Ellis, Narrative of a Tour of Hawaii, or Owhyee... Honolulu: I Advertiser Publishing Co., Ltd. Hammatt, H. I 1980 Archaeological Surface Survey of a 178 Acre Parcel in Na Ahupua`a, Kaumalumalu, Pahoehoe, Kona, Hawaii Island. Archaeological Research Center Hawaii, Inc. Report 14-203 II. Prepared for Farms and Ranches, Inc. Hammatt, H., and S. Clark L ' 1980 Archaeological Testing and Salvage Excavations of a ISS Acre Parcel in Na i Ahupua`a Pahoehoe, La`aloa and Kapala`aea, Kona, Hawaii. Archaeological ~ Research Center Hawaii Report 14152 III. Prepared for Pacific Basin Resorts, Inc. I i Hammatt, H., and W. Folk 1980 Archaeological Survey, Phase 1: Portions of Keauhou-Kona Resort, Keauhou and Kahaluu, Kona, Hawaii Island. Archaeological Research Center Hawaii, Inc. 14-177 lI. l . Lawai. Prepared for Kamehameha Investment Corp. ' Hammatt, H., and V. Meeker 1979 Archaeological Excavations and Heiau Stabilization at Kahalu`u, Kona, Hawaii Island. Archaeological Reseazch Center Hawaii Report 14-172 (II). Prepared for Gerald Park, Urban Planner. L I ~ 26 [ RC-0285 I Hammatt, H. and M. Tomonari-Tuggle ' 1978 Archaeological Surface Survey of the Old Gomes Property Belonging to Pacific ' i Basin Resorts, Inc. Kahului, Kona, Hawaii Island. ARCH Report 14-142. Prepared for Gerald Parl, Urban Planner. Han, T., S. Collins, S. Clark, and A. Gazland 1986 Moe Kau a Ho'o~lo: Hawaiian Mortuary Practices at Keopu, Kona, Hawaii. Chapter VII. Artifacts and Manuports from the Keopu Burial Site. Departmental Report Series 86-1. Department of Anthropology, B. P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. ~ Prepared for Hawaii Department of Transportation. Handy, E.S.C., E.G. Handy, and M. Pukui 1991 Native Planters in Old Hawaii: Their Life, Lore and Environment. B.P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 223. Honolulu: Department of Anthropology, Bishop Museum Press. (Revised edition) Haun, A. and D. Henry ~ 2004 Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMK: (3) 7-5-19:01, Land of Kahului 2, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Haun 8t Associates report 175-092204. Prepared for Sunstone Realty Partners, LLC, Honolulu, Hawaii. Haun, A., and J. Henry _ 2001 Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMK:7-5-16:15, 16, 17, 29, Kahului 1 and 2, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Haun and Associates report 023-041701. Prepared for Bolton, Inc. Haun, A., J. Henry, J. Jimenez, M. Kirkendall, K. Maly, and T. Wolforth 1998 Ali` Highway Phased Mitigation Program Phase I-Archaeological Intensive ~ Survey, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii, Vol. 1, Summary. PHRI Report ' 1320-052798. Submitted to the County of Hawaii c/o R. M. Towill Corporation. Kaschko, M., and P. Rosendahl 1987 Full Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey, Kealakekua Ranch Makai Land Subdivision, Land of Kealakekua, South Kona, Island of Hawaii (TMK:3-8-2- 02:2,33). PHRI Report 244-100186. Prepared for Kealakekua Ranch, Ltd. Kelly, M. I 1983 Na Mala O Kona: Gardens of Kona. A History of Land Use in Kona, Hawaii. Departmental Report Series 83-2. Department of Anthropology, B. P. Bishop - Museum, Honolulu. Prepared for the Department of Transportation, State of Hawaii. Kennedy, J., M. Maigret, and T Denham 1992 Inventory Survey and Subsurface Testing Results for a Property in the Ahupua`a of ~ Kahului 2nd, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii (TMK:3-7-5-19:43). Archaeological Research Center Hawaii. Prepared for Dr. James Watson. Ladefoged, T. 1991 Hawaiian Architectural Transformations during the Early Historic Era Asian Perspectives 30(1) 55-70 Newman, T. , 1970 Hawaiian Fishing and Farming on the Island of Hawaii, q.D. 1778. Division of State Parks, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Honolulu. , i 27 i t i i RC-0285 ~ O'Hara, C., and T. Wolforth 1997 Archaeological Inventory Survey of the Gomes Property Parcel, Land of Kahalui 1st, Island of Hawaii (TMK: 3-7-5-19:5, 38, 40). PHRI Report 1807-10197. Submitted to Towne Development of Hawaii, Inc. Rechtman, R., and D. Dougherty 2000 An Archaeological Inventory Survey of TMK: 3-7.5-19:44, 45, Kahului 2nd Ahupua a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Rechtman Consulting Report RC- 002?. Prepared for Sunstone Realty Partners, LLC. ~ Rechtman, R., and J. Henry 1999 Archaeological Inventory of the Kahului Bridge Replacement Project, Kahului lst and 2nd Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. PHRI Report 1945- 080499. Prepared for Ron Terry, Ph.D., Kea`au. r Rosendahl, P. 1989 Archaeological Field Inspection, Kahului Ist Development Parcel, Land of Kahului lst, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii (TMK:3-7-5-19:46). PHRI Report 709- 091989. Prepared for Mr. Darwin Lindberg. { I Soehren, L. l` 1976 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of Portion of Kahului 2nd, North Kona, Hawaii Island. Prepared for P. Yoshimura, Inc. I 1979 Letter Report: Archaeological and Historical Features on that Portion of TMK:3-7-5- I 19:1 Which Lies Between the Great Wall of Kuakini and the Kuakini Highway in the Land of Kahului 2, North Kona, Hawaii. Prepared for Hiroshi Kasamoto, Inc. I Tainter, J. 1973 The Social Correlates of Mortuary Patterning at Kaloko, North Kona, Hawaii. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 11:91-105. Tomonari-Tuggle, M. 1993 Draft Report, the Archaeology of the `Ohi`a Preserve; An Inventory Survey of I Surface Structures. International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc. (IARIn. Submitted to Kamehameha Investment Corporation, Honolulu. Sato, H., W. Ikeda, R. Paeth, R. Smythe, and M. Takehiro, Jr. I 1973 Soil Survey of the Island of Hawaii, State of Nawair: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and University of Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. i ( Schilt, A. 1984 Subsistence and Conflict in Kona, Hawaii. An Archaeological Study of the Kuakini Highway Realignment Corridor. Departmental Report Series 84-I. Department of i Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Prepared for the Depardnent of ~ Transportation, State of Hawaii. ~ Soehren, L., and T. Newman 1968 Archaeology of Kealakekua Bay. Department of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, and University of Hawaii-Manoa. Wolfe, E., and J. Morris [ ~ 1996 Geologic Map of the Island of Hawaii. Geologic Investigations Series Map 1-2524- A. U S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. . I j 28 Uct 27 08 02:09p Bob Rechtman 8089666459 p,~ - - - - LINDALINGLB rS~"°-+~'~4.,~+ DunRDC,vw~mANNn-T~inA~waounc~ ~ WYERMOO.OP NA WAO A ` 1t~ S a • ~~yy~t COA444S70N WI WA'IP.t pESOURCfl MAAAG4dlM 4~ ~`I 2 ROBERT K INASUDA DEHTrr DGIECrOR• WAD ~ ~4- ~ - ~ DEAN NAKANO ~ 9 AC"DIG D0.PllY INIIIdClUR-NA'IN ~o- + ~ Q'~~Oial: "pu"rn aescNmc~ro ROATINO AND GLEAN RECRF.~IYJN ~ OUREAU OP CONYEYA~C0.! COMMLgWI: ON WA7I'p 0.ESOIRU:R MA%AORMF!T~ ' STATE OF HAWAII mntPRVAnavANDLnASTALUwia ca~csnv"noK AND Rfsa rteco aa+DRC~cvr ~~y DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES FOAl;SIRyAND~W11.OlIFP _•a~ OIH~ IR4TOgK: /'R1:51RYA'[IOI. POST OFFICE BOX 621 ~u~oLAWe«~~ LND~nv~:avecanuasrlnN , HONOLULU, HAWAI196809 ~AT°P"'~L" _ October 4, 2006 Dr. Robert Rechtman LOG NO: 2006.3276 Rechtman Consulting, LLC DOC NO: 0610JTI7 ' HC 1 Box 4149 Archaeology Kea`au, HI 96749 ' Dear Dr. Rechtman: ' - SUBJECT: Nationa6 Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 Review - _ An Archaeologicad Inventory Survey of TMK 3-7-5-017:042 ' Kahului 2'd Ahupua°a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii TNdK: (3) 7-5-017: 042 Thank you for submitting the revised report by Bulgrin &Rechtman (2005), your report RC-0285, for our I review and comment. We apologize for the delay in our response. The report summarizes the results of an archaeological inventory survey of 15 acres for Mr. Phil Tinguely of Hualalai Partners, LLC. The survey identified six previously unrecorded sites and two previously identified sites. Rechtman Consulting LLC assessed all of the sites as significant under criterion d, and recommended that no further work was necessary at seven of the sites and that data recovery was appropriate for the eight sites. The report has satisfied our concerns expressed in the earlier review. Therefore, we agree with your - assessments and find sites 24553, 24555, 2A~562, 24563, 24564, 24565, and 24566 to be significant under _ criterion d. We also agree that site 24567 does not meet the criteria for significance, and therefore no further work on this site is necessary. We further agree that sufficient information has been collected and ~ no further work is required at sites 24553, 24555, 24563, 24564, 24565, and 24566. And finally, we agree ' that data recovery at site 24562 will mitigate the effects of development on this historic property. The report is therefore accepted. Thank you for your time and attention. We look forward to reviewing the data recovery plan for site 24562. If you have any comments or question please do not hesitate to contact Dr. Julie Taomia of the Hawaii Island office at (808) 327-3691. Aloha, Pe er Young, Chair to Historic Preservation Officer JT:gvf ' f A~~~~111ViLl ~I 1 i ' ~ 1r C H T lVl A 11>F; 1115 E,.'~" 11V C , l., 1., C 507-A E. Lan~kaula~~,~t. I3i~fo, Hawaii 96720 phone: (808) 96 -~tf66 x: 808 443- g ( ) 0065 e-mail: bo ' a~Y` Chtma consulting.com ARCHAEOLOGICAL,~ULTUR~iaL, AND-HCSTORICAL STUDIES October 22, 2008 RC-0532 Theresa Donham Hawaii Island Archaeologist DLNR-SHPD 40 Pookela St. Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Theresa: I am writing to inform you that we have completed the data recovery fieldwork at SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 on TMKs:3-7-5-17:42 and 43, in Kahului 2°d Ahupua`a, North Kona. The strategy that was presented in the data recovery plan (Loubser and Rechtman 2008) was adhered to as closely as possible in the field. A few of the excavation units were shifted slightly to increase sample size by avoiding exposed bedrock. There were no inadvertent discoveries or any great surprises made during the fieldwork. We aze going to strongly reassess the earlier interpretation that the excavated features were temporary habitation sites; the recovered material culture does not really support such a conclusion. Rather, these two modified outcrops appear to be more likely agricultural staging and processing areas. Very little in the way of food remains were recovered and a relative abundance of volcanic glass was present. We did collect sufficient charcoal for radiocazbon analysis, and four samples will be sent to Beta Analytic. Our report is currently being prepazed and we expect to finish it before the end of the yeaz. At this stage, given that all fieldwork is complete, we would anticipate that your office would have no hesitation signing a grubbing or grading permit for the project azea should such a permit come across your desk. We would appreciate your acknowledgement of this by return letter. Thank you. If you have any questions or concerns, or would like further information please feel free to contact me. Regards, Bob Rechtman, Ph.D. Principal Archaeologist Reference Cited Loubser, J., and R. Rechtman 2008 An Archaeological Data Recovery Plan for SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 (TMK:3-7-5- 017:042 and 043), Kahului 2nd Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Rechtman Consulting, LLC Report RC-0532. Prepazed for Brendan Lee, LLC, Huntington Beach, CA. RC-0532 An Archaeological Data Recovery Plan for SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 (TMK:3-7-5-017:042 and 043) ~ ~ ~ ~ ' , ~I Kahului 2nd Ahupua`a North Kona District ~ ~ , Island of Hawai `i ~ PREPARED B Y: Johannes H. N. Loubser, Ph.D. and Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D. PREPARED FOR: Lee Barrett Brendan Lee, LLC 16541 Gothard Street Ste. 109 Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 Apri12008 RECHTMAN CONSULTING LLC FiC: l liax 4149 Kea`au, Hatvai`i 96749-97l0 ph~rn~: (808) 966.7636 fax: (808) 443-01)65 e-mail: bobC~rechtmanconsultin~.co>n ARCIIAE()Id)C;ICAL, CUL'1'UR/wL, ANp FIIS'PURIC.AL SruD1ER ' RC-0532 An Archaeological Data Recovery Plan SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 TMK:3-7-5-017:042 and 043 Kahului 2nd Ahupua `a North Kona District Island of Hawai `i "1'L y }e RECHTIV4`A,~}C"ONSULTING i `i 1 RC-0532 C_ Contents INTRODUCTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AREA 1 CULTURAL CONTEX'I' 4 L Prior Archaeological Studies in the Project Area 7 I_ SII3P SITE 24558 11 L SII~P STfE 24562 14 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES 21 RESEARCH TECHNIQUES 21 Sampling Strategy 21 Cultural Material Analyses 25 Radiocarbon Samples 25 L Curation of Recovered Archaeological Material 25 Discovery of Human Remains 25 REFERENCES CTTED 26 Figures 1. Project azea location 2 2. Tax Map Key: 3-7-5-017 showing current study pazcels (042 and 043) 3 3. Vegetation in the project azea 4 4. Plan view of Pazce143 8 5. Plan view of Pazce142 10 6. SII~P Site 24558 plan view 12 7. SII3P Site 24558 TU-1 east wall profile 13 1 8. SII~P Site 24558 TU-2 south wall profile. 13 9. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A plan view 15 10. SII-IP Site 24562 Feature A TU-3 west wall profile 16 11. SII3P Site 24562 Feature A TU-3 hoto a h of west wall rofile. L P P p 16 12. SII~P Site 24562 Feature A TU-4 west wall profile 18 13. S1T~P Site 24562 Feature A TU-4 base of excavation, view to the east 18 14. SII~P Site 24562 Feature B, view to the north 19 15. SIhIIP Site 24562 Feature B plan view 19 ~f ii I - - - - - - - i i RC-0532 16. SII3P Site 24562 Feature B TU-2 west wall profile 20 ' ~ 17. SII~P Site 24562 Feature B TU-2 photograph of west wall profile. 20 18. Sampling strategy for data recovery at SII3P Site 24558 22 19. Sampling strategy for data recovery at SIIIIP Site 24562 Feature A 23 20. Sampling strategy for data recovery at SII-IP Site 24562 Feature B 24 Tables 1. Traditional Hawaiian agricultural zones 5 - 2. Archaeological sites recorded within TMK:3-7-5-017:043 7 3. Archaeological sites recorded within TMK:3-7-5-017:042 9 4. Items recovered from SHIP Site 24558 TU-1 . 11 ~ 5. Items recovered from SIHP Site 24558 TU-2. - 11 6. Items recovered from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A TU-3 Layer II. - 14 - r i i iii fi l_ RC-0532 L INTRODUCTION Rechtman Consulting, LLC on behalf of Mr. Lee Barrett of Brendan Lee, LLC, has prepazed this Data Recovery Plan, which sets forth strategies for the mitigation of SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 from any ~ possible impacts resulting from the planned development of TMK:3-7-5-017:42 and 43. The current study - azea is a consolidation of two neighboring pazcels that were thoroughly surveyed and test excavated by Rechtman Consulting, LLC in 2005 (Bulgrin and Rechtman 2005a and 2005b). These parcels, each measuring roughly 15-acres in size, include TMK:3-7-5-017:043, that is immediately west of Kahului- Hienaloli Road and south of Hualalai Road (Bulgrin and Rechtman 2005a), and TMK:3-7-5-017:042, situated immediately west of Pazcel 43 (Bulgrin and Rechtman 2005b). The prepazation of this Data I' Recovery Plan follows the successful completion of Archaeological Inventory Surveys of the two parcels (Bulgrin and Rechtman 2005a and 2005b), each of which identified a Precontact site considered significant - under Criterion D for providing new information concerning Precontact land-use practices at the kulalkalu `ulu interface of the Kona field system. The sites aze the following: two modified outcrops within Sly Site 24558 of Pazcel 43 and the terrace/mound/modified outcrop site complex within SIHP Site 24562 of Parcel 42. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AREA As mentioned above, the current project area consists of TMK:3-7-5-017:042 and TMK: 3-7-5-017:043, which aze both in Kahului 2~ Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii (Figures 1 and 2). The project azea is bounded to the north by a stone wall previously identified as SIHP Site 24555, to the east by Hualalai Road, to the south by a stone wall running along the Kahului 2°~/Puapua`a boundazy that was previously identified as SIHP Site 24553; and to the west by an undeveloped pazcel (TMK:3-7-5-017:041). Terrain in the project area is gently undulating and elevation ranges from 500 to 550 feet above sea level. The project area is chazacterized by Punalu `u extremely rocky peat (Sato et al. 1973), swell-drained, thin organic soil over bedrock. The underlying bedrock is pahoehoe dating to more than 10,000 yeazs B.P. (Wolfe and Moms 1996). Despite the seemingly consistent semi-arid condition of this azea, seasonality is evident. Throughout the Hawaiian Islands, the wazmer and drier summer months, traditionally referenced as kau, extend from May to September, and the wetter, cooler months (ho `oilo) extend from October to April (Handy and Handy 1972). The temperatures in the Kona area aze generally consistent with this seasonal pattern, ranging between 62-80 degrees in winter and 68-86 degrees in summer (Schilt 1984). However, the typical rainfall C pattern differs considerably from that seen elsewhere; in all elevations along the Kona coast, rainfall during kau is typically greater than that during ho`oilo (Schilt 1984). Vegetation within the project azea consists of a combination of kiawe (Prosopis pallida), koa hao[e (Leucaena glauca) and a vaziety of grasses, vines, weeds, and shrubs (Figure 3). Prior impacts within the project area can be described as substantial. Mechanical earth moving associated with extensive grubbing is evident throughout the project azea. L 1 1 - - I - - I RC-0532 I t9 190 ? Portions of USGS 7.5 minute series quadrangles Kailua and Kealakekua HI 1995 Ka ua- w Ko I~O~ ~ ~ ~ P BM ~ ® Z ~ ~ iY ~ rc w '4qµ: • ~ x ~ pn ,S S' g'~K3, ~ ~ or;` it ~5, .,ei{ i u i ,'i~; i _ • • "{4£0. ~ ~ A ~~~i.+~i. „ 5}Ps, r,,T _ k~ Laniak a ~ em , ~ , z = q n r. ; C~ d' ''i r, U r ~ c~ ,r Ka/ae a ~ ~ - v~ ~ ~ ~ Paakai ®m ~ i . ~i ~ • ` i i ~ . W ter O ocks~ ~ T nkr• i Ta ks ~ ~ Hdlcre ~ ' "y Park j.. • •j•• ~ i D a A U L i .,o ' ••..r ~1 ' ~'a, ~ , ~ ' >i • • ti ~ Project area ~ 11 I ~ v r K helo i 4 ~ ~ ABM 53 4 ~ i, ~ I i ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ - PROJECT AREA ~ .a - ~ j rte. ~ ` ~ ` ` ~ F~, ~ i ~ i - ^ ~t ~ x I `3' •R'~~, ,z`~"~4 {`NSA _~~-~r i X A'. i.' i , ~ e5~. Island of Hawa1`i a ,~4. igttre 1. Project area location. r ~irf• ~Y` _ spa f~;* t 2 ~ i RC-0532 , ar Po~ ~ t __..I o -z ~ c s F~ A ~ ~ a ~ q ~ 1 a x ~ 22 ~ I h°~ g ro I ~'d ~ ~ ~ _ - - ~ ~ z'. ~ ~ g~ ci ` a ; i` ~ t ` 1 ~ ~ C ' v r 1' ' tt`tj ~ ~ ~ i w i~"c"~~ ~ . nl O ~ ~f' ? o I # . ~ ~ a 1. ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 1~ ° 1 m 1 ~t 1 b IQ p T1 N t ~ a .~~t Q ~ ~ Q ~ 3 e jj ~ ~ a ~ t ' ~ j w ~ y i ~ I ~ ~ R ~ esu ~ ~ ~ b~ ~ ~ ~ a 4 ! R ~ f a ~ ~ j t L s i ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ p fop _ ~ - ~ ~ I t~ fir ' i {pi R,~o , .p ~ 1E / 4 q , . ~ V ~ O - i q ~ ~ ; i l N ~ jt ~ i i Y d~, ,~~e ~ a i i ~ ~ E , ~s~ ~ ~ f l ~ ~ ~8~ u / ~ ua KiNi ~ ~ P~Ai J' h~ ~ i O ~ .N.n \ ,F~4 l ~ c f ,A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I J ti I R ' ~ m ~ ~ C ~ - 1. 1 A 1.( ~ ~ ' ~ o /r ; 2 a/ .Gwkwr ~Jf/ 1~~. a ` • r,. ~ L Figure 2. Tax Map Key: 3-7-5-017 showing current study parcels (042 and 043). 3 ` RC-0532 I I n< p Ali .;F 'lq •1 _ ~~t { I I 7 i A Figure 3. Vegetation in the project area. , J CULTURAL CONTEXT The project area is in what has been termed the Kona Field System (Gordy 1995, Newman 1970, Schilt 1984). The Kona Field System extends north at least to Kau Ahupua`a and south to Honaunau and east from the coastline to the forested slopes of Hualalai (Gordy 1995) A large portion of this area ~s designated in the Hawaii SIHP (State Inventory of Historic Places) as Site 50-10-37-6601 and has been determined eligible for inclusion in the National Register of H~stonc Places. The basic characteristics and elevationally ! delimited zones within this agr1culturaUresidential system as presented in Newman (1970) have been confirmed and elaborated on by archaeological (Gordy 1995) and ethnohistoncal investigations (Kelly 1983). The current study parcel stands right at the recognized interface between the traditional kula and kalu `ulu zones (at 500 feet elevation). , Gordy (1995) presents a summary of archaeological settlement patterns for Kona that is based on previous archaeological work as well as on observations made by explorers and m~ssionanes during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Gordy bases his reconstruction on the Hawaiian terms for the major vegetation zones used to define and segregate space within an ahupua `a. It was these native terms (Table 1) that were used during the Mahele in the description of land claims. Gordy also describes a narrow ~ shoreline zone that was primazily a residential area. Immediately behind the shoreline is the kula. i I 4 j RC-0532 Table 1. Traditional Hawaiian agricultural zones. Zone Annual Rainfall Descnphon Elevation Primary Crops Kula c. 30 50 m Plam, open country Coast-500 ft Wauke, gourd and sweet (0.8-1.2 m) inland from the coast (0-150 m) potato Kalu or c. 40-55 in. Luxuriant, cultivable 500-1,000 ft. Breadfruit, Wauke, sweet Kalu'ulu (1.00-1.35 m) zone (150-300 m) potato, mountain apple, some taro `.~pa'a c. 55-80 in. Dryland cultivation 1,000-2,500 ft Taro, sweet potato, sugar (1.35-2.00 m) zone (300-750 m) cane, k% and banana Ama `u c. 80 m• Upland/fern zone 2,000-3,000 ft Banana and 'ama `u (fern) (2.0 m) (600-900 m) The kula zone is the azea from sea level to 150 meters elevation. Annual rainfall in the kula zone is 75 to 125 centimeters. This lower elevation zone is traditionally associated with habitation and the cultivation of sweet potatoes, paper mulberry, and gourds. Agricultural features, such as clearing mounds, planting mounds, planting depressions, modified outcrops, pavements, enclosures, and planting terraces, aze common throughout much of this zone (Hammatt and Clark 1980, Hammatt and Folk 1980, Haun et al. 1998, Schilt 1984). Dwellings were scattered throughout the agricultural portion of the kula, but they were commonly concentrated along the shoreline (Gordy 1981, Hammatt 1980). The shoreline zone, extending inland approximately 200 meters, was used primarily for permanent habitation and other non-agricultural activities, such as canoe storage, ceremonial and burial practices, recreation, and fishing-related activity. Royal and high chiefly centers were also situated within the shoreline of the kula. These complexes included dwellings for chiefs and their entourage, places of refuge, and other structures. Several large and densely populated royal centers were located along the shoreline between Kailua and Honaunau (Gordy 1995, Tomonari-Tuggle 1993). A variety of non-residential features aze present in the kula near royal centers, including small agricultural plots, and formal and informal burial features (Gordy 1995, Han et al. 1986, Schilt 1984, Tainter 1973, Tomanazi-Tuggle 1993). Kahului Ahupua`a is generally considered to have been a place of high-status residences and ceremonial complexes Nineteenth century habitation features built on stone platforms were present in the kula (Hammatt and Meeker 1979, Schilt 1984). Stone platforms with cleazly defined internal divisions are present (O'Hare and Wolforth 1997) and probably reflect a change in residential plans from a complex of multiple, separate, single-function structures (men's sleeping, women's sleeping, cooking) to a single structure with multiple rooms and functions (entire family's quarters and cooking) (Ladefoged 1991). Burial features with histonc- era artifacts and azchitecture (i.e., mortar and corrugated tin) aze present in the lower elevations. These are frequently isolated structures, but burials also occurred within residential platforms during the Historic Period (O'Hare and Wolforth 1997). Inland of the kula is the kalu `ulu. This zone was used primazily for breadfruit, with an under story growth of sweet potatoes and paper mulberry. Gordy (1995:7) notes "archaeologists have not been able to identify this zone." He goes on to state that, "the area at the edge of the Kealakekua's cliff, which was observed to be in this zone at European contact, has azchaeological site patterns similaz to the `apa'a zone [the next highest zone in elevation) (cf. Soehren and Newman 1968: Kaschko and Rosendahl 1987). Thus the kalu `ulu and `upa'a zones may well have near identical site patterns." (Gordy 1995:7). During the early nineteenth century, following the breaking of the traditional eating kapu by Liholiho, Ka`ahumanu, and the Queen mother Keopuolani, which was a symbolic gesture that led to the dernise of the entire Hawaiian religious system, the older places of worship (heiau) no longer held their significance. Many such places were dismantled, and the stones used for other building projects such as the Kuakini Wall and Mokuaikaua Church. 5 j RC-0532 i ~ The religious, socioeconomic, and demographic changes that took place m the period between 1790 ~ ~ and the 1840s, promoted the establishment of a Euro-American style of land ownership, and the Great Mahele was the vehicle for determining ownership of the native land. During this period (1848-1899), the ~ Mahele defined the land interests of the King (Kamehameha III), the high-ranking chiefs, and the low- ranking chiefs, the konohiki. The chiefs and konohiki were required to present their claims to the Land Commission to receive awazds for lands provided to them by Kamehameha III. They were also required to provide commutations to the government in order to receive royal patents on their awazds. The lands were identified by name only, with the understanding that the ancient boundaries would prevail until the land could be surveyed This process expedited the work of the Land Commission and speeded the transfers (Chinen 1961:13). During this process all lands were placed in one of three categories: Crown Lands (for the occupant of the throne), Government Lands, and Konohikt Lands. All three types of land were subject to the rights of the native tenants. Commoners could make claims for land, and if substantiated, they would receive awards referred to as kuleana, from the Land Commission. During this period, other land grants were also made to I individuals directly from the Kingdom. In 1862, the Commission of Boundaries (Boundazy Commission) was established in the Kingdom of Hawai `i to legally set the boundaries of all the ahupua `a that had been ~ awarded as a pazt of the Mahele. Subsequently, in 1874, the Commissioners of Boundaries was authorized to certify the boundaries for lands brought before them. The primazy informants for the boundazy ? _ descriptions were old native residents of the lands, many of which had also been claimants for kuleana during the Mahele. The information was collected primarily between 1873 and 1885. The testimonies were ~ generally given in Hawaiian and simultaneously transcribed in English. ` i The Missionazy William Ellis visited the vicinity of the current project azea in 1823 and described the following: _ Leaving Kairua [Kailua], we passed through the villages thickly scattered along the shore to ' the southward. The country azound looked unusually green and cheerful, owing to the frequent rain, which for some months past have fallen on this side of the island. Even the barren lava, over which we traveled, seemed to veil its sterility beneath frequent tufts of tall waving grass, or spreading shrubs and flowers. I _ The side of the hills, laid out for a considerable extent m gazdens and fields, and generally ' cultivated with potatoes, and other vegetables, were beautiful. The number of heiaus, and depositories of the dead, which we passed, convinced us that _ this part of the island must formerly have been populous The latter were built with fragments of lava, laid up evenly on the outside, generally about eight feet long, from four to six broad, and about four feet high. Some appeared very ancient, other had evidently been standing but a few years. (1963[1823]:72-73). _ In 1848 during the Mahele, the majority of Kahului 2"d Ahupua`a was awarded to Grace Kama`iku`i (LCAw. 8516-B:3), and there were eight kuleana claims. Most claims were small and located along the ` _ shoreline and m the mauka (above 700 feet) regions (Haun and Henry 2004:8). Three claims were for coastal house lots (LCAw 7336:1 to Kuapu'u; LCAw 7073:8 to Kapa`e; and LCAw 10373 to Niniha) and the rest were for mauka cultivation plots. There were no kuleana clamed within the current project area. - Population declined and settlements became smaller in the Kona area during the Terr~tonal Period _ (1900-1959). Coastal occupation was concentrated in the small villages of Kailua and Keauhou, with permanent residences, gardens and animal pens scattered along the shoreline. Upland areas of Kahului were _ associated with the Kona Sugaz Company from 1891 until 1904 and later from 1908 to 1926 with the Kona ~ Development Company (Dorrance and Morgan 2000:112). The Kona Development Company employed both the predecessor sugar company's mill and plantation lands. However, the Kona Development Company used private contactors and independent homesteaders to provide the cane. Harvests were transported by the West Hawaii Railway Company, a narrow gauge railroad that was owned by the same consortium. An historic trestle associated with this railway is located mauka of the project area. The railroad was subsequently sold to Japanese investors. Walls may have been constructed to mazk cane field 6 ~ I RC-0532 I boundazies in the eazly years of the twentieth century. In 1927, Manuel Gomes acquired the Kahului ahupua `a along with Wai `aha ahupua `a, from the failed Kona Development Company (O'Haze and Wolforth 1997). The land became part of the Gomes Ranch and was actively used for cattle grazing and corralling until the 1960s. Most of the stone walls seen in the study azea today aze a legacy of the Gomes Ranch. _ Prior Archaeolo ical Studies in t g he Project Area Archaeological investigations previously conducted in Kahului 1$` and 2nd ahupua `a have primazil concentrated on the zone makai of the current project area (see Haun and Henry 2004 for a thorough overview). Hammatt and Tomonari-Tuggle (1978), Hammatt and Meeker (1979) and O'Haze and Wolforth (1997) swveyed and tested a 32 acre pazcel stretching from Ali`i Drive to the Kuakini Wall. Sites in the vicinity of the Kuakini Wall included: a heiau, a habitation structwe that might have been associated with some form of specialized production, a bwial, and walls (O'Haze and Wolforth 1997:4-2,4-3). Rechtman and Henry (1999) conducted an inventory swvey for a bridge along Ali`i Drive within Kahului 1st and 2nd ahupua `a. Walls and a habitation site were documented in this study. Three swveys were carried out for the proposed Ali'i Highway project (Ching et al. 1973; Dunn and Rosendahl 1991; Haun et al. 1998). S13iP Site 6331, a habitation site, comprised of 11 featwes, was recorded. Rechtman and - Dougherty swveyed a 12-acre parcel along Ali `i Drive in Kahului 2°d. Five archaeological sites were recorded including three Precontact permanent habitation sites, one Precontact temporary habitation site, and a historic wall. Haun and Henry (2004) conducted an archaeological swvey in a 35.1 acre pazcel makai of Kuakini Highway in Kahului 2nd Ahupua`a. Seventeen sites made up of 103 featwes were discovered. The Precontact sites discovered were typical of the coastal portion of the kula zone including agricultwal featwes, temporazy and permanent habitation sites, and burials. Historical sites discovered were all ranch related walls. Other azchaeological investigations within Kahului 1$` and 2°d ahupua `a (Dye 1978, Kennedy et al. 1992, Rosendahl 1989, Soehren 1976, 1979) have documented Precontact and Historical sites that aze typical of the kula section of the Kona Field System. Haun and Henry (2001) conducted an azchaeological swvey of an 87 acre pazcel mauka of the current project area located in Kahului 1S1 and 2nd ahupua `a. Twenty seven sites made up of 349 featwes were discovered. Precontact features identified included two agricultwal encloswes, two agricultwal terraces, a modified outcrop, an agricultwal wall, a small agricultwal complex with eleven featwes, a complex of 33 featwes interpreted as elements of the Kona field system, a temporary habitation modified outcrop, and two permanent habitation platforms. Historical sites recorded included a complex of 101 featwes interpreted to correspond to Land Commission Awazds, a complex of 181 clearing featwes interpreted as associated with sugazcane cultivation, a historic road with a retaining wall, a historic railroad trestle, and twelve ranch related walls or encloswes. Bulgrin and Rechtman's (2005a) archaeological inventory swvey of the 15-acre Pazce1 43 within the current project area identified six archaeological sites (Table 2, Figwe 4). Fow of the sites were core filled stone boundazy walls dating from the 1890s until the 1960s. One site, SIIII' Site 24556, was an encloswe related to twentieth century ranching activities; and the sixth site (SIHP Site 24558) was a Precontact temporary habitation modified outcrop. Cultural material recovered from test excavation at this Precontact site included marine shell, coral, mammal bone, volcanic glass flakes, and a basalt adze fragment. Table 2. Archaeological sites recorded within TMK•3-7-5-017.043 l SIHP No Formal Type Functional Type e 24553 Wall ~ 24554 Ranching Historic Wall Ranching Historic 24555 Wall 24556 Wall Boundazy Historic t 24557 Bout~dazy Historic Encloswe Ranching Historic 24558 Modified outcro Tem or habitation Precontact 1 7 ~ RC-0532 i I i N ~cc nee ve I0 2I0 4I0 ~ua~~a~~s, W Scale m meters 5~~' Q ~l Hienaloh Dnve I t I - - i . - i SIHP ~iEe 24558 ~ ti ~ - a~ ~ ~v - 1 ~ I N f I - N ~ Y 1 ~ - ~ ~ I _ 5IHP-Site 24557- ~ ~ Core filled wall ,:ter ~ ~~g=~'' ~ Barbed wire fence ; Limits of dozed road/area , H Gate j Limits of project area Figure 4. Plan view of Parce143. I 8 _ a L RC-0532 Bulgrin and Rechtman's (2005b) azchaeological inventory survey of the 15-acre Parce142 within the current project azea identified eight azchaeological sites (Table 3, Figure 5). Two of the sites were core filled stone boundary walls dating from the 1890s until the 1960s, four were historic period field cleazing piles, one was a historic period fence post support, and one comprised two Precontact period modified outcrop features (SlHI' Site 24562). Cultural material recovered from test excavation at this Precontact site included marine shell, mammal bone, volcanic glass, and organic plant remains. Table 3. Archaeological sites recorded within TMK•3-7-5-017.042 SIHP No Formal Type Functional Type A e 24553 Wall Boundary marker Historic 24555 Wall Boundary marker Historic 24562 Modified outcrop Temporary habitation Precontact 24563 Mound Clearing piles Historic 24564 Mound Clearing piles Historic 24565 Mound Clearing piles Historic 24566 Mound Clearing piles Historic 24567 Rock cluster Fence ost su rt Historic/modern The findings of the prior investigations allow for a comprehensive portrayal of past land use and settlement patterns for the area. The coastal kula areas of greater Kailua-Kona contain numerous late prehistoric and eazly historic residential sites. Many of these were associated with the more privileged members of Hawaiian society. Also known to exist in this region are heiau and burial features. Such sites are known from both historic records and archaeological investigation. Burial sites both within habitation features and in dedicated burial features are not uncommon in the area (O'Haze and Wolforth 1997). Also common in this azea are 'small agricultural features, often associated with the residential sites. Historic Period sites, frequently related to cattle ranching, also left their mark on the landscape; stone walls and cattle enclosures are found consistently along the azea mauka of present day Ali `i Drive (former ala loa). The Precontact SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 are considered significant under Criterion D, and further data recovery was recommended to augment the excavation data obtained during the testing. Data recovery excavations would shed further light on site age and function. Settlement patterning at the kula/kalu `ulu transition is poorly understood and these sites have potential to increase azchaeological understanding of the past uses of these traditional agricultural zones. What follows is a detailed description of the surface layout, test units, features and recovered items at Sites 24558 and 24562. L L L 9 RC-0532 i f - ' - ' - • - • - • - • - Project Area Boundary " Wire Fence Feature B Feature A SIHP Site 24562M`^r, ~ ~ i N ' N ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ i N i SIHP Site 24566 ~ SIHP Site\24563 SIHP Site 24564 SIHP Site 24565 ' - ~ SIHP Site 24567 ' f - 0 20 40 c Scale in meters ' - (heights m centimeters) Figure 5. Plan view of Parce142. i 10 i RC-0532 SIHP Site 24558 Site 24 558 is located in the north central portion of the Pazce143 (see Figure 4). The site is made up of two L terraces, a stacked mound, and several rock alignments on a bedrock outcrop (Figure 6). The site is situated on a lazge raised bedrock outcrop that runs easdwest, north of a small drainage. A terrace constructed directly adjacent to the outcrop extends 10 meters to the west. Another terrace is constructed perpendiculaz L to the outcrop and extends 15 meters to the south. Both terraces are located against raised bedrock, with the downslope edge of each consisting of stacked cobbles and boulders retaining a fill of small to medium cobbles. The makai terrace faces west, while the mauka terrace faces south. A boulder mound and a rock [ alignment beneath a large monkey pod tree are located east of the terraces. The mound is roughly rectangulaz and appears to have stacked sides. The rock alignment is piled against bedrock and may have resulted from mechanical earthmoving. Two 1 x 1 meter test units (TU) were excavated in terraces at Site 24558. TU-1 tested the mauka terrace and TU-2 sampled the makai terrace. TU-1 was placed at the western end of the mauka terrace oriented north south. The surface of the unit was primarily tightly fitted angular cobbles and boulders with some leaf litter. Lazge cracks and holes revealed that there were numerous air pockets in the layer below. Two stratigraphic layers were discovered within the unit. Layer I, which extended to 29 centimeters below the surface, was almost entirely tightly fit rock cobbles and boulders with some humus and leaf debris in pockets. Layer II, located approximately 29- 56 centimeters below the surface was a mix of rock (approximately 50 percent) and 7.SYR 2.5/3 very dazk C brown ganulated silt (Figure 7). No artifacts were discovered in Layer I. Two fragments of a cowry (Cypraea sp.) shell, rodent bones, and a volcanic glass flake were recovered from Layer II (Table 4). Table 4. Items recovered from SIHP Site 24558 TU-1. Acc. # Layer Material Type/species NISP MNI Weight (g) 1 II Mazme shell Cypraea sp. 2 1 0.8 2 II Rodent bone Mus sp. 3 1 0.3 3 II Volcanic glass Flake 1 - 0 5 r TU-2 was placed at the interior southern end of the makai terrace (Figure 6). Several large cobbles and small boulders were visible on the surface of the unit but grass and organic matter predominated. Excavation revealed that bedrock was very close to the surface across the unit except for in the center and the northwest corner. A single layer was discovered in TU-2 extending to a maximum depth of 96 centimeters below the surface that Consisted of 80 percent cobbles mixed with lOYR 2/2 very dazk brown silt (Figure 8). Soil within the unit became finer as depth increased supporting an inference that all soil within the layer percolated down from the surface. Artifacts recovered from TU-2 included: coral, marine r shell, mammal bone, volcanic glass flakes, waterworn basalt, and a basalt adze fragment (Table 5). The l basalt adze fragment was quite small but polished on two adjoining sides indicating that it was located near the bit end and probably broke off during use. An extremely small sample of charcoal was recovered as well Table 5. Items recovered from SIHP Site 24558 TU-2. L Acc. # Layer Material Type/species NISP MNI Weight (g) 4 I Coral Waterworn 4 - 80.50 5 I Mazine shell Cypraea sp. 2 2 30.75 6 I Marine shell Conus sp. 4 1 2.50 7 I Mammal bone Sus sp. 5 1 6.00 8 I Volcanic glass Flake 6 - 2.1 9 I Basalt Waterworn 1 - 160.90 10 I Basalt Adze fragment 1 - 1.1 r 11 I Organic Charcoal 9 - 0.30 L 11 ~ RC-0532 I ~ ~ _ ~ ~o2ed YOad 0 2 4 ~ ~ ~ Scale in meters _ , , ~ ~ (heights m centimeters) N true Stacked I I ~ I Bedrock O DO O ; - , 0 oQ a o ao O aR ~ Top of outcrop i 7 Flat "ll ~ TU' o ~ ~ ; (70 (50) ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ (45) a ~ ~ i Ry ~ o O - ~ ~ ~ (so ~ lao) zs> o o> (60) O (130 135) U ~ _ j Blister o TU-2 , o - , Leveled wrth cobbles (160 I i ~ Figure 6. SIHP Site 24558 plan view. ~ 12 RC-0532 L O 10 20 Layer I Scale in centimeters Layer I -Tightly fit rock cobbles and boulders with some humus and leaf debris in pockets. r Layer II Layer II -Mix of approximately 50% rock and 1 II-~ 7.SYR 2.5/3 very dark brown II~ granulated silt. r f L Figure 7. SIHP Site 24558 TU-1 east wall profile. t No soil above line II ~I - I_ Layer I 0 10 2 0 W Scale m centimeters Layer I - 80% cobbles mixed with I~l l OYR 2/2 very dark brown silt which became finer with depth. I~~ ~ II~ Figure 8. SIHP Site 24558 TU-2 south wall profile. 13 I i RC-0532 In the case of Site 24558, terracing associated with the outcrop is mostly rock filled level azeas, which does not fit well with inferences of planting features or rock cleazing. It is more likely that the terraces were ~ ~ constructed to rovide p paved level areas for habitatton. Cultural material associated with habitation including faunal remains were recovered from both of the test units. However, the amount of cultural material recovered from the test units and the informal construction of the two terraces suggests that Site 24558 was only used for temporary habitation. The location of this site neaz the interface between two traditional agricultural zones, the kula and the kalu`ulu, makes Site 24558 of particular interest for future settlement pattern studies. SII~P SITE 24562 SIHP Site 24562 consists of two modified outcrop features located in the southeastern portion of Parcel 42 (see Figure 5). Based on formal surface attributes and the results of test excavation these features appear to be related and collectively have functioned as a temporazy habitation site during Precontact times Feature A is a roughly rectangular modified outcrop with stacked rock walls along portions of all sides (Figure 9). The heights of stacked rock walls range from 40 centimeters to 1.2 meters. The stacked walls in conjunction with the pahoehoe fill that they retain, serve to extend the surface azea of the outcrop. Cracks in the pahoehoe bedrock are also filled creating a relatively level surface. Overall the feature measures 12 ' meters north south and 8 meters easbwest (Figure 9). In the center of the feature, one meter west of the eastern edge, there is a distinct pavement. This pavement is roughly rectangulaz and measures approximately 1.5 meters by 1.5 meters. This level surface is composed of medium sized pahoehoe cobbles ~ and is raised 30 centimeters above the rest of the outcrop. I TU-3 was excavated in the southwestern portion of the outcrop on a fairly level filled terrace azea (Figure 9). The surface of the unit was a fairly uniform level pavement of sub-angular pahoehoe cobbles. Two stratigraphic layers were recorded m the unit (Figures 10 and 11). The first was an architectural layer, i approximately 40 centimeters thick, composed of pahoehoe cobbles. No cultural material was discovered in the first layer but one small piece of coral, 4 centimeters in diameter, was observed but not collected. The 1 - second layer, approximately 22 centimeters thick, was 7.SYR 3/4 dark brown silt mixed with small ~ boulders and cobbles resting on decaying bedrock. A volcanic glass core, volcanic glass flakes, marine ' shell fragments, a mammal bone (Sus sp.) fragment, and chazcoal were recovered from the second layer (Table 6). - Table 6. Items recovered from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A TU-3 La er II. i Acc~Y Material T e/S ecies Count MNI Wei ht 2 Volcanic glass Core 1 - 13.5 3 Volcanic glass Flakes 7 6.4 ' _ 4 Mazine shell Cypraea sp. 2 1 0.8 ~ 5 Manne shell Isognomon sp. 1 1 0 6g _ 6 Marine shell Unknown 2 1 0.5 7 Mammal bone Sus sp. 1 1 0 Sg 8 Organic Kukui 4 - 0.3 9 Organic Charcoal 7 - 0 4 _ i II i _ 14 RC-0532 0 1 2 Scale in meters (heights m centimeters) Stacked ~ (100) II ~I Bedrock (tto) (60) (60) _ 0 ~ Q 0 Q ~ ~ Soil and cobbles (50) op ~ o ~ 0 epressio O ° ~ OpU~ O G~ ~ ~ ~ p ~O (ioo) o I ~ o ~ ~ ~~o dD L ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 O~ ° ~ 0~ ~ ~ 0 0 Cobbles ~ vQ o~~~ oQ v Q ~ p ~ 1 0 o (120) c (ioo> Figure 9. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A plan view. 15 l - - ' RC-0532 of li JO 1 Scale in centimeters ' Layer I ' Layer II II II _ ~ II ~I ' II ~I _ i Layer I -Architectural layer consisting of stacked sub-angular pdhoehoe cobbles. Layer II -Dark brown (7 SYR 3/4) silt. Figure 10. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A TIJ-3 west wall profile. ' ,r _ ~k < -~~i~, i y ~ p . ~ s`n , ~ * .v,~' ~ _ ~ I rP ~~~t ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~v ,~`~+`Yf ~'t ~ ~ ~ ~ +P"` qy ~1 ry , ~ .r. a, ~ ~ I Figure 11 SIHP Site 24562 Feature A TU-3 photograph of west wall profile. I 16 r i I_ RC-0532 TU-4 was excavated in the northwestern portion of the feature (see Figure 10). The surface of the unit was made up of pahoehoe cobbles of mixed sizes. Two stratigraphic layers were recorded in the unit (Figures 12 and 13). The first layer was an architectural layer made up of mixed size pahoehoe cobbles. The second layer was 7.SYR 3/4 dark brown clay loam averaging 5 centimeters in thickness and extending mto depressions in the pahoehoe bedrock. No cultural material was recovered from the umt. Feature B is a roughly "L" shaped modified outcrop (Figure 14) located 10.5 meters east of Feature A (see Figure 4). The main portion of the feature is a roughly paved area oriented northwest/southeast and _ measunng 5 meters in length by 2.7 meters wide (Figure 15). A second roughly paved azea oriented north south extends from the northeast corner, is 10 centimeters lower, and measures 2.7 meters by 1.4 meters. The alignment of the upper paved azea is cleazly visible, suggesting that the lower azea was added on to the upper. ~ { The site is constructed of stacked medium and lazge sized pahoehoe cobbles (see Figure 14) with a cobble pavement in the interior. Two distinctly smoother pavement azeas are visible. The western end of _ the "L" shape has a level surface composed of small pahoehoe cobbles, measuring 2.7 meters east/west x 1.6 meters north/south. A second paved surface, also composed of small pdhoehoe cobbles, is located at the northeastern end of the site. This second paved surface measures 1.2 meters by 1.2 meters. The rest of the outcrop is paved with larger pahoehoe cobbles (see Figure 15). TU-2, a 1 meter by 1 meter excavation unit, was excavated in the northwestern portion of the site (see Figure 15). The surface of the unit was fairly level sub-angular pahoehoe cobbles. Test excavation revealed two layers (Figures 16 and 17). The first layer was composed of piled rocks. One small piece of coral, approximately 2 centimeters in diameter, was observed in the northwest corner of the unit within Layer 1 but not collected. The second layer was pahoehoe cobbles intermixed with 7.SYR 3/4 dark brown silt resting on decaying bedrock. One volcanic glass flake was recovered from Level I of Layer 2 in TU-2. Chazcoal flecks were observed within the unit but were too small to be collected. i L 7 3 3 17 - RC-0532 0, 10 2p W Scale in centimeters t Layer I II ~I Layer II II~ i II ~I ~ Layer I - Architectural layer cons~sring of mixed size pahoehoe cobbles Layer II -Dark brown (7 SYR 3/4) clay loam. ' I Figure 12 SIHP Site 24562 Feature A TU-4 west wall profile. i j i _ ~ P ~ I 1 ~r I I ~ I 1 i - * ~I I ! t^~ ~7 Y ~ _~~~fi ~ ~ `l rYia ~ aiai4~~7 ~_~,~I ~ ..Ij.O~itt~M ~ s . '..~ul 1 Figure 13. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A TU-4 base of excavation, view to the east. ~ I 18 RC-0532 ~ I ; ~ c j~ijoy' .I ~[r !.g A A } ~ f ~«w.,.~ ; I f- C ~ I ~ Figure 14. SIHP Site 24562 Feature B, view to the north. 0 1 2 O Scale in meters [ (heights m centimeters) N tnu ~ ~ Stacked I X45) 40)~ ~ ('70) ~j_ Bedrock ~ ,,T~~,~ ~ ~ (60) L (90) l Figure 15. SIHP Site 24562 Feature B plan view. 19 - - - - - - RC-0532 i j 0 10 20 - Scale m centirneters Layer I i I Layer II j i i i II ~I I II ~I i II ~I ~ I Layer I - Architectural layer cons~shng of stacked pdhohoe cobbles I Layer II - Pc3hoehoe cobbles intermixed with dark brown (7 SYR 3/4) silt ' Figure 16. SIHP Slte 24562 Feature B TU-2 west wall profile. i' 'i ~ i I ~ P~ o t a Y I ~i - ~ t ~ I ~ I _ ,ia • ~ I F Iu re 1 7. SI HP g Site 24 5 62 Fea lure - B TU 2 hoto a h p gr p of west wall profile. 20 i i RC-0532 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Whereas the archaeological test excavations at SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 summarized above aze indicative of the extant formal attributes and contents of these sites, specifics pertaining to the timing of occupation(s) site function(s), and structural features remain unknown. It is these three topics that form the { basic research objectives of the can ent data recovery effort. L The first topic, timing of occupation, will be addressed by the recovery of sufficiently sized chazcoal sampies from well-sealed contexts. Attention will be given to identifying in situ, single source charcoal pieces lazge enough for conventional C14 assaying. If such remains are recovered, a maximum of four samples will be submitted for age determination analysis. The second topic, the specific function of the site, will be addressed through an intensive subsurface l sampling of the site (see Research Methods below) and detailed materials and spatial analyses. It is hypothesized that the sites were used for short-term habitation and activities associated with agriculture. The type and vanety of material remains recovered from the excavation should provide sufficient { information to assess this hypothesis. The third topic, the identification of any former superstructure, can be addressed through a combination of both a detailed examination of the extant surface architecture and a detailed recordation of subsurface architectural elements. Based on information contained in Hiroa (1957:II), possible structure types include: 1) the vaziations of simple wall-less houses, where the roof rests directly on the ground; 2) short stone walled houses, where the roof structure rests on a stem wall built of dry stack rock; or 3) thatched wall houses, which may have only had a rock pavement. The structural elements (posthole patterns and rock alignments) of these different house styles aze sufficiently distinct that if any aze identified it will be a simple matter to pinpoint which house style if any was present. Over and above the three topics outlined above, this data recovery effort has the potential to recover unexpected information that will add to the growing corpus of knowledge concerning Precontact use of Kona's kulalkalu'ulu transition zone Whatever information is recovered it will be useful and available for incorporation into future regional syntheses. RESEARCH TECHNIQUES This section describes the technical approaches for the proposed data recovery. It includes discussion of sampling strategy, analysis of recovered remains, curatorial concerns, and actions to be taken in the event that human remains aze discovered. Sampling Strategy In order to obtain sufficient coverage of the sites, a total of 18 squaze meters will be dug across SIHP Site 24558 and Features A and B of 24562. Date recovery excavation units, including 2 x 2 meter, 1 x 2 meter, and 1 x 1 meter, will be placed strategically so as to recover the maximum amount of artifacts and/or features. For this reason many excavation units will be placed adjacent to those test units that have yielded an above-average number of artifacts. Most notably, TU-2, near the southwestern side of SIHP Site 24558, and TU-3, near the southern edge of SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, were productive test units that will have excavation units placed directly adjacent to them (see Figures 18 and 19). Nonetheless, the less productive TU-2 of SIHP Site 24562 Feature B also will receive additional excavation units in the event of unexpected activity locales or features being discovered (Figure 20). 21 i RC-OS32 I ~ 2 4 ed road D°Z Scale to meters N (heights m centimeters) t»u ~ C~ Stacked ' Ij II Bedrock ~ I O ~o~ ~ pro Oa Oo~ o o a O oR ~ Top of outcrop Flat TU-1 R1 (~o ~ (so) ~ ~ 2 ~ o (4s) ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ R~ i O ~ ~ (80 R~ 40) 25) o o) (60) ~ 13s) (130 a~ i 1~ ~ H ~ f i Blister a _ TU-2 Leveled with cobbles (160 ~ I Figure 18. Sampling strategy for data recovery at SIHP Site 24558. 22 i t RC-0532 0 1 2 Scale in meters (heights in centimeters) N Stacked ~ -I I (loo> 11= Bedrock (110) (60) TU-4 ~ (60> o ~g ~ oQ o~ ~ Soil and cobbles ~ (50) o~ ~ ~ p epressio 00 ~ ~ 0~ ~ f I d~ 0 ~ ~ O o h o o~ Cj~ o ~ ~0 O 0 0 Cobbles ~ va ~ o p o ~r o ~ a ~s o ; ' I,y, l' st l~l~ ~ 0 (120) I fi~ (100) f~ Figure 19. Sampling strategy for data recovery at SIHP Site 24562, Feature A. 23 I ' RC-0532 ~ 0 .5 1 f Scale to meters N (heights m centimeters) true Stacked ^ II ~I Bedrock i II 11 (45) (40) II ~I , II ~I (70) (25) TU-2 II ~1 ~ j f ~ ~ ' II II , II ~I _ t (60) (70) ~ I~ II ~%p i Ii ~I (90) , Figure 20 Sampling strategy for data recovery at SIHP Site 24562, Feature B. 24 ~m RC-0532 Hitherto unexcavated, but promising-looking features will also be sampled, such as the stone platfonn- like feature near the center of SIHP Site 24562 Feature A (Figure 19). If during the course of fieldwork the excavation crew comes across apromising-looking area, they might choose to excavate a unit in this productive area instead of areas known to contain fewer artifacts. A comprehensive but yet malleable approach such as this one will ensure adequate spatial coverage and a sufficient sample of known and hypothesized portions of the site. Excavation units will be dug by hand using 10 centimeter arbitrazy levels within natural stratigraphic layers. An exception to this will be where excavation units are positioned to sample piled rock features. In these cases the azchitectural layer will be dug as a single layer. When the feature cobbles have been removed, the underlying deposits will be excavated by arbitrary 10 centimeter levels within layers. All depths will be measured relative to an elevation datum established for the feature. Excavated matrix will be passed through 1/4 inch mesh screen and cultural material will be collected and segregated by level. Level Record Forms will be completed for each excavated level. Subsurface features encountered during excavation will be fully documented and sampled, if appropriate. Excavation will continue until bedrock is encountered. Upon completion of the excavation unit, a Unit Summary Form will be completed. All units will be photographed before and after excavation. Additional photographs will be taken to document the progress of the excavation. Cultural Material Analyses All recovered cultural material will be processed in the Rechtman Consulting, LLC laboratory facility. Items will be cleaned, weighed, counted, described, and entered into a master project catalog. Where appropnate, artifacts will be drawn, photographed, and subject to further detailed analyses as may be 1 appropnate for addressing the specific reseazch questions. Faunal remains will be tabulated and identified L to the lowest taxonomic level possible. Where applicable, the Number of Identified Specimens (NISP) and the Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI) will be determined. If sufficient soil deposits aze encountered during the data recovery excavations, soil samples will be collected for flotation analysis. Charcoal and other organic samples will be prepared for possible radiocarbon analysis. Radiocarbon Samples The radiocazbon samples collected dunng fieldwork will be prioritized based on size, provenience, and integrity of association. Priority will be given to lazge single-piece samples recovered in situ from a clear stratigraphic context. All samples v~nll be cataloged and initially cleaned and weighed in the Rechtman Consulting, LLC laboratory factlity. If lazge single piece wood chazcoal is recovered, portions of the sample will undergo wood identification analysis. Following this process, those samples selected for radiocarbon age determination will be sent to Beta Analytic Inc for analysis. Conventional radiocarbon J analysis coupled with a calculation of stable isotope ratios (C 13/12) will be used for most samples. In + instances where a particulaz sample is of a small size (between 0.3 and 1.0 gram final carbon) extended counting will also be used. f curation of Recovered Archaeological Material 1 All material recovered during data recovery will be temporarily stored at the Rechtman Consulting, LLC I curation facility for a period of no more than one year following submission of the final data recovery l report, during which time arrangements will be made for permanent curation in consultation with the landowner and DLNR-SHPD. It is the responsibility of the landowner to secure permanent curation in an acceptable facility; included in this responsibility are the costs associated with long-term curation. Discovery of Human Remains If during the data recovery investigation human remains are encountered, such remains will be treated l following the procedures outlined in HRS §§6E-43. Work in the area of the discovery will be halted, the remains stabilized if necessazy, and DLNR-SHPD contacted to provide guidance on how to proceed with the discovery. r I 25 RC-0532 I ' REFERENCES CITED + ~ Bulgrin, L and R. Rechtman 2005a An Archaeological Inventory Survey of TMK.•3-7-5-017:043. Rechtman Consulting Report RC-0285 Prepared for Hualalai Partners of Kona, LLC. 2005b An Archaeological Inventory Survey of TMK.•3-7-5-017:042. Rechtman Consulting Report RC-0285. Prepared for Hualalat Partners of Kona, LLC. Chinen, J. 1961 Original Land Titles in Hawait. Honolulu: privately published. Ching, F., E. Neller, S. Palama, and P. Griffin 1973 The Archaeology of North Kona, from the Ahupua`a of Kahului to the Ahupua`a of + Kahalu`u. Surface Survey: Realignment of Ali`i Dnve Hawaiian Archaeological Journal i 73-2. Archaeological Research Center Hawaii, Inc. ' Cordy, R. - 1981 A Study of Prehistoric Social Change: The Development of Complex Societies in the ' Hawaiian Islands. New York: Academic Press. ~ 1995 Central Kona Archaeological Settlement Patterns. State Historic Preservation Division, DLNR, State of Hawai `i. Prepazed for the Planning Depaztment, County of Hawai `i. w Dorrance, W. and F. Morgan 2000 Sugaz Islands: The 165 Yeaz Story of Sugaz in Hawaii. Mutual Publishing: Honolulu ' Dunn, A ,and P. Rosendahl 1991 Preliminazy Report: Phase 1(a) -Site Identification, Phased Intensive Archaeological Survey, Ahi Highway Phased Mitigation Program, North Kona District, Island of ' • Hawaii. PHRI Report 900-052191. Prepared for R M. Towill Corporation. - • ~ Dye, T 1978 An Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of Four Alternative Sites for the Kailua- Keauhou Elementary School. Ms. 031078. Depaztment of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu Ellis, W. [ 1823)1963 Journal of William Ellis, Narrative of a Tour of Hawaii, or Owhyee Honolulu. Advertiser Publishing Co., Ltd. + Hammatt, H. 1980 Archaeological Surface Survey of a 178 Acre Parcel in Na Ahupua`a, Kaumalumalu, Pahoehoe, Kona, Hawai `i Island. Archaeological Research Center Hawaii, Inc. Report ' - 14-203 II. Prepared for Fazms and Ranches, Inc. Hammatt, H., and S. Clark 1980 Archaeological Testing and Salvage Excavations of a 155 Acre Parcel in Na Ahupua`a - Pahoehoe, La`aloa and Kapala`aea, Kona, Hawaii. Archaeological Research Center Hawaii Report 14-152 III. Prepared for Pacific Basin Resorts, Inc. Hammatt, H ,and W. Folk ' - 1980 Archaeological Survey, Phase 1: Portions of Keauhou-Kona Resort, Keauhou and Kahaluu, Kona, Hawaii Island. Archaeological Research Center Hawaii, Inc. 14-177 II.1. Lawai. Prepared for Kamehameha Investment Corp. - Hammatt, H ,and V. Meeker 1979 Archaeological Excavations and Heiau Stabilization at Kahalu`u, Kona, Hawaii Island. ! Archaeological Research Center Hawaii Report 14-172 (II). Prepared for Gerald Park, ~ _ Urban Planner i I I _ 26 ~ RC-0532 Hammatt, H. and M. Tomonari-Tuggle 1978 Archaeological Surface Survey of the Old Gomes Property Belonging to Pacific Basin Resorts, Inc. Kahului, Kona, Hawai `i Island. ARCH Report 14-142. Prepazed for Gerald Pazk, Urban Planner. Han, T., S. Collins, S. Clark, and A. Garland I 1986 Moe Kau a Ho`oilo: Hawaiian Mortuary Practices at Keopu, Kona, Hawaii. Chapter VII. L_ Artifacts and Manuports from the Keopu Burial Site. Departmental Report Series 86-1. Department of Anthropology, B. P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Prepared for Hawaii Department of Transportation. Handy, E.S.C., E.G. Handy, and M. Pukui 1991 Native Planters in Old Hawaii: Their Life, Lore and Environment. B.P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 223. Honolulu: Department of Anthropology, Bishop Museum Press. (Revised edition) Haun, A. and D. Henry 2004 Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMK: (3) 7-5-19:01, Land of Kahului 2, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Haun & Associates report 175-092204. Prepared for Sunstone Realty Partners, LLC, Honolulu, Hawaii. Haun, A., and J. Henry 2001 Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMK:7-5-16:15, 16, 17, 29, Kahului 1 and 2, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Haun and Associates report 023-041701. Prepared for Bolton, Inc. i Haun, A., J. Henry, J. Jimenez, M. Kirkendall, K. Maly, and T. Wolforth L 1998 Ali`i Highway Phased Mitigation Program Phase I-Archaeological Intensive Survey, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii, Vol. 1, Summary. PHRI Report 1320-052798. Submitted to the County of Hawai `i c% R. M. Towill Corporation. Kaschko, M., and P. Rosendahl 1987 Full Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey, Kealakekua Ranch Makai Land j Subdivision, Land of Kealakekua, South Kona, Island of Hawaii (TMK:3-8-2-02:2,33). t- PHRI Report 244-100186. Prepared for Kealakekua Ranch, Ltd. Kelly, M. 1983 Na Mala O Kona: Gazdens of Kona. A History of Land Use in Kona, Hawaii. Departmental Report Series 83-2. Depaztment of Anthropology, B. P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Prepared for the Department of Transportation, State of Hawaii. r Kennedy, J., M. Maigret, and T. Denham 1992 Inventory Survey and Subsurface Testing Results for a Property in the Ahupua`a of Kahului 2nd, North Kona Distnct, Island of Hawaii (TMK:3-7-5-19:43). Archaeological Reseazch Center Hawaii. Prepazed for Dr. James Watson. Ladefoged, T. 1991 Hawaiian Architectural Transformations during the Eazly Historic Era. Asian Perspectives 30(1):55-70. L Newman, T. 1970 Hawaiian Fishing and Farming on the Island of Hawaii, A.D. 1778. Division of State Parks, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Honolulu. O'Haze, C., and T. Wolforth 1997 Archaeological Inventory Survey of the Gomes Property Parcel, Land of Kahalui 1st, Island of Hawaii (TMK: 3-7-5-19:5, 38, 40). PHRI Report 1807-10197. Submitted to L Towne Development of Hawai `i, Inc. ~C 27 RC-0532 Rechtman, R., and D. Dougherty 2000 An Archaeological Inventory Survey of TMK. 3-7-5-19:44, 45, Kahului 2nd Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Rechtman Consulting Report RC-0027 Prepared for Sunstone Realty Partners, LLC. Rechtman, R., and J. Henry 1999 Archaeological Inventory of the Kahului Bridge Replacement Project, Kahului 1st and 2nd Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawai`z. PHRI Report 1945-080499. Prepared for Ron Terry, Ph D., Kea`au. Rosendahl, P 1989 Archaeological Field Inspection, Kahului 1st Development Parcel, Land of Kahulur 1st, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii (TMK:3-7-5-19:46). PHRI Report 709-091989. - Prepared for Mr. Dazwin Lindberg. Soehren, L. , 1976 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of Porizon of Kahului 2nd, North Kona, Hawaii Island. Prepared for P. Yoshimura, Inc. 1979 Letter Report• Archaeological and Historical Features on that Portion of TMK:3-7-5-19.1 ~ Which Lies Between the Great Wall of Kuakin~ and the Kualam Highway in the Land of Kahului 2, North Kona, Hawau Prepazed for Hiroshi Kasamoto, Inc. Tamter, J. 1973 The Social Correlates of Mortuazy Patterning at Kaloko, North Kona, Hawaii. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology zn Oceania 11:91-105. , Tomonan-Tuggle, M. 1993 Draft Report, the Archaeology of the `Ohi`a Preserve; An Inventory Survey of Surface Structures International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc (IARII). Submitted to Kamehameha Investment Corporation, Honolulu. ' Sato, H., W. Ikeda, R. Paeth, R. Smythe, and M. Takehiro, Jr. ' _ 1973 Sozl Survey of the Island of Hawaii, State of Hawazz. U.S. Department of Agriculture, ' Soil Conservation Service and Universrty of Hawai `i Agricultural Experiment Station. - Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. ~ Schrlt, A. ' 1984 Subsistence and Conflict m Kona, Hawaii An Archaeological Study of the Kualum - Highway Realignment Corridor. Departmental Report Serves 84-1. Department of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Prepared for the Department of Transportation, State of Hawaii. _ Soehren, L., and T. Newman 1968 Archaeology of Kealakekua Bay. Depaztment of Anthropology, B P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, and Universrty of Hawaii-Manoa. _ Wolfe, E , and J Morris 1996 Geologic Map of the Island of Hawai`z. Geologic Investigations Series Map 1-2524-A. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. i 28 ATTACHMENT 6 . ~ ~ March 10, 2009 Date: - ~ Submittal Sheet for Historic Preservation Review Filing Fees RECEIVE D ' ~ State Historic Preservation Division APR 171009 ~ 601 Kamokila Blvd, #555, Kapolei, Hawaii 96707 Agency/Firm eshn Bob ~Ckttlyl~ ~ g Review): . Rechtman Consulting, LLC Contact: Bob Rechtman . old -C~~i1tKt~ Adcress 50 -A7 E. Lanikauta »...........».-•••».».~E•Mail: bob~recTitmariconsuitfng:con Street Hito~Ht 96720. Title of RepartlPTan: Archaeological Data Recovery Plan for SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 Island: Hawaii District: North Kona _ qh ua'a: Kahului 2 _ TMK [(1) 1-1-001:001]: (3) 7-5-b~5`"~d'~;~b~3 _.......M.._..........»..».......» Submitted Plan/Report Fee 8c Type: (All reports or plans submitted to the SHPD far review shall be ` accompanied by the appropriate fee in accordance with HAIL § 13-275-4 and §284-4). - Indicate here (JQ ifreport is a re-submittal (no fee charged) ~ $SO Archaeological Assessment $1 SO Archaeological Inventory Survey Plan $4S0 Archaeological, tlrchitectural or Ethnographic Survey Report $1S0 Preservation Plan _ $25 Monitoring Plan $1 S0 Archaeological Data Recovery Plan $2S0 Burial Treatment Plan $100 Archaeological Monitoring Report, if resources reported _ ...X».~..... $4S0 Archaeological Data Recovery Report . $4S0 Ethnographic Documentation Report o $25 Burial Disin -o Z ferment Report ~ $SO Osteological Analysis Report a c ~s Make check payable to "Rawer'! p Historic Preservation S ecial Fund" A ~r»-vrn _ service charge of $1 S will be assessed on all dishonored checks pursuant fo HRS §40-3S.S" A copy of this form wi11 be mailed or faxed back to you and ~ Fee Total: $ ..450 will serve as your receipt. ~ r+t~ _ r (/t For Office Use Onl ~ Date Received: Recei t No.: Payment Method •57i~.»».......»»..»..»»..»....».........».»»»......»»»..»»..».. ' 1 Check: r $ ...»Q~ . „ Log. No.. Y~. Check No.: --..~..~:7 Receipt Issued by: - Treasury Deposit Receipt No:~•„~~~»~» L RC-0532 Archaeological Data Recovery of SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 (TMK:3-7-5-017:042 and 043) ~ ,iI ~ till, ~ '9 Ih° ~ P " i iv ~ ~ i Kahului 2nd Ahupua `a ~I North Kona District Island of Hawai `i - ~I _ V DRA FT VERSION PREPARED B Y: Lizabeth A. Hauani`o, B.A. Johannes H. N. Loubser, Ph.D. and Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D. PREPARED FOR: Lee Barrett Brendan Lee, LLC 16541 Gothard Street, Suite. 109 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 February 2009 RBC.HTMA = ~ lyg ~iy G, LLC 507 A E. La ` kaula c. ' o, Hawaii 96720 phone: (808) 64-666 :(808)443-0065 e-mail: boE(grec~h mat~cons~lcing.com ARCHAEOLOGICAL`'tEULTUF~~L. A4VE'J~Y'~(STORIGAL STUDIES 1 - RC-0532 Archaeological Data Recovery of SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 TMK:3-7-5-017:042 and 043 Kahului 2nd Ahupua`a ~ North Kona District , Island of Hawai `i RECHTNjgN> CONSULTING ~ I I I C RC-0532 j Contents INTRODUCTION 1 Description of the Project Area 1 BACKGROUND 4 ` Physical and Cultural-Historical Setting 4 PREVIOUS ARC ~ HAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH. 7 SITE DESCRIPTIONS AND INVENTORY SURVEY RESULTS 11 S1HP Site 24558 11 SII3P Site 24562 14 THE DATA RECOVERY EFFORT 21 Research Questions Raised by Previous Results 21 Data Recovery Methods 21 Cultural Material Analyses 21 Radiocarbon Sampling.. 21 Curation of Recovered Archaeological Material 21 DESCRIPTION OF DATA RECOVERY RESULTS 22 Introduction 22 SII-iP Site 24558 22 S113P Site 24562 L 25 SYN'T'HESIS OF RESULTS 49 Introduction [ 49 Timing of occupation 51 Specific site and feature functions 51 Possible superstructures 60 CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS 60 REFERENCES CITED 62 APPENDIX A 66 APPENDIX B 72 i Figures 1. Project area location 2 2. Tax Map Key: 3-7-5-017 showing current study parcels (042 and 043) 3 3. Typical vegetation cover across the project area 4 RC-0532 4. Plan view of Parcel 43 8 5. Plan view of Par'ce142 6. SII~P Site 24558 plan view 10 12 7. SII~P Site 24558, TU-1 east wall profile 13 8. SIHP Site 24558, TU-2 south wall profile 13 9. S>1--iP Site 24562 Feature A, plan view 15 10. S1HP Site 24562 Feature A, TU-3 west wall profile 16 11. S1T-iP Site 24562 Feature A, TU-3 base of excavation 16 12. S1HP Site 24562 Feature A, TU-4 west wall profile 17 13. S1HP Site 24562 Feature A, TU-4 base of excavation 17 14. SII3P Site 24562 Feature B, view to the north....; 18 15. SII-1P Site 24562 Feature B plan view 19 16. SIHf' Site 24562 Feature B, TU-2 west wall profile 20 17. SII~P Site 24562 Feature B, TU-2 base of excavation. 20 18. S1TiP Site 24558 plan view with EU placement 23 19. SIHP Site 24558, EU-1 base of excavation 20. SIHP Site 24558, EU-1 west wall profile 24 24 i 21. SIHP Site 24558, EU-2 base of excavation 26 I 22. SII-1P Site 24558, EU-2 north wall profile. 26 23. S1HP Site 24562 Feature A, plan view with EU placement 27 ' 24. SII-1P Site 24562 Feature A, EU-3 base of excavation 28 25. SII~P Site 24562 Feature A, EU-3 north wall profile. 26. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A EU 28 -6 base of excavation 30 ~ 27. SII-iP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-6 north wall profile. " 30 28. SII3P Site 24562 Feature A, EU-7 base of excavation 2 29. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-7 southeast wall profile. 32 ~ 30. Plan view of waterworn basalt hamrnerstone from EU-8 (Acc. #37) ' 33 31. Side view of waterworn basalt ha mmerstone (Acc. #37) 33 32. Waterworn basalt hammerstone from EU-8 (Acc. #40) 34 33. SII~P Site 24562 Feature A, EU-8 base of excavation 34 i 34. S1HP Site 24562 Feature A, north wall profile of EUs-11, -12, -13, and -8 35 35. S1T-iP Site 24562 Feature A E -9 base of excavation 37 - ~ 36. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A EU-9 ' north wall profile. 37 37. SII3P Site 24562 Feature A EU-10 base of excavation _ . 39 iii ' C RC-0532 38. S1IdP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-10 north wall profile 39 39. Plan view of waterworn basalt hammerstone from EU-11 (Acc. #75) 41 40. Side view of waterworn basalt hamInerstone from EU-11 (Acc. #75) 41 41. SII-iP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-11 base of excavation 42 42. SII3P Site 24562 Feature A, EU-12 base of excavation 43 43. Plan view of worked coral from EU-13 (Acc. #93) 44 44. SIIiP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-13 base of excavation 45 45. SIIIP Site 24562 Feature B, plan view with EU placement 46 46. SIIiP Site 24562 Feature B, EU-4 photograph of west wall profile 47 47. SII-IP Site 24562 Feature B, EU-4 west wall profile 47 48. S]HP Site 24562 Feature B, EU-5 south wall profile 48 49. Map of study area showing excavated sites and features ..................................................50 L 50. S1I3P Site 24562 Feature A, average item count per unit 54 51. S1HP Site 24562 Feature A, average item weight per unit 55 52. SIIiP Site 24562 Feature B, average item count per unit 56 53. SIHP Site 24558, average item count per unit 58 54. SII IP Site 24558, average item weight per unit 59 Tables 1. Traditional Hawaiian agricultural zones 5 2. Archaeological sites recorded within TMK:3-7-5-017:043 7 L 3. Archaeological sites recorded within TMK:3-7-5-017:042 9 4. Cultural material recovered from S1HP Site 24558 TU-1 11 S. Cultural material recovered from SIIiP Site 24558 TU-2 14 6. Cultural material recovered from SII-IP Site 24562 Feature A TU-3 Layer II 14 7. Excavated area during the current data recovery 22 8. Cultural material recovered from SIIiP Site 24558 EU-1, Layer II Level 1 22 [ 9. Cultural material recovered from S)FIIP Site 24558 EU-2, Layer II Level 1 25 10. Cultural material recovered from S]HP Site 24562 Feature A EU-3 25 11. Cultural material recovered from SII3P Site 24562 Feature A EU-6 29 12. Cultural material recovered from SII-IP Site 24562 Feature A EU-7 13. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A EU-8 36 l 14. Cultural material recovered from S]HP Site 24562 Feature A EU-9 38 15. Cultural material recovered from SII-1P Site 24562 Feature A EU-10 40 1 ti RC-0532 16. Cultural material recovered from SII3P Site 24562 Feature A EU-11 42 17. Cultural material recovered from SII-1P Site 24562 Feature A EU-12 43 18. Cultural material recovered from SII~ Site 24562 Feature A EU-13 44 19. Cultural material recovered from SIhIIP Site 24562 Feature B EU-4 48 20. Summary of sites, features, sub-features, and units excavated within study area 49 21. Radiocarbon assays from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A by increasing age 51 22. Calibrated radiocarbon dates from SII3P Site 24562 Feature A by increasing age........... 51 23. Rank ordering of sub-features by descending item weight 52 24. Summary of items from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A 53 25 Summary of items from SIHP Site 24562 Feature B 57 26. Summary of items from SIHP Site 24558 . 57 61 _ 7. Summary of items from study area by descending ubiquity i i I i i V RC-0532 l INTRODUCTION On behalf of Mr. Lee Barrett of Brendan Lee, LLC, Rechtman Consulting, LLC conducted data recover ` excavations at SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 on TMKs:3-7-5-017:42 and 43. These sites aze on neighboring pazcels that were subject to Archaeological Inventory Swveys conducted by Rechtman Consulting, LLC in 2005 (Bulgrin and Rechtman 2005a and 2005b). Each parcel is roughly 15-acres in size; TMK:3-7-5- 017:043 is immediately west of Kahului-Hienaloli Road and south of Hualalai Road, and TMK:3-7-5- 017:042 is situated immediately west of Parce143. As a result of the Archaeological Inventory Swveys of the two parcels (Bulgrin and Rechtman 2005a and 2005b), SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 were determined to be significant under state significance Criterion D, as possessing the potential to provide scientific information concerning Precontact land-use practices at the kula/kalu `ulu interface of the Kona Field System. SIHP Site 24558 within Parce143 consists of two modified outcrops, and SIFB' Site 24562 within Pazce142 is a terracelmound/modified outcrop site complex. Both sites were thought to represent temporazy l habitation. This report describes the data recovery excavations at these sites, which were conducted in accordance with an SHPD-approved Data Recovery Plan (Loubser and Rechtman 2008). The successful completion of this report will serve to mitigate any negative impacts to Sites 24558 and 24562 that will [ result from the proposed development of the azea. Description of the Project Area As mentioned above, the current project azea consists of TMK:3-7-5-017:042 and TMK: 3-7-5-017:043, which are both m Kahului 2nd Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii (Figwes 1 and 2). The project azea is bounded to the north by a stone wall previously identified as SIHP Site 24555, to the east by Hualalal Road, to the south by a stone wall running along the Kahului 2"d/Puapua`a boundary that was previously identified as SIHF Site 24553; and to the west by an undeveloped parcel (TMK:3-7-5-017:041). Terrain in the project azea is gently undulating and elevation ranges from 500 to 550 feet above sea level. The project azea is characterized by Punalu`u extremely rocky peat (Sato et al. 1973), awell-drained, thin l organic soil over bedrock. The underlying bedrock is pdhoehoe dating to more than 10,000 years B.P. (Wolfe and Morns 1996). Despite the seemingly consistent semi-and condition of this azea, seasonality is evident. Throughout the Hawaiian Islands, the warmer and drier summer months, traditionally referenced as kau, extend from May to September, and the wetter, cooler months (ho `oilo) extend from October to April (Handy and Handy 1972). The temperatwes in the Kona azea aze generally consistent with this seasonal pattern, ranging between 62-80 degrees in winter and 68-86 degrees in summer (Schilt 1984). However, the typical rainfall pattern differs considerably from that seen elsewhere; in all elevations along the Kona coast, rainfall during kau is typically less than that during ho'oilo (Schilt 1984). Vegetation within the project area consists of a combination of kiawe (Prosopis pallida), koa haole (Leucaena glauca) and a vanety of grasses, vines, weeds, and shrubs (Figure 3). Prior impacts within the I project area can be described as substantial. Mechanical earth moving associated with extensive grubbing is L evident throughout the project area. L l i RC-0532 t9 190 . _ ~ Portions of USGS 7.5 minute serves quadrangles Katlua and Kealakekua HI 1995 ® • Ka ua- • w Ko I,®,O ~ ® ; \ 1 ° 1 S -t - \ ~ " ~ ~ r ~ rr, , ~ tr - rte 7SPn `~:Y.~ i1 e=.,:~°t' .'r 54», nm,.; L Al ~ ~1 ~ S~i~", 4 v i iY Y 11 nF ;~i 1G Laniak a em Y • ' w.=~ i • y. , ~ ,J , ~ ' , . 4 r~ ax~~r LJ a kg „e ° e ~ P+ - . : r ri ~ ~ " p U , ; • , ti r Ka/ae ~ _ v ~ c~ n Paakai .m s ~ ~ fly \ ® ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ocks~ 'o• ater \ '•Ta ks O V ~ T nk • ; ~ Hdlcre ~ Park . ' r.. ' ® U I e Prolect area °o . 1t - ~ 1 ?o . ~ L~ o ~ ~ rte, Y,P P ~ i _ +i ' • K halo 4 V * ~ + ABM 53 4 / ~ i ~ ~ ~ _ • ~ \ 1 PROJECT AREA f ~ ~ 0 fir, • .r . ~'4 - ~r~y , ~ ' ~ . p® Km • a i ~ ~ ~ ~~z i ~ ad Island of Hawat`t * a "x x ~ 0 .25 .5 l km ~ ~ ~ It w *5 ~ ~ Ftgure 1. Project area location. sr'" ~ I I I 2 RC-0532 i ~o B ae~ ~ t ~oa r ~ - .y1 Ml h fv» ~ ~ ~ N F j 16 C I ' 1r nn *1 1 O i i r`At 1~ ~ , 7d i I ~ ~ 4 I ,,p ~ ~ 3 r ~ ~ $ h 1 =1 ~ e l h Q~ ~ A ° ~ ! o ~ ~ 4 ~ ~j Y ~ 1 h 1? ~ ~ e ~ ~ ® ' 1 ~ I ~ ~ Q ~ ~ . r%_ •s~ ~ f s ~ ' 1 a m ~ ~ } :2 ~ ~ f~ ~ ~ d ~ A -T~ R p tu? ~ TT ~ T u ~ ~ bx ~ a ~ i a ~ : ~ ~ a ~ ~ A V m l St~Y U_ ~ ~ r ) NAN^r, ' O ; ~ tp V ~ 1 ~ ,r ~ J f ~ ~ r j 11 ~~t ~ ~ ~ ~ jtA ~ i i ~ ~ ~ r A! ~ ~ ~ r o v a ~ a i i ~ ii t ~ it. I~~l ~ r3 % i t ~ I I ~ t `r t O I I OL , ~ L IIQ ~ 1 ~ O Q i J , ' ~ ~ ~ 1 * \ I ~ ;°l~® 1 I a ° n w ~ ; 2 ~r~ ~~w"I' ~ ~ ~p ~ d 8 Figure 2. Tax Map Key: 3-7-5-017 showing current study parcels (042 and 043 shaded). 3 RC-0532 - Figure 3. Typical vegetation cover across the project area. ' ~ i D yy~~ ~ TAT i ~D~C1~~~®V l~l~ This section of the report describes and synthesizes prior cultural, historical, and azchaeological studies that are relevant to the can ent project area; and provides a brief cultural-historical background of Kahului 2nd Ahupua `a and the general North Kona region. i Physical and Cultural-Historical Setting The project azea is in what has been termed the Kona Field System (Gordy 1995, Newman 1970, Schilt 1984). The Kona Field System extends north at least to Kau Ahupua`a and south to Honaunau and east from the coastline to the forested slopes of Hual~lai (Gordy 1995). A lazge portion of this azea is designated in the Hawaii SIHP (State Inventory of Historic Places) as Site 50-10-37-6601 and has been determined eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The bask characteristics and delimited elevation zones w~thm this agricultural/residential system as presented in Newman (1970) have been confirmed and elaborated on by archaeological (Gordy 1995) and ethnoh~storical inveshgat~ons (Kelly 1983). The current study parcel is located at the recognized interface between the traditional kula and - kalu `ulu zones (at 500 feet elevation) Gordy (1995) presents a summary of azchaeological settlement patterns for Kona that is based on previous archaeological work as well as on observations made by explorers and missionaries during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Gordy bases his reconstruction on the Hawanan terms for the mayor vegetation zones used to define and segregate space within an ahupua `a. It was these native terms (Table 1) that were used during the Md/tele in the description of land clams. Gordy also describes a narrow ~ shoreline zone that was primarily a residential area. Immediately behind the shoreline is the kula. i - 4 1 RC-0532 L Table 1. Traditional Hawaiian a ricultural zones. _Zone Annual Rain all Description Elevation Kula c 30 50 in Plain, open country Coast-500 ft Wauke, gourd and sweet (0.8-1.2 m) inland from the coast (0-150 m) potato I- Kalu or c. 40-55 in. Luxuriant, cultivable 500-1,000 ft. Breadfruit, Wauke, sweet Kalu `ulu (1.00-1.35 m) zone (150-300 m) potato, mountain apple, some `flpa'a c. 55-80 in. Dryland cultivation 1,000-2,500 ft Taro, sweet potato, sugar (1.35-2.00 m) zone (300-750 m) cane ki ,and banana `Ama'u c. 80 in. Upland/fern zone 2,000-3,000 ft Banana and `ama `u (fern) (2.0 m) (600-900 m) The kula zone is the azea from sea level to 150 meters elevation. Annual rainfall in the kula zone is 75 to 125 centimeters. This lower elevation zone is traditionally associated with habitation and the cultivation I of sweet potatoes, paper mulberry, and gourds. Agricultural features, such as clearing mounds, planting mounds, planting depressions, modified outcrops, pavements, enclosures, and planting terraces, aze common throughout much of this zone (Hammitt and Clark 1980, Hammitt and Folk 1980, Haun et al. 1998, Schilt 1984). Dwellings were scattered throughout the agricultural portion of the kula, but were commonly concentrated along the shoreline (Gordy 1981, Hammitt 1980). The shoreline zone, extending inland approximately 200 meters, was used primarily for permanent habitation and other non-agricultural activities, such as canoe storage, ceremonial and burial practices, recreation, and fishing-related activity. Royal and high chiefly centers were also situated within the shoreline of the kula. These complexes included dwellings for chiefs and their entourage, places of refuge, and other structures. Several lazge and densely populated royal centers were located along the shoreline between Kailua and Hanaunau (Gordy 1995, Tomonazi-Tuggle 1993). A vaziety of non-residential features are present in the kula neaz royal centers, including small agricultural plots, and formal and informal burial features (Gordy 1995, Han et al. 1986, Schilt 1984, Tainter 1973, Tomanari-Tuggle 1993). Kahului Ahupua`a is generally considered to have been a place of high-status residences and ceremonial complexes Nineteenth century habitation features built on stone platforms were present in the kula (Hammitt and Meeker 1979, Schilt 1984). Stone platforms with cleazly defined internal divisions aze present (O'Hare and Wolforth 1997) and probably reflect a change in residential plans from a complex of multiple, separate, single-function structures (men's sleeping, women's sleeping, cooking) to a single structure with multiple rooms and functions (entire family's quarters and cooking) (Ladefoged 1991). Burial features with historic- [ era artifacts and azchitecture (i.e., mortar and corrugated tin) aze present in the lower elevations. These aze frequently isolated structures, but burials also occurred within residential platforms during the Historic Period (O'Haze and Wolforth 1997). Inland of the kula is the kalu `u lu. This zone was used primarily for breadfruit, with an under story growth of sweet potatoes and paper mulberry. Gordy (1995:7) notes "archaeologists have not been able to I identify this zone." He goes on to state that, "the azea at the edge of the Kealakekua's cliff, which was L observed to be in this zone at European contact, has azchaeological site patterns similaz to the `apa'a zone [the next highest zone in elevation] (cf. Scehren and Newman 1968: Kaschko and Rosendahl 1987). Thus the kalu `ulu and `apa `a zones may well have near identical site patterns." (Gordy 1995:7). During the early nineteenth century, following the demise of the entire Hawaiian socio-religious system, the older places of worship (heiau) no longer held their significance. Many such places were dismantled, and the stones used for other building projects such as the Kuakini Wall and Mokuaikaua Church. I RC-0532 -The religious, socioeconomic, and demographic changes that took place in the period between 1790 and the 1840s, promoted the establishment of a Euro-American style of land ownership, and the Great Mahele was the vehicle for determining ownership of the native land. During this period (1848-1899), the Mahele defined the land interests of the King (Kamehameha III), the high-ranking chiefs, and the low- ranking chiefs, the konohiki The chiefs and konohrk: were required to present their claims to the Land Commission to receive awards for lands provided to them by Kamehameha III. They were also required to provide commutations to the government in order to receive royal patents on their awards. The lands were identified by name only, with the understanding that the ancient boundaries would prevail until the land could be surveyed. This process expedited the work of the Land Commission and speeded the transfers (Chinen 1961:13). During this process all lands were placed in one of three categories: Crown Lands (for the occupant of the throne), Government Lands, and Konohiki Lands. All three types of land were subject to the rights of the native tenants. Commoners could make claims for land, and if substantiated, they would receive awards referred to as kuleana, from the Land Commission. During this period, other land grants were also made to individuals directly from the Kingdom. In 1862, the Commission of Boundaries (Boundary Commission) was established in the Kingdom of Hawaii to legally set the boundaries of all the ahupua'a that had been awarded as a part of the Mahele. Subsequently, in 1874, the Commission of Boundaries was authorized to certify the boundaries for lands brought before them. The primary informants for the boundary descriptions were old native residents of the lands, many of which had also been claimants for kuleana during the Mahele. The information was collected primarily between 1873 and 1885. The testimonies were generally given in Hawaiian and simultaneously transcribed in English. _ j The Missionary William Ellis visited the vicinity of the current project area in 1823 and described the - following: Leaving Kairua [Kailua], we passed through the villages thickly scattered along the shore to the southward. The country around looked unusually green and cheerful, owing to the frequent rain, which for some months past have fallen on this side of the island. Even the ~ . barren lava, over which we traveled, seemed to veil its sterility beneath frequent tufts of tall waving grass, or spreading shrubs and flowers. The side of the hills, laid out for a considerable extent in gardens and fields, and generally cultivated with potatoes, and other vegetables, were beautiful. ~ j _ The number of heiaus, and depositories of the dead, which we passed, convinced us that this part of the island must formerly have been populous. The latter were built with fragments of lava, laid up evenly on the outside, generally about eight feet long, from four to six broad, and about four feet high. Some appeared very ancient, other had evidently been standing but a few years. (1963[1823]: 72-73). In 1848 during the Mahele, the majority of Kahului 2°d Ahupua`a was awarded to Grace Kama`iku`r (LCAw. 8516-B:3), and there were eight kuleana claims. Most claims were small and located along the shoreline and in the mauka (above 700 feet) regions (Haun and Henry 2004:8). Three claims were for coastal house lots (LCAw 7336:1 to Kuapu`u; LCAw 7073:8 to Kapa`e; and LCAw 10373 to Niniha) and ' the rest were for mauka cultivation plots. There were no kuleana claimed within the current project area. Population declined and settlements became smaller in the Kona area during the Territorial Period (1900-1959). Coastal occupation was concentrated rn the small villages of Karlua and Keauhou, with permanent residences, gardens and animal pens scattered along the shoreline. Upland areas of Kahului were associated with the Kona Sugar Company from 1891 until 1904 and later from 1908 to 1926 with the Kona Development Company (Dorrance and Morgan 2000:112). The Kona Development Company employed both the predecessor sugar company's mill and plantation lands. However, Company used private contactors and independent homesteaders to provide theecanenaHar'vestspwere transported by the West Hawaii Railway Company, a narrow gauge railroad that was owned by the same ~ consortium. An historic trestle associated with this railway is located mauka of the project area. The ~ railroad was subsequently sold to Japanese investors Walls may have been constructed to mark cane field ~ I 6 I. RC-0532 boundazies in the eazly years of the twentieth century. In 1927, Manuel Gomes acquired the Kahului Ahupua`a along with Wal`aha Ahupua`a, from the failed Kona Development Company (O'Haze and Wolforth 1997). The land became part of the Gomes Ranch and was actively used for cattle grazing and corralling until the 1960s. Most of the stone walls seen in the study area today are a legacy of the Gomes Ranch. PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH Archaeological investigations previously conducted in Kahului 1S` and 2"d Ahupua`a have primarily concentrated on the zone makai of the current project area (see Haun and Henry 2004 for a thorough overview). Hammatt and Tomonari-Tuggle (1978), Hammatt and Meeker (1979) and O'Hare and Wolforth (1997) surveyed and tested a 32-acre parcel stretching from Ali`I Drive to the Kuakini Wall. Sites in the vicinity of the Kuakini Wall included: a heiau, a habitation structure that might have been associated with some form of specialized production, a burial, and walls (O'Haze and Wolforth 1997:4-2,4-3). Rechtman and Henry (1999) conducted an inventory survey for a bridge along Ali`i Drive within ` Kahului 1$` and 2"d Ahupua`a. Walls and a habitation site were documented in this study. Three surveys were carried out for the proposed Ali `I Highway project (Ching et al. 1973; Dunn and Rosendahl 1991; Haun et al. 1998). SIHP Site 6331, a habitation site, comprised of 11 features, was recorded. Rechtman and [ Dougherty surveyed a 12-acre pazcel along Ali`i Drive in Kahului 2°d. Five archaeological sites were recorded including three Precontact permanent habitation sites, one Precontact temporary habitation site, and a historic wall. Haun and Henry (2004) conducted an archaeological survey in a 35.1-acre parcel makai of Kuakini Highway in Kahului 2nd Ahupua`a. Seventeen sites made up of 103 features were discovered. The Precontact sites discovered were typical of the coastal portion of the kula zone including agricultural features, temporazy and permanent habitation sites, and burials. Historical sites discovered were all ranch related walls. Other archaeological investigations within Kahului ls` and 2"d Ahupua`a (Dye 1978, Kennedy et al. 1992, Rosendahl 1989, Soehren 1976, 1979) have documented Precontact and Historical sites that aze typical of the kula section of the Kona Field System. Haun and Henry (2001) conducted an archaeological survey of an 87-acre parcel mauka of the current ` project area located in Kahului lg` and 2°d Ahupua`a. Twenty seven sites made up of 349 features were discovered. Precontact features identified included two agricultural enclosures, two agricultural terraces, a modified outcrop, an agricultural wall, a small agricultural complex with eleven features, a complex of 33 features interpreted as elements of the Kona field system, a temporary habitation modified outcrop, and two permanent habitation platforms. Historical sites recorded included a complex of 101 features interpreted to correspond to Land Commission Awazds, a complex of 181 clearing features Interpreted as being [ associated with sugarcane cultivation, a historic road with a retaining wall, a historic railroad trestle, and twelve ranch related walls or enclosures. Bulgrin and Rechtman's (2005a) archaeological inventory survey of the 15-acre Pazcel 43 within the current project area identified six archaeological sites (Table 2, Figure 4). Four of the sites were core filled stone boundazy walls dating from the 1890s until the 1960s. One site, S1HP Site 24556, was an enclosure related to twentieth century ranching activities; and the sixth site (SIHP Site 24558) was a Precontact temporary habitation modified outcrop. Cultural material recovered from test excavation at this Precontact site included marine shell, coral, mammal bone, volcanic glass flakes, and a basalt adze fragment. Table 2. Archaeolo 'cal sites recorded within TMK:3-7-5-017:043. ` SIHP No. Formal T e Functional e 24553 A e Wall Ranching Historic 24554 Wall Ranchin 24555 Wall g Historic 24556 Boundary Historic Wall Boundary Historic 24557 Enclosure Ranchin 24558 Modified outcro g Historic Tem orazy habitation Precontact l RC-0532 N rue ~ ~~a,~,a,9t~~e O~O Scale m meters Hienaloh Drtve ~ ^ ` . ' 4~ ~ ~SII-iP Sife 245SR r, ; N + ~ ~ r p~ . i 4 ! a Sixp S'te 2A554 N - ~ - t~A i 't may,. r i SIHP Site 24557 ~ n.~-~' o0o Core filled wall , Barbed wire fence i ' Limns of dozed road/area H Gate Figure 4. Plan view of Parce143 ~ ~ Limits of project area 8 RC-0532 L Bulgrin and Rechtman's (2005b) archaeological inventory swvey of the 15-acre Pazcel 42 within the current project area idenrified eight archaeological sites (Table 3, Figure 5). Two of the sites were core filled stone boundazy walls dating from the 1890s to the 1960s, fow were Historic Period field cleazing piles, one was a Historic Period fence post support, and one comprised two Precontact Period modified outcrop features (SlHP Site 24562). Cultwal material recovered from test excavation at this Precontact site included marine shell, mammal bone, volcanic glass, and organic plant remains. Table 3. Archaeolo 'cal sites recorded within TMK:3-7-5-017:042. [ SIHP No. Formal a Functional T e 24553 A e Wall Boundazy marker Historic 24555 Wall Boundaz mazker 24562 y Historic Modified outcrop Temporazy habitation Precontact 24563 Mound Cleazin Iles 24564 Mound g p Historic 24565 Clearing piles Historic Mound Clearing piles Historic 24566 Mound Cleazin Iles 24567 Rock cluster g p Historic Fence ost su ort Historic/modern The findings of the prior investigations allow for a comprehensive portrayal of ast land use a settlement patterns for the azea. The coastal kula areas of greater Kailua-Kona contain numerous late prehistoric and early historic residential sites. Many of these were associated with the more privileged members of Hawaiian society. Also known to exist in this region aze heiau and burial featwes. Such sites aze known from both historic records and azchaeological investigation. Burial sites both within habitation featwes and in dedicated burial featwes are not uncommon in the azea (O'Haze and Wolforth 1997). Also common in this area aze small agricultwal featwes, often associated with the residential sites. Historic Period sites, frequently related to cattle ranching, also left their mark on the landscape; stone walls and cattle enclosures aze found consistently along the area mauka of present day Ali `i Drive (former ala loa). What follows is a detailed description of the surface layout, excavation units, features and recovered items from Sites 24558 and 24562. l C l l C i RC-0532 - ' - • - • - • - • - • - Project Area Boundary Wtre Fence Feature B - Feature A ~ SIHP Site 24562 ~ ~ i ~ ~ s N ~ SIHP Site 24566 SIHP Site 24563 SIHP Site 24564 SIHP Site 24565 ~r _ SIHP Site 24567 0 20 40 c Scale in meters (heights m centimeters) j Figure 5. Plan view of Parce142. I - 10 , RC-0532 SITE DESCRIPTIONS AND INVENTORY SURVEY RESULTS This section presents the sites as recorded during the Inventory Surveys (Bul rin and Rech 2005b). Descriptions of the sites aze excerpted from the Inventory Surveys and augmented by Inve005 Y Survey results. SIHP Site 24558 L Site 24558 was located in the north central portion of Pazcel 43 (see Figure 4). The site contained two 1 terraces, a stacked mound, and several rock alignments (Figure 6). These features were situated on a raised bedrock outcrop, trending east/west, just north of a small drainage. A terrace constructed directly adjacent to the outcrop extended 10 meters to the west. Another terrace was constructed perpendiculaz to the outcrop C and extended IS meters to the south. Both terraces were located against raised bedrock. The down slope edge of each terrace consisted of stacked cobbles and boulders retaining a fill of small to medium sized cobbles. The makai ten: ace faced west, while the mauka terrace faced south. A boulder mound and a rock alignment were located east of the terraces. The mound was roughly rectangulaz and appeazed to have stacked sides. The rock alignment was piled against bedrock and may have resulted from mechanical earthmoving. Two 1 x 1 meter test units (TU) were excavated in the terraces at Site 24558 (see Figure 6). TU-1 tested the mauka terrace and TU-2 sampled the makai terrace. TU-1 was placed at the western end of the mauka terrace and was oriented north/south (see Figure 6). The surface of the unit was primazily tightly fit angular cobbles and boulders with some leaf litter. Large cracks and holes revealed that there were numerous air pockets in the layer below. Two stratigraphic layers were discovered within the unit. Layer I, which extended to 29 centimeters below the surface, was almost entirely tightly fit rock cobbles and boulders with some humus and leaf debris in pockets. Layer II, located approximately 29 to 56 centimeters below the surface was a mix of rock (approximately 50 percent) and very dark brown (7.SYR 2.5/3) granulated silt (Figure 7). No artifacts were discovered in Layer I. Two fragments of a cowry shell, rodent bones, and a volcanic glass flake were recovered from Layer II (Table 4). r Table 4. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24558 ~-1. l Acc. ~ Layer Material Tune/species NISP MNI Weight 1 II Manne shell Cypraea sp. 2 1 0.8 2 II Rodent bone Mus sp. 3 1 0.3 _ 3 lI Volcanic glass Flake 1 - 0 5 I TU-2 was placed at the interior southern end of the makai terrace (see Figure 6). Several lazge cobbles I and small boulders were visible on the surface of the unit but grass and organic matter predominated. Excavation revealed that bedrock was very close to the surface across the unit except for the center and the northwest corner. A single layer (Layer I) was discovered in TU-2 extending to a maximum depth of 96 centimeters below the surface and consisted of 80 percent cobbles mixed with very dazk brown (lOYR 2/2) silt (Figure 8). Soil within the unit became finer as depth increased supporting an inference that all soil within the layer percolated down from the surface. Artifacts recovered from TU-2 included: coral, marine shell, pig bone, volcanic glass flakes, waterworn basalt, and a basalt adze fragment (Table 5). The basalt adze fragment was quite small but polished on two adjoining sides indicating that it was located near the bit end and probably broke off dunng use. An extremely small sample of charcoal was recovered as well. t I - RC-0532 Doled road 0 2 4 ~ ~ ~ Scale in meters ~ ~ (heights m centimeters) !N - erne ~ ~ j ~f- f - D O ~ Oda 00~ o a o >ry - ~ ~ oR Top of outcrop Flat TU-1 ~ j 7 ~ ~ ~ o (45) R1 ~ ifu ~1 ~ ~ i ~ O ~ ~ (so ~ lao) 2s> so o) ~ (60) O 135) . ~ (130 Blister o TU-2 _ a - Leveled with T, cobbles - (160 i r Figure 6. SIHP Site 24558 plan view. i 12 I RC-0532 0 10 20 O Layer I ~.i.i Scale m centimeters t_ Layer I -Tightly fit rock cobbles and boulders with some humus and leaf debris in pockets. Layer II Layer II -Mix of approximately 50 percent rock ` and very dark brown (7.SYR 2.5/3) granulated silt. 1 Bedrock Bedrock Figure 7. SIHP Site 24558, TU-1 east wall profile. L - No soil above line Bedrock LayerI 10 20 Scale in centimeters Layer I - 80 percent cobbles mixed with very dark brown (lOYR 2/2) silt that became finer with depth. Bedrock Bedrock Figure 8. SIHP Site 24558, TU-2 south wall profile. 13 - - - - - - - f E - RC-0532 Table 5. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24558 TU-2. Acc. # Layer Material Type/species NISP MNI Wei ht 4 I Coral g (g) Waterworn 4 80.50 5 I Marine shell Cypraea sp. 2 2 30.75 6 I Marine shell Conus sp. 4 1 2 50 7 I Mammal bone Sus sp. 5 1 8 I Volcanic glass Flake 6.00 9 I 6 - 2.1 Basalt Waterworn 1 160.90 10 I Basalt Adze fragment 1 11 I Or anic - 1.1 Charcoal 9 - 0.30 SIHP Site 24562 SIHP Site 24562 consisted of two modified outcrop features (Featwes A and B) located in the southeastern portion of Parcel 42 (see Figure 5). Two test units (i.e., TU-3 and TU-4) were placed within Feature A (Figures 9 - 13) and one test unit (i.e., TU-2) was placed within Featwe B (Figures 14 - 20). The following descriptions of Features A and B are derived from Bulgrin and Rechtman (2005b). i Feature A Featwe A was a roughly rectangular modified outcrop with stacked rock walls along portions of all sides (Figwe 9). The rock walls ranged in height from 40 0 centimeters to 1 2 meters. The stacked walls in conjunction with the pahoehoe fill that they retained, served to extend the surface area of the outcrop. Cracks in the pahoehoe bedrock were also filled creating a relatively level swface. Overall the feature measured 12 meters north south by 8 meters easdwest (see Figure 9). In the center of the feature, one meter west of the eastern edge, there was a distinct pavement. The pavement was roughly rectangular and measwed approximately 1.5 meters by 1.5 meters. The pavement swface was composed of medium sized i pahoehoe cobbles and was raised 30 centimeters above the rest of the outcrop. TU-3 was excavated in the southwestern portion of the outcrop on a fairly level filled terrace area (see ' Figure 9). The swface of the unit was a fairly uniform level pavement of sub-angular pahoehoe cobbles. ~ Two stratigraphic layers were recorded in the unit (Figwe 10). The first was an architectural layer, approximately 40 centimeters thick, composed of pahoehoe cobbles. No cultwal material was discovered in the first layer although one small piece of coral was observed but not collected. The second layer, approximately 22 centimeters thick, was dark brown (7.SYR 3/4) silt mixed with small boulders and cobbles resting on decaying bedrock (Figure 11). A volcanic glass core, volcanic glass flakes, marine shell fragments, a pig bone fragment, and charcoal were recovered from the second la er y (Table 6). Table 6. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A TU-3 La er II. Acc# Material T e/S ecies 2 Volcanic glass Core Count MNI Wei ht 3 Volcanic glass Flakes 1 - 13.5 4 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 7 - 6.4 5 Marine shell Isognomon sp. 1 1 0.8 ti Marine shell Unknown 1 0 6g 7 Mammal bone Sus sp. 2 1 0 5 8 Organic Kukuc 1 1 0 Sg 4 0.3 ' 9 Organic Charcoal 7 - 0 4 - ~ TU-4 was excavated in the northwestern portion of Feature A (see Figure 9). The surface of the unit was made up of pahoehoe cobbles of mixed sizes. Two stratigraphic layers were recorded in the unit (Figure 12). The first layer was an architectural layer made up of mixed size pahoehoe cobbles. The second layer was dark brown (7.SYR 3/4) clay loam averaging 5 centimeters in thickness and extending down into depressions in the pahoehoe bedrock (Figure 13). No cultural material was recovered from the unit. 14 i L RC-0532 r O 1 (100) L 2 (110) (60) Scale in meters L (heights m centuneters) ~ r (60) I i~ ~ ~ O O O ~ l (so) op ~ ~ f ~ p ° ~ L ~ ~ ~ O Op ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 p (100) "O ~ O~ o ao a o od o00 o~ ~ o ° ~o a 0 °a ~0 ° o o ~ o (120) (loo) L Figure 9. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, plan view. 15 ~ RC-0532 0 10 20 W Scale in centimeters Layer I Layer II Bedrock Layer I -Architectural layer consisting of stacked sub-angular p7lhoehoe cobbles. Layer II -Dark brown (7 SYR 3/4) silt. Figure 10. SIHP Site 24562, Feature A, TU-3 west wall profile. i i eX~ a Mti e4 ~~'Z.'Y~S, °'dj O ^'a*`~~~j; ~Y r.-" Ili `N tt3 ! .~1, f'~~ ~+~3~ 4a ~1~.' w'~.~^ I 1 ~ rr ~ i .r d t v ~ I ~ ~~MI 1 1 iQ~ N I 1Vy ~ Si 'w ma` " - y~~ "'yam `'1~~~'~ ~ ~ ~ i Ftgure 11 SIHP Srte 24562 Feature A, TU=3 base of excavation. ~ I 16 ' f= RC-0532 L o~uo Scale m cenrimeters l_ Layer I r t- Layer II Bedrock Layer I -Architectural layer consisting of mixed size pahoehoe cobbles. Layer II -Dark brown (7.SYR 3/4) clay loam. Figure 12. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, TU-4 west wall profile. - L ,r 1. f I } , ~ ~ - ` ~i ~ .r ~ .,~,i~ Figure 13. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, T'iJ-4 base ofexcavation. - 17 - - - - - - RC-0532 Feature B Feature B was a roughly "L" shaped modified outcrop (Figure 15) located 10.5 meters east of Feature A. The main portion of the feature was a roughly paved area oriented northwesVsoutheast and measuring 5 meters in length by 2.7 meters wide. A second roughly paved area oriented north/south extended from the northeast corner, and was 10 centimeters lower, measuring 2.7 meters by 1 4 meters. The alignment of the upper paved area was clearly visible, suggesting that the lower azea was added on to the upper area. The site is constructed of stacked medium and large sized pahoehoe cobbles (Figure 14) with a cobble pavement interior. Two distinctly smoother pavement areas were visible. The western end of the "L" shape had a level surface composed of small sized pahoehoe cobbles, measuring 2.7 meters easdwest by 1.6 meters north south. A second paved surface, also composed of small sized pahoehoe cobbles, was located at the northeastern end of the site. This second paved surface measured 1.2 meters by 1.2 meters. The rest of the outcrop was paved with larger sized pahoehoe cobbles. "=~"~„s \ I Q i ~ ~ A rte.' I x ~ r .I s 1 I _ ~ ~ , t J ~ ~ 1 I~ I _ ' s,~p''` ~ ~,~s2a °~o ja.. r y I w ; 3 F - ~ ~ , .Gets.?v.L,~~,~I~+~{ty~~l Fi ure 14 SIHP g Site 24562 Feat ur e B view to the north. TU-2, a 1 meter by 1 meter excavation unit, was excavated in the northwestern portion of the site (see Figure 15). The surface of the unit was made up of fairly level sub-angular pahoehoe cobbles. Test excavation revealed two layers (Figure 16). The first layer was composed of piled rocks. One small piece of coral, approximately 2 centimeters in diameter, was observed in the northwest corner of the unit within Layer 1 but not collected. The second layer was pahoehoe cobbles intermixed with dark brown (7.SYR 3/4) silt resting on decaying bedrock (Figure 17). One volcanic glass flake was recovered from Level 1 of Layer ' II in TU-2. Charcoal flecks were observed within the unit but were too small to be collected 18 i RC-0532 i ~J N Scale in meters - true (heights ?n centimeters) n _ (qs) (40) II II II~ (70) 1 (25) TU ~ I~~ O c II-~ II ~I (60) (70) II II II~ (90) 1_ Figure 15. SIHP Site 24562 Feature B, plan view. r 1 19 - RC-0532 10 20 Scale to centimeters LayerI Layer II i Bedrock Layer I - Architectural layer consisting of stacked pAhohoe cobbles Layer II - Pdhoehoe cobbles mterm~xed with dark brown (7 SYR 3/4) silt i Ftgure 16 SIHP Stte 24562 Feature B, TU-2 west wall profile. _ v~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ i ~ r J i i I i i i d: f Y}fit - ~ ` ~ y' ~ } ~i~ ;7 C ~ 4~ Y "4' x f' -z. * i 4- I~ i~;i ? ' II ~ ~ ~ i Ftgure 17. SIHP Site 24562 Feature B, TU-2 base of excavation. 20 i. RC-0532 l THE DATA RECOVERY EFFORT _ Data recovery investigations at Sites 24558 and 24562 were undertaken by Lizabeth A. Hauani`o, B.A., J. David Nelson, B.A., Chris Hand, B.A., and Johnny R. Dudoit, B.A., under the direction of Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D., between August 18-22, 2008. The fieldwork adhered to the DLNR-SHPD approved data recovery plan (Loubser and Rechtman 2008). Research Questions Raised by Previous Results The data recovery plan (Loubser and Rechtman 2008) outlined the reseazch objectives and set forth strategies for achieving those objectives. The primary research objective was to determine "the timing of occupation(s), site function(s), and structural features" of S1HP Site 24558 and Featwes A and B of Site i 24562 and (Loubser and Rechtman 2008:21). Both sites are considered significant under Criterion D for the { data that they have already provided, as well as for the information that they have the potential to provide, relative to Precontact settlement practices at the kula/kadu'ulu interface of the Kona field system. Settlement patterns of the kula/kalu'ulu translttonal zone are poorly understood and these sites have the potential to increase archaeological understanding of the past uses of these traditional agricultwal zones. Data Recovery Methods Prior to subswface testing, both sites and featwes were adequately cleared of vegetation and photographed. Also, scaled plan views were drawn or updated from the inventory swvey (Bulgrin and Rechtman 2005a, 2005b). Depending on the excavation context, unit size vaned from 1 meter by 1 meter to 1 meter by 2 meter to 2 meter by 2 meter. Regardless of the size, all excavation units were dug by hand following natural stratigraphic layers divided into 10-centimeter arbitrary levels. The arbitrary levels were measured relative to an elevation datum corresponding to the highest corner of the excavation unit. All excavated matrix was passed through 1/4 inch mess screening and any cultwal material was collected and segregated by level. Level record forms were completed for each excavated level. Excavation units were terminated upon reaching bedrock. Upon completion of the excavation unit, a Umt Summary Form was completed, photographs were taken, a stratigraphic profile was drawn, and the unit was backfilled. Previously unexcavated featwes that looked promising in yielding data were also sampled, such as the stone platfonn- like featwe near the center of SIHP Site 24562 Feature A. Dwing the cowse of fieldwork the excavation crew chose to excavate a series of fow adjacent units in this productive azea. Cultural Material Analyses All recovered cultwal material was processed in the Rechtman Consulting, LLC laboratory facility. Items were cleaned, weighed, counted, described, and entered into a master project catalog (Appendix A). Faunal remains were tabulated and identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible. Where applicable, the Number of Identified Specimens (NISP) and the Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI) were determined. The prevailing climatic conditions coupled with other historic and recent distwbances to the soils have rendered the property a poor candidate for pollen and flotation (macro-botanical) analyses, therefore recovered soil samples were not processed. Radiocarbon Sampling Radiocarbon samples collected dwing fieldwork were prlorittzed based on size, provenience, and integrity of association. Priority was given to lazge single-piece samples recovered in situ from a clear stratigraphic context. All charcoal samples were cataloged and initially cleaned and weighed in the Rechtman Consulting, LLC laboratory facility. Conventional radiocarbon analysis coupled with a calculation of stable isotope ratios (C13~~Z) was used for the samples. Curation of Recovered Archaeological Material All material recovered during data recovery is stored at the Rechtman Consulting, LLC curatton facility for a period of no more than one year following submission of the current data recovery report, during which time arrangements will be made for permanent curatton In consultation with the landowner and DLNR- SHPD. It is the responsibility of the landowner to secwe permanent cwahon in an acceptable facility; Included in this responsibility are the costs associated with long-term curation. ~ RC-0532 ~ESCRIPTI®Ii~ ®F DATA REC®VERY RESULTS Introduction The following description considers the results of the test units and the excavation units. The results are - presented in the sequence of site numbers The descriptions of the results include unit location, size, shape, make-up, stratigraphy, identification and number of recovered items by layer and level. The identification, weight and distribution are considered in the following discussion, whereas the results from the units are compared in the synthesis section An inter-unit compazison and overall distribution and density of recovered items provide a base for functional interpretations. ' A total of thirteen excavation units (EUs) were distributed throughout Stte 24558 and Features A and B of Site 24562 (Table 7), totaling 18 square meters of excavated area, as specified in the data recovery plan (Loubser and Rechtman 2008). Table 7. Excavated area Burin the current data recover . - Site Feature Excavation unit 24558 Total m Mauka terrace EU-1 (2x2 meter) 4 24558 Makai terrace EU-2 (1 x 1 meter) 24562 1 ' 24562 EU-3 (1x2 meter) 2 B EU-4 (1x2 meter) 2 24562 B EU-5 (1 x 1 meter) 24562 A 1 ' 24562 EU-6 (1x1 meter) 1 A EU-7 (1 x 1 meter) 1 24562 A EU-8 (1x1 meter) 24562 1 24562 EU-9 (1 x 1 meter) 1 A EU-10 (1x1 meter) 1 24562 A EU-11 (1 x 1 meter) 24562 1 24562 EU-12 (1x1 meter) 1 ' _ A EU-13 (1x1 meter) 1 ' SIIIP Site 24558 In addition to the two test units (TU-1 and TU-2) excavated at Site 24558 during the inventory survey - (Bulgrm and Rechtman 2005a), two excavation units (EU-1 and EU-2) were carried out during the current data recovery phase. t EU-1 (2 x 2 meter) was placed on the south central portion of the mauka terrace of SIHP 24558 and / was aligned north south (Figure 18). The unit was placed slightly southeast of TU-1 and included a portion ' of the faced edge of Site 24558. Two stratigraphic layers were discovered within the unit. Layer I extended ' roughly 24 to 36 centimeters below the surface on the north side of the unit and up to 80 centimeters in the south. No cultural material was discovered in Layer I. Layer II was a 6 to 16 centimeter layer of mixed rock and soil. Soil within the unit became finer as depth increased supporting an inference that all soil within the layer percolated down from the swface Layer II yielded volcanic glass and charcoal (Table 8). EU-1 ended at bedrock (Figure 19). The stratigraphic profile of EU-1 is shown in Figure 20 and is described as follows• La erI.. y ....architectural layer composed of small to lazge cobbles and boulders, tightly fitted, varying in thickness from 27 (north) to 141 (south) centimeters with pockets of very dark grayish brown (lOYR 3/2) granulated silt with 30 percent small cobbles and pebbles. Layer II. ..very dark grayish brown (lOYR 3/2 ' pebbles and small cobbles on decompos ngrbedrock. silt with 20 percent Table 8. