My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0040.005 2010-2012
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2010-2012
>
COM 0040.005 2010-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2011 2:27:09 PM
Creation date
4/7/2011 8:18:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2010-2012
Communication
0040
Point
005
Author
Pete Hoffmann, Council Member
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 05/03/2011 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 09/08/2011 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comments on Bill 304 <br /> Prepared by <br /> Co of HI Planning Department <br /> April 5, 2011 <br /> Funding (36 -23) and Benefit Zones (36 -24) <br /> • Reorganize 36 -23 per changes to 36 -24. <br /> • Consider tailoring assessments to unique conditions in each benefit zone. <br /> For example, in Puna and Ka`u, where most of the facilities are on private land <br /> and the roads are either private or state, maybe roads should be excluded. <br /> • Add new wording to clarify the need for sub accounts and a county wide <br /> benefit zone: 36 -23 (d) "Within each account, with the exception of the <br /> wastewater impact fee account, there are hereby created 6 sub - accounts, <br /> corresponding to the five (5) sub -area benefit zones and one county -wide benefit <br /> zone. The sub -area benefit zones are hereby created." <br /> Benefit Zones (36- 24(e)) <br /> • More appropriate zones would be to follow the CDP planning areas: Puna, <br /> S. Hilo, N. Hilo /Hamakua, N. Kohala, S. Kohala, Kona, and Ka'u. <br /> Capital Improvement Program (36 -24) <br /> • References to the process for developing the CIP budget (and using impact <br /> fee moneys) should be consistent with the Charter. <br /> • The head of each county agency shall furnish the mayor estimates of any <br /> capital improvements pending or proposed to be undertaken within the <br /> ensuing fiscal year and within the five fiscal years thereafter. (Section 10- <br /> 2(b)(2)) <br /> • The Planning Director reviews the lists of proposed capital improvements <br /> contemplated by agencies of the county and recommends the order of <br /> their priority. (Section 6 - 7.2(b)(4)) <br /> • The Managing Director recommends to the mayor the annual operating <br /> and capital improvement budget. (Section 6- 1.3(c)) <br /> • The Finance Department assists the mayor in the preparation of the <br /> capital budget. (Section 6- 6.3(a)) <br /> • The Mayor submits an annual capital budget, six -year capital program, <br /> and budget message to the Council. (Section 10- 2(a)). <br /> • 36 -22(b) and 36 -24(c) should be consistent, per the Charter. 22 indicates that <br /> the fund administrator (i.e., Finance) presents the CIP, and 24 indicates that <br /> Planning establishes the CIP. The Charter specifies that the Mayor /Managing <br /> Director /Finance prepare the CIP budget. <br /> • Are impact fee funds appropriated by Council? <br /> • Does HRS allow fees to be used to pay debt service? <br /> SECTION 3: <br /> • Change "approval' to "adoption." <br /> • At least 2 years will be needed to establish the new impact fee system, <br /> given all the cross - agency responsibilities, the transition from Fair Share, and <br /> challenges of implementation (see below). <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.