Laserfiche WebLink
LIM: No, we don't. We are doing, all we are doing is we are following the dictates of the <br /> Department of Public Works and the Kona CDP to stub out to the south. <br /> HOUSEL: Okay. Have you spoken with the adjacent landowner? <br /> LIM: I've spoken to him a long time ago, and I don't know what his current plans are. <br /> HOUSEL: I see, okay. Now, one of the things you stated in your application was that you felt this <br /> land qualified to be infill per the Kona CDP. Could you explain that, please? <br /> LIM: That's correct. The Kona CDP was essentially, I think, at least in my opinion, was set up to <br /> identify areas within Kona that would be proposed for a development, more so that the outside <br /> areas, and the infill was areas of land development in the general boundaries of existing urban and <br /> suburban areas. And we feel that it complies with the Kona CDP in that we've got existing urban <br /> and suburban areas immediately surrounding it. I think you saw from the General Plan LUPAG <br /> Map where the Urban Expansion Area was, that entire area should be going out to residential; there <br /> is a plan to do that in the General Plan anyway. <br /> HOUSEL: It seems like to me the definition as stated in the Kona CDP is infill is intended for land <br /> that has been previously developed or is surrounded by existing developments, is that correct? <br /> LIM: No, I think that's an incorrect statement, and I think you are getting that from one of the <br /> glossary terms in the back of the design guidelines. And you should know that that was imported <br /> into the Kona CDP, wholesale from the Smart Code without any kind of calibration here. It's <br /> inconsistent with the other definitions within the Kona CDP itself. <br /> HOUSEL: Okay, thank you. Any other questions? Commissioner Giffin. <br /> GIFFIN: I don't know if this question is better asked of Ki, but just looking at the existing <br /> roadways, looking at the proposed 45 lots of the subject property, the greatest impact of this traffic <br /> that would be resulting from the 45 lots would be where? I mean I am not ma`a to Kona and I am <br /> not kama`aina to that, so I just want to know, maybe from the applicant's representative or from Ki, <br /> the greatest impact. <br /> LIM: The two main entrances for the project are, you can see where the makai boundary of the <br /> parcel is -. <br /> BOWMAN: You get the -. Can you use the -? <br /> GIFFIN: Jeff has it. <br /> LIM: Okay. Off of the project concept, the one connection would be south to Pualena whenever <br /> that gets opened up; the other connection would be makai and right there on the makai portion of <br /> the project, you see this road tailing off, that will be developed, as the Planning Director was <br /> talking, into that Hualalai Road connector right at the one straight way where there's adequate sight <br /> distance. There will also be another roadway coming from the Hualalai Road section back through <br /> the makai project, which is Parcel 42, out to Paulehia Street when that gets finally dedicated in the <br /> 10 <br />