Laserfiche WebLink
contained in the package was grown in Hawaii, the label shall be worded "Hawaii -Grown <br />Macadamia Nuts ", preceded by the per cent by weight of the macadamia nuts contained in the <br />package that were grown in Hawaii, and shall appear on the principal display panel of the <br />package." <br />WHEREAS, HRS, Section 486 - 120.6, Hawai`i -grown roasted or instant coffee; labeling <br />requirements, states in part that (underscoring provided for emphasis only): <br />"(a) In addition to all other labeling requirements, the identity statement used for <br />labeling or advertising roasted or instant coffee produced in whole or in part from Hawaii -grown <br />green coffee beans shall meet the following requirements: <br />(2) For roasted or instant coffee consisting of a blend of one or more Hawaii - <br />grown coffees and coffee not grown in Hawaii, the per cent coffee by weight of one of <br />the Hawaii -grown coffees used in the blend, followed by the geographic origin of the <br />weight- specified coffee and the term "Coffee Blend "; and <br />"(c) "It shall be a violation of this section: <br />(2) To use a geographic origin in labeling or advertising, including in conjunction with a <br />coffee style or in any other manner, if the roasted or instant coffee contains less than ten per cent <br />coffee by weight from that geographic origin." <br />WHEREAS, the practice of protecting milk (90 %) but disadvantaging both macadamia <br />nuts (10 %) and coffee (10 %), as well as many other crops, is discriminatory to the growers of <br />these crops and contradicts several sections of the HRS, such as (underscoring provided for <br />emphasis only): <br />1. The definition of "misbranding" (HRS 486 -1) for providing incomplete <br />information, misrepresentation as to the identity or point of origin, identifiable geographical <br />location, and the historical usage by a people, misrepresentation of the consumer commodity as <br />an imitation of another or as an imitation of a generic product, or misrepresentation in any other <br />manner tending to confuse the prospective purchaser. If country of origin or the majority <br />percentage of the product is not identified on the front label in large font, then the consumer <br />cannot determine if the product meets his or her needs. Therefore, the consumer needs to be <br />protected from misbranding of any food product by identifying the majority of the product by <br />country or region of origin instead of only ten to fifty percent of the product; and <br />2. The definition of "practices" (HRS 486 -1) "to assure that amounts of <br />commodities or services sold are determined in accordance with good commercial practice and <br />are so determined and represented as to be accurate and informative to all parties at interest." If <br />the front label is not informative as to country or region of origin for the majority of the product, <br />the consumer may inadvertently purchase a non - Hawaiian commodity product. Therefore, the <br />consumer as a party at interest needs information to determine what he or she is actually buying <br />on the front label; and <br />3. The Board must require "practices to assure that amounts of commodities or <br />services sold are determined in accordance with good commercial practice and are so determined <br />and represented as to be accurate and informative to all parties at interest" (HRS 486 -7). The <br />parties most interested in the product content are the consumers who should be able to instantly <br />4 <br />