Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0128.054 2010-2012William P. Kenoi Mayor William T. Takaba Managing Director September 28, 2011 Glut. of DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 7 • Hilo, Hawai`i 96720 -4224 (808) 961 -8321 • Fax (808) 961 -8630 www.co.hawaii.hi.us Dominic Yagong, Council Chair and Members of the Hawaii County Council Hawaii County Council 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, HI 96720 SUBJECT: BILL 270 (DRAFT 3) Warren H. W. Lee Director Brandon A. K. Gonzalez Deputy Director Please include the enclosed Attachments 1, 2 and 3 to correspondence dated and submitted to Council on September 16, 2011 regarding Bill 270 (Draft 3), Comm. No. 128.39. The Attachments were inadvertently not included with the September 16 transmittal. The Department of Public Works apologizes for the oversight. arren H. . Director Attachments County of Hawai`i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. C./) r-n 0 rV F 7 co Comm, No. / ? a • 5T Ref. To•. Ref. Dote SEP 29 2911 Attachment 1 9/28/2011 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE BILL 270, DRAFT 3 PUBLIC CONCERNS THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2006 EDITION 9/28/2011 Attachment 1 9/28/2011 COMPARISONS BILL 270, DRAFT 3 9/28/2011 WIND LOAD Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification section 2311 BASE Section 1609.1.1 Present formula WIND SPEED is the Determination of wind loads. outdated. fastest -mile wind Wind loads on every building Proposed formula association with an or structure shall be based upon annual probability of determined in accordance recent data and 0.02 measured at a with Chapter 6 of ASCE 7 -05. studies, including point 33 feet above topographic the ground for an Section 1609.1.4. or W1010.2 maps. area having high basic wind speed (3- second exposure to category gust), miles per hour. V3s =105 C. v= 80mph... (continued on next slide) mph. (continued on next slide) 9/28/2011 9/28/2011 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS STRUCTURES J WIND LOAD (CONTINUED) Old Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification Justification The provision is essentially a distillation of the wind load provision in American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A58. 1- 1972 and 1982. section 2311 offers a somewhat simplified procedure and does not make provisions for dynamic effects. ASCE standard provisions for wind loads on typical low -rise buildings (2005 version) incorporate a factor of safety to peak wind loads on structural systems. Present formula outdated. Proposed formula based upon recent data and studies, including topographic maps. National Standard when FEMA funding is provided. 9/28/2011 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS STRUCTURES J Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification No Provision Sets out special requirements for Community Storm Shelters in accordance with ICC /NSSA -500. (section 421.2) National Standard when FEMA funding is provided. 9/28/2011 9/28/2011 -EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESS STRUCTURES Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification No Provision Sets out requirements for safe One option rooms relating to design required by the criteria, maximum State Building occupancy, exiting provisions, structural integrity, debris Code for partially enclosed impact protection, communications, and structures. Allows a more economical ventilation. Residential safe solution for rooms shall not be protection of constructed in areas subject wind -borne debris to stream flooding or coastal flooding (section 422) than 2006 IBC. 9/28/2011 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS STRUCTURES (CONTfNifED)— Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification No Provision Sets out special requirements Establishes for State -and County -owned minimum life high occupancy buildings safety design pertaining to Enhanced criteria mandated Hurricane Protection Areas. by Act 82 for These special requirements emergency relate to flood resistance, emergency vehicle access, occupancy capacity, toilet facilities, accessibility, design wind, rain, and impact roads, ventilation, and quality assurance. (section 423) preparedness and post disaster operations. 