HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 290 Draft 01 2008-2010
COUNTY OF HAWAI'I
STATE OF HAWAI'I
RESOLUTION NO.
290 09
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR TO ENTER
INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF HAWAI'I DEPARTMENT
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, PURSUANT TO HRS 46-7, FOR A
HAWAI'I NARCOTICS TASK FORCE - RECOVERY ACT GRANT
WHEREAS, the State of Hawai'i Department of the Attorney General, Crime
Prevention and Justice Assistance Division has authorized a Hawai'i Narcotics Task
Force - Recovery Act Grant to the Hawai'i County Police Department; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the grant is to disrupt the flow of narcotics via the
apprehension of mid- to high- level dealers that are smuggling and distributing narcotics
into and with the State of Hawai'i; and
WHEREAS, some of the major objectives are 1) to maintain a narcotics task
force of personnel from the Hawai'i County Police Department, Maui Police Department,
and Kauai Police Department, 2) to increase knowledge of vice officers by providing
training in such topics as narcotic investigations, current drug trends, smuggling and
distribution techniques, and State/Federal laws that impact the task force, and 3) to
meet at least quarterly to coordinate joint operations and training, as well as other
enforcement efforts, and to share information; and
WHEREAS, the sharing of resources and information between the Task Force
participants will affect not only the individual Counties but also the State of Hawai'i; and
WHEREAS, the results will be a decrease in the flow of illegal narcotics in the
State which will positively impact all aspects of police work and the criminal justice
system; and
WHEREAS, the funds provided by the State of Hawai'i Department of the
Attorney General are derived from the federal government's American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009; and
WHEREAS, Hawai'i Revised Statutes, Section 46-7, requires that county
departments obtain the consent of the council to enter into agreements with the federal
or state governments respecting action to be taken pursuant to any of the powers
granted by law to furnish, expend, and receive any funds or other assistance in
connection with projects being or to be undertaken pursuant to those powers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY
OF HAWAI'I, in accordance with section 46-7, Hawai'i Revised Statutes, that the Mayor
of the County of Hawai'j is authorized to execute, on behalf of the County, the contract,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "1", to enable the
County to utilize the Hawai'i Narcotics Task Force grant funding.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Clerk of the County of Hawai'i
shall transmit copies of this resolution to the Office of the Mayor, the Finance and Police
Departments.
, Hawai'i, this
day of
,2009.
Dated at
INTRODUCED BY:
COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAI'I
COUNTY COUNCIL
County of Hawai'i
Hila, Hawai'i
ROLL CALL VOTE
I hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION was by
the vote indicated to the right hereof adopted by the COUNCIL of the
County ofHawai'i on
AYES NOES ABS EX
ENRIQUES
FORD
GREENWELL
HOFFMANN
IKEDA
NAEOLE
ONISHI
YAGONG
YOSHIMOTO
ATTEST:
Reference:
C-658jFC
290 09
COUNTY CLERK CHAIRPERSON & PRESIDING OFFICER
RESOLUTION NO.
~ .~
Project Number 09-SU-20
CON T R ACT
THIS
CONTRACT,
executed on
the
respective
dates
indicated below, is effective as of
July I, 2009
by and
between the Department of the Attorney General, State of Hawaii~
hereinafter
called
"Agency" ,
by and through the Attorney
General, and
the Hawaii Police Department, hereinafter called
"Grantee" .
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe
Streets Act of 1968, 4;2 U. S. C. ~H3 3711 et seq., as amended
(hereinafter "Act"), was enacted to make grants to States and
units of local government, for use by the State or unit of local
government to provide additional personnel, equipment, supplies,
contractual
support,
training,
technical
assistance,
and
information systems for criminal justice, including for anyone
or more of the following programs:
(1) Law enforcement programs.
(2) Prosecution and court programs.
(3) Prevention and education programs.
EXHIBIT "I"
..
(4) Corrections and community corrections programs.
(5) Drug treatment programs.
Planning,
programs.
(7) Crime victim and witness programs.
evaluation,
and
technology
improvement
(6)
WHEREAS, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009, P.L. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115, (hereinafter "Recovery") was
enacted to help stabil i ze the economy, provide jobs and much
needed resources for states and local communities;
WHEREAS, the Governor has designated Agency to serve
as Hawaii's office for administering the federal financial
assistance available under the Act;
WHEREAS,
Grantee,
as an agency of the County of
Hawaii, is qualified to receive funds available to Hawaii under
the Act and its implementing regulations, contained in the
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant
(JAG)
State
Solicitation, and 28 C.F.R. Chapter 1, Part 66, and under
Recovery and has applied to Agency for receipt of the same as a
subgrantee;
Revised S/09
2
..
WHEREAS, Agency has reviewed Grantee's application for
funds, and is satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act
and Recovery and their resp~ctive implementing regulations have
been satisfied and that Grantee is capable of using the federal
funds requested appropriately;
WHEREAS,
Grantee has demonstrated the capacity to
provide the serVlces, programs and acti vi ties described herein
and is ready, willing and able to provide the required services,
programs and activities;
NOW
THEREFORE,
Agency
and
Grantee
for
and
In
consideration of the covenants,
conditions,
agreements,
and
stipulations
follows:
hereinafter
expressed,
do
mutually
agree
as
A. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
Grantee shall,
in a proper and satisfactory
manner, as determined by Agency, and In accordance with the
terms and conditions of this Contract, use the funds received
under this Contract for the purposes stated herein and In
accordance with the "Application For Grant" (Parts I through IV
including all certifications required under Section C and the
Revised 8/09
3
Acceptance of JAG Recovery Special Conditions) attached hereto
as Exhibit IIA'I and by reference incorporated herein.
It is
understood that this Contract includes as a part hereof any
rules, relevant directives or instructions issued by the United
States or the Agency, including the provisions of the federal
Office of Management and Budget circulars and the effective
edition of the Office of Justice Programs' financial manual
entitled IIFinancial Guide. II
B. TERM OF CONTRACT.
This Contract shall be In effect for the period
July I, 2009 to and including
June 30, 2010
from
unless
this
Contract
is
sooner terminated as
hereinafter
provided or unless this Contract lS extended in accordance with
Section L. of this Contract.
C. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS.
1. Grantee shall comply with the guidelines set
forth in the Act and Recovery and all applicable federal
regulations
and guidel ines,
including but
not
limited to
guidance issued by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, 28 C.F.R.
Chapter I, Part 66, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants
and
Cooperative
Agreements
to
State
and
Local
Revised S/09
4
Governments, and Office of Management and Budget circulars and
the effective edition of the Office of Justice Programs'
financial manual entitled "Financial Guide."
2.
Grantee
shall
comply
with
all
the
ordinances, codes, rules and regulations of the Federal, State
and local government which in any way affect its performance
under this Contract.
3. Grantee shall provide for an independent
audit of its activities on a periodic basis in accordance with
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133.
4. Prior to, or concurrently with the execution
of this Contract, Grantee shall complete, execute and submit to
Agency
a
Certification
Regarding
Drug-Free
Workplace
Requirements which meets the requirements of the Drug Free
Workplace Act of 1988
(Pub. L. 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D,
D.S.C., Title 41, Chapter 10, ~702), hereinafter referred to as
the "Drug-Free Workplace Certification".
A copy of the Drug-
Free Workplace Certification shall be included in Part IV of the
Application
for
Grant.
Grantee
covenants
that
the
representations made In the Drug-Free Workplace Certification
are true at the time this Contract lS executed and will remain
true throughout the entire term of this Contract and any
extensions, and that Grantee shall fulfill all the requirements
Revised S/09 5
set forth therein.
Grantee's execution and submission of a
false Drug-Free Workplace Certification! or Grantee I s violation
of any or all of the requirements set forth therein shall
entitle Agency to
Contract! and/or
suspend
one or
more payments under
this
the
terminate
this
Contract pursuant to
provlslons of Section N of this Contract.
Grantee warrants that
it lS aware that such false certification or violation of the
requirements contained in the Drug-Free Workplace Certification
shall subject the State of Hawaii to government-wide suspension
or debarment! or other sanctions which! in turn! shall result in
the withdrawal of funds from Grantee and/or the unavailability
of future funding for Grantee.
5. Prior to! or concurrently with the execution
of this Contract! Grantee shall complete! execute and submit to
Agency
a
Certification
Regarding
Debarment!
Suspension!
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion! hereinafter referred to
as the "Debarment Certification".
A copy of the Debarment
Certification shall be included in Part IV of the Application
for Grant.
Grantee covenants that the representations made in
the Debarment Certification are true at the time this Contract
is executed and will remain true throughout the entire term of
the Contract and any extensions! and that Grantee shall fulfill
any and all terms and conditions set forth therein.
Revised 8/09
6
6. Prior to, or concurrently with the execution
of this Contract, Grantee shall complete, execute and submit to
Agency a Certification of Non-Supplanting, hereinafter referred
to as the "Non-Supplanting Certification".
A copy of the Non-
Supplanting Certification shall be included in Part IV of the
Application
for
Grant.
Grantee
covenants
that
the
representations made In the Non-Supplanting Certification are
true at the time this Contract lS executed and will remain true
throughout the entire term of the Contract and any extensions,
and that Grantee shall fulfill any and all terms and conditions
set forth therein.
7. Prior to, or concurrently with the execution
of this Contract,
if so required by Agency, Grantee shall
complete, execute and submit to Agency a Certification Regarding
Lobbying,
hereinafter
referred
to
as
'the
"Lobbying
Certification", and any subsequent disclosure forms required
under Section 1352, Title 31 U. S. C. A copy of the Lobbying
Certification shall be included in Part IV of the Application
for Grant.
Grantee covenants that the representations made in
the Lobbying Certification 'are true at the time this Contract is
executed and will remain true throughout the entire term of the
Contract and any extensions, and that Grantee shall fulfill any
and all terms and conditions set forth therein.
Revised 8/09
7
8.
Grantee
.shall
comply
with
the
non-
discrimination requirements of the Omnibus Crime Control and
Safe Street Act of 1968 which prohibits discrimination In
employment and In the delivery of serVlces or benefits on the
basis of race, color, national origin, religion, or sex; Title
VI
of
the
Civil
Rights
Act
of
1964
which
prohibits
discrimination in the delivery of serVlces or benefits on the
basis of race, color, or national origin; Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Title II of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of
1990 which prohibit discrimination in
employment and in the delivery of services or benefits based on
disabili ty; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 which
prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex In training or
educational programs; and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975
which prohibits discrimination In the delivery of services or
benefits on the basis of age; Department of Justice regulations
on disability (nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in
the state and local government services, publ ic accommodations
and commercial facilities,
and accessibility standards),
28
C.F.R. Part 35; Exec. Order No. 13279, 28 C.F.R. Part 38 (equal
protection
of
the
laws
for
faith-based
and
community
organizations)
Exec. Order No. 13166 and U. S. Department of
Justice, Guidance to Federal Financial Assistance Recipients
Revised 8/09
8
Regarding
Title
VI
Prohibition
Against
National
Origin
Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons; the
Hawaii State Fair Employment Practices Act, Chapter 378, Hawaii
Revised Statutes; and all other applicable federal and state
laws, rules and regulations.
9.
Grantee assures
Agency
that
if
it
lS
required to formulate an Equal Employment Opportunity Program in
accordance wi th 28 C. F . R : Si Si 42. 301 et seq. it wi 11 submi t a
certification to Agency that a current program is on file.
10. Grantee shall maintain accounting procedures
and
practices
acceptable
to
Agency,
and
books,
records,
documents and other evidence which sufficiently, accurately and
properly reflect all direct and indirect expenditures and all
interest or other income earned as the result of funds provided
pursuant to this Contract.
Grantee shall ensure that its own
books, records, and documents are available for inspection,
reviews or audits at all reasonable times by Agency or the
United States Department of Justice.
In addition, Grantee shall
prepare and submit to the Agency reports In such form and at
such times as Agency or the Bureau of Justice Assistance may
require.
Grantee shall submit quarterly financial reports
fifteen (15)
calendar days after the end of each calendar
quarter.
Grantee shall submit monthly request for funds and
Revised 8/09
9
cash balance reports fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of
each month. The final fiscal reports must be received by Agency
within sixty (60) days after the date this Contract terminates
or unless mandated earlier by Agency.
Records and financial
accounts
shall be retained by the Grantee
and shall be
accessible to Agency and the United States Department of Justice
for at least three years after Agency1s grant with the Bureau of
Justice Assistance is closed.
11.
The
final
drawdown
for
funds
shall
be
recei ved by Agency no later than thirty (30) days after the
Contract terminates.
12. Any funds provided to Grantee under this
Contract which are unencumbered on the date this Contract
terminates shall be returned to Agency; all funds provided under
this Contract which are encumbered but not disbursed within
sixty (60) days after this Contract terminates shall be returned
to Agency.
13. Grantee shall submit progress reports as
required for the Recovery and Act funds to Agency during the
term of the Contract as stipulated under Part IV. Attachments 1
Acceptance of Special Conditionsl Sections 5 and 10.
14.
If so required by AgencYl
Grantee shall
certify to Agency that any expendable or nonexpendable personal
Revised S/09
10
property purchased or acquired with funds received under this
Contract will be used for criminal justice purposes before title
In such property may vest in Grantee. Grantee shall submit a
certification to Agency within thirty (30) days after the date
this Contract terminates.
If a certification is not provided by
Grantee, title to any personal property purchased or acquired
with funds received under this Contract shall vest in Agency and
such personal property shall be delivered to the Agency in good
working order upon expiration or sooner termination of this
Contract.
D. PERSONNEL.
1. Grantee shall secure at its own expense all
personnel required to perform the services required under this
Contract.
All such personnel shall not be considered employees
of, or have any contractual relationship with the State of
Hawaii unless Grantee is otherwise an agency of the State.
2. Grantee shall ensure that none of the work
or services to be provided under this Contract shall be
subcontracted or assigned without the prior written approval of
Agency.
E.
SUBCONTRACTS.
Revised 8/09
11
Grantee may provide some or all of the services
required under this Contract by subcontract provided that
Grantee secures the prior written consent of Agency.
In the
event
Grantee
enters
into
a
subcontract
with
a
private
organization to perform any of the services or activities
required under this Contract, Grantee agrees that the period of
each subcontract shall not exceed the term of this Contract, and
funds to the private organization will not be released unless
and until the requirements set forth in applicable state law and
implementing rules are complied with by the subcontractor. All
subcontracts shall include provisions to ensure that Grantee is
capable of satisfying the requirements of this Contract. All
subcontracts shall be reduced to writing and shall include all
provisions of this Contract required of Grantee.
F. SERVICES AS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
1. In the performance of the services required
under this Contract, Grantee shall be an independent contractor
wi th the authority to control and direct the performance and
details of the work and services required under this Contract i
however, Agency shall have the right to inspect work in progress
to determine whether, In Agency's opinion, the work is being
performed by Grantee in accordance with the provisions of this
Revised 8/09
12
Contract.
All persons hired or used by Grantee shall be
Grantee's agents and employees and Grantee shall be responsible
for the accuracy, completeness, and adequacy of any and all work
and
services
performed
by
its
agents
and
employees.
Furthermore, Grantee intentionally, voluntarily, and knowingly
assumes the sole and entire liability if such liability lS
determined to exist, to its agents and employees or to third
persons,
Grantee's
for all loss,
cost,
damage or injury caused by
agents
and
employees
in
the
course
of
their
employment.
The performance of work under this Contract alone
shall not be construed as employment with the State of Hawaii
and shall
not
entitle Grantee's
agents
and employees
to
vacation, sick leave, retirement, or other benefits directly
afforded state
employees by statutes.
