The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOM 0562.002 2008-2010 a W . E ner y .n . � 5 ' a. `fit' .,1'4 -' 7i � . ? i .` ..j -. e - ?` ' i . °y t d' .xb ? 1 Zi Implementation and Leadership ,...., . -4 ‘ r _ Energy Efficiency P� r gy og am �. ti ; m. 7. and x '. ,;, , . 4 :- .t Renewable Ever De to m ent . �. 9'Y p Y - -M of EI , ' • :-,1* Will (stop . (J'�::.` ' •�„i, • . 4 1 ` Energy - Coordinator :� ,'r,..k `�� ii Research and Development • • Cesar►Ma 54 Reef. Ta S d Ep 1914 Goio,� Ul 2 2 2010 ass. "E 2 Kauai A Oahu Molokai 41111r 1 011146 4 411 Maui araggilP Hawaii 41 , It .0 The Fix Hawaii Energy Projected State of Hawaii Electricity Requirements 16 Efficiency & Conservation 3'0/) 14 O 12 O Efficiency � 10 ® Ocean energy CI. ❑MSW Solar - utility scale ty Renewable Fueled Generation 40% ■ • Solar - commercial roofs 8 ❑ Solar - residential roofs 0 Hydro 0 • Geothermal V 6 0 Wind 0 Biomass - direct firing > ®Oil 0) = 4 Oil Based Generation 30% W 2 2008 2010 2020 2030 A 100W light bulb on for a full year consumes about 2 barrels of oil. O utline of Presentation • Energy Supply & Demand • Hawaii Island Energy Plan • Results and Implementation Island Energy Challenge 68% :_ 99.9% Electricity 4( \ t` ' Fuel (transportation) 76% 85% Materials Food High Cost =High Risk =High Capital Leakage _.. *Source: w Green Economy Report Eco ...s,,,,,.,,, N, "...,:.,„..„ .y ' - r j E i n J .., .., \ - .,.. ... ft . , . - . . Based on 80 million gallons of gasoline at $3.10 per gallon, 20 million 2009 gallons of diesel at $3.50 per gallon, 1,200 million kWh of electricity at $0.327 (residential) and $0.300 (other), 30 million gallons of aviation fuel at Est im at e $1.90 per gallon, and liquid petroleum gas sales of $5 million. i How is the rims energy being used on p � the Hawaii Island? Commercial Electricity 18% P Ground Public Sector Transport 38% Electricity 8% Residential Electricity 17% Air Industry Transport Based on Johnson, et al, 7 % 12`)/0 Hawaii County Baseline Energy Analysis, 2006. It's Going to Run Out weari here _. °1/f\\ Peak Oil , ' ' , _ • . , , , " . „ ' ,, . , , , . ,.... , - - ..... . . - ,...-. - ... .- ,..- . ... . .._....._.,..r....._..„. . F u t ur e no .. ___ • .,...... Ir'' y a. yM - � fix rt 4, . .. . . '# � . r � J _ J 1).11 t,., ,,,,.. ,,. z: 0 ..,,,II ' " ■ 2020 Estimate Good Ne ws te r _ Leads U.S. in Renewable Energy Generation on Isolated Grid at 30+ Percent t I , b.0 ct L. 1 CU Z , H b.0 LLI s_. GU L C CU = LLJ ..0 0 L. 7 0 al (.1) - a ,, - , (D E CU >. I . . t _c CU ce I 1 NI • , , 0 C a) , • At l ib C ID 1 C illik 1 , C 00 E 4Pill , IP MIMM ■ .w. 0 I . - 1, - ii iiii. ft „I li". ...2 iii t 4 ' / ,•4 41, 1111i NN , p ' ‘ s. 0 11 V ■ ,r, ' , rico Na %. 410 OW 111 ■IM 0 441 al.4 I % , ( al CL) (..) " Ct ,- Lm. L■ = Z TO 0 u V) (1) V) - 05 75 as a) F V) V) bO <.2 8 t" .. 0 Lii I Electricity Generation • a . ..._ Hawaii County Electricity Production - 2009 Wind 11% Diesel Hydro 11% Total Generation: 4% 1,320 million kWh Geothermal MSFO 17% 25% Naphtha 33% i H awaii — Existing Renewable Upo lu Poont , _-H -_ • 269 MW capacity w „ "° Kohala • 203 MW peak demand Kawaihae ; - —II� • Puna Geothermal - 30 MW Mauna Kea 1 Keaho Hilo • Sopogy — 500kw -NELHA Point b Hua' : • • Solfocus — TBD - NELHA { Kailas Kon . • a ,_ Hawi — 10.5 Wind — Upolu Point I no FA • Pakini Nui — 20 MW Wind — S Point Kilauea / • Lalamilo Wind — 1.2 MW — Waimea • Puueo Hydro — 3.25 MW — Wailuku • Waiau Hydro — 1.1 MW — Wailuku • Wailuku River Hydro — 12.1 MW .iii • Cellana — Biofuel TBD — NELHA South • Small Hydro — 300 KW — Various Point • Distributed Solar Thermal — 13GWh • Distributed Solar Electric — 7.5 MW Island of Hawai'i I I Go vernment O2eration 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 tiuil+din sand