Laserfiche WebLink
require that applicants provide notification within ten days of the Department actually accepting <br />their application. <br />HOUSEL: Do they need proof of service? <br />COTTLE: They do. <br />HOUSEL: They do. Okay. <br />COTTLE: That still remains the same, yes. And so the Director is supporting this <br />amendment. <br />HOUSEL: Are we making a recommendation to the Council with this? <br />COTTLE: You are — either unfavorable or favorable. <br />HOUSEL: Okay. Now, we have no one signed up to testify on this, so we can go <br />straight, if anybody has any questions -. <br />BEAUDET: I have a question. <br />HOUSEL: Okay. <br />BEAUDET: I just need to make sure that I'm reading this correctly. Current Code <br />requires notification to be sent out to neighboring properties within 500 feet of the property <br />affected; so if your parcel is 100 acres, its notification requirement is for property owners within <br />500 feet of your property boundary. The change is for notification of property owners within <br />1,000 feet of the building site, so if -. Is that what I'm reading here? <br />COTTLE: Actually, the Zoning Code uses the term "building site," but it's defined as <br />the perimeter of the affected property. So -. <br />BEAUDET: Okay, so we are expanding notification requirements. We are not -. <br />Yeah? We are expanding that. <br />COTTLE: Yes, you are expanding it from 5,000 to -. <br />WATANABE: No, 500. <br />BEAUDET: From 500 to -. <br />COTTLE: I'm sorry, 500 to 1,000 feet, or two contiguous parcels, yes. So using your <br />example, Brandi, if it's a 100 -acre parcel, it would be well into, 500 feet or even 1,000 feet really <br />would only get you into that one next parcel over; so this is saying you have to go two parcels. <br />Does that make sense? The next two contiguous -. <br />2 <br />