Grantee
shall
be
responsible for payment of all applicable federal, state, and
county fees which may become due and owing by the Grantee by
reason of the Contract, including but not limited to (i) income
taxes, (ii) employment related fees, assessments and taxes and
(iii) general excise taxes.
The Grantee also is responsible for
obtaining all licenses, permits and certificates that may be
required in order to perform this Contract.
2.
This
section
shall
not
be
enforced
if
Grantee lS an agency of the State of Hawaii.
Revised 8/09
13
G. COMPENSATION.
1. Subject to continuing availability of funds,
Agency agrees to pay Grantee,
for services satisfactorily
performed under this Contract, a sum not to exceed One
hundred thirteen thousand eight hundred eighty five and 00/100
dollars ($113,885.00)---- to be spent for the purposes of this
Contract.
This sum represents any and all compensation to be
paid to Grantee for any and all serVlces it provides, and for
any and all travel costs,
materials,
supplies,
equipment,
overhead, taxes, and other incidentals and operating expenses
which it incurs or may incur in connection with this Contract.
2. It lS covenanted and agreed by and between
the parties hereto that, as to the portion of the obligation
under this Contract to be payable out of federal funds, this
Contract shall be construed to be an agreement to pay such
portion to the Grantee only out of federal funds to be received
from the federal government when the federal funds are so
received and shall not be construed as a general agreement to
pay such portion at all events out of any funds other than those
which are received from the federal government.
H. METHOD OF PAYMENT.
1.
All
funds available for use under this
Revised S/09
14
Contract shall be subject to the allotment system as provided In
Chapter 37, Hawaii Revised Statutes.
2. Payments to Grantee under this Contract
shall be made In accordance with and subj ect to the following
provisions:
a. Payments shall be made monthly upon
receipt of Grantee's completed request for funds.
b.
All
payments
shall
be
made
In
accordance with and subject to Chapter 40,
Hawaii Revised
Statutes, which specifies the accounting procedures and controls
applicable to payments out of the Treasury of the State of
Hawaii.
c. If an amount of reported expenditures
lS preliminarily determined by Agency to be inappropriate and
unallowable, Agency may deduct an equivalent amount from the
next payable installment and may withhold payment of the amount
of the moneys equivalent to the questioned expenditures until
later resolution of the discrepancy by audit or other means.
If, after payment of the last installment, investigation and
examination reveal additional expenditures that are determined
by Agency to be inappropriate and unallowable, Agency may
require that an equivalent amount of moneys be refunded to
Agency notwithstanding Agency's preliminary determination of
Revised 8/09
15
appropriateness and allowability.
d. Failure to submit required reports by
the applicable deadline will result in the withholding of
payments until such time as the reports are received by Agency.
Grantee shall continue to provide the services, programs and
activities during the period that payments are being withheld.
I. INDEMNIFICATION.
1. It lS strictly understood that the State of
Hawaii shall in no way be held liable for any damages, cause of
act ion or
suits
resulting from the
acts,
activities,
or
omissions of Grantee.
Grantee shall indemnify and save harmless
the State of Hawaii, Agency, and their officers, agents, and
employees from and against any and all liability, loss, actions,
claims,
suits,
damages,
costs
or expenses,
including all
attorneys' fees, and all claims, suits, and demands therefor,
arising out of or resulting from the acts or omissions of
Grantee,
its bfficers,
employees,
agents,
or subcontractors
occurrlng during or in connection with the performance of
Grantee I s services under this Contract, or arising out of or
resulting from breach of this Contract by Grantee.
Grantee
shall defend the State of Hawaii,. Agency, and their off icers,
agents, and employees against any such action or claim unless
Revised 8/09
16
the action or claim involves an act or omlSSlon solely of
Agency, its officers, agents, or employees.
2.
This
section
shall
not
be
enforced
if
Grantee lS an agency of the State of Hawaii.
J. CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL.
Any information, data, report, record, summary,
table, map, or study given to or prepared or assembled by
Grantee under this Contract which is identified as proprietary
or confidential information that Agency requests to be kept
confidential shall be safeguarded by the Grantee and shall not
be made available to any individual or organization other than
any subcontractor to which the material may relate, without
prior written approval of Agency.
Grantee shall submit a
completed Privacy Certification for review and approval prior to
the expenditure of funds for the collection of identifiable
research/ statistical data.
All information, data, or other
material provided by the Grantee or the Agency shall be kept
confidential only to the extent permitted by law.
Grantee shall
comply with the requirements of Chapters 487J, 487N and 487R,
Hawaii Revised Statutes as applicable.
Revised S/09
17
provisions of the "Application For Grant" may be requested by
Grantee, approved by the Administrator of the Crime Prevention
and Justice Assistance Division on Agency's behalf, and made by
substituting
or
insert ing. the
revisions
in
Exhibit
"A".
Modifications, alterations or changes to the period during which
this Contract is In effect may be requested in writing by
Grantee or Agency,
up to forty-five
(45)
days before the
Contract would otherwise terminate, and shall be effective as of
the date approved by the Administrator of the Crime Prevention
and Justice Assistance Division (if requested by Grantee) or
Grantee (if requested by Agency) and made by attaching
a party's written request with the other party's written
approval thereon to this Contract.
No oral modification,
alteration,
amendment,
change,
or extension of
any term,
provision or condition of this Contract shall be permitted.
M. CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
Grantee represents that
it presently has no
interest and promlses that it shall not acquire any interest,
direct or indirect, that would conflict in any manner or degree
with the performance of the services under this Contract.
Revised 8/09
19
N. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT.
1. If, for any cause, Grantee refuses or fails to
satisfactorily fulfill
in a timely or proper manner
its
obligations under this Contract or any extension thereof, or if
Grantee breaches any of the promises, terms or conditions of
this Contract and, having been given reasonable notice of and
opportunity to cure any such default, fails to take satisfactory
corrective action within the time specified by Agency, Agency
shall have the right to terminate this Contract by giving
written notice to Grantee of such termination 'ten (10) calendar
days before the effective date of such termination.
The Grantee
shall continue performance of the Contract to the extent it lS
not terminated.
Notwi thstanding termination of the Contract,
and subject to any directions from the Agency, the Grantee shall
take timely, reasonable, and necessary action to protect and
preserve property in the possession of the Grantee in which the
Agency has an interest.
2.
Furthermore,
Agency
may
terminate
.
this
Contract without statement of cause at any time by giving
written notice to Grantee of such termination at least thirty
(30)
calendar
days
before
the
effective
date
of
such
termination.
3.
In the event of termination of either type,
Revised S/09
20
all finished or unfinished documents, reports, summaries, lists,
charts, graphs, maps, or other written material prepared by
Grantee, under this Contract shall become Agency's property and,
together with all information, data, reports, records, maps, and
other materials (if any) provided to Grantee by Agency, shall be
delivered and surrendered to Agency on or before the effective
date of termination.
4. Grantee shall be entitled to recel ve only
such compensation as shall have been satisfactorily earned prior
to the effective date of te.rmination.
Agency shall determine
the amount of work satisfactorily completed and the amount of
compensation satisfactorily earped.
If the termination is for
cause, any other provisions to the contrary notwithstanding,
Grantee shall not be relieved of liability to Agency for damages
sustained by Agency because of any breach by Grantee of this
Contract.
O. WAIVER.
The failure of the Agency to insist upon strict
compliance with any term, provision,
or condition of this
Contract shall not constitute or be deemed to constitute a
waiver or relinquishment of the Agency's right to enforce the
same In accordance with this Contract.
It is expressly
Revised 8/09
21
understood and agreed that no waiver granted by Agency on
account of any violation of any promlse, term or condition of
this Contract shall constitute or be construed In any manner as
a wal ver of the prOrrllSe, term or condition or of the right to
enforce the same as to any other or further violation.
P. DISPUTES; GOVERNING LAW; VENUE.
Any dispute concernlng a matter ,of fact arlslng
under this Contract or any subcontract, which is not disposed of
by mutual agreement within fifteen (15) calendar days, shall be
decided by the Attorney General, or the Attorney General's duly
designated representative, who shall reduce the decision to
writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy of the decision to
Grantee.
The decision of such person shall be final and
conclusive.
Pending final decision of such dispute, Grantee
shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Contract
in accordance with Agency's request.
The validity of this
Contract and any of its terms or provisions, as well as the
rights and duties of the parties to this Contract, shall be
governed by the laws of the State of Hawaii.
Except as
otherwise provided in this Section, any action to enforce this
Contract or for breach of this Contract shall be brought only In
a State court of competent jurisdiction in Honolulu, Hawaii.
Revised 8/09
22
Q. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS.
Additional
conditions may be
imposed against
Grantee by reducing them to writing and designating them as
exhibits to this Contract. Any such exhibit shall be attached
hereto and thereby incorporated herein.
Revised 8/09
23
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Contract.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Deputy Attorney General, State of Hawaii
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGALITY
By
Print Name
Title Corporation Counsel
Date
Revised 8/09
the parties hereto have executed
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF HAWAI I , ( II AGENCY II )
By
Print Name Mark J. Bennett
Its Attorney General
Date
HAWAII POLICE DEPARTMENT,
COUNTY OF HAWAI I ( II GRANTEE II )
By
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED
By
Print Name Harry S. Kubojiri
Title Chief of Police
Date
24
CRIME PREVENTION AND JUSTICE ASSISTANCE DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
235 South Beretania Street, Suite 401
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
APPLICATION FOR BYRNE JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT-RECOVERY
PART 1. TITLE PAGE
A. PROJECT TITLE:
HAW All NARCOTICS TASK FORCE
B. APPLICANT AGENCY:
Hawaii Police Department
C. CENTRAL CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION: rgJ Yes 0 No
DUNS No..
613154335
D. APPLICATION RANKING WITHIN AGENCY:
(as determined by agency head)
E. ADDRESS:
349 Kapiolani Street
City Hilo
Zip
96720
F. LOCATION OF PROJECT:
349 Kapiolani Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720
G. PROJECT PERIOD:
From Julv L 2009 To June 30, 2010
H. AUTHORIZED PURPOSE AREA:
Law Enforcement Programs
I. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
New 0
Continuation rgJ
J. TOTAL PROJECT AMOUNT:
$ 113,885
K. OTHER FUNDING SOURCES:
Is the proposed project seeking other sources of funding? Yes 0 No rgJ If~, then provide name of
source and the amount of funds that is being sought: Source Amount $
L. PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
The applicant agrees to comply with all reporting, data collection and evaluation requirements, as prescribed
by the Department of the Attorney General. Yes rgJ No 0
M. PROJECT DIRECTOR
Name:
Richard Sherlock
Title:
Lieutenant
Address:
Telephone:
349 Kapiolani StTeet, Hi10, Hawaii 96720
E-Mail: rsherlock@co.hawaii.hi.us
808-961-2253
Fax: 808-961-2372
N. FINANCIAL OFFICER
Name:
N ori Ishii
Title:
Accountant V
Address:
Telephone:
349 Kapiolani Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720
E-Mail: nishii@co.hawaii.hi.us
808-961-2273
Fax: 808-961-2390
FOR CPJAD USE
Date received:
Project Number:
01-~1A- 20
EXHIBIT A
AG/CPJAD #1 (Rev 03/3/2009)
APPLICATION FOR BYRNE JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT-RECOVERY
PART II. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Note: This fonn does not provide spell check"
A. THE PROBLEM
The overwhelming flow of narcotics into and throughout the County and State of Hawaii remains a very
significant threat to the citizens and communities ofthe Big Island. Both the supply and demand of
crystal methamphetamine, marijuana, cocaine, heroin, and other pharmaceutical drugs have continued to
increase in the County of Hawaii, as well as throughout the State.
Cocaine remains popular and readily available throughout the County of Hawaii and is often used in
conjunction with other drugs including heroin and marijuana. The majority of cocaine recovered by law
enforcement is in its powdered form but recoveries of "crack" cocaine are still not uncommon. Black tar
heroin is the most common form of heroin found in the County of Hawaii. Local heroin trafficking
organizations are very secretive and loyal in nature and prove very difficult to infiltrate by law
enforcement. The majority of methamphetamine, the number one threat in the State of Hawaii, has
already been converted from its powder form into "ice" before it is distributed in the County of Hawaii.
Crystal methamphetamine, cocaine, and heroin abuse can be attributed to drug trafficking organizations
(DTO) with strong domestic and international ties. These "hard" drugs, being neither found nor produced
locally in large quantities, are predominantly imported to the State of Hawaii via commercial and private
air transportation, federal and private mail couriers, and through maritime transport vessels. Mexican
DTO's have been responsible for the majority of Crystal Methamphetamine, Cocaine, and Heroin
imported into the State through California and Nevada. Asian DTO's have also been reported as
smuggling crystal methamphetamine into the State as well. The monetary proceeds are then transported
back to the West Coast and/or Asia via courier or parcel.
Marijuana continues to be readily available, as marijuana cultivators have developed and refined their
methods to avoid detection of outdoor marijuana grows, and have also incorporated indoor cultivation
with the use of artificial lighting and hydroponics technology.
The demand for "Hawaiian" marijuana both domestically and internationally, due to its potency and
reputation for high quality, continues to grow. In addition to the export of Hawaiian grown marijuana,
Canadian marijuana (BC Bud) has also been intercepted as imports into the County of Hawaii via parcel
and courier via California, Washington, and Oregon. Search warrants conducted on ice and cocaine
traffickers have consistently revealed small seizures of marijuana. Due to the availability of marijuana
and its use, it has been labelled by Hawaii High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDT A) as the second
most abused drug in Hawaii.
During the period of January 1 through December 31, 2008, the Hawaii Police Department had conducted
1,193 drug related investigations resulting in 621 "arrests. Officers had also seized 2,848.94 grams of
cocaine, 3,849.62 grams of methamphetamine, 102.05 pounds of processed marijuana, and 69.42 grams
of heroin. Numerous assets, vehicles, and currency related to narcotics investigations have also been
seized for forfeiture during this time.
The potential profit of drug trafficking is extremely high, prompting numerous people to become
involved in drug trafficking. These persons have since invested large amounts of money, time and effort
AG/CPJAD #1(a) (Rev 03/3/2009)
Page 1
to set up distribution networks which are very sophisticated and well organized. Such networks operate
on many different levels, filtering all the way down to the "street dealers," who often deal drugs to
support their own habits, sell only "user" quantities, and are highly visible to the general public. Such
"street dealers" are often the subject of numerous public complaints and become nuisances in any
community in which they operate.
The utilization of undercover officers to infiltrate drug trafficking organizations has repeatedly proven
itself as a very effective means of dismantling the organization. Such operations often lead to the arrest of
the upper-most levels of dealers in the organizations through undercover purchases of narcotics. In
addition, police controlled purchases conducted with reliable confidential sources and cooperating
individuals have also led to the arrest of many mid- to high-level dealers.
Narcotic investigations are often complicated, lengthy, and tedious and depend greatly on the skills of a
well-trained investigator. Without such skills and training, successful arrests and/or drug seizures would
not be possible. However, as the methods and trends of drug trafficking continuously change, it is
imperative that law enforcement personnel involved in narcotic investigations are continuously trained
and educated in order to maintain effectiveness. The criminal element's knowledge ofthe techniques
utilized by law enforcement to combat the drug problem is ever growing, not only by "word of mouth"
communication as in the past, but also due to the amount of information available to them via the
internet, not to mention the growing number of "reality" television shows in syndication. It is the
intention of the Hawaii Police Department to ensure that the members of our Vice sections are abreast of
the latest narcotic investigation techniques, intelligence, and resources to combat the ever changing and
evolving methods of the modem day drug trafficking organizations.
