HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 290 Draft 02 2008-2010COUNTY OF HAWAII
STATE OF HAWAII
RESOLUTION NO. 2 90 09
(DRAFT 2)
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR TO ENTER
INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, PURSUANT TO HRS 46 -7, FOR A
HAWAII NARCOTICS TASK FORCE - RECOVERY ACT GRANT
WHEREAS, the State of Hawai'i Department of the Attorney General, Crime
Prevention and Justice Assistance Division has authorized a Hawai'i Narcotics Task
Force - Recovery Act Grant to the Hawai'i County Police Department; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the grant is to disrupt the flow of narcotics via the
apprehension of mid- to high- level dealers that are smuggling and distributing narcotics
into and with the State of Hawai'i; and
WHEREAS, some of the major objectives are 1) to maintain a narcotics task
force of personnel from the Hawai'i County Police Department, Maui Police Department,
and Kauai Police Department, 2) to increase knowledge of vice officers by providing
training in such topics as narcotic investigations, current drug trends, smuggling and
distribution techniques, and State /Federal laws that impact the task force, and 3) to
meet at least quarterly to coordinate joint operations and training, as well as other
enforcement efforts, and to share information; and
WHEREAS, the sharing of resources and information between the Task Force
participants will affect not only the individual Counties but also the State of Hawai'i; and
WHEREAS, the results will be a decrease in the flow of illegal narcotics in the
State which will positively impact all aspects of police work and the criminal justice
system; and
WHEREAS, the funds provided by the State of Hawai'i Department of the
Attorney General are derived from the federal government's American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009: and
WHEREAS, the majority of voters of the County of Hawai'i passed the Lowest
Law Enforcement Priority of Cannabis ordinance in 2008; and
WHEREAS, Hawai'i County Code Article 16. Section 14 -101 states, (a) Neither
the council, nor the police commissioner, nor the chief of police, nor any attorneys
prosecuting on behalf of the county, nor any associated law enforcement staff, deputies,
or officers shall spend or authorize the expenditure of any public funds for the
investigation, arrest, or prosecution of any person, nor for the search or seizure of any
property in a manner inconsistent with the Lowest Law Enforcement Priority as defined
in section 14 -98 and 14 -99 of this article. (b) The council shall not support the
acceptance of any funds for the marijuana eradication program; and
WHEREAS, the Hawai'i County Council wishes to adhere to the ordinance
passed by the majority of voters in the 2008 elections; and
WHEREAS, Hawai'i Revised Statutes, Section 46 -7, requires that county
departments obtain the consent of the council to enter into agreements with the federal
or state governments respecting action to be taken pursuant to any of the powers
granted by law to furnish, expend, and receive any funds or other assistance in
connection with projects being or to be undertaken pursuant to those powers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY
OF HAWAII, in accordance with section 46 -7, Hawai'i Revised Statutes, that the Mayor
of the County of Hawai'i is authorized to execute, on behalf of the County, the contract,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "1 ", to enable the
County to utilize the Hawai'i Narcotics Task Force grant funding.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the funds received from this Recovery Act Grant
shall not be utilized for the purpose of marijuana eradication as defined in Article 16
section 14 -98 and 14 -99 which relates to the Lowest Law Enforcement Priority
Cannabis Ordinance.
2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Clerk of the County of Hawai'i
shall transmit copies of this resolution to the Office of the Mayor, the Finance and Police
Departments.
Dated at Hilo , Hawai'i, this 3rd day of February 2010.
INTRODUCED BY:
COUNCIL MEMB t R i CO ill OF HAWAII
COUNTY COUNCIL ROLL CALL VOTE
County of Hawai`i AYES NOES ABS Ex
Hilo, Hawaii ENRIQUES X
FORD X
I hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION was by GREEN WELL X
the vote indicated to the right hereof adopted by the COUNCIL of the FIOFFMANN
County of Hawaii on February 3, 2010 X
IKEDA X
NAEOLE—BEASON X
ATTEST: ONISHI X
YAGONG X
YOSHIMOTO X
8 1 0
�• � - Reference: C- 658.2/ FC -133
COUNTY CLERK CHAIRPERSON & PRESIDING OFFICER RESOLUTION NO. 290 09
(DRAFT 2)
3
i 'V
Project Number 09 -SU -20
C O N T R A C T
THIS CONTRACT, executed on the respective dates
indicated below, is effective as of July 1, 2009 1 by and
between the Department of the Attorney General, State of Hawaii.,
hereinafter called "Agency ", by and through the Attorney
General, and the Hawaii Police Department, hereinafter called
"Grantee ".
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe
Streets Act of 1968, 42 U. S. C. H 3711 et seq ., as amended
(hereinafter "Act ") , was enacted to make grants to States and
units of local government, for use by the State or unit of local
government to provide additional personnel, equipment, supplies,
contractual support, training, technical assistance, and
information systems for criminal justice, including for any one
or more of the following programs:
(1) Law enforcement programs.
(2) Prosecution and court programs.
(3) Prevention and education programs.
EXHIBIT "I"
0
(4) Corrections and community corrections programs.
(5) Drug treatment programs.
(6) Planning, evaluation, and technology improvement
programs.
(7) Crime victim and witness programs.
WHEREAS, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009, P.L. 111 -5, 123 Stat. 115, (hereinafter "Recovery ") was
enacted to help stabilize the economy, provide jobs and much
needed resources for states and local communities;
WHEREAS, the Governor has designated Agency to serve
as Hawaii's office for administering the federal financial
assistance available under the Act;
WHEREAS, Grantee, as an agency of the County of
Hawaii is qualified to receive funds available to Hawaii under
the Act and its implementing regulations, contained in the
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) State
Solicitation, and 28 C.F.R. Chapter 1, Part 66, and under
Recovery and has applied to Agency for receipt of the same as a
subgrantee;
Revised 8/09 2
WHEREAS, Agency has reviewed Grantee's application for
funds, and is satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act
and Recovery and their respective implementing regulations have
been satisfied and that Grantee is capable of using the federal
funds requested appropriately;
WHEREAS, Grantee has demonstrated the capacity to
provide the services, programs and activities described herein
and is ready, willing and able to provide the required services,
programs and activities;
NOW THEREFORE, Agency and Grantee for and in
consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and
stipulations hereinafter expressed, do mutually agree as
follows:
A. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Grantee shall, in a proper and satisfactory
manner, as determined by Agency, and in accordance with the
terms and conditions of this Contract, use the funds received
under this Contract for the purposes stated herein and in
accordance with the "Application For Grant" (Parts I through IV
including all certifications required under Section C and the
Revised 8/09 3
Acceptance of JAG Recovery Special Conditions) attached hereto
as Exhibit " A " and by reference incorporated herein. It is
understood that this Contract includes as a part hereof any
rules, relevant directives or instructions issued by the United
States or the Agency, including the provisions of the federal
Office of Management and Budget circulars and the effective
edition of the Office of Justice Programs' financial manual
entitled "Financial Guide."
B. TERM OF CONTRACT
This Contract shall be in effect for the period
from July 1, 2009 to and including June 30, 2010
unless this Contract is sooner terminated as hereinafter
provided or unless this Contract is extended in accordance with
Section L. of this Contract.
C. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS.
1. Grantee shall comply with the guidelines set
forth in the Act and Recovery and all applicable federal
regulations and guidelines, including but not limited to
guidance issued by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, 28 C.F.R.
Chapter 1, Part 66, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local
Revised 8/09 4
Governments, and Office of Management and Budget circulars and
the effective edition of the Office of Justice Programs'
financial manual entitled "Financial Guide."
2. Grantee shall comply with all the
ordinances, codes, rules and regulations of the Federal, State
and local government which in any way affect its performance
under this Contract.
3. Grantee shall provide for an independent
audit of its activities on a periodic basis in accordance with
Office of Management and Budget Circular A -133.
4. Prior to, or concurrently with the execution
of this Contract, Grantee shall complete, execute and submit to
Agency a Certification Regarding Drug -Free Workplace
Requirements which meets the requirements of the Drug Free
Workplace Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100 -690, Title V, Subtitle D,
U.S.C., Title 41, Chapter 10, §702), hereinafter referred to as
the "Drug -Free Workplace Certification ". A copy of the Drug -
Free Workplace Certification shall be included in Part IV of the
Application for Grant. Grantee covenants that the
representations made in the Drug -Free Workplace Certification
are true at the time this Contract is executed and will remain
true throughout the entire term of this Contract and any
extensions, and that Grantee shall fulfill all the requirements
Revised 8/09 5
set forth therein. Grantee's execution and submission of a
false Drug -Free Workplace Certification, or Grantee's violation
of any or all of the requirements set forth therein shall
entitle Agency to suspend one or more payments under this
Contract, and /or terminate this Contract pursuant to the
provisions of Section N of this Contract. Grantee warrants that
it is aware that such false certification or violation of the
requirements contained in the Drug -Free Workplace Certification
shall subject the State of Hawaii to government -wide suspension
or debarment, or other sanctions which, in turn, shall result in
the withdrawal of funds from Grantee and /or the unavailability
of future funding for Grantee.
5. Prior to, or concurrently with the execution
of this Contract, Grantee shall complete, execute and submit to
Agency a Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion, hereinafter referred to
as the "Debarment Certification ". A copy of the Debarment
Certification shall be included in Part IV of the Application
for Grant. Grantee covenants that the representations made in
the Debarment Certification are true at the time this Contract
is executed and will remain true throughout the entire term of
the Contract and any extensions, and that Grantee shall fulfill
any and all terms and conditions set forth therein.
Revised 8/09 6
6. Prior to, or concurrently with the execution
of this Contract, Grantee shall complete, execute and submit to
Agency a Certification of Non - Supplanting, hereinafter referred
to as the "Non- Supplanting Certification ". A copy of the Non -
Supplanting Certification shall be included in Part IV of the
Application for Grant. Grantee covenants that the
representations made in the Non - Supplanting Certification are
true at the time this Contract is executed and will remain true
throughout the entire term of the Contract and any extensions,
and that Grantee shall fulfill any and all terms and conditions
set forth therein.
7. Prior to, or concurrently with the execution
of this Contract, if so required by Agency, Grantee shall
complete, execute and submit to Agency a Certification Regarding
Lobbying, hereinafter referred to as the "Lobbying
Certification ", and any subsequent disclosure forms required
under Section 1352, Title 31 U. S. C. A copy of the Lobbying
Certification shall be included in Part IV of the Application
for Grant. Grantee covenants that the representations made in
the Lobbying Certification are true at the time this Contract is
executed and will remain true throughout the entire term of the
Contract and any extensions, and that Grantee shall fulfill any
and all terms and conditions set forth therein.
Revised 8/09 7
B. Grantee shall comply with the non-
discrimination requirements of the Omnibus Crime Control and
Safe Street Act of 1968 which prohibits discrimination in
employment and in the delivery of services or benefits on the
basis of race, color, national origin, religion, or sex; Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits
discrimination in the delivery of services or benefits on the
basis of race, color, or national origin; Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Title II of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 which prohibit discrimination in
employment and in the delivery of services or benefits based on
disability; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 which
prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in training or
educational programs; and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975
which prohibits discrimination in the delivery of services or
benefits on the basis of age; Department of Justice regulations
on disability (nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in
the state and local government services, public accommodations
and commercial facilities, and accessibility standards), 28
C.F.R. Part 35; Exec. Order No. 13279, 28 C.F.R. Part 38 (equal
protection of the laws for faith -based and community
organizations); Exec. Order No. 13166 and U.S. Department of
Justice, Guidance to Federal Financial Assistance Recipients
Revised 8/09 8
Regarding Title VI Prohibition Against National Origin
Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons; the
Hawaii State Fair Employment Practices Act, Chapter 378, Hawaii-
Revised Statutes; and all other applicable federal and state
laws, rules and regulations.
9. Grantee assures Agency that if it is
required to formulate an Equal Employment Opportunity Program in
accordance with 28 C.F.R: §§ 42.301 et seq it will submit a
certification to Agency that a current program is on file.
10. Grantee shall maintain accounting procedures
and practices acceptable to Agency, and books, records,
documents and other evidence which sufficiently, accurately and
properly reflect all direct and indirect expenditures and all
interest or other income earned as the result of funds provided
pursuant to this Contract. Grantee shall ensure that its own
books, records, and documents are available for inspection,
reviews or audits at all reasonable times by Agency or the
United States Department of Justice. In addition, Grantee shall
prepare and submit to the Agency reports in such form and at
such times as Agency or the Bureau of Justice Assistance may
require. Grantee shall submit quarterly financial reports
fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of each calendar
quarter. Grantee shall submit monthly request for funds and
Revised 8/09 9
cash balance reports fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of
each month. The final fiscal reports must be received by Agency
within sixty (60) days after the date this Contract terminates
or unless mandated earlier by Agency. Records and financial
accounts shall be retained by the Grantee and shall be
accessible to Agency and the United States Department of Justice
for at least three years after Agency's grant with the Bureau of
Justice Assistance is closed.
11. The final drawdown for funds shall be
received by Agency no later than thirty (30) days after the
Contract terminates.
12. Any funds provided to Grantee under this
Contract which are unencumbered on the date this Contract
terminates shall be returned to Agency; all funds provided under
this Contract which are encumbered but not disbursed within
sixty (60) days after this Contract terminates shall be returned
to Agency.
13. Grantee shall submit progress reports as
required for the Recovery and Act funds to Agency during the
term of the Contract as stipulated under Part IV. Attachments,
Acceptance of Special Conditions, Sections 5 and 10.
14. If so required by Agency, Grantee shall
certify to Agency that any expendable or nonexpendable personal
Revised 8/09 10
property purchased or acquired with funds received under this
Contract will be used for criminal justice purposes before title
in such property may vest in Grantee. Grantee shall submit a
certification to Agency within thirty (30) days after the date
this Contract terminates. If a certification is not provided by
Grantee, title to any personal property purchased or acquired
with funds received under this Contract shall vest in Agency and
such personal property shall be delivered to the Agency in good
working order upon expiration or sooner termination of this
Contract.
D. PERSONNEL.
1. Grantee shall secure at its own expense all
personnel required to perform the services required under this
Contract. All such personnel shall not be considered employees
of, or have any contractual relationship with the State of
Hawaii unless Grantee is otherwise an agency of the State.
2. Grantee shall ensure that none of the work
or services to be provided under this Contract shall be
subcontracted or assigned without the prior written approval of
Agency.
E. SUBCONTRACTS.
Revised 8/09 11
Grantee may provide some or all of the services
required under this Contract by subcontract provided that
Grantee secures the prior written consent of Agency. In the
event Grantee enters into a subcontract with a private
organization to perform any of the services or activities
required under this Contract, Grantee agrees. that the period of
each subcontract shall not exceed the term of this Contract, and
funds to the private organization will not be released unless
and until the requirements set forth in applicable state law and
implementing rules are complied with by the subcontractor. All
subcontracts shall include provisions to ensure that Grantee is
capable of satisfying the requirements of this Contract. All
subcontracts shall be reduced to writing and shall include all
provisions of this Contract required of Grantee.
F. SERVICES AS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
1. In the performance of the services required
under this Contract, Grantee shall be an independent contractor
with the authority to control and direct the performance and
details of the work and services required under this Contract;
however, Agency shall have the right to inspect work in progress
to determine whether, in Agency's opinion, the work is being
performed by Grantee in accordance with the provisions of this
Revised 8/09 12
Contract. All persons hired or used by Grantee shall be
Grantee's agents and employees and Grantee shall be responsible
for the accuracy, completeness, and adequacy of any and all work
and services performed by its agents and employees.
Furthermore, Grantee intentionally, voluntarily, and knowingly
assumes the sole and entire liability if such liability is
determined to exist, to its agents and employees or to third
persons, for all loss, cost, damage or injury caused by
Grantee's agents and employees in the course of their
employment. The performance of work under this Contract alone
shall not be construed as employment with the State of Hawaii
and shall not entitle Grantee's agents and employees to
vacation, sick leave, retirement, or other benefits directly
afforded state employees by statutes. Grantee shall be
responsible for payment of all applicable federal, state, and
county fees which may become due and owing by the Grantee by
reason of the Contract, including but not limited to (i) income
taxes,(ii) employment related fees, assessments and taxes and
(iii) general excise taxes. The Grantee also is responsible for
obtaining all licenses, permits and certificates that may be
required in order to perform this Contract.
2. This section shall not be enforced if
Grantee is an agency of the State of Hawaii.
