My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0640.001 2008-2010
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2008-2010
>
COM 0640.001 2008-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2021 4:29:19 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 1:09:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2008-2010
Communication
0640
Point
001
Author
Dominic Yagong, Council Member
Communications - Referred To
PSPRC
Document Relationships
REP PSPRC 022 01/05/2010 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2008-2010\Public Safety & Parks & Recreation Committee (PSPRC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />--4....<1. M <br /> <br />5) All existing leases and revocable permits would have to be honored by the County. (Note: <br />there is no lease or revocable per-mit issued in regard to the cruise ship industry.) At their <br />expiration date, the Cout1tymay renew or enter into new and/or additional agreements. <br />Further, all projects that are planned or arc underway will be transferred to the County in an <br />"as is" status as of the date oCthe trilnsfer. (See Chairman Young's letter dated January 6, <br />2006, to Mayor Kim) <br /> <br />6) Management and operation by the County may be entirely by the County, entirely by private <br />operators (for profit or nOIl~profit) or by some combination of the two. <br /> <br />7) The State would not be involved ill law enrorcement activities within the transferred facilities. <br />That responsibility would devolve to the County <br /> <br />6) RFPs that may be issued by DLNR have Ilot been prepared Stilluncler consideration. <br /> <br />7) The State will retili n jmisdictiorl over ncar-shale waters. <br /> <br />Conc1usi ons: <br /> <br />I) Absent SB 2150, authority exists \vithin the Executive Branch, by and through the DLNR, to <br />transfer the management and operati on of the boating faci I i ties in questi on to the County. <br /> <br />2) The manner and form of the transfer would be by and through an Executive Order, issued <br />after the completion of negotiations with the County. The form and nature of the Order <br />would likely follow that L1sed 10 transfer St,ltc park land to the counties. <br /> <br />3) The State would retain the real propeJ1y interest. Title to the real property would not be <br />Transferred to the COllnty <br /> <br />4) Authority would be provided to the COliilty to construct, demolish, reconstruct, replace or <br />otherwise improve the facilities (lS tile COllnty may see fit without first obtaining State <br />approval. . <br /> <br />5) Management and oper,ltiol1 may be cntirely by County government, entirely by private <br />organizations (either for profit 0[' non-prolit) or by any combination of the two (So far as the <br />State is concerned. We h(lvC not received d response from the Corporation Counsel as to its <br />view of County authority.) <br /> <br />6) The Hawaii County Police Depilrtment I1l<lY enrorce all state laws and cOLlnty ordinances <br />within the transferred f<lcilities <br /> <br />7) Negotiations between the State and the COllnty would be necessary to resolve some issues. <br /> <br />We would be pleased to respond to any questions that you may have. <br /> <br />CC: Noelani Whittington <br />Jane Bockus <br /> <br />-, <br />-) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.