9/28/2011 9/28/2011 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS STRUCTURES {CONTl- NUJ -EB) - Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification No Provision In wind -borne debris regions, glazing in buildings shall be impact- resistant or protected with impact- resistant covering (section 1609.1.2.1. Also W101.4). Wood pre -cut structural panels with a minimum thickness of 7/16 inch shall be permitted for opening protection. Meets Federal and State Building Code requirements. 9/28/2011 EM- ER-GENC REDNESS STRUCTURES Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification No Provision Partially enclosed occupancy R -3 buildings shall include a residential safe room (amending section 1609.1.2.1) One option allowed by the State Building Code, instead of opening protection for entire home as required by 2006 IBC. 9/28/2011 9/28/2011 EARTHQUAKE LOADS (JUSTIFICATION, NO COMPARISON) ADMINISTRATIVE: GENERAL Current Chapter 5 Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification Deputies section 202 (b) The procedures and limitations are for the design of structures are determined considering zoning, site characteristics, occupancy, configuration, structural system, and height. Selection of lateral force procedure includes static and dynamic... Every structure and portion thereof shall be designed and constructed to resist the effects of earthquake motions in accordance with ASCE7. National standards version 7 developed by the American Society of Civil Engineer (ASCE). 9/28/2011 ADMINISTRATIVE: GENERAL Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification Deputies section 202 (b) Department of Public works staff may be deputized in the event of a major natural disaster. (section 5 -15.) Authorizes a building official's duty during an natural disaster. No provision County officers and agents acting in good faith in the discharge of all duties are not liable for damages.( section 5- 16. ) Consistent with Bills, draft 3, 268 and 269 9/28/2011 9/28/2011 ADMINISTRATIVE: INSPECTIONS Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification No Provision Owner builders will have the option to have inspections performed by a licensed contractor or certified by licensed architects /engineers. (section 5 -41.) (e) Bills 268 and 269 draft 3, to provide flexibility to builders. 9/28/2011 ADMINISTRATIVE: INSPECTIONS Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification The building official may require that every request for inspection be filed at least 48 hours before such inspection is desired. Such request may be in writing or by telephone at the option of the building official. (section 5- 1.0.13.) (c). The notice that the work is ready for inspection shall be in writing on forms furnished by the authority having jurisdiction, by e -mail to the area inspectors, or maybe be faxed or by telephone at the option of the building official. (section 5 -41.) (a) Consistent with Bills draft 3, 268 and 269 to provide more flexibility for project schedules 9/28/2011 9/28/2011 PERMITS Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification section 5-1.0.11. Permits issued may be Permits are Proposed Chapter 5 assigned, or transferred to transferable and Plans shall be designed and stamped by a professional architect or structural engineer if a single story R -3 occupancy is more than 1,300 square feet. another by the permittee, to allowed in draft 3 whom it was issued. This requirement also applies to all to allow sale, completion building permits issued prior to without re- the adoption of this code permitting. (section 5-28) (g) 9/28/2011 SPECIFICATIONS & PLANS Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification Plans shall be designed and stamped by a professional architect or structural engineer if a single story R -3 occupancy is more than 1,300 square feet. Plans shall be designed and stamped by a professional architect or structural engineer if single story R -3 (Single family home or duplex) occupancy is more than 600 square feet. (section 5 -25) (c) (1) Consistent with Hawaii State Statute 464 to allow single family residence up to $50,000 in value without professional stamp. 9/28/2011 9/28/2011 SPECIFICATIONS & PLANS Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification Plans shall be designed and stamped by a professional architect or structural engineer if the structure is a mixed occupancy building with more than 1,800 square feet of total area. Plans shall be designed and stamped by a professional architect or structural engineer if the structure is of mixed occupancies ( R -3 and U Occupancies) with more than 1,200 square feet of total floor area. (section 5 -25) (c) (2) Total area of a dwelling including Garage, lanai, etc allowed without professional stamp. 