Revised 8/09 13
G. COMPENSATION
1. Subject to continuing availability of funds,
Agency agrees to pay Grantee, for services satisfactorily
performed under this Contract, a sum not to exceed One
hundred thirteen thousand eiqht hundred eighty five and 00 /100
dollars ($113,885.00) - - -- to be spent for the purposes of this
Contract. This sum represents any and all compensation to be
paid to Grantee for any and all services it provides, and for
any and all travel costs, materials, supplies, equipment,
overhead, taxes, and other incidentals and operating expenses
which it incurs or may incur in connection with this Contract.
2. It is covenanted and agreed by and between
the parties hereto that, as to the portion of the obligation
under this Contract to be payable out of federal funds, this
Contract shall be construed to be an agreement to pay such
portion to the Grantee only out of federal funds to be received
from the federal government when the federal funds are so
received and shall not be construed as a general agreement to
pay such portion at all events out of any funds other than those
which are received from the federal government.
H. METHOD OF PAYMENT
1. All funds available for use under this
Revised 8/09 14
Contract shall be subject to the allotment system as provided in
Chapter 37,, Hawaii Revised Statutes.
2. Payments to Grantee under this Contract
shall be made in accordance with and subject to the following
provisions:
a. Payments shall be made monthly upon
receipt of Grantee's completed request for funds.
b. All payments shall be made in
accordance with and subject to Chapter 40, Hawaii Revised
Statutes, which specifies the accounting procedures and controls
applicable to payments out of the Treasury of the State of
Hawaii.
C. If an amount of reported expenditures
is preliminarily determined by Agency to be inappropriate and
unallowable, Agency may deduct an equivalent amount from the
next payable installment and may withhold payment of the amount
of the moneys equivalent to the questioned expenditures until
later resolution of the discrepancy by audit or other means.
If, after payment of the last installment, investigation and
examination reveal additional expenditures that are determined
by Agency to be inappropriate and unallowable, Agency may
require that an equivalent amount of moneys be refunded to
Agency notwithstanding Agency's preliminary determination of
Revised 8/09 15
appropriateness and allowability.
d. Failure to submit required reports by
the applicable deadline will result in the withholding of
payments until such time as the reports are received by Agency.
Grantee shall continue to provide the services, programs and
activities during the period that payments are being withheld.
I. INDEMNIFICATION
1. It is strictly understood that the State of
Hawaii shall in no way be held liable for any damages, cause of
action or suits resulting from the acts, activities, or
omissions of Grantee. Grantee shall indemnify and save harmless
the State of Hawaii, Agency, and their officers, agents, and
employees from and against any and all liability, loss, actions,
claims, suits, damages, costs or expenses, including all
attorneys' fees, and all claims, suits, and demands therefor,
arising out of or resulting from the acts or omissions of
Grantee, its officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors
occurring during or in connection with the performance of
Grantee's services under this Contract, or arising out of or
resulting from breach of this Contract by Grantee. Grantee
shall defend the State of Hawaii,` Agency, and their officers,
agents, and employees against any such action or claim unless
Revised 8/09 16
the action or claim involves an act or omission solely of
Agency, its officers, agents, or employees.
2. This section shall not be enforced if
Grantee is an agency of the State of Hawaii.
J. CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
Any information, data, report, record, summary,
table, map, or study given to or prepared or assembled by
Grantee under this Contract which is identified as proprietary
or confidential information that Agency requests to be kept
confidential shall be safeguarded by the Grantee and shall not
be made available to any individual or organization other than
any subcontractor to which the material may relate, without
prior written approval of Agency. Grantee shall submit a
completed Privacy Certification for review and approval prior to
the expenditure of funds for the collection of identifiable
research/ statistical data. All information, data, or other
material provided by the Grantee or the Agency shall be kept
confidential only to the extent permitted by law. Grantee shall
comply with the requirements of Chapters 487J, 487N and 487R,
Hawaii Revised Statutes as applicable.
Revised 8/09 17
W
provisions of the "Application For Grant" may be requested by
Grantee, approved by the Administrator of the Crime Prevention
and Justice Assistance Division on Agency's behalf, and made by
substituting or inserting the revisions in Exhibit "A ".
Modifications, alterations or changes to the period during which
this Contract is in effect may be requested in writing by
Grantee or Agency, up to forty -five (45) days before the
Contract would otherwise terminate, and shall be effective as of
the date approved by the Administrator of the Crime Prevention
and Justice Assistance Division (if requested by Grantee) or
Grantee (if requested by Agency) and made by attaching
a party's written request with the other party's written
approval thereon to this Contract. No oral modification,
alteration, amendment, change, or extension of any term,
provision or condition of this Contract shall be permitted.
M. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Grantee represents that it presently has no
interest and promises that it shall not acquire any interest,
direct or indirect, that would conflict in any manner or degree
with the performance of the services under this Contract.
Revised 8/09 19
N. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT
1. If, for any cause, Grantee refuses or fails to
satisfactorily fulfill in a timely or proper manner its
obligations under this Contract or any extension thereof, or if
Grantee breaches any of the promises, terms or conditions of
this Contract and, having been given reasonable notice of and
opportunity to cure any such default, fails to take satisfactory
corrective action within the time specified by Agency, Agency
shall have the right to terminate this Contract by giving
written notice to Grantee of such termination 'ten (10) calendar
days before the effective date of such termination. The Grantee
shall continue performance of the Contract to the extent it is
not terminated. Notwithstanding termination of the Contract,
and subject to any directions from the Agency, the Grantee shall
take timely, reasonable, and necessary action to protect and
preserve property in the possession of the Grantee in which the
Agency has an interest.
2. Furthermore, Agency may terminate this
Contract without statement of cause at any time by giving
written notice to Grantee of such termination at least thirty
(30) calendar days before the effective date of such
termination.
3. In the event of termination of either type,
Revised 8/09 20
all finished or unfinished documents, reports, summaries, lists,
charts, graphs, maps, or other written material prepared by
Grantee, under this Contract shall become Agency's property and,
together with all information, data, reports, records, maps, and
other materials (if any) provided to Grantee by Agency, shall be
delivered and surrendered to Agency on or before the effective
date of termination.
4. Grantee shall be entitled to receive only
such compensation as shall have been satisfactorily earned prior
to the effective date of termination. Agency shall determine
the amount of work satisfactorily completed and the amount of
compensation satisfactorily earned. If the termination is for
cause, any other provisions to the contrary notwithstanding,
Grantee shall not be relieved of liability to Agency for damages
sustained by Agency because of any breach by Grantee of this
Contract.
O. WAIVER.
The failure of the Agency to insist upon strict
compliance with any term, provision, or condition of this
Contract shall not constitute or be deemed to constitute a
waiver or relinquishment of the Agency's right to enforce the
same in accordance with this Contract. It is expressly
Revised 8/09 21
4
understood and agreed that no waiver granted by Agency on
account of any violation of any promise, term or condition of
this Contract shall constitute or be construed in any manner as
a waiver of the promise, term or condition or of the right to
enforce the same as to any other or further violation.
P. DISPUTES; GOVERNING LAW; VENUE.
Any dispute concerning a matter of fact arising
under this Contract or any subcontract, which is not disposed of
by mutual agreement within fifteen (15) calendar days, shall be
decided by the Attorney General, or the Attorney General's duly
designated representative, who shall reduce the decision to
writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy of the decision to
Grantee. The decision of such person shall be final and
conclusive. Pending final decision of such dispute, Grantee
shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Contract
in accordance with Agency's request. The validity of this
Contract and any of its terms or provisions, as well as the
rights and duties of the parties to this Contract, shall be
governed by the laws of the State of Hawaii. Except as
otherwise provided in this Section, any action to enforce this
Contract or for breach of this Contract shall be brought only in
a State court of competent jurisdiction in Honolulu, Hawaii.
Revised 8/09 22
0
Q. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Additional conditions may be imposed against
Grantee by reducing them to writing and designating them as
exhibits to this Contract. Any such exhibit shall be attached
hereto and thereby incorporated herein.
Revised 8/09 23
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this Contract.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Deputy Attorney General, State of Hawaii
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF HAWAII, ( "AGENCY ")
C
Print Name Mark J. Bennett
Its Attorney General
Date
HAWAII POLICE DEPARTMENT,
COUNTY OF HAWAII( "GRANTEE ")
By
Print Name Dixie Kaetsu
Title Managing Director
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGALITY
By
Print Name
Title Cor
Date
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED
By
Print Name Harry S. Kubojiri
Title Chief of Police
Date
ration Counsel
Revised 8/09 24
0
CRIME PREVENTION AND JUSTICE ASSISTANCE DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
235 South Beretania Street, Suite 401
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
APPLICATION FOR BYRNE JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT - RECOVERY
PART]. TITLE PAGE
A. PROJECT TITLE: HAWAII NARCOTICS TASK FORCE
B. APPLICANT AGENCY: Hawaii Police Department
C. CENTRAL CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION: ® Yes ❑ No DUNS No. 613154335
D. APPLICATION RANKING WITHIN AGENCY: (as determined by agency head)
E. ADDRESS: 349 Kapiolani Street
Zip 96720
F. LOCATION OF PROJECT: 349 Kapiolani Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720
G. PROJECT PERIOD: From July 1 2009 To June 30, 2010
H. AUTHORIZED PURPOSE AREA: Law Enforcement Programs
I. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
New
❑
Continuation
J. TOTAL PROJECT AMOUNT:
$
113,885
K. OTHER FUNDING SOURCES:
Is the proposed project seeking other sources of funding? Yes ❑ No ® If Les, then provide name of
source and the amount of funds that is being sought: Source Amount $
L. PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
The applicant agrees to comply with all reporting, data collection
and evaluation requirements, as prescribed
by the Department of the Attorney General. Yes ® No ❑
M. PROJECT DIRECTOR
Name: Richard Sherlock Title:
Lieutenant
Address: 349 Kapiolani Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Telephone: 808 - 961 -2253 Fax: 808 - 961 -2372
E -Mail: rsherlock @co.hawaii.hi.us
N. FINANCIAL OFFICER
Name: Nori Ishii Title:
Accountant V
Address: 349 Kapiolani Street, Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Telephone: 808 - 961 -2273 Fax: 808 - 961 -2390
E -Mail: nishii @co.hawaii.hi.us
FOR CHAD USE p
Date received: Project Number: `�
City H
EXHIBIT A
AG /CPJAD #1 (Rev 03/3/2009)
APPLICATION FOR BYRNE JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT - RECOVERY
PART lI. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Note: This form does not provide spell check.
A. THE PROBLEM
The overwhelming flow of narcotics into and throughout the County and State of Hawaii remains a very
significant threat to the citizens and communities of the Big Island. Both the supply and demand of
crystal methamphetamine, marijuana, cocaine, heroin, and other pharmaceutical drugs have continued to
increase in the County of Hawaii, as well as throughout the State.
Cocaine remains popular and readily available throughout the County of Hawaii and is often used in.
conjunction with other drugs including heroin and marijuana. The majority of cocaine recovered by law
enforcement is in its powdered form but recoveries of "crack" cocaine are still not uncommon. Black tar
heroin is the most common form of heroin found in the County of Hawaii. Local heroin trafficking
organizations are very secretive and loyal in nature and prove very difficult to infiltrate by law
enforcement. The majority of methamphetamine, the number one threat in the State of Hawaii, has
already been converted from its powder form into "ice" before it is distributed in the County of Hawaii.
Crystal methamphetamine, cocaine, and heroin abuse can be attributed to drug trafficking organizations
(DTO) with strong domestic and international ties. These "hard" drugs, being neither found nor produced
locally in large quantities, are predominantly imported to the State of Hawaii via commercial and private
air transportation, federal and private mail couriers, and through maritime transport vessels. Mexican
DTO's have been responsible for the majority of Crystal Methamphetamine, Cocaine, and Heroin
imported into the State through California and Nevada. Asian DTO's have also been reported as
smuggling crystal methamphetamine into the State as well. The monetary proceeds are then transported
back to the West Coast and /or Asia via courier or parcel.
Marijuana continues to be readily available, as marijuana cultivators have developed and refined their
methods to avoid detection of outdoor marijuana grows, and have also incorporated indoor cultivation
with the use of artificial lighting and hydroponics technology.
The demand for "Hawaiian" marijuana both domestically and internationally, due to its potency and
reputation for high quality, continues to grow. In addition to the export of Hawaiian grown marijuana,
Canadian marijuana (BC Bud) has also been intercepted as imports into the County of Hawaii via parcel
and courier via California, Washington, and Oregon. Search warrants conducted on ice and cocaine
traffickers have consistently revealed small seizures of marijuana. Due to the availability of marijuana
and its use, it has been labelled by Hawaii High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) as the second
most abused drug in Hawaii.
During the period of January 1 through December 31, 2008, the Hawaii Police Department had conducted
1,193 drug related investigations resulting in 621 arrests. Officers had also seized 2,848.94 grams of
cocaine, 3,849.62 grams of methamphetamine, 102.05 pounds of processed marijuana, and 69.42 grams
of heroin. Numerous assets, vehicles, and currency related to narcotics investigations have also been
seized for forfeiture during this time.
The potential profit of drug trafficking is extremely high, prompting numerous people to become
involved in drug trafficking. These persons have since invested large amounts of money, time and effort
AGMAD #1(a) (Rev 03i3i2009) Page 1
to set up distribution networks which are very sophisticated and well organized. Such networks operate
on many different levels, filtering all the way down to the "street dealers," who often deal drugs to
support their own habits, sell only "user" quantities, and are highly visible to the general public. Such
"street dealers" are often the subject of numerous public complaints and become nuisances in any
community in which they operate.
The utilization of undercover officers to infiltrate drug trafficking organizations has repeatedly proven
itself as a very effective means of dismantling the organization. Such operations often lead to the arrest of
the upper -most levels of dealers in the organizations through undercover purchases of narcotics. In
addition, police controlled purchases conducted with reliable confidential sources and cooperating
individuals have also led to the arrest of many mid- to high -level dealers.
Narcotic investigations are often complicated, lengthy, and tedious and depend greatly on the skills of a
well- trained investigator. Without such skills and training, successful arrests and /or drug seizures would
not be possible. However, as the methods and trends of drug trafficking continuously change, it is
imperative that law enforcement personnel involved in narcotic investigations are continuously trained
and educated in order to maintain effectiveness. The criminal element's knowledge of the techniques
utilized by law enforcement to combat the drug problem is ever growing, not only by "word of mouth"
communication as in the past, but also due to the amount of information available to them via the
internet, not to mention the growing number of "reality" television shows in syndication. It is the
intention of the Hawaii Police Department to ensure that the members of our Vice sections are abreast of
the latest narcotic investigation techniques, intelligence, and resources to combat the ever changing and
evolving methods of the modern day drug trafficking organizations.
To combat the large amount of narcotics imported into the County of Hawaii, the Hawaii Police
Department created an "Airport Smuggling Detail" which was assigned to the Hawaii Airport Task Force
(HATF) comprised of Federally Deputized Officers from the four counties under the HIDTA initiative.
This specialized unit is responsible for interdicting narcotics that are being smuggled into the Keahole
International Airport in addition to other freight and parcel services in the County of Hawaii.
The Hawaii Police Department continues to utilize narcotic detection canines as a valuable tool in
narcotic investigations. Narcotics canines use their acute sense of smell to locate suspects or narcotics in
any type of hiding spot. This ability affords officers a safer tool to utilize in apprehending suspects and
narcotics. Currently, two (2) of the narcotic detection canines utilized by the Hawaii Police Department
have reached their "retirement years" and must be replaced.
As stated prior, crystal methamphetamine or "ice" remains the drug of choice throughout the County and
State of Hawaii and has a devastating effect on the local communities and families in the County of
Hawaii. In response, the' Hawaii Police Department has created its own internal "Ice Task Force" and
continues to seek the aide and cooperation of every Federal, State and County agency, to include the
Hawaii Narcotics Task Force (HNTF) in an attempt to stem the flow of illegal narcotics into and
throughout the County of Hawaii.
Funding for the Hawaii Narcotics Task Force and the partnership between these agencies has resulted in
numerous successful investigations which are summarized below:
From the months of April to August of 2008, two Hawaii Police Department task force officers worked
in an undercover capacity with the Kauai Police Department targeting "street" to "mid level" drug dealers.
ac /cPJan #](a) (Rev 03/3/2009) Page 2
The investigation, named "Operation Round Up ", was made possible by funding from the Hawaii
Narcotics Task Force project and resulted in the arrests of over thirty -five (3 5) individuals for over one
hundred (100) charges ranging from outstanding courtroom warrants to Methamphetamine Trafficking.
