My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0684.000 2008-2010
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2008-2010
>
COM 0684.000 2008-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2021 4:00:10 PM
Creation date
1/21/2010 1:15:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2008-2010
Communication
0684
Point
000
Author
Nancy E. Crawford, Director of Finance
Communications - Referred To
FC
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 02/18/2010 2008-2010
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2008-2010\Council
AGE FC 02/02/2010 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2008-2010\Finance Committee (FC)
BIL 200 Draft 01 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2008-2010
REP FC 139 02/02/2010 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2008-2010\Finance Committee (FC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Form #: B-52 <br />7/18/91 <br />DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DEPARTMENT: Finance DATE: 1/20/10 <br />STAFF CONTACT: Nancy Crawford PHONE <br />A. REQUEST: <br />x8234 <br />Requesting amendment to Hawaii County Code, Chapter 19, Sections 19-100 and 19-101 regarding <br />deposits accompanying appeals to the Real Property Tax Board of Review. <br />B. BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED): <br />The attached bill proposes to increase the deposit amount from $15 to $25 and to limit refunds of that <br />amount to situations where the board of review acrepts the taxpayer's appeal value without compromise. <br />Refunds would also be made in cases where adjustments are necessary due to clerical errors. For this fiscal <br />year we received 1,449 appeal forms with deposits totaling $21,735. We refunded approximately $9,885 in <br />deposits. Under the proposed deposit regulations, taxpayers would have paid an additional $14,490. The <br />purpose of increasing the deposit amount and limiting refunds of those deposits is two-fold. The additional <br />amount will better offset the cost of handling appeals and it should also reduce-the number of frivolous <br />appeals. <br />SIGNED: DATE: oZ ~~ <br />Department He <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.