My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BIL 062 Draft 02 2010-2012
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Bills
>
2010-2012
>
BIL 062 Draft 02 2010-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2021 1:26:55 PM
Creation date
7/11/2011 12:10:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
BIL
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2010-2012
Bill/Resolution
062
Draft
02
Introducer
Pete Hoffmann, Council Member
Referred To
PC
Action 1
Council: Bill 62, Draft 2 passes first reading; adopts PC-23 - 07/22/11
Action 2
Council: Bill 62, Draft passes second & final reading - 08/03/11
Status
Adopted
Date To Mayor or Adoption Date
8/12/2011
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
7/22/2011
Ayes
9-Blas;Ford;Hoffmann;Ikeda;Onishi;Pilago;Smart;Yagong;Yoshimoto
Noes
0
Absent
0
Excused
0
Reading Number .
2
Reading Date .
8/3/2011
Ayes .
6-Blas;Ford;Ikeda;Pilago;Yoshimoto;Yagong
Noes .
0
Absent .
3-Hoffmann;Onishi;Smart
Excused .
0
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 07/22/2011 2010-2012
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Council
AGE COUNCIL 08/03/2011 2010-2012
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Council
COM 0235.002 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2010-2012
COM 0235.002 2010-2012
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2010-2012
ORD 2011-071 2010-2012
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Ordinances\2011
ORD 2011-071 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Ordinances\2011
REP PC 023 07/06/2011 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2010-2012\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(e) Mitigation required. <br /> (1) If the LOS for any transportation facility in the project area is (A) currently <br /> worse than the acceptable level of service, or (B) projected to become worse <br /> than the acceptable level of service during the five year period of the TIAR, any <br /> rezoning of the property, if approved, shall contain conditions that require <br /> mitigation of adverse traffic effects before occupancy of the project is <br /> permitted, or that occupancy be delayed until the level of service has reached <br /> the acceptable level and is no longer projected to be worse than the acceptable <br /> level. <br /> (2) Where the LOS deficiency is due to roadway or intersection deficiencies in the <br /> immediate vicinity of the project, the conditions of zoning shall require local <br /> mitigation. Where the deficiency in LOS is due to insufficient capacity in the <br /> transportation facilities serving the project area, the conditions of zoning shall <br /> require area mitigation. <br /> (3) If there is more than one way to mitigate an adverse effect, the director shall <br /> present to the council the pros and cons of the alternatives. <br /> (f) Mitigation requirements will be deemed satisfied when: <br /> (1) A public agency has committed funds for area mitigation that will remove the <br /> LOS deficiency. In the case of the State, commitment of funds means that the <br /> governor has released funds to complete the improvement. In the case of the <br /> County, commitment of funds means that the council has appropriated funds to <br /> complete the improvement; or <br /> (2) The private developer's commitment to implement mitigation has been secured <br /> by bond or equivalent security, or mandatory participation in an improvement <br /> district, community facilities district, or other equivalent means of guaranteeing <br /> performance. <br /> (g) A developer's area mitigation expenses shall be credited against any fair share or <br /> similar fee requirement for roads. A developer's local mitigation expenses shall be <br /> credited against any fair share or similar fee requirement for roads if the council <br /> determines that the mitigation substantially benefits the general public and was not <br /> necessary primarily for the benefit of the project. In general, roads that are <br /> necessary for access to or within a development or turn lanes for a private project <br /> shall not qualify for fair share credit. <br /> (h) The following types of []zoning amendment applications shall be required <br /> to submit a TIAR when required by this section, but shall not be required to perform <br /> area mitigation: <br /> (1) Residential or other [rezening]zoning amendment where the applicant commits, <br /> and the conditions of zoning require, that the project earn at least two times the <br /> number of affordable housing credits otherwise required under chapter 11, <br /> County affordable housing policy, provided further that the applicant shall be <br /> entitled to the full amount of "excess credits" under section 11 -15, County <br /> affordable housing policy, based on the number of affordable housing credits <br /> normally required. <br /> (2) [Rezeg]Zoning amendment to CV, CN, MCX, PD, or ML where the council <br /> determines that the project will reduce regional traffic congestion by providing <br /> necessary commercial or light industrial opportunities to serve an area where <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.