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24558 EU-1, La er II Level 1. Acc.# Material S ecies/ a Count MNI Wei ht 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 2 Or anic Charcoal 2 0 8 - - O1 i 22 i RC-0532 D°Zed tom Scale in meters (heights m centimeters) N - ~ true ' ~ Stacked II ~I Bedrock ~ f O Oo0 f ~ o { ~`~a Oo~ ~ 0 r~ d O Top of outcrop ~ ~ oR ~ Flat ~ TU-1 ~ (~o ~ (so> ~ ~ ~ o (45) ao~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ O ~ 0) O (80 ~ (140) (125) (50) (60) O 135) - (130 i ~ EU-1 +I 1 Blister EU-2 04 l TU-2 Leveled with cobbles (160 Figure 18. SIHP Site 24558 plan view with EU placement. 23 RC-0532 a d ~ y~.. SS Y a F~ l I 7 A f r .Y r ~L~~ l ~a_ -~~i _ ~ ~rr ~itfM1 t`.+~..i i rs~ Figure 19. SIHP Site 24558, EU-1 base of excavation. 0, 20 4p W Scale m centimeters 1 Layer I i i;aycri~= - a ~ Bedrock r - Layer I -Architectural layer is composed of large cobbles and boulders on exterior and surface of umt. Small to medium cobbles compose the interior with pockets of very dark greyish brown (1 OYR 3/2) granulated silt with 25-30 percent pebbles and small cobbles. Layer II -Very dark greyish brown (1 OYR 3/2) granulated silt with 15-20 percent pebbles. i Figure 20 SIHP Site 24558, EU-1 west wall profile. ~ 24 I i RC-0532 j EU-2 (1 x 1 meter) was placed at the interior southern end of the makai terrace (see Figure 18). Oriented north/south, the unit abutted the northern edge of the previously excavated TU-1, and immediately _ south of a bedrock outcrop with a small blister cavity. A constructed terrace wall was located to the west and south of the unit. Several cobbles were visible in the south portion of the unit but grass and organic matter predominated on the surface. Two stratigraphic layers were discovered within the unit. Layer I ~ extended 10 to 18 centimeters below the surface and was a rock and soil mix of 75 percent cobbles, which extended deeper on the west side of unit. More soil was observed in the central and eastern portions of unit. No cultural material was collected in Layer I. Layer II was a roughly 5 to 13 centimeter thick mix of rock and granulated silt that yielded a single pig bone and a chunk of volcanic glass (Table 9). A coral fragment was observed but not collected. Within EU-2, bedrock was reached in all areas of the unit and sloped southwest at base (Figure 21). The stratigraphic profile of EU-2 is shown in Figure 22 and is described as follows: 1~ Layer I .........................architectural layer composed of small to lazge cobbles mixed with dark brown silt (7.SYR 3/3) and copious organic material. Layer II ........................dazk brown silt (7.SYR 3/3) with 15 percent small cobbles. Table 9. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24558 EU-2, La er II Level 1. Acc.~ Material Species/type Count MNI Weight 3 Mammal bone Sus sp. 1 1 1.3 4 Volcanic glass Chunk 1 - 40 4 _ SIHP Site 24562 ~ In addition to the two test units (TU-3 and TU-4) excavated at Site 24562 Feature A and the single test unit (TU-2) excavated at Site 24562 Feature B during the inventory survey (Bulgrin and Rechtman 2005b), nine excavation units (EU-3 and EUs-6, -7, -8, -9, -10, -11, -12, and -13) were placed in Feature A and two excavation units (EU-4 and EU-5) were situated at Feature B during the current data recovery phase. Feature A EU-3 (1 x 2 meter) was placed in the southeast portion of Feature A and was oriented roughly east/west at 102 degrees. EU-3 abutted the eastern edge of previously excavated TU-3 (Figure 23). Two stratigraphic layers were discovered within the unit. Layer I, the architectural layer extended to a depth of 28 to 55 centimeters below the surface of the unit. A possible constructed edge, oriented roughly northeast/southwest, was observed under the surface cobbles in the north northwest portion of unit. _ Excavation revealed a small, fire-cracked waterworn cobble and unburned kukui nutshell. These items were noted, but not collected. Layer II was a roughly 5 to 28 centimeter soil and rock mix that yielded volcanic glass and charcoal (Table 10). EU-3 ended at bedrock (Figure 24). The stratigraphic profile of EU-3 is shown in Figure 25 and described as follows: Layer I .........................architectural layer composed of piled small to large cobbles on surface and interior and large cobbles and small boulders in faced edge on the eastern side. Layer II .........................dazk brown (7.SYR 3/4) granular silt with 20 percent small cobble content that decreased to 0 percent near base of layer. Table 10. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A EU-3. _ Acc.~ Layer Level Material Species/type Count MNI Weight 5 II 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 3 - 2.0 6 II 1 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 1 - 0.8 7 II 1 Volcanic glass Utilized flake (in situ) 1 - 3.0 8 II 1 Basalt Flake 1 - 1.2 9 II 1 Basalt Flake with polish 1 - 0.4 10 II 1 Organic Chazcoal - 0 4 ~ 1 75 I RC-0532 + ~ F- , :i ~ , .r~ ' -f , I~ 4Y~~. ~Y. ~ c ~P 1 k ~~~at~r~ ~ z'L~. Figure 21 SIHP Site 24558, EU-2 base of excavation. ~ ' f 1Q 2~ W I Scale m centimeters Bedrock overhang i - Layer I ~ ' Layer II - - - - Bedrock Layer I -Architectural layer is composed of small to large cobbles mixed with dark brown (7.SYR 3/3) silt and numerous grass roots. Layer II -Dark brown (7.SYR 3/3) silt with 15 percent small cobbl es Figure 22 SIHP Site 24558, EU-2 north wall profile 26 RC-0532 u 2 Scale in meters (heights m centimeters) ` N Stacked p- ii_ ~ (100) hue 11= Bedrock 'c~ (110) (60) u ~ ° TU-4 (60) ~ t) Q O ~ O ~ Soil and cobbles (so) Depression O 1 ~ ~ ~ OD~O ® O4 (100) I~ r ~ ~ 4p d ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 00 ~ o ° ~0 O 0 ~ Cobbles ~ oo °~p0 o OcP ~ O oO ~ °o ° 4 ~ a o o (120) (100) L I_ Figure 23. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, plan view with EU placement. r I 27 RC-0532 ri ~ ~ ,L e"' ~-p . ~ n r{j, `.~a S' 4 I i 'r' q 1 ~ i Figure 24. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-3 base of excavation. 0~ ~0 Zp ~ Scaleale ~n centimeters i Layer I Q; ~Q~ - . _ Layer II a _ ao, „Q°,~c~ o~ _o Bedrock ~ ~ o "G Layer I -Architectural layer is composed of small cobble pavtng and medtum ' to large cobbles and a few boulders on surface i Layer II -Dark brown (7 SYR 3/4) granular silt i Ftgure 25. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-3 north wall profile. ! 28 i_, RC-0532 ~ EU-6 (1 x 1 meter) was placed in the southeast portion of Feature A and was oriented at 12 degrees (see Figure 23). The eastern side of EU-6 exhibited aligned cobbles. Two stratigraphic layers were recorded _ within the unit. Layer I, the azchitectural layer, extended to a depth of 32 to 58 centimeters below the ~ surface and contained one marine shell fragment (Table 11) that was collected and two fragments of coral and one small waterworn cobble that were not collected. Layer II was a 25 to 35 centimeter layer of soil. ~ Level 1 of Layer II yielded the largest variety of marine shell fragments in the site, in addition to one fragment of unidentified mammal bone, volcanic glass, and one basalt flake with polish and chazcoal (see Table 11). Layer II Level 2 yielded mazine shell, unidentified avian bone, unidentified fish bone, volcanic glass, and chazcoal (see Table 11). Unburned kukui nutshell was noted but not collected. EU-6 ended at bedrock (Figure 26). The stratigraphic profile of EU-6 is shown in Figure 27 and described as follows: r Layer I .........................architectural layer composed of piled small to lazge cobbles with dark brown (7.SYR 3/4) granulaz silt. Layer II Level l ............dark brown (7.SYR 3/4) granular silt with 10 percent small cobbles. Layer II Leve12............dazk brown (7.SYR 3/4) loose silt with 5 percent small cobbles and gravel. Table 11. Cultural material recovered from SIIIP Site 24562 Feature A EU-6. Acc.~` Layer Level Material Species/lype Count MNI Wei ht 13 I 1 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 1 1 g (g) 14 II 1 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 8 4 0.9 15 II 1 Mazine shell Conus sp. 4 1 36.0 16 II 1 Manne shell Drupa sp. 1 1 19.5 17 II 1 Marine shell Isognomon sp. 1 1 1.0 18 II 1 Mammal bone Unidentified >0.1 19 II 1 2 1 0.2 Volcanic glass Shatter 4 - 1.3 20 II 1 Volcanic glass Chunk 1 21 II 1 Volcanic glass Flake 7.6 22 II 1 Basalt 1 - 0.15 Flake with polish 1 0.4 23 II 1 Organic Charcoal _ 24 II 2 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 4 i 0.4 25 II 2 Marine shell Colubrari~dae 0.8 26 II 2 Avian bone Unidentified 1 1 1.7 27 II 2 Fish bone 3 1 0.6 Unidentified 1 1 0.1 28 II 2 Volcanic glass Flake 2 _ 29 II 2 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 0.6 30 II 2 Or anic 1 - 0.8 Charcoal _ _ 2 0 l 1_ i1 ?9 I i RC-0532 ~ ~ ~ ~ f~9 - + ~ ~s~r ~ '~4Ty~ mC :h _ 1 y +h~Y t+~ -,r 1*~ I I rY- . YN~f~ r ~ Figure 26. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-6 base of excavation. ' Layer I I ~ Bedrock - ~ Layer n ` = Scale m centimeters - ~ ~ - ~ - ` . Bedrock Layer I -Architectural layer is composed of small to medium pled cobbles, roughly level. Layer II Level 1-Dark brown (7.SYR 3/4) granular silt with 10 percent small cobbles Layer II Level 2 -Dark brown (7.SYR 3/4) silt with 5 percent small cobbles and gravel Figure 27 SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-6 north wall profile. 30 i i RC-0532 EU-7 (1 x 1) was placed along a stacked edge in the east central portion of Featwe A and was oriented northeasbsouthwest (see Figwe 23). Bedrock was visible in the southeast corner of the unit. Two stratigraphic layers were discovered within the unit. Layer I, the architectwal layer, extended between 10 and 65 centimeters below the surface and contained no cultwal material. A single piece of waterworn coral was noted in the southeast profile. Layer II was a roughly 25 centimeter thick soil layer that yielded mazine shell, two basalt flakes, and two charcoal samples, one of which was collected was collected in situ (Table 12). Layer II also revealed unbwned kukui nutshell and coral fragments that were not collected. Two fragments of volcanic glass and a chazcoal sample were collected from Level 2 of Layer II (see Table 12). ~ Within EU-7, bedrock was reached in all azeas of unit, with the east half directly below the azchitectwal layer and the west half at a depth of 80 centimeters below the swface (Figwe 28). The stratigraphic profile of EU-7 is shown in Figwe 29 and described as follows: _ Layer I .........................architectwal layer composed of lazge cobbles and boulders to create stacked edge with small to medium cobbles on the swface and interior. Layer II Level l ............dazk brown (7.SYR 3/3) granulaz silt with 10-20 percent small cobbles and gravel. Layer II Leve12.......:,~;,dazk brown (7.SYR 3/4) granular silt with 10.20 percent small cobbles and , gravel on decomposing bedrock. Table 12. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A EU-7. Acc.~# La er Level Material Species/type Count MNI Wei ht 31 II 1 Mazme shell Cypraea sp. 1 1 ~ (gI 32 II 1 Basalt 0.1 33 II Flake 2 - 0.7 1 Organic Chazcoal 17 34 II 1 Organic Chazcoal (m situ) 35 II 2 Volcanic glass Shatter ~ 0.6 36 II 2 - 0.55 2 Or anic Charcoal - 0.6 EU-8 (1 x 1) was placed in the east central portion of Feature A and was the easternmost of fow adjacent units (EUs 8, 11, 12 and 13). These fow units fonned a 1 x 4 meter trench in the center portion of Featwe A (see Figure 23). Three stratigraphic layers were recorded within EU-8. Layer I, the architectural layer, extended to a depth of roughly 30 centimeters below the surface. The only item of cultwal material recovered from this layer was a waterworn basalt hammerstone (Table 13; Figures 30 and 31) that also exhibited grinding wear. Layer II was a roughly 30 centimeter thick layer of mixed soil and rock that yielded marine shell, volcamc glass and another smaller waterworn basalt hammerstone (see Table 13, Figure 32). Layer III was roughly 20 centimeters of very dazk brown silt of which the lower 10 centimeters (Level 2) were culturally sterile. Level 1 of Layer III contained a relative abundance of cultural material, including a worked coral item, one identified fish vertebrae, volcanic glass, and chazcoal (see Table 13). Bedrock was encountered immediately below the architectural layer m the eastern half of the unit and between 70 and 80 centimeters below the surface in the western half unit (Figwe 33). The stratigraphtc profile of EU-8 (along with those of EU-11, -12, -13) is shown in Figure 34 and is described as follows: Layer I .........................architectural layer composed of roughly fitted medium and large cobbles, with some small boulders that form a surface pavement. Layer II .........................very dark gay (7.SYR 3/1) granulated silt with 30 percent small to medium cobbles, gravel, and organic debris. Layer III .......................very dark brown (7.SYR 2.25/2) silt with 20 percent pebbles and gravel. - - - - - RC-0532 'J r.~, f~~~ d ice' ~ 1~,~~ ' `'r~~M -y. it ~ y,d =r~ ~y + y • d ~ ~I+~ ~ ~ ~ y. seta ~ ~ti,T+~f'~ ~y1 fix, r ~ „ ~ 7. `a . _ 3 a r''~A ~ ~ _ ' ~ t at~~~t ~ ~ :s r~, ,,~~~+-~i r - ' ' ~ h,~. a~ a I t .~~n ~~'°`j'1 t k f ~ y f t>. ' G E v 'F" i, f - 4 ii2lo ~ ~ Figure 28. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-7 base of excavation ~ i 0, 10 2.0 Scale i~n centimeters • LayerI Bedrock , i Waterworn coral ` fragment m wall Layer II Bedrock - ~ Layer I -Architectural layer is composed of pled cobbles with boulders on western edge Layer [I -Dark brown (7 SYR 3/3) granular silt , Figure 29 SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-7 southeast wall profile ' 32 i RC-0532 I_ ``7"i~fT~~brr' d. . e,~, ~`tya 1~9,~~yrn.fi„ r.'w~. rr 20 tii~ ~5 ~ r ~rj ~ ~ - t~$ +kt1 r a i~i ~aa r r ~ y a ~i 1 } ~x 111 k ~ Chi ~ . Figure 30. Plan view of waterworn basalt hammerstone from EU-8 (Acc. #37). I 20 cm x l ~ 4 i Figure 31 Stde view of waterworn basalt hammerstone (Acc. #37). I 33 - i RC-0532 ~Q GRI i d i 1 Figure 32. Waterworn basalt hammerstone from EU-8 (Acc. #40). , . _ t ~ . ,'p ~ n;y r ~ . p i I j H , . ` R 5~ ~ .Y'' i ~,w ~ir~'a Figure 33. SIHP 24562 Feature A, EU-8 base of excavation F 34 I 0 20 40 I Scale in centuneters EU-11 EU-12 EU-13 EU-8 Bedrock ~ - - -;3 ra I,aye IC'I'`^_',- Layer II _ _ _ Bedrock ~H~ Layer I architectural layer is composed of roughly fitted medium to large cobbles with some small boulders that form a level surface. Layer II very dark brown (7.SYR 2.5/3) granular silt with 10 to 30 percent small and some medium cobbles. Layer III very dark brown (7.SYR 2.5/3) to very dark gray (7.5 3/3) loose silt with 5 to 20 percent small cobbles and gravel. 0 w w N Figure 34. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, north wall profile of EU's 11, 12, i 3, and 8. ~ r-- r- r---~ ~ r---- - ~ ~ r-- ~ r-~ i RC-0532 T e abl 13. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A EU-8. Acc.# Layer Level Material Species/type Count MNI Weight (g) 37 I 1 Basalt Waterworn 1 1 581.3 hammer/grinding stone 38 II 1 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 2 2 3 6 39 II 1 Volcanic glass Flake 2 - 0.6 40 II 1 Basalt Waterworn hammerstone 1 - 72.8 41 III 1 Coral Worked 1 - 0.3 42 III 1 Ftsh bone Unidentified 1 1 0.3 43 III 1 Volcantc glass Chunks 4 - 9 3 44 III 1 Volcantc glass Shatter 6 - 3 1 45 III 1 Volcantc glass Flake 2 - 1 1 46 III 1 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 1 - 1.2 47 III 1 Organic Charcoal - - 0 4 EU-9 (1 x 1 meter) was placed to the west central portion of the Feature A, approximately 1 meter i northwest of EU-7, to a north/south orientation (see Ftgure 23) Two strattgraphtc layers were recorded within EU-9. Layer I, the archttectural layer, extended to a depth of roughly 35 centimeters below the ' surface Cultural material from Layer I include martne shell and volcanic glass shatter (Table 14). Unburned kukut nutshell and two types of coral were noted, but not collected. Layer II was a 3 to 30 centimeter soil layer that yielded marine shell, volcanic glass and charcoal (see Table 14). Also noted wtthtn Layer II, but not collected, were unburned kukut nutshell and coral Level 2 of Layer II contained martne shell, volcanic glass and charcoal (see Table 14). EU-9 ended at bedrock (Ftgure 35). The stratigraphtc profile of EU-9 is shown in Figure 36 and is described as follows. Layer I archttectural layer composed of fitted small and large cobbles forming a level surface Medium and large cobbles compose the interior fill. Large cobbles and boulders that have collapsed from the alignment to the east are present on the surface. Layer II Level 1... dark brown (7.SYR 3/4) granular silt with 10-15 percent small cobbles, gravel and large roots Layer II Level 2 .dark brown (7 SYR 3/4) granular silt with 10-15 percent small cobbles, gravel and rootlets. t 36 RC-0532 ~,.r' ' ~e _ t ~ ~ ~ lyJ~ w: :'s'~, r" ~p• ~.Y ~ . ~ 'e~~ i ' t ° . W b ` t ~ i~E i~~ tr` . .r . I t. y ~ II t,;tt r. .w h Y~ L'k'~, a , r Figure 35. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-9 base of excavation 10 20 Scale to centimeters Layer I 0 Layer II Bedrock Layer I -Architectural layer is composed of small and large cobbles to create a Layer II -Dark brown (7.SYR 3/4) granulated silt with 10-15 percent cobbles and large roots. Ftgure 36. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-9 north wall profile. 37 RC-0532 Table 14. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A EU-9. Acc.# Layer Level Material Species/type Count MNI Weight (g) 48 I 1 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 2 2 11.6 49 I 1 Manne shell Charonca trctoncs 1 1 6 7 50 I 1 Marine shell Cellana sp. 1 1 1 5 51 I 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 1 - 0 1 52 II 1 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 3 1 5.4 53 II 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 2 _ 0.8 54 II 1 Volcamc glass Flake 1 - 0 6 55 II 1 Organic Charcoal - - 0.5 56 II 2 Marine shell Cypraea sp 1 1 0.9 57 II 2 Manne shell Conus sp. 1 1 0.4 58 II 2 Marine shell Charonca trctoncs 1 1 1 1 59 II 2 Volcamc glass Shatter 1 - 0 5 60 II 2 Volcamc glass Flake i _ 0 4 61 II 2 Organic Charcoal - - 0,2 i EU-10 (1 x 1 meter) was placed in the north central portion of Feature A, directly south of previously excavated TU-4 (see Figure 23). Excavation revealed four stratigraphic layers within EU-10 Layer I, the architectural layer covered 80 percent of the surface of the unit while thick grass covered the remaining ' surface of the southeast quadrant. Layer I extended roughly 10 to 20 centimeters below the surface and a coral cobble was noted but not collected. Layer II, a soil layer, roughly 15 centimeters thick, was excavated ' in two levels. Level 1 yielded volcanic glass and a charcoal sample (Table 15). Unburned kukuc nutshell was observed but not collected. Leve12 of Layer II contained volcanic glass (see Table 15). Layer III was a thin dark brown silt layer that contained marine shell and volcanic glass (see Table 15) Layer IV was at the I base of the unit above bedrock and included a large root running west to east Layer IV yielded volcanic glass and a charcoal sample (see Table 15). EU-10 ended at bedrock (Figure 37) The stratigraphic profile ~ of EU-10 is shown in Figure 38 and described as follows• ' Layer I architectural layer composed of medium cobbles to small boulders. Layer II Level 1 .........dark brown (7 5 YR 3/3) granulated silt with 30 percent small cobbles and roots Layer II Leve12 ...dark brown (7.5 YR 3/3) granulated stlt with 20 percent small cobbles. Layer III .......dark brown (7.5 YR 3/3) compacted silt ' Layer IV ..dark yellowish brown (10 YR 3/4) sterile, compacted silt with large root. 38 ! RC-0532 .,,+r a.~ ~aaw ii ~ , s. ~ ~ . I ti ~ J_ "z1~. by - i, ~1 b ~ ~ ~L ~ ~ f~ ~~w ! , w' ~ il'6 ~ k` ~ y ~ , ~ yr _~~t~`~~,i,~.v ~ i~a'v~~.; ..~..w'' s it .qLd.,~+ a.yz r' _ ~.a~~.:.:J ti Figure 37. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-10 base of excavation. 0, 10 20 Scale in centimeters Layer I Layer II Layer III . _.s r~~'~k ~ ufi~r~'~ L~~~~e~ ~ ire r ~x~ a ,y ~ i,,,.- Root ~ i4 Bedrock Layer I -Architectural layer is composed of piled medium to large cobbles and with small boulders. Layer II Level 1-Dark brown (7.SYR 3/3) granular silt with 30 percent small cobbles and roots. Layer II Leve12 -Dark brown (7.SYR 3/3) granular silt with 20 percent small cobbles and roots. Layer III -Dark brown (7.SYR 3/3) compacted silt with 20 percent gravel. Layer IV -Dark yellowish brown (IOYR 3/4) compacted silt with large root. Figure 38. SHIP 24563 Feature A, EU-10 north wall profile. 39 RC-0532 Table 15. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A EU-10. Acc.# Layer Level Material Species/type Count MNI Weight (g) 62 II 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 1 - 0.1 63 II 1 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 1 - 0.7 64 II 1 Organic Charcoal - - 0.3 65 II 2 Volcanic glass Shatter 4 - 3 1 66 III 1 Marine shell Unidentified 1 1 0.4 67 III 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 7 - 2 9 68 IV 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 2 - 0 5 69 IV 1 Organic Charcoal - - 0.1 EU-11 (1 x 1 meter) was placed in the east central portion of Feature A (see Figure 23) and was the western most of four adjacent units (EUs 8, 11, 12 and 13) that formed a 1 x 4 meter trench in the center portion of the feature (see Figure 23). Two stratigraphic layers were recorded within EU-11. Layer I, the architectural layer, extended to a depth of roughly 40 centimeters below the surface and contained no cultural material. Layer II was a roughly 20 centimeter thick layer of soil with Level 1 yielding a minimal amount of marine shell, nine pieces of volcanic glass, a waterworn basalt hammerstone (Table 16, Ftgures 39 and 40) and a charcoal sample (Table 16) The lower 10 centimeters (Level 2) yielded 24 volcanic glass pieces, the most recovered from the site, a basalt flake with polish, and two charcoal samples (see Table 16) Bedrock was encountered between 35 and 55 centimeters below the surface in all areas of the unit ~ (Figure 41) The stratigraphic profile of EU-11 (along with those of EU-8, -12, -13) is shown m Figure 34 and is described as follows• Layer I architectural layer composed of mostly medium cobbles, with some small and large cobbles. Layer II Level 1 very dark brown (7 SYR 2 5/3) granular silt with 10 percent small cobbles and gravel Layer II Leve12 ..very dark brown (7 SYR 2.5/3) loose silt with 10 percent small cobbles ' and gravel Large roots at base of unit i i i r 40 i RC-0532 x ~ ~ M Figure 39. Plan view of waterworn basalt hammerstone from EU-11 (Acc. #75). i~k~ t~ 4 Figure 40. Side view of waterworn basalt hammerstone from EU-11 (Acc. #75). 41 - - - - - - - - - - - - RC-0532 r F--ter,-'~ts~' i • T ~rY ~ w`K7fi~~ ~ " ,Ya h...a •kaej~ rt°~w` ' w„~i r~.~L~M1 N+y r7` W ;~5~ z °~W • ~.1~ wt ° v '~1 {r ti ~ ,.y lr~ ' ~ ~~l ~ .I" S ~'r!' be~z ~ ' I h ~ ~ !r ~ ~Y t i"!aX/ _ _ v. + `;~ri .fin Figure 41 SIHP Site 24563 Feature A, EU-11 base of excavation. Table 16. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A EU-11. Acc.# Layer Level Material Species/type Count. MNI Weight (g) 70 II 1 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 2 2 1 7 71 II 1 Volcanic glass Chunk 1 - 1 8 72 II 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 6 - 3 9 73 II 1 Volcanic glass Flake 1 - 0.1 74 II 1 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 1 - 0 1 75 II 1 Basalt Waterworn 1 - 240 0 hammerstone 76 II 1 Organic Charcoal - - 2 5 77 II 2 Volcanic glass Chunk 3 - 4 3 78 II 2 Volcanic glass Shatter 12 - 3 9 79 II 2 Volcanic glass Flake 3 - 1 9 80 II 2 Volcanic glass Uhhzed flake 6 - 7 7 81 II 2 Basalt Flake with polish 1 - 2 1 82 h 2 Organic Charcoal (m sate) - - 0 45 83 II 2 Organac Charcoal - - 3 3 EU-12 (1 x 1 meter) was placed an the east central portion of Feature A (see Fagure 23), and was adjacent to EU-11 to the west and EU-13 to the east Two strattgraphtc layers were recorded within EU-12 Layer I, the architectural layer, extended to a depth of roughly 25 centimeters below the surface and did not contain cultural material Layer II was a roughly 20 centimeter thick layer of soil and minimal rock that ~ yielded a single piece of marine shell, two utilazed volcanic glass flakes, one basalt flake and two utaltzed 42 RC-0532 basalt flakes in the first 10 centimeters (Level 1) (Table 17). Unburned kukui nutshell was observed, but not collected. Level 2 of Layer II contained one fragment of marine shell, volcanic glass and a charcoal sample m situ (see Table 17). Within EU-12, bedrock was reached first in the northeast corner directly under the architectural layer and sloped southwest to a depth of roughly 35 centimeters (Figure 42). The majority of soil was contained in the western half of the umt. The stratigraphic profile of EU-12 (along with those of EU-8, -11, -13) is shown in Figure 34 and is described as follows: Layer I .........................architectural layer composed of fitted medium cobbles. Layer II Level l ............very dark brown (7.SYR 2.5/3) granular silt with 15 percent small cobbles and gravel. Layer II Leve12............very dark brown (7.SYR 2.5/3) loose silt with 5 percent gravel. ~+~1" xr~^`,'U~~Sr~1~a~i~~~~+,°~~~fg?.t~~rr~y~~r y,"^_'3'1~y?`~-+:.~sys`Y~'~~ x:';~' `y~'R"' y.'u. ~ri '4'fPi i. :h ~••7~.',t'~ v ~e', t~ vi3j?x'',4. _ ~ • ~ a`M~ >'u ~ ae ~ %C W v~ #.Y. / 'i~b ~ 1 l/ 4 ~ 1 I r~ U. i ,a i` ~ .r.i•'ti fn`. . ~ 1mti Figure 42. SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, EU-12 base of excavation. Table 17. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A EU-12. Acc.# Layer Level Material Species/type Count MNI Weight (g) 84 II 1 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 1 1 1.7 85 II 1 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 2 - 0.7 86 II 1 Basalt Flake 1 - 0.1 87 II 1 Basalt Utilized flake 2 - 2,4 88 II 2 Manne shell Unidentified 1 1 0.7 89 II 2 Volcanic glass Shatter 4 - 1.3 90 II 2 Organic Charcoal - - 0.3 91 II 2 Organic Charcoal - - 2.0 4'i RC-0532 EU-13 (1 x 1 meter) was placed in the east central portion of Feature A, and was adjacent to EU-12 to the west and EU-8 to the east (see Figure 23). Two stratigraphic layers were recorded within EU-13. Layer I, the surface architecture layer, extended to a depth of 22 to 32 centimeters below the surface. No items of cultural material were recovered from this layer. Layer II was a 5 to 48 centimeter thick layer of mixed soil and rock that yielded a worked piece of coral (Table 18, Figure 43) A friable `opihi shell (Acc.# 92) was located at the base of Layer II Level 1 (possibly a scraper but it is too deteriorated to verify) (Table 18). Level 2 was roughly 20 centimeters of very dark gray silt that contained (see Table 18), volcanic glass and charcoal. Bedrock was encountered in all areas of the unit with the north and central areas exposed first and sloping towards the southeast to a depth of 65 centimeters below surface (Figure 44). The stratigraphic profile of EU-13 (along with those of EU-8, -11, -12) is shown in Figure 34 and is described as follows: Layer I architectural layer composed of medium to large cobbles with some boulders to create a rough pavement. Layer II Level 1 very dark brown (7.SYR 2.5/2) granulated silt with 20 percent small cobbles. Layer II Leve12.... ....very dark gray (7 SYR 3/3) silt with 10-15 percent small cobbles and gravel. s;, ~ i "5 ~r~~i f'~L4.•4~'a X`~i'r .kf te^-xe~.y, r? 'i 7 Figure 43. Worked coral from EU-13 (Acc #93). Table 18. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A EU-13. Acc.# Layer Level Material Species/type Count MNI Weight (g) 92 II 1 Marine shell Cellana sp 20+ 1 6.0 93 II 1 Coral Worked 1 _ g,g , 94 II 2 Marine shell Drupa sp. 1 1 0 1 95 II 2 Volcanic glass Shatter 2 - 0 7 ' 96 II 2 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 2 - 0.4 97 II 2 Organic Charcoal - - 16 I 44 ~ RC-0532 N!~. r`. ~+~~:~y~~~w. ~.etY'- ANC .i yti ii-~*~~lV~: ~ d'' r e: ti~ .fir , ` 7"r p9 rr, Y i~ / {t ~ R i Q Figure 44. SIHP 24562 Feature A, EU-13 base of excavation. Feature B In addition to the single test unit (TU-2) excavated at Site 24562 Feature B during the inventory survey (Bulgrin and Rechtman 2005b), two excavation units (EU-4 and EU-5) were placed in Site 24562 Feature B (Figure 45). EU-4 (1 x 2 meter) was placed in the south/southeastern portion of Feature B and was oriented at 42 degrees (see Figure 45). Excavation identified two stratigraphic layers within EU-4. Layer I, the architectural layer, was directly on bedrock in the majority of the unit. Layer II was a small but deep pocket of silty soil m the south half of the unit, resting on decaying bedrock. One small fragment of marine shell and a charcoal sample were collected (Table 19). EU-4 ended at bedrock (Figure 46). The stratigraphic profile of EU-4 is shown in Figure 47 and is described as follows: Layer I .........................architectural layer composed of large cobbles and small to medium boulders creating a roughly level area with pockets of very dark grayish brown (lOYR 3/2) granulated silt with organic debns. Layer II .........................very dark grayish brown (lOYR 3/2) granulated silt with 40 to 45 percent small cobbles and pebbles with organic debris. 45 RC-0532 0 .5 I Scale to meters (heights m centimeters) N true Stacked II ~I Bedrock I~ II (45) (40) II!I II II (70) (25) ~u^$ ` i 4 _ TU-2 ~ I~ II a _ ~ °0 o II II , -'r. (70) II ~I , ~r r F,-, i i II ~I ~ (90) i Figure 45 SIHP Site 24562, Feature B plan view with EU placement 46 ~ RC-0532 I l_ r C_ l ? w I1 l_ Figure 46. SIHP Site 24562 Feature B, EU-4 photograph of west wall profile. Layer I Bedrock Layer II f 10 20 Scale in centimeters { Layer I -Architectural layer composed of large cobbles and large to medium boulders ` that create a faced edge. A roughly level surface area of small to large cobbles and small cobble fill with pockets of very dark greyish brown (1 OYR 3/2) granulated silt. Layer II -Very dark greyish brown (lOYR 3/2) granulated silt with 40-45 percent small ~r cobbles and pebbles and 20 percent organic debris. Il Figure 47. SIHP Site 24562 Feature B, EU-4 west wall profile. 47 RC-0532 Table 19. Cultural material recovered from SIHP Site 24562 Feature B EU-4. Acc./# Layer Level Material Species/type Count MNI Weight (g) 11 II 1 Marine shell Drupa sp. 1 1 0 2 12 II 1 Organic Charcoal - - 0 5 EU-5 (1 x 1 meter) was placed in the northeast portion of Feature B approximately 1 meter north of EU-4 and also oriented at 42 degrees (see Figure 45). Two stratigraphic layers were excavated within EU- _ 5. Layer I, the architectural layer, extended to a depth of 15.0 centimeters in the west portion of the unit and 35.0 centimeters in the east. Layer II was thin soil layer that rested on gently sloping bedrock. No cultural material was recorded in EU-5. The stratigraphic profile of EU-5 is shown in Figure 48 and is described as follows: Layer I .architectural layer composed of small to medium cobbles with a few large cobbles to create a roughly level area. Layer II ...very dark grayish brown (lOYR 3/2) granulated silt with 40 percent small cobbles with organic debris. 0 10 ~0 Scale m centimeters Layer I ' Layer II I Bedrock Layer I -Architectural layer is composed of small to medium cobbles with a few large cobbles Layer II -Very dark greyish brown (lOYR 3/2) granulated silt with 40 percent small ' cobbles and 15 percent organic debris Figure 48. SIHP Site 24562 Feature B, EU-5 south wall profile. 48 i RC-0532 SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS Introduction The following section synthesizes the results of the data recovery excavations conducted at SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 on TMKs:3-7-5-017:42 and 43, both of which fall within a 30-acre area what is called ( _ here the study area. The synthesis focuses on the following three reseazch questions: timing of occupation, specific site functions, and identification of probable former superstructure. By excavating the primary SIHP Sites 24558 and 23562, it was possible to sample slightly different portions of traditional planting , zones. Being located on the slope above the 600 foot contour SIHP Site 24558 is virtually within the kalu`ulu zone, whereas the lower-lying SIHP Site 24562 is just above the slightly drier kula zone (Figure 49). One purpose of site designations is to facilitate chronological and functional compazison between spatially separate surfaces; SII-iI' Sites 24558 and 24562 represent two primary modified surfaces within r- the study area that yielded datable and identifiable items introduced by the former occupants of the land. ' Feature designations are given to spatially distinct surfaces within each site for the purposes of infra-site comparison. For this reason SII3P Site 24562 has been divided into Feature A (a roughly rectangular- shaped modified outcrop with stacked rock walls along portions of all sides) and Feature B (a roughly "L" shaped modified outcrop) roughly 10.5 meters east of Feature A (Figure 49). Likewise, SII-1P Site 24558 , has been sub-divided into anorth/south makai terrace and an east/west mauka boulder mound roughly two meters east of the terrace. For the purpose of infra-feature compazison in the following synthesis, the distinctive surfaces within Feature A of SIHP Site 24562 have been given separate designations. The stacked walls in conjunction with the pahoehoe fill that they retained not only served to extend the surface azea of the SIHP Site 24562 outcrop, but also created distinctive surfaces, or sub-features. Most noticeable of these surfaces was the pavement in the center of Feature A, one meter west of its eastern edge. In the synthesis, this sub-feature is labeled "central modified outcrop" (Table 20). The cobbled surface on the southern end of Feature A is r labeled "south modified outcrop," the far northern soil and cobble-filled end of the feature is labeled "north I modified outcrop," and an irregulaz surface on the western end is called "west modified outcrop." For the purposes of sampling these sub-features, excavation units were selectively placed on each. By following this sampling strategy it was hoped to detect possibly distinctive activity azeas within SII-IP Site 24562, Feature A. By placing more than one unit (ideally 1 x 1 m) within each sub-feature, it was hoped to capture infra-sub-feature activity loci. Overall a total of two sites, four features, four sub-features, and 18 units were excavated within the study area (Table 20). In order to avoid possible confusion, it is worth noting that two TU-2s were excavated; one in the makai terrace of SIHP Site 24558 and the other in the Feature B modified outcrop of SIHP Site 24562. As will be shown in the following synthesis, particulazly when it comes to interpreting site and feature function, it helps to compaze and contrast these proveniences at different scales, ranging from the microcosm of the unit to the macrocosm of the site. Table 20.5ummary of sites, features, sub-features, and units excavated within stud area. l SIHP Site Feature Sub feature Units 24558 mauka mound - TU-1, EU-1 24558 »iakai terrace - TU-2, EU-2 l 24562 A modified outcrop south modified outcrop TU-3, EU-3, EU-6 24562 A modified outcrop central modified outcrop EU-8, EU-11, EU-12, EU-13 24562 A modified outcrop west modified outcrop EU-7, EU-9 24562 A modified outcrop north modified outcrop TU-4, EU-10 24562 B modified outcrop - TU-2, EU-4, EU-5 49 N ~ rue 0 40 80 Scale in meters SIHP Site 24558 jmauka mound il..~? makai terrace 600 ft contour ~ ~ Wa`„ ~>>1ed Core Feature B 9 co Feature A ~ SIHP Site 24562 0' ' o- r-. _ ~ Figure 49 Map of study area showing excavated saes and features. i 50 RC-0532 Timing of occupation The first topic, timing of occupation, was addressed by the recovery of chazcoal samples from well-sealed contexts. Attention was given to identifying in situ, single source charcoal pteces large enough for 1 conventional C14 assaying. The following four samples (Appendix B) were collected from SIHP Site 24562, Feature A: two from EU-11 (one in situ) and one each from EU-12 and EU-13. All four samples came from the central platform-like sub-feature (i.e., central modified outcrop) m Feature A of SIHP Site 24562. In terms of radiocarbon years the four dates aze virtually contemporazy (Tables 21 and 22). The ~ weighted average calculation of the four linked assays, also known as a best estimate, intersects the tree ring calibration curve at AD 1650, 1740, 1800, 1930, and 1950. The calibrated standard deviations of the linked dates range between AD 1670 and 1950. The absence of historic aztifacts at SIHP Site 24562 and within the surrounding study area suggests that the area was no longer utilized by the end of the eighteenth ~ century. When compazed with the general Hawaiian chronology of settlement patterns (Kirch 1985; 1 Hommon 1976) and the specific patterns developed for north Kona (Gordy 1985, Gordy et al. 1991, Graves and Goodfellow 1993; Rosendahl 1973; Schilt 1984, Tomonan-Tuggle 1985) the date for occupation at SIHP Site 24652 falls in a period when agriculture expanded into the kula zone (i.e., post-AD 1650). It is assumed that SIHP Site 24558, which is farther upslope and closer to kalu `udu zone, dates to more-or-less the same time, although ~t may be slightly earlier based on previous work along this portion of the Hawaiian west coast. Table 21 R i ad ocarbon assays from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A by increasing age. RC # Beta # EU Layer Level Measured 14C l-sigma+/- l3C/12C Corrected 14C 82 251741 11 II 2 130 BP 40 -23.3%0 130 BP - 91 251743 12 II 2 150 BP 40 -24.8%0 150 BP 97 251744 13 II 2 160 BP 40 -23.8%0 160 BP 83 251742 11 II 2 180 BP 40 -25.6%0 180 BP Table 22. Calibrated radiocarbon dates from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A b increasing age. RC# Beta # EU Layer Level Calibrated intercepts (AD) Calibrated range (AD) 82 251741 11 II 2 1690,1730,1810,1920,1950 1660-1960 { 91 251743 12 II 2 1680,1740,1810,1930,1950 1660-1960 l 97 251744 13 II 2 1680,1740,1810,1930,1951 1660-1960 83 251742 11 II 2 1670,1770,1800,1940,1950 1650-1710,1710-1880,1910-1950 Specific site and feature functions The second topic, the specific functions of sites and features, was addressed through excavation units and assessments of item variety, count, and weight within each unit. In order to obtain representative coverage of the sites, units were spread out and placed strategically so as to sample the maximum amount of features and items. To maximize item recovery, several excavation units were placed adjacent to those test units that have yielded an above-average number of items during the inventory survey phase. Most notably, TU-2, + near the southwestern side of SIHP Site 24558 (see Figure 18), and TU-3, near the southern edge of SIHP IL Site 24562 Feature A (see Figure 23), were productive test units that had excavation units placed directly adjacent to them. In order to avoid areas that yielded sparse remains, units such as EU-4 and EU-5 were placed farther from the less productive TU-2 of SIHP Site 24562 Feature B (see Figure 45). Previously unexcavated, but promising-looking features were also sampled, notably the platform-like modified outcrop 51 i RC-0532 ' near the center of SIHP Site 24562 Feature A (see Figure 18). During the course of fieldwork the crew ; chose to excavate a series of four adjacent units across this productive centrally located platform (i a ,from i east to west these were EU-8, EU-13, EU-12, and EU-11), creating afour-meter long trench in the process. Excavated sub-features within the study area are ranked in the following descending order of item variety: SIHP Site 24562, Feature A, south modified outcrop (17 kinds of items), SIHP Site 24562, Feature A, central modified outcrop (14 kinds of items); SIHP Site 24558, makai terrace (9 kinds of items); SIHP Site 24562, Feature A, west modified outcrop (8 kinds of items); SIHP Site 24558, mauka mound (5 kinds of items); SIHP Srte 24562, Feature A, north modified outcrop (4 kinds of items); and SIHP Site 24562, Feature B modified outcrop (3 kinds of items) (Table 23). The south modified outcrop of Feature A in , SIHP Site 24562 is the only sub-feature within the study area that yielded bird bone (Table 24) Within Feature A of SIHP Site 24562, the south modified outcrop is also the only sub-feature with pig and mammal bones (although collected only from the south modified outcrop, the remainder of the observed kukui nut shell fragments were limited to Feature A). However, basalt hammerstones and worked coral pieces are limited to the central modified outcrop of Feature A. An interpretation as to the probable ~ function of the basalt hammerstone and coral tools might help with an interpretation of the central modified outcrop sub-feature. 'i Table 23. Rank ordering of sub-features by descending item weight. I~ SIHP Site/Feature/Sub feature vanety n average MNI average of items n (lxlm) 8 g (lxlm) 24562/A/central modified outcrop 14 94 23 5 10 974 3 243.6 24558/makai terrace 9 34 17 0 5 325.9 162.9 24562/A/south modified outcrop 17 68 17 0 17 104 9 25.9 _ ~ 24562/A/west modified outcrop 8 21 10.5 9 35.0 17 5 24562/A/north modified outcrop 4 16 8.0 1 8 1 4 1 24558/mauka mound 5 8 1 6 2 2 5 0.5 245628 modified outcrop 3 2 0.5 1 0.7 0.2 ~I The three basalt hammerstones from the central modified outcrop have the following shapes• a roughly triangular stone from EU-8 (Accession #37), a round stone from EU-8 (Accession #40), and an oval stone from EU-11 (Accession #75) The basalt hammerstones exhibit hammering and abrading/grinding use- wear. As all three hammerstones were found in the same sub-feature, albeit on different ends, they could represent different stages in the same production process, such as pounding or rubbing against a portable or fixed bedrock anvil-like surface This process might have started with the biggest, triangular, tool and ended with the smallest, round, tool Exactly what was being processed is difficult to interpret with certainty, but could have included the processing of plandwood materials, such as shaping an `o `o (hard wooden digging stick) Whatever the function of the basalt hammerstones might have been, their recovery from the platform-like central modified outcrop within Feature A suggests that the surface was used for preparing agricultural implements This interpretation is supported by the recovery of two worked coral items (i e., Accession # 41 from EU-8 and Accession # 93 from EU-13) from the central modified surface, but from nowhere else in the study area Moreover, a large friable Cellana sp., or `opihi, shell from EU-13 could possibly have been a scraper used in the same set of wood shaping tasks involving the basalt stones and the worked corals It is worth noting that EU-8 and EU-13 are on the eastern end of the central sub-feature, opposite from EU-11 which was on the far western end of the same sub-feature (Figure 50). As in the case of the central modified outcrop of Feature A, item variety, counts, and weights are highest on the eastern and western units and lowest in the central units of the south modified outcrop of the same feature (Figures 50 and 51, ~ Table 24) Fish bone is limited to the far eastern ends of both the south and central modified outcrop sub- 52 i RC-0532 I' L_ features in Feature A. The concentration of items on the edges of the excavated features suggests that these represent the toss-zones where items were discarded. If this was indeed the case, actual activities might have been concentrated in the centers of each of the south and central modified outcrop surfaces. { The recovery of polished basalt flakes from both the south and central modified outcrop surfaces and the concentration of volcanic glass flakes, notably utilized ones, are indicative of intensive activity on the t southeastern quadrant of the overall Feature A. Of note is the drop-off in variety, number, and weight of recovered items in the units on the west (i.e., EU-7 and EU-9) and north (TU-4 and EU-10) modified j outcrops of Feature A (Figures 50 and 51, Table 24). Two fragments of Charonia tritonis sp. were l collected from EU-9 (Table 24) on the eastern end of west modified outcrop. Whereas there is no evidence of its use as a tool, this large shell is also known for being utilized as a scraper. Located roughly two meters northwest of the central modified outcrop, the west outcrop could have served as a secondary activity surface. The same interpretation of secondary activity area applies to the north modified outcrop with its comparatively sparse remains. r Table 24. Summar of items from SIHP Site 24562 Feature A. 1 west modified north modified central modified outcrop south modified outcrop outcrop outcrop EU-11 EU-12 EU-13 EU-8 TU-3 EU-3 EU-6 EU-7 EU-9 TU-4 EU-10 Item t e ish bone - - - 0 3 - - 0 1 - - - - i Charonta tntonts - - - - _ _ _ _ 7 g - - L lubraritdae - - - - - - 17 - - - - Cypraea sp. 1 7 1 7 - 3 6 0 8 - 37 7 0 1 17 9 - - rupa sp - - 0 1 - - - 1 - - - - Celtana sp - - 6 - - - - - 1 5 - - sognomon sp - - - - 0 6 - >01 - - - - Conus sp - - - - - - 19 5 - 0 4 - - anne shell - 0 7 - - 0 5 - - - - - 0 4 oral worked - - 8.5 0 3 - - _ _ _ _ _ vian bone - - - - - - 0 6 - - - - us sp - - - - 0 5 - - - - - - ammal bone - - - - _ _ p 2 _ _ _ _ Basalt hammer 240 - - 654 - - - _ _ _ _ asalt polish flake 2 1 - - - - 0.4 0 4 - - - - Basalt used flake - 2 4 - - - - _ _ _ _ _ Basalt flake - 0 1 - - - 1 2 - 0 7 - - - olcanic used flake 7 8 0 7 0 4 1 2 - 3 8 0 8 - - - 0 7 olcanic flake 2 - - 1 7 6 4 - 0 8 - 1 - - olcanic chunk 13 9 1 3 0 7 12 4 13 5 2 8.9 0 6 1 4 - - olcantc core - - - - - - - - - - 6 6 Kukut - - - - 0 3 - - - - _ - harcoal 63 23 16 04 04 04 2.4 29 07 - 04 Unit total. 273 8 9 2 17 3 674 23 7.8 74 1 4 25 30 7 0 8 1 Sub-feature total: 974 3 104 9 34 95 8 1 In stark contrast with the variety of items from Feature A, the nearby Feature B yielded only a few l items, which include marine shell, a volcanic glass core, and a few flecks of charcoal (Figure 52, Table 25). Items decline from west to east and no items were noticed within EU-5 on the eastern end of Feature B. It is not inconceivable that the tiered L-shaped Feature B was used as a planting platform and/or as a staging area. Like Feature B, platforms and mounds used for planting typically contain some soil within their interiors and charred macro-botanical remains indicative of the crops they once concealed. Piled or stacked planting features identified elsewhere in Hawaii have also yielded a few volcanic glass flakes and other items (e.g., Major and Allen 2001:95; Rechtman 1999). 53 RG0532 0 1 2 Scale m meters (heights m centimeters) north ar Stacked modified „u t^~ outcrop (ioo> pia=n, 11= Bedrock (110) n n - TiJ-4 ~ (60> o Q ° Soil and cobbles (50) Depression O T~ u~ ~ O ,~L I: [1-7 ~~oo ~ central modified west (ioo iT~ " 'ErJ-8 outcrop modified ) r,, outcrop ~ ;L D 0 0 D ~ ~ o ~ o QD ~ o ° ~0 O 0 ~ Cobbles ,~L op o~ 0 oaf p 0 Item ~ ~ ~ count o per ~/1 n ~ f ~ A ~ fL umt 3 + ~ f o 32-37 21-26 south (I oo) modified 11-16 outcrop 1-7 Figure 50 SIHP Site 24562 Feature A, average item count per unit 54 RC-0532 ~ 0 1 2 Scale in meters (heights in centimeters) north N modified ~ Stacked outcrop (too) u= 11= Bedrock (tto) (so n ii TU-4 ~ o ~ - Q ~ ~ Soil and cobbles (so) Depression O Y.I~;g ~ ~ ~ ~ central "~r5 ` I;' modified west (too} EII~Y] ~;>4lJ ~ ~ )II=B outcrop ;w~~~ modified ~ '~r~~~. outcrop a ~o d ~ ~ 0 0 Item 0 ~ Cobbles weight ~ o~ ~ ~ O 0 Per ~ O~ 0 umt o ~ Q 'E fi a ~ t ~Yxf~~ ;3 ~ (120) 273.8-284.3g ~ ~ ® 41.7-74.1g south (too) modified ~ outcrop 17.3-30.7g 1.6-9.2g 0 7-0.9g Figure 51. SIHP Srte 24562 Feature A, average item weight per unit. i5 J RC-0532 0 .5 I Scale to meters (heights in centimeters) N erua Stacked I I ~ I Bedrock II ~I (45) (40) II II II ~I (70) (25) _ EU-5 - 'I'LF-2,, ~ II II O ~Q O~ II II II ~I F EU-4 (60) II II (70) II II Item count per unit (90) I-7 OS Figure 52 SIHP Site 24562, Feature B average item count per unit 56 RC-0532 ' Table 25. Summer of items from SIHP Site 24562 Feature B. TU-2 EU-4 EU-5 Item type g g 8 Drupe sp - 0 2 - Volcamc core present - Charcoal - 0.5 - Umt total• present 0 7 0 Feature total. 0.7 The mauat terrace portion of SIHP Site 24558 has yielded far more items than the nearby mauka mound (Figure 53, Table 26). Betng placed on a paved-ltke wtdemng of the terrace wall, TU-2 and EU-2 yielded a comparatively wide variety and high count of items (Figure 54). Moreover, the average weight of the items per square meter from this makac feature was the second highest for excavated features within the project area (see Table 23). Perhaps as a result of being more directly on top of the paved-like extension of ' the terrace, TU-2 yielded more than its neighboring EU-2 which extends slightly north of the paved area (see Figures 53 and 54). The only basalt adze fragment identified for the study area came from TU-2. This adze fragment together with the pig remains from TU-2 and EU-2 could be offerings on behalf of the ' family head for success in nearby agricultural activities (e.g., Handy et al. 1991:253). The concentration of coral fragments in TU-2 could also be offering remnants (e.g., Kirch 1985:261-262). In contrast with the concentration and variety of items from the makai terrace, the hmtted items from the mauka mound of SIHP Site 24558 (Table 26) resemble those from Feature B of SIHP Stte 24562 (see ` Table 2S). These include marine shell, volcanic glass fragments, and a few charcoal flecks. Mouse bone was also recovered from the mauka mound. Like Feature B then, the mauka mound probably functioned as a planting platform mound and/or as a staging area. Table 26. Summer of items from SIHP Site 24558. ' 24558 B 24558 A • makae terrace mauka mound TU-2 EU-2 TU-1 EU-1 Item type g g g g Cypraea sp 30.8 - 0 g _ Cones sp 2.5 - _ Coral 80 5 - - - Sus sp 6.0 1 3 - - Mus sp - - 0.3 - • Basalt adze I 1 - - _ Basalt 160 9 - - _ Volcanic flake 2.1 - 0 5 - Volcamcchunk - 40 4 - 0.8 ' Charcoal 0 3 - - 0 1 Unit total 284 2 41 7 16 0 9 Feature total• 325 9 2 5 57 RC-0532 0 2 4 Doled roan r-~'" Scale m meters ~r (heights m centimeters) J- 1t In1t C~ Stacked O ~j Bedrock O~ O ~~a ° o d Top of outcrop 0 0~ rL R~~ TU-1 Fla Ro ~ T1 (45) t~'rd ~ R~ - p Tu o (so ~ o O R~ (140) (125) (50) (60) O (130) (135) mauka EU-1 mound makaz terrace Item count per Blister untt i1 EU-2 32-37 a 21-26 - TU-2 Leveled with 11-16 cobbles (160 1-7 OS Figure 53. SIHP Site 24558 average Item count per umt 58 i RC-0532 , Dozed toad 0 2 4 Scale in meters (heights m centimeters) N [Nf Stacked II ~I Bedrock O O~ D o ~~a o d ~ Top of outcrop 0 0~ Flat ~ ~-1 ~ ~ ~ (0) _ ~ _ ~ (70~ ~ nu ~ (45) ~ ~ ~s-'• 1~L IL ~ ~~~H ~ p (140) 50) (0) O (80 >r8 (125) ( (60) O (130) (135) mauka EU-1 mound makai terrace Blister R~ , EU-2 ¦ 273.8-284.38 , ° . 41 7-74.18 _ TU-2 Leveled with 17 3-30.78 cobbles (160 ? 1 6-9.28 ? 0.7-0.98 Figure 54. SIHP Site 24558 average item weight per unit. 59 RC-0532 Possible superstructures The third topic, the identification of any former superstructure, was addressed through a combtnation of both a detailed examination of the extant surface architecture and a detailed recordation of subsurface architectural elements Based on information contained in Hiroa (1957:II), possible structure types include: 1) the variations of simple wall-less houses, where the roof rests directly on the ground; 2) short stone walled houses, where the roof structure rests on a stem wall built of dry stack rock; or 3) thatched wall houses, which may have only had a rock pavement. The structural elements (posthole patterns and rock alignments) of these different house styles are sufficiently distinct that if any were located it would be a simple matter to pinpoint which house style tf any was present. No evidence of former superstructure was identified at any of the excavation sites. In a sense all the features were built on top of lava flows and so are best labeled as modified outcrops, or rock-filled level areas (even the makai terrace of SIHP Site 24558 rested on a north/south lava outcrop with a blister). It could be that temporary lean-to thatched structures were erected on at least one or two of the bigger sub- features, particularly the central modified outcrop of SIHP Site 24562, Feature A. But even this sub-feature had an uneven outline, so it is unlikely that it or any of the other irregularly-shaped features could have supported regularly shaped rectilinear or curvilinear superstructures. CONCI,IJI)INIs O~SEIZVA~'IONS As can be seen in Table 27, the most widespread, or ubiquitous, Item recovered from the seven excavated sub-features within the study area is charcoal (i.e., 100% ubiquity). Charcoal is followed by shatter/chunks of volcanic glass found at six different sub-features (t e., 86% ubiquity) Cowry shell and volcanic glass flakes rank third at five different locations (i.e., 71% ubiquity). Cone shell, volcanic glass utilized flakes, basalt flakes, marine unidentifiable shells, and Drupa sp. were recovered from three different sub-features (i e , 43% ubiquity) Basalt hammerstones, volcanic glass cores, pig bones, limpet shell, basalt flakes with polish, and fish bones were identified at two sub-features (t e , 29% ubiquity). Waterworn basalt and coral, worked coral, trumpet shell, utilized basalt flake, Colubriariidae shell, a basalt adze, bird bone, Isognomon sp., kukui nutshell, rat, and mammal bone came from one sub-feature only (i e , 14% of the total sub- features excavated) The absence of urchin remains from the study area is of interest, bearing in mind their ubiquity at other sites in the Kona area The absence of urchin spine abraders and files from the excavated features within the study area is evidence, albeit negative, that detailed and specialized work, such as fishhook manufacture or complicated carpentry, most probably did not occur in the area. The fairly common types, and comparatively limited counts, weights, and varieties of items recovered from all the sub-features are indicative of everyday agricultural activities, probably carried out on a temporary or short term/seasonal basis It is proposed that whereas Feature A of SIHP Site 24562 was used for short-term implement manufacturing and/or processing activities associated with nearby agricultural plots, Feature B of the same site and the mauka mound of SIHP Site 24558 probably functioned as planting platforms/mounds and/or as staging areas The small pavement-like extension from the makai tettace of SIHP Site 24558 might have been a surface where modest family-level offerings were made on behalf of nearby agricultural activities All-in-all then, the general paucity of Items m addition to the informal construction of the sub-features suggests that SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562 were not used for habitation, but rather as a staging, processing, planting, and ritual locales associated with agriculture. 60 f 1 RC-0532 ~ Table 27. Summar of items from stud area b descendin ubi uit . Type sub feature presence Total count (n) Total MNI Total weight (g) Charcoal 7 9 - 18.7 Volcanic chunk 6 69 0 88.05 - Cypraea sp. 5 31 20 95.05 Volcanic flake 5 27 0 14.45 ' Conus sp. 3 9 3 22.4 Volcanic used flake 3 15 0 14.6 Basalt flake 3 4 0 2 Mazine shell 3 4 3 1.6 Drupa sp. 3 3 3 1.3 Basalt hammerstone 2 2 1 894.1 Volcanic core 2 2 - 13.5 Sus sp. 2 7 3 7.8 Cellana sp. 2 21 2 7.5 Basalt flake w/polish 2 3 - 2.9 Fish bone 2 2 2 0.4 Basalt waterworn 1 1 - 160.9 Coral waterworn 1 4 - 80.5 Coral worked 1 2 - 8.$ Charonia tritonis 1 2 2 7.8 ` Basalt used flake 1 2 - 2.4 Colubrariidae shell 1 I 1 1.7 Basalt adze 1 1 - 1.1 Avian bone 1 3 1 0.6 Isognomon sp. 1 2 2 0.6 Kukut 1 4 - 0 3 Mus sp. 1 3 1 0.3 Mammal bone 1 2 1 0.2 This data recovery effort satisfactorily mitigated the adverse effects to sites and features within the study area (TMK: 3-7-5-017:042 and 043) in Kahului 2"d Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. The research objectives were addressed concerning the determination of both dates and feature function interpretations. The information collected from this data recovery project will hopefully contribute to the growing corpus of knowledge concerning Precontact use of North Kona's traditional kalu `ulu and kuda planting zones, and is available for use into future regional syntheses. It is hoped that the interpretations of chronology, resource exploitation, and feature funcrion proposed to the synthesis of this report would prove to be of heuristic value, especially if the interpretations help generate opposing interpretations and encourage looking at the azchaeolog~cal record in innovative and revealing ways. r fi 1 RC-0532 ~~F~~~~vcES ~T c Bulgrtn, L. and R Rechtman 2005a An Archaeological Inventory Survey of TMK.3-7-5-017 043 Rechtman Consulting Report RC-0285. Prepared for Hualalai Partners of Kona, LLC. 2005b An Archaeological Inventory Survey of TMK•3-7-5-017:042. Rechtman Consulting Report RC-0285 Prepared for Hualalai Partners of Kona, LLC Chinen, J 1961 Original Land Titles in Hawati. Honolulu: privately published. Ching, F , E. Neller, S Palama, and P. Griffin 1973 The Archaeology of North Kona, from the Ahupua`a of Kahului to the Ahupua`a of Kahalu`u Surface Survey: Realignment of Ali`i Drive. Hawaiian Archaeological Journal 73-2. Archaeological Research Center Hawaii, Inc. Cordy, R 1981 A Study of Prehistoric Social Change: The Development of Complex Societies in the Hawaiian Islands. New York: Academic Press 1995 Central Kona Archaeological Settlement Patterns State Historic Preservation Division, DLNR, State of Hawai `i. Prepared for the Planning Depaztment, County of Hawati. Dorrance, W and F. Morgan 2000 Sugar Islands• The 165 Year Story of Sugar in Hawaii. Mutual Publishing: Honolulu Dunn, A ,and P. Rosendahl 1991 Preliminary Report: Phase 1(a) -Site Identification, Phased Intensive Archaeological Survey, Alit Highway Phased Mitigation Program, North Kona District, Island of Hawai `t. PHRI Report 900-052191 Prepared for R M. Towiti Corporation. Dye, T 1978 An Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of Four Alternative Sites for the Kailua- Keauhou Elementary School. Ms 031078. Department of Anthropology, B P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Ellis, W [ 1823] 1963 Journal of William Ellis, Narrative of a Tour of Hawaii, or Owhyee . Honolulu Advertiser Pubhshmg Co., Ltd Hammatt, H. 1980 Archaeological Surface Survey of a 178 Acre Parcel in Na Ahupua`a, Kaumalumalu, Pahoehoe, Kona, Hawai `i Island. Archaeological Research Center Hawaii, Inc. Report 14-203 II. Prepared for Farms and Ranches, Inc. Hammatt, H ,and S. Clark 1980 Archaeological Testing and Salvage Excavations of a 155 Acre Parcel in Na Ahupua`a Pahoehoe, La`aloa and Kapala`aea, Kona, Hawaii Archaeological Research Center Hawaii Report 14-152 III. Prepared for Pacific Basin Resorts, Inc. Hammatt, H , and W Folk 1980 Archaeological Survey, Phase 1• Portions of Keauhou-Kona Resort, Keauhou and Kahaluu, Kona, Hawaii Island. Archaeological Research Center Hawaii, Inc. 14-177 II 1. Lawai. Prepared for Kamehameha Investment Corp Hammatt, H., and V Meeker 1979 Archaeological Excavations and Heiau Stabilization at Kahatu`u, Kona, Hawati Island. Archaeological Research Center Hawan Report 14-172 (II). Prepared for Gerald Park, Urban Planner. Hammatt, H. and M Tomonart-Tuggle 1978 Archaeological Surface Survey of the Old Gomes Property Belonging to Pacific Basin Resorts, Inc. Kahulut, Kona, Hawati Island ARCH Report 14-142. Prepared for Gerald Park, Urban Planner. Han, T., S. Collins, S. Clark, and A. Garland 1986 Moe Kau a Ho`oilo. Hawaiian Mortuary Practices at Keopu, Kona, Hawai `i Chapter VII Artifacts and Manuports from the Keopu Burial Stte Departmental Report Series 86-1 62 RC-0532 Department of Anthropology, B. P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Prepared for Hawaii Department of Transportation. Handy, E.S.C., E.G. Handy, and M. Pukui 1991 Native Planters in Old Hawaii: Their Life, Lore and Environment. B.P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 223. Honolulu: Department of Anthropology, Bishop Museum Press. (Revised ` edition) Haun, A. and D. Henry ` 2004 Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMK: (3) 7-5-19:01, Land of Kahului 2, North Kona District, Island of Hawai `i. Haun & Associates report 175-092204. Prepared for Sunstone Realty Partners, LLC, Honolulu, Hawaii. Haun, A., and J. Henry 2001 Archaeological Inventory Survey, TMK:?-5-16:15, 16, l7, 29, Kahului 1 and 2, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Haun and Associates report 023-041701. Prepared for Bolton, Inc. Haun, A., J. Henry, J. Jimenez, M. Kirkendall, K. Maly, and T. Wolforth 1998 Ali`i Highway Phased Mitigation Program Phase I-Archaeological Intensive Survey, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii, Vol. 1, Summary. PHRI Report 1320-052798. Submitted to the County of Hawaii c/o R. M. Towill Corporation. Kaschko, M., and P. Rosendahl 1987 Full Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey, Kealakekua Ranch Makai Land Subdivision, Land of Kealakekua, South Kona, Island of Hawaii (TMK:3-8-2-02:2,33). PHRI Report 244-100186. Prepazed for Kealakekua Ranch, Ltd. , Kelly, M. 1983 Na Mala O Kona: Gardens of Kona. A History of Land Use in Kona, Hawaii. Departmental Report Series 83-2. Department of Anthropology, B. P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Prepazed for the Depaztment of Transportation, State of Hawai `i. ` Kennedy, J., M. Margret, and T Denham 1992 Inventory Survey and Subsurface Testing Results for a Property in the Ahupua`a of Kahului 2nd, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii (TMK:3-7-5-19:43). Archaeological Research Center Hawaii. Prepared for Dr. James Watson. Kirch, P. V. 1985 Feathered Gods and Fishhooks: An Introduction to Hawaiian Archaeology and Prehistory. Honolulu: University of HawaiOi Press. ' Ladefoged, T. 1991 Hawaiian Architectural Transformations during the Early Historic Era. Asian Perspectives 30(1):55-70. Loubser, J. and R Rechtman 2008 An Archaeological Data Recovery Plan for SIHP Sites 24558 and 24562, (TMK:3-7-5- 017:042 and 043), Kahului 2"d Ahupua`a, north Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Rechtman Consulting Report RC-0532. Prepared for Lee Barrett, Brendan Lee, LLC, Huntington Beach, California. Major, M., and M. Allen 2001 Archaeological Excavations, 1996. In Gardens of Lono: Archaeological Investigations at ` Amy B. H. Greenwell Ethnobotanical Garden, Kealakekua, Hawai `t. Edited by M. Allen, Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. ` 63 i RC-0532 i ~ ~ Newman, T. 1970 Hawaiian Fishing and Farming on the Island of Hawaii, a.d. 1778 Division of State Parks, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Honolulu O'Hare, C., and T. Wolforth 1997 Archaeological Inventory Survey of the Gomes Property Parcel, Land of Kahalui 1st, Island of Hawaii (TMK• 3-7-5-19:5, 38, 40). PHRI Report 1807-10197 Submitted to Towne Development of Hawaii, Inc. Rechtman, R. 1999 Archaeological Inventory Survey of the Norrie Property, Ka`awaloa Ahupua`a, Island of Hawaii. PHRI Report 1978-090799. Rechtman, R., and D. Dougherty 2000 An Archaeological Inventory Survey of TMK: 3-7-5-19 44, 45, Kahului 2nd Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Rechtman Consulting Report RC-0027. Prepared for Sunstone Realty Partners, LLC. Rechtman, R ,and J. Henry 1999 Archaeological Inventory of the Kahului Bridge Replacement Project, Kahului 1st and 2nd Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. PHRI Report 1945-080499. Prepared for Ron Terry, Ph D., Kea`au. Rosendahl, P. 1989 Archaeological Field Inspection, Kahului 1st Development Parcel, Land of Kahului 1st, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii (TMK:3-7-5-19.46) PHRI Report 709-091989. Prepared for Mr. Darwin Lindberg. Sato, H., W. Ikeda, R. Paeth, R. Smythe, and M. Takehiro, Jr. 1973 Soil Survey of the Island of Hawaii, State of Hawaii. U S Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and University of Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office Schilt, A 1984 Subsistence and Conflict in Kona, Hawaii. An Archaeological Study of the Kuakmi Highway Realignment Corridor. Departmental Report Series 84-1 Department of Anthropology, B P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Prepared for the Department of Transportation, State of Hawaii. Soehren, L. 1976 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of Portion of Kahului 2nd, North Kona, Hawaii Island Prepared for P Yoshimura, Inc. 1979 Letter Report: Archaeological and Historical Features on that Portion of TMK:3-7-5-19:1 Which Lies Between the Great Wall of Kuakmi and the Kuakmi Highway in the Land of Kahului 2, North Kona, Hawaii. Prepared for Hiroshi Kasamoto, Inc Soehren, L , and T Newman 1968 Archaeology of Kealakekua Bay Department of Anthropology, B P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, and University of Hawau-Manoa. Tainter, J. 1973 The Social Correlates of Mortuary Patterning at Kaloko, North Kona, Hawaii. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 11 91-105. Tomonan-Tuggle, M. 1993 Draft Report, the Archaeology of the `Ohi`a Preserve; An Inventory Survey of Surface Structures. International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc. (IARII). Submitted to Kamehameha Investment Corporation, Honolulu ~ Wolfe, E ,and J. Morris Geologic Map of the Island of Hawaii. Geologic Investigations Series Map 1-2524-A. U S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. i r 64 i RC-0532 i APPENDIX A-Master Catalog Acc.# Site Feature Unit Layer Level Material Type/Species Count MNI Weight (g) 1 24558 EU-1 II 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 2 - 0.8 2 24558 EU-1 II 1 Organic Charcoal - - 0.1 3 24558 EU-2 II 1 Mammal bone Sus sp. 1 1 1.3 4 24558 EU-2 II 1 Volcanic glass Chunk 1 - - 40.4 5 24562 A EU-3 II Volcanic glass Shatter 3 - 2.0 6 24562 A EU-3 II 1 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 1 - 0.8 7 24562 A EU-3 II 1 Volcanic glass Utilized flake (in situ) 1 - 3.0 8 24562 A EU-3 II 1 Basalt Flake 1 - 1.2 9 24562 A EU-3 II 1 Basalt Flake with polish 1 - 0.4 10 24562 A EU-3 II 1 Organic Charcoal - - 0.4 11 24562 B EU-4 II 1 Marine shell Drupa sp. 1 1 0.2 12 24562 B EU-4 II 1 Organic Charcoal - - 0.5 13 24562 A EU-6 I 1 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 1 1 0.9 14 24562 A EU-6 II 1 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 8 4 36.0 15 24562 A EU-6 II 1 Marine shell Conus sp. 4 1 19.5 16 24562 A EU-6 II 1 Mazine shell Drupa sp. 1 1 1.0 17 24562 A EU-6 II 1 Marine shell Isognomen sp. 1 1 >0.1 18 24562 A EU-6 II 1 Mammal bone Unidentified 2 1 0.2 19 24562 A EU-6 II 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 4 - 1.3 20 24562 A EU-6 II 1 Volcanic glass Chunk 1 - 7.6 21 24562 A EU-6 II 1 Volcanic glass Flake 1 - 0.15 22 24562 A EU-6 II 1 Basalt Flake with polish 1 - 0.4 23 24562 A EU-6 II 1 Organic Charcoal - - 0.4 24 24562 A EU-6 II 2 Mazine shell Cypraea sp. 4 1 0.8 25 24562 A EU-6 II 2 Marine shell Colubraziidae 1 1 1.7 26 24562 A EU-6 II 2 Avian bone Unidentified 3 1 0.6 27 24562 A EU-6 II 2 Fish bone Unidentified 1 1 0.1 28 24562 A EU-6 II 2 Volcanic glass Flake 2 - 0.6 29 24562 A EU-6 II 2 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 1 - 0.8 30 24562 A EU-6 II 2 Organic Charcoal - - 2.0 31 24562 A EU-7 II 1 Mazine shell Cypraea sp. 1 1 >0.1 32 24562 A EU-7 II 1 Basalt Flake 2 - 0.7 33 24562 A EU-7 II 1 Organic Chazcoal - - 1.7 34 24562 A EU-7 II 1 Organic Chazcoal - - 0.6 35 24562 A EU-7 II 2 Volcanic glass Shatter 2 - 0.55 36 24562 A EU-7 II 2 Organic Charcoal - - 0.6 37 24562 A EU-8 I 1 Basalt Waterworn 1 1 581.3 hammer/grinding stone 38 24562 A EU-8 II 1 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 2 2 3.6 39 24562 A EU-8 II 1 Volcanic glass Flake 2 - 0.6 , 40 24562 A EU-8 II 1 Basalt hammerstone 1 - 72'8 i 41 24562 A EU-8 III 1 Coral Worked 1 - 0.3 42 24562 A EU-8 III 1 Fish bone Unidentified 1 1 0.3 ~ 43 24562 A EU-8 III 1 Volcanic glass Chunks 4 - 9.3 I t 65 RC-0532 i Acc.# Site Feature Unit Layer Level Material Type/Species Count MNI Weight (g) 44 24562 A EU-8 III 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 6 3.1 45 24562 A EU-8 III 1 Volcanic glass Flake 2 - 1.1 46 24562 A EU-8 III 1 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 1 - 1.2 47 24562 A EU-8 III 1 Organic Charcoal - - 0.4 48 24562 A EU-9 I 1 Marne shell Cypraea sp. 2 2 11.6 49 24562 A EU-9 I 1 Marine shell Charonia tritonis 1 1 6.7 ' S0 24562 A EU-9 I 1 Manne shell Cellana sp. 1 1 1 5 S 1 24562 A EU-9 I 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 1 - 0 1 ' S2 24562 A EU-9 II 1 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 3 1 5.4 53 24562 A EU-9 II 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 2 _ 0 g 54 24562 A EU-9 II 1 Volcanic glass Flake 1 - 0.6 55 24562 A EU-9 II 1 Organic Charcoal - - 0.5 56 24562 A EU-9 II 2 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 1 1 0 9 57 24562 A EU-9 II 2 Manne shell Conus sp. 1 1 0 4 58 24562 A EU-9 II 2 Marine shell Charoma tritonts 1 1 1.1 59 24562 A EU-9 II 2 Volcanic glass Shatter 1 - 0.5 60 24562 A EU-9 II 2 Volcanic glass Flake 1 - 0.4 61 24562 A EU-9 II 2 Organic Charcoal - _ p 2 62 24562 A EU-10 II 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 1 - >0.1 63 24562 A EU-10 II 1 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 1 - 0 7 64 24562 A EU-10 II 1 Organic Charcoal - - 0.3 65 24562 A EU-10 II 2 Volcanic glass Shatter 4 - 3.1 66 24562 A EU-10 III 1 Marine shell Unidentified 1 1 0.4 67 24562 A EU-10 III 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 7 _ 2 9 68 24562 A EU=10 IV 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 2 - 0.5 69 24562 A EU-10 IV 1 Organic Charcoal - - >0.1 70 24562 A EU-11 II 1 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 2 2 1.7 71 24562 A EU-11 II 1 Volcanic glass Chunk 1 - 1 8 72 24562 A EU-11 II 1 Volcanic glass Shatter 6 - 3.9 73 24562 A EU-11 II 1 Volcanic glass Flake 1 - >0.1 74 24562 A EU-11 II 1 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 1 - 0 1 75 24562 A EU-11 II 1 Basalt Waterworn 1 _ 240 hammerstone 76 24562 A EU-11 II 1 Organic Charcoal - - 2.5 77 24562 A EU-11 II 2 Volcanic glass Chunk 3 - 4.3 78 24562 A EU-11 II 2 Volcanic glass Shatter 12 - 3.9 79 24562 A EU-11 II 2 Volcanic glass Flake 3 - 1 9 80 24562 A EU-11 II 2 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 6 - 7.7 81 24562 A EU-11 II 2 Basalt Flake with polish 1 - 2.1 ~ 82 24562 A EU-11 Ii 2 Organic Charcoal - - 0 45 83 24562 A EU-11 II 2 Organic Charcoal _ _ 3 3 84 24562 A EU-12 II 1 Marine shell Cypraea sp. 1 1 1 7 ' 85 24562 A EU-12 II 1 Volcanic glass Ut~l~zed flake 2 _ p 7 ' 86 24562 A Eu-12 II 1 Basalt Flake 1 - 0.1 87 24562 A EU-12 II 1 Basalt Utilized flake 2 ~ - 2.4 88 24562 A EU-12 II 2 Manne shell Unidentified 1 1 0 7 ~ 89 24562 A EU-12 II 2 Volcanic glass Shatter 4 - 1 3 66 I i s RC-0532 ~ Acc.~ Site Feature Unit Layer Level Material Type/Species Count MNI Weight (g) 90 24562 A EU-12 II 2 Organic Charcoal - - 0.3 91 24562 A EU-12 II 2 Organic Charcoal - - 2.0 92 24562 A EU-13 II 1 Mazine shell Cellana sp. 20+ 1 6.0 93 24562 A EU-13 II 1 Coral Worked 1 - 8.5 , 94 24562 A EU-13 II 2 Mazine shell Drupa sp. 1 1 0.1 95 24562 A EU-13 II 2 Volcanic glass Shatter 2 - 0.7 ' 96 24562 A EU-13 II 2 Volcanic glass Utilized flake 2 - 0.4 97 24562 A EU-13 II 2 Organic Chazcoal - - 1.6 t r 67 ' RC-0532 APPENDIX P-Radiocarbon Results r- r., .r ~ ~V`r ~ JS ~ ~ ~ s v'' lit ~ + ~~"t~~~~ ) t r + } ~"1 ',J"~ e rkyJ~.~4 a~~~ G~. L"','mil ~C ~ i.';2 /~~~~~i~J v1 ; iQititi ~ti Ih ~f,~;.* q~. ~,~.t~ ~ f l~ t ~ ~ k .I'4~ ~J a.I . 4 _t..`-._.e. ,._~..~~.r~~... ~..~.~......r, ! ~~ss:~aa'~ _c.~..t.~.~"~v~ ~~.....x.~. ~ i, I~'~~a i 1`~ ~ ! ~ _ ~r. REPORT OF RADIOCARBON DATING ANALYSES Dr. Bob Rechtman Report Date• 12/9/2008 u _ _ .._n_,..... _ _ _ Sample Data Measured 13C/12C W Conventronal Radiocarbon Age Ratro Radiocarbon Age(') Aeta - 2S t 743 150 40 BP -24 8 0100 ] SO 40 BP SAMPLE RG-OS32-91 ANALYSIS AMS-Standard dehvery MATERIAL/PRETREATMENT (charred material) ac~d/alkal~actd 2 SIGMA CALIBRATION Cal AD 1660 to 1960 (Cal BP 240 to 0) Beta - 251744 140 40 BP -23 8 0/00 160 40 BY SAMPLE • RC-0532-97 ANALYSIS AMS-Standazd delivery MATERIAL/PRETREATMENT (charred material) actd/alkaldacld 2 SIGMA CALIBRATION Cal AD 1660 to 1960 (Cai BP 290 to 0) Beta - 2S 1741 100 40 BP -23 3 0/00 130 40 BP SAMPLE RC-0532-82 ANALYSIS AMS-Standard delivery MATERIAL/PRETREATMENT (chan•ed material) acid/alkah/actd 2 SIGMA CALIBRATION Cal AD 1660 to 1960 (Cai BP 280 to 0) IIeta - 2S 1742 190 40 BP -25 6 0/00 180 ~ 40 BP SAMPLE RC-OS32-83 ANALYSIS AMS-Standazd dehvery MATERIAL/PRETREATMENT (charred material), acid/alkall/acrd 2 SIGMA CALIBRATION Cal AD 1650 to 1710 (Cal BP 300 to 240) AND Cal AD 1710 to 1880 (Cal BP 240 to 60) Cal AD 1910 to 1950 (Cal BP 40 to 0) Dates are reported as RCYBP (radiocarbon years before present, The Conventional Radiocarbon Age represents the Measured 'present" = AD 1950) By international convention, the modem Radiocarbon Age corrected for ~sotop~c fractionation, calculated reference standard was 95°h the 14C achv~ty of the National Institute using the delta 13C On rare occasion where the Conventional of Standards and Technology (NIST) Oxalic Aad (SRM 4990C) and Radiocarbon Age was calculated using an assumed delta 13C, calculated using the Libby 14C half-life (5568 years) Quoted errors the ratio and the Conventional Radiocarbon Age wdl be followed by represent t relative standard deviation statistics (68% probability) The Conventional Radiocarbon Age ~s not calendar calibreted counting errors based on the combined measurements of the sample, When available, the Calendar Calibrated result is calculated background, and modern reference standards Measured 13C/12C from the Conventional Radiocarbon Age and is listed as the ratios (delta 13C) were calculated relative to fhe PDB-1 standard 'Two Sigma Calibrated Result" for each sample 68 i RC-0532 f CALIBRATION OF RADIOCARBON AGE TO CALENDAR YEARS (Variables: C13/C 12=-24.8:1ab.mult=]) • Laboratory number: Beta-251743 Conventional radiocarbon age: 150140 BP Z Sigma calibrated result: Cal AD 1660 to 1960 (Cal BP 290 to 0) (9S% probability) Intercept data Intercepts of radiocarbo» ago , with calibration curve: Cal AD 1680 (Cal BP 270) and Cal AD 1740 (Cal BP 210) and , Cal AD 1810 (Cal BP 140) and Cal AD 1930 (Cal BP 20) and Cal AD 1950 (Cal BP 0) 1 Stgma calibrated results: Cal AD 1670 to 1700 (Cal BP 280 to 250) and (68% probability) Cal AD 1720 to 1780 (Cal BP 230 to 170) and Cal AD 1800 to 1820 (CaJ BP I50 to 130) and ~ Cal AD 1840 to 1880 (Cal BP 110 to 70) and Cal AD 1920 to 1950 (Cal BP 40 to 0) and Cal AD 1950 to 1950 (Cal BP 0 to 0) ~ 280 150140 BP Cfterrad malerlal , 280 240 , - 220 200 180 - . - 9t 180 140 'g6 120 y 100 ~ d 80 40 ~ , 20 0 ~ 1800 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 CelAO References. ' Database used INTCAL04 Callbratlon Database r INTCALOI RadloearbonAgeCalibratlon IntCa104 Colfbrat~on lasue ojRadloearbon (6olume 46, nr 3, 1004) ~ Maehemaries A SlmpltftadApproadt to Callbrating C14Dates Talmo, A S, Vogel, J C, 1993, Radiocarbon 33(1), p317-312 1 Beta Analytic Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory 4983 S W 74th CourR Mlaml Florida 33135 •Te! (308)667-8/67 • Fax (305)663-0964 •8-Mall bgaQradlocarbon com t i d 69 i t RC-0532 ~ i I~ CALIBRATION OF RADIOCARBON AGE TO CALENDAR YEARS (Variables: C13/C 12=-23.5.lab, mull=l) Laboratorynumber: Beta-251744 Conventional radlocarbon age: 160140 BP 2 Sigma calibrated result; Cal AD 1660 to 1960 (Cal BP 290 to 0) (95% probability) Intercept data Intercepts of radlocarbon age with caltbrattoti curve Cal AD 1680 (Cal BP 270) and Cal AD 1740 (Cal BP 210) and Cal AD 1800 (Cal BP I50) and Cal AD 1940 (Cal BP 20) and Cal AD 1950 (Cal B P 0) 1 Sigma calibrated results: Cal AD 1670 to 1700 (Cal BP 280 to 260) and (68% probability) Cal AD 1720 to 1780 (Cal BP 220 to 160) and Cal AD 1790 to 1820 (Cal BP 160 to 140) an d Cal AD 1920 to 1950 (Cal BP 30 to 0) 160140 BP Charred matenal 30 0 280 260 24 0 220 ~l~ it 200 - 'Y Ea ~ 180 , m 1so 0 6 140 - - - ~ 120 100 A 80 4~ ~ - - 60 a0 ' 20 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 CalAO References Database used 1NTCAL04 Calibratlan Dotabase 1NTCA1 OI R adiurnrbun Age Calibration lntCa104 CnltbratronlssveofRadlocarboa (Volume 46, nr3, 2004) Mathemattcs A Slmpltfled Approadi to CalrbraunQ C1I Data Talmo, A S, Yogel, J C , 1993, Radiocarbon 33(2J, p317-311 Beta Analytic Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory 49dS SW 741h Covr< Miami, F1orYda33153 •Te! (303J667--5167• Fa: (305)663-0964 •E-Mal! 6em(dradiocarboncom f i 7~ RC-0532 ~ CALIBRATION OF RADIOCARBON AGE TO CALENDAR YEARS ' (Variables C13/C12=-233 lab molt=Ij Laboratory number: Beta-251741 Conventional radiocarbon age: 130140 BP 2 Sigma calibrated result: Cal AD ]660 to 1960 (Cal BP 280 to 0) (95°/a probability) ` Intercept data intercepts of radiocarbon age with caltbraUon curve Cal AD 2690 (Cel HP 260) and Cal AD 1730 (Cal BP 220) end ` Cal AD 1810 (Cal BP 140) and Cal AD 1920 (Cal BP 30) and ~ Cal AD 1950 (Cal BP 0) l Sigma calibrated results: Cal AD 1680 to 1770 (Cal HP 270 to 180) and , (68% probability) Cal AD 1800 to 1890 (Cal BP 150 to 60) and Cal AD 1910 to 1940 (Cal BP 40 to 10) and Cal AD 1950 to 1950 (Cal BP 0 to 0) 260 130140 BP Charred materiel 240 220 ~~y - 200 'r 180 , 180 8 140 , a , 120 e 100 80 80 - i 40 ' 20 i 0 -20 , 1800 1810 1700 1780 1800 1810 1800 1810 2000 CaIAD References: ` Database peed /NTCALOI Cptlb rattan Dore Daad /NTCAL 04 R adfo m rbon Age Cattbratton lntCal04 CaNbratron tope ojRadrocarbon (Volume 46, nr 3, 1004) Matbtmat/cs , A Sfmpll/led Approp cb to Caa6rattng GI Data Talmo, A S, Vogel, J C , 1993, Radroearbon 31(1), p3/7.311 Beta Analytic Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory 1911 SW fltlr Covr4 Mlam1, F[arlda 33/SJ •Te! (301)667.1 167• tax (301)66]•0961 •g-Mall bera(r~mdlorarbon rom t I i 71 RC-0532 CALIBRATION OF RADIOCARBON AGE TO CALENDAR YEARS (Variables C13/C 12=-25.61ab.mult=l) Laboratorynumber: Beta-251742 Conventional radiocarbon age: 180140 BP 2 Sigma calibrated results: Cal AD 1650 to 1710 (Cal BP 300 to 240) and (95°/a probability) Cal AD 1710 to 1880 (Cal BP 240 to 60) and Cal AD 1910 to 1950 (Cal BP 40 to 0) Intercept data Intercepts of radiocarbon age wRh calibration curve Cal AD 1670 (Cal BP 280) and Cat AD 1770 (Cal BP 180) and Cal AD 1800 (Cal B P 150) and Cal AD 1940 (Cal BP 10) and Cal AD 1950 (Cal BP 0) I Sigma calibrated results Cal AD 1660 to 1690 (Cal BP 290 to 260) and (68% probability) Cal AD 1730 to 1810 (Cal BP 220 to 140) and Cat AD 1930 to 1950 (Cal BP 20 to 0) 180140 BP 320 Charred matenal 300 28 0 260 - - m 240 ~ zzo g, zoa 1ao 1so ~ 140 120 100 ~ 80 60 40 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 CaIAD References Dolabase used JNTCALO! Cal~braflon Dulabure JNTCAL 0! Radlornrbon Age CaGbrallon /nlCa/09 Cul+bronon Jrsve ojRadloearbon (Volume 96, nr 3, 1n04) Malb em arcs A SrmpGfled App roadr to CaGbratlrtg CJ! Dala Talmo, A S, vagcl, J C, 1993, Radiocarbon 35(I), p317-321 Beta Analytic Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory 9985 S W 79th Coar! Af~ami, Florida 33155 • TeC (303)667-5167 • Fax (305)663-0964 • E-Mai! beinJa radiocarbon com r - i 7~) i _r ATTACHMENT 7 Continued om revious a e p P g ) Table 1.13-- RESIDENT POPULATION OF COUNTY DIVISIONS AND CENSUS DESIGNATED PLACES (CDPs), HAWAII COUNTY, BY AGE: 2000 A e Division and lace 60 to 64 65 to 74 75 to 84 85 and over Kau division 298 512 294 76 Hawaiian Ocean View 112 190 70 18 Naalehu 48 84 55 13 Pahala 63 117 106 38 Pahoa-Kala ana division 324 572 348 75 Hawaiian Beaches 127 268 127 20 Leilani Estates 34 63 34 12 Nanawale Estates 33 64 26 9 Pahoa 55 81 105 20 Keaau-Mt. View division 762 1,256 765 174 Ainaloa 63 85 41 6 Eden Roc 17 8 4 1 Fern Acres 30 26 8 0 Fern Forest 17 28 13 4 Hawaiian Acres 58 82 28 8 Hawaiian Paradise Park 224 367 207 44 Keaau 67 160 141 32 Kurtistown 38 101 69 22 Mountain View 74 150 119 33 Orchidland Estates 65 83 37 6 Volcano 91 158 92 15 Source: U.S Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 1; figures compiled and calculated by County of Hawaii, Department of Research & Development. (Continued from previous page) Table 1.13-- RESIDENT POPULATION OF COUNTY DIVISIONS AND CENSUS DESIGNATED PLACES (CDPs), HAWAII COUNTY, BY AGE: 2000 i A e I Division and lace 60 to 64 65 to 74 75 to 84 85 and over Hawaii Coun 6 003 10 923 7 064 2 132 Hilo division 1,762 3 642 2 603 924 Hilo 1 701 3 473 2 471 879 Wainaku 47 126 100 36 Pa aikou-Wailea division 246 530 387 119 Honomu 26 62 40 11 Pa aikou 75 138 108 38 Paukaa 33 69 51 14 Pe eekeo 69 170 132 46 North Hilo division 88 139 114 40 Lau ahoehoe 22 64 39 12 Paauhau-Paauilo division 104 192 100 32 Paauilo 32 55 31 8 r Honokaa-Kukuihaele division 128 339 289 101 Honokaa 78 219 195 68 Kukuihaele 9 28 17 12 North Kohala division 260 456 253 99 Halaula 24 38 16 8 Hawi 47 75 33 9 Ka aau 48 117 77 29 South Kohala division 449 717 373 96 Puako 25 38 20 7 Waikoloa Villa a 143 199 106 16 Waimea 248 424 217 70 , North Kona division 1210 1 916 1 159 290 ' Holualoa 309 431 298 64 ' Honalo 78 159 102 22 , Kahaluu-Keauhou 187 285 200 64 Kailua 351 607 304 74 Kalaoa 230 346 210 51 , South Kona division 372 652 379 106 Ca tain Cook 137 278 156 35 Honaunau-Na o0 0 103 162 103 23 Kealakekua 86 154 90 41 (Continued on next page) ~j (Continued from previous page) Table 1.13-- RESIDENT POPULATION OF COUNTY DIVISIONS AND CENSUS DESIGNATED PLACES (CDPs), HAWAII COUNTY, BY AGE: 2000 A e Division and lace 21 to 24 25 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 59 Kau division 194 1346 1012 381 Hawaiian Ocean View 43 554 439 167 Naalehu 36 215 91 61 Pahala 74 289 195 63 Pahoa-Kala ana division 344 2,166 1 487 480 Hawaiian Beaches 163 896 590 190 Leilani Estates 27 269 212 68 Nanawale Estates 44 280 146 49 Pahoa 31 218 114 38 Keaau-Mt. View division 891 6 370 3,819 1,100 Ainaloa 93 536 267 70 Eden Roc 14 133 103 22 Fern Acres 32 203 147 33 ' Fern Forest 10 158 109 20 ' Hawaiian Acres 55 527 359 90 Hawaiian Paradise Park 293 1,942 1,182 340 Keaau 70 547 253 86 ' Kurtistown 39 291 198 63 Mountain View 103 779 404 136 ' Orchidland Estates 82 451 300 81 Volcano 73 686 446 .139 (Continued on next page) ' i f i 1 (Continued from previous page) Table 1.13-- RESIDENT POPULATION OF COUNTY DIVISIONS AND CENSUS , DESIGNATED PLACES (CDPs), HAWAII COUNTY, BY AGE: 2000 Ae Division and lace 21 to 24 25 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 59 Hawaii Coun 6 364 38 888 24 452 8163 Hilo division 2 182 10 298 6102 2 302 Hilo 2 108 9 928 5 842 2 215 Wainaku 52 289 191 59 Pa aikou-Waiea division 210 1 182 709 282 , Honomu 19 135 87 18 Pa aikou 58 350 178 75 ` Paukaa l8 97 74 42 Pe eekeo 84 398 245 95 North Hilo division 81 411 267 86 Lau ahoehoe 23 103 69 18 Paauhau-Paauilo division 84 571 344 100 Paauilo 20 134 76 26 ` Honokaa-Kukuihaele division 141 988 566 237 Honokaa 82 545 286 121 Kukuihaele 13 77 47 17 North Kohala division 293 1 606 977 340 Halaula 24 130 61 39 Hawi 36 245 133 55 Ka aau 44 258 173 62 South Kohala division 464 3 990 2157 667 , Puako 14 114 107 47 Waikoloa Villa a 169 1,646 767 195 Waimea 252 1,978 1,135 371 North Kona division 1,174 7,938 5,285 1,670 Holualoa 221 1,683 1,266 369 ` Honalo 72 529 354 95 Kahaluu-Keauhou 71 479 495 188 Kailua 496 2,838 1588 520 Kalaoa 257 2,001 1,356 407 South Kona division 306 2 022 1727 518 Ca fain Cook 103 724 637 178 Honaunau-Na o0 00 95 573 494 152 Kealakekua 67 416 267 100 (Cont:Hued on next page) f (Continued from previous page) Table 1.13-- RESIDENT POPULATION OF COUNTY DIVISIONS AND CENSUS DESIGNATED PLACES (CDPs), HAWAII COUNTY, BY AGE: 2000 A e Division and lace Median Under 5 5 to 17 18 to 20 Kau division 41.5 330 1 194 190 Hawaiian Ocean View 43.1 124 411 50 Naalehu 35.6 61 220 35 ' Pahala 39.6 65 311 57 Pahoa-Kala ana division 38.0 569 1,906 326 Hawaiian Beaches 34.4 300 876 152 Leilani Estates 40.5 60 228 39 Nanawale Estates 31.6 76 296 50 Pahoa 40.6 46 208 46 Keaau-Mt. View division 36.2 1543 5 240 818 Ainaloa 29.5 197 474 78 Eden Roc 37.3 26 106 17 Fern Acres 35.9 53 196 28 Fern Forest 41.4 20 88 13 Hawaiian Acres 38.4 83 430 56 Hawaiian Paradise Park 34.7 513 1,700 239 Keaau 37.3 131 442 81 ~ Kurtistown 40.5 57 239 40 Mountain View 34.6 230 671 100 ' Orchidland Estates 34.6 114 442 70 Volcano 41.3 90 364 77 (Conttnued on next page) i 1 i i I i Table 1.13-- RESIDENT POPULATION OF COUNTY DIVISIONS AND CENSUS DESIGNATED PLACES (CDPs), HAWAII COUNTY, BY AGE: 2000 I A e Division and lace Median Under 5 5 to 17 18 to 20 Hawaii Coun 38.6 9130 29 722 5 836 Hilo division 38.7 2,382 8 078 2 150 Hilo 38.6 2 301 7,764 2 077 Wainaku 42.7 59 211 57 Pa aikou-Wailea division 42.5 299 846 151 Honomu 42.2 31 99 13 Pa aikou 40.4 84 258 52 Paukaa 49.9 21 66 10 Pe eekeo 40.8 110 281 67 North Hilo division 40.4 100 328 66 Lau ahoehoe 42.9 32 75 16 Paauhau-Paauilo division 39.3 137 477 72 Paauilo 37.4 31 133 25 Honokaa-Kukuihaele division 40.4 218 743 145 Honokaa 40.2 142 420 77 Kukuihaele 39.6 21 57 19 North Kohala division 38.2 349 1 125 280 Halaula 35.3 42 93 20 Hawi 37.7 58 205 42 Ka aau 39.8 72 242 37 South Kohala division 36.2 891 2 933 394 Puako 48.1 13 37 7 Waikoloa Villa a 34.6 374 1,061 130 Waimea 36.5 442 1,647 244 ' North Kona division 39.4 1830 5141 930 Holualoa 42.1 331 975 160 Honalo 39.2 131 376 69 ` Kahaluu-Keauhou 49.4 112 283 50 Kailua 35.5 747 1951 394 Kalaoa 38.8 430 1,301 205 South Kona divison 41.2 482 1 711 314 Ca fain Cook 41.7 182 658 118 Honaunau-Na o0 00 40.4 124 482 103 ` Kealakekua 42.4 98 266 60 (Continued on next page) r l ATTACI~MENT' 7A (Continued from previous a e PSI ' Table 3.3-- PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ENROLLMENT AND GRADES, HAWAII DISTRICT: 2005 TO 2006 Enrollment 1/ Grades School 2005 2006 2006 Waiakea Elementa 826 852 K-5 Waiakea Hi h 1,312 1,303 9-12 Waiakea Intermediate 908 881 6-8 Waiakeawaena 702 733 K-5 Waikoloa 587 519 K-5 Waimea Elementa 648 673 K-5 Connections -PCS 291 316 K-12 Hawaii Academ of Arts & Sciences -PCS 174 217 K-12 Innovations -PCS 125 126 1-6 Ka `Umeke Ka'eo -PCS 138 140 K-6 ' Kanu O Ka'aina -PCS 122 141 K-12 Ke Ana La'ahana -PCS 96 90 7-12 Kua O Ka La -PCS 52 55 6-12 Nawahi Iki Lab -PCS 76 90 K-6 Volcano School of Arts & Sciences -PCS 137 143 K-8 Waimea Mid -PCS 516 540 6-8 Waters of Life -PCS 178 88 K-12/K-8 ~ West HI Ex lorations Academ -PCS 152 143 7-12 1/Includes students m regular classes, special education and special pre-K classes ~ Source Hawaii State Department of Education, Webstte http //doe k 12 hi us/reports/index htm; tabulation ' by R&D Table 3.3-- PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ENROLLMENT AND GRADES, HAWAII DISTRICT: 2005 TO 2006 Enrollment 1/ Grades School 2005 2006 2006 Grand total 26 299 26,327 De Silva 358 382 K-6 Haaheo 161 150 K-6 Hilo Hi h 1,558 1,549 9-12 Hilo Intermediate 637 558 7-8 Hilo Union 529 538 K-6 Holualoa 451 447 K-5 Honaunau 135 135 K-5 Honokaa Elements 368 380 K-6 Honokaa Hi & Intermediate 835 850 7-12 Hookena 141 153 K-5 Kahakai 623 569 K-5 Kalanianaole Element & Intermediate 371 353 K-8 Ka iolani 411 404 K-6 Kau Hi h & Pahala Elements 502 515 K-12 Kaumana 227 226 K-6 Ke Kula O Ehunuikaimalino 146 171 K-10 Keaau Elements 751 762 K-5 Keaau Hi h 867 960 9-11 Keaau Mid 633 613 6-8 Kealakehe 969 999 K-5 Kealakehe Hi h 1530 1,567 9-12 Kealakehe Intermediate 965 933 6-8 Keaukaha 250 264 K-6 Keone oko 621 629 K-6 Kohala Elements 415 397 K-5 Kohala Hi h 285 297 9-12 Kohala Mid 214 202 6-8 Konawaena Elements 579 606 K-6 Konawaena Hi h 929 833 9-12 Konawaena Mid 446 432 7-8 Lau ahoehoe Hi h & Elements 225 218 K-12 Mt. View Elements 427 435 K-5 Naalehu 367 385 K-8 Paauilo Elements & Intermediate 241 243 K-9 Pahoa Elements 342 361 K-6 Pahoa Hi h & Intermediate 750 761 7-12 (Continued on next page) - i I 1 ~ 1 1 1 1~~~~1 r i 1~~~~ ~~~4 WAiA1C3~ (1~I4DRT~d); TMK (3~D}: 7-5-11: 14, 27, 38; 7-5-12: 44, 4S, 46, 4$ WAraFin (~OUTK 1+ldnuxn): TMK (3""): 7-5-16: 15,16,17, 29, 88, $9, 90, 91, 42, 93, 94, 9S, 102, I03 VVnt,~Ha (~o[rr~ 1Vla~ar): TMK (3"'}: T-S-IT:11, 30, 40,41, 42, 43 W~~~~~~ ~y~t~m~ ~IC.t~ ~aa~y 200$ ~ ~Y ~ v~ wAlAfiA (~lo~T~[}: TMK (3RD): 7-$-11: 14, 27, 38; 7-5-12:44, 45, 46, 48 jWAIAdiA (StDUTH MAUDCA}; TMK (31D}; ?-5-16: 1 S, 16,17, 29, $8, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93,94, 95,102,103 WA[AHA (~otrr~~t 1v1a~cAg: TMK (3RD}: 7-5-17: 11, 34, 40, 41, 42, 43 I1~AL I+ 1~tV1~~1~ilYYEI~d'T1~I. ~~~li+ ~S1VI~IV'~' ~a S~~~xl~aC ~~~.~C•r) 1'~cpar~~i ~a~aha 5ys~gn~, LLC Waiaha Systems II, LLC I'a~epa~l 1>~?~ Xt~lsic t~l~o~hi P'laanin~ ~®m~ulta~t LLC P®13ox 7~b Volcano, lElava~aii 967~~ Jaaly 20411 i _ _ wAIAEIA wATE~t ~YSTEt69 ' (~ta~t'CH ~{aNA, HAiWAII ~ rl C~ll.6~~ ~~1 `V~~~ A `T'ABLE GF CUyNTFNTS .......................................................................................................................i ~iV lLL Y LL RVIl/~C jt H+1.P1 Y paaataea..eaeaN000a0000aOtl O.peaaa00at000eleeaa0.9eOeaaaaY6ee.aaepgaapeeOOeaa.awa0eaaee.0eeeatlaa aba0a0eaee00000000Y 1.1 Project Summary ..........................................................................................................1 1,2 Chapter 343, HRS Compliance< ...................................................................................2 1.3 Tdentif caftan of the Applicant .....................................................................................2 1.4 Purpose aT' and Need for the Project ...........................................................................4 ' 1.5 Agencies Cansulted .......................................................,...............,...........................,..5 1.6 Community Interaction .................................................................................................5 2aQD 1~77~SQ:RIP'I'gI~1~I ~1?~'ICH~ PI2~P~DSIi<;I~ AC'I'II~l~I weeeeaaesa.o...wesaaeeae.oee..aeeaseaaeeees.e.asaaseawwaweww / 2.1 Project Location /Project Lands ..................................................................................7 2.2 Surrounding Uses .......................................................................................................13 2.3 Existing Conditians ....................................................................................................13 2.4 Project Description .....................................................................................................13 2.5 Project Schedule and Cost ..........................................................................................16 2.6 Regulatory Requirements ...........................................................................................18 2.6.1 Chapter 343, HRS 18 ; 2.6.2 Land Use Designatians ..................................................................................18 2.6.3 State and County Permits and Approvals ......................................................19 2.6.4 Consistency with Government Plans and Policies ........................................19 2.6.4.1 Hawaii State Plan and Land Use District .....................................19 " ' ' ' X2.6.4.2 Hawaii C''ounty General Plan and Zoning ......................................20 ,Y.CI AJ1V ~Y 91~~1~i1YA.Q`JI V T~L Sfl`.r Y T7C1~l~D, A1YES~ ~~1yy .L~11V Bl/ l0'1lY LL Y~ATll~IJl'~ ~1Ct~~1~11811Pt~ ..a..lrt 3.1 Physical Characteristics ..............................................................................................21 ~ 3..1 unate ...........................................................................................................21 ~ 3.1.2 Geolagy .........................................................................................................21 3.1.3 Topography and Sails ....................................................................................22 3.1.4 Hydrolagy .......................................................................................................23 3.I.S Botanical Resources .......................................................................................24 3.1.6 Wildlife Resowrces .........................................................................................25 3.1.'/ Historic !Archaeological Resources ......,26 3.1.$ Cultural Resources .........................................................................................28 3.1.9 Air Quality ......................................................................................................30 3.1.10 Noise .....................................................................................,................,........31 3.1.11 Scenic Resources ............................................................................................31 3.2 Socioeconomic Characteristics ..................................................................................31 3.3 Infrastructure 32 3.3.1 Roadways .......................................................................................................32 3.3.2 Utilitie5 ...........................................................................................................34 3.4 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts ...........................................................................34 1~"INAL NVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT i ' R WAIAHA WATLi2 ~vsTl,ms NQi2TH KQNA HAWAII 4e4 ~ KW R ` ii Ai. Y i,J~ V sil l~a~ Af ++...OQRNOOOYWOetoopANO00MM1R0.40.09P014NO.Of060000RG)9....O.r#pPRtle.?.a16OpAb V~ 4.1 No Action Altern~tive ................................................................................................36 4.2 County De~~velopment ofthe Waiaha Trans'mi~sion and Storage R.eservoirs....,.......36 .i70V ®~Y~J 1`i,C~J1Y~lYl`~ Y71174J~"~~fl1~E19R8.~`Al`®~?'.U.q~R/~LAI~B'6A.eA171~.91Vk~lseseuaepsaresees?~/ 5.1 Significance Criteria ...................................................................................................37 S.2 Anticipated Determination .........................................................................................39 ~i.4 C®ib~l@/~N'~`~ 1~SPOI~i'SEB ®I'V EA ...............................................41 7.0 1~I+'~l~CeeeenpoHO4+.pe+epeepo.a+seeaep.wu.+ee+s.e.ness+..adea.rssasaee.eaeeeiu..o.ape...aee. T'allowan~ ~.e~ers A Botanical Survey B State Historic Preservation Division Correspondence B-1 January 25, 2006 TMIC: (3} 7-5-017: 043 B-2 C}ctober 4, 2006 TN1K: (3} 7-5-017: 042 B-3 Jurxe 13, 2008 TMI~: (3} 7-5-017: 040, 041 Oct©ber 17, 2006 TMIC: (3} 7-5-017: 04Q, 041 C Grading Permits for North Alignment ~'IIYAL ~NYIti0iVMENTAL ASSESSMENT tl WAIA}~A 1~ll~T~R ~YST~P+19 ' NO}2TkI ~ioNA, ~dA.wAII ~'p'+ 'y y' ~ ' Location Mal? 2A Into}~th Alignment Property Ownership Map ........................................................................9 2B Forth Alignment Property Ownership Map ..................................................,...................1U 3A South Mauka Align.}Went - TMK ........................................................................................11 3B South Makai Alignment - TMK . ........................................................................................12 4A IVarth Alignment -Site Photographs ..............................................................................14 4B South Alignment -Site Photographs ..............................................................................15 ' S Trench Sectian ...................................................................................................................17 1 Waiaha Systems, LLC Member Parcels and Allocation of North Water Commitments ....3 2 Waiaha Systems II, LLC Member Parcels and Allocation of South Water Commitrnents.3 3 Affected TMl~ Parcels ~ 4 Project Components ...........................................................................................................16 S Project Costs ......................................................................................................................18 6 Land Use T~esignations for the Project Area ................................................................19 7 Required State and County Ferrnits and Approvals ..........................................................19 S South Makai System: Archaeological Inventory Surveys for Undeveloped Parcels ........26 9 Archaeological Sites Affected by the South Makai Transmission Line ............................2? I Q Population Growth in North Dana Between 198U 2440 .................................................32 ~ 11 Affected Roadways in the Project Area .............................................................................33 ~}iJAL ~ANIRONRAENTAL AsSE~.SiaYEiV'}' Iii ~ v~rnrArrn wa~r~~u 5Y8TEM NoaTrr Koran, tlAwArr 100 ~1~'T~C~I~~J'T~C~I~ 1.1 Pit®.II~C'T` SU16~IMApi~ Propect Namne: Waiaha Water System (North), Waiaha Water System (South Makaa), and Waiaha Water System (South Makai} North Kona, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii Collectively, "Waiaha Water Systems" ,ApplACant: Waiaha Systems, LLC ! Waiaha Systems 1I, LLC PC} Bax 898 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 9b745 Contact: MGMT Corp., Manager Consultant: Yukie Dhashi Planning Consultant LLC PO Box 7$6 Volcano, HI 96785-0786 Approving Ageeacy: Department of Water Supply County of Hawaii Pr~oposcd Action: Development of the Waiaha well resource distribution system, including two transmissions mains and three reservoirs, along two routes between Mamahatoa Highway and Hienaloli Road and Mamalahoa Highway and the Queen Kaahumanu Extension {also known as Hawaii Belt Road, State Route 11) Location/I)Ista~iet: Kailas-K:ana / North Kona District, County and State of Hawaii Landaavmer: Various A.f'fected 'Tll~Ks: (North} TMK; 7-5-11: I4, 27, 38; 7-5-12; 44, 45, 46, and 48 (South Makka) TMK: 7-5-16: 1S, 16,17, 29, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 102, and 103 (South Makai) 'I"MiC: ~-5-17: 11, 30, 40, 41, 42, and 43 G~ded stand Area / L6near l~ t: 4.78 acres / 12,670 linear feet {2.41 miles) (North) 1.88 acres 14,100 linear feet (0.78 mite) {South Makka) 1.45 acres / 4,4201inear feet (0.84 mile] {South Makai} 1.45 acre / 4,150 linear feet {0.79 mile) Class of Actio®: Use of Public Lands (public roadway easements) Use of Public Funds (for oversizing of project components} FITtAL ~NVIRUNMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1 i WAYAIiA WAT~;R ~YSr~ MS ~ NORTH KaNA,1H(AWAt[ i I.2 C ~It X43, HRS C~D1~F`LIA1~C~ ' The Applicant, Waiaha System, LLC and Waiaha System II, LLC, has received the approval of the County of Hawaii Board of Water Supply {Water Board} and farmed Agreements with the Water Board to develop the Waiaha Water System (North), and Waiaha Water System (South Mauka and South Makai) -collectively "Waiaha Water Systems". A requirement of both Agreements is the preparation and completion of an Environmental Assessment (EA) pursuant to Chapter 343, Hawaii Revised Statutes and Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11, State of Hawaii Department of Health, Chapter 200, Environrnentai Impact Statement Rules. The subject water system described herein involves the construction oftransmission Imes and reservoirs to transmit an existing water resource which is presently under-utilized. In 2003, the County of Ilawaii Department of Water Supply (DWS) completed an environmentai assessment entitled "Waiaha Froduction Well and Reservoir" for the development of the high level water resource. The 2003 environmental assessment was prepared and reviewed pursuant to State of Hawaii rules and a finding of no significant impact was issued in April 2003. In 2006, the production well and a two million gallon reservoir were developed by DWS. This facility has been in operation far two years. The subject water systems, consisting 16-inch transmission mains, North, South Mauka, and South ' Makai, and I million gallon (MG) water tank at each alignment (totaling three 3 tanks}, will be ' designed and constructed with private funds, on privately owned lands and cross pubic road rights-af way for connectivity, In exchange for the development of the transmission and storage system, the Applicant reserves the right to use i,SO4 units of water by 2027. The system will accommodate the parties in the Waiaha System, LLC and Waiaha System II, LLC, and, in addition, the system will be oversized to supplement the overall Department of Water Supply (DWS} North Kona system. The cost to oversize the system will initially be paid by Waiaha System, I.I.C and Waiaha System II, LLC, The added cost to oversize the system will be paid by the Water i Board to Waiaha System, LLC and Waiaha System II, LLC as a reimbursemerrt upon completion; this reimbursement will utilize public funds. Upon its completion the system and the land for the i reservoirs will be turned over to the Water Board and dedicated as a pubiic facility. Construction will also occur within short segments of public roadway easements, primarily for connectivity of the system: Mamalahoa Highway, Hualalai Road, Hienaloli Road, and the Queen Kaahumanu Highway Extension (also known as Hawaii Beit Road, State Route l i}. Triggering actions for Chapter 343, HRS compliance include the following: i}use of public funds, 2) use of pubiic lands (which consist of roadway easements}. This EA describes the proposed water transmission lines and reservoirs and its potential impacts. 1.3 II~El~1TI1F'Y~CA~`I41~ DI+` 'H'1EI1~ AFFLI~AN'1~ Since 2004, the Applicant, Waiaha Systems, LLC and Waiaha Systems II, LLC, has been engaged in formal discussion with UWS and the Water Board over its development proposal of the Waiaha Water ' System transmission and storage facilities. On January 2405 the Water Board officially adopted a ~'11VAL ENVIRaNMENTAL ~4sSIESSMENT ! 2 i WA[AiiA WATELL$YST1dAtS NUtiTH K®~VA, D3A:WAII Memorandum of Agreement between the Water Board and the Applicant, and, on September 25, 200?, formal Agreements far the Waiaha Northh and South Water Systems were approved. The Applicant holds the unique opportunity to assist 1JWS in the design, development and/or construction of the proposed water system, to connect to the existing DWS system in an expeditious manner within the project area, due to its ownership or control of real property and easements necessary for the water storage and transmission lines and facilities, and /or its agreements with and among its various landowners to mutually develop the proposed system. Tables 1 and 2 below summarize the Waiaha Systems, LLC and Waiaha Systems II, LLC land parcels and the equivalent number of waxer units assigned to each parcel. ~ Table 1. Waiaha Systems, Eai.C Member Parcels and Allocation of North Water Camarltaoents TMK Parcels Nnmber of Water Comaritmerrts E ulvalent Units of Water TMK: 3 7-5-003: 00'7, 008, 409 223 TMK: 3 7-5-010:064 43 TMK: 3 7-5-010:088 b TMK: 3 7-5-010:089 31 TMK: 3 7-5-011:014 56 TMK: 3 7.5-017: 008, 009, 004 99 Table Z.Walaha Systems III, II.iLC Member Parcels and Allocation of South Water Commitments TINK Parcels Number of Wat!ar Commitments 1 E ulva[eut Units of Winter TMK: 3 ?-5-003:005 7~ TMK: 3 7-5-003:023 50 TMK: 3 7 5-010: 001 125 TMK: 7-5-010: 013 110 TMK: 3 7-5-017:OOS 170 TMK: 3 ?-5-017: 031 Lot Al or. I2 TMK: 3 ?-5-017; 031, Lot A 1 22 TMK: 3 7-5-017: 031 Lot A2 25 TMK: 3 7-5-017: 040 43 TMK: 3 7-5-017:041 d4 TMK: 3 7-5-017:042 79 TMK: 3 7-5-017; 043 ~1 TMK: 3 7-5-019:001 ~5 'The Agreements aliow the following, water commihnents (including any credits towards DWS facilities charges} to remain appurtenant lo, and ran with the land afthe origi~ial TMK parceI(s) within the Lands as described in the Agreements, and to successors and assigns in interest to the original TMK parcels. If the original TMK parcels are consolidated with any canrtiguous parcel, the water commimaeuts may be applied to developmen# on the consolidated parcel without consem or approval by DWS or the Water Board. The Agreements further state that with the prior written consent of the Water Board. and DWS, the water commitments granted herein may be assigned to other parcels described within the rands in ~clribit "A", subject to any and all improvements that may be required by DWS. iFiNAL II~..N{?IRt)NMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3 ~ 1~/AtA}iA VVAT~&t SYSTEMS 1Rd(DRTEY I~ONA, HA`vAll i~ ' Y.~ F~713PD~~ Dl~ Al`~D fiI~L+D FDIC T'~IE PR~~IJCT ' The intent of the proposed Waiaha Water System improvements is to transmit the available "upper level" water resource from the existing DWS Waiaha production well and reservoir facility, which was ' completed in 2406 and is located mauka of the Mamalahoa highway at the 1,542 ft elevation in the area to the east of the proposed subject water transmission lines. The capacity of this existing well is 2 million gallons per day; however, DWS is currently able to use approximately 2S percent, ar half a million gallons per day due to limitations in the existing transmission system. As proposed by the Applicant, new water transmission lines and tanks would efficiently transmit the remaining available 75 percent of the water by gravity-flow and would augment the North Kona water supply through two mauka-malzai corridors into the high consumption North Kona rnakai water ' distribution system. 'T'his would provide DWS with greater flexibility in water management and would implement improvement provisions as stated in the DWS' 20-Year Master Plan (R. W. Beck, 2446). The Master Plan provides along-range planning teal that guides the development of the DWS's water ' service areas and the use of its resources. The Master flan identifies the N°arth Kona water system as the highest metered water consumption area due to the area's numerous resort and community areas. Additional growth is anticipated in the next 24 years. Moreover, the Master Plan cautions that potential water quality issues can arise with the overuse of the Kahaluu shaft-based water supply sources...." DWS has determined that these improvements, as proposed by Waiaha Systems, LI,C and Waiaha Systems II, LLG, are necessary to reduce pumping an the Kahaluu System wells which are located approximately three to four miles to the south of the Waiaha project area. The transmission of water from the DWS Waiaha upper-level production well into the North Dona water system is necessary to ~ alleviate the current rate of pumping of the Kahaluu shaft which has resulted in a diminishing supply and may be contributing to reduced water quality.3 ' The Agreements between the Water Board and the Applicant allow the DWS's Waiaha resource to be efficiently added to the North Kona water system to serve the overall North Kana community, and including the lands owned or managed by the member parties of Waiaha System, LLG and Waiaha System II, LLG. The proposed development of the Waiaha improvements presents a unique opportunity whereby easements on private property and the funding source will be secured by the Applicant. The Applicant has the ability to expedite development within a two year period. In contrast, implementation by DWS would be aver a much longer time period to .fund the project through the CIP, obtain easements from multiple landowners, and procure services for design and eanstruction. Z R.W. Beck, Inc. (3une 2006] County of Hawaii t)epartment of Water Supply 2t1-Year Water Master Plan. Prepared for the County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply. 'Bauer, Glen (2UU3) A Study ofthe Ground-water Conditions in Marth and South Kona and South Kohala Districts, Island of Hawaii 1991-2002. Prepared for the State of Hawaii Commission on Water Resource Management. ~'nYAL ENYIttaNMENTAL AssESSMEPPr 4 WAIA6#A WATER SYS1'~Ms MORTf3 K®NA, I$AWAII I..S L~Ca1CI~tC;Ili+ S ~:®N9[1I..'1('El~ The following agencies or agency documents were consulted in the preparation and review process of the environmental assessment. Asterisk ~ denotes that a comment letter was received. The agencies' letters and the Applicant's responses are included in Section b. ~ County of Hawaii Planning Department ~ Department of Public Works Department of Water Supply* Fire Department Folice Department Hawaii County Councitrnember of the District ® State of Hawaii Department of Health, Enviranmentai Planning OfI"ice Department ofHealth, Office of Bnvironmental Quality Control Department of Land and Natural Resources' Department of Land and Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Division Department of Business, Econam`rc Development and Tourism, Planning Office Department of Transportation Office of Hawaiian Affairs* Kailua Kana Library ~ Federal Agencies US Army Engineer Division US Department of the Interior - Kalaka-Hanakahau National Historic Park ~ ~.b COIaIlO+I~J~1I'1CY Y1~1'I'EJi~C'I'f®1~1 Since conceptual inception of the prosect, the Applicant (and/or its representatives) has followed all procedures established by DWS and the Water Board, including participation in open forwn meetings. The existing utility easements far the North and South alignments traverse numerous properties. All affected property owners (whose properties contain utility easements) have been notified by snail of the Water Board's approval of the Waiaha Water Systems Agreements and the preparation of the environmental assessment. ~lerbal responses were received from the following affected landowners: ® tJeskima Co,~`ee Company: UCC requested information an the specific location of the North alignmern that traverses their south boundary. UCC was shown the location of the waterline alignment along the south side afthe existing roadway. ~llVAL C+ NvIRONM~NTAL 1~SSE&3MENr S ~ ~ - - wAtAttA ~IAT~12 SYSTIEMS PdORTH KU1VA, HAWAIt j~ ~ Joseph Staneck.• Mr. Stanek of Iokepa Estate Subdivision, requested information an the specific location of the South Mauka alignment, a segment borders his south boundary. Mr. Stanek was told that the transmission line would traverse the existing subdivision roadway. Mr. Stanek also Hated that water pressure at his property was inconsistent and, generally poor, and asked whether he and others in his subdivision would be able to connect to the new transmission line. Mr. Stanek was tall that the affected owners would be able to hookup to the new waterline.) Through the Chapter 343, HRS process, public comments will be solicited and all inquiries will be addressed. i f i FINAL ENV[ROAI1Vt~NTAt. ASS~SSMEIVT i G WAIAHA WATEI; SY8'r~MS 1VORTH d~ONA, 4iAWAII ZeV JJ 81~~.i ~1~./~ <.I 1. ~81J? ~.6.O.t.J~~A.Yi?i./ L b.~ 1140 The proposed project described herein is defined as the Waiaha Water System (North}, Waiaha Water System (South Mauka), and Waiaha Water System (South Makai). The North and South systems consist of transmission mains and storage tanks ar reservoirs. Collectively, all components are called the "Waiaha Water Systems". 2.1 PRO.IEL~' ~.®CATI®1~1 / PHB~~~~'~` I.