9/28/2011 PACKAGE HOMES Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification No Provision New pre - approval for package homes with no changes are limited to three typical model home designs per manufacturer per year. (section 5-26.) (1) Expedite building permit process for package homes. No Provision New exception added exempting pre- approved R -3 package model homes from plan and specifications requirements with the approval of the Building Division (section 5 -28) (a) 9/28/2011 9/28/2011 VIOLATIONS Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification section 5- 1.0.6. Amending section 205. New Provision Failure to comply with any provision of this code, any rule adopted pursuant to this code, or with conditions imposed as part of any permit or variance from the provisions of this code, shall constitute a violation of this code (section 5 -58) (b) Consistent with Bills draft 2, 268 and 269 in an effort to allow code enforcement for public health and safety 9/28/2011 r- VIOLATIONS Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification Language revised ...to make the building or portion thereof comply with the requirements of this code. (section 5 -59) (a). Non - compliance with the code can be considered a misdemeanor (up to 1 year in jail or $2000 fine). (section 5- 1.0.6.) Noncompliance can only be considered a petty misdemeanor (up to 30 days in jail or $1000 fine) (section 5- 61.) (a) This aids enforcement since the requirements are less stringent and was incorporated into the bill on the advice from Corporation Counsel. Classification of offense lowered. No longer a misdemeanor and penalties reduced 9/28/2011 9/28/2011 VIOLATIONS Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification Language revised 9/28/2011 Whenever the administrative authority determines that there exists a violation of any provision of this code, the administrative authority shall serve a notice of violation upon the parties responsible for the violation, which may include, but shall not be limited to the owner, and any lessee of the property where the violation is located. Chapter 38, group R occupancy FIRE PROTECTION Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification Chapter 38, group R occupancy section 903.2.7 Group R. An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with section 903.3 shall be provided throughout all buildings with a group R fire area. Exception: R -3 Residential Occupancies Added exception for R -3, including single family dwellings pending State Fire Council adoption of rules. 9/28/2011 9/28/2011 1- THE END INDIGENOUS ARCHITECTURE MAHALO Current Chapter 5 Proposed Chapter 5 Justification No Provision Adopts specific provisions regarding to Hawaiian indigenous architecture relating to material requirements, height and size limitations, zoning, minimum separation, uses and activities, fire sprinklers, and design standards. (Appendix X) Mandates specific provisions to be adopted regarding indigenous architecture for cultural expression (section 5 -3.2.) Adopted by Ordinance 9/28/2011 1- THE END MAHALO 9/28/2011 9/28/2011 • http: / /hawaii.gov /dags /bcc /comments /approved- 1ui ing- code -ruts WIND DESIGN American Association of Civil Engineers publishes wind design methods beginning in 1998 (ASCE -7) IBC incorporates ASCE -7 (2005) for wind design Hawaii is defined as "Hurricane Prone" (IBC 1 609.2) ❖ All of Hawaii is also designated as a "Wind -Borne Debris Region" (1609.2) • Glazing protection is required with exceptions (1609.1.2) • The Hawaii County Code amendment provides exemptions to these requirements by amendment (Bill 270, 1609.1.2 Exception 4) • Public and critical occupancies must comply (1604.5) 9/28/2011 WIND DESIGN Residential Structures R -3, Occupancy Category II may have unprotected openings (1609.1.2 Exception 4: • "Glazing ... shall be assumed to be openings ") Design Professional must determine if glazing (openings) creates a "Partially Enclosed" structure per ASCE -7 (ASCE -7 Chapter 6.2 Definitions) • State law requires that a "Partially Enclosed Residence (R -3)" must have a Safe Room (Bill 270, Sec.1 609.1.2.1) • "Open" or "Enclosed" buildings (or in flood areas) are exempt (Section 422.2) WIND DESIGN (CONTINUED) TYPE PROTECTION REQUIRED /TYPE OPEN NO N/A PARTIALLY ENCLOSED YES High Impact Glazing Protected openings Safe Room ENCLOSED NO N/A 9/28/2011 WIND DESIGN PARTIALY ENCLOSED STRUCTURES 1. OPENINGS ON ONE WALL> 110% OF BALANCE OF OPENINGS? TWO PART TEST NO YES 2. BALANCE OF OPENINGS < 20% OF REMAINING WALLS? YES NO OPENING PROTECTION REQUIRED NO PROTECTION OF OPENINGS PLYWOOD CUTOUTS APPROVED SHUTTERS, ETC OR SAFE ROOM NO OPENING PROTECTION REQUIRED WIND DESIGN PARTIALY ENCLOSED STRUCTURES The department of Public Works proposes that there be 3 ways in which R -3 structures can vary from this requirement (W101.4 Revisions to Sec 1609.1.2): 1. Protect all windows of the home with impact resistive glazing or impact protective systems 2. Protect all windows of the home using pre -cut plywood sheets 3. Add pre - installed permanent attachments on the walls and design the home for partially enclosed conditions Or provide one safe room (1609.1.2.1 & Sec 422) • These options accommodate a range of costs. 9/28/2011 EMERGENCY SHELTERS SAFE ROOM J State law requires design standards relating to "Emergency shelters being built in compliance with hurricane resistant criteria" It does not mandate the use of a residential safe room, but if one is installed, it must adhere to the minimum requirements set forth by Public Works Bill 270, draft 3 section 422. 9/28/2011 PERMITS • If you have a present permit, and the new building code ordinance takes effect, you can operate under your existing permit. • Under the proposed ordinance, if work does not commence within 120 days a new permit must be obtained. If the work has commenced but is not completed within 3 years, a new permit must also be obtained. • No increase in permit fees (section 5 -31) 9/28/2011 9/28/2011 TRANSFER OF PERMITS • Transfer of building permits are allowed • Transfer of plumbing and electrical permits are allowed to another licensed contractor • The permit expiration will remain from original issue date 9/28/2011 INSPECTIONS • A request for scheduled inspection must be filed with the inspector not less than 48 hours and no more than 72 hours by fax, email, or phone call. • The inspector has 48 hours excluding holidays and weekends to respond. • If the building inspector does not keep to the schedule or if the area to be inspected is covered or concealed, a Hawai'i State licensed contractor, architect /engineer, in a letter to Public Works verifies the project meets the current codes. • The letter must be stamped and signed. 9/28/2011 9/28/2011 VIOLATIONS & ENFORCEMENT • In order to aid enforcement, noncompliance with the provisions of the code are considered a petty misdemeanor. This provision was included on the recommendation of Corporation Counsel. 9/28/2011 Attachment 2 9/28/2011 4* Central Pacific Hurricane Center 2011 Hurricane Preparedness Briefing www.weathe r.gov /c phc National Weather Service Honolulu, HI Briefin g Outline • CPHC Review • 2010 Tropical Weather Season in Review • Tropical Weather Climatology • Outlook • Definitions • Tropical Weather Ingredients • Tropical Cyclone Impacts • Myths • Questions www.weather.gov /cphc Attachment 2 9/28/2011 CPHC Review • 39 staff members, including meteorologists, electronic technicians, programmers and researchers • Responsibility for 140W -180 (north of the equator) • Other responsibilities: Aviation, Climate, Marine, Public, Surf, Fire Weather, Satellite, and more... www.weather.gov/cphc HFO & CPHC Review Aviation Program Responsibility Marine Program Responsibility Tropical Program Responsibility www.weather.gov/cphc 2 2010 Tropical Season Review www.weathe r. gov /c phc • La Nina dominates • Tropical Storm Omeka — 16 -22 December — Peak winds near 50 knots — Impacts to NW Hawaiian Islands 9/28/2011 3 • Tropical Weather Climatology gy • Central Pacific Average per • 1970 to 2010: 175 Tropical Year Cyclones — 4 -5 Tropical Cyclones — 30% Hurricanes — 37% Tropical Storms — 33% Tropical Depressions www.weathe r. gov /cp he • Direct hits rare...but devastating — 3 in last 50+ years — Dot (1959), Iwa (1982), Iniki (1992) • Central Pacific Tropical Cyclones 1970 -2010 80 9/28/2011 4 9/28/2011 Central Pacific Tropical Cyclones 1970 -2010 Tropical Storm Fernanda August 18 -20 N'til rl �I i �o�ithr���l� Tropical Storm Fernando Modal Aga 11 AU INT Milan 11 NW, Ctnlnl paanc Humane Cum, Potential Trade Area: Jay IJ ('l: Hhy'a5 Current