Laserfiche WebLink
HSSPSC -1 Page 2 Comm. 925.2/ Bill 291, Draft 2 . <br />Defense Administrator Quince Mento, Planning Director Bobby Jean Leithead Todd and members of the <br />Committee. <br />Mr. Hoffman expressed hope that any amendments, recommendations, or concerns would have come <br />forward at this meeting. However, he added that today's presentation by the State opened up issues and <br />concerns that were not considered previously and suggested postponing this bill to allow time for further <br />consideration. Mr. Ikeda voiced his objection to the postponement and suggested forwarding it to the <br />Planning Commissions and Department to see what is uncovered during their research, and allow them <br />to make recommendations; the motion to refer was carried unanimously. <br />After review by the Windward and Leeward Planning Commissions and Planning Department the bill <br />appeared before your Committee on February 1, 2011. Communication 60, from Mayor William P. <br />Kenoi, dated January 3, 2011, also came forward which included the Planning Director's background <br />and recommendation report and the Planning Commission's negative recommendation. Mr. Hoffmann <br />expressed his disappointment that no solutions or alternatives were provided in either report. <br />Ms. Smart expressed concern that the siren.costs may be born entirely by a single new development, e.g. <br />a new restaurant, instead of being shared by an entire existing development. <br />Mr. Hoffman replied that impact fees may be used in multiple ways but tsunami sirens are not currently, <br />defined in the process. He also added that this is about establishing the requirement that a tsunami siren <br />be installed and not about who will pay for it. <br />Mr. Mento related that the State Civil Defense has plans to provide more sirens but he did not know if . <br />the plans had been funded. He added that the plans look great but there is no legislation statewide that. <br />requires installment of sirens. <br />Mr. Ikeda shares Mr. Hoffmann's concerns but questioned if adding it to development costs is the <br />correct place. Ms. Ford also expressed distress to learn that private resorts are not required to allow the <br />installation of sirens, stating that something needs to be established to make it a requirement in areas <br />with a large populace. She suggested the establishment of impact fees that help fund installation of <br />sirens beyond what the State may provide. <br />Mr. Onishi inquired if Civil Defense had other means to notify people at the resorts, and Mr. Mento <br />replied that many people are notified by text messages to their cell phone, radio /TV broadcast, and the <br />security departments at the resorts,have their own radio transmitters. <br />This item was postponed to February, 15, 2011, to allow the Planning Department time to provide <br />suggestions for establishing a requirement for installing sirens. <br />At the February, 15, meeting Civil Defense Administrator Quince Mento and Planning Department <br />Program Manager Daryn Arai were present. Mr. Hoffman recapped previous meetings and <br />postponements to seek amendments or comments from colleagues and the Planning Department. He <br />reminded the committee of the recent earthquake in Chile as .a note of the continual threat and the gaps <br />in our warning system, particularly in West Hawaii. He stressed the need to take action because there <br />currently is no requirement to establish a uniform warning'system in populated areas. He added that the <br />bill simply establishes a requirement, it does not address who is going to pay for it. <br />