Laserfiche WebLink
And on Page 2 -1, the correct diacritical marks for "Malama Ki" should have the macron or <br /> macona over the word "Kr. <br /> I also had another one that I wondered whether the Council should consider whether the word <br /> "ohi`a" should be changed to "ohi`a- lehua" to actually reference the tree that they are referring <br /> to; and that is because the word "ohi`a" in the Hawaiian language dictionary can also mean <br /> mountain apple, a tomato, a native variety of sugar cane, and a variety of taro, among other <br /> meanings. And so those are non - substantive, but I wanted to submit those for your <br /> consideration. <br /> WOODWARD: Okay, thank you, Madam Director. Do we have any questions for the Director? <br /> Okay, seeing none, we do have four people from the public signed up to testify. If we can get <br /> you to come up as I call your name, have a seat at the table here, Daniel Taylor, Jon Olson, Rob <br /> Tucker and Tim Rees. <br /> REES: I was testifying on a later matter. <br /> WOODWARD: Oh, okay. Let's see, if I could get you, let's see, you two gentlemen have <br /> already been sworn in. I'd like to swear you in. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth today <br /> before the Windward Planning Commission? <br /> TAYLOR: I do. <br /> WOODWARD: All right, very good. And Mr. Taylor, you have signed up first. If you'll give <br /> us your name and address, and then you may begin your testimony. <br /> TAYLOR: Okay. My name is Daniel Taylor. I'm a resident of Volcano community. I have <br /> been a resident in Hawai`i for about 30 years. And I represent the Action Committee for the <br /> Puna Community Development Plan, and I'm speaking on their behalf. But I'd like to point out, <br /> you all lowlanders are wearing short sleeves and I am cold in this room. I had to put a sweater <br /> on to keep myself going here. <br /> I'd like to complement the Planning Director. We are very gratified by the amount of attention <br /> you gave to our letter and to the very rational well- thought response to us. And I'd like to pass <br /> on the respects of the Action Committee, too, for that. What remains with respect to Bill 194, <br /> just a few points where we'd like to simply clarify some of our thinking, we don't have a <br /> disagreement with anything. We simply would like to clarify some of our thinking on five <br /> points. And they're listed in a 2 1/2 page thing we copied for you; and they're available. I'm not, <br /> I'm not going to bore you by reading it, besides we have to get off for lunch in a few more <br /> minutes. <br /> We are still a little bit uncomfortable with something that the Planning Director referred to a few <br /> minutes ago about the kind of language that Bill 94 would use to tweak the, subtly tweak the <br /> intent of the community plan. We need some help on this. Our committee is new and this whole <br /> idea of community driven and action committees is kind of a new concept. And we might be <br /> 5 <br />