Information: • Center Location 14A N IVA if Mae Sunnn.d WNW iS mph AbrratentWMWa heard Watches: Hurricane IrapAt rN Forsnst Positions: • 1ropkd CYdOtle 0 Post -4%4al &Astaire.' Winds: o • aS mph S 74P1 eph H /I 11Q mph M • Thrash Warnings: Mil Hurricane 'rrop.Starn 5 9/28/2011 • Definitions • Tropical Cyclone: Generic term. Includes Tropical Depressions, Tropical Storms, and Hurricanes. • Tropical Depression: Winds of 38 mph or less. Assigned a number (e.g., TD -01C) • Tropical Storm: Winds of 39 to 73 mph. Assigned a name. • Hurricane: Winds of 74 mph or higher. Five Categories. Category 5 >155mph www.we at h e r. gov /c p h c Tropical Cyclone Ingredients • Sea Surface Temperatures above 80F (26.5 C) over a large area • Low level disturbance • Deep layer moisture • Instability • Weak vertical wind shear • Distance from the Equator www.weather.gov /cphc 4 6 9/28/2011 • Sea-Surface Temperature Climatology Ir 421. to sas act coca iso 224 6Cw 1111111.11111M3====. 4 6 a 10 11 14 6 15 20 02 24 26 26 I 13e 1 3.0 42,4 ‚ow it:, 24 -r01111 301 451 451 so ert■ 205 623 aes 646 4466 '0 11 14 16 16 20 21 24 26 26 16) ". 4 6 3 '1;1 71 14 16 10 20 22 24 26 26 Sea-Surface Temperature Climatology Ir ji 7 9/28/2011 Ocean Heat Content (OHC) Warm water (fuel) is often not just at the surface www.weather.gov /cphc 8 Deep Layer Moisture Dry 76626 Guadalupe 100 200 300 400 500 60 700 800 900 dinir Alinitarissa-M: MSS milassaaniMinawitin lo No Ps zi .e8 stoff ir 4 ia4t ,..•..,.y:. • -40 -30 -20 10 20 30 40 Bad for Development www.weather.gov/cphc Moist 91165 100 "L 00 300 400 600 600 700 five 900 -40 PHLI Lieu. C \,:, `I ' T ' 2 r r�x�K e�v 7 . ' A V / ®, i' r x; 1g* 4210:. • - - - -X: --f'X �g r % - .a• ""a 1 0111M0/0:0 : . -tr. - ......,<.:... .ts ,: _= arAVe ripg• -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 Good for Development • Cold air above warm air promotes lift, and convection 9/28/2011 9 • Effect of Vertical Wind Shear 40,000 ft /200 mb Typical cruising altitude of commercial enplane r 5,000 ft/850 mb www.weather.gov /cphc Surface • Coriolis Force www.weather.gov/cphc • This force aids in "spinning up" a disturbance • Caused because the Equator rotates faster than land areas both to the north and south 9/28/2011 10 9/28/2011 Tropical Cyclone Impacts • Extreme Winds: During Iniki winds gusted higher than 150 mph, and during Iwa they were higher than 120 mph. • Flash Flooding: TD 1 -C dropped 14+ inches above Hilo, while Iniki brought 8 -10 inches. • Storm Surge: Iniki generated 3 to 4 foot surge and 30 -35 ft waves. Honolulu Advertiser www.weather.gov/cphc SEMP Position Error (NM) 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 %qt y��e tip, , , ti9, 1 / www.weather.gov /cphc Year CPHC Tropical Cyclone Track Forecast Five Year Running Mean Error —6.-12 hour forecast —w-24 how breast ti -39 tour breast —a -48 hour breast X72 how breast —+-9e how breast X120 how breast FY10481TFaecastGG — -_ ry ti tiv i f 11 Myths /Rumors • Misconception: No Category 5s could exist in Central Pacific — 3 occurred in 1994; one in 2006 (loke) • Misconception: The Big Island is Protected by Mountains — Category 3 in August 1871, Tropical Storm in 1958. • ALL Islands at EQUAL Risk • 1 out of 15 chance of hurricane winds somewhere in Hawaii every year Myths /Rumors • Hawaii is hit by a tropical cyclone every 10 years • The "I" storms 9/28/2011 12 Attachment 3 Hawaii Wind Design Requirements for Hurricanes Gary Chock, S.E Structural Engineers Association of H . waii Representative to the State Building Code Council Peak sign Windspeed for Hawaii in the rricane Hazard Analysis IBC is based o • The now obsolete Uniform Building Co windspeed of 80 mph was based on a 19 weather station sites using a technique for sy longer accepted for hurricane hazard analysis. fastest -mile design tudy of two Honolulu tic winds, that is no • The best modern estimates of hurricane hazard to Ha : ii have been developed using state -of the art computer simulations by o independent nationally recognized researchers working un, er grants from NASA and the Hawaii Hurricane Relief Fund. • These regional studies of the eastern and central Pacific Ocean encompassed modeling of the equivalent of thousands of storm originating in their historically preferred areas, with tracking of the uIl path of each storm taking into account local sea surface temperat es and climatic conditions. Attachment 3 1 Tropical Cyclones n r Hawaii since 1949 