My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0819.001 2008-2010
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2008-2010
>
COM 0819.001 2008-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2021 4:05:29 PM
Creation date
5/17/2010 1:00:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2008-2010
Communication
0819
Point
001
Author
Kelly Greenwell, Council Member
Communications - Referred To
PSPRC
Document Relationships
REP PSPRC 030 05/18/2010 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2008-2010\Public Safety & Parks & Recreation Committee (PSPRC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
obscene profits. It was actually worse than that. I wasn't just creating a job opening; I was creating a <br />safe job opening because it they tried to get the job while the dealer was still on the corner he would <br />probably shoot them. I would suggest to you that whole armies of police cannot stop drug trafficking <br />when the profits are this immense. <br />A hundred years ago there was not a single federally illicit drug in the United States. In 1914 <br />the US government decided it wanted to justify making certain drugs illegal so it estimated that 1.3 <br />percent of the population was addicted to drugs .21 "We can't have that," they said, and they passed <br />the 1914 Harrison Anti - Narcotics Act. Fifty -six years later the US government wanted to justify a <br />policy starting a war on drugs, so they conducted a survey that showed 1.3 percent of the population <br />was addicted to drugs. After nearly four decades of fueling this war with over a trillion dollars of <br />our taxes and making over 39 million arrests for nonviolent drug offenses, what are the results? <br />Our court system is choked with the escalating number of drug prosecutions and our quadrupled <br />prison population has made building prisons this nation's fastest growing industry; with 2.3 million <br />incarcerated today and another 1.9 million arrested every year for nonviolent drug offenses. The <br />United States now imprisons 1,009 per 100,000 population, more per capita than any country in the <br />world; 1.6 times as many as Russia (our closest competitor) and 6 times as many as China. Where <br />will it end? The United States has 4.6 percent of the world's population and 22.5 percent of its <br />prisoners' right here in this "land of freedom "! And today, 1.3 percent of the population is <br />addicted to drugs. <br />The only thing that has changed in a hundred years, whether drugs were legal, whether they <br />were illicit, or whether they were illicit and we were involved in a war against them, is that those <br />drugs are now cheaper, more potent, and far easier for our children to access. Drug barons continue <br />to grow richer every year and terrorists now make fortunes on the trade, while our citizens continue <br />dying on our streets. This represents the very definition of a failed public policy. Will Rogers said, <br />"If you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is stop digging." So what we're suggesting at <br />LEAP is that we stop digging in the hole of a failed war on drugs and start searching for alternative <br />strategies. <br />Now I am now going to make a couple of suggestions that I hope will answer what I think is <br />your obvious question "Is there anything that can be done to stop this scourge on our nation and <br />the world ?" <br />I believe there is. <br />I am going to offer you a policy model I have been working on for some thirty years. <br />However, I am not presenting it to convince you of its worth as much as to open your mind to the <br />fact that workable alternatives to these failed drug policies do exist. If you ever get to hear another <br />LEAP speaker you may get an alternative policy that differs slightly as to how we might distribute <br />drugs once they are legal. All LEAP requires of its speakers is that they believe the war on drugs is a <br />failure and that the speakers support alternative policies that will reduce the incidence of death, <br />disease, crime and addiction by ultimately ending drug prohibition. <br />We speak to thousands of very intelligent people like yourself during our presentations and <br />what we are hoping is that once the public's mind is open to alternative solutions, they will think of <br />workable policies that are much better than any we have yet considered. <br />This then is my suggested solution. <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.