In May of 2008, task force officers concluded a three month long investigation by arresting a 25 year old
male after task force officers intercepted 89.2 grams of methamphetamine "stored" at one of his
associate's properties. Through wires, informants, and surveillance, a Methamphetamine Trafficking case
was built against the 25 year old male who was the head of a local drug trafficking operation and had
been quite "elusive" escaping prosecution in prior investigations.
In August of 2008, Hawaii Police Department task force officers received information from the Maui
Police Department about a marijuana trafficking organization between Maui and Hilo. This resulted in
the recovery of six (6) pounds of dry marijuana intended to be smuggled via private small engine Cessna
between the two islands. The investigation concluded at a large sophisticated "indoor" grow on the
Hamakua coast resulting in three arrests and the recovery of 397 marijuana plants, 5 pounds of dry
processed marijuana, and numerous vehicles and other property.
In September of 2008, Hawaii Police Department task force officers working with the DEA were able to
conduct a controlled delivery of 237 grams of Crystal Methamphetamine hidden within a water pump to a
vacant address on the Big Island where the parcel was then picked up by a 37 year old California man.
The parcel was "interdicted" at the Honolulu FedEx office by the Hawaii Airport Task Force.
In November of 2008, Maui Police wrapped up a two year investigation into a marijuana trafficking
organization that was "exploiting" existing State medical marijuana laws. A Hawaii Police Department
task force officer also assisted the Maui Police in an undercover capacity to assist in infiltrating and
dismantling this ring. Operation "Weedkiller" resulted in the arrest of seven Maui men and the recovery
of hundreds of marijuana plants and $14,000 in cash.
In November of 2008, Hawaii Police Department task force officers with the assistance of the U.S. Postal
Sevice arrested two persons after intercepting a parcel containing 13.1 grams of heroin from the Kailua
Kona Post Office and conducting a successful "controlled delivery".
In December of 2008, the Hawaii Police Department concluded Operation "Nailgun ", a
methamphetamine trafficking investigation involving the FBI, ATF, ICE, and DEA which resulted in the
arrest of seven suspects on Federal charges. _
These investigations, just to name a few, are representative of the partnership of resources and
information gained from the Hawaii Narcotic Task Force project and the effect it has on drug trafficking
not only in the County of Hawaii, but also the State of Hawaii
The Hawaii Narcotics Task Force funding for fiscal year 2008 was limited to overtime and investigative
travel. The Hawaii Police Department recognizes that training and equipment are also essential
components of narcotic investigations. As illegal narcotics trafficking and dealing continues to remain a
large problem for the State and County of Hawaii despite progress made in past years, the Hawaii Police
Department wishes to use this recovery funding for training and equipment while still fulfilling the goals
of the Hawaii Narcotics Task Force.
AG /CPJAD #1(a) (Rev 03/3/2009) Page 3
B. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The overall goal of the HNTF is to disrupt the flow of narcotics via the apprehension of mid- to high -
level dealers smuggling and distributing narcotics into and within the State of Hawaii.
The objectives are as follows:
1. Maintain a task force of personnel from the Hawaii Police Department, Maui Police Department,
and the Kauai Police Department.
2. Increase the knowledge of vice officers by providing training in such topics as narcotic
investigations, current drug trends, smuggling and distribution techniques, and State /Federal laws that
impact the task force.
3. Meet at least quarterly to coordinate joint operations and training, as well as other enforcement
efforts, and to share information.
4. Seize a minimum of 900 grams of cocaine, 600 grams of crystal methamphetamine, and 50 grams
of heroin.
Make a minimum of 200 drug- related arrests.
Conduct 3 joint task force operations.
C. PROJECT ACTIVITIES
1. Investigative efforts will be directed towards the identification and arrest of drug distributors and
smugglers.
2. The Hawaii Police Department's Narcotic Canine Unit will continue to play a vital role in the
drug enforcement program. The unit also assists the HATF in interdiction and distribution operations in
East and West Hawaii. Time will be spent at the Hilo International and Keahole -Kona International
Airport, as well as at private and federal mail and courier services.
When requested, the canine unit is utilized to assist other State and Federal law enforcement agencies.
An example of this is the occasional check of private aircrafts and cruise ships.
Personnel assigned to the canine unit and/or those assigned to assist them will attend various workshops
and seminars dealing with canine issues and investigative techniques. New narcotic detection canines will
be purchased as needed to replace older canines.
3. In furtherance of the task force concept, the Hawaii Police Department will continue to participate
and assist in interagency investigations.
4. Personnel will attend quarterly meetings in order to share current information and to coordinate
joint operations as well as other enforcement efforts.
AG /CPJAD #1(a) (Rev 03/3/2009) Page 4
5. Training of personnel is an essential component to the drug enforcement program. Training will
include attending conferences and workshops on topics that will be instrumental in increasing the
attendees' knowledge and work performance. Training will also familiarize the narcotics officers with
current and up -to -date trends of various narcotics concerns and investigative techniques.
D. PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
The project director for the Hawaii Police Department shall be the Lieutenant of the Area I Vice Section..
The project director will be responsible for the overall management of the Project and will oversee
department activities with the Hawaii Narcotic Task Force.
The project director reports to the captain of the Criminal Investigation Division. The Criminal
Investigation Division falls under the command of the Major and Assistant Chief of Area I
Operations.
E. PERSONNEL
The County police departments will use existing personnel; there will be no hires for the project.
F. BRIEF PERSONNEL BIOGRAPHIES
N/A
G. PARTICIPATING AGENCIES
1. The lead agency and facilitator for the County police departments will be the Maui Police
Department who will, through the Vice Division, coordinate technical assistance, training, and
manpower.
2. The Hawaii Police Department will conduct enforcement throughout the County of Hawaii and
provide manpower assistance to the other Counties on an "as needed" basis.
3. The HNTF is comprised of the following County agencies:
Hawaii Police Department
Maui Police Department
Kauai Police Department
4. Participating agencies shall include the:
Drug Enforcement Administration
U.S. Customs & Immigration Enforcement
U.S. Postal Service
National Park Service
U.S. Coast Guard
Federal Bureau of Investigation
U.S. Attorney General
Internal Revenue Service
AG /CPJAD #](a) (Rev 03/3/2009) Page 5
State Attorney General
Department of Land and Natural Resources
State Narcotic Enforcement Division
Hawaii National Guard
Honolulu Police Department
County Prosecutor's Office
Hawaii HII)TA
H.
I.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS /OUTCOME MEASURES
The American Recovery Act and Reinvestment Act JAG (ARRA JAG) of 2009, requires grantees to report
specific Performance Measures for project activities. Refer to Table 1 to locate the Performance Measures
that pertain to this project.
l:
Training:
2:
Equipment /Supplies:
3:
Contractual Support:
4:
Task Force Activities
5:
Outcomes for All
Activity Areas:
Questions #14 -24
Questions #39 -42
Questions #43 -46
Questions #66 -83
Questions #84 -86
PROBABILITY TO IMPROVE THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
The Hawaii Narcotics Task Force Project will provide Hawaii Police Department with the continued
funding necessary to investigate and apprehend mid- to high -level drug dealers.
The sharing of resources and information between the Task Force participants will affect not only the
individual Counties but also the State of Hawaii.
The results will be a decrease in the flow of illegal narcotics into the State which will positively impact
all aspects of police work and the criminal justice system
AG MAD #](a) (Rev 03/3/2009) Page 6
TABLE 1
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Activity Area: State/Local Initiatives
State and local initiatives include activities that are planned for implementation of a new program to
provide a direct service or to improve a criminal justice system by implementing a new process.. procedure,
or policy. Initiatives may improve a program, service, or system. They also may include the
implementation of a new program to meet an identified need of a population. Planned activities also may
include a campaign to counteract criminal activity in a variety of settings.
1
Total number
The purpose of this
output indicator is to
of new state
output indicator is to
planned
initiatives
measure the number
programs, services or
planned
of new state - initiated
(System
programs, services or
or partially by (ARRA)
Improvement)
interagency task forces
for grantees under any
that are funded wholly
purpose area that use
or partially by (ARRA)
implement programs
JAG funds. Appropriate
that have a direct
for grantees under any
population or use
purpose area that uses
funding for system
(ARRA) JAG funds to
activities. Report the
implement programs
that have a direct
impact on a targeted
population or use
funding for system
improvement activities.
Report the total
number of new state -
initiated programs,
services or interagency
task forces that are
planned for the project
period. SOURCE:
Agency records are
preferred data source.
Total number of
new state initiatives
planned for the
project period (life
of the award).
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Total number
The purpose of this
of new local
output indicator is to
initiatives
measure the number
planned
of new locally- initiated
(System
programs, services or
Improvement)
interagency task forces
that are funded wholly
or partially by (ARRA)
JAG funds. Appropriate
for grantees under any
purpose area that use
(ARRA) JAG funds to
implement programs
that have a direct
impact on a targeted
population or use
funding for system
improvement type
activities. Report the
A. Total number of
new local initiatives
planned for the
project period (life
of the award)
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Activity Area: State /Local Initiatives
Total number
of state
initiatives
maintained
using (ARRA)
JAG funds
(System
Improvement)
Total number
of local
initiatives
maintained
using (ARRA)
JAG funds
(System
Improvement)
total number of new
locally- initiated
programs, services or
interagency task forces
that are planned for
the project period.
SOURCE: Agency
records are preferred
data source.
The purpose of this
output indicator is to
measure the number
of state initiated
programs, services or
interagency task forces
that are maintained
wholly or partially by
(ARRA) JAG funds.
Appropriate for
grantees under any
purpose area that uses
(ARRA) JAG funds to
maintain programs
that have a direct
impact on a targeted
population or use
funding for system
improvement activities.
Report the total
number of state -
initiated programs,
services, or
interagency task forces
that are maintained for
the project period.
SOURCE: Agency
records are preferred
data source.
The purpose of this
output indicator is to
measure the number
of locally- initiated
programs, services or
interagency task forces
that are funded wholly
or partially by (ARRA)
JAG funds. Appropriate
for grantees under any
purpose area that use
(ARRA) JAG funds to
maintain programs
that have a direct
impact on a targeted
population or use
funding for system
improvement activities.
Report the total
number of state -
initiated programs,
A. Total number of state Law Enforcement
initiatives maintained for Prosecution and Court
the project period (life Prevention and Education
of the award) Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
A. Total number of local
initiatives maintained for
the project period (life
of the award)
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Activity Area: State /Local Initiatives
#
Measure
Definon s
Data Grantee Reports#
Appiies_to Purpose Arias
i
services, or
interagency task forces
that are maintained for
the project period.
SOURCE: Agency
records are preferred
data source.
5
Number of
The purpose of this
A. Number of program
Law Enforcement
program
output indicator is to
participants
Prosecution and Court
participants
measure service
receiving services
Prevention and Education
receiving
provision levels.
carried over from
Corrections and Community Corrections
services
Appropriate for
the previous
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(Direct
grantees in purpose
reporting period
Crime Victim and Witness
Service)
areas in which (ARRA)
B. Number of NEW
JAG funds are used for
program
direct services to
participants
individuals and /or
receiving services
groups of program
that were added
participants. (e.g.,
during the
crime
reporting period
prevention /intervention
C. Sum (a +b) Auto -
programs, one- to-one
calculated by PMT
contact, support
groups). Program
participants may be
defined by the
population served by
the program. Report
the number of
program participants
who received services
during the reporting
period SOURCE:
Program records are
preferred data source.
6
Number of
SHOULD ONLY USE
A. Number of defined
Law Enforcement
defined
IF DATA for ITEM
groups receiving
Prosecution and Court
groups
#3 IS NOT
services carried
Prevention and Education
receiving
REPORTED. The
over from the
Corrections and Community Corrections
services
purpose of this output
previous reporting
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(Direct
indicator is to measure
period
Crime Victim and Witness
Service)
service provision
B. Number of NEW
levels. Appropriate for
defined groups
grantees in purpose
added during the
areas in which (ARRA)
reporting period
JAG funds are used for
C. Sum (a +b) Auto -
direct services to
calculated by PMT
groups of individuals
(e.g., crime prevention
awareness campaigns
to schools,
communities or
organizations). A
defined group includes
schools, communities,
organizations, agencies
or departments.
Report the number of
communities or
Activity Area: State /Local Initiatives
7 Number of
program slots
offered
through
initiatives
(Direct
Service)
Number of
local
initiatives
implemented
(System
Improvement)
organizations that
received services
during the reporting
period. Community
includes groups of
people by organization,
neighborhood or
affiliation. Use
measures with
"defined groups" when
the number of
individuals can not be
determined. SOURCE:
Program records are
preferred data source.
The purpose of this
output indicator is to
measure program
capacity. Appropriate
for grantees in purpose
areas in which (ARPA)
JAG funds are used for
direct services to
individuals or programs
offered to groups of
individuals. Program
slots are, for example,
service delivery slots,
programs, and
campaigns. Report the
number of program
slots offered through
initiatives as a result of
(ARRA) JAG funds
during the reporting
period. The number of
slots available at the
start of the reporting
period reflects the
number of slots that
are available for use
with funds from your
current (ARRA) JAG
award. SOURCE:
Program records are
preferred data source.
The purpose of the
outcome indicator is to
measure
accountability.
Appropriate for
grantees in purpose
areas that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for system
improvement. Report
the number of locally -
initiated initiatives
implemented. (e.g.,
programs, task force
A. Number of program
Law Enforcement
slots available at
Prosecution and Court
the start of the
Prevention and Education
reporting period
Corrections and Community Corrections
B. Number of NEW
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
program slots
Crime Victim and Witness
created during the
reporting period
C. Sum (a +b) Auto -
calculated by PMT
A. Number of local
initiatives
implemented
during the
reporting period
B. Total number of
local initiatives
planned for the
project period
(Auto - filled by PMT
from #2a)
C. Percent (a /b) Auto -
calculated by PMT
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
4
Activity Area: State /Local Initiatives
operations) SOURCE:
Program records are
preferred data source
9
Number of
The purpose of the
Prosecution and Court
state
outcome indicator is to
during the
initiatives
measure
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
implemented
accountability.
state initiatives
(System
Appropriate for
Improvement)
grantees in purpose
C. Percent (a /b) Auto -
areas that use (ARRA)
)AG funds for system
improvement. Report
the number of state -
initiated initiatives
implemented. (e.g.,
programs, task force
operations) SOURCE:
Program records are
preferred data source
10 Number of
program
participants
who
completed
programming
(Direct
Service,
System
Improvement)
The purpose of this
outcome indicator is to
measure
accountability.
Appropriate for
purpose areas in which
direct services are
provided to individuals.
Report the number of
participants who
completed services
provided during the
reporting period.
SOURCE: Program
records are preferred
data source
11
Number of
defined
groups that
completed
programming
(Direct
Service,
System
Improvement)
SHOULD ONLY USE
IF DATA for ITEM
#18 IS NOT
REPORTED. The
purpose of this
outcome indicator is to
measure
accountability.
Appropriate for
purpose areas in which
direct services are
provided to
communities or
defined groups (e.g.,
the Maple Street
business association,
the Main High School
Parent/Teachers
Organization, Orange
County.) Public
A. Number of state
Law Enforcement
initiatives
Prosecution and Court
implemented
Prevention and Education
during the
Corrections and Community Corrections
reporting period
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
B. Total number of
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
state initiatives
Crime Victim and Witness
planned (AUTO -fill
from #1a)
C. Percent (a /b) Auto -
calculated by PMT
A. Number of program
participants who
completed
programming
during the
reporting period
B. Total number of
program
participants that
exited
programming
during the
reporting period
(complete or not
complete)
C. Percent complete
(a lb) Auto -
calculated by PMT
A. Number of defined
groups that
completed
programming
during the
reporting period
B. Number of defined
groups that exited
programming
during the
reporting
period(complete or
not complete)
C. Percent (a /b) Auto -
calculated by PMT
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Activity Area: State /Local Initiatives
12 Cost savings
(in man
hours) as a
result of new
systems
implemented
(System
Improvement)
13
Cost savings
(in dollars) as
a result of
new systems
implemented
(System
Improvement)
awareness campaigns
would fit under this
category. Report the
number of defined
groups that completed
programming provided
during the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Program records are
preferred data source
The purpose of this
outcome indicator is to
measure program cost
savings in man hours.