~ANI~S The project area generally encompasses land which is bounded by Keaotani Drive to the north and Hualalai Road #o the south, and Mamatahoa Highway to the east and Queen Kaahulnanu Extension (aka Hawaii Belt Road, State Route 11 } to the west at North Kona, Hawaii (the "project area"}. The area includes several ahupuaa, including Hienalali, Auhaukeae, Puaa 1, Puaa 2-3, Waiaha 1-2, Kahului 1-2, and Puapuaa 1 (Fi gore 1). The transmission lines and reservoir sites are mainly atom existing private roadways and undeveloped land in private ownership as shown in Table 3 and Figures 2A, 2B and 3A, 3B. Table 3. At'fected TI1R1~ Parcels TMK Parcel Nott6 7-5-I l: 14 7-5-I I: 27 7-3-1 I : 38 7-5-12.44 45, 4b 7-5-12: 48 South Mauka 7.5-I6: l5 I6,17 88 89 90, 91 92 43 94, 9S 7-5-1~: 29 7-5-Ib: 102 7-5-16: I03 South 1VIakal 7-5-17: II 7-5-17:30 7-5-I7: 40 7-5-1?: 4I ?-5.17: 42 7-5.17: 43 Waterline Easements within each affected parcel have been obtained and will be granted in favor of DWS at the time of dedication to the County of Hawaii. Likewise, the three reservoir sites, each consisting of 0.42 acre, will be conveyed to the Water Board, also at the time of dedication. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL A85ESSMENT 7 ~ ~,,,.,.~^a" R ~ Ctt ~ ~ Y r F ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ca - y ~ ~ spy y J, r 1 ~ t ~ ! ~ ~ r ..~r-,tAR•-..i 111 ~ ~ • s !d ~r,,,,' 1`), ~ .rte r • r.A ya . T ' t F r ~ f v ~g • ~ ~ rr {'^~,1 ' ` its"". r r a, 3 Dp,....._..• f ± ~ ' f j. { Y. ! ~~d~ ~~~6e''''' S e f FF ~ /'j ~ R+ ~ - iy~e ea r ~ ~ Sh. r D' w \\i p~ ~ 1°c ~ w i ..v''~~ ~ a ~ . s Q+ ~w._ ! rye ` ~ ~ ~~f ~ ~ ~y ~ ' ~ ~ s w. ~ ~ ~ 0~7. ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~i'r ~ ~ ' ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ t ~ r ! w~ ( ~ . ~ i ~ M}.~ f9 t ~r s• ,i . ~ ~~~r / a 3 ~y L~r r S rr r ~ ~ i ~ ' ~ ( k , t i .I ~ , ,1:tSes}E ,~e;.~r I , J. ~ if "I'~ ~;j~'/~_~R// y~~'}~} , S'i~3} t~~;t s.,?'~~t. ~~r ~ "f~ tl r~R~r/; ~i N+.41 ~r... ~ .~--..»+.a, p :C~' ''{P,I t ~ .~ilPy_'`Xi>ta r•}RIZ Y t'x , O_ r ' r~ ~ ~ ~ s /t ~ w ~.wr~a. M.s~r ~ w ~A ~ !IO/6 t~ww. Z.~.I.M.w lm~ew iwiti /a Ais ~.te+fa t a d'.»i ~ ~ J.+r..~Nq RPM IS, p.Wy. .a. •ay„y ~ b ~ a aR Ik. c+tA.~ wsgy.~. e, G !b ~~y~ Airlr I ' t qfl MD'^"r W ~ u 4 _`.98.7 pO~A.. yr<+'i L. :nay ~ia d{ V ty ~'•a e.vANr y~~~;:,' 0 .~~.~'"'...r *'~s" rl'aiV4! Jtti Aar. A'.~+'u ro t~ Aaa,~r. S rv ~-.-.per... ~ ~ ®j ~!S"~_ : n ~ ° ~ ~ iaaw ~ ~',r sass G .i T7/Sv~ i i"e~a.=-'. e~i~w~7..7~~"w+,~.~ A,.srwrw-,~1.,as. ~ 1 ~ asea.+ v2tQ, ~ _ ~ MwO! ~ " A yam. /~.M'. ~ QLIwyI a~w~ 4,~jr w Mw ~ .4 10 ~ sw'.s' -T K~~+~• rL c,L4 ~ isC ~ =c gym, fM4a. V ~p,~~f.K,,.C,•,: e-n a.is P _ _ ~ a~' $ ,,,,,w. tl ~ ~ ~ 6 RAN aszi .w. i4 cec..+taj'~` °p rtS ~ ice. ''r ~~r i! i+e.w. g,~ ±!y...+t.. ww ..a... ~ ,~,+'r u+..• ....r. ~ +rn.r. E.r ,wr na n.rY.eaq.w.awr i""Rds9G :.`.'y $s...rrw.+srw ® .a.w rs, ta. h ~r.ausa.w I ~a µasiw.. ~ a a+»~ n «..yt•« .+wwrcr+ t ' .'~..s.. in..4lMrtrl./n.NY t p.ya B.YII.aW ii t ~ 'wn'~~ ~ ~rfsW 1 i p, ~yw.Y •w..~a.~ a~ ~HI A I p+~A~(T ~ y / ~'t+fy~ ~ JVt nrr. R /f ( /~I I' /'l W I jeM ~ ww. ww~. A ~.1r rtrwr 6V'wi ZQM ~ .l Y_+.rr abva,vice srresr 7 5 t 2 ~ ~ - Au/~u~aE navert> xr~, nr~a~f suarkrr m crr~.~vcs ~.a ~ 16-inch Transmission Line ~ 96-inch Transmission Line {by Others) aiahs Water ~ysiems 1.0 fl9G Water Tank fttorth Atigr~mern - TAAK - i i i ~ ~ ± ~ ~ a ~ ~ C If _ a~ ~ ~ G ~s~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ y S J yy Y4 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ! 111 1. I3 ~ { ~ i y " 1 ~t 4 V d { @e, ~ A ~ ~ a ~ t +S O ~ C A d il~ q k s ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n~ ~ } ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ i v ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` < ! ~ O V ~ V "~i ~ ~ r 1 ~ 2 q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ l ~ e q e I i 1 ~ ~ e = ~ ' v J a ~ I © ~ x x u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti o ~ W~ w ~ 1 W ~ C i y y f ~ : O ~ ~ 4 i 4y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ v f i ~ t!) `"yam 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ' ! ' ~ J _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ . ~ Y ~ 'Y`,w-' ,q r,~' xl ~ r . _ }tl ~~j` i o A t J i~ r V ~ ~ ~'~a. ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~--_-~..~~-.a'~~~' ~ ~ ,3f r::°.4.s~3:3 ~.xiar r~,~; ~t ~='g 3~E_ ~~6~'. - i iQ ? t ~ ~n ® LYYd ~ n jY~ ~ ~ fr~W ~ • I Q~~~~ tiX ~ ~ ~ ~ :+r~:.'~~Y . _ ~ ",fie. V ~ ~ $ r" ~ i ~ r~ ~ f 1 ~ ~ ~ a $ f ~ ~ ~ $ i 't ~ ~ . 1 ~ a i e ~ ccl~ f ~ ~ t I ~ L ~ r a < t ~ ~ ~ a ~ f t a f!j J~7 ~r ~ ~~f~ ~ ~ f J ~ ~ ~1 a~ ~ t ' v xlJ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q~ t~ -z. ~ i K ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ t ~ 1 iv'~ J ~1, v u ! ~ ~tv ~ \Y 0 y4 i~ ` ~ I as ~~~f~{ ~ e +`r !1 ~ ~f~ I t i Z ` ~ i : F : ~ t r ~ ~ t ~ _ _ r Y ! S 4 ~ ~ f ~ a ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ t '`f r~ i tr ~ Qi, Gi ' ~ ~ e t 4 C f ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ Q jt ~ ~ ~ N rJ aj ~ f j I I y V { 3 Q ! u tvTd 4 ~ ~ 22 y 11 J t ( 7 1 IS ~ 3tr 1y .rwT 1 r~.`~w."r~''y.. ~ _ ~ b A f Nnasa sar .y,.,,, C ~~^yn dpi ~ o ~ "w'~~:..'~r'Hw.,n,rti~„` ~ , • t '.ra, ~ ~ A ..,"lit , Sf ~ 1. 1' ~ `L u t SCI sr / ~ ` o ~ Q R .v ~ /B60 ..,,.-.r-- wM sl,~ 4 R w r s a 3 Illtl4 y,~.~r..~ y GR.ANT F83 3 i 1+ y f _ ° - 'H - .3' v ~ Q :I.a b+~o > t roFs-~ a~.m X .3 A ~ ,CJ °y, ~ nurr ~ ...,e.... errs-o s ,r..,.l. ~ iii ~ M, I """""f° i ~ 14 I r \ Y ~ .r'~. ~ c + 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , wsrtti 1,µr S G C T y ~ R rnY0 0!M'90N A4YRIVGF, SIfEGT 7 ~ t I J+ SUWtr,L7' YYJ CfiANGB PORT/flN DF Wit/ANA 1L• TO lftUPU~4INU/ N01?TTl KD~lG~ ~ M' N ~ i i®IeRY,. ~ i 96-inch Transmission Line ' 1.0 i1~G Water Tank l~aaaha Water S~stee~ South ~iakai Aiignmanf - TiViK - - I WAWHA WATIER SYSTEMS NQR d'H KaNA, A$AVYAT! Z.~ SU]ttlt®UIVI)IN~ USES The project area is a mile to two miles east southeast of Kailua Town. Land use in the project area consists of residential subdivisions, agricultural uses and pastures, and formerly grazed vacant land. 2.3 EXISTING Cd~I~IDITI®I~1S Photographs shown in Figures 4A - 4H depict the alignment routes and the surrounding area. North: The North system starts at Mamalahoa Highway along the private unnamed access road to the Ueshima Coffee Company property, and then traverses through undeveloped land along dirt roadways to Hienaloli Road. South Mauka: The South Mauka system starts at MamaIahoa I-Iighway at ICamila Place through the existing Iakepa Estates subdivision and connects to an existing system at Pu Hoaloha Place which connects to the DWS main within Hienaloli Road. South Mcrkai: The South Makai system will connect at the Hienalali Road and Pu Hoalaha Place main, traverse the Hualalai Road and Hienaloli intersection and run down Hualalai Road for approximately 114U feet. The remaining distance of fi mile is through vacant formerly grazed pasture Iand. 2.4 I'ISDJIrC'I' 1DESCIBII'TYtII~ The existing DWS Waiaha production potable water well has a capacity of two million gallons per day, however, at the present time, only 25 percent of the available water is utilized due to a tack of transmission lines. The proposed project will allow access to the remaining ?5 percent of the water by constructing two new transmission lines and storage tanks to the high demand lower elevation areas of North Kona. The Applicant has designed and proposes to construct a potable water system that .meets DWS and State of Hawaii standards for drinking water to serve lands controlled or managed by the Applicant as well as other properties in the North Kona water system. The proposed water system is intended to be a public fhcility, and upon final inspection and approval, will be dedicated to the Water Board, including any and all appurtenant interests in real estate far the reservoirs, transmission and distribution infrastructure, via warranty deed, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, at no cast to DWS and the Water Hoard (except for oversizing, as described in the paragraph below). At the request of DWS, the Applicant has agreed to oversize the facilities to accommodate Iands other than what is owned or controlled by the Applicant. This will be in accordance with Rule 4-2(2}and 4- 2(3) of the Rules and Regulations of the Department of Water Supply to serve property not parties to the Waiaha System, LLC and Waiaha System Ii, LLC. 'The oversizing requirements have been determined by DWS and the cost for the oversizing will be reimbursed to the Applicant by the Water Board upon dedication to the County of Hawaii, FINAL ENVIR©NME~ITAL AssFBSMENI` I3 - - - i I I i E~ : , ~ rf yfFa~~~ i1i_~l'1 # C1 ~4~~~ N I 9 b 1 , ~r~ ~ e ~ s r~ ta~i~~~~r' r~~ ' n~x~u~w a Spy rsl2 j ~~yt~~k'' ~~"~~r S s .a ^,.p yt ~ t f','1~ ~ t i l ~~'"~~3 3.'~i~~ 1 I ; ~ k's ~iL~ ~ ~f 1~ra ~ ~Y R~A1 r_y r74 ' ~ ~ ~ 1 rr~ y~` r ~ ~ l . ~ ~ ti r ~r 9r5.,4 ~ `l r 4>`~ it ~ r ~ ~ o~}~ . 1 fig ~ tI~ << ~ i° g~ l r ~Z~.. ri ~~~tit S~ ~ ~ d yy,~ ~k S f~~, , ~ tYr f~ y ' ~ ':~w C~~~~~A ~ ui i a kr{ ~ ~ f 1~ qty-; ~ t 'r- r~ ~r ~ ~ ~S 1~ ~ fit t Y r O =1ya l~~f ~ 3. Yl,,a~a 3. . _ ~ 4. i yk. i `~yyrj`k t~rni k , v ~ ~ 7 , r t u etf rj,~lr , t 4 a ~ i _ r; Photo 1. The North transmission line alignment begins at Mamatahoa Highway at an unnamed private access road to the UGC property. The utility easement is along the south side of the paved road (left side of photo). View is mauka to makai. ' Photo Z. The easement continues makai along older pavement (left side of photo}. Photo 3. The transmission tine will turn to the north and run along the east side of a dirt road (right side of photo}, Photo 4. The transmission tine again turns west (or makai) along a dirt road and continues on to Hienaloti Road. Easement is on the south side (left side of photo). Photo 5. View of the graded water tank site. F1CaURE 4al ~ Vitaiaha UVafar Sysfems North Alignment -Site Photographs 14 + § , • . ~ a..t7" It'"~ ~ i « r~.rr rxEa t 7 sg_ c ~ i' ~ ~t~ . s ~ { " 2 ~ s .rq s + ~ ray, ` f ~ < ~ A,~i~„ yts'F~ka, ~ y'a Sn. ,fix . )s .cf lr y ~r~ Zyli~ dt~ ~ r ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ !Ur j ~ } ' t ° ~ III > ~ ~ ~ 4s^" ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~i c f ~ . f ~ ~ ~i! r ~ (n 0 t y ~arr x .S'~ii~ ~ ~'°.'L a o'<_Fj 't P" ~ J ~[i ~ ~ jt 1 ~ 3 i Pq p~ 3 Yc~ i a 9 rya J .r 5rr ~/~'v ~f}r~~,~~~ ~t~. I t w+x,A ` r ` tr it ~ v~ ~ ~ { + i . ~ 4iy t 3 F ~q'~ 611 . V. 1 i~•C . ~ I. ..~r~.I.VI i .i4; ,'1~3~1_. ~ r < < ~J ~ ~ f! ~ ~ iR ~ . ,rl '`'fib ~ ~ : ;.h _ 't7 v t ~ t ~ "i ~~~~L- a` I ~ F 1 _ 4 ~ tea 1 ~ ~t ~4a ~ r r Photo 6. The South Mauka transmission tine alignment begins at Mamalahoa highway ak Kamila Place through • the existing lakepa Estates subdivision and connects to an existing system at Pu Haalaha Place which connects to the DWS main within Hienatoli Road. The utility easement is along the south side of the paved road (left side of photo). View is mauka to makai. Photo 7. The South Makai system wilt connect at the Hienatoli Road and Pu Haalaha Place main, traverse the Hualatai Raad and Hienaloli intersectfon and run down Huatalai Road for approximately 800 feet. The remaining distance of Y4 mite is through vacant formerly grazed pasture land. Photo 8. Mauka, to makai view of the South Makai transmission line slang a portion pf Hualalai Raad. Photos 9 and f0. Views of pasture land slang the alignment. Photo f f. Cattle ranching era rock watts are present along portions of the South Makai alignment. >FrGUR~ is Waiahs Wa#er Systems South Alignment -Site Photographs ~ - t ~ v~r4tA1tIA VYA'1"Eti aYS7'Ehis ~ I~onTti i~®NA, HAwA[i 1'he nc;w l b-inch water transmission mains would be installed un er ro nd wi h d g u t o 15 ft waterline easement and IQ«ft wide paved access road over them. 'I`he new reservoir sites would have asphalt concrete pavement driveways; perimeter fencing and appurtenances; and associated water mains to connect the reservoirs to the water distribution system. In general, trenches will be 24 to 3b inches by four feet deep (Figure S}, ' l~iorth alignment. The proposed north route begins at a connection at Mamalahoa Highway (Highway 180, County roadway}, down an unnamed paved one-lane private road (address is 75-5564 Marnalahoa Hwy}, which becomes unpaved and takes a jag to the north and then continues west. At this paint the proposed waterline would connect to a 2,500 ft. pipeline segment through TMK: 7-5-12: lb which is separately being installed by others, traverse Hienaloli Raad, and then connect to the existing I~WS ' water line within Nani I~ailua Street. Hienalali Road and Nani Kailua Street axe County roadways. South align~~rent`. The proposed south mauka route begins at a connection at Mamalahaa Highway {.Highway 180, County roadway), dawn ICamita Place, a private roadway through the Iakepa Estate Subdivision, and connects to an existing pipeline at Pu Hoaloha Place. The south makai route begins ' at the Hienaloli RoadlPu Hoalaoha Place intersection and traverses south on Hienalali Road to the Hualalai Road intersection. The alignment wi11 then tra~rerse to the west along the Hualalai Road right-of way and finally through private undeveloped land, terminating at the Queen ~aahumanu Extension (State Route 11}. 1 Reservoirs. Each of the water tanl~s will have a capacity to hold 1 million gallons ofwater... and will be constructed of concrete with steel wired with seismic cables. 'table 4. P'u~oject ~ompooent Coro onee?t fl.iaear Feet tteservoir ~ North 4, I fl0 _ One 1-MG tank ~ South Mauka 4,420 Qne i-MG tank South Makai 4,150 One t-MG tank gyp) /eqS g/~q~pp'pry~~ g/y/y~ p~ry~p~{ ~ry/~py~~®[[T1 pp ~ ~~yp [(y~y[/~g(y+{ QSO?/ ~I~YJ {Y.AJV i4 ~4mY~YF RJ f1.J~ ~NItA V V14~~ 1 The construction is expected to occur upon receipt of all required permits and will be completed within two years. The anticipated total cast of development of the North alignment is $4.1 million, the South Mauka alignment is $4.87 million, and South M`akai alignment is $4.52 million, for a total of $13.5 ' million. The cost to upgrade the system to serve the overall North Dona community is approximately 31 percent of the total cost. Included in the cost of the reservoir (or tank} sites is 0.42 acre of land far each ttmk, which will become County of Hawaii property upon the dedication ofthe facilities, The ' project costs are swnmarized in Table 5, 1ttPtA~. ~NVIRQNM~A1TAL ASSE3SAiENT lb i WAIAtiA VVAT~R SxBTlEMB 1VURTH I~COMA, HAWA[I ~~i~ ~ ~ W~~4 ysp~~ tr~p~~,' J~? r~~ ~ ~pp~~~jr p ~ ~~[~~?~tr~ ~tyry*~~{~~ y~y~y ~plaR6aiVb~e~~~p~yg+l9 ~~y~/[~ir~Dgl~1a (~9o'!AS ~p91~ ei~itNi Std 'V®U ~ ~p WIiK 186 ~T ~ 7~T P~I~ffN~ ~d~li~R! ~ ~ ~~iR~ f~tA. ~ dP,A~'1~IB .~'tt~t+ t~l~tl '~'tE~'d~0 W1~'~M 'BAR ~ 1FiGllaRE i5 Waiaha Water systems Trench Section II~tAL ENYIRtTNMF.AITAL ASSESSMF,NT 17 i WAIAHA WATER SYSrEMB ~ NORTH 1~aNr1, E#AWAII Table 5. Project Costs Waittha Sysicm t9versi~e Cost (Difference to 12-inch Pipe 16-inch Pipe Upgrade Ta„k ~ Site 1 M dal Tank & Site North _ Constnuction Cost: 4,100 L.F. 1,064,874 1,659,374 594,500 Reservoir 500,000 allon 1,760,000 2,450,000 f>90,000 Subtotal 2,824 74 4 109 374 1 284 500 South 1Vlauka _ Constn,ction Cost: 4,420 L.F. 1,813,026 2,418,283 645,257 • Reservoir 500,000 gallons 1,760,000 2,450,000 690,000 Subtotal 3 573 0.26 4868 283 129 257 ' South lvlakai Construction Cost: 4,150 L.F. 1 420,593 2,022,343 601,750 Reservoir 100,000 lion 1,465,000 2,500,000 1,035,000 Subtotal Z 885 593 4,522 343 1,636 750 PRt}JECT T~T`AI.S 9 2R3 493 13,500,000 4 21b 507 2.6 RRG~IT.A'~`®118'x' 1~Q><IIA~EMEI~I'1['S 2.6.i1 Clnapte~ 343, Ha~owaii Revised Statutes Caitmpliance This environmental assessment process is being conducted in accordance with Chapter 343, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS}. 'This law, along with its implementing regulations, Title 11, Chapter ZOO, Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR}, is the basis for the environmental impact review process in j Hawaii. According to Chapter 343, an EA is prepared to determine impacts associated with an action, to develop mitigation measures for adverse impacts, and to determine whether any of the impacts are signif cant according to the thirteen specif c criteria. Section 5 of this report states that anticipated finding of na significant impacts are expected to occur, and discusses each criteria and presents the preliminary findings far each. If, after considering comments to the Draft EA, DWS, the approving j agency, concludes that na significant impacts would be expected to occur, a FONSI determination ' would be issued, and the action will be permitted to occur. The comment letters received and the responses to each comment are founding Section 6. 1f DWS concludes that significant impacts are expected to occur as a result of the proposed action, and an environmental impact statement (EIS} would be required, and maybe prepared at the discretion of the Applicant. ' The use of public lands and funds are criteria for Chapter 343, HRS compliance. Although the proposed system will be developed mainly on private lands, tie-ins to existing waterlines will be necessary within rights-af--way at Mamalahaa Highway, Nani Kailua Street, Hienalali Road, Hualalai ' Road, and Queen Kaahumanu Extension. In addition, an X00-ft segment will be along a portion of Hualalai Road. The Applicant will fund the development privately, but will be reimbursed by the Water Board far the over-sizing of the project upon dedication. 2.6.2 Land Use Designations The land use designations ofthe project area are summarized in Table 6. I+iNAL ENVIRONMENTAL t4SSESSMENT j 1$ ~AIAHA WA'CLP.ti $YSfFhYS NORTH 1iOTIA, HAWAII 'l`ahle ti. band Use IDesignations for the Project Area ii.and Use IDesY nation State Land Use A 'cultural Co General Plan Urban E ansion 1 ortant A 'cultural Land Coun Zonin A "culture A-5 A-la S ecial Mara ement Area Pro'ect area is not in the SMA 2.6.3 State anti Cmllnt'y Perlrllts and Approvstls The processing of State and County permits are prerequisites to construction, as shown in Table 7. Private and public utilities (including water system impmvements~ are permitted within any zoning district 4, however, Plan Approval review would be required prior to obtaining a Building Permit. 'd'able 7. Required State and County Permits and Approvals Permit or A ~roval AutJborit A rovln A enc State of Naeroaii State Historic Sites Gorn fiance Cha ter 8E HRS State Hisbarie Preservation Division National Pollutant Discharge Clean Water Act, Section 402, State Department of Health Elimination S tem PDES Permit NPDES Righ~of--Way work approval (Rights-af--Way Department} State Department of Transpotta#ian, een ICaahumanu Extension Hi hwa s Divisio Hawaii District Office Count of Hawaii Plan Approval Hawaii CaunCy Coda, Chapter 25, Planning Department Section 25-4-I l Grading Permit„ Permit to construct Hawaii County Code, Chaptcar 10 Department of Public Works within a RUW Building Permit (water collection system Hawaii County Code, Chapter 5 Building Division, Department of Public a rovai Works 2.6.4 Coarsistencg? w+itli ~o~?erlt®IeIIt Plans anti Pallcfes 2.6.4.1 Hawaii State Plan and Lind Use District The Hawaii State Plan was adopted in 1978 and last revised in 1991 (Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 26, as amended}. The Plan establishes a set ofthemes, goals, objectives and policies that are meant to guide the State's long-range growth and development activities. The three themes that express the basic purpose of the Hawaii State Plan are individual and family self-sufficiency, social and economic mobility, and community or social well-being. The proposed project would promote these goals by improving water service for the North Kana District. The project is within the State Land Use Agricultural district. ~Nater system improvements are permitted uses within this district. Hawaii Ca Zoning Code, Section 25-4-1 l o~ FWAL ENVIRONMENTAL AS$E$SMEIVT 19 i ~ - - i WAfA~iA WATER SY3'I'FMs i I`d'aDtTfff ~{D1VA, ~AWAIY i~ 2.&.4,2 Hawaii County General Plan and Zoning The General PIan far the County of Hawaii is a policy document expressing the broad goals and policies far the long-range development of the island of Hawaii. 'I he General Ptan was revised and adapted in 20U5. The Plan is organized into I3 elements, with policies, objectives, standards, and principles far each. There are also discussions of the specific applicability of each element to each of the nine judicial districts comprising the County of l-Iawaii. Mast relevant to the proposed project is the fallowing goal and standard: J. Public Iacilities (1) Water Policies: ® Water system improvements shall correlate with the County's desired land use pattern. ~ Improve and replace inadequate systems. ~ Courses of Action: North Dona: Public hacilitics: Water Continue to evaluate growth conditions to coordinate improvements as required to the existing water system in accordance with the North Kona Water System Master Plan. The proposed project satisfies relevant goals, objectives, and courses of action related to water systems in the North Kona district. The Hawaii County General Plan Land Ilse Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAGj:., The LUPAG map component of the General Plan is a graphic. representation of the Plan's goals, policies, anal standards, as well as of the physical relationship between land uses. It also establishes the basic urban and non- i urban form for areas within the planned public and cultural facilities, public facilities and safety features, and transportation corridors. The North and South alignments traverses Urban Expansion and Importatrt Agricultural Land areas in the LLTPAG.S The proposed Waiaha water system is consistent with the General Plan. ~ Hawaii County Zoning. 1'he county zoning districts for the properties in the project include Agriculture A-5a and A-la (5-acres and 1-acre minimum}. The proposed project is a permitted use within these districts, 'I'he linear nature of the project which is mainly along existing roadways, will not affect any agricultural ranching activities. None of the properties that constitute the project are in the Special Management Area (SMA}. s General Pian t.UPAG znap. ~nva~. ~+NdIRONMEiVTAL ASSESSMENT 2D - V41A[AHA WATER SYSTEMS NORTH KoNA, HAWAII 3.4 ~VIItI~NENT.~~,. ~E'T.'TIN~, ITVYPA~'T, AND 1VII'TI~A'TI~N ~A~I~~E~ 3.1 PIE~SI~AL CHAIRAC'1CES'~'I(CS The transmission routes and the reservoir sites are referred to as the "project site". The term "project area" is used to describe the general environs of the area between the two transmission line alignments to the north and south and Mamalahoa Highway (to the west) and Queen Kaahumanu I-Iighway (ta the east). 3.1.1. Clnnla~te Settin Located an the western leeward coast of the island of Hawaii, the project area is between the 200 ft and 1,500 ft elevations, thus the microclimate of each area varies. Generally, temperatures afthe project area are moderate, ranging from winter lows in the 50's to summer highs in the 84's at the higher elevations, and, at the lower elevations the winter lows are in the 70's and summer highs in the higher 80's. Rainfall patterns are also seasonal, drier in the winter months (November being the driest), with mast rain falling during the summer months (generally, June). Annual rainfall amounts in inches range from the mid-50's to law-b0's. Tradewind patterns are predominantly from the Hartbeest (University of Hawaii at Hilo, 199$). Impacts and Mitigation Measures The project will Hot have any effect on the micraclimate of the area. 3.~.Z ~ealasgy Se 'na Geologically, the project area consists of 3,000 year old lava flows from Hualalai Volcano which last erupted in 1800-18U1 (Hoare and Trusdell 1491, and Wolf and Morris 1996}. The island of Hawaii is associated with volcanic eruptions and earthquakes. The US Geological Survey (USGS) has developed Iyava-Flow Hazard Zones With a numerical rating of 1 to 9 (Zane 1 has the most severe hazard). The volcanic hazard zone of the general area and the subject property is Zone 4 which is associated with Mt. Hualalai. Approximately 5 percent of the land area in Zone 4 has been covered by lava since 1800, and l5 percent has been covered by lava in the last 750 years. Hualalai's flanks do not have a distinctly lower hazard than its rift zones because the distance from the vents to the coast is short and the slopes are steep. Hualalai erupts less often than Kilauea and Mauna e awaii U.S. Geolo ical Surve 1991. Heliksr, C. Volcanic and Seismic Ha2ards on the Island of H , g y, P`WAL ENVIRONIIRENTAt ASSESSMENT 21 - - WAtAHA WATER S1(sTLMS ~iaRTtt ~CONA, k$AwAIp Lao, but flows typically cover large areas. Other direct hazards from eruptions, such as tephra fallout and ground cracking and settling, tend to be the greatest in the areas of highest hazard from lava flaws. Impacts and Mitigation Measures I'he constructia~t of the project will not exacerbate any hazard conditions. The project will be constructed in accordance with County requirements for specific hazards, including seismic tremors and will comply with the Uniform Building Code adopted by the County of Hawaii. The water tanks are designed in accordance with applicable American Water Works Association and American Concrete institute standards for Seismic Zane 3, as well as alI applicable County Building Department requirements. The walls of each tank will be concrete and steel wired with seismic cables. 3.1.E T'capaagra~p@ay .and Sails The topography of the Site is uneven terrain with elevations ranging from 200 ft at Queen Kaahumanu Highway to 800 ft at Hienaloli Road to 1,500 ft at Marnalahaa Highway. The vegetation of most of the project area has been extensively modii~ed far roadways, house sites, fanning, and ranching activities. The project site is slang existing roadways or vacant agricultural lands. The natural soils along the North and South alignments are of the Kainaliu and Punaluu series. However, for those segments of the alignments along existing roadways, the sails are composed of fill material. The fallowing descriptions are from the SUiI Survey of the Island of hl'awaii (Sato, et al. j 1973}~. North Alignrnerat: Kainaliu extremely stony clay 1aa~n (KEC}, 12 to 20 percent slopes. The Kainaliu series consists ofwell-drained silty clay looms that formed in volcanic ash. 't'hese are moderately sloping to moderately steep soils an uplands at an elevation ranging from 800 to 1,200 fit. "Ihe annual rainfall is 40 to 60 inches, and most of it falls during the summer months. The mean annual sail temperature is between 7i° and 73° F. The natural vegetation consists of guava, Lantana, kaa haole, and guinea grass. These soils and Hanuaulu, Kaimu, Punaluu, and Waiaha soils are in the same general area. This soil is at law elevations an Mauna Loa and Hualalai. in a representative profile the surface layer is very dark brown extremely stony silty clay loam about l0 inches thick. The subsoil consists of dark-brown very stony silty clay loam and silt loam, It is about 16 inches thick and is underlain by fragmental a`a lava. The surface layer is medium acid, and the subsoil is neutral. Kainaliu soils are ~ used .mostly for pasture, coffee, and macadamia nuts. A small acreage is used for truck crops. i South Alignment: Punaluu extremely rocky peat (rPYD), 6 to 20 percent slopes. The Punaluu series ~ consists ofwell-drained, thin organic sails over pahaehoe lava bedrock. These soils are gently sloping to moderately steep. They are on uplands at an elevation ranging from near sea level to l,t?00 feet and receive Pram 60 to 90 inches of rainfall annually. 'i'he mean annual soil temperature is between 72° and 74° F. The natr~ral vegetation consists of koa haote, Christmas berry, guinea grass, natal redtop, and sand bur. These soils and Kaalualu, Kaimu, Kainaliu, Malama, Pakini, and Waiaha soils are in the same general area. Punaluu sails are used for pasturage. i http:/Iwww.+ctahr.hawaii.edulsoilsurvey/Hawaii/hawaii.htm P'[NAL ~+NVIR©NMENCAL ASSESSR~EiNT 22 WAIAHA WATER SYSTEMS 1vaaTtt K4NA, ¢IAWAII Impacts and Mitigation Measures The transmission line alignments will generally be beneath existing roadbeds or roadway shoulders; thus, trenching will likely be in roadway fill material. At the vacant paracls, the topographic and soil conditions impose no canstxaints on the installation and operation of the water system. Any existing agricultural uses will not be affected by the construction and operation of the project, During construction and until any open exposed soil surfaces are stabilized with vegetation, erosion control measures will be taken, including the installation ofa silt curtains ar sand bags at the malcai boundary. 3.1.'6 Hydrology and Groundavater The hydrologic and groundwater conditions far the project area have been described in detail in the Final EA far the Waiaka Produeti~+n Well and heservair (Planning Solutions 2003)$ which describes the water source which will feed into the proposed transmission system. Setting Surface Water. Surface water in the vicinity of the project is limited to the intermittent Waiaha Stream which is classified as Class 2 Inland Waters (D4H 2O0t}}, There are no wetland conditions along the alignments of the proposed transmission lines and reservoir si#es. Flooding Waiaha Stream traverses the project area between the North and South transmission Lines and terminates an vacant land near the Ilualalai Raad and Queen Kaahumanu Highway intersection. The eras of the projec# near Queen Kaahumanu Highway is designated as Lane "X" and "AE" by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flaad Insurance Rate Map, Community-Panel Number 155166 0713 D, Map Revised Date: May 16,1994, Zane 3~ consists of areas that era outside the SQO- yea.r flood plain. Zone AE consists of areas where base flood elevations have been determined. Ground Water. The project area overlies the Keauhau Aquifer System of the Hualalai Sector. The State Commission an Water Resource Management (CWRM) has determined that the Keauhou System has a sustainable yield of 38 million gallons per day (MGD), while the entire Hualalai Sector sustainable yield is 56 million gallons per day (MGD) (CWRM 1995 in Planning Solutions 2p03). The DWS system far Kana can be divided into the North Kona and South Kona systems. These systems are interconnected, and it is passible to transport water from one system to the other. However, this is lane only during emergencies and on a very limited basis. The Kahaluu wells and shaft currently provide the bulk of the water far the North Kana system, The present average water usage in 2008 is 7 MGD. ~ Waiaha Production Well and Reservoir Final Environmental Assessment, Apri12003, Prepared for the Departmem of Water Supply, County of Hawaii, by Planning Solutions. A~CNAL ENV1ItONMEIVTALRSSESSMENT 23 WAIAIkW WA'CER'SY5'rf~Ms ~ 1VaATH ~tbNA, HAWAII i Impacts and Mitigation Measures G'onstruction Phase Irrrpacts: Installation of the new transmission mains along the Q.78 mile North and 1.63 miles South segments, and the three l MG gallon tanks will cause minimal changes to impermeable surfaces and only marginally reduce storm water runoff. Storm water drainage will essentially be unchanged and will not alter the existing drainage patterns. Use of sand hags and other sediment containing devices will be utilized for erosion control at open trenches. Impacts on Starface Waters: Waiaha Stream is in the vicinity of the project, traversing between the North and South transmission lines. At the location ofthe South Maleai alignment, stream flaw is ' through a culvert at Hualalai Road and onto the vacant parcels near Queen Kaahumanu Highway. Constriction in this area will be during the dry months. The installation of the transmission lines is not expected to affect the stream. i Impacts on Grcundtt~ater: The installation of the transmission lines and reservoirs near or at the ' ground surface will have no effect on groundwater. 'Chew facilities will transport the available high- level water resource (from the underlying aquifer} into the DWS system. Moreover, the infusion of the Waiaha well water into the North Kona water system will reduce pumpage of the Kahaluu shaft which is currently over-pumped. Separate from the installation of the transmission system is the impact of well production (as described in the Waiaha Production and Reservoir environmental assessment}. As part of the DWS operating ; procedures, well systems are monitored by computerized equipment an a monthly basis. The Gantrol Building at the Waiaha production well is equipped with a monitoring gauge which records water levels x.11<~ botanicallE~esouu~ces Bettina A botanical survey of the pro}ect site was conducted and is attached as Appendix A ~ Both the Pdorth and South alignments and the Water Tank sites are in areas that have been greatly altered by past 1 human activities. North Alignment I Approximately half of the North alignment is along a well manicured roadway with sides which are grassed and mechanically tended. The remaining portions consist of roadside herbaceous vegetation common to the leeward side such as Guinea grass (Panicum maxitnutn), kihuyu grass (Pertnisetum clandestinum}, and California grass (Brachiaria mutica}, , South Mauka Alignment -Between Mamalahva Highway and Hienalali .Road The South Mauka alignment follows two private residential subdivision paved roadways. The vegetation on the roadside is mechanically cleared and poisoned. The vegetation in the vacant areas 9 Yoshida, L., Flora of the Waiaha Water Systems Project Area FINAL 1+ NV1RaNMLNTAL ASSESSMENT , 24 j i i WAIA,HA. WATER SYSTBMB 1~IORTH ~{ONA, gIAWAtt consists of exotic species such as buffalo grass (Pennisetum purpureum), false mallow (Malvastrum coromandelianum) and Guinea grass. South Makai Alignment -Between Hienaloli Road and Queen Kaahumanu Highway The dominant vegetation in the pastureland is Guinea grass with other species of plants found on ar next to the rock wall. One native plant, Peperomia leptostachya, was found. This species was seen in two separate discrete populations, growing atongside or on rock walls. This commonly found species has been collected and identified in other areas slang the Queen Kaahurnanu Highway. Other indigenous species located within the study site are weedy species such as uhaloa (Waltheria indica}, morning glory {Ipomaea indica), Huehue (Cocculus trrlobus), and Fopolo (Solanum americanum). dArater Tank Sites Three sites have been mechanically cleared in preparation for the construction of water tanks along the proposed pipeline. The vegetation reflects aggressive weedy species. Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Species The study area does not contain any rare, threatened, or endangered plants as listed under Federal ar State of Hawaii regulations. Impacts and Mitigation Measures Constnaction of the project will involve trenching within existing roadways (or shoulders of roadways) with the exception of the South Makai segment which is through pastureland. The plants that constitute the area are generally weedy roadside exotic species and introduced landscape plants, with a few commonly found native species. The native plants include pepperomia, uhaloa, Huehue, and popolo which are commonly found in the Kona landscape, The affected area is not habitat for any rare, threatened, or endangered species, and will therefore, have na substantial impac#s an the flora of the project area. x.1,6 Wildliffe 18esources Se- ttina 'The natural vegetation of the project area has been altered aver many decades and does not contain habitat suitable for native wildlife species. Commonly found species that occur within the Kailas Kona area are also found in the project area. These include rodents, mongoose, and feral cats. Commonly found bird species include the zebra dove (Geopelia striate), spotted dove (Streptopelia chinensis},rock. doves {Columba livis), nutmeg manikin (Lanchura punctulata), pause finch {Carpodacus mexicanus), English sparrow {Passer domesticus), Japanese white eye (Zosteraps japonica}, northern cardinal {Cardinalis cardinalis), meIodius laughing thrush {Garrulux canorus), as well as other non-native species. The native Hawaiian Hawk or `Io (.8uteo salitarius) may possibly use the ofd site Inauka wooded areas at a higher elevation that the project and the Hawaiian Hoary Bat {Lasiurus cinerus semotus), a native mammal, are not known to be in the project area. The Facifec golden plover (Pluvialis fulva), a FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASBE8sMENT 25 WAWItA WA'rL~R SYSTEMS ' NORTH KOPiA, IIAWAiI protected migratory species, may utilize the open mowed grassy areas during the months from August to May. Impacts and Miti$atian Measures ~ There may be temporary disruption to the Pacific golden plover which may feed along roadsides during August through May. Otherwise, there is no native habitat that would support native wildlife ' species within the project area, therefore na adverse effects to native fauna is expected to result from the construction of the project. ' x.1..7 H~~o~ic / Aa°cinaeologacal P2esources The project components, which consist of linear corridors for transmission lines and water tanks, occur within or alongside existing roadway rights-of way, with the exception of the South Makai alignment which traverses undeveloped pasture lands. Archaeological inventory survey reports have been completed far these undeveloped lands (TMK: 7-5-OI7: 40, 41, 42, and 43} (Table lI}, in accordance with State of Hawaii historic preservation regulatory review inventory requirements, as contained ' within Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 13, DGNR, Subtitle l3, State Historic Preservation Rules. The State Historic Preservation Division {SHPD) has approved the survey reports for Parcels 4p and 41, and 42, and 9~3. SHPD correspondence is included in Appendix B. Table 8, South li9[akai System: Archaeological Inventory Surveys for Uudevelaped Parcels ? TI+/lIC Parcel No. Pre arer / IDate I?ate Pre aced for ~ 7»5-017: 40, 41 Wvlforth and Wilson, An Inventory Surve~ for 29.389 Brian R. Cook SCS Archaeology Acres in Kahului 2° ,North Kona ' Qctober 2006 District, Island of Hawaii: Investigations into Se#tlement ' Patterns in the Kula Zone of the Kona. Field S stem Near K_ailua_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' 7-5-017: 42 Bulgrin and Rechtman An Archaeological Inventory Survey Hualalai Partners of Kona, LLC November 2005 of TMK: 3»7-5»017:042 Kahului 2"d Ahupuaa, North Kona = Distric Island of Hawaii , 7-5-017:43 Bulgrin and RechUnan An Archaeological Inventory Survey Hualalai Partners of Kona, LLC August 2045 of TMK: 3?-5-017:043 ` Kahului 2°d Ahupuaa, North Kona Aistrict, Island of Hawaii ' Setttn~ From a macro perspective, the undeveloped lands (TMK: 7-5-U17; 4Q, 41, 42, and 43) comprise a small area of the Kona Field System which is extensive within North and South Kona, from Kau Ahupuaa to the north to Honaunau to the south and west from the coastline and east to the forested slopes of Hualalai (Gordy 1995 in Bulgrin and Rechtman 2Q05). A large portion of this field system is designated as State Inventory of Historic Places (SIHP) Site 50-10-37-b601 and has been eligible for ' inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. ' F11VAL ~NVUSONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 26 WAIAHA WATED2 5Y5rEM8 NaR7f~t ~CDIQA, HAWA}1 The parcels (TMK: 7-S-U17: 40, ~1, 42, and 43) contain several sites associated with the precantact Kona li field System acid same sites associated with the more recent Ranch era. None of the precontact sites will be affected by the construction of the Waiaha Water System and mast in fact, require "no further work". In 1927, Manuel Cronies acquired the Kahului and Waiaha ahupuaa from the Kona Development Company, a sugar cane plantation company. The land became part of the Games Ranch and was actively used for cattle grazing and stockading. 114ost of the stone walls seen in the study area today are mast likely a legacy of the Games Ranch (Bulgrin and Rechtman, 2QQS and Kona F~istarical Society "A Guide to 4Id Kona"}. In general, the South Makai transmission line will be parallel to the rack walls; however, small segments of walls may be breached to construct the transmission line. The affected sites as summarized in Table 9. Table 9. Archaeological Sites AlYeeted by the Construction of the South 1l~9akr?l mater Traosimisston I<.ine.lo Site No. 'lt`MK Age i3escrlption Criteria of ttecommeuded Form a Si niflsance 'Treatment TS-l 7-5-17:40 1980 (approx. Cattle Barrier core-frlled wall farms D No further work Roadside year built) rnakai border of parcel and farms right Wall angle with TS-15 at its eastern terminus. T8-1 parallels and is adjacent to Queen Kaahumanu Highway, suggesting that the wall was built when the highway was built, and the pasture mauka of the highway was reconfigured far the new hi TS- I S 7-5- 1920's Cattle barrier core-filled rock wall. Has D Na further work Wall 1'7:40 41 ttanch been breached mid wa b a dirt road. Site 24555 7-S-1T. Historic Cattle bmcsrierccre-tilled wall tdcely D No further wank Watt 42, 43 1891-1904 canstruded by bona Development Company and Gaines Ranch as a parcel bound marker and livestock control. Site 24556 7-5-17:43 Historiclmadern Care-filled retaining wall running D No further work Wap parallel-ta and along kluatalai Raad. Portions ofthe wall have been reconstracted as evidenced by a truck fire incorporated iato the base of the welt at the intersactian with Hienatoii Road Site 24557 ?-5-17:43 Historic ltanah related mck wall enctosure D No further wank Enclosure Ranch augmented with metal fence and wooden gate. Area also contains a riveted steel water tank and concrete water trou The North alignment is through existing paved and dirt roadways. The mare recently graded segments have received County grading permits which have received DLNR sign-off. These documents are attached as Appendix C. 10 Information is summarised from archaeological studies of TNiK: 7-5-t7: 40, 41, 42, 43 by Wolfarth and Wilson October 2005, Bulgrin and Reclxtznan November 2005 and August 2005. Sfte Numbers are labeled as noted in the reports. 11+'IPtAL ENYIItaNMI:NTAI. ASSFS3MENT 27 WAIAiIA'WATH:tt ~YSs r~16i8 l~fatt'riI ~{~NA, ~$AWAII The Bouth Mauka alignnic:nt is through existing residential subdivisions, which eornpletcd hlstaric preservation /archaeological review at the time of their construction. Impacts and Miti~atian Measures The Waiaha Water Systems South Makai improvements (transmission line and reservoir) are spatially separated from the Dona Field Bystenx precantact sites which occur on the various parcels. The construction anal long-term operation of the system will therefore, have no efi'ect on any of the precontact sites. The construction of the South Makai water system may, however, requnre breaching portions of the walls and enclosure that are associated with cattle ranching, These walls and one enclosure, identified as Site 24SSS, Site 24556, Site 24SSfi, TS-2, and TS-l have been documented in the respective studies (~ulgrin and Itechtxxxan 2005, and Wolforth and Wilson 2006) and the Recommended Treatment of "No further work°' has been assigned. Where practicable, the breaches will be repaired and the openings will be rebuilt. Prior to construction, any sites which are outside the construction footprint but within 20 feet of the F construction area, will be marked with orange construction fencing. During construction, should any unexpected cultural features, deposits, or burials, be encountered, work in the area will be suspended and the State I-listoric I'reservatian Division office will be immediately notified to determine an appropriate course of action. ; ~»~.g ~illtlas~:xl )l~esaiae°ees A cultural resources assessment is intended to be informational for the purpose of disclosing any impacts to native rights and practices the proposed project might have an Hawaiian culture and to address ~,ct 50. The thrust of Act SO is to consider the effects of the project on native Hawaiians ' pertaining to the practice of traditional customs. In addition, the Hawaii State Constitution, Article ~ XII, Section 7 protects all rights ofnative I-iawaiians that are "customarily and traditionally exercised 1 for subsistence, cultural, and religious purposes". I In addition, the Kapa`akai a ka Aina decision established an analytical framework independent af, but consistent with, the cultural impact assessment requirements of Act S0. The specific findings and conclusions required in three areas include the following. i ® The identity and scope of "valued cultural, historical, or natural resources, including the extent to which traditional and custalnary native Hawaiian rights are exercised there; i ~ The extent to which those resources -including traditional and customary native Hawaiian ' rights will be affected or impaired by the proposed action; ~ The feasible action, ifany, to be taken by the Land Use Commission to reasonably protect native Hawaiian rights if they are found to exist. , Bettina While the general area of the undeveloped parcels (TMI~: 7-S-1 fi: 40, 41, 42, 43) contain precontact sites and features associated with the Kana Field System, the construction of the proposed water FINAL ~NV[I30NR1~NTAL,P.SSH'SSMEN'f as WAIA~IA WATER ~YSTENIS 1~1aR7fH tSaNA, HAWAI6 system improvements will have no effect an these sites because of the spatial separation of 184 meters or mare or any sites which require foilow~up (TS 11, 44, 41, 42). All other sites require "Alo further work". Short segments of the Ranch-age related walls that are within the South Makai alignment may be breached during construction but would regain their integrity upon repair at the conclusion of construction. Most of the general environs of the proposed Naxth and South Mauka alignments have been extensively modified and developed during historic times, with the exception of the undeveloped parcels of the South Makai alignment. This is described above in Section 3.1.7 Historic Archaeological Resources. The proposed water system improvements will focus on a narrow linear easement along the north boundary of the undeveloped parcels, thus, the cultural impact assessment focuses on the Ranch-age features. In assessing the impacts to Hawaii's culture and traditional and customary rights, we review the studies for the natural and the archaeological resources. Relevant paints include the following topics: ~ Agricultural, Gathering anal other Cultural Uses: In general, the Kona Field System integrated Hawaiian agricultural zones, as well as habitation uses, and other cultural uses. ~ Religlvus or spiritr~tal ctestoms. Though it is passible that religious or spiritual customs may have been practiced within the project area, na evidence of these customs was found. Interview: Mr. Stanle~Gpmes An interview was conducted with Stanley Domes at K.ahatuu at a location overlooking the undeveloped parcels. Stanley was born at Kahuluu, Kailua-Kona, on December 24,1935, and is the son of Joseph Games and the grandson of Manuel Games. Manuel Games (b. circa 1870 - d. circa 19S8) was a i 3• year old stow-away on a ship heading to Hawaii from Portugal. Three days out of Portugal, he was discovered but it was too late for the ship to turn around. Young Manuel was made the "Captain's bay" to pay far his passage. In Hawaii, Manuel met and married Maria, also from Portugal. They had 12 children, Joseph being the youngest. In 1927, Manuel Gornes purchased the Kahuluu and Waiaha ahupuaa from the Dona Development Company (previously, Dana Sugar Company), Kailua's only sugar cane company which operated briefly in the early I944's to 1926. Manuel established the Domes Ranch within these two ahupuaa, which extended from the sea coast to the mountains. 'The land where sugar cane was formerly raised was now actively used for cattle grazing and stockading until the late 1990's. Today, a small partio~r afthe Iand is still used for a few head of cattle. During World War II, the Dana Mill site, built in 1941, was used by the US Army as a training camp. The Mill smoke stack was dismantled and sold as scrap metal. Remnants of the Kona Sugar Mill are still present at Hienalali Raad near Hualalai Road. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASS~'S~MENr 29 i - - - ~ WAWIIA ~A•rl:x SlfSI'~~415 ( T41aI2'rII Ka~vA,1~TAWAII Stanley Gorrtes grew up on the ranch and has been a rancher since his chiIdhaod and youth. Throughout the years, Stanley estimafies that he has built l0 - lS miles of "dry" rack walls. As an adult he served on the Ilawaii Police Department far 25 years. Stanley was asked for any references of individuals who might have any cultural ar traditional ties with the property. Stanley was not able to identify any persons who had ties with. the property. Impacts and Mitigation Measures The construction of the Waiaha Water System -North and South alignments would temporarily affect access through poitians of the property. Upon its completion, however, the sub-grade transmission line and restoration of the surface conditions would allow resumption of access. Although na ~ traditional and customary uses have been identified, it is believed that after completion of construction and over the long-term, any uses of the project area could be resumed and no significant negative effects an Hawaii's culture ar individual's traditional and customary rights would result. ' ~.1a~ Alr t~uallly Setfina ~I The regional and local climate, together with the amount of human activity, generally dictates the air quality of a given location. The climate of Dana is warm. and humid, with average annual rainfall of ~ . SS to 60 inches. Winds are dominated by light but persistent northeast trade winds, especially in ~ summer. Air quality in the project area is currently affected by periodic volcanic enussians of sulfur dioxide ; convert into particulate sulfate that causes a volcanic haze (vog) that blankets the area during occasianaI episodes when. tradewinds are oat present. t ~ Impacts and Mitigation Measures The project will entail some grading and trenching over 0.78 mile for the North alignment, 0.84 mile for the South Mauka alignment, and 0.79 South Makai aligrunents. The construction activities aver a period of two years are not expected to affect air quality. Measures wilt be taken to minimize the fallowing: 1) fugitive dust from vehicle movement and soil excavation, and 2) excessive enussians from an-site construction equipment. Construction activities will comply with provisions of Hawaii Administrative l~.ules, Chapter 11-60.1, Air Pollution Control and Section 11-60.33, Fugitive Dust. Over the tang-term, the proposed water transmission lines apd reservoirs are situated to allow gravity ; flaw from the existing DWS Waiaha production well and reservoir source which is situated at the 1,50(f ft elevation. Pumping from the source will be minimal, thereby, minimizing electrical 11 Hollingshead, Annetta T., Steven Businger, Roland Draxler,lohn Porter, Duane Stevens (August 2002) Dispersion Modeling of the Kilauea Plume. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. Vog paper http://www,soest.hawaii.edu/MET/Faculty/businger/PDP/VOGPAPI~R,pdf ~IRiAL ~P1dI~aNivTEIYTAL AS~ESSR~t~NT 30 ~ WAIAHA WAT1aR SYSTEMS NORTH KONA, HAwA1I consumption locally at the project, as well as at the HELC4 generating source. Power usage, therefore, is minimized and impacts to air quality will be negligible. x.1,10 Noise Bettina The neighborhood through which the transmission lines will traverse is a mtx of rural, law density residential, and pastureland. There are no known noise generators, with the exception of traffic on the roadways. Impacts and Mitigation Measures The dominant noise sources during construction will result from using earth moving equipment, such as bulldozers and diesel-powered equipment, and generators far power tools. Noise from construction activities would be limited to daylight hours and weekdays. 'T'here will be na long-term noise effects on the surrounding neighborhood upon completion of the project. 3,1,1 Scelrlc Itesotna~ess Bettina The Kona districts have long attracted people because of their natural beauty. Although man-made structures are in same places dominant, the vast expanse of the Kona landscape is still the area's most striking feature. Part of Kana's natural beauty is also due to the wide range of climatic conditions in a relatively short distance. Such variations extending from the caastai areas to the higher elevations are evidenced by changes in vegetation, producing a wide scope of different physical environments. The County General Plan does not identify any locations within the project area that are notable for its natural beauty, however, it notes that this area is dominated by Hualalai, with its steep slopes providing a green backdrop when viewed from the coast, or spectacular views of the coastline, ocean and horizon from higher elevations. to Irn~ d Mitigation Measures Most of the project upon completion will not impact upon any natural beauty areas identified in the General Plan. The three new water tanks will be 23 feet high and wilt impact views from elevations above them. 3.2 SOCIDEC®NdDft~tlG C~~fAfltt~C'I`EPI~i'Y'IC~ Settin The population of Hawaii County has gmwn steadily since 1980. According to the 2000 U.S. Census, the County's population increased 23 per cent between 1990 and 2000. During the same period, the County of Hawaii General Plan RINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 31 f WAUr~9A WAT~4t SYSTEIdYS ~ NOIItT6i C~6DNA, T$AWAIi i State's population grew by 9 per cent. The district of Puna saw the largest increase at 51 percent, followed by South Kohala (44 percent), North Kohala (4t percent}, Kau (31 percent), North .Kona {2$ percent), South Kona (12 percent), North Hilo (12 percent}, Hamakua {10 percent), and South Hilo (6 percent). Table 10 depicts the population grrowth in North Kona between 190 - 2U00. 'T`able 10. T'opulatian 8rowtlt in Nortit Vona between 1980 -2000 1District 1980 1990 2000 1980 -1990 1990 - 2000 . % G6an 6 % GTl~on =e North Dona I3,748 22,284 28,543 62.1 28.1 In North Kona, spurred primarily by the employment opportunities created by the expanding visitor industry, population has greatly increased over the last 34 years. The growth of the visitor industry in recent years can be largely attributed to the expansion of runway and terminal facilities at Dona International Airport at Kcahole, which now permits the arrival ofnational and international direct flights. ~ ~ Imp`aets and Miti,, a~ti'on Measures 'T'he current I~WS infrastructure will not sustain growth in North Kona. The implementation of the subject Waiaha Water Systems as proposed herein is consistent with the County of Hawaii General Plan. There will be construction related jobs for a period ofapproximately two years, followed by increased property tax revenue to the County as surrounding lands are built out in the future to accommodate the projected growth, as evidenced in the county General Plan LUPAG designation of Urban Expansion Area for much of the project area.. i 3.3 1<hIF'~AS"l['ll&~7~'1<'IJ 3.3x1. I~oaalways Bettina 'T'he project area is accessed by several roadways as shown in Table 11. ' County of Hawaii General Plan. ± ~+'[NAI. ~NVILtoNM~NTAd., ASSESSl4flENT i 32 ' WAiAHA WATT SYSTEl1~8 NORTH KO1VA, KAWAII Table 11. Affected Roadways is the Project Area Pro'ect 5~e ment Roadw fywnershi NortB Mamalahoa Hi wa Coun Unnamed GC Road Private Hienaloli Road Coun South Mautca Mamaialtoa H' wa Coun _ Knn~ila Place Private oke a Estates _ Pu Hoala Piave connect to Private South Mahal Hienaloli Road Coun Hualatai Road Coun een Kaahumunu Extension State Impacts and Miti a~ -five. Measures The proposed action will require construction vehicles to access the sites during a period of several months for grading, excavation of the trench for the transmission lines, hauling building materials, pipe installation, and paving over the installation, as well as construction of the three reservoirs. Construction will be phased over atwo-year period with the initial construction of the North alignment, followed by the South Mauka alignment, and finally the South Makai alignment. Construction in the rights-of way of roadways will disrupt traffic flow and induce short delays for motorists. The connection to the DWS existing transmission main within the Mamalahoa highway right of--way will occur at the top of the North and South Mauka alignments. In general, the work within the County roadways (Mamalahoa Highway, Hienaloli Road, and T~lualalai Road) will experience the most delays. White mast of the construction will be on private roadways with limited traffic, there will be increased traffic flaw on connecting roadways that could cause disruptions in traffic flow. Thus, a traffic control plan during the construction period wilt include the following guidelines and measures: Traffic Safety and Flaw ® Specify a circulation plan for each of the three transmission alignments Far each of the alignments, North, South Mauka, and South Makai, transport of materials will originate from the Kawaihae direction and turn right on the Queen Kaahumanu Extension afi Hualalai Road. a Limit roadwork on major thoroughfares to off-peak hours ~ Prior to construction on major thoroughfares, notify the County Traffic Division, Police Departrnen#, and State Departmenfi of Transportation Highways Division, as applicable. Q Traffic control personnel will be hired during peak traffic periods at major intersections, as needed FtNAi. E1VVIRONi1~NTAI. ABSit"9sM~Nt' 33 _ _ ( YVpA~IAyp,S~1,+A Mp,Yt`A~~ryic.~plg?a+s7. `411.`~IrY.ts , 1V aY[1 ii®li A,.II~AtY~EI Strategies far Pedestrian Safety ~ All trenches will be cordoned with portable barriers and/or construction cones ar flagging. Emergency Response ~ All construction supervisors will be trained to assess emergency situations, and respond with prapcr actions. © Ernergcncy 41 I calls will be initiated, as warranted. Upon the completion of construction, and over the long,-term, the installation of this water system will have no negative impacts to traffic. x.3.2 I.Ttilifies Setting Electrical power to the facilities is supplied by Ilawaii Electric bight Company (I IEI,C4}, a privately- awned utility company, via its netwarlc of overhead lines in the project area. Telephone service is available from Hawaiian telcom along area roadways but is not rcquired for the project. There are no public wastewater systems in the project area; but such systems are not necessary for the praject. i Impacts and Mitigative Measures 'The project will potentially have a signif carat beneficial impact on existing electrical facilities and HELCtJ's ability to provide electricity, first, the DWS Waiaha praductiata well, located upslope of the North and South transmission alignments, has sufficient head at Mamalahoa Highway to allow gravity flaw into bath proposed transmission lines. 'Thus, the three proposed reservoirs are designed as gravity flow pressure roclucing tanks and pump stations will riot be required, thereby significantly mitigating energy consumption. Secondly, the DWS existing North K.ana system relies on several pump stations ~ to transmit the low-level aquifer resource (I~ahrYluu shaft) to service its customer base along the higher elevation slopes of Mt. Hualalai. Upon completion of the subject praject, the Waiaha water resource i will replace the Kahaluu resource, and DWS would potentially be able to reduce pumping to same of its customers, and reduce its energy consumption. 3.~ ~I+',C4~.411{t~' A1~lIlD GI.II~~JL.~,'T'IV~ PACTS The development of the Waiaha Water Systems NaYth and South transmission lines and reservoirs fulfills a mandate of tlae Department of Water Supply to provide high-quality service to its customers , in existing service areas. The implementation of these improvements, whether constructed by the , DWS or a private developer (as proposed) serves the overall North Kana community. The installation of new transmission lines (as proposed} would efficiently utilize the available high- ~ level Waiaha water and will allow DWS to reduce (ar cease} pumping of the Kahaluu shaft ~IIYAL ~NVIRa1VML;NTAL As3ES5I4YlEtVT 34 , 'i WAIAIHA WATER ~1t3TEM8 PItDRTII ICQNA, ~$AWArI While Waiaha System, LLC and Waiaha System II, LLC are allowed 1,500 units of water as described in the Agreements, the allocations will be over a period of 20 years and will be synchronized with the overall growth of North Kona, as articulated in the General P1an's classification of Urban Expansion Area for a portion of the project area. Any future land development actions would be subject to all existing land use laws Cumulative impacts result when implementation of several projects that individually have limited impacts combine to produce more severe impacts ar conflicts in mitigation measures. The adverse effects of the project, the construction of a water system, would have very minor and temporary disturbance to air quality, noise, visual resources, water service, and traffic flow during construction are very limited in severity, nature, and geographic scale. FAVAL ENVIRONMENTAL ~ASSES5MENT 35 ~AIAIIA, "4~IAT~It S~fs7'I;109s t~1C1It rFi g{aNA, II3(AWAIH The provisions of Tiile 11, Environmental Impact Statement Mules, Section 11-2Q0-17(f) require an analysis of the alternatives which could attain the objectives of the action, while minimizing potential adverse enuironmental impacts. l~i~ ~C'~'I~I~I' This alternative would involve no near term use of the available Vtlaiaha production well water resource, This available high-level water resource would remain untapped until such time when the Water Hoard and DWS fund the transmission facilities through the capital improvement projects program, secure appropriate easements through private lands, and contract far the design and construction of a comparable system, The County would also forgo the unique opportunity of a private developer funding the ~ 13.5 million project and obtaining the requisite easements through private property to complete the installation of the facilities at approximately 30 percent of the projected cost. The delay of adding the Waiaha water resource to supplement the North I~.ona water system would require continued demand on and potentially further compromise the 1Cahaluu Shaft wells, and thereby adversely affect the North Dana community drinking water supply. ~.2 CQ~'?C'~f ~lC~~~..~1~11~18` d'9~+`'~'ll~ ~IA~'.t~~tl~ ~"~~l~fSI~~SS~Q~I~ ~,l~le~? ~'ll'~D1i~~lC Postponing the construction of a comparable water transmission and storage system solely by the DWS would delay bringing the Waiaha high-level resource on-line to DWS customers by several years. The continued averpumping of the 1Cahaluu shaft. wells would result in declining water quality and the potential inability to meet peak demand, including flreflow requirements. ~IPIAE. EPCV1Rfl1YMENTAi, A~fiES.41?lfEA1T 36 I VNAYAMA VYATER SYSTEMS 1VORTH ~iUNA, HAWAII sso Tex su~~~~~z~~ ~~~~z~~~ To determine whether the proposed action may have a significant impact on the environment, every phase and expected consequences, bath primary and secondary, and the cumulative as well as short- and long-terns. effects afthe proposed project have been evaluated. Based on the studies conducted and research evaluated, a finding of no significant impact is anticipated as summarized in this section. 5.1 SiCGI~~FIC~.1~tCE CRI'1'ER~A According to the Department of Health Rules (11-200-12}, an applicant or agency must determine whether an action may have a significant impact an the environment, including all phases of the project, its expected consequences bath primary and secondary, its cumulative impact with other projects, and its short and Lang-term effects. In making the determination, the Rules establish "Significance Criteria" to be used as a basis £ar identifying whether significant environmental impact will occur. According to the Rules, an action shall be determined to have a significant impact on the environment if it meets any one of the fallowing criteria: {1} lrrevaeahle lass ®r destructlaer of valuable resources. The North and South Mauka alignments are within graded roadways, and the South Makai alignment is within grated pastureland. Botanical resources consist primarily of alien roadside grasses and pasture grass with the exception of a few commonly occurring native species. The archaeological resources that may be affected include aRanch-era enclosure and short segments of walls within the undeveloped South Makai alignment. 1'he State Historic Preservation Division has approved the completed archaeological inventory surveys for two of the vacant parcels (TMK: 7-5-017: 42, 43} and concurred that "no further work" is required fortheRanch-era affected sites beyond what is recorded in the inventory surveys. The surveys far parcels TMK: 7-5-017: 40 and 41 are presently under review. {Z} C~artaale the range of beneficial uses of the a»viranima~eart. No restriction of beneficial uses of the alignments would occur. Upon the completion of construction, the existing roadways would be re-paved and continue to be utilized as roadways. The pipe of the South Makai segment would besub-grade with a new paved roadway, and would not curtail any future uses. {3} Canffiicts with the State's laaag-teran envirananental policies ax' gaols and gceadelie~es as expressed in Chapter 3441, ~I18S. The proposed project is consistent with the environmental policies set forth in the State Plan and Chapter 344, Hawaii Revised Statutes. The broad goal of this policy is to conserve the natural resources and enhance the quality of life. Utilizing the high-level Waiaha production well water resource will greatly reduce risk to the Kahaluu resource which is currently being averpumped. The FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 37 WAIAIiA WA'r~B SYSTEMS ~IaRTE9 ~tOiVA, HAWAII infusion of the Waiaha resource iota the North Iona Water System will reduce salt-water infiltration at the lower elevation. Fixe flaw capacity will be established, water quality will improve, and overall quality of life will be enhanced. SuD~stantiaUy siffects tlae eeeinomie ar soeiai welfare of the ceirrerrneanity yr state. The proposed transmission lines and storage reservoirs arc intended to provide a continuing supply of water to existing residents of North Kana and to accommodate the growth provided for in the County of Hawaii General Plan. It will not have an adverse effect an economic or social welfare except that it allows DVS to assure its customers that they are receiving the best quality water at the lowest cast, consistent with the maintenance of environmental quality. {S} Soabstti~ntiai&y aff~ts puhlie health. The overall public health will be unproved by the infusion of quality high-level potable water into the Narth Kana Water System. The prajcct will not adversely affect air ar surface water quality, nor will it generate solid waste or produce other emissions that would significantly affect public health. Noise levels attributed to construction would be abated by measures that the County will require, {6) Involves substantial secondary irzapaets, soach as pmpulatiota sh:inges ar ef$"ects on public facilities. The project will not produce significant secondary impacts. Rather, the project implements the existing plans and policies of the DWS and the County ofI-lawaii. I`ilvolves a substantial degradaifiom off envir+aaarnenfal quality. The limited construction period will involve grading, noise, and same congestion an the roadways; however, mitigation measures will minimize those impacts. C3ver the fang-term, the new water source will improve envirolunental quality to the overall water resource in Narth Dana. Is indis~idatal~ limited &aelt eumtnlativel~r has eonside~ble affect oat the errvir onnment, ail" indalves a eoi~ainita~nent far larger actions. Development ofthe Waiaha Water System allows the existing Waiaha production well resource to be utilized as intended by County of Hawaii and DWS plans and policies. Presently only 25 percent of the available 2 million gallons per day is pumped into existing ]DWS transmission lines. The proposed action involves the installation of infrastructure by private parties, through private lands, and using private funds. 'I'bis represents a unique opportunity to bring the remaining 75 percent of the available water resource online at a significantly reduced cost to the public. The Waiaha water would be committed over a maximum period of 20 years and would accantmadate growth as defined by the General Plan LUPAG designation of Urban Expansion Area. All future land development actions would be subject to existing land use laws, FINAL Errv112a1Vti~C1N;1V'rAL ASSESSA~tE1WT 38 ~vnwr,? w~a~a ~xs~r~ms tvo~x t~an~~, Hnwnn The proposed action is intended primarily to replace existing water withdrawals froxrt low-level sources. Continued withdrawals from these low-level sources at the current rates have the potential of harming the potable water quality in the system and even. irreparably damaging the aquifer. (9~ Substantially a~'ects a rare, tlrreateried ar eaada~rsgered species or its llabi~t. The North and South alignments contain no rare, threatened, or endangered species or habitat, and will have no effect an the biological resources of the area, (1~) I~etrircaentall~r affects air ar water garalBty oar arnbia~nt n+aise levels. l3evelopmcnt and operation of the project will not have a measurable effect on air and water quality. Noise levels during canstructian will be regulated through the building plan process, but will have no long-term effects at completion. (A l~) Afffects nr Bs likeAy to suffer damage by beaaag located in an ertviroaatx~eratally seaasitive area, such as a fflaad plain, tstaraarrri gone, beach, ersosiorn-prone area, geaiogicaB~y Bna~arilaus land, estreary, freslnwaker, ar eoa~stat waters. The island of Hawaii as a whale is subject to geologic hazards such as earthquakes and lava flows. However, the project area is not stay more subject to earthquakes and lava flows than any other prospective sites in the region. All construction will conform to the Uniform. Building Cade far Earthquake Zama 3. (IZ) Substantially ufffects scenic vistas grad view planes ldemtified in couatty or state plate or s4~udies. The proposed facilities are not within any scenic areas designated by the General k'lan. The reservoirs will be 23 feet talc, but will neat obstruct view planes dine to the naxural slaps of the corridors. (A~) Requires srabstantial energy eonsuxnptiarw, The long term operation would reduce energy consumption because the new Waiaha system facilities are downslope of the water resource and will be served by gravit~+ flaw. In addition, when the "VVaiaha system is integrated into the North Kona distribution system, DWS would have the option to reduce pumping the low-level water to customers located at higher elevations, thereby reducing energy consumption. 5.2 lDE'C~ l~Tt~?TxC~~ In accordance with Chapter 343, Hawaii Revised Statutes, this EA has examined the enviroanax~ental and technical aspects of the proposed project. Fn considering the significance of potential envixanxnental effects, the sum of effects on the quality of the environment was considered and the overall and cumulative effects of the action were evaluated. Every phase of the proposed action, the expected consequences, both primary and. secondary, and the cumulative as well as the shorfi and long term affects of the action were considered, ~'nvAa. E1VVIitU~iM~nrrna. Assr 39 l~AtAYiA ~AT~It S'YST~lbi3 I~IUD2'Cli ~oNA, ~AWAiY As a result of these considerations, it is determined that ~e proposed action will not significantly impact the environment, based ozi the significance criteria listed in 11-20Q•12 of the 1 "nvirar~mental Impact Statement Rules and addressed below. Therefore, a "Finding of No Significant Impact" (F{~~TSI) bass been issued by the Approving Agency for this project. FINAL EIVS~[Y2.4ZN~ENTAL ~i~.S~SibYENT 40 WAiA~t WATER SYSrF;MS NQitTti Kt~NA, HAWAII 1~ ~ dea ~~1 E~'Y`~ AID 'I'he Draft EA was published by OE(~C %n the :March 8, 20QSTheEnvironmental Notice. The 34-day comment period ended on Apri17, 2048. The Applicant consulted or distributed the Drat EA to the list afagencies, arganizatians, and individuals fisted in Section 1.5 vfthe Final EA. The fallowing agencies provided comments vn the Draft EA. These comment letters and the Applicants responses are included in this sectian. County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply Planning Department Police Department Hawaii Fire Department State of l~iawaii Department of Land and Natural l2esvurees, Land Division Department of Health, Environmental Planning Glffice Department of Transportation {)ffice of I Iawaiian Affairs Federal Ag~nexes CJS National Park Servic® t? F.awrrnor~tu~rrrn~. ~ss~saM~rrr 41 l F 7aTFR . i ~oa <t ( ~ i i 7 o r s C?~~~~'1'l~~l~'~" ~F UlIAT~R ~tJ~I..Y ~tiU~~'~ i'~~UilA1 1 fr " ~ ;`r ~ 345 KEKCiANAO'A S7REE7, SUITE 20 ° Nllq, HAWAI'! 9ti720 • P NHwP 1 7ELEPNgNE (808) 861-805D p PAX (808) 961-8657 April 8, ZU08 Yukie ()hashi Pfannittg Cansultaitt P.O. I3ox 7f36 Vgfcano, III 96785 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT WAIAIIA WA"L'k;It SYSTEMS (Ti2ANSMLSSI4N MAINS AND RESERVOIRS} "I'AX MAF KEY 7~5-oil, pit, O1G, AND tti? We have t•evier~ved ilia subject Draft Invirantnental Assessment (DEA) and have the fallawing comments. 1. Page 2, Paragraph 3: Shahid be revised tq state that oversizitig of the water system itnpt•oventents will be reitnbutsed by the "Water I3aard" and oat the "Gotutty." 2. Figure l: Please shave the sizelcapaCity of the proposed improvements (i.c. 16-inch transmission line and f •U MG water tanl€s). 3. Figures 2A and 213: Sltattld be revised to shave the ~'Vaiaita North transtnissign waterNtte extending tq Natti Kailaa Drive at Hiettaiali Raad" Phase also show the size/capacity afthe prapased impravemettts. 4. Page 1 S: Should ba revised to state that the waterline easements for the 16-inch waterlines will be 20-feet t•vide, 5. Page 23, Section 3.1.4, Paragraph 5: Shgtllci be revised to state that the average daily usage from the I~ahaluu Shaft and Wells is appraxunately 7 MOD. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr Finn 1bicCal(afaur Water Resaut`ces and Planning Hrattch at 96I-807Q, extension 255. Since~t~ly°`~ Ctrs, Mil n .Pavan, P.£r. Ma alter k FM:dfg copy - State of Hawaii, Office ofl~ttviranntental Qt lit Catttral ` Ut/cst~er~ fawcra<~3 ~a~o~r"~~~... The Department of Water Supply is an Equal gpportunity provider and employer To file a complaint at discrimination, write, USDA, Director, gtflce of Clvii Rights, Rcom 326-W, Whitten Building, 141h and Independence Avenue, SW, Washing€on DG 202509410 Dr call (202? 72D-5984 (voice and TDD) 0~ Al~laning Consultant L.LC rely 2, 2448 Mr. Milton D. Favaa, F. E. Manager Department of Water Supply County of Hawaii 345 Kekuanaaa Street, Suite 24 Hilo, I-II 9b'724 SUIBJECT: Waiaha Water Systems ~Transmissian Maiws and Reservoirs) Response to Comments on the Draft Ts,nvironmental ~asessmetlt Dear 1vlr. Favaa: We have received your letter dated April 2408. The foilovving responds to your comments. The EA has been revised to address your comments; 1. Page 2, Paragraph3; Reimbursement will be by the Water Board. 2. Piguresl, 2A, 213, 3A, 3C: The Legend lies been revised to indicate the size/capacity of the proposed impravexlaents. 3. Figures 2A; The North transmission lix~ is shown extending through TMK: 7-5-12:1 b (tu be canshvcted by Others) to Hienalali ltaad at the Mani I~ailua Street intersection. 4. Through consultation with Mr. Kurt .Inaba of the Engineel~tng Section, the waterline easements for the 1b-inch waterlines have been determined to be a laninimum of 1S-feet wide. 5. Page 23, Section 3.1.4, Paragraph 5: 'Fhe statement regarding the Kahaluu shad is revised to state `[the present average water usage is 7.4 MC1D." Thank you for your participation and review of the Draft EA. Sincerel yo ? ~i u Planning Consultant c: Waiaha Systems, LLC Waiaha Systems lI, LLC PD Bax 786 / Voleeno. Howell 88T861 Ph; 808.88S.22Rit J Rex; 888.988.8181 .y ~~'v'~"' i~''v I~l?~i r Cht~sS~o~t~4~x I'utrn ; Mayor ~ b,_ : 4, °~0j'o'~;'~~~o~' ifrad Kuttitt~w~, 1.~~1~® ELP' Deputy pirector (~~~~tt~ ~~tgg P~.~N~I~~ FART' ~'T' 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 * Hilo, Nawau 96720-4224 (808} 961-8288 • FAX (808) 961.8742 ApY11 20t18 Waiaha Water Systems clo Yukie C?hashi Platlzlitlg Consrtltat~t F<C}. 13ox 78~ Volcano 1-II ~&785 Dear Ms. Gthaslli: SUBJECT: t}rs~ft E1lvirontneiltal ~~ssessmenf Applicant: Waiaha System, LLC i111d Waiaha System lt, L1.C I'raject: Waiaha Water Systems ('Cransmissian Ntai~ls and Reservoirs) "riV1I{: North 7-5-11:14, 27 & 38; '7-5-12:14-4ti & 48 Snufll lwlallka 7-5-] G:1S-17, 29, 88-95 & 102-1.03 South Nlakai 7-5-17:11, 30 & 40-43 Lacatio~l; i~orfh Kona, Hawaii `This to acknowledge receipt of your submittal an March 6, 2008 requeSting ouT C01n111C11tS 011 a Draft Envirotlme~ltal Assessment For the proposed Waiaha Water Systems project. T11e project consists of the development ©f the Waiaha well resource distrib~ttian system including two transmission tx1ai11s and tluYce rescrvairs, along two routes bctweell Mamalallaa Iiighwa,y and Tlienaloli Eaad a11d ~~a11°laiahoa Highway a11d Q±1eCZ1 l~aallulnaiiu kligllway. We affirm the State and County land use designations and that t11e project is not within the County's Special lVianagemctlt Area. In reference to the South Mauka system starting at Kalipa Place, please note that the officially recognized and approved name is Kamila Place. according to the Hawaii County Cade, Section 25-4-11(a), "Contttazrrrzcatioft, tr"rrrxsrnissiorz, arzd po~v~r di~~es caf patlztic artd przvrzte utrlrties card gaverr~naenta! agerzcr~s ~z~•~ perr~~itt~~d ustis tivztlrzn cony clastrrct. " Therefore, the proposed project is considered a perrllitted usc< Hawai `d County is an Squad Qppartunity 1'rr~vFder and 13mptayer. Ms. Yukie Olzashi Planning Consultant Page 2 April 7, 200$ However, Hawaii County Cade, Chapter 25, Section 25-4-11(b) further states that "A~ry siibstutiati used by a public utility far the purpose of f arrzis/~i~rg teXepliane, gas, electricity, water, radio, or televisioir shall be a perrriitterl use in any district provided that the use is Prot haaardous or dangerous to the sirrroundir:g area and the director has issued plait approval far such use. " Therefore, `1 able 7. Required State azzd County Permits and Approvals on Page 19 should also include Plan ,Approval review prior to obtaining a building permit far the proposed irnpravemezzts. if you have questions, please feel free to cozztact Esther Iznarrzura at 961-8288, ext. 257, Sincerely, CHRISTOPHER r. "YtJEN Planning Directar ETI;pk p;~wpv~mbCl\E7'ItCiAdraflPr~-cansultUh~shi v~a~alta'4i+Ss N Kana.rtf xc: Office of Environmental Quality Control 235 South Beretania Street, Suite '702 Honolulu HI 96$ 13 Department of Water Supply 345 Kekuanaoa Street, Suite 20 Hilo HI 96720 Yukie Ohashi Planning Consultant P.Q. Box 786 Volcano Hl 96785 Planning Departmezzt,l{.ona Planning Consultant LL.C July 2, 200$ Mr. Christopher J. Yuen, Planning I?irector County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Paualu Street Suite ~ Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4224 SUiiJEC1': Waiaha Water Systems (Transmission Mains and Reservoirs) Response to Comments on the ]Draft Environmental Assessment Dear Mr. Yuen: V~Te have received your letter dated April 200$. The following responds to your comments. We have corrected. the spelling of the South Mauka originating location at Mamalahoa Highway as °Kamila Flace'. We acknowledge that Plan Approval review in accordance with Hawaii County Cade, Chapter 2S, Section 25-4-11 (b} will be required. 'fable 7 in the Final EA has been revised to reflect that requirement. Thank you for your participation and review of the Draft EA. Sincerely yours k KIE 4HASHl Planning Consultant iaO Box 788 !Volcano, Hawaii 98785 J Ph: 808.98b.22221 Fax: 848.885,9131 / yohashi@hawaitantei.ne! Harry Kim i,4~'• Lawrence K. Mabuna n~ny~~ Poll~~ Ck+~•~ r; `a :k. , .~`~:o~°~Ayi+~~` Harry S. IfuboJiri !)epury Police f klef C~1~,~ e~ I3a~r~.ii POLICE DEPARTMENT 349 tCapiolani Street • t{ilo, ttawaii 96720-3998 (808 935-331 t s Fax (808) 9fit -2389 March 1 Mr. Yukie phashi Planning Consultant P.Q. Box 786 Volcana3 Hawaii 96785 Dear Mr. Ohashi: SUBJECT: Waiaha Water Systems (Transmission Mains and Reservoirs) This responds to your March 4, 200$ letter requesting comments on any special environrnental conditir~ns ar impacts related to the project. Staff recommends that the Environmental Assessment address the #'allowing during the construction stage: ` ~ Traff c safety and flow. • Emergency response. • Strategies to address pedestrian safety. Should you have any questions, please contact Acting Captain Chad Basque, Commander of Kona Patrol, at 326-4646, extension 249. Mahalo, LAWRENCE K. MAC=tt7NA POLICE CHIEF ~a ; HE Y J~ ~AVARES ASSI T ' 'T CHIEF ~ AREA II OPERATIONS CB "Hativai'i County is ar? Tsyquat opportunity Pravrder and Employer" Planning C©nsultant LLB July 2, 2008 Mr. Lawrence K. Mahuna, Police Chief Mr. Henry J. Tavares Jr., Assistant Chief (Area lI Operations} Hawaii Police Department County of l iawaii 349 Kapiolani Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720-3998 SUBJECT: Waiaha Water Systems {Transmission Mains and Reservoirs) Response to ~amments ot~ the Draft EnvirQnmentay Assessment Dear Chief Mahuna: We have received your letter dated Marchl0, 200$. The fallowing responds to your comments. While most of the construction will be an private roadways with limited traffic, there will be increased traffic flow an connecting roadways that could cause disruptions in traffic flow. Thus, a traffic control plan during the construction period will include the fallowing guidelines and measures: Traffic Safety and Flow ~ Specify a circulation plan for each of the three transmission alignments For each of the alignments, North, South Maulca, and South Makai, transport of materials will originate from the Kawaihae direction and tum right on the Queen l{aahurnanu l;xtension at Hualalai Road. ® Limit roadwork on major thoroughfares to off-peak hours ~ Prior to construction an major thoroughfares, notify the County Traffic Division, Police Department, and State Department of Transportation Highways Division, as applicable. ~ Traffic control personnel will be hired during peak traffic periods at major intersections, as needed. Strategies far Pedestrian Safety • All trenches will be cordoned with portable barriers and/or construction cones ar flagging. PO Bnx 7861 Yalcana, HawaU 96786! Ph; 8A8.986.22281 Pax: 8Q8.9$6.8131 1 yohashf@hawa!lantei.net Mr. Lawrence K_ Mahone, Police Chief Page 2 of ~ Emergency Response ~ All construction supervisors will be trained to assess emergency situations, and respond with proper actions. ~ Emergency 911 ca11s wi11 be initiated, as warranted. Thank you for your participation and review of the Draft EA. Sincerely yours, I\\//~~~JJ\//~~ ~/\j/~J\f `V ~ r UKIE ~HASHI Planning Consultant 2 3,~SY.rN,k4 , Darryl .T. Oliveira Harry Kim tidynr ~ i'IYP f.Jrtef a, NAB°~` Glen P.I. klanda !)eprtty Ffrt Chief ~GL~ ~1J ld d 4 L~ ~ L f~ G' l~t ii ` ~ d , IHtA"tN,AI`X 1~'IR1E l©EPAR'JCNIl~N'lC 2S Aupasii Street a Suike 103 a Fiilo, Eiasvai`E 96720 (808)981-839A • Fax(808)9$1-2037 March 17, ~aa$ Yukie Qhashi Planning Cons~lltant I'C) I3ox 786 Volcano, Ilawaii 967&S SUBJECT: DRAF"C ENVIRC3NMENTAL ASSESSMENT WAIAI~A WATER SYSTEMS {TRANSMISSI(}N MAINS AND RESERVOIRS) TAX. MAP KT;YS: NOR'1I-I (3~~ 7-5-11:14, 27, 38; ?-S-I2:~4, $S, r16, 48 SOU°I"H MAUKA (3~") 7-5-16:15, 16, 17, 29, 88- 95, 1a2, 103 SOUTH MAKAI (3~~') 7-5-17:11, 3a, 4Q-43 We have no camn~ents to offer at this time in reference to the a6ave-mentioned Draft Envirornnental Assessment, ' a ' %~t ~ 1 ~R L QLIVEIRA Fire Chzef I'BW:lpc CC: CQH Department of Water Supply Office of Envirorunental Quality Control artF,~ x~' ~ `A+S!(TM Natnrtr't County +s nn Eclcant Opporfunity Pmvrder and Eruployer. r~ H~~ w ~ Planning Carlsulfanf LLG July 2008 Mr. T)arryl Oliveira, Fire Chief Hawaii Fire Department County of Hawaii 2S Aupuni Street, Suite 103 Hilo, HaWati 96720 S~CTSJECT: Waiaha Water Systems (Transmission mains aad Reservoirs} Response to Comments on the Draft Environmental Assessment Dear Chief pliveira: We thank for your letter dated Marahl7, 2008. We note that you have no coznrnents to offer at this time. Thank you far your participation and review of the Draft EA. Sincerely yours YUKIE OHASHI Planning Consultant PO Sox 788 I Volcano, Hawaii 98788 ! Ph; 808.986.2222 !Fax: 808.988.9131 ! yohashi(~hawallantet.nat }[nDAElNGt.~ ap u' ~ aaartacnLAtnaah~N~nn~=k,~l,a~atnrerks WVEft\`CtR CIF IiA1VA11 ~ ~ CC32+4htS'~IOH fR. WA'1kR RF3BURCL MANAGkBdkNf nd and ®(1.a ~td6~'~I r~ " " STATE QF HAWAII - ~ DEPAEtTiV1EN'C qI' LAND ANA NA7"UttAL ItESOUItCE 5 i.ANn a~visxarv sra~eatH~aa POST OF~iGi%BOX 621 iiONOLUi.U,FiAWAIi 96K09 April 3, 200$ Waialla Water Systems Yukie Ohashi Planning Consultant f3oX 786 "Volcano, ilawaii 90785 Gentlemen; Subject: Draft Environmental Assessment for Waiaha Water Systems, North Dona, Hawaii Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Department of Land and Natural Resources' {DLNR) Land Division distributed or made available a copy of you~• report pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR Divisions for their review and comment. Other than the comments from Engineering Division, the Department of Land and Natural Resources has no other comments to offer on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call our office at 587-0433. Thank you. Sincerely, Morris IvI. Arta Administrator LAURA N. TN~SI,TtN LIIVI2A1,1?~Gl.~ t ~ ~b x°}!*uas~av P 'r tk»icu r~x tn~ts nvv:~ain~ns. w,srtxc~s covsax~a oP tin~vttt r ixt+~rsc~nti~~at~a ats~cmc~a~a*:~~aes+a~r ` ~ STATE C}F HAWAII A~PART1~IiSNT Q~ LA~1U AND NATURtIL RESUURCFS LA~[A UIVISIaI~t x sra~otNavrO~' PAST aNFICE sax 621 IIpNaI.ULU, tIAVt+AII 96809 .March 7, 2008 ~ : ^v t~.. . - . ~a F ; T4: DLNR Agencies: _Div. of Aquatic Resources ~ ~ ~ _Div, of E cea ecreation .ra _ ngincering Divis' ~ *.a ~~~~t•estry & Wildlife Div. of State Parks x CommISSIan on Water Resource Management _pfflce of Canservatian Coastal Lands xLand Division - Hawaii District FROM: g Morris M. Atta SUBJECT. Draft Environmental Assessment for Waiaha Water Systems LQCATIQN: North Kona, Hawaii APPLICAI'JT: Waiaha Water Systems Transmitted far your review and comment aIi the above referenced doeulx~ent. We would appreciate your comments on this document, Please submit any comments by April 1, 2008. Tf na response is received by this date, we will assume your agency kiss no cominexlts. If you have any questions about this request, please contact my office at 587-0433. Thank you. Attachments ( ) We have Ira objections. ( ) We have no carnments. ( Comments are attached. Signed: ~ Date; DEPAR'T`l1'IENT (7F T,AJVA AND 1VATUI2AL R)CSUUT2CI;S F1~IGINETsTtTI~tG T)IVISIdN 1.1{lYtorrtsAtta i2I;E: DEAforVVaiahaWaterSystems Ha~vaii,001 CdMMT?NTS (X) We confirm that Dart of the project site, according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), is located in Flood Zone AE. The National Fuod Insurance Program regulates developments within AF as indicated in bold letters below. (X} Please take Hate that the remainder of the project site, according to the Flood Insurance Rata Map (FIRM), is located in Flood Zane X. The National Flood Insurance Program does Hat have any regulations far developments within Zone X Please note that tl3e correct F~ load Lane ©esignatian far the project site according to the Flaad tnsurance Rate Map (FIRM} is (X) Please note that the project site must comply with the r~?Ies a~td regulations of the Natianat Flood Insurance Program (NETT') presented in Title 44 of tlae Cade of Fcderat Regulations (4~iCl~ R), ~vheticver develaprnent within a Special Flood T-Tazard Area is untlertalten. Tf there are. any questions, please contact the State 1VT'TP Caordit?atar, Ms. Carol Tyau-Beam, of the Department of Gand and Natural Resources, Engineering Division at (808) 587-0267. Please be advised that 44CFR indicates the mininrt~tn standards set forth by tl~e NFII'. Your Community's local flood arduance may prove to be snore restrictive and thus tape precedence aver the minimum NFTP standards. If there are questions regarding the Local flaod ordinances, please contact the applicable County NFIP Coordinators beln~v: Mr, TtaL~et•t Suniimoto at (808) 523-4254 or l~Ir, Maria Stu I.i at (808} 523-4247 of the City and County of Honolulu, Department a#`Punning and Permitting. (X) Mr. Kelly Gomel at (808) 961-8327 (Hilo) ar Mr. TCiran Emle~• at (808) 327-3530 (Kona} of the County of Hawaii, Department of Publie Warles. O Mr. Francis Cerro at (808) 270-7771 ofthe Gounty ofMaua, Department of Planning. Mr. Mario Antonia at (808) 241-d620 of the County of Kauai, Depa~~nent of Public Works. Tl~e applicant should include project water demands and infrastructure required to meet water demands. Please Hate that the implementation of any State-sponsored projects requiring water servace fi•am the 1-ionalulu F3aard of Water Supply system must first obtain water allacatian credits from the Engineering Division before ~t can receive a building pern~it andlor water meter. T'he applicant should provide the water demands and calculations to the ingineering Division so it can be included in the State Water Projects Plan Update, Additional Comments: _ _ - 5hcauld you have any questions, please call Mr. Dennis Irrtada ofthe Planning Branch at 587-Q257. Signed' _ - _ - l:I2IC 1'. I IIRAN(~ CHIEF ENGINEER ~ Date: ~ Planning Consultant LLC July 2, 2008 Mr. Morris M. Atta, Administrator State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources Land Division PO $ax 621 Honolulu, Hawaii 96809 SU1i~lECT: Waiaha Water Systems (Transmission lViains and Reservoirs) ltespanse to Comments an the ]Draft Enviroumentai Assessment Dear Mr. Alta: We have received your letter dated April 3, 2008 and the attached Engineering Division comments. The following responds to your comments. You confirm that a small portion ofthe pmject is in th+a Flood Zone AE and the remainder 4fthe project site is in Zone X. Any construction in Zone AE will comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFtP} as presented in Title ~4 of the Code of Federal Regulations (~4CFR} and will also comply with the County of Hhwaii Department of Public Works' requirements. Thank you for your participation and review of the Draft EA. SincereAly yours, yy/ /f/~/) j ~„/I~IEWi L[~f3~~ ~'VI l(55'7Y7 \\\...r.~"rF• Planning consultant PC? Box 786 ! Vafcano, Nawati 96785 t Ph: 608.985.2222 t Fax; 808.965,9131 ! yohasht~hawailantel.net t .,4 «N~ LAURA ti. TtgRl 6?~F ~p ~}iatnr~RS~+ L1NpA I,I\GLC a, ~ p, t3o~kua} t.~.*ron.+,~a++atvaT,l Rk~av~Re}s GOVERt Y)R QF F1AWA71 ~a CUM~~65Si(m 0.4't~nTER R}?~ptRC} }Kt»'~AG>;~.i'hT' 'Rt ~4and and,~~4r~/ ~ts"~ ~ STATE QF HAWAII DEPARTMENT QF 1.A1~[D AND 1VATCII2AG 1tESOi1RCE5 t.~1l~n AIV`ISla~l $ra~~~ft~` POST OrFIGE BOX 621 1-IONOLULU, HAWAII 9b&09 April l 1, 2QQ8 Waialxa Water Systems Yukie Qlxaslxi Planning Consultant I3ox 786 Volcano, Hawaii 96785 Gentlemen: Subject: Drab Environmental Assessment for Waiaha Water Systems, Notth Dona, Hawaii Thatxk you far the appartutxity to review and cornnxent atx the subject matter. The Department of Land and Nattitral Resources' (DLNR), Land Divisiatx distributed ar made available a copy of your report pertaining to the subject matter to tlxe Commission on Wat+~r Resource Manag+:lxxent for their review and caxnnxCrxt. Tlxe Departtrterxi of Land and l~iatural Resources has tyo other conxnxcnts to offer on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call our office at 587-Q433, Thank you, Sincerely, ` Morris M. Atta ~ Adrnirxistrator ~ A ~ t.AU'!tA H. THt~1.C~ LLYpAL~GLE P e' ~t~c8n nnvUrastnr+a,ah~ hxhx n~atx~mts cx~u~xaoao~w?w,~rt ~-a,++~~s~osaonr~v.~n~cttbarocmeaatn~~nscm ` 4 ` 8TAT1~ OI<' xAwA,~t DRPARTMEN~' OI: t.AND AND NATURAI.~ RESOURCES I.r11VD DNISION C star~ott+ PAST aPHIC:G saX 621 1~iQNbLULU, IfAWAII 56$09 March 7, 2Q08 MEMORANDUM TO: TDLNR Agencies: _Div. of Aquatic Resources _Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation X .Engineering Division D' f k~csr~r'y 8~ Wildly`°~°°---~-- 4 _DIV, of Mate Parks X CaY712rlls8iari an ,Water lt.esaurce Managemel~t -~...~~,_Q~~_C~EJ~I3et'~c t2fll~~b~4~9~~1"~,"'~'~'~'~M~~ xLand Division - Hawaii District FROM: Morris M, Alta SUB7ECT. Draft Environmental Assessment for Waiaha Water Systems LOCATIC3N: North Kana, Hawaii APPLICANT: Waiaha Water Systems Transmitted for your review and colx?ment on the above referenced document. We would appreciate your comments on this document. Please submit any comments by April I, 2048. If no resparise is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact my office at 587-0433. Thank you. Attachments ~ tr'j We have no objections. We have ria comments. ( Comments are attached. Signed; Date: ?f"` p Paa.Na,.«.,.,,,h~T LINDA 41NGLE _ & ~ r.AURA H THIELEN aBYEgvap GF ttAVtA1a ~ ua,uPCW'"H MEREaI'CN J. CN+NG +t~„tj(, ~\JC E°E JAMESA FftAZIE+t f # ~ ~ ,Yt ~ ~ t NEA#. 3, FUJlwARA f-. paNNA AY K KIYaSAK+, P E ~ IAwRENCE N MAKE. M p., J a. a~rurr a~aECraq ~ .!'4 i~.'= ~ STATE ()F HAWAII KEN C KAwANARA, P E DEAARTMENT OF tANO AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT' P a eOX 621 . ~ , E ~ fiaNOlUlU. HAWAiI 98899 i ` a ~ r` ~l ~ April 2oaa REF: Waiaha Water System.dea.dr TO: Morris Alta, Acting Administrator Land D+visian FROM: Ken C. Kawahara, P.E., Deputy Director ~ ~ ~i Commission an Water Resource Management SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Assessment for Waiaha Wate Systems, No Kana, Hawaii FILE N0. NA Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject document. The Commission on Water Resource Management (CWRM} is the agency responsible for adminlstering the State Water Code (Cade). Under the Cade, all waters of the State are held in trust far the benefit of the citizens of the State, therefore, alt water use is subject to legally protected water rights. CWRM strongly promotes the effrcient use of Hawaii's water resources through conservation measures and appropriate resource management. For mare information, please refer to the Stets Water Code, Chapter 1740, Hawaii Revised Statutes, and Hawaii Administrative Rules, Chapters 13-'167 to t3-171. These documents are available via the interne# at htlp //4v+n+w.ha#~raif.grov/dlnrlcwrm. Our comments related to water resources are checked off below. . 1 We recommend caordinatian with the county to incorporate thrs pralect into the county's Water Use and Development Plan. Please contact the respective Planning Department andlor Department of Water Supply for further Informat(on, ? 2. We recommend caardrnation w+th the Engineering Division of the State Department of Land and Natural Resources to incorporate this project into the State Water Projects Plan ? 3. There may bathe potential far ground or surface water degrade#ion/contamination and recommend that approvals for this project be conditioned upon a review by the State Departrnen# of Health and the developer's acceptance of any resulting requirements related to water quality. Permits required by CWRM• Addrtronat infarma#ion and farms are available at www.hawaii gav/tllnr/cwm~Ifarms,htm. ? 4. The proposed water supply source for the project is located in a designated graund~water management area, and a Water Use Permit is required prior to use of ground water, ? 5. A Welt Canstructton Permit{s) is (are) required before the commencement of any welt construct+on work. ? 6. A Pump Installation Permit(s) is (are) required before ground water is developed as a source of supply for the projec#. s DRF-lA 03/02/2(?06 Morris Atta, Acting Administrator Page 2 April 3, 2gg8 ? 7. There is (are) well(s) located on ar ad}scent to this project. If wens are not planned fa be used and wiN be affected by any new canstructian, they must be praparly abandoned and sealed. A permit far well abandonment must be obtained. ? 8. Ground-water withdrawals from this project may affect streamftaws, which may require an instream flaw standard amendment. ? 9. A Stream Channel Alteration Permit(s) is (are) requited before any alteration can be made to the bed andfar banks of a stream channel. 10. A Stream Diversion Works Permit(s) is (are) required before any stream diversion works is constructed or altered. ? 11. A Petition to Amend the Interim instream Flow Standard is required for any new or expanded diversion(s) of surface water. ? 12. The planned source of water far this project has net been identifted in this report. Therefore, we cannot determine what permits ar petitions are required from our office, or whether there are potential impacts to water resources, Q 13. We recommend that the report identify feasible alternative non-potable water resources, Including reclaimed wastewater. OTHER; The Department of Water Supply may consider a regional update to their Water Use and Development Plan to focus on water system infrastructure development and upgrades !n areas of emerging "hot spats", such as the Keauhau Aquifer System Area, where the build-out of existing aontng may exceed the aquifer's sustainable yield. if there are any questions, please contact Lenore Ohye at 587'-8218. DRP-IA 03102/2006 f Planning Consultant LLC July 2, 2008 Mr. Morris M. Atta, Administrator State of Hawaii Department of Land and :N'atural Resources Land Division PQ Box 621 Honolulu, Hawaii 96809 SUBJECTS Waiaha Water Systems (Transmission Mains and Reservoirs) Response to Comments an the Draft Environmental Assessment Dear Nir. Atta: We have received your second letter dated April 1 1, 2008 and the attached Comrzaissian on Water Resources Management comments. The following responds to your comments. We note that C4RWM has no objections to this project. We also Dote your comments related to water resources: item 1. The Applicant, Waiaha Systems, LLC and Waiaha Systems Ii, LLC, will coordinate with the County Department of Water Supply to incorporate this project into the County's Water Use and Development Plan. Item OTHER. It is our understanding that the Hawaii Department of Water Supply is continually evaluating the water needs of the areas served by the Keauhou Aquifer System. As needed, DWS Intends to update the Water Use and Development Plan, including infrastructure development and upgrades of the ICeauhou Aquifer System area. Thank you for your participatian and review of the Draft EA. Sincerely ours, KIB OHASHI Planning Consultant Po Box 788 t Yolaano, Hawall 98788 ! Ph: 808.988.2222 t Fax: 848.98&.9131 t yohashl~hawaltanteLnet 4 kR $ ~ ~s~s a 4 r~~~ UNpp LiNGLE GHIYOME L. FUKINO, M.D. GOYLkNOR 4F HAWRll ~ ~ ~ Q,RECYOR OF MEAL'4N 471P9! ~ ~AIYVFII) G3EpARTMENT QF WEALTW in reply, please rater to po sax oars EP4-08-041 HONOLULU, WAWAA 96699.3378 April 4, 2408 Mr. Yukie Ohashi Yukie Oliashi Planning Consultant • F'. O. Box 7$6 Volcanar Hawaii 96?$S Dear Mr. Ohashi: SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEXS} for Waiaha Water Systems- Transmissian Mains and Reservoirs North Kana, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii TMK: (3) ?-5-011:14, 27 and 3$ {3) 7-5-012: 42, 4S, 4G, and 4$ {3) 7-5-016: 1S-17, 29, $8-95, and 102-103 {3}'7-S-OI7: 30 and 40-43 Thank you for allowing us to review and comment an the subject application. The document was routed to the various branches of the Department of Health {DaH) Environmental Health Administration. We have the fallowing Waste Water Branch, Clean Water Branch, Safe Drinking Water Branch, and General comments. Waste Water Branch The document proposes the development of the Waiaha we11 resource distribution system including two transmissions mains and three reservoirs, along tyro routes between Mamalahoa Highway and Hienaloli Raad and Mamalahaa Highway and Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The project is located in the Non -Critical Wastewater Disposal Area (CWDA} {7-5-011 & 7-5- 012} and the CWDA {7-6-416} where na new cesspools will be allowed. The following sites are serviced by an existing cesspool or currently approved treatment individual wastewater system (septic tank): TMIC: (3) ?-S-Ol 1:02'7, 038; ~-5-012: 444 and 046, We are concerned with any potential contamination to the water systems via improper wastewater treatment and disposal from any nearby source. As fang as water quality is checked periodically, we have na objections to the proposed water systems, however defer to the Safe Drinking Water Branch on any water system approvals. iVlr. Qhashi Apri14, 2008 Page 2 All wastewater plans must meet Department's Rules, HAR Chapter l I-62, "Wastewater Systems." We da reserve the right to review the detailed wastewater plans for conformance to applicable rules. Ifyou have any questions, please contact the Planning & Design Section of the Wastewater Branch at 58&-4294. Clean Water Branch The Department of Health, Clean Water Branch (CWB}, has reviewed the subject document and offers these comments on your project. Please note that our review is based solely on the information provided in the subject document and its compliance with Hawaii Administrative Rules (I-IAR}, Chapters I 1-54 and 1 I-S5. You may be responsible for fulfilling, additional requirements related to our program. We recommend that you also read our standard comments an our website at httn:/lwww hawaii.aov/health/environmentaUenv-plannin~llanduse/CWB-standardcomment,pdf. l . Any project and its potential impacts to State waters must meet the following criteria: a. Antidegradationpoliey (HAR, Section 11-54-1.1}, which requires that the existing uses and the level of water quality necessary to prated the existing uses of the receiving State water be maintained and protected. b. Designated uses (HAR, Section 11-54-3}, as determined by the classification of the receiving State waters. c. Water quality criteria (ITAR, Sections 11-54-4 through 11-54-8). 2. You are required to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for discharges of wastewater, including storm water runoff, into State surface waters (HAR, Chapter 11-SS}. For the following types of discharges into Class A ar Class 2 State waters, you may apply for NPDES general permit coverage by submitting a Notice of Intent (NC3I) foam: a, Storm water associated with construction activities, including clearing, grading, and excavation, that result in the disturbance of equal to ar greater than one (1 }acre of total land area. The total land area includes a contiguous area where multiple separate and distinct construction activities may be taking place at different times on different schedules under a larger common plan of development or sale. An NPDES permit is required befoxe the sta~~t of the construction activities. b. I-Iydratesting water. c. Construction dewatering effluent. Mr. Ohashi April 4, 20Q8 Page 3 You must submit a separate NOI form far each type of discharge at least 30 calendar days prior to the start of the discharge activity, except when applying far coverage far discharges of storm water associated with construction activity. For this type of discharge, the NbI must be submitted 30 calendar days before to the start of construction activities, The NOI farms may be picked up at our office or downloaded from our website at http•l/www hawaii gav/healtl~tenviranmentallwaher/cle~nnwater/forms/genl=index.html. 3, Far types of wastewater Hat listed in Item 3 shave ar wastewater discharging into Class 1 ar Class AA waters, you may need att NPDES individual permit. An applicatian for an I~iPDES individual permit must be submitted at least 184 calendar days before the commencement of the discharge. The l~IPDLS applicatian farms maybe picked up at our office ar downloaded from our website at htt .ha i. v e th/ n ' en 1/ a er/cTe n er farm indiv-i dex.htm . 4. Yau must also submit a cagy of the NOI ar NPIIES permit applicatian to the State Department of Land and Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD~, or demonstrate to the satisfaction of the CWB that SHPD has or is in the process of evaluating your project. Please submit a copy afyaur request far review by SHPD ar SHPD's determination letter far the project slang with your NOI ar NPDES permit applicatian, as applicable. S. Please Hate that all discharges related to the project construction ar operation activities, whether ar not NPDES permit coverage and/or Section 441 Water Quality Certification are required, must comply with the State's Water Quality Standards. Noncompliance with watex quality requirements contained in HAR, Chapter 11-54, and/or pe~Ynitting requixements, specified in HAR, Chapter 11-55, maybe subject to penalties of$25,000 per day per violation, If you have any questions, please visit our website at http•llwww,hawaii~vlhealthlenvironmentaUwaterfcleanwaterfindex~htrnl, or contact the Engineering Section, CWB, at 58&-4309. " Safe Drinking Water Branch 1. We understand that the applicant, Waiaha Systems, LLCIWaiaha Systems ll, LLC, is proposing to develop the Waiaha Water Systems in the North Kana area. At this time, we understand the Applicant will design and construct the water system with private funds on privately awned lands. Upon completion, the entire water system, including the land far the reservoirs, will be turned over to the Hawaii Department of Water Supply and dedicated as a public facility. Mr. Qhashi April 4, 2(108 Page 4 2. All projects that propose the development of new sources of drinking water serving a public water system must comply with the terms of Section l I-20-29 of the Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 20, titled "Rules Relating to Potable Water Systems." This section requires that all new public water system sources be approved by the Director of Health prior to its use. Such approval is based primarily upon the submission of a satisfactory engineering report which addresses the requirements set in Section 11-20-29. 3. The engineering report must identify all potential sources of contamination and evaluate alternative control measures which could be implemented to reduce or eliminate the potential far contamination, including treatment of the water source. In addition, water quality analyses for all regulated contaminants, performed by a laboratory certified by the State Laboratories Division of the State of Hawaii, must be submitted as part of the report to demonstrate compliance with alI drinking water standards. Additional parameters maybe required by the Director of Health far this submittal ar additional tests required upon his or her review of the infarmatian submitted. 4. Furthermore, all sources of public water systems must undergo a source water assessment which will delineate a source water protection area. This process is preliminary to the creation of a source water protection plan far that source and activities which will take place to protect the source of drinking water. 5. The document does not mention if the applicant will explore the availability afnnn-potable (brackish andlar reclaimed) water sources in the North Dana region far irrigation purposes, if the applicant proposes the use of dual water systems or the use of anon-potable water system in proximity to an existing drinking water system to meet i~~rigatian or other needs, he or she must be careful in the design and operation of these systems to prevent the cross- connectian of these systems and prevent the possibility of backflow of water from the non- potable system to the eatable system. The two systems must be clearly labeled anal physically separated by air gaps or reduced pressure principle backflow prevention devices to avoid contaminating the potable water supply. xn addition, backflow devices must be tested periodically to assure their proper operation. Further, all non potable spigots and irrigated areas should be clearly labeled with warning signs to prevent inadvertent consumption ofnon-potable water, Gomplianee with Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 1 1, Chapter 11-21, titled "Gross Connection and Backflow Control°° is required. Should you have any questions regarding the drinking water system, please contact Mr. I~.umar Bhagavan of the SDWB Compliance Section at 586-4258 in Honolulu. 1~Ir:~lep~r©und x~ject~on Co~~trvl Injection wells used for the subsurface disposal of wastewater, sewage effluent, or surface runoff are subject to environmental regulation and permitting under Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title Mr. C?hashi April 4, 2p08 Page ~ 11, Chapter 23, titled "Underground Injection Control" {UIC). The Departxxtent of Health's approval must be first obtained before any injection well construction commences. A UIC permit must be issued before any injection well operation occurs. Authorization to use an injection well is granted when a UIC permit is issued to the injection well facility, The UIC permit contains discharge and operating limitations, monitoring and reporting requirements, and other facility management and operational conditions. A completed UIC permit-application form is needed to apply far a UIC permit. A UIC permit can have a valid duration of up to five years. Permit renewal is needed to keep an expiring permit valid for another term, Questions about UIC maybe directed to Mr. Chauncey Hew at 586-4258. Clener We strongly recommend that you review all of the Standard Comments an our website: hit :!/hawaii. ov/health/enviro entallenv- tannin !land eflanduse.html. Any comments specifically applicable to this project should be adhered to, t eats lease contact Jiacai Liu with the Environmental If there are any questiians about hese camm p Planning Office at 586-4346. Sincerely, .YY,R ~1~ W M~ KELVIN H. SUNADA, MAltl"AGER Environmental Planning C}f.~ce c: EPO W~VB CWB SDWB ElI-Hawaii r Planning Consultant LLC July 2, 2008 Mr.1{.elvin H. Sunada, Manager Environmental Planning Uff ee State of Hawaii Department of Health Pt) l~vx 33?8 Hrsnalulu, HI 96801-33?8 SUI~JECTe Waiaha Water Systems (Transmission Mains and Reservoirs} Response to Comments on the Draft Extviranmental Assessnxent Dear Mr. Sunada: We have received your letter dated April 4, 2408. The following responds to your comments. Wastewater Eiranch The subject project, which includes water transmission lines and water tanks, will not require a wastewater system, therefore np wastewater plans will be prepared. The Applicant acknowledges that existing residential wastewater systems {i.e., cesspools ar septic tanks) are present on four afthe properties (TMK: ?-5-011:2?, 38; ?