County Fleet I Residential Land t se Facilities I I . I I I I Street Lights 1 t 1 and Traffic Transit Fleet 1 . C'ommeri c a l Uti l ittr� Power Signal I Producers 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I Policy./ I I I Wastewater Employee I Industrial Regulation 1 1 Facility Commute I I I vommummummop IIIIIIIIIIMIIMINIIMINP I I I I 1 I I Water Solid Waste I I I I Delivery (*Resource I Tra nsp.orat ion I I I Facility Management) I I w• I L _ I L 1 I t + : COH COH Mayor's Energy Mayor's Green All IMP Advisory Commission Team Focus Area Focus Area COH Electricity and Fuel Cost (2007 -2008) • Facility - $4.2 million Street lights - $1.4 million Water - $18 million Sewage - $2 million Fleet - $7 million Energy Plan 1. Efficiency Improvements 20% 2. Renewable Generation Increments 3. Partners: Federal, State, International Twenty by Twenty-Twelve Efficiency Improvements 20% = $7 million 1. County of Hawaii Facility Audits Savings $500K /year 2. ARRA Funds $738K 3. Mayor Green Team 4. Department of Water Supply 5. Fleet Management Energy Efficiency $Saved = Economic Development (ED) + Workforce Development (WD) (jobs saved!) Island of Hawaii Community Efficiency = $$ saved by taxpayers 1. Outreach and Capacity Building 2. Residential Efficiencies Program: PACE-pilot Berkeley, Boulder, • Solar Water Heaters paid through County Property Taxes 3. Sustainable Communities and Businesses 4. Transportation: EAC Fleet Analysis Started • Mass Transit — Increase Ridership program 2010 — Hydrogen Buses • Bicycle Lanes - PATH has COH $ • Rideshare Car, Van-pools— Program started in County 10/09 Implementation Increments Real Renewable Results 1. COH — Hawaii County Building • 100 kW PV system • 22 Plug -in conduits for Electric Vehicles 2. COH - Public Works Projects • New Buildings and Retrofits to have PV — Standardized set for adoption by County — WHCC RFP documents and PPAs for PV Projects • List Projects: new roofs, new structures 3. COH -West Hawaii Civic Center • Photovoltaics for up to 100% of Load — Finished WHCC RFP — Evaluations — Ready to Award - $1M savings ($500K Present Value) • Electric Vehicles - Battery Charge Stations — Working with NREL on EVs for WHCC • Energy Management Systems and sub - meters — Positioning for first Feed -in Tariff in United States 4. Department of Water Supply • Micro - turbine opportunites at several sites — Identifying with DWS other sites • Lalamillo site and other Water systems — Working with DWS /NREL to develop ideal power systems and RFP 3rd Party • 3` Party Finance Cpportunities (Kau, others) — Additional sites being analyzed for similar projects 5. COH - Wastewater Treatment sites • EPA Workshop — free Audit —Free EPA Audit accomplished - results — ready to install on other Wastewater sites • Reclaimed water for Agriculture — GreenField designs being pursued with Yale School of Forestry • Algae to breakdown water and use for fuel and water 6. Island of HawaiiShort Term Potentials: • Property Assessed Tax Financed Renewable Projects • Feed -in Tariff projects — Participating in HEPF and Intervening on PUC Dockets to allow Hawaii County more Renewable Generation • Geothermal +8 MW — negotiation with HELCO on 8MW to change original contract • DOT - Airport Kona — First Net -Zero Airport — Setting up meetings with NREL, DOT to stay in loop on first Net - Zero- Airport • Wind Projects, HELCO Bio -mass Project • NELHA Microgird, Desalinization, Airport back -up — Working with NELHA, Berkeley Lab on PV and Microgrids and back -up power 7. Island of Hawaii Long Term Potentials: • Electric and Hydrogen vehicle /storage systems — Started NREL on Fleet Analysis • Biofuels vs. Agriculture decisions — Assigned to review committee on Bio- energy Master Plan to give recommendations to COH Renewable Energy Increments = Economic Development (ED) + Workforce Development (WD) + Agriculture & Tourism (AT) ■ - o Survey of m o ees ..