Contours show • a ber of times in 10 years a storm (of at least tropical storm inte • ) passes within 75 Nmi of a site 30 -vr. Historical Tendency West of 140 °W, most 30 storms go south of Hawaii, some drift north but die off in intensity, 20 some make a sharp turn north while retaining 10 stronger intensity Monte Carlo Simulation Simulated storm origins (year, month, initial direction) per historical tendency Track each storm across the Pacific using formulas for direction, translation speed, and intensity Storms "die" in simulation when intensity is low enough 30 20 10 -11C -160 -150 -140 -130 -120 -110 -100 2 Pea • st Design Windspeed • These wind models were utilize Engineers standards committees to in the ASCE 7 Standard, Minimum Desi Other Structures. The 3- second basic winds for Hawaii is defined by the 500 -year return pe -N11.6. the American Society of Civil the Basic Windspeed for Hawaii Loads for Buildings and ed gust value of 105 mph d speed divided by • This Standard is developed using a consensus -based accredited by the American National Standards Institute. committees involved in the ASCE 7 Standard have a balan participation of practicing engineers, building officials, constr industry association representatives, and researchers. cedure that is he technical d ction • The national model codes have adopted accredited national stan ' ards like ASCE 7 so that detailed technical provisions can be develope,' in a non - political environment and be subject to peer review by those 'th nationally recognized expertise. ICC adopts such standards by reference and sometimes extracts key portion of text to include in th codes. Hurrican ategories Saffir- Simpson Category 1 2 3 4 1 minute Sustained mph 74 - 94 94 - 110 110 - 1 130 - 155 Peak Gust (over land) mph 82 - 108 108 - 130 130 - 156 6 - 191 3 Topographic Win • - •eed Map developed by Chock also accounts for mesoscale s - tering and acceleration effects • 10 -year program of research and deve •ment to develop topographic wind maps with the same probability of oc rence, so that there would be no bias in likelihood. • In late 2009, this body of work was adopted by th- tate Building Code Council. • In 2011, it was awarded the Outstanding Achievement! Civil Engineering by the Hawaii Chapter of the American Socie of Civil Engineers. • The maps are also nationally recognized in the ASCE 7 Stan • -rd, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 20 edition. • The maps giving the topographic effects for every major island in he state are also published electronically and available for no charge :t the State Building Code Council website. Martin & Chock, In Effective Wind Spe -• k ap for Components & Cladding of Buildings developed by research into ignificant differences between Hawaii's complex island terrain co . -red to the mainland USA Martin & Chock, In 4 G a ' = 'rotection from Windborne Debris — Inter = Tonal Building Code Applicable to any portion of a building up • •0 ft. height and within 30 ft. above any aggregate surface roofs located wi 'n 1,500 feet of the building ASCE . _ :C 2006 Windborne Debris Re ements • Windborne debris regions are established fo = eas of the country with hurricane risk based on distance from the coastline. Landfalling rricanes on the continental United States lose intensity of wind speed once they - - no longer over the ocean energy source. The distance for the windborne debris reg varies, but it is generally in the range of 50 to 150 miles from the coastline. • For the continent, ASCE selected the 120 mph 3- second gust wi ' d hazard contour as an approximation of the coastal region subject to debris from landf- ing hurricanes. That is, the basis is distance from the coast and not the wind speed : lue. • In Hawaii, the islands are not nearly large enough to isolate hurricane sy ems from their oceanic source of energy, and even when landfalling events occur, th- cyclone quickly passes over the island with no significant diminishment of intensity. oreover, hurricane systems can pass to any side of the islands and the windfield of hur 'canes is large enough to generate hurricane force winds on land even without the dir- t passage of the eye of the storm overhead. • Thus, Hawaii statewide is designated as a windborne debris region in recognitio of the physics of the tropical cyclone environment being different for Hawaii than th mainland. 