To combat the large amount of narcotics imported into the County of Hawaii, the Hawaii Police
Department created an "Airport Smuggling Detail" which was assigned to the Hawaii Airport Task Force
(HATF) comprised of Federally Deputized Officers from the four counties under the HIDTA initiative.
This specialized unit is responsible for interdicting narcotics that are being smuggled into the Keaho1e
International Airport in addition to other freight and parcel services in the County of Hawaii.
The Hawaii Police Department continues to utilize narcotic detection canines as a valuable tool in
narcotic investigations. Narcotics canines use their acute sense of smell to locate suspects or narcotics in
any type of hiding spot. This ability affords officers a safer tool to utilize in apprehending suspects and
narcotics. Currently, two (2) of the narcotic detection canines utilized by the Hawaii Police Department
have reached their "retirement years" and must be replaced.
As stated prior, crystal methamphetamine or "ice" remains the drug of choice throughout the County and
State of Hawaii and has a devastating effect on the local communities and families in the County of
Hawaii. In response, the Hawaii Police Department has created its own internal "Ice Task Force" and
continues to seek the aide and cooperation of every Federal, State and County agency, to include the
Hawaii Narcotics Task Force (HNTF) in an attempt to stem the flow ofiIlega1 narcotics into and
throughout the County of Hawaii.
Funding for the Hawaii Narcotics Task Force and the partnership between these agencies has resulted in
numerous successful investigations which are summarized below:
From the months of April to August of 2008, two Hawaii Police Department task force officers worked
in an undercover capacity with the Kauai Police Department targeting "street" to "mid level" drug dealers.
AG/CPJAD #1(a) (Rev 03/3/2009)
Page 2
The investigation, named "Operation Round Up", was made possible by funding from the Hawaii
Narcotics Task Force project and resulted in the arrests of over thirty-five (35) individuals for over one
hundred (100) charges ranging from outstanding courtroom warrants to Methamphetamine Trafficking.
In May of 2008, task force officers concluded a three month long investigation by arresting a 25 year old
male after task force officers intercepted 89.2 grams of methamphetamine "stored" at one of his
associate's properties. Through wires, informants, and surveillance, a Methamphetamine Trafficking case
was built against the 25 year old male who was the head of a local drug trafficking operation and had
been quite "elusive" escaping prosecution in prior investigations.
In August of 2008, Hawaii Police Department task force officers received information from the Maui
Police Department about a marijuana trafficking organization between Maui and Hilo. This resulted in
the recovery of six (6) pounds of dry marijuana intended to be smuggled via private small engine Cessna
between the two islands. The investigation concluded ata large sophisticated "indoor" grow on the
Hamakua coast resulting in three arrests and the recovery of 397 marijuana plants, 5 pounds of dry
processed marijuana, and numerous vehicles and other property.
In September of 2008, Hawaii Police Department task force officers working with the DEA were able to
conduct a controlled delivery of 237 grams of Crystal Methamphetamine hidden within a water pump to a
vacant address on the Big Island where the parcel was then picked up by a 37 year old California man.
The parcel was "interdicted" at the Honolulu FedEx office by the Hawaii Airport Task Force.
In November of2008, Maui Police wrapped up a two year investigation into a marijuana trafficking
organization that was "exploiting" existing State medical marijuana laws. A Hawaii Police Department
task force officer also assisted the Maui Police in an undercover capacity to assist in infiltrating and
dismantling this ring. Operation "Weedkiller" resulted in the arrest of seven Maui men and the recovery
of hundreds of marijuana plants and $14,000 in cash.
In November of2008, Hawaii Police Department task force officers with the assistance of the U.S. Postal
Sevice arrested two persons after intercepting a parcel containing 13.1 grams of heroin from the Kailua
Kona Post Office and conducting a successful "controlled delivery".
In December of2008, the Hawaii Police Department concluded Operation "Nailgun", a
methamphetamine trafficking investigation involving the FBI, ATF, ICE, and DEA which resulted in the
arrest of seven suspects on Federal charges.
These investigations, just to name a few, are representative of the partnership of resources and
information gained from the Hawaii Narcotic Task Force project and the effect it has on drug trafficking
not only in the County of Hawaii, but also the State of Hawaii
The Hawaii Narcotics Task Force funding for fiscal year 2008 was limited to overtime and investigative
travel. The Hawaii Police Department recognizes that training and equipment are also essential
components of narcotic investigations. As illegal narcotics trafficking and dealing continues to remain a
large problem for the State and County of Hawaii despite progress made in past years, the Hawaii Police
Department wishes to use this recovery funding for training and equipment while still fulfilling the goals
ofthe Hawaii Narcotics Task Force.
AG/CPJAD #1(a) (Rev 03/3/2009)
Page 3
B. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The overall goal of the HNTF is to disrupt the flow of narcotics via the apprehension of mid- to high-
level dealers smuggling and distributing narcotics into and within the State of Hawaii.
The objectives are as follows:
1. Maintain a task force of personnel from the Hawaii Police Department, Maui Police Department,
and the Kauai Police Department.
2. Increase the knowledge of vice officers by providing training in such topics as narcotic
investigations, current drug trends, smuggling and distribution techniques, and State/Federallaws that
impact the task force.
3. Meet at least quarterly to coordinate joint operations and training, as well as other enforcement
efforts, and to share information.
4. Seize a minimum of 900 grams of cocaine, 600 grams of crystal methamphetamine, and 50 grams
of heroin.
5. Make a minimum of200 drug-related arrests.
6. Conduct 3 joint task force operations.
C. PROJECT ACTIVITIES
1. Investigative efforts will be directed towards the identIfication and arrest of drug distributors and
smugglers.
2. The Hawaii Police Department's Narcotic Canine Unit will continue to playa vital role in the
drug enforcement program. The unit also assists the HA TF in interdiction and distribution operations in
East and West Hawaii. Time will be spent at the Hilo International and Keahole-Kona International
Airport, as well as at private and federal mail and courier services.
When requested, the canine unit is utilized to assist other State and Federal law enforcement agencies.
An example of this is the occasional check of private aircrafts and cruise ships.
Personnel assigned to the canine unit and/or those assigned to assist them will attend various workshops
and seminars dealing with canine issues and investigative techniques. New narcotic detection canines will
be purchased as needed to replace older canines.
3. In furtherance of the task force concept, the Hawaii Police Department will continue to participate
and assist in interagency investigations.
4. Personnel will attend quarterly meetings in order to share current information and to coordinate
joint operations as well as other enforcement efforts.
AG/CPJAD #1(a) (Rev 03/3/2009)
Page 4
5. Training of personnel is an essential component to the drug enforcement program. Training will
include attending conferences and workshops on topics that will be instrumental in increasing the
attendees' knowledge and work performance. Training will also familiarize the narcotics officers with
current and up-to-date trends of various narcotics concerns and investigative techniques.
D. PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
The project director for the Hawaii Police Department shall be the Lieutenant ofthe Area I Vice Section.
The project director will be responsible for the overall management of the Project and will oversee
department activities with the Hawaii Narcotic Task Force.
The project director reports to the captain of the Criminal Investigation Division. The Criminal
Investigation Division falls under the command ofthe Major and Assistant Chief of Area I
Operations.
E. PERSONNEL
The County police departments will use existing personnel; there will be no hires for the project.
F. BRIEF PERSONNEL BIOGRAPHIES
N/A
G. PARTICIPATING AGENCIES
1. The lead agency and facilitator for the County police departments will be the Maui Police
Department who will, through the Vice Division, coordinate technical assistance, training, and
manpower.
2. The Hawaii Police Department will conduct enforcement throughout the County of Hawaii and
provide manpower assistance to the other Counties on an "as needed" basis.
3. The HNTF is comprised ofthe following County agencies:
Hawaii Police Department
Maui Police Department
Kauai Police Department
4. Participating agencies shall include the:
Drug Enforcement Administration
U.S. Customs & Immigration Enforcement
U.S. Postal Service
National Park Service
U.S. Coast Guard
Federal Bureau of Investigation
U.S. Attorney General
Internal Revenue Service
AG/CPJAD #I(a) (Rev 03/3/2009)
Page 5
State Attorney General
Department of Land and Natural Resources
State Narcotic Enforcement Division
Hawaii National Guard
Honolulu Police Department
County Prosecutor's Office
Hawaii HIDT A
H. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS/OUTCOME MEASURES
The American Recovery Act and Reinvestment Act JAG (ARRA JAG) of2009, requires grantees to report
specific Performance Measures for project activities. Refer to Table I to locate the Performance Measures
that pertain to this project.
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
Training:
Equipment/Supplies:
Contractual Support:
Task Force Activities:
Outcomes for All
Activity Areas:
Questions #14-24
Questions #39-42
Questions #43-46
Questions #66-83
Questions #84-86
1. PROBABILITY TO IMPROVE THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
The Hawaii Narcotics Task Force Project will provide Hawaii Police Department with the continued
funding necessary to investigate and apprehend mid- to high-level drug dealers.
The sharing of resources and information between the Task Force participants will affect not only the
individual Counties but also the State of Hawaii.
The results will be a decrease in the flow of illegal narcotics into the State which will positively impact
all aspects of police work and the criminal justice system
AG/CPJAD #1(a) (Rev 03/3/2009)
Page 6
Tp"BLE 1
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Activity Area: StateILocal Initiatives
State and local initiatives include activities that are planned for implementation of a new program to
provide a direct service or to improve a criminal justice system by implementing a new process, procedure,
or policy. Initiatives may improve a program, service, or system. They also may include the
implementation of a new program to meet an identified need of a population. Planned activities also may
include a campaign to counteract criminal activity in a variety of settings.
Total number
of new state
initiatives
planned
(System
Improvement)
2
Total number
of new local
initiatives
planned
(System
Improvement)
The purpose of this
output indicator is to
measure the number
of new state-initiated
programs, services or
interagency task forces
that are funded wholly
or partially by (ARRA)
JAG funds. Appropriate
for grantees under any
purpose area that uses
(ARRA) JAG funds to
implement programs'
that have a direct
impact on a targeted
population or use
funding for system
improvement activities.
Report the total
number of new state-
initiated programs,
services or interagency
task forces that are
planned for the project
period. SOURCE:
Agency records are
preferred data source.
The purpose of this
output indicator is to
measure the number
of new locally-initiated
programs, services or
interagency task forces
that are funded wholly
or partially by (ARRA)
JAG funds. Appropriate
for grantees under any
purpose area that use
(ARRA) JAG funds to
implement programs
that have a direct
impact on a targeted
population or use
funding for system
improvement type
activities. Report the
A.
Total number of
new state initiatives
planned for the
project period (life
of the award).
A.
Total number of
new local initiatives
planned for the
project period (life
of the award)
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Activity Area: State/Local lnitiatives
3
Total number
of statE
initiatives
maintained
using (ARRA)
JAG funds
(System
Improvement)
4
Total number
of local
initiatives
maintained
using (ARRA)
JAG funds
(System
Improvement)
total number of new
locally- initiated
programs, services or
interagency task forces
that are planned for
the project period.
SOURCE: Agency
records are preferred
data source.
The purpose of this
output indicator is to
measure the number
of state initiated
programs, services or
interagency task forces
that are maintained
wholly or partially by
(ARRA) JAG funds.
Appropriate for
grantees under any
pu rpose a rea that uses
(ARRA) JAG funds to
maintain programs
that have a direct
impact on a targeted
population or use
funding for system
improvement activities.
Report the total
number of state-
initiated programs,
services, or
interagency task forces
that are maintained for
the project period.
SOURCE: Agency
records are preferred
data source.
The purpose of this
output indicator is to
measure the number
of locally-initiated
programs, services or
interagency task forces
that are funded wholly
or partially by (ARRA)
JAG funds. Appropriate
for grantees under any
purpose area that use
(ARRA) JAG funds to
maintain programs
that have a direct
impact on a targeted
population or use
funding for system
improvement activities.
Report the total
number of state-
initiated programs,
A. Total number of state
initiatives maintained for
thE project period (life
of the award)
A. Total number of local
initiatives maintained for
the project period (life
of the award)
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
2
Activity Area: State/Locallnitiatives
5
Number of
program
participants
receiving
services
(Di rect
Service)
6
Number of
defined
groups
receiving
services
(Direct
Service)
services, or
interagency task forces
that are maintained for
the project pe riod.
SOURCE: Agency
records are preferred
data source.
The purpose of this A.
output indicator is to
measure service
provision levels.
Appropriatj: for
grantees in purpose
areas in which (ARRA) B.
JAG funds are used for
direct services to
individuals and/or
groups of program
participants. (e.g.,
crime
prevention/intervention C.
programs, one-to-one
contact, support
groups). Program
participants may be
defined by the
population served by
the program. Report
the number of
program participants
who received services
during the reporting
period SOURCE:
Program records are
preferred data source.
SHOULD ONLY USE
IF DATA for ITEM
#3 IS NOT
REPORTED. The
pu rpose of th is output
indicator is to measure
service provision
levels. AppropriCjte for
grantees in purpose
areas in which (ARRA)
JAG funds are used for
direct services to
groups of individuals
(e.g., crime prevention
awareness campaigns
to schools,
communities or
organizations). A r-
defined group includes
schools, communities,
organizations, agencies
or departments.
Report the number of
communities or
Number of program
partici pants
receiving services
carried over from
the previous
reporting period
Number of NEW
program
pa rtici pa nts
receiving services
that were added
during the
reporting period
Sum (a+b) Auto-
calculated by PMT
A. Number of defined
groups receiving
services carried
over from the
previous reporting
period
B. Number of NEW
defined groups
added during the
reporting period
C. Sum (a+b) Auto-
calculated by PMT
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Crime Victim and Witness
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Crime Victim and Witness
..,
-'
Activity Area: State/Local Initiatives
organizations that
received services
during the reporting
period. Community
includes groups of
people by organization,
neighborhood or
affiliation. Use
measures with
"defined groups" when
the number of
individuals can not be
determined. SOURCE:
Program records are
preferred data source.
7 Number of The purpose of this A.
program slots output indicator is to
offered measure program
through capacity. Appropriate
initiatives for grantees in purpose B.
(Direct areas in which (ARRA)
Service) JAG funds are used for
direct services to
individuals or programs C.
offered to groups of
individuals. Program
slots are, for example,
service delivery slots,
programs, and
campaigns. Report the
number of program
slots offered through
initiatives as a result of
(ARRA) JAG funds
during the reporting
period. The number of
slots available at the
start of the reporting
period reflects the
number of slots that
are available for use
with funds from your
current (ARRA) JAG
award. SOURCE:
Program records are
preferred data source.
8 Number of The purpose of the A.
local outcome indicator is to
initiatives measure
implemented accountability.