Appropriate for all
purpose areas that
provide direct service
and are able to realize
a cost savings as a
result of implementing
new systems. The
period "prior to the
initiative" represents
the activities that
occurred prior to the
start of grant- funded
activities. The cost of
standard procedures
before system changes
were made provided in
man hours. The period
"after initiative" refers
to the activities that
occur with grant funds.
SOURCE: Agency
records are preferred
data source
The purpose of this
outcome indicator is to
measure program cost
savings in dollars.
Appropriate for all
purpose areas that
provide direct service
and are able to realize
a cost savings as a
result of implementing
new systems. The
period "prior to the
initiative" represents
the activities that
occurred prior to the
start of grant- funded
activities. The cost of
standard procedures
before system changes
were made provided in
dollars. The period
"after initiative" refers
A. Number of man
Law Enforcement
hours required
Prosecution and Court
prior to initiative
Prevention and Education
B. Number of man
Corrections and Community Corrections
hours required
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
after initiative
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
C. Savings (a-b) Auto-
Crime Victim and Witness
calculated by PMT
A. Dollars expended
prior to initiative
B. Dollars expended
after initiative
C. Savings (a -b) Auto -
calculated by PMT
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
rel
Activity Area: State /Local Initiatives
to the activities that
occur with grant funds.
SOURCE: Agency
records are preferred
data source
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Activity Area: Training
Training activities would include the provision of different types of training, the purchase of training
services for or to staff or departments.
14
Amount of
The purpose of the output
A. Number of
(ARRA) JAG
indicator is to measure
training
funds used to
system accountability.
Prosecution and Court
provide
Appropriate for grantees in
service levels. Appropriate for
training
purpose areas that use
(System
(ARRA) JAG funds for system
the reporting
Improvement)
improvement. Report the
(System
that use (ARRA) JAG funds for
amount of (ARRA) JAG funds
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
the reporting period.
used to provide training.
system improvement. Report
(Training is paid for with
Training may be delivered by
(ARRA) JAG funds.) SOURCE:
the grantee or funds used to
Crime Victim and Witness
acquire training for staff. All
received. SOURCE: Program
training is paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds. SOURCE: Program
records are preferred data
records are preferred data
source
A. Amount of funds Law Enforcement
used to provide Prosecution and Court
training during Prevention and Education
the reporting Corrections and Community Corrections
period Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
15
Number of
The purpose of the output
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
trained during the
training
indicator is to measure
training requests
Prosecution and Court
Appropriate for grantees in
requests
service levels. Appropriate for
received during
Prevention and Education
received
grantees in purpose areas
the reporting
Corrections and Community Corrections
reporting period
(System
that use (ARRA) JAG funds for
period
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
the reporting period.
Improvement)
system improvement. Report
(Training is paid for with
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(ARRA) JAG funds.) SOURCE:
the number of requests
Crime Victim and Witness
calculated by PMT
received. SOURCE: Program
E. Percent of those
needing training
records are preferred data
and were trained
source
16
Number of
The purpose of this output
A. Number of staff
staff trained
indicator is to measure
trained during the
(System
system /program capacity.
reporting period
Improvement)
Appropriate for grantees in
B. Total number of
purpose areas that use
staff needing
(ARRA) JAG funds for system
training during the
improvement. Report the
reporting period
number of staff trained during
C. Total number of
the reporting period.
individuals on staff
(Training is paid for with
D. Percent trained
(ARRA) JAG funds.) SOURCE:
(a /c) Auto -
Program records are
calculated by PMT
preferred data source
E. Percent of those
needing training
and were trained
(a /b) Auto -
calculated by PMT
F. Percent of staff
that needed
training (b /c)
Auto - calculated by
PMT
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Activity Area: Training
#
Measure
DetinWonu
17
Number of
SHOULD ONLY USE IF
A. Number of defined
Law Enforcement
defined
DATA for ITEM #14 IS
groups trained
Prosecution and Court
groups
NOT REPORTED. The
during the
Prevention and Education
trained
purpose of this output
reporting period
Corrections and Community Corrections
(System
indicator is to measure
B. Total number of
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement)
system /program capacity.
defined groups
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Appropriate for grantees in
needing training
Crime Victim and Witness
purpose areas that use
during the
(ARRA) JAG funds for system
reporting period
improvement. To train
C. Percent of those
defined groups who are
needing training
within a defined geographic
and were trained
region or discipline. Report
(alb) Auto -
the number of defined groups
calculated by PMT
(i.e.,
communities /organizations /ag
encies) trained during the
reporting period. (Training is
paid with (ARRA) JAG funds.)
Use measures with "defined
groups" when the number is
too large to determine the
number of individuals.
SOURCE: Program records are
preferred data source
18
Number of
The purpose of this output
A. Number of training
Law Enforcement
training
indicator is to measure
calls held during
Prosecution and Court
events held
accountability. Appropriate for
the reporting
Prevention and Education
(System
grantees in purpose areas
period
Corrections and Community Corrections
Improvement)
that use (ARRA) JAG funds for
B. Number of training
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
system improvement. Report
conferences held
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
the number of training events
during the
Crime Victim and Witness
by type held during the
reporting period
reporting period. Source:
C. Number of training
Program records are the
manuals produced
preferred data source.
during the
reporting period
D. Other forms of
training conducted
during the
reporting period
E. Sum (a +b +c +d)
Auto - calculated by
PMT
19
Percent of
The purpose of this outcome
A. Number of staff
Law Enforcement
staff who
indicator is to measure
who completed
Prosecution and Court
completed
system /program capacity.
training during the
Prevention and Education
training
Appropriate for grantees in
reporting period
Corrections and Community Corrections
(System
purpose areas that use
B. Total number of
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement)
(ARRA) JAG funds for system
staff who
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
improvement. Report the
participated in
Crime Victim and Witness
number of staff who
training during the
completed training during the
reporting period
reporting period (Training is
C. Percent (a /b)
paid for with (ARRA) JAG
Auto - calculated by
funds.) Source: Event records
PMT
are the preferred data source.
Activity Area: Training
#
Measure
Definrhon - �
K Data Grantee���
-�,�
��� j
Apples to Purpose g IN , �
�
� s- -�
20
Percent of
SHOULD ONLY USE IF
A. Number of defined
Law Enforcement
defined
DATA for ITEM #17 IS
groups who
Prosecution and Court
groups that
NOT REPORTED. The
completed the
Prevention and Education
completed
purpose of this outcome
training during the
Corrections and Community Corrections
training
indicator is to measure
reporting period
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System
system /program capacity.
B. Total number of
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement)
Appropriate for grantees in
defined groups
Crime Victim and Witness
purpose areas that use
that participated in
(ARRA) JAG funds for system
the training during
improvement. Report the
the reporting
number of defined groups
period
(communities /organizations /a
C. Percent (a /b)
gencies) that completed
Auto - calculated by
training during the reporting
PMT
period (Training is paid with
(ARRA) JAG funds.) Source:
Event records are the
preferred data source.
21
Percent of
The purpose of this outcome
A. Number of staff
Law Enforcement
staff who
indicator is to measure
trained who report
Prosecution and Court
reported the
effectiveness. Appropriate for
training as useful
Prevention and Education
training as
grantees in purpose areas
during the
Corrections and Community Corrections
useful
that use (ARRA) JAG funds for
reporting period
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System
system improvement. Report
B. Number of staff
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement)
the number of staff who
who completed
Crime Victim and Witness
reported training as useful
training during the
during the reporting period
reporting period
(Training is paid with (ARRA)
(Auto - filled by
JAG funds.) Source: Event
PMT from #19a)
evaluation is the preferred
C. Percent (a /b)
data source.
Auto - calculated by
PMT
22
Percent of
SHOULD ONLY USE IF
A. Number of defined
Law Enforcement
defined
DATA for ITEM #19 IS
groups who
Prosecution and Court
groups who
NOT REPORTED. The
reported the
Prevention and Education
reported the
purpose of this outcome
training as useful
Corrections and Community Corrections
training as
indicator is to measure
during the
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
useful
effectiveness. Appropriate for
reporting period
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System
grantees in purpose areas
B. Number of defined
Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement)
that use (ARRA) JAG funds for
groups trained
system improvement. Report
during the
the number of defined groups
reporting period
(communities /organizations /a
(Auto - filled by
gencies) who reported the
PMT from #20a)
training as useful during the
C. Percent (a /b)
reporting period (Training is
Auto - calculated by
paid with (ARRA) JAG funds.)
PMT
Source: Event evaluation is
the preferred data source.
23
Percent of
The purpose of this outcome
A. Number of staff
Law Enforcement
staff who
indicator is to determine
who reported an
Prosecution and Court
reported an
effectiveness in criminal
increase in skills
Prevention and Education
increase in
justice system operations.
during the
Corrections and Community Corrections
skills
Appropriate for grantees in
reporting period
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
10
Activity Area: Training
24
(System
purpose areas that use
B. Number of staff
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
staff who
Improvement)
(ARRA) JAG funds for system
trained during the
Crime Victim and Witness
effectiveness in criminal
increase in
improvement. Report the
reporting period
justice system operations.
knowledge during
number of staff who indicate
(Auto - filled by
the reporting
(System
an increase in skills during the
PMT from #19a)
Improvement)
(ARRA) JAG funds for system
reporting period (attributable
C. Percent (a /b)
improvement. Report the
trained during the
to (ARRA) JAG funds.)
Auto- calculated by
number of staff who reported
reporting period
Source: Pre /Post tests are the
PMT
(Auto - filled from
preferred data source.
# 19a)
24
Percent of
The purpose of this outcome
A. Number of staff
staff who
indicator is to determine
who reported an
reported an
effectiveness in criminal
increase in
increase in
justice system operations.
knowledge during
knowledge
Appropriate for grantees in
the reporting
(System
purpose areas that use
period
Improvement)
(ARRA) JAG funds for system
B. Number of staff
improvement. Report the
trained during the
number of staff who reported
reporting period
an increase in knowledge
(Auto - filled from
during the reporting period
# 19a)
(attributable to (ARRA) JAG
C. Percent (a /b)
funds.) Source: Pre /Post tests
Auto- calculated by
are the preferred data source.
PMT
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTIVITY AREA: Technical Assistance
25 Amount of
(ARRA) JAG
funds used to
provide technical
assistance
(System
Improvement)
26 Number of staff
who received
technical
assistance
(System
Improvement)
This activity area includes the provision of technical assistance for staff.
The purpose of
the output
indicator is to
measure system
accountability.
Appropriate for
grantees in
purpose areas
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the
amount of
(ARRA) JAG
funds used to
provide technical
assistance.
SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
The purpose of
this output
indicator is to
measure
system /program
capacity.
Appropriate for
grantees in
purpose areas
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the
number of staff
who received
technical
assistance during
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
A. Amount of
(ARRA) JAG funds
used to provide
technical
assistance during
the reporting
period
A. Number of staff
who received
technical
assistance during
the reporting
period
B. Total number of
staff needing
technical
assistance
C. Total number of
individuals on
staff
D. Percent receiving
technical
assistance (a /c)
Auto - calculated
by PMT
E. Percent of those
needing technical
assistance and
received (a /b)
Auto - calculated
by PMT
F. Percent of staff
that needed
technical
assistance (b /c)
Auto - calculated
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology
Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology
Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
12
ACTIVITY AREA: Technical Assistance
M
Data Grantee
} U'^ .f _
f#
P9easure fX
Defin�hon
Reports
Appllles to Purpose
by PMT
27
Number of
The purpose of
A. Number technical
Law Enforcement
technical
the output
assistance
Prosecution and Court
assistance
indicator is to
requests received
Prevention and Education
requests received
measure service
during the
Corrections and Community Corrections
(System
levels.
reporting period
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement)
Appropriate for
Planning, Evaluation and Technology
grantees in
Improvement
purpose areas
Crime Victim and Witness
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the
number of
requests
received.
SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
28
Number of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
technical
this outcome
technical
Prosecution and Court
assistance events
indicator is to
assistance events
Prevention and Education
held
measure
held by phone
Corrections and Community Corrections
(System
accountability.
during the
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement)
Appropriate for
reporting period
Planning, Evaluation and Technology
grantees in
B. Number of
Improvement
purpose areas
technical
Crime Victim and Witness
that use (ARRA)
assistance
JAG funds for
meetings held
system
during the
improvement.
reporting period
Report the
C. Number of
number of
technical
technical
assistance
assistance events
manuals
by type held
produced during
during the
the reporting
reporting period.
period
Source: Program
D. Other forms of
records are the
technical
preferred data
assistance
source.
delivery held
during the
reporting period
E. Total (a +b +c +d)
Auto - calculated
by PMT
29
Percent of staff
The purpose of
A. Number of staff
Law Enforcement
who reported the
this outcome
who reported
Prosecution and Court
technical
indicator is to
technical
Prevention and Education
assistance as
measure
assistance as
Corrections and Community Corrections
useful
effectiveness.
useful during the
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System
Appropriate for
reporting period
Planning, Evaluation and Technology
IJ
ACTIVITY AREA: Technical Assistance
�'#
Measure �
Definrdon
� Data Grantee
� � ��� _.
F
z Reports
f,
FM
Improvement)
grantees in
B. Number of staff
Improvement
purpose areas
to request
Crime Victim and Witness
that use (ARRA)
technical
JAG funds for
assistance during
system
the reporting
improvement.
period
Report the
C. Percent (a /b)
number of staff
Auto - calculated
who reported
by PMT
technical
assistance as
useful (paid with
(ARRA) JAG
funds). Source:
Program records
are the preferred
data source.
30
Percent of staff
The purpose of
A. Number of staff
Law Enforcement
who reported an
this outcome
who reported an
Prosecution and Court
increase in skills
indicator is to
increase in skills
Prevention and Education
(System
determine
as a result of
Corrections and Community Corrections
Improvement)
effectiveness in
technical
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
criminal justice
assistance
Planning, Evaluation and Technology
system
received during
Improvement
operations.
the reporting
Crime Victim and Witness
Appropriate for
period
grantees in
B. Number of staff
purpose areas
to request
that use (ARRA)
technical
JAG funds for
assistance during
system
the reporting
improvement.
period (Auto - filled
Report the
by PMT from
number of staff
#29b)
who reported an
C. Percent (a /b)
increase in skills
Auto - calculated
during the
by PMT
reporting period
(attributable to
(ARRA) JAG
funds.) Source:
Pre /post tests
are the preferred
data source.
31
Percent of staff
The purpose of
A. Number of staff
Law Enforcement
who reported an
this outcome
who reported an
Prosecution and Court
increase in
indicator is to
increase in
Prevention and Education
knowledge
determine
knowledge as a
Corrections and Community Corrections
(System
effectiveness in
result of technical
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement)
criminal justice
assistance
Planning, Evaluation and Technology
system
received during
Improvement
operations.
the reporting
Crime Victim and Witness
Appropriate for
period
grantees in
B. Number of staff
purpose areas
to request
that use (ARRA)
technical
JAG funds for
assistance during
system
the reporting
14
ACTIVITY AREA: Technical Assistance
improvement.
Report the
number of staff
who reported an
increase in
knowledge
during the
reporting period
(attributable to
(ARRA) JAG
funds.)
period (Auto - filled
from #29b)
C. Percent (alb)
Auto - calculated
by PMT
15
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTIVITY AREA: Personnel
Personnel activities may include the employment of new staff either through new recruitment activities or
payment to existing staff for work over and beyond (overtime) the normal work period. The (ARRA) JAG
grant program allows use of funds for retention of positions otherwise lost due to budget cutbacks.
32
Number of new
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
personnel paid
this output
NEW
Prosecution and Court
with (ARRA) JAG
indicator is to
personnel
Prevention and Education
funds
measure the
paid with
Corrections and Community Corrections
(System
extent of
(ARRA) JAG
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement)
personnel hours
funds during
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement)
paid with (ARRA)
the reporting
Crime Victim and Witness
JAG funds
period
(system
E. Totai number
capacity).
of existing
Appropriate for
personnel
grantees in
paid by ail
purpose areas
OTHER (nor -
that use (ARRA)
ARRA. JAG)
JAG funds for
sources
system
during the
improvement.
reporting
Report the
period
number of new
C. Total (a +b)
personnel paid
Auto -
with (ARRA) JAG
calculated by
funds during the
PMT
reporting period.