-a-412: 44, 4G} of the North alignment. These properties are in the Nvn-Critical Wastewater Disposal Area. in all cases, the route of the transmission lines wiIi be spatially separated from the wastewater systems. Moreover, the 16-inch ductile iron waterline will be impervious and na contamination of the water supply will occur. Clean Water Bunch The Applicant has reviewed the standard conditions pasted an your State of Hawaii, Department of Health website and included relevant discussion ire various sections of the environmental assessment, including water quality and permits. Appropriate erosion and sediment control measures will lie taken, thus, State waters are not expected to be affected by this project, PO Bpx 788 / VpiCBnC~, Hawaii 987$5 / Ph: 808,985.2221 t Fax: 808.985.9131 f y4hasht~hawai3antei.neE Mr, Kelvin H. Sunada Page 2 of 2 A Notice of Intent far a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES} will be submitted to the Clean Water Branch prior to the start of construction activities. All requirements of the Clean Water Branch ITawaii Administrative Rule, Chapters 1-55 will be followed. Safe Drinking, Water Branch Clean Water Branch Ttems 2 and 3. The Applicant, in concert with the DWS, will comply with the terms of Section 11-2A-29, HAR., Title 11, Chapter 20, titled "Rules Relating to Potable Water Systems." An engineering report meeting the requirements of Section 11-2t)-29 will be prepared and submitted to the I~irectar of Health upon the aampletian of construction and prier to use. Item 4. The DWS has in place protocols far undergoing a source water assessment to create a source water protection plan for the Waiaha water resource. Item 5. The subject project does not include anon-potable water resource component. Underground lniection Control The project will not require or utilize any injection wells. T hard you for your participation and review of the Draft EA, Sincerely your G,. OHASHT 'Planning Consultant LINDA 41NGL~ ~ o F„H4 LiRENNON T MORIOKA GOVERNOR , ~as~ ; aaREGro~ Y acputy Oireciars MICIiAEt O. FOR618Y ~ ~ FRANCi3 PAUL KEENO '~x BRIAN N. $EKiGUCHI STATE AF MAWAq 1N REPCY REFER T0: DEPARTMENT QF TRANSPQRTATfC?N 869 PUNCHBC}WL STREET STP 8.2833 HQNpLUt.U, HAViIAI{ 96813-5Q97 April 8, ZOQB Mr. Yul~ie C~hashi Yukie Ollashl Planning Consultant I'.O. BoX 78fi Volcano, I.3awaii 9G7S5 Dear Mr. Ohashi: Subject: Waiaha Systems, LLC'IWaiaha Systems II, IsI,C Waiaha Water Systems (Transmission Mains and Reservoirs) Dra#~ Envirann~ental Assessment (Draft EA) Thank you for requesting the Department of Transportation's (DOT) review of the subject project. DOT's cancenis are for tlic South alignment ofthe transmission line. Although the subject project will be developed on private lands, the Draft EA mentions that atie-into the existing waterline an Queen Kaahumanu Highway will be necessary. The applicant must coordinate and apply for a permit with DOT 1-liglaways Division, Hawaii District Ofhce, for any construction work within or abutting the highway right-of--way. The applicant should also provide the DOT highway Division with updated infartnation on the subject project to ensure that any traffic detours, delays or other effects on Queen Kaahumanu Extension (State Route 11 }are addressed and coordinated in advance of construction work, including compliance with any environmental assessment requirement, The DOT appreciates the opportunity to provide comments. Ver truly ours, BRENNON T. MIORTOKA, Pl-I.D., P.E. Director of Transportation c; Kurt Inaba, Hawaii Department of Water Supply Katherine Kealaha, flfl:ice of Envirarunental Quality Control Plannln~ Consultant tLC July 2, 2008 Mr. Brennan T.Mariolca, Ph.D, F. E. Directar of Transportation Mate of Hawaii Department of Transportation 859 Punchbowl Street Honolulu, HI96$i3~5097 SU~~': '~Valalaa ~Yater Systelcros jTransrnaussnon Mamas and ~eservairs) spm~~r to ~aaantm~eatts oas the l~ra~'t ~aaviroaaaraental A.ssessaneal<t Dear Mr. Morioka: We have received your Letter dated. April 8, 2008. The fallowing responds to your comments. The South Mal~ai transmission line will terminate within the Queen Kaahumanu Extensiau (State R,outel I) right-ofwway to tie-into the existing Department of Water Supply waterline, The Applicant will coordinate and apply for a permit with the D4T Highways Division, Hawaii District Office, prior to construction. The Applicant wilt also provide the DOT Highways Division with a construction period traffic control plan prior to the start of construction. Thantc you far your participation and review of the Draft EA. Sincerely yours, ~ Y~CII~E Q~HASHI Planning Consultant PE's Box 788 i Volcano, Hataa11987851 Ph: 888.988.42Z~ 11~ax: 8Q8.988,8939 / yohashl~7hawaitarnat.ne4 PM(3NE (808j 594-1888 FAX (808) 594-1865 1 ~~hMgft RYP" STATE ~JEr hAWAI'1 QFFECE ©F WAWAIlAN AFFAIRS 711 KAPI'CaI.ANI BOULEVA~it), 8U{7E 500 Nt7NOG.UtU, HAWAII 98813 IiRD(18/3553 Alaril 3, 2808 Yulcie C)haslti, Planning Consultant Waiaha Water Systems P413ax 7$G Hilo, Hawaii 96785 RC: I<)raft IFnvironme77ta1 Assessment tn~cAa, 'VVai`aha Water System, North Kana, Ha~vai`i, TMi~s 7-5-11: 14, 27s 38; 7-5-12: 44, 45, 46, 4l3; 7-S-lti: 1S, .16, 17, 29,138, 94, 91, 92, 93, 95, 95, 102,103; 7-5-17: 1I, 30, 40, 4X, 42, and 43.. llear Ms. Ohashi, The QI'fice of l~tawaiian Affairs (UIIA) is in receipt of the request for comments i°egarding a DEA for the proposed ~Vai `aha Water System in North Kona an Hawai `i. We have ilie fallowing comments: UHA appreciates that the cultural context in which this proposed project may take place has been considered, as required by House Bill No. 2895 H.D.1 as Act SO which amended Chapter 343 1-Iawaii Revised Statutes, However, f~HA wishes to clarify that a cultural assessment should clot fracas itself on the "Ranch-age features" as stated nn page 29 of the TJEA. We also urge that our beneficiaries eonstitutianall}~ protected access rights neat be affected due to this proposed project as mentioned on page 3Q of the L7EA. fJHA seeks the applicant's assurances that should any historic resources be uncovered, then work will immediately stop in the vicinity of the discovery and the apprap7•iate authorities will be contacted as outlined in Hawaii Administrative Rules. This is particularly relevant because, as noted in the DIvA an page 26, a large portion of the area is designated as State Inventory of Historic Places and is eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. As such, OHA also asks whether err not a Section I06 Consultation has been initiated under the ,National Historic Preservation Act. We also wish to clarify that the statement made in the DEA on page 18 is in error by saying that: Yukie Shashi April 3, 2(108 Page 2 If DWS (Department of Water Supply) concludes that significant impacts are expected to occur as a result of the proposed action, and an enviranmental impact statement (EIS) would be required, and may be prepared at the sole discretion of the Applicant. OHA understands with the help of staff at the Office of Environmental Quality Control that if significant impacts are expected to occur as a result of the prapased action, then an EIS would be required and it rs not at the discretion of the applicant. The very purpose of enviranmental review is to "ensure that environmental concerns are given appropriate consideration in decision making slang with economic and technical consideration."r If significant effects are found, then Hawaii Administrative Rules state in section 11-200- 11.2 that after preparing a .final environmental assessment and reviewing public and agency comments the proposing agency or the approving agency "shall" issue an EIS preparation notice. This is not discretionary and furthermore is important because it strikes at the heart of Hawai `i's enviranmental review process. It benefits everyone involved to clarify this so that the law is adhered to and projects can avoid unnecessary delays and casts as recent cases involving Hawai `i's EIS law unfortunately demonstrate. OHA is concerned about the scope of this prapased project as described in the DEA. OHA understands that this prapased water system will be designed and constructed by the applicant with private funds and that the system will be oversized to accommodate additional flaw. However, the added cast of aver sizing the system will eventually be paid by the County upon completion. In exchange far the applicant's buildrng the system, the applicant will receive a total of 1,5+00 units of water to be used by 2027, OHA learned from staff at DWS that a unit of water is 4110 galIans per day (gpd) which amounts to 600,000 gpd, which is a significant amount of water, OkIA Hates that the land is currently designated as agricultural and sa we would expect to see details regarding craps, irrigation and acreage plans presented in the DEA far the use of this water designation. However, there is na description at all in the UEA regarding what the applicant intends to da with this water. OHA is particularly concerned because we read the footnote on page three of the DEA which states that, "the water commitments granted herein may be assigned to other parcels described within the bands in exhibit "A", subject to any and all improvements that maybe required by DWS (Department of Water Supply)„ z ~ Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) § 11-200-1 ~ C3HA. also notes that neither exhiait "A'" nor the agreements mentioned in the DEA are presented in this DEA. As such, a proper review of all elements of this proaect cannot be performed due to a lack of inforrnatian. Yukie Ohashi April 3, 2gg8 Page 3 This amounts to vesting the applicant with transferable water rights without knowing what they intend to da with the water. This also violates the environmental review process by creating a parceling of the review. QHA realizes that the water units are until 2027; however, the applicant is free to amend this condition and C)HA urges that this 2027 time limit be a mite one that is not to be extended. OHA also realizes that water Use permits are granted based an reasonable usage and in consideration of maximum- beneficial use. C3HA stresses that waters of the State used in agricultural zoned parcels must be used in order to support agriculture and we urge that this be made a condition of this proposed project. QHA would object to the applicant receiving this water and then latet• applying to develop the land (ar lands that the water can be transferred ta) as this is the sort of analysis that should be presented in an environmental review document. Should the applicant intend to develop the land, they would certainly be using this County water system which would require an environmental assessment of its awn. By not presenting this information in thts DEA, it could be viewed as segrnetrted projects and a segmented review of these proposed actians.~ As such, QHA asks that all of the information and alternatives be consolidated and presented in one environmental review sa that reviewers can perform their constitutional and statutory mandates. A consolidated review also allows far a bettor view into a cumulative effects analysis, as required by HAR § 11-200-5, whic:lr this DEA segments. Another example of this segmented review is the private parts of this no~v public project that have already been completed. Far instance, the water tank sites have already been graded as seen in photo five an pages l3 and 25 of the DEA. This raises canceY•ns far us as we cannot offer carrrments an haw to mitigate potential adverse effects of a proposed project if they are already carnpleted when presented taus which severs these elements of the project from public review. pHA realizes that the County seeks to have this system oversized so that they can bring dawn two million t;pd to support rite existing system and relieve pumping far the Kailtta/Kana area due to the increased salinity and poor water quality found there. We are sympathetic to this; .however, we cannot support a project that admittedly expedites a proposed project that would benefit private entities with public trust resources without knowing the consequences of doing sa.d C7HA notes with concern that this DEA does not even present data as to the effect of removing 7S percent of the water frortr this system as praposed.~ ~ Projects that touch a public road or use a public water system require an environmental assessment of their own. Hence, OHA points out that it would actually benefiE the applicant as tivell to organize and ~aresent this Information xn one review, DEA, page four. ~ DEA, pages four and 12. Yukie O~hashi APri13, 2008 Page 4 OHA also notes that this proposed protect includes the installation of water mains with a 10-foot wide paved access road, asphalt concrete driveways and fencing. We further Hate that these impcrmcable surfaces are expected to increase runoff in the area. We, therefore, request that the applicant provide information regarding the best management practices (BMPs), treatment train and monitoring programs associated with these parts of the proposed praject so that we can deteirnine the significant effects that this project may produce and that are even mentioned in the DEA. OHA further Hates that the project area now is mostly comprised of Han-native plant species or various alien weed communities with only small areas of rexnnant forest remaining. As such, C7HA suggests that what remains of the remnant forest should be preserved and that the praject area should be landscaped with native ar indigenous drought tolerant species. Also, any invasive species should be removed. Thank you far the opportunity to comment. If you. have any further questions or concerns please contact Grant Arnold at (808) 594-q2&3 ar aranta@a1la.or~. Sincerely, . Clyd . Namu`o Administrator C: Lukela Ruddle, Community Resources Coordinator Office of Hawaiian Affait•s, Hilo Office l62 A Halter Avenue • Hilo, Hawai°i 9672Q-4$G9 ~ DEA, page 15. ~ DEA., Page 24. N Planning Consultant l.LC July 2, 2008 Mr. Clyde W. `NamUO, Administrator Mate of Hawaii Qftice of Hawaiian Affairs 711 Kapiolani Boulevard, Suite 500 Honolulu, HI 9b813 SUBJECT; Waiaha V4'ater Systems (Transmission Mains and Reservoirs) Response to Comments on the Draft Environmental Assessment Dear Mr. Namuo: We have received your letter dated April 2008. The following responds to your conunents. The environmental assessment acknowledges the project area as a linear site that would affect relatively Small portions Of larger areas. We acknowledge the richness of the cultural history of the area; however, we emphasiLe that impacts of the liner project site are tci the R.anch}age historical and cultural features only. Understandably, access during construction would be limited for safety purposes, however, upon completion, UHA beneficiaries would continue to have their constitutionally protected access to project area which consists of the easement areas for the waterlines and tank sites. As noted in the environmental assessment, the State Historic Preservation Division has done archaeology reviews for all vacant lands in the project site. In the event that any historic resources are uncovered, work will immediately be stopped in the vicinity of the discovery and the SHPD office will be contacted as required by State of Hawaii rules. We want to clarify that as the Approving Agency, the County of I Iawaii Department of Vdater Supply would make the determination if the project impacts would be significant and warrant the preparation of an environmental impact statement, If such a determination is reached, then, the County Water Board and the Applicant have agreed that the Applicant has the option to withdraw from this project. The Applicant would then decide if the project is still feasible. If it is not feasible, the Applicant may decide to withdraw from the project and the environmental review process would be terminated. PO Box 7861 Yoicana, Hawaii 96785 / Ph: 8t~8.985.2222 /Fax: 808.985.9131 Mr. Clyde W. Namuo Fage 2 of 3 Regarding the scope of the project and the 1,540 units of water, we note that under the agreement between the Water Board and the Applicant, the Applicant will be paying 68.8 percent ofthe fatal cast to build the transmission system to DWS standards, and in exchange, will receive I,500 units, or 33 percent of the Waiaha welt resource aver a 2t1 year time period. Moreover, the Applicant will be expending its awn funds far design and construction immediately, yet any use of the water aver the 20-year time period is not guaranteed until any future tend use on any member parcel is approved by the County's various approving agencies. The Water Board has recognized the great public value of this ,proposal by the Applicant, and thus, entered into agreements with them. Thus, this environmental review process is to assess the development of the prapased water system infrastructure, and is not viewed as a segment of a larger project, similar to haw DWS would approach a water development project. DWS is mandated to bring safe drinking water to the public, and its purpose would be to sexvice existing and future residents of the County of Hawaii. In this case, this project would allow DWS to actueve its purpose far the North Kona community far a fraction of the cost, and allow it to be online in the next two years, rather than wait until funding is available sometime in the future. This is certainly a project which creates a "win-win" situation. Any subsequent future proposal by a member parcel would require application to the County of Hawaii far review before any discretionary ar ministerial determination is made ar pexmit approved. At this time, any discussion df future uses on member parcels would be speculative and. cannot adequately be described in the environmental assessment. We therefore, respectfiilly disagree with your statement that "`this amounts to vesting the applicant with transferable water rights without knowing what they intend to do with the water." The water units assigned to any of the member parcels would not be utilized until any prapased future land use is approved. regarding the State and County agricultural designations of the property, we note the according to the Hawaii County Cade, Section 25-~-11(a}, "Cvrrununfcativn, tratasmission, and power ~itaes of publre and private uttlttres cznd governmental agent#es are permitted uses within any district. " Therefore, the County Flanning Department has determined that the proposed project is considered a permitted use. The water tx~ansmissian lines and water tanks will not hinder any an-going and fugue agricultural efforts, Regarding your comment on the photographs of the tank sites, we have enclosed the Grading Permit documents in Appendix C of the enviroxuxientat assessment. Regarding your statement (Page paragraph 4} that "GHA cannot support a project that expedites the process far private development", we again clarify that any use of the water resource far any future land use prapased by a member parcel would be required to submit an application and any required studies. We acknowledge that water availability is an important component, but not the only requirement for development, thus we disagree that this project "expedites" future development. Mr. Clyde W. Namuo Page 3 of 3 Re ardin aved access roads we a ee that these im ermeable surfaces would increase ~ gP a ~ ~ runoff and will address that itx the final envixonrnental assessment. 't'hank you for your paxticipation and review of the Draft IaA. Sincere~lyy* yours, UKIE UHASHI Plazu~ing Consultant C: Waiaha Water Systems, LI,C Waiaha Water Systems 11, LLC Lukela Ruddle, Community Resources Coordinator C?ffice of Hawaiian Affairs, Hilo Office 162 A Barer Avenue Hilo, Hawaii 96720-486 v ~ vv Vv! MY~ v4i +vrr i tSV~S ~iLb I L4 r ~ ~ I ~ , Y7nited States Y}epartment of the Interior NA~'Z4NAL PARK SFsRVZCE , ' Kaloko-Hc~nvkahant National I~istariral Fark 'I3.786 Kanalani St., Suite 14 IN REPLY I2EF~1t, TQ; Ka9,tu~ .Kara, III 9G740 L7621 Apri17, 2008 J Mfs, 'Yukio 4haslu Wai'aha Systems, LLC, Wai'aha Systeans II, LLC 1'.0. Box Kailua,Koua, HI 90745 ItE: National parr Service Raspanse to the Draft Enviranmental Assessment, Waxaha Water Systems {Transmission lVXaints and >fteservoirs), Narth Kona I}istdat, Tdawaii. Dear Ms, Qhashi; 'T'hank you for providing the National Turk Service with the opparttiu~ity to review axzd aommen~t an the dram k?nvirpnmental AS9essrrtezxt (PSA.) for the Waft" Water Systom (transmission mains and reservoirs), proposed by'W'ai'aha Systems LLCtwai'aha Systems ST, LLC, The proposed new transmission lines and tanks will allow the County of Hawaii Department of Water supply (DWS) to increase production at the Wai'aha well, located iut the Keauhau high-level aquifer, about 5.5 miles from Kalako-Honokahau National ~Iistoricai park,, By inareasxrag pumping at the Wai'aha well, the DWS will also be able to alleviate tl~e current rate of pumping at th® Kahalu'u shaft located 7,6 mhos from tfte National Park in the Keauhou basal aquifer. The IrA states tiyat the K~dhalu'u shaft is currently being over-pumped and that water quality franc this socurce is declining, apparently due to saltwater intrusion, We submit the fallowing camrnents on the draft EA. This project is of concern to tl~e Al'atianal Park Service because Kalako•Honakahau 1*tatianal ~Iistorical Park lies in the vicinity of thQ Wai'aha well acid the Park's ground water dependent cultural and natural resources may be adversely imparted by the cumulative irnpscts of increased ground vt+atex pumpixtg in tl~e him Ievel aquif®r, IC.alai~o-HQnokolaau Natia~aal Historiaai park was authorized in 197$ by Congress to preserve, interpret, and perpetuate traditional native Hawaiian activities and culture (Public Law 95-625), The authorizatiozt was based an a study and report by a congressioz~at advisory cammissiana campxissd ofnativc~ Hawaiians. The study recommended that the site that is the Honokahau Ssttlemeat National .Historical Landmark (designated in 1962) and its adjacent waters be preserved for the benefit of the Hawaiian. people and the nation as part of the national park system, Water quality autd quantity are vital. to the i~ttegrity of the Pt~k's nnissiaza. ~`he Nfltionaal k'ark contains twc~ large (11 and 15-acre) anciemt Hawaiian fishponds with large associated wetlands, mare than 140 known anchialiue pools, and S96 acres of marine waters. Each ofthese water bodies is a significant caituacai resaurco and they t U4-48--0$; 03: 55P~C; ; $08 328 1247 # 2/ G also provide habitat for nine federally protected and candidate endangered specx8s. The National I'aak water resources era fed by, and in the case ofthe anchialine pools and'Airnakapa Fishpond, are Solely dependent upon, ,groundwater inputs. The anchialirte pools support three known candidate endangered species, 'Aimakapa Fishpond and wetland is a significant foraging and nesting habitat for the endangered Hawaiian stilt and the Hawaiian coot, and is an important habitat for migratory watexfowl, The .park boundaries also encompass Sod acres of class AA marine waters which include extensive coxal reef habitat, and supports four federally protected marine species, ~er~andary and Cumulative Imuacls Page 23, Secondary and Cumulative l'mpacts a Page 26, I~eterntinations with Supporting Findings and reasons (6} Tnvalves substantial secondary impacts, such as papulatiozz chauages or effects on public facilities • Page 2f, Determinatiozas with Supporting Findings and Reasons (8} Is individually limited but cumulatively has considerable effect do the eiavirozament, ar involves a commitment :For largsr actions In these se4ta+cns, the draft `EA states that the cumulative and secondary impacts, which result when implementation of several prc~jeots that individually have limited impacts combine to produce more severe impacts or conflicts in mitigation measures, would be ternporaxy and very limited in severity, nature, and geographic scale. These sections are inadequate and incarnpletc because they do not describe the hydrologic iaxpacts associated with increased pumping at khe Wei*aha well, which will include 1 Sb~ units afwater to be used by the Applicant. Additionally, increased pumping has the potential to lead tc> impacts in coastal aquatic ecosystems that support endangered and candidate endangered species and impacts tp the cultural practices that rely On tlxese intact ecosystems, The C1.S. Geological Survey Hates that "Arguably, there is zta valux~rte of ground-water use that can be truly free of any adverse consequence, especially whenn time is considared. The direct hydrologic effects will he equal. to the volume of water removed, but thane effects may rewire decades to centuries to be manifest" (,A~ttdet'son & Woolley, USGS Circular 1261, 2445}, Likewise, if Bumping at the Wai'aha well is planned to increase by 1.5 lvTgd as a direct result of this prajcat, then. the EA should clearly acknowledge that aquifer storage in combinatio~a with ground-water discharge to the basal aquifer and the nearshore axes will decroase by 1.5 Mgd in the'viCizxity of the Wtii'aha well. Cxrpund ~1'ater ¦ Page 2S, beterminationwith Suppartixig Findings and Reasons Conflicts with the State's to»g-term envirrynmental policies or goals aid guidelines as expressed in Chapter 344, HIt.S. r Pogo 26, Detem~ination with Supporting Fin~liztgs and reasons Involves a substantial degradation of environmental quality. Z 04-4$-0$;{}3,55pM; ;808 326 127 # 3f 4 Yn these sections, tlia draft lrA finds that "over the low-term, the new water source will improve envirazunental qualityta the avaratl water xesource in North Kana" and . , will reduce salt» water ir~fZltration at the lower elevation..:, These conclusions are inaccurate because they do not descxibe the overall long-tezrt~ impacts to water quality aerazn ground wafer pumping. V~hile transferring pumping tom the Kahalu'u shaft to the Wai'aha well may temporarily immprove water quality in the vicinity of the I{ahaa'u shaft, saltwater intrusion will cantinas because the overall gxpuad-water withdrawals will not be reduced. Increasixkg punnping at the Wai'aha well will decrease aquifer discharge to the basal aquifer aver the long toxin and contribute to saltwater intrusion in the baSa1 aquifer. Changing the point of diversion from the basal aquifer to thehigh-level aquifer only delays the hydrologic consequences of gxat~nd-water pumping. Impacts a~adMitiaa~tiaa lVleasures The cumulative impacts of existing ground-water withdrawals, in: addition to the future demand far wafter in tlxe Kona area, pass a serious threat to the purposes and values for which the National Park was esststablished. Accordi»g to recen# xepart8, pun,~piztg in the Keauhau aquifer system averages 12.0$ M$d (http;//hi.water.usgs.gav/west hawaii/west hawaii tab.htm~. `I'Fie Natiaz~al ~'axk Service estimates that satisfying the water needs of ail of the currently graposed development in the vicinity a~'~C.alako-~anokohat~ Natianat ~istr~xxiGal Paxlt will ntoxe tlaar~ ~ double praduc#ion in. the I~eauhou aquifer system. To address these concerns and to conftrnx ttte draft ~A.'s detexzx~inatiaxl afno significant iong- tezm sscandary or cumulative impacts, a network of observation wells to monitor around»water levels and saltwater ir~txusioz~, must be established in the Keauhou aquifer system. The N'atianal Park Service recognizes that water managers do not yet fully understand haw the aquifer xesparids to pumping stresses, nor does the National Park Service yet fully unda~t&tand the quantity of ~raund Water necessary to sustaauc,. xesawrGes at KalakawS~t~nakahau NHI.'. Adequate monitoring of well withdrawals and any changes in water levels and salinity are critical to understanding bow the Keauhau aquifer system responds to develaprnez~t and managing For sustainability iota the mature. The I~atiozial l+"ark Service is developing a program to monitor water levels and water quality in three shallow wells within the l'ark's boundaxies and is committed to improving our understanding of the National Park's ground»water needs, Similarly. the r}WS should identify an ol~servatian well in the high-level aquifer ~aear the Waiaha well, inn which water levels and fluid conductivity will bs uaoz~itared an at least a monthly 1~asis to mea&urs changes in aquifer storage and salinity aver time and to ultimately evaluate whether current and proposed water use in the ICeauhou aqui.Fcar system is sustainable. 3 04--Q8-08;(13.55PM; ;8Q8 328 1247 ~ 41 4 Thank au far the o artuui to artici ~ e in 1 r i w Y Pp tY p t your env~xcz~znn~ats eve process and to provide our comments and concerns an the proposed project SincerolY, ~-k, Cecaidine ~eii Superlnfiendent cc: K.. Inaba, County of Hawaii, Dept. o:f Water SuFPiY . iVi, Pavan, County of Haawaii, Dept. of Water Supp1Y Hardy, Commission axe Water Resnumes Management Office of Environmental duality CantraI C~ Yuen, County of Hawaii, Office of Planning P. Leonard, U'~ dish and Wildlife Se~vioe National Parr ~ervic® Paai~a W est Regional t~fiics C. I'ettee, NP`S Water Rights Ezanch G, Lind, C)~'fxce o~'the Solicifior Planning Cc~nsultan~t 1,L.C .luly Z, 200 l~ls. Geraldine K. Bell, Stiperin#enclc;n# US Department of the Interior National Park service l~alako-Hanakahau National His#arical Park 73-47gb I{.asiatani Street, Suite 14 I~aiiua-Kane, H~ 1674p SI7C`T; Wa~ialaa Water 3yste~ns ~T~ansnanssian ~I'alres and Hescrvairs~ l3tesponse to ~oeramee~ts an the l~rat't Enviiranmental ,~,ssessinent Dear Superiurtenderrt Bell. We have received your letter dated April 7, 2008. Can behalf of Waiaha Systems, LLC and Waiaha Systems II, LLC, we provide the following responses, l,~aragraphl. We want to em hasize that the sub'eet water s stem described in the Wiaiaha muter S .steins P 3 Y Y (~unsrrrass~on ,hfirins utu~` Reservvarx) Draft F`nvas~onrnentraX ~ssessrnent which you reviewed involves the construction of transmission waterlines and reservaixs to convey an existing water resource to the cornrnunity ofNarth K.ana residents, In 2003, the Caur~ty of Hawaii Departrment of Water Supply {I)WS~ completed an environmental assessment entitled "Waiaha Pmductian Well and Iteservair" for the development of the high level water resource. The 2003 enviromnental assessment was prepared and reviewed pursuant to State of Hawaii rules and a fu~cling of na significant impact was issued in April 2003. TlYis reference is cited on page 23 of the subject'W'aial~a Weser Systems Draft EA. In 2!t10~6, the production v?rell and a two million gallon reservoir were developed by 12WS and bas been in operation far the past two ~+ears. We respectfully suggest that your corrunents, as described in your .April ?s` letter, would have been appropriate prior to the development of this production well and are not applicable to the subject project. The subject project (Waiaha Wa#er Systems Transmission Mains and Reservoirs} proposed by Waiaha Systems, LLC and Waiaha Systems II, LLC will allow the DWS to provide much needed quality dririkixig water tc> the North Mama. cammuoity. Altlzougli the proposed system will be constructed with private funds and on private lands, upon its completion it will be dedicated to the Water Board of the County of Hawaii as a public utility and bccorne a~z intcgrxil addition to thrs DWS system, The DWS is mandated to provide eatable water to the citizens of the County of Hawaii. i'O 8t?x 786 ! ltoit~nn, 6i~uvaii 96T8S t ~h: 86$.985.~R2.2 irax; 811$.986.9931 Mrs. Geraldine K.13e11 Page 2 Pa e I arc ra h 2• Pa e ~ arc rah 1. We recognize the signi ticance of the KalakayHanokahauNotional Historical Park resources and their dependence on water quality and quantity. We also acknowledge your statement that the National Park Service does not .fully understand the quantity of ground water necessary to sustain the resources at Kaloko-Honokahau National Historical Park (Page 3, paragraph S}. According to Tam Nance Water Resource Engineering, scientists are sti11 studying the structure of the high level aquifer (which was discovered in the early 1994's) and how water travels laterally through the aquifer (Tom Nance, personal communication}. Anchialine ponds are found ux gealogicaliy young lava fields near the coast, The lava in these areas has fissures that connect the ponds to the ocean. Thus these panels are always close to the sea and have varying salinity levels and tidal influence (http_//l~~r~~v~ii~gavldlnr/dar~ptibsJsavc~aslanch sk~rimla.pdfl. This is in cantarast to your statement that the anehialine pools are safely dependent an groundwater inputs. Thus, we acknowledge that understanding the true effect of pumpage of the Waiaha well, which is approximately 6 miles southwest of Aimakapa Pond, must also factor in tidal influences of ocean levels. Page 2, Secondary and Cumulative Impacts Based on the definition of the subject project as development of"transmission mains and water storage tanks" of an approved and available water resource, we standby our discussion of the secondary and cumulative effects of the project. With regard to hydrologic impacts, the Waiaha Well is approved by the Water Commission as a 2MG well, thus the subject project will oat increase pumpage beyond what is already approved. Page 2, Groundwater Based on the definition of the subject project as development of "transmission mains and water storage tanks" of an approved and available water resource, we stand by our discussion of the environmental policies, goals, and guidelines, as well as environmenal degradation. Page 3, Impacts and Mitigation pleasures Based an the definition of the subject project as development of "transmission mains and water storage tanks" of an approved and available water resource, we stand by our discussion of the impacts and mitigation measures. We do, however, we provide the foliawing discussion. You state that "[t]he cumulative impacts of existing ground-water withdrawals, in addition to the future demand for water in the Kona area, pose a serious threat to the purposes and values far which the National Park was established" anal that the "National Park Service estimates that satisfying the water needs of all of the currently proposed development in the vicinity of ICaloko Honokau National Historical Park wi11 mare than double production in the Keauhau aquifer system." "Your statements are based on the USGS article which states the l~eauhou aquifer system pumpage rate is 12.48 rngd. At this time, we question how you have reached these conclusions. Mrs. Geraldine K, Bell Page 3 Xour letter also states that, "[a]dequate monitoring of well wsthdrawals and any changes in water levels in water levels and salinity are critical to understanding haw the Keauhou aquifer system responds to development and managing [sic] far sustainability into the future " We note that as part of the DWS' operating procedures, well systems are monitored by computerized equipment on ~ monthly basis (hurt Inaba, personal communication}, Thy Control Building at the ~U'aiaha production well is equipped with a monitoring gauge which continuously records water levels. Moreover, as part of its periodic source water assessment, DWS collects a full suite of data, including salinity levels. Thus, monitoring procedures are an-going and permanently in place. We note that the 2043 Waiaha production well environmental assessment evaluated data from the UrS. Geological Survey Gaging Station 16751300 which operated during the period between May, 1960 through Septernber,1969 and collected Waiaha Stream flow data. And finally, You suggest that DWS identify an observation well in the high-level aquifer near the Waiaha well for monthly testing anal monitoring to assess the sustainability of water usage in the Keauhou aquifer system. This matter should rightly be addressed by DWS, and is not within the tale of Waiaha Systems, LLC and Waiaha Systems Il, LLC as developers ofthe transnnission sys#ern. We do understand, however, that a recently established water round table group has been formed to comprehensively address the sustainability of water usage in Kana. We fiuther understand. that discussions between DWS and USGS, both participating parties in the round table, will include the need far further monitoring of wells within the Keauhau aquifer system. The discussions will help to clarify the impact of pumpage within the high-1eve1 aquifer upon the basal lens and determine a system-wide monitoring pion.. We tlna~ you far your participation and review of the Draft EA. Sincerely yours, - K1E tJI-IASHI Planning Consultant W~a~rn wnr ~vsr~r~~s t~onrx t~t~rta, t~w~xt Baker, H.L. et at. {1965} U~tailed Land Classf~eatinn, lsluhd of Hawaii. L.S. Land Study Bureau, University cif Hawaii, Bauer, Glen R. (24(13} Study cif the Cround9water Conditions in North and South'C~ona and South Kabala Districts, Island of 1-Iawaii, l 9~ 1 - 2402. http:llhau~aaii.~ov/dlrtrJcwrm/datalreportsll'R204341.pdf Beck, R.W. (2400 .~(~-Year iYater Master Plan. Prepared for the County of Hawaii I}epart7xcent of Water Supply. Bulgrin, Lon B. and Robert B. Rechtman. (I+.ugust 2045) An Arcl~crendngicad 1»vent4ry Sr~rvey of 7'MK: 3--.5-(117:1143, ~'ahului 2"~ Ahupuaat, Narth Kona Dlsirict, Island of `~'rrwaii. Bulgrin, Lon G. and Rabert B. itechtman. (November 2005} An Archaenlogical Inventory Survey of 2"l1~ll~:• .~--~`-t?17.~(?42, Kahului 2"~ Ahupuaa, 1Varth K'rana Distrzet, Island of Ilawaif. County of Hawaii, Department aiE Res~h and Development (July 199} County of Hawaii Data Bank 1.997. Hilo, T-lawaii County of Hawaii (2045) General Plan of the C:aunty of Hawaid. Hilo, Hawaii, e Hawaii Chun Code 19€3. Hilo, Hawaii, County of Hawax~ (updated 7-1-00} Z'h ty Hawaii Mate Department of Agriculture (1977) Agricultural Lands Uf lmpvrtanee to the State of Ilma~aii. Honolulu, Hawaii Hawaii state Department of Business, Economic Development ~c Tourism (2005}. The State of T iawaii Data Book 2405. httpsllwww.hawaii.~ov/clbedtfinfo/economicldatabookl Hawaii State Department of Health (2000) Classification of Hawaii Mate Waters. URi.: http:/lwww.state.hi.usfhealtlalelx/ewblwgmapslwr~stand.htm Hawaii State Department of Land anal Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation L3ivision, Letter Dated Janu~~~y 2S, 2446 to Dr. Robert R.echtman, Regarding Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review jCounty !Planning] inventory Survey Report (RCa4285, Kahului 2"a Ahupuaa, North Dona District, Island of Hawaii, TMR: (3) 7-5«017.043. Hawaii state Department of Land and Natural 12.esources, State ~Iistoric Preservation Division, Letter .Dated October 4, 2040 to Dr. Robert Rechtma?n, Regarding rational Historic Preservation ~.ct (NHPA} Section 106 Review - A.n l~rchaeological Inventory Survey ofTMK 3-7-5.41?:442, Kahului 2°d A.hupuaa, North Kona District, Island of 1-lawaii, TMK: (3} 7-5-41'7:442 Hawaii State Depac~trnent of Land and Natural It.esources, starts Historic Preservation Division, submittal sheet for I-Iistoric Preservation Review Filing Fees; Dated October 17, 2446. Submittal by p? iP~IR.L ~,,A(v1Et(1RIR~EIVTF~1...~:~~S101E1~'P I wAYAk~tk W~'r~r~ ~~'S'l`E1dE$ 1~oXi'~H tD1VA,, k~11,W,A11 SCS Arclology, Title of ReFortlPlan: An In~rentory Survey for 29.389 Acres in lriorth krona k?istriat, Island of Hawaii. TMK: 7-5-017: 40 and 41. HctilCer, C. {1991) volcanic and Seismic Hazards an the Island of Hawaii, U.S. Geological Survey Juvik, Sonia F. ~ James O. Juvik, eds. (1998) Atlas o, f Hawaii. 2nd edition. Honolulu: University aI' Iiawaii Press, Honolulu, Hawaii llfiacdonald, Gordan A,, Agatin T. 'k'albot, Frank L. Peterson (19$3) ~'alcanoes Under' the Sea: 7'lae Geology t~f Hawaiz. CJniveasity of I-Iawaik Press, Honolulu, Hawaii Odyssey Publishing, I,LC. (2046) :l'he Ready Mapbook of Vest Hawaii Sri` ,~'dition. Odyssey Publishing, LLC. Hilo, Hawaii. Planning Solutions (2003) YVaiaha Production well and Reservoir Final Envirorrrraental Assessment. sato, Harry, etal. (l 973) United States I~epartntent of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service In cooperation with iniversity of Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station, Sail Survey of Islaru,~ Qf Hawaii, State a, f Hawaii. Washington, T3.C, USGS, Recent Iiydre~logic Conditions, West I iawaii (Feb 2tI08) http:flhi,water,usgs.gov/west hawaiifwest ~twsi~ tabhtrn Wolfe Edward W. and Jean lt~iorris (1996 Geological Map afthe Island of Hawaii (MAP I-ZS24-A, Sheet 2 of 3}. U.S. Department cif the Interior. U.S. Geological Survey. Wolforth, Thomas T~,. and Wilsoax, J'on. (E~ctober 200G) An inventory Survey for 29.389 Acres in Kahukuti 2"~, Noz~th Kona Distxict, Island of Hawaii: Inves#igations into Settlement Patterns in the Dula Zone ofthe Kona Field System Near Kailua [TN1I~: (3) 7~~-017:40 and 41~. Yoshida, Layne (ZOQ7). Flora of the Waiaha Water System Project Area» ~u+r~a,. ~rrvmorrna~r~, ~,ss~ss~~t~r County oPI°Iawaii DJLI'AI2.TMrN'I' oz' I'UI3LIC WQItKs ~CKPIt,ING AERMtT NQ, J a tl r ^i -a Fee: 1 c; c~ Owner . .'g^"'~, ~ tX. ~ Address: _t'~ ~ ` Phone: ~ 9- ~ Contrackvr. ~bC7Ury 1,v11t , 4`~` Address: Pnone; ~Z_ 9-~.~n License Nc. C' ~l yES~` ~=-~~~tsa -1~a~r,,o~. /~r'?~/ a , Location• ~1 ,u~ ~-C~~_~~'j~..._. Tax Map Key: {3} _`~,,ri-•II: / Quantity (cy):p7~~~ --'~'-'~3- Reference GrubbinglGrading Fermik No.: Estimated Starting bats: ~""15~-'~~t~t~_S „ Exp~ratian pafe: (v-'-~°- ~ (2 working days minimum after issuance date) Remarks: Marc Smith - Phone• 933-0482 ~ ~ `a - 1 • ~ STATE pLNR -HISTORIC PRESERVATION Appraued [or Permit Issuance Ret:etLed By: ~ i Oate• ~ ~~V Date: _~"T 7 USied on the Hawati or National Reglsier of HtstonC Places, p ye$ a 2• ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 Approved igr Permit Issuance ReceNed By.~,•-~~~ Oate: ~ ~ e~ ~ ~ -7 ~~6• Cr.-Y•ft...- Date. ~ 3• ® DEPARTMENT pF PUELIC WORKS. Approved tar Permit issuance: . rt4~ 5 I ~ ~ ; „r } Received By:- ! ,r is Date: f,•.~-~,~,,,,,./Yrf~~~.~"~" - ~ ' r~^ . t.c ~ ate: -w~~ t hereby Certify that al~work as requested above wilt conform to Chapter 1tf taf thQ Hawali County Cods. tJwner• _ it ~ Return to the Department of Publlc Works, EngtneQring Division, upon completion ofi' work. G .canon Acceptsd by• Dats~ _ (DPW inspector 1 engineer) - Starxptrv+q spy prcgrnWr 9 t599 Grading ~~rmi~s ~'or Noah ~lignrnent - - - - - - nr ~~c5 ~c:trcr f:~RC~S 4 ~ ~ubmzttai Wheel; far Historic ~ . ` ~ ~ Preserv~tio>n .review Filing Fees ~ ~ --~'s-' ' Stato Historic Preservation Division s~~ Department Land and Natural ResoLtces Agencp/Firm (R.equesting Review); ~ C-.~ /~,~G,. le ~ e_ a~~ Contact; Jo ~ W ~ ~-Sa ,~i Phone: ~ ~ " j( Fax:.~t ~ -/(~..3 ~-Mail: ~ ot+ rsor, ~ rc~clee.f ~Q Address: ~~.4 ~F©~-~1 f f~/~.r(, . ~r.'`.~' /-~nl /f~ QG8 ~ "3 ' ~ Titles of T2,ep ortJ,t'ian~: J ~ ~ jK ~ ~.n ~r, ,r . 3~9 4 c t ~c~ i ~ r~cv r i-4- ~,,•,v~, _ i l Isl3txd: District: Ahupna'a: Submitted PlanlReport Fee & Type: (Ali repons or plane submitted to the SHPD far review sha11 be acearnpanied by the appropriate fee in accordance with HAIL, §13-275-4 and §28~i-~). ' Check if Report is a Re-Subnuttal (no fee charged) $5U Archaeological Assessment .~J' ; $154 Archaeological Inventaty'Survey Plan ~ a ~ ~ S~Sp Archaeological. Architectuzal ar Ethnoeraphic Survey ~ ~ Report ~ X150 Preserratian Plan $25 Monitoring Plana ~ ~Ci $150 Archaeological Data Recovery Plan 5250 Burial Treatment Play ' $1 QQ Archaeological Monitoring Reportr if resources reported $450 Archaeological Data Reravery Report ~ $4SA Ethnographic D`ocutnentatio>a Report i _ 525 Burial Disinterment Report SSO Osteological Analysis Report e~i P'ee ToCa1; ~ ~ ~ (Zvtalce check payable m "-t3awaii Historic Preservation Special Fund") p F4t OTIlCe U$e v~+T • ~ - ~ Aate Received: I RoceiptNo.: ~ ~ ~ . ~ Payment Merhad: 4G7 1 8 2706 Cash $ t.~.~~p. rX,? - j Check: ~ Check No.: ~ ~ I.Og, i f a.: p r.~ . I RCCEipt ISS~ed 1Sy; ~ ~Trea~ur„~ Deposit Receipt ' Note: A copy of ttus farm will ba ~ziled ar'axed back to you and '~zIl same as your receipt, f ~ } . ,y i~\l k a It I IIILICA tt~'t5r,r'+<tt wF•'~n, t1ii.~ s ~'1~< •Ir ¢t Nt; '•1 Wtt . I. 'Yi 1 ii t 1 . .tk La 5 tint `aA +t t a .DIt 1. a. r . 5 8•r~ts"T'~: I ItLt'4 t~.~i; r ' !'ll ,+i n•~i .w. s .1 `.:~~p'~ •nt:`r wig tv p{,,~,. UEt'.1ti t t1F;h 1 t)i' i.rttil) r~:~f2) t 14`!t \t, itt:tita! tit; LS la • , . ti 4T'rw1 k I (i'tTY'IkN" 1'ttt.tiCl41'A f lIJ ~ I~ib h ti y^hft 's P'"e ot:t h.\+rhktL.tRti~.LLI`1k11.iHx1~' SSi a.1Ni)Lt.t, lt.t~:.~ti t~a.t Jwte 1;t, ?rit)~ ttlr. Cil?:rtrr ~•;c•trtt LAG i~!ta; .'OUS.?t:'~ ~clsntili~c C"o2tsultin~ Se>~i~ee, Inr. 1~tJC t),•st}&'1'S2I IY.U,13o~ 13~ tlrolt7rtrlct~ty I.a~tli' ~'XT. 1~SL'e~tl. StET3dC~'.4"`~': C'tt:rptr,• frl'--l2 [Citterr•ie IPr•e•crr~`sstiurr 1•tr~•ir•\\ l~.c+•is~tcC Iu~~erttt2rr• `iut•~ ry Cot• ?y ~i4~) Aeres in Isnhului ~"~Y 'i... t2tvr~tIl;ntlnns i>etM ficiiirrnrnt C'utterrrs i2t ilu• Y~tala 7..nrrr uC the• Citrrru ~ic•icC 5) a2t•itr ititttrrs` I{triiu,r'' C:inhului 2rtel Aitttpurt`tt, Nc2>I•th Iinnst Dir;it•ict, Iclnntl of )it«ttici "i'A1t~: ril 7'-5-Ef17:-itl uuti $1, '["haul: v+~tt lili• the rtrlx,,:Erctiti~ tc^t tant,tte,rt a:: fire rr:~•i.cxl .^trritae~Jctgie.,l ittvrntr,r~, art:rvcy tcCart~t 1» Srirntrti.' ~'ern:,t,ltin~± Sa~re~ie•\:•~. Iltc. {~:,ro.t, ~tiutl't.rrth ttncl ti~il::pn ~Or1~y ~t•hich we r~Ct:24aX1 ef2t Iviay Us, ~'tlt"i;t. 'Cltt::\t,S ralttera.•r9 art 7t't.;i oC Z9?Fc) .tCt-c•:. r3r,t1 r•e~v>rri~•tt .r tc>ht1 r,t' ;141 tx:?~ rlrc•I;:rc;alnt~'ic•.rl situ. tyl~irtil al't!tc E~ona field S}•stetn {~llit'~'s :+tl-I Ut-~?~-2{rSet3 throw -?fifa?2y. I'hc icl~ntit`tcauiatt oftlte sttnrrv ttraa, dest:ril~ti\\tt ol'tlt~ ett~t•ire»:tuant tt,tet ttte archACtrlos:icat aticl histarical ~~.Il'~ai'tSLtittl 'tt•aat41l1ti t~CFt: tlta't'ITtai7it' t#t 1114' 1JIY:1tCiitss titll'llltiti'r3(1rt. ~t~ Pa`l'tti:i,~ rer~ir~12 ~'{4~Citl"`XCI:S (ttl 'i: it+Wnx of t'ortcr?•it :o the S1 lI'1) ineluclitt~ t12e adelit:c,rt trf t:il~S teeth:~:c:t] irtiitrr~ruiart, St:ttr [m~arnn:y ai' [IiKtari~• I'l.•:ccs aitc rttnt,i}+^r, su,tl clu.rli(ic;.,rinn, ~<latt•?:rnitr:! •..•\'t,`Yi,t frla:~•ci ,rt~rit:ulttirsll 22'tr.,trttclx (SII1C'~r`c it{- ?p-s~_?{tiG{?r. -2f>t',tl~'. -~fa(,th), ;,ncl -~G(alty}. ~?it th,c~ oi`ttte~r ituai~r lta~u t~reir~•ed adc~yu;rte nite,rtion in ;br r\:tiri~:?•cl rc:(wkrt. 1','c szr,rtrz•c ctiCtlt.~ RIB tt~ rttt.tl. tv~ ratteur ntith tl2a:,igttiiiLttnee et'trlusrtivnx and miti~atlnn me:a~ttttr,<rnJtttianx cattaiueci i2t tha reltnri, i~o f~trtlter• ~~•r•,ria is teyuir~eet i`err ?{i erf ilt.: r~\r2'etetl ,itc~.~.. ~t''c: Ic'u,4: I'crrt\:tr~I tll rc~•ice\•ittl! t)tc fl:tta I7r:~•ctvc:r•}~ I'talts I'c}t' ~ I.trtita;d partian of the ~a~°e stle lSllllu~ St}-IU-25'-2(~Gl)?y nrd th3 E3uri:tt "tY~'attt7ent Plnns ti,r rlty tlu•+:c 12;u;t,1 t,ir~, {Stt I{~.~` :+Iy.14SM21t-'~~ih~ty. ~?tt~?l.:ltrt! -2Cib~'') c:clrrt„iuuci l\•ttl22n tlritt c;rt~•a•. t+}ti'~t:.• cutrt:ic:t :iti~,iats,rrt lia\\•t,~i !s[tastd .~Yc:ltittK11t1~,lNI. 7ttit 5.;h~itlc:r, I'h.I), t4s~~'y 9~t1-3~?'Te) {tine+sh} .e :~cltet'Ilertrr Cr.r+v:rii.}~~\v} i C ve,u Ir:c\ ~s ;nty yuc:~;r i<crlti os• CC,uE:~~ry?, , a•t!ardirtt? tlria: Icttrr-. Itll+lrl, i~:tnt:y 1~~Cch•1,?[tirtt, iac:l~uty SI1Pt)~State ~trcltaeningi4t amt tlisu7r'ia Press;r~.ttiui~ Nf:trra}~Lr `+tttt~ 1Ts,trri~ 1'r~:~rn ~tticut ii~t••tsia:t 15 i it i I I i f I ~PP~~11~~X 3HI'D Correspondence June 13, 200$ fJctober 1'7, 2006 Tom: ~-s~o 1 a4o ana o41 t o ° w rehxr.r ~~w~ u a * , 4D;sa ; R~ +aa wo,+ma~ww Y oagtw,~a~so~act ~s vas av ~Q ~ ~ ncwao•w~rea STATE OF HAWAII a~a~~„~~u`~T ~aw~nnrmcawra.waa +~~.muu»ao,r DEPAR'PMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL REBQLiRCEB ~,wo`"Dwu~wr PAST OFk7CftADX ~t ttONOLtJLU, ItAWA[[968Dq October 4, 2006 ~'D~ LOti NO: 2006.376 Rechhnan Consulting, LLC DOC NU: 061QJT17 HC 1 Dox 4149 ~ liea`au, HI 96749 Arehaealo Rear L~r: Rechdman: SiIHJFttiTs NaNapal 8lstorte Preaet~+adop Aat (NHPA) Sectlan 1Q6 Review An AreHaeoIaglcal rm*eptary survey of TMK 3.7-s-alyeo42 Kahului 2°~ Agupua~s, Nortb Kapa Dlatrlct, Istapd ofl~awai`t f317,5.OIT 042 Thank you far submitting the revised report by 13uigris 8t: ReehUnan (2005), Your report RC-0285, for out review and comment. We apologize for the delay in our t+esporrse. Thar report sumrnariaes the results of an archaeological inventr>ry survey of 1S acres far Mr. Phil Trpguely of Httatatai I'armars, LLC. The survey identified six previously unrecorded sites and two previously identified sites. Rechtman Cansultfng LLC assessed aU of the after as slgpificant under criterion d, and recommended that po firtth~er work Was necessary at seven of the sites and that data recovery Was appropriate for the eight rites. The report has satisfied our copcsrns expressed in the earlier review Therefore; we agree with your assessments apd find sites 24553, 24555, 24562, 24563, 24564, 24565, and 24566 to be slgnificarut corder arlteriop d. We stab agree that site 24567 does pat meet the criteria for significance, and therefore no Rirther work oar this site is necessary. Wa t'+rr#her agreA that sufficient information has been collected and tm t3uSrerwork Is required at altos 24553, 245SS, 24563, 24564, 24545, and 24566. And finally, we agree that data t~ecavery at,site 24562 will mitigate the oR'eots of devetopmept on this historic property. The report is therefore accepted. Thank you for your tGpe end attention. We took forwend to reviewing the d>;ta recovery plop fbr site 24562. Kyou have any comments or question please do not hesitate tb contact I)a: Julip Taomie ofthe HaWai'i lstapd otiico at (808) 327-3691. Aloha, P er Xoupg, Chair Oe Hf~orics Prrservation Officer JT:gvf _ - - - I i~ 5 i A~'PE1d~IX ~-Z SHPD Correspondence October 4, 2006 TMI~: (3) 7-5-017: 042 4 i i s• r Dr, Robert Rechtman page 2 ff your current ittterpretaticm of Site 24588 as a temporary habitatloa site relies solely on attifaet t'1'eequsncy and does not account for all the dimensions of variability; `4he diverse traces that formation processes "map auto" cultural materials" (Schur 2996:23j, these it may be erroneous. "1'eraistent ambiguities [a propas site intsrpretattonj leave resulted flnrrt archaeologists' faihue to keep coneeptualIy and operationally distinct the various contexts of tsrlturat rBmains in which traces are pr+oduced," and the inherent ~i2nre to recognize the four dimensions of artifact variability and the for7natian processes of the archaeolagieal retard (Sahifl'er 2996:23; sec Reid 2983), We ask that you consider alternative sits terminologies that Gamey duration information regarding die actual occupational pattxun8, rather than relying on Iaose and ambiguous termina2ogies such as slmst tsm?~ tang-term„ temporary. etc• (see Schiffer 2996:100.2113), The report satisfies the eamditions of HAR 13 § I3 278 and is therefore considered adequate. We Zook forward to reviewing a data rscoirery plea if you leave any questiosrs regarding this review, please ooatact IV7aryArme A~2aigcat, 2iawaii island Section. at (808) 329 3691). Ala}ta, M anie Chinon, Administrator 2iistcrio Preserwetion 2)ivision MM:dtb - - - - - - ~ ~i ~ f3.2g~c LII'IOA LIXGLr; t4 C ~ kq PB11Q R cox~:oceAwAa ti } ~ a9' w+~mv~aro°~o~a wdovarra '+l RdBeATlGMA6VpA ~yddMtj ~ ~ wxmrwacm..~ naAN nAwu+d ~ Acrnn~-+vx+a ~ row' AavA,uwowam aoAtaa ABp caw RlgtC^71011 ario4suau°mia~ ~pwia,art~. ` STATE OF HAWAII °°'~'"°A"~^~~^~~+ tlmlfFDARIiDAAN01}loL~ItCElgapp~ ~eOM„Ned D7iPARTMENT OF LAIYt) AND NATi1RALItESOURCLS ~ ~ STATE H18TORIC PRESERVATION DI VBION ~"°O41r1°'t~ `zO07°a'®0" 601 KAMOKILADOULEVARD, ROOM SSS •TAII'"*~ KAPOLEt,1tAWAn 96707 7anuary 2s, 2006 Dr. Robert Rsx;htman LOG Nt7: 2006.0116 Rechtman Cotlsu(ting, LLC DOC NO: 0601MM18 ~ HC I Box 4149 Archaeology Kea`au, Hawaii 96749-9710 Dear Dr. Rs:chfman; S11I3J1+_',C°I': Chapter bFf42 Historic Preservation Review [CountylPtannin~ Inven#ory Survey Report (RC-02&3~ Kahului Znd Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island atHawai~i TMK:1317-5-017:043 I Thank you for your cover letter dated August 17, 2005 and a copy of the report fitted Archaeologlcu! Inventory Survey of TMK.• 3-7.5-017:043 (Bulgrin and Rechtman, August 2005) for our review. We apologize for the delay in providing our continents and for any inconvenience to yon or your client, Mr. Phil Tinguely, } ~ The report summarizes the resahs of an inventory survey on approximately l5-acre parcel sttuated along I' Hualalai Road near its intorscction wiW the Kahului-Hienatoll Road, The historic background section is ~ suificierrt to predict the types of historic properties that might be present, aad to evaluate their significance. 13videnoe of habitation and agriculture both prior to and following Western contact is expected. The parcel was in ranching use by the Gomea fams)tiy+ from 1927 to the 19ti0's, so impacts from cattle and ranching activities are also expected, Evidence of intensive cuhivation from the short-lived late nineteenth and early twentieth century sugar cane industry may also be present. We believe that given the methodology described, all historic sites on the parse[ have been identified. Six (6) archaeotogicai sites are identified in the survey. These are historic walls which filnctioned as boundaries or in ranching (Sites 24553 24550), a ranching enclosure (Site 24557) and a terraced outcrop interpreted as a temporary habitation site in use prior to Western contact {Site 24538). Test excavations within temaeing at Site 24558 yielded small amowlts of marine shell, pig hone, volcanic glass flakes, and an adze fragment, suggesting temporary habitation use. We agree with your recommended site treatments and the functional interpretations in all cases but one (Site 24588). All six {6) sites Are assesses{ as sigtlificant under Criterion D for information on prehistory or history they have yielded, or are likely #o yield. No further work is recommended for Sites 24553- 24557. Data recovery is recommended for Site 24558, wiUr a specific interest in the location of this site at the elevation transition from the kola to ksrlu Yslu traditional agricultural planting zone. 1~p'p'~lYI$IX °1 SHPD Correspondence January 25~ 2006 TMI~: {3) 7-5-017: 043 - - - - - i i i I i ~tatc historic Prescrvation Division Correspondcacc B-1 January 2S, 2006 TMK.: (3} 7-5-017: 043 B-2 CJctober 4, 2006 TM[I~: (3} 7-5-017: 042 lB-3 June 13, 200 ~ C?ctober 17, 2006 Tll~I{: (3} 7-5-017: 040, 041 'i i Sclentliic Name Family Gammon Life Status* Tank Tank Tank Name Faun #I #2 #3 Nephralepis Nephrolepida• Sword Fern Fern A 3 multi ores ceae f)xalts cornfcnluta Gxalidaceae Waod Sorrel Herb A i Panieum maximum Poaceae Guinea Grass Herb A 1 2 Pennisetum Poaceae Elephant Herb A 2 r ureum Grass P ltantltus s . Eu horbiaceae Ph ilanthus Herb A I 2 Pityragramma Hemiottitida- Silver Fern Fern A 3 calutnelanos ceae _ P ales anlcttlata Pol alaceae Pol la Herb A 2 3 Pteris crerica Pteridaceae Cretan Break Fern l 3 he tram re ens Poaceae Natal Red Herb A 2 Ricimts cammunls Eu ttorbiaceae Castor Bean Shrub A 1 Schinus Anacardiaceae Chrlshnas Shrub A 2 terebinih' olius Be Seneclo s . Astetaceae Senecio Herb A 3 Sides rhombi olio Matvaceae Cuba Jute Herb A 1 3 Sides s !noses Malvaceae Prick! Sides Herb A 1 3 Si esbeckia orienta!!s Asteraceae Si esbeckia Herb A 1 2 5ilene gallica Caryaphylla• Catchfly Herb A 3 cese Spatlsadea Bignoniaceae African Tulip Tree A 1 carat emulates Stachytarpheta Verbenaceae Vervain ~Ierb A 1 amaicensis edrella nod ores Asteraceae Nodeweed Herb A 2 7Y~ium etta s . Tiliaceae Bur Bush Herb A 1 2 Waltkeria indices Stercullaceae Uhaloa Herb I 3 Zia fiber zerumbet Z' iberaceae Awa uhi Herb A 1 "Status Codes: A = Alien I =Indigenous, End = FederaUState listed Endangered Species IO T~b~~ 2. W~ia~n "~V~te~ Tank ~i>l~s ~'1~n4 ~.~sir ' * Status Codes: A = Alien, l =Indigenous, End =Federal/State listed l?ndangered Species , i Scientific Narae Family Common M LifQ Statns* Tank Tank Tank Namc Form #1 #2 #3 ' ~tgerattun corryzotdes Astaraceae Maile Herb A 2 _ _ Hohano ,9geratunr ^Astaraceae Maile Herb A 2 3 houstontanum Hohono rlleurites moluccana Eu horbiaceae Kukui Tree A 1 Ambrosia Astaraceae Ragweed Herb A 3 ~ artemtsii alia _ _ _ Ascle tas /i socar a Ascle iadaceae Balloon Plant Herb A ~ 1 l3tdens na rr olia Astaraceae Bidens Herb A 2 ,Bidens ptlosa Astaraceae Beggar's Herb A 2 Tick 13uddleia astatica Buddieiaceae D Tail Shrub A l 3 , Canna s . Cannaeeae Canna Herb A 2 Chanraecrista Fabaceae Partridge Pea Herb A 1 2 3 ntctttans Cltamaesyce hirta Euphorbiaceae Garden Herb A 3 Sure Clramaesyce Euphorbiaceae Graceful Herb A 3 erica olia Surge Chlorts s . Po~ceae Chloris Herb A 3 Conyza bonariensis Astaraceae Hairy Herb A 2 ~ Horseweed ' Cratalarta s. Fabaceae Rattlebox Herb A 1 2 3 ~ Cuphea Lythraceae Tarweed Herb A 2 cartha enensis Desmodtum Fabaceae Desmadium Herb A 1 sandwtcense Desnrodium tw•tuosrrrn Fabaceae Desmodium Herb A 3 Di Marta s. Poaceae Crab s Herb A 1 2 3 Dryrnaria cordata Caryophylla- Drymaria Herb A 3 Ceae • Eleusine tndtca Poaceae Goose ss Herb A 1 3 _ ~ H tis ectinata Lamiaceae Comb H tis Shrub A 3 , Indtgofera Fabaceae Indigo Herb A 1 3 su ruticosa 1 omoea alba Convolvulaceae I omoea Vine A 3 K lltn a 6revt otta C eraceae K Ilin a Herb A 2 3 K Ilan a nemoralts C eraceae K Itin a Herb A 2 3 Leucaena Fabaceae Haote Koa Shrub A I leucoee hala Madvastrum Malvaceae False Mallow Herb A 3 • coromat:deltarrum Mimosa pudtca Fabaceae Sleeping Herb A 1 3 ` Grass Momordtca charantta Cucurbitaceae Bitter Melon Vine A 1 Mores alba Moraceae White Tree A 1 Mulberry 9 Scientific Famlly Common Llfe Status* Segment Segment Segment Nance Name Form #I ttZ #3 Ricimcs Euphorbiaceae Castor Bean Shrub A I 2 3 communis Rubrrs Rosaceae Thimbleber- Herb A I rosi oltus Sacctolepfs Poaceae Glenwood Herb A 1 tndfca Grass Samanea Fabaceae Monkey Tree A 3 samara Pad Schlnus Anacardiaceae Christmas Tree A I 2 terebfnthffal- Berry fus Senecfa s . ,Asteraceae Senecio Herb A I Senna Fabaceae Coffee Herb A 2 3 accicientalls Senna Senna endula Fabaceae Senna Shrub A I 3 Setarfa s . Poaceae Setaria Herb A_ 1 3 Stda Malvaceae Cuba Jute Herb A I 2 3 rhombt lfa Sfda s tnasa Malvaceae Pric Sida Herb A 1 2 3 Sfgesbeckfa Asteraceae Sigesbeckia Herb A 1 3 orlentalfs Sflene alltca o h ilaceae Catchfl herb A 1 Solanum Solanaceae Pnpola Herb I I 3 amerteanum Sonchus Asteraceae Sonchus Herb A I 2 3 aleraceus Spathodea Bignoaiaceae African Tree A 2 canr anulata Tuli ermacace s , ltubiaceae 13uttonweed Herb A 1 3 S orabo/us s. Poaceae S orobalus Herb A 2 Stachytarpketa Verbenaceae Vervaut Herb A 1 2 3 s. ,S~nedrella Asteraceae Nodeweed Herb A I Wadi ora Taltnum s . Portutaceae Fameflower Herb A 2 ~ Thevetta Apocynaceae Be-Still Shrub A I eruutana "tree 71~idax Asteraceae Coat Jierb A 3 - acumberts Buttons ?Ytum etta s . Tiliaceae Bur Bush Herb A 1 2 3 Waltheria Sterculiaceae Uhalaa Herb I 3 tndf~a Youngia Asteraceae Oriental Hem A 1 'a ontca Hawksbeard Zingfber Zingiberaceae Awapuhi Herb A t zerumbet * Status Codes: A = Alien, I =Indigenous, Ead = FederaUState listed Endangered Species i Scientific Family common Lifc Sfntus* Segment Segment Segerren# idl'ame _ _ iVame Farm #f #2 #3 ~ Nephrolepis Nephrolepida Sword Fern Fern A 1 ~ multi ora ceae Nr'candra s . Salonaceae Nicandra Herb A I 3 O lismenus s. Poaceae O lismenus Herb A t 4 runtia s. Cactaceae O untie Shrub A 3 Oxalis Oxalidaceae Wood Herb A 1 2 3 cornicrrlata Sorrei L?xalls Oxalidaceae Woad Herb A I ~ ca mbosa Some[ ' Panicum Poaceae Guinea Herb A 1 2 3 maxlrrrurrr Grass Paspalum Paaceae Hilo Grass Herb A 1 2 3 con `u atrrnr Pas alums . Poaceae Pas alum Herb A 3 Pass~ora Passifloraceae Lilikoi Vine A I 2 ~ edulis Pennisetum Poaceae Kikuyu Herb A I ' clandestlnum Grass Pennisetum Paaceae 8lephant Herb A 1 2 ur rrreum Grass Peperomia Piperaceae Peperamia Herb l 1 3 ~ le tostacls a ' Persea Lauraceae At+acado Tree A 1 2 ~ ~merfcana ~ Phlebodium Poiypodiaceae Hare's Foot Fern A 1 aureurrr Fare P llantrrs s . Eu horbiaeeae Ph llantus Herb A 2 3 Phymutosorr~.s Polypodiaceae Maile Fern A 1 ' scolopendrra Scented Fern Pithecellabirrm Fabaceae l~ulce Tree A 3 clrtlce Pttyrogramraa Hemianitida- Silver Fern Fern A I , calomelanos ceae Plantago Flantaginaceae English Herb A 1 lancealcrta Plaata[n Pluchea Asteraceae Sourbush Shrub A 1 2 m ti olia Polygala Palygalaceae Palygaia Herb A I 2 3 antculata Portulaca Portulaceae Pigweed Herb A 3 oleracea Portulaca Portulacaeae Partulaca Herb A 3 ilosa Frosopis Fabaceae ICiawe Tree A 3 allida Psidlrrm Myrtaceae Guava Tree A 1 2 a ava Pycreus fyperaeeae Cyperus Herb A 2 al stach os Rhynchelytrrurr Paaceae Natal Herb A 1 3 reperrs R.edtop 7 Scientific Family Common Llfe Status* Segment Segment Segment Name !Yams Form #1 #2 #f3 Euphorbfa Euphorbiaceae Kaliiso Herb A 1 3 hetero lla Err horb/a s . Eu horbiaceae Eu horiba Shrub A 1 2 Flcus Maraceae Chinese Tree A 3 mlcrocar Han Catinso a s . Asteraceae Galinso Herb A 2 _ Hedyotis Rubiaceae Hedyotis Herb A 2 c mbosa Hypos Larniaceae Comb Shrub A 1 2 3 ectfnata H is Indrgofera Fabaceae Indigo Herb A Z 3 s ticosa I omoea albs Convolvulaceae I amoea Vine A 1 2 Ipomoea fnclfca Convolvulaceae Morning Vine I Z 3 Glo Ipomoea ConvolvuIaceae Ipomoea Vine A 3 obscures Ipomoea Coavolvulaceae Little Bell Vine A 1 3 trfloba Kalanchae Crassulaceae Kalanchoe Hexb A 1 3 innata Kyllfnga Cyperaceae KyII'mga Herb A i 3 brev olfa Kyllfnga Cyperaceae Kyllinga Herb A 1 2 3 nemoralls Lantana Verbenaceae Lantana Shrub A 3 crrmara Leanotis Lamiaceae Lion's Ear Herb A 3 ne et olfa Leucaena Fabaceae Haola Koa Shrub A I 2 3 teuco la Lycoperstcon Soloneceae Tomato Herb A 1 s. Macroptflfum Fabaceae Macroptili- Vine A 1 Z 3 afro u rheum mn Macroptilfum Fabaceae Caw Pea Herb A 1 2 lest aides Magtfera Anacardiaceae Mango Tree A Z indlca Malvastrurn Malvaceae False Herb A 1 2 3 coramandeltarr- Mallow um Medics o s, Fabaceae Medi o Herb A 1 Menthes s Larniaceae Mint Herb A 1 Michelfa M liaceae Michelia Tr+e~ A Z Mimosa pudica Fabaceae Sleeping Herb A 1 Z 3 Grass Momordica Cucurbitaceae Bi#er Vine A 1 2 3 eharantfa Melon Manus albs Moraceae Vlthite Tree A 3 Malb Nephrolepls Nephrolepida- Sword Fern Irern I 1 exaltaKt ceae 6 Scientific Family Camman Lifc Stafus~ Segment Segment Segment blame IWarme Form #1 #2 #3 Christella sp. Thelypterida- Maiden Fern A 1 2 ceae Fern Chrysapogon Poaceae Goiden Herb I? l ' aeiculatus Beard s Clea»re Capparaceae Spider Plant herb A T 3 na:rdra l..'OCCfttia Cucurbitaceae Ivy Gaurd Vine A 3 ra~tdis ' Caccutrrs Menisperma- Huvhue Vine 1 i trilobus ceae Co ea ~rabica Rubiaceae Cafi'ee Shrub A 1 ~ Commelina Cammelinaceae Hairy Herb A 3 ben halensis Hanohono Comirtelina Camrnelinaceae Honahana herb A I di sa ' Canyza Asteraceae Hairy Herb A 1 2 banariensis Harseweed G"ardyline Agavaceae Ki Shrub A 1 2 uticosa ' Crotalaria s . Fabaceae Crotalaria Herb ~ A _ 1 2 3 _ ' Cucumis Cucurbitaceae Teasel Vine A 3 ~ ~ ! di saceus Gourd ! Cuphea I.ythraceae Tarweed Herb A 1 cartha enensis , Cynodan Poaceae Bermuda Herb A 1 2 3 i ,I dactylon Grass , t ~perus af. Cyperaceae Cyperus Herb A 3 ~I Com ressus Desmanthus Fabaceae Slender Herb A 3 vir~atus _ Mimosa Desmodium Fabaceae Desmodium Herb A 1 2 3 sandwicense Desmadiuu: Fabaceae Florida Herb A 1 2 3 tartuasum Be eed Desmodium Fabaceae Aesmodiuru Herb A 1 !ri ortutt Digitaria Poaceae Saurgrass Herb A 2 3 insularis De itaria s . Poaceae Crab ss Herb A 1 3 Dioscarea s . Dioscoreaceae Hoi Vine A 1 Drymaria Caryaphyllaeeae Pipi[i Herb A 1 cordata Eleusine indices Poaceae Gaase s Herb A 1 2 3 Emilia Asteraceae Pualele Herb A 1 2 3 osber it Emilia Asteraceae Pualele Herb A 1 3 sanchi olia Era ostis s . Poaceae Era tis Herb A 3 Eragrostis Poaceae I,ovegrass Herb A 3 tenella Erechtltes Asteraceae Fireweed Herb A 1 hieracl olia 5 '~'~bfle la '6~~~a~ha V4Jat~r ~ysl`.~m 'T~ensmiss~mn I.in~s P1~nt Ldst * Status Codes: A = A}ien, ! =Indigenous, End = FederaVState listed Endangered Species Scientitie Fam}ty Cammon Lifc Status* Segment Segment Segment Dame r}sme p'arrn #1 #Z #3 Abutllon Malvaceae I~iairy Shrub A 3 and ollum Abutilan Acacia Fabaceae lCtu Shrub A 3 arneslana Ageratum Asteraceae Maile Herb A 1 co older Hohana Ageratum Asteraceae Made Herb A ] houstanianum Hohono Aleurites ~ Eupharbiaceae Kukui Tree A 1 3 moluccana Allemande Apocynaceae Purple Shrub A 3 blanchetif Allemande Amaratrtltus Amaranthaceae Amaranthus Herb A 1 2 3 s lnovus Amarunthus Amaranthaceae Amaranthus Herb A 1 3 vlrldus Ambrosia Asdaraceae Ragweed Herb A 1 artemtslf olfa Arwcarpus Maraceae Ulu Tree A 2 altllls Asclepir~s Aaclepiadaceae Ba}laan Herb A 2 h racer a Flans Asystasia Acanthaceae Chinese Herb A 1 an etica Vialet Bauhlnla s . Fabaceae Bauhinia Tree A 3 Bebanla Begoniaceae Begonia Herb A 1 2 hirtelta Blderar rxf. Asteraceae Bidens Herb A 2 3 a !l olio Bldens ila+sa Asteraceae Be rtick Herb A 1 2 3 Baerhavla Nycteginaceae Boerhavia Herb A 3 coccinea Brachlarla Foaceae California Herb A l malice Qrass 13rrddlela Buddleiaceae Butterfly Shrub A 1 2 astatica Bush Carica a u a Caricaceae Fa e a Shrub A 1 3 Catharanthrrs Apocynaceas Madagascar Herb A 1 raseus Periwiankle Chamaecrista Fabaceae Partridge Herb A l 2 3 nlctltans Pea Ghamaescye Euphorbiaceae Hairy Herb A 3 hrrta Sur e !Chamaescye Eupharbiaceae Graceful Herb A 1 2 3 ic' olio Sur e Chan:aescye Euphorbiaceae Prostrate Herb A 1 2 3 rostrate S e Chlorls s. Foaceae Fine s Herb A 1 2 3 4 - I i In the attached plant list ('Table 2) the water tank site on the south mauka alignment is listed as #1. The mauka tank site slang the northern alignment is tank #2 and the makai tank on the northern alignment is #3, A number of species that were seen in the study area were not included in the list attached to this report since #hese are ornamental species that have been planted and are clearly being tended as Landscaping. Some of these plants are Manila Palm (lfeitchia sp.), Snake Plant (Sansevieria sp.), Bougainvillea (~3ougainvrdlec~ sp.) and Rheo (Tt~at~escantia sp.) RARE ANDJOR ENDANGERED SPECIES: The study area does not contain any Endangered, Threatened, or Rare species as listed ' under the Federal ar State of Hawaii regulations. Further none of the plants recorded ' during this study are at present being proposed far placement on the Federal or State Registxy far Rare or Endangered Plants. CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY: ' The species and plant camrnunities observed in the study area encompassed in this report are dominated by exotic, aggressive and weedy species. 'I'ho few indigenous species seen in the area are common throughout the leeward side aFthe island of Hawaii and for the ~ mast part aggressive colonizers that are able to compete with exotic species. Since the area has been so greatly altered by human activity there does not appear to be any plant communities or species that are unique or that should be considered Far preservation. Moreover, since the study area is predominately urban and is currently being maintained by mowing, clearing, or herbicides, the area is an artificial assemblage of species that will change over time, if not maintained. 3 ' ~ The vegetation along segment #l, the north alignment, is dominated by aggressive, weedy species that are the first colonizers of cleared land or seen along the side of the highways on the leeward side of the island. Exotics such as Guinea grass (Panicum maximum}, T~ikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum) and California grass (Brachiaria mutica) are common in this type of transient floristic community. The area following the side of the paved rand is composed ofa lawn that is mowed and well tended. The vegetation slang segment #2, the south mauka alignment, is also dominated by aggressive, exotic species such as Z~uffala grass (Permisetum purpureum), False Mallow {Malvastrum coromandelianatm} and Guinea grass {Panicum maximum}. The south makai alignment, segment #3, is dominated by Guinea grass in the pasture and by weeds like Desmodium (Desmadium tartuasum) and Partridge Pea Chamaecrista n%titans) along the side of Hualalai Road and Hienaloli Road. Escaped ornamental plants such White Mulberry (,Mores albs) can also be seen in this area. Far the mast part the few indigenous species observed in the area are also aggressive and weedy species such as Morning Glory (Ipamoea indica) and Uhalaa {Waltheria ind%a). Other indigenous species observed in the study were Popalo (Solanum americanum}, Huehue (Cocculus trilobus} and Cuba Jute (Bids rhombifolia). There is some uncertainty concerning whether Cuba Jute is indigenous to Hawaii or not but far this report it is listed as being indigenous. One native species that is common an the leeward side of i-ia~uvaii but not weedy was also Located within the study area, this is Peperomia leptostachya. This species was seen in two discrete populations growing either within or adjacent to the study area. Bath populations were observed to be growing along the side of or an a stonewall, One population was located along the north alignment and the second population was located an a stonewall adjacent to Hualalai Raad in the southern makai alignment Water Tank Sites Three sites that have been mechanically cleared for placement of water tanks were also inspected in preparation for this report, The two water tank sites that are located along the Werth alignment have been recently bulldozed and so the vegetation consists of primarily herbaceous, weedy pioneer species that are common on the leeward side of the island. The third water tank site is located on the southern mauka alignment, this site was bulldozed at one time but since the plot has had a longer time for the vegetation to grow, the site includes trees such as l~ukui (Aleurites mollucana} and African Tulip (Spathodea campanulata) that have grown to about 20 ft in height. 'The dominant plant communities on the three water tank sites are primarily a mixture of exotic species. Also, since the communities are still young, it can be expected that they will change over time but still be dominated by exarics. • 2 I II it y Prepared by; l~ayate ~'oshida, flotarais# The approximate broader area ofthis floristic study is bounded by the Queen Kaahuraanu Highway on the makai (ocean) side and the old Mamalahaa Highway on the mauka (mountain) side. `rl~c: area is generally bounded by the 'V4~'aiaha Gulch on the north side and by l-lualalai Road on the south. Transmission Line 'segments The study area can be divided into three discreet sections, all of which have been greatly altered due to human activity, ~ The first segment is the northern alignment and starts at the old 11~amalahoa Highway and terminates at Hienaloli Road. The rnauka side of this segment follows a paved private road and the rnakai portion of the segment follows a cleared but not yet paved road in a developing subdivision, ~ The second segment is the southerr? mauka segment and it again starts from the old Mamalahoa Highway and the segment terminates at a subdivision that borders Hienaloli Road. This segment fc,llows an extension of the subdivision road and the area has been cleared and herbicide .had been sprayed prior to the time of the geld survey, ~ The third segment in the study area is the southern rnakai alignment, this alignment nuns from Hienaloli Road to the Queen Kaahumanu Highway, "Phis segment follows the shoulder of Hienaloli Road and Hualatai Road for a distance, then crosses through a pasture. The three segments are in an area that has been greatly altered by human activities and the north alignment, the south mauka alignment and a portion of the south. makai alignment have all been mechanically cleared and are subject to periodic maintenance with the plants being either cut or sprayed with herbicide. Table 1 includes a plant last for the corridors of the north and south alignments of the transmission lines. Zt should be noted that when the Fieldwork for this report was done several of the areas had only seedlings and new growth sprouting in the area due to the use of herbicide. Segment #3, the southern rnakai alignment that crosses the pasture as the only area in this study that does not appear to have been completely mechanically cleared at some point in time. However, even in this area the vegetation has been greatly altered due to human activity. Fven though the gesture was not subject to active grazing at the time of the field work. it is clear that the vegetation in the area is not a native type of floristic community. 1 ~otani~al Survey Cotlllty of Hawaii Di+:PART1YiI~:N7' C?F >'u~~~.zc ~~vo~tr{s GRApCNG PERMIT NO. . d~ Fee; Owner. '~R ~11~ ~ Address: ,~+7 1~U.k ?S~ Phone; ~ j~~~-~ 1~~t~1~; lei. ~~?~l~.__ Civil Eng. J Surveyor: ~.~~tdi~v~.~..,__. Address: ~d 1~~__~ Phone: ~C j~/ UcensaNo.: o~~tJ~?'_ C. Colltractar..k~~a~..7~?n1 1 rV~,,~ ~ Address: l~~ ~~Q~' PhtitYe: 5~ 9' license No.: ~F? G .1 ~l~J-,~~ ._~.1~ t.acatian: r~{J ~.rt~G~2L~1 ~~?~'L~d,1.r~ J~~+, Tax Map Key: (3) ^ ~ -_...~1~~~__ Area Graded (acre): • Sri. Disposer Site; _ Estimated Starting Data: ~ ~I:~'- ~t~i.._ Estimated Compieiion Date: ~ µ ~'~r~2C~o Filt(cy); ~y (minimum 2 working flays after issuance date) Barrow Slte: Remarks: Phone: 327-3#390 Fex:327-3ParJ3 1. ~ Sl`ATE Dt_NFt - MiS~'t7F-t1C Pi~ESERUA~T~tON l7iVtStGIN Approved: Ftecsived By, Mll1,~, ~ f~. date: _t~l_`_ atq' ~ ~ C:,n,../ f ~ l.isfed arl the Hawail or National Register or Historic Places CI Yes 9da 2. i~ PLANNfNG DEPAtZTMEN7 Approved: R~~ived ar. Dale: Ci• c~'" ~~j _'~t~~ aata: ~ ~ " 3. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WURKS Approved for Permit Issuance: ? tZecetvad rty t f' t C' Date. G: Ej ~ ~ crate- I hereby certify that ail work as rectues~d above wilt conform to Chapter 10 of tiro Hawaii County Code. E' Owner: t s;_ , Date: .trn to the I]apaltment of Public Vllarks, Engineering Division, open contptetion of work, Certification Accepted by: l~3ate: {DPW it}si~ectar i enr~inePr) ~ i • • ATTACHMENTS • I PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR OFFSITE FLOWS TO LOT D KAHULUI, NORTH KONA, HAWAII I TMK (3)7-5-017:042 APRIL, 2009 Prepared for: ' i Hu Ko PA, LLC ,f 'S:i E- - ~ ~ ~i,".L 'r Prepared by: WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 75-5751 Kuakini Hwy., Ste. 106 ' Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 ' (808)334-0322 FAX (808)334-0831 I i i f j TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PURPOSE ..............................................................1 II. METHODOLOGY , 1 ~ III. CALCULATIONS .........................................................1 i IV. CONCLUSION .2 APPENDIX A Location Map and Tax Map Key Map APPENDIX B Hydrographs I~ I ~i - i I I I I I i i i HU-KO-PA, LLC PRELIMINARY D RAINAGE .REPORT FOR OFFSITE FLOWS TO LOT D KAHULUI, NORTH KONA, HAWAII TMK (3)7-5-017:042 ~ I. PURPOSE The purpose for this report is to quantify the amount of runoff from the area mauka of Lot D so that, when the azea is developed, mitigation measures can be incorporated into the design. This information is being performed at the request of the Department of Public Works, County of Hawaii. II. METHODOLOGY ~ In order to ascertain the quantity of flow, the Upland Method was used. This method can be found in the SCS, National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Chapter 15, "Hydrology". This method was developed for watersheds of less than 2,000 acres. The Department of Public Works, at this time, feels that the 100-yeaz storm should be considered when designing offsite work. However, within the subdivision, a 10-year, 1-hour storm is used. The tributary area for Lot D is 122 f acres. The typical drainage pattern due to the topography of the azea would direct storm water runoff to primazily traverse onto Hualalai Road and into the adjacent mauka Lot E. Therefore, this report will quantify the amount of runoff from the tributary area mauka of Lot D, to include the storm water runoff from Lot ~ Eat TMK:(3)7-5-017:43, hereinafter "Project Area". i III. CALCULATIONS i In order to determine runoff, it is necessazy to determine a curve number for this area. A ~ curve number is based upon a vegetative cover type and density and a hydrologic soil group. I ~ It represents the amount of runoff that can be detained- the higher the curve number- the higher the runoff. The predominant soil type in the azea is classified as HVD. This was determined from the "Soil Survey of the Island of Hawaii", compiled by the NRCD (SCS). ~ Soil type HVD falls in the soil group A. The ground cover in the azea is primarily dense vegetation with spazsely separated residences. Therefore, a curve number of 60 was selected. Using the computer program, "Hydroflow", hydrographs were produced for 10-year, 25-yeaz, 50-yeaz and 100-yeaz twenty-four hour storms. The following aze the results. i I Page 1 of 2 I 1 I i 1 Storm Type Rainfall Peak Flow Total Volume ears Inches t~/sec ) ( ) U ) (f~) 10 6.5 73.01 984,442 25 7.5 101.58 1,293,137 ~ ` 50 8.5 132.05 1,620,279 100 9.0 147.87 1,789,569 i These hydrographs aze included as Appendix B. ' 7 IV. CONCLUSION I No storm water conveyance systems, such as culverts, inlets, catch-basins, and storm sewer lines, are present in or neaz the Project or would be affected in any way by the proposed Project. There is no significant storm water runoff or any major flood drainage ways found ~ to be in or neaz the Project Area and the Project is located well outside of any flood zone areas. During the design phase of the Project, offsite flows will be taken into consideration ~ and the developer shall continue to coordinate with the Department of Public Works to determine the appropriate storm water drainage facilities. I. r . i ' Page 2 of 2 - - - - I ' APPENDIX A i i i i r i t i i • N ' I HA 1 w E 7 ~ N RTH KOH A ~ S , , ~ 110lIOKM 5 KAWAHAE WALEA 19 ~ , ~ SOUTH ~ ~ KOHALA ~ j ' / , ~ NORTH HIlO 19 190 HAMAKUA f ~ _ . ~ . ~ - . ~ / , / ~ NORTH KONA ~ SOUTH HILO Ino / i ' ~ ~ oo ~ . ~ KAIIUA LOCATION ' ~ ` / ` 130', \ i~ _ ~ ~ PAHOA, • 132 - OUTH / J'' PUNA i KONA i I / + KAU it 1 ~ t~ , ' ,I ~ 1 ' " l~/1 NAALEHU i k t WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP LOCATION MAP 7S•97~IKUOAInIMw11 SIe.t06 Coneulltnq~ivgfngineere Ko~luo•kono Horrai{98710 Conelruclon Manoaere ans. L... 1 i• MOEAUOA R-- -GPM J-- :6 0- Ivjp ~ ~fl~~.~_0ay~.^M.Er+ pR~68_eNOir j~~~~-`jj`Y1 ~ - - l O.F' ~a1 1 ~.~.F, .1_•._ ter... 4iJ . v a' r cit" _ ~ - •+t ~ yti, - ~ .fit Q° ' tea` a _ ' R~p~~~ ~ t11~ +t. =1^'` - Q iQ F r r. ! ~ R~ ^~S jam ~1 ~r f ~ O ~l - 4 i! • .y fi~$. J~B~. ' ~ i _ ~ _ • i ~ ~n i~ 8r `d ~ ' ~ .JO ~\s ~ ~~Jin211.Nc. `~I ~ _ ~~i` • Ha n • ;~_9 ao 3 ~ 23:~~~y~ ~ C ;---^`r?~~` ~ = v ~ ~kIF .('NAB-2 Cv..]?~ .r~~.. ~~./TpTy~it NO r- .1' _ J_~~.~Q,[j/~~Cy,"- r 1-~~ = ttrr r ~ R`i•. ' , Val .O ~•.n~~a. _ •r-" •r ',1 k p " g • _ 1110 e e 'ir.2~-= ` A.-MGR i • • ~r~' 4~p~0 : ~-_..~'i ~ 1 •o } AfS' . ' ' °0 ~ ~ 3 ~r?if-~'"~____-KONA3~E~GH'I'S SU9m 71 -..alt v 6p0 ' ~ f J ~ - t- . ~ _ , 4" P~iti ~ M` ~ ~T ,,,mss c ,~•~ar . ~ 2e~ + ~ ~ ' = T, ! o" ~ ~ JKpNA' HILLCR ~ 0.~ a248 ` ti N Za m3 ` * »~80 'O .rte _ 8 1 ~ ti ° . • ¦ f~ f as w~O M . ( - • a ~ ' ~ BOy ..r • ~ y'Y • ~ • 666 Y r U • rm i = o ~ I 2-0.50 MC Roservoirs KUAItiNI-WALUA Bot. E1a294 d 111nA ~ J ; ~ ~ ,a , a rt ~ O.F. EI~.324.78 4'=IdA r • ~r° ~ c ~ ~ K~ U~ONi0N1 (not in use) ~ 'r ~ ~ EI=127 t! r ~ ~ ~ I 4°=~40 ,f ~ 4 ~ ."~F _ ! (riot ina UBA~ / T 6 17 .s....._ a I CJrAE:7_C ~ 20 ,A.wfl awp.~Idewy.,.r ~~y.,p qY,q g '939" ~ „ - ~ PLRT ^n~aj6R 7~ANK a/r%'i)h JU x77 • ..~4 /O ~ ' ° ' ' ~ P G At. ern It 1 tC, ° CT. JAl~ 2 ~ ~tl 1A:y 1 ~ qQ 'aM-. ` mss.. ~ 34 w oxlp ' zr 4 w. i q a~ ~ ~I ~7i ` YF ~ ~ p s~ 48 9CE Ao _tirwr.w.~~ _ wHS Z l ,,s~ ~ ara na ~ lass M'' ,98 ~ " ~ / t7 u,e TMS.wN OfIMI1 ~ r'/ jet4eradr.I~rNa a AS) `seC. 2 yuoA' ~ 4rfieti ,.'t'~7N.~ I 6i AY _ )''4 e%"~I;"aR~`e'r~ aria °s?1 fri4e<.tc gar ~ ~ ~ ~~x:TR'y I { NY~~ ra,aN ' I '10 t 4 _ r/ (337f9A°),~, =,r ~ ry 11 r DEC i1 q~ G7e'7'Ao ~ , 1~ r` a i ~1 +a , ep60 1964 , I l ~ ~ L 1 a04o ` ~ .DDIl6~ \ / V 'R' 10D ~ /Q6e ° S ~WkI/erd~naryt/NS„~ RA /y r 9J3~~ ~'ily'~o G R t4d0oA+, a ~ ~r7}°. 81l19t1 0 ~ ,r„r ~ GRANT 98.! esaeM~ r 1 ! 111th ? ~ ~ i ~ 0 3 b 6tl19i2 0 6 ~ e~~ ~tiyM""' " 2374sA°, o~~ s , wuesadiroNa~p \ :~f~6~~a ;~;p n".~.'y,','.rrc.'A.'„ ,y 3 Ix,eerAe. 311914 /.r, nro ~-r- asssy wsu•n „„Egqer l9l# r ~ ~"i ~ cntle ~at°i~~. w ~ O P I V 1 61~ ~ b Q Di611'at ' IytIDA s J61Z3tlq > ~ ~ rrlepu ; ~ o [J p~S7~1 l+9aeA. sets-B '9 Jf ~ ~ . M w' L b l ~ O , ~ *018 Ao ~ ah K nte~ , r ~ ~ r ~ 70,977Ao ~ ^ III ; pose ~I 19 la+aa~Acr, 4 B g 7: 2 IM ~ O ~ / ~ y rl b i iii, - a H , , q ~ ~ ! A 3 ~ , ~ ~ e p ~ ,,°.d /•I C p~~l (,M1, C / a rE~l' "KONG eRCNAaa u,o'rMM e ~ ~ anLy J 4 4 _ V N ~ ` - M4LIrrr = A h a ' ~ = i ac . ti • ~ ~ b ~ ie, ~ I ~ ~ ~T f ~ , tie i ~ r , ~ ~ ~ l C ! - , NO Msl~A, ~ ryn.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 - ~ - y ~ I ! " i i ~ A+rsoRt Oro Ir7/t, y,I/, ss, ~..,rt.r~,j <,n«,~.,-7c L V r ! ~ p N ]r,aa„f},,o,x., sxpaa, ' " O «~M C T ) A h 0~ ~ l4~,A. M ~ 5 g ~ n+lao o~V1310N \ ''4., ~ r~,r, y AD~ANCF. SHEET 7 .5 ~ 7 ~ ~ SUBJECT TO CtIANGE CCNTAINlNG r'ARCCl9 PORTION Of WA/AHA l3* TO dUAPUMN(!/ 1. NORTH KONq, H.IWA/,,7~ r1 sc~~e ile=boo PJgMfEQ...--"---,~..a /p i i Hydrograph Plot 1 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Wednesday, Feb 18 2009, 3 35 PM - ~ Hyd. No. 1 j Runoff to Lot E f Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 101.58 cfs f Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval 6 min Drainage area = 120.22 ac Curve number - 60 Basin Slope = 16.9 % Hydraulic length = 6400 ft _ Tc method =LAG Time of conc. (Tc) = 59.2024 min Total precip. = 7.50 in Distribution =Type I Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 - ~ Hydrograph Volume = 1,293,137 cuff ( Runoff to Lot E Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 25 Yr Q (cfs) 120.00 120.00 100.00 100.00 ~ 80 00 - - - - - - - - - - 80 00 l - - - - - 60 00 _ _ 60 00 - - - - - 40.00 40 00 - ` 20 00 20 00 _i 0 00 0 00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Hyd No. 1 Time (hrs) _r I Hydro ra h Plot g p Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Wednesday, Feb 18 2009, 3:35 PM Hyd. No. 1 Runoff to Lot E Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 132.05 cfs L I Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 6 min Drainage area = 120.22 ac Curve number = 60 Basin Slope = 16.9 % Hydraulic length = 6400 ft Tc method =LAG Time of conc. (Tc) = 59.2024 min Total precip. = 8.50 in Distribution = Type I Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 I_ Hydrograph Volume = 1,620,279 cult ( i rr I_ Runoff to Lot E Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 50 Yr Q (cfs) 140.00 140.00 ( 120 00 - - - - - _ . - - - 120. - L 100.00 100.00 80.00 - - . - . 80.00 r 1 I - - . - 60.00 60.00 [ I 40.00 40.00 20.00 20.00 0 00 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs)~ Hyd No. 1 f i i - ~ ~yd~og~~~n ~a®t i Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Wednesday, Feb 18 2009, 3 31 PM - ~ Hyd. No. 1 Runoff to Lot E Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 147.87 cfs ( Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min i Drainage area = 120.22 ac Curve number = 60 Basin Slope = 16.9 % Hydraulic length = 6400 ft _ I Tc method =LAG Time of conc. (Tc) = 59.2024 min Total precip. = 9.00 in Distribution =Type I - Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 1,789,569 cuff I ( Runoff to Lot E Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 100 Yr Q (cfs) 160.00 160.00 I 140.00 140 00 120.00 120 00 r . - - 100.00 ~ - 100.00 80.00 80.00 I - - - - 60.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 60.00 40.00 40.00 20 00 20 00 0 00 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Hyd No 1 Tlme (hrs) I • • ATTACHMENTIO 1 i i i i SEWER REPORT HU Ko PA, LLC KAIIiJLUI, NORTH K®NA, HAWAII T'l~K (3)7-5-017:042 APRIL, 2009 PREPARED FOR HU KO PA LLC ~ Vii:?Li i~ 1~0 ~„~2- ffff ~ 'fie, P+~ a~ ~ i PREPARED BY WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 75-5751 KUAKINI HIGHWAY, SUITE 106 KAILUA-KONA, HI 96740 (808)334-0322 1_ L TABLE OF CONTENTS Hu Ko Pa, LLC SEWER REPORT NORTH KONA HAWAI I TMK (3)7-5-017:042 I. Project Description 1 II. Project Location .................1 III. Topography ............................................................1 I. N. Population .............................................................1 V. Field Survey ............................................1 A. Existing Facilities 1 B. Industrial Waste 2 C. Soil Investigation 2 D. Flooding .........................................................2 I E. Permits and Clearances .............................................2 F. Extent ...........................................................2 [ G. Downstream Facilities and Capacities 2 H. Basis of Design ...................................................3 L VI. Conclusion .............................................................3 APPENDIX A. Maps ` A-1 Location Map A-2 TMK Map Showin Existin Sewer Line g g L ~1 r i SEWER REPORT HU KO PA, LLC i NORTH KONA, HI TMK (3)7-5-017:042 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The purpose for this report is to quantify the amount of flow which can be expected from the proposed subdivision of Lot D located makai of Hualalai Road and adjacent to the Pualani Subdivision. In addition, the downstream capacity will be examined. I II. PROJECT LOCATION I For the purpose of this report, it is assumed that the adjacent mauka lot, TMK (3)7-5- 017:043, will be developed at approximately the same density as Lot D, and requested by the County to connect to their sewer system. 'Therefore, this report will address the cumulative wastewater impacts of development of Lot D and Lot E as the "project". The project as stated above lies makai of Hualalai Road and mauka of Pualani Subdivision. It is situated between the 440 ft and 680 ft elevation and is within the Ahupua'a, Puapua'a. I~ III. TOPOGItAP HY The topography of the area is steep, with slopes of 10% to 20% and slopes downward from - Hualalai Road. - I IV. POPULATION The area at this time is essentially vacant. When built out, the project will be approximately 105 single-family homes giving an estimated population of 420, using the City and County of Honolulu criteria. V. FIELD SURVEY A. Existing Facilities - There are no existing sewer facilities to the site. However, at the end of Paulehia Street in the Pualani Estates Subdivision, there is an 8" sewer connection available. The proposed routing of flow from this project will traverse south through Paulehia Street within the Pualani Estates Subdivision, continue makai along Puapuaanui _ Street, then south on Kaanee Place, then makai across Kaahumanu Highway where Pa e 1 g of 3 i c c j the pipe size becomes 12" intersecting with Kuakini Highway, and continuing north on Kuakini Highway towazds Kailua Town where the pipe changes from a 12" °to a ~ 18" sewer line at Walua Road. The portion from Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway to the ~ connection with the 21" line near the University of the Nations has been installed by Pualani Estates Subdivision. ~ B. Industrial Waste r- There is no industrial waste in this area, nor is any anticipated. C. Soillnvestigation i There are two geotechnical reports available which cover the Hualalai Heights Subdivision and the Pualati Estates Subdivision. One was prepared by South Pacific (Y Geotechnical dated January 17,1994 and the other was prepared by Geolabs-Hawaii dated March 30, 1995. Both are available for perusal at this office or at the County Department of Public Works in Kona. Basically, the azea is thin soils over vazious L basalt flows. D. Flooding L The project is located in Zone "X". There is no special flood hazard azea at this ~ location. E. Permits and Clearances No permits have been issued for the proposed projects. F. Extent The enclosed map shows the extent of this project and the existing and under- f construction facilities. G. Downstream Facilities and Capacity Downstream facilities have already been discussed. Essential) ,the area 8" line to Y Y 12" line to 18" line to 21 "line to 33" line at Hualalai Road and Kuakini Highway. ~ The effluent from this project eventually finds its way to the Kealakehe Treatment Plant, which plant has still not reached its capacity. There have been a number of reports prepared by this office, among them is one for the 65 acres makai of Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway adjacent to Pualani Estates Subdivision and another prepazed for two multi-family lots off Kalani Street mauka of Kuakini Highway. Both of these reports show that downstream facilities have adequate capacity for this subdivision. ~I Page 2 of 3 l r- I ' H. Basis of Design, Using Criteria from the Design Standards of the Division of ~ WastewaterManagement Volume 1, Department ofPublic Works, City and County i of Honolulu, State of Hawaii Design Period: 50 years Equivalent Population: 420 Area Served 29.12 acres Average Per Capita Wastewater Contribution 80 gal/day _ ~ Maximum Flow Factor 5 ~ Dry Weather Infiltration 5 gcd Wet Weather Infiltration 1250 gad ~ Design Flow Rates Average Wastewater Flow 33,600 gpd I Maximum Wastewater Flow 168,000 gpd Design Average Flow 35,700 gpd r Design Maximum Flow 170,100 gpd I Design Peak Flow 206,500 gpd The Pualani Estates Subdivision is south of the project. Mauka of Pualani Estates Subdivision is The Heights of Hualalai Subdivision. These two subdivisions have r- a combined design peak flow of 735,700 gpd. Adding the 206,500 gpd from the project to these combined design peak flows gives a design peak flow of 942,200 gpd. There is adequate capacity within Pualani Estates Subdivision for this flow. Before the flow exits Pualani Estates Subdivision, the pipe size changes from 8" to _ 12"and flows across Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway to Kuakini Highway and towards . Kailua-Kona on Kuakini Highway. At Pottery Terrace, the line changes to 18". I The 12" line has a total line capacity of 2.34 mgd. Of this,1.49 mgd either currently being utilized or reserved for (The Heights at Hualalai Subdivision, Pualani Estates Subdivision and 65-acres makai of Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and mauka of I Kuakini Highway). This leaves a total 0.85 mgd available capacity. The project _ I would require only 0.21 mgd of this capacity leaving 0.64 mgd available for others. I VI. CONCLUSION With 0.85 mgd available capacity in the sewer system and the project only requiring 0.21 - ; mgd, there is adequate capacity in the existing County sewer system to service the project. Page 3 of 3 R i i APPF~,xA ~ i M ~ l I I l I • I l N ' HA I 7 w E N RTH KOH A ~ s ~ ' Iglk)KM _ ~ ~ • 50 KAWMIAE WIA,EEA 19 ' SOUTH ~ ~ KOHALA j j ' ~ / / ~ NORTH HILO 19 HAMAKUA 190 _ ~ / / ~I / / ~ ' NORTH KONA / ~ / SOUTH HILO ?no / i ~ ~ . i KAgUA LOCAYI OIV ~ / ~ 130 1 a ~ , J_~-' PA}IOA~ • 132 OUTH/J PUNA --I KONA~ / K AU 11 ~ --I •1 1 11 ` _ i' l - NMLEHU i , i ~1 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP .L »•O~g1 KuawlniHw Sle. 106 Contulllnq CivAEngin~o~ LOCATION MAP ~ kaiue•kono Horra~~871p Conslrucllon Monogeri ~goe133~•b3i2 I T 5 17 CJdAFr:;;g 1k ! Yr' ~ 2S ~R...r oQ.wi~ ~y.'.IR•*y,,Y JAa 20 me'? a ~e~,Ayy)!s k+~88 ~ PL.gT "AMrrRT~NR7/r/' 4ger~ - - ,.,NI JAN 218 ~4i _ ~ a~~ ApP. Ilr a'. C ~t ~ i {9 r ti L. ~ ),;,`'tN C, PLAT ~p9 R,j u,oq 0 ~'~•hZajr•.. IpAOp IDI 1 ,~M~ , qr 14 ~ a ' ii f 1 0 l7q Av ~ _w. pxael B ~f~ ^L3-._ _ ~ 9 48 9G8 Am ,n a ~ ~ ~ n poop : 38) as eY ~p.R"'ffe'wu ~N~ u •~rNr'~i+r) d7set -OTPd]7 n '7P7 1Fe~~sAMnJwW~dA<> ~e3C, d Ne~~ . aawfl l _ rtri k'eryq ~ 2 e}-t~a+ts•D Ai'iu rarl ph ' f~y~<<c,~1aT I «•e1_ L yy Z S aa~ ~~Ir' ~I9~ A" y Iiaa, ) ep re9A• "I h, re ~1~1a ~ ~ ~ \O ~ I ~a4{I ®1 a ~q ! -~4'.f ~.~1r4t,,~, ~ flrce 1,11 _ a " ~t ' ~ ~'Y "~b~s',Ay-4~.. BtP 8' 1868 / \ ig ~ ~y~ DEC FD CD6 r..sa7A. / ~ , / \ \ ~ s 0 DFD101981 f / / ~ ~ ! I S I ,I ~•o~ / WD9 IDfiS \ ~ i ~~~_!~J V 7 L V ~ l I y.~ I,.z" ID10 / /d6d ~ .`~,gfH,D r1l)TS'd+. ~ p~27 KTD ' D R N~ 71 .+e`. ~ f,fer M• ~~'S L IY1D L4.g00M ~ ? ` of D>an ~ > ~ , GRANT 9 e 3 aG ; D I I NR I ,Iluw rF/ d it"y ~ R8 79l/ Aa, 3 I yMnan ar~p ~ ;r~8~s; b ~ ~~a. ~~hyoe>~Ao. ~ S~ rpf,M wu":Fii~` d 2Y 1015 ~ ,~I A. y Nr„r .y : T - - _ - .i~TrP« r tlos~- 1, y ~ ; 0 V I I 4 i ~tet i F6~ 10 NG ~ ' tlG ~ • I / Q ~ Nn Nfi 13 D!3 JtlD 2l wF +5r ~9 r . > n p ~ H,gJ7ti l,.op.a' d 3!6'B '9 pYf I pN `t .ry ~ a w. d iF IC~ , f F :uWn ~t uuvW t~ $ ~ a !*eetA. rua K 6a 'Jl 11% , 7p 071he pIIASR Ilr 0 ra lal. A0 ,4, B 8 r ~ 2 t ti ~ /f I 9TA11S ~i ~v1 r l ~ a < b - O ! A'n a~ iG--- ~ ! r .rte `~f p(4 'n 11 IL! ~ pqA pRtMAAp Sye~ T , g . J ~ C 1 "Il, IA I I K J ~ , ~ V ' ! !1 I \ ^ I ~"u'~ I91A. o N ` I a J i. J n- ~ s m ~ PµT w3 ~ ~ 9' ~ til Q - .r f ~ ry~~ II 1 C ! lIi Np MplsM I I I l ~ -'u / ~ ~ j 6 ~ d' \ ,ra. ~ ! ! ! „2~' ~ p11 i ~ Nreeb Ors ~Irf/f, f7, /d t ~ ~ r t I\~,; N m,ar,e4,ra,:rrP,ee, R 1i'^7 R?y I.{eM6.+-r/r L ! 1 ry' v4/ ~ 1 ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M c ~ THleo olvlsloly .,9piA. ~ y 8 r ,rgD+ i ZONE S C. ~ 7~~ I~+'"I 1---= A ADVANCE. SHEET 7 Fj 17 ,waa,jr 1 U 'SUBJECT TO CHANGE i +o ! CONTAIFUNG FA9CElS PORTION Of WA/Ah+A /S* TD ~UAPUMNU/ 1r; NORTH KONA, H W i~` ~ AIM ~I ~ , I sca~E I I~ ~ 9 0 ' /n - - - . ~ • I~ 'I'I~AFF'IC I11~I'AC'I' ANALYSIS F®I2 PR®P®SED 53-L®T PLANNED LTNI'I' DEYEL®I'1l~EN'I' ®N S®LI'I'I-I SIDE HITAI~ALAI IZ®AD I~AIL~TA-BONA, I~AWAII r~ ~ ` T1VII~ (3)7-5-01'x:042 1 C~ APRIL, 2009 l_~- PREPARED FOR: HU-KO-PA LLC C~ ~ P~:~--:::.~~^a•~a~ i'~' _a.. i~ C'4~ G.: ` " .<1,, ~~fr N `/,Y t PREPARED BY: WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 75-5751 KUAKINI HIGHWAY, SUITE 106 KAILUA-KONA, HI 96740 ~ (808)334-0322 (808)334-0831 Fax r a, Plt~nning ®ept. Exhibit c i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 A. Purpose and Study Objectives 1 ' II. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1 A. Site Location III. STUDY AREAS ..........................................................1 A. Study Area .......................................................1 B. Site Accessibility 2 C. Land Use ........................................................2 D. Concurrency ......................................................2 1 Table 1 Parcels Located in Area of Study 3 IV. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 A. Physical Characterics 4 B. Traffic Volumes 4 Table 2 Peak Hours of Traffic Flow 5 Table 3 Traffic Counts for Peak Hours 6 C. Level of Service 7 Table 4 Levels of Service, Existing Conditions, Peak Hours 7 V. PROJECTED TRAFFIC ....................................................9 l A. Methodology ................................................9 B. Trip Generation ..................................................10 Table 5 Trip Generation 10 C. Traffic Distribution 10 Table 6 Traffic Distribution, Hualalai Road 10 ~ Table 7 Turning Movements for the Development 11 i D. Trip Assignments 11 Table 8 Trip Distribution and Assignment 11 VI. TRAFFIC AND IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS 13 Table 9 Levels of Service Comparison 13 Page 1 of 3 i APPENDIX I Traffic Movement Diagrams-Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway &Hualalai Road • Existing Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic (includes 5,10 and 20 year) APPENDDt J Traffic Movement Diagrams-Hualalai Road & Hienaloli Road ' Existing Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic (includes 5,10 and 20 year) APPENDIX K Traffic Movement Diagrams- Hualalai Road & Puapuaanui Street ( Existing Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic 1 Future Conditions AM & PM Peak Traff c (includes 5,10 and 20 yeaz) APPENDIX L Traffic Movement Diagrams- Hualalai Road & Lako Street • Existing Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic (includes 5,10 and 20 year) APPENDIX M Traffic Movement Diagrams-Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway & Puapuaanui Street • Existing Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic (includes 5,10 and 20 yeaz) APPENDIX N Traffic Movement Diagrams-At New Development • Conditions at Build-Out, 5 Years AM & PM Peak Traffic • Future Conditions AM & PM Peak Traffic (includes 10 and 20 year) f i Page 3 of 3 i i TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PROPOSED 53-I.,®T PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPIVIENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HUALALAI ROAD KAILUA-K®NA, HAWAII TMK (3)7-5-017:042 I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ~ A. Purpose and Study Objectives The purpose of this report is to provide data showing how the development of the I proposed Hu-Ko-Pa 53-lot subdivision (Project) on an approximately 14.437 acre parcel, located on the southerly side of Hualalai Road, mauka of Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway (QKH) will affect traffic at the proposed Hu-Ko-Pa development along: 1) the primary access road at Puapuaanui Street in the adjacent Pualani Estates Subdivision from QKH; and 2) the secondary access road at Hualalai Road, makai/east of its intersection with Hienaloli Road. In addition, this report will analyze the impact upon the intersection of QKH and Hualalai Road, the intersection of Hienaloli Road and Hualalai Road, the intersection of Hualalai Road and Lako Street, the intersection mauka of Hualalai Road and Puapuaanui Street, and the intersection of QKH and Puapuaanui Street will be analyzed. II. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT l A. Site Location The Project is located in the North Kona District of Kailua-Kona, Hawaii adjacent ~ to the Pualani Estates Subdivision. The proposed Hu-Ko-Pa subdivision is approximately 14.437 acres on Tax Map Key (3) 7-5-017:042. Current plans for the proposed Hu-Ko-Pa subdivision will encompass 53-lots within ~ a planned unit development. III. STUDY AREA CONDITIONS A. Study Area The Project is surrounded by single-family residential developments ranging in size from 7,500 square foot to one acre parcels which include the Pualani Estates, Sugar Cane Lane and Hualalai Heights subdivisions. Pa e 1 of 17 g i Since traffic from this development could have some impact on the adjacent streets, QKH and Hienaloli Road are considered in this report. Lako Street and Puapuaanui i ~ Street have been opened for public use. Since the road openings, there has been a noticeable reduction in traffic in this area. ~ B. Site Accessibility At this time, primary access to the project site will be from the south at Paulehia Street within the Pualani Estates Subdivision with a secondary access from Hualalai Road. Pursuant to Condition F of the Pualani Estates Ordinance 99-51 (Bill No. 13, Draft 2), all internal roadways within the adjacent Pualani Estates Subdivision, including Paulehia Street and Puapuaanui Street, shall be dedicated to the County of Hawaii. Dedication of all the internal roadways within the Pualani Estates Subdivision is anticipated by the end of 2009. Paulehia Street will have a 50-foot wide right-of--way and Puapuaanui Street will have a 60-foot wide right-of-way. Puapuaanui Street will l have improved curbs, gutters and sidewalks. There are two access entry points to the upper portion of Hualalai Road mauka of the Project. The first access point is located at Lako Street between Kona Vistas and I'olani Subdivisions. Construction of Lako Street was completed in December, 2006. f The second access point is at the mauka end of Puapuaanui Street which was ( completed in 2008. Puapuaanui Street starts at QKH and passes through the Pualani Estates Subdivision and the Hualalai Heights Subdivision and intersects at Hualalai Road. Traffic signals are located at both the QKH intersections of Lako Street and at Puapuaanui Street. The traffic signal at the intersection of QKH and Puapuaanui Street is located at the main entrance to the Pualani Estates Subdivision. C. Land Use The~project site is currently vacant land and is designated within the State Land Use i Agricultural District, and the County Agricultural minimum 5 acres (A-Sa) zone. I D. Concurrency Pursuant to Section 25-2-46, Concurrency Requirements of the Hawaii County Zoning Code, the County requires a traffic impact analysis report (TIAR) of major developments be prepared or updated within six (6) months before the submission of any change of zone that can generate 50 or more peak hour trips. The TIAR shall include projections for future traffic growth for aminimum offive-, ten- andtwenty- yearsincluding other approved or proposed development expected to impact the area j with reasonable assumptions about the build-out of such development. Based on the current recession and economic conditions, we can only assume that future ` Page 2 of 17 ' ~ development within the area of the project over the next five years will be limited, and thus the Project will have a minimal impact on the traffic conditions in the ~ general area. Economic trends in the past have indicated 10~ years of growth followed by 10~ ~ years of economic downturn. The present state of the economy indicates that this ~ downturn could be longer and more intense than those of the past with some slow ~ growth towards the end. Thus we project a limited number of developments to occur within the surrounding areas. There are several parcels in the area of study that could be developed during the five- 1 to twenty-year period. The following is a list of these parcels: TABLE I PARCELS LOCATED IN AREA OF STUDY Tax Map Key Size in Acres (3)7-5-017:040 14.682 (3)7-5-017:041 14.707 (3)7-5-017:043 14.968 (3)7-5-017:022 10.940 (3)7-5-017:044 23.738 (3)7-5-017:031 12.932 Under the present circumstances, it is difficult to predict when, or if, these parcels will be developed. Parcels (3)7-5-017:031, 040, 044 are located within the Special Flood Hazard Area. Therefore the assumption can be made that these parcels will not i be developed in the near future. On the other hand, the remaining parcels (3)7-5- 017:022, 041, and 043 may be developed in the short term. Therefore, the future ( projected development for the surrounding areas in the next ten to twenty years will l be comprised of Parcel 43 followed by Parcels 22 and 41. The following lists the projected single-family residential units for each parcel over the next twenty years, ( assuming changes of zone are approved for density allowing 10,000 square feet residential lots, with approximately 20 percent of the land area going to roadways: Parcel 22 38 units Parce141 51 units Parcel 43 52 units l I ~ Page 3 of 17 (r I ~ It is projected that due to the signalized intersection at Puapuaanui Street and QKH intersection, the vast majority of the traff c from the Hu-Ko-Pa development is anticipated to route to the south onto Paulehia Street within the adjacent Pualani ' Estates Subdivision and continue makai along Puapuaanui Street to the signalized intersection at QKH. However, this study will also analyze Hualalai Road as an ~ alternate souce for trip generations. Construction of the adjacent Pualani Estates Subdivision has commenced with full- ~ project build-out expected in late 2009. In addition, these assumptions are made: 1. Over the initial five years, due to the present economic situation in Hawaii and on the mainland, there will be no appreciable increase in traffic on any of the roads studied in this report. 2. After five years a 1.067% increase in traffic per year on QKH, Lako Street and Puapuaanui Street can be expected. This percentage comes from the i CHZM Hill traffic study prepazed for the Lako Street extension. l 3. The increase in traffic on Hualalai Road will, in part, be due to this I development and others adjacent to Hualalai Road. i 4. This report assumed one scenario where all traffic from these developments will utilize Hualalai Road for primary entry and exit. This assumption will l show a worst case scenazio for the intersection of Hualalai Road and QKH. l 5. This report also assumed that a like amount of traffic will use Puapuaanui Road and QKH. i IV. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS I A. Physical Characteristics Hualalai Road is a two-lane road running mauka-makai from Holualoa to Kailua- Kona. This road has no paved shoulders and no sidewalks. The speed limit is 30 mph. Therefore, pedestrian traffic and/or bicycle travel were not considered in this study. ( B. Traffic Volumes 1 Traffic counts were taken at Hualalai Road and Hienaloli Road on June 5, 2005, at Hualalai Road and Puapuaanui Street on November 11, 2008, and at Hualalai Road i and Lako Street on November 11, 2008. Tube counts provided by Hawaii State Page 4 of 17 I r ~ Department of Transportation were used for the intersection of QKH and Hualalai Road- this data being from June 3, 2008 and June 4, 2008. The intersection of QKH ~ and Puapuaanui Street was also examined. Traffic counts were taken at this location ' as well as again taken at Hualalai Road and Puapuaanui Street on April 15, 2009. The counts at Hualalai Road were not appreciatively different than those taken on November 11, 2009, so the original counts are used in this report. The intersection ~ of QKH and Puapuaanui Street is a channelized intersection with traffic signals. The peak hours are tabulated as follows. TABLE 2 PEAK HOURS OF TRAFFIC FLOW Location Peak Hour Vehicles Per Hour (vph) QKH &Hualalai Road 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM* 1847* QKH &Hualalai Road 5:15 PM to 6:15 PM* 1825* Hienaloli Rd &Hualalai Rd 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM 205 ( Hienaloli Rd &Hualalai Rd 5:15 PM to 6:15 PM 153 Puapuaanui St &Hualalai Rd 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM 177 l ~ Puapuaanui St &Hualalai Rd 5:15 PM to 6:15 PM 136 t Lako St &Hualalai Rd 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM 495 1 Lako St &Hualalai Rd 5:15 PM to 6:15 PM 341 QKH & Puapuaanui St 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM 1946 QKH & Puapuaanui St 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM 1816 j *From Hawaii Department of Transportation 2008 Traffic Summary- Counts on 6/3/08 and 6/4/08. For clarification purposes, the directional traffic flow is as follows: ` Eastbound- traveling from the west to the east. An eastbound left would be f making a left turn from traveling eastbound. An eastbound right would be making a right turn from the eastbound travel. Westbound- traveling from east to west. A westbound left would be making a left turn from traveling westbound. A eastbound right would be making a ~ right turn from the westbound travel. i Pa e5of 17 g I Northbound- traveling from south to north. A northbound left would be making a left turn from traveling northbound. A northbound right would be 1 making a right turn from the northbound travel. Southbound- traveling from north to south. A southbound left would be making a left turn from traveling southbound. A southbound right would be ' making a right turn from the southbound travel. i The following table gives a breakdown of each peak traffic period at the various locations by traffic movement. ~ TABLE 3 1 TRAFFIC COUNTS FOR PEAK HOURS QKH and Hualalai Road l Direction AM PM Westbound Left 47 33 Westbound Right 64 29 Northbound Through 988 815 Northbound Right 38 35 Southbound Left 27 41 Southbound Through 747 934 Hualalai Road and Hienaloli Road j Direction AM PM Eastbound Left 21 18 1 Eastbound Through 44 58 Westbound Through 73 37 Westbound Right 11 8 I Southbound Left 18 7 Southbound Right 38 25 ~ Puapuaanui Street and Hualalai Road Eastbound Left 7 9 Eastbound Right 19 19 ~ Page 6 of 17 i Northbound Left 36 13 ~ Northbound Through 69 41 Southbound Through 36 42 Southbound Right 10 12 Lako Street and Hualalai Road Eastbound Left 10 9 i Eastbound Right 124 117 Northbound Left 208 109 l Northbound Through 86 52 l Southbound Through 54 43 Southbound Left 13 11 I QKH and Puapuaanui Street l Westbound Left 35 29 Westbound Right 131 61 Northbound Through 975 794 Northbound Right 33 32 Southbound Left 53 67 Southbound Through 719 833 1 C. Level of Service Levels of service were calculated for these intersections using the data gathered on November 11, 2008. The following table shows the existing conditions. TABLE 4 LEVELS OF SERVICES, EXISTING CONDITIONS, PEAK HOURS I Direction Level of Service ~ QKH and Hualalai Road Direction AM PM Westbound Left F F i ~ Pa e 7 of 17 g i i ' Direction Level of Service Westbound Right C C - Southbound Left B A ~ Hualalai Road and Hienolola Road ( Direction AM PM Eastbound Left A A Eastbound Through A A Southbound Left A A Southbound Right A A Puapuaanui Street and Hualalai Road I Direction AM PM Eastbound Left A. A 1 Eastbound Through A A Eastbound Right A A Southbound Left A A Lako Street and Hualalai Road Direction AM PM Eastbound Left B B Eastbound Right A A Northbound Left A A QKH and Puapuaanui Street ~ Direction AM PM ~ Westbound Left E E ` Westbound Right A A ~ Northbound Through A A Northbound Right A A ~ Southbound Left E E Page 8 of 17 I I I i Direction Level of Service ~ Southbound Through A A ~ V. PROJECTED TRAFFIC i i A. Methodology Highway capacity analysis was performed in accordance with the "Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, 2°d Edition" of the Transportation Research Board,1992 ( and the Highway Capacity Software from the Federal Highway Administration and f McTrans, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Levels of service for the various intersections were computed for the existing condition in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual. Level of service is defined as "a qualitative measure describing operational I conditions within a traffic stream; generally described in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety." There are six levels of operational conditions defined as { follows: I Level of Service A Little or no traffic delays Level of Service B Short traffic delays Level of Service C Average traffic delays Level of Service D Long traffic delays Level of Service E Very long traffic delays Level of Service F Extreme traffic delays Level of service calculations and volume-capacity-ratios are tabulated herein for both AM and PM peaks for existing and the post development condition. Each ~ intersection is diagramed in the appendix showing existing and post development ~ conditions. The trip generation methodology used in this report is based upon applications ~ developed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and published in "Trip Generation", 5`~ Edition, 1991. Trip generations have been developed for a variety ~ of land uses (or facility types) which correlate trips with dwelling units, area, ! population, vehicle ownership and intensity of use. Each facility type has a catalog number for identification purposes. In this case, Classification 210, single-family ~ detached, was used. It should be noted that no adjustments are made to reflect the impact of less than full-time residents which could be the case in the study area. I i ~ ~ Page 9 of 17 1 i i B. Trip Generation As stated above, this is a single family residential development, therefore, ' Classification 210, or Single-Family was used for trip generation. Since the peak hour trips for this development generate less than 100 peak hour trips, the horizon is f the opening year. The following are the trips generated. r TABLE 5 TRIP GENERATION Time Quantity Generator Entering % Exiting 5 Year AM 53 0.74 10 26 29 74 PM 53 1.01 35 65 19 35 Daily 53 9.55 506 10 Year I AM 52 0.74 10 26 28 74 i PM 52 1.01 34 65 18 35 Daily 52 9.55 497 20 Year AM 89 0.74 17 26 49 74 PM 89 1.01 58 65 31 35 Daily 89 9.55 850 C. Traffic Distribution Since Hienaloli Road is closer to the project site, the eastbound and westboundtraffic was used for the traffic analysis of the project. The following table shows the distribution of eastbound and westbound traffic. Table 6 Traffic Distribution, Hualalai Road Direction AM PM ~ Eastbound 34 55 Westbound 66 45 i ~ Page 10 of 17 I I The turning movements from the project are based upon these percentages and are ~ as follows: ~ TABLE 7 TURNING MOVEMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT i Direction AM PM ENTERING Eastbound Right 3 19 Westbound Left 7 16 EXITING ~ Northbound Left 19 9 Northbound Right 10 10 I The existing turning movements at QKH and Hienaloli Road were used to proportion the traffic within these intersections, thereby distributing traffic generated by the I development. 