Laserfiche WebLink
LEEWARD PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> COUNTY OF HAWAI`I <br /> HEARING TRANSCRIPT <br /> APRIL 21, 2011 <br /> A regularly advertised hearing on the PLANNING DIRECTOR INITIATED AMENDMENT <br /> TO CHAPTER 25, RELATING TO ADDITION OF CIVIL DEFENSE SIRENS TO <br /> CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS was called to order at 1:07 p.m. in the West Hawai`i Civic <br /> Center, Community Center, Building G, 74 -5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway, Kailua -Kona, <br /> Hawai`i, with Chair Geraldine Giffin presiding. <br /> COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Geraldine Giffin, Brandi Beaudet, Lani Bowman, Thomas <br /> Hickcox, Wayne Iokepa and Richard Nelson <br /> ABSENT AND EXCUSED: Thomas Whittemore <br /> STAFF PRESENT: Julie Mecklenburg (Deputy Corporation Counsel), Margaret Masunaga <br /> (Deputy Planning Director), Daryn Arai (Planning Program Manager), Jeff Darrow (Staff <br /> Planner) and Maija Cottle (Staff Planner) <br /> And one person from the public in attendance. <br /> INITIATOR: PLANNING DIRECTOR INITIATED <br /> Amendment to Chapter 25 (Zoning), Article 2, Division 4, Section 25 -2 -46 of the Hawai`i County <br /> Code 1983 (2005 Edition, as amended) relating to the Addition of Civil Defense Sirens to <br /> Concurrency Requirements. <br /> GIFFIN: We are on Agenda Item No. 3. And this is relating to the addition of Civil Defense sirens <br /> to concurrency requirements. Daryn? <br /> ARAI: Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, Commissioners. I'm going to try and make this brief. I <br /> think the background and recommendation report that we transmitted to you explains thoroughly <br /> why this bill is before you. It's different from the bill that you heard earlier that was transmitted <br /> down from the County Council, which previously tried to include a requirement for the installation <br /> of tsunami sirens as part of plan approval, which is a departmental administrative review. And as <br /> you recall, the Director did not support that bill, and the Planning Commission, both Leeward and <br /> Windward, voted to send an unfavorable recommendation. That bill currently has been tabled and <br /> it's awaiting this bill that the administration put together for you. And what it simply does is it ties <br /> in the installation of tsunami sirens as a requirement of concurrency. As you are aware, the State <br /> has undertaken efforts to install sirens at locations throughout the island, throughout the state for <br /> that matter, but the amount of monies that have been secured would not address all of the sirens that <br /> are needed to provide adequate coverage. <br /> That being said, a concurrency requirement basically specifies that a proposed development may <br /> not be approved, if it would cause levels of service of public facilities to fall below a specified <br /> baseline. What this proposed bill is attempting to do is basically, say, if an area is not serviced by a <br /> tsunami siren, then a proposed rezoning or time extension for the performance of a zoning <br /> requirement shall not be considered, or shall not be approved. It applies to certain types of projects <br /> 1 <br />