D. Percent (a /c)
SOURCE: Agency
Auto -
records are
calculated by
preferred data
PMT
source
33
Indicate the type
The purpose of
A. Law
Law Enforcement
of NEW
this output
Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
personnel paid
indicator is to
Personnel
Prevention and Education
with (ARRA) JAG
measure
B. Prosecution
Corrections and Community Corrections
funds
accountability.
and Court
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System
Appropriate for
Personnel
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement)
grantees in
C. Prevention
Crime Victim and Witness
purpose areas
and
that use (ARRA)
Education
JAG funds for
Personnel
system
D. Corrections
improvement.
and
Check all boxes
Community
applicable to the
Corrections
type of NEW
Personnel
personnel paid
E. Drug
with (ARRA) JAG
Treatment
funds during the
and
reporting period.
Enforcement
SOURCE: Agency
Personnel
records are
F. Planning,
ACTIVITY AREA: Personnel
preferred data
source
Evaluation,
and
Technology
Improvement
Personnel
Crime Victim
and Witness
Personnel
34
Number of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
personnel
this output
personnel
Prosecution and Court
retained with
indicator is to
retained with
Prevention and Education
ARRA (ARRA)
measure the
ARRA (ARRA)
Corrections and Community Corrections
JAG funds
extent of
JAG funds
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System
personnel
during the
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement)
retained as a
reporting
Crime Victim and Witness
result of ARRA
period
(ARRA) JAG
B. Total number
funds. This
of existing
measure is only
personnel
appropriate for
paid by all
the ARRA (ARRA)
OTHER (non -
JAG because the
ARRA JAG)
ARRA (ARRA)
sources
JAG allows use of
during the
funds for
reporting
retention of
period
positions
C. Total
otherwise lost
(a +b)Auto-
due to budget
calculated by
cutbacks. The
PMT
intent of this
D. Percent (a /c)
measure is to
Auto -
capture the
calculated by
number of
PMT
personnel
retained each
quarter for the
life of the award.
Report the
number of
personnel
maintained with
ARRA (ARRA)
JAG funds during
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Agency records
are the preferred
data source.
35
Indicate the type
The purpose of
A. Law
Law Enforcement
of RETAINED
this output
Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
personnel paid
indicator is to
Personnel
Prevention and Education
with ARRA
measure
B. Prosecution
Corrections and Community Corrections
(ARRA) JAG
accountability.
and Court
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
funds
Appropriate for
Personnel
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System
grantees in
C. Prevention
Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement)
purpose areas
and
17
ACTIVITY AREA: Personnel
K-1
Number of
overtime hours
paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds
(System
Improvement)
The purpose of
A. Number of
that use (ARRA)
Education
overtime
Prosecution and Court
indicator is to
JAG funds for
Personnel
measure
with (ARRA)
Corrections and Community Corrections
system
D. Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
capacity.
during the
improvement.
and
reporting
Crime Victim and Witness
grantees in
This measure is
Community
purpose areas
B. Total number
only appropriate
Corrections
JAG funds for
overtime paid
for the (ARRA)
Personnel
by all OTHER
improvement.
JAG because the
E. Drug
Report the
JAG) sources
(ARRA) JAG
Treatment
overtime hours
reporting
allows use of
and
period
JAG funds during
funds for
Enforcement
the reporting
Auto -
retention of
Personnel
total hours of
the PMT
positions
F. Planning,
D. Percent (a /c)
all OTHER (non-
otherwise lost
Evaluation,
ARRA) JAG)
calculated by
due to budget
and
total of hours
cutbacks. Check
Technology
represented in
all boxes
Improvement
the grant
applicable to the
Personnel
type of
G. Crime Victim
RETAINED
and Witness
personnel paid
Personnel
with (ARRA) JAG
funds during the
reporting period.
SOURCE: Agency
records are the
preferred data
source.
K-1
Number of
overtime hours
paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds
(System
Improvement)
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
this output
overtime
Prosecution and Court
indicator is to
hours paid
Prevention and Education
measure
with (ARRA)
Corrections and Community Corrections
system /program
JAG funds
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
capacity.
during the
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Appropriate for
reporting
Crime Victim and Witness
grantees in
period
purpose areas
B. Total number
that use (ARRA)
of hours of
JAG funds for
overtime paid
system
by all OTHER
improvement.
(non -ARRA
Report the
JAG) sources
number of
during the
overtime hours
reporting
paid with (ARRA)
period
JAG funds during
C. Total (a +b)
the reporting
Auto -
period. Report
calculated by
total hours of
the PMT
overtime paid by
D. Percent (a /c)
all OTHER (non-
Auto -
ARRA) JAG)
calculated by
sources. This is a
the PMT
total of hours
from the agency
represented in
the grant
application.
URN
ACTIVITY AREA: Personnel
Data Grantee
AM
#
Measure -�
Definrdon
�
A Ues to Pul4reas
PP �� �" ~�
r
Source: Agency
records are the
preferred data
source.
37
Percent of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
departments that
this outcome
departments
Prosecution and Court
report desired
indicator is to
that report
Prevention and Education
efficiency
measure desired
desired
Corrections and Community Corrections
(System
efficiency.
efficiency
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement)
Appropriate for
during the
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
grantees under
reporting
Crime Victim and Witness
any purpose area
period
that use (ARRA)
B. Total number
JAG funds for
of
system
departments
improvement
that used
activities. Report
(ARRA) JAG
the number of
funds to hire
departments that
new
report desired
personnel,
efficiency as a
maintain
result of new
personnel or
personnel or
pay for
overtime paid
overtime
with (ARRA) JAG
hours
funds. SOURCE:
C. Percent (a /b)
Agency records
Auto -
are the preferred
calculated by
data source.
PMT
38
Percent of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
departments that
this outcome
departments
Prosecution and Court
report desired
indicator is to
that report
Prevention and Education
program quality
measure
desired
Corrections and Community Corrections
(System
increased
program
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Improvement)
program quality.
quality during
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Appropriate for
the reporting
Crime Victim and Witness
grantees under
period
any purpose area
B. Total number
that use (ARRA)
of
JAG funds for
departments
system
that used
improvement
(ARRA) JAG
activities. Report
funds to hire
the number of
new
departments that
personnel,
report desired
maintain
program quality
personnel or
as a result of
pay for
new personnel
overtime
and overtime
hours (Auto -
paid with (ARRA)
filled from
JAG funds.
#37b)
SOURCE: Agency
C. Percent (a /b)
records are
Auto -
preferred data
calculated by
source.
PMT
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTIVITY AREA: Equipment /Supplies
Equipment and supplies includes the purchase of new or replacement equipment or supplies to improve or
replace what currently exists.
39
Amount of
The purpose of
A. Amount of
Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG
this output
(ARRA) JAG
Prosecution and Court
funds used to
measure is to
funds used to
Prevention and Education
purchase
document the
purchase
Corrections and Community Corrections
equipment
extent of
equipment
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
and /or supplies
equipment
and /or
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System
and /or supplies
supplies
Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement)
purchased with
during the
Improvement)
(ARRA) JAG
reporting
funds.
period
Appropriate for
equipment
grantees in all
(ex. Aircards
purpose areas
for Verizon,
that use (ARRA)
Sprint, AT &T,
JAG funds for
etc.)
system
I. Security
improvement.
systems
Report the
(station or
amount of
evidence
(ARRA)JAG
room)
funds used to
purchase
equipment
and /or supplies.
SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
40
Indicate the
The purpose of
A. Weapons
Law Enforcement
number by types
this output
B. Equipment
Prosecution and Court
of equipment
indicator is to
for police
Prevention and Education
and /or supplies
measure
cruisers
Corrections and Community Corrections
purchased with
accountability.
C. Uniforms
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG
Appropriate for
D. CAD
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
funds
grantees in
E. RMS
Crime Victim and Witness
(System
purpose areas
F. Software
Improvement)
that use (ARRA)
G. Computers
JAG funds for
H. Mobile access
system
equipment
improvement.
(ex. Aircards
Report the
for Verizon,
number by types
Sprint, AT &T,
of equipment or
etc.)
supplies
I. Security
purchased with
systems
(ARRA) JAG
(station or
funds during the
evidence
reporting period.
room)
20
ACTIVITY AREA: Equipment /Supplies
SOURCE:
J.
Biometric
Program records
equipment
equipment
are preferred
Prosecution and Court
(Live scans,
data source
and /or supply
fingerprint
requests
document the
readers, etc.)
Corrections and Community Corrections
K.
In -car
purchased
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
camera
equipment
with (ARRA)
systems
funds
L.
Video
Crime Victim and Witness
(System
observation
during the
(station,
(ARRA) JAG
reporting
community,
funds.
pole cams)
M.
Undercover
B. Number of
surveillance
grantees in all
equipment
equipment
purpose areas
(microphones
, video)
requests
N.
License plate
JAG funds for
received
readers
O.
Kiosk units
for
Auto -
community
Report the
calculated by
access or
number of
registration
P.
Vehicles
Q.
Radios
and /or supply
R.
Other (please
requests received
specify type
and quantity)
41
Number of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
equipment
this output
equipment
Prosecution and Court
and /or supply
measure is to
and /or supply
Prevention and Education
requests
document the
requests
Corrections and Community Corrections
purchased with
extent of
purchased
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG
equipment
with (ARRA)
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
funds
and /or supplies
JAG funds
Crime Victim and Witness
(System
purchased with
during the
Improvement)
(ARRA) JAG
reporting
funds.
period
Appropriate for
B. Number of
grantees in all
equipment
purpose areas
and /or supply
that use (ARRA)
requests
JAG funds for
received
system
C. Percent(a /b)
improvement.
Auto -
Report the
calculated by
number of
PMT
equipment
and /or supply
requests received
and of that, the
number
purchased with
(ARRA)JAG
funds. SOURCE:
21
ACTIVITY AREA: Equipment /Supplies
22
Program records
are preferred
data source.
42
Percent of staff
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
that directly
this outcome
staff that
Prosecution and Court
benefit from
indicator is to
directly
Prevention and Education
equipment or
measure
benefit from
Corrections and Community Corrections
supplies
efficiency.
equipment or
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
purchased by
Appropriate for
supplies
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(ARRA) JAG
grantees in
purchased by
Crime Victim and Witness
funds, who
purpose areas
(ARRA) JAG
report a desired
that use (ARRA)
funds, who
change in their
JAG funds for
report a
job performance
system
desired
(System
improvement.
change in
Improvement)
Report the
their job
number of staff
performance
that directly
B. Number of
benefit from
staff to
equipment or
receive
supplies
equipment or
purchased with
supplies
(ARRA) JAG
purchased
funds, who
with (ARRA)
report a desired
JAG funds
change in their
during the
job performance
reporting
during this
period
reporting period.
C. Percent (alb)
SOURCE: This is
Auto -
a count of direct
calculated by
staff that benefit
PMT
from the
D. Explain the
equipment
impact on job
and /or supplies
performance
purchased.
for the
Program records
reporting
are preferred
period
data source
22
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTIVITY AREA: Contractual Support
Contractual support includes activities that address issues that help to improve the effectiveness and /or
efficiency in various points of the criminal justice system. This may include consultants or evaluators, not
otherwise captured in another activity area.
43
Number of hours
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
paid with (ARRA)
this output
hours paid
Prosecution and Court
JAG funds for
indicator is to
with (ARRA)
Prevention and Education
contractual
measure
JAG funds for
Corrections and Community Corrections
support
program /system
contractual
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System
capacity.
support
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement)
Appropriate for
during the
Crime Victim and Witness
grantees in
reporting
purpose areas
period
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the
number of hours
paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds for
contractual
support during
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Program records
are a preferred
data source.
44
Types of
The purpose of
A. Indicate the
Law Enforcement
contractual
this output
types of
Prosecution and Court
support paid with
indicator is to
contractual
Prevention and Education
(ARRA) JAG
measure
support paid
Corrections and Community Corrections
funds
accountability.
with (ARRA)
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System
Appropriate for
JAG funds
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement)
grantees in
during the
Crime Victim and Witness
purpose areas
reporting
that use (ARRA)
period
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the types
of contract
support paid with
(ARRA) JAG
funds during the
reporting period.
SOURCE:
Program records
are a preferred
data source.
23
ACTIVITY AREA: Contractual Support
45
Number of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
departments that
this outcome
departments
Prosecution and Court
report a desired
measure is to
that report a
Prevention and Education
change in
document
desired
Corrections and Community Corrections
efficiency
improved
change in
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System
efficiency.
efficiency
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement)
Appropriate for
during the
Crime Victim and Witness
grantees under
reporting
any purpose area
period
that use (ARRA)
B. Number of
JAG funds for
departments
system
that received
improvement
contractual
activities. Report
support with
the number of
(ARRA) JAG
departments that
funds during
report a desired
the reporting
change in
period
efficiency (e.g.,
C. Percent (a /b)
reduced case
Auto -
backlogs,
calculated by
increased
PMT
contacts with
D. Explain the
offenders or
impact on
victims) as a
efficiency
result of (ARRA)
during the
JAG funds during
reporting
the reporting
period
period. SOURCE:
Program records
are a preferred
data source.
46
Number of '
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
departments that
this outcome
departments
Prosecution and Court
report a desired
measure is to
that report a
Prevention and Education
change in
document
desired
Corrections and Community Corrections
program quality
improved
change in
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System
program quality.
program
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement)
Appropriate for
quality during
Crime Victim and Witness
grantees under
the reporting
any purpose area
period
that use (ARRA)
B. Number of
JAG funds for
departments
system
that received
improvement
contractual
activities. Report
support with
the number of
(ARRA) JAG
departments that
funds
report a desired
C. Percent (alb)
change in
Auto -
program quality
calculated by
(e.g., per staff
PMT
caseloads meet
D. Explain the
professional
impact on
standards,
program
increased
quality during
availability of
the reporting
specialized
period
24
ACTIVITY AREA: Contractual Support
25
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTIVITY AREA: Information Systems for Criminal Justice System
This activity area includes the development implementation or improvements made to benefit staff or
departments.
47
Amount of
The purpose of
A. Amount of
Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG
this output
(ARRA) JAG
Prosecution and Court
funds used for
indicator is to
funds used
Prevention and Education
improvements to
improve system
for
Corrections and Community Corrections
information
effectiveness
improvement
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
systems for
and /or capacity.
s to
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
criminal justice
Appropriate for
information
Crime Victim and Witness
systems
grantees under
systems for
(System
any purpose area
criminal
Improvement)
that uses (ARRA)
justice
JAG funds for
systems
system
during the
improvement.
reporting
Report the
period
amount of
B. Number of
(ARRA) JAG
NEW
funds used to
departments
improve
that use
information
(ARRA) JAG
systems for
funds to
criminal justice
systems during
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Agency records
are a preferred
data source.
48
Number of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
departments that
this output
departments
Prosecution and Court
used (ARRA) JAG
measure is for
that used
Prevention and Education
funds to make
system /program
(ARRA) JAG
Corrections and Community Corrections
improvements to
capacity based
funds to
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
information
on the idea that
make
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
systems for
new, enhanced
improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
criminal justice
or improved
s to criminal
(System
information
justice
Improvement)
systems can
information
provide staff with
systems
better efficiency
started in the
to do their jobs.
previous
Appropriate for
period
grantees under
B. Number of
any purpose area
NEW
that uses (ARRA)
departments
JAG funds for
that use
system
(ARRA) JAG
improvement
funds to
26
ACTIVITY AREA: Information Systems for Criminal Justice System
#
Definrt�on�
Ar�
Apploes #o Purpose Areas
P9easure��
activities. Report
make
the number of
improvement
departments that
s to criminal
uses (ARRA) JAG
justice
funds to make
information
improvements to
systems that
information
were added
systems for
during the
criminal justice
reporting
during the
period
reporting period.
C. Total (a +b)
SOURCE: Agency
Auto -
records are a
calculated by
preferred data
PMT
source.