1 D. Trip Assignments Tri s were asst ned in accordance with the above traffic distribution discussion. For P g comparison purposes, the distribution and assignment is shown for the existing condition and future condition in the following table. i TABLE S TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT AM PM Direction ~ Exist S Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Exist S Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr QKH AND HUALALAI ROAD ~ Westbound Left 47 55 67 90 33 37 44 57 Westbound Right 64 74 92 123 29 33 39 51 Northbound Through 988 988 1073 1267 815 815 885 1045 I Northbound Right 38 41 46 57 35 44 56 77 Southbound Left 27 28 33 41 41 51 65 91 i Southbound Through 747 747 811 958 934 934 1015 1197 ' i , ~ , i i Page 11 of 17 ~ I i ' AM PM Direction Exist S Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Exist S Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr HUALALAI ROAD AND HIENALOLI ROAD Eastbound Left 21 24 29 38 18 21 24 32 Eastbound Through 44 50 60 79 58 65 79 103 Westbound Through 73 77 87 108 37 47 59 81 i Westbound Right 11 11 12 13 8 8 9 9 Southbound Left 18 18 20 21 7 7 8 8 l Southbound Right 38 40 46 56 25 31 40 55 j AT THE DEVELOPMENT I Eastbound Through - 65 71 83 - 76 83 97 ~ Eastbound Right - 4 8 15 - 19 38 71 Westbound Left - 6 12 22 - 16 32 67 ( Westbound Through - 111 121 142 - 62 67 79 Northbound LeR - 19 3 8 71 - 8 16 29 Northbound Right - 9 18 34 - 10 20 38 PUAPUAANUI STREET AND HUALALAI ROAD Eastbound Left 7 8 9 11 9 10 12 16 Eastbound Right 19 19 22 26 19 19 22 26 Northbound Left 36 36 42 50 13 13 15 18 Northbound Through 69 79 90 110 41 49 56 74 Southbound Through 36 4 i 63 78 42 48 68 86 Southbound Right 10 11 13 22 12 13 19 25 I, LAKO STREET AND HUALALAI ROAD Eastbound Left 10 11 12 13 9 10 11 12 I Eastbound Right 124 124 135 146 117 117 127 138 i Northbound Left 208 208 226 245 109 109 118 129 Northbound Through 86 95 103 112 52 52 56 61 Southbound Through 54 58 68 83 43 48 72 90 Page 12 of 17 i li t~~ ' ~ AM PM Direction Exist 5 Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Exist S Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Southbound Right 13 14 17 21 11 12 18 22 QKH AND PUAPUAANUI STREET i Westbound Left 35 47 54 75 29 33 44 52 Westbound Right 131 141 164 209 61 65 74 92 Northbound Through 975 975 1059 1250 794 794 863 1018 Northbound Right 33 36 41 51 32 41 56 73 Southbound Left 53 54 62 74 67 77 92 124 t Southbound Through 719 719 781 922 833 833 905 1068 I VI. TRAFFIC AND IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS Level of service was performed for the existing and future conditions for the intersections at QKH and Hualalai Road and Hienaloli Road at Hualalai Road. This analysis was also performed for the proposed entry of this development. TABLE 9 LEVELS OF SERVICE COMPARISON AM PM Direction Exist S Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Exist S Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr HUALALAI ROAD AND QKH Westbound Left F F F F F F F F Westbound Right C C D F C C C C Southbound Left B B B B A A B B i ~ Westbound Approach F F F F F F F F ' ~ Westbound Approach Delay 52.8 65.1 187.8 1177 51.1 59.0 132 3 1114 HUALALAI ROAD AND HIENALOLI ROAD ' ~ Eastbound Left A A A A A A A A ~ Eastbound Through A A A A A A A A i ~ Southbound Left A A A B A A A B I ' Southbound Right A A A A A A A A j Page 13 of 17 ~ I I I i AM PM Direction Exist S Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Exist S Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Southbound Approach A A A A A A A A Southbound Approach Delay 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.4 8.7 8.8 8.9 9.0 PUAPUAANUI STREET AND HUALALAI ROAD Eastbound Left A A A A A A A A i Eastbound Right A A A A A A A A Northbound Left A A A A A A A A Eastbound Approach A A A A A A A A i Eastbound Approach Delay 8.9 8.9 9.1 9.4 8.8 8.9 9.0 9.3 LAKO STREET AND HUALALAI ROAD Northbound Left A A A A A A A A ( Eastbound Left B B B C B B B B I Eastbound Right A A A A A A A A ( Eastbound Approach A A A A A A A A I! Eastbound Approach Delay 9.4 9.5 9.7 9.9 9.1 9.1 9.4 9.6 QKH AND PUAPUAANUI STREET Westbound Left E E E F E E E E Westbound Right A A A A A A A A I Northbound Through A A B C A A A B Northbound Right A A A A A A A A , Southbound Left E E F F E E E E ~ Southbound Through A A A A A A A A Intersection Delay 8.8 9.3 10.9 17.7 8.2 8.7 10.1 13.8 Intersection Level of Service A A B B A A B B AT NEW DEVELOPMENT ~ Westbound Left - A A A - A A A Westbound Through - A A A - A A A ~ Northbound Left - A A B - A A B Page 14 of 17 I fli AM PM Direction Exist S Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Exist S Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Northbound Right - A A B - A A B Northbound Approach - A A B - A A B Northbound Approach Delay - 9.3 9.7 10.4 - 9.1 9.4 10.2 I 'TABLE lO OVERALL DIRECTIONAL LEVEL OF SERVICE AT QKH AND PUAPUAANUI STREET AM PM Direction ~ Exist S Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Exist S Yr 10 Yr 20 Yr Westbound B B B C B C C C ( Northbound A A B B A A A B l Southbound A A A B A A A B Overall A A B B A A B B VII. DISCUSSION I Recent traffic studies in the area indicate a significant amount of traffic has been diverted from Hualalai Road by the two connector roads, Lako Street and Puapuaanui Street with more traffic particularly using Lako Street. CHZMHiII prepared a draft traffic analysis for the signal at the intersection of Kuakini Highway (QKH extension) and Lako Street. The CHZMHiII figures suggest a higher volume of traffic on Lako Street compared to this study. However, this study discovered a higher volume of traffic on Lako Street resulting from traffic traveling to the south rather than from ' the north at Hualalai Road. At the intersection of QKH and Puapuaanui Street, the intersection level is "A". However, the two left turn movements are "E". This means that through traffic is not impeded and that left-turn movements only have a short time to move or wait for the next green light. By the time the 20-year period is attained, the intersection level of service will be "B" with the westbound direction having a level of service of "C". VIII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS For the purpose of this traffic study, the levels of service considered within our recommendations are derived from the main intersections leading to the project's primary ~ ~ Page 15 of 17 i f ~ access at Paulehia Street to the south and the secondary access at Hualalai Road to the north. Our conclusions are based on the areas of this traffic study which cover: 1) the primary j access at Paulehia Street taken from the intersection at Puapuaanui Street and QKH; and 2) ' the secondary access from Hualalai Road at the intersection of Hualalai Road and Hienaloli Road. I The levels of service projected with the next 5, 10, and 20 years at the Project's primary access located at the QKH/Puapuaanui Street intersection and at the Project's secondary access at the Hualalai Road/Hienaloli Road intersection are summarized as follows: r A. Primary/Secondary Access 1 INTERSECTION AT QKH AND PUAPUAANUI STREET (PROJECT'S PRIMARY ACCESS Acceptable levels of service of "A"and "B"for all traffic movements except left-turn movements were observed at the intersection of QKH and Puapuaanui Street. The level of service for the left-turn movements are "D" and "E" when the signal timing is optimized for the intersection. This holds true throughout the 20-year period. However, by optimizing the timing, the overall level of service for the intersection is "A" and "B" throughout the 20-year period. This intersection will serve as the entry point leading to the primary project access at Paulehia Street. Therefore, the proposed Hu-Ko-Pa development will have little or no effect on traffic at the ( Puapuaanui Street/QKH intersection. No additional lanes are necessary to access the development because of the signalized intersection at the Pualani Estates main entrance on Puapuaanui Street/QKH and a future 50-foot wide County dedicable i roadway connection to the Project to be provided via Paulehia Street. Traffic f produced by this development will not be an issue. INTERSECTION AT HUALALAI ROAD AND HIENALOLI ROAD (PROJECT'S SECONDARY ACCESS) With the traffic from the proposed Project, the intersection at Hualalai Road and Hienaloli Road will remain at an acceptable level of service of "A" for all traffic movements. This intersection will serve as the secondary access point to the Project. B. Traffic Impacts from Surrounding Properties (Summarizes the Levels of Service ~ for those general areas projected for the next 5,10 and 20 years) I INTERSECTION AT HUALALAI ROAD AND QKH Traffic traveling left onto QKH headed south had an unacceptable level of service of "F" for the southbound left approach. Level of service "F" is also projected for left i turn movements into Hualalai Road at the southbound approach on QKH. ~ Page 16 of 17 Although the levels of service were "F" for both the southbound left and southbound ~ approach traffic at the Hualalai Road/QKH intersection, access from the intersection will be vastly improved after the installation of a signalized intersection. The ~ Hawaii Department of Transportation has planned a signalized intersection at the Hualalai Road/QKH intersection within the next five years INTERSECTION AT HUALALAI ROAD AND PUAPUAANUI STREET An acceptable level of service of "A" for all traffic movements were observed at the Hualali RoadlPuapuaanui Street intersection indicating little or no impact from the proposed development. INTERSECTION AT HUALALAI ROAD AND LAKO STREET Acceptable levels of service of primarily "A" or "B" were observed for the intersection at Hualalai Road/Lako Street intersection indicating little or no impact from the Project. A level of service of "C" was projected for the next 20 years for eastbound left-turn traffic. This traffic study concludes that the levels of service at the intersection of 1) Puapuaanui Street and QKH; and 2) Hualalai Road and Hienaloli Road to be "A" or "B" during the AM and PM peak hours and are thus "acceptable levels of service", in compliance with the Concurrency Requirements for traffic impact analysis reports of the Hawaii County Code I Section 25-2-46. i i i Page 17 of 17 i ~ i l (.4fe~' f ~r , ~ , , ~ ~ ~ - ' ~ w~ ~ , a _ ~ . . ~ " - ~ ` f~~ . APPENDIX A LOCATION MAP ~ TAX MAP KEY MAP l_~ z~;:~ (w, t_ M1 F,' o~~ f_ ~r~ , E~A~ i f N HA 1 W E i 7 N RTH S KOH A ~ ~ . ~ HONOKM SO { KAWAI-IAE WN.EA 19 i SOUTH I KOHALA j / / ~ ( NORTH HILO _ HAMAKUA _ _ ~ - ~ ' ~ 19 190 \ ~ % - , I . \I % 1, NORTH KONA / SOUTH HILO ?+~o t / / / / % 00 ~ KNLUA LOCATION _ % / . i,/~ E _ - - 130' / / _ \ i ~ PA/IOA, • 132 ~ ~ - ~ PUNA ~ J' OUTH ~ KONA; ~ f 11 j K AU t I 1 t 11 / ' l l_ / ' NAALENU 1. _ ~ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP LOCATION MAP 75-S7S1KuaklniHwy S1e.106 Consu~linq CivaEnginsers i i Koduo-Kono Howou96740 ConslrucUon Monogers (I rBOB1334-b322 _ ~I I ~ ~ / ~.Awrl Ow.N l.wtM1~J^nr R•%•l$ I ~ ' F--- - sr.,,y G Yt I c•w,J ~ w.Y) I JAR ZO w~fl ed..f I?afi. svsdq)!e I PLAT NA>6R 7ANK S/T " 93y_. AAY S 7 ~ ~ ~ aupr ~ ~ . C T ~ ~ SP.Pt%~ ~ 2 ;1 {Ia 11 - - ~ ~ ~pp1 r~ ~ W JAN2914b7 t "k ,u~la~r y ~ ~~~`r„ C, ~OLAT i ;f" to oe) 3 d :,:_•~r roooo ~ ~ /4w, ~ . w a, ~ ~ 48 968 Aq . iivx,W ~ ,~ns~ r aanMn~ ,8. 387 pf i exsa \ 1 ,°s` ~uu.~°.°.r. Pam-" ~ _ !'r/ Slis i`b ojlle"Mil 5eo. 2 t ,roewl, ~ ~'FeoT-p%d6~)n ted.~roh>•enar~r~yN,) INp,3 xr u:a ~~ssoPA4oe. ~v/•) ~ .'e.+m~M~ Nr __ef_~.i~•^•-.._~, /1~I~~•/xINOTiNK C~2a~~ G ' $ .//.Iye00 I - yr~ sn' '+a a orf/ey y~11 ~ ,r~ m~H ' ~ D ~,FJA _ 1 d C ( saof ~ ~ r sap~,<eRpQr ai'~ L ~ ~-r .nn~ r~ 9p / ~ `59 8R. ~ A r! (S37t9 Ae).~w~-~-;. -"G R ~~iy'__~_.a - - I~ ~ti~ fit,"1 H.~r.a/++'~A~---~. ® ~ ~ - ®S_} "09 ~,b~ \ { ?~~""~-~'~Y P.,~,y``~,. 8EP 8 ^ 1868 l ~ ~y a 'P- ara~Aa~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ DECit~ ~ ~ ~ i0 ` o6cao tsso ~p / ~ t ff L Sl ~ I L 1WR S t96~ ;3// tl ~ - ~r { t Wild dmm iin G R A ~.1 ,A61zG~ ~ 3' S ~.,ofMea2inj~dlly~ u T 943 ~,NAp~y$yf" ~tg?g7p N ~ /86B ~ A ' ,'t ."0` e,aas Aa. ~ l ,'Pl GtY706 ~ . O le I~kOOGe1c , D ~a1 ~.i" G ~At"I7' 9 8 9 R'"y~ 3 i U S~IHT!) 6 .I ~ ~ ~ W~~ 23,738Aa~ poe ° l ~v`roT'~ ~ 6 a i 19)2 V .~~m r ~ 31 r2 03e Aa na ~ RBdls ern4~.. i i 679 ~ i J Btt l e i ~ O ~ mg 6z, nn ~ ; _ khasR6~ ~ .l_.• f ~~s~, .o ,1 r! - ~ 1g987A° 6; I406isAo 83/6"B's ` mr: / tA1 )l ~ ! ` /r gat ~ f :i _..r~".. - v L 1 C Pa ~ ~aaa Aa ® ic) , ff / Zvi ~Ga,verG p O f 1 1 Il lu 'I I : 2 p,977Ao ~,eae tD /0.9889 ;4c1, 4, 8 8 Y ~ 44 ~ Ill ~ t I T~ ~ ~ f~~ P y. ~ i r ~ , ~ t ivit, Q r A"• 9 , r 1, ' , . L b ~ ~ ~ ne esA ~ "II + ~ ~ C A~q~ a/ ~IS)I` eKe~ oR°'ro' o, ~ 1 I~ ; 11~~ 398 r8~ I ~ ~ ~ ,i 85 g a ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~3 yr Mourn I o T> a a9 ~ ,~J I ~ L r M d7eN $ 7 fi 1 ~ C to \ I/ \ J ~ ~ op ~ ~ ~ l~ i~ ~ ~ r t ~ ~ ~ ~ 16 ~ N N.41ah tit Syr ~~1 r ~ ~ O ~ I I I ~J I ~i*.M r ~ IWme/s Oro pe4~~)i, l~ /SWE I r 1 ~ ~ ' ' / ~ p N sr.~s4,/o,z~ as o t ! ` f}iliiD 0!YiSfON a )7 •3 /+pe4A. ,~r~ $ E ~ ZON S C, P T y >a+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ADVANCF, SHEET 7 5 ( 7 SAG ~ ~ SUBJECT TO CHANGE caNralwNC r~wu~s 's ~ ~ SGALE Itn~.~OA t~ f~ PdRTJON OF WA/AHA !i~ TO ~UAPUAANUI 1.s3', NORTH KONA, HAW~4/. t~tr~M..~r._...? _ _ - I, I ,g I ,,,~.a r~ - ~ _ x .r,` ~ ~ ~ ~ - 111 z - o 'ti L_ } APPENDIX B LEVEL ®F SERVICE CRITERIA ff, r l_ ~L T I_ i~~ f} 1' n~ r ~k~~{ ' r~+~ i ~ r!~ I L r~ ~ ~rf ;,Yt i i t i I.,EVEI. ®F SERVICE C1~I'TEIZIA ~ AVERAGE TOTAL LEVEL OF EXPECTED DELAY TO DELAY (Seconds/Vehicle) SERVICE MINOR STREET TRAFFIC z 5 A Little or no delay 5.1 to 10.0 B Short traffic delays 10.1 to 20.0 C Average traffic delays 20.1 to 30.0 D Long traffic delays 30.1 to 45.0 E Very long traffic delays >45 F Extreme traffic delays l • I I I-- !j I ' ~ Appendix B l ~ .r ~ I 1'~7 ` 1 ~I`f 1 ~1 I x ~ . r i ~ ` a T( f , ` v I N .1 ~~er R ~k ~ , APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE QUEEN KA'AHUMANiJ HIGHWAY & HUALALAI ROAD UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION l_ AM & PM PEAK HOUR ~r~ ;•°s i ~ _ i~ ~~a ~ i l~_ ~~f~ +yT 1~ l__ ~t 4l' i I~ l_ ~ ,fi Y ~ ~~i i f? ` t+~d ~i HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 r _TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY lyst: BEW ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ate Performed: 11/20/2008 f Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, EXISTING Intersection: T ( Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary ~ Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHQKHAMEX ( East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: QKHWY Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 988 38 27 747 ( Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Il Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 988 38 27 747 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 (-Median Type/Storage Undivided / I RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T tream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume 47 64 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 47 64 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / ` Lanes 1 1 Configuration ~ L R f _ _ _ _ __Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ L R ~ v (vph) 27 47 64 C(m) (vph) 685 85 295 v/c 0.04 0.55 0.22 f 95% queue length 0.12 3.18 0.83 L_ Control Delay 10.5 96.7 20.6 i S B F C proach Delay 52.8 Approach LOS F - i I Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 I Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 _ Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 _ _Upstream Signal Data______ _ _ A_ Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance i Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn ( Through 1 r~ Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: L Number of major street through lanes: l Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation 1 Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv> l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo L-_ P (hv) 0 0 0 _ t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t (3, lt) 0.00 0 .70 0 . 00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 l__ ~ Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals i _ Computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) { V Prog - - Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 ( v ~ C ~ X j - - 1 s 1500 l u, x) C(r,X) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Im edance and Ca acit E uations ' P P Y 4 Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 1007 Potential Capacity 295 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 295 ' Probability of Queue free 5t. 0.78 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 1026 A Potential Capacity 685 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ( Movement Capacity 685 I Probability of Queue free St. 0.96 1.00 l Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ~ ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 - Conflicting Flows , Potential Capacity " Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.96 Movement Capacity { Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 i Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 { Conflicting Flows 1808 Potential Capacity 88 ' f Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.96 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.76 Movement Capacity ~ - 85 - Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St.` 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage I~~ Conflicting Flows tential Capacity I destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ~I Probability of Queue free St. L__ i Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches - Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 - L T R L T- R C sep 85 295 Volume 47 64 Delay - Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +l) n max _ C sh SUM C sep r n 1 C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L R I v (vph) 27 47 64 C(m) (vph) 685 85 295 C vac 0.04 0.55 0.22 95s queue length 0.12 3.18 0.83 Control Delay 10.5 96.7 20.6 LOS B F C Approach Delay 52,g Approach LOS F Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 L.' P(oj) 1.00 0.96 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 f_ v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 10.5 N, Number of major street through lanes ( d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 l_ _ L_ l_ l-- _ _ _ - - HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 ~i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst: BEW ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE to Performed: 11/20/2008 I Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, FUTURE 5yrs Intersection: T , Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO f Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 _ Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHQKHAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD ~ North/South Street: QKHWY Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 , f _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound , Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 988 41 28 747 ( Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , Il Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 988 41 28 747 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 r Median Type/Storage Undivided / IL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T stream Signal? No No inor Street Approach Westbound Eastbound 4 Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R , Volume 55 74 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 55 74 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 ~ Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / ' Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R f_ - - _ Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service , Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 ~ ( Lane Config L ~ L R l_ v (vph) 28 55 74 l C(m) (vph) 683 83 295 v/c 0.04 0.66 0.25 95% queue length 0.13 4.47 1.00 ~`I_ Control Delay 10.5 124.1 21.3 I S B F C i( proach Delay 65.1 Approach LOS F ,l_ i Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 _ Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 _ _Upstream Signal Data - Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn Through _ S5 Left-Turn Through I Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: t Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation t Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 L Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 f t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 0 I t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals L_ _ Computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V (t) V (l,prot) V (t) V (l,prot) V prog _ - - ~ 4 f Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 - I s 1500 111 x) r_ ,u,x) ' ( C(r,x)T C (plat, x) r- - - `f Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations ` Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 1008 Potential Capacity 295 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 295 Probability of Queue free St. - 0.75 - 1.00 1 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 1029 f Potential Capacity 683 , Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ( Movement Capacity 683 1 Probability of Queue free St. 0.96 1.00 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. (-~ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 - 11 { Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ` Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.96 ~ Movement Capacity ( Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ( Step 4 LT from Minor St 7 10 C_ Conflicting Flows 1811 Potential Capacity 87 Pedestrian Impedance Factor ~ 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.96 111 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.73 ' ~ Movement Capacity - - - 83 _ ( Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance If_ Ste 3: TH from Minor St ~ 8 ~ 11 P 1~ Part 1 - First Stage ~,t- Conflicting Flows w ~tential Capacity ii edestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ~~t Probability of Queue free St. f t i Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement ~ ~ 7 8 9 10 11 12 L - T R -_~L T R C sep 83 295 Volume 55 74 Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L R v (vph) 28 55 74 C(m) (vph) 683 83 295 v/c 0.04 0.66 0.25 95% queue length 0.13 4.47 1.00 Control Delay 10.5 124.1 21.3 LOS B F C Approach Delay 65.1 Approach LOS F Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay I ~ Movement 2 Movement 5 t p(oj) 1.00 0.96 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 t v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 10.5 N, Number of major street through lanes ~ d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 , l_ I l__ L_ - - - - - - HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ( - II fl alyst: BEW ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ;I to Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, FUTUREl0yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO ~ Units: U. S. Customary l Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHQKHAMFU ( East/West Street: HUALALAI RD ' I North/South Street: QKHWY Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.0'0 r Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume 1073 46 33 811 f Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1073 46 33 811 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / , RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T stream Signal? No No ~ l _ inor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound ~ Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 ~ L T R ~ L T R Volume ~ 67 92 , s Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 67 92 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 , ( Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R ~ L_ ~ _ Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ' Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ L R v (vph) 33 67 92 C(m) (vph) 632 65 262 v/c 0.05 1.03 0.35 js 95°s queue length 0.17 10.54 1.59 Control Delay 11.0 409.8 26.1 ~ S B F D ~j~proach Delay 187.8 ~ Approach LOS F ~ I~ 'L i f Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data _ _ ( Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance l Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: ~ Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: S_ Number of major street through lanes: Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 I_ t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 ll 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations _ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R j t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals Computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal ( Movement 2 Movement 5 II V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V prog 1 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V (c, x) s 1500 c,u,x) ~ ~x) - - ~ C (r, x) C(plat,x) { Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 RT from Minor St. 9 12 I Conflicting Flows 1096 Potential Capacity 262 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 262 Probability of Queue free St. 0.65 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ~ Conflicting Flows 1119 1_ Potential Capacity 632 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 _ Movement Capacity 632 Probability of Queue free St. - 0.95 1.00 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free 5t. ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows ' Potential Capacity i Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 LLL Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.95 Movement Capacity C Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 - Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ' Conflicting Flows 1973 " Potential Capacity 69 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.95 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.96 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.62 Movement Capacity - 65 - Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows ~tential Capacity edestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. ,1,_ i f= Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches j - - - { Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R r ~ C sep 65 262 1 Volume 67 92 Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh 5UM C sep r` n C act 1 Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length., and Level of Service l Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L R l v (vph) 33 67 92 C (mJ (vph) 632 65 262 v/c 0.05 1.03 0.35 95% queue length 0.17 10.54 1.59 ` Control Delay 11.0 409.8 26.1 111 LOS B F D Approach Delay 187.8 Approach LOS F Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj) 1.00 0.95 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 _ v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 ( s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1 P* (07 ) 1 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 11.0 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 t_ t_ l._. . 1 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 ____TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ----Y - - al st: BEW ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE f ate Performed: 11/20/2008 ~ Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, FUTURE20yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 _ Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHQKHAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: QKHWY Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume 1267 57 41 958 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1267 57 41 958 i Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? ` Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T ~ stream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R I Volume 90 123 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 90 123 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 s Configuration L R t_ - - - - _ _ Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L I L R I~ v (vph) 41 90 123 't C(m) (vph) 528 38 200 v/c 0.08 2.37 0.62 f, 95o queue length 0.25 30.44 4.31 << ontrol Delay 12.4 2717 50.7 S B F F i' proach Delay 1177 Approach LOS F ~ - - i Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 _ Upstream Signal Data____ _ _ Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal r vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn , Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles c Movement 2 Movement 5 } Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 111 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: J, Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation 1 Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage 1~ Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals Computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V prog - - - - Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 i V(c,x) ~ I s 1500 i I x) r_ ~u,x) C (r ~ x ) - C(plat,x) ' fnlorksheet 6-Impedance and Ca acit E uations ' P Y q Step 1: RT from Minor St. ~ 9 12 - - Conflicting Flows 1296 Potential Capacity 200 L_ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 200 r Probability of Queue free St. 0.38 1.00 ~ Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 1324 Potential Capacity 528 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 528 Probability of Queue free St. 0.92 1.00 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. , _ ~ ep 3: TH from Minor~St. 8 11 ' f. ~onflictin F1 w ~ g o s ( Potential Capacity ' 1 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 i Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.92 0.92 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 _ _ Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 I Conflicting Flows 2336 A Potential Capacity 41 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.92 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.94 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.92 0.36 Movement Capacity 38 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance i Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 i~ Part 1 First Stage j Conflicting Flows tential Capacity i ~destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. i `L i Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 -L T R L T R C sep 38 200 Volume 90 123 Delay Q sep { Q sep +l round (Qsep +1) n max i C sh SUM C sep n C act r Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service c_ _ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L R Il v (vph) 41 90 123 C(m) (vph) 528 38 200 v/c 0.08 2.37 0.62 95~ queue length 0.25 30.44 4.31 Control Delay 12.4 2717 50.7 LOS B F F Approach Delay 1177 Approach LOS F Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 l p(oj) 1.00 0.92 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 C_ v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 12.4 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 l_ 1 L-- HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ` alyst: BEW ncy/Co.. BRENDAN LEE to Performed: 11/20/2008 ~ Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, EXISTING ' Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 "F$ Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHQKHPMEX East/West Street: HUALALAI RD I North/South Street: QKHWY a" Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 ~\i Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R I L T R s,.. Volume 815 3 5 41 934 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 815 35 41 934 ' ,i;~ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 '-5 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T stream Signal? No No 11~';? inor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound r'=, Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 1 L T R ~ L T R ll~~ Volume 33 29 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 33 29 ' ~a=`= Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 -Percent Grade ( ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 ` Configuration L R F~ Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 ' Lane Conf ig L ~ L R I ~~i v (vph) 41 33 29 i 1-_, C (m) (vph) 797 79 372 v/c 0.05 0.42 0.08 ,I 95% queue length 0.16 1.98 0.25 l Control Delay 9.8 82.3 15.5 i" S A F C proach Delay 51.1 ' Approach LOS F i HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 _ _ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY- ~ Analyst: ~ BEW ~I Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, EXISTING Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHQKHPMEX East/West Street: HUALALAI RD ~ North/South Street: QKHWY Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments- 'I l~ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 ~ L T R ~ L T R 1 1 Volume 815 35 41 934 l~I Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 815 35 41 934 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? { Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 ~ L T R ~ L T R , Volume 33 29 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 33 29 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: 'Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 1_ Lane Config L ~ L R v (vph) 41 33 29 C(m) (vph) 797 79 372 v/c 0.05 0.42 0.08 95$ queue length 0.16 1.98 0.25 i Control Delay 9.8 82.3 15.5 1 LOS A F C Approach Delay 51.1 Approach LOS F r 1 i , HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 Td'~ Phone : Fax : ~ E-Mail. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS j ~ i ~ Analyst: BEW 7s;;N Agency/Co . BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 ' ` Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, EXISTING ' Intersection: T , p~~-- Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary f,~Analysis Year: 2008 " Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHQKHPMEX East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: QKHWY w;~~Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 , vehicle Volumes and Adjustments , Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R ~ ~4, ume 815 35 41 934 ;i;Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 204 9 10 234 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 815 35 41 934 'Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 °_Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? ' - Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No ' L s Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ' Volume 33 29 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 J Peak-15 Minute Volume 8 7 l__Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 33 29 Iwr Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 ~ 5h:~' Percent Grade 0 0 .I Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / RT Channe 1 i z ed? No , Lane s 1 1 Configuration L R~ ~ j( _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments- ,j` Movements 13 14 15 16 I - - - Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 Ii Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 , - ~ - _ Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance ' i Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn - Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: ~ Number of major street through lanes: Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation 1' Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 it 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1' P (hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 t (f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 t Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals Computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V prog ~ i _ _ I Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 1 y? Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) ' Cycle Length, C (sec) (from Exhibit 16-11) '~~oportion vehicles arriving on green P g (ql) l g(q2) ,,v g (q) f 1~r r Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked 1 Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) - - alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 i Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p (2) 0.000 p(5) 0.000 ~ P (dom) ~ p (subo) f nstrained or unconstrained? t_~ i Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process y~ movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II x p(1) P(4) p ' P(8) ~ P (9) p (10) p (11) 1 p(12) ~ (,~,r~ Computation 4 and 5 1 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 850 1848 832 s ~ Px i~ V c,u,x i _ ~F~plat,x i,~= Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 it l.._ r `7,r .;'b i Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 ~ V(C,X) s 1500 P (x) V(c,u,x) ~ C(r,x) ~ C(plat,x) _ I Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 1) l~ Conflicting Flows 832 Potential Capacity 372 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 372 Probability of Queue free St. 0.92 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 850 ~ Potential Capacity 797 _,i Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 797 Probability of Queue free St. 0.95 1.00 ~ Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ` Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.95 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 i Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1848 Potential Capacity 83 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.95 J Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.96 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.89 Movement Capacity 79 L Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance _ 1 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ~ Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. I - - - i _T^ _ - - Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity i~ destrian Impedance Factor ' :;~~p. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt ( Movement Capacity ~ _ ,x'~ Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ,~K Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.95 Movement Capacity ~as Result for 2 stage process: , a t y ,x C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 1 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj, factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity i ~ , rt 2 - Second Stage ` ~,~flicting Flows Potential Capacity i Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ~ .a,4 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1848 k Potential Capacity 83 ' V~~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.95 Maj . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0.96 , Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.89 ( Movement Capacity 79 L,, 1~~~ Results for Two-stage process: a ~ y C t 7 9 ~I '{~N~ Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations i1 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 Itw~ L T R L T R _ fi olume (vph) 33 29 I~ Movement Capacity (vph} 79 372 kr Shared Lane Capacity (vph) ~ ~L Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep 79 372 Volume 33 29 Delay _ Q sep " i Q sep +l ~ round (Qsep +1) n max ~ C sh _ SUM C sep _ n C act I Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L R v (vph) 41 33 29 C(m) (vph) 797 79 372 v/c 0.05 0.42 0.08 95~ queue length 0.16 1.98 0.25 ~ Control Delay 9.8 82.3 15.5 . LOS A F C Approach Delay 51.1 Approach LOS F Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 ~j p(oj) 1.00 0.95 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) ~ , d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 9.8 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,i) Delay for stream 2 or 5 1. ' HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 _ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY a 1 ys t--------- B E W I, td ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE t ate Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK,FUTURE 5 yrs Intersection: ~ T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHQKHPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD ~ North/South Street: QKHWY Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 r' _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ~ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 ' I L T R I L T R l - Volume 815 44 51 934 ` Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 815 44 51 934 ' Percent Heavy Vehicles p ~ j' Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? !t Lanes 1 0 1 1 ~ Configuration TR L T i,~stream Signal? No No ,i t'`~~ Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R s: _ Volume 37 33 ' Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 33 ' 't; Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 ' ~ Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / r Lanes 1 1 ' Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 ~ Lane Conf ig L ~ L R ~ s~' - v (vph) 51 37 33 C (m) (vph) 791 75 370 i~~ v/c 0.06 0.49 0.09 95% queue length 0.21 2.57 0.29 ,1~ Control Delay 9.9 97.6 15.7 S A F C ' proach Delay 59.0 ~ ~ ~ Approach LOS F ,,.u- n ~ - - i f~ 'f,x HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 -i i~ Fax: f Phone: E-Mail: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS_~_ r, _ - BEW ~l Analyst: Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE _ Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK,FUTURE 5 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO ~r Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHQKHPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: QKHWY _ Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments I; Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 815 44 51 934 Volume Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 204 11 13 234 r., Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 815 44 51 934 i~ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / ~ RT Channelized? 4 Lanes 1 0 1 1 ~ Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No l Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 37 33 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 9 8 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 37 33 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 O M 0 1 I~' l Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~ walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ' r Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 i ~I1k - - - - Upstream Signal Data _ ' Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal 1~~~, vph vph sec sec mph feet I S2 Left-Turn - * ~ Through S5 Left-Turn Through I ~ ; ~ - j~~' Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles 1 5;~~ Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Ir• - Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation (~vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ( L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 ' t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv) 0 0 0 ~ q4, t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 ' Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t (3, lt) 0.00 0 . 70 0.00 ;;al t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage ~ws Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 10 <<~ 8 9 11 12 L L L T R L T R l t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 r~ t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 ~ I ,Etih Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals ~~mputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal - j~ Movement 2 Movement 5 l V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V p r o g - - i' Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) , Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) ~I Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) g(q2) g (q) _ Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked y ~ Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) _ _ 1 alpha beta Travel time, t (a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) 1, Min platooned flow, V(c,min) 1 Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 ' Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result P(2) 0.000 P(5) 0.000 ~ p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II ' P(1) 1 P(4) ~ . p (7) P(8) ~ P(9) i p(10) p(11) q' p(12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process 1 Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ L L L T R L T R V c,x 859 1873 N 837 l_ s Px V c,u,x ~ _ 1, C r, x C plat,x _ - - - - Two-Stage Process 7 g 10 11 I~ - - - i Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 I v (c ~ x) - - - - I s 1500 ' i ) ~`Y' u' x ) ~ I~ C(r,x) ~n C(plat,x) ' ~W Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations _ s ,Step l: RT from Minor St. 9 12 I_ - ' Conflicting Flows 837 l Potential Capacity 370 j Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 370 Probability of Queue free St. 0.91 1.00 Ste 2: LT from Ma'or St. 4 1 p 7 `'t~ Conflicting Flows 859 Potential Capacity 791 rf~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ' `r~ Movement Capacity 791 1 Probability of Queue free St. 0.94 1.00 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ( ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 , ; Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ,,Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ~ Cap. 'Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.94 0.94 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 _ ~ Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1873 ' Potential Capacity 80 ~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ~ Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.94 Maj . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0.95 ' Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.94 0.87 Movement Capacity 75 l a f`~~ Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance ~~w, Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows tential Capacity ~ destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ~ Probability of Queue free St. Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.94 0.94 Movement Capacity ti Result for 2 stage process: Y ~,E C t \ Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 i! Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 'I`t Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 1 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity _ Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity - T Part 3 - Single Stage ' Conflicting Flows 1873 Potential Capacity 80 ` Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 j Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.94 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.95 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.94 0.87 Movement Capacity 75 Results for Two-stage process: a , Y C t 75 l Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ 1 L T R L T R t Volume (vph) 37 ~33 ~ 1 Movement Capacity (vph) 75 370 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) . - Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches r- Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R l r` - - - C sep 75 370 Volume 37 33 Delay rx~ Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n C act r~ Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L R 1„ v (vph) ~ 51 37 33 C(m) (vph) 791 75 370 v/c 0.06 0.49 0.09 95o queue length 0.21 2.57 0.29 ontrol Delay 9.9 97.6 15.7 S A F C proach Delay 59.0 ` Approach LOS F C~' Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 ' - - p (07 ) 1 . 00 0 . 94 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 9.9 N, Number of major street through lanes I d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 t_' ~yw ~ ~y4 ~y ~ 4V ~y ICJ 1 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 ptn ______A_ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst : BEW ;r~, ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ate Performed: 11/20/2008 ' ~ Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK,FUTUREI0 yrs Intersection: T ~ Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO ~~Units: U. S. Customary i Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHQKHPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: QKHWY Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 I ~ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ _ _ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ( Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 1 L T R ~ L T R r Volume 885 56 65 1015 C Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 885 56 65 1015 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / 1 RT Channelized? !f_ Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T tream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R I L T R rya _ _ Volume 44 39 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 44 39 ;A Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 p Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / 3~~ Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R l~_ - _Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ L R v (vph) 65 44 39 C (m) (vph) 737 56 334 v/c 0.09 0.79 0.12 ~,95o queue length 0.29 5.66 0.40 ~_Control Delay 10.4 234.4 17.2 ~ B F C roach Delay 132.3 Approach LOS F ~F*~ 1~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 I l_ Fax: Phpne : i j E-Mail. i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS -1 i~ Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK,FUTUREIO yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHQKHPMFU l East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: QKHWY ~ Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments lr Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 885 56 65 1015 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 221 14 16 254 ~1 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 885 56 65 1015 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? l~ Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No ~I _ i Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ~ 44 39 _ Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 11 10 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 44 39 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 (fr. Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 I-;~ Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 l - Upstream Signal Data- - Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet ~ S 2 Left -Turn Through `;,t S5 Left-Turn ~ Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 ` Shared In volume, major th vehicles: - l Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: a, C_ Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R _ „k^ t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 `r' P (hv ) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 { Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 ~qA' t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 ~h, t (c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations - Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R - - t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 p (HV) 0 0 p I t (f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 f~ ,r Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals ~~h mputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal - Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V p rog - .r~rt Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) ,_f Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g (ail) g(q2) ~ Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked ~1 Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) _ _ _ ~ alpha ~ beta . Travel time, t(a) (sec) II Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result P(2) 0.000 i , p(5) 0.000 I L i p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1} (2) (3) ~ for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage iI P(4) ~ ~ p( ) p(~) - p (8) P (9) ~ ' p(10) p(11) ~I p (12) Computation 4 and 5 LLL Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R _ Ir ~ ~ V c,x 941 2058 913 s l Px V c,u,x C r,x C plat,x Two-Stage Process ~ g 10 it ( Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 - s lsoo x) ,~c' u' x) r C (r , x ) - - - r r:.e Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations ~_t Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 _ Conflicting Flows 913 Potential Capacity 334 ~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 r'~ Movement Capacity 334 'f-~r Probability of Queue free St. 0.88 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 941 C Potential Capacity 737 cr~~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 737 I Probability of Queue free St. 0.91 1.00 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 C~ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 £,y Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.91 0.91 Movement Capacity C Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows - 2058 Potential Capacity 61 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.91 Maj . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0.93 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.91 0.82 Movement Capacity 56 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3 TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage-T L. Conflicting Flows ;~tential Capacity ( destrian Impedance Factor L Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt ;bra Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St . ~ _ _ _ I__l Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity i _ _ li Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows i Potential Capacity l Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.91 0.91 Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: - a y ii C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 7 10 ( ~ Step 4: LT from Minor St. Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor I~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage ~ Conflicting Flows ~ Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 Single Stage Conflicting Flows 2058 ~ Potential Capacity 61 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.91 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.93 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.91 0.82 Movement Capacity 56 Results for Two-stage process: a ~7 Y J C t 56 - Calculations Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) N 44 39 Movement Capacity (vph) 56 334 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) _ _ _ _ Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ~ Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R u,: 1„ - C sep 56 334 i Volume 44 39 Delay Q sep ( Q sep +1 round (Qsep +l) n max - - - C sh SUM C s ep ( n C act t~P r.~ ~ Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service "n~' - - - - _ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L R C, _ _ v (vph) 65 44 39 C(m) (vph) 737 56 334 v/c 0.09 0.79 0.12 95o queue length 0.29 5.66 0.40 ,~a~ Control Delay 10.4 234.4 17.2 S B F C ~~proach Delay 132.3 Approach LOS F l ~`E> Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay ~,A, Movement 2 Movement 5 L_ 7~~(f p (oj ) 1 . 00 0 . 91 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 l":.` s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 f_ P*(o~) x~ d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 10.4 N, Number of major street through lanes ~ d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 l._ t~~ 4~~? !Mw R ly ( _ t~ nir~ ~I`' i .~ni> ' HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 ~t~. - TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY i, alyst : BEW ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ate Performed: 11/20/2008 ~ Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK,FUTURE20 yrs {t,,~ Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO I Units: U. S. Customary ~T=~ Analysis Year: 2008 f~; Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHQKHPMFU ~ Easy/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: QKHWY ~,<< Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments V, Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1045 77 91 1197 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 f Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1045 77 91 1197 ;.N Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / C RT Channelized? , Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T stream Signal?_ No No inor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L L T R I L T R ~ Volume 57 51 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 57 51 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( o ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 11£~ Configuration L R j - Dela y, Queue Length, and Level of Service j Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ L R I v (vph) 91 57 51 C (m) (vph) 630 29 266 v/c 0.14 1.97 0.19 95a queue length 0.51 18.60 0.71 Control Delay 11.7 2091 21.7 '°;S B F C I''~ proach Delay 1114 Approach LOS F C HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 i Phone: Fax: E-Mail: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS _ ~l i Analyst: BEW I" Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK,FUTURE20 yrs , Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO ri Units: U. S. Customary Ari.alysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHQKHPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: QKHWY I_I Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 ~l Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments I Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 1045 77 91 1197 Volume Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 261 19 23 299 fl Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1045 77 91 1197 Ill Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 l Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No NO T Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 57 51 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 14 13 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 57 51 l Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / l RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R _ YPedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 ~ 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ` Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 _ _ __Upstream Signal Data_ _ ~ Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet ' S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn i Through j~~ Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: ;',;Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R _ t (c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - P (hv) 0 0 0 ,-y t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 3~' 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 ' 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R ( _ ~ t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 1_ `~x~ t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 :fig I~ Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals ~l _ _ _ _ yea ~`mputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 ~ V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) y~r @~ o V prog l ` 'r~s i Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) ~ Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ` Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g (q1) g (q2 ) r 5(q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha M i beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p (2) 0 .000 p(5) 0.000 i, p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P (1) p (4) P(~) p(9) p(8' f1 p(10) p(11) [ p(12) ~ I Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 1122 2463 1084 l_ s Px V c,u,x C r, x C plat,x Two-Stage Process ~ g 10 11 _ [ Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 F,1 - - - v(c,x) M s 1500 x) c, u, x) - - - I C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step l: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 1084 ( Potential Capacity 266 II Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ,tr Movement Capacity 266 y°.E Probability of Queue free St. 0.81 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ( Conflicting Flows 1122 l Potential Capacity 630 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 630 Probability of Queue free St. 0.86 1.00 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ' Conflicting Flows .,,z° Potential Capacity [ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.86 0.86 Movement Capacity ( Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ( Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 I~ Conflicting Flows 2463 Potential Capacity 34 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.86 . Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.89 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.86 0.72 f Movement Capacity 29 t_ - - ,~u Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 rc _ Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows ~ tential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. t- "~F + Part 2 - Second Stage Y Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity _ _ _ _ _ Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows ~ Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.86 0.86 Movement Capacity ~ Result for 2 stage process: y I; C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 (I~ Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage _ Conflicting Flows L Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity _ Pedestrian Impedance Factor i~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage (I' Conflicting Flows 2463 Potential Capacity 34 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.86 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.89 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.86 0.72 r Movement Capacity 29 I1 Results for Two-stage process: a Y C t 29 _ Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations L Movement 7 ~ 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R , Volume (vph) 57 51 Movement Capacity (vph) 29 266 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Il'y l ~ 1~1 Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ,,~i L T R L T R C s ep- 2 9 - 2 6 6--- ~ Volume 57 51 t ,~u~ Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max - - - - ~r C s h SUM C sep n f C act ~•x Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4- 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L R v (vph) 91 57 51 C(m) (vph) 630 29 266 [ v/c 0.14 1.97 0.19 . 95o queue length 0.51 18.60 0.71 Control Delay 11.7 2091 21.7 L~S B F C proach Delay 1114 ;T Approach LOS F L_ Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay (zar` I Movement 2 Movement 5 _ _ p (oj ) 1 . 00 0 . 86 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 f__ v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 t,, s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 ~ s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) T, d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 11.7 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 ..~x l_- {~4 i ~Y xP3n 4r~ • Y }~d a ~7 r l ,k Y r I ~ l r; Yr~° ~I I~ i l s~ f~ ~ ~ ~ F _ V << ^ rr~~ > r ~ s r , e as r a ~ APPENDIX D t ` LEVEL ®P SERVICE "~r L~ HUALALAI ROAD & HIENALOLI ROAD UNSIGNALIZED INTERSEC'T'ION AlVI & PM PEAK IIOIJR ~a 7~,~ F.. `f~ k~ 4 W I(h„~ L_ ~~1~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst: BEW ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ~ ate Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, EXISTING Intersection: T ~ Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHHAMEX East/West Street: HUALALAI RD I North/South Street: HIENOLOI RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ _--_Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments- Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume - 21 44 73 11 ( Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 It Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 44 73 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lane s 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR stream Signal? No No - - - - - Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume 18 38 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 _ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 38 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 l Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration- L - R -Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service______ Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I ~ L R v ~ vph ) 21 - - 18 3 8- C(m) (vph) 1526 820 988 v/c 0.01 0.02 0.04 95o queue length 0.04 0.07 0.12 Control Delay 7.4 9.5 8.8 S A A A proach Delay ~ 9,p Approach LOS A f HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 ~ Phone: Fax: i E-Mail: i ~ __TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS I~ Analyst: BEW l Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 ~ I Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, EXISTING Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 ~ Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHHAMEX East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: HIENOLOI RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 ~ L T R L T R Volume 21 44 73 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 5 11 18 3 Ii Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 44 73 11 ~ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ~ I; Volume 18 38 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 4 10 I' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 38 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / ~ RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R l _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 Laxie Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage---_----0'-- 0- 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet ~ S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 44 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 [ Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation ~~vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) l.o0 1.00 1.00 l.o0 1.00 1.00 l.o0 1.00 P (hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) o.o0 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 _ t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30A t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 ~ t (f) 2.2 3 .5 3 .3 ~ Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V (t) V (l,prot) V (t) V (l,prot) - - - V Prog 1-- Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) f Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) ~ Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ' Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(ql) i g (Q2 ) g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha ` beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) ~ Smoothing Factor, F ~ Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) ~ Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p (2) 0.000 ~ ' p (5) 0.000 p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? i Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) I for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P(1) i I p(4) p(7) P(8) ~ p(9) p(10) p (11) p(12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 84 164 78 li s Px ~ , V c,u,x ~ C r, x C plat, x ~ I Two-Stage Process 7 g 10 11 r Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 - - V (c, x) ~ s 1500 ~x) c,u,x) - - - C (r, x) C (plat, x) t - Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations [ Step l: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Qonflicting Flows 78 Potential Capacity 988 l Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 988 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.96 - Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 I Conflicting Flows 84 l Potential Capacity 1526 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1526 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 0.99 1 ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 t Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity [ Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4~LT from Minor St . 7 10 Conflicting Flows 164 Potential Capacity 831 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 I Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.99 Movement Capacity 820 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. A 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows tential Capacity edestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. _ _ _ Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows ~ Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 r Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a Y l C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor I~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage ' Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Ii Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage ~i Conflicting Flows 164 Potential Capacity 831 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 l Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.99 Movement Capacity 820 I Results for Two-stage process: a ~ Y ~ C t 820 ' (~I Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 _ 9 10 11 12 I~ L T R L T R Volume (vph) 18 38 Movement Capacity (vph) 820 988 , Shared Lane Capacity (vph) - I I i Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches - - - Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L-----T --R--- C sep 820 988 Volume 18 38 Delay ( Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max - - - - - - C sh SUM C sep n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT L R v (vph) 21 18 38 f C (m) (vph) 1526 820 988 yl v/c 0.01 0.02 0.04 95o queue length 0.04 0.07 0.12 Control Delay 7.4 9.5 8.8 S A A A C~proach Delay 9.0 Approach LOS A Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay - Movement 2 Movement 5 11 _ p(oj) 0.99 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 44 C v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 p*(oj) 0.99 d(M,LT) Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.4 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 - 0.1- - I l l_ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 - TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst: BEW ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE to Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE 5yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHHAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: HIENOLOI RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 ( 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume 24 50 87 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 24 50 87 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR tream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 I L T R ~ L T R Volume ~ 18 40 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate; HFR 18 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( °s ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 ~ Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 ( Lane Config LT ( ~ L R I v (vph) 24~ 18 40 L C(m) (vph) 1507 790 970 v/c 0.02 0.02 0.04 95a queue length 0.05 0.07 0.13 l Control Delay 7.4 9.7 8.9 A A A proach Delay 9.1 Approach LOS A l- HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 Phone: Fax: E-Mail: i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS - i i Analyst: BEW " Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE 5yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO ~ Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHHAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD ~I' North/South Street: HIENOLOI RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and'Adjustments _ Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R _ I Volume 24 50 87 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 6 12 22 3 ~ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 24 50 87 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / I~ RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 ~ Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No II Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 18 40 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 4 10 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 40 II Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 ll Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / i RT Channelized? No Lane s 1 1 ~ l Configuration L R _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments___ _ _ j Movements 13 14 15 16 ~ Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 1'2.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data - Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet ~ - - S2 Left-Turn Through 55 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 50 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 i ~Iorksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation t Critical Gap Calculation ~~vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage ,Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ~ P (HV) 0 0 0 ' t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals mputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal ~ Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V prog L_. Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) I' Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(ql) ' g (q2 ) g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p (2) 0.000 p (5) 0.000 p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? ~1 Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process ' movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II ~ P(1) ~ 1 P(4) P(7) p (8) P (9) j p(10) p(11) I p(12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 j L L L T R L T R " V c,x 99~ 191 ~ 93 ~ ? s Px V c,u,x 1 C r,x C plat, x ~ - - ~ Two-Stage Process ? 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(C,X) s 1500 ~x ) c, u, x) - C (r , X) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step l: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 93 Potential Capacity 970 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 970 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.96'-- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 99 Potential Capacity 1507 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1507 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 0.98 ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 _ Conflicting Flows T Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj, factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows - 191 Potential Capacity 803 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.98 Movement Capacity - - -790 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Ste 3: TH from Minor St 8 11 P Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows tential Capacity edestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. i Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows i, Potential Capacity i, Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity ' Result for 2 stage process: a Y C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 - 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor I~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage ' Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage I~ Conflicting Flows 191 Potential Capacity 803 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 ~i Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.98 Movement Capacity 790 i Results foz Two-stage process: a Y C t 790 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement ~ 7 8 9 10 11 12 Y L T R L T R ~ Volume (vph) 18 40 Movement Capacity (vph) 790 970 i Shared Lane Capacity (vph) _ ~ ~ - - - I I ' Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches f Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R r Sep 790 970 Volume 18 40 Delay Q sep Q sep +1 ( round (Qsep +1) f n max ~ A- - l C sh SUM C sep ` n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config Y,T L R l v (vph) 24 ~ 18 40 C(m) (vph) 1507 790 970 v/c 0.02 0.02 0.04 95% queue length 0.05 0.07 0.13 Control Delay 7.4 9.7 8.9 S A A A ~proach Delay 9.1 Approach LOS A Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj)-- - 0.98 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 50 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 p*(oj) 0.98 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.4 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 ( d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.1 - - 1 f~ L i HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY `I lyst: BEW ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE } ate Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE 10 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHHAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: HIENOLOI RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ -Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments- _ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 29 60 87 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 60 87 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 f Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? - Lane s 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR tream Signal? No No 1 - - - Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume 20 46 C Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config LT ~ ~ L R I~I v (vph) 29 20 46 t_ C(m) (vph) 1507 767 970 v/c 0.02 0.03 0.05 95o queue length 0.06 0.08 0.15 ontrol Delay 7.4 9.8 8.9 S A A A ~ proach Delay 9.2 t Approach LOS A i ~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 Phone: Fax: E-Mail. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS - - Analyst: BEW I~' Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE 10 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 ~ Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHHAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: HIENOLOI RD l Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 -r-- L T R L T R Volume 29 60 87 12 i Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 7 15 22 3 f, Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 60 87 12 I: Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? J% Lanes 0 1 1 0 II Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No _ Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L ~T R ~ L T R ~ Volume 20 46 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 5 12 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / ~ RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R I~ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments _ _Y___ Movements 13 14 15 16 ~ Flow (ped/hr) ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 _ f Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent+Blockage A~- 0--- 0 -0---_-0 ___Up s t r e am S i gn a 1 D a t a_ _ ~ Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance I Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet ~ S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 1 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 60 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gip Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 L t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage i Follow-Up Time~Calculations l Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 ~ 3.50 3 30 y t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal ( Movement 2 Movement 5 Il V (t) V (l, Prot) V (t) V (l,prot) - - V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s {vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) i Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ~ Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g (q1) g (q2 ) g (q) Computation 2-Proportion ofyTWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) ~ - - I alpha 1 beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result j~ p(2) 0.000 f p (5) 0 .000 1 p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process j movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P{1) p(4) P(7) P(8) P(9) l p (10) p(11) p(12) ~ Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 99 211 93 I, i~ s Px v c,u,x C r, x C plat, x _ N_ Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 ~ Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V (c, x) g 1500 ~x) c,u,x) C (r , x ) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 RT from Minor St. 9 - 12 Conflicting Flows - 93 Potential Capacity 970 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 970 Probability-of Queue free St. -1.00 - 0.95 - Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 99 f Potential Capacity 1507 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1507 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 0.98 ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 - Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity ( Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 211 Potential Capacity 782 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.94 0.98 Movement Capacity - 767 - Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage - T - - Conflicting Flows tential Capacity edestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. l- ~i - r_,~ Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt i Movement Capacity - Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows j Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a Y C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 (I Step 4: LT from Minor St. ~7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity - i Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows ~ Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 211 Potential Capacity 782 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.94 0.98 Movement Capacity 767 Results for Two-stage process: a Y C t 767 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~t L T R L T R f Volume (vph) ~ 20 46 Movement Capacity (vph) 767 970 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) _ Y Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ~ Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ L T R L T R S e p_--___ 7 6 7 9 7 0 Volume 20 46 Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) I - - n max C sh SUM C sep n C act ( Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ( Lane Config LT L R l_ - - - - v (vph) 29 20 46 - C(m) (vph) 1507 767 970 v/c 0.02 0.03 0.05 95% queue length 0.06 0.08 0.15 Control Delay 7.4 9.8 8.9 S A A A i_~proach Delay 9.2 Approach LOS p' Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 f p(o7) 0.98 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 60 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 p*(aj) 0.98 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.4 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 ( d(rank,l) Delay for stream-2 or 5 - - - 0.1 - l I~ l- I l__ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 ___~_________________TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst: BEW ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ate Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE 20 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 _ Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHHAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: HIENOLOI RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments___ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound r Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume ~ 38 79 108 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 79 108 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / { RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR stream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 [ L T R ~ L T R Volume ~ 21 56 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 56 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R l' - - - Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config LT ( ~ L R v (vph) 38 21 56 C(m) (vph) 1479 706 944 v/c 0.03 0.03 0.06 95% queue length 0.08 0.09 0.19 Control Delay 7.5 10.3 9.1 ~S A B A pproach Delay 9.4 Approach LOS A ~L~ . I~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 Phone: Fax: ~ E-Mail. i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: BEW i Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE 20 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary I! Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHHAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD i, North/South Street: HIENOLOI RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' L T R L T R Volume 38 79 108 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 10 20 27 3 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 79 108 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? l Lanes 0 1 1 0 l Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No - No fl Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume ~ 21 56 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 5 14 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 56 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments ~ 1 Movements 13 14 15 16 f( Flow (ped/hr) Y Y 0 0 0 0 ~ ~A ( Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0-~--0-_-- 0---- I Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S 2 Left -Turn -------A- - Through S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles 1 - - Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 79 ( Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 ' ( Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 l Number of major street through lanes: 1 Cf Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 1 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 ( Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L_ t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c} 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 T 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V (t) V (l,prot) V (t) V (l,prot) - - - - - V prog Zotal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) I~ Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g'(cIl) 9' (Q2 ) g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked+ ~ Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) { Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) ~ Duration of blocked period, t(p) ' Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p (2) 0.000 p (5) 0.000 p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P(1) P(4) P P(8) I P(9) p(10) p (11) p(12) i Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V C,x ~ 121 269 ~ 114 s ~ Px V c,u,x _ ~ C r , x N ~ - _ C p I a t, x _-Y _ - Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 ~ Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(C,X) s 1500 u, x) C (r , x) - - C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 RT from Minor St. 9 12 - Conflicting Flows 114 ( Potential Capacity 944 Il Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 944 Probability of Queue free St. - -1.00 0.94 - Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 121 Potential Capacity 1479 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1479 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.97 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 0.97 ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.97 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 269 Potential Capacity 725 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.92 0.97 Movement Capacity 706 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage - l_ Conflicting Flows tential Capacity edestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity f Probability of Queue free St. Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cag. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.97 Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a ~I y i' C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 1~ Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt { Movement Capacity ~ Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor fl Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt i Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 269 it Potential Capacity 725 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Ac~j. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.92 0.97 Movement Capacity 706 ~i Results for Two-stage process: y C t 706 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R i g Volume (vph) 21 56 l Movement Capacity (vph) 706 944 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) ~ _ ~ 1~ ~ Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches I ( Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 II L T R L T R sep 706 944 Volume 21 56 Delay Q sep Q sep +l ~ round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep _ n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 f Lane Config LT L R ' t v (vph) 38 21 56 C(m) (vph) 1479 706 944 v/c 0.03 0.03 0.06 95o queue length 0.08 0.09 0.19 Control Delay 7.5 10.3 9.1 OS A B A 1J roach Delay 9.4 proach LOS A Worksheet il-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p (o j) - - 0 . 9 7 - 1 . 0 0 _ v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 79 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 _ s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 P* (oj ) 0 . 97 ~ d(M,LT) Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.5 ~ N, Number of major street through lanes 1 ' d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.2 'I - - - L_ `I iP HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst: BEW ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ~,i ate Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, EXISTING Intersection: T (r Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO )y Units: U. S. Customary ~~r' Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHHPMEX 1~ East/West Street: HUALALAI RD t North/South Street: HIENOLOLI RD ;Y Intersection Orientation: EW Stud eriod (hrs) 1.00 Y P Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments__ _ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound _ Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R rt~4 ~ ~ Volume 18 58 37 8 5f' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 58 37 8 ,zF Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 r`` Median Type/Storage Undivided / i RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR (stream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L L T R ~ L T R N~M Volume 7 25 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 a~~ Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R ~;~a~ A_ Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service__ A Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config LT ~ ~ L ~ R i v (vph) 18 7 25 l._ C(m) (vph) 1576 853 1036 v/c 0.01 0.01 0.02 95a queue length 0.03 0.02 0.07 Control Delay 7.3 9.3 8.6 n S A A A i proach Delay 8.7 IL Approach LOS A ~st s~~ T~ ~T 1~F4 gkx~ F~fi HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 tI Phone: Fax: ~I E-Mail: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: BEW I~ AgencyjCo.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, EXISTING ~ Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHHPMEX East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: HIENOLOLI RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 18 58 37 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 4 14 9 2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 58 37 8 i Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / ( RT Channelized? i Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 7 25 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 2 6 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L' R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 r , ~ Lane Width ( f t ) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 ~ Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet i S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through ~x Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles ~ Movement 2 Movement 5 rfi I Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 58 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 ~.,k 7';` L_ Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation ~~vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R r~, _ _ ' t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv ) 0 0 0 t (c, g) 0.20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 C Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage , Follow-Up Time Calculations Ys Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t (f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV ) 0 0 0 I t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 l_ r Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals L _ _ _ ;,imputation 1 Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal L Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) °:rt 3~ V P r o g--- - ~ r,;: Tbtal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) IJ Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ` Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(ql) g(q2) g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked 11, Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) i , alpha ~ beta Travel time, t (a) (sec) j ~ Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) i Min platooned flow, V(c,min) ~ Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 ' Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result P(2) 0.000 P(5) 0.000 p (dom) p (subo ) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P(1) P(4) P i p(8) i p(9) p(10) p(11) I p(12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 45 135 41 1 s l Px V c,u,x C r,x C plat,x Two-Stage Process ~ g 10 11 ~~s i_ Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V (c , X ~ - ~ s 1500 x) c, u, x) 1 l C(r,x) C(plat,x) C' y~~~ Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations ~ - Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 41 Potential Capacity 1036 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1036 f~= Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 Step 2 : LT f rom Major St . 4 1 5; Conflicting Flows 45 Potential Capacity 1576 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1576 tl Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 t, Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 0.99 i ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ;,a Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 X Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ";~t Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 135 Potential Capacity 863 r- Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 I Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 1114, Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.99 Movement Capacity 853 I~"~ Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St 8 11 Part 1~ First Stage r Conflicting Flows tential Capacity L edestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt ~p Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. I lr, .5 - i ~ Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows i Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1~ Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity II'' i~ Result for 2 stage process: a y C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 l~ Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage I Conflicting Flows 1 Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor ~I Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 135 Potential Capacity 863 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.99 Movement Capacity 853 Results for Two-stage process: a j Y t C t 853 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) ~ 7 25 Movement Capacity (vph) 853 1036 ~ Shared Lane Capacity (vph) f Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches j ~ - Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ L T R L T R ~eP - 8 5 3---- 10 3 6 Volume 7 25 " Delay ~,k Q sep Q sep +l round (Qsep +l) ' ~,t t' - f ' n max C sh SUM C sep n C act d, Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service - Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT L R ~f v (vph) 18 7 2 5 C(m) (vph) 1576 853 1036 v/c 0.01 0.01 0.02 95% queue length 0.03 0.02 0.07 Control Delay 7.3 9.3 8.6 S A A A i roach Delay g_7 ~.~r~ ro a pp ch LOS p, ~-'Worksheet 11-Shared Ma'or LT Im edan e J p c and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 It,~~ P (0 7) 0. 9 9 1. 0 0 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 5g L v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 ;F s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 a_; s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 P*(OJ) 0.99 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7,3 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 j` d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.1 L,._ - , l~ ` 4 L y,~~, i ~r r= l HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY f alyst : BEW ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ate Performed: 11/20/2008 ~ Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE 5 yrs Intersection: T r~'° Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO + Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1r07 BLHHPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: HIENOLOLI RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ - Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound ,~n Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R ~ L T R _ 'a'~, Volume 21 65 ~ 47 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 65 47 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 r Configuration LT TR stream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 j L T R ~ L T R Volume 7 31 C Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 ~Zi~ L Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / «x Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 Lane Conf ig LT ~ ~ L R ~s; ' v (vph) 21 ~ 7 31 ~wk C (m) (vph) 1563 827 1023 x;~~ v/c 0.01 0.01 0.03 95o queue length 0.04 0.03 0.09 ~y_ Control Delay 7.3 9.4 8.6 S A A A 1 proach Delay ~ g,g Approach LOS p, l_.. F - ~1~ f Af~ I1 / 1 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 I+ tf Phone: Fax: j E-Mail. i' TWO-WAX STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS, Analyst: $EW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 i~ Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE 5 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHHPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: HIENOLOLI RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 21 65 47 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 5 16 12 2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 65 47 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L- T R - Volume 7 31 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 2 8 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / 1 RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow ( ed hr) ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 P / i t I Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 , Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 ______Up s t re am S i gna 1 D a t a_ _ r Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance } Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn t Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles - Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 65 z,~ Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 ~_F Number of major street through lanes: 1 £9 C_ Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation r Critical Gap Calculation j vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 C_~ L L L T R L T ~ R ~;s t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv ) 0 0 0 ' t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Gradej100 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 'Yk t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV ) 0 0 0 r t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 ;t, ~ - - - Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals _ _ _ ;imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal - Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) 1 V p r o g - - } Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) • Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ` Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g (ql) ~ g(q2) ~ ~ g(q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) _ _ alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) r Min platooned flow, V(c,min) I1 Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p (2) 0 .000 p (5) 0.000 p (dom) p (subo ) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process t' movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II p (1) I P (4) i P(~) p(8) p(9) p(10) p(11) 1 p (12) Computation 4 and 5 r' Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ L L L T R L T R f V c,x 55 158 51 1 s 111 Px V c,u,x I C r, x l C plat, x Two-Stage Process ~ 8 10 11 !tea Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 ' ~ v ~ ~ ~ X~ - - J s 1500 x) ~u~x) C (r , x ) - - - C(plat,x) l,';~ Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations i Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 t Conflicting Flows 51 Potential Capacity 1023 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 r Movement Capacity 1023 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.97 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 N1tY Conflicting Flows 55 Potential Capacity 1563 f=?; Pedestrian Impedance Factor ~ 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1563 11 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 n Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 0.99 r `r ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity C_ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj, factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 `t' Step 4 LT froth Minor St. 7 10- Conflicting Flows 158 Potential Capacity S38 _,sx~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.99 Movement Capacity g27 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance ~e ~at~; Step 3 TH from Minor St. 8 - 11 y,°~.~, Part 1 - First Stage - - ~ Conflicting Flows tential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. I - - - - - i i Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ~ Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ` Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity ~ Result for 2 stage process: a Y C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows 1 Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage ' Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ' Pedestrian Impedance Factor ' Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 158 Potential Capacity 838 Pedestrian Impedance Factor - 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 11 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.99 Movement Capacity 827 Results for Two-stage process: a y 827 C t - e Calc lations Worksheet 8 Shared Lan u Movement 7 8 9 10 11 ~ 12 L T R L T R l Volume (vph) 7 31 Movement Capacity (vph) 827 1023 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) _ a` , Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches $1 Movement L T R 1L 1T 1R sep 827 1023 Volume 7 31 ~,f. Delay Q sep Q sep +l ,a,, round (Qsep +1) a - n max C sh SUM C sep r-- n I + C act t_ ;~;n Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT L R v (v h) 21 7 31 P C (m) (vph) 1563 827 1023 C v/c 0.01 0.01 0.03 95's queue length 0.04 0.03 0.09 Control Delay 7.3 9.4 8.6 S A A A proach Delay 8.8 roach LOS A ,,x, PP Work heet 11-Shared Ma'or LT Im edance and Dela s 7 P Y a Movement 2 Movement 5 pr~ p (oj ) 0 . 99 1 . 00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 65 1 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 -~7 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 4 P*(oj) 0.99 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.3 ~.N N, Number of major street through lanes 1 d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.1 l_- A ~V~ r ~ lr ~ 1y1 ,==`i . HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 f5 ___`_TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY t ' alyst: BEW ~~Fncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ate Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE 10 yrs ';b~ Intersection: T r' Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO l Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 (~'n Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHHPMFU +~East/West Street: HUALALAI RD t, North/South Street: HIENOLOLI RD '';4 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 ~y _ _Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ~ _ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound ' Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 C L T R ~ L T R _ r~ Volume 24 79 59 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 24 79 59 9 sr; Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lane s 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR C~stream Signal? No No ;J~~ Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 8 40 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 40 ~i~ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 ( Percent Grade 0 0 Il_. Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 A Configuration L R - ~;~p Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound j_ Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Conf ig LT ~ ~ L R L v (vph) 24 8 40 C (m) (vph) 1546 791 1006 95°s queue length 0.05 0.03 0.12 ontrol Delay 7.4 9.6 8.7 ,,t, S A A A proach Delay 8.9 Approach LOS A s' `z~n< 1, if li HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 I' I~ Phone: Fax: E-Mail: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: BEW I~ Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE 10 yrs ~ Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO I Units: U. S. Customary 1 Analysis Year: 2008 ~ Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHHPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: HIENOLOLI RD 1 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 1.00 1 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 24 79 59 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 6 20 15 2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 24 79 59 9 I Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No I Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 8 40 ~ Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 2 10 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / 1 RT Channelized? No ` Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 f 1 1 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed ( f t/sec ) 4. 0 4. 0 4. 0 4. 0 r{ Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 _Upstream Signal Data _ 1 Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance ~ Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet r ~ - - ( S2 Left-Turn a,rq Through S5 Left-Turn Through _ _ Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles ~ Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 79 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 ~r - - Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation _ _ ritical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R ,y kS+J t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 t Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 l t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 ,fib t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 L t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 ~3~ 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t (f,base} 2.20 3.50 3 .30 t (f, HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 ~ P (HV) 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 l_. rp~ - Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals h*; mputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) r V prop 4°'~ Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type ' Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-i1) 4~ Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) i~ g(q2) g(q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked ' Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) , _ i alpha ' beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p ~ 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p (2) 0 .000 p (5) 0.000 p (dom) p (subo) 1 Constrained or unconstrained? _ Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage TI p (1) I P(4) p(7) P(8) p(9) p (10) p(11) p(12) ~ Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process j Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 { L L L T R L T R V c,x ~ 68 191 64 s Px j V c,u,x I' C r, x C plat,x - - - - l Two-Stage Process ~ g 10 11 j I 9 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(C,X) ~ s 1500 x) c~u~x) ~ ' ` C ~ r ~ x) - - r, C (plat, x} TA ~ - - ',s Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations ,'t Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 64 Potential Capacity 1006 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1006 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.96 1 ~ _ Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 r-• Conflicting Flows 68 Potential Capacity 1546 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 " Movement Capacity 1546 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 r, Maj L-Shared Proki Q free St. 0.98 ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 - Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 tr Cap. Adj, factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity 1 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 jH~'~ Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 191 Potential Capacity 803 ,~w Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 t,_ Maj . L, Min T Adj Imp Factor . 0 . 99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.98 J Movement Capacity 791 1. _ Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 ~ 11 r' f~ I Part 1 - First Stage ~ onflicting Flows tential Capacity j edestrian Impedance Factor L Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 7 ~,k Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. l~ 1( , Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity J Result for 2 stage process: a Y C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 i; _ I Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor J Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt , Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt j' Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 191 Potential Capacity 803 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.98 Movement Capacity 791 Results for Two-stage process: a j Y C t 791 - - - '1 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations ~ Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) N ~ 8 40 Movement Capacity (vph) 791 1006 i Shared Lane Capacity (vph) i Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R i sep 791 1006 1 Volume 8 40 ~ Delay `,9 T- Q sep Q sep +l round (Qsep +l) n max C s h SUM C s ep e n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service t ~ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Conf ig LT - L -R ~dn v( vph ) 2 4 8 4 0 jam- C (m) (vph) 1546 791 1006 1 v/c 0.02 0.01 0.04 l 95% queue length 0.05 0.03 0.12 Control Delay 7.4 9.6 8.7 S A A A roach Delay 8.9 pproach LOS A ,k Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay ~f Movement 2 Movement 5 p (oj ) 0 . 98 1 . 00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 79 C_ v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 P*(oj) 0.98 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.4 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.1 L... - - - R l~ 4_. l~ I, i t~-~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 r~~ __TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY _ alyst: BEW ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ~ to Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE 20 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO I' Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 ~~s Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHHPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD I North/South Street: HIENOLOLI RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R -t _ Volume ~ 32 103 81 9 r" Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 32 103 81 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? l-- Lane s 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR stream Signal? No No inor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R "j~~ Volume 8 55 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 ~=_E Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 55 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / j Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R - - trf Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service r Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound L Movement 1 4 17 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 `r Lane Config LT ~ ~ L R a, v (vph) ~ 32 8 55 C(m) (vph) 1518 724 978 v/c 0.02 0.01 0.06 j 95% queue length 0.06 0.03 0.18 ! Control Delay 7.4 10.0+ 8.9 S A B A "pproach Delay 9.0 Approach LOS A i l~ ii HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 i Phone: Fax: i E-Mail: ~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE 20 yrs ~ Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary l Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHHPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD j' North/South Street: HIENOLOLI RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ' Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R r~ Volume 32 103 81 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 8 26 20 2 > Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 32 103 81 9 t. Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 ' Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No j Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 8 55 _ ~ Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 2 14 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 55 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R _ I _Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~~°Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 f f~_ Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 I - _y_-___-- -Upstream Signal Data _ - j Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog Distance ( Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet I~ S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn j Through l ~s, Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles r- Movement 2 Movement 5 ~a~ _ Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 103 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 ,Number of major street through lanes: 1 r t~= - 1, Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation r~ - Critical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t (c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv> 1.00 l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo P (hv ) 0 0 0 t(~,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 !t(3,1t) o.o0 0.70 0.00 w~ t(c,T): 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 ~-r t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 , P (HV) 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 - - Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals „imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal - Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V prog - r~« vS~ Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 'Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) , Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit ~.6-11) ` ' Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) i J'(q2) g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked _ '~I Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F , Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 , i Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) 0.000 p (5) 0.000 p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) , for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage T Stage II 1' p (1) ~ p(4) ' p(7) P(8) ) P(9) p (10) p(11) 1 p(12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R _ V c,x 90 253 86 s Px V c,u,x C r, x C plat, x _ NN~_ _ t Two-Stage Process ~ g 10 11 1, Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V V (C, X) s 1500 ` x) (a~c' u' x) I ~ C(r,x) - - - A Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step l: RT from Minor St. - 9 12 - - Conflicting Flows 86 Potential Capacity 978 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 978 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.94 Step 2 : LT f rom Major St . 4 1 ~SIF~ Conflicting Flows 90 Potential Capacity 1518 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1518 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 0,98 ;a; ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 - Conflicting Flows - Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 p.9g Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. - 7 10 yr, Conflicting Flows 253 s~ Potential Capacity 740 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 k Maj . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0.98 y;~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.93 0.98 Movement Capacity 724 - Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Ste 3 TH from Minor St . 8 P 11 I~ Part 1 - First Stage - Conflicting Flows tential Capacity edestrian Impedance Factor ° Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ' Probability of Queue free St . ~t~ Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows ~I Potential Capacity ; Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ! _ l i Part 3 - Single Stage r++ Conflicting Flows i~j Potential Capacity ~t Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 11 Movement Capacity ~ Result for 2 stage process: {i a y C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ~4 7 10 Step 4: LT from Minor St. Part 1 - First Stage ~I Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity _ Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt ii Movement Capacity _ r Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 253 i' Potential Capacity 740 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.93 0.98 Movement Capacity 724 i Results for Two-stage process: a y 724 C t ~ . Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 8 55 ~l Movement Capacity (vph) 724 978 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) i, ,1r I.~:~Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches , , Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R .s,A „z , - - - I- sep 724 978 ~ Volume 8 55 ~~ti, Delay Q sep +l ~ round (Qsep +1) a~~ ` n max C sh t SUM C sep n C act 1, , Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ ~`f'~ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~,}r` Lane Config LT L R l ; v (v h) 32 8 55 P C(m) (vph) 1518 724 978 v/c 0.02 0.01 0.06 C! 95o queue length 0.06 0.03 0.18 ,rr: Control Delay 7.4 10.0+ 8.9 S A B A roach Delay 9.0 .~~roach LOS A a~ PP ~ - Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay „a . 11 Movement 2 Movement 5 LX p(oj) 0.98 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 103 v(i2) Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 .