Laserfiche WebLink
d v <br /> 2010 Tax Board of Review Annual Report 6 <br /> 2. The vacancies to be left by Harold Murata and the current vacant position should be <br /> filled prior to the organizational meeting to he Crhedoeri in Ma 9011. Tr sessions <br /> should occur shortly thereafter. <br /> 3. The Board continues to recommend that the feasibility of a more aggressive outreach <br /> program to inform and educate citizens of this County on real property issues be <br /> considered. The Board has heard many cases where a better informed and educated <br /> citizenry could have prevented the filing of appeals. The number of appeals filed this year <br /> was in part due to the building values of properties not eligible to be in the homeowner's 3% <br /> growth cap. <br /> 4. Again, the Council might want to be proactive to enhance the viability of small <br /> businesses by considering discounts and /or exemptions. Value added local agricultural <br /> commodity processing plants (e.g. dairy products, meat processing, macadamia nut <br /> processing, coffee processing) should be given a discount on the commercial property <br /> values to preserve and encourage local food production. Education should be given to <br /> assist small businesses (e.g. the provisions for enterprise zones and urban revitalization). <br /> 5. The Board continues to recommend that the Real Property Tax Division update their <br /> website to be educational and informative to the taxpayers. <br /> 6. The Board continues to recommend that Section 19- 53(e)(2)(A) should be amended to <br /> include in the homeowner's class an owner /occupied property used for care giving and /or <br /> care home. Under the current code, an owner /occupied property that is partially used for a <br /> home - occupation and /or a rental qualifies to be in the homeowner's class but a property <br /> partially used as a care home does not qualify for this class, per the County's Planning <br /> Department. <br /> 7. Sales data should be shared and used amongst the real property appraisal staff for their <br /> annual re- evaluations to avoid large differences in values between relatively comparable <br /> neighborhoods within close proximity to each other. The uniformity and equality provision of <br /> the County Code requires a quality control program. <br /> 8. The Board recommends that a "pricing ladder" worksheet be provided as a part of the <br /> County's Appeal Data Worksheet packet prepared by appraisers. This worksheet should be <br /> included as a standard document in each appeal information packet. <br /> 9. The Board has recommended over the past few years that prior years' market and <br /> assessed values be posted on the County's Real Property Tax website. Appellants have <br /> stated on many occasions that they have attempted to compare prior years' assessments <br /> with their neighbors but the information was not available on the website. It seems that this <br /> could readily be addressed since the prior years' assessments are part of the division's <br /> database. <br /> 10. The Board again recommends that market modeling be implemented. Market modeling <br /> is the term commonly used by the real property tax division for the mass appraisal of <br />