49
Number of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
departments that
this output
departments
Prosecution and Court
completed
measure is for
that
Prevention and Education
improvements to
system
completed
Corrections and Community Corrections
information
accountability.
improvement
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
systems for
Appropriate for
s to
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
criminal justice
grantees under
information
Crime Victim and Witness
(System
any purpose area
systems for
Improvement)
that uses (ARRA)
criminal
JAG funds for
justice during
system
the reporting
improvement
period as a
activities. Report
result of
the number of
(ARRA) JAG
departments that
funds
completed
B. Number of
improvements to
departments
criminal justice
to use
information
(ARRA) JAG
systems during
funds to
the reporting
make
period. SOURCE:
improvement
Agency records
s to
are a preferred
information
data source.
systems for
criminal
justice (Auto-
i
filled by PMT
from # 48c)
C. Percent(a /b)
Auto -
calculated by
PMT
50
Number of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
departments that
this outcome
departments
Prosecution and Court
report a desired
measure is to
that report a
Prevention and Education
change in
document
desired
Corrections and Community Corrections
efficiency
improved
change in
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
(System
efficiency.
efficiency
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Improvement)
Appropriate for
during the
Crime Victim and Witness
grantees under
reporting
any purpose area
period
27
ACTIVITY AREA: Information Systems for Criminal Justice System
51 Number of
departments that
report a desired
change in
program quality
(System
Improvement)
that uses (ARRA)
B. Number of
JAG funds for
departments
system
that
improvement
completed
activities. Report
improvement
the number of
s to
departments that
information
report a desired
systems for
change in
criminal
efficiency as a
justice
result of
systems as a
improved
result of
information
(ARRA) JAG
systems for
funds (Auto -
criminal justice
filled by PMT
systems as a
from #49a)
result of (ARRA)
C. Percent (a /b)
JAG funds during
Auto -
the reporting
calculated by
period. SOURCE:
PMT
Agency records
D. Explain the
are a preferred
impact on
data source.
efficiency for
information
the reporting
report a desired
period
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
this outcome
departments
Prosecution and Court
measure is to
that report a
Prevention and Education
document
desired
Corrections and Community Corrections
improved
change in
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
program quality.
program
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Appropriate for
quality during
Crime Victim and Witness
grantees under
the reporting
any purpose area
period
that use (ARRA)
B. Number of
JAG funds for
departments
system
that
improvement
completed
activities. Report
improvement
the number of
s to
departments that
information
report a desired
systems for
change in
criminal
program quality
justice
(e.g. per staff
systems
caseloads meet
during the
professional
reporting
standards,
period (Auto -
increased
filled from
availability of
#48c)
specialized
C. Percent (alb)
services) as a
Auto -
result of (ARRA)
calculated by
JAG funds.
PMT
SOURCE: Agency
D. Explain the
records are
impact on
preferred data
program
28
ACTIVITY AREA: Information Systems for Criminal Justice System
W
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
ACTIVITY AREA: Research, Evaluation, and Product Development
This activity area includes research and evaluation activities that have a coal of informing decisions and
providing information as to what works. Product development activities are those that have a goal to
inform.
52
Amount of
The purpose of
A. Total amount
Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG
this output
of (ARRA)
Prosecution and Court
funds used for
indicator is to
JAG funds
Prevention and Education
criminal justice-
increase
used during
Corrections and Community Corrections
related research
knowledge about
the reporting
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
studies
what works in
period for
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System
criminal justice.
criminal
Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement)
Appropriate for
justice -
grantees under
related
any purpose area
research
that uses (ARRA)
studies
JAG funds to
implement
criminal justice -
related research
studies. Report
the total amount
of(ARRA)JAG
funds used for
criminal justice -
related research
studies for the
reporting period.
SOURCE: Agency
records are
preferred data
source
53
Provide the type
The purpose of
A. Provide the
Law Enforcement
of criminal
this output
type of
Prosecution and Court
justice - related
indicator is to
criminal
Prevention and Education
research studies
increase
justice-
Corrections and Community Corrections
paid with (ARRA)
knowledge.
related
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
JAG funds
Appropriate for
research
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System
grantees in
studies paid
Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement)
purpose areas
with (ARRA)
that use (ARRA)
JAG funds
JAG funds for
system
improvement.
Report the type
of criminal
justice - related
research studies
paid with (ARRA)
JAG funds during
the reporting
30
ACTIVITY AREA: Research.. Evaluation. and Product Development
31
,��
to Purpose Are
A9easure
Definfion
Applies
period. SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
54
Percent of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG
this output
(ARRA) JAG
Prosecution and Court
funded criminal
indicator is to
funded
Prevention and Education
justice - related
improve program
criminal
Corrections and Community Corrections
research studies
effectiveness.
justice-
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
completed
Appropriate for
related
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System
grantees under
research
Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement)
any purpose area
studies
that uses (ARRA)
completed
JAG funds to
during the
implement
reporting
criminal justice-
period
related research
B. Number of
studies. Report
criminal
the number of
justice -
criminal justice-
related
related research
research
studies
studies
completed during
planned
the reporting
C. Number of
period. SOURCE:
studies
Program records
initiated
are preferred
during the
data source
reporting
period
D. Number of
studies
continued
from the
previous
reporting
period
E. Percent
complete
(a /c +d) Auto -
calculated by
PMT
55
Amount of
The purpose of
A. Total amount
Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG
this output
of (ARRA)
Prosecution and Court
funds used for
indicator is to
JAG funds
Prevention and Education
criminal justice-
increase
used for
Corrections and Community Corrections
related
knowledge about
criminal
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
evaluations
what works in
justice-
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System
criminal justice.
related
Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement)
Appropriate for
evaluations
grantees under
during the
any purpose area
reporting
that uses (ARRA)
period
JAG funds to
implement
evaluation
activities. Report
the total amount
31
ACTIVITY AREA: Research, Evaluation, and Product Development
32
1-10
Data (,Yantee
�
ng
to Purpose Areas
#
Wfeasur® 3
Defin on �
Reports
k Pies
is
of (ARRA) JAG
funds used for
criminal justice -
related
evaluations for
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Agency records
are preferred
data source
56
Provide the type
The purpose of
A. Provide the
Law Enforcement
of criminal
this output
type of
Prosecution and Court
justice - related
indicator is to
criminal
Prevention and Education
evaluations paid
increase
justice-
Corrections and Community Corrections
with (ARRA) JAG
knowledge.
related
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
funds
Appropriate for
evaluations
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System
grantees in
paid with
Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement)
purpose areas
(ARRA) JAG
that use (ARRA)
funds during
JAG funds for
the reporting
system
period
improvement.
Report the type
of criminal
justice - related
evaluations paid
with (ARRA) JAG
funds during the
reporting period.
SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
57
Percent of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG
this output
criminal
Prosecution and Court
funded criminal
indicator is to
justice-
Prevention and Education
justice - related
improve program
related
Corrections and Community Corrections
evaluations
effectiveness.
evaluations
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
completed
Appropriate for
completed
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System
grantees under
during the
Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement)
any purpose area
reporting
that uses (ARRA)
period
JAG funds to
B. Number of
implement
criminal
criminal justice-
justice -
related
related
evaluations.
evaluations
Report the
planned
number of
C. Number of
criminal justice-
evaluations
related
initiated
evaluations
during the
completed during
reporting
the reporting
period
period. SOURCE:
D. Number of
Program records
evaluations
are preferred
continued
data source
from the
32
ACTIVITY AREA: Research, Evaluation. and Product Development
#
A!leasure
Definfion
Applies toPurpose Areas
3
Re rtS�
y
previous
reporting
period
E. Percent
complete
(a /c +d) Auto -
calculated by
PMT
58
Amount of
The purpose of
A. Total amount
Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG
this output
of (ARRA)
Prosecution and Court
funds used for
indicator is to
JAG funds
Prevention and Education
criminal justice-
increase
used for
Corrections and Community Corrections
related product
knowledge about
criminal
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
development
what works in
justice-
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
projects
criminal justice.
related
Crime Victim and Witness
(System
Appropriate for
product
Improvement)
grantees under
development
any purpose area
projects
that uses (ARRA)
during the
JAG funds to
reporting
implement
period
criminal justice-
related product
development
projects. For
example,
brochures,
curricula,
manuals or
workbooks.
Report the total
amount of
(ARRA) JAG
funds used for
criminal justice -
related product
development
projects for the
reporting period.
SOURCE: Agency
records are
preferred data
source
59
Provide the type
The purpose of
A. Indicate the
Law Enforcement
of criminal
this output
type of
Prosecution and Court
justice - related
indicator is to
criminal
Prevention and Education
product
measure
justice-
Corrections and Community Corrections
development
accountability.
related
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
projects paid
Appropriate for
product
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
with (ARRA) JAG
grantees in
development
Crime Victim and Witness
funds
purpose areas
projects paid
(System
that use (ARRA)
with (ARRA)
Improvement)
JAG funds for
JAG funds
system
during the
improvement.
reporting
For example,
period
brochures,
JJ
ACTIVITY AREA: Research, Evaluation, and Product Development
curricula,
manuals or
workbooks.
Provide the type
of criminal
justice - related
product
development
projects paid
with (ARRA) JAG
funds during the
reporting period.
SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
60
Percent of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG
this output
(ARRA) JAG
Prosecution and Court
funded product
indicator is to
funded
Prevention and Education
development
measure the
criminal
Corrections and Community Corrections
projects
extent of criminal
justice-
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
completed
justice - related
related
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
(System
product
product
Crime Victim and Witness
Improvement)
development that
development
is funded wholly
projects
or partially by
completed
(ARRA) JAG
during the
funds.
reporting
Appropriate for
period
grantees under
B. Number of
any purpose area
criminal
that uses (ARRA)
justice -
JAG funds to
related
implement
product
criminal justice-
development
related product
projects
development
planned
activities. For
C. Number of
example,
product
brochures,
development
curricula,
projects
manuals or
initiated
workbooks.
during the
Report the
reporting
number of
period
criminal justice-
D. Number of
related product
product
development
development
projects
projects
completed during
continued
the reporting
from the
period. SOURCE:
previous
Program records
reporting
are preferred
period
data source
E. Percent
complete
(a /c +d) Auto -
calculated by
34
ACTIVITY AREA: Research. Evaluation, and Product Development
�t
Nleasurs
Defimbor�
Data Grantee
� x g
Apples to Purpose Areas
ON
���
Reports
�
��
PMT
61
Percent of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG
this outcome
(ARRA) JAG
Prosecution and Court
funded criminal
indicator is to
funded
Prevention and Education
justice - related
improve
research
Corrections and Community Corrections
research studies
knowledge
studies or
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
or evaluations
dissemination.
evaluations
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
resulting in
Appropriate for
that resulted
Crime Victim and Witness
presentations or
grantees under
in one or
poster sessions
any purpose area
more
at professional
that uses (ARRA)
presentations
meetings or
JAG funds to
or poster
conferences
implement
sessions at
(System
criminal justice-
professional
Improvement)
related research
meetings or
or evaluations.
conferences
Report the
during the
number of
reporting
(ARRA) JAG
period
funded criminal
B. Number of
justice - related
(ARRA) )AG
research or
funded
evaluations
criminal
resulting in a
justice -
presentation or
related
poster session at
research
professional
studies
meetings or
completed
conferences
during the
during the
reporting
reporting period
period(Auto-
SOURCE:
filled by PMT
Program records
from #54a)
are preferred
C. Number of
data source
evaluations
completed
(Auto - filled
by PMT from
#57a)
D. Percent
a /(b +c) Auto -
calculated by
PMT
62
Percent of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
criminal justice-
this outcome
criminal
Prosecution and Court
related programs
indicator is to
justice-
Prevention and Education
that were
improve tools for
related
Corrections and Community Corrections
evaluated as
knowledge
programs
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
effective and the
dissemination.
that were
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
evaluations were
Appropriate for
evaluated as
Crime Victim and Witness
(ARRA) JAG
grantees under
effective
funded.
any purpose area
during the
(System
that use (ARRA)
reporting
Improvement)
JAG funds for
period
system
B. Total number
improvement.
of criminal
35
ACTIVITY AREA: Research, Evaluation and Product Development
63
Percent of
(ARRA) JAG
funded criminal
justice - related
research studies
or evaluations
resulting in peer -
reviewed articles
(System
Improvement)
The purpose of
A. Number of
Report the
justice -
indicator is to
funded
improve
number of
related
justice-
dissemination.
related
criminal justice-
programs
grantees under
studies or
any purpose area
related programs
that were
projects
JAG funds to
resulting in
that were
evaluated
criminal justice-
reviewed
related research
evaluated as
with (ARRA)
during the
evaluations.
reporting
effective. The
JAG funds
number of
B. Number of
(ARRA)JAG
evaluation was
C. Percent (a /b)
funded
justice - related
criminal
paid with (ARRA)
Auto -
or evaluation
related
projects resulting
JAG funds.
calculated by
studies
articles during
completed
Report the
PMT
period. SOURCE:
reporting
Program records
number of
are preferred
filled from
data source
#54a)
criminal justice -
C. Number of
evaluations
related programs
(Auto - filled
from #57a)
that were
evaluated as
effective during
the reporting
period. SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
63
Percent of
(ARRA) JAG
funded criminal
justice - related
research studies
or evaluations
resulting in peer -
reviewed articles
(System
Improvement)
The purpose of
A. Number of
this outcome
(ARRA) JAG
I
indicator is to
funded
improve
criminal
knowledge
justice-
dissemination.
related
Appropriate for
research
grantees under
studies or
any purpose area
evaluation
that use (ARRA)
projects
JAG funds to
resulting in
implement
peer -
criminal justice-
reviewed
related research
articles
studies or
during the
evaluations.
reporting
Report the
period
number of
B. Number of
(ARRA)JAG
(ARRA) JAG
funded criminal
funded
justice - related
criminal
research studies
justice -
or evaluation
related
projects resulting
research
in peer- reviewed
studies
articles during
completed
the reporting
during the
period. SOURCE:
reporting
Program records
period(Auto-
are preferred
filled from
data source
#54a)
C. Number of
evaluations
completed
(Auto - filled
from #57a)
Law Enforcement
Prosecution and Court
Prevention and Education
Corrections and Community Corrections
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
Crime Victim and Witness
36
ACTIVITY AREA: Research. Evaluation. and Product Development
37
Definfion
Grantee'
Apples to purpose Ar
�#
Mleasur��
;Report5�
D. Percent(a /b)
Auto -
calculated by
PMT
E. Percent (a /c)
Auto -
calculated by
PMT
64
Percent of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
(ARRA) JAG
this outcome
(ARRA) JAG
Prosecution and Court
funded programs
indicator is to
funded
Prevention and Education
that have
improve program
criminal
Corrections and Community Corrections
implemented
effectiveness.
justice
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
recommendations
Appropriate for
programs
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
based on a
grantees under
that have
Crime Victim and Witness
program
any program
implemented
evaluation
area that uses
one or more
(System
(ARRA) JAG
recommendat
Improvement)
funds for system
ions based on
improvement.
a program
Report the
evaluation
number of
during the
criminal justice
reporting
programs that
period
have
B. Total number
implemented one
of criminal
or more
justice-
recommendations
related
from a program
programs
evaluation. The
that were
program
evaluated
evaluation was
with (ARRA)
funded by
JAG funds
(ARRA) JAG
(Auto - filled
funds. SOURCE:
from #62b)
Program records
C. Percent(a /b)
are preferred
Auto -
data source
calculated by
PMT
65
Percent of
The purpose of
A. Number of
Law Enforcement
curricula that was
this outcome
curricula that
Prosecution and Court
evaluated as
indicator is to
was
Prevention and Education
effective and
improve
evaluated as
Corrections and Community Corrections
evaluation was
knowledge
effective
Drug Treatment and Enforcement
paid with (ARRA)
dissemination.
during the
Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement
JAG funds.
Appropriate for
reporting
Crime Victim and Witness
(System
grantees under
period and
Improvement)
any program
evaluations
area that use
were paid
(ARRA) JAG
with (ARRA)
funds for system
JAG funds
improvement.
B. Total number
Report the
of curricula
number of
evaluated
curricula that was
during the
evaluated as
reporting
37
ACTIVITY AREA: Research Evaluation and Product Development
effective during
period
the reporting
C. Percent (a /b)
period. The
Auto-
evaluation was
calculated by
paid with (ARRA)
PMT
JAG funds.
SOURCE:
Program records
are preferred
data source
38
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Task Force Activities
This activity area applies to grantees that will utilize (ARRA) JAG funds to cover task force activities not
otherwise captured in other activity areas. Activities may include those that help to decrease violent crime.
66 1 Number of new investigations
initiated
67 1 Number of judicial search warrants
served
68 Total number of individuals
(including gang members) arrested
based on task force activity during
the reporting period.
69 I Total number of GANG MEMBERS
ONLY arrested based on task force
activity during the reporting period
70 Drug amounts seized in kilograms
(KG) during the reporting period.
Remember that 1000g = 1 kg.
Answer should be provided in kg.
71 Drug amounts, in kilograms (kg),
seized in clandestine drug labs
during the reporting period.
Remember that 1000g = ikg.
Answer should be reported in kg.
72 1 Other Seizures
73 1 Number of firearms seized during
For all arrests (including gang
members) with multiple charges
count the single most serious
charge here.
