Laserfiche WebLink
LINDALINGLE <br />GOVERNOR O LRYIM <br />July 1, 2003 <br />Mr. James Moore <br />Archaeological Consultants of the Pacific, Inc. <br />59 -624 Pupukea Road <br />Haleiwa, Hawaii 96712 <br />Dear Mr. Moore: <br />STATE OF HAWAII <br />DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL. RESOURCES <br />HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION <br />KAKUHIHEWA BUILDING, ROOM 555 <br />601 KAMOKILA BOULEVARD <br />KAPOLEI, HAWAII 68707 <br />PETER T. YOUNG <br />manna CWA <br />RR OF RAIL AND NARR RENOLRCER <br />CO W LOYiN ON YAISR RlD4r.2 st w/GEW N+ <br />DAN DAVIDSON <br />OENRYCORCIOf• LAND <br />ERNEST Y.W. LAU <br />DEAR, UA6RPR • WATER <br />ACUATC te3c RCFA <br />e4ATOc APO °CEAAiRECPFATON <br />BWRAU CF CONVEYANCER <br />WOSSSON ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEM <br />CONSONATDN ANO COASTAL LAAOE <br />COMDNAri]N/IDREsOLRtes eNPORCTJU.T <br />ENGUN.EYND <br />TC <br />FCRESTRY ARO W1O FE <br />WORM WPRESERVARON <br />NNRODAWe WAND SESSAi! DDAWTSTON <br />wm <br />RATE Punt <br />LOG NO: 2003 1082 <br />DOC NO: 0306PM15 <br />SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review of a Final Plan: "An <br />Archaeological Data Recovery Plan for the Kingman Property, TMK: 7 -7- <br />08:20, 31 and 100, in Pahoehoe 2° and 3'' Ahupua'a, North Kona District, <br />Aland of Hawal'i" (Elmore and Kennedy 2003) <br />Thank you for your letter of June 25, 2003 and copy of the above referenced plan for our review <br />and comment. The plan was revised to respond to the comments in our review letter of May 15, <br />2003 (McEldowney to Elmore, Log No. 2003.0385; Doc No. 0304PM14). <br />The revised plan has satisfactorily addressed all of our earlier comments, except for the comment <br />on traditional Hawaiian residences known as kauhale, which is addressed in your cover letter. <br />Three research questions will be addressed in the data recovery research. In our May 15, 2003 <br />review letter we indicated that the research objectives should be discussed in the context of_ <br />previous research and the kinds of data that are needed to address the research questions. As an <br />example, we noted that the research question on the relationship between Sites 18002 and 18005, <br />which you have conjectured might be components of a kauhale, should provide a brief <br />discussion of previous archaeological investigations of kauhale in the area, and the kinds of data <br />that would be required to address this question. This information is not contained within the <br />plan, but you have promised in your cover letter to include it in the final report on the data <br />recovery investigations. With this understanding your plan meets with our approval. <br />The plan indicates that a Preservation Plan for the Kuakini Wall (Site 6302) and revised Burial <br />Treatment Plan for all of the burials on the subject property (Sites 18006, 18010, 18013, and <br />18015) still need to be developed and submitted to our office for review and approval. Data <br />recovery should not proceed until these plans are in place. <br />EXHIBIT B <br />