„ o 74% of respondents indicated:they would accept a standardized AC setting of 74 to 75 ° F o 36% indicate they would prefer a warmer setting o 58% indicate they would not prefer a cooler setting o 23% prefer a cooler setting o 4% of county workers bring heaters to work and 8% bring fans. • The vast majority of respondents indicated that they would work with the County in changing their daily routine to conserve energy o 85% of respondents would change their daily routine to conserve energy o 97% would help county to conserve energy o 95% would work together with the county to conserve energy • The vast majority of respondents showed positive attitudes to energy conservation and its impact on the environment o 97% energy conservation is something to be concerned about o 91% energy consumption has an effect on the environment o 83% do not believe that it is their right to use as much energy as they want to o 92% agree that energy costs put a strain on the County's budget; 72% believe that savings achieved through energy conservation would aid securing jobs (18% do not) o 94% responsibility to conserve energy and natural resources o 97% should help the county conserve energy .'s:. . - ., t � _ � d,. - °,,'. .•.m.s3' � b- ."'�,'a:r, lc,�t» w,s2� .- �+ *'.; - i ch. t 0 n . 4 3:- t �.�4e r_ - 'fi t, to O ng oi n o I t i oI m na t ion �x`�"� ' y c�. rc ��, ..s�.�rea� �h+L ":'a'us" �;k t�; �,, ,,_,..�4.,.+ „. .�` }. � - .,,q'�s. { - _s; ' 44 r ;. ATM_ k E1SS 9 ®-� 7 - 4 -3+ �s+ ' zxcr^ 3' t"�t , - -xE3 $' - , f Ay u•- d ".w.e S . • Lead By Example — County campaign to bring energy awareness to County first then Island -wide • Facility Audits and Efficiency Implementation • Model Energy Code — New Building Codes need some outreach — COH needs outreach decision for adoption of Codes 10/10 • Projects for County: Solar, Wind, Microturbines, PHEV & other efficient systems at county facilities (especially DWS) — Projects identified in Public Works and DWS • Transition fleet to more efficient vehicles and use — NREL Program Started • Continue expansion of public transit system — Transportation to increase mass transit • Continue efforts to assess the costs, benefits and environmental impacts of different biofuel feedstock • Ramp up public education, capacity building and outreach program — COH funding community groups for capacity building in energy awareness _ '� 'tom' $.` x `�, ",::: ^'n, " "d� C .��: '�..,.eF �": ,- *t .r P owerProducInqR a 4n e r s h I P s . � . Nt '�!_ .3 :5, - S 'A, tX`g x Y - , ..4 n -:7 E kr"' y- Y k . Int�n {�or�al row '.1. # „'-tom -:i.„;,41_ _ E +'� .z. ,,,yyy t, � zr ',4S w k , , . „.- 4,....,:i - .. - "4 n ,'sts 4 4,, ,'-, x ) i Yf?; '" ', , .. ' t -, y cM1 f-FS.[ , `S„4 ..,--. 1. US DOE Grants • ARRA Funding — ARRA Funding approved, sent quarterly reports, RFPs ready for $738K • Microgrids and Smartgrids — working with DOE /NREL on smart and microgrid applications • Demonstration sites — DWS, NELHA, Wastewater — NREL /DWS ready for decision 2. USDA -Rural Grants: • Low Income — High Energy Areas — Working with USAID Energy Consult for Grants (Alaska has $20M — Hawaii has $1M should have $50 mm) • DWS — systems — continuous financing system in analysis • Puna Area — increased Geothermal production to Alternate Fuel Production 3. Hawaii Clean Energy Funds • NREL Technical Support — NREL visit and tour and project priorities kicked -off • Electric Vehicle Match — DBEDT gave verbal approval for matching fund • HECO /HELCO PPAs 4. Asia: Japan, China, Korea Partnerships • Electric Vehicles — NREL Study — DBEDT starting conversations with Toyota, others • Batteries • JV and R &D