(System Appropriate for
Improvement) grantees in purpose B.
areas that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for system
improvement. Report
the number of locally-
initiated initiatives
implemented. (e.g., C.
programs, task force
Number of program
slots available at
the sta rt of the
reporting period
Number of NEW
program slots
created during the
reporting period
Sum (a+b) Auto-
calculated by PMT
Number of local
initiatives
implemented
during the
reporting period
Total number of
local initiatives
planned for the
project period
(Auto-filled by PMT
from #2a)
Percent (a/b) Auto-
calculated by PMT
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Crime Victim and Witness
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
4
Activity Area: State/Local Initiatives
operations) SOURCE:
Program records are
preferred data source
9 Number of The purpose of the A. Number of state Law Enforcement
state outcome indicator is to initiatives Prosecution and Court
initiatives measure implemented Prevention and Education
implemented accountability. during the Corrections and Community Corrections
(System Appropriate for reporting period Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement) grantees in purpose B. Total number of Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
areas that use (ARRA) state initiatives Crime Victim and Witness
JAG funds for system planned (AUTO-fill
improvement. Report from #1a)
the number of state- C. Percent (a/b) Auto-
initiated initiatives calculated by PMT
implemented. (e.g.,
programs, task force
operations) SOURCE:
Program records are
preferred data source
10 Number of The purpose of this A. Number of program Law Enforcement
program outcome indicator is to participants who Prosecution and Court
participants measure completed Prevention and Education
who accountability. programming Corrections and Community Corrections
completed Appropriate for during the Drug Treatment and Enforcement
programming purpose areas in which reporting period Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(Direct direct services are B. Total number of Crime Victim and Witness
Service, provided to individuals. program
System Report the number of participants that
Improvement) participants who exited
completed services programming
provided during the during the
reporting period. reporting period
SOURCE: Program (complete or not
records are preferred complete)
data source C. Percent complete
(a/b) Auto-
calculated by PMT
11 Number of SHOULD ONLY USE A. Number of defined Law Enforcement
defined IF DATA for ITEM groups that Prosecution and Court
groups that #18 IS NOT completed Prevention and Education
completed REPORTED. The programming Corrections and Community Corrections
programming purpose of this during the Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(Direct outcome indicator is to reporting period Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Service, measure B. Number of defined Crime Victim and Witness
System accountability. groups that exited
Improvement) Appropriate for programming
purpose areas in which during the
direct services are reporting
provided to period(complete or
communities or not complete)
defined groups (e.g., C. Percent (a/b) Auto-
the Maple Street calculated by PMT
business association,
the Main High School
Parent/Teachers
Organization, Orange
County.) Public
5
Activity Area: State/Local lnitiatives
12 Cost savings
(in man
hours) as a
result of new
systems
implemented
(System
Improvement)
13 Cost savings
(in dollars) as
a result of
new systems
implemented
(System
Improvement)
awareness campaigns
would fit under this
category. Report the
number of defined
groups that completed
programming provided
during the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Program records are
preferred data source
The purpose of this
outcome indicator is to
measure program cost
savings In man hours.
Appropriate for all
purpose areas that
provide direct service
and are able to realize
a cost savings as a
result of implementing
new systems. The
period "prior to the
initiative" represents
the activities that
occurred prior to the
start of grant-funded
activities. The cost of
standard procedures
before system changes
were made provided in
man hours. The period
"after initiative" refers
to the activities that
occur with grant funds.
SOURCE: Agency
records are preferred
data source
The purpose of this
outcome indicator is to
measure program cost
savings in dollars.
Appropriate for all
purpose' areas that
provide direct service
and are able to realize
a cost savings as a
result of implementing
new systems. The
period "prior to the
initiative" represents
the activities that
occurred prior to the
start of grant-funded
activities. The cost of
standard procedures
before system changes
were made provided in
dollars. The period
"after initiative" refers
A.
Number of man
hou rs req u ired
prior to initiative
Number of man
hours required
after initiative
Savings (a-b) Auto-
calculated by PMT
B.
c.
A.
Dollars expended
prior to initiative
Dollars expended
after initiative
Savings (a-b) Auto-
calculated by PMT
B.
c.
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
6
Acti vity Area: State/Local Initiatives
to the activities that
occur with grant funds.
SOURCE: Agency
records are preferred
data source
7
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Activity Area: Training
Training activities would include the provision of different types of training, the purchase 'of training
services for or to staff or departments.
14 Amount of The purpose of the output A. Amount of funds Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG indicator is to measure used to provide Prosecution and Court
funds used to system accountability. training during Prevention and Education
provide Appropriate for grantees in the reporting Corrections and Community Corrections
training purpose areas that use period Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System (ARRA) JAG funds for system Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement) improvement. Report the Crime Victim and Witness
amount of (ARRA) JAG funds
used to provide training.
Training may be delivered by
the grantee or funds used to
acquire training for staff. All
training is paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds. SOURCE: Program
records are preferred data
source
15 Number of The purpose of the output A. Number of Law Enforcement
training indicator is to measure training requests Prosecution and Court
req uests service levels. Appropriate for received during Prevention and Education
received grantees in purpose areas the reporting Corrections and Community Corrections
(System that use (ARRA) JAG funds for period Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement) system improvement. Report Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
the number of requests Crime Victim and Witness
received. SOURCE: Program
records are preferred data
source
16 Number of The purpose of this output A. Number of staff Law Enforcement
staff trai ned indicator is to measure trained during the Prosecution and Court
(System system/program capacity. reporting period Prevention and Education
Improvement) Appropriate for grantees in B. Total number of Corrections and Community Corrections
purpose areas that use staff needing Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG funds for system training during the Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
improvement. Report the reporting period Crime Victim and Witness
number of staff trained during C. Total number of
the reporting period. individuals on staff
(Training is paid for with D. Percent trained
(ARRA) JAG fU,nds.) SOURCE: (a/c) Auto-
Program records are calculated by PMT
preferred data source E. Percent of those
needing training
and were tramed
(a/b) Auto-
calculated by PMT
F. Percent of staff
that needed
training (b/c)
Auto-calculated by
PMT
8
8
Activity Area: Training
17 Number of SHOULD ONLY USE IF A. Number of defined Law Enforcement
defined DATA for ITEM #14 IS groups trained Prosecution and Court
groups NOT REPORTED. The during the Prevention and Education
trained purpose of this output reporting period Corrections and Community Corrections
(System indicator is to measure B. Total number of Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement) system/program capacity. defined groups Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Appropriate for grantees in needing training Crime Victim and Witness
purpose areas that use during the
(ARRA) JAG funds for system reporting period
improvement. To train C. Percent of those
defined groups who are needing training
within a defined geographic and were trained
region or discipline. Report (a/b) Auto-
the number of defined groups calculated by PMT
(i.e.,
com m un ities/ orga n izations/ ag
encies) trained during the
reporting period. (Training is
paid with (ARRA) JAG funds.)
Use measures with "defined
groups" when the number is
too large to determine the
number of individuals.
SOURCE: Program records are
preferred data source
18 Number of The purpose of this output A. Number of training Law Enforcement
training indicator is to measure calls held during Prosecution and Court
events held accountability. Appropriate for the reporting Prevention and Education
(System grantees in purpose areas period Corrections and Community Corrections
Improvement) that use (ARRA) JAG funds for B. Number of training Drug Treatment and Enforcement
system improvement. Report conferences held Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
the number of training events during the Crime Victim and Witness
by type held during the reporting period
reporting period. Source: C. Number of training
Program records are the manuals produced
preferred data source. during the
reporting period
D. Other forms of
training conducted
during the
reporting period
E. Sum (a+b+c+d)
Auto-calculated by
PMT
19 Percent of The purpose of this outcome A. Number of staff Law Enforcement
staff who indicator is to measure who completed Prosecution and Court
completed system/program capacity. training during the Prevention and Education
training Appropriate for grantees in reporting period Corrections and Community Corrections
(System purpose areas that use B. Total number of Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement) (ARRA) JAG funds for system staff who Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
improvement. Report the participated in Crime Victim and Witness
number of staff who training during the
completed training during the reporting period
reporting period (Training is C. Percent (a/b)
paid for with (ARRA) JAG Auto-calculated by
funds.) Source: Event records PMT
are the preferred data source.
9
Activity Area: Training
20 Percent of SHOULD ONLY USE IF A. Number of defined Law Enforcement
defined DATA for ITEM #17 IS groups who Prosecution and Court
groups that NOT REPORTED. The completed the Prevention and Education
completed purpose of this outcome training during the Corrections and Community Corrections
training indicator is to measure reporting period Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System system/program capacity. B. Total number of Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement) Appropriate for grantees in defined groups Crime Victim and Witness
purpose areas that use that participated ih
(ARRA) JAG funds for system the training during
improvement. Report the the reporting
number of defined groups period
( communities/organizations/a C. Percent (a/b)
gencies) that completed Auto-calculated by
training during the reporting PMT
period (Training is paid with
(ARRA) JAG funds.) Source:
Event records are the
preferred data source.
21 Percent of The purpose of this outcome A. Number of staff Law Enforcement
staff who indicator is to measure trained who report Prosecution and Court
reported the effectiveness. Appropriate for training as useful Prevention and Education
training as grantees in purpose areas during the Corrections and Community Corrections
useful that use (ARRA) JAG funds for reporting period Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System system improvement. Report B. Number of staff Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement) the number of staff who who completed Crime Victim and Witness
reported training as useful training during the
during the reporting period reporting period
(Training is paid with (ARRA) (Auto-filled by
JAG funds.) Source: Event PMT from #19a)
evaluation is the preferred C. Percent (a/b)
data source. Auto-calculated by
PMT
22 Percent of SHOULD ONLY USE IF A. Number of defined Law Enforcement
defined DATA for ITEM #19 IS groups who Prosecution and Court
groups who NOT REPORTED. The reported the Prevention and Education
reported the purpose of this outcome training as useful Corrections and Community Corrections
training as indicator is to measure during the Drug Treatment and Enforcement
useful effectiveness. Appropriate for reporting period Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System grantees in purpose areas B. Number of defined Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement) that use (ARRA) JAG funds for groups trained
system improvement. Report during the
the number of defined groups reporting period
( communities/organizations/a (Auto-filled by
gencies) who reported the PMT from #20a)
training as useful during the C. Percent (a/b)
reporting period (Training is Auto-calculated by
paid with (ARRA) JAG funds.) PMT
Source: Event evaluation is
the preferred data source.
23 Percent of The purpose of this outcome A. Number of staff Law Enforcement
staff who indicator is to determine who reported an Prosecution and Court
reported an effectiveness in criminal increase in skills Prevention and Education
increase in justice system operations. during the Corrections and Community Corrections
skills Appropriate for grantees in reporting period Drug Treatment and Enforcement
10
Activity Area: Training
(System pu rpose a reas that use B. Number of staff Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement) (ARRA) JAG funds for system trained during the Crime Victim and Witness
improvement. Report the reporting period
number of staff who indicate (Auto-filled by
an increase in skills during the PMTfrom #19a)
reporting period (attributable C. Percent (a/b)
to (ARRA) JAG funds.) Auto-calculated by
Source: Pre/Post tests are the PMT
preferred data source.
24 Percent of The purpose of this outcome A. Number of staff Law Enforcement
staff who indicator is to determine who reported an Prosecution and Court
reported an effectiveness in criminal increase in Prevention and Education
increase in justice system operations. knowledge during Corrections and Community Corrections
knowledge Appropriate for grantees in the reporting Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System purpose areas that use period Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement) (ARRA) JAG funds for system B. Number of staff Crime Victim and Witness
improvement. Report the trained during the
number of staff who reported reporting period
an increase in knowledge (Auto-filled from
during the reporting period # 19a)
(attributable to (ARRA) JAG C. Percent (a/b)
funds.) Source: Pre/Post tests Auto-calculated by
are the preferred data source. PMT
] ]
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTIVITY AREA: Technical Assistance
This activity area includes the provision of technical assistance for staff.
25 Amount of
(ARRA) JAG
funds used to
provide technical
assistance
(System
Improvement)
26 Number of staff
who received
technica I
assistance
(System
Improvement)
The purpose of
the output
indicator is to
measure system
accountability.
Appropriate for
grantees in
purpose areas
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the
amount of
(ARRA) JAG
funds used to
provide technical
assistance.
SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
The purpose of
this output
indicator is to
measure
system/program
capacity.
Appropriate for
grantees in
purpose areas
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the
number of staff
who received
technical
assistance during
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
A. Amount of
(ARRA) JAG funds
used to provide
technical
assistance during
the reporting
period
A. Number of staff
who received
technical
assistance during
the reporting
period
B. Total number of
staff needing
technical
assista nce
C. Total number of
individuals on
staff
D. Percent receiving
technical
assistance (a/c)
Auto-calculated
by PMT
E. Percent of those
needing technical
assistance and
received (ajb)
Auto-calculated
by PMT
F. Percent of staff
that needed
tech n ica I
assistance (b/c)
Auto-calculated
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology
Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology
Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
]2
ACTIVITY AREA: Technical Assistance
by PMT
27 Number of The purpose of A. Number technical Law Enforcement
technical the output assista nce Prosecution and Court
assistance indicator is to requests received Prevention and Education
requests received measure service during the Corrections and Community Corrections
(System levels. reporting period Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement) Appropriate for Planning, Evaluation and Technology
grantees in Improvement
purpose areas Crime Victim and Witness
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the
number of
requests
received.
SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
28 Number of The purpose of A. Number of Law Enforcement
technical this outcome technical Prosecution and Court
assistance events indicator is to assistance events Prevention and Education
held measure held by phone Corrections and Community Corrections
(System accountability. during the Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement) Appropriate for reporting period Planning, Evaluation and Technology
grantees in B. Number of Improvement
purpose areas technical Crime Victim and Witness
that use (ARRAy assistance
JAG funds for meetings held
system during the
improvement. reporting period
Report the C. Number of
number of technical
technical assistance
assistance events manuals
by type held produced during
during the the reporting
reporting period. period
Source: Program D. Other forms of
records are the technical
preferred data assistance
source. delivery held
during the
reporting period
E. Total (a+b+c+d)
Auto-calculated
by PMT
29 Percent of staff The purpose of A. Number of staff Law Enforcement
who reported the this outcome who reported Prosecution and Court
technical indicator is to technical Prevention and Education
assista nce as measure assistance as Corrections and Community Corrections
useful effectiveness. useful during the Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System Appropriate for reporting period Planning, Evaluation and Technology
13
ACTIVlTY AREA: Technical Assistance
Improvement) grantees in B. Number of staff Improvement
purpose areas to req uest Crime Victim and Witness
that use (ARRA) technical
JAG funds for assistance during
system the reporting
Improvement. period
Report the C. Percent (a/b)
number of staff Auto-calculated
who reported by PMT
technical
assistance as
useful (paid with
(ARRA) JAG
funds). Source:
Program records
are the preferred
data source.
30 Percent of staff The purpose of A. Number of staff Law Enforcement
who reported an this outcome who reported an Prosecution and Court
increase in skills indicator is to increase in skills Prevention and Education
(System determine as a result of Corrections and Community Corrections
Improvement) effectiveness in technical Drug Treatment and Enforcement
criminal justice assistance Planning, Evaluation and Technology
system received during Improvement
operations. the reporting Crime Victim and Witness
Appropriate for period
grantees in B. Number of staff
pu rpose areas to req uest
that use (ARRA) technical
JAG funds for assistance during
system the reporting
improvement. period (Auto-filled
Report the by PMT from
number of staff #29b)
who reported an C. Percent (a/b)
increase in skills Auto-calculated
during the by PMT
reporting period
(attributable to
(ARRA) JAG
funds.) Source:
Pre/ post tests
are the preferred
data source.
31 Percent of staff The purpose of A. Number of staff Law Enforcement
who reported an this outcome who reported an Prosecution and Court
increase in indicator is to increase in Prevention and Education
knowledge determine knowledge as a Corrections and Community Corrections
(System effectiveness in result of technical Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement) criminal justice assistance Planning, Evaluation and Technology
system received during Improvement
operations. the reporting Crime Victim and Witness
Appropriate for period
grantees in B. Number of staff
purpose areas to req uest
that use (ARRA) technical
JAG funds for assistance during
system the reporting
14
ACT1V1TY AREA: Technical Assistance
improvement.