For arrests of GANG MEMBERS
with multiple charges count the
single most serious charge here.
Drug seizure values will be
calculated by the tool based on
values provided by BJA. You may
verify your response through a
number of sites available through
the internet. You may search using
the "conversion of grams to
kilograms."
Drug seizure values will be
calculated by the tool based on
values provided by BJA. You may
verify your response through a
number of sites available through
the internet. You may search using
the "conversion of grams to
kilograms."
A. Total number of new
investigations initiated
A.
Federal
B.
State
C.
Total (a +b) (Auto calculated by
PMT)
A.
Number arrested for a felony
B.
Number arrested for a
misdemeanor
A.
Number of GANG MEMBERS
arrested for a felony.
B.
Number of GANG MEMBERS
arrested for a misdemeanor.
A.
Heroin
B.
Cocaine (powder)
C.
Crack cocaine
D.
Marijuana commercial grade
E.
Marijuana hydroponic
F.
Methamphetamine
G.
Methamphetamine ice
H.
Ecstasy (MDMA)
A.
Heroin
B.
Cocaine (powder)
C.
Crack cocaine
D.
Marijuana commercial grade
E.
Marijuana hydroponic
F.
Methamphetamine
G.
Methamphetamine ice
H.
Ecstasy (MDMA)
A.
Number of indoor cannabis -
growing operations seized
B.
Number of outdoor cannabis -
growing operations seized
C.
Number of cultivated marijuana
plants seized
A.
Number of firearms seized
39
the reporting period
B. Number of firearms seized that
were reported to NIBIN
C. Number of hits in NIBIN
74
Number of Federal forfeiture cases
A. Number of forfeiture cases filed
B.
filed during the reporting period
misdemeanor charges.
75
Value of asses forfeited under
A. Real property forfeited
Federal cases during the reporting
B.
B. Cash forfeited
period
C.
C. Other (vehicles, weapons,
disrupted (a +b) (auto
jewelry) forfeited
76
Number of State forfeiture cases
A. Number of forfeiture cases filed
filed during the reporting period
B.
Number of dismantled
77
Value of assets forfeited under
A. Real property forfeited
C.
State cases during the reporting
B. Cash forfeited
period
A.
C. Other (vehicles, weapons,
organizations disrupted during
jewelry) forfeited
78 I Number of defendants accepted
for Federal prosecution during the
reporting period
Provide the number of defendants
that were accepted for federal
prosecution for federal felony
charges and misdemeanor
charges.
A. Number accepted for Federal
felony charges.
B. Number accepted for Federal
misdemeanor charges.
79 I Number of defendants accepted
for State prosecution during the
reporting period
80 I Number of gangs disrupted during
the reporting period
81 I Number of gangs dismantled
during the reporting period
82 Number of drug trafficking
organizations and money
laundering organizations disrupted
Provide the number of defendants
that were documented criminal
gang members that were accepted
for state prosecution for felony
charges and misdemeanor
charges.
Disrupted is defined as impeding
the normal and effective operation
of the targeted organization, as
indicated by changes in
organizational leadership and /or
changes in methods of operation,
including, for example, financing,
trafficking patterns,
communications, or drug
production.
Dismantled: Destruction of the
organization's leadership, financial
base, and supply network such
that the organization is incapable
of operating and /or reconstituting
itself.
Measure is intended for projects
that utilize (ARRA) JAG funds to
support activities that will disrupt
the market place for illegal drugs
A.
Number accepted for State
felony charges.
B.
Number accepted for State
misdemeanor charges.
A.
Number of disrupted drug
trafficking or other street gang
organizations
B.
Number of disrupted trafficking
or other entrepreneurial gangs
C.
Total number of gangs
disrupted (a +b) (auto
calculated by tool)
A.
Number of dismantled drug
trafficking or other street gang
organizations
B.
Number of dismantled
trafficking or other
entrepreneurial gangs
C.
Total number of gangs
dismantled (a +b (auto
calculated by tool))
A.
Number of drug trafficking
organizations disrupted during
the reporting period
B.
Number of money laundering
40
83
Number of drug trafficking
organizations and money
laundering organizations
dismantled
Measure is intended for projects
that utilize (ARRA) JAG funds to
support activities that will disrupt
the market place for illegal drugs
by dismantling and disrupting the
most significant drug trafficking
organizations and money
laundering organizations that
support them. Dismantled:
Destruction of the organizations
leadership, financial base and
supply network such that the
organization is incapable of
operating and /or reconstituting
itself. SOURCE: Program records
A. Number of drug trafficking
organizations dismantled
during the reporting period
B. Number of money laundering
organizations dismantled
during the reporting period
C. Sum (a +b) Auto - calculated by
PMT
11
by dismantling and disrupting the
organizations disrupted during
most significant drug trafficking
the reporting period
organizations and money
C. Sum (a +b) Auto - calculated by
laundering organizations that
PMT
support them. Disrupted:
Impeding the normal and effective
operation of the targeted
organization, as indicated by
changes in organizational
leadership and /or changes in
methods of operation, for
example, financing, trafficking
patterns, communications or drug
production. SOURCE: Program
records
83
Number of drug trafficking
organizations and money
laundering organizations
dismantled
Measure is intended for projects
that utilize (ARRA) JAG funds to
support activities that will disrupt
the market place for illegal drugs
by dismantling and disrupting the
most significant drug trafficking
organizations and money
laundering organizations that
support them. Dismantled:
Destruction of the organizations
leadership, financial base and
supply network such that the
organization is incapable of
operating and /or reconstituting
itself. SOURCE: Program records
A. Number of drug trafficking
organizations dismantled
during the reporting period
B. Number of money laundering
organizations dismantled
during the reporting period
C. Sum (a +b) Auto - calculated by
PMT
11
(ARRA) JAG PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Outcomes for All Activity Areas
(As they apply to grant- funded activities)
84 Change in number of individuals
arrested in a targeted group by
crime type
85 I Change in reported crime rates in
a community by crime type
86 1 Type of crime
The purpose of this outcome
indicator is to measure rates of
individuals arrested in a targeted
group by crime type. Appropriate
for grantees in purpose areas that
provide direct service to individuals
with (ARRA) JAG funds. Report the
number of individuals arrested for
a targeted group by crime type.
For the first reporting period, the
"a" value reflects available data for
the quarter prior to the start of
grant- funded activities. For
subsequent reporting periods, the
"a" value will reflect the number of
individuals arrested during the
quarter before the start of the
award. Population numbers will
vary based on target
population /sub - population of the
program /initiative Crime types are
identified by the target of grant -
funded activity. SOURCE: Program
records
The purpose of this outcome
indicator is to measure rates of
related crimes in a targeted
community. Appropriate for
grantees in purpose areas that
provide direct service to
communities or organizations with
(ARRA) JAG funds. Report the
number of related crimes reported
during the reporting period.
Population numbers will vary
based on target populations/sub -
population of the
program /initiative. The "a" value
reflects the quarter prior to the
start of the award. This measure is
intended to collect rates of crime
targeted by (ARRA) JAG award.
Crime types are identified by the
target of grant- funded activity.
SOURCE: Program records
Provide the type of crime targeted
A.
The number of individuals (by
related crime) arrested during
the quarter before the start of
the award
B.
Total number of individuals
arrested (by related crime)
during the reporting period
C.
We expected number of
individuals arrested to increase
as a result of our efforts We
expected number of individuals
arrested to decrease as a result
of our efforts. We expected
number of individuals arrested
to remain stable (no change)
as a result of our efforts. We
had no expectations about
changes in number of
individuals arrested of crime as
a result of our efforts. Not
applicable for this reporting
period
A.
Number of reported crimes
(targeted by (ARRA) JAG
funds) during the quarter
before the start of the award
B.
Total number of reported
crimes (targeted by (ARRA)
JAG funds) during the period
C.
We expected the crime rate to
increase as a result of our
efforts We expected the crime
rate to decrease as a result of
our efforts We expected the
crime rate to remain stable (no
change) as a result of our
efforts We had no expectations
about the crime rate as a result
of our efforts Not applicable for
this reporting period
A.
Homicides
B.
Forcible Rapes
C.
Robberies
D.
Aggravated Assaults
E.
Other, please define.
42
APPLICATION FOR BYRNE JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT- RECOVERY
PART III. BUDGET DETAIL AND EXPLANATION
BUDGET DETAIL:
COST ELEMENT
AMOUNT
A. Salaries and Wa es
Position Title
No. of
Positions
Monthly rate
Subtotal
$
$
$
$
Position Title
No. of
Positions
Hourly Rate
No. of
Hours
Subtotal
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total Salaries and Wages
I
$
B. Fringe Benefits
Employee Benefits %
Position Title
No. of
Positions
Monthly Rate
Subtotal
$
$
$
$
Position Title
No. of
Positions
Hourly Rate
No. of
Hours
Subtotal
Total Fringe
Benefits
$
C. Consultants /Contracts
Scope of Consultant /Contract
Estimated
Cost
Length of
Consultant/
Contract
Service
Select as Appropriate
Informant Mngt. Training
$4000
2 days
® Consultant ❑ Contract
$
❑ Consultant ❑ Contract
$
❑ Consultant ❑ Contract
$
❑ Consultant ❑ Contract
$
❑ Consultant ❑ Contract
Total
Consultants
$4000
COST ELEMENT
I
AMOUNT
AC /CPJAD O(b) (Rev 03;3/2009)
D. Transportation and Subsistence
Itemize for mainland/interisland
airfare ground transportation, rental
car, per diem
Unit Cost
No. of
Travelers
as
applicable
No. of
Days
Subtotal
CNOA Training Conference
$2005
4
4
$8020
$
$
CNCA Annual Conference
$1002
2
4
$4010
IAUO Training Conference
$1091
2
3
$3275
$
$
$
$
Total Transportation and Subsistence
$15305
E. Office Supplies
Itemize supplies and related costs such
as printing, paper binders, etc.
Quantity
Cost by Unit
Subtotal
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total
Office Supplies
$
F. Equipment
Specify equipment that will be
p urchased, leased, or rented.
Quanti
Cost bv Unit
Subtotal
Dell Desktop Computer/Mon
8
$2000
$16280
$
$
$
$
Total Equipment
$16280
AG /CPJAD #I(b) -(Rev 03/3/2009)
COST ELEMENT
AMOUNT
G. Other Costs
Quantity
Cost by Unit
Subtotal
Confidential Funds
$
$39900
$
$
Helicopter Rental
8
$800
$6400
Vehicle Rentals
24
$600
$14000
Narcotic Detection Canine
2
$9000
$18000
$
$
Total Other Costs I
$78300
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $113885
AG /CPJAD #](b) (Rev 03/3/2009)
BUDGET EXPLANATION:
A. Salaries and Wages
I101.l
B. Fringe Benefits
The composite fringe benefit rate is at % for (list positions). The rate consists of
the following fringe benefit items and computed rates:
C. Consultants /Contracts
hlformant Management, Craig Michaels, 2 day training, $4,000.00 (Cost per Day, $200 Per
Diem, $780 Airfare, $200 Rental Vehicle, $800 Lodging, $52 Parking, $450 x 2 Prep for
Training, $450 x 2 Training Fees)
Hilo Police Station, Hilo, Hawaii
D. Transportation and Subsistence
Travel allocation to include airfare, per diem, and ground transportation to attend trainings and
meetings within and out -of -state to ensure that the program's officers are proficient in the latest
investigation techniques and safety precautions:
Out of State Travel (Cost per Day, $145 Per Diem, $850 Airfare, $75 Rental Vehicle,
Registration Fees)
California Narcotics Officer's Association Annual Training Conference (CNOA),
San Francisco, CA (4 officers)
California Narcotic's Canine Association (CNCA) Training Conference,
Burbank, CA (2 officers)
Narcotics, Vice, Street Crime Supervisor Training Seminar (IAUO),
Las Vegas, NV (2 officers)
E. Office Supplies
N/A
F. Equipment
Dell Desktop Computer and Monitor (8) for analytical support on intelligence based
investigations utilizing PEN -LINK, LiNX, WSIN, and Law Enforcement related software.
Hawaii Police Department Vice officers rely solely on computers for report writing, database
and intelligence analysis, inter agency communication, and research. The current computers
AG /CPJAD # 1(b) (Rev 03/3/2009) page I
utilized have been in use for five to six years and are antiquated and ineffecient.
G. Other Costs
Confidential funds to be used for the purchase of evidence, information, and /or services relating
to investigations of drug trafficking organizations in the County and State of Hawaii.
The price of illegal narcotics, particularly crystal methamphetamine, has doubled in price an
example being $400.00 for 1/8 of an ounce of "ice" in 1985, to $1000.00 for the same amount in
2009.
Rental of civilian helicopters for aerial surveillance and probable cause reconaissance, based on
$800.00 an hour, 2 - 2 hour flights per quarter.
The County of Hawaii, or the Big Island, encompasses 4,028 square miles and is larger than all
of the other Hawaiian Islands combined. That being said, the vast majority of the land mass is
vacant or comprised of some of the largest subdivisions in the nation having individual lot sizes
of one to ten acres. These conditions sometimes hinder surveillance operations by vehicle due to
the absence of traffic and long range visibility. A helicopter flying at maximum sight range has
proved to be a necessary resource to assist with these types of narcotic investigations.
Rental of motor vehicles for surveillance and probable cause determination, based on 2 vehicles
per month at $600.00 per month.
Although the largest of the four islands, the population of the County of Hawaii accounts for
approximately 15% of the State of Hawaii. The communities and towns are small. Police
officers and their vehicles are very recognizable to the community, especially drug trafficking
organizations, who make it a point to have counter intelligence. Rental vehicles from local used
car dealerships have been a valuable tool in past surveillance investigations in maintaining
anonymity.
To purchase equipment to assist in conducting narcotic investigations, gathering /analyzing
intelligence on drug trafficking organizations, and presenting completed, quality investigations
to the Prosecutor's Office and State Judiciary System.
Narcotic Detection Canines (2) needed to replace existing Canines that are entering their
"retirement" years (7 -9 years). Per Hawaii State Narcotics Certified Trainers (CNCA), narcotic
detection canines begin to lose their "drive" at seven years. These purchasing funds include the
selection, certification (trainer, canine, trainer with canine), and training expenses as well as for
the canine itself.
AG /CPJAD #1(b) (Rev 03/3/2009) Page 2
PART IV. ATTACHMENTS
(Certifications)
A. Acceptance of Conditions (AG /CPJAD #14)
B. Acceptance of JAG RECOVERY SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(AG /CPJAD #26)
C. Certification of Non - Supplanting (AG /CPJAD #3)
D. Certification of Non - Discrimination (AG /CPJAD # 15)
E. Certification of Regarding: EEOP
F. Certification Regarding Drug -Free (AG /CPJAD #16)
G. Certification Regarding Debarment (OJP 4061/1)
H: Certification Regarding Lobbying (AG /CPJAD #22)
Confidential Funds Certification (AG /CPJAD # 18)
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS
The undersigned agrees, on behalf of the applicant agency, that:
This project, upon approval, shall constitute an official part of Hawaii's Drug Control and System
Improvement Formula Grant Program established under Title VI, Subtitle C, Part E, Subpart 1, of the
Anti -Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (Public Law 100 -690).
2. Any grant awarded pursuant to this application shall be subject to and will be administered in
conformity with:
(a) general conditions applicable to administration of grants under Title VI, Subtitle C, Part E,
Subpart 1, of the Anti -Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (Public Law 100 -690), as amended, as
applicable;
(b) conditions applicable to the fiscal administration of grants under Title VI, Subtitle C, Part E,
Subpart 1, of the Anti -Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (Public Law 100 -690), as amended, as
applicable;
(c) any special conditions contained in the grant award; and
(d) general and fiscal regulations of the Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division.
3. Any grant received as a result of this application may be terminated, or fund payment may be
discontinued, by the Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division when it finds a substantial
failure to comply with the foregoing provisions, the application obligations or for non - availability of
funds.
SUBMITTED BY:
Signature:
Date:
Name: Harry S. Kubojiri Title: Police Chief
Agency: Hawaii Police Department
AG /CPJAD # 14 06/02
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division
ACCEPTANCE OF JAG RECOVERY SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The undersigned Grantee understands and agrees, on behalf of its agency that:
Access to Records; Interviews
(a) U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) including the Office of Justice Programs (OJP)
and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), and its representatives, and the
Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall have access to and the right to
examine all records (including, but not limited to, books, papers, and. documents)
related to this Recovery Act award, including such records of any subrecipient,
contractor, or subcontractor.
