My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1005.000 2008-2010
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2008-2010
>
COM 1005.000 2008-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2011 2:14:26 PM
Creation date
11/4/2010 11:51:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Council Term
2008-2010
Communication
1005
Point
000
Author
William P. Kenoi, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 01/04/2011 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 03/15/2011 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 07/21/2011 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 08/16/2011 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 327 Draft 01 2008-2010
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2008-2010
BIL 327 Draft 01 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2008-2010
BIL 328 Draft 01 2008-2010
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2008-2010
BIL 328 Draft 01 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2008-2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
442
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GIFFIN: And what is the timetable in relationship to the subject property? <br /> LIM: For that particular project, we have a Planned Unit Development application in also and we <br /> have to get that approved, then after that I think we will go with the subdivision application notice — <br /> I estimate a year and half to two years for the issuance of final subdivision approval. <br /> HOUSEL: Any more? Okay. Mr. Lim, I had one other question. As you are aware, the Kona <br /> Community Development Plan has set a preference, as this is not in a TOD but it's and what would <br /> be called the TND, and the conventional rezoning that you are requesting is an alternative to the <br /> TND. Did you consider a TND? <br /> LIM: We discussed it briefly with the Director, but we felt that because we didn't have the <br /> minimum size that it's very difficult to plan these TND's or TOD's. A lot of the TND and TOD <br /> concepts, at least as I understand them, are intended to be these complex concentrated urban <br /> developments that they will have some urban core where you've got commercial retail, you get, you <br /> know, the more residential out further and less dense residential and some greenbelt on the outside. <br /> And you really can't do that unless you've got a large project, like, the County heads the plan that <br /> you guys had had review, the Honokohau Village TOD, something like that where you've got, you <br /> know, a significant amount of acreage and it's located along one of the transit lines that are planned, <br /> because that was the whole intent, at least as I understand, of the TND. And the TOD was this <br /> Transit - Oriented Development where you would have the buses or maybe rail or whatever else in <br /> the future, and you plan these big urban projects. And this is just not appropriate for that. <br /> HOUSEL: Now, you know, and I'm referring to the letter from the Land Use Commission <br /> regarding these four parcels, which are apparently individually owned but have a lot of thing in <br /> common, that could potentially be considered a TND; there is a large enough, there is 60 acres in <br /> that total area there that you've, you know, you obviously with connecting roads to adjacent <br /> properties, you're doing some cooperative efforts, that maybe you would consider working with the <br /> other owners to develop a TND per the Kona CDP. <br /> LIM: That's, one of the issues that the smaller developers like this one have is you really don't <br /> have the ability to work with some of the other developers because we don't know what their timing <br /> is, and there is obviously the infrastructure cost issues. So, as - (interrupted by a comment from the <br /> public). <br /> HOUSEL: Please continue. Sorry. <br /> LIM: So I guess, in short, no, we feel like the project was a small project and we could not do that <br /> with the other developers. We didn't even know they were going to be coming up at the same time <br /> as we were. <br /> HOUSEL: Well, I participated in the Kona CDP, and I think the general intent was to do planned <br /> development for our community, and that everyone, all landowners and everyone was encouraged <br /> to, you know, cooperate together to do mass planning and instead of piece -meal planning. So I <br /> would certainly encourage everyone to try to cooperate together and maybe coordinate their <br /> schedules, I realize that it's not practical for everyone to do that but, do the best they could to try to <br /> meet the intention of the Kona CDP. <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.