Report the
number of staff
who reported an
increase in
knowledge
during the
reporting period
(attritJutable to
(ARRA) JAG
funds.)
period (Auto-filled
from #29b)
C. Percent (a/b)
Auto-calculated
by PMT
J 5
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTIVITY AREA: Personnel
Personnel activities may include the employment of new staff either through new recruitment activities or
payment to existing stafffor work over and beyond (overtime) the normal work period. The (ARRA) JAG
grant program allows use or funds for retention of positions otherwise lost due to budget cutbacks.
32 Number of new The purpose of A. Number of Law Enforcement
personnel paid this output NEW Prosecution and Court
with (ARRA) JAG indicator is to personnel Prevention and Education
funds measure the paid with Corrections and Community Corrections
(System extent of (ARRA) JAG Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement) personnel hours funds during Planning, Evaluation and Technologylmprovement
paid with (ARRA) the reporting Crime Victim and Witness
JAG funds period
(system E.. Total nUrTtber
capacity). of existing
Appropriate for personnE!
grantees in paid by a!!
purpose areas OTHER (non-
that use (ARRA) ARRP. JAG)
JAG funds for sourCES
system during the
improvement. reporting
Report the period
number of new C. Total (a+b)
personnel paid Auto-
with (ARRA) JAG calculated by
funds during the PMT
reporting period. D. Percent (a/c)
SOURCE: Agency Auto-
records are calculated by
preferred data PMT
source
33 Indicate the type The purpose of A. Law Law Enforcement
of NEW this output Enforcement Prosecution and Court
personnel paid i nd icator is to Personnel Prevention and Education
with (ARRA) JAG measure B. Prosecution Corrections and Community Corrections
funds accountability . and Court Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System Appropriate for Personnel Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement) grantees in C. Prevention Crime Victim and Witness
purpose areas and
that use (ARRA) Education
JAG funds for Personnel
system D. Corrections
improvement. and
Check all boxes Community
applicable to the Corrections
type of NEW Personnel
personnel paid E. Drug
with (ARRA) JAG Treatment
funds during the and
reporting period. Enforcement
SOURCE: Agency Personnel
records are F. Planning,
]6
ACTIVITY AREA: Personnel
preferred data Evaluation,
source and
Technology
Improvement
Personnel
G. Crime Victim
and Witness
Personnel
34 Number of The purpose of A. Number of Law Enforcement
personnel this output personnel Prosecution and Court
retained with indicator is to retained with Prevention and Education
ARRA (ARRA) measure the ARRA (ARRA) Corrections and Community Corrections
JAG funds extent of JAG funds Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System personnel during the Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement) retained as a reporting Crime Victim and Witness
result of ARRA period
(ARRA) JAG B. Total number
funds. This of existing
measure is only personnel
appropriate for paid by all
the ARRA (ARRA) OTHER (non-
JAG because the ARRA JAG)
ARRA (ARRA) sou rces
JAG allows use of during the
funds for reporting
retention of period
positions C. Total
otherwise lost (a+ b )Auto-
due to budget calculated by
cutbacks. The PMT
intent of this D. Percent (ale)
measure is to Auto-
ca ptu re the calculated by
number of PMT
personnel
retained each
quarter for the
life of the award.
Report the
number of
personnel
maintained with
ARRA (ARRA)
JAG funds during
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Agency records
are the preferred
data source.
35 Indicate the type The purpose of A. Law Law Enforcement
of RETAINED this output Enforcement Prosecution and Court
personnel paid indicator is to Personnel Prevention and Education
with ARRA measure B. Prosecution Corrections and Community Corrections
(ARRA) JAG accountability. and Court Drug Treatment and Enforcement
funds Appropriate for Personnel Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System grantees in C. Prevention Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement) purpose areas and
17
ACTIVITY AREA: Personnel
36 Number of
overtime hours
paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds
(System
Improvement)
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
This measure is
only appropriate
for the (ARRA)
JAG because the
(ARRA) JAG
allows use of
funds for
retention of
positions
otherwise lost
due to budget
cutbacks. Check
all boxes
applicable to the
type of
RETAINED
personnel paid
with (ARRA) JAG
funds during the
reporting period.
SOURCE: Agency
records are the
preferred data
source.
The purpose of
this output
indicator is to
measure
system/program
capacity.
Appropriate for
grantees in
purpose areas
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the
number of
overtime hours
paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds during
the reporting
period. Report
total hours of
overtime paid by
all OTHER (non-
ARRA) JAG)
sources. This is a
total of hours
from the agency
represented in
the grant
application.
Education
Personnel
D. Corrections
and
Community
Corrections
Personnel
E. Drug
Treatment
and
Enforcement
Personnel
F. Planning,
Evaluation,
and
Technology
Improvement
Personnel
G. Crime Victim
and Witness
Personnel
A. Number of
overtime
hours paid
with (ARRA)
JAG funds
during the
reporting
period
B. Total number
of hours of
overtime paid
by all OTHER
(non-ARRA
JAG) sources
during the
reporting
period
C. Total (a+b)
Auto-
calculated by
the PMT
D. Percent (a/c)
Auto-
calculated by
the PMT
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
] 8
ACTIVITY AREA: Personnel
37 Percent of
departments that
report desired
efficiency
(System
Improvement)
38 Percent of
departments that
report desired
program quality
(System
Improvement)
Source: Agency
records are the
preferred data
source.
The purpose of
this outcome
indicator is to
measure desired
efficiency .
Appropriate for
grantees under
any purpose area
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement
activities. Report
the number of
departments that
report desired
efficiency as a
result of new
personnel or
overtime paid
with (ARRA) JAG
funds. SOURCE:
Agency records
are the preferred
data source.
The purpose of
this outcome
indicator is to
measure
increased
program quality.
Appropriate for
grantees under
any purpose area B.
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement
activities. Report
the number of
departments that
report desired
program quality
as a result of
new personnel
and overtime
paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds.
SOURCE: Agency C.
records are
preferred data
source.
A. Number of
departments
that report
desired
efficiency
during the
reporting
period
B. Total number
of
departments
that used
(ARRA) JAG
funds to hire
new
personnel,
maintain
personnel or
pay for
overtime
hours
C. Percent (a/b)
Auto-
calculated by
PMT
A. Number of
departments
that report
desired
program
quality during
the reporting
period
Total number
of
departments
that used
(ARRA) JAG
funds to hire
new
personnel,
maintain
personnel or
pay for
overtime
hours (Auto-
filled from
#37b)
Percent (a/b)
Auto-
calculated by
PMT
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
19
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTIVITY AREA: Equipment/Supplies
Equipment and supplies includes the purchase of new or replacement equipment or supplies to improve or
replace what currently exists.
39 Amount of The purpose of A. Amount of Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG this output (ARRA) JAG Prosecution and Court
funds used to measure is to funds used to Prevention and Education
purchase document the purchase Corrections and Community Corrections
equipment extent of equipment Drug Treatment and Enforcement
and/or supplies equipment and/or Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System and/or supplies supplies Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement) purchased with during the
(ARRA) JAG reporting
funds. period
Appropriate for
grantees in all
purpose areas
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the
amount of
(ARRA) JAG
funds used to
purchase
equipment
and/or supplies.
SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
40 I ndicate the The purpose of A. Weapons Law Enforcement
number by types this output B. Equipment Prosecution and Court
of equipment indicator is to for police Prevention and Education
and/or supplies measure cruisers Corrections and Community Corrections
purchased with accountability. C. Uniforms Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG Appropriate for D. CAD Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
funds grantees in E. RMS Crime Victim and Witness
(System F. Software -
purpose areas
Improvement) that use (ARRA) G. Computers
JAG funds for H. Mobile access
system equipment
improvement. (ex. Aircards
Report the for Verizon,
number by types Sprint, AT&T,
of equipment or ete. )
supplies 1. Security
purchased with systems
(ARRA) JAG (station or
funds during the evidence
reporting period. room)
20
ACTIVITY AREA: Equipment/Supplies
41 Number of
equipment
and/or supply
requests
purchased with
(ARRA) JAG
funds
(System
Improvement)
SOURCE: J. Biometric
Program records equipment
are preferred (Live scans,
data source fingerprint
readers, etc.)
K. In-car
camera
systems
L. Video
observation
( station,
community,
pole cams)
M. Undercover
surveillance
equipment
(microphones
, video)
N. License plate
readers
O. Kiosk units
for
community
access or
reg istration
P. Vehicles
Q. Radios
R. Other (please
specify type
and quantity)
The purpose of
this output
measure is to
document the
extent of
equipment
and/or supplies
purchased with
(ARRA) JAG
funds.
Appropriate for
grantees in all
purpose areas
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the
number of
equipment
and/or supply
requests received
and of that, the
number
purchased with
(ARRA) JAG
funds. SOURCE:
A. Number of
equipment
and/or supply
req uests
purchased
with (ARRA)
JAG funds
during the
reporting
period
B. Number of
equipment
and/or supply
requests
received
C. Percent ( a/b)
Auto-
calculated by
PMT
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
2]
ACT1VlTY AREA: Equipment/Supplies
42 Percent of staff
that directly
benefit from
equipment or
supplies
purchased by
(ARRA) JAG
funds, who
report a desired
change in their
job performance
(System
Improvement)
Program records
are preferred
data source.
The purpose of
this outcome
indicator is to
measure
efficiency.
Appropriate for
grantees in
purpose areas
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the
number of staff
that directly
benefit from
equipment or
supplies
purchased with
(ARRA) JAG
funds, who
report a desired
change in their
job performance
during this
reporting period.
SOURCE: This is
a count of direct
staff that benefit
from the
equipment
and/or supplies
purchased.
Program records
are preferred
data source
A. Number of
staff that
directly
benefit from
equipment or
supplies
purchased by
(ARRA) JAG
funds, who
report a
desired
change in
their job
performance
B. Number of
staff to
receive
equipment or
supplies
purchased
with (ARRA)
JAG funds
during the
reporting
period
C. Percent ( a/b)
Auto-
calculated by
PMT
D. Explain the
impact on job
performance
for the
reporting
period
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
22
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTIVITY AREA: Contractual Support
Contractual support includes activities that address issues that help to improve the effectiveness and/or
efficiency in various points of the criminal justice system. This may include consultants or evaluators, not
otherwise captured in another activity area.
43 Number of hours
paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds for
contractual
support
(System
Improvement)
44 Types of
contractual
support paid with
(ARRA) JAG
funds
(System
Improvement)
The purpose of
this output
indicator is to
measure
program/system
capacity.
Appropriate for
grantees in
purpose areas
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the
number of hours
paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds for
contractual
support during
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Program records
are a preferred
data source.
The purpose of
this output
indicator is to
measure
accountability.
Appropriate for
grantees in
purpose areas
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the types
of co ntract
support paid with
(ARRA) JAG
funds during the
reporting period.
SOURCE:
Program records
are a preferred
data source.
A. Number of
hours paid
with (ARRA)
JAG funds for
contractual
support
during the
reporting
period
A. Indicate the
types of
contractual
support paid
with (ARRA)
JAG funds
during the
reporting
period
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
23
ACTIVITY AREA: Contractual Support
45 Number of The purpose of A. Number of Law Enforcement
departments that this outcome departments Prosecution and Court
report a desired measure is to that report a Prevention and Education
change in document desired Corrections and Community Corrections
efficiency improved change in Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System efficiency. efficiency Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
I m prove ment) Appropriate for during the Crime Victim and Witness
g ra ntees under reporting
any purpose area' period
that use (ARRA) B. Number of
JAG funds for departments
system that received
improvement contractual
activities. Report support with
the number of (ARRA) JAG
departments that funds during
report a desired the reporting
change in period
efficiency (e.g., C. Percent (a/b)
reduced case Auto-
backlogs, calculated by
increased PMT
., contacts with D. Explain the
offenders or impact on
victims) as a efficiency
result of (ARRA) during the
JAG funds during reporting
the reporting period
period. SOURCE:
Program records
are a preferred
data source.
46 Number of The purpose of A. Number of Law Enforcement
departments that this outcome departments Prosecution and Court
report a desired measure is to that report a Prevention and Education
change in document desired Corrections and Community Corrections
program quality improved change in Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System program quality. program Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement) Appropriate for quality during Crime Victim and Witness
grantees under the reporting
any purpose area period
that use (ARRA) B. Number of
JAG funds for departments
system that received
improvement contractual
activities. Report support with
the number of (ARRA) JAG
departments that funds
report a desired C. Percent (a/b)
change in Auto-
program quality calculated by
(e.g., per staff PMT
caseloads meet D. Explain the
professional impact on
standards, program
increased quality during
availability of the reporting
specialized period
24
ACTIVITY AREA: Contractual Support
services) as a
result of (ARRA)
JAG funds.
SOURCE:
Program records
are a preferred
data source.
?~
-)
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTIVITY AREA: Information Systems for Criminal Justice System
This activity area includes the development, implementation or improvements made to benefit staff or
departments.
47 Amount of
(ARRA) JAG
funds used for
improvements to
information
systems for
criminal justice
systems
(System
Improvement)
48 Number of
departments that
used (ARRA) JAG
funds to make
improvements to
information
systems for
criminal justice
(System
Improvement)
The purpose of
this output
indicator is to
improve system
effectiveness
and/or capacity.
Appropriate for
grantees under
any purpose area
that uses (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the
amount of
(ARRA) JAG
funds used to
improve
information
systems for
criminal justice
systems during
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Agency records
are a preferred
data source.
The purpose of
this output
measure is for
system/program
capacity based
on the idea that
new, enhanced
or improved
information
systems can
provide staff with
better efficiency
to do their jobs.
Appropriate for
grantees under
any purpose area
that uses (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement
A. Amount of
(ARRA) JAG
funds used
for
improvement
s to
information
systems for
criminal
justice
systems
during the
reporting
period
A. Number of
departments
that used
(ARRA) JAG
funds to
make
improvement
s to criminal
justice
information
systems
started in the
previous
period
B. Number of
NEW
departments
that use
(ARRA) JAG
funds to
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
26
ACTJVlTY AREA: Information Systems for Criminal Justice System
activities. Report make
the number of improvement
departments that s to criminal
uses (ARRA) JAG justice
funds to make information
improvements to systems that
information were added
systems for during the
criminal justice reporting
during the period
reporting period. C. Total (a+b)
SOURCE: Agency Auto-
records a re a calculated by
preferred data PMT
source.
49 Number of The purpose of A. Number of Law Enforcement
departments that this output departments Prosecution and Court
completed measure is for that Prevention and Education
improvements to system completed Corrections and Community Corrections
information accountability. improvement Drug Treatment and Enforcement
systems for Appropriate for s to Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
criminal justice grantees under information Crime Victim and Witness
(System any purpose area systems for
Improvement) that uses (ARRA) criminal
JAG funds for justice during
system the reporting
improvement period as a
activities. Report result of
the number of (ARRA) JAG
departments that funds
completed B. Number of
improvements to departments
criminal justice to use
information (ARRA) JAG
systems during funds to
the reporting make
period. SOURCE: improvement
Agency records s to
are a preferred information
data source. systems for
criminal
justice (Auto-
filled by PMT
from #48c)
C. Percent (a/b)
Auto-
calculated by
PMT
50 Number of The purpose of A. Number of Law Enforcement
depa rtments that this outcome departments Prosecution and Court
report a desired measure is to that report a Prevention and Education
change in document desired Corrections and Community Corrections
efficiency improved change in Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System efficiency. efficiency Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement) Appropriate for during the Crime Victim and Witness
grantees under reporting
any purpose area period
27
ACT1VlTY AREA: lnformation Systems for Criminal Justice System
51 Number of
departments that
report a desired
change in
program quality
(System
Improvement)
that uses (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement
activities. Report
the number of
departments that
report a desired
change in
efficiency as a
result of
improved
information
systems for
criminal justice
systems as a
result of (ARRA)
JAG funds during
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Agency records
are a preferred
data source.
