Laserfiche WebLink
the Kahului- Puapua`a Traditional Neighborhood Development, I mean, excuse me, Neighborhood <br /> Village Transit - Oriented Development. Again, we have an aerial, and this is the general area. This, <br /> more specifically, is the general area of this particular application. <br /> The applicant is requesting a State Land Use boundary amendment from Agricultural to Urban, and <br /> a change of zone from Agricultural 5 acres to Single - Family Residential 7,500 square feet for <br /> approximately 14.707 acres of land. The reason for the request: The applicant is proposing to <br /> subdivide the property into 46 lots that are approximately 7,500 square feet in size. This is the <br /> proposed layout for the particular subdivision. Just for reference, the left side of the map would be <br /> north, the right side would be south, this is the existing Pualani Estates subdivision. As you can see, <br /> we have a proposed access connecting to the existing Pualani Estates and that's through Paulehia <br /> Street, and then again, we have a proposed connection to the mauka property, which was identified <br /> earlier as the property owned by Hu- Ko -Pa. And they will work in conjunction with not only the <br /> mauka property, but as well as the makai property for access. Also identified is a drainage channel. <br /> And these areas here are identified as park sites on the particular layout. <br /> The Planning Director is recommending a favorable recommendation for the State Land Use <br /> boundary amendment, but they are recommending, we have submitted to the Commission an <br /> unfavorable recommendation for the change of zone request. The reasons for the unfavorable <br /> recommendation is at this time, as we had mentioned earlier about the particular property being <br /> located within the identified TOD area, in looking at the Kona CDP, we feel it's appropriate for the <br /> applicant to come in with a master plan for this particular area to identify where the TOD for this <br /> area is located. If the applicant has options, those options would include amending the plan or again <br /> working with the Design Center to come up with a master plan for this area. Planning Director? <br /> LEITHEAD TODD: Yeah, just wanted to comment. The TOD's are intended to be kind of like <br /> floating zones; they are not permanently fixed to where the circle is. They may not even look like a <br /> circle once you do a master plan. A TOD could end up looking like some kind of a parallelogram, <br /> it could look like a half circle because it might be constrained by particular issues. But until you do <br /> the master plan, you don't really know what it's going to look like. This particular TOD has several <br /> constraints on it because it is bisected by Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway. But as we looked at the <br /> CDP, we became -. And we argued back and forth in the Department, and I had conflicting input <br /> from, you know, I talked to some people who had been involved in adopting and preparing the <br /> CDP, and I had conflicting advice from different people in terms of what the intent was. But the <br /> bottom line, I ended up going with what was adopted as opposed to what somebody's vision of <br /> what the intent might have been. And we felt that without the master plan, it becomes very difficult <br /> to approve anything within these circled areas, even if ultimately it might not be within the TOD, as <br /> it eventually gets planned, because of Queen K running through there. You'll note that the transit <br /> corridor has already been identified makai of Queen K, because it has that little tram thing on it. <br /> And that area, some of it has already been rezoned for multiple families in my recollection and -. <br /> Yeah, right, that darker brown, that's a higher density. And so that's supposed to be the urban core, <br /> and then you get into more just residential outside. But we don't have a master plan yet. And <br /> obviously, you know, I think the applicant and the applicant's representative disagrees with my <br /> recommendation, but we felt that at this point that this was the best way to go. <br /> DARROW: Lastly, Mr. Chairman -. <br /> HOUSEL: Any questions, Commissioners? <br /> 2 <br />