(b) DOJ and the GAO are authorized to interview any officer or employee of the
Grantee (or of any subrecipient, contractor, or subcontractor) regarding
transactions related to this Recovery Act award.
2. Separate Tracking and Reporting of Recovery Act Funds and Outcomes
(a) Grantee agrees to track, account for, and report on all funds from this Recovery
Act award (including specific outcomes and benefits attributable to Recovery Act
funds) separately from all other funds, including DOJ award funds from non -
Recovery Act awards awarded for the same or similar purposes or programs.
(Recovery Act funds may be used in conjunction with other funding as necessary
to complete projects, but tracking and reporting of Recovery Act funds must be
separate.) Accordingly, the accounting system must ensure that funds from this
Recovery Act award are not commingled with funds from any other source.
(b) Grantee further agrees that all personnel whose activities are to be charged to the
award will maintain timesheets to document hours worked for activities related to
this award and non - award - related activities.
Subawards / Contracts — Monitoring
(a) Grantee is responsible for monitoring subawards and subcontracts under this
Recovery Act award in accordance with all applicable statutes, regulations, Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) circulars, and guidelines, including the OJP
Financial Guide, and to include the applicable conditions of this award in any
subaward /subcontract. The recipient is responsible for oversight of subrecipient
spending and monitoring of specific outcomes and benefits attributable to use of
Recovery Act funds by subrecipients. The Grantee agrees to submit, upon
AG /CPJAD #26 JAG - Recovery 08/09
request, documentation of its policies and procedures for monitoring of
subawards /subcontracts under this award.
4. Transactions Listed in Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards -
(a) Grantee shall maintain records that identify adequately the source and application
of Recovery Act funds, to maximize the transparency and accountability of funds
authorized under the Recovery Act as required by the Act and in accordance with
2 CFR 215.21, "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-
profit Organizations" and OMB A -102 Common Rules provisions (relating to
Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments).
(b) Grantee agrees to separately identify the expenditures for Federal awards under
the Recovery Act on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) and
the Data Collection Form (SF -SAC) required by OMB Circular A -133. This
condition only applies if the recipient is covered by the Single Audit Act
Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular A -133, "Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations.` This shall be accomplished by
identifying expenditures for Federal awards made under the Recovery Act
separately on the SEFA, and as separate rows under Item 9 of Part III on the SF-
SAC by CFDA number, and inclusion of the prefix "ARRA -" in identifying the
name of the Federal program'on the SEFA and as the first characters in Item 9d of
Part III on the SF -SAC.
5. Recovery Act Reporting and Registration Requirements
(a) Grantee shall complete projects or activities which are funded under the Recovery
Act and shall submit progress reports under Section 1512 of the Recovery Act on
use of Recovery Act funds provided through this award. Information from these
reports will be made available to the public.
(b) Grantee shall report the information described in section 1512(c) as applicable,
using the reporting instructions and data elements that will be provided by
CPJAD.
(c) The progress reports are to cover activities that the Grantee has completed
whether funded in whole or in part by the Recovery Act. The Recovery Act
reporting periods and due dates are:
• Julyl - September 30
• October 1- December 31
• January 1 - March 30
• April 1 -June 30
Due: October 5
Due: January 5
Due: April 5
Due: July 5
AG /CPJAD #26 JAG - Recovery 08/09 2
(d) Grantee shall maintain current registration in the Central Contractor Registration
(www.ccr.gov) at all times during which they have active federal awards funded
with Recovery Act funds. A Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) Number (www.dnb.com) is one of the requirements for
registration in the Central Contractor Registration.
6. Reporting Potential Fraud, Waste, and Abuse, and Similar Misconduct
Grantee shall promptly refer to the DOJ OIG any credible evidence that a principal,
employee, agent, contractor, subgrantee, subcontractor, or other person has either 1)
submitted a false claim for Recovery Act funds under the False Claims Act; or 2)
committed a criminal or civil violation of laws pertaining to fraud, conflict of interest,
bribery, gratuity, or similar misconduct involving Recovery Act funds. Potential fraud,
waste, abuse, or misconduct should be reported to the OIG by:
Mail: Office of the Inspector General
U.S. Department of Justice
Investigations Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Room 4706
Washington, DC 20530
E -mail: oig.hotline2usdoj.gov
Hotline: (contact information in English and Spanish): (800) 869 - 4499, or
Hotline fax: (202) 616 -9881.
Additional information is available from the DOJ OIG website at www.usdoj_gov /oig
7. Protecting State and Local Government and Contractor Whistleblowers (Recovery Act,
section 1553)
Grantee recognizes that the Recovery Act provides certain protections against reprisals
for employees of non - Federal employers who disclose information reasonably believed to
be evidence of gross mismanagement, gross waste, substantial and specific danger to
public health or safety, abuse of authority, or violations of law related to contracts or
grants using Recovery Act funds. For additional information, refer to section 1553 of the
Recovery Act. The text of Recovery Act is available at www.ojp.usdoi.gov /recovery
8. Misuse of Award Funds
Grantee understands and agrees that misuse of award funds may result in a range of
penalties, including suspension of current and future funds, suspension or debarment
from federal grants, recoupment of monies provided under an award, and civil and /or
criminal penalties.
AG /CPJAD #26 JAG - Recovery 08/09 3
I
10
11.
Additional Requirements and Guidance
Grantee shall comply with any modifications or additional requirements that may be
imposed by law and future OJP (including government -wide) and Hawaii Department of
the Attorney General guidance and clarifications of Recovery Act requirements.
Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) Reporting Requirement
Grantee shall comply with all reporting, data collection and evaluation requirements, as
prescribed by law and detailed by the BJA in program guidance for the Justice Assistance
Grant Program.
Grantee shall complete BJA- required report on -line using the Performance Measurement
Tool (PMT). The on -line reporting system will require a username and password to log
on. The username and password will be provided by CPJAD after the contract is
executed. The PMT web address is https : / /www.bjaperformancetools.org
The BJA reporting periods and due dates are:
■ July 1 - September 30
■ October 1 - December 31
■ January 1 - March 31
■ April 1 -June 30
Delinquent Reports
Due: October 15
Due: January 15
Due: April 15
Due: July 15
(a) Grantee shall comply with all reporting requirements. Failure to comply with the
reporting requirements may, in addition to other penalties, subject the recipient to
the following:
(i) After failure to report complete data by the due date stated in sections 5.c.
and 10 for two consecutive reporting periods, the Grantee may be
precluded from drawing down funds until such time as the Grantee
becomes current in its reporting obligations.
(ii) After failure to report complete data by the due date stated in sections 5.c.
and 10 for three consecutive reporting periods, the Administrator of the
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division may terminate the
Grantee's contract for cause. Upon written letter of termination, the
Grantee must return any unexpended award funds within 15 calendar days
of the date of the letter of termination.
AG /CPJAD #26 JAG - Recovery 08/09 4
12. Funds Subcontracted to Faith Based Organizations
Grantee shall comply with the applicable requirements of 28 C.F.R. Part 38, the
Department of Justice regulation governing "Equal Treatment for Faith Based
Organizations" (the "Equal Treatment Regulation "). The Equal Treatment Regulation
provides in part that Department of Justice grant awards of funding may not be used to
fund any inherently religious activities, such as worship, religious instruction, or
proselytization. Recipients of grants may still engage in inherently religious activities, but
such activities must be separate in time or place from the Department of Justice funded
program, and participation in such activities by individuals receiving services from the
grantee or a sub - grantee must be voluntary. The Equal Treatment Regulation also makes
clear that organizations participating in programs funded by the Department of Justice are
not permitted to discriminate in the provision of services on the basis of a beneficiary's
religion. Notwithstanding any other special condition of this award, faith -based
organizations may, in some circumstances, consider religion as a basis for employment.
See http: / /www.ojp.gov /about /ocr /equal_fbo.htm.
SUBMITTED BY:
Signature:
Date:
Name: Harry S. Kubojiri Title: Police Chief
Agency: Hawaii Police Department
AG /CPJAD #26 JAG - Recovery 08/09
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division
CERTIFICATION OF NON - SUPPLANTING
I certify that federal funds will not be used to supplant State, local or other non - federal funds that
would, in the absence of such federal aid, be made available for law enforcement, criminal justice,
and victim compensation and assistance activities.
SUBMITTED BY:
Signature:
Date:
Name: Harry S. Kuboiiri Title: Police Chief
Agency: Hawaii Police Department
AG /CPJAD #3 06/02
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division
CERTIFICATION OF NON - DISCRIMINATION
I certify that the applicant agency will comply with and will insure compliance by its subgrantees
and contractors with the non - discrimination requirements of:
• The Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, which prohibits
discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, or sex, in OJP and
COPS funded programs or activities. (42 U.S.C. §3789d and 28 C.F.R. §42.201 et sue)
• Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of
race, color or national origin in OJP and COPS funded programs or activities. (42 U.S.C.
§2000d and 28 C.F.R. §42.101 et se q.)
• Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of
disability in OJP and COPS funded programs or activities. (29 U.S.C. §794 and 28 C.F.R.
§42.501 et i .)
• Section 1407 of the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA), which prohibits discrimination on the
basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, or disability in VOCA funded programs
or activities. (42 U.S.C. §10604)
• Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as it relates to discrimination on
the basis of disability in OJP or COPS funded programs or activities. (42 U.S.C. §12132
and 28 C.F.R. Pt. 35)
• Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as it relates to discrimination on the basis
of sex in OJP and COPS funded training or educational programs. (20 U.S.C. §1681 and
34 C.F.R. Pt. 106)
• The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 as it relates to services discrimination on the basis
of age in OJP or COPS funded programs or activities. (42 U.S.C. §6102 and 28 C.F.R.
§42.700 et se .)
• Executive Order No. 13166 prohibiting discrimination of Limited English Proficient
Persons.
• Executive Order No. 13279 regarding equal protection of the laws for faith -based
organizations. (28 C.F.R. pt. 38)
No person shall, on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability, be
excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, be subjected to discrimination under, or
be denied employment in connection with any program or activity funded in whole or in part
with funds made available under this title from the U.S. Department of Justice through the
Department of the Attorney General, Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division.
Noncompliance with the discrimination regulations may result in the suspension or termination
of funding.
SUBMITTED BY:
Signature:
Date:
Name: Harry S. Kubojiri Title: Police Chief
Agency: Hawaii Police Department
AG /CPJAD #l5 12/07
CERTIFICATION FORM
Recipient Name and Address:
Grant Title: Grant Number: Award Amount:
Contact Person Name and Title:
Phone Number: (
Federal regulations require recipients of financial assistance from the Office of Justice Programs (OJP), its component agencies, and the
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) to prepare, maintain on file, submit to OJP for review. and implement an Equal
Employment Opportunity Plan (EEOP) in accordance with 28 C.F.R §§ 42.301 -.308. The regulations exempt some recipients from all of
the EEOP requirements. Other recipients, according to the regulations. must prepare, maintain on file and implement an EEOP. but they
do not need to submit the EEOP to OJP for review. Recipients that claim a complete exemption from the EEOP requirement must
complete Section A below. Recipients that claim the limited exemption from the submission requirement, must complete Section B
below. A recipient should complete either Section A or Section B, not both. if a recipient receives multiple OJP or COPS grants,
please complete a form for each grant, ensuring that any EEOP recipient certifies as completed and on file (if applicable) has been
prepared within two years of the latest grant. Please send the completed form(s) to the Office for Civil Rights. Office ol'Justice Programs.
U.S. Department of Justice. 810 7` Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20531. For assistance in completing this form, please call (202)307-
0690 or TTY (202) 307 -2027.
Section A- Declaration Claiming Complete Exemption from the EEOP Requirement. Please check all the boxes that
app ty.
Q Recipient has less than 50 employees, Q • Recipient is an Indian tribe.
Q Recipient is a non - profit organization, Q Recipient is an educational institution. or
Q Recipient is a medical institution. Q Recipient is receiving an award less than $25,000
M
[responsible official], certify that
[recipient] is not required to
prepare an EEOP for the reason(s) checked above, pursuant to 28 C.F.R §42.302. 1 further certify that
[recipient] will comply with applicable Federal civil rights
laws that prohibit discrimination in employment and in the delivery of services.
Print or type Name and Title Signature Date
Section B- Declaration Claiming Exemption from the EEOP Submission Requirement and Certifying That an
ESOP Is on File for Review.
If a recipient agency has 50 or more employees and is receiving a single award or subaward for $25,000 or more, but less than $500,000,
then the recipient agency does not have to submit an EEOP to OJP for review as long as it certifies the following (42 C.F.R. § 42.305):
1, [responsible official], certify that
the [recipientl,which has 50 or more
employees and is receiving a single award or subaward for $25,000 or more, but less than $500,000, has formulated an
EEOP in accordance with 28 CFR §42.301, et seq., subpart E. I further certify that the EEOP has been formulated and
signed into effect within the past two years by the proper authority and that it is available for review. The EEOP is on file in
the office of: [organization],
at [address],for review by the public and
employees or for review or audit by officials of the relevant state planning agency or the Office for Civil Rights, Office of
Justice Programs, U. S. Department of Justice, as required by relevant laws and regulations.
Print or type Name and Title
Signature Date
OMB Approval No. 1121 -0140 Expiration Date: 01 /31/06
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
0 OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
Certification Regarding
Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion
Lower Tier Covered Transactions
(Sub - Recipient)
This certification Is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and
Suspension, 28 CFR Part 87 Section 67.510, Participants' responsibilities. The regulations were published
as Part VII of the May 26, 1988 Federal Register (pages 19160-19211).
(BEFORE COMPLETING CERTIFICATION, READ INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE)
(1) The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither It nor its
principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from participation In this transaction by any Federal department or agency.
(2) Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements In this certlW
cation, such prospective- participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Name and Title of Authorized Representative
Slgnature
Date
Name of Organization
Address of Organization
WP FOAM 406111 (REV. 4/L9) Previous editions an obsolete.
Instructions for Certification
1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant Is providing the
certification set out below.
2 The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed
when this transaction was entered into. if it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant
knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, In addition to other remedies available to the Federal
Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available
remedies, including suspension and /or debarment.
3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide Immediate written notice to the person to which
this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant leams that Its certification
was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
4. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended," "ineligible," "lower. tier covered
transaction," "participant," "person," "primary covered transaction," "principal," "proposal," and
"voluntarily excluded," as used In this clause, have the meanings set out In the Definitions and Coverage
sections of rules implementing Executive Omer 12549.
5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed
covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction
with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation
in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this tmnsactTon
originated.
S. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include
the clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, ineligibility and Voluntary
Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transactions," without modification, in all lower tier covered
transactions and In all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions.
7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a
lower tier covered transaction that It is not debarred, suspended ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from
the covered transaction, unless It knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the
method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may check
the Nonprocurement List.
8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of
records in order to render in good faith the certification required by We clause. The knowledge and
Information of a participant Is not required to exceed that which Is normally possessed by a prudent
person in the ordinary course of business dealings.
9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a
covered transaction knowingly enters Into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who Is
suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntary excluded from participation in this transaction, In addition
to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this
transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and /or debarment.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division
CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING
Each person shall file the most current edition of this certification and disclosure form, if applicable,
with each submission that initiates agency consideration of such person for an award of a Federal
contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of $100,000 or more; or Federal loan of $150,000 or more.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this
transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or
entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to
file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more .
than $100,000 for each such failure.
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing
or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the
making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the
extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant,
loan or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any non - Federal funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or
attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned
shall initial here and complete and submit Standard Form # LLL, A Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities, in accordance with, its instructions.
(3) Recipient understands and agrees that it cannot use any federal funds, either directly or
indirectly, in support of the enactment, repeal modification or adoption of any law,
regulation or policy, at any level of government, without the express prior written approval
of the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
(4) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award
documents for all subawards at all tiers and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose
accordingly.
Hawaii Police Department
_349 Kapiolani Street, Hilo, HI 96720
Name and Address of Organization
Name of Authorized Individual
Signature and date
09 -SU -20
Application No.
BJA
Name of OJP Agency
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Crime Prevention and Justice Assistance Division
CONFIDENTIAL FUNDS CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that I have read all of the conditions for confidential funds as set forth in the
effective edition of Office of Justice Program's Financial Guide, and I agree to abide by all the
conditions for confidential funds as set forth in the manual.
SUBMITTED BY:
Signature:
Date:
Name: Harry S Kuboiiri Title: Police Chief
Agency: Hawaii Police Department
AG /CPJAD # I S 05/09