Laserfiche WebLink
programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the County's internal control over <br /> compliance with the requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program <br /> in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance, but <br /> not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. <br /> Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the County's internal control over <br /> compliance. <br /> A control deficiency in an entity's internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of <br /> a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned <br /> functions, to prevent or detect noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program <br /> on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, <br /> that adversely affects the entity's ability to administer a federal program such that there is more than a <br /> remote likelihood that noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is <br /> more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected by the entity's internal control. <br /> A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in <br /> more than a remote likelihood that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a <br /> federal program will not be prevented or detected by the entity's internal control. <br /> Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first <br /> paragraph of this section and would not necessarily identify all deficiencies in the entity's internal control <br /> that might be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. We did not identify any deficiencies in <br /> internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. <br /> Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards <br /> We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, the <br /> discretely presented component unit, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the <br /> County as of and for the year ended June 30, 2009, and have issued our report thereon dated February 11, <br /> 2010. Our audit was performed for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that <br /> collectively comprise the County's basic financial statements. The accompanying schedule of expenditures <br /> of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by OMB Circular A -133 and <br /> is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing <br /> procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all <br /> material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. <br /> This report is intended solely for the information and use of the County Council, the County <br /> Administration, federal awarding agencies, and pass- through entities, and is not intended to be and should <br /> not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. <br /> 0 LEP <br /> March 30, 2010, except for <br /> the Schedule of Expenditures of <br /> Federal Awards, which is as <br /> of February 11, 2010 <br /> 6 <br />