~9, ",e+; s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 P* (oj) 0.98 ,1_' d(M,LT) Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.4 ,r``4~ N, Number of major street through lanes 1 d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.2 I `r`~' ~I t~ , i , r: ,I L, i+~ I '~N ii ~'CC~ f ' A` I i~ {t~ ~ ~v ~ r h - APPENDIX E LEVEL OF SERVICE I~UALALI ROAD & PUAPUAANUI STREET UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AM & PM PEAK HOUR ~I~~ l f~ !L L~ i jl HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I ~ alyst• BEW ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE to Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, EXISTING Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO I Units: U. S. Customary ! Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHPAMEX EastfWest Street: PUAPUAANUI f North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 __Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ _ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 36 69 10 - Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 36 69 36 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? _ Lane s 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR stream Signal? No No inor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound _ Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R l Volume 7 0 19 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 0 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 ( ,Percent Grade ( o ) 0 0 I Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / l Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR - _y Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service________-- Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ ~ LTR v ( vph ) 3 6--- - 2 6 C(m) (vph) 1575 957 v/c 0.02 0.03 j- 95o queue length 0.07 0.08 I Control Delay 7.3 8.9 S A A ~proach Delay 8.9 Approach LOS A L~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 i it I'~ Phone: Fax: E-Mail. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS_,_ _ Analyst: BEW I 1 Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, EXISTING ~j Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary II Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPAMEX East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI (I North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ (j Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 36 69 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 9 17 9 2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 36 69 36 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? ' Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No _ _ Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 ~ 12 ~ L T R L T R I`~, Volume 7 0 ~ 19 f ~ Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 2 0 5 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 0 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR I"' l _ _Pedest,rian Volumes and AdjustmentsY ~ ~ _ ~1 Movements _ 13 14 15 16 1 I Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 I _Up s t r e am S i gn a 1 D a t a_ _~_Y ~ Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn Through _ S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3=Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 ( Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: I Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation ~~vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L- P (hv ) 0 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2-stage ~ Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R I _ _ _ t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 ~ Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals l _ _ _ _ imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 L_ V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V Prog - - Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) i Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(ql) g(q2) I ' g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked ~ ii Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha - ~ beta ' Travel time, t(a) (sec) I' Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) ( i Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Ii Duration of blocked period, t(p) ' Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result j~, p(2) ~ 0.000 ~ , p (5) 0.000 p (dom) ' p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? _ i Proportion ~ unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P(1) - i p (4, I a p(7) p (8) I p(9) p(10) p(11) p(12) I Computation 4 and 5 M- - Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 j L L L T R L T R V c,x 46 182 182 41 i s Px V c,u,x ~ _ II C r, x C plat,x _ - ~ Two-Stage Process '7 8 10 11 I I Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 - I~-- V(c,x) s 1500 1500 c,u,x) ~x) - C(r,x) C(plat,x) r Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 RT from Minor St 9 12 ( _ _ Conflicting Flows ~ ~ 41 ( Potential Capacity 1036 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1036 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 - Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 f Conflicting Flows 46 l Potential Capacity 1575 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ( Movement Capacity 1575 1 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 l Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ep 3 TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 182 ( Potential Capacity 716 I Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 l Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity 700 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 182 Potential Capacity 812 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.98 ( Movement Capacity 793 ~ - - Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance - Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage L_ Conflicting Flows ~tential Capacity ( edestrian Impedance Factor ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. f' ' Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows I! Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity - - ~ ~ Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 182 Potential Capacity 716 I~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity 700 Result for 2 stage process: a Y l' C t 700 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 i _ Ii Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage I' Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor I, Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt I{! Movement Capacity ~ Part 2 - Second Stage ' Conflicting Flows ~ Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt i Movement Capacity ~ 'Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 182 Potential Capacity 812 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 ~ Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.98 Movement Capacity 793 (I Results for Two-stage process: y ~ (i C t 793 l~ Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement ~ 7+ 8 9 10 11 M 12 II L T R L T R I Volume (vph) ~ 7 0~~ 19 Movement Capacity (vph) 793 700 1036 I( Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 957 _ _ _ _ _ _ f l ' Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 S 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R - ~ sep 793 700 1036 ~ Volume 7 0 19 Delay I Q sep Q sep +l II round (Qsep +1) n max - - - - 1 C sh 957 SUM C sep r n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L LTR l - v (vph) 36 26 C(m) (vph) 1575 957 v/c 0.02 0.03 95% queue length 0.07 0.08 Control Delay 7.3 8.9 S A A proach Delay 8.9 pproach LOS A Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay - ( Movement 2 Movement 5 p (oj 0 . 98 1 . 00 r v(il) Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2) Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) d(M,LT) Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.3 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 , I{ L I~ l- f R HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 ____TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst: BEW _ ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ate Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE 5 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 ~ Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHPAMFU ~ East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1,00 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume ~ 36 79 41 11 ( Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 36 79 41 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ( Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR stream Signal? No No inor Street: A r ch Eastbound T pp oa Westbound r Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 1 L T R ~ L T R Volume 8 0 19 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1 00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 1 0 ~ Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L ( ~ LTR v (vph) 36 27 C(m) (vph) 1567 939 v/c 0.02 0.03 C 95o queue length 0.07 0.09 Control Delay 7.4 8.9 S A A proach Delay 8.9 f Approach LOS A iI L_ . HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 l'~ Phone: Fax: E-Mail: ~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS` _ - - - Analyst: BEW AgencyjCo.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 II Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE 5 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary I' Analysis Year: 2008 I~ Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHPAMFU East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ i; Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 36 79 41 11 ~ ' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 9 20. 10 3 ~ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 36 79 41 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lane s 1 1 1 0 l Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No i Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 8 0 19 ' Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 2 0 5 ~ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 19 ~j Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 II Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / RT Channelized? ~ Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR O _ _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments r 1 Movements ~ 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 (l Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 r _ __Up s t r e am S i gna 1 D a t a_____________ j Prog, Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance ~ Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet ` S2 Left-Turn Through 55 Left-Turn ( Through ( Worksheet 3=Data-for Computing Effect of-Delay to Major Street Vehicles I Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: [ Number of major street through lanes: Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation I Critical Gap Calculation _ vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base)~ 4.1 ~ 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv) 0 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.~0 0.00 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 { t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 ~ 3 50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 ~ _ f Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal I Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t} V(l,prot) V prog ' I~ L Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) ~i Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ~ Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) g(q2) S (q) _ ~ Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked i', Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) ~I alpha _ - beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) ~i Smoothing Factor, F ~i Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 - i I Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) 0.000 p (5) 0 .000 p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? ~ _ _ i Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process l movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II ~ P(1) ~ f l p(4) ~ p (7) p(8) p(9) I p (10) p(11) p(12) ~ j Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process ~I Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x S2 197 197 46 s Px V c,u,x C r , x - _ l C plat,x Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 it f ~ Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 - - - _ V(c,x) s 1500 1500 ,u,x) C ~ X ~ C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT-from-Minor St. 9 - 12 - Conflicting Flows 46 ( Potential Capacity 1029 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1029 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 l Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1- Conflicting Flows 52 [ Potential Capacity 1567 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1567 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ep 3 TH from Minor St. 8 11 - 197 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 702 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity 686 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 l - - - Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 f Conflicting Flows 197 Potential Capacity 796 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.98 Movement Capacity - 778 Il Worksheet 7-Computation of-the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance l-- Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 - Part 1 - First Stage L_ Conflicting Flows ~tential Capacity edestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. ~ Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity i Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 197 ( Potential Capacity 702 I Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity 686 Result for 2 stage process: a i~ I, C t 686 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 I' Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage I~~ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor l; Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage ~ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt II Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 197 Potential Capacity 796 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 I' Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.98 Movement Capacity 778 Ii Results for Two-stage process: a I? Y C t 778 li Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ii L T R L T R Volume (vph) 8 0 19 ' Movement Capacity (vph) 778 686 1029 I( Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 939 Il r Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L- T--- R L - T R i C sep 778 686 1029 Volume 8 0 19 Delay Q sep t Q sep +l round (Qsep +l) n max C sh 939 SUM C sep ( n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service t Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L LTR v( vph) 3 6 2 7 C (m) (vph) 1567 939 v/c 0.02 0.03 95o queue length 0.07 0.09 Control Delay 7.4 8.9 S A p' (_~proach Delay 8.9 Approach LOS p' Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay ( Movement 2 Movement 5 l P(oj) - - - 0.98 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.4 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 l-_ 1 II J_ i ' ~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 j ___TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst: BEW ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ~ ate Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTUREIO yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHPAMFU East/West Street: PUA~UAANUI 1 North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ _Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ -A Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 42 90 63 13 ( Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Il Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 42 90 63 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR stream Signal? No No - Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 1 L T R I L T R Volume 9 0 22 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 0 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 I_ Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration - - LTR _ _Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ ~ LTR 1 v (vph) 42 31 l C(m) (vph) 1536 901 v/c 0.03 0.03 95o queue length 0.08 0.11 I l_ Control Delay 7.4 9.1 S A A ' J proach Delay 9,1 ~ Approach LOS A f_ ~ ~ ~ I HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 ~ Phone: Fax: E-Mail. II TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: BEW l Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTUREIO yrs I+ Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPAMFU East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 42 90 63 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 10 22 16 3 1~ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 42 90 63 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? f~ Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No rTO - (l Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L -T R I, I Volume 9 0 22 ~ Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 2 0 6 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 0 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / NO / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR II _N~Y Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments___ _ Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 [l Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 i _ -____-________Up s t r e am S i gna 1 D a t a_______ ~ ~ Pro Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance ~ g Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn - Through S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 f Shared In volume, major th vehicles Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: I Number of major street through lanes: f_ Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation ~vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ( 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations l Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R 1 t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals ' Imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal - Movement 2 Movement 5 V (t) V (l,prot) V (t) V (l,prot) _ V p r o g - - '~otal~Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g (q1) g(q2) g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 - _ - V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot)-- alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) 1 Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result I' p(2) 0.000 p (5) 0.000 ~ p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II II P(1) p(4) P (7) P(8) P(9) p(10) p(11) p (12) ~ 1 Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c, x 76 244 244 70 f s Px ' V c,u,x C r,x C plat,x I Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 ~ I f Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 - V (c, x) s 1500 1500 x) c,u,x) C (r, x) C(plat,x) ~ Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step l: RT from Minor St. 9 1?_ l Conflicting Flows 70 ( Potential Capacity 998 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 998 Probability of Queue free St. - 1.00 0.98 _ Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 76 Potential Capacity 1536 Pedestrian 'Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ( Movement Capacity 1536 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.97 l Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 i Conflicting Flows 244 ( Potential Capacity 661 1 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.97 Movement Capacity 643 ( Probability of Queue f ree St. 1.00 1.00 t _ _ _ _ _ Step 4 LT from Minor St. 7 10 ~ Conflicting Flows ~ 244 Potential Capacity 749 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.97 Movement Capacity 729 ~ - ~ Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acpeptance 1 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 t Part 1 - First Stage ~ 1_ Conflicting Flows tential Capacity j edestrian Impedance Factor ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity S Probability of Queue free St. L_ ~ 1 a . _ _ Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 244 it Potential Capacity 661 i Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.97 Movement Capacity 643 Result for 2 stage process: a Y ' C t 643 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage I' Conflicting Flows l Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage ~ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt ~ Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 244 ~ Potential Capacity 749 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 l Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.97 ~ Movement Capacity 729 +i Results for Two-stage process: a Y C t 729 I~ Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 I) L T R L T R ~ Volume (vph) 9 0 22 Movement Capacity (vph) 729 643 998 (l Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 901 (l - - I i Ir l Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ` --L T R L T R C sep 729 643 998 Volume 9 0 22 Delay ~ Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +l) ( n max - - l C sh 901 SUM C sep ~ n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service t Movement 1 4 7 8 9- 10 11 12 Lane Config L LTR v (vph) 42 31 C(m) (vph) 1536 901 vac 0.03 0.03 95% queue length 0.08 0.11 Control Delay 7.4 9.1 l ~S A A proach Delay 9.1 Approach LOS A Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay I Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj) 0.97 1.00 1 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.4 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 - i I_ I J~- ~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY lyst: BEW ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE 20 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary ~ Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPAMFU East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI i• North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_-_ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R i Volume 50 110 78 22 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 50 110 78 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR stream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume A 11 0 26 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 0 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR - _Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service___ _ - Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 ( Lane Config L ~ ~ LTR I v( vph 5 p---- 3 7 l C(m) (vph) 1505 861 v/c 0.03 0.04 95o queue length 0.10 0.13 ~l__ Control Delay 7.5 9.4 S A A proach Delay 9.4 Approach LOS A HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 I Phone: Fax: r E-Mail. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS I Analyst: BEW ~ Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20•/2008 i! Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE 20 yrs 1 Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary ~I Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPAMFU East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI j North/South Street:' HUALALAI RD it Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 ~ L T R L T R Volume 50 110 78 22 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 12 28 20 6 r•, Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 50 110 78 22 i Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ' Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 i L T R L T R Volume 11 0 26 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 3 0 6 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 0 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR I' l~ - - - ' ` _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments ~ _ _ ~ Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) ~ 0 0 0 0 _ 1 ,Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 _ Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 _Upstream Signal Data ~Prog~ Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 1 S2 Left-Turn ~ Through S5 Left-Turn 4 Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 I t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 l 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3 50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ~ P (HV) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals l _ imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V prog - .Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) I' Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ' Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g (ql) g(q2) ~ g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked+ Movement 2 Movement 5 ' V (t) V (l,prot) V (t) V (l,prot) alpha ~ ~ beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p} Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result I p(2) 0.000 ~ p (5) 0.000 ~ ' z, p (dom) ' p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) ( for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P(4) ! p(7) p (8) p (9) p(10) p(11) p (12) Computation 4 and 5 Y Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 100 299 299 89 ~i s Px V c,u,x i C r,x C plat,x ~ _ Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 I~ . Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 - V(C,X~ s 1500 1500 ,u,x) _ _ i C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St ~ 9 12 - Conflicting Flows 89 Potential Capacity 975 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 975 Probability of Queue free St. - 1.00 - 0.97 - Step 2• LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 100 Potential Capacity 1505 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1505 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.97 t Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ( ep 3 TH from Minor St 8 11 t_ - - onflicting Flows 299 f Potential Capacity 616 Il Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.97 Movement Capacity 596 I Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St.~ 7 ~10 Conflicting Flows 299 Potential Capacity 697 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 ~ Maj . L, Min T Adj Imp Factor. 0 .97 Cap. Adj, factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.97 Movement Capacity - - ~ 674 _ Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance 4- Step 3: TH from Minor St. Y 8 11~ Part 1 - First Stage L Conflicting Flows tential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows II Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 299 Potential Capacity 616 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.97 i Movement Capacity 596 1' - Result for 2 stage process: a y i C t 596 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage i~' Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows ~ Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt ~ Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage ( I) Conflicting Flows 299 Potential Capacity 697 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.97 Movement Capacity 674 ~ Results for Two-stage process: a ~i y C t 674 ~ - - - - t Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement ~ 7 8 9 N10 11 12 ~ ~ L T R L T R ' Volume (vph) 11 0 Y 26 Movement Capacity (vph) 674 596 975 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 861 l - - - - - [ I Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ~ sep 674 596 975 Volume 11 0 26 Delay j Q sep Q sep +l round (Qsep +l) - n max C sh 861 SUM C sep n 1 C act j Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 11 Movement 1 4 7y 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L - - LTR l v (vph) 50 37 C(m) (vph) 1505 861 v/c 0.03 0.04 95o queue length 0.10 0.13 Control Delay 7.5 9.4 ( ~S A A l proach Delay 9.4 Approach LOS A l - - - - Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 l p(oj) 0.97 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 _ v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 ~ P* (oj ) d(M,LT) Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.5 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 t j ~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 `"4 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY r ~ alyst. ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE to Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, EXISTING Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary t~°y Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHPPMEX East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 13 41 42 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 41 42 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / C RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR stream Signal? No No C_ M ' n r i o Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound - Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L 't' R lllY,~ Volume 9 0 19 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 0 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( o ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lane s 0 1 0 Configuration LTR - _ _ _Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Conf ig L I ~ LTR ~ I~I v (vph) 13 28 L`` C (m) (vph) 1564 974 v/ c 0. 01 0. 0 3 95% queue length 0.03 0.09 Control Delay 7.3 8.8 v S A A "~proach Delay 8.8 h Approach LOS A ~~~t i I ~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 Phone: Fax: E-Mail: ~ i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS _ Analyst: ' Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 ~I Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, EXISTING Intersection: T ' Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHPPMEX East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ _ L~ Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R _ I Volume 13 41 42 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 3 10 10 3 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 41 42 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / ~ RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No - l~ Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ili L T R L T R Volume 9 0 19 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 2 0 5 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 0 19 Il Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 t Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / RT Channelized? l Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ~ Lance Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ;t Walking•Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 I _-Upstream Signal Data - - Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance ~ Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet t S2 Left-Turn - --A- ~ Through S5 Left-Turn `~z~~ Through I~~ Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles - Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: "~j" - C- Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation ~+fi Critical Gap Calculation (~vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 LL L L L T R L T R a _ _ t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv ) 0 0 0 0 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 t(c,g) ( Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L__ t (3, lt) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 Sri t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 s. ~ 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2-stage ~y~3 Follow-Up Time Calculations - Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base} 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30 - -s t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV ) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 Xw§ - R .i. Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals ~~mputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V (t) V (l,prot) V (t) V (l,prot) ~-,E, V p r o g - - i~ Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) ~ Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(ql) ' g(q2) g (q) 'I Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) ' Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p (2) 0.000 p (5) 0 .000 p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P(1) ~ ( ~ Pc4> I ~ p(7) p(8) ( ~ P(9) l , p(10) p(11) p (12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 54 115 115 48 s l Px v c,u,x _ _ - - C r, x C plat,x Two-Stage Process r ~ g 10 11 t I Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 - V (C , X ~ s 1500 1500 r X) _ , u, x) - C (r, x) C (plat, x) ;.,r Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations e~n, Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 i _ _ `,~i Conflicting Flows 48 Potential Capacity 1027 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1027 t~€'~ Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 -v Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 54 [,Potential Capacity 1564 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ~4+- Movement Capacity 1564 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. p 3: TH from Minor St 8 11 - - Conflicting Flows 115 Potential Capacity 779 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 773 C Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 [ Conflicting Flows 115 Potential Capacity 886 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 l{:, Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 ~s,~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.99 ~ Movement Capacity 879 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance n Ste 3 : TH from Minor St . ~ 8 A p 11 j Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows tential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. i r~ ~a Yi' Part 2 Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor ' Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 Single Stage Conflicting Flows 115 , Potential Capacity 779 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 773 I' Result for 2 stage process: a Y 1, C t 773 Probability of Queue freerSt. 1.00 _ 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage ~ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity - Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 115 Potential Capacity 886 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 r~ Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 II Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.99 Movement Capacity 879 Results for Two-stage process: t a y 879 C t Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 9 0 19 Movement Capacity (vph) 879 773 1027 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 974 i ~i Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R ~ C s e---------- 8 7 9 7 7 3 10 2 7 p Volume 9 0 19 Delay rfi;~ Q sep Q sep +1 ,.z round (Qsep +1) a ~ - - n max ~ , C sh 974 SUM C sep n C act ~v~t ( Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ LTR ' ~ v (vph) 13 28 C (m) (vph) 1564 974 v/c 0.01 0.03 95% queue length 0.03 0.09 Control Delay 7.3 8.8 S A A C_~proach Delay g.g Approach LOS A Worksheet 11-Shared Ma'or LT Im edance and Dela 7 P Y ~;iq Movement 2 Movement 5 `7<~, - p (oj) 0.99 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 L v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) L d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.3 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 ,r)~ - - ~ - - l_ dk )f(t~A r£~ pti 2~' ~tC a` HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst: BEW envy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ate Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE 5yrs Intersection: T ,~•R ( Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO I Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHPPMFU ~ East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments- 4~t4 Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R v<<~ Volume 13 49 48 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 49 48 13 .~~rti Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - - - - - - - Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR stream Signal? No No _ _ _ Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R I L T R _ _ Volume 10 0 19 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 R Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 0 19 y,,~~ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 (LL Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / ~s Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR f ,r~ -Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Conf ig L I ~ LTR -ksF lTM v (vph) 13 29 C(m) (vph) 1555 959 ~F~= x~; v/c 0.01 0.03 95o queue length 0.03 0.09 Control Delay 7.3 8.9 S A A ~proach Delay 8.9 Approach LOS A L HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 , ~i Fax: Phone: ;i E-Mail: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS - ( ~ Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE 5yrs i l Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 ~ Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB$k 551-01-07 BLHPPMFU East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI ~j North/South Street: HUALALAI RD ' Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Ij Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 1 i Volume 13 49 48 13 ; Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 3 12 12 3 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 49 48 13 ~I Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / r, RT Channelized? ~ Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No ) _ [ i i Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T- R Volume 10 0 19 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute`~Volume 2 0 5 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 0 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( °s ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR _ __Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments___ _ _ MovementsY 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) ~ ~0 0 0 0 Y _ - Y~ Lar_e Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 T Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 i ,4 Upstream Signal Data_ _ ` Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance ~ Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal r,.^;~~ vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn - Through S5 Left-Turn ( Through Worksheet 3-Data for-Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 r~ Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: I Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation - ,s, Critical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv) 0 0 0 0 ,V"' t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) o.oo o.~o o.oo o.oo .~yt~ t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 f t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 ,,~d 2 -stage ,'t, L; Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV ) 0 0 0 0 L t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals - ~~mputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal (F Movement 2 Movement 5 I4- V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) .~m~ V p rog - - - A~'~ =1;'' i~ Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type ' Effective Green, g (sec) ~ Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ~ ' Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g (q1) g (q2 ) g(q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked ii Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) I ~ i alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F L Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p (2) 0.000 p (5) 0 .000 p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process f movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P (1) l , p (4) p(7) p (8) { P(9) l p (10) p(11) r p(12) IL Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V C,x 61 129 129 54 I s t Px V c,u,x I C r, x ~ l C plat,x Two-Stage Process N ~ g 10 11 t "'h > l Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 ~_,t, V ~ ~ ~ X~ - - ~ S 1500 1500 l x) ,~~c' u' x) - C(r,x) _ . C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations r' - - - Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 54 r~' Potential Capacity 1019 j Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1019 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ;i s' _ _ Conflicting Flows 61 Potential Capacity 1555 ^d, Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1555 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 1~, Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 - - ,v, Conflicting Flows 129 Potential Capacity 765 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ,n, Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 759 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ,r - - n'~~ Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 "i Conflicting Flows 129 L_ Potential Capacity 870 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ( Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 t Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.99 Movement Capacity 863 Ity Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance l~,^ Step 3 TH from Minor St. 8 11 dY~a Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows ;;~tential Capacity edestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity fi~t~ Probability of Queue free St . ~a<~, Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows , Potential Capacity , Pedestrian Impedance Factor ' Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ~ ~ Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 129 Potential Capacity 765 j Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 759 1, Result for 2 stage process: a ' Y I C t 759 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 1 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ('I Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows - l Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt ~I Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 129 I' Potential Capacity 870 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 r Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 II Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.99 Movement Capacity 863 l Results for Two-stage process: l a { Y l C t 863 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Y Y' Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R l Volume (vph) ~10 0 19 Movement Capacity (vph) 863 759 1019 ~ Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 959 r Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ~''3 , Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R r.t sep - 8 6 3 7 5 9 1019 , Volume 10 0 19 s~: Delay , d~ Q sep ( Q sep +1 ' ,aV round (Qsep +1) f~ n max C sh 959 SUM C sep " n t, C act ,t~'` - ( Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ' l_ ,',ti, - Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L LTR ' l v (vph) 13 29 C (m) (vph) 1555 959 vac ~ 0.01 0.03 ,1~ 95 o queue length 0.03 0.09 Control Delay 7.3 8.9 r, S A A i _~proach Delay 8.9 Approach LOS A ' Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay _ Movement 2 Movement 5 p (oj) 0.99 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 L v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 _ s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oJ ) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.3 ~3° N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 - - ~k, l ~~~,E ',l i~~ _ li~ i T4 i r4 4.x. `f "f f HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 I; TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY________ _ _ i nalyst: BEW ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE to Performed: 11/20/2008 j Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE 10 yrs Intersection: T I~ Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO I Units: U. S. Customary E~ Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHPPMFU East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 1.00 f _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound _r Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 ( L T R ~ L T R ~'ssx Volume 15 56 68 19 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 56 68 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / ( RT Channelized? l Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR stream Signal? No No inor Street. Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 1 L T R ~ I, T R `Y° Volume 12 0 22 L Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 0 22 zt~ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 f Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / „u Lane s 0 1 0 ~~„x Configuration LTR ~y_ - Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service_ - Approach NB 5B Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4- ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 a~, Lane Config L ~ ~ LTR v ( vp h ) 15 ~ 3 4 - C(m) (vph) 1522 923 v/c 0.01 0.04 95o queue length 0.03 0.11 Control Delay 7.4 g,0 S A A proach Delay 9,0 Approach LOS p, t l HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 'I Phone: Fax. E-Mail: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS r ~ I Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 i! Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE 10 yrs Intersection: 'r Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPPMFU East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI North/South Street: HUALALAI RD l Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1,00 -Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 15 56 68 19 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 4 14 17 5 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 56 68 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / ff RT Channelized? I~, Lanes 1 1 1 0 t Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No-~- Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 it 12 L T R L T- R Y_ Volume 12 0 22 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 3 0 6 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 0 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 - r Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / it RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR~` y -Pedestrian Volumes and AdjustmentsY_ _ Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 f _ ~rF ~ Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 C- Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 , , , -Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival, Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet ' S2 Left-Turn Through , S 5 Left -Turn Through _„i ( Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles l - - - i Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: - l Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: z;r' Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: ' Number of major street through lanes: - Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation x~ _ _ q~yr Critical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R ~ t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 I t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,~ P (hv) 0 0 0 0 -;x t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 L Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1, 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 C t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2-stage s, Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ,~,M L L L T R L T R ~4 t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30 qty' t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 ~.au Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals ',Imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) x ' ~ V p r o g - - - Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) ~ • Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(ql) g(q2) ~ g(q) - Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha ' beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) 1 Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) ' Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result { p(2) 0.000 ~ ~ P(5) 0.000 p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? ~ Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P(1) p(4) p (7) p(8) P(9) ~ p (10) p (11) p(12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process { Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 87 ~ 164 164 78 I s t Px r V c,u,x (I C r,x C plat,x Two-Stage Process 7 g 10 11 1~ - { I Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 ;~'i V ~ c ~ x j - 5 1500 1500 x) r,,c' u' x) I _ ' I - C (plat, x) ~;'1 Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations ~ i% '~t Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 ' _ _ ~ Conflicting Flows 78 ~ Potential Capacity 988 ' i Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 988 ~f'~ Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 ' Step 2 LT from Major St. 4 1 ~,w - - f Conflicting Flows 87 ' l Potential Capacity 1522 Pedestrian Impedance Factor ~ 1.00 1.00 ' Movement Capacity 1522 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 j ~s Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ep 3 TH from Minor St. 8 11 C~~- ,mi Conflicting Flows 164 Potential Capacity 732 (y Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ~t;, Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 725 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ~~r,` Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 164 Potential Capacity 831 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 a Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 tr~~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.99 Movement Capacity 823 ' - Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance l _ Step 3 : TH from Minor St . ~ 8 ~ 11 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows ~;rf tential Capacity edestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt i.a,~ Movement Capacity j k4 r' Probability of Queue free St. ' ~~?a I ' Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows I. Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage ~ ` Conflicting Flows 164 ~i Potential Capacity 732 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 1 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 1 Movement Capacity 725 Result for 2 stage process: a Y C t 725 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 i~ Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 f Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage l Conflicting Flows 164 1111 Potential Capacity 831 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.99 Movement Capacity 823 Results for Two-stage process: a l Y l C t 823 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 12 0 22Y Movement Capacity (vph) 823 725 988 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 923 1~„ _ _ - I Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches 4,~ Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 , - - L---T- - R L T-- R C sep 823 725 988 Volume 12 0 22 ~ r" De 1 ay Q sep Q sep +l '~,5' round (Qsep +1) i n max - - ' C sh 923 SUM C sep n ; C act (F I Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L LTR '~a; v (vph) 15 34 C (m) (vph) 1522 923 ~ vac 0.01 0.04 95°s queue length 0.03 0.11 ,r~ ontrol Delay 7.4 9.0 , S A A ' .afi proach Delay 9.0 Approach LOS A w~ Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p (oj) 0.99 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2) Volume for stream 3 or 6 ~,Fx s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 C P* (oj ) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.4 N, Number of major street through lanes 'I I drank, 1) Delay f•or stream 2 or 5 ~I ~k~ ' ~d,° i r i~ ~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 ~I _TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 i Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE20 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPPMFU East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI North/South Street: HUALALAI RD ~ Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume 18 74 86 25 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 74 86 25 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channe].ized7 Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No - Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 I~ L T R ~ L T R Volume 16 0 26 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 0 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 No / Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR ~ ~ Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ ~ LTR v (vph) 18 42 C(m) (vph) 1492 882 v/c 0.01 0.05 955 queue length 0.04 0.15 Control Delay 7.4 9.3 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.3 Approach LOS A I1 - "'~k - - - - - - - I HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 ' ___~T'WO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY` _ _ alyst: BEW , ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE i~' ate Performed: 11/20/2008 ~ Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE20 yrs Intersection: T ~`F'' Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 ~~,t, Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPPMFU r East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 ' l_ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound :r _ Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R ~ L T R ;Y~', Volume 18 74 86 25 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 [ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 74 86 25 ,w~ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? - Lanes 1 1 1 0 i';w Configuration L T TR ~~stream Signal?- No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 j I L T R ~ L T R ~I ,j~~ Volume 16 0 26 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 0 26 ~;r„, Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 ~ '''1 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / .~F Lanes 0 1 0 f Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ _ Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound L'~ Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ ~ LTR ( v (vph) 18 42 L C(m) (vph) 1492 882 v/c 0 . O1 0 . 05 !i 95% queue length 0.04 0.15 Control Delay 7.4 9.3 S A A '~proach Delay 9.3 Approach LOS A _ _ i' HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 Phone: Fax: E-Mail. ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS ~I Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE20 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO 1 Units: U. S. Customary II Analysis Year: 2008 11 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPPMFU East/West Street: PUAPUAANUI North/South Street: HUALALAI RD ' Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments li Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 18 74 86 25 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 4 18 22 6 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 74 86 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 I Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No f• Minor Street Movements 7 8 ~ 9 10 11 12 l L T R L T R Volume 16 0 26 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 4 0 6 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 0 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 r Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / f RT Channelized? ~ Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR _ _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 , walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 `'s~ Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 _Upstream Signal Data__ _ _ _ IJ Prog Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance I ~ i Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal , vph vph ~ sec sec mph feet r - _ _ S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn ~f Through '~7, - - Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles I - _ - ~sr Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: u's Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: ' Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation _ _ Critical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv) 0 0 0 0 " t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 ( Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L_ t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 ~'r~ t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 „a 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 L t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2 -stage :,y Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 s~ L L L T R L T R ~ t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30 ~;A t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV ) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 - ~ Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals L_ imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal ~ Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V p r o g - - - - l~,_ Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) i~ Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ' Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g (q1) ~ g(q2) g (q) i Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked ~ Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) ~i alpha beta i Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) II Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) 0.000 p (5) 0 .000 p (dom) t p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, (x) Process Stage I Stage II P P(1) l p(4) P(7) f P(8) l P(9) p (10) p(11) p(12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 it 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 111 208 208 98 I s l Px V c,u,x C r, x { C plat,x Two-Stage Process ~ 8 10 11 I_ (1~ j Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 ' i,s, r V ~ C ~ X ~ ~ s 1500 1500 ~ x) - - C(r,x) C(plat,x) j - - - - - - - (,,,4; Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 RT from Minor St 9 12 ~ - Conflicting Flows gg Potential Capacity 963 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 963 Probabilit of y Queue free St. 1.00 0.97 L Step 2:' LT from Major St. 4 ~ 1 '~9' Conflicting Flows 111 [ Potential Capacity 1492 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 j^i= Movement Capacity 1492 ( Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.99 L Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. _ ep 3: TH fram Minor St. 8 11 C~ Conflicting Flows 208 Potential Capacity 692 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 1,; Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 , Movement Capacity 684 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 L~ Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 i'r Conflicting Flows 208 G~ Potential Capacity 785 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.99 Movement Capacity 776 - ~ _ _ _ ~ Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 1 - - - - - Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows tential Capacity edestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt r.~~ Movement Capacity s~~' Probability of Queue free St. Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows ~ Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor ' Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage _ ~ Conflicting Flows 208 f~ Potential Capacity 692 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj, factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 684 Result for 2 stage process: N I Y r- 1 C t 684 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 i+, Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage ` ~j Conflicting Flows ~ Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor i~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 208 Potential Capacity 785 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 I Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.99 Movement Capacity 776 Results for Two-stage process: a f Y L C t 776 - ed ne Calculations Worksheet 8 Shar La Movement M~ 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 16 0 26 Movement Capacity (vph) 776 684 963 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 882 l- _ } ~ i 1.. Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches (r~, I Movement 7 8 9 10 11 ~ 12 ll L T R L T R sep 776 684 963 Volume 16 0 26 ~x~, Delay i Q se P Q sep +1 ~r round (Qsep +1) n max C sh 882 SUM C sep n C act ~S3` - Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service f~ . a~ _ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L LTR v (vph) 18 42 v ' C(m) (vph) 1492 882 vac 0.01 0.05 95a queue length 0.04 0.15 Control Delay 7.4 9.3 S A A ~proach Delay 9.3 (,,r~~ Approach LOS A lam. Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Vii', L Movement 2 Movement 5 rj~ p (oj) 0.99 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 '°Fr s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.4 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 _ l bX "-u l__ ,M, a~~ I^ i y'l+, I I i °i t°2 ~ I r4 ~ ~ i ~ t~ I ~,,v i i 3~ S ,3 k)}y_ t i ' ~ ~ t ~ I .t t D4 ~ ~ e < ~i APPENDIX F l-- LEVEL OF SERVICE ~4~ ~IiTALALAI ROAD & LAI~O STREET ,i ` UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AlVI & P1VI PEAK HOUR Cc 3~; r. <<~, •fk l i__ i~ lT 'i s._, - HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 1 nalyst: BEW , ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE to Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, EXISTING Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO 1 Units: U. S. Customary 1 Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: ( East/West Street: LAKO ST North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_-- _ - l Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 ' I L T R I L T R - - Volume 208 86 54 13 r Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 208 86 54 13 111 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / ( RT Channelized? f Lanes 1 1 1 0 , Configuration L T TR stream Signal? - No No- - inor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R - - - Volume 10 124 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 124 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / - Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R - _ Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service__ Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ I L R ' I v ( vph ) 2 0 8 - - - 10 12 4 C(m) (vph) 1547 426 1011 v/c 0.13 0.02 0.12 95% queue length 0.47 0.07 0.42 Control Delay 7.7 13.7 9.1 S A B A proach Delay 9.4 Approach LOS A r HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 I Phone: Fax: Ii E-Mail: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS- _ • I~ Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, EXISTING Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary I~ Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: East/West Street: LAKO ST I~ North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ -Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments- I! Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 208 86 54 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 52 22 14 3- it Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 208 86 54 13 ~ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 I Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal?- - No _ ----No N Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 ~12 ~ L T R L T R Volume 10 124 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 2 31 (i Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 124 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / l RT Channelized? NO { Lanes 1 1 Configuration _-N -M L -~R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments- _ Movements ~ 13 14 15 16 I~ Flow (ped/hr) ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 I~ - - i l L2sne Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 I Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 - Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 _ ~ i ___-_________-_Up s t r e am S i gn a 1 Data-___ Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance ~ Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet j i S2 Left-Turn Through , S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: ~ Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: ( Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: l Number of major street through lanes: worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation - vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R - - t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo P (hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 l t(3,1t} 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage ( Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ~ P (HV) 0 0 0 t(f) ~ 2.2 3.5 3.3 l-- Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals ~omputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal ( Movement 2 Movement 5 L V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V p r o g 1__ Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ~ ~ Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) g(q2) g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Y ~ l Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) 1, Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) ' Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result j~ p (2) 0.000 p (5) 0 .000 p (dom) ' p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? - - ' Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) I~ for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process , movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II ' P (1) ( ~ P(4) P P (8) P(9) p(10) p(11) P(12> ~ Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 it 12 ' L L L T R L T R V c, x~-----~-` 6 7~ 5 6 2 ~ 6 0 i~ s ' Px V c,u,x _ _ I C r, x C plat,x - Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 - V(C,X) s 1500 ,u,x) - - C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations i - Step l: RT from Minor St. 9 12 - Conflicting Flows 60 Potential Capacity 1011 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1011 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.88 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 67 f Potential Capacity 1547 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1547 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.87 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows ( Potential Capacity I Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.87 0.87 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 t Step 4: LT from Minor St. A~ 7 ~ 10 Conflicting Flows 562 Potential Capacity 492 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.87 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.90 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.79 0.87 Movement Capacity 426 f Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance ~ Step 3:-TH from Minor St ~ A 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage ~ Conflicting Flows ~tential Capacity ~ destrian Impedance Factor L Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ' ~ Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.87 0.87 Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a Y C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 - I Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor I Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage ~ ' Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage _ Conflicting Flows 562 ' Potential Capacity 492 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.87 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.90 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.79 0.87 Movement Capacity 426 Results for Two-stage process: Y C t 426 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ( L T R L T R I I Volume (vph) 10 ~ 124 Movement Capacity (vph) 426 1011 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) I Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R - - sep 426 1011 Volume 10 124 Delay Q s ep ~ Q sep +l round (Qsep +1) ~ n max C sh SUM C sep ( n !t C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 - 11 12 Lane Config L L R 1 - v (vph) 208 10 124 C(m) (vph) 1547 426 1011 v/c 0.13 0.02 0.12 95% queue length 0.47 0.07 0.42 Control Delay 7.7 13.7 9.1 S A B A _~proach Delay 9.4 Approach LOS A Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay - Movement 2 Movement-5 - - p (o j) 0. 8 7 1. 0 0 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 ,i v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 r- s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 '~I P*(o7) t d(M,LT) Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.7 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 . t HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 _TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 1 alyst: BEW ~ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ( Date Performed: 11/20/2008 ` Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, FUTURE 5 yrs Intersection: T = Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 _ Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHLAMFU East/West Street: LAKO ST ( North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume 208 95 ~ 58 14 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 208 95 58 14 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / ( RT Channelized? l Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR stream Signal? No No - - Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume 11 124 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 124 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 ' t_ Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R ~ __Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ I L R v (vph) 208 11 ~ ~ 124 C(m) (vph) 1541 417 1005 v/c 0.13 0.03 0.12 95°s queue length 0.47 0.08 0.42 ~l_ Control Delay 7.7 13.9 9.1 S A B A proach Delay 9.5 ~ Approach LOS A f__ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 II I Phone: Fax: E-Mail. j TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS _ I Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 ~i Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, FUTURE 5 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHLAMFU East/West Street: LAKO ST I~, North/South Street: HUALALAI RD l,' Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 208 95 58 14 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 52 24 14 4 i Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 208 95 58 14 ~ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? I' Lanes 1 1 1 0 i Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No- No - Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R Volume 11 124 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 3 31 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 124 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 ~ Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / 1~ RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments _ Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 f _ _ - - ~ f -Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~ Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance ( Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn , Through C Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles - Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: ( Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation l Critical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 f L L L T R L T R f t(c,base) 4.1 - 7.1 6.2 I t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 P (hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t> o.oo o.~o o.oo t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage 1 Follow-Up Time Calculations t Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R i t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 ~I Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals ~putation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal- Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) t _ ~ V p r o g- - ~l__ i Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) ii Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g (ql) g(q2) I g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked II, Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) a 1 pha - , beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) I, Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Ii, Duration of blocked period, t(p) ~ Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result I! p (2) 0.000 , p(5) 0.000 ( ' p (dom) p(subo) Constrained or unconstrained? - - - Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process I' movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P (1 ~ - I I P(4) P(7) P(8) p(9) p(10) p(11) p(12) I Computation 4 and 5 - Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 72 - 576 65 s Px V c,u,x C r,x C plat,x Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 f Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 ~ - V(c,x) s 1500 ' (x) c, u, x) ( C (r , x~ C(plat,x) ' Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 RT from Minor St.- - 9 -------12 - Conflicting Flows 65 Potential Capacity 1005 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1005 s Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.88 t_ Step 2: LT from Major St 4 1 Conflicting Flows - 72 Potential Capacity 1541 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ' i _ Movement Capacity 1541 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.87 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 onflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ' Cap, Adj, factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.87 0.87 Movement Capacity ~ ( Probability of Queue free-St. 1.00 1.00- ' Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 r_ - Conflicting Flows 576 Potential Capacity 482 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.87 t Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.90 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.79 0.87 Movement Capacity 417 I _ - - - - WOrksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 - 11 i - - Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows tential Capacity ~destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ' Probability of Queue free St. i f Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.87 0.87 Movement Capacity _ I Result for 2 stage process: a Y ~ C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 l~ Step 4: LT from Minor St~ 7 10 ' Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt I, Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage ' Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt I~~ Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 576 Potential Capacity 482 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.87 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.90 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.79 0.87 Movement Capacity 417 Results for Two-stage process: Y C t 417 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations I~ Movement 7 8 ~~9 10 11 12 ~ i L T R L T R Volume (vph) Y ~ 11 124 Movement Capacity (vph) 417 1005 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) ~ Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R sep 417 1005 1 Volume 11 124 Delay f Q sep Q sep +l ~ round (Qsep +1) f - n max C sh SUM C sep n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ( Lane Con~ig L L R l - - v (vph) 208 11 124 C(m) (vph) 1541 417 1005 v/c 0.13 0.03 0.12 95% queue length 0.47 0.08 0.42 Control Delay 7.7 13.9 9.1 S A B A _~proach Delay 9.5 Approach LOS A Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay - Movement 2 Movement 5 _ _ _ _ p(oj) 0.87 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.7 N, Number of major street through lanes I d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 I J~ l.__ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 _______---TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ----y al st: BEW ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE to Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, FUTURE 10 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-O1-07 BLHLAMFU East/West Street: LAKO ST North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound - Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume 226 103 - 68 17 - Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 226 103 68 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 _ Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? t Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR stream Signal? No No no r - - Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume 12 135 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 i_ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 135 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R __-__Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 f Lane Config L I I I, R f v ( ~rph ) --------2 2 6 12 13 5 l C(m) (vph) 1524 382 991 v/c 0.15 0.03 0.14 ( 95% queue length 0.52 0.10 0.47 Control Delay 7.8 14.7 9 2 ~S A B A proach Delay 9.7 Approach LOS A l_ - L_ 1~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 Phone: Fax: ~ E-Mail. i _ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS_ _ _ Analyst ~ A~ BEW ~ _ I~' Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 ~ jl, Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, FUTURE 10 yrs II' Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary ii Analysis Year: 2008 ~ Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHLAMFU East/West Street: LAKO ST ~j North/South Street: HUALALAI RD . Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 ~ L T R L T R Volume 226 103 68 17 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 56 26 17 4 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 226 103 68 17 I', Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 ~ Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal?r No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11~ 12 L T R L T R Volume 12 `13 5 Y ~ ~ Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 3 34 ii Hourly Flow Rate, HFR ~ 12 135 ~ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( o ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / RT Channelized? No ' Lanes 1 1 Configuration - L R ~ I1 _ __Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements ~ ~ ~ 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 ~ 0 0 0 l Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0---_-0-----0 Upstream Signal Data ~ Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance i Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: r Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Il Number of major street through lanes: worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation (~vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1i L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1- 7.1 6.2 j t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t P(hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 t 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations - - Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 0 t t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal r Movement 2 Movement 5 } V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V p rog - Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) i1 Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) ~I Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) 1 g(q2) I g (q) I Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked _ it Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha - beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p (2) - 0 .000~ { p(5) 0.000 p (dom) t p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? i Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) r for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II ` p (1) - - - - ~ , P(4) P p(8) p(9) p(10) p(11) p(12) ~ i Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c, x 8 5- 6 31 ----7 6 I` s Px V C i u i x C r,x C plat,x Two-Stage Process - - 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) s 1500 c, u, x) ~x) - C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 RT from Minor St. 9 12 - - - Conflicting Flows 76 f Potential Capacity 991 ~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 991 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.86 C Step 2 LT from Major St. 4 ~ 1 Conflicting Flows ~ 85 { Potential Capacity 1524 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1524 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.85 - Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ~p 3: TH from Minor St. - - _ 8 - 11- - Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.85 0.85 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows ~ ~ 631 Potential Capacity 448 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.85 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.89 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.77 0.85 Movement Capacity 3g2 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3 TH from Minor St. ~ 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage l_ Conflicting Flows tential Capacity r~destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ~I Pedestrian Impedance Factor ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity , Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows r Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ' Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.85 0.85 Movement Capacity ~ Result for 2 stage process: a Y I, C t Probability of queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4 LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage ~ f Conflicting Flows ti Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt j,, Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage ~ ~ Conflicting Flows 631 Potential Capacity 448 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.85 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.89 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.77 0.85 Movement Capacity 382 i~ Results for Two-stage process: Y I~ C t 382 - - - I } Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11M 12 L T R L T R j Volume (vph) ~ 12 ~ 135 Movement Capacity (vph) 382 991 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) - - - ~ r~_ ~ 1 Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ~ - Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ L T R L T R f sep 382 991 ( Volume 12 135 Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) i n max - C sh SUM C sep n jl C act I Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L R v (vph) 226 - 12 135 r C(m) (vph) 1524 382 991 i v/c 0.15 0.03 0.14 - 95% queue length 0.52 0.10 0.47 Control Delay 7.8 14.7 9.2 S A B A proach Delay 9.7 pproach LOS A Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay - - Movement 2 Movement 5 - - - p(oj) 0.85 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 , s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) d(M,LT) Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.8 N, Number of major street through lanes d (rank , 1) De 1 ay-for s t re am 2 or 5 - I l ~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 _TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 1 alyst: BEW ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE 1~ ate Performed: 11/20/2008 t Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, FUTURE20 yrs Intersection: T - Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHLAMFU East/West Street: LAKO ST North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 245 112 83 21 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 245 112 83 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR stream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume 13 146 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 146 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lanes 1 1 Configuration --_A L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ I L R - - - v (vph) 245 13 146 C(m) (vph) 1500 344 968 v/c 0.16 0.04 0.15 95% queue length 0.59 0.12 0.53 Control Delay 7.9 15.9 9.4 S A C A f proach Delay 9.9 t Approach LOS A 1 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 Ii Phone: Fax: E-Mail: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS_~_____ I Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK, FUTURE20 yrs ~ Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAT RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHLAMFU East/West Street: LAKO ST f North/South Street: HUALALAI RD ` Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume ~ 245 112 83 21 i Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 61 28 21 5 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 245 112 83 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lane s 1 1 1 0 ~ Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal?- - No - No - _ 1 Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 13 146 ~ l~ Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 3 36 ~ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 146 I1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (g) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / I~ RT Channelized? No i Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R _ ~ ) _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments____ Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0~ 0 0 Y •I` Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage ------_0 ----0~ 0 0 I Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn Through 55 Left-Turn Through l Worksheet 3'Data for Computing Effect of-Delay to Major Street-Vehicles--- Movement 2 Movement 5A Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flaw rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation L Critical Gap Calculation ~ a vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 ~6.2 t(c,hv) l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo i.oo l.oo l.oo P(hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 i~ 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations « Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R 'l t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 A t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 ~ 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 t_ Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals l _ _ mputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal j Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) - - S V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Iy Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) g(q2) g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked ~I Movement 2 Movement 5 V (t) V (l,prot) V (t) V (l,prot) - I alpha ~ ~ beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) , Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) l~ Duration of blocked period, t(p) 1 Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3 Platoon Event Periods Result P (2 ) - - 0 . 0 0 0 - p (5) 0.000 I p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1.,) ( 2 ) ( 3 ) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II p (1) p(4) p(7) p (8) P(9) p(10) p(11) p(12> i Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 it 12 ~ L L L T R L T R V c, x - 10 4 - - 6 9 6 ~r- 9 4-- i s Px V c,u,x C r, x C plat,x - - Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V (c, x) s 1500 l ~x) c,u,x) C ~ r X~ C(plat,x) ~ Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations - i 2--- Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 - Conflicting Flows 94 Potential Capacity 968 1 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 968 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.85 S t ep 2 LT f r om Major S t. - 4 ~-------1 - Conflicting Flows 104 Potential Capacity 1500 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1500 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.84 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. ep 3: TH from Minor St. ~8 11 l - _ _ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.84 0.84 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 - - - Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 696 Potential Capacity 411 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.84 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.87 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.74 0.84 { Movement Capacity 344 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. ~ 8 A 11 Y Part 1 - First Stage ~ Conflicting Flows tential Capacity 1 destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. i Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ~ Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ' Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 i~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.84 0.84 Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a Y Ii C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4 LT from Minor St. ~ 7 ~ 10 Part 1 First Stage N~ j' Conflicting Flows i Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt I~, Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Y ~ i Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 1 Part 3 - Single Stage I Conflicting Flows ~ 696 i~ Potential Capacity 411 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.84 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.87 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.74 0.84 Movement Capacity 344 Results for Two-stage process: Y I~ C t 344 - - - - Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R j Volume (vph) Y~~ Y 13 146 Movement Capacity (vph) 344 968 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) L Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ L T R L T R ' sep 344 968 Volume 13 146 Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep j- n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service - - Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config -----L L R - v (vph) 245 13 146 C(m) (vph) 1500 344 968 v/c 0.16 0.04 0.15 95o queue length 0.59 0.12 0.53 Control Delay 7.9 15.9 9.4 S A C A proach Delay 9,9 pproach LOS A Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay i - - { Movement 2 Movement 5 p(o7} 0.84 1 00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 1 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 l s(il}, Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) _ d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.9 N, Number of major street through lanes drank,l)-Delay-for stream 2 or 5 - - i~ 1 '9t4 ' HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 III'( TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY P 1 ~ Analyst : BEW ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE to Performed: 11/20/2008 ' Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, EXISTING Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO jJ Units: U. S. Customary <<, Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPPMEX East/West Street: LAKO ST North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 r _ _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments__ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 109 52 43 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 109 52 43 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 k Configuration L T TR ~pstream Signal? No No ~`i~Inor Street: A roa h Eastbound pp c Westbound 1111' Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ( L T R r' Volume ~ ~ 9 117 = Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 lr Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 117 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ('s) 0 0 J Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / ~ Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R _ _ ___Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service_ _ _ 5`~` Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ ~ L R ,t"s v (vph) 109 9 117 fl C (m) (vph) 1564 632 1027 v/c 0.07 0.01 0.11 1~ 95% queue length 0.22 0.04 0.39 Control Delay 7.5 10.8 9.0 OS A B A proach Delay 9.1 pproach LOS A M~~~ i l HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 l Phone: Fax: E-Mail. __TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS T~__~, Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, EXISTING i~~ Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPPMEX East/West Street: LAKO ST North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: N5 Study period (hrs) 1.00 - _ __Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ~ Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R - Volume 109 52 43 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 27 13 11 3 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 109 52 43 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? ; Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR 1 Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 9 117 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 2 29 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 117 1( Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 ' Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / ~ RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R T _ _ ~ _ Pedestrian Volumes and AdjustmentsN_ Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 1 ~~i Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 I, -,r Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 +r I 3"' _ -Upstream Signal Data____ _ Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance ~ Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn ~ Through S5 Left-Turn Through t - - - a Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles I _ _ _ Movement 2 Movement 5 t r Shared In volume, major th vehicles: l~ Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 'x~ Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: - .;fi Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation 'T'~ Critical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ L L L T R L T R t1µ_ t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv> l.o0 1.00 l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo P (hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 r-"j 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 I t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 111 2-stage ] Follow-Up Time Calculations - Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 l_=~ t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 t (f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 I Worksheet S=Effect of Upstream Signals ;~~mputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 ~ V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V p r o g - - - 1 i" Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) i Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) - Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ~ 1 Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) g(q2) ~ ~ g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked - - Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha - - ~ beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) i Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p (2) 0 .000 p(5) 0.000 j p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? ~ Proportion r unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process ~ movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II ~ p(1) I P(4) t P(7) 1 P(8) t p (9) p (10) p(11) P (12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L. L L T R L T R V c,x 54 318 48 } s l Px V c , u , x - ~ - C r, x C plat,x Two-Stage Process - 7 8 10 11 f' 1, i~ Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) s 1500 (x) b~~ c, u, x) ~ C(r,x) ,t~; C (plat , x) ~ Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations .h Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 I Conflicting Flows 48 Potential Capacity 1027 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1027 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.89 Step 2 LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 54 ( Potential Capacity 1564 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 t Movement Capacity 1564 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.93 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. tep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 onflictin Flows ~ g Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.93 0.93 _r;~ Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free 5t. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 I Conflicting Flows 318 1, Potential Capacity 679 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ' Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.93 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.95 :a~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.84 0.93 Movement Capacity 632 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance 1 - - l Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows ~ otential Capacity ``destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. . f Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity j Pedestrian Impedance Factor ) Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.93 0.93 Movement Capacity - - Result for 2 stage process: a Y ~ C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 _ _ li Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage ~ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage J Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor , Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage ~ Conflicting Flows 318 ~ Potential Capacity 679 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.93 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.95 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.84 0.93 Movement Capacity 632 _ Results for Two-stage process: a Y C t 632 - - - - - Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 ~ 11 12 L T R L T R !1 Volume (vph) 9 117 Movement Capacity (vph) 632 1027 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ~r# Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 - L T R---- L---- T R u - r sep 632 1027 Volume 9 117 r~ Delay J'"'~ Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) .,t ~ _ n max C sh SUM C sep t, f n Jl C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service r, Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ` Lane Config L L R v (v h) 109 9 117 P C (m) (vph) 1564 632 1027 v/c 0.07 0.01 0.11 95v queue length 0.22 0.04 0.39 r„~ Control Delay 7.5 10.8 9.0 S A B A proach Delay 9.1 ~y` roach LOS PP A ,~r~r, Worksheet 11-Sh re a d Mayor LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 L - - - - - - - p (oj) 0.93 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 ,,,u s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 j P* (oj ) d (M, LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 7 . 5 N, Number of major street through lanes ~YY' d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 fl°~ L_ j. f HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY (r- 1 alyst: BEW ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE to Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE 5 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPPMFU East/West Street: LAKO ST North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs} 1.00 _Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ _ 1j-Y Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R _ ~ - - Volume 109 52 48 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 109 52 48 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 r~a Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR stream Signal? No No C: inor Street: A ro h pp ac Westbound Eastbound ..x Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 j L T R ~ L T R _ Volume ~ A T 10 117 . Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Q~ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 117 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( a ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Lane s 1 1 •:fi Configuration L R r ~ - _ Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service_ i'~° Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound l Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 r Lane Config L ~ ~ L R r _ v (vph) 109 Y 10 117 L C(m) (vph) 1556 627 1019 v/c 0.07 0.02 0.11 95% queue length 0.23 0.05 0.39 Control Delay 7.5 10.8 9.0 S A B A '~proach Delay 9.1 ~ Approach LOS A K~'~~ ii HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 I Phone: Fax: E-Mail. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS ~ _ Analyst: BEW ~,1 Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 , Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE 5 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary ~ Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPPMFU East/West Street: LAKO ST North/South Street: HUALALAI RD 1 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 ` Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 , L T R L T R Volume 109 52 48 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 27 13 12 3 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 109 52 48 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 1 Volume 10 117 ~ Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 2 29 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 117 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / I` RT Channelized? No ~ Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R _ _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments _ Movements N N 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 T Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 - Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet era P~ r S2 Left-Turn Through ~as~ 55 Left-Turn Ea~ Through k Y,t Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles L> Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: ~ Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: xf Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: j`s~ Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: y Number of major street through lanes: - Worksheet 4-Critical Gap_and Follow-up Time Calculation . Critical Gap Calculation ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6 2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv ) 0 0 0 ,E t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 j,~ t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage iF b Follow-Up Time Calculations ~ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ,i~` L L L T R L T R n~~~ t(f,base) 2 20 3.50 3.30 t~~~ t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV ) ~ 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 - 3.3 L_ i Worksheet~5-Effect of Upstream Signals omputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Y Movement 2 Movement 5 { V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) `t_ !t~ V - - - prop i Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) II " Arrival Type ` Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) g(q2) I g (q) - - - - I Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) _ _ i' alpha - i ~ beta , Travel time, t (a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) 1' Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 - - ~I Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result 1 r p (2) 0.000 p(5) 0.000 p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? ' Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P(1) ~ ~ P (4) s P (7) P(8) p(9) p(10) _ p(11) p (12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process 1 Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 L L L T R L T R t V c,x ~ 60 ~ 324 54 ~ j s ~ Px V c,u,x j C r,x C plat,x ~ - - - - Two-Stage Process ~ 8 10 11 a~i, r- Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 ~ V(c,x) . s 1500 c, u, x) ,~x) - - C(r,x) C(plat,x) <<Yk Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations n~ i„ Step 1 RT from Minor St_. 9 12 Conflicting Flows ~ i ~ 54 Potential Capacity ~ 1019 f Pedestrian Impedance Factor I 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1019 ~r, Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.89 ~ ~ _ _ ( Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 60 Potential Ca acit P y 1556 4 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1556 1 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.93 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. h`~ ~ ep 3: TH from Minor St. _ 8 - 11 - j,,. "~onflictin r, g Flows " Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.93 0.93 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 324 Potential Capacity 674 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.93 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.95 ,g Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.84 0.93 I~` Movement Capacity 627 l - - rt~d Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance -x Step 3 TH f rom Minor St . 8 11 ~ Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows tential Capacity ~'Fdestrian Impedance Factor ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. L G Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity (r Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.93 0.93 Movement Capacity - - - - ~ i Result £or 2 stage process: a ~ Y C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 _ I Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows ~ Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor , Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage ~ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt i Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Y ~ ~Y Conflicting Flows 324 Potential Capacity 674 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.93 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.95 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.84 0.93 Movement Capacity 627 l _ I Results for Two-stage process: ~Y a J Y C t 627 - - - r Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 N12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 10 117 Movement Capacity (vph) 627 1019 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) - - - ~ , Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 T2 ~ L T R L T R M sep 627 1019 Volume 10 117 Delay Q sep Q sep +l round (Qsep +1) ~~x n max - - - - - C sh SUM C sep n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ _ _ ;,~n Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ( Lane Config L L R 1 _ - - - .r~ v (vph) 109 10 117 C (m) (vph) 1556 627 1019 v/c 0.07 0.02 0.11 95o queue length 0.23 0.05 0.39 Control Delay 7.5 10.8 9.0 S A B A proach Delay g.1 r pp oach LOS p, - Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay rq - Movement 2 Movement 5 l__ - ,r~ p (oj ) - 0 93 1.00 r v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 I v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 ,~a a,~, s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) L, d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.5 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 I - ~ -_yS_ ~tyt ~ ~?'e k~~. 1 .U~~ ~R3 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 { TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY E~ alyst: BEW ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE jr~' to Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTUREIO yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Ir Units: U. S. Customary r Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPPMFU East/West Street: LAKO ST 'f~ North/South Street: HUALALAI RD 4~, Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 II Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R ( L T R Volume 118 56 72 18 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 118 56 72 18 t~£; Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 `'<<~ Median Type/Storage Undivided / C RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR r~ stream Signal? No No t - - y~;, inor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R I L T R tr Volume ~ A 11 127 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 127 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 r`~°` Percent Grade ( o ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / L Lanes 1 1 ~9 Configuration L R 1 - - - - Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 Lane Config L ~ ~ L R ' v (vph) ~ 118 11 127 l,_ C (m) (vph) 1518 583 985 ~r v/c 0.08 0.02 0.13 ~ 95o queue length 0.25 0.06 0.44 Control Delay 7.6 11.3 9.2 ~4~ S A B A proach Delay 9.4 L' Approach LOS A t i . i' HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 it Phone : Fax : E-Mail: _ _ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS _ Analyst : BEW ~ " Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTUREIO yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHPPMFU East/West Street: LAKO ST North/South Street: HUALALAI RD ~j Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R r Volume 118 56 72 18 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 30 14 18 4 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 118 56 72 18 t~ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? i, Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? ~ No No _ Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 it 12 L T R L T R {1 Volume 11 127 t Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 3 32 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 127 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration - - L R -N- Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments _ Movements 13 14 15 16 t, Flow (ped/hr) 0 ~ 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 _________Up s t r e am S i gna l D a t a____ Prog Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance f Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet - - S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through - r f"~ Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles A Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: " Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: ,r Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation C. _ _ Critical Gap Calculation C~vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R - - - - - t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 ( t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t P(hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t> o.oo o.~o o.oo t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (`F` 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 I t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 ~ 2-stage i"' _ _ Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ~P (HV) 0 0 0 f t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 l' Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal ~ Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) t__ _ r~~ - - V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) I~ ' Arrival Type i Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) ~I Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ~ ~ Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(ql) g(q2) g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked - Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha - - ( 1 beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) ~I Duration of blocked period, t(p) ~ Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 ~ 0.000 _ ~i Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) 0.000 p (5) 0.000 p (dom) ~ p (bubo) Constrained or unconstrained? r' Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process ii movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P(1) - P(4) t P(7) p (8) p (9) p(10) ' p (11) p(12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 90 373 81 l~ s ~ Px V c,u,x - C r, x C plat,x - - - , Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 f~, 4`p Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 v ~ ~ ~ x) s 1500 P (x) E~~~~ o , u , x ) l - C (r, x) C (plat, x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. - - 9 12 - ~ Conflicting Flows 81 Potential Capacity 985 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 985 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.87 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 -ne. ,3~ - - Conflicting Flows 90 Potential Capacity 1518 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1518 I' Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.92 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. S,~ - tep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 -"'Conflictin Flow g s Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.92 0.92 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Ste 4: LT fro p m Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 373 Potential Capacity 632 ti„ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.92 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.94 ,fix Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.82 0.92 4r~ Movement Capacity 583 _ Ott Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ~,~k - Part 1 - First Stage ~ Conflicting Flows ~tential Capacity f; destrian Impedance Factor ` Cap. Add. factor due to Impeding mvmnt L Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. ' Part 2 - Second Stage I_ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ' Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity - - l_ i Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Ii Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ~ ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.92 0.92 Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a ~ Y C t ` 1 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4 LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage ~ f~ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt , Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt ~ Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage ~ Conflicting Flows 373 ~ Potential Capacity 632 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.92 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.94 ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.82 0.92 Movement Capacity 583 Results for Two-stage process a Y C t 583 ' Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations L Movement Y 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) _ 11 127 Movement Capacity (vph) 583 985 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ L T R L T R sep 583 985 ,Volume 11 12 7 Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) ~ n max - - - - - C s h rM1 SUM C sep n C act - - kP ( Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L R C,. v (v h) - 118 11 127 P C (m) (vph) 1518 583 985 v/c 0.08 0.02 0.13 95% queue length 0.25 0.06 0.44 T~,~ Control Delay 7.6 11.3 9.2 S A B A proach Delay 9.4 pproach LOS A ~'ti Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 _ _ p (o j) - 0. 