Laserfiche WebLink
Veto Message — Bill 29 <br /> June 15, 2011 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Council Actions Violate Separation of Powers <br /> The council's amendments to Bill 29 would increase overall county spending beyond what our <br /> administration proposed, and would shift some spending within the budget. To accomplish this, <br /> the council amended the budget to include a fabricated "Council Adjusted Expense Account" <br /> that appears to be unprecedented in Hawaii government history, and represents the most serious <br /> of the defects in the council budget amendments. <br /> The Hawai`i County Council has the power to reduce specific appropriations, which is the proper <br /> way for the council to cut spending. However, this Council declined to do so. Instead, the <br /> Council attempted to use this fabricated "Council Adjusted Expense Account" to press our <br /> administration to make cuts that the council was apparently unwilling or unable to make. <br /> Corporation Counsel on June 14, 2011 issued a legal analysis advising County Director of <br /> Finance Nancy Crawford that this Council use of the "Council Adjusted Expense Account" is in <br /> effect a violation of the separation of powers mandated in Article III of the Hawaii County <br /> Charter. <br /> Council Action on PONC Apparently Violates County Code <br /> An additional council amendment to Bill 29 proposes to cut funding for the Public Access, Open <br /> Space and Natural Resources Preservation Fund (PONC) by $1 million. This Council <br /> amendment would reduce funding for the PONC from 2 percent of county tax collections to <br /> about 1.5 percent of projected property tax collections for fiscal year 2012. However, Hawaii <br /> County Code Chapter 2, Article 42, clearly requires that 2 percent of county tax collections must <br /> be deposited into the PONC fund annually. Corporation Counsel therefore advises Finance <br /> Director Crawford that this council budget amendment appears to violate the County Code. <br /> Council Refuses to Increase Budget Reserves <br /> A third critical flaw involves the council budget amendment to divert funding away from the <br /> county's Budget Stabilization Fund. We recently witnessed dire events overseas with impacts <br /> that rippled out to affect our local economy, ranging from the Great Recession of 2007 -2009 to <br /> the tragic March 11, 2011 tsunami that devastated parts of Japan. Those events dramatized the <br /> need for a budget reserve fund to stabilize county finances during challenging economic periods. <br /> With those risks in mind, our administration's budget set aside $2.8 million in anticipated labor <br /> savings from collective bargaining to build up the county's budget reserves. <br /> The council disregarded that proposal, and instead amended the budget to spend the entire $2.8 <br /> million immediately, saving none of those funds for later. This is unwise because it fails to set <br /> aside additional reserves for what may be challenging times ahead. It is also risky, because this <br /> $2.8 million the council proposes to spend may not materialize. Depending on the outcome of <br /> statewide collective bargaining later this year, the labor savings could be smaller than we have <br /> projected. That is one important reason we urged the council to be cautious, and to place these <br /> funds in a reserve fund for the future. Unfortunately, the council refused. <br /> County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. <br />