The purpose of
this outcome
measure is to
document
improved
program quality.
Appropriate for
grantees under
any purpose area
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement
activities. Report
the number of
departments that
report a desired
change in
program quality
(e.g. per staff
case loads meet
professional
standards,
increased
availability of
specialized
services) as a
result of (ARRA)
JAG funds.
SOURCE: Agency
records are
preferred data
B. Number of
departments
that
completed
improvement
s to
information
systems for
criminal
justice
systems as a
result of
(ARRA) JAG
funds (Auto-
filled by PMT
from #49a)
C. Percent (a/b)
Auto-
calculated by
PMT
D. Explain the
impact on
efficiency for
the reporting
period
A. Number of
departments
that report a
desired
change in
program
quality during
the reporting
period
B. Number of
departments
that
completed
improvement
s to
information
systems for
criminal
Justice
systems
during the
reporting
period (Auto-
filled from
#48c)
C. Percent ( a/b)
Auto-
calculated by
PMT
D. Explain the
impact on
program
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
28
ACTIVITY AREA: Information Systems for Criminal Justice System
source
quality during
the reporting
period
/
"
29
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTIVITY AREA: Research, Evaluation, and Product Development
This activity area includes research and evaluation activities that have a goal of informing decisions and
providing information as to what works. Product development activities are those that have a goal to
inform.
52 Amount of
(ARRA) JAG
funds used for
criminal justice-
related research
studies
(System
Improvement)
53 Provide the type
of criminal
justice-related
research studies
paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds
(System
Improvement)
The purpose of
this output
indicator is to
increase
knowledge about
what works in
criminal justice.
Appropriate for
grantees under
any purpose area
that uses (ARRA)
JAG funds to
implement
criminal justice-
related research
studies. Report
the total amount
of (ARRA) JAG
funds used for
criminal justice-
related research
studies for the
reporting period.
SOURCE: Agency
records are
preferred data
source
The purpose of
this output
indicator is to
increase
knowledge.
Appropriate for
grantees in
purpose areas
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the type
of criminal
justice-related
research studies
paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds during
the reporting
A. Total amount
of (ARRA)
JAG funds
used during
the reporting
period for
criminal
justice-
related
research
studies
A. Provide the
type of
criminal
justice-
related
research
studies paid
with (ARRA)
JAG funds
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
30
ACT1VlTY AREA: Research, Evaluation, and Product Development
period. SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
54 Percent of The purpose of A. Number of Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG this output (ARRA) JAG Prosecution and Court
funded criminal indicator is to funded Prevention and Education
justice-related improve program criminal Corrections and Community Corrections
research studies effectiveness. j ustice- Drug Treatment and Enforcement
completed Appropriate for related Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System grantees under resea rch Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement) any purpose area studies
that uses (ARRA) completed
JAG funds to during the
implement reporting
criminal justice- period
related research B. Number of
studies. Report criminal
the number of justice-
criminal justice- re lated
related research resea rch
studies studies
completed during planned
the reporting C. Number of
period. $OURCE: studies
Program records initiated
are preferred during the
data source reporting
period
D. Number of
studies
continued
from the
previous
reporting
period
E. Percent
complete
(ajc+d) Auto-
calculated by
PMT
55 Amount of The purpose of A. Total amount Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG this output of (ARRA) Prosecution and Court
funds used for indicator is to JAG funds Prevention and Education
criminal justice- increase used for Corrections and Community Corrections
related knowledge about criminal Drug Treatment and Enforcement
evaluations what works in j ustice- Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System criminal justice. related Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement) Appropriate for evaluations
grantees under puring the
any purpose area reporting
that uses (ARRA) period
JAG funds to
implement
evaluation
activities. Report
the total amount
3]
ACTIVJTY AREA: Research, Evaluation, and Product Development
of (ARRA) JAG
funds used for
criminal justice-
related
evaluations for
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Agency records
are preferred
data source
56 Provide the type The purpose of A. Provide the Law Enforcement
of criminal this output type of Prosecution and Court
justice-related indicator is to criminal Prevention and Education
evaluations paid increase justice- Corrections and Community Corrections
with (ARRA) JAG knowledge. related Drug Treatment a~d Enforcement
funds Appropriate for evaluations Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System grantees in paid with Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement) purpose areas (ARRA) JAG
that use (ARRA) funds during
JAG funds for the reporting
system period
improvement.
Report the type
of criminal
justice-related
evaluations paid
with (ARRA) JAG
funds during the
reporting period.
SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
57 Percent of The purpose of A. Number of Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG this output criminal Prosecution and Court
funded criminal indicator is to J ustice- Prevention and Education
justice-related improve program related Corrections and Community Corrections
evaluations effectiveness. evaluations Drug Treatment and Enforcement
completed Appropriate for completed Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System grantees under during the Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement) any purpose area reporting
that uses (ARRA) period
JAG funds to B. Number of
implement criminal
criminal justice- justice-
related related
evaluations. evaluations
Report the planned
number of C. Number of
criminal justice- evaluations
related initiated.
evaluations during the
completed during reporting
the reporting period
period. SOURCE: D. Number of
Program records evaluations
are preferred continued
data source from the
32
ACT1VITY AREA: Research, Evaluation, and Product Development
previous
reporting
period
E. Percent
complete
(ajc+d) Auto-
calculated by
PMT
58 Amount of The purpose of A. Total amount Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG this output of (ARRA) Prosecution and Court
funds used for indicator is to JAG funds Prevention and Education
criminal justice- increase used for Corrections and Community Corrections
related product knowledge about criminal Drug Treatment and Enforcement
development what works in justice- Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
projects criminal justice. related Crime Victim and Witness
(System Appropriate for product
Improvement) grantees under development
any purpose area projects
that uses (ARRA) during the
JAG funds to reporting
implement period
criminal justice-
related product
development
projects. For
example,
brochures,
curricula,
manuals or
workbooks.
Report the tota I
amount of
(ARRA) JAG
funds used for
criminal justice-
related product
development
projects for the
reporting period.
SOURCE: Agency
records are
preferred data
source
59 Provide the type The purpose of A. Indicate the Law Enforcement
of criminal this output type of Prosecution and Court
justice- related indicator is to criminal Prevention and Education
product measure justice- Corrections and Community Corrections
development accountability. related Drug Treatment and Enforcement
projects paid Appropriate for product Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
with (ARRA) JAG grantees in development Crime Victim and Witness
funds purpose areas projects paid
(System that use (ARRA) with (ARRA)
Improvement) JAG funds for JAG funds
system during the
improvement. reporting
For example, period
brochures,
"l"l
.:U
ACTIVlTY AREA: Research, Evaluation, and Product Development
60 Percent of
(ARRA) JAG
funded product
development
projects
completed
(System
Improvement)
curricula,
manuals or
workbooks.
Provide the type
of criminal
justice-related
product
development
projects paid
with (ARRA) JAG
funds during the
reporting period.
SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
The purpose of
this output
indicator is to
measure the
extent of criminal
justice-related
product
development that
is funded wholly
or partially by
(ARRA) JAG
funds.
Appropriate for
grantees under
any purpose area
that uses (ARRA)
JAG funds to
implement
criminal justice-
related product
development
activities. For
example,
brochures,
curricula,
manuals or
workbooks.
Report the
number of
criminal justice-
related product
development
projects
completed during
the reporti ng
period. SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
A. Number of
(ARRA) JAG
funded
criminal
justice-
related
product
development
projects
completed
during the
reporting
period
B. Number of
criminal
justice-
related
product
development
projects
planned
C. Number of
product
development
projects
initiated
during the
reporting
period
D. Number of
product
development
projects
continued
from the
previous
reporting
period
E. Percent
complete
(a/c+d) Auto-
calculated by
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
34
ACTIVlTY AREA: Research, Evaluation, and Product Development
PMT
61 Percent of The purpose of A. Number of Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG this outcome (ARRA) JAG Prosecution and Court
funded criminal indicator is to funded Prevention and Education
justice-related improve resea rch Corrections and Community Corrections
research studies knowledge studies or Drug Treatment and Enforcement
or evaluations dissemination. evaluations Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
resulting in Appropriate for that resulted Crime Victim and Witness
presentations or grantees under in one or
poster sessions any purpose area more
at professional that uses (ARRA) presentations
meetings or JAG funds to or poster
conferences implement sessions at
(System criminal justice- professional
Improvement) related research meetings or
or evaluations. conferences
Report the during the
number of reporting
(ARRA) JAG period
funded criminal B. Number of
justice-related (ARRA) JAG
research or funded
evaluations criminal
resulting in a justice-
presentation or re lated
poster session at research
professional studies
meetings or completed
conferences during the
during the reporting
reporting period period(Auto-
SOURCE: filled by PMT
Program records from # S4a)
a re preferred C. Number of
data source evaluations
completed
(Auto-filled
by PMT from
#S7a)
D. Percent
a/(b+c) Auto-
calculated by
PMT
62 Percent of The purpose of A. Number of Law Enforcement
criminal justice- this outcome , criminal Prosecution and Court
related programs indicator is to j ustice- Prevention and Education
that were improve tools for related Corrections and Community Corrections
evaluated as knowledge programs Drug Treatment and Enforcement
effective a nd the dissemination. that were Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
evaluations were Appropriate for evaluated as Crime Victim and Witness
(ARRA) JAG grantees under effective
funded. any purpose area during the
(System that use (ARRA) reporting
Improvement) JAG funds for period
system B. Total number
improvement. of criminal
35
ACTIVJTY AREA: Researc~, Evaluation, and Product Development
63 Percent of
(ARRA) JAG
funded criminal
justice-related
research studies
or evaluations
resulting in peer-
reviewed articles
(System
Improvement)
Report the
number of
criminal justice-
related programs
that were
evaluated as
effective. The
evaluation was
paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds.
Report the
number of
criminal justice-
related programs
that were
evaluated as
effective during
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
The purpose of
this outcome
indicator is to
improve
knowledge
, dissemination.
Appropriate for
grantees under
any purpose area
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds to
implement
criminal justice-
related research
studies or
evaluations.
Report the
number of
(ARRA) JAG
funded criminal
justice-related
research studies
or evaluation
projects resulting
in peer-reviewed
articles during
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
justice-
related
programs
that were
evaluated
with (ARRA)
JAG funds
C. Percent ( a/b)
Auto-
calculated by
PMT
A. Number of
(ARRA) JAG
funded
criminal
justice-
related
research
studies or
evaluation
projects
resulting in
peer-
reviewed
articles
during the
reporting
period
B. Number of
(ARRA) JAG
funded
criminal
justice-
related
resea rch
studies
completed
during the
reporting
period(Auto-
filled from
#54a)
C. Number of
evaluations
completed
(Auto-filled
from #57a)
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
36
ACTIVITY AREA: Research, Evaluation, and Product Development
D. Percent (a/b)
Auto-
calculated by
PMT
E. Percent (a/c)
Auto-
calculated by
PMT
64 Percent of The purpose of A. Number of Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG this outcome (ARRA) JAG Prosecution and Court
funded programs indicator is to funded Prevention and Education
that have improve program criminal Corrections and Community Corrections
implemented effectiveness. justice Drug Treatment and Enforcement
recommendations Appropriate for programs Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
based on a grantees under that have Crime Victim and Witness
program any program implemented
evaluation area that uses one or more
(System (ARRA) JAG recommendat
Improvement) funds for system ions based on
improvement. a program
Report the evaluation
number of during the
criminal justice reporting
programs that period
have B. Total number
implemented one of criminal
or more justice-
recommendations related
from a program programs
evaluation. The that were
program evaluated
evaluation was with (ARRA)
funded by JAG funds
(ARRA) JAG (Auto-filled
funds. SOURCE: from #62b)
Program records C. Percent (a/b)
are preferred Auto-
data source calculated by
PMT
6S Percent of The purpose of A. Number of Law Enforcement
curricula that was this outcome curricula that Prosecution and Court
evaluated as i nd icator is to was Prevention and Education
effective and improve evaluated as Corrections and Community Corrections
evaluation was knowledge effective Drug Treatment and Enforcement
paid with (ARRA) dissemination. during the Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
JAG funds. Appropriate for reporting Crime Victim and Witness
(System grantees under period and
Improvement) any program evaluations
a rea that use were paid
(ARRA) JAG with (ARRA)
funds for system JAG funds
improvement. B. Total number
Report the of curricula
number of evaluated
curricula that was during the
evaluated as reporting
37
ACTIVITY AREA: Research, Evaluation, and Product Development
effective during
the reporting
period. The
evaluation was
paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds.
SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
period
C. Percent (a/b)
Auto-
calculated by
PMT
,r'
38
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Task Force Activities
This activity area applies to grantees that will utilize (ARRA) JAG funds to cover task force activities not
otherwise captured in other activity areas. Activiti~s may include ~hose that help to decrease violent crime.
. . .
66 Number of new investigations A. Total number of new
initiated investigations initiated
67 Number of judicial search warrants A. Federal
served B. State
C. Total (a+b) (Auto calculated by
PMT)
68 Total number of individuals For all arrests (including gang A. Number arrested for a felony
(including gang members) arrested members) with multiple charges B. Number arrested for a
based on task force activity during count the single most serious misdemeanor
the reporting period. charge here.
69 Total number of GANG MEMBERS For arrests of GANG MEMBERS A. Number of GANG MEMBERS
ONLY arrested based on task force with multiple charges count the arrested for a felony.
activity during the reporting period single most serious charge here. B. Number of GANG MEMBERS
arrested for a misdemeanor.
70 Drug amounts seized in kilograms Drug seizure values will be A. Heroin
(KG) during the reporting period. calculated by the tool based on B. Cocaine (powder)
Remember that 1000g = 1 kg. values provided by BJA. You may C. Crack cocaine
Answer should be provided in kg. verify your response through a D. Marijuana commercial grade
number of sites available through E. Marijuana hydroponic
the internet. You may search using F. Methamphetamine
the "conversion of grams to G. Methamphetamine ice
kilograms." H. Ecstasy (MDMA)
71 Drug amounts, in kilograms (kg), Drug seizure values will be A. Heroin
seized in clandestine drug labs calculated by the tool based on B. Cocaine (powder)
during the reporting period. values provided by BJA. You may C. Crack cocaine
Remember that 1000g = 1kg. verify your response through a D. Marijuana commercial grade
Answer should be reported in kg. number of sites available through E. Marijuana hydroponic
the internet. You may search using F. Methamphetamine
the "conversion of grams to G. Methamphetamine ice
kilograms. " H. Ecstasy (MDMA)
72 Other Seizures
A. Number of indoor cannabis-
growing operations seized
B. Number of outdoor cannabis-
growing operations seized
C. Number of cultivated marijuana
plants seized
73 Number of firearms seized during
A. Number of firearms seized
39
the reporting period
74 Number of Federal forfeiture cases
filed during the reporting period
75 Value of assets forfeited under
Federal cases during the reporting
period
76 Number of State forfeiture cases
filed during the reporting period
77 Value of assets forfeited under
State cases during the reporting
period
78 Number of defendants accepted
for Federal prosecution during the
reporting period
79 Number of defendants accepted
for State prosecution during the
reporting period
80 Number of gangs disrupted during
the reporting period
81 Number of gangs dismantled
during the reporting period
82 Number of drug trafficking
organizations and money
laundering organizations disrupted
Provide the number of defendants
that were accepted for federal
prosecution for federal felony
charges and misdemeanor
charges.