9 2 1. 0 0 ~ ~k ( v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 L v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 {ri. s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 4,~. s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) _ d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.6 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 C_ - - - ;t, ,x _ ~a, ~r~ r L_, L_ ~~1 j HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 „~,°r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ga alyst : BEW 'fix ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ate Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE20 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO , f Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHPPMFU East/West Street: LAKO ST „f North/South Street: HUALALAI RD r';;~ Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 I_ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ _ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R Volume ~ 129 61 90 22 C Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 129 61 90 22 =`>4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / C RT Channelized? Lane s 1 .1 1 0 Configuration L T TR stream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R t°z - - Volume 12 138 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 138 .~a~ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade ( 0 0 C Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / "r Lanes 1 1 ~r ~ Configuration L R l _ - - - - ___Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ ` Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 ,x~ Lane Config L ~ ~ L R v (vph) 129 12 138 C(m) (vph) 1490 543 960 a~~~ v/c 0.09 0.02 0.14 95% queue length 0.28 0.07 0.50 Control Delay 7.6 11.8 9.4 s'~ S A B A pproach Delay 9.6 Approach LOS A r~~, r - i i~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 Phone: Fax: ~i E-Mail. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK, FUTURE20 yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHPPMFU East/West Street: LAKO ST North/South Street: HUALALAI RD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R , Volume ~ 129 61 90 22 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 32 15 22 6 ~ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 129 61 90 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? ~ Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 -L T R L T R Vo~.ume 12 13 8 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 3 34 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 138 l Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / / Il RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 r. ~ I, ~ Lane `Width (ft) 12. 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 i°r~ Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 if Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 , , _ Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance ,<<C Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn I Through II'^" - - r - I~ Worksheet 3-Data-for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles - Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: vk~f~ _ Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation _ i'7~? Critical Gap Calculation ~~vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R 3"'' 7 ,Sa°' _ t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,,`y t (3, lt) 0.00 0 .70 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2-stage !v d _ Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~i~ L L L T R L T R ~__t t(f,base) 2.20 3.50` 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 0 L t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals i__ mputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal A Movement 2 Movement 5 LN V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) ;t;~, V prog 5z~ i~ -Tota3 Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) I~ Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) ~ Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g (ql) g(q2) g(q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked j Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) I alpha ~ - beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) ~ Smoothing Factor, F ~ Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) ~ Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 ~ Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result - p (2) 0.000 p(5) 0.000 p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II p(4) p (7) P{8) i p (9) p(10) p(11) i p (12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 112 420- 101 s Px V c,u,x I I C r,x C plat,x Two-Stage Process Y 7 8 10 11 I- i "r~ r I Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 ti~ - - - - V(c,x) s 1500 x) ~?c,u,x) ~ c ~ r ~ x ) - <<~ C (plat, x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations ~'f~~ Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 101 Potential Capacity 960 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 -''F' Movement Capacity 960 ' Probability of Queue free St. - 1.00 0.86 Step 2 : LT f rom Major St . 4 1 t.- (x Conflicting Flows 112 l Potential Capacity 1490 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 " Movement Capacity 1490 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.91 =r Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. '1, ~~t ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 ~ 11 L_ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ~;r, Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.91 0.91 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 f Conflicting Flows 420 T;~ Potential Capacity 594 Pedestrian Impedance Factor, 1.00 1.00 } Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.91 Maj L, Min T Adj Imp Factor. 0.93 ~4MS. 'r1 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.80 0.91 Movement Capacity 543 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ti Part 1 - First Stage ( Conflicting Flows tential Capacity ~a edestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity I~,x,< Probability of Queue free St. 1, i~ ~y3~ i~ Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows ~ Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due. to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows (1 Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.91 0.91 Movement Capacity it Result for 2 stage process: ri a y i C t Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 - Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage~ Conflicting Flows l Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ' Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt i Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage i, Conflicting Flows 420 i Potential Capacity 594 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.91 l Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.93 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.80 0.91 Movement Capacity 543 Results for Two-stage process: a Y C t 543 - - - i Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement .r 7 8 9 10 11 ~ 12 ~ I L T R L T R ~ Volume (vph) ~ 12 138 Movement Capacity (vph) 543 960 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) - It Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches - ~ Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R `Re s e - - p 543 960 I Volume 12 138 Delay ,v~~ ( Q sep II Q sep +1 round (Qsep +l) e,„,r ~ n max ~ C sh i4 SUM C sep n C act ii Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 'f Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L R - - - v (vph) 129 12 138 C(m) (vph) 1490 543 960 1 v/c 0.09 0.02 0.14 95% queue length 0.28 0.07 0.50 _f Control Delay 7.6 11.8 9.4 ~S A B A proach Delay g,6 '~'i Approach LOS A Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay :C: Movement 2 Movement 5 l v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 ~~N s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P* (oj ) _;3 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.6 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l} Delay for stream 2 or 5 ` f i~ I I ~~n~ I f, . 3 ~ ~ ~ e ~ - - ~ r = _ , z (r{ ~ - _ , L_ APPENDIX G LEVEL ®F SERVICE .a C_ QUEEN KA'AI~UMANU I-IIGI3WAY ~ PUAPUAANUI STREET r,~~ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTI®N AlVI & PM PEAK H®UYZS ~c ((,LX l_ ,,f~, 4,,; e~pG~ L~ ~~r~ r" fk 5~t i ~ HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 ` Analyst: BEW Inter.: T r Agency: BRANDAN LEE Area Type: All other areas ~ te: 4/16/2009 Jurisd: HDOT iod: AM PEAK EXISTING Year 2009 ( oject ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-O1-07 BLQKHPAMEX ~ E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY _ _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound L T R ~ L T R I L T R ~ L T R No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 I LGConfig I I L R ~ T R I L T Volume ~ I35 113 ~ 975 33 I53 719 Lane Width ~ (12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 f RTOR Vol ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 uration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ( __Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 EB Left ~ NB Left Thru I Thru P Right ~ Right P P Peds ~ Peds WB Left P ~ SB Left P Thru ~ Thru P P Right P ~ Right Peds ~ Peds Right P ~ EB Right _ Right ~ WB Right P P reen 6.0 6.3 85.7 Yellow 3.7 3.7 3.7 L All Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs _Intersection Performance Summary _ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound l- Westbound L 98 1805 0.40 0.05 61.9 E ( 14,7 B 11 R 1615 1615 0.08 1.00 0.1 A Northbound I T 1480 1900 0.73 0.78 9.5 A 9.2 A L R 1615 1615 0.02 1.00 0.0+ A Southbound L 103 1805 0.57 0.06 71.7 E T 1658 1900 0.48 0.87 2.5 A 7.3 A Intersection Delay = 8.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Phone: Fax: E-Mail. _ OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRANDAN LEE Date Performed: 4/16/2009 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK EXISTING Intersection: T Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: HDOT Analysis Year: 2009 Prgject ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-01-07 BLQKHPAMEX E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY VOLUME DATA Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound ~ L T R I L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R I Volume ~ ~35 113 ~ 975 33 I53 719 ~ I; ~ Heavy Veh~ ~0 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 0 PHF ~ 0.90 0.90 ~ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PK 15 Vol ~ ~10 31 ~ 271 9 ~15 200 Hi Ln Vol ~ Grade ~ ( 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 Ideal Sat ~ 1900 1900 ~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 ~ ~ ParkExist ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NumPark No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 ( 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 LGConfig ( ~ L R ~ T R ~ L T Lane Width ~ 12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 Adj Flow ~ ~39 126 ~ 1083 37 ~59 799 ~InSharedLn~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ii Prop LTs ~ ( ~ 0.000 ~ 0.000 Prop RTs ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 Peds Bikes 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ I Buses ~ ~0 0 ( 0 0 ~0 0 ~InProtPhase Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ OPERATING PARAMETERS Eastbound ~ Westbound ( Northbound ~ Southbound L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R Init Unmet ~ ~0.0~ 0.0 ~ 0.0 0.0 ~0.0 0.0 I~ Arriv . Type ( 3 3 ~ 3 3 ~ 3 3 ~ Unit Ext. ~ ~3.0 3.0 ( 3.0 3.0 ~3.0 3.0 I Factor ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 1.000 ~ 1.000 ~ ~ Lost Time ~ ~2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2.0 ~2.0 2.0 Ext of g ( ~2.0 2.0 ( 2.0 2.0 ~2.0 2.0 Ped Min g ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 ~ ~ Il r 1 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 Left ~ NB Left Thru I Thru P i Right ~ Right P P Peds ~ Peds j WB Left P ~ SB Left P Thru ~ Thru P P Right P ~ Right Peds ~ Peds NB Right P ~ EB Right SB Right ~ WB Right P P Green 6.0 6.3 85.7 Yellow 3.7 3.7 3.7 All Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW WORKSHEET___ I Volume Adjustment Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~lume, V ~ I35 113 ~ 975 33 ~53 719 PHF ~ I0.90 0.90 ~ 0.90 0.90 10.90 0.90 Adj flow I I39 126 ~ 1083 37 ~59 799 [ No . Lane s ~ 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 Lane group ~ ~ L R I T R I L T Adj flow ~ ~39 126 ~ 1083 37 ~59 799 Prop LTs I I ~ 0.000 ~ 0.000 Prop RTs ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 ( Saturation Flow Rate (see Exhibit 16-7 to determine the adjustment factors)_ )l Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LG L R T R L T So 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 ' fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fBB 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fA 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fLU 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fRT 0.850 1.000 0.850 1.000 fLT 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 Sec. l_ fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ~pb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1805 1615 1900 1615 1805 1900 Sec. _CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET_ _ Capacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity t Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c ' Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio _ f - - Eastbound ~ Prot Perm Left ~ ' Prot Perm Thru Right Westbound Prot Perm ~ ~ Left L 39 1805 # 0.02 0.05 98 0.40 Prot Perm Thru Right R 126 1615 0.08 1.00 1615 0.08 Northbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru T 1083 1900 # 0.57 0.78 1480 0.73 Right R 37 1615 0.02 1.00 1615 0.02 Southbound ~ Prot Perm Left L 59 1805 0.03 0.06 103 0.57 Prot Perm r Thru T 799 1900 0.42 0.87 1658 0.48 ~ Right Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0.62 Total lost time per cycle, L = 12.00 sec Critical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc)(C)/(C-L) = 0.70 Control Delay and LOS Determination Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach ` Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del _ _ Grp vfc g/C d1 Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Ij Eastbound Westbound L 0.40 0.05 50.3 1.000 98 0.50 11.6 0.0 61.9 E L! 14.7 B R 0.08 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.1 0.0 0.1 A Northbound (l ll T 0.73 0.78 6.2 1.000 1480 0.50 3.2 0.0 9.5 A 9.2 A R 0.02 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.0 0.0 0.0+ A ~ Southbound L 0.57 0.06 50.5 1.000 103 0.50 21.1 0.0 71.7 E T 0.48 0.87 1.5 1.000 1658 0.50 1.0 0.0 2.5 A 7.3 A I, i - Intersection delay = 8.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS A I SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET ~ for exclusive lefts Input ~ EB WB NB SB Opposed by Single (S) or Multiple(M) lane approach Cycle length, C 110.0 sec Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) Opposing effective green time, go (s) Number of lanes in LT lane group, N ( Number of lanes in opposing approach, No Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) Lost time for LT lane group, tL Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/[3600(No)fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) gf=G(exp(- a * (LTC b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] gq, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf _.~Max(gq-gf)/2,0) PTHo=1-PLTo PL*=PLT [1+(N-1)g/(gf+gu/EL1+4.24)] ELl (refer to Exhibit C16-3) EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) fmin=2(1+PL)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g L gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) L fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (ELl-1) ] , (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm= [gf/g] +[gu/g] / [1+PL(EL1-1) J + [gdiff/g] / [1+PL(EL2-1) ] , (fmin<=fm<=1.00) or flt= [fm+0.91 (N-1) ] /N** Left-turn adjustment, fLT For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. t- * If Pl>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>1, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. _~_SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET _ _ for shared lefts Input ~ EB WB NB SB Opposed by Single (S) or Multiple(M) lane approach ~cle length, C 110.0 sec 1 otal actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) Opposing effective green time, go (s) Number of lanes in LT lane group, N Number of lanes in opposing approach, No Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) 'Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT - 0.000 0.000 i Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo i' Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) Lost time for LT lane group, tL Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/[3600(No)fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) ~ gf=G[exp(- a * (LTC b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),O] gq, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) i~' gu=g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf ~ n=Max(gq-gf)/2,0) PTHo=1-PLTo i' PL*=PLT[1+(N-1)g/(gf+gu/EL1+4.24)] j ELl (refer to Exhibit C16-3) EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) fmin=2(1+PL)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] , (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=f m= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (ELl-1) ] + [gdiff/g] / [1+PL (EL2-1) ] , (fmin<=fm<=1.00) ~ or flt= [fm+0.91 (N-1) ] /N** Left-turn adjustment, fLT For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. ~ For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. ,I _ SUPPLEMENTAL PEDESTRIAN-BICYCLE EFFECTS WORKSHEET Permitted Left Turns EB WB NB SB ( ~ Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) ~ Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) Pedestrian flow rate, Vpedg (p/h) II OCCpedg Opposing queue clearing green, gq (s) Eff. ped. green consumed by opp. veh. queue, gq/gp OCCpedu ~ Opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) ~ OCCr Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec I,' Number of turning lanes, Nturn ApbT Proportion of left turns, PLT li Proportion of left turns using protected phase, PLTA JI Left-turn adjustment, fLpb Permitted Right Turns Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) I Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) Conflicting bicycle volume, Vbic (bicycles/h) Vpedg OCCpedg Effective green, g (s) Vbicg ~ 1 ~ OCCbicg OCCr Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec ( Number of turning lanes, Nturn { bT oportion right-turns, PRT ( oportion right-turns using protected phase, PRTA Right turn adjustment, fRpb _ SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET _ ` EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Cycle length, C 11x.0 sec i Adj. LT vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Protected phase effective green interval, g (s) Opposing queue effective green interval, gq Unopposed green interval, gu Red time r=(C-g-gq-gu) ~ Arrival rate, qa=v/(3600(max[X,1.0])) Protected ph. departure rate, Sp=s/3600 l Permitted ph. departure rate, Ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) XPerm XProt Case Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound ( 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Westbound L 0.0 0.00 52.0 50.3 0.00 0.0 0.0 61.9 0.0 0.0 R 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 Northbound 0.0 0.0 T 0.0 0.00 12.2 6.2 0.00 0.0 0.0 9.5 R 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0+ Southbound L 0.0 0.00 51.8 50.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 71.7 T 0.0 0.00 7.0 1.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 2.5 l 0.0 0.0 Intersection Delay 8.8 Ysec/veh Intersection LOS A A C_ _BACK OF QUEUE WORKSHEET Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound I~ LaneGroup 1 IL R 1 T R IL T 1 ~ 'Init Queue 1 10.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 1 Flow Rate ( 139 126 ( 1083 37 159 799 ( j~' So 1 11900 1900 1 1900 1900 11900 1900 1 ~ No.Lanes 10 0 0 11 0 1 10 1 1 I1 1 0 i SL 1 11805 1615 1 1900 1615 11805 1900 1 LnCapacity 1 198 1615 1 1480 1615 1103 1658 ( Flow Ratio ( 10.0 0,1 i 0.6 0.0 10.0 0.4 1 v/c Ratio 1 10.40 0.08 ( 0.73 0.02 (0.57 0.48 1 Grn Ratio 1 (0.05 1.00 1 0.78 1.00 10.06 0.87 1 I Factor 1 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 ( AT or PVG 1 13 3 1 3 3 13 3 Pltn Ratio 1 11.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1 j PF2 1 11.00 1 1.00 11.00 1.00 1 I' Q1 1 11.2 1 17.0 I1.8 5.4 1 kB ( 10.3 1.8 1 1.7 1.8 10.3 1.9 1 Q2 1 10.2 0.2 1 4.3 0.0 10.3 1.7 1 Q Average 1 11.3 1 21.3 12.1 7.1 1 Q Spacing 1 125.0 25.0 1 25.0 25.0 125.0 25.0 1 Q Storage 1 10 0 1 0 0 10 0 1 1; Q S Ratio ~ 1 1 1 i 70th Percentile Output: fB% 1 11.3 1 1.2 (1.3 1.2 1 BOQ 1 11.7 i 25.6 12.7 8.7 1 Qsxatio I I I I I 85th Percentile Output: fB% ( 11.6 1 1.4 11.6 1.5 ( BOQ ~ 12.2 1 30.0 13.3 10.4 ( 111 QSRatio 1 I 90th Percentile Output: fB% 1 11.9 1 1.5 (1.8 1.6 1 BOQ 1 12.5 1 32.2 13.8 11.5 1 QSRatio I ~ I I I ~ 95th Percentile Output: fB% ( 12.4 1 1.6 12.3 1.8 1 11 BOQ 1 13.1 1 34.4 14.7 13.0 1 QSRatio I I I i I 98th Percentile Output: i fB% 1 12.9 1 1.7 12.7 2.1 1 BOQ 1 13.8 1 36.7 15.6 14.6 1 ~ QSRatio I 1 1 I I ERROR MESSAGES Il No errors to report. l l' I 1 HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: BEW Inter.: T Agency: BRANDAN LEE Area Type: All other areas te: 4/16/2009 Jurisd: HDOT riod: AM PEAK FUTURE 5YR Year 2014 oject ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-01-07 BLQKHPAMFU E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY _ _ __SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY____ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound L T R I L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R f No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 LGConfig ~ ( L R ~ T R ~ L T { Volume ~ I47 141 ~ 975 36 I54 719 RTOR Vodth i i12.0 102.0 i 12.0 102.0 112.0 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ _ Signal Operations _ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left Thru ~ Thru P Right ~ Right P P Peds ~ Peds WB Left P I SB Left P Thru ~ Thru P P Right P ~ Right Peds ~ Peds Right P ~ EB Right Right ( WB Right P P reen 6.0 6.0 86.0 Yellow 3.7 3.7 3.7 All Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary_ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 98 1805 0.53 0.05 69.7 E ( 17.4 B fl R 1615 1615 0.10 1.00 0.1 A Northbound T 1485 •1900 0.73 0.78 9.3 A 8.9 A R 1615 1615 0.02 1.00 0.0+ A Southbound L 98 1805 0.61 0.05 76.2 E ~ T 1658 1900 0.48 0.87 2.5 A 7.7 A Intersection Delay = 9.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A i HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 . ~ Phone: Fax: E-Mail. _ OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS__ _ _ Analyst: BEW Il Agency/Co.: BRANDAN LEE Date Performed: 4/16/2009 i Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK FUTURE 5YR Intersection: T Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: HDOT l Analysis Year: 2014 Project ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-01-07 BLQKHPAMFU E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY _ VOLUME DATA Eastbound ~ Westbound ( Northbound ~ Southbound ~ ~ L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume ~ (47 141 ~ 975 36 ~54 719 ~ °s Heavy Veh~ IO 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 0 PHF ~ (0.90 0.90 ~ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PK 15 Vol ~ ~13 39 ~ 271 10 ~15 200 Hi Ln Vol ~ Grade ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 Ideal Sat ~ 1900 1900 ( 1900 1900 1900 1900 ~ ~ ParkExist ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NumPark No. Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ( 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 ~ } LGConfig ~ ~ L R ~ T R ~ L T ~ Lane width ~ 12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~ RTOR Vol ~ ~ 0 ( 0 Adj Flow ~ (52 157 ~ 1083 40 ~60 799 ~ , ~InSharedLn~ Prop LTs ~ ~ ( 0.000 ~ 0.000 Prop RTs ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 Peds Bikes 0 ~ o ( 0 ( ~ ~ i Buses ~ ~0 0 ~ 0 0 IO 0 $InProtPhase Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ OPERATING PARAMETERS Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound ~ L T R ~ L T R I L T R ~ L T R Init Unmet ~ ~0.0 O.OY~ 0.0 0.0 ~0.0 0.0 ~ ~ Arriv . Type ~ 3 3 ~ 3 3 ~ 3 3 ~ t Unit Ext. ~ (3.0 3.0 ( 3.0 3.0 ~3.0 3.0 I Factor ~ ~ 1.000 ( 1.000 ~ 1.000 Lost Time ~ (2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2.0 I2.0 2.0 Ext of g ~ ~2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2.0 ~2.0 2.0 Ped Min g ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 Left ~ NB Left Thru ~ Thru P Right ~ Right P P Peds ~ Peds j WB Left P ~ SB Left P Thru ~ Thru P P Right P ~ Right Peds ~ Peds NB Right P ~ EB Right SB Right ~ WB Right P P ( Green 6.0 I 6.0 86.0 l Yellow 3.7 3.7 3.7 All Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs _ VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW WORKSHEET_ Volume Adjustment Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ( Southbound L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ( L T R f ~ _ _ flume, V ~ ~47 141 ~ 975 36 ~54 719 PHF ~ I0.90 0.90 ~ 0.90 0.90 10.90 0.90 Adj flow ~ ~52 157 ~ 1083 40 ~60 799 No. Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ( 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 Lane group ~ I L R ~ T R ~ L T _ Adj flow ( ~52 157 ~ 1083 40 I60 799 ` Prop LTs ~ ~ I 0.000 ~ 0.000 t__ Prop RTs ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 Saturation Flow Rate (see Exhibit 16-7 to determine the adjustment factors) Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LG L R T R L T So 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 _ fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fBB 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 f fA 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fLU 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fRT 0.850 1.000 0.850 1.000 fLT 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 Sec. ~ fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ~pb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1805 1615 1900 1615 1805 1900 Sec. _ _CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET I Capacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity A t- Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound - - - ~ i Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru Right Westbound Prot ' l Perm ~ ' Left L 52 1805 # 0.03 0.05 98 0.53 Prot I i Perm ~ Thru Right R 157 1615 0.10 1.00 1615 0.10 Northbound ~i Prot Perm Left { Prot l Perm Thru T 1083 1900 # 0.57 0.78 1485 0.73 Right R 40 1615 0.02 1,00 1615 0.02 I' Southbound Prot Perm Left L 60 1805 # 0.03 0.05 98 0.61 Prot Perm Thru T 799 1900 0.42 0.87 1658 0.48 Right Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0.63 1~ Total lost time per cycle, L = 12.00 sec i Critical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc)(C)/(C-L) = 0.71 Control Delay and LOS Determination fi Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C d1 Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound westbound f~ L 0.53 0.05 50.6 1.000 98 0.50 19.0 0.0 69.7 E I 17.4 B R 0.10 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.1 0.0 0.1 A Northbound T 0.73 0.78 6.1 1.000 1485 0.50 3.2 0.0 9.3 A 8.9 A R 0.02 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.0 0.0 0.0+ A Southbound j L 0.61 0.05 50.9 1.000 98 0.50 25.3 0.0 76.2 E T 0.48 0.87 1.5 1.000 1658 0.50 1.0 0.0 2.5 A 7.7 A l ~ Intersection delay = 9.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A I ( -----SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET f - for exclusive lefts Input I EB WB NB SB' Opposed by Single (S) or Multiple (M) lane approach Cycle length, C 110.0 sec Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) Opposing effective green time, go (s) Number of lanes in LT lane group, N Number of lanes in opposing approach, No Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) Lost time for LT lane group, tL _ Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/[3600(No)fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) gf=G[exp(- a * (LTC b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] q, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) J g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf t--- =Max(gq-gf) /2, 0) PTHo=1-PLTo PL*=PLT[1+(N-1)g/(gf+gu/EL1+4.24)] EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16-3) EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) fmin=2(1+PL)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g ( gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) 1 fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] , (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] + [gdiff/g] / [1+PL (EL2-1) ] , (fmin<=fm<=1.00) or flt= [fm+0.91 (N-1) ] /N** Left-turn adjustment, fLT For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>1, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. ` For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. ( For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. S _ _ SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET- A_ _ for shared lefts ~ Input EB WB NB SB - pposed by Single (S) or Multiple(M) lane approach ycle length, C _110.0 sec otal actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) Opposing effective green time, go (s) Number of lanes in LT lane group, N Number of lanes in opposing approach, No l . Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT 0.000 0.000 Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) Lost time for LT lane group, tL Computation ~ LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 ~ Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/[3600(No)fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) gf=G[exp(- a * (LTC b)) ] -tl, gf<=g j Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] gq, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) gu=g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf ` n=Max(gq-gf)/2,0) ' PTHo=1-PLTo ~ PL*=PLT [1+(N-1)g/(gf+gu/EL1+4.24)] EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16-3) EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) J~ fmin=2(1+PL)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 1 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] , (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] + [gdiff/g] / [1+PL (EL2-1) ] , (fmin<=fm<=1.00) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** Left-turn adjustment, fLT For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>1, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. II SUPPLEMENTAL PEDESTRIAN-BICYCLE EFFECTS WORKSHEET Permitted Left Turns 1~ EB WB NB SB Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) Pedestrian flow rate, Vpedg (p/h) OCCpedg l Opposing queue clearing green, gq (s) Eff. ped. green consumed by opp. veh. queue, gq/gp OCCpedu Opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) OCCr Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec Number of turning lanes, Nturn ApbT Proportion of left turns, PLT Proportion of left turns using protected phase, PLTA Left-turn adjustment, fLpb Permitted Right Turns Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) I~ Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) Conflicting bicycle volume, Vbic (bicycles/h) Vpedg OCCpedg 1 Effective green, g (s) Vbicg ~ ~ OCCbicg OCCr j Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec Number of turning lanes, Nturn ~bT oportion right-turns, PRT Proportion right-turns using protected phase, PRTA ~ Right turn adjustment, fRpb _-SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET - EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Cycle length, C 110.0 sec Adj. LT vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Protected phase effective green interval, g (s) I Opposing queue effective green interval, gq Unopposed green interval, gu Red time r=(C-g-gq-gu) Arrival rate, qa=v/(3600(max[X,1.0])) Protected ph. departure rate, Sp=s/3600 Permitted ph. departure rate, Ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) XPerm XProt Case Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet A_ Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec ( Eastbound L 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Westbound L 0.0 0.00 52.0 50.6 0.00 0.0 0.0 69.7 0.0 0.0 R 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 Northbound 0.0 0.0 T 0.0 0.00 12.0 6.1 0.00 0.0 0.0 9.3 R 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0+ Southbound L 0.0 0.00 52.0 50.9 0.00 0.0 0.0 76.2 T 0.0 0.00 7.0 1.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 - - 0.0 I` Intersection Delay 9.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS A t_ _ _ _~__BACK OF QUEUE WORKSHEET---- L_ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound l,~ LaneGroup ~ ~L R ~ T R ~L T Init Queue ~ ~0.0 0.0 ~ 0.0 0.0 ~0.0 0.0 ~ ~ Flow Rate I ~52 157 ~ 1083 40 ~60 799 ~ So ~ 1900 1900 ~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 No.Lanes IO 0 0 ~1 0 1 ~0 1 1 I1 1 0 SL ~ 1805 1615 ( 1900 1615 1805 1900 LnCapacity ~ ~98 1615 ~ 1485 1615 ~98 1658 Flow Ratio ~ ~0.0 0.1 ~ 0.6 0.0 ~0.0 0.4 v/c Ratio ~ 0.53 0.10 ~ 0.73 0.02 0.61 0.48 Grn Ratio ~ 0.05 1.00 ~ 0.78 1.00 0.05 0.87 I Factor ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 1.000 ~ 1.000 AT or PVG ~ ~3 3 ~ 3 3 ~3 3 ~ r Pltn Ratio ~ I1,00 1.00 ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PF2 ~ 1.00 ~ 1.00 11.00 1.00 ~ ' Q1 ~ ~1,5 I 16.8 ~1.8 5.4 kB ~ ~0.3 1.8 ~ 1.7 1.8 ~0.3 1.9 Q2 ~ ~0.3 0.2 ( 4.3 0.0 ~0.4 1.7 Q Average ~ ~1.8 ~ 21.1 I2.2 7.1 Q Spacing ~ 25.0 25.0 ~ 25.0 25.0 (25.0 25.0 Q Storage ~ ~0 0 ~ 0 0 IO 0 Q S Ratio 70th Percentile Output: fB% ~ ~1.3 ( 1.2 i1.3 1.2 ~ f BOQ ~ ~2.3 ~ 25.4 ~2.7 8.7 ~ 1 QSRatio 85th Percentile Output: j' fB% ~ ~1.6 ~ 1.4 ~1.6 1.5 ~ 1 BOQ ~ ~2.9 ~ 29.6 ~3.5 10.4 QSRatio 90th Percentile Output: fB% ~ ~1.8 ~ 1.5 ~1.8 1.6 BOQ ~ ~3.4 ~ 31.8 (4.0 11.5 QSRatio ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 95th Percentile Output: l fB% ~ ~2.3 ~ 1.6 ~2.2 1.8 BOQ ( ~4.2 ~ 34.1 ~4.9 13.0 QSRatio ~ ~ ~ ~ ( 98th Percentile Output: fB% ~ ~2.7 ~ 1.7 ~2.7 2.1 BOQ ~ ~5.0 ~ 36.3 ~5.8 14.6 ( ' QSRatio ERROR MESSAGES No errors to report. ~i I 1 1 i__ ~ HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 [~nalywt: BEW Inter.: T Agency: BRANDAN LEE Area Type: All other areas ~~ate: 4/16/2009 Jurisd: HDOT iod: AM PEAK FUTURE lOYR Year 2019 ct ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-O1-07 BLQKHPAMFUIO St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY i _ _ _ ---SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY-- Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound L T R ~ L T R I L T R I L T R - ~ I ~ - No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 ~GConfig I ~ L R ~ T R ~ L T ('olume ~ ~54 164 ~ 1059 41 I62 781 Lane Width ~ I12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ''TOR Vol I ~ 0 ~ 0 ~lluration 0.25 Area T e: All other areas YP _ -Signal Operations ('hase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 i ;B Left ~ NB Left Thru I Thru P Right ~ Right P P [ Peels ~ Peds WB Left P ~ SB Left P Thru I Thru P P Right P ~ Right Peels ~ Peels NB Right P ~ EB Right Right I WB Right P P n 6.0 6.0 86.0 Y e-]. l w . 7 0 3 3.7 3.7 X11 Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary _ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach pane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS astbound !J 4estbound 98 1805 0.61 0.05 76.2 E 19.0 B Z 1615 1615 0.11 1.00 0.1 A l Northbound T 1485 1900 0.79 0.78 11.3 B 10.9 B 2 1615 1615 0.03 1.00 0.0+ A Southbound L 98 1805 0.70 0.05 85.8 F P 1658 1900 0.52 0.87 2.8 A 8.9 A l_ Intersection Delay = 10.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Phone: Fax: E-Mail: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS~_ Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRANDAN LEE Date Performed: 4/16/2009 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK FUTURE 10YR j~ Intersection: T Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: HDOT Analysis Year: 2019 i' Project ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-01-07 BLQKHPAMFUIO E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY , I~ VOLUME DATA ~ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ( Southbound L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ l Volume ~ (54 164 ~ 1059 41 ~62 781 i r Heavy Veh~ ~0 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 0 PHF ~ 0.90 0.90 I 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 I ' PK 15 Vol ~ ~15 46 ~ 294 11 ~17 217 Hi Ln Vol % Grade ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 Ideal Sat ~ 1900 1900 ~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 ParkExist ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NumPark ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ No. Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 LGConfig ~ ~ L R ~ T R( L T Lane Width ~ 12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~ RTOR Vol ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ( ~ Adj Flow ~ ~60 182 ~ 1177 46 ~69 868 %InSharedLn~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I Prop LTs ~ ~ ~ 0.000 ~ 0.000 Prop RTs ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 Peds Bike s 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 Buses ~ ~ 0 0 ( 0 0 I O 0 %InProtPhase Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ ,OPERATING PARAMETERS ~I~ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound L T R ~ L T R ( L T R I L T R ~ ~ j Init Unmet ~ ~0.0 0.0 ~ 0.0 0.0 ~0.0 0.0 Arriv. Type ~3 3 ~ 3 3 (3 3 ~ ~ Unit Ext. ~ ~3.0 3.0 ~ 3.0 3.0 I3.0 3.0 I Factor ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 1.000 ~ 1.000 Lost Time ~ ~2.0 2.0 I 2.0 2.0 ~2.0 2.0 Ext of g ~ ~2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2.0 ~2.0 2.0 Ped Min g ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 f~ --PHASE DATA_____ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 I ~ Left ~ NB Left ~~Thru ~ Thru P f Right ~ Right P P Peds ~ Peds IT"TB Left P ~ 5B Left P Thru ~ Thru P P Right P ~ Right Peds ~ Peds IB Right P ~ EB Right ~B Right ~ WB Right P P Green 6.0 6.0 86.0 'ellow 3.7 3.7 3.7 _~11 Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 ( Cycle Length: 110.0 secs 1 -VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW WORKSHEET Volume Adjustment Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound L ~ L T R I L T R ~ L T R I L T R me, V ( I54 164 ( 1059 41 ~62 781 0.90 0.90 ~ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 A j flow ~ I60 182 ~ 1177 46 I69 868 ( rTo . Lane s ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 I 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 I pane group ~ ~ L R ~ T R I L T Adj flow ~ ~60 182 ~ 1177 46 ~69 868 Prop LTs ~ I I 0.000 ~ 0.000 prop RTs ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 Saturation Flow Rate (see Exhibit 16-7 to determine the adjustment factors) Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ;G L R T R L T ~0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane s 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 EW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1=HV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 EP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 EBB 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 -fA 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fLU 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ERT 0.850 1.000 0.850 1.000 L-FLT 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 Sec. ELpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 L_ERpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1805 1615 1900 1615 1805 1900 _ CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET-- _ _ `-Capacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound v Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru Right Westbound Prot Perm ( Left L 60 1805 # 0.03 0.05 98 0.61 I Prot Perm ~ Thru Right R 182 1615 0.11 1.00 1615 0.11 Northbound Prot Perm ' Left Prot ( ' Perm It Thru T 1177 1900 # 0.62 0.78 1485 0.79 Right R 46 1615 0.03 1.00 1615 0.03 Southbound - Prot Perm Left L 69 1805 # 0.04 0.05 98 0.70 i Prot ~ Perm Thru T 868 1900 0.46 0.87 1658 0.52 Right I ~ 1 Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0.69 Y Total lost time per cycle, L = 12.00 sec Critical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc)(C)/(C-L) = 0.78 Control Delay and LOS Determination _ _ Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach I Lane _ Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del _ ' Grp v/c g/C di Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound ~I Westbound L 0.61 0.05 50.9 1.000 98 0.50 25.3 0.0 76.2 E 19. 0 B R 0.11 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.1 0.0 0.1 A ~ Northbound T 0.79 0.78 6.9 1.000 1485 0.50 4.4 0.0 11.3 B 10.9 B R 0.03 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.0 0.0 0.0+ A Southbound , L 0.70 0.05 51.1 1.000 98 0.50 34.7 0.0 85.8 F T 0.52 0.87 1.6 1.000 1658 0.50 1.2 0.0 2.8 A 8.9 A f1 i - -------------------y Intersection dela = 10.9 (sec veh) Intersection LOS = B I SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET ( for exclusive lefts Cnput EB WB NB SB ;Opposed by Single (S) or Multiple (M) lane approach ~ycle length, C 110.0 sec ~!'otal actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) apposing effective green time, go (s) i Jumber of lanes in LT lane group, N Number of lanes in opposing approach, No ~'~djusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) 2roportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT "Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) ( most time for LT lane group, tL computation LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 "apposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 (_~pposing flow, Volc=VoC/ [3600 (No) fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) gf=G[exp(- a * (LTC b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) apposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] -gq, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) gu=g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf =1-PLTo P *-PLT [1+(N-1)g/(gf+gu/EL1+4.24)] F'Ll (refer to Exhibit C16-3) L2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) -fmin=2 (1+PL) /g or fmin=2 (1+P1) /g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) .m= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (ELl-1) ] , (min=fmin;max=1.00) _=It=fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL(ELl-1) ] + [gdiff/g] / [1+PL (EL2-1) ] (fmin<=fm<=1.00) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** weft-turn adjustment, fLT or s ecial case of sin 1 -1 p g e ane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. r If Pl>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>1, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. for special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach ~ ~r when gf>gq, see text. ~ _ SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts -Input EB WB NB SB apposed by Single (S) or Multiple (M) lane approach ~_~ycle length, C 110.0 sec a1 actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) ~~ective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) apposing effective green time, go (s) -1Qumber of lanes in LT lane group, N i_ Number of lanes in opposing approach, No ' Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT 0.000 0.000 Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo , Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) j Lost time for LT lane group, tL Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 ~ Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 j Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/ [3600 (No) fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) gf=G[exp(- a * (LTC b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) ~ Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] gq, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) i gu=g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf ii n=Max(gq-gf)/2,0) PTHo=1-PLTo PL*=PLT [1+(N-1) g/ (gf+gu/EL1+4.24) ] ELl (refer to Exhibit C16-3) EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) fmin=2(1+PL)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) II fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] , (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm= [gf/g] +[gu/g] / [1+PL(EL1-1) ] +[gdiff/g] / [1+PL(EL2-1) ] , (fmin<=fm<=1.00) or flt= [fm+0.91 (N-1) ] /N** Left-turn adjustment, fLT For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>1, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. ~ For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PEDESTRIAN-BICYCLE EFFECTS WORKSHEET f~ i Permitted Left Turns EB WB NB SB Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) I~ Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) Pedestrian flow rate, Vpedg (p/h) OCCpedg Opposing queue clearing green, gq (s) i Eff. ped. green consumed by opp. veh. queue, gq/gp OCCpedu Opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) Il OCCr ~ Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec Number of turning lanes, Nturn ApbT ~ Proportion of left turns, PLT Proportion of left turns using protected phase, PLTA Left-turn adjustment, fLpb Il Permitted Right Turns Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) Conflicting bicycle volume, Vbic (bicycles/h) Vpedg OCCpedg ' Effective green, g (s) Vbicg 7CCbicg >CCr Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec __Number of turning lanes, Nturn l ~pbT _ ' ortion right-turns, PRT ortion right-turns using protected phase, PRTA a t turn adjustment, fRpb ___SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT I~:ycle length, C 110.0 sec Adj. LT vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v ~~/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X ~'rotected phase effective green interval, g (s) Opposing queue effective green interval, gg Tnopposed green interval, gu :ed time r=(C-g-gq-gu) -Arrival rate, qa=v/(3600(max[X,1.0])) Protected ph. departure rate, Sp=s/3600 permitted ph. departure rate, Ss=s(gq+gu}/(gu*3600) _.Perm XProt 'ase [queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu esidual queue, Qr ~niform Delay, dl ll _ DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE _ _ Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group (T,ane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay I_~roup Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ?estbound L 0.0 0.00 52.0 50.9 0.00 0.0 0.0 76.2 0.0 0.0 ' 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 Northbound 0.0 0.0 ~ 0.0 0.00 12.0 6.9 0.00 0.0 0.0 11.3 R 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0+ j southbound lL 0.0 0.00 52.0 51.1 0.00 0.0 0.0 85.8 'I' 0.0 0.00 7.0 1.6 0.00 0.0 0 0 2.8 ~ 0.0 0.0 ~ _ _ Intersection Delay 10.9 sec/veh A Intersection LOS B V_ ____BACK OF QUEUE WORKSHEET__ -A---- ` Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LaneGroup ~ IL R I T R IL T Init Queue ~ ~0.0 0.0 ~ 0.0 0.0 I0.0 0.0 Flow Rate ~ ~60 182 ~ 1177 46 ~69 868 So ~ 1900 1900 ~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 ~ No.Lanes IO 0 0 ~1 0 1 ~0 1 1 I1 1 0 SL ~ I1805 1615 ~ 1900 1615 1805 1900 LnCapacity I ~98 1615 ~ 1485 1615 ~98 1658 I i Flow Ratio ~ I0.0 0.1 ~ 0.6 0.0 ~0.0 0.5 ~ ~ v/c Ratio ~ 0.61 0.11 ~ 0.79 0.03 0.70 0.52 Grn Ratio ~ 0.05 1.00 ~ 0.78 1.00 0.05 0.87 I i I Factor ~ ~ 1.000 ( 1.000 ~ 1.000 ~ AT or PVG ~ I3 3 ~ 3 3 ~3 3 Pltn Ratio ~ I1.00 1.00 ( 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 PF2 ~ 1.00 ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q1 ~ ~1.8 ~ 20.6 ~2.1 6.2 ~ kB ~ ~0.3 1.8 ~ 1.7 1.8 ~0.3 1.9 Q2 ~ I0.4 0.2 ~ 5.8 0.1 +0.5 2.0 Q Average ~ ~2.2 ~ 26.4 ~2.6 8.2 Q Spacing ~ 25.0 25.0 ~ 25.0 25.0 125.0 25.0 Q Storage ~ IO 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 0 Q S Ratio ~ ~ I I ( ~ 70th Percentile Output: fB% ( ~1.3 ~ 1.2 ~1.3 1.2 BOQ ~ ~2.7 ~ 31.7 ~3.3 10.0 QSRatio 85th Percentile Output: fB~ ~ ~1.6 ~ 1.4 ~1.6 1.5 BOQ ~ ~3.5 ~ 37.0 ~4.1 12.0 ~ QSRatio 90th Percentile Output: , fB~ ~ (1.8 ~ 1.5 ~1.8 1.6 BOQ ~ I4.0 ~ 39.7 ~4.7 13.1 QSRatio 95th Percentile Output: fB~ ~ ~2.2 ~ 1.6 (2.2 1.8 BOQ ~ ~4.9 ~ 42.4 ~5.7 14.8 QSRatio 98th Percentile Output: f B •°s ~ 1 2 .7 ~ 1.7 ( 2. 6 2. 0 ~ I BOQ ~ ~5.8 ~ 45.1 ~6.8 16.4 QSRatio ERROR MESSAGES I No errors to report. II ~I i f ~ HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: BEW Inter.: T Agency: BRANDAN LEE Area Type: All other areas te: 4/16/2009 Jurisd: HDOT riod: AM PEAK FUTURE20YR Year 2029 ~ roject ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-01-07 BLQKHPAMFU20 E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY ( SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ~ ~ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound L T R ( L T R ~ L T R I L T R No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 LGConfig ~ ~ L R I T R ~ L T Volume ~ I75 209 ~ 1250 51 I74 922 Lane Width ~ 12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 Duration _-0.25 Area Type: All other areas - - Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 EB Left ~ NB Left Thru I Thru P Right ~ Right P P Peds ~ Peds r WB Left P ~ SB Left P 1 Thru ~ Thru P P 111 Right P ~ Right Peds ~ Peds Right P ~ EB Right Right I WB Right P P Green 6.7 6.3 95.0 Yellow 3.7 ~ 3.7 3.7 All Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs _ Intersection Performance Summary - Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L- Westbound L 101 1805 0.82 0.06 106.5 F 28.2 C R 1615 1615 0.14 1.00 0.2 A Northbound T 1504 1900 0.92 0.79 20.6 C 19.8 B f- R 1615 1615 0.04 1.00 0.0+ A Southbound ~ L 95 1805 0.86 0.05 116.8 F 4_ T 1667 1900 0.61 0.88 3.7 A 12.0 B Intersection Delay = 17.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B L_ i HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 II~ Phone: Fax: ' E-Mail. _ OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS_ ~I Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRANDAN LEE Date Performed: 4/16/2009 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK FUTURE20YR Intersection: T Area Type: All other areas I! Jurisdiction: HDOT ~ Analysis Year: 2029 Project ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-O1-07 BLQKHPAMFU20 E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY I VOLUME DATA I~ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound ~ L T R ~ L T R ( L T R ~ L T R Volume ~ ~75 209 ( 1250 51 ~74 922 I 11 % Heavy Veh~ ~0 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 0 PHF ( 0.90 0.90 ~ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PK 15 Vol ~ ~21 58 ~ 347 14 ~21 256 Hi Ln Vol ~ % Grade ~ ~ 0 ~ 0~ ~ 0 Ideal Sat ~ 1900 1900 ~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 ParkExist ~ I ~ ~ ( fl NumPark No. Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 ~ ~ ~ LGConfig ( ~ L R ~ T R I L T Lane Width ~ I12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~ RTOR Vol ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 Adj Flow ~ ~83 232 ~ 1389 57 ~82 1024 ~ i %InSharedLn~ Prop LTs ~ ~ ~ 0.000 ~ 0.000 Prop RTs ( ~ 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 ~ , Peds Bikes) 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ I~ Buses ~ ~0 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 0 ~ %InProtPhase Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas j OPERATING PARAMETERS ' Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound ~ L T R ( L T R ~ L T R I L T R Init Unmet ~ ~0.0 0.0 ~ 0.0 0.0 ~0.0 0.0 ~ Arriv. Type ~3 3 ~ 3 3 ~3 3 ~ ~ Unit Ext. ~ ~3.0 3.0 ~ 3.0 3.0 ~3.0 3.0 I Factor ~ ~ 1.000 ( 1.000 ~ 1.000 Lost Time ~ ~2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2.0 ~2.0 2.0 Ext of g I ~2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2.0 I2.0 2.0 Ped Min g ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 ~ ~ I~ i r PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 Left ~ NB Left ~ Thru ~ Thru P Right ~ Right P P Peds ~ Peds WB Left P ~ SB Left P Thru ~ I Thru P P Right P ~ Right Peds ~ Peds NB Right P ~ EB Right SB Right ~ WB Right P P Green 6.7 I 6.3 95.0 Yellow 3.7 3.7 3.7 All Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs _ ___VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW WORKSHEET _ Volume Adjustment Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound I L T R I L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R l_~lume, V ~ ~75 209 ~ 1250 51 ~74 922 PHF I 10.90 0.90 ~ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 f Adj flow ~ ~83 232 ~ 1389 57 ~82 1024 't No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 Lane group ~ ~ L R ~ T R ~ L T Adj flow I ~83 232 ~ 1389 57 ~82 1024 Prop LTs ~ ~ ~ 0.000 ~ 0.000 Prop RTs I ( 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 Saturation Flow Rate (see Exhibit 16-7 to determine the adjustment factors) Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LG L R T R L T So 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 l Lane s 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 l fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fBB 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ( fA 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 4( fLU 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fRT 0.850 1.000 0.850 1.000 fLT 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 ( Sec. fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ~pb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1805 1615 1900 1615 1805 1900 Sec. _CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET_ _ Capacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity i Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio i - Eastbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm ~ i Thru Right Westbound Prot I j Perm l Left L 83 1805 # 0.05 0.06 101 0.82 Prot Perm j , Thru Right R 232 1615 0.14 1.00 1615 0.14 Northbound I' Prot Perm Lef t Prot ~ Perm Thru T 1389 1900 # 0.73 0.79 1504 0.92 Right R 57 1615 0.04 1.00 1615 0.04 Southbound Prot Perm Left L 82 1805 # 0.05 0.05 95 0.86 ~ Prot Perm ( ~ Thru T 1024 1900 0.54 0.88 1667 0.61 Ii Right Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0.82 1j Total lost time per cycle, L = 12.00 sec Critical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc)(C)/(C-L) = 0.91 Control Delay and LOS Determination ~ i' Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del ~i Grp v/c g/C di Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 0.82 0.06 56.1 1.000 101 0.50 50.4 0.0 106.5 F ~ 28.2 C ~ R 0.14 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.2 0.0 0.2 A Northbound I T 0.92 0.79 9.7 1.000 1504 0.50 11.0 0.0 20.6 C 19.8 B R 0.04 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.0 0.0 0.0+ A Southbound ~ L 0.86 0.05 56.4 1.000 95 0.50 60.4 0.0 116.8 F T 0.61 0.88 2.0 1.000 1667 0.50 1.7 0.0 3.7 A 12.0 B l Intersection delay = 17.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B I ~ ~ SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts Input r EB WB NB SB Opposed by Single(s) or Multiple (M) lane approach Cycle length, C 120.0 sec Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) I~ Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) t Opposing effective green time, go (s) Number of lanes in LT lane group, N ( Number of lanes in opposing approach, No Il Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) Lost time for LT lane group, tL Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/[3600(No)fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) r gf=G[exp(- a * (LTC b))]-tl, gf<=g I( Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] gq, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf Max(gq-gf)/2,0) PTHo=1-PLTo PL*=PLT [1+ (N-1) g/ (gf+gu/ELl+4.24) ] ELl (refer to Exhibit C16-3) EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0} fmin=2(1+PL)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g 1 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] , (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] + [gdiff/g] / (1+PL (EL2-1) ] , (fmin<=fm<=1.00) or flt=[fm+0.91 (N-1)]/N** Left-turn adjustment, fLT For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach ( or when gf>gq, see text. i _ SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET---- ` for shared lefts Input EB WB NB SB l Opposed by Single (S) or Multiple (M) lane approach cle length, C 120.0 sec ( otal actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) L Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) Opposing effective green time, go (s) Number of lanes in LT lane group, N L Number of lanes in opposing approach, No Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) ,Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT 0.000 0.000 Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo ~ Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) Lost time for LT lane group, tL Computation i LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 ~ Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/[3600(No)fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) gf=G[exp(- a * (LTC b)) ] -tl, gf<=g Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] gq, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) gu=g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf n=Max(gq-gf)/2,0) PTHo=1-PLTo j~ PL*=PLT [1+(N-1)g/(gf+gu/EL1+4.24)] EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16-3) EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) fmin=2(1+PL)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g (i, gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] , (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm= [gf/g] +[gu/g] / [1+PL(EL1-1) ] +[gdiff/g] / [1+PL(EL2-1) ] , (fmin<=fm<=1.00) I or flt= [fm+0.91 (N-1) ] /N** Left-turn adjustment, fLT For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>1, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. ~ For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. (i 11 SUPPLEMENTAL PEDESTRIAN-BICYCLE EFFECTS WORKSHEET Permitted Left Turns (i ' EB WB NB SB I Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) Pedestrian flow rate, Vpedg (p/h) I ~ OCCpedg I! Opposing queue clearing green, gq (s) Eff. ped. green consumed by opp. veh. queue, gq/gp Ii OCCpedu ~ Opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) OCCr Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec I~ Number of turning lanes, Nturn ApbT Proportion of left turns, PLT Proportion of left turns using protected phase, PLTA Left-turn adjustment, fLpb Permitted Right Turns Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Confl*icting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) Conflicting bicycle volume, Vbic (bicycles/h) Vpedg OCCpedg I Effective green, g (s) Vbicg OCCbicg OCCr T',Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec Number of turning lanes, Nturn bT portion right-turns, PRT roportion right-turns using protected phase, PRTA Right turn adjustment, fRpb ~ _ _ -SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET Y EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT ~ Cycle length, C 120.0 sec Adj. LT vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Protected phase effective green interval, g (s) Apposing queue effective green interval, gq Unopposed green interval, gu Red time r=(C-g-gq-gu) Arrival rate, qa=v/(3600(max[X,1.0])) Protected ph. departure rate, Sp=s/3600 Permitted ph. departure rate, Ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) XPerm XProt [ Case Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE - Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group [ Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1_ Westbound L 0.0 0.00 56.7 56.1 0.00 0.0 0.0 106.5 0.0 0.0 - R 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.2 Northbound _ 0.0 0.0 T 0.0 0.00 12.5 9.7 0.00 0.0 0.0 20.6 R 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0+ Southbound L 0.0 0.00 56.8 56.4 0.00 0.0 0.0 116.8 T 0.0 0.00 7.4 2.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 3.7 L 0.0 0.0 Intersection Delay 17.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS B L -BACK OF QUEUE WORKSHEET- _ L_ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound f' LaneGroup I IL R I T R IL T 1 ,Init Queue I 10.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 1 Flow Rate 1 183 232 i 1389 57 182 1024 1 So 1 11900 1900 1 1900 1900 11900 1900 1 No.Lanes 10 0 0 Il 0 1 10 1 1 I1 1 0 1 SL 1 11805 1615 1 1900 1615 11805 1900 1 ' LnCapacity ( 1101 1615 1 1504 1615 195 1667 1 Flow Ratio i 10.0 0.1 ( 0.7 0.0 10.0 0.5 ( v/c Ratio 1 10.82 0.14 1 0.92 0.04 10.86 0.61 1 Grn Ratio ( 10.06 1.00 1 0.79 1.00 10.05 0.88 1 I~~ I Factor 1 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 ' AT or PVG 1 13 3 1 3 3 13 3 1 Pltn Ratio 1 11.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1 PF2 1 11.00 1 1.00 11.00 1.00 i Ql 1 12.7 1 35.9 12.7 9.1 1 kB 1 10.3 2.0 1 1.9 2.0 10.3 2.0 1 Q2 ( 10.9 0.3 1 12.2 0.1 11.0 3.1 1 Q Average 1 13.7 i 48.0 (3.7 12.1 ( Q Spacing 1 (25.0 25.0 1 25.0 25.0 125.0 25.0 1 Q Storage 1 10 0 1 0 0 10 0 i Q s Ratio 1 1 70th Percentile Output: fB% 1 11.2 ( 1.2 11.2 1.2 1 BOQ 1 14.6 1 57.6 14.7 14.7 1 QsR.atio I I I ( I 85th Percentile Output: fB% 1 11.5 1 1.4 11.5 1.4 I ~ BOQ 1 (5.6 1 67.3 15.8 17.3 1 QSRatio I I i I 90th Percentile Output: fB% 1 11.7 1 1.5 11.7 1.5 1 BOQ 1 16.4 1 72.1 16.5 18.7 1 QSRatio 1 I I I I 95th Percentile Output: I fB% 1 12.1 1 1.6 12.1 1.7 1 i BOQ 1 17.6 i 76.9 i7.8 20.5 i r~ QSRatio 98th Percentile Output: fB% 1 12.4 1 1.7 12.4 1.8 ( BOQ I 18.9 1 81.7 19.0 22.2 1 ( QSRatio I I I I I I~ ERROR MESSAGES No errors to report. I Il l f~ r~, j HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: BEW Inter.. T } Agency: BRANDAN LEE Area Type: All other areas ,,,f te: 4/16/2009 Jurisd: HDOT riod: PM PEAK EXISTING Year 2009 roject ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-01-07 BLQKHPPMEX E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY . Y, _ _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~~Southbound I L T R I L T R ~ L T R I L T R ~ No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ( 1 1 0 LGConfig I ~ L R ~ T R ~ L T '~~t Volume I I29 61 ( 794 32 I67 833 4r Lane Width ~ (12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ ( 0 ~ 0 -,,r _ x~ Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations , - Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 EB Left ~ NB Left Thru I Thru P Right ~ Right P P ~~r Peds ~ Peds WB Left P ~ SB Left P 4m Thru ~ Thru P P lr Right P ~ Right Peds ~ Peds Right P ~ EB Right L Right I WB Right P P Green 6. 2 9. 0 8 2. 8 Yellow 3.7 3.7 3.7 L All Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs _Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach l.~ Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound C Westbound h"z L 102 1805 0.31 0.06 57.7 E 18.5 B R 1615 1615 0.04 1.00 0.0+ A `~3 Northbound T 1430 1900 0.62 0.75 8.3 A 8.0 A ~q~ R 1615 1615 0.02 1.00 0.0+ A Southbound L 148 1805 0.50 0.08 59.9 E T 1655 1900 0.56 0.87 3.2 A 7.4 A ( Intersection Delay = 8.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A fi,4t (X` ~ - l L ' HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 ~ .I Phone: Fax: ~ E-Mail: _ _OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRANDAN LEE Date Performed: 4/16/2009 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK EXISTING Intersection: T Area Type: All other areas I~ Jurisdiction: HDOT Analysis Year: 2009 Project ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-01-07 BLQKHPPMEX II, E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY VOLUME DATA `t Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R Volume ( ~29 61 ~ 794 32 ~67 833 ~ Heavy Veh~ ~0 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 0 PHF ~ 0.90 0.90 ~ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PK 15 Vol ~ ~8 17 ~ 221 9 ~19 231 Hi Ln Vol Grade ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 Ideal Sat ~ 1900 1900 ~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 ParkExist ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NumPark No. Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 LGConfig ~ ~ L R ~ T R ~ L T ~ Lane Width ( (12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~ ~ RTOR Vol ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 Adj Flow ~ ~32 68 ~ 882 36 ~74 926 %InSharedLn~ Prop LTs ~ ~ ~ 0.000 ~ 0.000 Prop RTs ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 Peds Bikes 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ( l Buses ~ ~0 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 0 %InProtPhase Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R Init Unmet ~ ~0.0 ~ 0.0 ~ 0.0 0.0 ~0.0 0.0 Arriv. Type ~3 3 ~ 3 3 ~3 3 ~ t Unit Ext. ~ ~3.0 3.0 ~ 3.0 3.0 ~3.0 3.0 I Factor ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 1.000 ( 1.000 Lost Time ~ ~2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2.0 I2.0 2.0 Ext of g ~ ~2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2.0 ~2.0 2.0 Ped Min g ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 _k 1 PHASE DATA i Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 .i~5~ Left ~ NB Left E Thru ~ Thru P Right ~ Right P P Peds ~ Peds ~s, It WB Left P ~ SB Left P r~ Thru ~ Thru P P Right P ~ Right Peds ~ Peds NB Right P I EB Right SB Right I WB Right P P ~'r Green 6.2 9.0 82.8 l Yellow 3.7 3.7 3.7 All Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs ,k "r~ _VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW WORKSHEET Volume Adjustment {.3 ~ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound ri`~ I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I L, lume, V ~ ~29 61 ~ 794 32 ~67 833 °~~'~PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ~f Adj flow ~ ~32 68 ~ 882 36 ~74 926 No . Lane s ~ 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 ,,r Lane group ( ~ L R I T R ~ L T Adj flow ~ ~32 68 ~ 882 36 ~74 926 Prop LTs ~ ~ ~ 0.000 ~ 0.000 Prop RTs ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 t Saturation Flow Rate (see Exhibit 16-7 to determine the adjustment factors) C Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound x~ LG L R T R L T So 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 h Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 L fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fBB 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ( fA 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fLU 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 l-~ fRT 0.850 1.000 0.850 1.000 fLT 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 Sec. fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ;~.pb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1805 1615 1900 1615 1805 1900 Sec. _ CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET _ Capacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity A ' Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- ~ ' Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio - j Eastbound ~ ~ Prot Perm Left ! Prot Perm Thru ~ ~ Right ~ Westbound Prot ~ Perm ~ Left L 32 1805 # 0.02 0.06 102 0.31 Prot Perm ~ I Thru Right R 68 1615 0.04 1.00 1615 0.04 Northbound ~ Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru T 882 1900 # 0.46 0.75 1430 0.62 Right R 36 1615 0.02 1.00 1615 0.02 Southbound Prot Ferm Left L 74 1805 # 0.04 0.08 148 0.50 Prot Perm Thru T 926 1900 0.49 0.87 1655 0.56 Right Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0.52 Total lost time per cycle, L = 12.00 sec ~ Critical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc)(C)/(C-L) = 0.59 Control Delay and LOS Determination Y Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C d1 Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 1 f Westbound L 0.31 0.06 49.9 1.000 102 0.50 7.9 0.0 57.7 E 18.5 B t R 0.04 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.0 0.0 0.0+ A Northbound T 0.62 0.75 6.3 1.000 1430 0.50 2.0 0.0 8.3 A 8.0 A R 0.02 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.0 0.0 0.0+ A Southbound L 0.50 0.08 48.3 1.000 148 0.50 11.6 0.0 59.9 E T 0.56 0.87 1.8 1.000 1655 0.50 1.4 0.0 3.2 A 7.4 A dr < r- i~ Intersection delay = 8.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A ~ SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET ~ for exclusive lefts Input r ~ EB WB NB SB Opposed by Single (S) or Multiple(M) lane approach ~ Cycle length, C 110.0 sec Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) f Opposing effective green time, go (s) ` Number of lanes in LT lane group, N - Number of lanes in opposing approach, No Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) ~;r, Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) Lost time for LT lane group, tL Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 t~ Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/[3600(No)fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) gf=G[exp(- a * (LTC b)) ] -tl, gf<=g Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] ,i~~r gq, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) =g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf Max(gq-gf)/2,0) =;;^Ho=1- PLTo ' ~ PL*=PLT [1+ (N-1) g/ (gf+gu/EL1+4 .24) ] ELl (refer to Exhibit C16-3) EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) fmin=2 (1+PL) /g or fmin=2 (1+P1) /g 1 gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (ELl-1) ] , (min=fmin;max=1 .00) ~,;i; flt=fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [l+PL (EL1-1) ] + [gdiff/g] / [1+PL (EL2-1) ] , (fmin<=fm<=1.00) or flt= [fm+0.91 (N-1) ] /N** Left-turn adjustment, fLT ~N;; For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>1, then assume de-facto 4h, left-turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach k'~~~ or when gf >gq, see text . ~ SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts r,,, Input EB WB NB SB Opposed by Single(S) or Multiple(M) lane approach ;~cle length, C 110.0 sec t tal actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) .-w Opposing effective green time, go (s) Number of lanes in LT lane group, N L_ t` ~I Number of lanes in opposing approach, No Adjusted LT flow rats, VLT (veh/h) Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT 0.000 0.000 Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) Lost time for LT lane group, tL Computation ' LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 ',I Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/[3600(No)fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) gf=G [exp a * (LTC b)) ] -tl, gf<=g Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) ~ Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] gq, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) gu=g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf ~ n=Max(gq-gf)/2,0) PTHo=1-PLTo I, PL*=PLT [1+(N-1)g/(gf+gu/EL1+4.24)] EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16-3) EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) ` fmin=2(1+PL)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g Il gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm= [gf/g] +[gu/g] / [1+PL(EL1-1) ] , (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm= [gf/g] +[gu/g] / [1+PL(EL1-1) ] +[gdiff/g] / [1+PL(EL2-1) ] , (fmin<=fm<=1.00) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1)]/N** Left-turn adjustment, fLT For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. t * If P1>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>1, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. Far permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PEDESTRIAN-BICYCLE EFFECTS WORKSHEET_ 1 Permitted Left Turns EB WB NB SB ~ I Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) ~ Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) Pedestrian flow rate, Vpedg (p/h) j OCCpedg Opposing queue clearing green, gq (s) Eff. ped. green consumed by opp. veh. queue, gq/gp OCCpedu Opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) OCCr Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec Number of turning lanes, Nturn ApbT Proportion of left turns, PLT Proportion of left turns using protected phase, PLTA Left-turn adjustment, fLpb Permitted Right Turns Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) t Conflicting bicycle volume, Vbic (bicycles/h) Vpedg OCCpedg Effective green, g (s) Vbicg OCCbicg OCCr Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec i Number of turning lanes, Nturn ' bT oportion right-turns, PRT roportion right-turns using protected phase, PRTA ~ Right turn adjustment, fRpb ~e SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT -'f_~ Cycle length, C 110.0 sec Adj. LT vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Protected phase effective green interval, g (s) y:r Opposing queue effective green interval, gq C Unopposed green interval, gu Red time r=(C-g-gq-gu) a~ Arrival rate, qa=v/(3600(max[X,1.0])) Protected ph. departure rate, Sp=s/3600 Permitted ph. departure rate, Ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) XPerm XProt C Case Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa ~,~~x Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu C Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl i, _ DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE . Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay 111„, Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec °i ~=r A Eastbound 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t_" Westbound x~ L 0.0 0.00 51.9 49.9 0.00 0.0 0.0 57.7 0.0 0.0 t_~ R 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0+ Northbound 0.0 0.0 T 0.0 0.00 13.6 6.3 0.00 0.0 0.0 8.3 R 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0+ Southbound L 0.0 0.00 50.5 48.3 0.00 0.0 0.0 59.9 ( T 0.0 0.00 7.1 1.8 0.00 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 ( Intersection Delay 8.2 sec/veh Intersection LOS A .,,sr _ _ --BACK OF QUEUE WORKSHEET- _Y__ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ~LaneGroup ( ~L R ~ T R ~L T Init Queue ~ I0.0 0.0 ~ 0.0 0.0 ~0.0 0.0 Flow Rate ~ ~32 68 ~ 882 36 ~74 926 So ~ 1900 1900 ~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 No.Lanes ~0 0 0 I1 0 1 ~0 1 1 (1 1 0 SL ~ 1805 1615 ~ 1900 1615 1805 1900 LnCapacity I (102 1615 ~ 1430 1615 148 1655 Flow Ratio ~ ~0.0 0.0 ~ 0.5 0.0 ~0.0 0.5 v/c Ratio ~ 0.31 0.04 ( 0.62 0.02 0.50 0.56 Grn Ratio ~ 0.06 1.00 ~ 0.75 1.00 0.08 0.87 ~ ~ I Factor ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 1.000 ~ 1.000 ~ ~ AT or PVG ~ ~3 3 ~ 3 3 I3 3 Pltn Ratio ~ 1.00 1.00 ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PF2 ~ I1.00 I 1.00 11.00 1.00 Q1 ~ ~0.9 ~ 12.4 ~2.2 7.1 kB I I0.3 1.8 ~ 1.7 1.8 ~0.3 1.9 ~ Q2 ~ ~0.1 0.1 ~ 2.6 0.0 ~0.3 2.3 Q Average ~ (1.1 ~ 15.1 ~2.5 9.4 Q Spacing ~ 25.0 25.0 ~ 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Q Storage i i0 0 i 0 0 i0 0 Q S Ratio 70th Percentile Output: fB~ ~ ~1.3 ~ 1.2 ~1.3 1.2 BpQ ~ I1.4 I 18.1 ~3.1 11.5 ( j QSRatio 85th Percentile Output: fB~ ~ ~1.6 ~ 1.4 ~1.6 1.4 ~ {t BOQ ~ ~1.7 ~ 21.3 ~4.0 13.6 QSRatio 90th Percentile Output: fBg ~ ~1.9 ~ 1.5 I1.8 1.6 BOQ ~ (2.0 ~ 23.0 I4.5 14.9 QSRatio 95th Percentile Output: fBa ~ ~2.4 ~ 1.6 ~2.2 1.8 BOQ ~ ~2.6 ~ 24.8 ~5.5 16.5 QSRatio 98th Percentile Output: fB~ I ~2.9 ~ 1.8 I2.6 1.9 BOQ ~ ~3.1 ~ 26.7 ~6.5 18.2 QSRatio ERROR MESSAGES No errors to report. l i , HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 xi `ri Analyst: BEW Inter.: T j Agency: BRANDAN LEE Area Type: All other areas te: 4/16/2009 Jurisd: HDOT 5, iod: PM PEAK FUTURE 5YR Year 2014 roject ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-O1-07 BLQKHPPMFU i E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY a - _ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY_ _ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound ' I L T R I L T R ~ L T R I L T R - I- - No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 ~ 0 _ 1 1 I 1 1 0 . LGConfig ( I L R( T R ~ L T Volume ~ ~33 65 ~ 794 41 I77 833 Lane Width ~ 12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 _ _ Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ~ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 °ae; '};c EB Left ~ NB Left Thru ~ Thru P Right ~ Right P P Peds ~ Peds WB Le f t P ~ SB Le f t P Thru ~ Thru P P Right P ~ Right Peds ( Peds Right P ~ EB Right Right I WB Right P P ,,;ar Green 6.0 8.8 83.2 ,i Yellow 3.7 3.7 3.7 All Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs _ Intersection Performance Summary t Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach l Lane Group Flow Rate _ _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound "r `n~: C„ Westbound 'fit L 98 1805 0.38 0.05 60.9 E 20.7 C R 1615 1615 0.04 1.00 0.1 A :y,F Northbound T 1437 1900 0.61 0.76 8.1 A 7.7 A s R 1615 1615 0.03 1.00 0.0+ A Southbound L 144 1805 0.60 0.08 65.8 E ~mm T 1658 1900 0.56 0.87 3.1 A 8.4 A ~r ~ Intersection Delay = 8.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A 1(4, l~ `iP ~i HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Phone: Fax: ~ E-Mail: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRANDAN LEE , Date Performed: 4/16/2009 ~ Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK FUTURE 5YR ~ Intersection: T Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: HDOT ~ Analysis Year: 2014 Project ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-01-07 BLQKHPPMFU E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY VOLUME DATA Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound L T R ( L T R ~ L T R I L T R Volume ~ ~33 65 ( 794 41 ~77 833 ~ Heavy Veh~ ~0 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 0 PHF ( 0.90 0.90 ~ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PK 15 VO1 ~ ~9 18 ~ 221 11 ~21 231 Hi Ln Vol ~ ( I 0 i 0 IdealdSat ~ 1900 0 1900 ( 1900 1900 1900 1900 ~ f" ParkExist ( ~ ~ ~ ~ t' NumPark No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ( 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 LGConfig ~ ~ L R ~ T R ~ L T Lane Width ~ 12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 12.0 (12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 Adj Flow ~ ~37 72 ~ 882 46 ~86 926 ~InSharedLn~ ( ~ ~ ~ t Prop LTs ~ ~ ~ o.ooo ~ o.ooo ~ Prop RTs ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 i 0.000 i { Peds Bikes 0 ~ 0 ( Il Buses ~ ~0 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 0 ~InProtPhase Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS - = I Eastbound ~ Westbound ( Northbound ~ Southbound ~ (a L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ( L T R Init Unmet ~ I0.0 0.0 ~ 0.0 0.0 ~0.0 0.0 Arriv. Type ~3 3 ~ 3 3 ~3 3 Unit Ext. ~ X3.0 3.0 ~ 3.0 3.0 ~3.0 3.0 I Factor ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 1.000 ~ 1.000 Lost Time ~ (2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2.0 ~2.0 2.0 Ext of g ~ ~2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2.0 ~2.0 2.0 Ped Min g ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 ~ ~ tti a~ - --PHASE DATA- - ~ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 Left ~ NB Left Thru ~ Thru P ~ Right ~ Right P P °a Peds ~ Peds WB Left P ~ SB Left P ' Thru ~ Thru P P Right P ~ Right j Peds ~ Peds NB Right P ~ EB Right [ SB Right ~ WB Right P P Green 6.0 8.8 83.2 - Yellow 3.7 3.7 3.7 All Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs " _ VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW WORKSHEET Volume Adjustment ~ Eastbound ~ Westbound ( Northbound ~ Southbound 'r~ ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~~lume, V ~ ~33 65 ~ 794 41 ~77 833 PHF ( 0.90 0.90 ~ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj flow I ~37 72 ~ 882 46 ~86 926 y No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0' 1 ( 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 Lane group ~ ~ L R ~ T R ~ L T Adj flow I ~37 72 ~ 882 46 ~86 926 Prop LTs ~ ~ ~ 0.000 ~ 0.000 - Prop RTs ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 ,;a_" `i1 Saturation Flow Rate (see Exhibit 16-7 to determine the adjustment factors) C_ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LG L R T R L T So 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 ,,,y fw 1.000 l.ooo l.ooo l.ooo l.oo0 1.000 fHV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 t_ fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ~ fBB 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fA 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fLU 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 4': fRT 0.850 1.000 0.850 1.000 '~~r -r:~, fLT 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 ~ Sec. Lpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 pb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1805 1615 1900 1615 1805 1900 L Sec. ;4~ CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET _ _ 'Y' Capacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity ~T i I Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group {v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Prot Perm Lef t ` Prot Perm Thru Right Westbound Prot Perm Left L 37 1805 # 0.02 0.05 98 0.38 Prot Perm ~ Thru Right R 72 1615 0.04 1.00 1615 0.04 Northbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru T 882 1900 # 0.46 0.76 1437 0.61 1 Right R 46 1615 0.03 1.00 1615 0.03 Southbound Prot Perm Left L 86 1805 # 0.05 0.08 144 0.60 Prot Perm Thru T 926 1900 0.49 0.87 1658 0.56 Right Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0.53 Total lost time per cycle, L = 12.00 sec l Critical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc)(C)/(C-L) = 0.60 c Control Delay and LOS Determination l Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 1 Westbound L 0.38 0.05 50.2 1.000 98 0.50 10.7 0.0 60.9 E 20.7 C R 0.04 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.1 0.0 0.1 A Northbound T 0.61 0.76 6.1 1.000 1437 0.50 2.0 0.0 8.1 A 7.7 A R 0.03 1.00. 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.0 0.0 0.0+ A Southbound L 0.60 0.08 48.9 1.000 144 0.50 16.9 0.0 65.8 E T 0.56 0.87 1.7 1.000 1658 0.50 1.4 0.0 3.1 A 8.4 A r3. OCCbicg OCCr Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec 1 Number of turning lanes, Nturn ' bT ~s portion right-turns, PRT oportion right-turns using protected phase, PRTA Right turn adjustment, fRpb r~~ f~' SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET _ 4M~ EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Cycle length, C 110.0 sec Adj. LT vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v ~ v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X Protected phase effective green interval, g (s) Opposing queue effective green interval, gq ~ Unopposed green interval, gu Red time r=(C-g-gq-gu) Arrival rate, qa=v/ (3600 (max [X, 1 . 0]) ) Protected ph. departure rate, Sp=s/3600 .t Permitted ph. departure rate, Ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) ~~~`r XPerm XProt Case iti~~ Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu Residual queue, Qr Uniform Delay, dl :yt DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane rv~~ ' Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay =y Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound l_, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Westbound L 0.0 0.00 52.0 50.2 0.00 0.0 0.0 60.9 0.0 0.0 _~s R 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 Northbound 0.0 0.0 T 0.0 0.00 13.4 6.1 0.00 0.0 0.0 8.1 R 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0+ Southbound "y~~ L 0.0 0.00 50.6 48.9 0.00 0.0 0.0 65.8 t T 0.0 0.00 7.0 1.7 0.00 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 i Intersection Delay 8.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS A IlT' z _ BACK OF QUEUE WORKSHEET _ _ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LaneGroup ~ ?L R ? T R ?L T Init Queue ? ?o.o o.o ~ o.o o.o (o.o o.o ? Flow Rate ~ ?37 72 ? 882 46 ?86 926 ~ it So ~ (1900 1900 ? 1900 1900 ?1900 1900 No.Lanes ?0 0 0 ?1 0 1 ?0 1 1 ?1 1 0 SL ~ ?1805 1615 ? 1900 1615 ?1805 1900 ? LnCapacity ~ ?98 1615 ? 1437 1615 ?144 1658 ? Flow Ratio I ?0.0 0.0 ? 0.5 0.0 ?0.0 0.5 ? v/c Ratio ? ?0.38 0.04 ? 0.61 0.03 ?0.60 0.56 ? Grn Ratio ~ ?0.05 1.00 ~ 0.76 1.00 ?0.08 0.87 ~ ~i I Factor ~ ( 1.000 ? 1.000 ? 1.000 ? AT or PVG ~ ?3 3 ? 3 3 ?3 3 ? Pltn Ratio ? ?1.00 1.00 ? 1.00 1.00 ?1.00 1.00 ? I PF2 ? ?1.00 ? 1.00 ?1.00 1.00 ~ ~ Q1 ( ?1,1 ~ 12.3 ?2.5 7.0 kB ? ?0.3 1.8 ~ 1.7 1.8 ?0.3 1.9 ? Q2 ? ?0.2 0.1 I 2.6 0.1 ?0.5 2.3 ? ~ Q Average ~ ?1.2 ~ 14.9 ?3.0 9.3 ? Q Spacing ? ?25.0 25.0 ? 25.0 25.0 ?25.0 25.0 ? Q Storage ? ?0 0 ? 0 0 ?0 0 ? Q S Ratio ~ ? ? ~ ? 70th Percentile Output: fB°s ? ?1.3 ? 1.2 ?1.3 1.2 BOQ ? ?1.6 ? 17.9 ?3.8 11.3 ? QSRatio ? ~ ~ ? 85th Percentile Output: fB°s ? ?1.6 ~ 1.4 ?1.6 1.4 ? BOQ ? ?2.0 ~ 21.0 ?4.7 13.5 ? QSRatio ~ ~ ~ ~ ? 90th Percentile Output: fB~ ? ?1.9 ~ 1.5 ?1.8 1.6 BOQ ~ ?2.4 ~ 22.7 ?5.3 14.7 QSRatio ~ ~ ? ~ ? 95th Percentile Output: ~ fB"s ~ ?2.4 ~ 1.7 ?2.1 1.8 BOQ ? ?3,p ? 24.5 ?6.5 16.4 QSRatio ? ? ~ ? ? 98th Percentile Output: fB~ ~ ?2.9 ( 1.8 (2.5 1.9 ? BOQ ~ ?3.6 ~ 26.4 ?7.6 18.0 ? QSRatio ? ~ ~ ? ? ERROR MESSAGES No errors to report. 1 r' 1 HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 . to N i ~'ix Analyst: BEW Inter.: T ~ Agency: BRANDAN LEE Area Type: All other areas te: 4/16/2009 Jurisd: HDOT riod: PM PEAK FUTURElOYR Year 2019 r Project ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-01-07 BLQKHPPMFUIO 1, E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY ~z ~~~3 Ey _ _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY _ ~ ~ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 LGConfig ~ ~ L R ~ T R ~ L T Volume ~ (44 74 ~ 863 56 ~92 905 ( Lane Width ~ 12.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 It RTOR Vol ~ I 0 I 0 ' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ _ Signal Operations___ v^ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4( 5 6 7 8 EB Le f t v~_ ~ NB Left ( Thru ~ Thru P l Right ~ Right P P Peds ~ Peds WB Left P ~ SB Left P Thru ( Thru P P Right P Ri ght Peds Peds Right P ~ EB Right Right ~ WB Right P P Green 6.0 10.1 81.9 Yellow 3.7 3.7 3.7 All Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 ;~~~r Cycle Length: 110.0 secs _ Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach - Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound ,2, Westbound L 98 1805 0.50 0.05 67.6 E 25.3 C R 1615 1615 0.05 1.00 0.1 A Northbound T 1415 1900 0.68 0.74 9.9 A 9.3 A R 1615 1615 0.04 1.00 0.0+ A , ';~u;~ Southbound L 166 1805 0.61 0.09 63.9 E t-- 1658 1900 0.61 0.87 3.6 A 9.1 A ~f { Intersection Delay = 10.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 I~, ll Phone: Fax: E-Mail. OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ~ I Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRANDAN LEE Date Performed: 4/16/2009 f~ Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK FUTURElOYR Intersection: T , Area Type: All other areas i~ Jurisdiction: HDOT Analysis Year: 2019 Project ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-01-07 BLQKHPPMFUIO jj E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY li, VOLUME DATA _ _ t Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound ~ j L T R ~ L T R I L T R ~ L T R Volume ~ ~44 74 ~ 863 56 ~92 905 ~ o Heavy Veh~ ~0 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 0 PHF ~ 0.90 0.90 ~ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PK 15 Vol ~ ~12 21 ~ 240 16 ~26 251 Hi Ln Vol ~ ~ I 0 I 0 ~ ' ~ Grade ~ ~ 0 Ideal Sat ~ 1900 1900 ~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 ~ ParkExist i I I I ( Jl NumPark No. Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 LGConfig ~ ~ L R ~ T R ~ L T ~ I~ Lane Width ~ 12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 Adj Flow ~ ~49 82 ~ 959 62 102 1006 °sInSharedLn~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l Prop LTs ~ ~ ~ 0.000 ~ 0.000 Prop RTs ~ ~ 1.000 ( 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 Peds Bike s 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 Buses ~ ~0 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 0 ~InProtPhase Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS ~ 1 Eastbound ( Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound ~ ! L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ l Init Unmet ~ ~0.0 0.0 ~ 0.0 0.0 ~0.0 0.0 ~ t Arriv. Type ~3 3 ~ 3 3 ~3 3 ~ t Unit Ext. ~ ~3.0 3.0 ~ 3.0 3.0 ~3.0 3.0 I Factor ~ ~ 1.000 ( 1.000 ( 1.000 Lost Time ~ ~2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2.0 I2.0 2.0 Ext of g ~ ~2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2.0 I2.0 2.0 Ped Min g ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 ~ ~ f_ PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4( 5 6 7 8 ~„111•~ Left ~ NB Left Thru ~ Thru P Right I Right P P ,``x Peds ~ Peds ~ WB Left P ~ SB Left P Thru I Thru P P Right P ~ Right i~ Peds ~ Peds 1 NB Right P ~ EB Right SB Right ~ WB Right P P (Y t~ Green 6.0 10.1 81.9 ~ Yellow 3.7 3.7 3.7 All Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs _ VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW WORKSHEET 1, Volume Adjustment l~ ~ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound I L T R I L T R ~ L T R ( L T R ~~~lume, V I I44 74 ~ 863 56 ~92 905 PHF ~ 0.90 0.90 ~ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj flow ~ I49 82 ~ 959 62 ~ 102 1006 L No . Lane s ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 Lane group ~ ( L R ~ T R ~ L T Adj flow ~ ~49 82 ~ 959 62 102 1006 Prop LTs ~ ~ ~ 0.000 ~ 0.000 Prop RTs ~ I 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 '.a Saturation Flow Rate (see Exhibit 16-7 to determine the adjustment factors) l Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound a,; LG L R T R L T °~r' So 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fBB 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fA 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fLU 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fRT 0.850 1.000 0.850 1.000 fLT 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 Sec. fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 jpb _ 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ( 1805 1615 1900 1615 1805 1900 Sec . _ __CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET _ Capacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- I~ Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c - Mvmt Group (v)__--N (s) --(v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio i Eastbound Prot Perm Left ~ Prot Perm ~,i Thru ~ Right Westbound Prot ~ Perm ~ ' Left L 49 1805 # 0.03 0.05 98 0.50 Prot Perm Thru ' Right R 82 1615 0.05 1.00 1615 0.05 l~ Northbound Prot Perm Left { Prot Perm Thru T 959 1900 # 0.50 0.74 1415 0.68 Right R 62 1615 0.04 1.00 1615 0.04 ~II Southbound t Prot Perm Left L 102 1805 # 0.06 0.09 166 0.61 , Prot Perm ' Thru T 1006 1900 0.53 0.87 1658 0.61 1~~, Right Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0.59 Total lost time per cycle, L = 12.00 sec Critical flow rate to capacity ratio, %c = (Yc)(C)/(C-L) = 0.66 Control Delay and LOS Determination I Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del _ Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound t Westbound L 0.50 0.05 50.5 1.000 98 0.50 17.1 0.0 67.6 E 25.3 C R 0.05 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.1 0.0 0.1 A Northbound T 0.68 0.74 7.2 1.000 1415 0.50 2.6 0.0 9.9 A 9.3 A R 0.04 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.0 0.0 0.0+ A Southbound L 0.61 0.09 48.1 1.000 166 0.50 15.8 0.0 63.9 E T 0.61 0.87 1.9 1.000 1658 0.50 1.7 0.0 3.6 A 9.1 A f t Intersection Bela 10.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B ,,,e~ _ _SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET- for exclusive lefts 'z Input EB WB NB SB Opposed by Single(S) or Multiple(M) lane approach , Cycle length, C 110.0 sec Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) Opposing effective green time, go (s) Number of lanes in LT lane group, N Number of lanes in opposing approach, No Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT <X Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) Lost time for LT lane group, tL Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/ [3600 (No) fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) gf=G [exp a * (LTC b)) ] -tl, gf<=g Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) ,r; Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] ,,~y gq, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) j~=g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf tt Max(gq-gf)/2,0) ' ` PTHo=1-PLTo PL*=PLT [1+ (N-1) g/ (gf+gu/EL1+4.24) ] ELl (refer to Exhibit C16-3) ~ EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) fmin=2(1+PL)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) l fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [l+PL(EL1-1} ] , (min=fmin;max=1.00) ;F flt=fm= (gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] + [gdiff/g] / [1+PL (EL2-1) ] , (fmin<=fm<=1.00) or flt=[fm+0.91(N-1))/N** Left-turn adjustment, fLT . For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. ` For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. l~ For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach a;~~ or when gf>gq, see text. _ SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET _ l~k for shared lefts Input f EB WB NB SB Opposed by Single(S) or Multiple(M) lane approach cle length, C 110.0 sec otal actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) ;aw Opposing effective green time, go (s) 4 Number of lanes in LT lane group, N l-' iSdE Number of lanes in opposing approach, No ,Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT 0.000 0.000 Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo ~ Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) Lost time for LT lane group, tL Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/[3600(NO)fLUO] (veh/ln/cyc) gf=GCexp(- a * (LTC b))]-tl, gf<=g Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] gq, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) gu=g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf n=Max(gq-gf)/2,0) PTHo=1-PLTo it PL*=PLT [1+(N-1)g/(gf+gu/EL1+4.24)] EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16-3) EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) fmin=2 (1+PL) /g or fmin=2 (1+P1) /g li gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] , (min=fmin;max=1.00) flt=fm= [gf/g] + Lgu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] + [gdiff/g) / [1+PL (EL2-1) ] , (fmin<=fm<=1.00) or flt= [fm+0.91 (N-1) ] /N** Left-turn adjustment, fLT For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, ~I see text. * If P1>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. t~ SUPPLEMENTAL PEDESTRIAN-BICYCLE EFFECTS WORKSHEET Permitted Left Turns EB WB NB SB Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) , Pedestrian flow rate, Vpedg (p/h) OCCpedg Opposing queue clearing green, gq (s) Eff. ped. green consumed by opp. veh. queue, gq/gp OCCpedu Opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) OCCr Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec Number of turning lanes, Nturn ApbT Proportion of left turns, PLT Proportion of left turns using protected phase, PLTA l Left-turn adjustment, fLpb Permitted Right Turns I Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) J! Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) Conflicting bicycle volume, Vbic (bicycles/h) Vpedg OCCpedg Effective green, g (s) Vbicg HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 „Analyst: BEW Inter.. T r~iAgency: BRANDAN LEE Area Type: All other areas ~ date: 4/16/2009 Jurisd: HDOT 1 P iod: PM PEAK FUTURE20YR Year 2029 'ect ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-01-07 BLQKHPPMFU20 f's St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY i ;i~;~ ____SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY_ _ ~ Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R ~,r< ~ I-- -I- ' I i --1---1 0 - '';;No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 0 1 1 ~GConf ig I I L R I T R I L T ~I Jolume ~ ~52 92 ~ 1018 73 124 1068 ,r'~Lane wiath ~ X12.0 ~2.0 ~ 12.0 ~2.0 X12.0 12.0 ~ RTOR Vol ~~,Duration 0.2 t,~ 5 Area Type: All other areas _ Signal Operations ?base Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 ~~B Left ( NB Left Thru ~ Thru P Right ~ Right P P Peds Peds ~,~WB Left P ~ SB Left P r Thru Thru P P J' Right P ~ Right 1111 Peds ~ Peds '"rr`NB Right P ~ EB Right Right ~ WB Right P P n 6.0 10.7 81.3 ;~;~Ye 1 ow 3. 7 3. 7 3. 7 All Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs e~ Intersection Performance Summary`_ ~~Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ((mane Group Flow Rate i~ _ l.~=Y'p Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ;~s~ ,s~ J astbound ,Ve s tbound 98 1805 0.59 0.05 74.4 E .u~~ f`~ 27.0 C ~ 1615 1615 0.06 1.00 0.1 A Northbound '"T' 1404 1900 0.81 0.74 14.3 B 13.3 B ~ Z 1615 1615 0.05 1.00 0.1 A outhbound ~r~~ 176 1805 0.78 0.10 77.2 E 1658 1900 0.72 0.87 5.1 A 12.6 B Intersection Delay = 13.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B M HCS+: Signalized Intersections xelease 5.~ 1 Phone: Fax: E-Mail. ~I OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: BEW ` Agency/Co.: BRANDAN LEE Date Performed: 4/16/2009 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK FUTURE20YR Intersection: 'r ` Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: HDOT ~i Analysis Year: 2029 Project ID: LOT D SUBDIVISION JOB #551-01-07 BLQKHPPMFU20 E/W St: PUAPUAANUI N/S St: QK HWY VOLUME DATA _ Eastbound ( Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound ~ ~ L T R ~ L T R I L T R I L T R ~ I _ Volume ~ ~52 92 ~ 1018 73 124 1068 ~ % Heavy Veh~ IO 0 ~ 0 0 ~0 0 PHF I 0.90 0.90 ( 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ~ ~ PK 15 Vol ~ ~14 26 ~ 283 20 I34 297 Hi Ln Vol % Grade ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 Ideal Sat ~ (1900 1900 I 1900 1900 1900 1900 ParkExist NumPark ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ No . Lanes ~ 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 LGConfig ~ I L R ~ T R I L T Lane Width ~ 12.0 12.0 ~ 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 Adj Flow ~ I58 102 ~ 1131 81 138 1187 %InSharedLn~ Prop LTs ~ ~ ~ 0.000 ~ 0.000 Prop RTs ~ ( 1.000 ( 0.000 1.000 ~ 0.000 Peds Bikes 0 ~ 0 I 0 0 0 ~0 0 Buses ~ ~0 0 %InProtPhase Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas OPERATING PARAMETERS _ - - l Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R ~ L T R-- - - I I - - - I Init Unmet ~ ~0.0 0.0 ~ 0.0 0.0 I0.0 0.0 Arriv. Type ~3 3 ~ 3 3 ~3 3 Unit Ext. ~ ~3.0 3.0 ~ 3.0 3.0 ~3.0 3.0 I Factor ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 1.000 ~ 1.000 Lost Time ~ I2.0 2.0 ~ 2.0 2.0 I2.0 2.0 Ext of g ~ ~2.0 2.0 I 2.0 2.0 I2.0 2.0 Ped Ming ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 ~ 3.2 I x ______PHASE DATA_____ ~t~s~ r~?hase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~ 5 6 7 8 i i~ Left ~ NB Left fa~~ Thru ~ Thru P Right ~ Right P P ~ Peds ~ Peds ~WB Left P ~ SB Left P Thru ~ Thru P P Right P ~ Right Peds ( Peds 't dB Right P ~ EB Right I"SB Right ~ WB Right P P 1,~ ~~Green 6.0 10.7 81.3 ~[ellow 3.7 3.7 3.7 f X11 Red 0.3 0.3 0.3 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs 153 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW WORKSHEET n"'Volume Adjustment Eastbound ~ Westbound ~ Northbound ~ Southbound _y~ ~ L T R ~ L T R I L T R ( L T R ~ _ ume, V ~ ~52 92 ~ 1018 73 124 1068 10.90 0.90 ~ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 rzA ] flow I ~58 102 I 1131 81 1138 1187 ~f`No . Lane s ~ 0 0 0 ~ 1 0 1 ~ 0 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 ~~ane group ~ ~ L R ~ T R L T -,~dj flow ~ I58 102 ~ 1131 81 1138 1187 '`FaProp LTs ~ ~ ~ 0.000 ~ 0.000 prop RTs ~ ~ 1.000 ~ 0.000 1.000 I 0.000 ;Saturation Flow Rate (see Exhibit 16-7 to determine the adjustment factors) Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LG L R T R L T ~~0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 G~Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 EW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ~fHV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ~,fG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 IEBB 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 l:~fA 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 a.~•fLU 1.000 1.000 '1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ~ffRT 0.850 1.000 0.850 1.000 L~fLT 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 Sec . { fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 lTfRpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1805 1615 1900 1615 1805 1900 r _ CAPACITY AND LO5 WORKSHEET _ apacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity ~3~ Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c ~f Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound ~I Prot ` Perm Left Prot ~ ~ Perm Thru Right Westbound ~ Prot Perm ~ Left L 58 1805 # 0.03 0.05 98 0.59 Prot Perm Thru ~ Right R 102 1615 0.06 1.00 1615 0.06 Northbound i Prot j( Perm Left Prot { Perm L Thru T 1131 1900 # 0.60 0.74 1404 0.81 Right R 81 1615 0.05 1.00 1615 0.05 f Southbound 1 Prot ` Perm Left L 138 1805 # 0.08 0.10 176 0.78 Prot Perm Thru T 1187 1900 0.62 0.87 1658 0.72 Right l Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0.70 Total lost time per cycle, L = 12.00 sec Critical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc)(C)/(C-L) = 0.79 Control Delay and LOS Determination _ _ Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c Yg/C d1- Fact Cap k - d2 d3 - Delay-LOS Delay LOS Eastbound I Westbound L 0.59 0.05 50.8 1.000 98 0.50 23.6 0.0 74.4 E 27.0 C R 0.06 1.00 0.0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.1 0.0 0.1 A ~ Northbound 1 T 0.81 0.74 9.3 1.000 1404 0.50 5.0 0.0 14.3 B 13.3 B R 0.05 1.00 0 0 0.950 1615 0.50 0.1 0.0 0.1 A Southbound L 0.78 0.10 48.5 1.000 176 0.50 28.7 0.0 77.2 E T 0.72 0.87 2.4 1.000 1658 0.50 2.7 0.0 5.1 A 12.6 B ~ 1, it Intersection delay = 13.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B r- I ________~__,_SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts Input EB wB NB SB l°~Opposed by Single (S) or Multiple (M) lane approach Cycle length, C 110.0 sec r~~~Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) >>~`Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) Opposing effective green time, go (s) l Number of lanes in LT lane group, N ,,"Number of lanes in opposing approach, No Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT :„~~Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo ,'.'`Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) Lost time for LT lane group, tL ,Computation ;ALT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 '`Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/[3600(No)fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) ~~gf=G [exp a * (LTC b)) ] -tl, gf<=g =Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] .~;gq, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) ~~;~xgu=g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf ~~o=1-PLTo {~;PL*=PLT [1+ (N-1) g/ (gf+gu/EL1+4.24) ] ("~EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16-3)~ I EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) l~~ fmin=2 (1+PL) /g or fmin=2 (1+P1) /g ;i~' gdi f f =max (gq-gf , 0 ) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] (min=fmin;max=1.00) _~flt=fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] + [gdiff/g] / [1+PL (EL2-1) ] , (fmin<=fm<=1.00) ~;~~ror flt= [fm+0.91 (N-1) ] /N** -Left-turn adjustment, fLT I `~gFor special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, x~,, 'see text. I * If P1>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto L left-turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. ( For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach ~ or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET _ for shared lefts I npu t EB wB NB sB ~ Opposed by Single(S) or Multiple(M) lane approach I (~C cle length, C 110.0 sec al actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) ective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) i Opposing effective green time, go (s) `.y,~ Number of lanes in LT lane group, N d{F~ Number of lanes in opposing approach, No I'I Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh/h) 1I Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT 0.000 0.000 Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) ai Lost time for LT lane group, tL Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC=VLTC/3600 ~ Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.000 1.000 11 Opposing flow, Volc=VoC/[3600(No)fLUo] (veh/ln/cyc) gf=G[exp a * (LTC b)) ] -tl, gf<=g r Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16-11) Opposing Queue Ratio, qro=Max[1-Rpo(go/C),0] gq, (see Exhibit C16-4,5,6,7,8) gu=g-gq if gq>=gf, or = g-gf if gq<gf ti ~ n=Max(gq-gf)/2,0) PTHo=1-PLTo PL*=PLT [1+(N-1)g/(gf+gu/EL1+4.24)] ~i EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16-3) EL2=Max((1-Ptho**n)/Plto, 1.0) fmin=2(1+PL)/g or fmin=2(1+P1)/g gdiff=max(gq-gf,0) fm= [gf/g] + [gu/g] / [1+PL (EL1-1) ] , (min=fmin;max=1.00) t ~ flt=fm= [gf/g]+[gu/g] / [1+PL(EL1-1) ]+[gdiff/g] / [1+PL(EL2-1) ] , (fmin<=fm<=1.00) or flt= [fm+0.91 (N-1) ] /N** ~ , Left-turn adjustment, fLT ~ For special case of single-lane approach opposed by multilane approach, - see text. * If Pl>=1 for shared left-turn lanes with N>l, then assume de-facto left-turn lane and redo calculations. For permitted left-turns with multiple exclusive left-turn lanes, flt=fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single-lane approach or when gf>gq, see text. SUPPLEMENTAL PEDESTRIAN-BICYCLE EFFECTS WORKSHEET Permitted Left Turns EB WB NB SB Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) l Pedestrian flow rate, Vpedg (p/h) OCCpedg Opposing queue clearing green, gq (s) Eff. ped. green consumed by opp. veh. queue, gq/gp OCCpedu Opposing flow rate, Vo (veh/h) OCCr Number of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec Number of turning lanes, Nturn ApbT , Proportion of left turns, PLT Proportion of left turns using protected phase, PLTA Left-turn adjustment, fLpb ~ Permitted Right Turns Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p/h) T Conflicting bicycle volume, Vbic (bicycles/h) Vpedg OCCpedg Effective green, g (s) Vbicg {t' 1 ~~OCCbicg ~CCr ~.,~Vumber of cross-street receiving lanes, Nrec ~`;YNumber of turning lanes, Nturn ~pbT oportion right-turns, PRT ortion right-turns using protected phase, PRTA 3 h ~ t turn adjustment , fRpb _SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET 5¢ _ _ EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT I~FCycle length, C 110.0 sec .°~;~dj. LT vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v ~s'v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X il~rotected phase effective green interval, g {s) t`;Opposing queue effective green interval, gq r"'~.Jnopposed green interval , gu Red time r=(C-g-gq-gu) ~,zArrival rate, qa=v/ (3600 (max [X, 1 . 0]) ) ~~;,Protected ph. departure rate, Sp=s/3600 Permitted ph. departure rate, Ss=s(gq+gu)/(gu*3600) KPerm f~ ~:XProt ~'~aC a s e ~~ueue at beginning of green arrow, Qa ,,yQueue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu ~~Residual queue, Qr Jniform Delay, dl DELAY/LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane ~~;t~,PPr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet ueue Grou ,s Q p .;Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay I Jroup Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec' d sec L~ ~~F~Eas tbound 3~, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 nlestbound t-L 0.0 0.00 52.0 50.8 0.00 0.0 0.0 74.4 4 R 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 .z?+Northbound j' 0.0 0.0 I T 0.0 0.00 14.3 9.3 0.00 0.0 0.0 14.3 l,~R 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.1 Southbound 0.0 0.00 49.7 48.5 0.00 0.0 0.0 77.2 ?'T 0.0 0.00 7.0 2.4 0.00 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 l_ - v„ Intersection Delay 13.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS B i~, BACK OF QUEUE WORKSHEET - - - 4~~ < l~ Eastbound Westbound Northbound ~ouLnpouna LaneGroup ( IL R 1 T R IL T i Init Queue 1 10.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Flow Rate 1 158 102 1 1131 81 1138 1187 1 So 1 11900 1900 1 1900 1900 11900 1900 1 ~I No.Lanes 10 0 0 I1 0 1 10 1 1 11 1 0 1 11 SL 1 11805 1615 1 1900 1615 11805 1900 1 LnCapacity 1 198 1615 1 1404 1615 1176 1658 1 Flow Ratio 1 10.0 0.1 1 0.6 0.1 10.1 0.6 1 I v/c Ratio 1 10.59 0.06 1 0.81 0.05 10.78 0.72 1 Grn Ratio 1 10.05 1.00 i 0.74 1.00 10.10 0.87 1 I Factor 1 1 1.000 i 1.000 ( 1.000 1 AT or PVG 1 13 3 1 3 3 13 3 I Pltn Ratio i 11.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1 PF2 1 11.00 1 1.00 11.00 1.00 1 Q1 1 11.7 1 22.3 14.1 12.3 i ]tB I 10.3 1.8 i 1.7 1.8 10.4 1.9 i Q2 1 10.4 0.1 ( 5.9 0.1 11.1 4.4 Q Average 1 12.1 1 28.2 15.3 16.7 ( Q Spacing 1 125.0 25.0 1 25.0 25.0 125.0 25.0 1 Q Storage 1 10 0 1 0 0 10 0 1 Q S Ratio 1 1 I I I 1 70th Percentile Output: fB% 1 11.3 ( 1.2 11.2 1.2 i BOQ i i2.6 ~ i 33.8 i6.5 20.1 QSRatio 85th Percentile Output: fB% I 11.6 1 1.4 11.5 1.4 1 BOQ 1 13.3 1 39.5 17.9 23.6 1 1, QSRatio 1 I I I I ~ 90th Percentile Output: fB% 1 11.8 1 1.5 11.7 1.5 1 BOQ 1 13.8 1 42.3 18.8 25.3 1 QSRatio 1 ~ 1 I I 1 95th Percentile Output: ( fB% 1 12.3 1 1.6 11.9 1.6 ( l BOQ 1 14.7 1 45.2 110.3 27.3 1 QSRatio 1 1 I I 1 98th Percentile Output: ~ fB% 1 12.7 1 1.7 12.2 1.8 1 ~ BOQ 1 (5.6 1 48.0 111.7 29.3 QSRatio 1 I i I ERROR MESSAGES - No errors to report. I 1 I f~ I 1 r , ~~i ti. ,.a ~z ~ - - dr APPENDIX H LEVEL OF SERVICE AT NEW DEVELOPMENT UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION i_ AM & PM PEAK HOURS ,~~j~ ~~W~ ' vA ?N t yya~ 1Y~~ I nh .