Laserfiche WebLink
Kaumana area, mostly Ag parcel, large Ag parcel, Ag parcel owners who were in favor of that <br />amendment. So it's certainly, I think, a good idea. <br />But when I threw out the number two at the Council level I was just throwing out, that out as <br />food for thought; and I was hoping that the Council would really mull over what is the right <br />number of contiguous parcels and what would be the correct distance to have as a lower default. <br />So the passage that is missing now as I hear this is that 1 added one additional thing that said <br />"whichever provides greater notification to the surrounding property owners." So just wanted <br />to explain that to you; and thank you very much. There were other Council Members who felt <br />that was a good idea also to have two variables, the set distance and the contiguous property <br />owners. <br />WOODWARD: All right, Commissioner Kern. <br />\KERN: It does say "whichever distance is greater." <br />REES: Thank you for that clarification. <br />WOODWARD: Okay, any other questions? No? Somebody would like to make a motion? <br />DOMINGO: Move for its approval. <br />WOODWARD: All right. Second? <br />KERN: Second. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. So we have a recommendation for a favorable recommendation on <br />Agenda Item No. 10. Council, County Council Bill No. 125, Draft 3. Any further discussion? <br />Okay, Maija. <br />COTTLE: Commissioner Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: Aye. <br />COTTLE: Commissioner Kern? <br />KERN: Aye. <br />COTTLE: Commissioner Au? <br />AU: Yes. <br />COTTLE: Commissioner Tshibashi? <br />ISHIBASHI: Aye. <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT E <br />