Provide the number of defendants
that were documented criminal
gang members that were accepted
for state prosecution for felony
charges and misdemeanor
charges.
Disrupted is defined as impeding
the normal and effective operation
of the targeted organization, as
indicated by changes in
organizational leadership and/or
changes in methods of operation,
including, for example, financing,
trafficking patterns,
communications, or drug
production.
Dismantled: Destruction of the
organization's leadership, financial
base, and supply network such
that the organization is incapable
of operating and/or reconstituting
itself.
Measure is intended for projects
that utilize (ARRA) JAG funds to
support activities that will disrupt
the market place for illegal drugs
B. Number of firearms seized that
were reported to NIBIN
C. Number of hits in NIBIN
A. Number of forfeiture cases filed
A. Real property forfeited
B. Cash forfeited
C. Other (vehicles, weapons,
jewelry) forfeited
A. Number of forfeiture cases filed
A. Real property forfeited
B. Cash forfeited
C. Other (vehicles, weapons,
jewelry) forfeited
A. Number accepted for Federal
felony charges.
B. Number accepted for Federal
misdemeanor charges.
A. Number accepted for State
felony charges.
B. Number accepted for State
misdemeanor charges.
A. Number of disrupted drug
trafficking or other street gang
organizations
B. Number of disrupted trafficking
or other entrepreneurial gangs
C. Total number of gangs
disrupted (a+b) (auto
calculated by tool)
A. Number of dismantled drug
trafficking or other street gang
organizations
B. Number of dismantled
trafficki ng or other
entrepreneurial gangs
C. Total number of gangs
dismantled (a+b (auto
calculated by tool))
A. Number of drug trafficking
organizations disrupted during
the reporting period
B. Number of money laundering
40
83 Number of drug trafficking
organizations and money
laundering organizations
dismantled
by dismantling and disrupting the
most significant drug trafficking
organizations and money
laundering organizations that
support them. Disrupted:
Impeding the normal and effective
operation of the targeted
organization, as indicated by
changes in organizational
leadership and/or changes in
methods of operation, for
example, financing, trafficking
patterns, communications or drug
production. SOURCE: Program
records
Measure is intended for projects
that utilize (ARRA) JAG funds to
support activities that will disrupt
the market place for illegal drugs
by dismantling and disrupting the
most significant drug trafficking
organizations and money
laundering organizations that
support them. Dismantled:
Destruction of the organizations
leadership, financial base and
supply network such that the
organization is incapable of
operating and/or reconstituting
itself. SOURCE: Program records
organizations disrupted during
the reporting period
C. Sum (a+b) Auto-calculated by
PMT
A. Number of drug trafficking
organizations dismantled
during the reporting period
B. Number of money laundering
organizations dismantled
during the reporting period
C. Sum (a+b) Auto-calculated by
PMT
4]
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Outcomes for All Activity Areas
(As they apply to grant-funded activities)
84 Change in number of individuals The purpose of this outcome A. The number of individuals (by
arrested in a targeted group by indicator is to measure rates of related crime) arrested during
crime type individuals arrested in a targeted the quarter before the start of
group by crime type. Appropriate the award
for grantees in purpose areas that B. Total number of individuals
provide direct service to individuals arrested (by related crime)
with (ARRA) JAG funds. Report the during the reporting period
number of individuals arrested for C. We expected number of
a targeted group by crime type. individuals arrested to increase
For the first reporting period, the as a result of our efforts We
"an value reflects available data for expected number of individuals
the quarter prior to the start of arrested to decrease as a result
grant-funded activities. For of our efforts. We expected
subsequent reporting periods, the number of individuals arrested
"an value will reflect the number of to remain stable (no change)
individuals arrested during the as a result of our efforts. We
quarter before the start of the had no expectations about
award. Population numbers will changes in number of
vary based on target individuals arrested of crime as
population/sub-population of the a result of our efforts. Not
program/initiative Crime types are applicable for this reporting
identified by the target of grant- period
funded activity. SOURCE: Program
records
85 Change in reported crime rates in The purpose of this outcome A. Number of reported crimes
a community by crime type indicator is to measure rates of (targeted by (ARRA) JAG
related crimes in a targeted funds) during the quarter
community. Appropriate for before the start of the award
grantees in purpose areas that B. Total number of reported
provide direct service to crimes (targeted by (ARRA)
communities or organizations with JAG funds) during the period
(ARRA) JAG funds. Report the C. We expected the crime rate to
number of related crimes reported increase as a result of our
during the reporting period. efforts We expected the crime
Population numbers will vary rate to decrease as a result of
based on target populations/sub- our efforts We expected the
population of the crime rate to re~ain stable (no
program/initiative. The "an value change) as a resLlt of our
reflects the quarter prior to the efforts We had nb expectations
start of the award. This measure is about the crime tate as a result
intended to collect rates of crime of our efforts Not applicable for
targeted by (ARRA) JAG award. this reporting period
Crime types are identified by the
target of grant-funded activity.
SOURCE: Program records
86 Type of crime Provide the type of crime targeted A. Homicides
B. Forcible Rapl.=s
C. Robbenes
D. Aggravated Assaults
E. Other, please define.
42
APPLICATION FOR BYRNE JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT-RECOVERY
PART III. BlJDGET DETAIL AND EXPLANATION
BUDGET DETAIL:
COST ELEMENT AMOUNT
A. Salaries and "'a2es
No. of
Position Title Positions Monthly rate Subtotal
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
No. of No. of
Position Title Positions Hourly Rate Hours Subtotal
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
Total Salaries and Wages $
B. Frin2e Benefits Employee Benefits (aJ_ %
No. of
Position Title Positions Monthly Rate Subtotal
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
No. of No. of
Position Title Positions Hourly Rate Hours Subtotal
$ $
$ $/
$ $
$ $
Total Fringe Benefits $
c. Consultants/Con tra cts
Length of
Consultant/
Estimated Contract
Scope of Consultant/Contract Cost Service Select as Appropriate
Informant Mngt. Training $4000 2 days [gJ Consultant o Contract
$ o Consultant o Contract
$ o Consultant o Contract
$ o Consultant o Contract
$ o Consultant o Contract
Total Consultants $4000
COST ELEMENT T AMOUNT
AG/CPJAD #l(b) (Rev 03/3/2009)
D. Transportation and Subsistence
No. of
I temize for mainland/interisland Travelers No. of
airfare, ground transportation, rental as Days
car, per diem Unit Cost applicable Subtotal
CNOA Training Conference $2005 4 4 $8020
$ $
CNCA Annual Conference $1002 2 4 $4010
$ $
IAUO Training Conference $1091 2 3 $3275
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
Total Transportation and Subsistence $15305
E. Office Supplies
Itemize supplies and related costs such Cost by Unit
as printing, paper, binders, etc. Quantity Subtotal
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
Total Office Supplies $
I
F. Equipment
Specify equipment that will be
purchased, leased, or rented. Quantity Cost by Unit Subtotal
Dell Desktop Computer/Mon 8 $2000 $16280
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
Total Equipment $16280
AG/CI'JAD #l(b) (Hev 03/3/2009)
COST ELEMENT AMOUNT
G. Other Costs Quantity Cost by Unit Subtotal
Confidential Funds $ $39900
$ $
Helicopter Rental 8 $800 $6400
$ $
Vehicle Rentals 24 $600 $14000
$ $
Narcotic Detection Canine 2 $9000 $18000
$ $
$ $
$ $
Total Other Costs $78300
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $113885
AG/CPJAD #l(b) (Rev 03/312009)
BUDGET EXPLANATION:
A. Salaries and Wages
N/A
B. Fringe Benefits
The composite fringe benefit rate is at _% for _ (list positions). The rate consists of
the following fringe benefit items and computed rates:
C. Consultants/Contracts
InfOlmant Management, Craig Michaels, 2 day training, $4,000.00 (Cost per Day, $200 Per
Diem, $780 Airfare, $200 Rental Vehicle, $800 Lodging, $52 Parking, $450 x 2 Prep for
Training, $450 x 2 Training Fees)
Hilo Police Station, Hilo, Hawaii
D. Transportation and Subsistence
Travel allocation to include airfare, per diem, and ground transportation to attend trainings and
meetings within and out-of-state to ensure that the program's officers are proficient in the latest
investigation techniques and safety precautions:
Out of State Travel (Cost per Day, $145 Per Diem, $850 Airfare, $75 Rental Vehicle,
Registration Fees)
California Narcotics Officer's Association Annual Training Conference (CNOA),
San Francisco, CA (4 officers)
California Narcotic's Canine Association (CNCA) Training Conference,
Burbank, CA (2 officers)
Narcotics, Vice, Street Crime Supervisor Training Seminar (IADO),
Las Vegas, NY (2 officers)
E. Office Supplies
N/A
F. Equipment
Dell Desktop Computer and Monitor (8) for analytical support on intelligence based
investigations utilizing PEN-LINK, LiNX, WSIN, and Law Enforcement.related software.
Hawaii Police Department Vice officers rely solely on computers for report writing, database
and intelligence analysis, inter agency communication, and research. The current computers
AG/CI'JAD #l(b) (Rev 03/3/2009) Page 1
utilized have been in use for five to six years and are antiquated and ineffecient.
G. Other Costs
Confidential funds to be used for the purchase of evidence, information, and/or services relating
to investigations of drug trafficking organizations in the County and State of Hawaii.
The price of illegal narcotics, particularly crystal methamphetamine, has doubled in price an
example being $400.00 for 1/8 of an ounce of "ice" in 1985, to $1000.00 for the same amount in
2009.
Rental of civilian helicopters for aerial surveillance and probable cause reconaissance, based on
$800.00 an hour, 2 - 2 hour flights per quarter.
The County of Hawaii, or the Big Island, encompasses 4,028 square miles and is larger than all
of the other Hawaiian Islands combined. That being said, the vast majority of the land mass is
vacant or comprised of some ofthe largest subdivisions in the nation having individual lot sizes
of one to ten acres. These conditions sometimes hinder surveillance operations by vehicle due to
the absence oftraffic and long range visibility. A helicopter flying at maximum sight range has
proved to be a necessary resource to assist with these types of narcotic investigations.
Rental of motor vehicles for surveillance and probable cause detennination, based on 2 vehicles
per month at $600.00 per month.
Although the largest of the four islands, the population of the County of Hawaii accounts for
approximately 15% of the State of Hawaii. The communities and towns are small. Police
officers and their vehicles are very recognizable to the community, especially drug trafficking
organizations, who make it a point to have counter intelligence. Rental vehicles from local used
car dealerships have been a valuable tool in past surveillance investigations in maintaining
anonymity.
To purchase equipment to assist in conducting narcotic investigations, gathering/analyzing
intelligence on drug trafficking organizations, and presenting completed-quality investigations
to the Prosecutor's' Office and State Judiciary System.
Narcotic Detection Canines (2) needed to replace existing Canines that are entering their
"retirement" years (7-9 years). Per Hawaii State Narcotics Certified Trainers (CNCA), narcotic
detection canines begin to lose their "drive" at seven years. These purchasing funds include the
selection, certification (trainer, canine, trainer with canine), and training expenses as well as for
the canine itself.
AG/CI'JAD #l(b) (Rev 03/3/2009)
Page 2
PART IV. ATTACHMENTS
(Certifi cations)
A. Acceptance of Conditions (AG/CPJAD #14)
B. Acceptance of JAG RECOVERY SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(AG/CPJAD #26)
C. Certification of Non-Supplanting (AG/CPJAD #3)
D. Certification of Non-Discrimination (AG/CPJAD #15)
E. Certification of Regarding: EEOP
F. Certification Regarding Drug-Free (AG/CPJAD #16)
G. Certification Regarding Debarment (OJP 406111)
H: Certification Regarding Lobbying (AG/CPJAD #22)
I: Confidential Funds Certification (AG/CPJAD # 18)
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS
The undersigned agrees, on behalf of the applicant agency, that:
1. This project, upon approval, shall constitute an official part of Hawaii's Drug Control and System
Improvement Formula Grant Program established under Title VI, Subtitle C, Part E, Subpart 1, of the
Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-690).
2. Any grant awarded pursuant to this application shall be subject to and will be administered in
conformity with:
(a) general conditions applicable to administration of grants under Title VI, Subtitle C, Part E,
Subpart 1, of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-690), as amended, as
applicable;
(b) conditions applicable to the fiscal administration of grants under Title VI, Subtitle C, Part E,
Subpart 1, of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-690), as amended, as
applicable;
(c) any special conditions contained in the grant award; and
(d) general and fiscal regulations of the Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division.
3. Any grant received as a result of this application may be terminated, or fund payment may be
discontinued, by the Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division when it finds a substantial
failure to comply with the foregoing provisions, the application obligations or for non-availability of
funds.
SUBMITTED BY:
Signature:
Date:
Name:
Harry S. Kuboiiri
Title:
Police Chief
Agency:
Hawaii Police Department
AG/CPJAD #14 06/02
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division
ACCEPTANCE OF JAG RECOVERY SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The undersigned Grantee understands and agrees, on behalf of its agency that:
1. Access to Records; Interviews
(a) U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) including the Office of Justice Programs (OJP)
and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), and its representatives, and the
Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall have access to and the right to
examine all records (including, but not limited to, books, papers, and. documents)
related to this Recovery Act award, including such records of any subrecipient,
contractor, or subcontractor.
(b) DOJ and the GAO are authorized to interview any officer or employee of the
Grantee (or of any subrecipient, contractor, or subcontractor) regarding
transactions related to this Recovery Act award.
2. Separate Tracking and Reporting of Recovery Act Funds and Outcomes
(a) Grantee agrees to track, account for, and report on all funds from this Recovery
Act award (including specific outcomes and benefits attributable to Recovery Act
funds) separately from all other funds, including DOJ award funds from non-
Recovery Act awards awarded for the same or similar purposes or programs.
(Recovery Act funds may be used in conjunction with other funding as necessary
to complete projects, but tracking and reporting of Recovery Act funds must be
separate.) Accordingly, the accounting system must ensure that funds from this
Recovery Act award are not commingled with funds from any other source.
(b) Grantee further agrees that all personnel whose activities are to be charged to the
award will maintain time sheets to document hours worked for activities related to
this award and non-award-related activities.
3. Subawards 1 Contracts - Monitoring
(a) Grantee is responsible for monitoring subawards and subcontracts under this
Recovery Act award in accordance with all applicable statutes, regulations, Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) circulars, and guidelines, including the OlP
Financial Guide, and to include the applicable conditions of this award in any
subaward/subcontract. The recipient is responsible for oversight of subrecipient
spending and monitoring of specific outcomes and benefits attributable to use of
Recovery Act funds by subrecipients. The Grantee agrees to submit, upon
AG/CPJAD #26 JAG-Recovery 08/09
request, documentation of its policies and procedures for monitoring of
subawards/subcontracts under this award.
4. Transactions Listed in Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards -
(a) Grantee shall maintain records that identify adequately the source and application
of Recovery Act funds, to maximize the transparency and accountability of funds
authorized under the Recovery Act as required by the Act and in accordance with
2 CFR 215.21, "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-
profit Organizations" and OMB A-I 02 Common Rules provisions (relating to
Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments).
(b) Grantee agrees to separately identify the expenditures for Federal awards under
the Recovery Act on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) and
the Data Collection Form (SF-SAC) required by OMB Circular A-133. This
c~dition only applies if the recipient is covered by the Single Audit Act
Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular A-133, "Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations:" This shall be accomplished by
identifying expenditures for Federal awards made under the Recovery Act
separately on the SEF A, and as separate rows under Item 9 of Part III on the SF-
SAC by CFDA number, and inclusion of the prefix "ARRA-" in identifying the
name of the Federal program 'on the SEF A and as the first characters in Item 9d of
Part III on the SF-SAC.
