My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0255.000 2010-2012
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2010-2012
>
COM 0255.000 2010-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2011 1:59:27 PM
Creation date
7/5/2011 8:11:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2010-2012
Communication
0255
Point
000
Author
Marilyn Nicholson, Chairperson
Communications - Referred To
FC
Document Relationships
AGE FC 07/21/2011 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Finance Committee (FC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. Process and Procedures Followed by the COGC <br /> Early on, reviewing the prior Cost of Government reports issued in 2003 and 2007, and in <br /> discussion with current County employees, COGC members felt some concern about the <br /> commitment of County government to take its recommendation seriously. However, given the <br /> challenging environment, especially the fiscal restraints that the County now faces, it is hoped <br /> that the recommendations included in this report will receive a careful and thoughtful reading by <br /> the Mayor, members of the County Council, and the heads of all County departments. <br /> The COGC, which held 18 meetings over the course of eleven months to formulate this report, <br /> utilized a number of methods in its research. Surveys were developed and sent to all County <br /> employees. Departmental inquiries that focused on specific questions as well as requests for <br /> updated responses on actions recommended in previous COGC reports were also solicited. <br /> Interviews were conducted with various County employees, including Department heads and /or <br /> their designated representatives, employees, administrative and support staff, and affiliated <br /> members of the public. Various County documents and focused Internet research were also <br /> helpful in formulating the basis for some of the interview questions as well as in preparing this <br /> report. Due to time constraints public input, although welcomed, was not directly solicited. <br /> Summary COGC Efforts: <br /> Theme: <br /> Identify What Services the County is Responsible to Provide <br /> Overarching Policy Issues: <br /> Contracting Process Collection & Fees County Technology Plan <br /> • Invited Department Heads, Corporation Counsel, and personnel who deal with these <br /> processes and procedures to speak with COGC <br /> Focus Areas (3 Subcommittees) <br /> Operations /Budget Revenue Enhancement Technology Adoption <br /> Recommendations and Collections <br /> and Consolidation <br /> • Analyzed Responses to Questionnaires and Conducted Interviews with Departments <br /> and Personnel <br /> Actions Taken by Commission: <br /> • Provided a Questionnaire to County Agencies, Departments and Commissions via Letter <br /> • Provided a Questionnaire to County Employees via Payroll Notice <br /> • Logged and Categorized Responses to Questionnaires <br /> • Received Presentation from County Green Team <br /> • Analyzed Responses Regarding the Implementation Status & Adoption of 2007 COGC <br /> Recommendations <br /> • Requested and Received Results from an Employee Survey that Dominic Yagong <br /> conducted in the Spring of 2009 <br /> • Received Presentations and Conducted Q &A with Specific Departments and County <br /> Administration Offices including a member from the Council and the Mayor <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.