|
<br />I,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />,'4 . .
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.",~ -
<br />
<br />
<br />srATE OF HAWAII
<br />
<br />"":., ." ,"~'..::.' -- -- ........, . -. , . ,,:,., .
<br />',. -',',', ..,...".......--."..
<br />. ,",---- .
<br />......... ...,.,.....--"...... '.
<br />":',"':',"',' . .,."....
<br />. 'C. " -.'.", .,'...
<br />........, ......., ......- ,.
<br />"'-, ,", ".....'..
<br />-........ ...... ....,...
<br />":.-, --.... -,,:,:.:-.'
<br />
<br />RESOLUTION NO.
<br />
<br />249 98
<br />
<br />RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CORPORATION COUNSEL, AND HIS
<br />AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH.
<br />THE INDIVIDUALLY NAMED DEFENDANT, WHO IS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE
<br />COUNTY OF HAWAII, TO REPRESENT HIM IN THE CIVIL ACTION ENTITLED
<br />DEAN E. BEAUMONT Vs. RICHARD CARTER, JR.,ETAL., CIVIL NO. 97-187K
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, the County of Hawaii and Police Officer Richard Carter, Jr., are
<br />
<br />)
<br />being sued by Dean E. Beaumont in Civil No. 97-187K; and
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, the Hawaii County Police Commission has found that the concerned
<br />
<br />officer, Le., Officer Carter, was acting in the performance of his duty when the alleged
<br />
<br />acts complained of in that lawsuit occurred; and
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of the
<br />
<br />State of Hawaii has rendered the opinion that representation by one attorney of multiple
<br />
<br />parties in such actions is improper unless those parties waive the potential conflicts
<br />
<br />involved or unless the governmental entity agrees toindemnify the individual party for all
<br />
<br />damages, including punitive damages; and
<br />
|