5. Recovery Act Reporting and Registration Requirements
(a) Grantee shall complete projects or activities which are funded under the Recovery
Act and shall submit progress reports under Section 1512 of the Recovery Act on
use of Recovery Act funds provided through this award. Information from these
reports will be made available to the public.
(b) Grantee shall report the information described in section 1512( c) as applicable,
using the reporting instructions and data elements that will be provided by
CPJAD.
( c) The progress reports are to cover activities that the Grantee has completed
whether funded in whole or in part by the Recovery Act. The Recovery Act
reporting periods and due dates are:
· Julyl - September 30
· October I-December 31
· January 1 - March 30
· April I-June 30
Due: October 5
Due: January 5
Due: April 5
Due: July 5
AG/CPJAD #26 JAG-Recovery 08/09 2
(d) Grantee shall maintain current registration in the Central Contractor Registration
(www.ccr.gov) at all times during which they have active federal awards funded
with Recovery Act funds. A Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) Number (www.dnb.com) is one of the requirements for
registration in the Central Contractor Registration.
6. Reporting Potential Fraud, Waste, and Abuse, and Similar Misconduct
Grantee shall promptly refer to the DOJ GIG any credible evidence that a principal,
employee, agent, contractor, subgrantee, subcontractor, or other person has either 1)
submitted a false claim for Recovery Act funds under the False Claims Act; or 2)
committed a criminal or civil violation of laws pertaining to fraud, conflict of interest,
bribery, gratuity, or similar misconduct involving Recovery Act funds. Potential fraud,
waste, abuse, or misconduct should be reported to the OIG by:
Mail: Office of the Inspector General
U.S. Department of Justice
Investigations Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Room 4706
Washington, DC 20530
E-mail:
Hotline:
Hotline fax:
oig.hotline@usdoi.gov
(contact information in English and Spanish): (800) 869-4499, or
(202) 616-9881.
Additional information is available from the DOJ OIG website at www.usdoi.gov/oig.
7. Protecting State and Local Government and Contractor Whistleblowers (Recovery Act,
section 1553)
Grantee recognizes that the Recovery Act provides certain protections against reprisals
for employees of non-Federal employers who disclose information reasonably believed to
be evidence of gross mismanagement, gross waste, substantial and specific danger to
public health or safety, abuse of authority, or violations of law related to contracts or
grants using Recovery Act funds. For additional information, refer to section 1553 of the
Recovery Act. The text of Recovery Act is available at WWW.OiD.Usdoj.gov/recoverv.
8. Misuse of Award Funds
Grantee understands and agrees that misuse of award funds may result in a range of
penalties, including suspension of current and future funds, suspension or debarment
from federal grants, recoupment of monies provided under an award, and civil and/or
criminal penalties.
AG/CPJAD #26 JAG-Recovery 08/09 3
9. Additional Requirements and Guidance
Grantee shall comply with any modifications or additional requirements that may be
imposed by law and future OJP (including government-wide) and Hawaii Department of
the Attorney General guidance and clarifications of Recovery Act requirements.
10. Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) Reporting Requirement
Grantee shall comply with all reporting, data collection and evaluation requirements, as
prescribed by law and detailed by the BJA in program guidance for the Justice Assistance
Grant Program.
Grantee shall complete BJA-required report on-line using the Performance Measurement
Tool (PMT). The on-line reporting system will require a username and password to log
on. The username and password will be provided by CPJAD after the contract is
executed. The PMT web address is https://www.bjaperformancetools.org
The BJA reporting periods and due dates are:
.
July 1 - September 30
October 1 -December 31
January 1 - March 31
April I-June 30
Due: October 15
Due: January 15
Due: April 15
Due: July 15
.
.
.
11. Delinquent Reports
(a) Grantee shall comply with all reporting requirements. Failure to comply with the
reporting requirements may, in addition to other penalties, subject the recipient to
the following:
(i) After failure to report complete data by the due date stated in sections S.c.
and 10 for two consecutive reporting periods, the Grantee may be
precluded from drawing down funds until such time as the Grantee
becomes current in its reporting obligations.
(ii) After failure to report complete data by the due date stated in sections S.c.
and 10 for three consecutive reporting periods, the Administrator of the
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division may terminate the
Grantee's contract for cause. Upon written letter of termination, the
Grantee must return any unexpended award funds within 15 calendar days
of the date of the letter of termination.
AG/CPJAD #26 JAG-Recovery 08/09 4
12. Funds Subcontracted to Faith Based Organizations
Grantee shall comply with the applicable requirements of 28 C.F.R. Part 38, the
Department of Justice regulation governing "Equal Treatment for Faith Based
Organizations" (the "Equal Treatment Regulation"). The Equal Treatment Regulation
provides in part that Department of Justice grant awards of funding may not be used to
fund any inherently religious activities, such as worship, religious instruction, or
proselytization. Recipients of grants may still engage in inherently religious activities, but
such activities must be separate in time or place from the Department of Justice funded
program, and participation in such activities by individuals receiving services from the
grantee or a sub-grantee must be voluntary. The Equal Treatment Regulation also makes
clear that organizations participating in programs funded by the Department of Justice are
not permitted to discriminate in the provision of services on the basis of a beneficiary's
religion. Notwithstanding any other special condition of this award, faith-based
organizations may, in some circumstances, consider religion as a basis for employment.
See http://www.ojp.gov/about/ocr/equal_fbo.htm.
SUBMITTED BY:
Signature:
Name:
Agency:
Harry S. Kuboiiri
Hawaii Police Department
AG/CPJAD #26 JAG-Recovery 08/09 5
Date:
Title:
Police Chief
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division
CERTIFICATION OF NON-SUPPLANTING
I certify that federal funds will not be used to supplant State, local or other non-federal funds that
would, in the absence of such federal aid, be made available for law enforcement, criminal justice,
and victim compensation and assistance activities.
SUBMITTED BY:
Signature:
Date:
Name:
Harry S. Kuboiiri
Title:
Police Chief
Agency:
Hawaii Police Department
AG/CPJAD #3 06/02
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division
CERTIFICATION OF NON-DISCRIMINATION
I certify that the applicant agency will comply with and will insure compliance by its subgrantees
and contractors with the non-discrimination requirements of:
. The Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, which prohibits
discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, or sex, in OJP and
COPS funded programs or activities. (42 U.S.C. 93789d and 28 C.F.R. 942.201 et~)
. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of
race, color or national origin in OJP and COPS funded programs or activities. (42 U.S.c.
92000d and 28 C.F.R. 942.101 et~)
. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of
disability in OJP and COPS funded programs or activities. (29 U.S.C. 9794 and 28 C.F.R.
942.501 et~)
. Section 1407 of the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA), which prohibits discrimination on the
basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, or disability in VOCA funded programs
or activities. (42 U.S.C. 910604)
. Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as it relates to discrimination on
the basis of disability in OJP or COPS funded programs or activities. (42 U.S.C. 912132
and 28 C.F.R. Pt. 35)
. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as it relates to discrimination on the basis
of sex in OJP and COPS funded training or educational programs. (20 U.S.C. 91681 and
34 C.F.R. Pt. 106)
. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 as it relates to services discrimination on the basis
of age in OJP or COPS funded programs or activities. (42 U.S.C. 96102 and 28 C.F.R.
942.700 et seg.)
. Executive Order No. 13166 prohibiting discrimination of Limited English Proficient
Persons.
. Executive Order No. 13279 regarding equal protection of the laws for faith-based
organizations. (28 C.F.R. pt. 38)
No person shall, on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability, be
excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, be subjected to discrimination under, or
be denied employment in connection with any program or activity funded in whole or in part
with funds made available under this title from the U.S. Department of Justice through the
Department of the Attorney General, Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division.
Noncompliance with the discrimination regulations may result in the suspension or termination
of funding.
SUBMITTED BY:
Agency:
Harry S. Kuboiiri
Hawaii Police Department
Date:
Title:
Signature:
Name:
Police Chief
AG/CPJAD #15 12/07
CERTIFICATION FORM
Recipient Name and Address:
Grant Title:
Grant Number:
A ward Amount:
Contact Person Name and Title:
Phone Number: (
)
Federal regulations require recipients of financial assistance from the Office of Justice Programs (OJP), its component agencies, and the
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) to prepare, maintain on file, submit to OJP for review, and implement an Equal
Employment Opportunity Plan (EEOP) in accordance with 28 C.F.R ** 42.301-.308. The regulations exempt some recipients from all of
the EEOP requirements. Other recipients, according to the regulations, must prepare, maintain on file and implement an EEOP, but they
do not need to submit the EEOP to OJP for review. Recipients that claim a complete exemption from the EEOP requirement must
complete Section A below. Recipients that claim the limited exemption rrom the submission requirement, must complete Section B
below. A recipient should complete either Section A or Section B, not both. If a recipient receives multiple OJP or CO PS grants.
. please complete a form for each grant ensuring that any EEOP recipient certifies as completed and on file (if applicable) has been
prepared within two years of the latest grant. Please send the completed form(s) to the Office for Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs,
U.S. Department of Justice, 810 7th Street, N. W ., Washington, D.C. 20531. For assistance in completing this form, please call (202)307-
0690 or TTY (202) 307-2027.
Section A- Declaration Claiming Complete Exemption from the EEOP Requirement. Please check all the boxes that
apply.
Q
Q
Q
Recipient has less than 50 employees,
Recipient is a non-profit organization,
Recipient is a medical institution,
Q Recipient is an Indian tribe,
Q Recipient is an educational institution, or
Q Recipient is receiving an award less than $25,000
I, [responsible official], certify that
[recipient] is not required to
prepare an EEOP for the re~son(s) checked above, pursuant to 28 C.F.R 942.302. I further certify that
[recipient] will comply with applicable Federal civil rights
laws that prohibit discrimination in employment and in the delivery of services.
Print or type Name and Title
Signature
Date
Section B- Declaration Claiming Exemption from the EEOP Submission Requirement and Certifying That an
EEOP Is on File for Review.
If a recipient agency has 50 or more employees and is r~ceiving a single award or sub award for $25,000 or more, but less than $500,000,
then the recipient agency does not have to submit an EEOP to OJP for review as long as it certifies the following (42 C.F.R. * 42.305):
I, [responsible official], certify that
the [recipient],which has 50 or more
employees and is receiving a single award or subaward for $25,000 or more, but less than $500,000, has formulated an
EEOP in accordance with 28 CFR 942.301, et seq., subpart E. I further certify that the EEOP has been formulated and
signed into effect within the past two years by the proper authority and that it is available for review. The EEOP is on file in
the office of: [organization],
at [address],for review by the public and
employees or for review or audit by officials of the relevant state planning agency or the Office for Civil Rights, Office of
Justice Programs, U. S. Department of Justice, as required by relevant laws and regulations.
Print or type Name and Title
Signature
Date
OMB Approval No. 1]2]-0140
Expiration Date: 0]/3 ]/06
_M..
. '"'
~
~
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OFFICE OF ~USTICE PROGRAMS
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
Certification Regarding
Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary exclusion
Lower Tier Covered Transactions
(Sub-Recipient)
This certification Is required by the regulations Implementing Executive Order 12549, Debannent and
Suspension, 28 CFR Part 67; Section 67.510, Participants' responsibilities. The regulations were published
as Part VII of the May 28, 1988 Federal Register (pages 19160-19211).
(BEFORE COMPLETING CERTIFICATION, READ INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE)
(1) The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submlsalonof this proposal, that neither It nor Its
principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared Ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from participation In this transaction by any Federal department or agency.
(2) Where the prospective lower tier p8!tlclpant Is unable to certify to any of the statements In this certifI-
cation, such prospective. participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Name and Title of Authorized Representative
Signature
Date
Name of Organization
Address of Organization
OJP FOAM AOll11t ~EV. 2J89) PrnJouI editions ... ObIOJeta.
Instructions for Certification
1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant Is providing the
certification set out below.
2. The certification In this clause Is a material representation of fact upon whIch reliance was placed
when this transaction was entered Into. If It Is later determined that the prospective lower tier particIpant
knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, In addition to other remedies available to the Federal
Government, the department or agency wIth which this transaction originated may pursue available
remedies, Including suspension and/or debarment.
3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide Immediate written notice to the person to which
this proposal Is submitted If at any time the prospective lower tier participant leams that Its certification
was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
4. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended," "Ineligible," "lower. tier covered
transaction," "participant," "person," "primary covered transactIon," "principal," "proposal." and
"voluntarily excluded, " as used In this clause, have the meanings eet out In the DefinItions and Coverage
sections of rules Implementing Executive Order 12549. .
5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed
covered tr:ansactlon be entered Into, It shall not knowingly enter Into any lower tier covered transactIon
with a person who Is debarred, suspended, declared Ineligible. or voluntarily excluded from partiCipation
In this covered transaction, unlesa authorized by the departm~nt or agency with which thls'transactTon
originated.
8. The prospective lower tier partiCipant further agrees by submitting this propoaanhat It will Include
the clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary
Excluslon- Lower Tier Covered Transactions," without modification, In all lower tier covered
transactions and In all solicitations for lower tier covered transactIons.
7. A partIcipant In a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant In a
lower tier covered transactIon that It Is not debarred, suspended..lnellgfble, or voluntarily excluded from
the covered transaction, unless It knows that the certification Is erroneous. A particIpant may decIde the
meJhod and frequency by which It determines the el.lglblllty of lis principals. Each partiCipant may check
the Nonprocurement Ust.
8. Nothing contained In the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of
records In order to render In good faith the certification required by thIs clause. The knowledge and
Information of a partiCipant Is not required to exceed that which Is normally possessed by a prudent
person In the ordInary cour&e.of business dealings. .
9. Except for transactIons authorized under paragraph 5 of these Instructions, If a partiCipant In a
covered transaction knowingly enters Into 8 lower tier covered transaction with a person who Is
suspended, debarred, Ineligible, or voluntary excluded from participation In this transaction, In addition
to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this
transaction originated may pursue available remedies! Including suspension and/or debarment.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division
CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING
Each person shall file the most current edition of this certification and disclosure form, if applicable,
with each submission that initiates agency consideration of such person for an award of a Federal
contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of$l 00,000 or more; or Federal loan of$150,000 or more.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this
transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or
entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to
file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more .
than $100,000 for each such failure.
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing
or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the
making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the
extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant,
loan or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any non-Federal funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or
attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned
shall initial here _ and complete and submit Standard Form # LLL, A Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities, in accordance with its instructions.
(3) Recipient understands and agrees that it cannot use any federal funds, either directly or
indirectly, in support of the enactment, repeal modification or adoption of any law,
regulation or policy, at any level of government, without the express prior written approval
of the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
(4) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award
documents for all subawards at all tiers and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose
accordingl y.
Hawaii Police Department
349 Kapiolani Street, Hilo, HI 96720
Name and Address of Organization
Name of Authorized Individual
Signature and date
09-SU-20
Application No.
BJA
Name ofOJP Agency
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division
CONFIDENTIAL FUNDS CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that I have read all of the conditions for confidential funds as set forth in the
effective edition of Office of Justice Program's Financial Guide, and I agree to abide by all the
conditions for confidential funds as set forth in the manual.
SUBMITTED BY:
Signature:
Date:
Name:
Harry S. Kuboiiri
Title:
Police Chief
Agency:
Hawaii Police Department
AG/CPJAD #18 05109