5 Hawaii mendments for Windborne Debris Pro ed Safe Room • IBC 2006 requires opening protection for all wi •ws and doors in all Hurricane Zones up to 60 ft height (including Hawaii) • In 2005, the Hawaii State Legislature required State Civ •efense to "develop Hawaii public shelter and residential safe room design criter - by January 1, 2006, and shall facilitate impact resistance testing and certification o afe room design." • Hawaii State Amendment provides option of including a home saf- room, instead of protecting the entire exterior enclosure of the building. Rather tha being required to protect all windows in new home construction with protecti - systems or impact- resistant glazing, one can select a single room to harden as a awaii Residential Safe Room as far less cost. • The Hawaii Residential Safe Room is a local Hawaii standard that is essen 'ally a relaxation of the national code, based on cost benefit considerations for the moderate hurricane hazard of Hawaii compared to other mainland regions. If he Hawaii Residential Safe Room is not adopted as a local standard alternative t the IBC 2006, then Hawaii residents will pay more for new home construction. i Amendment 1609.1.2.1 Building with openings. Whe opening in accordance with Section 1609. evaluated to determine if the openings are of constitute an open or partially enclosed building Open and partially enclosed buildings shall be desi with the applicable provisions of ASCE 7. Partially e Occupancy R -3 buildings shall also include a residentia accordance with Section 422, Hawaii Residential Safe Ro glazing is assumed to be an the building shall be fficient area to s defined in ASCE 7. ed in accordance losed safe room in [ Note: R -3 residential occupancies include those that do not contain mo - than two dwelling units, Adult facilities that provide accommodations for five or fewe persons of any age for less than 24 hours, Child care facilities that provide accommodations for five or fewer persons of any age for less than 24 hours, Congregate livin facilities with 16 or fewer persons] Martin & Chock, In 6 Hawaii ' 'dential Safe Room (Hawaii Amended IBC Sect. • 422 and IRC Section R325) "422.1.1 Intent and Scope. The intent of the Re dential Safe Room is to temporarily provide an enhanced protection area, enclosed within a dwelling or within an accessory structure to a residen - which is designed and constructed to withstand the wind pressures, windborne • bris impacts, and other requirements of this section. " "422.2 Site Criteria. Residential Safe Rooms shall not be constructed within areas subject to stream flooding, coastal flooding or dam failure in dation within any of the following areas: 1. FEMA Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA) subject to rainfall runo flooding or stream or flash flooding; 2. Coastal zones "V" or "A" identified in the Flood Insurance Rate Map IRM) issued by FEMA for floodplain management purposes, in which the fl • od hazard are tides, storm surge, waves, tsunamis, or a combination oft - se hazards; 3. Areas subject to dam failure inundation as determined by the Departme t of Land and Natural Resources." AST - ' 1 .RD E1996 Standard Specification for Performance of Exterior Windows, Cu -• • Walls, Doors and Storm Shutters Impacted by Windborn- •ebris in Hurricanes Windborne Debris Testing Device built per Hawaii State Legislature requirement 7 • Typical Style of Home Construction One Example Hardie Board — HomeWrap — Studs @16" o.c. Gypsum Board • 3/4" Structural Plywood exterior sh 3/4" Plywood — Studs @ 24" 8 clusions • Design Basic Windspeed 3 -sec. gust, was derived utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation of the East - Central Paci i egion. The windspeed value of 105 mph is justified by two independ- • research studies that complied with the ASCE 7 criteria for regional wi , analysis in hurricane regions. • Hawaii amendments include maps that account for Ioc- topography effects on windspeed. • Hawaii residents cannot evacuate inland to escape hurrican winds • Section 422, Hawaii Residential Safe Room , provides an alte ative lower cost option in lieu of the IBC requirement for glazing prot- tion of all windows of R -3 residential construction. • Cladding for the safe room is relatively simple to achieve: - Cement Board siding over 5/8" thick structural plywood - 3/4" thick structural plywood - 22 gage sheet metal - The safe room window should have impact protected laminated glazing 9