~i u~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY - Analyst: BEW " ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE to Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE 5 yrs Intersection: _ Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHLOTDAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD J North/South Street: LOT D RD ` Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 0.25 _ _ _,_-Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments-___-_ - Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 - - L -T R ~ --L - T - R - Volume 65 4 6 111 f Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 65 4 6 111 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT stream Signal? No No nor Street: A roach- Northbound Southbound PP Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume 19 0 9 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 19 0 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( o ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / Lane s 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound i Movement 1 4 17 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 ~ Lane Config LT ~ LTR v ( vph ) 6 2 8 - C(m) (vph) 1545 856 v/c 0.00 0.03 95o queue length 0.01 0.10 Control Delay 7.3 9.3 OS A A proach Delay 9.3 pproach LOS A I_ i HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 i, I~ Phone. Fax: E -1~a i lk:- - - - •~r,~r~ ~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS____ Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE 5 yrs Intersection: Jurisdiction: Units: U. S Customary Analysis Year: I Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHLOTDAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: LOT D RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 0.25 ` Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments___A` ~ Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R - Volume 65 4 6 111 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 16 1 2 28 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 65 4 6 111 j Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / i RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 i; Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No , I Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 19 0 9 ! , Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 5 0 2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 19 0 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / i RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR I~ _______Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 I Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ` Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 r Upstream Signal Data___ Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance ~ Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal ' vph vph sec sec mph feet i It S2 Left-Turn t Through 55 Left-Turn --Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles ~ 'Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 111 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv> 1.00 l.oo l.oo l.oo l.o0 1.00 l.oo l.oo P (hv) 0 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 ( Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Il t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) Y 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 0 I t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 i Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) - - V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) ~ Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) g(q2) J g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked i' Movement 2 Movement 5 I V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha , beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F I~ Proportion of conflicting flow, f ' Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) i, Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) 0.000 , p (5) 0.000 I , p (dom) ~ ' p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P (1) I i p(4) l i p(7) p(g) , P(9) ~ p (10) p(11) , p (12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 tl L L L T R L T R t V c,x 69 190 190 67 s Px V c,u,x ~ I C r,x C plat, x Two-Stage Process 7 g 10 11 II Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 - - - _ V(c,x) ~ s 1500 1500 (x) ~c,u,x) I C(r,x) C (plat, x) ~ Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations - Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 67 i Potential Capacity 1002 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1002 Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 69 Potential Capacity 1545 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1545 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 1.00 ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 `-"'~onflic in Fl t g ows 190 Potential Capacity 708 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 705 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows+ ~ A 190 Potential Capacity 804 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.99 l Movement Capacity 801 L_ - - - - f Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance l__ Step 3 TH from Minor St. ~ 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage A ~ Conflicting Flows tential Capacity ~destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. l Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 190 Potential Capacity 708 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 705 Result for 2 stage process: a Y i~I C t 705 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 --g - Part 1 - First Sta e ' Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ' ----------g - Part 2 - Second Sta e Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity - Part 3 - Single Stage j, Conflicting Flows 190 ~ Potential Capacity 804 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.99 Movement Capacity 801 Results for Two-stage process: a C t 801 l Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R I ~ Volume (vph) 19 0 9 Movement Capacity (vph) 801 705 1002 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 856 il i Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches r Movement 7 8 9 10 11 - 12 i L T R L T R - - - sep 801 705 1002 Volume 19 0 9 Delay Q sep ~ Q sep +1 ~ round (Qsep +l) n max C sh 856 SUM C sep r n C act I Worksheet lo-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service - Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LTR v ( vp h ) 6 2 8 - C(m) (vph) 1545 856 v/c 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.10 Control Delay 7.3 9.3 S A A [ proach Delay 9.3 pproach LOS A Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay - - Movement 2 -Movement 5 p(oj) 1.00 1.00 ~ v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 111 i v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 P*(oj) 1.00 d(M,LT) Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.3 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 i d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.0 I- I I~ i I i__ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I alyst: BEW ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ~ to Performed: 11/20/2008 I Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE 10 yrs Intersection: Jurisdiction: ~ Units: U. S. Customary ~ Analysis Year: Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHLOTDAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: LOT D RD ( Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 0.25 1 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 I L T R I L T R Volume - - 71 8 - 12 121 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 71 8 12 121 Percent Heavy Vehicles p _ Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? _ Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT f stream Signal? No No ` inor Street: A roach - pp Northbound Southbound _ Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume 38 - 0 18 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 0 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR l ____Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service________ ~ Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config LT ~ LTR ~ v ( vp h ) - 12 5 6 - - _ C(m) (vph) 1532 827 v/c 0.01 0.07 ~ 95o queue length 0.02 0.22 Control Delay 7.4 9.7 S A A proach Delay 9,7 Approach LOS A L_ i HCS+• Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 I'. "'r Phone: Fax• E-Mail. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS - I Analyst. BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period• AM PEAK,FUTURE 10 yrs Intersection: Jurisdiction. Units. U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Project ID LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB$$ 551-O1-07 BLHLOTDAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: LOT D RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 0.25 _Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 71 8 12 121 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 18 2 3 30 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 71 8 12 121 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? ~ Lanes 1 0 0 1 ' Configuration TR LT Upstream-Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 38 0 18 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 10 0 4 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 0 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR ' I ______________________Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 ~ Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ( I,~ ~ Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 I ~ Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 i Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal ~ vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left-Turn ~ I I Through S5 Left-Turn Through f Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles . I _ _ _ _ _ ~ Movement 2 Movement 5 ( Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 121 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R - - - - t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 ( t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t_ P (hv) 0 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t) o.o0 0.70 0.00 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2-stage ( Follow-Up Time Calculations I Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3 50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 I ~ Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals omputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) - - - - - V prog C Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type ' Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g (q1) g(q2) g(q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F ~ Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) l' Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result - p (2) 0.000 p (5) 0 .000 p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? - Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) l for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II p(1) P(4) P(7) P (8) p(9) i I p(10) p(11) p (12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process ! Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 79 220 220 75 (i s Px V c,u,x 1 C r,x C plat,x Two-Stage Process 7 g 10 11 .I r ~ Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 ~ V(c,x) s 1500 1500 f ~x ) . c,u,x) C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step l: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows A 75 Potential Capacity 992 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 992 ( Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 1.00 Step 2 LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 79 Potential Capacity 1532 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1532 j Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 1.00 ( Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 0.99 - - - - ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 220 Potential Capacity 682 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 676 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 t Step 4: LT from Minor St. ~ 7 10 Conflicting Flows 220 Potential Capacity 773 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 ~ Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.98 ( Movement Capacity 767 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance l - - - Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ~ Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows tential Capacity edestrian Impedance Factor 1 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. l- Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 220 ~i Potential Capacity 682 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ' Cap. Adj factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 676 I' Result for 2 stage process• a y i~ C t 676 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1 00 - - Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 l' - Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity ' Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity - Part 3 - Single Stage ~j Conflicting Flows 220 Potential Capacity 773 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 I; Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.98 Movement Capacity 767 l l Results for Two-stage process: a Y C t 767 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 38 0 18 ~ Movement Capacity (vph) 767 676 992 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 827 III L Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ~ Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R sep 767 676 992 ~ Volume 38 0 18 Delay ~ Q sep ~ Q sep +l round (Qsep +1) n max C sh 827 SUM C sep ( n l C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 { Lane Config LT LTR t - - v (vph) 12 56 C(m) (vph) 1532 827 v/c 0.01 0.07 95a queue length 0.02 0.22 Control Delay 7.4 9.7 S A A ~proach Delay 9.7 Approach LOS A ~ Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj} 1.00 0.99 ~ v(il) Volume for stream 2 or 5 121 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 L s(il) Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 V p* (03 ) 0 . 99 L d(M,LT) Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.4 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.1 ~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 r _____TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY E alyst: BEW ency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE ate Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: AM PEAK,FUTURE20 yrs Intersection: Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHLOTDAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: LOT D RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 0.25 _____Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ - - Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume A 83 15 22 142 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 83 15 22 142 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ( Median Type/Storage Undivided / 1 RT Channelized? l Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT stream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume 71 0 34 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 71 0 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 r Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR __Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service__ Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Config LT ~ LTR v (vph) 22 105 ~ C(m) (vph) 1508 776 v/c 0.01 0.14 j 95°s queue length 0.04 0.47 t__ Control Delay 7.4 10.4 ~S A B pproach Delay 10.4 ~ Approach LOS B If l_ HCS+• Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 Phone' Fax• I, E-Mail. i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSTS Analyst: BEW Agency/Co. BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period• AM PEAK,FUTURE20 yrs i Intersection: Jurisdiction. Units: U. S. Customary 1~ Analysis Year: Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-O1-07 BLHLOTDAMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD I, North/South Street: LOT D RD ~ Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 0.25 `__~_______,___Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 83 15 22 142 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 21 4 6 36 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 83 15 22 142 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized~ Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? -No- No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 ---L-----T----R ----L--- T------R----- f - (I Volume 71 0 34 , Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 18 0 8 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 71 0 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR I Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments - Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ~I f Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage ~ 0 0 0 0 _Upstream Signal Data_____ - - Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle- Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph i vph sec sec mph feet 52 Left-Turn ~ Through S5 Left-Turn Through ~i t i Worksheet 3-Data for Cmputing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles f _ - Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 142 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 ( Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Jt Number of major street through lanes: 1 - Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation t_ _ Critical Gap Calculation ~~vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 14.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv) l.oo l.o0 1.00 1.00 l.o0 1.00 l.o0 1.00 P(hv) 1 0 0 0 0 t(c,g) ~I 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,1t> i, o.o0 0.70 0.00 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 ~ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ( 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 I t(c) 1-stage ' 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 L 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30 - t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 5-Effect of U stream Si nals P g L - I - - - - - mputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal r Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) l~ V p r o g----------- ~ - i Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) II Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) g(q2) ~ ~ g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked i~ Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) ~1 Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result P (2 ) - 0. 0 0 0 - p(5) 0.000 ' p (dom} ~ p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II ' P (1 } - - - f ~ P(4) ' P(7} P(8) ~ P(9) ! j p(10) p(11) p(12) Computation 4 and 5 ~ - - - - Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 98 276 276 90 I s - - ~ Px V c , u , x~--- - - - t C r, x C plat,x - - I Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 ~I Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 - V(C,X) I s 1500 1500 1 P (x) ~c, u, x) C (r, x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations - - - ( Step l~ RT-from Minor St. 9 12 Il Conflicting Flows 90 Potential Capacity 973 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 973 Probability of Queue free St. 0.97 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 r Conflicting Flows 98 i( Potential Capacity 1508 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 _ Movement Capacity 1508 Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 1.00 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 0.98 tep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 onflicting Flows 276 C Potential Capacity 635 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity 625 Probability of Queue free St. - --A1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 L Conflicting Flows 276 Potential Capacity 718 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.95 Movement Capacity 708 l_ - - - Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance 1 - - - - - 1- Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ~ Part 1 - First Stage ~ Conflicting Flows ~tential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. l I~ Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ~ I' Pedestrian Impedance Factor ll Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 276 Potential Capacity 635 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity 625 _ l' - Result for 2 stage process: a ~ i y I C t 625 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4 LT from Minor St. 7 ~ 10 l Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage ~T' Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor I, Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1111 Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Y Conflicting Flows 276 Potential Capacity 718 pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.95 Movement Capacity 708 Results for Two-stage process: a i Y I C t 708 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement ~ 7 8 9 10 11 Y~12 I~ L T R L T R , Volume (vph) 71 0 34 Y~ , Movement Capacity (vph) 708 625 973 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 776 - i l Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 -'___-`-L---- T R L T R sep 708 625 973 l Volume 71 0 34 Delay Q sep Q sep +l ` round (Qsep +1) - - - I( n max C sh 776 SUM C sep n C act ` Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ( Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 A Lane-Config LT LTR v (vph) 22 105 C(m) (vph) 1508 776 v/c 0.01 0.14 95% queue length 0.04 0.47 Control Delay 7.4 10.4 S A B roach Delay 10.4 pproach LO5 B ` Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay ' Movement 2 Movement 5 P(oJ) 1.00 0.99 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 142 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 I P*(oj) 0.98 1 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.4 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.1 L_ l~ f~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY I(- - 1 nalyst: BEW "`s~ ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE to Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK,FUTURE 5yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary t, Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID; LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHLOTDPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD ~ North/South Street: LOT D RD F"~~ Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 _ _ - ___Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments__ _ A-__~ Major Street. Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 76 19 16 62 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 C Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 76 19 16 62 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 ``i`~ Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? C_. Lanes 1 0 0 1 t;,~ Configuration TR LT stream Signal? No No - nor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ,gip Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 { L T R ~ L T R Volume 8 0 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 { Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / Lane s 0 1 0 Configuration LTR _ _Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ ~ Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ~ 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 Lane Conf ig LT I LTR ~ : _ _ v (vph) 16 18 ~,r C (m) (vph) 1512 893 v/c 0.01 0.02 95% queue length 0.03 0.06 Control Delay 7.4 9.1 S A A (E proach Delay 9.1 1 Approach LOS p, L~ k,, ~r.•u I~ l HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 Phone: Fax: E-Mail. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSTS - - - Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK,FUTURE 5yrs I Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary 1 Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHLOTDPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: LOT D RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 ___Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 L T R L T R Volume 76 19 16 62 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 19 5 4 16 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 76 19 16 62 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? f Lanes 1 0 0 1 { Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal?-~- No ~ No - Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R volume 8 0 10 T f Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 2 0 2 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles ~ 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration-~ _ LTR _ _ _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments _ Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) ~ 0 0 0 0 ~T 1,0~ Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 - Upstream Signal Data f" Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance ~ Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal '~j~ vph vph sec sec mph feet - S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn r Through l j„t Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles - - ~ Movement 2 Movement 5 P~ '}1 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 62 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1 Number of major street through lanes: 1 Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation l~ _ _ r~~~ Critical Gap Calculation ~vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R r~ t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 ( t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 tom, P (hv ) 0 0 0 0 t(C,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 t~ ' Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 -,4 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2-stage Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R ,i t(f,base) 2.20- 3.50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 fi P (HV) 0 0 0 0 I~ t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 t 1`` Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals 'imputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 ~ V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V Prog - - - - - ~a~ r Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type ~ Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ~ ' Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g (q1) g(q2) 1 g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked j~ Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha j beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F ~ Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) ~ Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result - - - - p (2) 0.000 p (5) 0.000 p (dom) p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Pro ortion P unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P(1) P (4> l ' P P(8) p(9) p(lo) p(11) p(12) ~ _ _ _ Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process f Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Il L L L T R L T R V c,x ~ 95 ~ 180 ~ 180 gg - s Px V c , u ~ x- - l C r, x C plat,x Two-Stage Process ~ Y 7 8 10 11 f X e 111 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 r,,, 5, ~ - v (c ~ x) - s 1500 1500 (x) ;•;`~c~u~x) - i C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations t' ( Step 1 RT from Minor St. 9 12 II Conflicting Flows 86 Potential Capacity 978 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 978 Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 1.00 1 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ~''t _ Conflicting Flows ~ 95 1 Potential Capacity 1512 lll, Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1512 Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 1.00 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 0.99 ,;~z, r tep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 '~~i onflicting Flows 180 ,,.a ~y, Potential Capacity 717 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 ~,•s ~~z Movement Capacity 709 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 l ; - - - - .T~~ Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 180 Potential Capacity 814 r~sti Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ( Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 Il Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.98 Movement Capacity 805 I I°~~ Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance 'L~_ Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows otential Capacity '~'~destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probabilit of Queue free St. a~< Y f Part 2- Second S t a ge------------------------------ l~ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity II Pedestrian Impedance Factor i~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity - - l Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 180 Potential Capacity 717 II Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 709 i _ _ _ Result for 2 stage process: a r y ~I C t ~ 709 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 ~I Step 4: LT from Minor St. - 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage ~ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt ~j Movement Capacity l1 Part 3 --Single Stage Conflicting Flows 180 Potential Capacity 814 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.98 Movement Capacity 805 { Results for Two-stage process: l a Y C t 805 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement - 7 8 9 10 li 12 { L T R L T R II Volume (vph) 8 0 10 Movement Capacity (vph) 805 709 978 Shared Lane Capacity (vgh) 893 (,r~ i` s, Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ,'z r' jlll Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R d~ sep 805 709 978 Volume 8 0 10 Delay 4j'= Q sep Q sep +l ~ round (Qsep +1) e y~i ~ n max C sh 893 SUM C sep n C act t ''tt - s, Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service - k _ _ v;~ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LTR ~,a v (vph) _ 16 18- - C (m) (vph) 1512 893 v/c 0.01 0.02 95o queue length 0.03 0.06 s e~ Control Delay 7.4 9.1 r OS A A proach Delay 9.1 proach LOS A Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay °d - - - - - ( Movement 2 Movement 5 L p (oj) 1.00 0.99 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 62 i v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 1 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 v~. s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 P*(oj) 0.99 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.4 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 i d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or-5 - -0.1 - - f Ij~ ~(~<<fi I~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 t-°; TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: BEW ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE to Performed: 11/20/2008 I Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK,FUTURE l0yrs Intersection: T u~ Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO 1 Units: U. S. Customary l Analysis Year: 2008 ;~~y Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB## 551-01-07 BLHLOTDPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: LOT D RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 ~ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 :c~ _ - L T R I L T R yak Volume 83 38 32 67 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 83 38 32 67 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 °~c Configuration TR LT stream Signal? No No inor Street A roach` Northbound Southbound :.,~r PP Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R ~ L T R Volume 16 0 20 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 [ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 0 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 t~k Percent Grade ( o ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR l 3fi~a __Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service _ Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT ~ LTR 1;~~, _ _ _ v (vph) 32 36 C (m) (vph) 1479 850 v/c 0.02 0.04 95 o queue length 0 . 07 0 . 13 ~ Control Delay 7.5 9.4 t_ OS A A proach Delay 9.4 pproach LOS A h,i( i ' ~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 i I Phone; Fax: E-Mail: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: BEW jj Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 ~ Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK,FUTURE l0yrs l~ Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHLOTDPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD I i North/South Street: LOT D RD ~ Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 ~ _ _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments _ _ I Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume ~ 83 38 32 67 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 21 10 8 17 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 83 38 32 67 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? - No No - - ri Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R • _ ! Volume N 16 0 20 Y Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 4 0 5 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 0 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( °s ) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration - - LTR - -Y- i _ Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments M_~_~ _ Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0~ 0 t _ , ';;Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ,~;~Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ';~~~~Percent Blockage 0 ~ 0 0 0 ,-.'y~ ~r'~N= Upstream Signal Data - -------------g Pro Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal ' ,t~.,,r vph vph sec sec mph feet S 2 Left -Turn Through u, °~~~~,'S5 Left-Turn +~~~a= ~ Through I - - - - ~'~'~,;~,Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles l ~ ~ _ - - ~ ~ Movement 2 Movement 5 - - - - - - 6 7 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: i Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 1 '~~r=~,k", Sat flow rate, major th vehicles : 1700 'w''~'Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 - ,~,w - 'Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation ;,4,<,~ Critical Gap Calculation t" ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T ~ R L T R - - - " ~v~°"- t (c,base) 4.1 7 .l 6 .5 6.2 t(c,hv} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv) 0 0 0 0 '"t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 5'~° Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,I t(3,1t> o.o0 0.70 0.00 0.00 ll~ t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2-stage fi - Follow-up Time Calculations ,iY~ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20- 3.50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 _ ,y~;',~ p (gV) 0 0 0 0 t (f) 2.2 3 .5 4.0 3 .3 Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals : omputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal - - Movement 2 Movement 5 V (t) V (l,prot) V (t) V (l,prot) V p r o g , r ~ Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(ql) g (q2 ) g (q) , Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked - - Movement 2 Movement 5 {l V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha - - I i beta ~ Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result P(2) 0.000 P (5) 0.000 ~ p (dom) I p (subo) l ' Constrained or unconstrained? - Proportion - - - unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process ~1 movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II j P (1) - - - p(4) P (7) 1 P (8) P(9) l p(10) p (11) p (12 ) - t Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 j~ L L L T R L T R ~ V c, x 121 233 233 102 - I i s , i Px V c,u,x r ~ C r , x - - ~ C plat,x - - Two-Stage Process ~,1 7 8 10 11 ~'1 r~~ ` Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 4 V(C,x) s 1500 1500 x) _,i ~u~X) 1 C(r,x) C (plat, x) ` ~a f - '1,' Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations a Step l: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 102 Potential Capacity 959 l Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 959 Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 1.00 l Step 2 LT from Major St. 4 1 `r.4 - Conflicting Flows 121 Potential Capacity 1479 =tr Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1479 ( Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 1.00 l__ Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St . 0 . 98 ep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 - n_, 'Conflictin F g lows 233 Potential Capacity 671 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 ~k Movement Capacity 656 x Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 - - Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 , Conflicting Flows 233 Potential Capacity 760 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.96 s;~ Movement Capacity 744 ~'r~ Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3 TH from Minor St. 8 ~ 11 kf ~ - Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows tential Capacity y`'destrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity '~°m~ Probability of Queue free St. i ' I i Part 2 - Second Stage ' Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity ~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 Single Stage Conflicting Flows 233 Potential Capacity 671 j Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity 656 I Result for 2 stage process: a Y C t 656 ' Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 _ I Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ~ Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 233 { Potential Capacity 760 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.96 Movement Capacity 744 _ .A Results for Two-stage process: a Y C t 744 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations ~ Movement ~ 7 8 9 10 11 12 r L T R L T R I Volume (vph} ~ 16 0 20 Movement Capacity (vph) 744 656 959 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 850 - - a , 1f Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R . sep 744 656 959 ~ Volume 16 0 20 Delay ~~L Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +l) n max - - - - - ~ C sh 850 SUM C sep n C act I Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service - - Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LTR v (vph) 32 36 C (m) (vph) 1479 850 v/c 0.02 0.04 95o queue length 0.07 0.13 y~ Control Delay 7.5 9.4 OS A A proach Delay 9.4 ~_LL proach LOS A ~N Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay f Movement 2 Movement 5 ' v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 67 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 P*(oj) 0.98 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7.5 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.2 ~wE~ 'U r, E~r~ .4' R +r I L_ M r~ ~`Rf r'~_. d ~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 i -x~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY r= i Analyst : BEW ,y,~,ncy/Co.: BRENDAN LEE f e Performed: 11/20/2008 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK,FUTURE 20yrs Intersection: T Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO ( Units: U. S. Customary ~r Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHLOTDPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD North/South Street: LOT D RD Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 _Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ _ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R ~ L T R x,. Volume 97 71 ~ 67 79 - Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 97 71 67 79 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? i Lanes 1 0 0 1 s Configuration TR LT s'r` stream Signal? No No - - \K~ or Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 29 0 38 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 0 38 s`~: Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / l Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR ~ - - _ Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service (A` Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound I Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 1~,; Lane Conf ig LT ~ LTR ~s ~~r _ 1 v( vph ) 6 7 6 7 L C(m) (vph) 1422 765 v/c 0.05 0.09 j~~~ 95% queue length 0.15 0.29 L Control Delay 7.7 10.2 r=,;" S A B r' proach Delay 10.2 pproach LOS B 18 - ~n I~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 { Phone: Fax: E-Mail. _ _~_~TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS i Analyst: BEW Agency/Co.: BRENDAN LEE Date Performed: 11/20/2008 , Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK,FUTURE 20yrs Intersection: T ~ Jurisdiction: HAWAII CO Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2008 Project ID: LOT D, HUALALAI RD JOB# 551-01-07 BLHLOTDPMFU East/West Street: HUALALAI RD f North/South Street: LOT D RD I1, Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ~ Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 97 71 67 79 Y Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 24 18 17 20 ~ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 97 71 67 79 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 ~ Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? - No - No - Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 29 0 38 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 7 0 10 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 0 38 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / / RT Channelized? t Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR __~Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 _ ~r Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walkin S eed (ft sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 g P / ~ Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 __________Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet g - S2 Left-Turn ~ Throu h S5 Left-Turn ' Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 SJ Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 79 Il Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 i,~ Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 ~ - _ Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation - _ Critical Gap Calculation ovement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T~ R _ _ n~~` t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P (hv) 0 0 0 0 ,',~i t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 f' Grade/100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I(~ t(3,1t) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 t(c,T) 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1-stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2-stage - - ~ Follow-Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3 50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P (HV ) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 r Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals mputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) ~ - V prog i~ • Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) ~ Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) , Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) ~ ' Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g (ql) g(q2) g (q) Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked j! Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) - alpha ~ i beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F i~ Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) ;~I Duration of blocked period, t(p) , Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result - ~ p(2) - 0.000 p(5) 0.000 ~ i p (dom) ; p (subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Pro ortion - - P unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process I~I~ movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II li p (1) - - - i p(4) l~ ; p(~) p(8) r p(9) Il p(10) p(11) p (12 ) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 168 345 345 132 1 s "l Px V c,u,x { C r , x - - - C plat , x - Two-Stage Process ~ 7 8 10 11 1 i Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 l` 5 V(C,X) s 1500 1500 P (x) ;fir c, u, X) .k ~ - C (r ~ x ~ C(plat,x) I, Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations ''arc - - - Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 l - - Conflicting Flows 132 Potential Capacity 923 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 s.. Movement Capacity 923 tR Probability of Queue free St. 0.96 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 'r, Conflicting Flows 168 Potential Capacity 1422 ,fTpi~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1422 Probability of Queue free St. 0.95 1.00 Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St. 0.95 teptep 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 `i-'~Conflictin Flows 345 g Potential Capacity 581 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 l_ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.95 Movement Capacity 552 I Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 1 - - - ~ - Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 345 Potential Capacity 656 b>r' Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.95 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.96 }:~#ti, Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.92 Movement Capacity 625 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. ~ 8 11 ` Part 1 - First Stage l- Conflicting Flows otential Capacity ~`~edestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity w~ Probability of Queue free St. ~k r Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity I Pedestrian Impedance Factor i Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 345 Potential Capacity 581 ~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.95 Movement Capacity 552 f _ _ i Result for 2 stage process: a Y ' C t 552 ` Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 r Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ~ Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt ~ Movement Capacity Part 2 - Second Stage ~ " Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj, factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 345 Potential Capacity 656 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ~ Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.95 i~ Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.96 ` Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.92 Movement Capacity 625 1 I Results for Two-stage process: a i Y 1 C t 625 1 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations ~ Movement ~ 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R j Volume (vph) 29 0 38 Movement Capacity (vph) 625 552 923 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 765 - - - Worksheet 9-Com utation of Effect of Flared Minor Street A roaches p Pp r Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R r~,, sep 625 552 923 j Volume 29 0 38 ~ ~r Delay Q sep r- ~ Q sep +l ~ round (Qsep +l) ,r~ - - n max C sh 765 SUM C sep "k n C act ' Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service - _y~ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 r~ Lane Config LT LTR v (vp11) 6 7 6 7 C (m) (vph) 1422 765 f v/c 0.05 0.09 i_ 95% queue length 0.15 0.29 r; Control Delay 7.7 10.2 OS A B roach Delay 10.2 proach LOS g Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 P (oj) - 1.00 0.95 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 79 { v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 n s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 p*(oj) 0.95 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 7,7 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.4 f ~Y,r L. II;~ l+ r--- I r f -ea ~'x r a I _ ' ~ r APPENDIX I TRAFFIC M® EME T DIA RA a V N G MS ~y ~ QUEEN I~A'AHUMANU HIGHWAY & HUAI.,AI-,AI ROAD UNSIGNAI.IZEI) INTERSECTION rr~~ AM & PM PEAK HOURS L, II~~.~, l_ yIII~ `r IIs5 1~ t,u~ ,ry` ~tt It _ - ~ ~ assn a'ahu ~ anu i ay ualal~' 1°ra ~c ov ent - x~~t~n Conditions a ®ur ®7:15 t® e 1 Kona 774 1052 747 27 988 64 Q l ~ 2 64 111 _ 47 HUALALAI ROAD 27 65 ~ 38 Z l ~ f Q I Z W W ( a C'1 ,5 t ~'u 747 47 988 38 f 794 1026 Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 75-5751 Kuawni Hwy, s~ ,o~ Consulting Civd Engineers JN 551-02-08 eo~a>a~o3~z 9870 Construction Managers 11/11/08 ® ®Pa j^ assn a'au ~ anu ivva ualalae oad ~ Traffic overnet ® rojeced Years Peak Hour - 7:15 t® x:15 i4 ~ Kona _ 775 1062 747 28 988 74 I i 4 Q E-~ 74 129 I__ 55 HUA[AIAI ROAD 28 69 ~ 41 Z L___ ~ QQQ I_ Y Z w w l ~ i l_ 747 55 988 41 ~ 802 1029 L-- Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 559-02-08 ~ H~ 108 Consuftmg Civil Engineers 11/11/08 csoe~ssa.oszz Construction Managers L_ (J assn a'a ~ anu a way _ allat ®a ' T'ra ~c ®ve ent ® r®~ece 1 Years ea ®ur - 7:15 t® x:15 Kona 844 1165 811 33 1073 92 i h' Q 2 C~ 2 92 159 67 HUALALAI ROAD 33 [ 79 ~ ---V~~-- 46 z ~ 2 a z w w =U' 811 67 1073 46 I` 878 1119 Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 ~ K ~e H~ ~ 0~ 106 Consulting Civd Engineers < <BO8>~aoszz Construction Managers 11/11/08 to-®- a ~ assn a'aumanu i wa ualalai Roar! Traffic ®vernen - r®jecte 2 Years Peak our - 7:15 to x:15 ~1 t Kona 999 1390 I 958 41 1267 123 f a 1 123 213 t 90 HUALALAI ROAD 41 98 QQQ Y Z w w Q 958 9U 1267 57 1048 1324 Keauhou ~ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 755751 Kuaicini Hwy, sm ,os Consulting Civil Engineers JN 551-02-08 KaOaaKona, w se740 ~ 11/11/08 (~~-~22 Construction Managers I l - 1.1~11 ®~U ~U 1 U~I~'~1 ( ra is v nt - xs~t~n n iti®ns a r - 5:1 t : t Kona 975 844 l 934 41 815 29 j 5. y. 29 ~ 62 33 ` HUALALAI ROAD l-- 41 76 ~ -''r~~~. 35 Z ~LL ~ 2 Y L Q¢ W W 934 33 815 35 I 967 850 Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 755751 KuaWm Hwy, sca ,05 Consuiting Civil Engineers JN 551-02-08 Kadua-Kona, HI 98740 11/11/08 (808)334-0322 Construction Managers I~ I_ Hll°~®-Pa I~ Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway Hualalai Road Traffic I~lovernent -Projected 5 Years PIVI Peak Hour - 5:15 PIVI to 6:15 PNI i Kona 985 848 1 934 51 815 33 f Y:. a C: 33 70 l-- 37 C HUALALAI ROAD 51 95 QZ If j ( QQ i_ Y l Z W W 934 37 815 44 971 859 Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 75575, Kuaktnl Hwy, sta,o5 Consulting Civil Engineers JN 551-02-08 KanuaKona. Hi ss7ao 11/11/08 caoe~ssa-o3zz Construction Managers _ _ assn a'au , anu i wa ualala' ®acl ~ °Tra is ®ve en rct 1 Years ea ®ur ®5:15 ® :1 ` Kona 1080 g24 1015 65 885 39 L Q ~ C7 2 39 83 HUALALAI ROAD I 65 121 ~ 56 Z ~ Q Z W C 1015 44 885 56 f ~ 1059 941 Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 75575, Kuakmi Hwy, spa ,os Consu~ing Civil Engineers JN 557-02-08 Kadua-Kona, Hl 96740 11/11/08 (808)334-0322 Construction Managers L_~ f_ !.1- ®-Pa ~ assn a'aumanu ih~nry ualalai Road ~ Traffic overnent - rojectec1 Years P Peak our - 5:15 P to 6:15 P 'l Kona 1288 1096 !L_ 1197 91 1045 51 Q C7 51 108 t_~ 57 HUALALAI ROAD 91 168 z aQ Z w w ( ~ I~ ~ 1197 57 1045 77 1254 1122 ~-J Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP ~ss~s, Kuawn~ Hwy, sa~.,os Consulfing Civd Engines JN 551-02-08 Kama-Kona, HI X740 11/11/08 ce~~~ Construction Managers L_ C ,,g fti , a ~;~~3, f.~ ~,~r r~,~ sa - ~ :'`s ~ ~ , ~ ° ~ 1. r C APPENDIX J TRAFFIC MOVEMENT DIAGRAMS ~~o i ~ II~JALAI..AI ROAD & HIENALOLI ROAD s~~~ UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ~LL AM & PM PEAK HOUR Cr r i III(k;~~ l_ l~ I~ l + ~i~ ~K I ~ky~ I ~k `3 ~~~t S, ".d _ lJ- ( ualalal ®a - venal I~ ®a ra is ve en - xi~tin ®niti s ea ur - 7:00 t® x:00 56 32 i 38 18 21 11 Q O O Q z w_ 38 11 101 84 cv = 0 Y HUALAIAI ROAD ~ v 0 21 18 ~ 65 62 t ~ ~i;~+~ 44 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 755751 Kuakini Hwy, Ste 108 Consulting Civil Engineers L JN 551-02-08 Kadua-Kona, Hi 98740 11/11/08 (808)334-0322 Construction Managers I- I i u-IBC®- a ualalai oad - ienaloli oad ra is ovement -Projected bears ea our - 7.00 to 8.00 _ 58 35 40 18 24 11 Q O J f O Jj J 40 11 117 88 l_W 77 = ~ o Y HUALALAI ROAD ~ m 0 24 °1 18 74 68 50 50 l_ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 75575, icuakini Hwy, sca ,ae Consulting Crvd Engineers JN 551-02-08 KailuaKone, Hi es~ao 11/11/08 Construction Managers - ualalai ®a - ienal®li ®a - ra is ®ve ent - r®jecte 1 Years ~ ea ®ur - 7° ° t® x.00 i. _ 66 41 46 20 29 12 l ~ ~ O ~ J Q Z W 2 12 133 g9 87 87 co = 0 Y HUAIALAI ROAD ~ v 29 20 89 80 60 - 60 l_ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 75-575, Kuakmi Hwy, s~ ,os Consulting Civd Engineers JN 551-02-08 Kadua-Kona, HI 98740 11/11!08 (808)3340322 Construction Managers r u- a ~ ~ Huaialai Road - Hienaloli oad Traffic ove ent -Projected 0Years ~ P eak Hour - 7:00 to 8:00 A 77 51 56 21 30 13 0 O ~ J O Z W_ 2 56 „ , ~,k 13 164 121 108 ~ F~ 108 Y HUALALAI ROAD ~ 0 t. ~ 38 21 117 100 t 79 79 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP L_ JN 551-02-08 ~75~Of18,,;; ~ 108 Consulting Civil Engineers 11/11/08 teue)3sn-oszz Construction Managers t__ ® GA ualalai ®ad ® Banal®ll ad °Tra lc ®ve ant ® r®jected 1 Years ~ . ea ®ur 7.00 t x.00 I 66 41 46 20 29 12 l O ~ , J ~ a O z w_ 46 , , ~ 12 133 99 87 i 87 = _ ~ ( Y HUALALAI ROAD o 29 20 ~ ( 89 80 l 60 60 l- WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP ~ 75-575, Kuak~nl Hwy, Ste ,os Consulting Civil Engineers JN 551-02-08 Kadua-Kona, HI 98740 11/11/08 caos~as4-osaz ConstruCt~on Managers `r C-- i - - ~ _ ualalao ®a Renal®li ®ad - 1°ra Ic ®ve ent ®r®jecte 20Years ~ Peak hl . ®ur 7.00 ® 0.0014 77 51 56 21 30 13 Q ~ J 0 Z W_ 2 56 164 121 108 108 = Y HUALALAI ROAD ~ >v m 38 21 117 100 ` 79 79 t_ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 75.5751 wmkioi ste ,os Consulting Civil Engineers JN 551-02-08 X40 Construction Managers 11/11/08 I - - - i ( I 1l - ~ ualala~ ®a - penalI~ ®a ra is ®vent - xist~n ®n~t~n~ ea ur-5:15 ®6:15 1__ 'i _ ~ k 32 26 , 25 7 18 8 , O l Q w C 25 8 62 45 ! 37 37 ~ _ 0 Y HUALALAI ROAD ~ o ~ 18 r~ 7 1'_, 76 65 58 58 I~- WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP { 75~i751 Kuak~ni Hwy, see ,oe Consulting Civil Engineers I` JN 551-02-08 Kaaua-Kona, HI ae7ao lvlvos ceo822 Construction Managers i r I ~ ualalai oad - ienaloli Road r- `Traffic ovement -Projected 5 Years P Peak our - 5:15 P to 6:15 P _ 38 29 31 7 21 g O J Q Z _W L . 31 g r 7g 55 L 47 47 = Y FiIJALALAi ROAD ~ o 21 7 86 72 65 65 C WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 7s.s7s, Kua~mu t+wr. sta.,oe Consulting Civil Engineers JN 551-02-08 Keilua-Kona, HI 98740 11H1ro8 ceo9~a-«~~z Construction Managers r l._ I ' j ualaiai ®ad ® ienalli ®aci ~ 1'ra is veent ®r®~ectec! Years ' ea , ®ur ®5:15 t® 6:15 ~ i~ I 48 33 40 8 24 g ~ ~ O ~ j D! O J Z ' _W ~ l-_ 40 - g 99 68 t 59 47 m = 0 1 Y HUALALAI ROAD ~ 1 ~ 0 24 8 m 103 87 79 79 f. WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP ~ 75575, Kuakmi Hwy, s,a ,oa Consulting Civd Engineers ~ JN 551-02-08 Ka~i~a-Kona, Hi 98740 11/11/08 ceoe»z2 Constnaction Managers I t i C _ Flu-o-a j Hualalai oacl - Hienaloli Roar! - Traffic ovement -Projected 20 Years 1, . P Peak Hour-5.15P to 6.15P1V1 1-~ 63 41 i-~ ~ 8 32 g ~l O J L~ O 55 -~a¢~, r .T g 136 9U ~f 81 1 8 = co 0 Y HUALALAI ROAD ~ m 0 32 g 135 111 103 103 L- t_ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 ~ SaKona, m ~~0 106 Consulting Civil Engineers 1v11roe Construction Managers ~3~' 5 ~ pI i ~ f ~ A4. ~ `I ~''11 ~ ~M1 (~~I k l ;~`vt ,n I - xry~ _ _ f s.,,, ' . , ~ 9 ~r, - ; - , s _ n ~ ~ ' 'r~R. APPENDIX K TRAFFIC MOVEMEN'T' DIAGRAMS ~IUALALAI ROAD & PUAPUAANUI STREET .1.; UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION C AM & PM PEAK HOUR rr~,~~ l~ r .f~ ~Fe~ ~p• .±V 1~ ~~1 ( V l~ ~I k L_ Vf't` u,r~ Fj,~ V y~ i ~ ualala~ . ®a uauaanu' treat raff6c ®ve ant ® x~~tin ®nit~®ns ea ®ur ®7:00 t® 46 Kona 76 10 36 7 69 i l 1 I i O ~ _ 10 46 36 PUAPUAANUI STREET 7 - 26 19 l_ Q 2 19 36 36 69 55 Holualoa 105 L__~ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 75575, Kuakini Hwy, see ,os Consulting Ciwl Engineers Kadua-Kona, Hl 98740 11/11/08 reoe»4.o3r~ Construction Managers L li_ 1.1-®- ~ 11~s~'c`~1 ~ ®~C~ ~ - Pua uaanui Street T'raoc ®vernent - r®~ectecl 5 Ye~r~ Peak ®ur - 7.00 t® x.00 52 Kona 87 jj )t. , _ 11 41 8 79 t-- 0 j O 1_ ~ LL 11 r__ 47 36 PUAPUAANUI STREET 8 27 19 1. ` _ l_ 1~ _ 19 41 36 79 60 Holualoa 115 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 Consu~ing Civil Engineers ~v~~ros ceo~~~ Construction Managers i lJ~~~fr~l ~C~ uauaanu~ treat ra is v ent ® rc 1 e r~ ® ¦ a ea ur 7m t 000 76 Kona gg 63 13 9 90 O O 13 1_. 55 42 PUAPUAANUISTREET 9 31 22 l__ 22 g3 42 90 85 Holualoa 132 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 75-5751 Kuak~n~ Hwy, see roe Consulting Civd Engineers Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 11/11/08 Laos>asa-os22 Construction Managers ~ - u--a Hualalai R®ad ~ ua uaanui Street - Traffic Nlovernent - r®jected 20 Years eak Hour - 7.00 to 8.00 [ ~ 100 Kona 121 22 78 11 110 l_ _ Q ~ 22 72 50 PUAPUAANUI STREET 11 37 26 C g rr ~ 1~. 26 78 50 110 ¦ea~ C 104 Hotualoa 160 1__ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 ~ss~s, w~,i ?,Yyv, sm Consulting Civil Engineers 11/11/08 ~eK oe~os2z~ Constn~ction Managers - ualalai ~ ®a ua a u u treat ra is ve ant ® xistin niti® s ea ®ur - y15 t® 6:15 54 Kona 50 12 42 9 41 O ~ 12 25 13 PUAPUAANUISTREET 9 28 19 g Q I_ _ t_ Y, l~ c_ 19 42 13 41 t_ 61 Holualoa 54 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 75-5751 KuaWn~ Hwy, Ste 106 Consulting Civil Engineers Kedua-Kona, Hl 98740 11/11/08 (808)334-0322 Construction Managers { I u ~ ualalaa ®ad uaua~nuo Street ra oc ®vernent ® r®jected 5 Year ~`ea ®ur - 5.15 P' t® 6.15 61 Kona 59 13 48 10 49 t O ~y 26 13 { 13 t(-~ PUAPUAANUI STREET 10 29 19 l 19 48 13 49 67 Holualoa 62 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP [ JN 551-02-08 ~~~s, ~,a~,~ ?+w,,, sc~ ,oe Consulting Civil Engineer$ tv~troa c~»zz~ X70 Construction Managers I ll~'~Ic`7~1 l!~ U~~ l~f tr t ra i~ ve n rjct 1 ea ur®5:15 :1 j 87 Kona 68 19 68 12 56 t O ~ _ 19 34 15 PUAPUAANUISTREET 12 34 22 L` g a I C. 22 68 15 56 90 Holualoa 71 l_ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 75575, Kuak~rn Hwy, spa ,os Consulting Civil Engineers Kadua-Kona, Hl 96740 ~ v~ lioe (806)334-0322 Construction Managers l__ a I - UaOa'al ®aC~ aaa u' street Traffic ®vement - r®je~te Years ea ®ur-5.15 to.15 111 Kona 90 , 25 86 16 74 l I_ O O 25 43 18 PUAPUAANUI STREET 16 L 42 T 26 ( _ 1_ t_ 26 86 18 74 l 112 Holualoa 92 i_ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP i JN 551-02-08 755751 Kueklni Hwy, ste. ,oe Consulting Civil Engineers ~~~~vos X740 Construction Managers (Mai,, l 5=~ 'h Y~y r % ' ~}i r 1r3 II l ~r~ i~ 2~` * mY _ < o ~ ~ _ ~y , ~M~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y~ v (:~r Ar PENI~I11 L Lk,~ TRAI+,FIC MOVEMENT DIAGRAMS d~ ~~ai IIIJALALAI ROAD & LAI~O STREET - UNSIGNALIZED AM & PM PEAK I-IOUR l~ i_m .tN I- i+ r` I I ,S5 _~~~y .i l ° - i t.l~'a~~l ®~CO ak® Street ~ ra ~c ®ve ent - x~st~n ®niten~ ea ®ur ®7: t® x:00 67 Kona 96 13 54 10 86 I~_ r~~' l O 13 221 2os LAKO STREET 10 134 124 l Q 2 l_ 124 54 208 86 L_ 178 Holualoa 294 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 75-5751 Kuak~M Hxy, ste ,o~ Consulting Civil Engineers 11/11/08 Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 (806)334-0322 Construction Managers L_ u- o-Pa ~ ualalai oad Lao street Traffic overnent -Projected 5 Years ¦ . A Peak Hour - 7.00 to 8.00 A 72 Kona 106 rl~ 14 58 11 95 l i Q 14 - 222 i 2os t- LAKO STREET 11 135 124 g 124 58 208 95 182 Holualoa 303 l ~v~ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 ~ss~s, iw~a~ ~ sfe Consulting Civil Engineers X40 Construction Mana ers 11/11/08 Leos>saa-os2z 9 I - ~,ia'a~al ~ a treat 1°a sc a ant ® r®jectc! Years ea r 7® 85 Kona 115 f 17 68 12 103 ~ 1. ` O t ~ 17 C 243 226 LAKO'STREET 12 147 135 g Q i-~ f 135 68 226 103 t 203 Holualoa 329 4 t_ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP l JN 551-02-08 75575, Kuakmi Hwy, s~ ,os Consuftmg CNd Engineers { Katlua-Kona, HI 96740 11/11/08 cso6~~4-oszz Construction Managers L ~ u® a ualalai oa Lao treet Tra is overnent - rojectec! 2 Year Peak our - 7® to 8:00 104 Kona 125 21 83 13 112 O O _ 21 266 _ 245 t LAKO STREET 13 159 146 g 146 83 245 112 229 Holualoa 357 L_ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02 08 75-5751 iwaicini Hwy, ste ,oe Consulting Civil Engineers 11/11/08 X740 Construction Managers I ® - ~ ualata~ ®a a treat ~ 1'ra is ve ant - xi~tin ®n iti®ns ' ea cur ®:1 t® 6:15 54 Kona 61 11 43 9 52 i O 11 120 109 LAKO STREET 9 126 117 Q ( ~ ( _ 117 43 109 52 f l_ • 160 Holualoa 161 l_ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 765751 Kuakmi Hwy, ste ,os Consulting Civil Engineers 11/11/08 Kadua-Kona, Hi se~4o (808)3340372 Construction Managers L- ® m ®0 paw I-~l.~alala! oad Lao Street ~ T'ra ~c overnent - r®jected 5 Years ' Peak our - 5:15 P to 6:15 P 60 Kona 62 C 12 48 10 52 1 D O 12 L. 121 109 t- LAKO STREET 10 127 117 f g Q 117 48 109 52 165 Holualoa 161 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP t l JN 551-02-05 ~~s~ x~w„~++Wr, sue. ,oe Consulting Civil Engineers ~ v~ tios eoais~oaz"z~ X740 Construction Managers f - ® ® ~ ~a~a~ai a treat ~ 1°ra is ve ant ® rjecte Years ' ea cur ~ :15 t :1 r gp Kor?a 67 18 72 11 6 ~ 5 L_ 0 O L ~ 18~' 136 118 LAKO STREET 11 138 127 C 2 127 72 118 56 f_ 199 Holualoa 174 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP L JN 551-02-08 75-575, Kuak~n~ Hwy, spa ,o~ Consulting Civd Engineers Kadua-Kona, Hl 96740 ~ v~ vos ~so6~3a4-o~2 Construction Managers a Hua'a'al ®aC~ Lao street ~ Traffic overnent - Pr®jecte 2 Years Peak Hour - 5:15 P to 6:15 l 112 Kona 73 22 90 12 61 i__ O O D: 151 129 LAKO STREET 12 150 138- g ,r 138 90 129 61 228 Holualoa 190 l_ _ WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 ~s-s~s+ w,~kr~+++~. see ,os Consuftmg Civil Engineers 11/11!08 c oe~°osn ~ 40 Construction Managers t,• ~~a ~A. f 1 r` _ w 1 1 ~ ' ,xq> r s r ~ ~ ~ 1i~° ~f~ed 1 ; x3 ¢ ~ P ` t APPENDIX M ~r. TRAFFIC M®VEMENT DIAGRAMS QUEEN I~A'AHUMANU HIGHWAY & PUAPUAANUI STREET SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION C~~ t AM & PM PEAK H®UR a4 L~ h ~S~tY I l , f ~ ~,1ee11 are ' a ua uaanu~ tree ~ ~ T'ra is ve ent ® x~stin rt itsns _ ea r - 7: ® X030 Kona 772 1106 t 719 53 975 131 I t Q ` ~ L7 131 166 35 ( PUAPUAANUISTREET L_ 53 86 ~ - 4 33 z ~ . z w w ~ I 719 35 975 33 754 1008 Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 7rr575, Kuak~rn Hwy, ste ,os Consulting Civil Engineers .14d 551-02-08 Kailua-Kona, H~ es7no - ~ 11/11/08 c~~3~,-0~~ Construction Managers L 1 t,~- ~ uen a°ahurnanu i way ua uaanui tree p °Tra is ®vernent - r®jecte 5 Year ea ®ur - 7:30 t® 3:30 Kona 773 1116 719 54 975 141 Q _ C7 141 188 47 PUAPUAANUISTREET 54 ~K 90 ,t,-~x. 36 z Z ` w w 719 47 975 36 766 1011 Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 75575, KuakW sYa ,ae Consulting Civil Engineers JN 551-02-08 KaAua-Kona, HI 98740 11N1/OB ~oe~~ Construction Manager; L_ ® ee a®a u ~nu i a ua uaanu~ tree ~ ~ ra is ®ve ent ® rc 1 Years ea ur ®?':3 t i Kona 843 1223 781 62 1059 164 l _ r`' f _ 164 218 54 PUAPUAANUISTREET 62 103 L__ ~ 41 r Z li ~ j QQ L Y Z w w c~ r 781 54 1059 41 835 1100 Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 755757 Kuakmi Hwy, sce ,os Consulting Ciwl Engineers JN 551-02-08 Kailua-Kona, Hi 96740 11/11/08 (808)3340372 Construction Managers - u - -Pa ~ _ ueert a'aurnanu 0 h~ray _ ua uaauo strae p T'ra is ®veertt ® r®jecteci 2 Years _ Peak our ~ 7:30 t® x:30 Kona 996 1459 922 74 1250 209 t a 209 284 75 f PUAPUAANUISTREET C~ 74 125 s t__ ~ ( Q l~ Z W W O 922 75 1250 51 997 1301 Keauhou ~L WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 H" ~ ~ Consu~ing Civil Engineer; 11/11/08 Construction Managers f - ~ ~ uee U ~1'lU 1 a ua uaanu~ tree ( ra is ®ve en - xistin neliti®ns _ ea ®ur ®330 t® Kona 900 855 f 833 67 794 61 l~ { v, Q ~ C~ 2 _ 61 90 2s PUAPUAANUISTREET 67 ~J 99 ~ 32 ( Z (i ~ f aQ I Y Z W W C~ ! ~ 833 29 794 32 ~e 862 826 Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 755751 Kuakmi Hwy, s~ ,os Consulting Cnnl Engineers JN 551-02-08 aos>33Ka-oszi~ X740 Construction Managers 11/11/08 ill-~®-Pa ~ Queen Ka'ahurnanu Hi hway Pua uaanui ~tree~ P I__ 1'ra ec ®vernent -Projected 5 Years Peak ®ur - 3:30 P t0 4:30 PIVI Kona 910 859 833 77 794 65 , t~ ff. ( a 1~ _ t. _ 65 98 33 PUAPUAANUISTREET 77 118 z a z w t_ ~ 833 33 794 41 e~ 866 835 Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-0B ~~5 Hii ~7~ 108 Consulting Civil Engineers 11/11/08 ~~saa-osu Construction Managers I-- t - assn a'ahu anu i ay ua assn u i tree T'ra is ®ve ent - r®jecte Years ea ®ur - 3:30 ® 4:30 1 j Kona 997 937 1 905 92 863 74 Q C7 74 118 t_ 44 PUAPUAANUISTREET - 92 ( 148 l_ Z Q Q Z W W C'1 905 44 863 56 949 919 Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 75-5751 Kuakmi Hwy, see ,os Consulting Civil Engineers JN 551-02-08 Ka7ua-Kona, Hi ss~ao 11/11/08 caoe»,-osa~ Construction Managers u- o-Pa ( assn a'umanu o vvay Pua uaanui stree p 1'raffac ovement - Projectec12 Years P Peak Hour - 3:30 P to 4:30 P Kona 1192 1110 1068 124 1018 92 1 ( a i = C~ 92 144 , 52 1 PUAPUAANUISTREET 124 197 i Z it a z w w C3~ t 1 1068 52 1018 73 1120 1091 Keauhou WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 rii~ e~e7no~ 106 Consulting Civil Engineers 11/11/08 ~Oe~s~~ Construction Managers t, A~"~ I ~G ` r E ' _ ~ ~ " , v;~ a r ` APPENDIX N ~ i T12AFFIC MOVEMENT DIAGIZAMS AT NEW DEVELOPMENT r fi IJNSIGNALIZED INTEIZSECTION AM & PM PEAK DOUR 1_' ~n~ ,a ~k~ s Vk 't 1 -i ((`11r~ 4-..I ~~1 ;'rT r _ - ~ uala9ai a - vl e ra is v ent - ui - ut Year ea u r - 7. t® a 111 111 130 117 19 _ 6 - ca = 0 Y HUALALAI ROAD ~ v 0 65 (~~~,,4 65 ~.,5 . 69 74 4 - 9 . H z w a O J W 4 6 19 9 10 28 L_ WITCHER ENGINEERfNG LLP 75-5751 Kuekmi Hwy, ste ,os Consult(ng Civil Engineers JN 551-02-08 KaduaKona, HI 98740 11~11~U8 (808)334-0322 Construction Managers L_ - a ua4a0a~ ad - evel®ment r °rra is verr~ent - r®jecte 1 Years t s ¦ ea Our - 7.00 t® x.00 i-- 121 121 159 133 38 ~ 12 0 Y HUAfALAI ROAD ~ 71 ~ 71 79 89 _ 8 18 1- z w a g O _ ~u 8 12 38 18 20 56 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP ~~s, ~u,ewm s~ sae Consulting Civil Engineers t JN 551-02-08 ~n~a~on~, Hi s~4o ~eos~as4-o~z Construction Managers i~ ® e ~ _ ualala~ 2t vel nt ~ T°ra is v t ® r®~t ears - a cur ®7a a 142 142 213 164 71 22 ca = 0 Y HUALALAI ROAD ~ °m 83 83 98 117 15 34 L z w a O J W r< D 15 22 71 34, 37 105 l_ it WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP 755751 Kuakmi Hwy, Ste 108 Consuftmg Civd Engineers JN 551-02-08 Kadua-Kona, HI X740 1 an 1io8 ceoe>ssn-oszz Construction Managers a [ ualatai oad - evelornent Tra is ovement - wild- ut Years ~ ea our - 5.15 to 6.15 l sz sa 70 _ 78 8 ~ - 16 co = 0 Y HUALALA{ ROAD ~ 0 76 76 f _ 95 86 LL 19 - 10 H Z w g a 0 J ~ 19 16 8 10 35 18 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP JN 551-02-08 ; 108 Consulflng Civil Engineers 11/11/08 csoe~ssa-osz~ Constructwn Managers I ~ ualalai a evel et T'ra is e e t ® r~ect 1 Years ea ®ur ®:1 t® :15 1 i C l- 67 83 r 99 16 32 t c~ 2 Y HUALALAI ROAD 0 83 ;.~,4~.;,.~.~. 83 _ 121 103 38 H Z W C O o 38 32 16 20 70 36 WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP ( 75.5751 Kuakmi Hwy, Ste 106 COnsuftmg Civil Engineers L JN 551-02-08 eoie»o~2i X740 Construction Managers 11/11/08 l_ A Hualalai ~®ad - ®evel®prnent - Traffic Movement -Pr®jected 20 Years PM Peak Hour - 5.15 PM to 6.15 PM 79 79 108 146 29 ~ 67 2 ~ ROAD Y HUALALAI 0 97 97 168 135 71 38 t- Z w n. O w• ~ o 71 67 29 38 138 67 L WITCHER ENGINEERING LLP L JN 551-02-08 785751~n' ~ 108 Consulting Civil Engineers KaAua-Kona, HI 98740 11h1108 ce0~9sa-oszz Construction Managers l~lr~,~~;ii.~ Ir~~~; -F~a#~~~ ti G;e DEPARTMENT OF iPUBLIC WORKS ~;~ii~Fi``n i}' ~~r! _;,;r i? COUNTY OF HAWAII HILO, HAWAII ~~d ~ :3i~ ~ ~ DATE: June 17, 2009 e ®r~Q1d. TO B.J. Leithead -Todd, Planning Director Planning Department FROM Galen M. Kuba, Division Chief ~ Engineering Division SUBJECT : Change of Zone Application (REZ 09-000096 SLUBA (SLU 09-000022] Applicant: Hu-Ko-Pa,LLC Location: Kahului 2"d, N. Kona, HI TMK: 3 ! 7-5-017:042 We reviewed the subject application and our comments are as follows: Q /NACU 1. All development generated runoff shalt be dis osed of on-site and shall not be p directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared prior to the issuance of any construction permit and the recommended drainage ' system shall be constructed meeting with the approval of DPW prior to final construction approval. 2. We have testimony of offsite stormwater crossing Hualalai Road into property mauka of the subject parcel. Topography maps and development plans on file indicalte the offsite flow will impact the subject property. A Preliminary Drainage Report, included with application in (Attachment 9j acknowledges the potential for offsite runoff. The final drainage study shall address offsite stomtwater and the proposed development plans shall be prepared such that: a. Proposed building sites and infrastructure will be reasonably safe from flooding and designed to minimize exposure to flood damage. b. Pre-development stormwater quality shall not be degraded nor stormwater quantities or peak flows increased from development or from channelization which reduces natural infiltration. c. The proposed development shall not alter drainage patterns upstream or downstream of the development for any storm event except when a flood control plan is approved otherwise. d. We recommend the applicant be required to propose and participate in a ~ comprehensive flood control plan to address the offsite flow in a ma ~ Planning ®~pt.~ Exhibit ~ _-----.~...._._.o...~_ i Me?no to PD- 08.000038 March 29.2006 P.2ot3 will reasonably protect the subject, adjacent properties and downstream properties, meeting with the approval of the DPW. 3. The applicant shall be informed that ff they include dryweils in the subject development, an Underground Injection Control (UIC) permit may be required. The applicant shall comply with chapter 11-55, Water Pollution Control, Hawaii Administrative Rules, Department of Health, which requires an NPDE~ pemlit for certain construction activity. ROADWAYS 1. Roadway connections to adjoining parcels should be provided. All connecting roadways should be constructed to dedicabee standards and dedicated to the County. Concrete curbs, goiters, and sidewalks should be required in areas of pedestrian traffic in conformance with adjoining development and DPW policy. 2. Hualalai Road, the collector street serving the subject property, is a County Road It has an 18-20 ft. wide pavement within a variable right-of-way width, it is substandard based on width, alignment and roadside hazard clearances. The General Plan calls fora 60-foot wide right-of-way for new collector streets. 3. Acxess to Hualalai Road, including the provision of adequate sight distances, shall meet with the approval of DPW. The proposed connection to Hualalai Road, shown on the Master Plan of the application appears to lack adequate site distance and should be master planned further mauka to serve both parcel 42 and adjoining parcel 43. Vehicular access to the (ndlvidual lots shall not be from Hualalai Road. 4. Improvements to Hualalai Road, should be provided according to the County's General Plan. In considering existing and future needs for right-of way, a 5p-'Foot minimum right-of-way width will be adequate to serve as a collector street with paved shoulders ff add~ional right of way is provided where turning lanes will be needed. 5. The applicant shall realign the right-of-way property line along #re entire subject property frontage of Hualalai Road to provide an alignment meeting with the approval of the DPW and dedicate additional right-of -way to the County equal to or more than one-half the difference between the existing right-of-way and the realigned 50-foot wide right-ofway. An additional 5 -foot wide future road widening setback easement shall be provided along the subject property frontage and dedicated to the County upon request at no cost to the County. 6. The applicant shall provide improvements to the entire frontage of parcel 42 along Hualalai Road consisting of, but not limited to, grading, pavement widening, Memo to PD- 06-000036 ` March 29, 2006 P. ~ of 3 drainage improvements, and any relocation of utilities; meeting with the approval of the DPW. Install street lights, signs and markings meeting with the approval of the DI'W, Traffic Division. The applicant shall construct all improvements at no cost to the County, prior to frnal subdivision constnaction approval. 7. Any utility poles in a County or dedicable road right-of-way shall be installed as shown on DPW Standard Detail R-35 (Revised). The applicant shall provide any necessafy easements for installation of such utilities. ' Should there be any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact Khan Emler of our Kona Engineering Division office at 327-3530. KE ~'i copy: ENG-RICO PLNG-KONA ' i ,1 Hawaii county is an Equal Oppord,utity Arovider and Employer i r Ii ~I$ I Q~ .oF WATpR SGq`~ pytr ~q ~y p ~{q~ f L~~~~i~~~y ~,iry~~~Tp1~!~~p~t~tpil ' ~~~liz:~ f ~FS~'YtSi~ 18 qg "o ~ DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY COIT~~4~~ 1~~111~;A~~1 G py\ ~'UpHAWp\\? 345 KEKUANAO`A STREET, SUITE 20 HILO, HAWAII 96720 TELEPHONE (808) 961-8050 FAX (808) 961-8657 June 24, 2009 TO: Ms. BJ Leithead Todd, Planning Director Planning Department FROM: Milton D. Pavao, Manager SUBJECT: STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (SLU 09-000022) REQUEST: AGRICULTURE TO URBAN CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 09-000096) REQUEST: A-SA TO RS-10 ~ APPLICANT - HU-KO-PA, LLC TAX MAP KEY 7-5-017:042 We have reviewed the subject applications and have the following comments and conditions. Please be informed that the applicant is member of Waiaha System, LLC, which has executed a Water Development Agreement ("Agreement") with our Water Board in order to secure water commitments for the development of various properties within the Department's North Kona Water System. The Department will confirm that the applicant has obtained a water commitment, through the Agreement, in the amount of 79 units of water with an average daily usage of 400 gallons per day, per unit (or a maximum daily usage of 600 gallons per day per unit). We will note that water will not be made available for the applicant's proposed 53-lot development until the necessary transmission and storage facilities, as detailed in the Agreement, have been satisfactorily completed and properly dedicated to the Water Board. The Department is currently reviewing construction plans for the installation of a 16-inch waterline to be placed within a private waterline easement within the subject parcel. Water will be made available for the proposed development from the new 16-inch waterline after all necessary water system improvements have been completed, in accordance with the Agreement. Also pursuant to the Agreement, the Department has agreed to provide a 100 percent credit toward payment of the prevailing facilities charge that would normally be required. In other words, payment of the facilities charge will not be required for final subdivision approval. In addition to the above, the following conditions must be met prior to final subdivision approval being granted: 1. Construct necessary water system improvements, which shall include, but not be limited to: a. water mains capable of delivering water at adequate pressure under peak-flow and fire-flow conditions; the minimum diameter of which shall be 6 inches, ~CAI~TI~ b. service laterals that will accommodate a 5/8 inch meter to each lot, t~~~ ~ / / Planning ®ept. 'l~ IlUater brih~~ prc~~fl~lt The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer To file a complaint of discrimination, wnte USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington DC 20250-9410 Or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD) Ms. BJ Leithead Todd, Planning Director Page 2 I June 24, 2009 I c. subject to other agencies' requirements to construct improvements within the road right-of--way fronting the property affected by the proposed development, the applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and adjustment of the Department's affected water system facilities, should they be necessary, and d. fire hydrants spaced no more than 600 feet apart. On dead-end streets, the last fire hydrant shall be located within 300 feet from the last house, or unit, fronting the property line, or to the driveway or access for the properly. 2. Submit construction plans, prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii, for review and approval. 3. Submit the appropriate documents, properly prepared and executed, to convey the subdivision water system improvements and necessary easements to the Water Board of the County of Hawai` i prior to final subdivision approval being granted. A registered land surveyor shall stamp and certify the metes and bounds description within the conveyance documents. However, prior to water meter services being granted to the development, or any lots within, the conveyance documents shall be accepted by the Water Board. 4. Should it be necessary, the developer shall be required to execute an Irrigation Agreement for any ~ irrigation meter(s) installed with the project. The agreement requires that all water use for irrigation purposes be metered separately. Construction plans for the project must show the separate irrigation meter(s) and irrigation system. ,i Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Finn McCall of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070, extension 255. Sincer ly yours, f i Mil n . Pavao, P.E. M ag FM:dfg copy - Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC Carlsmith Ball, LLP i~ i ¢ 1 . ~ William P. KetEi'~i; $ _ , , j ~t~o•.~~~ Darryl J. Oliveira Mayor r, a" . " t • • v FYre Chkj ~'a•`, Glen P. Y. Honda F,fr -y f. ~ n ~ < a s R ~.y~ qh•O% M~` Depu[y I+i?e Chkf ~ouutp of ~acbnaci`i HAWAII FIRE DEPARTMENT 2S Aupuni Street • Suite 103 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 (808) 981-8394 • Fax (808) 981-2037 June 4, 2009 TO: BJ LEITHEAD TODD, PLANI~TING DIRECTOR FROM: DARRYL OLIVEIRA, FIRE CHIEF SUBJECT: STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (BELT 09- 000022) REQUEST: AGRICULTURE TO URBAN CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 09-000096) REQUEST: A-Sato RS-10 APPLICANT: HU-KO-PA, LLC TAX MAP KEY: 7-5-17:42 In regards to the above-mentioned State Land Use Boundary Ainerdment and Change of Zone, the following shall be in accordance: Fire apparatus access roads shall be in accordance with UFC Section 10.207: "Fire Apparatus Access Roads "Sec. 10.207. (a) General. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of this section. "(b) Where Required. Fire apparatus access roads shall be required for every building hereafter constructed when any portion of an exterior wall of the first story is located more , than 150 feet from fire department vehicle access as measured by an~ unobstructed route around the exterior of the building. "EXCEPTIONS: 1. When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the provisions of this section may be modified. ~ " 2. When access roadways cannot be installed due to topography, waterw s nonnegotiable grades or other similar conditionti, the chief may require ad fire protection as specified in Section 10.301 (b). Awq,, Planning Dept. 5~,~.~~E EXO'11b1t ,IUIU 10 2009 0~` Hawm'i County is an Equal Opportunity rove er an mployer. - - i ~ i ~1 BJ Leithead Todd June 4, 2009 Page 2 3. When there are not more than two Group R, Division 3 or Group M Occupancies, the requirements of this section may be modified, provided, in the opinion of the chief, fire-fighting or rescue operations would not be impaired. "More than one fire apparatus road may be required when it is determined by the chief that access by a single road maybe impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions or other factors that could limit access. "For high-piled combustible storage, see Section 81.109. "(c) Width. The unobstructed width of a fire appazatus access road shall meet the requirements of the appropriate county jurisdiction. ' "(d) Vertical Clearance. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. "EXCEPTION: Upon approval vertical clearance may be reduced, provided such 1 reduction does not impair access by fire apparatus and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating the established vertical clearance. "(e) PermissiBle Modifications. Vertical clearances or widths required by this section may be increased when, in the opinion of the chief, vertical cleazances or widths aze not adequate to provide fire apparatus access. "(f) Surface. Fire appazatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the ' imposed loads of fire appazatus and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all- i weather driving capabilities." (20 tons) "(g) Turning Radius. The turning radius of a fire appazatus access road shall be as approved by the chief." (45 feet) "(h) Turnarounds. All dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length i shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning azound of fire appazatus. "(i) Bridges. When a bridge is required to be used as access under this section, it shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the applicable sections of the Building Code and using designed live loading sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. i "(j) Grade. The gradient for a fire apparatus access road shall not exceed the maximum approved by the chief." (15%) t 4 I 6 9 BJ Leithead Todd June 4, 2009 Page 3 "(k) Obstruction. The required width of any fire apparatus access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including pazking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and clearances established under this section shall be maintained at all times. "(1) Signs. When required by the fire chief, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof or both." Water supply shall be in accordance with UFC Section 10.301(c): (c) Water Supply. An approved water supply capable of supplying required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which buildings or portions of buildings are hereafter constructed, in accordance with the respective county water requirements. There shall be provided, when required by the chief, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow. "Water supply may consist of reservoirs, pressure tanks, elevated tanks, water mains or other fixed systems capable of providing the required fire flow. "The location, number and type of fire hydrants connected to a water supply capable of delivering the required fire flow shall be protected as set forth by the respective county water requirements. All hydrants shall be accessible to the fire department apparatus by roadways meeting the requirements of Section 10.207. O EIRA Chief GN:lpc - - ,,,,~~~tV os k~ tT,~' (j • • ~ iii . C~tAi~~~if~€a ~F'A 1 William Kenoi 'r 1{~1°~~(~ Lono A. Tyson Mayor ~ Director ~~O!''N''~ ~ M. Torigoe i ~ ~ ~ ~ Deputy Director j DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 (808) 961-8083 • Fax (808) 961-8086 http•//co Hawai'i hi us/director~d~r envmng htm ' MEMORANDUM " ' Date May 26, 2009 r To BJ LEITHEAD TODD, Planning Director From : LONO A. TYSON, Director ~ ( ° ` f Subject: State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application (SLU 09-000022) Request: Agriculture to Urban Change of Zone Application (REZ 09-000096) Request: A-Sato RS-10 Applicant: Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC TMK: 7-5-17:42 We have reviewed the subject application and offer the following recommendations: _.~DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: R~1=F?z T~_c~Z,dl.e"~L7s T3~.c.~au~ "''WASTEWATER COMMENTS: ( ) No comments ( )Require connection of existing and/or proposed structures to the public sewer in accordance with Section 21-5 the Hawai' i County Code. ( t/~Require Council Resolution to approve sewer extension in accordance with Section 21-26.1 of the Hawaii County Code. Complete D.E.M. Sewer Extension Application. ( )Require extension of the sewer system to service the proposed subdivision in accordance with Section 23-85 ,~°f the Hawai' i County Code. (V) Other: -5t;~~ ~''~'t~1. D ~ 1 nt R ct,c}n-I,~Jj rrL~ rrt p~s4~ ~•1 3'i ~Z2.-'~ TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMENTS: `~a ~r~.JY~v'p~~ ~ ~ c~~iJ~~7~~~, S~~ 1~1~?'~-? ~ h ~ 7 heh ~ ? 1 t~ i s ~1~J`7 ~ SOLID WASTE COMMENTS: ( ) No comments C b.~~ ~ ~ Commercial operations, State and Federal agencies, religious entities and non-profit organizations may not use transfer stations for disposal. Aggregates and any other construction/demolition waste should be responsibly reused to its fullest extent. " ~ ()q) Ample and equal room should be provided for rubbish and recycling. (7p) Green waste may be transported to the green waste sites located at the Kailua and Hilo transfer stations, or other suitable diversion programs. Construction and demolition waste is prohibited at all County Transfer Stations. ' ~ (Ao) Submit Solid Waste Management Plan in accordance with attached id~,lEnes. I' ( ) Otherng Solid Waste Management Plan is to be foc~l~ to the depa ~ t?~c ( ) y VVV ~7 ~~t cc: SWD, WWD 1 It ~~1>Q County of Hawa~`i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer a, _ r ~~tr or~p,~ ~6i William P. Kenoi Lono A. Tyson Mayor Drrector ":•'~i~~~ Ivan Torigoe •~~os~Nt' Deputy Drrector y DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 25 Aupuni Street • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 (808) 961-8083 • Fax (808) 961-8086 http://co.hawaii.hi.us/directorv/dir envmng htm February 12, 2009 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Guidelines INTENT AND PURPOSE This is to establish guidelines for reviewing solid waste management plans, for which special conditions are placed on developments. The solid waste management plan will be used to: (1) promotes and implement recycling and recycling programs, (2) predict the waste generated by the proposed development to anticipate the loading on County solid waste management facilities, and (3) predict the additional vehicular traffic being generated because of waste and recycling transfers. A qualified consultant shall prepare a suitable solid wasfe management plan for review by the Department of Environmental Management. REPORT The Solid Waste Management Plan will contain the following: 1. Description of the project and the potential waste it may be generating: i.e. analysis of anticipated waste volume and composition. This includes waste generated during the construction and operational or maintenance phases. Waste types shall include (but not be limited to): A. Organics (including food waste and green wastes); B. Construction and Demolition; C. Paper (including cardboard); D. Metal (including ferrous and non-ferrous metals}; E. Plastic; F. Special (including ash, sludge, treated medical, bulky items, tires); G. Household Hazardous (including paint, vehicle fluids, oil, batteries); and H. Glass. 2. Indicate onsite sourpe separation facilities by waste type; i.e. source separation bins of glass, metal, plastic, cardboard, aluminum, etc. Provide ample and equal space for rubbish and recycling. 3. Identification and location of the proposed waste reduction, waste re-use, recycling facility or disposal site and associated transportation methods for the various components of the development's waste management system, including the number of County of Hawar`i rs an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer Solid Waste Management Plan Guidelines Page 2 of 2 vehicle movements and associated routes that will be used to transport the waste and recycled materials. 4 The report will include identification of any impacts to County-operated waste management facilities, and the appropriate mitigation measures that will be implemented by the development to minimize these impacts. 5. Analysis will be based on the highest potential use or zoning of the development. REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS 1. A solid waste management plan well be prepared for all commercial developments, as defined under the policies of the Department of Environmental Management, Solid Waste Division. ~ 2. The Department of Environmental Management will require the developer to provide or resolve all recommendations and mitigation measures as outlined in the solid waste management plan; besides any conditions placed on the applicant herein. 3. A State of Hawaii licensed engineer will draft and certify in writing the solid waste management plan as complying with applicable Federal, State and County of Hawaii f solid waste laws, regulations, and administrative rules. Should you require additional information, please contact Michael Dworsky, P.E., Solid Waste Division Chief at 808-961-8515. CONCUR: ' i Lono A. Tyson DIRECTOR i County of Hawai' i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer PI~P~i~li~iC ~iE~'€~~`~ ~~~~ft~~: ~~t;~1{s~l~ LINDA LINGLE t O r Hq IµReERS~on~ GOVERNOR OF NAWAR A,P ~ 1989 R 1 BOARO OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ~ ~ I COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE NANAGGMENT Y~ ~ ~ , RUSSELLY TSUJt Va'^" ~ FIRST UFPVIY j' ~ ~ DEPVIY DIRECTORA}fARA ~ A., AQUATIC RESOURCES ~`~YFa ~~F~" BOATING AND OCEAN RECREATION ~'f"i$~ BURRAU OF CONVEYANCES COMMISSION ON WATER R630URCE MANAGEMEKF ~ _ CONTFIIVATION ANDCOASTAL (ANDS STATE OF HAWAII rnNSERVATIONAND RESOURCES RJFORCEMEM - ~ 6NOItdiGRINO '~+rB°rt DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES xis" oR~iCPRSSERVeno YAHOOLAWE ISI.ATID RESERVE COMMSSION STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION sraT~E ewca 601 KAMOKILA BOULEVARD, ROOM 555 KAPOLEI, HAWAII 96707 June 15, 2009 Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd, Planning Director LOG NO: 2009.1533 County of Hawaii Planning Department DOC NO: 0906TD08 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Archaeology Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4224 Dear Ms. Leithead-Todd: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review - State Land Use Boundary Application (SLU 09-00022) & Change of Zone Application (REZ 09-00096) Kahului 2°d Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii TMK: (317-5-17: 42 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the subject land use application, which was received in our office May 26, 2009. As indicated in the application documents, we have previously reviewed and approved an archaeological inventory survey and data recovery plan for this project area (Log 2006.3276, Doc 0610JT17; Log 2008.1520, Doc 0807MD78); and we have recently completed review of the data recovery report of findings (Log 2009.0788, Doc 0906TD03). The data recovery fieldwork has been completed and there are no sites designated for preservation within the project area. We determine that no historic properties will be affected by this project because: ? No construction will occur in connection with this application ? Development/urbanization has altered the land ? An accepted azchaeological inventory survey (AIS) found no historic properties ® SHPD previously reviewed this project and mitigation has been completed ? Other: In the event that historic resources, including human skeletal remains, lava tubes, and lava blisters/bubbles aze identified during the construction activities, all work should cease in the immediate vicinity of the find, the find should be protected from additional disturbance, and the State Historic Preservation Division, Hawaii Island Section, should be contacted immediately at (808) 933-7653. Please contact Theresa Donham at (808) 933-7653 if you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Aloha, Nancy McMahon, Deputy SHPO/State Archaeologist and Historic Preservation Manager State Historic Preservation Division i Planning ®ept. ~u~~~~ 6 2 Exhibit r ~ t E..,~ Y. N4 LAURA H 7HIELEN ' LINDA LIR~'GL tP,/' ~ cxA~RFERSON GOVERNOR OF HA W~~ ~~l~ i } S ~i ~ ~ ~~~A. ;Y. ~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES t 1 ~,t R + i ' COhAIIS510N ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGET¢NT ~f~~,f , s , Sys ( i \3~ and L~1ij~ ..°dl~`~ iJ d. E ~~~d< , F o , STATE OF HAWAII _ _ . DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES -`2y LAND DIVISION i<T- Std~eofHa~Na`~ POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 ' June 16, 2009 County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attention: Mr. Norman Hayashi Ladies and Gentlemen: i Subject: State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application (SLU 09-000022) Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Department of Land and Natural Resources' (DLNR), Land Division distributed or made available a copy of your report pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR Divisions for their review and comment. ~ Other than the comments from Division of Aquatic Resources, Engineering Division, the Department of Land and Natural Resources has no other comments to offer on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call our office at 587-0433. Thank you. Sincerely, , Morris M. Atta Administrator ,I I Planning ®ept, ~C,~,I~l`~~I) JUN ~0~9 ' Exhibit = ~ ~ r F , 'CE GF. Nq LAURq,M THIELEN LINDALINGLE ~ P \ S s~ EGARDOFLMIDANDR'NA~fIRN.RGSOl.7tCE:7 GOVERNOR OF HAWAII COMMIS510N ON \VATER RESON2CE MANAGCMENT ot`yndandNdr ~4~ qe,"'~~ i ;'~~1~e ~.~?~r~lJ~lJ~ ~c~ wd`~ ii"r~ STATE OF HAWAII jQQ4 J~Pd - 5 ( f DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION i ~teofHa~ POST OFFICE BOX 621 ~~~~~~~~_5, ~ r~ ~<<{~~~ HONOLULU,'HAWAiI 96809 J~i~i ~ (1 C: ~{'~,,,r~ May 21, 2009 MEMORANDUM TO: DLNR Agencies: x Div. of Aquatic Resources • o`oa g"&''6 Recreation x Engineering Division ~ - Ildlife -Div. of State Parks x Commission on Water Resource Management -Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands -Land Division - FROM: orris M. Atta r 1~'`~' ~ SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application (Agriculture to Urban) LOCATIO :North Kona, Hawaii APPLICANT: Steven S.C. Lim on behalf of Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC Transmitted for your review and comment on the above referenced document. We would appreciate your comments on this document. Please submit any comments by June 12, 2009. Only 1 copy of the Application for SLU District Boundary Amendment, Change of Zone, and Traffic Impact Analysis available in Room 220. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact my office at 587-0433. Thank you. Attachments ( ) We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. Co ents are attached. Signed: Date: ~ - ~ . DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION LD/MorrisAtta REF.: SLUDistrictBdryAmendmentKahuluiNKona , Hawaii:436 COMMENTS , ( X) We confirm that the project site, according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), is located in Zone X. The National Flood Insurance Program does not have any regulations for developments within Zone X. Please take note that the project site, according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), ns located m Zone. Please note that the correct Flood Zone Designation for the project site according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) ns _ O Please note that the project must comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) presented nn Tale 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44CFR), whenever development within a Special Flood Hazard Area ns undertaken If there are any ' questions, please contact the State NFIP Coordinator, Ms. Carol Tyau-Beam, of the Department of Land and Natural Resources, Engineering Division at (808) 587-0267 Please be advised that 44CFR indicates the minimum standards set forth by the NFIP. Your , Communnty's local flood ordinance may prove to be more restnctnve and thus take precedence over the minimum NFiP standards, If there are questions regardnng the local flood ordinances, please contact the applncable County NFIP Coordinators below: Mr Robert Sumntomo at (808) 768-8097 or Mr. Marno Siu Li at (808) 768-8098 of the Cnty and County of Honolulu, Department of Planning and Permnttmg. , Mr. Kelly Gomes at (808) 961-8327 (Hnlo) or Mr. Khan Emler at (808) 327-3530 (Kona) of the County of Hawai, Department of Public Works O Mr. Francis Cerizo at (808) 270-7771 of the County of Maui, Department of Planning. O Mr. Marro Antonio at (808) 241-6620 of the County of Kauai, Department of Public Works. The applncant should include water demands and infrastructure requnred to meet project needs ' Please note that projects wnthin State lands requiring water senvnce from the Honolulu Board of ~ Water Supply system will be requnred to pay a resource development charge, in addition to Water Facnlrtnes Charges for transmnssnon and danly storage. O The applicant should provnde the water demands and calculations to the Engineering Dnvnsnon so tt can be included in the State Water Projects Plan Update. O Additional Comments. O Other: Should you have any questnons, please call Ms. Suzie S. Agraan of the Planning Branch at 587-0258 Sngned. HI ,CHIEF ENGINEER Date. l4 y d I I I t E.. ~ F.. Nq LAURA N THIELEN LWDALINGLE ~P v, EGARDGFLMDIND RESOU1lCCs GOVERNOR OF NAWAI) COMMIS510N ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGCMEM Y ~ AQUATIC ~ RESOURCES• ~ot~d and Nat~4ei ®ra~i9NA~'A DIRECTOR . _ ~ COMM FISH ~ ~ • ~ STATE OF HAWAII A RESlENV DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES A REC LAND DIVISION PLANNER 'r~teofHav+~ POST OFFICE BOX 621 STAFF SVCS HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 RCUH/UH STAT/STiCS May 21, 2009 AFRC/FED A(D EDUCATION SECRETARY MEMORANDUM OFFICE SVCS TECH ASST TO: LNR Agencies: iv. of A uatic Reso c Re„„T, ~o, FtECFj _Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation No cop,as CP ICS lG' F4 x Engineering Division a„e r)Rle• MAY _Div. of Forestry & Wildlife ~ ;y r a r_ p ?2 ?OQy _Div. of State Parks -dry t ~ w 9~ x Commission on Water Resource Management ~ ~ ~ ~ ESOl1 -Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands - ; ~w r*: Land Division - ~ ~ ~ v~'"''' FROM: orris M. Atta ` ~ ci ~ SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application (Agriculture to Urban) LOCATIO :North Kona, Hawaii APPLICANT: Steven S.C. Lim on behalf of Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC Transmitted for your review and comment on the above referenced document. We would appreciate your comments on this document. Please submit any comments by June 12, 2009. Is c en , o n , ysls . If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact my office at 587-0433. Thank you. Attachments ( c~ We have no objections. We have no comments. ( ) Comments are attached. Q ~ u?UP~ 2on9 Signed: F~c~~ +?.,aw-rel.+F~.rw Date: 63' - - - - j I yy ~JatV oI°„,,Y W1111a~F'f~4g,t a a, ,a 'f f i € Mayon- ~ Stephen J Arnett t ' ~ Hous~ngAdmrnutrator 7P ~ gaup o~ a~~f f OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 50 Wailuku Dnve • Hilo, Hawa~'~ 96720-2484 ~ V/T`I' (808) 961-8379 • FAX (808) 961-8685 June 10, 2009 ' MEMORANDUM TO: Bobby-Jean Leithead Todd ' Planning Department FROM: ".,~5 phen J. Arnett Housing Administrator i SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 09-000022) Request: Agriculture to Urban Change of Zone Application (REZ 09-000096) Request: A-5a to RS-10 Applicant: Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC Tax Map: (3) 7-5-017:042 Pursuant to Hawaii County Code, Chapter 11, Housing, are ' applicable to the request. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. ' i ii ' JUN 10 2 09 05~~~.4 • Planning ®ept. ' G: \PLANNING\1763pasr. doc Exhibit ~ ' EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ~ °HAWAI 1 COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY PROVIDER AND EMPLOYER' LINDA LINGLE c a ~ CHIYOME L. FUKINO, M.D. GOVERNOR ~~t ~gsg ~ ~ Director of Health F~, W~''~~ fl`f 2 fi ~~1 I~~ ~ ! STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH P.O BOX 916 HILO, HAWA1196721-0916 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 21, 2009 TO: BJ Leithead Todd Planning Director, County of Hawaii FROM: Newton Inouye Acting District Environmental Health Program Chief SUBTECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application (SLU 09-000022) Request: Agriculture to Urban Change of Zone Application (REZ 09-000096) Request: A-Sato RS-10 Applicant: Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC Tax Map Key: 7-5-17:42 The submittals for the subject development have been transmitted to our Environmental Management programs for their coordinated review and comments. Upon receipt of their reply, their comments will be forwarded to your office. WORD SLU-09-000022 at c: Environmental Planning Office sr:.~r~ ! Planning Dept. MAY 26 ~pp~ Exhibit 0 5 3.10' ~ , - ` it q,~nl3Sx it ~l ~„'i lfr~~b~`Y`. §'S~ ,(P~~r1859~99 LINDALINGLE S~'~,`~~} ~ ~ ~ l 1 CHIYOMEL FUKINO,MD GOVERNOR OF HAWAII i t® DIRECTOR OF HEALTH ~k a+~ ®aA p STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH In reply, please refer to P 0 BOX 3378 DOHICWB HONOLULU, HI 96801-3378 06108PSS 09 June 29, 2009 Ms. Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd Director Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Leithead-Todd: Subject: Comments on the State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application (SLU 09-000022), Agriculture to Urban by Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC North Kona, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii , TMK: (3) 7-5-017:042 Reference 09-086 The Department of Health, Clean Water Branch (CWB), has reviewed the subject document ' and offers these comments on your project. Please note that our review is based solely on the information provided in the subject document and its compliance with Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR), Chapters 11-54 and 11-55. You may be responsible for fulfilling additional , requirements related to our program. We recommend that you also read our standard comments on our website at http://www.hawaii. gov/health/environmental/env-planning/landuse/C WB-standardcomment.pdf. 1. Any project and its potential impacts to State waters must meet the following criteria: a. Antidegradation policy (HAR, Section 11-54-1.1), which requires that the existing uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses of the receiving State water be maintained and protected. b. Designated uses (HAR, Section 11-54-3), as determined by the classification of the receiving State waters. ' c. Water quality criteria (HAR, Sections 11-54-4 through 11-54-8). 2 The Army Corps of Engineers should be contacted at (808) 438-9258 to see if this project requires a Department of the Army (DA) permit. Permits may be required for work erformed ; in, over, and under navigable waters of the United States. Projects requiring a D it~l~~~ require a Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) from our office. JUL - LUU9 ~yp.~.~.2~... Ms. Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd 06108PSS.09 June 29, 2009 Page 2 3. You may be required to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for dischazges of wastewater, including storm water runoff, into State surface waters (HAR, Chapter 11-55). For the following types of dischazges into Class A or Class 2 State waters, you may apply for NPDES general permit coverage by submitting the applicable Notice of Intent (NOI) form: a. Storm water associated with construction activities, including excavation, grading, clearing, demolition, uprooting of vegetation, equipment staging, and storage areas that result in the disturbance of equal to or greater than one (1) acre of total land area. The total land azea includes a contiguous area where multiple separate and distinct construction activities may be taking place at different times on different schedules under a larger common plan of development or sale. An NPDES permit is required before the start of the construction activities. b. Dischazges of hydrotesting water. c. Discharges of construction activity dewatering. You must submit a separate NOI form for each type of discharge at least 30 calendar days prior to the start of the discharge activity, except when applying for coverage for discharges of storm water associated with construction activity. For this type of discharge, the NOI must be submitted 30 calendaz days before the start of construction activities. The NOI forms may be picked up at our office or downloaded from our website at http://www.hawaii ~ov/health/environmental/water/cleanwater/forms/genl-index.html. 4. For types of wastewater dischazges not covered by an NPDES general permit or discharges to Class AA or Class 1 State waters, you may need an NPDES individual permit. An application for an NPDES individual permit must be submitted at least 180 calendar days before the commencement of the discharge. The NPDES application forms may be picked up at our office or downloaded from our website at http://www.hawaii. gov/health/environmental/water/cleanwater/forms/indiv-index.html. 5. You must also submit a copy of the NOI or NPDES permit application to the State DLNR, State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD), or demonstrate to the satisfaction of the CWB that SHPD has or is in the process of evaluating your project. Please submit a copy of your request for review by SHPD or SHPD's determination letter for the project along with your NOI or NPDES permit application, as applicable. 6. Please note that all discharges related to the project construction or operation activities, whether or not NPDES permit coverage and/or Section 401 WQC are required, must comply with the Water Quality Standazds. Noncompliance with water quality requirements contained in HAR, Chapter 11-54, and/or permitting requirements, specified in HAR, Chapter 11-55, may be subject to penalties of $25,000 per day per violation. ~ - - - I` Ms. Bobby Jean Leithead-Todd 06108PSS.09 June 29, 2009 Page 3 If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shane Sumida of the Engineering Section, CWB, at (808) 586-4309. Sincerely, ALEC WONG, P.E., C I F Clean Water Branch SS:np c: Mr. Jiacai Liu, EPO [via e-mail only] I ~R I~~,~A9~~~'yg11!E~~ ~P~~l;'~~~T LINDA LINGLE o F GOVERNOR ~P<: •9~ BRENNON T. MORIOKA f ~ ~ ~ ; DIRECTOR t Deputy Diregors ~ ~ MICHAEL D FORMBY ~ FRANCIS PAUL KEENO aq,®,~•p,~~ BRIAN H SEKIGUCHI JIRO A SUtutADA STATE OF HAWAII IN REPLY REFER TO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813-5097 STP 8.3289 June 13, 2009 Ms. Bobby Jean Liethead-Todd Director Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720-3043 Dear Ms. Liethead-Todd: Subject: Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 09-000022) and Change of Zone (REZ 09-000096) Applications Thank you for providing the subject project for the State Department of Transportation's (DOT) review and comments. DOT understands that the applicant proposes to develop a single family residential subdivision of approximately fifty-three (53) lots on approximately 14.437 acres. The primary access to the subdivision will be via Paulihia Street from the adjacent Pualani Estates subdivision, which will provide access to Queen Kaahumanu Highway at a signalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street. Further, a secondary access will be from Hualalai Road, which will provide access to Queen Kaahumanu Highway at an unsignalized intersection. The subdivision roads will provide connectivity between Paulihia Street and Hualalai Road. The DOT submits the following comments. 1. The project access roads are under the jurisdiction of the County of Hawaii. These internal subdivision roads will provide connectivity between Hualalai Road and Puapuaanui Street and will aid local and regional traffic circulation. 2. The subject 53-lot residential subdivision is not anticipated to generate significant adverse impacts to the surrounding State highways system, however, some of the characteristics and descriptions in the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) are a bit confusing as the TIAR does not follow general standard practices. There also appears to be a few inco the traffic volumes presented and use~~Qnningigtl ceap~city calculations. rExhlbit P7 ~ I ~ E Ms. Bobby Jean Liethead-Todd STP 8.3289 Page 2 June 13, 2009 3. DOT requests that the applicant provide a copy of the application and TIAR on CD-ROM disc, in PDF format, for DOT Highways Division's files. The requested material can be sent directly to the Highways Division Planning Branch at 869 Punchbowl Street, 3~d Floor, , Honolulu, Hawaii 96813. DOT appreciates the opportunity to provide comments. If there are any questions, please contact Mr. David Shimokawa of the DOT Statewide Transportation Planning Office at (808) 587-2356. Very truly yours, r BRENNON T. MORIOKA, PH.D., P.E. Director of Transportation LINDA UP;L•3LE GOVERNOR tE cv Hy PATRICIAHAMAMOTO q P a ase p y SUPERINiENOENT v.~ a~®~ ,JJs~ ~ ~a ~Q: ~ d STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION P O BOX 2360 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96804 OFFICE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES AND SUPPORT SERVICES i June 15, 2009 Ms. BJ Leithead Todd, Director County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Leithead: Subject: The Hu-Ko-Pa Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone Application Kahului, North Kona, TMK: 7-5-017:042 (SLU 09-000022) jREZ 09-000096) The Department of Education (DOE) has reviewed the application for State Land Use Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone for the Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC (Applicant) subdivision in North Kona. The application indicates that the Applicant is familiar with the new school impact fee law and the possibility that the project will be required to pay school impact fees if the Board of Education adopts the West Hawaii School Impact Fee District. The Hu-Ko-Pa project is within the boundaries of the proposed district. It is unclear why the application includes school enrollments for the 2005 and 2006 school year for all schools on the island. While Section 2.2.1 Schools states that enrollment dropped from 2005 to 2006; the corresponding Table 3.3 indicates an increase in enrollment. The fact that island-wide school enrollment declined from one year to another is not an indication that the project will have`h.minimal impact'on education services. Enrollment in schools serving West Hawaii has more than doubled from 4,699 students in 1980 to 9,566 students in 2008. The number of schools serving the area has grown from six schools in 1980 to 17 in 2008. The actual Change of Zone Application makes reference to the total number of units that would be permitted in the project. Will accessory dwellings be permitted? Estimates of school enrollment rely on the best estimate of the total number of residential units planned. The Change of Zone Application states that no government assistance and/or improvements for schools will be needed when the project is developed. The DOE believes that is incorrect. Plannin ®e t. SCA,I®1N~~~ J P Exhibit ~u~3~~:1.I~y AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYE I - - - - - - - - - - i Ms. BJ Leithead Todd ~ Page 2 June 15, 2009 Accommodations will have to be made for students who will reside in the project and the cost of the accommodation can be offset by the payment of impact fees. The Applicant should contact the DOE to discuss an educational contribution agreement. If you have any questions, please contact Heidi Meeker of the Facilities Development Branch at (808) 377-8301. Sincerely yours, G~~~ e Y. Kashiwai ublic Works Administrator Facilities Development Branch ' DYK:jmb c: Art Souza, CAS, Honokaa/Kealakehe/Kohala/Konawaena Complex Areas ~ , CARLSMITH BALL LLP PI.~~fsi ~~€~~P~~r~?4Gt~~~T CCU ~ U~' ,~sl A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP 121 WAIANUENUE AVENUE ~ ~ ~ ~ Y p P.O. Box 686 HI[.o, HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808 935.6644 FAx 808.935 7975 WWW CARiSMTfH.COM RNABOA®CARLSMITH COM June 26, 2009 Ms. BJ Leithead Todd, Director County of Hawaii Police Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Re: State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application (SLU 09-000022) Request: Agriculture to Urban Change of Zone Application (REZ 09-000096) Request: A-Sato RS-10 Applicant: Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC TMK: (317-5-17.42 (14 437 acres) Dear Ms. Leithead Todd: Your staff has forwarded comments from various agencies on the applications listed above and therefore we provide the following responses: STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ("DOH"): We acknowledge receipt of the State DOH letter of May 21, 2009 informing us of their transmittal of the subject applications to their Environmental Management Programs for review and comments. To date we have not received comments from any of the Environmental Management Programs and therefore no response is warranted. STATE DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ("DLNR"): Division of Aquatic Resources We acknowledge receipt of the DLNR Division of Aquatic Resources memorandum of May 21, 2009 commenting on the subject applications. We acknowledge that the Division has no objections or further comments to offer at this time. En~ineerinn Division We acknowledge receipt of the DLNR Engineering Division's memorandum of June 4, 2009 commenting on the subject applications. We agree that the project site, according to the - Flood Insurance Rate Map, is located in Zone X. Furthermore, the National Flood Insurance Program does not have any restrictions for the proposed development within the Zone X. HONOLLiI.U Hao KONA ~ 7i.T~ l n i n g C~pt~ SAIPAN . ~ ~Jj,p~gN L~ ~ 4849-0374-4003 1 058109-00001 Exhl~A~ ~3 JUN 3 01UUy 6!26/09 .w® a o i BJ Leithead Todd June 26, 2009 ~ Page 2 Land Division We acknowledge receipt of the DLNR Land Division letter of June 16, 2009 commenting on the subject applications. We acknowledge that the Division has no further comments to offer at this time. State Historic Preservation Division ("SHPD"): We acknowledge receipt of the DLNR SHPD letter of June15, 2009 We acknowledge that the SHPD has determined that the data recovery fieldwork has been completed and there are no sites designated for preservation within the project area based on their previous review and approval of an archaeological inventory survey and data recovery plan for the project area. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ("DEM"): We acknowledge receipt of the DEM memorandum of May 26, 2009 commenting on the subject applications. In accordance with the design standards and prior to connection, the Applicant will prepare a Sewer Study and shall complete the sewer report meeting with the Department of Public Works ("DPW") design standards and requirements. Pursuant to Section 21-26.1 of the Hawaii County Code, the Applicant will complete a DEM Sewer Extension Application for approval of a Council Resolution approving the sewer extension from Paulehia Street within the adjacent Pualani Estates subdivision into the proposed Hu-Ko-Pa development. The Applicant will comply with all regulations related to solid waste and will prepare a Solid Waste Management Plan. FIRE DEPARTMENT: i We acknowledge receipt of the Fire Department letter of June 4, 2009 commenting on the subject applications. The fire apparatus access roads within the proposed Hu-Ko-Pa subdivision shall be built in accordance with Uniform Fire Code ("UFC") Section 10.207. Additionally, we acknowledge that the water supply shall be in accordance with the UFC Section 10.301(c). KONA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN ("KCDP") PROJECT MANAGER: We acknowledge receipt of KCDP Project Manager, Nancy Pisicchio, letter of May 22, 2009 commenting on the subject applications and the project's compliance with the policies of the KCDP. We acknowledge that the property is consistent with the KCDP: Policy LU-1.4. Property is located within Urban Area; • Policy LU-2.8: Property is an "infill" rezoning; and • Policy IRAN-2.1: Property meets Connectivity Standards In response to the KCDP Policy PUB-6.2 (Neighborhood Park), we disagree with Ms. Pisicchio's assessment regarding the inclusion of a Neighborhood Park (up to 4 acres in size) within the proposed development to fulfill the requirement of Policy PUB-6.2. Policy PUB-6 2 requires subdividers to provide neighborhood parks 1/2 mile apart for area residents and provide for private maintenance or pay a fee pursuant to Chapter 8 of the Hawaii County Code. Due to the relatively small size of the project, under 15 acres, and the close proximity of approximately 0 2 mile from the nearest Community Park, William Charles Lunalilo Playground, located within the adjacent Pualani Estates subdivision, it would be unfair to require the Applicant to construct a Neighborhood Park for such a small development. 4849-0374-4003 1 058109-00001 6/26/09 I BJ Leithead Todd June 26, 2009 Page 3 The Applicant would like to further clarify the park located nearest the project was erroneously listed on page 15 of our application as "Prince Jonah Kuhio Kalanianaole Park, a 5-acre park" and instead should be replaced with "William Charles Lunalilo Playground, a 6.8-acre park". f,~ i OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ("OHCD"): We acknowledge receipt of the OHCD letter of June 10, 2009 commenting on the subject applications. The Applicant shall comply with the requirements of Hawaii County Code, Chapter 11, Housing. POLICE DEPARTMENT: We acknowledge receipt of the Police Department letter of June 2, 2009 commenting on the subject applications. We acknowledge that the Police Department has no further comments to offer at this time. Sincerely, Steven S . Li SSL/rma cc: Hu-Ko-Pa, LLC